Probably not IIRC you need a quantum computer with enough bits to hold the number you're trying to factor, so that'll need over a thousand bits for most encryption in use today.
it also seems pretty hard to add more bits to these quantum computers, so it looks like traditional encryption might be here to stay after all.
Which works just fine without 2 way traffic, that's just your settop box choosing a different video stream in the channel and accessing extra data in the stream (just like good old ceefax, you're NOT communicating with some device at the BBC).
"Also if they are having humans approve your image selection before you get paid, isn't that as much effort as you making your original choice?"
Not if they just send the same to 5 people, and pick the most popular result as correct, massive use of bots could give them some nasty surprises if they do that though!
You're in for a long wait, the development model changed and now 2.6.x is unstable, 2.6.x.y is bugfixes, so the latest 'stable' version is 2.6.x.y where x is one lower than the current development version and y is the highest you can find. 2.7 can be years away, if it ever happens at all.
So when you have a piece of paper that can change it contents so you only need one (or two for seeing two pages like in a book now), you'd buy a few hundred instead to make a book out of it??
maybe that old tech called paper is better for you:)
there's only one company they'd protect like that, themselves!
C++9x was released as C++98 in 1998 as the first C++ standard and they agreed on what will be in the C++0x standard a few months ago.
so C++9x happened, and C++0x is about to happen, not sure what your rant on those was about.
I too expect there to be a C++1x, but that'll just be the new standard, C++ isn't a dead language it still gets improvements.
You're not counting correctly. You missed windows 98, and windows 98SE, which would make windows 2000 windows 7!
however, when you look at the version number reported in XP it is 5.1 2000 was 5.0
vista is likely to be 6.0 so they could make the next one 7, although from what they've said about it so far it should really be 6.1
Probably not IIRC you need a quantum computer with enough bits to hold the number you're trying to factor, so that'll need over a thousand bits for most encryption in use today.
it also seems pretty hard to add more bits to these quantum computers, so it looks like traditional encryption might be here to stay after all.
Which works just fine without 2 way traffic, that's just your settop box choosing a different video stream in the channel and accessing extra data in the stream (just like good old ceefax, you're NOT communicating with some device at the BBC).
it is perfectly valid UTF-8, so no problem there
easy, 1 mod for troll, than underrated all the way up! :)
probably better to get a few underrated first or nobody will see the troll to mod up
perhaps he dives?
cpu frequency: 4Mhz vs 2Ghz, improvement 500x
.99something Mhz, lets say it was 1, so that's a 2000x improvement, more if you count IPC!
C64 was
why does everyone type wq? just x will do!
The EU might just allow pirated versions of Microsoft software, no problem!
"Also if they are having humans approve your image selection before you get paid, isn't that as much effort as you making your original choice?"
Not if they just send the same to 5 people, and pick the most popular result as correct, massive use of bots could give them some nasty surprises if they do that though!
You're in for a long wait, the development model changed and now 2.6.x is unstable, 2.6.x.y is bugfixes, so the latest 'stable' version is 2.6.x.y where x is one lower than the current development version and y is the highest you can find. 2.7 can be years away, if it ever happens at all.
They may be smart, but they don't belong cohabitating with humans. Not compatible. Let them have their own places to live.
:)
They do! they even allow people to live with them
So start your own party, I think just about all democracies allow this :)
So, with all that, why do american TV shows have beeps all over them? Are the networks doing that because they don't like those words themselves?
(I really don't know, I just find it rather silly)
perhaps, but i was just pointing out that the current government is not necessarily the one you need to worry about.
oh yes, we all know nothing can go wrong and no democratic government ever fell, being replaced with people like hitler... oh wait
I wish!
my IBM XT has an MDA card (for Monochrome Display Adapter, i think), it ONLY does text in green on black. full size ISA card too!
I'd also rip support of all European languages unless you paid mucho..
:)
You are aware of english being a European language?
sounds good!
:)
days are much too short for me anyway
nature didn't remember the game well...
it's supposed to be a three headed MONKEY
I'll buy this as quick as i can, before he adds jar jar in a new release!
this is the best you'll be able to get
So when you have a piece of paper that can change it contents so you only need one (or two for seeing two pages like in a book now), you'd buy a few hundred instead to make a book out of it??
:)
maybe that old tech called paper is better for you
Why does it matter if your cellphone is NAT'd
Well, one reason could be that he wants people to be able to call him?
seems nice for a phone