Slashdot Mirror


It's Official -- Star Wars on DVD

savagexp writes "There's yet to be an actual press release, but according to DVDFile.com, 20th Century Fox and LucasFilm have confirmed that The Original Trilogy will arrive on September 21st in a four-disc set. More info can be had here."

646 comments

  1. Special editions only :-( by Tet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Bah! I knew it wouldn't happen, but I was still hoping against hope that he'd allow the original versions to be released, rather than the special editions. Ho hum. I'll probably still buy them anyway. At least I still have the real versions on VHS. Maybe I'll see if I can rip them myself...

    --
    "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    1. Re:Special editions only :-( by the+real+darkskye · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the laserdisc originals are out there somewhere, if we're really lucky we'd be able to choose which version to watch from the menu ... as long as there is a "Solo shoots first" option ...

      --
      Music is everybody's possession.
      It's only publishers who think that people own it.
      Fuck Beta
      ~John Lenno
    2. Re:Special editions only :-( by hashbrownie · · Score: 1

      And the slander against Greedo's shooting accuracy continues ...

      --
      Fax Baba!
    3. Re:Special editions only :-( by visgoth · · Score: 1

      Greedo was no bounty hunter, only a poseur with a gun. However, Han should shoot first, as it helps establish his character. He's supposed to be a sneaky asshole at the start. Someone the audience initially distrusts. With Greedo shooting first, he's just a lucky schmuck.

      --
      My patience is infinite, my time is not.
    4. Re:Special editions only :-( by mkrieger1277 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Funny that you mention ripping. I knew that he'd never release the original movies on DVD, so I've been copying my "Definitive Collection" laserdiscs onto DVD via my PC. The end result is pretty good. Very little loss of quality. I'm sure it would look better if I had a nicer LD player for output. Too bad Lucas has to shove the crappy special editions out to the public. Sad to see a once celebrated franchise become the biggest joke out there (well, maybe a close second to the Matrix sequels). :-)

    5. Re:Special editions only :-( by swordboy · · Score: 1

      At least I still have the real versions on VHS.

      This was done on purpose. Lucas knew that he could milk all of his pathetic fans (including myself) into buying both VHS and DVD versions.

      I will get the DVD version but I'll get a pirated copy and I'll be sure to distribute to all of my friends and family. I'm gonna take pictures of all these DVDs and send it to him for ransom. If he buys back my VHS copy, then I'll be happy to buy my own DVD copy off the shelf and keep it to myself.

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    6. Re:Special editions only :-( by websaber · · Score: 1

      How about shnidlers list. That is another famous DVD missing also how about magnum PI? Why do the best movies take so long? Probally because they are still making money from other sources and don't want to kill the golden goose.

      --
      "A good friend will bail you out of jail. A true friend will be sitting next to you saying, 'damn....that was fun!'"
    7. Re:Special editions only :-( by benzapp · · Score: 1

      I 100% guarantee they will be 7.4GB DVD's... won't be able to do a straight copy of those. Of course you can pirate it, but it still won't be perfect. not until larger DVD-R's come out.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    8. Re:Special editions only :-( by aaaarrgghh · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The original versions will come out eventually... Pretty much everyone who wants the original versions will be willing to buy the new versions. Then, in a few more years, when Lucas releases the original version on DVD, they'll buy that too. This two-part strategy is profit maximizing. It's very similar to the strategy followed by LOTR.

    9. Re:Special editions only :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes, way to go, break copyright law, show him who the real man is. You're pathetic.

      If he wants to be an a$$hole, that's his right. But illegally copying things doesn't make you any more right than he is.

    10. Re:Special editions only :-( by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 2, Informative

      I read on AICN that Lucas has decided to change it back again and make it so that Han does shoot first.

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    11. Re:Special editions only :-( by aonaran · · Score: 1

      If anyone who is doing LD-DVD rips of the originals is willing to lend me a copy I'm curious to see what it looks like. e-mail me rod-at-macphersonclan.com

    12. Re:Special editions only :-( by ScottGant · · Score: 1

      Yes, I was hoping they would have an option of seeing the original version...at least of just plain Star Wars (without the episode IV, Greedo shooting first, Jabba the Hut weirdness), as an additional DVD.

      I know, I'm probably a fan boy (of the old movies, not the new ones) but I'd like to see the original movie. The one that started it all. Without any computer generated effects...all the work and hacks and model kits and spit and gum thrown into the mix by John Dykstra and company to get these shots out there.

      Why can't we just have both versions? It's almost like if Coppola went back to the Godfather and digitally enhanced the movie to lighten up the scenes where Gordon Willis shot them very dark...destroying the mood and feel of those scenes, just because "we can do that now with computers". Or the fiascos of 10 years ago when Turner was going wild and trying to colorize every B&W movie he could get his hands on. But the public spoke and that practise has ground to a halt.

      But that's just my opinion. These films belong to Lucas, so he can pretty much do what he wants with them. It's just a shame that he can't see that there's a market for the original AND the special editions.

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    13. Re:Special editions only :-( by Darth23 · · Score: 1

      Haven't you been paying attention? Ever since the SE's came out in 1997 Lucas has been saying that these are the only versions that will be released. It's seven years later and you're SURPRISED that the SE's are going to be the ones released on DVD?

      --

      -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

    14. Re:Special editions only :-( by tuffy · · Score: 4, Informative
      I knew that he'd never release the original movies on DVD, so I've been copying my "Definitive Collection" laserdiscs onto DVD via my PC.

      This has been done, and a nicely transferred version is floating around the internet already - complete with high resolution covers and a "bonus" DVD full of extra material. The quality isn't ideal (the transfer is for 1 single-layer DVD per film) but it's widescreen, better than VHS and the best version of the originals we're likely to get.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    15. Re:Special editions only :-( by Nutcase · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Big differences:

      1) In LOTR, they told everyone up front was the plan was so the informed consumer could choose... instead of feeling ripped off.

      2) In LOTR, they made sure that there was no overlap in the special features between the theatrical cut and the extended cut.

      3) In LOTR, the extra features on the extended cut, plus 45 minutes of NEW footage justify the second purchase - instead of only offering a version that was modified (for the worse) for sale initially, and then relenting and offering the original at a later date.

      In other words, with LOTR the extended cuts are actually GOOD, and are put out there for fans, while leaving the original theatrical cut available for everyone. In the Star Wars case, no one can get the original version they know and love, and are stuck with the extended/special versions, DESPITE the fans.

      Peter Jackson and New Line are treating fans like people worth of respect, and offering them as much of the LOTR magic as they can soak up. George Lucas is treating Star Wars fans the way a school bully treats kids in cartoons - turning them upside down and shaking money out of their pockets, all the while trying to dampen whatever Star Wars magic is left with a thick blanket of corporate greed.

    16. Re:Special editions only :-( by Highlander · · Score: 2, Informative

      Schindler's List (Widescreen Edition) (1993) - This item will be released on March 9, 2004.

      H

    17. Re:Special editions only :-( by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      Actually huge parts of the "original" version were wiped out in storage....part of the need for the digital effects was that certian scenes were damaged beyond repair and had to be "recreated"..so it was cheaper to do it ditigally. Then Lucas got carried away monkeying with script.

      ON a side rant, this was actually part of Lessing's case to the SCOTUS that much of today's media is not really "published" and collectors aren't allowed to archive stuff like this for posterity... hence our culture is at the mercy of corporations' bottom lines...if it's to expensive to protect these famous works...oh well. But of course WE can't copy them either to keep them alive!!! [of course Disney used the same issue with Snow White to get the BoZo act passed]

    18. Re:Special editions only :-( by queequeg1 · · Score: 1

      There are some decent boots you can buy in Hong Kong (I ordered the entire trilogy online for about $25 delivered). There's a big thread in the forums at Dvdtalk.com that goes over the quality of all of the popular bootleg versions out there for sale. The ones I ordered are clearly ripped from the Laserdisc and look very good on a standard definition TV. However, they are completely unwatchable on a high definition set (Everything looks very blocky). I ended up giving them to my neighbor after I got my high def set.

    19. Re:Special editions only :-( by Baby_with_a_nailgun · · Score: 2, Funny

      I will get the DVD version but I'll get a pirated copy and I'll be sure to distribute to all of my friends and family.

      Illegally copying Star Wars makes baby Annakin cry.

    20. Re:Special editions only :-( by glesga_kiss · · Score: 4, Informative
      As another poster has mentioned, this has already been done. There are multiple unofficial digital version of the movies. The ones I have are:

      Original triology, SE on German DVD with 5.1 German audio and 5.1 upmixed (from 2.0) English. The original English 2.0 soundtrack is also available. Verdict: Very good, but all text is in German, including scrolling start. English 5.1 isn't real 5.1 unfortunately, but the German is.

      Original trilogy, SE on DivX. Sound is prologic, one disk per movie. Verdict: A keeper until the offical DVDs are out.

      The Phantom Menace Phantom Edit. A rip of the VHS version, minus as much Anakin and Jar-Jar bullshit as possible. Verdict: Worth checking out. Available in mpeg2, DivX and VCD. I kept the mpeg4 version I found on e2k.

      The Phantom Menace Peoples Edition. A DVD rip including several deleted scenes. Verdict: Worth a look, educational purposes.

      Finally, a someone I know made proper DVDs from his own LD-cap, supposedly very good but I never got to see it.

      Fuck Lucas. Like the RIAA, he has learned that missing a business opertunity costs. We want DVD, you don't give. We go elsewhere and your products are forever tainted. Combined with the poorish recent movies, Lucas has almost succeeded in making Star Wars suck.

    21. Re:Special editions only :-( by RockClimbingFool · · Score: 2, Informative

      You just span it across two dvd-r's using your pirated version of dvd x copy. It produces exact copies and you get extra karma for using boot legged software to do it!!!

    22. Re:Special editions only :-( by cens0r · · Score: 1

      You're really going to rag on Lucas for releasing a copy of the trilogy in the late 80's... a new one with improved video and sound in the early 90's... and the special editions in the late 90's? If they had been on dvd you'd have a point. But this was VHS, a format that wears out. At the point I bought a new version, my old copies were always showing their age, and I would have had to buy a new copy regardless of whether or not they had been re-released.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    23. Re:Special editions only :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    24. Re:Special editions only :-( by leenoble_uk · · Score: 1

      My dad's got a VHS recording of the ONLY EVER showing of Star Wars (original version) on UK Terrestrial TV.
      Maybe I could supply them with that copy to restore those worn out tapes.

      Mind you it was on ITV so they'd have to cut the adverts out.

    25. Re:Special editions only :-( by Pamplemousse · · Score: 1

      Probably the best quality you can get for the originals is find someone with the Laser disks, have them rip them onto DVD, that way you get them they way they were before George lost his marbles! I know that is my plan, but I will still buy the sey just for the extra disk:)

    26. Re:Special editions only :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have the THX versions of the Original Trilogy (incidentally, I hate when people refer to the "Special" (is that special as in Special Ed?) editions as the O.T. - they aren't original, damnit!) on Laserdisc. My wife's MiniDV camcorder has an analog input, and will pass-through the analog input to Firewire, so I'm planning to make my own DVDs of the original trilogy. Since Lucas no longer seems interested in profiting from the movies in their original form, I will feel absolutely no guilt at providing copies of these DVDs to friends and family.

    27. Re:Special editions only :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm considering releasing my WS rip of the original films that I have split into two DVDs with full menu's, chapter points, bonus materials, covers, lables, etc.. etc.. Six disks in all.

      They came off the THX LD that were purchased. Then again they are watching everywhere and are now trying to track my location.

    28. Re:Special editions only :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what do you mean 'almost' ? The newer movies all suck.. A lot... They are utter crap. Only the originals are worth watching (in untainted 'special edition' form).

    29. Re:Special editions only :-( by gglaze · · Score: 1

      Original trilogy, SE on DivX. Sound is prologic, one disk per movie.

      I believe there are also some 2-disc DivX copies of each of the originals (non-SE) out there somewhere, widescreen, and quality is rumored to be excellent, presumably ripped from LD or something.

    30. Re:Special editions only :-( by fee79 · · Score: 1

      I agree, but it still makes me happy. I've been waiting along time to see this. I'll definately be buying them.

    31. Re:Special editions only :-( by Golias · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I agree that Greedo was there to play Peter Lorrie to Han's Bogart, but the dramatic impact of that scene is completely drained in the SE version by the fact that Jabba says the exact same lines two minutes earlier in the re-inserted footage. I mean, both scenes were in made-up languages with subtitles! If you really needed that scene, would it have been so hard to make Jabba say something else!?

      There's a reason why Sam Spade doesn't meet the Fat Man before his initial scenes with Peter Lorrie's character. Once the mystery of "my employer" is gone, the pathetic lackey is not really as interesting.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    32. Re:Special editions only :-( by Golias · · Score: 1
      Illegally copying Star Wars makes baby Annakin cry.

      In that case, count me in! :)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    33. Re:Special editions only :-( by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Its been awhile since I watched the original triology of SW on LD....original versions. I could swear it says Episode IV at the beginning of the first movie??

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    34. Re:Special editions only :-( by ScottGant · · Score: 1

      They changed it to "Episode IV" when they re-released it after "The Empire Strikes Back" came out and had "Episode V" on it.

      I'm talking about sitting in a theater in 1977 and seeing just "Star Wars" and that was it.

      Lucas started changing things around way back then. At first, I'm sure everyone was saying "oh cool, he changed it to be consistent"...but then he went kinda hog wild with everything.

      Meh...it's a minor sticking point I guess. I think it's us old guys still trying to capture that fleeting feeling when we first saw the original movie back in 77. Released with no fan-fare, being the "sleeper hit" of the summer since they hardly advertised it, and it seemed to have come out of no where.

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    35. Re:Special editions only :-( by tuffy · · Score: 1
      Its been awhile since I watched the original triology of SW on LD....original versions. I could swear it says Episode IV at the beginning of the first movie??

      The original theatrical run didn't have "Episode IV" in the opening crawl; that was added for home video and subsequent theatrical re-releases. Most people aren't concerned with it whatsoever, but perhaps it should've been seen as an omen of things to come.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    36. Re:Special editions only :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe not high on everyones list but Pink Floyd - Pulse is missing also. It's on HI-FI VHS and audio CD but no DVD. I assumed they did not want to cut into the cd sales as the DVD would proably be priced cheaper then the $30 audio cd AND include full video, the RIAA has some very strange pricing practices.

    37. Re:Special editions only :-( by |/|/||| · · Score: 1
      Are you kidding? Don't just buy them anyway. I'm not buying any of this crap until the originals are released on DVD. No SE's, no prequels, no star wars legos, nothing. Maybe I'll borrow the SE DVD's from someone so I can rip 'em and try to do some repairs, but there's no way I'm going to buy them.

      Maybe, just maybe, I will buy the special editions after I buy the originals (yes, they will be released eventually, after Lucas is dead and/or the copyrights expire and/or the robots take over) - just for completeness' sake. Probably not, though, after all of this stupidity.

      --
      [javac] 100 errors
    38. Re:Special editions only :-( by Major_Small · · Score: 1
      At least I still have the real versions on VHS

      I have them on LD... along with pretty much every other version they released...

    39. Re:Special editions only :-( by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Hahaha...ok. Hmm...well, I did see it in the theaters back then about 6-7 times...but, just too long ago to remember that detail....

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    40. Re:Special editions only :-( by |/|/||| · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I thought he'd get his head out of his ass by now. I'll keep waiting.

      Dum de dum...

      [checks watch]

      La la la...

      [twiddles thumbs]

      *Yawn* - still waiting...

      --
      [javac] 100 errors
    41. Re:Special editions only :-( by kevin7kal · · Score: 2, Funny

      Noticed on the linked website, at the top, where they list the titles included in the box set that they say Empire(Viewed by some as the best in the series)

      Who are these people?

      My Picks go like this.

      1)A New Hope
      2)Empire
      3)Jedi
      4 & 5) Episodes II & III
      6) Any Episode of Barney the Purple Dinosaure
      7) Phantom Menace

    42. Re:Special editions only :-( by killerkalamari · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Anyone know where I could buy a set of the LD -> DVD rips? I own the THX Laserdisc set, and they are great, but I know my Laserdisc player is going to die someday, so I'd like the movies in a digital format. I'm guessing though, that even if I did find DVD rips, they would probably be bad quality.. just good enough to make an illegal buck at the flea market.

      I've experimented with recording ROTJ myself, but my BT878-based capture card is lame and the results were very poor (stripes of different color intensity, static, and sync problems). Can a videophile suggest an EXCELLENT capture card (i.e. the best)? Needs great audio capture too, so there aren't any sync problems.

      Once we have DVD versions of both the old and new, it becomes possible for a good film editor (not me) to splice the movies together (between shots). Most of the special edition hasn't been changed, so it would be great to benefit from the better film transfer on the non-altered shots.

      I wonder if the new DVD will include the original stereo tracks? I would assume not because of all the changes.

      calamari

    43. Re:Special editions only :-( by segfault7375 · · Score: 1


      Now that I got a DVD burner for xmas (thanks honey!) I was thinking about this too. As someone mentioned earlier, the scene with Han and Greedo where Greedo shoots first really pisses me off too. I don't mind the new special effects too much because they can be cool to look at, but by changing that scene they are screwing with the story line. So, when i get the DVD, fuck Lucas, I'll rip the disc, edit the scene back to the way it was in the original, and re-burn it. I'll have to leave the extras and stuff off the disc to make it fit, but I'd still have the SE disc if I wanted to see those things. Just my $0.02.

      Segfault

    44. Re:Special editions only :-( by mkrieger1277 · · Score: 1

      The quality isn't ideal (the transfer is for 1 single-layer DVD per film) but it's widescreen, better than VHS and the best version of the originals we're likely to get.

      That was exactly my point of starting this project. The Definitive Collection Laserdiscs were THX mastered in widescreen format. Audio is a Dolby Mix (pre 5.1 days). The movies were on 5 disc sides and the sixth had supplemental material. There were also a few commentary tracks at various points of the movies.

      I was able to capture 3 sides on a single layer DVD, so my copies thus far are on 2 discs (about 80 mins fits on one disc). I'd rather have higher quality on 2 discs than a compressed copy on one (I tried that too and didn't really like the result). I figure that I can abuse the DVD copies and always try to make another set from the Laserdiscs later as technology improves (i.e. dual layer burners, blu-ray, etc.)

    45. Re:Special editions only :-( by Rufus211 · · Score: 1

      Haha, man it's been long since I've seen the Phantom Edit. Back when it first came out I helped host it using BitTorrent way back before torrentse and suprnova and all the rest made BT big.

    46. Re:Special editions only :-( by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I realize thats an option...

      but I would rather NOT have to put in another DVD halfway through the movie.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    47. Re:Special editions only :-( by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "2) In LOTR, they made sure that there was no overlap in the special features between the theatrical cut and the extended cut."

      Actually, as a customer, this one really pisses me off. I just wanted the extended edition because of the extra footage. But I also like the extra features, and in order to get them all now......I would have to purchase both the theatrical and extended cuts. Why can't they just have the same extras on the theatrical and extended cuts? Oh wait.....more money this way.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    48. Re:Special editions only :-( by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 0

      I would much rather see the newer versions than the originals. Sure, the originals are good, but Lucas could never really make the movie he intended until the Special Edition came out.

      --
      "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
    49. Re:Special editions only :-( by 0divide · · Score: 1

      The saddest part for me is that I have the original on tape as well--the long box, with the letter boxed versions, etc.

      But the tapes are gonna disintegrate. I just know it. In a few years, even though I have only watched them once or twice, the particles will slide off the tape and render the movies useless. Lucas knows this--I remember him commenting about this in some article about how, 10-15 years in the future, the only versions out there will be the new "special edition" versions.

      Of course, the laserdiscs are gonna be out there, so that's cool, but I don't have one.

      Good luck ripping them!

      --
      ---mike
    50. Re:Special editions only :-( by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1
      If they had been on dvd you'd have a point. But this was VHS, a format that wears out.

      My copies aren't showing their age. Maybe that's because they aren't VHS?

      There were at least four non-SE laserdisc versions released, not counting CAV vs CLV pressings. Pan-and-scan, 1-disc widescreen (time-compressed to 120 minutes), 2-disc widescreen, and the widescreen THX "faces" version (also available in a box set). I have the latter two versions.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    51. Re:Special editions only :-( by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      Here's how you do it yourself:

      1) Go to eDonkey2000.com, get Overnet or eDonkey client
      2) Go to http://forum.sharereactor.com and click on Search. Type Star Wars LD Rip
      3) Queue all the files you want
      4) Go to friend with DVD Burner, bring blanks and burn

      Now I don't condone piracy, but since I own the originals on VHS I consider this fair use in action! Yeah Baby!!!

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    52. Re:Special editions only :-( by Rotting · · Score: 1

      I have recently picked up the Definitive Collection on laserdisc which came with a laserdisc player for $130 (CAD) on ebay.

      The quality may not be as good as the DVD but Solo shoots first. :)

    53. Re:Special editions only :-( by cens0r · · Score: 1

      That would be great if I had a laser disc player. Of course if they were going to re-release the VHS version, they might as well release them on laser disc too. And each release did improve a little bit as the technology did (did the THX version have DD, or did that not come until the special editions?)

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    54. Re:Special editions only :-( by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      What good is a LD to DVD rip?

      Laserdiscs are not great visual quality...they're just RF modulated video on a format that doesn't degrade like tape does. The resolution is about the same as SVHS. Color reproduction on Laserdisc is better than VHS but nowhere near as crisp as DVD, in fact I've noticed that reds on the star wars LDs I have bleed really badly, to a level that's almost distracting.

      Ripping from the laserdisc would give you the same visual quality as you got from the laserdisc player, only the color bleed will be accentuated by block noise unless you pump a lot of bits at it. A softening filter might help a little, but it'll also decrease your effective resolution. So you'll end up with a really high quality compressed rip of kind of crappy video.

      The best part of laserdiscs is the digital audio (your choice of CD quality stereo or a fully digital 5.1 track on the SE THX version)...and of course, when you convert this to DVD audio you gain nothing. You don't lost anything perceptible, either, but compressing an uncompressed digital audio track doesn't help you out anyway.

      In fact, the only benefit I can see to making a DVD of the laserdisc is being able to get rid of your laserdisc player. Personally, I like mine, without it I'd have a big empty space on my entertainment center, and I'd have to buy something to fill it up :).

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    55. Re:Special editions only :-( by Slime-dogg · · Score: 2, Funny

      No.

      The correct order from best to worst is :

      • Empire
      • Jedi
      • A New Hope
      • Episodes II & III (I won't be able to tell).
      • Sleep. (Andy Warhol).
      • Phantom Menace

      Some may argue about the 5th item on the list, but honestly... what is the enjoyment of watching a guy sleep for a couple hours?

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    56. Re:Special editions only :-( by The_dev0 · · Score: 1
      (Yes yes, I know this is offtopic)

      Actually, I have been in contact with EMKA Steven O'Rourke Management (Pink Floyds Australian Reps) and they assure me that when copyright is agreed by all parties and a 5.1 mix is done a DVD of Pulse will be released. The problem is that Rogers Waters and David Gilmour won't play friendly with each other any more. Neither of them will release their rights to it if it means the other will make some money off it. Never mind the fans, it's all about screwing your ex-band members.

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
    57. Re:Special editions only :-( by leapis · · Score: 1

      The "original unedited" versions have been available for some time on eBay. I bought a trilogy set about 3 years ago, which are Region 0 copies of the original (non-SE) trilogy. At the end of the movie, you even see the LaserDisc logo, so it would appear that these were mastered from LaserDisc. They do look good (given their age), and have 5.1 Dolby Digital sound.

    58. Re:Special editions only :-( by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Even lousy video cards can capture decent quality. Which one do you have, by the way?

      Here are some tips:
      1) Use HuffYUV as your capture codec. This is a lossless AVI format, but it is very big. You'll need a large, fast hard drive to cap with no frame drops. To be safe, I capture to a RAID0.
      For audio, use PCM 48000. Don't try to compress the audio, as the AVI spec doesn't deal with with VBR audio, and almost all audio compression that's worth a damn for capturing is VBR.

      2) Get a color corrector. Most of these also remove Macrovision. Don't rely on software to do this, for $50 or so you can get a good hardware one that sits between the LD player and your capture hardware.

      3) AVISynth (on Windows) is your friend for processing. Pay attention to the Levels function, but you can mess with the just about anything. You can also apply different functions to different parts of the video, although as a scripting language, it can take some time to get things perfectly right. You might also try a sharpness filter. Make sure all your filters are interlaced compatible, as you'll probably be dealing with an interlaced AVI. Don't deinterlace unless you know what you are doing--it can make the video look really bad.

      4) Track down someone who has a copy of CCE and encode the video with that. Use 4 passes (5 or 6 if you really have time to waste, but most of the video quality will be obtained in the first 4). Make sure that you are encoding interlaced. Look for a good guide to CCE at http://www.doom9.net/ to get all the settings right. I'd go ahead and do a 4.7GB version and a 9.0GB version, as dual layer DVD burners will be coming out sometime this year, and it would be a pain to do the encoding again. You may wish to encode the credits separately at a much lower bitrate to save bits for the movie.

      5) Do whatever you need to to encode the audio. I use BeSweet to get AC-3, but there may be better solutions.

      Advanced usage would be making the video anamorphic, but I've never really messed with that, so you're on your own :)

    59. Re:Special editions only :-( by killerkalamari · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the site info. :)

      It seems dishonest to me to change formats (i.e. VHS to LD rip) and still consider it fair use. If I paid for a VHS copy, I would only feel justified in downloading a VHS rip. Since I own the LD copy, if I found a VHS rip, that would seem off limits to me.

      calamari

    60. Re:Special editions only :-( by killerkalamari · · Score: 1

      I have the AverTV Stereo card. It's great for watching TV, and with the sourceforge bt878 (maybe it's bt848 I can't remember right now) drivers you can capture at 640x480 or more. I've been using VirtualDub to record and I have a/v sync problems because the sound is recorded independently by my sound card. If you just want to record a Star Trek episode off TV it's fine.. but I'm looking to preserve the quality of my LD and it isn't happening with this card.

      I'm pretty sure there isn't a macrovision problem because I'm using S-Video. Even watching regular TV with the card the color problems are visible. My best guesses are radio interference or a bad board design. I was reading a site where another card with the same chipset as mine was modified and the color problems went away, turning it into an excellent capture card. IIRC, the problem was caused by incorrect grounding information provided by the chip manufacturer. Unfortunately, my card was not one the guy knew how to fix, the price was like $150 anyways, and I'd still have the audio sync problems.

      calamari

    61. Re:Special editions only :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you could probably fit The Barney collection and Sleep in at 5&6, the question is...which of those is better?

    62. Re:Special editions only :-( by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      Dishonest? I don't think so. I purchased the right to view this movie at home, at least that is what the FBI warnings say in the beginning of the movie. What difference does it make whether I view it on a DVD LD Rip I downloaded or the original VHS? I purchased this right from the copyright holder.

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
  2. OMG!!!!! by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 2, Funny

    OMG! The Force and my Mastercard will be with me!!!!

    1. Re:OMG!!!!! by McAddress · · Score: 5, Funny

      You will buy the DVD's

    2. Re:OMG!!!!! by cybergrue · · Score: 1

      The site has been /.ed. Apparently the Force was not with it.

    3. Re:OMG!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The ability to slashdot a server is insignificant next to the power of the Force.

    4. Re:OMG!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny


      These aren't the DVD's I'm looking for.

    5. Re:OMG!!!!! by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      No, I won't! I'm a Toydarian you insensitive clod!

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
  3. Finally! by Jad+LaFields · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now to just wipe the memory of the two new films completely from memory...

    --
    [SIG] It's like putting a moose in the blender -- a recipe for disaster!
    1. Re:Finally! by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

      I didn't think episode 4 was that great, but I'll never understand knocking episode 5. I've watched that a million times with my kids. IMHO, episode 5 is the best of the 5 to date.

    2. Re:Finally! by unlinear · · Score: 1

      's easy.

      "These are not the movies you were hoping for. Move along"

      *waves*

    3. Re:Finally! by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Empire Strikes Back was pretty good. Definately better than episode six, which was a hell of a lot better than episode one or two.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    4. Re:Finally! by eraserewind · · Score: 1

      Actually episode 4 is a lot of fun though, and more self contained than 5 is. It's cheezy and a bit dated of course, but has almost everything you require in a classic action movie.

      Han is cool, and Luke perfect as a naive young hero, Vader the perfect villain, Leia the love interest and the droids as comic relief. They are all caught up in an action filled adventure in an exotic location (space) and ends with a happy ending. It's a straight forward good vs evil battle, and that appeals to people.

      Episode 5 is a superior film on many levels, but for out and out enjoyment 4 is best. IMHO.

  4. HDDVD by mal3 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Lucas was going to wait longer, but realized if he did it would have to be released on HDDVD and he'd lose the opportunity to sell it to you twice.

    --
    Non gratis rodentus anus
    1. Re:HDDVD by kevcol · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Who modded this 'Interesting'? Interesting? It's fuckin hilarious and describes Lucas the vulture to a 'T'. Since he can no longer create magic on the screen, he just repackages what he did when he had it to exact more geld from the minions.

    2. Re:HDDVD by 3Daemon · · Score: 1

      Maybe. My initial thought was that Lucas probably wants to create some buzz around the StarWars universe again, before releasing EP3.

      (It has been a while since EP2, and whilst it did good at the Box Office (or so I believe - to lazy to check my facts... :) ), but he might have picked up on the fans not really digging it.)

    3. Re:HDDVD by bstil · · Score: 1

      from the article: The films will not be sold separately, at least initially, according to Fox representatives.
      Movies from the Indiana Jones trilogy were not released until October 2003, and then only in a DVD boxed set for $69.98 retail.
      Looks like Lucas is following that marketing strategy.

    4. Re:HDDVD by Amorpheus_MMS · · Score: 1

      Would HD-DVD actually make a difference for movies filmed around 1980? You can't get more quality than the original material offers.

    5. Re:HDDVD by kevcol · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Funny, I wholeheartedly agreed with the OP on this who was modded to 5, and my post got knocked down to -1.

    6. Re:HDDVD by misterpies · · Score: 3, Informative


      Of course, because like all movies until pretty recently it was recorded on good ol' photographic film, which offers a resolution far higher than any existing digitised video format. Same goes for digital cameras - even the best still don't match the resolution of a decent 35mm film.

      --
      The author of this post asserts his moral rights.
    7. Re:HDDVD by Fishstick · · Score: 3, Funny

      According to Fox Home Entertainment president Mike Dunn, both the studio and Lucasfilm arrived at the September 21st date to gain maximum exposure during the holiday season: "We sold about 17 million VHS 'Star Wars' units during two fall release periods in '95 and '97," he explained. "With that in mind, we designed our release strategy to pick the best release date that had the most gentle sales curve decline on home video."

      translation: we are waiting until the best possible moment to extract the maximum mileage from getting these poor dumb slobs, err, fans buying the same content yet again. We are timing the release relative to the seasonal holiday buying spree (formerly known as Christmas).

      duh

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    8. Re:HDDVD by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      It would certainly make a difference to me, particularly where Leia's metal bikini is concerned... :)

    9. Re:HDDVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's jewish, does this surprise you?

    10. Re:HDDVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HD-DVD will have a resolution of ~2 megapixels, and be heavily compressed. Standard DVD is 1/2 megapixel. The Star Wars movies were filmed on 35mm film. High-end 11-megapixel digital cameras are generally considered to be slightly inferior to 35mm film. Now, please think for a moment, and your answer will be obvious.

    11. Re:HDDVD by SlashdotLemming · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Lucas was going to wait longer, but realized if he did it would have to be released on HDDVD and he'd lose the opportunity to sell it to you twice.

      He can only sell it to you twice if you choose to buy it twice.

    12. Re:HDDVD by 0123456 · · Score: 5, Informative

      "High-end 11-megapixel digital cameras are generally considered to be slightly inferior to 35mm film."

      Remember: 35mm _still_ frames go along the film, whereas 35mm _movie_ frames go across the film. Also, only a fraction of the frame is actually used in movies, due to the widescreen aspect ratio. That means a lot less pixels are required to get the same resolution.

      A lot of 35mm movie effect shots are rendered at around 2048x1024-ish resolutions, so while 2 megapixels is a little low for the full 35mm movie resolution, it's not far off.

    13. Re:HDDVD by Golias · · Score: 1

      I'm almost positive that Empire was on 72mm film, and I think Star Wars might have been, too, but I was about 7 years old at the time, so I'm less sure.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    14. Re:HDDVD by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 1

      Or how about the six-breasted dancing girl?

      --
      Needle Nardle Noo
    15. Re:HDDVD by BostonPilot · · Score: 1
      On the subject of 35mm (still) versus digital photos... I shoot and print both 35mm and professional digital (Nikon D1X) and I'd have to say they are comparable. Each has a couple characteristics in which it is superior to the other. The D1X is a 5 megapixel camera, btw.

      Be careful about just comparing number of pixels, though. You need to look at stuff like noise, color rendition, etc. as well.

    16. Re:HDDVD by Mateito · · Score: 1

      I read once that the equivalent to 35mm film is 50MegaPixel in 24 bit. Of course most people don't have 35mm cameras that justify this.. but when you are dealing with somebody with a top of the line Canon or Nikon body and a few tens-of-thousands of dollars worth of glass, you will see the difference.

      Digital is excellent for sticking photos on the web. Still not good enough to blow up past A4.. but then when was the last time you blew up a photo past A4?

    17. Re:HDDVD by egomaniac · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Same goes for digital cameras - even the best still don't match the resolution of a decent 35mm film.

      Then you either haven't used a good digital camera or you haven't done a fair comparison.

      My wife is a professional photographer who shoots with a Nikon D1x. Film admittedly has higher line pair resolution, but as my wife isn't taking pictures of line pairs, that's irrelevant. For real-world shooting like portraits and nature photography, the D1x is easily comparable to 35mm film (a bit better in some respects, a bit worse in others).

      And the D1x is only a 5.5 megapixel camera. There are already much higher resolution cameras on the market, and anyone who believes that 35mm film actually compares favorably to a good 16 megapixel imager is suffering from a severe inability to accept reality. The fight is already over. Film is dead.

      Of course, I'm sure that a hundred years ago there were still horse-and-buggy proponents arguing that cars were inferior...

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    18. Re:HDDVD by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, it's the other way around. The high-end digital cameras are superior to film for almost everything. At the 11 megapixel level (specifically the Canon 1Ds), digital surpasses 35mm film.

      At ISO (film sensitivity) at or over 800, digital will come out way ahead, since grain will be so large on the film that resolution is severely compromised. Digital will have a small amount of noise at higher ISO's, but it would be not nearly as severe in deteriorating the image quality as large grain fast 35mm film. This is one of the reasons why all the sports photographers are shooting digital now, even if it is with the lower resolution 4 or 5 megapixel cameras.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    19. Re:HDDVD by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      There's a sucker born every minute.

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
    20. Re:HDDVD by niller · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the marketing department. As far as Lucas is concerned... people will always buy whatever Star Wars crap he provides... just do a search for "Star Wars" on eBay.

  5. Not a democracy? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the article:
    So what are the faithful to do if they don't want to watch the altered 1997 editions of the trilogy? Either give in, or don't buy. "We realize there's a lot of debate out there," says Ward. "But this is not a democracy. We love our fans, but this is about art and filmmaking. [George] has decided that the sole version he wants available is this one."

    So you say it's not a democracy? That George "Artist" Lucas can do what he damn well pleases?

    Perhaps Lucas has forgotten that he's in the marketplace -- where democracy indeed rules, and the cash register is the ballot box.

    My vote will be for the version where Han shoots first. For me, it *is* about "art and filmmaking". Both of which were evident in the original, absent from the remake, and forgotten in the prequels.

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:Not a democracy? by ttsalo · · Score: 1
      So you say it's not a democracy? That George "Artist" Lucas can do what he damn well pleases?
      My vote will be for the version where Han shoots first.

      Watch him not care.

      --
      If the road to hell is paved with good intentions, where does the road paved with evil intentions lead to?
    2. Re:Not a democracy? by IncarnadineConor · · Score: 1

      I thought they changed that back, am I wrong on that?

    3. Re:Not a democracy? by mahdi13 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Perhaps Lucas has forgotten that he's in the marketplace -- where democracy indeed rules, and the cash register is the ballot box.
      Maybe you forgot who made the movies...?
      It has nothing to do with politics, the final product is George's choice...not yours

      Don't like it, vote by not buying it
      --
      "Some things have to be believed to be seen." - Ralph Hodgson
    4. Re:Not a democracy? by stephenry · · Score: 1

      So what if George says it's about the "art and filmmaking"... After seeing the phantom menace and attack of the clones, I am inclined to disagree.

      Steve

    5. Re:Not a democracy? by Metryq · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Perhaps Lucas has forgotten that he's in the marketplace -- where democracy indeed rules, and the cash register is the ballot box."

      Have you been to the cinema lately or watched any TV? The voting public is not terribly critical, which is why crap keeps selling. The public is buying it.

      Remember Sturgeon's Law: 90 percent of anything is crap.

    6. Re:Not a democracy? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1
      My vote will be for the version where Han shoots first.
      What is this about Han shooting first? I've seen this come up before (someone even put it in their sig). Did I miss something, somewhere?

      Anyway, at least they haven't digitally replaced all blasters with walkie-talkies.
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    7. Re:Not a democracy? by MikeHunt69 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      So you say it's not a democracy? That George "Artist" Lucas can do what he damn well pleases? Perhaps Lucas has forgotten that he's in the marketplace -- where democracy indeed rules, and the cash register is the ballot box.

      Thats right. It *isn't* a democracy. He can sit on those movies until the grave and then have the originals destroyed and there is not one damn thing you can do about it.

    8. Re:Not a democracy? by Mister+Furious · · Score: 1

      The cantina scene in 'a new hope' was changed so that greedo (the bug-eyed bounty hunter) shot at han solo first, then han shot him back, killing him. the original had han just shooting him under the table. it's pretty rediculous in the redo since they're sitting at a table no more than 5 feet apart. greedo has his gun pointed at hans chest and shoots...and MISSES!!! He's a freakin' bounty hunter! he captures/kills people all the time. he wouldn't miss at point blank range. it's stupid.

      here's a link:
      a link

    9. Re:Not a democracy? by cowscows · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You can still call him a dick, and be right about it.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    10. Re:Not a democracy? by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      I still don't understand why Lucas changed it except to paint Han as a more sympathetic character - a bit of a nicer rogue.

    11. Re:Not a democracy? by Fishstick · · Score: 4, Informative

      >What is this about Han shooting first?

      In the original release, Greedo corners Solo, levels a gun across the table and threatens to turn him into Jabba unless he hands over the money.

      Solo distracts him while unholstering his blaster under the table and then blasts poor dumb unsuspecting Greedo in the nuts.

      Guess Lucas felt this was unsportsman-like, to blast a guy under the table instead of in a fair gunfight (ala Gary Cooper).

      So Lucas changed it in the "Special Edition". Greedo pulls off a shot, misses (how can you miss at point blank range?) and _then_ Solo blasts him in the nuts.

      Much more honorable. Han is going to be a major Alliance general and hero. Can't have him shooting first under a table - not Kosher. Bit of revisionist history, actually. Solo was presumably a smuggler scumbag before meeting up with Luke and Ben. I'm sure blasting Greedo from under the table is not the worst thing he did before getting the hots for Leia and joining her rebellion.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    12. Re:Not a democracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly with current copyright laws this is true.

      Decades ago the public's rights were actually considered. If copyrights hadn't been extended forever, these movies would be public domain by now, and numerous legal versions would be out there.

    13. Re:Not a democracy? by gowen · · Score: 1
      it's stupid.
      Enjoyable but cheesy sci-fi movie (aimed at kids) in "stupid" shocker.

      Chill out, its just entertainment.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    14. Re:Not a democracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want the original versions on DVD. The movie that changed the way I imagined movies to be! Lucas may say this is not a democracy, but the votes with your dollars do count to this ass.

      I will not buy them, instead I will rent and copy with DVDShrink (look it up on Google). It's freeware, its awesome. Shrink any DVD to fit on one 4.7 DVD-R or +R. It copies AC3, DTS, subtitles, everything. Even with shrinking a 2-hour movie that is ove 6GB (dual layer) they look great.

      See, I still buy a few DVDs. DS9 box sets, Indiana Jones trilogy box set, Seabiscuit in red colectors slipcases, the LOTR Fellowship and Two Towers in 4-disc set. I copy the ones that I like enough to watch again but are not important enough for me to own.

      Send a message. Have your cake and eat it too.

    15. Re:Not a democracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps Lucas has forgotten that he's in the marketplace -- where democracy indeed rules, and the cash register is the ballot box.

      Are you kidding me?! Lucas is the MASTER at milking his fans for every cent they're worth and you all keep buying into it time and time again. Sure, you may be pissed off and bitch about how it's not the way you want it, BUT YOU KEEP BUYING!

    16. Re:Not a democracy? by Mister+Furious · · Score: 1

      yeah, i think that's why he changed it. but i think the point is that there was no point and the change is unbelievable. han was a rogue who lied, stole, cheated, etc. but through the original trilogy, he became a better person through trial, difficulties and love.

      by painting him as a more sympathetic character from the get-go, you lose that metamorphosis.

    17. Re:Not a democracy? by Mister+Furious · · Score: 1

      i agree. i'm actually not a huge star wars fan, so I feel kinda weird having this much of an opinion about this. i just think that it was unnecessary and the movie was better without the change. i just posted this in response to another response to my original post, but han was a rogue who became a hero throughout the original trilogy. by painting him as nice from the beginning, you lose that cool part of the story.

      so, yes I agree that in the larger scheme of things, it's not that big of a deal. but, since we are in a star wars discussion, it's not out of place to make a comment that changes made to star wars were stupid.

    18. Re:Not a democracy? by dTaylorSingletary · · Score: 1

      Remembering back to one of the few Star Wars novels I read, the collection of short stories... Tales From Mos Eisley Cantina or someother somesuch, Greedo is sent by Jabba mainly to get get rid of him. Greedo wasn't a bounty hunter, he was a a wannabe, a pain in the neck snot-nose brat. His missing is therefore not too suprising, as he was an idiot.

      --
      d. Taylor Singletary,
      reality technician techra.el
    19. Re:Not a democracy? by Yakko · · Score: 1

      This is perhaps the reason I never go to the movies or watch the TV the big networks want me to watch. I vote for a bunch of cartoons with my ReplayTV and watch them whenever I want.

      --

      --
      Me spell chucker work grate. Need grandma chicken.
    20. Re:Not a democracy? by Mister+Furious · · Score: 1

      i think that's a stretch. i mean, he was sitting at the same table directly across from han. stevie wonder could've hit him. even if he was an amatuer, his gun was pointed directly at han when he fired. him missing is silly. if greedo shot first, han would've had a much smaller role in the movies.

      also, I thought that greedo said that jabba was going to pay him handsomely or something like 'there's a huge bounty on your head' type of thing. that sounds like bounty hunting to me.

    21. Re:Not a democracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .............I believe that's what he was getting at.

    22. Re:Not a democracy? by WNight · · Score: 1

      Not correct. You can do what many people have done. Purchase or download high-quality transfers of the original movies from Laser Disc instead of replacing the VHS tapes yet again and never deal with Lucas again.

      And there's not one damn thing he can do about it.

    23. Re:Not a democracy? by JoshWurzel · · Score: 1

      And this is why they'll have to pry my laserdisc player from my cold, dead hands. Those laserdiscs have the original versions of the movies. No Greedo-shoots-first, no guns-replaced-with-walkie-talkies, nothing. Just Star Wars in its purest.

    24. Re:Not a democracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he wants my money, its my choice. Some how I don't think these are going to do as well as he thought. Hes also doing very poorly on the merchandising and the last movie of the 1st 6 could sink him. Of course with the crap from the reedits of the 1st 3 and the suckkyness of the last 2, I won't see the 6th till it shows up for free on the TV.

      However I would buy the 1st three if they were the original movies.

    25. Re:Not a democracy? by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      I thanks to iDVD, we can make DVDs of those laserdiscs. For personal use, of course.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
  6. Re:Can you believe it? by yarisbandit · · Score: 1

    Uh-oh, now that's a nasty troll if intended ;)

  7. Never seen it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Ah, to be 18 again.

  8. At last.... by mrgrey · · Score: 0

    At last they release the Star Wars movies worth watching.

    --
    -Tolerate my intolerance
  9. Someone send this to George. by grub · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Please bear with my rant..

    When I read of the Star Wars DVD release I immediately thought of the speech Gordon Gekko give the board of Teldon Papers in the movie Wall Street (1987)
    "The point is, ladies and gentleman, is that greed -- for lack of a better word -- is good. Greed is right. Greed works."

    Years after the DVD has become ubiquitous they decide to release the original 3 on that medium. It was only a few years ago that they released the VHS set to the consumers.
    Lucas "found some time" in his schedule and "was willing and eager to make it happen."
    Wow! Thanks, George! The story makes it sound like they're doing us a favour! Yeah right. The only favour is to their bank accounts. The tide of cash flowing in from the "Official VHS set" has slowed to a crawl. They want the consumers to re-purchase the same stuff on a new format. George didn't "[find] some time", the market studies indicated that this is the right time to release the DVDs.

    Thanks but no thanks George. After the embarassment of Episodes I & II and your blatant milking of the franchise you've lost a big fan in me. I'd only buy the set if I could guarantee that my money buys the exact slice of pizza you choke on.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Someone send this to George. by mgs1000 · · Score: 1

      And, of course, in a couple of years, Lucas will release the original versions on DVD.

    2. Re:Someone send this to George. by haystor · · Score: 1

      Star Wars is dead to me.

      --
      t
    3. Re:Someone send this to George. by albeit+unknown · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd only buy the set if I could guarantee that my money buys the exact slice of pizza you choke on.

      Pizza the Hutt!!

    4. Re:Someone send this to George. by Lieutenant_Dan · · Score: 1

      I agree. He's blatantly milking the media in order to make more money. He's never had the best interests of the fan in mind.

      He can do all the creative garbage (Eworks, Jar Jar, etc) that he wants, since as an artiste that's his right, but the SW franchise is a billion dollar industry and he has no qualms in hiding that fact.

      I didn't buy the Indiana Jones box set and I won't buy this one. I've enjoyed the movies, but I'll wait until they're shown on TV, rent them, or borrow them from a friend. My money he will not see.

      The thing is, I don't think Lucas understands his fanbase or cares much for them. All he seems to care is his cash flow. I've read dozens of interviews and seen him blatter endlessly in TV profiles, but he's just a cold bugger. It's not even like his movies have a "message", but instead are pure entertainment. So basically we have tons of frosting, and no nutritious filling, and for that he wants to keep charging us until the folks between 20-50 are too old to operate a VCR/DVD/Holoset.

      --
      Wearing pants should always be optional.
    5. Re:Someone send this to George. by gowen · · Score: 1
      You misheard. He actually says "Greedo." He's defending Greedo's honour -- a hard working and thorough bounty hunter -- from the vicious accusation of having shot first.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    6. Re:Someone send this to George. by alexburke · · Score: 1

      I'd only buy the set if I could guarantee that my money buys the exact slice of pizza you choke on.

      This line is so good that you can consider it stolen, grub. :)

    7. Re:Someone send this to George. by grub · · Score: 1


      Woo hoo! Feel free to use it but credit where due is always appreciated :)

      --
      Trolling is a art,
  10. Yes, but it's not really the original by signe · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not the original Star Wars trilogy. It's the version that Lucas ham-handedly put together in 1997. It definitely won't be on my list of must-have DVDs, regardless of how much I would love to own the original trilogy on DVD.

    Greedo did not shoot first.

    -Todd

    --
    "The details of my life are quite inconsequential..."
    1. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by sweeney37 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      there were rumors floating about in regards to changes Lucas was supposedly making for the DVD edition. I guess we'll have to wait and see if it actually happens.

      Mike

    2. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by Wonda · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'll buy this as quick as i can, before he adds jar jar in a new release!

      this is the best you'll be able to get

    3. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by jcoleman · · Score: 4, Funny

      The words "get over it" come to mind. You remind me of the guy on Mr. Show that wore a scarf in summer and complained that wax cylinders were the only true way to appreciate recorded music.

    4. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by Scrameustache · · Score: 0, Troll

      The words "get over it" come to mind.

      Your mind is wrong, the actual words Lucas means are "bend over" and "squeal like a pig".
      And possibly "You got a purty mouth".

      I will personally take the high road and be the guy with the bow, i.e. not give Lucas more money for screwing us over.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    5. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by TheWickedKingJeremy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Um, some people like viewing the movies they grew up with in their original state - not "enhanced" with bad CG dancing scenes or politically-correct changes that make no sense in the context of the scene.

      In the grand scheme of things, Lucas f-ing up his original Trilogy is small potatoes... but in the context of a Star Wars article on Slashdot - you have to expect some bitching about the Greedo scene ;)

      --

      my religion lies somewhere between buddhism and super monkey ball - pamphlet?
    6. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by sg3000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      > You remind me of the guy on Mr. Show that wore a scarf in
      > summer and complained that wax cylinders were the only true
      > way to appreciate recorded music.

      Slow-witted guy eating donut: "You wanna watch the new Star Wars movie?"

      Guy wearing scarf: "Oh, puh-lease! The new Star Wars movies blow! People were not meant to see movies with good special effects. People need to see strings, rubber suits, and that shit."

      Digs out worn VHS copy of the original Star Wars movie.

      "What is that?"

      "This, my friend, is the only version of Star Wars I will touch," he says while lovingly stroking the VHS tape.

      "Is it the THX remastered version?"

      "No! I just -- it's the original Star Wars movie on VHS. It allows me to watch the only decent movie ever committed to celluloid."

      "Celluloid?"

      "Yessss!"

      "Does it have computer effects?"

      "Jesus! Just watch. It's so pure it hurts ..."

      Screen zooms in to a rubber suited alien flopping around a dingy sound stage threatening a young Harrison Ford. A man in a metal robot suit starts prat-falling on the scene.

      The fact is, the new Star Wars movies are just as good as the old ones. Complainers were just 20 years younger when they saw the originals.

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    7. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

      there were rumors floating about in regards to changes Lucas was supposedly making for the DVD edition. I guess we'll have to wait and see if it actually happens.

      Greedo and Han aim at and shoot Jar Jar Binks, Greedo hit due to misfire.

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    8. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're that guy that really likes Ted Turner style colored-in movies, right?

      Or are you the guy that prefers the US version of Brazil, with incidental heavy-metal music and a happy ending?

      Naah! I know! You're the guy that likes Winnie the Pooh hanging ten on Waikiki beach and Bugs Bunny has to slam-dunk with Michael Jordan to be funny.

      You see, there is a difference between being stuck in the past and appreciating a decent original. Just because the vandalism was perpetrated by Lucas himself, doesn't make it any more palatable. He's legally within his rights to mess up his own work, but it's sad nonetheless.

    9. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by double-oh+three · · Score: 2, Funny

      Return of the Jedi: 13. We see more planets celebrating at the end of the movie. We see an aged Jar Jar, who is now the leader of the Gungans, on Naboo celebrating with the people of Naboo and the Gungans. We see an old Watto, who is now unable to fly, sitting in a hover chair cheering on Tatooine. During these scenes Across the Stars plays transitioning to the victory celebration music at the Ewok tree village.

      They want to add in Jar Jar...

      Well... There goes all that was pure and good about those movies.

      --
      "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
    10. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greedo did not shoot first.

      I'm pretty sure Lucas is the authority on that, not some random asshat on Slashdot. Like it or not, it says "George Lucas" in the credits, not "Todd".

    11. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could, I dont know, buy a bootleg set of the original series.

    12. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by signe · · Score: 1

      Ah, you are so perceptive. From a statement that I wouldn't purchase a product that I don't like, and my reason as to why, you have gleaned so much insight into my life. You must know all about my room which is wallpapered with a frame-by-frame detailing of each of the scenes, with the changes lovingly noted. And of course you must have found my website, greedodidnotshootfirst.com, where I have written dozens of articles, and three theses on why the remastered movies should not exist in a sane world. But did you read about my theory that Lucas is an alien sent to frighten and confuse us? I have proof!

      Perhaps you should take your own words to heart.

      -Todd

      --
      "The details of my life are quite inconsequential..."
    13. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by jcoleman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh, if only I could mod this up. :) David Cross is a comedy genius.

      It's not like Lucas went back to your childhood and stole your teddy bear, people! I don't think Greedo should have shot first, and I agree with leaving Han's character as a rogue who did what he had to to stay alive. But damn, get over it already.

      It's HIS movie, he can do as HE pleases with it. He is not screwing you. He is not raping your childhood. He is not having sex with your mother while you watch, helplessly duct-taped to a chair.

      Stories evolve, folks. You just happened to see the rough drafts.

    14. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by signe · · Score: 1

      Then I won't get it. We have the VHS set of the originals. I'll just be forced to burn them to DVD.

      -Todd

      --
      "The details of my life are quite inconsequential..."
    15. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by TheWickedKingJeremy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's HIS movie, he can do as HE pleases with it. He is not screwing you. He is not raping your childhood. He is not having sex with your mother while you watch, helplessly duct-taped to a chair.

      Did I miss something? I believe the parent poster simply stated that he probably won't be buying the revised DVDs...

      --

      my religion lies somewhere between buddhism and super monkey ball - pamphlet?
    16. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by gosand · · Score: 1
      You're that guy that really likes Ted Turner style colored-in movies, right? Or are you the guy that prefers the US version of Brazil, with incidental heavy-metal music and a happy ending? Naah! I know! You're the guy that likes Winnie the Pooh hanging ten on Waikiki beach and Bugs Bunny has to slam-dunk with Michael Jordan to be funny.

      Let's not forget one of the worst remakes, La Femme Nikita, with Brigette Fonda instead of the original French version, which is 10x better.

      Hey, I understand Lucas may want to release his half-assed versions of the film, but he should still release the originals. You can't expect a movie with such a huge fanbase, which MADE Lucas who he is, to not have emotions about it. Lucas owes his fame to these people. And yet, they aren't asking for anything outrageous, just simply the original movie that they love.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    17. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by signe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, as is noted on that page, it sounds like more of a wish list than something that was leaked from ILM or the Ranch. If it ends up being accurate, I might consider the DVDs. But I'm not holding my breath.

      Frankly, Lucas and his people know what bothers so many fans, with regards to the remastered trilogy. I can't believe that they're so oblivious that they don't know by now. So if they really were going to change the Cantina scene back, don't you think they'd let people know, or at least drop large hints, in order to raise the hype around the DVD release more?

      -Todd

      --
      "The details of my life are quite inconsequential..."
    18. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by jcoleman · · Score: 1

      I was going for humor...guess I missed. :) In any case I was trying to sum up all the arguments for not buying.

    19. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by sg3000 · · Score: 1

      > Did I miss something? I believe the parent poster simply
      > stated that he probably won't be buying the revised DVDs

      If I'm the parent poster, then let me clarify: I'm buying the revised DVDs. And if the original trilogy was for sale, I wouldn't buy it instead since I prefer the digitally re-mastered movies.

      Although I liked the movies, I used to dismiss Episodes IV-VI as just "space westerns", but now that I've seen Episodes I and II, I think that the Star Wars movies are actually quite good. Palpatine came up with an amazingly complex plan to dissolve the Republic. Anakin's story is one of a good person becoming terribly bad, but ultimately redeeming himself. I even think C3PO in Episodes IV-VI is more annoying that Jar Jar Binks in Episode I.

      Then again, I'd hate to give an opinion that dissents from the score of slashdot posters who screech, "OH! OH! JUPITER'S THUNDER! GREEDO DID NOT SHOOT FIRST! THE NEW STAR WARS MOVIES ARE THE MOST CRIMINAL OF GARBAGES! IT IT IT IS A CRUTCH! THE RE-MASTERED MOVIES WILL NEVER SULLY MY EYES!"

      (Hey, I got to sneak in another reference to the Mr. Show character from his brief reprise in Season 3!)

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    20. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by jcoleman · · Score: 1

      Point taken...it's still fun to be on the other side of the argument, though. Mod this up funny. :)

    21. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by Khomar · · Score: 1

      I have "gotten over it" myself. So over it, in fact, that I do not plan on even watching the first three movies (episodes IV-VI) ever again (and certainly not the third episode). I have come to the conclusion that there is more than enough good movies out there that I don't need to waste my time with Lucas anymore. Call it being ornery or being a smarter consumer... I don't know... but I don't care if I have anything else to do with the franchise -- past or future.

      --

      I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

    22. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by jcoleman · · Score: 1

      You're that guy that really likes Ted Turner style colored-in movies, right?

      Colorized movies were generally not colorized by the original filmmakers, and arguments can be made that people who wouldn't watch "old movies" because they are in black and white would be drawn to fantastic films that they otherwise would not have appreciated.

      Or are you the guy that prefers the US version of Brazil, with incidental heavy-metal music and a happy ending?

      Also, I believe that Terry Gilliam is a genius (I'm a big Python fan too) and I've not actually seen the US version of Brazil, it not being the director's vision.

      I think you have just made two poor analogies. I agree that it's sad that Lucas feels he has to make changes to his original films (and realtively poor changes at that; Jabba looks like shit in SW). At least he left the kiss in ESB. :)

      I'll still see the shit out of them when they are released. (Mr. Reference number 4, for those of you scoring at home)

    23. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Maybe one day we might just see a 'Star Wars Classic edition' - marketing for the edition that everyone wants. But then again we're more likely to see pink elephants and flying pigs.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    24. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by Bullseye_blam · · Score: 1

      Greedo did not shoot first.

      Wow, I actually had no idea what this was referring to... so of course I google'd, and found the whole sordid story.

      From a fan site:

      George Lucas thought the scene between Han Solo and Greedo in the cantina made Han cold blooded. Let's think about the original scene, shall we? Greedo the bounty hunter is holding Han at gunpoint and says in his gurgly argot that he is going to kill him. Han shoots Greedo through the table before Greedo can blow Han a new smuggling hatch. That's makes Han cool-- not cold.

      I didn't have a clue that was ever the case (hey, I was young when I watched both versions! heh). This really does astound me, though. Lucas is a goddamned moron, and really has no clue how to make a compelling story anymore. So sad.

    25. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by Scrameustache · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The fact is, the new Star Wars movies are just as good as the old ones. Complainers were just 20 years younger when they saw the originals.

      Nope, I worked in a day camp in 2000, one of the kids asked why guys my age loved Star Wars so much, he'd seen episode 1 and didn't see what all the fuss was about: Its not that good he said.

      I explained he was right, episode 1 isn't that good, and the reason guys my age loved Star Wars so much was that the original were
      1. Much better than the prequels
      2. released in an age when SW had the best SFX ever seen, it was revolutionary. Episode 1 had SFX that were pretty much the same as every other movie released in the 90's. Jurassik Park gave the SFX push that A New Hope had given (go rent Logan's Run to compare SFXs).

      And that was a 10yr old, exactly the target audience for a kid-friendly poop-joke infested flick like Ep1.

      Its not just the rose-tainted glasses of nostalgia. Lucas lost it.
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    26. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does Lucas think we CARE about any of the "new characters" introduced in the prequels? I won't even comment on Jar Jar, but who cares about Watto? Was he an endearing character? Heck no. There are NO endearing characters outside of Darth Maul and Jango Fett (maybe) in the new series. Even Count Dookula sucks as a Sith Lord, with none of the "cool" of Maul or Vader.

    27. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by TheWickedKingJeremy · · Score: 1

      Sorry I was not more specific - I was referring to this post.

      The only reason I said anything was because this post simply stated that he didnt consider the new, revised DVDs a "must have" because he preferred the original versions of the films (as most people do). Just thought it was funny that some of the child posts were saying people were spazzing out about it, saying things like "Lucas is raping my childhood" - when in fact the parent post was simple, reasonable statement. Just didn't know why you guys were saying those things, thats all. Maybe it was more a response of a million other fanboys or something; surely it wasn't derived from this thread.

      Ok, enough about Star Wars... :)

      --

      my religion lies somewhere between buddhism and super monkey ball - pamphlet?
    28. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by Frostalicious · · Score: 1

      The fact is, the new Star Wars movies are just as good as the old ones. Complainers were just 20 years younger when they saw the originals.

      I saw the originals last week, they rock. The final showdown between Luke, the Emperor and Vader is among the best scenes EVER. There were lineups in 1997 for the re-releases. 20 years from now, no one is going to line up for the crappy prequels.

    29. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by frenchgates · · Score: 1

      Just the usual flammable interface between "Lucas retroactively ruined what I originally loved about SW" (my opinion) and "Get over it, the new ones are just as good."

      Nothing to see here.

      --
      Syntax error: loose != lose, affect != effect, then!=than
    30. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take that you filthy Lucas apologists! All your illusions smashed by the opinions of a single 10 year-old!

    31. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      I agree with you on calling BS for all the "victims" of Lucas... but calling the movie released 20 years ago a draft is stretching credibility.

      It was the finished product, so far as he could do, at the time. I code better now than I did 5 years ago, and I might revise some old production code, but I can't truthfully claim that I was "never finished".

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    32. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by PinkStainlessTail · · Score: 1

      Actually it's worse: in the version coming to DVD Greedo shoots first, kills Han, and takes over his role for the rest of the series.

      --
      "Slashdot is about legos and staplers." -Cmdr. Taco
    33. Re:Yes, but it's not really the original by Monster+Zero · · Score: 1
      He screwed with the memories from my childhood. Being born in 1977 means that Star Wars was always around, and having watched the trilogy upteen times while growing up means I have a lot of memories tied to the films as they were originally released. Changing the films as I entered my 20th year just seems to piss all over my enjoyment, it makes no difference if its what he originally intended or not, they are not the same experience for me. As other posts have already noted, he should release all of the versions on the DVD's and let the viewers decide which they want to watch.

      Also, changing the films wouldn't have been a big deal if the additions didn't suck so bad. Greedo shooting first, the planet exploding in a ring, extra CGI just chopped into scenes. None of his additions added to the originals, few were within the framework of the characters or universe, as originally presented. It does not matter if they matched what Lucas had in his mind originally. As the movies gained a following the ideas of the characters and style was established, changing things now is just a fruitless endeavor.

      He is raping my childhood, but it just happens it's in a meaningless little way.

  11. mmm..... by freerecords · · Score: 5, Funny

    these are not the dvds you are looking for...

    --
    tim
    1. Re:mmm..... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 5, Funny

      Screw Star Wars quotes! My personal fav from the sci fi genre:

      Dark Helmet: Who made that man a gunner?

      Maj. Asshole: I did, sir. He's my cousin.

      Dark Helmet: Who is he?

      Col. Sandurz: He's an Asshole, sir.

      Dark Helmet: I know that. What's his name?

      Col. Sandurz: That is his name, sir. Asshole, Major Asshole.

      Dark Helmet: And his cousin?

      Col. Sandurz: He's an Asshole too, sir. Gunner's Mate, First Class, Philip Asshole.

      Dark Helmet: How many Assholes we got on this ship, any how?

      Everyone: Yo!

      Dark Helmet: I knew it. I'm surrounded by Assholes. Keep firing, Assholes!

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    2. Re:mmm..... by Noofus · · Score: 1

      I wish I had a mod point for you! Star Wars has to be my favorite story of all time (well, ep 4-6). But the only thing that can make it better, is a downright excellent parody of it!

      Mel Brooks is a genious :) (and yes I have Space Balls on DVD...and it HASNT BEEN EDITED)

    3. Re:mmm..... by neko9 · · Score: 1

      you forgot to wave hand!

    4. Re:mmm..... by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      Lucas has gone from suck to blow!

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  12. Cliche by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 0, Redundant

    These are not the discs you're looking for :D

    --
    This is the sig that says NI (again)
  13. I'm not buying. by rbolkey · · Score: 1

    Of course, the big question mark amongst fans has always been whether Lucas would allow the original, unaltered original editions of the trilogy to also be released on DVD. Not possible, said Ward, who confirmed that the upcoming set will feature only the 1997 Special Edition versions of each film. "What George did in 1997," Ward explains, "was [to] make the movie he originally wanted to make."

    Oh well, Lucas can count me out.

    1. Re:I'm not buying. by Chiron+Taltos · · Score: 1
      "What George did in 1997," Ward explains, "was [to] make the movie he originally wanted to make."

      He originally wanted to make crap?!?!

      I never thought I'd thank the '70s for anything ... but thank you, '70s, for holding back Mr. Lucas!

      Damn the '90s!!!

      --
      CT

  14. Gods Must Be Crazy by ubiquitin · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    StarWarsSchmarWars, the big news is that
    The Gods Must Be Crazy - both I and II is in DVD as of today. Those movies are just alltime classics.

    --
    http://tinyurl.com/4ny52
    1. Re:Gods Must Be Crazy by SpudB0y · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I thought for a second that this might be a good movie to enjoy with my son, but then I realized that he has probably never seen a glass coke bottle either. Sort of ruins the joke.

    2. Re:Gods Must Be Crazy by Spacejock · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hell of a product placement, that was.

      By the way, my local deli now has coke in glass bottles again. (Western Australia).

    3. Re:Gods Must Be Crazy by ubiquitin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you've seen the movie, you may recall the truck up the tree? I aye I aye I aye I

      The humor in "the Gods" movies is for all ages, really. It was so popular in Kansas City when the first movie came out that it ran continuously in a small private theater for over a full year. This is some of the best independent filmmaking ever. Ever.

      --
      http://tinyurl.com/4ny52
    4. Re:Gods Must Be Crazy by Scrameustache · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I won't buy the "Han is a pussy and look! Dinosaures!" Star Wars DVDs and I won't buy "The Gods Must Be Crazy - both I and II" because it does not include both official languages of region 1.
      Region 1 is U.S. and Canada, Canada has 2 official languages, these movies were realeased in cinemas at the same time in Canada in both French and English, there is no reason not to onclude the french track on there. It is an insult not to include it. It doesn't cost more, and there is plenty of room on the 2 disc set to include the extra language.
      Ideally, the unofficial 3rd language of region 1 (spanish) would also be included.

      DVD Encoding: Region 1
      Available Audio Tracks: English (Dolby Digital 2.0 Mono)

      Screw that.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    5. Re:Gods Must Be Crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it really though? Is the type of bottle really that important here? Has he ever seen a bottle of any type? You sir, are an asshat.

    6. Re:Gods Must Be Crazy by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      I won't buy the "Han is a pussy and look! Dinosaures!" Star Wars DVDs and I won't buy "The Gods Must Be Crazy - both I and II" because it does not include both official languages of region 1.

      Are they intended for Canadian release?

      I live in region 2. Region 2 includes Japan. Should I refuse to buy any region 2 DVD that doesn't include Japanese dialogue? No, because it wasn't intended for Japan.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    7. Re:Gods Must Be Crazy by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Are they intended for Canadian release?

      Product Details

      * Starring: N!xau, See more
      * Director: Jamie Uys
      * Encoding: Region 1 (U.S. and Canada only. This DVD will probably NOT be viewable in other countries. Read more about DVD formats.)

      I live in region 2. Region 2 includes Japan.

      And Japan is NTSC while the rest of region 2 is PAL.

      Movies, records, DVDs, are all released simultaneously in the U.S. and Canada. Same encoding, same standards, same release dates, similar pricing, same ad campaigns.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    8. Re:Gods Must Be Crazy by Highlander · · Score: 1

      I find it amusing that you deem spanish as the unofficial 3rd language, implying that English is the US's official language, when, as far as I know, the US has no official languages whatsoever.

      I do however agree that spanish would be the next most prevalent language.

      H

    9. Re:Gods Must Be Crazy by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      implying that English is the US's official language, when, as far as I know, the US has no official languages whatsoever.

      Implying nothing. English is one of the 2 official languages of Canada.
      I said "of region 1", not "of the U.S.".

      I do however agree that spanish would be the next most prevalent language.

      There are movements of people in the south of the states that are trying to make English the official language to combat the rise of spanish down there, btw.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  15. what's the difference? by junkymailbox · · Score: 1

    as someone who doesnt remember much of star wars .. what's the difference

    1. Re:what's the difference? by GrenDel+Fuego · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Mostly added scenes and unnecessary special effects.

      "Hey, we can do computer generated graphics... let's add some big creatures in the background"

      There is one scene with a computer generated Jabba the Hutt that is just awful.

    2. Re:what's the difference? by somethinghollow · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not to mention all the guns were replaced with flashlights...

    3. Re:what's the difference? by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Informative

      Some superflous new scenes added, like computer generated spaceships flying around. More computer generated aliens in the background.

      In the first film, they took some cutting-room floor footage of Han talking to Jabba as he's preparing to take off in the Millenium Falcon. (I thought I read somewhere that Marlon Brando was actually playing Jabba in that scene). Anyways, they put in a computer generated Jabba walking alongside Han, and it looks pretty cheesy to me.

      I hate overused computer animation. I think it looks out of place and fake, and the world of Star Wars was much more believable made out of foam rubber costumes and cheesy props.

      The big one that gets all the geeks riled up is they changed the Cantina scene, so that Jabba's bounty hunter shoots at Han, and he kills him in 'self defense'. In the original, Han just shoots him under the table and gets up and leaves.

      It effectively changes Han's character from an outlaw who cares only about himself, to some sort of good guy who found himself in trouble.

      I haven't seen the special edition versions of the other two movies.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:what's the difference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was ET 20th aniversary edition you monkey.

      Bad monkey sit in the corner

    5. Re:what's the difference? by Zathrus · · Score: 2, Informative

      And, of course, anybody who will actually bother looking at the E.T. 20th Anniversary DVD will note that both the original, unaltered 1983 and the "enhanced" 2003 vesions are sold in the very same package.

      I think the alteration in question (guns -> flashlights) is absurd as well, but talk about making a mountain out of a molehill.

    6. Re:what's the difference? by arb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The big one that gets all the geeks riled up is they changed the Cantina scene, so that Jabba's bounty hunter shoots at Han, and he kills him in 'self defense'. In the original, Han just shoots him under the table and gets up and leaves.

      It effectively changes Han's character from an outlaw who cares only about himself, to some sort of good guy who found himself in trouble.


      Add to that the fact that the added effects shot was so poorly done that I still cringe just thinking of it. Greedo is sitting two feet away from Han with his blaster aimed squarely at him, yet somehow misses by a mile?

      The rest of the Special Editions are not too bad though.

      I'll still be getting it on DVD - I have the original Original Trilogy on VHS, as well as the Special Editions of the Original Trilogy, so like a true fan-boy I'll fork out for the DVDs...

    7. Re:what's the difference? by tuffy · · Score: 3, Informative
      The rest of the Special Editions are not too bad though.

      I could do without Luke screaming as he's falling from the platform in "Empire", though. It's completely pointless and out of character. Except for the two Han scenes in the original, that's the third most irksome thing about Lucas' "adjustments".

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    8. Re:what's the difference? by arb · · Score: 1

      And, of course, anybody who will actually bother looking at the E.T. 20th Anniversary DVD will note that both the original, unaltered 1983 and the "enhanced" 2003 vesions are sold in the very same package.

      Are you sure? I seem to recall only having the "enhanced" version on my copy of the DVD... Just checked and there are two versions - the "Enhanced" version and "Enhanced with live John Williams performace". No original ET on my 20th Anniversary DVD. 8-/

      I think the alteration in question (guns -> flashlights) is absurd as well, but talk about making a mountain out of a molehill.

      It's only if you know the change had been made and look out for it that it becomes noticeable. To me it was not such a major thing.

    9. Re:what's the difference? by arb · · Score: 1

      But at least he left the Stormtrooper banging his head on the door and he completely missed Leia's blaster which still sounds like a 45 at one point in ANH.

    10. Re:what's the difference? by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 5, Informative

      Plus, in the starport Jabba's moving around, and has all these expressions, just like a lame-ass cartoon. It contrasts terribly with the stationary, smug, heartless Jabba we know and love from his palace and on his yacht in the Sarlacc Pit scene.

      In the first film, they took some cutting-room floor footage of Han talking to Jabba as he's preparing to take off in the Millenium Falcon.

      Want to hate that scene even more?

      Notice the part where Han circles Jabba while proposing a deal. Originally, that was fine since Jabba was a fat guy who looked like the rancor handler. But now that they were pasting a big slug with a long tail over the guy, Han couldn't really walk around hom anymore. Unadjusted, Han would be walking right through the animation.

      Their solution? Make it look like Han is stepping on Jabba's tail by cutting him from the background and moving him up a bit then down a bit as he circles Jabba. They even make Jabba comically cringe when Han "steps" on his tail. This looks about as real as when a kid bounces a doll along the ground to make it "walk".

    11. Re:what's the difference? by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Shrug, the DVD box I purchased has two DVDs in it -- the original 1983 version and the "enhanced" 2003 version. Said so very clearly on the outside of the box or I never would've bought it -- not because it's such a massive change, but because it was an unnecessary change.

    12. Re:what's the difference? by arb · · Score: 1

      Bugger - must be another difference between R3 and R1. We got two discs, but one is the movie (with original and live soundtracks) and the other is special features...

    13. Re:what's the difference? by dar · · Score: 2, Informative

      That was humor you twit.

      --
      My other Slashdot ID is much lower.
    14. Re:what's the difference? by arb · · Score: 1

      must be another difference between R3 and R1

      Ugh - make that "R4 and R1."

      (Gotta remember to Preview first...)

    15. Re:what's the difference? by Radius9 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nitpicky, I know, but it was one of my favorite lines in Empire. Right after Luke jumps/falls off the platform, Vader turns around and as he passes one of the Empire's goons, he snaps "Prepare my ship.". I always liked that line because he sounds so angry when he says it. And in the Special Editions, they changed the line. I don't know why, but they did. Pisses me off every time I see it. I don't care nearly as much about the other scenes, but I always liked that line.

    16. Re:what's the difference? by Viking+Coder · · Score: 1

      If you're going to fix ANYTHING in the trilogy, fix Ben's lightsaber, in his duel with Vader!

      And they didn't fix that!!! Argh!

      --
      Education is the silver bullet.
    17. Re:what's the difference? by arb · · Score: 1

      That's the thing that got me with the changes in the SE - so many little mistakes in the films were left unchanged, but scenes that already worked were turned upside down. Oh well, they're Georgie's babies and we still paid to see them and bought the videos and will buy the DVDs...

    18. Re:what's the difference? by Clock+Nova · · Score: 2, Informative

      The line was "Bring my shuttle." He says it in such a way that you can really feel his frustration. The new lines show no emotion, and give no insight into his character. They were just a way to introduce a new scene.

      --
      There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
    19. Re:what's the difference? by Earlybird · · Score: 5, Informative

      IMDb's "alternate versions" section is your friend: Star Wars, The Empire Strikes Back, Return of the Jedi.

    20. Re:what's the difference? by Viking+Coder · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, but we'll complain about it in top Comic Book Guy form!

      Worst. Special Editions. Ever.

      I only bought four copies.

      Feh.

      --
      Education is the silver bullet.
    21. Re:what's the difference? by Golias · · Score: 1
      Bah. I said more than two years ago that the originals, as released, were the only versions I would ever be interested in buying, and that remains the case. The explosion of the Death Star in Star Wars was a major moment in film special effects history, and Lucas chose to paint over it with crappy CGI.

      It will be LD rips only for my DVD player unless the non-SE versions are released somehow.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    22. Re:what's the difference? by cynical+kane · · Score: 0

      I love the "informative" mod right there.

    23. Re:what's the difference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you replace guns with humor?

    24. Re:what's the difference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And also walking on the tail would be the equivalent of yanking Tony Soprano's tie while he was yelling at you for screwing up a delivery... It's a wonder Jabba didn't kill Han right then and there.

    25. Re:what's the difference? by mlush · · Score: 3, Funny
      Why would you replace guns with humor?

      Its more effective than harsh language

    26. Re:what's the difference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yeah, now it's "alert my Star Destroyer to prepare for my arrival" I think. I'm guessing they changed it because they thought people would be too stupid to figure out how Darth Vader got to the Star Destroyer. Because apparently, we are all to stupid to figure that one out. This change is almost as dumb as Han shooting first in my opinion, but more subtle.

    27. Re:what's the difference? by wwest4 · · Score: 4, Funny


      (I thought I read somewhere that Marlon Brando was actually playing Jabba in that scene


      Common misconception. Marlon Brando was actually Jabba in Return of the Jedi. A lot of people think it's a big puppet, but it's just Brando naked.

    28. Re:what's the difference? by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      And also walking on the tail would be the equivalent of yanking Tony Soprano's tie while he was yelling at you for screwing up a delivery... It's a wonder Jabba didn't kill Han right then and there.


      lol! Yeah Han wasn't exactly in a good bargaining position at that moment...

      So this enhanced version is "the movie Lucas really wanted to make". What, was the original too good?

    29. Re:what's the difference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's several categories of differences: horrific monstrosities, harmless but unneccessary additions, and F/X cleanups.

      In the first category, we've got Greedo shooting first, Jabba hanging out in the hangar and getting stepped on, Luke screaming as he falls in Cloud City (as if he slipped and fell instead of jumped), and the godawful music video in Jabba's palace.

      In the second category, we have lots of weird wacky monsters wiggling all over the place, "modernized" explosions everywhere, and the snow creature chewing on a rack of lamb.

      In the last category, we have minor cleanups around spaceships in space scenes (no "black boxes"), and incredibly, NO cleanup of the scene most needing it--the Rancor Monster. Also, some sound improvements.

      In summary, they really are very different. The special editions look and sound a little nicer, but the originals are actually better films. Get the laserdisk version on DVD. There are good versions out there.

    30. Re:what's the difference? by PixelSlut · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I won't buy the DVDs, because I personally think Star Wars sucks now. Partly because of the Special Edition, and partly just because now that I'm older I realize that they just weren't good movies to begin with. When I was a kid, I didn't know anything about acting or cinematography or anything, and I liked them. The only thing those movies had going for them was the nostalgia from childhood, and George ruined that.

      If George had fixed minor flaws in the movie, that doesn't ruin the effect. But all this CG stuff looks so out of place in these old 70s/80s films. It definitely changes the feel of the movie.

      The sad thing is that everyone will go out there and buy the DVDs, even though it seems like everyone hates the Special Edition. Bitching about how they suck is obviously not a clear message to Lucas. The only way to get the message through to them is to not buy the movies.

    31. Re:what's the difference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't Marlon Brando. It was just some other fat hairy guy.

    32. Re:what's the difference? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      I know they considered Brando for the part, or he read for it, or Jabba was modelled after the Godfather, or some shit..

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    33. Re:what's the difference? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not to mention all the guns were replaced with flashlights...

      And Leia's suddenly wearing an iPod.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    34. Re:what's the difference? by Savatte · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the added scenes also messed up the flow of the movie, because certain scenes were edited so things happen on specific musical cues, but with new footage added, the synchronization is all off. It's not just the visuals that were messed with.

    35. Re:what's the difference? by Aidtopia · · Score: 1

      What bugs me is the stuff they didn't fix. In Empire, when Han is about to be frozen in carbonite, his jacket keeps vanishing and reappearing--a neat trick given that he's handcuffed. I find it the most distracting continuity error in all of film history. Why couldn't they fix that?

      I'll stick with my 12 CAV laser disc edition.

    36. Re:what's the difference? by Libertarian001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hate to burst your bubble here, but not everybody hates the SE. I liked most of the extras. The only thing I didn't like was the cantina shot. But that's not going to ruin my nostalgia trip.

      BTW, I lived in Marin County when the SW movies were originally released and I remember seeing all of them and liking all of them, so I do have something to compare the SE to.

      Acting? Cinematography? Sorry, but who the heck cares? The difference between us is that I go to a movie to be entertained for 2 hours, not to find a new philosophy in life. Is the SE perfect? No, but it's not the end of the world and I'm certainly not going to throw a temper tantrum because of the addition of a few scenes that in no way affect the story (except the cantina scene).

    37. Re:what's the difference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be happy with my original versions on VHS, except they all have an interview with George Lucas at the FRONT of the tape. Grr. I want to watch a movie, why on earth would I want to watch an interview with the director first? Why would I want to watch an interview with the director at all?

    38. Re:what's the difference? by bludstone · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Er. Pardon my fanboyism.. but during starwars:a new hope, jabba wasnt NEARLY as big of a gangster he was in the later movies.. he was still getting his whole big shebang together. He was still mobile.. eventually, hes too chubb to even move. Plus, he wasnt on such bad terms with Han at the time.

      I also agree that this scene just didnt work.

      (all of this negated by starwars ep1)

      --

      no .sig
    39. Re:what's the difference? by BiggerBoat · · Score: 1

      I don't much like overused or gratuitous computer effects either. But about your "foam rubber costumes and cheesy props" comment, I think it was an improvement in the Episode IV Special Edition to remove those ridiculous, "straight-off-the-shelf-halloween-mask-looking" aliens in the cantina. The purist side of me would still like to have access to the original version, but I didn't miss those badly dated aliens at all.

    40. Re:what's the difference? by sirshannon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He was on bad enough terms to have sent Greedo (and possibly other underlings/bounty hunters) after him. ANY crime boss would have reacted violently after being stepped on by a (now, thanks to Lucas' horrid remix of the movie) "nice guy" like Han who dropped a load of contraband and owed him money.

    41. Re:what's the difference? by kill+-9+$$ · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Lets not forget about the changes to the end of Jedi. Personally, I liked the original tribal song, not the latin symphony that apparently replaced it.

      All, in all the new scenes were a waste of time. Its sad that Lucas is such an arrogant that he refuses to put the originals out on DVD. I was actually hoping he'd do something similar that my T2 DVD does, watch the original, or watch the expanded version...

      Oh well, I'm on the fence on whether I'll get these or not. I'm actually pretty sick of the whole Star Wars brand at this point which is sad, cause I was one of the die-hards originally. (guess I wasn't die-hard enough)

      --

      -- A computer without COBOL and Fortran is like a piece of chocolate cake without ketchup and mustard
    42. Re:what's the difference? by Iscariot_ · · Score: 1

      What's more anoying is that they didn't even get James E. Jones to do the voice. They got the guy that did the voice from Rebel Assault 2.

    43. Re:what's the difference? by ryen · · Score: 0

      also, in Empire Strikes Back, when Luke is fighting Darth on the tower and after Darth swipes off part of his arm with the light saber, Luke is hanging on to the bridge with the other arm. Darth reaches out with "join me, blah blah blah.." and Luke decides to fall instead.

      At this point I believe Lucas chose to add an annoying scream to the fall in the special edition (which didn't even sound like look but I guess that makes sense since it was done 20+ years later). Why did they want Luke to scream? Didn't he choose to fall off himself? It was pretty cheesy to say the least.

      All this and more in the "Special Edition"

      Lucas has found a way to mangle and destroy a great trilogy. I just hope the next generation of kids aren't subjected to this "Special Edition" crap and go watch the originals.
      Not to mention the cinematic filth that was Episodes I & II.

    44. Re:what's the difference? by MCZapf · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I noticed this too. John Williams did an excellent job composing the music for the films, tailoring it to match the action perfectly, and Lucas just chops it all up. One insertion I rather dislike is the shot of Vader's shuttle returning to the command ship from the Cloud City in Empire Stikes Back. It ruins the flow of my favorite "Escape from Cloud City" theme, because they had to insert a generic Imperial March clip to fill the extra time. Grrr.

    45. Re:what's the difference? by dfj225 · · Score: 1

      "I personally think Star Wars sucks now. Partly because of the Special Edition..."

      I like the original versions as well, but a couple of changed scenes doesn't create enough hate for me to hate the entire movie. After all, to me SW isn't about the effects or the alien costumes or even the cinematography, but its the story. What other movie can take you half-way around the galaxy, in a universe so large and interesting that people still create books today based off of what Lucas started? Episodes I and II are looked down upon because of the story, otherwise they are much better in the effects and cinematography areas.

      --
      SIGFAULT
    46. Re:what's the difference? by Bonewalker · · Score: 1
      The only thing those movies had going for them was the nostalgia from childhood, and George ruined that.

      That's BS. The originals had great chemistry between the characters. That is what made the movies so great. Han and Leia going at it...Luke and Han arguing...Obi Wan mentoring Luke...even just the right amount of R2 and C3PO arguing, not over done or trying to hard like they are in the prequels.

      They still stand the test of time, regardless of the newer movies.

    47. Re:what's the difference? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Hokey, unrealistic explosion of death star in the new version.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    48. Re:what's the difference? by glenrm · · Score: 1

      This is great. I was always upset at buying the original VHS tapes and then seeing the special edition come out later, but now I feel vindicated. But I just can't bring myself to watch VHS anymore time to Rip. Mix. Burn.

    49. Re:what's the difference? by 0divide · · Score: 1

      The special edition of "Empire" is actually, for me, the least intrusive and the "best" of all of 'em. Very subtle changes, mostly in Bespin, and the improvements to the hoth battle sequences are welcome (you used to be able to see right through the speeders).

      The newer "Jedi" one has the biggest changes, mostly at the end, with footage of other planets celebrating the fall of the Empire and a new song at the end. The beginning part of the movie (the best part, methinks) is fairly unchanged.

      --
      ---mike
    50. Re:what's the difference? by dmancine · · Score: 1
      In the first film, they took some cutting-room floor footage of Han talking to Jabba as he's preparing to take off in the Millenium Falcon. (I thought I read somewhere that Marlon Brando was actually playing Jabba in that scene). Anyways, they put in a computer generated Jabba walking alongside Han, and it looks pretty cheesy to me.

      It's not Marlon Brando. It's a big Scottish guy dressed in some furs, and he speaks English (not Huttese). They show a large portion of the original version of the scene in the documentary "From Star Wars to Jedi: the Making of a Saga". I could never find a copy of it for sale; luckily, I taped it off HBO about 20 years ago, and I still have it.

      I think the original version of the scene was pretty good. It worked. You just have to ignore the issue of Jabba being human in one movie, and a Hutt in another. Certainly, I'm more apt to accept that then a bunch of unnecessary CG garbage.

      An interesting thing that Lucas says in that documentary is, in regards to it taking 3 months just to construct Jabba's sail barge set, "A story isn't a setting. A story is a story," (or something close to that). I wish he'd remember that he said that, and maybe use that philosophy on his current projects. Fewer animators, better writers.

    51. Re:what's the difference? by fpp · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nope. It was James Earl Jones.

      http://www.starwars.com/community/askjc/ben/askj c2 0030410.html

    52. Re:what's the difference? by smoke_tetsu · · Score: 1

      I don't know who that guy was that I saw in the actual scene playing Jabba but it definetly WASN'T Marlon Brando. You can see the footage in a special right before the VHS version of special edition episode IV. They talk like Lucas had this great vision of replacing the actor with the final Jabba all along but I don't buy it. If he did, he wouldn't have let him be designed to be so big in episode VI knowing that he was small in episode IV.

    53. Re:what's the difference? by mfrank · · Score: 1

      The nice thing about added scenes like that is you can rip the DVD to hard drive and edit them out :).

      Since Lucas won't sell me the version I saw when I was thirteen, I guess I'll just have to make it myself.

    54. Re:what's the difference? by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      The scene with the CG jabba was terrible because it was done over a scene with a live actor. I cant find any pictures, i have seen them somewhere though, but originally jabba was just a fat guy. They cut the scene in the original and were able to make jabba a non-humanoid in Jedi.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    55. Re:what's the difference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So LucasFilm really are incompetent. On the special edition changes in Empire:

      Lucasfilm officials have stated that they didn't realize the dialogue was any different until the film was released. This also accounts for some of the other minor dialogue changes in the SEs.

      They released the SE's without even realising that they had changed the dialog? They must have been asleep at the wheel to not realise that.

    56. Re:what's the difference? by bludstone · · Score: 1

      But han shot first, remember? Greedo was just sent to GET han. Han replied by shooting the messanger. Badass. At least, thats the argument.

      --

      no .sig
    57. Re:what's the difference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that's true. However, Jabba played Marlon Brando (uncredited) at the end of Apocalypse Now.

    58. Re:what's the difference? by sirshannon · · Score: 1

      You're confusing the 2 vesions. The stuff you mention above is true in the real version but we are talking about the lame-ass version where Greedo shot first and Han is a nice guy in a bad situation.

    59. Re:what's the difference? by HexiaDeTrix · · Score: 1

      I completely lost interest in StarWars after the special editions for all of the above reasons, but the one scene i really remember is the scene where Luke kisses Leia, it shows the spawn of the competition between Luke and HanSolo, but it was edited out because it is not kosher because Luke and Leia are brother and sister, thereby loosing a lot of the incitament for the relationship between Luke and HanSolo, this make the first film crap IMHO. F$CK Lukas for ruining a completely good movie, and i wont buy nor download.

    60. Re:what's the difference? by bludstone · · Score: 1

      Er, dont be dumb. The shot was originally recorded for the first movie, but was cut out. It would make sense if lucas wasnt such a cockmonger and made the greedo/han edit.

      --

      no .sig
    61. Re:what's the difference? by sirshannon · · Score: 1

      wrong again. Lucas did not originally shoot that scene with the intentions of having Han walk on Jabba's tail. Jabba did not have a tail when the scene was shot.

    62. Re:what's the difference? by aneurysm36 · · Score: 0
      Oh well, I'm on the fence on whether I'll get these or not. I'm actually pretty sick of the whole Star Wars brand at this point which is sad, cause I was one of the die-hards originally.
      Unfortunately, there are a ton of us who feel exactly the same.
      --
      ------ hi mom
    63. Re:what's the difference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't care if he was a badass... you don't disrespect the boss, or you get whacked.

  16. I wonder what additions there are by WarSpiteX · · Score: 1

    After all, Georgie-boy waited a long time for the technology to be "mature" (ie, in enough homes to sell to), and for him to be able to take advantage of all the DVD features (now with more Gungans and extra footage of Jake Lloyd being the best starfighter pilot in the Galaxy.)

    Who am I kidding, I shouldn't be so cynical. I'll hold out until noon on the day the movies are released on DVD, before I break down and rush to Best Buy during lunch hour.

    --


    I'm a little segfault, short and stout.
    1. Re:I wonder what additions there are by Neurotoxic666 · · Score: 1

      Georgie-boy waited a long time for the technology to be "mature"

      Yes, and meanwhile, he was singing Karma Chameleon, with red lipstick and an ugly hat.

      --
      You are more than the sum of what you consume. Desire is not an occupation.
  17. Re:Can you believe it? by Threni · · Score: 1

    > I've never seen a Star Wars movie.

    You're not missing much. You want to watch Episode IV, which was the first one. The newer two (is the third one out yet) are a bit crap - sort of Battlestar Galactica meets the Muppets. If you're after modern sci-fi you're better off with the Matrix (but only the first one!)

  18. *snore* by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Someone needs to invent a new SF franchise.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:*snore* by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      Someone did (Firefly), but the FOX-assboats killed it off too soon.

      I still miss that series.

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    2. Re:*snore* by Tickenest · · Score: 1

      Nah, Street Fighter's been done to death. I think they're up to Super Duper Awesome Street Pocket Puzzle Fighter EX Alpha 3 Gold vs. SNK Marvel Super Heroes Remix Unlimited: 72nd Iteration.

      Yes, yes, I know you meant Sci-Fi.

      --
      This is the NFL, which stands for "Not For Long" if you keep making those bulls*** calls.
    3. Re:*snore* by bstil · · Score: 1

      Someone needs to invent a new SF franchise.

      Star Wars : 1970s scifi/fantasy trilogy ::
      Lord of the Rings : 2000s scifi/fantasy trilogy

    4. Re:*snore* by Ianing · · Score: 1

      Go buy the Firefly DVD set, That will fix everything (For a little while).

    5. Re:*snore* by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Someone did (Firefly), but the FOX-assboats killed it off too soon.
      I still miss that series.


      You beat me to the punch.
      Hey, the movie might launch a new sci-fi movie franchise...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    6. Re:*snore* by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      Stargate, Farscape, LOTR...to a lesser extent Buffy, Angel, & Charmed... Andromeda, Mutant X...

      Actually Stargate is very good, but suffers from lack of "major network" affiliation popularity. That said, it would have been canceled 2 seasons in due to loosing a few ratings points. They've got an 8th season planned and a spin off!!!

      With all the LOTR hype I'd like to see a Magic:TG franchise...There's enough backstory written in the last 10 years to cull 2-3 decent movies from...of course you could say the same about D&D...except they seem to find the crappiest screenwriters and pick the worst stories from the great material available. Of course if somebody could get Lucas to let go of the reins we could have real SW stories...like the stuff by Zahn or Dark Horse!!!

      The next real Hope I see for SF would be Machima...but it's still in it's infancy. It would make it possible for "hobbiest" loyal to the material to pick up some of the great stories to "non-PC" for mainstream media to handle without breaking the bank on motion picture fees. ...If only iTunes [and the store] supported Quicktime video...you'd have a really cheap outlet. Maybe Jobs could kick something off with that hobby project company he CEOs...pixel-something...They're looking for a new distributor you know!

    7. Re:*snore* by ctr2sprt · · Score: 1
      I agree about Firefly being great, but its chances of being a box office smash (or even making it that far) are slim. I really hope I'll end up eating my words, but... It's not like Fox wants their shows to fail. The reality of the situation is that, for a big network like Fox, Firefly just didn't appeal to enough people.

      The most common complaint about its cancelation is that Fox never gave it a chance. Well, if you listen to the bonus material on the DVDs (which I encourage everyone to buy), you'll see that Fox were definitely not enthusiastic about the show even before it started airing. They hated the pilot and made Whedon et al. rewrite it over a weekend. They still weren't happy with the result, but they decided to give it a shot and ran eight or nine episodes. Maybe they were out of order, maybe some like The Train Job were out of order, but the fact is, Fox thought they had a loser and they went with it anyway. And let's not forget that Fox gave Firefly a chance, which I very much doubt ABC, NBC, or CBS would be willing to do.

      Maybe Fox could've done a better job of promoting Firefly, but I don't think you can fault them for doing as much as they did. At least we got 14 episodes out of it, and maybe - maybe! - a great movie.

      And to drag myself painfully back on-topic, I'll probably buy the Star Wars DVDs. I'm not a hardcore fan, so I don't care who shoots first, and my DVD player has a "fast forward" button so I can skip the annoying scenes. I mean, if you don't want the "extended edition" DVDs, then don't buy them. If enough people do it, then eventually Lucas will give you what you want. But most nerds aren't that smart. They'll buy it anyway, because if it's got the "Star Wars" label attached they can't resist. (Note to self: Market "Star Wars Brand Latex Condoms" at 350% markup. They don't even have to work, nobody who would buy a Star Wars Brand Condom could possibly have a need for one.)

    8. Re:*snore* by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Well, if you listen to the bonus material on the DVDs (which I encourage everyone to buy)

      I did and so do I...

      they decided to give it a shot and ran eight or nine episodes. Maybe they were out of order, maybe some like The Train Job were out of order, but the fact is, Fox thought they had a loser and they went with it anyway.

      One of those episodes played at 12:05 am after being advertised for 8pm, the other at 12:20am. That is not giving it a chance.

      The reality is that Firefly was the best sci-fi show to come along in recent memory, and that was't what Fox wanted.
      They wanted what Fox sells: Cheap and dumb, not excellent and smart. That's not their demographics.

      But most nerds aren't that smart. They'll buy it anyway, because if it's got the "Star Wars" label attached they can't resist. (Note to self: Market "Star Wars Brand Latex Condoms" at 350% markup. They don't even have to work, nobody who would buy a Star Wars Brand Condom could possibly have a need for one.)

      Yeah, I take a stand against being exploited by greedy companies, most nerds are all too happy to be exploited though, I think it makes them feel needed.

      And as for the condoms, I'd buy 'em! I do own the "french-kiss Jar Jar Binks" toy (gag gift) and the assorted Jar Jar lip balm (bought it to make the gag gift even funnier).

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    9. Re:*snore* by Golias · · Score: 1
      FOX has a long and storied history of trying out inventive new shows and cancelling them prematurely.

      The Ben Stiller Show won an Emmy award several months after cancellation. Action aired for one episode and then was pulled. The Tick was dropped just as it was getting good. I could go on to list nearly a dozen other critically aclaimed shows which FOX dumped in a season or less to make more room for crap like Fastlane, Dark Angel, and reality TV.

      FOX has had three major hits in the entire history of their network: X-Files, The Simpsons, and Married With Children. All of those shows started out modestly in the days when FOX was in less of a hurry to develop audiences, and grew into pop culture landmarks. If FOX had continued to stick with even half of the really good shows they could have been as big as the "big 3" by now. Instead, they are fending off UPN and WB for the #4 spot, and they richly deserve thier current lowly status.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    10. Re:*snore* by Pope · · Score: 1

      Not quite. FOX's big 2 new shows that year were "Fastlane" (Wed. night) and "Firefly" (Fri. night).

      "Fastlane" got good ratings, "Firefly" got poor ratings, and was dropped. When "Yet Another Reality Show" came along, "Fastlane" was moved to Friday, and immediately tanked in the ratings.

      I guarantee if "Firefly" has debuted on Wed. nights, the ratings would have been pretty good.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    11. Re:*snore* by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      Copyright Extentions are to blame. Unreasonably long commercial control or artistic works has caused this. If StarWars had entered the public domain, could we have seen an expension of the StarWars universe -- by fans looking to create more depth. Further, Lucas and the others involved here would be required to CREATE new works.... not just exploit their old efforts.

      The Remakes of old films, and the never-ending extension and "franchise-ation" of works is proof that copyright needs to expire (much) more quickly. Not less quickly.

    12. Re:*snore* by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Oooh. An MtG movie would be cool. Phyrexians or classic fantasy? Maybe Ice Age...

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  19. Weeeee! by Jaegar · · Score: 1

    One horseman down, three to go. What's next? Indiana Jones on DVD? Doh.

  20. Original? by Ephemeriis · · Score: 1

    Hrrmm... Is that the original (Han shot first) trilogy, or the "Special Edition"?

    yrs,
    Ephemeriis

    --
    "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:Original? by ElectricPoppy · · Score: 1

      Special Edition.

    2. Re:Original? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither.

      It's a new edition that's supposed to sync up more with the prequels. Lucas was filming new scenes for the "original" trilogy during filming of AotC.

  21. Cool by FePe · · Score: 1
    It's going to be great to have the first three Star Wars films on DVD. I once have taped them on VHS, but the quality is bad. Furthermore, I have by mistake taped some other show on the tapes.

    It's also a good thing that there's no more than one extra bonus DVD, as opposed to the Lord of the Rings Extended DVD sets. It's simply too much, for me at least.

    --
    "Until you do what you believe in, how do you know whether you believe in it or not?" -- Leo Tolstoy
  22. I want, but.... by Apreche · · Score: 5, Funny

    I really would like to own all the star wars movies ever in one giant dvd box set of super awesome. I don't even like eps 1-3, but the geek in me must own them. However, there is one problem.

    GREEDO SHOOTS FIRST!

    FUCK THAT.

    I know it's super nerdy to complain about it, but I'm not willing to pay for a copy of the movie if that's the way it's going to be. Solo is supposed to kill him in cold blood.

    Lucas, if you want my cash you're going to have to release the real deal. Spielberg, you too. I didn't buy none of your walkie talkie E.T. shit. Good thing I still have the real deals on VHS. But still, DVD would be nice.

    Man, I am such a freakin' fanboy sometimes.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:I want, but.... by BMonger · · Score: 1

      Spielberg, you too. I didn't buy none of your walkie talkie E.T. shit. Good thing I still have the real deals on VHS. But still, DVD would be nice.

      Doesn't the version on DVD (2-Disc's) have both versions?

    2. Re:I want, but.... by ShieldWolf · · Score: 1

      Spielberg, you too. I didn't buy none of your walkie talkie E.T. shit

      Don't paint them both with the same brush, the E.T. DVD release had the Special Edition but it also came with a DVD of the original release. Spielberg knows something about pleasing fans and tinkering at the same time.

      Lucas on the other hand is a fat, artisticly bankrupt ego-maniac who sits on a pile of money like Jabba. He says he loves the fans who made him rich, but he screws them over time and again with crap like this. I am not buying these in a million years.

      --
      just = (My)Opinion.toCents();
    3. Re:I want, but.... by Bullseye_blam · · Score: 1

      I know it's super nerdy to complain about it

      Hell no it's not! We're talking about good film-making versus idiotic, pansy, sterilized film-making. It's scenes like these that make the original so great.

    4. Re:I want, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm. The ET DVD set that I bought had two disks in it. One with the original version and the other with the walkie-talkie crap.

    5. Re:I want, but.... by Apreche · · Score: 1

      thank you for informing me, I did not know that. I may just purchase the et dvd with the money that was originally allocated to star wars dvds.

      --
      The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    6. Re:I want, but.... by jafac · · Score: 1

      It wasn't exactly cold-blood either.

      Greedo had a gun pointed at him.

      If I was on the jury, I'd call it self-defense. (but mostly because those stinkin filthy aliens all deserve to die, especially when they threaten a creature who is a member of that noble race; homo sapiens)>

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  23. Re:So has he edited Jar Jar into all three films? by ahess247 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually the secret is this: Lucas has "artistically" re-edited the scene yet again. Now Han and Greedo hug each other and Greedo keels over from a heart attack after being overcome with emotion that they're no longer enemies.....

    Han shoots first dammit!

  24. Timing by Stormcrow309 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It probably has to do with the amount of money Lucas is spending on Episode III. He must have a significant burn rate. It also could be an attempt to generate interest after the abysmal response to Episode II.

    --

    In God we trust, all others require data.

    1. Re:Timing by Dirtside · · Score: 2, Informative
      It also could be an attempt to generate interest after the abysmal response to Episode II.
      Episode II grossed over $600 million worldwide. Considering it was budgeted at about $120 million, I think Lucas probably has plenty of cash.
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    2. Re:Timing by pmj · · Score: 1

      Um, wasn't Episode II generally regarded as a much better movie than Episode I? Checking IMDB, EP II is the 14th highest grossing movie of all time in the U.S.... that doesn't sound abysmal to me.

      --
      Are you BioCurious?
    3. Re:Timing by BostonPilot · · Score: 1

      There was an Episode II ?

    4. Re:Timing by SQLz · · Score: 1

      I've been waiting for Star Wars on DVD for a long time but if its not the original version I don't want it. I'll stick with my laser disk rips burned to DVD.

    5. Re:Timing by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Episode II grossed over $600 million worldwide. Considering it was budgeted at about $120 million, I think Lucas probably has plenty of cash.

      Yeah, but after seeing ep1 and 2, I'm pretty sure that that is peanuts compared to Lucas' drug spending.

      Man, how much LSD and coke does a guy need to take to convince himself that "less jedi lightsaber action" and "more Jar Jar poopoo jokes" is a sound editing choice?

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    6. Re:Timing by Stormie · · Score: 1

      The original poster may have been referring to the abysmal critical response to Episode II. But I think the $648 million probably took the sting out of that a little - I can't see any reason why George Lucas would serve up anything other than another bucket of shit for Episode III.

  25. strong am I with the force... by Savatte · · Score: 2, Funny

    but not strong enough to resist buying dvd versions of movies I already have on vhs.

  26. Why bother... by Robert+Hayden · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Greedo still shoots first.

    1. Re:Why bother... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. That modification to the Greedo scene in the cantina just ruins that whole movie for me.

  27. No Thanks by Spacejock · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not interested in revisionist work. Give me back my memories.

    I'll just have to get some genetic work done and outlive ol' George by 75 years or so. Then I'll get hold of the REAL original trilogy. Unless the copyright extensions keep pace with Mickey(tm)(r) Mouse(tm)(r) indefinitely, the films will be public domain.BR>

  28. They'll have more releases by chia_monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's not forget about who you're talking about. Remember when the first trilogy was released on VHS? And then the widescreen edition. And then the digitally remastered edition. I'm sure they'll just release this, wait a year or two and then release the "classic" edition for people clamoring for it and they'll make loads of money yet again.

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
    1. Re:They'll have more releases by sg3000 · · Score: 3, Informative

      > Remember when the first trilogy was released on VHS? And
      > then the widescreen edition. And then the digitally remastered
      > edition.

      I remember it as:

      1. Original trilogy full screen
      2. Original trilogy with THX re-mastered sound, full screen (I think the three movies had the stormtrooper mask, Yoda, and Darth Vader)
      3. Then re-mastered trilogy, full screen (in the gold box)
      4. Then re-mastered trilogy, wide screen (in the silver box)

      I imagine Peter Jackson saw the above and was a bit inspired when he released Lord of the Rings several times.

      Personally, I prefer the re-mastered versions if Star Wars. The Death Star looks cooler blowing up, the snow battle on Hoth looks better, and the end of Return of the Jedi is actually pretty good once Lucas purged the "Yub Yub" song.

      I recommend one change though -- Lucas should replace whatever actor played the Emperor in ESB, and stick in Ian McDiarmid instead. Then the circle would be complete.

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    2. Re:They'll have more releases by finkployd · · Score: 4, Informative

      Peter Jackson at least came clean ahead of time and told everyone exactly what he was going to do and why.

      Finkployd

    3. Re:They'll have more releases by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Peter Jackson's actually been pretty reasonable with his DVD editions of LOTR. One fullscreen, One widescreen, and One Collector's Multi-disc widescreen for each of the three movies. Although he did stagger it, so if you wanted to see it ASAP on DVD you had to buy/rent the single disc version a month or two before the Collector's edition was released.

    4. Re:They'll have more releases by chad9023 · · Score: 0, Informative

      I recommend one change though -- Lucas should replace whatever actor played the Emperor in ESB, and stick in Ian McDiarmid instead.

      Good call, except it actually was Ian McDiarmid.

    5. Re:They'll have more releases by Chibi · · Score: 5, Informative
      I imagine Peter Jackson saw the above and was a bit inspired when he released Lord of the Rings several times.


      New Line Cinema and Peter Jackson have been very upfront about their release plans for the Lord of the Rings movies. Saying they are doing the same thing as Lucas is inaccurate... at least so far. Plenty of people thinking they will put out some form of mega-collector's set after the final (extended) movie comes out. But, up to now, they have been very fan-friendly in terms of their openness regarding the release plan.

      --
      If all you have are silver bullets, everything looks like a werewolf.
    6. Re:They'll have more releases by hackstraw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure they'll just release this, wait a year or two and then release the "classic" edition for people clamoring for it and they'll make loads of money yet again.

      Or they could release both versions on the same release. Recently, I bought the Pink Floyd "Directors Cut" of Live at Pompeii and it has the original and the directors cut versions. I have other dvds that have widescreen and 4:3 versions.

      Plus, there are only like 20 or so minutes of different footage, so it would fit on one disk easily.

      Bah, I'll just keep buying them.

    7. Re:They'll have more releases by cens0r · · Score: 1

      of course everytime they released the full screen, they released the widescreen at the same time. So you really can't call them different versions. Most movies in this country are released in those two versions.

      I've never been too hard on Lucas for re-releasing the movies. Since they were on VHS, they were always wearing out at about the time they were released.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    8. Re:They'll have more releases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it wasn't.

    9. Re:They'll have more releases by Leto-II · · Score: 1

      Uhm, before upping the score on the parent post did any of the moderators actually check that the parent's and grandparent's links were actually different? No? Didn't think so.

      Idiots.

      --
      Do not anger the worm.
    10. Re:They'll have more releases by IPFreely · · Score: 2, Informative

      The original request was to replace the actor who played the Emperor in Empire Strikes Back. That was Clive Revill. You are probably pointing back to Ian because he played the emperor in Return of the Jedi. Just a little mix up there.

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    11. Re:They'll have more releases by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      Did you even read that? ESB is nowhere to be found in his filmography.

      ESB's emperor was voiced by Clive Revill.

    12. Re:They'll have more releases by mlush · · Score: 1
      New Line Cinema and Peter Jackson have been very upfront about their release plans for the Lord of the Rings movies. Saying they are doing the same thing as Lucas is inaccurate... at least so far. Plenty of people thinking they will put out some form of mega-collector's set after the final (extended) movie comes out. But, up to now, they have been very fan-friendly in terms of their openness regarding the release plan.

      In one of the commentarys he did muse about fixing Gollum appearance in Fellowship of the Ring to match The Two Towers. Possibly a minor tweek to the mega-collector's set

    13. Re:They'll have more releases by darth_MALL · · Score: 0

      Palpatine was played by an old lady in make-up (no joke) this is from one of many SW Trivia sites: Emperor Palpatine is played by an old woman with makeup and a fake monkey eyebrow bump. In episode VI, he is played by Ian McDiarmid. check it out.

    14. Re:They'll have more releases by /dev/niall · · Score: 1
      Lucas should replace whatever actor played the Emperor in ESB

      I'm pretty sure "he" is actually an old woman with a lizard super-imposed over her in ESB.

      --
      --
    15. Re:They'll have more releases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What! I love the "Yub Yub" song at the end. It still puts a smile on my face whenever I hear it. The new age instrumental piece at the end of the special edition does not fit at all with anything else in the series.

    16. Re:They'll have more releases by cubicledrone · · Score: 3, Funny

      Return of the Jedi is actually pretty good once Lucas purged the "Yub Yub" song.

      They needed it for Phantom Menace.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    17. Re:They'll have more releases by Hays · · Score: 1

      Wow I didn't even realize it was the same actor. That's amazing. That means Ian McDiarmid eas only 36 years old when he played the emporer in ROTJ. That's crazy?! And they made him look so old. It's almost like they planned to use him looking younger in prequels.

    18. Re:They'll have more releases by ThePhin · · Score: 1

      Lucas should replace whatever actor played the Emperor in ESB

      According to Internet Movie Database, it was:

      Clive Revill .... Voice of Emperor (voice)
    19. Re:They'll have more releases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ian McDiarmid was the Emperor in the OT.

    20. Re:They'll have more releases by Cybercifrado · · Score: 1

      Actually, according to the IMDB link, Ian McDiarmid already _WAS_ playing the part of the emperor in 1983.

    21. Re:They'll have more releases by AeroIllini · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've been pleased with the way Peter Jackson has released the LOTR DVDs. Almost every movie released on DVD has a widescreen and a fullscreen version, sometimes on the same 2-sided disc. The widescreen version is for those of us who care about the visuals in the movie and want to see the moviemakers' vision, and the fullscreen edition is for people who don't care that much or who have tiny TVs and can't afford to lose screen space to black nothingness. The Extended editions came out after the other two because Peter needed more time to recut the movies, not to mention create the DVDs... the bonus features are quite extensive, and the menus are fantastic. These things take time.

      Peter has also been careful not to call the Extended DVDs "Director's Cuts." He says that the phrase "director's cut" usually implies that the director was somehow dissatisfied with the theatrical release, and that was not the case with LOTR. The Extended Editions, he said, just put back all the things that fans of the books would enjoy seeing, but that the moviegoer who has *not* read the books would not miss.

      George Lucas, on the other hand, is not thinking of anyone but himself when he subsequent versions. This is what he wanted to see, and the fans be damned-- even if the 1977 Lucas knew far more about moviemaking than the 1997 Lucas.

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    22. Re:They'll have more releases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was the Emperor in Return of the Jedi (1983), the parent is talking about Empire Strikes Back (1980).

  29. Re:Can you believe it? by FePe · · Score: 1
    You're not missing much.

    What?! Star Wars is like the most essential science fiction movie on this planet. Matrix is just some postmodern crap ;-) No, give me Star Wars - that's a classic.

    --
    "Until you do what you believe in, how do you know whether you believe in it or not?" -- Leo Tolstoy
  30. Pan and Scan? by binaryDigit · · Score: 1

    With all this talk about it not being a democracy and about it being about "art", I'm therefore amazed that George would allow a cut/cropped version of his baby out into the public. Were the movies shot matted so the full screen versions actually are closer to his "vision"?

    1. Re:Pan and Scan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      With all this talk about it not being a democracy and about it being about "art", I'm therefore amazed that George would allow a cut/cropped version of his baby out into the public. Were the movies shot matted so the full screen versions actually are closer to his "vision"?

      You sir should be modded +5 for f---ing brilliant.

    2. Re:Pan and Scan? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I doubt that any director who shoots matted film does it with the intention to make the TV version superiour. It's just to make it better using a limited medium; the areas matted in the cinema allows the TV version to be more complete. Think of a scene in 2.35:1 widescreen (the widest, mostly action flicks). Now, you have two cast talking on screen at either end, what do you do for the 4:3 version?:

      a) Cut back and forth between the actors

      b) Pan back and forth

      c) Use a crop to show both actors on screen.

      Now, the first two suck. They are just not the same as the original version, and sometimes clumsily done. I can name many movies with obvious Pan & Scan artifacts (e.g. Ghostbusters media coverage montage scene, Austin Powers Vegas scene and so on). Pretty annoying.

      On the other hand, using a matte allows the director to use footage from the top and bottom of the screen to flesh out the bars that would normally be in a 4:3 presentation of a 2.35:1 movie. Often this causes feck-ups, especially boom mike goofs. The IMDB goofs pages has many entries that only apply to certain aspect ratio versions.

      Back to the point. Cinema is all about the big screen. That's where directors want their movies watched. Maybe because of the artistic merit, maybe for the per-person revenue. Whatever. The point is that the original theatrical version is the one to watch.

      Not all movies are WS, some directors didn't take to it. Kubrik for example didn't use it, except maybe for "eyes wide shut" (never seen it, too much BS hype). Jeez, most of his films only had monoural sound.

      By the way, in case anyone is wondering, I checked the press release. The SW DVDs in this thread will aparently be released in separate anamorphic WS (yippie) and 4:3 (if that takes your fancy).

      I'll be going for the WS ones. I don't buy a painting to cut pieces out to fit an old frame I happen to have lying around. The same with film.

    3. Re:Pan and Scan? by Golias · · Score: 1
      Not all movies are WS, some directors didn't take to it. Kubrik for example didn't use it, except maybe for "eyes wide shut" (never seen it, too much BS hype). Jeez, most of his films only had monoural sound.

      That's funny, "2001" is the best example I can name of a movie which must be seen in wide-screen to be fully experienced.

      PS. "Eyes Wide Shut" was an interesting movie, although the scope of the story was a bit smaller and more personal than Kubrick's other work. You should probably see it.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    4. Re:Pan and Scan? by jazzmans · · Score: 1

      Agreed, 2001 is awesome in Widescreen, and the only version of Eyes Wide Shut I can find is full screen, with a ?commentary? saying that Kubrick shot it to be viewed fullscreen. Whether that's true or not, I dunno, since Spielberg finished the film for release. jaz

      --
      Life is what happens to you while you are busy making other plans. No-one sees motorcycles
  31. Star Wars by kc0re · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a typical holly wood thing to do, if all else fails, relese old stuff. Money must be getting tight with Episode 3 -- "Hey! I have an idea, lets re-re-re-release Episodes 4-6.... again."

  32. Marketing .... by tr0llb4rt0 · · Score: 1

    Nothing like trying to bump up the public awareness of a project in it's gap year.

    I enjoyed the originals (and the updates) and will probably buy this, but the timing is really shameless.

    Phantom Menace and AOTC really sucked big fat hairy balls and IMVHO this is just a marketing ploy to get the Star Wars brand back in the forefront of the publics mind before the release of Episode 3.

    --
    Worst .sig ever!
  33. I remember when George said by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 1

    that he was never going to release Star Wars onto VHS, and DVD was a distant dream.

    Fast Forward a few years and we have Star Wars release as the most expensive VHS tape of all time - $120.

    Fast Forward and we have 4, 5, and 6 released as a set.

    And you tell me this wasn't expected? Puulleeasssee!

  34. Don't buy it!!! by darkmayo · · Score: 1

    IT'S A TRAP!! /ducks

    --
    "I am a kernel in the linux army"
  35. DVD rips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    interestingly, supposed DVD Rips of episode 4 and 6 have been appearing on bittorrent sites in the last 24 hours.

  36. Originaltrilogy.com by DeadBugs · · Score: 5, Informative

    It may not be too late to visit the Original Trilogy website and sign the petition to get the original un-updated version put on DVD. 50,000 have signed up already!

    Well it may be too late, but the fans must be heard!

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
    1. Re:Originaltrilogy.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was waiting for someone to break that out :o

    2. Re:Originaltrilogy.com by Viking+Coder · · Score: 1

      I'm replying to this posting in an effort to draw more attention to it.

      PLEASE sign this petition, if you want the original versions of the trilogy to make it to DVD.

      I would love a cleaned-up print, but I would hate to have to watch Greedo shooting first for the rest of my life.

      --
      Education is the silver bullet.
    3. Re:Originaltrilogy.com by Snipet · · Score: 1

      online petitions are infamously poor at gaining any form of respect/notice. If you really care write a letter (remember those) to Fox (not Lucas). They are the ones who if they see a real interest in the product will put pressure / wads of money on /in front of Lucas to release the original trilogy.

      --
      The internet makes me stupid.
    4. Re:Originaltrilogy.com by Bullseye_blam · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but George will never back down on this one. By releasing the original versions, he would be admitting that the original versions have some qualities which are superior to the updated ones.

      George Lucas strikes me as being very arrogant, so why would he go out of his way to look like even more of a buffoon?

    5. Re:Originaltrilogy.com by erasmus_ · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link, that's a really good write-up about online petitions. I've signed a few in my life, but in my defense, some of them seemed to have worked. For example, the several about Family Guy did bring the series back for a little bit, and another may have helped in getting it released on DVD. Oh, also the Japanese track on the Princess Mononoke DVD was also going to be not included by Disney until the huge petition response, from what I heard.

      --
      Please subscribe to see the more insightful version of th
    6. Re:Originaltrilogy.com by neko9 · · Score: 1

      already done that.

  37. I'll save my credits... by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Of course, the big question mark amongst fans has always been whether Lucas would allow the original, unaltered original editions of the trilogy to also be released on DVD. Not possible, said Ward, who confirmed that the upcoming set will feature only the 1997 Special Edition versions of each film. "What George did in 1997," Ward explains, "was [to] make the movie he originally wanted to make."


    This should answer all the questions below. Forget it. I want the original unaltered versions on DVD. Didn't anyone learn anything from New Coke?
    1. Re:I'll save my credits... by 0123456 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      ""What George did in 1997," Ward explains, "was [to] make the movie he originally wanted to make.""

      Which is an interesting comment. While the 'special editions' suck less than the prequels, they do suck almost as bad as the original 'Star Wars' scripts before Lucas read Joseph Campbell's books, so we can conclude from this that if Lucas hadn't been kept in check by the studio he'd have released a 'Star Wars' movie that sucked in 1977 and would have vanished without a trace.

      Of course, having seen the prequels, the fact that Lucas' "artistic vision" sucks shouldn't really be a surprise.

    2. Re:I'll save my credits... by bigdavex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Didn't anyone learn anything from New Coke?


      When you finally do release the original product, it's a huge boost with lots of publicity, and you make a lot of money?


      Yeah, I think they might have learned that lesson.

      --
      -Dave
    3. Re:I'll save my credits... by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      "What George did in 1997," Ward explains, "was [to] make the movie he originally wanted to make."

      He originally wanted to make a movie with a comically bad CGI slug, and where a bounty hunter misses a target two feet away by over a foot? Pull the other one, George.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    4. Re:I'll save my credits... by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 1

      (Shaking fist desperately)

      "Damn you Lucas! Damn you and your extra droids in the background! Damn you and your extra thirty seconds!"

      *SOB* *Sniffle*

      (FALLS TO KNEES, LOOKS SKYWARD)

      "Star Wars fans are made of PEOPLE! It's made of PEOPLE!"

      (COLLAPSES)

      (Crawls off to to throw up tent in a line outside of Best Buy)

    5. Re:I'll save my credits... by Ahnteis · · Score: 1

      Bad example. Blind taste tests showed that people actually preferred the new coke but because they knew it was "not really coke" they were upset. Maybe it's not such a bad example after all.

    6. Re:I'll save my credits... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want the original unaltered versions on DVD. Didn't anyone learn anything from New Coke?

      Yes. They learnt that they could rekindle interest by relaunching the old Coke as "Classic Coke" and make more money that way.

      Expect a "Classic Star Wars" DVD to be released in a few years.

    7. Re:I'll save my credits... by edstromp · · Score: 1

      I'll pass on the DVD's myself. Loved the first 3 movies. Own the original remastered versions on vhs. But Lucas has really put me off the series with his latest two installments. It was great for a long time, and then #1 came out, only to be further ruined with #2. I'm not seeing #3, no matter how good people say it is.

    8. Re:I'll save my credits... by Noofus · · Score: 1

      Maybe he doesnt realize that the CGI Slug looks like ass. Maybe he doesnt realize all that digital garbage in EP 1/2 looks like ass. Maybe he thinks that shit looks *GOOD*.

      Its sad isnt it? I think he honestly believes his crappy CGI looks as good as lifelike puppets.

      I have always liked puppeteering - it looks *real*. On a slight tangent: which looks better? ST:TNG that used models of the enterprise or babylon 5 which is CG...

      I say ST:TNG looks more *real*

    9. Re:I'll save my credits... by mordereo · · Score: 1

      Something to consider, this could even make Lucas twice as much money. Put both the original and the re-mastered 1997 version out on DVD, seperately, that way people will get a choice on which one they want to own. Some die hard fans would buy both just to have them, and the older fans (myself included) would buy the original version. Just a thought

  38. "original" original versions? by motorsabbath · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Any chance of us getting the first three movies with those odious "extra" scenes removed or not added?

    --
    The heat from below can burn your eyes out
    1. Re:"original" original versions? by telstar · · Score: 1
      "Any chance of us getting the first three movies with those odious "extra" scenes removed or not added?"
      • $10 says somebody splices out the new crap, and splices in the old stuff from VHS so that 95% of the film is DVD quality.

    2. Re:"original" original versions? by rabel · · Score: 1

      I don't download music or movies from the internet, but I'll be damned if I'm going to buy the revised edition on DVD.

      I propose a massive download party for all nerds to get a copy of a spliced edition that the parent refers to and make a statement to George in doing so.

      I don't like stealing movies in general but this would be more of a "nerd political statement" then anything else. We want the original movies, that we know and love from our childhoods, including the fact that Han was a hard-ass smuggler and blasted Greedo before Greedo could blast him first.

      Weak sales of the DVD release and ubiquitous downloads of a "nerd approved" splice job would be a fun way to make our point. With cheap DVD burners available now, we can all have the movies we want. I also hearby proclaim that I'll purchase the original movies on DVD when they are made available.

  39. Tuesday? What were they thinking by RedShoeRider · · Score: 3, Funny

    ....looks like I'm going to have to take a sick day on Wednesday the 22nd, boss.... *cough, cough*

    --

    Chris Knight is my hero.

    1. Re:Tuesday? What were they thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Skipping work for some DVDs of movies you've seen a million times? That's pretty sad. What next, calling in sick because they are showing reruns of The Nanny?

    2. Re:Tuesday? What were they thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DVD's are always released on Tuesday, it is an industry standard.

      Not sure of the reason, but I suspect Tuesday had been a low day for volume, and this is a good way to increase mid-week sales.

  40. Re:Can you believe it? by nomadic · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    What are you smoking? The Matrix was alright, but VASTLY overrated. Any of the original SW trilogy (yes, even the third one) beats it.

  41. Too late by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    Lucas made a big mistake in waiting to release this. He would have made a lot more money if he had released it before he deluted the franchise with Episode's I and II.

  42. so.... by mrscorpio · · Score: 5, Funny

    "There's yet to be a press release..."

    So unofficially, it's official?

    Chris

  43. Re:HDDVD -- Twice? by ketamineX · · Score: 1

    Twice?

    I think this will be the 3rd or 4th time around for some people: Laserdisc, VHS boxed original, VHS boxed SE, DVD...

    Bah.

  44. *Ka-Ching* by Nplugd · · Score: 0, Troll

    Good, even more money for Lucas. This will give him the envy to make those sequels.
    Wait a min...
    HANDS DOWN! STAY AWAY FROM THOSE DVDs! Trust me, you don't wanna have a chance to see what's next in Lucas'twisted mind.

    --
    Je n'ai pas d'avenir Je n'ai qu'un destin Celui de n'être qu'un souvenir C'est pour demain
  45. Re:Can you believe it? by russellh · · Score: 1

    I've never seen a Star Wars movie.

    Wow. And I saw the original in the theater in 1977. It's hard to imagine today how amazed people were back then by it.

    --
    must... stay... awake...
  46. Re:Can you believe it? by Durin_Deathless · · Score: 3, Funny

    OK. I need your geek license. Hand it over now!

    --
    You should use AdiumX on your Mac.
  47. Classic Laser Discs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    luckily i have a set of the original laser disc release. i think that's the only (legal) way you'll get the originals in a digital format. God bless laser disc!

  48. What will the special features be? by MasterKayne · · Score: 1
    The real question is, will one of the special features be The Star Wars Holiday Special

    Chewy eventually shows up back at home. Han greets the family: "Malla. Lumpy. Itchy." Han scruffs the little one's head, saying, "Look at Lumpy, he's all grown up. I think his voice is changing." Then Han hugs all four fur balls and pauses meaningfully at the door: "All of you are an important part of my life."


    If so, perhaps one could use viewing this as a threat to get the kids to clean their rooms.
    1. Re:What will the special features be? by jazzmans · · Score: 1
      I have to admit, I watched this.

      I still remember it.

      at 8 years old, it didn't suck, but I bet it would suck if I saw it now.

      The Cartoon with Boba is what I remember best.

      jaz

      --
      Life is what happens to you while you are busy making other plans. No-one sees motorcycles
    2. Re:What will the special features be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to see this just out of morbid curiosity.

  49. Re:Can you believe it? by rootofevil · · Score: 1

    have you not seen empire? or, as everyone with a brain calls it "the best star wars movie ever"

    --
    turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
  50. Four CD's by voxlator · · Score: 1

    The Original Trilogy will arrive on September 21st in a four-disc set.

    This trilogy is starting to sound a lot like the HHGG 'trilogy'....

    --voxlator

    1. Re:Four CD's by Highlander · · Score: 1

      I disagree.

      "The Original Trilogy" refers to the movies. The "four disc set" is the medium which the movies appear, along with other special feature.

      In the case of H2G2, the "trilogy" actually had more components than a trilogy. I have H2G2 in a 1 Volume hardcover set. I guess by your rules I just have a single book now.

      H

    2. Re:Four CD's by voxlator · · Score: 1

      For those of you who are working late, tired, lacking stimulants, or all of the above, I guess I should have used some method of signifying humour .

      --voxlator

  51. To quote the Comic Book Guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Worst episode ever"

  52. Looks like we've never see the original... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    quote:

    The original versions technically don't exist," says Lucasfilm's Jim Ward, who is the project's executive producer. "(Lucas) wanted to represent the films as they exist in his mind, and that's the special-editions versions."

    1. Re:Looks like we've never see the original... by real_smiff · · Score: 1
      quote:

      The original versions were amoung the highest grossing films of all time," says Slashdot reader real_smiff, who won't be watching these DVDs. "The fans loved the originals, and don't care what's in Lucas' mind any more."

      Ok seriously, I don't care very much what happens either way (I think i'm over Star Wars), but it's sad that George Lucas is so arrogant that he thinks he knows best.. once art is released it belongs to everyone's collective consciousness and should be respected as such.

      --

      This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

  53. Its official by Omega1045 · · Score: 1
    There's yet to be an actual press release

    So, its not official then, right?

    --

    Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

  54. *yawn* by Brian+Kendig · · Score: 1

    If this news had come five years ago, I would have been right there with my credit card ready to pay whatever price George asked.

    But since then, we've had Episode I and II with silly plots and terrible acting and Jar Jar Binks, and the Star Wars series has become WAY overmarketed. I didn't think it could become even *more* commercialized than it was in the eighties, but, it did. And on top of that, George keeps going back and messing with the original movies -- what's this I hear about new footage of Amidala being added into RotJ?

    So, yawn. I used to really want the Episode IV-VI DVD's, but when they weren't available, I found my love in other series. I'm buying the extended DVD editions of all three Lord of the Rings movies. I couldn't care less about Star Wars.

    1. Re:*yawn* by zecg · · Score: 1


      It boggles the mind how easily people can substitute their love for a pulp SF space-opera for a film based on literary fantasy classic. Is it because they are both trilogies?

      You know what, Lucas? I'm sick of you and am instead pledging my eternal allegiance to "Trois Couleurs: Rouge, Blanc et Bleu". Hopefully, there'll be quite some DVD editions in the near future, so I can bitch about how Kieslowski is milking me.

      --
      .i lu doi ringos.star. xu do puku'aroroi dunli dopecaku leni virnu li'u
    2. Re:*yawn* by Brian+Kendig · · Score: 1

      No, it's because both are rich and broad tales of adventure and heroism, but one has become diluted over time while the other has become deeper.

      George went for the quick buck over and over and over again, until there's no substance left. Peter Jackson could be talking about "The Lord of the Rings IV: What Happened Afterwards" or "The Hobbit: Episode 0", but he isn't.

  55. Cold blood? by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Solo is supposed to kill him in cold blood.

    I don't get why people say that. In the dialogue, Greedo had just said the he was going to enjoy killing Solo in a moment, so Han shot first and killed Greedo in self-defense. It's not like Solo sneaked into the cantina, spied Greedo, and shot him in the back.

    --
    All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
    1. Re:Cold blood? by matastas · · Score: 1

      Watch that again. Solo is reaching for his gun about ten lines before Greedo even gets threatening (aside from the initial exchange).

      Han fires in cold blood and kills Greedo. It sets him up as a selfish outlaw who finds redemption and a purpose in the Rebel cause, and eventually in Leia. IMO, Lucas destroys three metric tons of character development with one laser blast.

    2. Re:Cold blood? by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 1
      Watch that again. Solo is reaching for his gun about ten lines before Greedo even gets threatening (aside from the initial exchange).

      Yeah, but Solo realizes that Greedo is a bounty hunter who's been sent to find him. Isn't it a reasonable supposition that Greedo therefore means him bodily harm?


      Now, if Greedo had been a messenger from Jabba or something, and Han had just shot him because he didn't like the message, that would be something different.

      --
      All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
  56. Special Features To Include: by andih8u · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. Making of the movie 2. Making of the special effects 3. Making of the money with footage of George Lucas hauling bags of cash to bank.

    --


    slashdot, news for crazed liberal socialist zealots
  57. Re:Can you believe it? by Threni · · Score: 1

    Star Wars is just pulp fiction, populated by two dimensional characters who are either entirely good or entirely evil. Sure the Matrix has turned to shit what with the dire sequel which has put me off seeing the third, but at least it doesn't consist of a bunch of cliches strung together and every other line being someone saying stuff like "I've a bad feeling about this".

  58. In the immortal words of The Who... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...won't get fooled again".

    Last dime George Lucas got from me was for Phantom Menace. I did view a divx of Return of the Clones and felt no guilt in doing so.

  59. Ehhhh by tipo21 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ehh wheres is the Torrrent??

  60. Re:Can you believe it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    What the hell's this pinksock.com thing? It's either a "Mutts" reference or some sort of circumcision fetish site, and I'm afraid to see which. Last thing I need is for my boss to walk by and see me looking at a picture of some dude with a cue ball in his foreskin...

  61. FYI - original by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1
    "The point is, ladies and gentleman, is that greed -- for lack of a better word -- is good. Greed is right. Greed works."

    this quote from one of my favorite movies, was actually 'based on' a speech by the infamous Ivan Boesky a few years earlier.

    1. Re:FYI - original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Oh, neat! Thanks for that info.
      grub

  62. Don't buy them by Wind_Walker · · Score: 1
    I'm just adding my voice to the others who have protested the release of DVDs as being merely a profit motivation. Lucas is only motivated by profit - he proved that when he re-released the "Special Edition" to theatres, destroying the films in the process.

    Don't buy the DVDs. Tell your parents not to buy them for you. Tell your siblings not to buy them for you. Tell your girlfriend not to buy them for you. Do not see Episode 3. It's the only way to get George's attention.

    But perhaps it is too late for him...

    1. Re:Don't buy them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't buy the DVDs. Tell your parents not to buy them for you. Tell your siblings not to buy them for you. Tell your girlfriend not to buy them for you. Do not see Episode 3. It's the only way to get George's attention.

      I understood most of that - but what's this "girlfriend" to which you refer??

    2. Re:Don't buy them by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      That's precisely what I plan to do. I might buy the Sucky Editions when they're released on HD-DVD if they're the only option available other than bootlegs, but I certainly won't buy the Sucky Editions on DVD and then buy them again on HD-DVD.

  63. Except Peter Jackson told the truth up front by lordpixel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > It's very similar to the strategy followed by LOTR.

    Except for the inconvenient fact Peter Jackson told the truth up front about there being two releases.

    If they ever release hyper-super-extended editions, then you can make that comparison. In any case, there might be legitimate reasons for another release of many movies, if HD-DVD becomes the norm.

    Of course, if you think regular DVDs are already good enough, no one is forcing anyone ot upgrade.

    --

    Lord Pixel - The cat who walks through walls
    A little bigger on the inside than out

    1. Re:Except Peter Jackson told the truth up front by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      I can't lay my hands on the quote, but I remember PJ saying that there will NOT be any more extended versions after the first 3. Maybe a super-all-three-movies box set, or a reissue down the line, but no changes (with the possible exception of redoing gollumn in 1 scene of FOTR).

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  64. Remakes of classic films by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Wait until they release "Birth of a Nation - The Special Edition" where the guys in white sheets hug black people and join hands in song.

    Wasn't the purging of art and history to fit current standards something you'd expect from a despot like Stalin? Guess moviemakers really are dictators.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:Remakes of classic films by rufo · · Score: 1

      Dude, RTFA. There's a quote in the article that *says* "This is not a democracy".

      --
      My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.
    2. Re:Remakes of classic films by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      I "RFTA" as you put it. I can still vote though, with my $.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  65. Makin' the Mozilla Move by Sergeant+Beavis · · Score: 2, Funny

    I will buy the DVD's

    --
    There is nothing inherently safe about liberty. That's why so many people died protecting it.
    1. Re:Makin' the Mozilla Move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will start using apostrophes correctly.

      Shit, I hate Star Wars. This probably won't work.

    2. Re:Makin' the Mozilla Move by Sergeant+Beavis · · Score: 1

      I will butcher the english language ;)

      --
      There is nothing inherently safe about liberty. That's why so many people died protecting it.
  66. Re:This hit Fark.com about 20 minutes ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell is fark.com? Don't assume we all read the same websites (other than /. obviously).

  67. Original Trilogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Original?

    Does this mean the theatrical version, the digital version or the fubar version with new scenes and a Han Solo that doesn't fire first?

    If this isn't the theatrical version I (and probably everyone else) will pass for obvious reasons.

    1. Re:Original Trilogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 35mm or 70mm version?

    2. Re:Original Trilogy by Bullseye_blam · · Score: 1

      If this isn't the theatrical version I (and probably everyone else) will pass for obvious reasons.

      More like, everyone _should_ pass. Unfortunately, I'm sure these DVD's are going to sell like hotcakes.

  68. Re:Can you believe it? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

    I got to see it at a DRIVE IN!!! it wasn't that cool though [the drive in part] I was only 5...just barely old enough to remember it...I think I actually fell a sleep for part ...hey! it was WAY after bedtime!!

  69. Democracy does not mean you get to buy Star Wars by Dogtanian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps Lucas has forgotten that he's in the marketplace -- where democracy indeed rules

    Yeah, right.

    Listen, I know there are many people out there who think that the marketplace and democracy are the same thing. They're wrong, and so are you.

    Democracy; various flavors, but the intention is that what the majority of people want, they get. This means that if the country votes for a government-controlled socialist utopia, it's democratic, and when another country invades and forces a market-based economy upon them, it's not (or vice versa).

    Marketplace; people have money and goods. Money and goods are exchanged at the highest perceived benefit to both parties. Those with more money have more buying power. Those with goods/rights can do what they like with them. Those with no money or goods/rights have no power.

    Do you understand? Two separate concepts. Until the people in such-and-such a country vote for a law that says George Lucas must release the original Star Wars trilogy on DVD, there's nothing "undemocratic" about his decision (in the sense that we are discussing here) like it or not. The democratic USA (*) (and most other countries) has passed laws which allow whoever holds the rights to do pretty much what the hell they like with the Star Wars movies.

    And while I'm here, I'll point out that liberty is also different to capitalism *and* democracy, regardless of bluster to the contrary.

    (*) You can argue the toss about the effectiveness of US democracy, but that's another topic altogether.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  70. Just a thought by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1
    I know our beloved Han Solo shot first in the originals, but has anyone considered that George changed the originals initially due to some suggestions by editors, screenwriters, etc? Maybe he intended Greedo to shoot first.

    That being said, I still would rather have the 'as first released version' over the Special Editions.

    1. Re:Just a thought by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      It was just fine like that for 20 years!!!! If it was an error too bad George. Worse than that it's a needless change to something already good. We liked Star Wars just the way it was. Sure it's not cutting edge anymore....but it STILL sets the bar for special effects. The "primitive" technology is part of the charm...It'd be like Wizard of Oz with the B&W part removed "because audiances don't have B&W anymore"

      More than that, it's a work of art...a part of culture. And there's been a disturbing trend lately by certian directors [cough, George and steven, cough] to reedit their movies to make them more "politically correct" Stuff like the "shoots first" or "guns to flashlights" edits really, really are insulting to the viewers...espically those of us who watched it as children the first time around! There was a certian shock value to those scenes...down right scary...make you question the world... But it seems that George and Steven don't quite think that it's OK to shake up little kids worlds anymore...espically THEIR KIDS worlds!!! They're all guilty of it, Gates, Jobs, Lucas, Speiberg...of trying to sheild their own children from/rewrite history of their own Up and comming to "greatness"...That's a crime against history...straight out of 1984!!!

    2. Re:Just a thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      > due to some suggestions by editors, screenwriters

      If George Lucas listened to suggestions, Jar Jar would have been sodomized by a Bantha and roasted in the exhaust of an X-Wing in the last movie.

  71. Re:So has he edited Jar Jar into all three films? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And in ET they thought the kids looked like "terrorists" dammit!

    F*king revisionists!

  72. I will wait a little longer by Flyboy+Connor · · Score: 3, Funny

    I will buy them when Lucas has finished all three trilogies, and all nine movies are bundled together in the Ultimate Death Star Box, including both the classic and the extended editions, at least three special feature DVDs, and with and without Jar Jar replaced by a pink furry rabbit.

    1. Re:I will wait a little longer by RdsArts · · Score: 1

      Shoulda' waited for the Ultimate Death Star Box Deluxe edition. Oh sure, it comes out 4 months later, but it has over 2 years of extra footage on 9264 DVDs.

      And a collectable 'Hans Solo in carbonite' keychain.

  73. Re:Lucas is still a bitch. by Twylite · · Score: 1
    I guess it could be worse, he could have made Star Wars 4, 5, 6 the Ultra-Mega Edition, now with 2 hours of poorly done CGI.

    Already happened. They're called Star Wars 1, 2 and 3. Includes purile humour, plenty of out-of-place CGI and some unused scenes from Titanic.

    --
    i-name =twylite [http://public.xdi.org/=twylite], see idcommons.net
  74. Re:HDDVD -- Twice? by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

    You forgot the VHS boxed THX re-release. My mom has the original, THX, and the Special Edition. She has the last two (first two?) movies too. She'll probably get the DVDs of the first trilogy when they come out. Maybe I will too, but there is no way I'm letting Episode I and II enter my house. III either.

  75. Re:Can you believe it? by rjstanford · · Score: 1

    by two dimensional characters who are either entirely good or entirely evil

    Not quite - why do you think that Han was by far the most popular character in the films? Complexity, and reality. Of course, that can be changed through CGI these days.

    Er, most popular human character, that is. The Falcon probably takes top honors overall... at least, it did when I was a kid...

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  76. Re:Can you believe it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Entirely good or entirely evil characters? What about Darth Vader?

  77. Re:Can you believe it? by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

    And you fuckin' replied. Brilliant.

    Errr...

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  78. USAToday Article by Genjurosan · · Score: 4, Informative

    Find the article on USAToday HERE.

  79. What we REALLY need is the 'extended edition' by arcite · · Score: 3, Funny
    You know, like PJ has done with LotR....adding an extra hour or so to the movie. Possible re-inserted scenes could include....

    1. 5 minutes of yet unseen footage of Princess Lea in chains and bikini

    2. 15 minutes of extended (grusome) Ewok death scenes during the final battle.

    3. 10 minute conversation of luke and Darth reminicing and coming to terms over their 'broken family' .

    4. cut scene of Luke working on the farm....tilling perhaps...or milking the cows. - you know, to add context

    5. an indepth and real explanation of the implications of the kiss between luke and his sister....ewwww.

    6.ummmmm, more cut scenes of lea belly dancing in the casino ship.

    that would add atleast another 40min easy! :).

    1. Re:What we REALLY need is the 'extended edition' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You know, like PJ has done with LotR....adding an extra hour or so to the movie.

      Right, so then all the stuff from the original novels which could not be adapted due to time constraints could be put back in.

      Oh, wait...

  80. Well... by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1

    Well, LOTR dates back to before Star Wars, and, even by a stretch the size of Star Jones, is not sci-fi.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  81. Do a Beauty and the Beast, George by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I have a Platinum Edition DVD of Disney's Beauty and the Beast, and they did some things that could satisfy purists and non-purists.

    There are 3 versions of the film on the disc. Firstly, the original theatrical edition that means that if you want to watch what was first released at the cinema/on VHS, you can. Secondly, a 'work in progress' edition that was shown at the NY film festival - lots of non-coloured images/coffee stains etc. Thirdly, the Special Edition which includes "Human Again" which was a song added for the stage show and added in later (which as an add-on is quite entertaining and works with the rest of the film).

    I imagine these versions were done by setting the film to just use different chapters, so parts could be added at different points.

    Why can't Lucas do that? Give us the improved sounds and visual effects of the Sp. Editions, but give people a choice of Original or Pointlessly Remixed versions of the film.

    PS If you've never seen the Platinum Edition of B&TB, do so. It's a great example of how to make a great DVD set.

    1. Re:Do a Beauty and the Beast, George by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      Too bad disney screwed up that dvd. They crammed 3 FULL versions on one side which were compressed way too much creating shimmering and artifacts. They didn't use branching like they should have. They should have spread it across multiple discs to give the best possible version.

    2. Re:Do a Beauty and the Beast, George by dbkluck · · Score: 1

      why can't lucas do that? 'cause then he can't wait another year or two, then release the super-duper special edition and make you buy it again. and again. and again...

  82. Re:So has he edited Jar Jar into all three films? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Peope, people. Han DOES shoot first in these editions.

  83. Re:Can you believe it? by dar · · Score: 1

    I saw it the first week it was out. When the first battle cruiser went over, the whole theater went ooooooh.

    --
    My other Slashdot ID is much lower.
  84. I just hope... by Seoulstriker · · Score: 0

    I just hope that the ORIGINAL Star Wars is put onto DVD. I really don't want to see the Special Edition anymore.

    --
    I am defenseless. Use your button. Mod me down with all of your hatred.
  85. Re:Can you believe it? by ePhil_One · · Score: 1
    Bah!

    Star Wars was fun, pure and simple fun. No hidden meanings, no moral lessons, just a backwater farmboy fulfilling his dreams of rescueing a princess and fighting the good fight. No annoying political lessons about why the bad guys are bad (They blew up a populated planet just to prove they were the baddest guys in town).

    --
    You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
  86. "When he already has a comb... (A COMB!)" by Burgundy+Advocate · · Score: 4, Funny

    The trilogy, featuring the classic franchise films "Star Wars," "The Empire Strikes Back" and "Return of the Jedi," will be released on three DVD discs, with a fourth disc likely to hold a newly made documentary about the "Star Wars" franchise and never-before-seen footage, among several other bonus materials, said Jim Ward, Lucasfilm's VP of marketing and distribution and the DVD trilogy's executive producer.

    Oh please let the bonus materials be a digitally restored copy of the Star Wars Holiday Special!

    Imagine the marketing possibilities! You could promote the touching "Life Day" celebration! Multicultural wookie Goodness!

    If you haven't seen it, go here. You really need to.

    Have a Very Wookie Christmas! I know if I get this I will!

    --
    Dragging people kicking and screaming into reality since 1996.
    1. Re:"When he already has a comb... (A COMB!)" by meadowsp · · Score: 1

      I know he'd never do it, but would it even be possible? I'm sure I read somewhere that all that exists of it are dodgy taped off the TV videos?

      PS: Gotta love the wookie porn.

    2. Re:"When he already has a comb... (A COMB!)" by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Indeed. The 'Holiday Special' has to be one of the most mindboggling stupid things I have ever seen in my life... so bad, in fact, that many people seem unable to believe that it even exists. Perhaps 'Indiana Jones and the Star Wars Holiday Special' would be a good candidate for the next Indie movie?

    3. Re:"When he already has a comb... (A COMB!)" by darkest_light · · Score: 0
      Yeah, that's pretty much the case. George Lucas is, I believe, on an active quest to destroy every remaining copy of the Holiday Special in existence. Not that bad an idea on his part, since it does feature:
      • At least a full half-hour of Wookie-only speech, without subtitles
      • A coked-up Carrie Fisher hanging off of Chewie
      • Bea Arthur as a singing cantina owner forced by the empire to close her cantina. But not before she sings the longest song on earth
      • Boba Fett's first canon appearance (the Holiday Special came out before Empire Strikes back), in a cartoon where he tricks Han and Luke with the evil tactic of calling them "friend" every five minutes
      • Chewie's son, Lumpy. Lumpy shows up later in the novels, but this is where he got his terrible name.
      • A cooking show with a multi armed cook, one among many totally nonsensical vignettes.

      Oh, it's a beautiful thing. There *are* a few copies still floating around the internet... I'd recommend you find one.

      --
      Orationem pulchram non habens, scribo ista linea in lingua Latina.
    4. Re:"When he already has a comb... (A COMB!)" by Rary · · Score: 1
      You forgot the Wookie porn scene.

      Oh, how I wish I could forget the Wookie porn scene. *shudder*

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    5. Re:"When he already has a comb... (A COMB!)" by Cappy+Red · · Score: 1

      Was the cook named "Elzar?"

      Just wondering...

      *honk*

      --
      This is my sig. It's prescription, I swear. I need it for reading things... on the other side of things
  87. Re:This hit Fark.com about 20 minutes ago... by eraserewind · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's a battle to the death for marketshare. All of the sites are in it to make money, and all competing for somewhat, if not totally, similar audiences. It's no different from the way that "real" news stories echo across the TV channels in a matter of minutes.

  88. Recreate the Originals by mofochickamo · · Score: 1

    I signed the petition. But if Lucas does not release the "real" originals on DVD perhaps someone will recreate the "real" originals from the DVDs. I know that some scenes were updated and some added, but were any deleted?

    --
    Honk if you're horny.
  89. Consumer power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please people, realize the power that you have as a consumer. You have the one thing every company craves: money. All marketing of consumer goods is trying to convince you something is a "must-have", while in reality there are almost no such things, especially not in the luxury goods market as DVDs. Please take a moment to think how it would affect your life if you don't have these latest DVDs are CDs or whatever gadgets, before you part with your hard earned money.

  90. Original rips? by dschuetz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, anyone got a source for a nice, MPEG-2, digital audio rip of the original-version widescreen laserdiscs?

    1. Re:Original rips? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Usenet. It's posted to alt.binaries.starwars as the "Dr. Gonzo" or DrG versions. Just be sure to have a good binaries newsfeed, like the sort that easynews.com provides.

    2. Re: Original rips? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got high-quality rips from eDonkey - I won't slashdot the forum I got links from.

  91. It's on LaserDisc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All 3 StarWars films (the *real* ones) are in LaserDisc and a quick short look on Ebay shows they are available.

    Ok, it's on step away from 8-Track, but it's the real movies and much better picture than VHS.

    1. Re:It's on LaserDisc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      All 3 StarWars films (the *real* ones) are in LaserDisc and a quick short look on Ebay shows they are available.

      Ok, it's on step away from 8-Track, but it's the real movies and much better picture than VHS.

      I agree that getting getting the technology to play a LaserDisc is comparable to getting an 8-Track player; however, the quality of the picture is light-years better than VHS.

      If I were ripping old movies to MPEG, I would use source from a LaserDisc. No Macrovision, no blocky compression, no magnetic dropouts. However, some movies were chopped to fit on LaserDisc (Twister comes to mind).

      Is there a way to interface a LaserDisc player directly to the computer and get digital rips of a movie?

    2. Re:It's on LaserDisc by Gizzmonic · · Score: 2, Informative

      LaserDisc is not a digital technology. If you look closely at a CAV laserdisc, you can see the individual frames reflected off the light. It's basically a record player that reads frames (not to be confused with the CED.

      In the later years, they kludged some digital stuff into it to do digital sound (AC-3).

      But the video itself is not digital. It's an old-ass technology...as a matter of fact, it was originally called 'DiscoVision'. That should give you a hint of its age.

      On the other hand, it would be the perfect uncompressed, copy-protection free source for anyone trying to make the 'original' on DVD. They could even sub in the soundtrack from the AC-3 versions of the special edition. That gives me an idea!

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    3. Re:It's on LaserDisc by claud9999 · · Score: 1

      Huh? LD is analog but it is not "film" (with individual frames represented visually on the media.) It's akin to analog videotape but is read via a laser reflection so no wear and tear.

      In fact, CAV LD stores frames as concentric circles on the disc (CLV is one big spiral, a-la CD's) so you'd definitely not see any pictures besides the reflection of your ugly mug. ;^)

      Google for "laserdisc technology" for more information.

      Regarding transcoding to DVD, the LD video quality is generally much worse than DVD. I suspect it's mostly due to lower quality master tapes and mastering process. A friend of mine compared my Criterion Bladerunner LD to his DVD (in ~95, when DVD was just getting rolling) and the DVD was far far better looking. (On the same TV and dual-format player.)

  92. crap by neko9 · · Score: 1

    Of course, the big question mark amongst fans has always been whether Lucas would allow the original, unaltered original editions of the trilogy to also be released on DVD. Not possible, said Ward, who confirmed that the upcoming set will feature only the 1997 Special Edition versions of each film. "What George did in 1997," Ward explains, "was [to] make the movie he originally wanted to make."

    so scene in cantina where Han shoots first... stupid scene where Han steps on Jabba's tail... is right? in Special Editions most new CGI scenes is really great. but some scenes are awful. looks like my vhs tapes with original episodes soon will be priceless...

    1. Re:crap by loveaxelrod · · Score: 1

      looks like my vhs tapes with original episodes soon will be priceless...

      Yeah - after all you were the only person in the world to buy them.

    2. Re:crap by neko9 · · Score: 1

      so you are saying that someone else has another copies? oh crap...

  93. sign the petition... by whiteSanjuro · · Score: 1
  94. Original Text of Article Here (fake mirror) by d2tu · · Score: 1
    The Force is Back - 12:01am

    After years of waiting, hype and hope, the rumors can at last be laid to rest: the holy grail of DVD will finally be released this September. Yes, it is the original Star Wars trilogy: Episodes IV: A New Hope, Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back (which many regard as the best in the series) and Episode VI: Return of the Jedi.

    While a full press release has yet to be issued, both Lucasfilm and Fox Home Entertainment confirmed today that the trilogy will touch down on September 21st as a four-disc set, available in both anamorphic widescreen and full screen versions, containing the three films plus a bonus fourth disc with extras, a la the top-selling Adventures of Indiana Jones set released late last year. The films will not be sold separately, at least initially, according to Fox representatives.

    While the long-held rumor was that George Lucas would wait until the completion of Star Wars Episode III, due in theaters in May 2005, to release the original trilogy on DVD, Lucasfilm VP of Market Jim Ward revealed today that Lucas found some time in his schedule and was willing and eager to make it happen.

    Today's announcement came early and without finalized specs due in part to the intense anticipation amongst consumers for the titles. We are currently in the process of restoring and remastering all three titles for the DVD release, so we're still working on details of the marketing strategy, revealed Ward, not before adding with knowing understatement, but I believe that it is safe to say that it will receive tremendous exposure across all media.

    According to Fox Home Entertainment president Mike Dunn, both the studio and Lucasfilm arrived at the September 21st date to gain maximum exposure during the holiday season: We sold about 17 million VHS 'Star Wars' units during two fall release periods in '95 and '97, he explained. With that in mind, we designed our release strategy to pick the best release date that had the most gentle sales curve decline on home video.

    While the full details on what extras will be included in the set are still pending, Ward promises that Lucasfilm are creating added-value material that gets inside the creation of the 'Star Wars' films in a fresh and fun way. We want watching this DVD collection to be as memorable as seeing the movies for the first time. He also confirmed that rumors that Lucas would not contribute new audio commentaries to the set are false, although there are as of yet no exact details on which films will receive commentary tracks, and who will be among the participants.

    Of course, the big question mark amongst fans has always been whether Lucas would allow the original, unaltered original editions of the trilogy to also be released on DVD. Not possible, said Ward, who confirmed that the upcoming set will feature only the 1997 Special Edition versions of each film. What George did in 1997, Ward explains, was [to] make the movie he originally wanted to make.

    So what are the faithful to do if they don't want to watch the altered 1997 editions of the trilogy? Either give in, or don't buy. We realize there's a lot of debate out there, says Ward. But this is not a democracy. We love our fans, but this is about art and filmmaking. [George] has decided that the sole version he wants available is this one.

    With no press release due for at least several weeks, watch this space for further updates as September 21st approaches. We'll keep you posted, and as always.... May the Force Be With You.

    1. Re:Original Text of Article Here (fake mirror) by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Lucasfilm VP of Market Jim Ward revealed today that Lucas found some time in his schedule and was willing and eager to make it happen.

      More like he realized that Episode III might not be well received and that he should try to capitalize on the success of Episodes IV-VI before more fans desert his franchise than did after I and II.

      We love our fans, but this is about art and filmmaking. [George] has decided that the sole version he wants available is this one.

      It should be about adhering to the intent of copyright that his exclusive rights be for a limited time and that all published works must eventually enter the public domain. If he does not preserve the original works, nor allow for the public to preserve them, that should be grounds for forfeiture of copyright. He should not have the right to erase the original works from history.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  95. Thank Goodness for Laser Discs by dfn5 · · Score: 1
    Makes me glad they immortalized the "original" original trilogy on Laser Disc. Just as good as DVD without all that extra Lucas crap.

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
  96. One word: Rental by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No problem. Just rent the DVDs and copy them.

    End of Difficulty.

    George gets his due....a rental. You get the "modified" movie and the knowledge that you haven't paid for more than what it was worth and you haven't been "milked."

    Posted anonymously for obvious reasons.

  97. So it's not the original version. by JoeD · · Score: 1

    So what?

    George won't be around forever. Eventually, he'll retire or be bought out or be pushed aside in a merger.

    Eventually, someone else will be in charge, and that someone else will not be blinded by an emotional attachment to the work. THEN you may see the original movies released.

    Unless, of course, George does something stupid like get the original masters from the film vault and destroy them...

  98. Re:Can you believe it? by Threni · · Score: 2, Interesting

    > why do you think that Han was by far the most popular character in the films?

    It's because he's the only person in any of the (first three - not familiar with the newer ones) films who can act. Alec Guinness looked awkward, and absolutely hated the films. I don't remember seeing any of the other actors in anything else since.

    Wait - didn't the actor who played Luke Skywalker appear in some of the FMV in the PC version of Wing Commander 4?

    The music, by John Williams, is a cheap copy of Stravinsky too, btw.

    It's a shame, but there really aren't very many intelligent science fiction films. Bladerunner, and...um....er....

  99. I'll live with Greedo... by stubear · · Score: 1

    ...shooting first but give us the Jabba the Hutt scene in Episde IV to make up for changing the story in the Mos Eisley Cantina.

  100. Laserdisc by blackmonday · · Score: 1

    Laserdisc might be the best way to get the original flicks on DVD. They have 5.1 surround and widescreen formats. I still have a laserdisc player, but I think the Star Wars Laserdiscs are very pricey.

    1. Re:Laserdisc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but I think the Star Wars Laserdiscs are very pricey.

      Not really.

  101. Re:Finally! -- Simpsons Quote by thebes · · Score: 2, Funny
    Lenny: The Phantom Menace sucked more!
    Carl: Attack of the Clones sucked more!!!
    All the while fighting with plutonium rods.

    Simpsons and Star Wars

  102. So it's just a matter of time ... by unsigned+integer · · Score: 1
    Before the "Super Special Ninja Turtle" Edition is released, followed by the "Super Ninja Dragon Boxed Gold Platinum" Edition.

    Come on everyone, pony up right now so you can be a fanboy and pay more later!

  103. So what? Splice your own movie!! by UpnAtom · · Score: 2, Insightful
    [The big one that gets all the geeks riled up is they changed the Cantina scene, so that Jabba's bounty hunter shoots at Han, and he kills him in 'self defense'. In the original, Han just shoots him under the table and gets up and leaves.

    It effectively changes Han's character from an outlaw who cares only about himself, to some sort of good guy who found himself in trouble.]

    Add to that the fact that the added effects shot was so poorly done that I still cringe just thinking of it. Greedo is sitting two feet away from Han with his blaster aimed squarely at him, yet somehow misses by a mile?

    Assuming the new scene is the same length as the old scene, it would be pretty easy to splice the old scene back in.

    I don't mind the new Jabba scene, having already seen the film. But I think it takes away from Jabba's evilness in part VI. Which is one of the few decent parts of that film...

  104. Clueless by Darth23 · · Score: 1

    Hot many times has Jaws or the Godfather been released on Video? You don't know, becuase no one keeps track of that shit. Movies that sell well are re-released multiple times becuase there's a market for them. Otherwise people try to unload over 'out of print' versions on ebay and elswhere as over-priced 'collectibles'. The SE's came SIX YEARS AGO on video, they mostly sold out and were going for twice the retail price on e-bay, then were released again around the tim of TPM - FIVE years ago. Compare that to the Double dipping of the LOTR saga - basic edition released then an Expanded edition released 4 or 5 months later - with different extras. yet no one complains about New Line or Peter Jackson's 'greed'.

    --

    -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

    1. Re:Clueless by rufo · · Score: 1

      Because Peter Jackson has said all along that there would be an extended edition. Both the standard and extended edition DVDs were announced at the same. This way people can pick and choose whether they want the originals or the extended.

      Unlike pretty much everybody else, who releases the regular DVD then a year later comes out with a newer special edition without any advance warning.

      --
      My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.
  105. Why Greedo v. Han by bonkedproducer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sure, I agree with all of you, Han should be shooting first, it's more "in character" with him, and makes him coming in to save the day at the end that much more important (If he's always a good guy, why is it such a shock - sometimes there are shades of grey George!)

    OTOH, we should be pointing out what a tremendous slap in the face to all those that worked so hard on the original movies (that made George into what he is today) it is to refuse to release the original versions on DVD. By refusing to release the original, unedited editons on a format that preserves them for generations instead of decades because they (paraphrased quote)"aren't the movies the way I wanted to make them, but wasn't able to because the technology didn't exist," George is saying that the incredible achievements of ILM on those orginal versions is worthless. He forgets the fact that those movies changed the way all movies were made from that point on. He dismisses the hard work of his cast, crew, and effects workers on the original cuts as weak, and unfinished products - nevermind the fact that those unfinished, weak versions made him a millionaire many times over, defined a genre, created groudbreaking visuals, and broke box office records that stood for years to come. Think about it, when "A New Hope" came out it cost roughly $2.00 a ticket, and it wasn't until Tim Burton's "Batman" came out at an average ticket price of more than twice that for the box office returns record "A New Hope" held was broken.

    George's attitude shows through in more than his words, his actions speak louder than he ever could, he hates the fan base. He ignores our request to be able to relive a cherished moment in our upbringing in order to feed his own ego. Why do we put up with him anymore. Listen to your fans George, they put you in that ranch, and while we won't be taking you out of it, I miss being able to look up to you. Stop ignoring our requests, and quit stoking your own ego. Stop spitting on those that made you who you are.

    Save the Original Trilogy - Sign the petition

    --
    Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence in society - M. Twain
  106. A Proposal for George by cmpalmer · · Score: 1

    Go ahead and release the Special Editions. Hell, add Jar Jar to the end of the ROTK (it couldn't suck much worse, could it?).

    But (and I'm very serious here)...

    Fix the Han and Greedo scene and, right before the DVD's come out, go on CNN and apologize for changing the scene in the first place. It's a small change, no big deal. Then all of the fanboys and fangirls around the planet won't have any excuse to wait a week or so to "punish" you for screwing up the films -- they can safely go and stand in line at Wal-Mart to buy them at midnight and skip work or school the next day to watch them!

    Everybody wins!

    I don't think for a moment that most of the slashdotters saying that they won't buy the DVDs are serious. They'll wait a few days or weeks, but everytime they walk by them, they'll feel the urge and eventually they'll give in. If Lucas made that one little geeky, stupid change, everyone would swallow up the rest of the CGI and cuteness.

    Overall, I liked the special editions just fine, particularly ESB (I like the cloud city FX). But, for completeness, if he issued the original-originals and the SE-originals, I'd probably buy both sets the first day (with or without Han shooting first -- at least I could remix the scene from the original-original DVD).

    --
    -- stream of did I lock the front door consciousness
    1. Re:A Proposal for George by |/|/||| · · Score: 1
      Think again. I'm seriously, very seriously, not buying the SE DVDs, or the prequel DVDs, until I can buy the original trilogy on DVD. It's at the top of my DVDs-to-buy list, see? I may buy the others just to "fill out the library," but what's the point if I don't have the originals? Sure there are positive things about the SEs, but there's no way I could enjoy them - it would just be a nagging reminder that I can't watch the real movies.

      I don't know if I'll go to the trouble of buying a LD player and making my own DVDs, but I may do so one of these days when I run out of other projects (yeah, right). I suppose the deadline is whenever my VHS copies wear out and I haven't obtained a digital copy yet.

      So, in other words, you're underestimating how disgusted people are about this. When I walk by the SEs, I won't feel the urge to buy them - I'll feel the urge to buy them, walk outside, remove the shrink-wrap, and then return them to the store and complain that it's the wrong version. Maybe I'll hassle them to try and order the version I want. Maybe I won't do any of the above, but I'll certainly think about it as I pass by the display...

      --
      [javac] 100 errors
    2. Re:A Proposal for George by cmpalmer · · Score: 1

      Well, I did say "most" :-)

      Personally, I agree with most of the other posters who have said that they will (a) probably buy the DVDs regardless (after all, they're only movies and Eps 1 and 2 have kinda taken the shine off the whole Star Wars thing), and (b) by any means possible, remix or download then burn my own DVDs of the version(s) I want to see.

      I have bought (several) VHS versions and, if I've also bought the DVDs, I will have no guilt about downloading an "illegal" version if that is the only way to get it -- Lucas has got plenty of my money over the years (movie tickets, DVDs, VHS videos, books, merchandise, etc.).

      By the same token, I had a really nice DivX copy of The Two Towers about six months before it was released on DVD. I watched it several times (after seeing TTT in the theater four times), then I bought the legal DVD the day it was released (actually, both versions). No harm, no foul, right?

      --
      -- stream of did I lock the front door consciousness
  107. Re:HDDVD -- Twice? by Noofus · · Score: 1

    While I appreciate the story telling of Episodes 1-3 to tie in the original 4-6 trilogy, I will never buy them. 4-6 were my all time favorite movies (I horribly resent the special editions). I *will* buy those (hopefully I will have the option of the original versions) but I dont need the crappy Ep 1-3.

  108. Re:Can you believe it? by nicky_d · · Score: 1

    and whatever rhymes with eloquent

    Wherever Tom Selleck went.
    People found him eloquent.

    No charge to you.

  109. What George did in 1997 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't understand...the technology to allow Greedo to shoot first didn't exist in 1979.

  110. Me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't even see any TV ads for "Star Wars." I heard two ads on the radio, and then of course the title itself indicated something.

    So when I went into the theater, I didn't have any expectations.

    In the words of Isaac Asimov, it was "one giant-sized charge and then it becomes your baby-blue habit for life." (He was talking about altered Spaceoline, though).

  111. wait for the complete 6 episode set by ThePlaydoh · · Score: 1

    *waves hand*
    These are not the DVDs you are looking for.

  112. Re:Can you believe it? by zipfaust · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Several years ago I saw an IMAX film on special effects. The opening scene for Star Wars was recreated in IMAX. No digitial enhancing bull. They cleaned up the models and shot them in IMAX.

    The effect was amazing. I saw it in one of those semispherical IMAX screens and the footage and sound completely enveloped you. Very impressive.

  113. More Evidence That Lucas Won't... by JohnPerkins · · Score: 1

    More evidence that Lucas won't give us what we want.

    Give us a prequel that doesn't suck! Um...No.

    Let Stephen take a crack at it! Um...No.

    Give us the original original trilogy! Um..No.

    Try to understand that I don't give a flying-f about your art, that i'm a consumer and I very much want to spend my money on what I saw in theaters as a kid! Um...No.

  114. Firefly is the answer ... by MS_leases_my_soul · · Score: 5, Informative

    FireFly is the answer. You have a kick-ass writer/director who is more than willing and able and actors who have already put in some amazing acting. You have a plotline that grabs you by the gut and pulls you along for a ride.

    I warn everyone who has not seen Firefly yet -- if you get the DVDs and start watching them, you will go one half of the best ride of your life. It will be like getting on the world's greatest rollercoaster (with 10 loops!), making through the first 3 loops and having the rollercoaster stop in the middle of the ride. You will love what you get and be disgusted that there is not more.

    Still, if people continue to buy the DVDs and word of mouth continues to spread, there is still the movie in the works and hope for SciFi or someone else to pick it up. Fox should be smart enough to put it into production again as long as they are getting paid.

    1. Re:Firefly is the answer ... by bitrott · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      ...and Actors that mumble through their lines, rarely have the range necessary for the role, rarer still look ANYTHING like what you'd imagine the characters should look like. Even still Firefly had all the problems tv sci-fi has: poor production designs, lame plot contrivances and predictability.

      It's a great show. Whendon's writing and the core 'ideas' are it's strongest points. Too bad the cast is so horrible.

    2. Re:Firefly is the answer ... by __aailob1448 · · Score: 1

      Prompted by a post just like yours a few months ago, I went and watched the first 5 episodes of firefly. I thought it was average. Cheesy as hell too...

    3. Re:Firefly is the answer ... by bitrott · · Score: 1

      Not sure why this is flamebait. It's true. Moderators need to reply in kind, not simply kneejerk.

    4. Re:Firefly is the answer ... by shrik3 · · Score: 1
      Prompted by a post just like yours a few months ago, I went and watched the first 5 episodes of firefly. I thought it was average. Cheesy as hell too...
      The first episodes that SciFi-channel aired (which actually were eps 2-6); or the actual first episodes, with the pilot as the first ep (aired as 11-12 on SciFi-channel - ending the serie) The pilot really brings depth to the world, explaining a lot of the backstory. The network's decision to air the pilot as the last episode never ceases to baffle me.
  115. Re:Oh, yes, LOTR is sooo much better. by MoneyT · · Score: 1

    What people are pissed at is that if I don't want to sit through the extra hours of orcs I don't have to, I can buy the theatrical release. YOU CAN"T BUY THE THEATRICAL RELEASE OF STARWARS ANYMORE except second hand.

    That's why people are pissed.

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  116. What always got me (Jedi's Music Ending) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I rarely care about changes and always just loved the story(The Han thing is a bit disturbing though). However, when the special editions came to the theater I was actually confused and astonished to find out the Music changed at the end of Return of the Jedi when everyone is celebrating with the ewoks. To me this is a huge deal. Imagine if the intro song or Vader's theme changed. But I never here anyone mention this, am I the only one who notices it.

    To me, when I heard that that's when things changed.

  117. Re:Can you believe it? by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 1

    Which Stavinsky piece is he copying? That sounds interesting.

    --
    Needle Nardle Noo
  118. Satellite Feed B-Roll Right Now (T6/21) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The B-Roll to accompany the DVD announcement is on Telstar 6, transponder 21 right now (C band). They're showing scenes from each of the three movies. This video is intended for local stations to use as part of their news programs. They keep doing a real time rewind and showing the roll over and over. No Ewoks.

  119. The classic debate! Jackson vs. Lucas! by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 1


    Pick a side people. There is no in between.

    Are you for the guy that inspires girlfriend to wear bikini slave girl costumes in public, or are you for the guy that inspires LARPing?

    I think the choice is clear.

  120. a cunning rip-off? by mydigitalself · · Score: 1

    then after they release Episode 3 they will release a brand new uber box with 1-6 in it. and out go all the fanatics and but that one as well!

  121. With any luck, by stuffduff · · Score: 1
    With any luck, this could be the start of the fund raising for 7, 8 & 9! By the time 9's out it will be on High Definition DVD and we'll be seeing yet another release, probably platnum where for about a thousand bucks you can get a hand autographed boxed edition of the first 9 episodes, with the serialized 10th episode starting the following fall on The George Lucas Channel!

    Honey, what channel is TGL on? Do we have any blank HDDVD disks? Where's my walker?
    I have to get across the living room to the touch screen tv wall to change the channel!

    Why don't you use the force you moron!

    What do you mean by that!? I knew I should havd traded you for a robot when I had the chance!

    --
    "Can there be a Klein bottle that is an efficient and effective beer pitcher?"
  122. Laserdisc Definitive Collection is still the best by GreatDrok · · Score: 1

    I have both the original and SE versions on LaserDisc and the original is far better. There is running commentary and extras, the whole nine yards and the picture (THX mastered) and sound (THX uncompressed Dolby Surround) are excellent.

    Looks like I'll still be able to lord it over people even when this DVD set is released :-) I bet they don't even release these new ones with DTS sound, savages!

    --
    "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
  123. Cut scenes by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 1
    Maybe someone here will know. No-one on the imdb did.

    Does anyone remember the scene when Boba-Fett gets burped out of the Sarlac pit? I remember watching it as a kid, my dad remembered it, and I remember discussing it as a kid on the playground with my friends. I'd like to see it included in the set, even just as a cut scene.

    Also, the scene where Han and Leia make out on Endor and the Imperial Troop transport on Tatoonie. I haven't seen these scenes for years but what really gets me is that no-one else, or at least, none of the younger Star Wars fans, believe that many of these scenes exist. Does anyone else remember them or any other cut scenes which are missing?

    --
    Needle Nardle Noo
    1. Re:Cut scenes by jazzmans · · Score: 1
      I thought he (meaning the sarlac) just burped after eating Boba Fet... but it's been way too many years since I saw the unforked up versions.

      jaz

      --
      Life is what happens to you while you are busy making other plans. No-one sees motorcycles
    2. Re:Cut scenes by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 1
      Hey,

      Finally someelse who believes me.

      Boba Fett is burped out and lies on the sand just outside the Sarlac's mouth.

      IIRC its a shot of Fett lying on the sand and we're looking down from somewhere just above his head, a 3/4s view.

      Wish I knew where to get those scenes. Possibly the Laser Disc versions, but I don't know for sure. I'm gonna have to check them out (when I get cash).

      --
      Needle Nardle Noo
  124. What about without the added effects? by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    I would buy it but only if it comes in it's original format, without the added in CG crap.

    I saw it both ways and I like the way it was to begin with, like it was when I saw it 100 times at the theatre when I was 15...

    Leave it alone man, we don't like no steenking CG !!

  125. Re:This hit Fark.com about 20 minutes ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been noticing boing boing feeding a lot of stories recently. And you shouldn't overlook the monthly "new stories on wired" karma whore feeding frenzy...

  126. Don't whine until you see the french version by Professeur+Shadoko · · Score: 1

    I dunno what happened here, but in that scene they also changed what Han says.

    They removed the insult... and I guess they could not get the man who was Han's voice back in 1977 to re-read it, and the result is a *completely* different voice.

    This is awful. I was shocked when I saw the special edition

    1. Re:Don't whine until you see the french version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      man who was Han's voice back

      That would be Harrison Ford, perhaps? Maybe they forgot to write it down or something

    2. Re:Don't whine until you see the french version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The French voice, Mister Smartypants.

    3. Re:Don't whine until you see the french version by Monsieur_F · · Score: 1

      His name is Francis Lax.
      You can hear his voice on a page dedicated to people who made voices for Harrison Ford on this page (in French)

      --
      McCartney fans pay bus tickets. [...] Lennon fans too, with discretion.
  127. Its not nice self-defense nor cold blood by voss · · Score: 1

    Han knows greedo is going to probably shoot him so he shoots first. He is not a cold blooded killer, hes a man living in a lawless space frontier.

    I like the way it is shown in the original trilogy.
    What Lucas has done is nothing short of 1984-style rewriting history hoping that we will forget.

  128. Han shooting first is nothing... by robnauta · · Score: 0

    compared to the massive edits in the new DVD versions. C3PO will be digitally replaced by a cylon, Luke will have an new digital up-to-date haircut instead of that lame 70's long hair, the deathstar explosion will be redone (again). Instead of just shooting in the saloon Han and Greedo will duke it out kung-fu style, since the Matrix made that compulsory for any fight scene. Darth Vader will speak with an english accent because the actor's guild requires this for all villains nowadays. The stormtroopers will probably speak with an arabic accent. And wait till you see the product placements :)

  129. Re:Can you believe it? by Threni · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Williams has made a career out of copying Stravinsky, but the piece I'm referring to, which he copied in Star Wars, and again in Jaws, is The Rite of Spring (Le Sacre du Printemps). Listen to the music in Star Wars IV when the droids have crash landed on that desert planet, and the camera is panning around, with the eerie music in the background....then listen to "part 2 - introduction` of Le Sacre. I just tried to find a site online where you can listen to parts of this excellent piece of music, but unfortunately the first 10 or so disks I found on Amazon break the piece up into 20 or so tracks (and rightly so), not just two, and Amazon only let you listen to the first 6 or so tracks, but if you look long enough you'll probably find a copy online with just the two tracks, and it'll be the start of track 2.

    I can't recommend Stravinsky's music enough.

  130. Boycott... with DVDShrink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want the original versions on DVD. The movie that changed the way I imagined movies to be! Lucas may say this is not a democracy, but the votes with your dollars do count to this ass.

    I will not buy them, instead I will rent and copy with DVDShrink (look it up on Google). It's freeware, its awesome. Shrink any DVD to fit on one 4.7 DVD-R or +R. It copies AC3, DTS, subtitles, everything. Even with shrinking a 2-hour movie that is ove 6GB (dual layer) they look great.

    See, I still buy a few DVDs. DS9 box sets, Indiana Jones trilogy box set, Seabiscuit in red colectors slipcases, the LOTR Fellowship and Two Towers in 4-disc set. I copy the ones that I like enough to watch again but are not important enough for me to own.

    Send a message. Have your cake and eat it too.

  131. More B-Roll Info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, three scenes being shown that'll show up on your local news; destructions of the death star ("Great shot, kid!"), Luke gives Vader a hand ("I'll never join you!"), and the speeder chase ("Jam their comlink!").

    Phone numbers for more info (from the B-Roll end splash page) are:

    Harry Parrish (Fox Home Entertainment) 310/369-1628
    and
    Lynne Hale (LucasFilm Ltd.) 415/662-1962 ... and just as I typed this the feed went cold.

  132. All editions DVD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have seen DVDs that contains the Widescreen and Normal screen version on the same disk. I have also seen DVD movies that give you the choice to play the movie with the extended scenes or not.

    Why not release the DVD so that you can play them in any one of the carnations that exist? Am I wrong or does it seems very possible to do?

    Long ago in a galaxy far far far away Lucas Films was on the cutting edge to Technology. Why not be a leader once again buys delivering a DVD with the countless versions of the movies and the ability to select which version you really want view. Leave all the other crap off disk and include a supplement disk. That would actually make the fans happy. Sad thing is that the only way Lucas could get more money would to do some actual work produce something new. It would have to be somewhat creative for even people to buy it. It seems that Lucas has long ago lots his creative edge and now relies on marking teams to decide what is best. But what do I know I am just in customer services.

  133. PG vs PG-13 by Tassach · · Score: 1

    The original Star Wars was made before the PG-13 rating was created. In order to maximize toy sales, George wants the Star Wars universe to be solidly PG, If you recall, the PG-13 rating was actually created in response to that other classic Lucas series. Early on, people often referred to PG-13 as "The Indiana Jones Rating". There was a big push to create a new rating between PG and R because many people were upset over the fact that Raiders of the Lost Ark really pushed the edges of PG.

    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    1. Re:PG vs PG-13 by filmsmith · · Score: 1

      I know it was a joint project and Lucas did lend a hand, but I can't help but think of the Indiana Jones trilogy as being a classic Spielberg series.

      My .02

      fs

  134. Download doesn't work, jerk. by Moryath · · Score: 1

    UGO took them over. Realmedia file is gone.

  135. If Star Wars was a roguelike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You see Darth Vader.
    Darth Vader announces: "I am your father!"
    You are confused!
    Darth Vader announces: "I am your mother, too!"
    You are more confused!
    There's a wall in the way! [x4]

    [Paraphrased from r.g.r.a.]

  136. Too little... by dr_turgeon · · Score: 1

    as always, too late.

    --
    "...objectivity resides in recognizing your preferences, subjecting them to especially harsh scrutiny." -Gould
  137. Star Wars? Overrated. by metamatic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I couldn't care less if Lucas finally releases Star Wars on DVD.

    What I want to see is THX-1138 on DVD. His one great movie.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  138. 2 Options by Holdstrong · · Score: 1
    - Wait for the material to pass into public domain, the way all material is eventually supposed to....

    - or ignore the copyright and buy an original DVD set on EBay.

    Seeing as how laws have a funny way of changing everytime some important cash cow piece of art is due to enter public domain (ie: Mickey Mouse) I think we may be waiting a long, LONG time for that. (bad pun)

    But in either case, this arrogant jerk will not be getting my money.

  139. Wrong menu option Lucas! Whoops! by superultra · · Score: 4, Funny

    ". . .the original version technically don't exist."

    You can't blame him. I mean how many times have you clicked on "Save" in the File Menu instead of "Save As"?

  140. Re:Oh, yes, LOTR is sooo much better. by Nutcase · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I didn't actually compare the movies at all. You are welcome to choose your poison. This isn't about the content - it's about the business model.

    Peter Jackson and New Line, regardless of the movie's content, are treating those who choose to purchase the films with respect. George Lucas is not.

    Since you brought up the content and the genre defining aspects of films, I have to make a side comment:

    Star Wars may have come out in 1977, but we aren't talking about /that/ star wars. We are talking about the one that came out in the 90's. You can't buy the '77 one anymore even if you wanted to. So I guess the star wars that defined the genre is dead. Now all we can see is the one that fell victim to the cliches of the genre it helped spawn.

  141. New Coke? by Hadean · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As someone hinted at elsewhere in the posts, Lucas may be pulling an intentional version of the "New Coke" fiasco. According to Wikipedia:

    The public were unhappy with the new taste, and even more unhappy that they were no longer able to obtain the original product, and so the company had to backtrack and return to the older formula. However, when they went back to the original formula - now renamed Classic Coke/Coca Cola Classic - demand for the classic taste grew to a greater extent than before New Coke...

    Sounds like something an evil marketer might want to try... Who knows, maybe we'll see Classic Star Wars in 2006, when all of the marketing from the newer Star Wars' is finished and Lucas is scrounging around for something to sell before making Episode 7. G'ah.

  142. "These are not... by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 1

    ...the DVD's I'm looking for," SW Fan, waving a hand at Best Buy clone.

    "These are not the DVD's you're looking for," replied the Best Buy clone.

    Seriously folx, the who original concept of the DVD film industry was the presentation of director cuts, alternent endings, etc... There is no reason, other than GL's insanity that they shouldn't offer the DVD set with the option to turn the Special Edition features on and off.

    More thank likely, after they are released and sell a billion copies, the original version will be released as a special edition on the 30th aniversary and they'll sell another billion copies.

  143. About Ian McDiarmid.. by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    Considering that he was the Emporer in ROTJ, and considering that the "Emperor" in ESB was only a voice part, I don't think it'd be really worth the dubbing and resyncing of audio. I mean, really, how far must you go?

    They're fine, it's fine, everything's fine. Enjoy the movies for what they are -- an epic space adventure. Don't nitpick everything into nothingness.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:About Ian McDiarmid.. by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      They're fine, it's fine, everything's fine. Enjoy the movies for what they are -- an epic space adventure. Don't nitpick everything into nothingness.

      Couldn't have said it better... Someone needs to tell this to Lucas.

      -matt

  144. My thoughts... by spottedkangaroo · · Score: 1

    I got a copy of the theatrical release ripped from laser disk.

    Has menus, greedo doesn't shoot first, snai snoodle signs her original song, and the ewok party doesn't span the galaxy.

    I like the special editions.

    That makes sense. They're very well done.

    However, Lucass should really include both versions on the DVD -- and he should have done so about 8 years ago. Think about any director's cuts you have -- the original will be on there too. The special editions would be far superior if he hadn't have messed with the plot.

    In the special edition, they make guido shoot first. He doesn't do that in the originals. I hate that enough to not like the special editions. Also, I really like the original snai snoodle song (jabba's bar) and was pissed that they changed that. Also, I'm apparently the one in a billion that liked the original ewok Yub Yub song at the end of jedi. Most people seem to hate it, but...

    Those moves aren't very good and I have memorized them. The only reason to watch them is to remember the first time, or to appreciate movie history ... or something. The special edition isn't that. :) I understand why he subbed out the two songs. The new scenes were longer than the old songs -- but I'd rather watch the old scenes than suffer the new songs.

    I'll never understand why greedo shoots first.

    DISCLAIMER: I realize this is pretty unimportant shat... But it is important to me.

    --
    Imagine if you weren't allowed to use roads because a bus company complained about your driving 3 times. --skunkpussy
    1. Re:My thoughts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Lucass should really include both versions on the DVD -- and he should have done so about 8 years ago."
      Well, first off - it's Lucas. Second, 8 years ago DVD player manufacturers hadn't quite reached the level of market penetration they currently enjoy so a DVD release then might not have been the best thing in the world. It's also worth nothing that 8 years ago, I believe the special editions were just beginning to play in theatres.
    2. Re:My thoughts... by spottedkangaroo · · Score: 1

      Ok, my bad. 7 years ago.

      --
      Imagine if you weren't allowed to use roads because a bus company complained about your driving 3 times. --skunkpussy
  145. big deal! by zorcon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Who cares? I've owned these DVDs for years...in fact, I have the original trilogy and SE trilogy with a total of 37 different covers!!! All with Chinese, Malay, and Thai subtitles too! Beat that Lucas...you fool!!!

  146. "Yub Yub" at least made SENSE in the STORY! by Moryath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Face it; at the end of RoTJ, NOBODY IN THE GALAXY was supposed to know what was going on.

    The Second Death Star had been destroyed. Whee. The Imperial Fleet was defeated. Whee.

    The Rebels were victorious. Oh joy.

    We forget two very important things:
    #1 - People fear change almost as much as they hate oppression (look at Iraq / Islam in general; a bunch of seventh-century savages they remain, even while claiming to overthrow governments in the name of their "freedom").

    #2 - The Rebels were a minority in the galaxy, whose population mostly just wanted to be left alone.

    It's been explored in the novels and elsewhere; during the time of the Empire, there were a few planets in rebellion, but mostly it was just business as usual. Unless you got the attention of the Imperial government, you did business the same way you'd done it under the Republic.

    If you joined the Imperial Forces, chances are you did it because of a slick recruiting plan and promises of good wages / adventure -- hey, Luke was about to join up before Obi-Wan came along, wasn't he? For that matter, the officers of the Imperial Navy might have feared Vader, but the grunts were happy enough as they were, obviously.

    Therefore, having a LOCALIZED celebration on Endor made sense. There were a bunch of Rebels present, because they'd won the battle, and there were a bunch of Ewoks around because they were indigenous.

    Showing celebrations elsewhere? Yeesh, people. THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN NO CELEBRATIONS ELSEWHERE.

    You think the entire galaxy would have just cheered and shouted and gone "Whee, the Emperor's gone! Yay!"???

    Fuck that. They'd have been hand-wringing, worried about who was restoring/keeping order with the StormTroopers now out of a job. Planetary governors would alternately have been quelling civil distress and working on plans either to take over territory or work their way into positions of power in the new government. Smugglers wouldn't have given a flying fuck, except that the unrest made it easier for them to slip stuff into ports undetected.

    That's the reality. On Endor, and maybe a few other Rebel bases, there might have been a party. Mon Calamari perhaps, given what the Emperor did to them.

    Coruscant? The seat of the Emperor's power? FUCK NO. Coruscant wouldn't have been cheering. The other planets shown? Likewise.

    "Yub Yub" and the original party scene make sense. The Special Edition bullshit is just that, BULLSHIT, and completely ignores the realities of the universe Lucas constructed in the first place.

    1. Re:"Yub Yub" at least made SENSE in the STORY! by NanoGator · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      "Showing celebrations elsewhere? Yeesh, people. THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN NO CELEBRATIONS ELSEWHERE."

      A.) this was a long time ago in a galaxy far far away.

      B.) Just shut up. Seriously. It's hard enough admitting to being a fan of the original trilogy without people ranting about frivilous, yet easy to debate, topics.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:"Yub Yub" at least made SENSE in the STORY! by mog007 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      All of that is insightful, except that bit about the stormtroopers being out of a job.

      If you actully read any of the extended universe books, you'd know that the Empire didn't fall when the second Death Star was destroyed. The Rebels just kept winning victory after victory, pushing them back. The stormies didn't just get fired by the Rebellion, because they wouldn't have listened. Besides, as small as the Rebellion was, they would have probably tried to get the stormies on their own payroll.

    3. Re:"Yub Yub" at least made SENSE in the STORY! by Daniel+Quinlan · · Score: 1

      If you joined the Imperial Forces, chances are you did it because of a slick recruiting plan and promises of good wages / adventure -- hey, Luke was about to join up before Obi-Wan came along, wasn't he? Sheesh. Luke was going to join the Rebel Alliance like his friend Biggs had. Daniel

    4. Re:"Yub Yub" at least made SENSE in the STORY! by compling · · Score: 1

      Wow. The way you threw in that ignorant, malicious attack on Iraq / Islam is amazing. And thank you to the rest of you who modded it up.

    5. Re:"Yub Yub" at least made SENSE in the STORY! by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Showing celebrations elsewhere? Yeesh, people. THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN NO CELEBRATIONS ELSEWHERE.

      Given the sheer amount of ships involved in that battle on both sides? It's unimaginable NOT to have everyone phone home that they just thrashed the Imperial Fleet.

      It's almost unimaginable for someone who takes star wars so seriously to have such little imagination. ;)

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    6. Re:"Yub Yub" at least made SENSE in the STORY! by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Though his post wasn't the most tactfully worded, it was still quite a valid point. Too many people try to pass try to pass off observations about why something wouldn't happen the way it did in a movie as proof of their higher existence. Why reward them for making such a frivilous nitpick? Why punish the guy who rightfully tells them to shut up?

    7. Re:"Yub Yub" at least made SENSE in the STORY! by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      If you actully read any of the extended universe books, you'd know that *snip*

      Unless it was in the movies or written by Lucas, it didn't happen, or is simply speculation. It's not part of the official Star Wars canon. Though it does make sense. :) I mean, if someone blew up the White House, it wouldn't mean the US would be defeated. Just set back.

    8. Re:"Yub Yub" at least made SENSE in the STORY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yub Yub ruled. That was the relief to the dramatic ending. Changing that completely degraded the happiness at the end to feel like the emmy awards!

    9. Re:"Yub Yub" at least made SENSE in the STORY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Canada burnt it down in the 1800's and the US just came back more powerful than we ever could imagine.....

  147. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus, how many times can you all watch this?

    And you're going to shell out 50-? bucks to watch it again?

    You should all just lie low and make them suffer for not releasing it nine years ago.

    You've lasted this long.

  148. Empire Strike's Back by kevin7kal · · Score: 1

    I noticed the comment on the website Empire Strikes Back(Regarded by many as the best in the series). Who are these people? Empire is better than Phantom Menace, but so is Barney. My Rankings 1) A New Hope 2) Jedi 3) Empire 4 and 5) Episode II & III 6) Barney 7) Phantom Menace

  149. Inspiration by daBass · · Score: 1

    Hopefully that inspriation works both ways, PJ may have inspired Dark Overlord Lucas to make the final three episodes the Jackson way; shoot all three in one go and finish the whole project in 4-5 years time, not 10. That means they may actualy get made before George is too old...

    1. Re:Inspiration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people might say George has been too old since about 1990.

  150. It's official, George Lucas can suck on my balls. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    I grew up LOVING all things Star Wars. I saw episode IV in a theater, before I was out of diapers. I was Darth Vader for like 6 halloweens in a row. I saw Empire and Jedi during their opening weeks. As soon as the trilogy was first released on VHS I got a copy. I went to the theater to see the "Special Edition" movies. How did Lucas repay people like me, Star Wars fans?

    By trying to anally rape us all. First there was that festering piece of feces that we'll just say rhymes with "Mepisode 1". For now, I'll just forget about the announcement about the original trilogy not being released on DVD. Episode 2 was a little better, but Episode 3 better be spec-fucking-tacular to make up for the horror of Episode 1.

    I'm not paying a cent for the DVD version of movies that I alreay have. I'll go to blockbuster, rent them, and um... you know...

    This cash cow is shutting off the udder. Lucas isn't making another cent off of me.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  151. Unlike George Lucas... by douglips · · Score: 1

    Yeah! How dare George not tell us his plans for the DVD or even VHS release in 1977!

    1. Re:Unlike George Lucas... by finkployd · · Score: 2, Informative

      I didn't start the comparison, pal. I only mentioned that if you have a beef with Lucas and his "Star Wars revision of the week" games, comparing that to Peter Jackson isn't exactly fair since Jackson has totally up front about how many releases there would be.

      Finkployd

    2. Re:Unlike George Lucas... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Well, if Peter Jackson meant to steal the idea from George Lucas, he screwed up. Jackson's revisions were actually enjoyable to watch, which destroys the value in re-releasing the "archival quality original" in about 10 years...

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  152. It's Official by poofyhairguy82 · · Score: 1

    Well it's offical. The DVD is now a complete success. Wasn't these and the Indiana Jones movies purposly held from dvd for a while because Lucas (And his buddy Spielberg) didn't believe in the market for Dvds. Now that he is giving up his baby, it proves that the Dvd is one of the most succesful formats of all time.

  153. completely agree by yuud · · Score: 1

    having greedo shoot first (and miss) does 2 things a) shows that aliens with suction cups on their fingers shouldn't use guns b) han loses some depth as a character

  154. Empire has the least intrusive.... by jzarling · · Score: 1

    I think Empire has the least intruse "ehancements" The extra fighter in the A New Hope looked outta place, and the cantina scenes do not even merit responses. OFr the most part Empire limited its intrusive CGI to Cloud City and it sorta helped out it in my book.

    --
    It is better to be the hammer than the anvil.
    1. Re:Empire has the least intrusive.... by sammaffei · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ.

      The whole "Bring my Shuttle" scene where they show Vader actually walking out to the shuttle and stepping off in the Star Destroyer (using a edited out scene from Jedi) was utterly useless. When I was 10 (and saw ESB in the theaters), I understood that he went to the ship. I didn't have to see it.

      --

      Political correctness is the newest form of slavery.

    2. Re:Empire has the least intrusive.... by stilleon · · Score: 1

      I think the fixes to Empire are all pretty good. best was cleaning up the discoloration of the optical matting (the boxes around ships in space) which was way more apparant in this film. I liked the Wampa Ice Beast... even more because he was a practical effect not some CGI thing. The only bad part was the adding of the scream to Luke falling after Vader reveals he's Luke's father. Empire SE has Luke screming like a baby... the classic one he just falls. For A New Hope I like the new version of the Death Star Attack... much improved. But there is so much to hate: All the added stuff at Mos Eisly, the Greedo scene change, the added Jabba scene that doesn't really work and just repeats the exposition from the Greedo scene. Also, the adding of Biggs at the end... it doesn't work without the missing scenes of Biggs visiting Tatooine (its in the script, novel, comic adaptation and Radio Show). I'd love to know if someone has the widescreen LaserDisc of the classic PRE-SE trilogy. I'd love to burn them to DVD. Even make a backup for that person.

    3. Re:Empire has the least intrusive.... by sammaffei · · Score: 1

      You think in the redo of IV they would have:

      1. Fixed the rope pulling the droid (when Luke was looking for Artoo).
      2. Remove the stormtrooper hitting his head on the overhang.
      3. Updating the computer simulation of the Death Star attack plan.
      4. Fixed the scene where look calls Leia "Carrie" after destroying the Death Star.

      --

      Political correctness is the newest form of slavery.

  155. Stop whining by panic911 · · Score: 1

    A lot of people are whining about it being the special edition.

    If you like crappy quality video and audio (like the original version had), go get the VHS tape. DVDs are meant to be high quality, and the special edition has been completely remastered with THX and a much clearer video.

    Or are you whining about the fact that they added scenes? If anything - that's just an improvement.

    Perhaps you're just whining about the fact that they took some of the corny (70s) special effects out and decided to use state of the art (90s) special effects to improve the X-Wing scenes.

    I just don't get the mentality behind flaming the special edition. I like both versions, but if anything, the Special Edition was an improvement.

    1. Re:Stop whining by neko9 · · Score: 1

      what crappy audio and video? laserdisc version has high quality video and THX sound...

  156. one gripe about LOTR extended DVDs by Johnny2Bags · · Score: 1

    One thing that REALLY pisses me off about the LOTR extended DVD series is that the Two Towers extended DVD does NOT contain the short film by Sean Astin "The Long and Short of It" (with making of documentary). The theatrical DVD does have this.

    So now I need to either purchase the theatrical, or rent and rip it, because I have not seen it available for D/L anywhere.

  157. Re: [movie film resolution] by genericacct · · Score: 2, Informative
    It should probably be pointed out that there is cropping done as you describe to the original shot, but also some re-shaping done by lenses at both the shooting and projection ends, thanks to Panavision(TM). We've seen examples of the director watching prints in the editing room where there's a big ~4:3 ratio frame and a little white-line box where the end result is framed in widescreen. This area, I believe, is what is printed to the final film, which is re-distorted back to realistic perspective in a widescreen frame ratio (1:2.35?). So you're right, not all that is captured by the camera's film even ends up at the projectionist's booth.


    Of course, I'm sure Panavision or a film professional like my dad could explain it better than I can.

  158. Make your own by {tele}machus_*1 · · Score: 1

    I took my widesreen edition VHS tapes, worked around the macrovision protection and made my own DVDs of the original trilogy. Sure the quality is not that great (compared to other DVDs, that is), but they don't wear out from repeated viewings (and they are only for my own personal use, so I consider them fair use under copyright law). If I wanted the Special Edition movies on DVD, I would have already bought them on eBay. I imagine I'll end up buying this set for the extras, because I've always wanted to see the scenes left on the cutting room floor, especially for Episode 4.

  159. It's all becuase of Yub-Nub by ChopsMIDI · · Score: 1

    It's because they took out "Yub-Nub" at the end of Jedi, and replaced it with some corny "non-Ewok" sounding music. At least that's my major beef!

    That and the CGI Jabba in Empire. Unneccesary!

    --

    How could I say to men: "Speak louder, shout! For I am deaf!"? -Ludwig van Beethoven
  160. That's not quite true by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First off, for still cameras, there ARE ones that rival or exceed 35mm film. Take a look at the Cannon E01 as an example.

    Now as for movies, generally all-digital is going to give higher quality. Why? Well mainly because when you go from analogue film to a digital format, there's always problems with the consistency of the exposure. It's easiest to see with stuff shot on lower res flm like 16mm. Watch Resivour Dogs and notice the sort of "snow" effect in solid colour areas. It's less pronounced on good 35mm film, but still happens.

    Now, this is no big deal when the presentation is analogue, you'll probably never see it, even on the big screen, and certianly not on a TV. However that's not true when it goes compressed digital. The MPEG-2 encoder will try to encode all this, or rather an approximation thereof. Now this causes two problems:

    1) Uses data that could be used for other information. There's only so many bits per second it's allowed to use, and when they get used encoding something unnecessary like this, there's less for other detail. It's also not real efficient at encoding that kind of noise which leads us to...

    2) Because it's not good at encoding it, it tends to generate artifacts that make it much more noticable.

    Now when it comes from a digital source, and is digital the whole way, this is not a problem. Thus, on a compressed digital distribution medium, like DVD, you get a better end result.

    It will also probably result in a better theatre experience. In the theatre analogue film suffers from some major problems that digital does not:

    1) Generation loss. You never see the orignal film, you see, at best, a copy and usually a copy of a copy. Each time, detail is lost. Digital is the orignal every time.

    2) Film damage. I've never seen a movie that the film didn't have at least a few flects of dust or the like on it that were visible. Again, never happens with digital.

    3) Projector rumble. At all the theatres around here, the projector shakes ever so slightly. This is understandable due to the mechanics of it. Thing is, that slight shake becomes not so slight when transmitted to the large screen. The jitter is certianly visible. DLP projectors (and related technologies) don't do this either.

    Combine that with the high resolution that digital films are ususally shot at (3840x2400), and I think the experience will be superior.

    1. Re:That's not quite true by Hungus · · Score: 1

      35mm movie film is approximately 5000dpi which is a 20 megapixel image with typically a 1000:1 contrast ratio so that would be the equivalent of a 36bit 86 MB tiff file per frame.

      Exposure consistancy is best accounted for by using matched lenses and film stock from the same lot.

      a videophile you wil most likely never be

      --
      Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
    2. Re:That's not quite true by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      There are video filters available that reduce the film noise when converting to digital. The ones I'm familiar with (yuvfilter in mjpegtools) aren't perfect and might require some manual intervention, but what's 100 man-hours in a project of this sort? Using such a filter improves results and lowers data rate.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    3. Re:That's not quite true by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

      First off, for still cameras, there ARE ones that rival or exceed 35mm film. Take a look at the Cannon E01 as an example.

      You mean the Canon EOS 1Ds. It's an 11 megapixel digital SLR camera. And yes, it's better than 35mm film.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    4. Re:That's not quite true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can buy 20,000 dpi film for a 35mm camera at most good camera stores. Kodak makes some 60,000 dpi stuff too. Digital cameras have a very long way to go to catch up with film.

    5. Re:That's not quite true by misterpies · · Score: 1


      if you want to throw money around, the best 35mm film can provide the equivalent of 20 megapixels and will cost you far less than an EOS 1D. Though you'll need a good camera since at that level flaws in the lens are more important than the film grain.

      An everyday SLR with decent film will give you around 12 MPx. Even a $5 throwaway gives you 4MPx. Good film also holds more colour information, equivalent to 36bit.

      Digital cameras have many advantages, but resolution is not yet one.

      --
      The author of this post asserts his moral rights.
    6. Re:That's not quite true by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

      Spoken like someone who doesn't really know what he's talking about...

      Here's an article comparing the Canon 1Ds to 6x7 medium format film scanned with a $100 per scan drum scanner process.

      http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/shootout .shtml

      The result is that they're really close. And then when you consider the fact that 6x7 film is something like 6 times the surface area of a 24mm by 36mm film negative... well, you get the idea.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
  161. Upgrade? by MrSparkle · · Score: 1

    So where do I take my VHS copies to trade them in for the DVD upgrade? After all, I've already paid for my license to watch them.

  162. That's *Revenge* of the Jedi by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Yes, the video quality and special effects improved. But they retitled ROTJ, and Jabba the Hutt, who in the original "Star Wars" was a fat guy, was replaced in "Episode 4: A New Hope" with the big worm from "Revenge of the Jedi".

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  163. A marketing mistake hiding an evil marketing ploy by dionwr · · Score: 1

    All this jawing over original vs. extra-crispy -- er, I mean, specical edition -- is obscuring another aspect of this that people should be paying attention to: you can only buy ALL THREE MOVIES. In other fields, this is called bundling, and it's illegal.

    But in DVD's, the studios have discovered they can get away with it, because we're letting them do so. So you have to buy the sucky third Godfather to get the other two, and you have to buy the TWO lameass Indiana Jones sequals to get the only one of the three that's worth a damn, and you have to put up with those two truly awful "Back to the Future" movies to get the first, and now we'll have to buy "Jedi" to get "Empire" or "Star Wars" (fuck calling it "New Hope"), assuming you want that last one after they change it so that Greedo shoots first.

    Fortunately, it will be possible to buy singles from folks breaking up the box sets on ebay.

    But we're still being diddled here, folks, whichever version they're putting out. You might want to take that into consideration.

    I'd like for these to not sell, and everyone, without exception, to not buy them because they're not selling us what we want. But I'd also like world peace, an end to world hunger, and for George W. Bush to die in jail, preferably while being anally raped by his 300lb. cellmate, but I don't expect that, either.

    Also, to those of you running out the theory that Lucas is an evil marketing genius who cleverly intends to sell you the original cuts later and is only holding on now to get more money from you down the road, get a grip. It's NOT a conspriacy -- just check out his recent movies. His judgment really has gotten that bad.

    I mean, this is the mind that thought up Jar-Jar.

    --
    Make a man a fire, and he's warm for a day. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  164. Burn in Hell. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    May you burn in hell George. You're a cocksucking ass fart. GIMMIE THE ORIGINAL.

    "THIS IS NOT A DEMOCRACY." YOU'RE RIGHT, BUT I AIN'T BUYING YOUR FUCKED UP SHIT.

    DIE.

    May your heart explode and you land in a pile of your own dung.

  165. SciFi Acting (See Babylon 5) by MS_leases_my_soul · · Score: 2, Funny

    You obviously are using the standard scale in your judgement of acting and not the weighted SciFi scale.

    In non-scifi works, actors are expected to have emotional range and be capable of pulling the audience into the plot for the plot's sake. Their ability to project the suspension of disbelief is key into the audience feeling that they are part of an actual event instead of simply an observer.

    The SciFi sliding scale, however, is broken into several sub-categories of attributes that are appealing to your typical SlashDot reader. This attributes include such qualities as bust size, scruffiness, ability to immediately represent a given stereotype, bust size, how they look sitting naked on a rock on a desert planet, how they look in a form fitting uniform, bust size, and how they look shooting a ray gun. Occasionally, if they are not female, thus making bust size irrelevant, their acting ability may come into play unless they can show documented proof of being on such hits as "The Scarecrow and Mrs. King".

    1. Re:SciFi Acting (See Babylon 5) by bitrott · · Score: 1

      :) Thanks for the laugh. That was very witty.

  166. Greedo shoots first? by runlvl0 · · Score: 1

    So what are the faithful to do if they don't want to watch the altered 1997 editions of the trilogy? Either give in, or don't buy. "We realize there's a lot of debate out there," says Ward. "But this is not a democracy. We love our fans, but this is about art and filmmaking. [George] has decided that the sole version he wants available is this one."

    That's right, it's not a democracy, it's capitalism and I'll buy the version that I want, and ignore the version that I don't.

    While the long-held rumor was that George Lucas would wait until the completion of Star Wars Episode III, due in theaters in May 2005, to release the original trilogy on DVD, Lucasfilm VP of Market Jim Ward revealed today that Lucas "found some time" in his schedule and "was willing and eager to make it happen."

    Yeah, I'll bet he "found some time" in his schedule -- from making episode 3? That really puts me at ease about the quality of the last Star Wars movie. Actually, it does, because I have the sneaking suspicion that the less that George Lucas has to do with it at this point, the less likely it will be to *suck*. Also telling that he's eager to release SW 4-6 (and altering his schedule to do so) before the last movie comes out. Maybe he's becoming unsure about the new franchise - of course, I'm arguing the artistic vision of the man who brought us Jar-Jar Binks and "I don't like the sand. It's coarse and rough and irritating--not like you. You're soft and smooth." So I could be wrong. Of course, it's all about the art and the fans.

    According to Fox Home Entertainment president Mike Dunn, both the studio and Lucasfilm arrived at the September 21st date to gain maximum exposure during the holiday season: "We sold about 17 million VHS 'Star Wars' units during two fall release periods in '95 and '97," he explained. "With that in mind, we designed our release strategy to pick the best release date that had the most gentle sales curve decline on home video."

    One more thought about Jar Jar Lucas and the idea "that the sole version he wants available is this one." Don't misunderstand me in my claim that this is all about the money - it's a good thing. Obviously, the man has lost all of his non-technical artistic judgement and talent, but he can still understand his bank statement. Don't rush out and buy the inferior ("New And Improved!" TM) version, and see how long it takes him to offer the classic version. It worked with New Coke...

    --

    Carthago delenda est!
  167. Thre is a press release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go over to thedidgitalbits.com

  168. new music by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 1

    LOTR extended editions also include newly composed and recorded music to go with the new footage.

    It's going the extra mile that is not often found in contemporary capitalism society...

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
  169. Episodes 1 and 2: I can only hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I hope that George Lucas releases a Special Edition of Episodes 1 and 2, and edits them into better movies.

  170. Other lame dialogue changes by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

    I didn't even notice that little "shuttle" difference because it's kind of an offhand line that wasn't very memorable to me. Some of the ones that bother me are a couple of cases where they intentionally took out humorous lines and replaced them with boring stuff that's just lame filler.

    In ESB, when R2 has just gotten spit out by that whale-thing on Dagobah, Luke turns him back rightside up and asks him if he's OK. In the original, he says the line, "You're lucky you don't taste very good." It is replaced with "You're lucky to get out of there."

    In ROTJ, when Han is hanging off the edge of the skiff on Tatooine, and he gets the blaster so he can shoot the Sarlacc tentacle that's holding Lando, Lando yells, "Wait, I thought you were blind!" In the original, Han's response is, "It's all right. Trust me." It was changed to, "It's all right. I can see a lot better."

    Is that some kind of thing to make them easier to understand for non-native English speakers or something? I've never seen any mention of why they messed up clever dialogue like that. It wasn't even a special effect "improvement"; it was just dumbing down the script!

    --
    We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
    1. Re:Other lame dialogue changes by banzai51 · · Score: 3, Funny

      It is precisely because those lines are well done, funny, clever, or have bravado that they were edited. Lucas seems to think that good dialogue is bad, because it distracts you from all the fancy effects.

    2. Re:Other lame dialogue changes by truenoir · · Score: 1

      It might be dependant on the takes that they used. I remember seeing mention of differences in audio tracks between laser disc versions of the original versions. Not that I don't think it's annoying too, and in some ways moreso than the added stuff. It's one thing to have interjected scenes that I can recognize as not having been there. It's another to remove what was.

  171. Holy shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Years and years of bitching and moaning in every Star Wars related story about how badly you want the original Star Wars on DVD.

    You finally get a release date and not a single one of you are happy. All you can do is whine, piss and moan like little bitches that George Lucas is fucking you yet again, that Greedo is shooting first, that he's holding a gun to your head and forcing you to buy his product -- how dare he make a red cent off of Star Wars after entertaining you pack of boobs for TWENTY FIVE FRIGGING YEARS.

    I think it would be funny if Lucas re-relased the movies on DVD with Han shooting first, no CGI Jabba, and said "this is the last format that Star Wars will ever be released on, ever, when DVD goes obsolete (and it will) Star Wars is gone for all time."

    Then you bunch of ingrates will have nothing to complain about anymore.

  172. when I get my hands on those DVDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I will rip the video, and edit the audio so that Ben Kenobi says:

    "Skywalker Ranch. You will never find a more greedy hive of scum and re-releases."

  173. Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Laser Discs ONLY convert to interlaced analog

  174. unfixed mistakes by Scryber · · Score: 1
    This really bugged me when I saw the SE movies. I was expecting not only improved effects but for all the obvious errors to be fixed. For example:

    In SW, Luke has a small microphone on his flight helmet. It keeps switching from one side to the other. OK, not a biggie. But...

    In Jedi, in the scene where Fett pulls his gun on the "bounty hunter" that has Chewbacca, his antenna is on the wrong side of the helmet--the costume is backwards. I presume this was because it was shot wrong... Fett was aiming to his right but later in editing they realized from where Fett was standing he would really be aiming to his left. All I wanted them to do was do a little Photoshop clone stamping (no pun intended) and flip that antenna around. But no.

    There are other errors, but I'll leave those to the fans who still give a damn.

  175. Re:So has he edited Jar Jar into all three films? by No.+24601 · · Score: 1
    Actually the secret is this: Lucas has "artistically" re-edited the scene yet again. Now Han and Greedo hug each other and Greedo keels over from a heart attack after being overcome with emotion that they're no longer enemies.....

    Nah, Greedo looked pretty tired... he was just taking a nap.

  176. Press release by CyberDong · · Score: 1
    There's yet to be an actual press release

    This is pretty much an official press release.

    1. Re:Press release by CyberDong · · Score: 1

      /me mods self as REDUNDANT

      oops.

  177. Re:A marketing mistake hiding an evil marketing pl by stilleon · · Score: 1

    Except that the cost of owning all 4 Indiana Jones is about the same as two separate DVDs.

  178. I cry for you. by Burgundy+Advocate · · Score: 1

    Truly.

    --
    Dragging people kicking and screaming into reality since 1996.
  179. Uhm, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wanted it, and wanted it, and wanted it. He said
    no. I moved on. Sold my VHS version, haven't
    seen the latest 2, won't see the new one either.
    I've found better stories, and better movies, to
    spend (waste?) my time on. Mr. Lucas, you will
    not get ONE PENNY out of me, EVER AGAIN! Too late!

    Anonymous because every time I post something like
    this I get modded down. Sick of it...

  180. Pay attention to what Luke says, moron by Moryath · · Score: 1

    Biggs went off to the Academy. He didn't join the Rebels till later, and Luke never knew Biggs had till he met him on-base. Luke wanted to go to the Imperial Academy, like Biggs had.

    Or are you not paying attention when Aunt Beru talks to Uncle Owen about how he "promised" Luke could go off to the Academy?

    Yeesh. Idiots abound.

    1. Re:Pay attention to what Luke says, moron by BillyBlaze · · Score: 1
      Interestingly, when Luke is talking to Ben, he says,
      "It's not that I like the Empire. I hate it! But there's nothing I can do about it right now. It's such a long way from here."
      So his opinion must have changed, possibly after he learned that Biggs joined the Rebels. It's also possible he wanted to defect after being trained.

      Heck, I once wanted to work for Microsoft. Opinions can change.

  181. Exactly my point. by Moryath · · Score: 1

    Planetary governors would have just absorbed Stormtroopers into their defense forces.

    Still-Imperial sectors, no way in hell they would have been celebrating.

    Only a few planets, if that, would have had any reason to have a party the day after Palpatine died. The Special Edition bullshit makes it look like the entire universe is throwing some gigantic party.

  182. Ignorant/Malicious? NEITHER by Moryath · · Score: 0, Troll

    Accurate, yes. Read the Koran, the Hadith, and Shari'a, then tell me it's not a bloodthirsty, barbaric, genocidal bargain-bin religion.

    If you can do that honestly, you're the moral equivalent of Hannibal Lecter.

    1. Re:Ignorant/Malicious? NEITHER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever read the Bible or the old testament or the Talmud.... Those are some of the most bloody novels ever written.

  183. Bible? OT? by Moryath · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let's see; in the Bible, horrific things are done to the main character, who endures them and tells people to forgive those who did and treat them kindly.

    Yeah. Real violent.

    In the OT, it's historical accounts of wars. Ok, check. For that matter, Homer's tales, and most other historical accounts are pretty bloodthirsty. So?

    The Koran/Hadith/Shari'a, on the other hand, prescribe brutal punishments and the horrific treatment of women. They include direct calls to convert "infidels" by the sword, to wage war till all are converted.

    They call for the enslavement of the "peoples of the book" and the destruction -- wholesale -- of any others.

    Compared to the Koran/Hadith/Shari'a, the OT and Bible are childrens' novels about a Turle named Yertle.

    1. Re:Bible? OT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like the Bible calls for wholesale enslavement and destruction as well. Pot, kettle, you know the rest.

      From http://jacobandrews.com/tomshort.htm:
      :

      1st Samuel chapter 15, God has once again spoken to Samuel, only this time God tells him to instruct King Saul to exterminate a group of people known as the Amalekites. Beginning with verse 3 we read:

      "Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy everything that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants..."

      Anxious to please God and Samuel, Saul assembled an army of 210,000 men and set about the grizzly task of doing God's bidding. Unfortunately, God's bidding very often involves the murder of children. That was most certainly the case here. The Bible doesn't tell us exactly how many people died in this particular attack, but I would imagine the number would be quite staggering in light of the fact that Saul felt the need to assemble an army of nearly a quarter of a million to accomplish the task. The casualties no doubt numbered in the hundreds of thousands. After all, how many women and children do you think one well-armed soldier can kill ... especially when he has god on his side?

      As you read through this story, you might find yourself wondering what on earth these Amalekites had done to deserve such a pounding. The answer to this question is found in 1st Samuel 15:2 and Exodus 17: 8-16. It seems that about 400 years earlier, the Amalekites' distant ancestors had attacked the Israelites during their 40 years of wandering through the desert with Moses. This attack so infuriated God that he vowed to one-day wipe the Amalekites completely off the face of the earth. God finally makes good on this promise in 1st Samuel 15. ...

      "When a man strikes his slave, male or female, with a rod and the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. But if the slave survives a day or two, he is not to be punished; for the slave is his money." Exodus 21:20

      "As for your male and female slaves whom you may have: you may buy male and female slaves from the nations that are round about you. You may also buy from among the strangers who sojourn with you and their families that are with you, who have been born in your land; and they may be your property. You may bequeath them to your sons after you, to inherit as a possession forever; you may make slaves of them, but over your bretheren the people of Israel you shall not rule, one over another, with harshness."

      Leviticus 25:44

      "Slaves, be obedient to those who are your earthly masters, with fear and trembling, in singleness of heart, as to Christ...."

      Ephesians 6:5

      "Moreover of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among you, of them shall ye buy . . . and they shall be your possession . . . they shall be your bondmen forever."

      Leviticus 25:45-46

      "Let all who are under the yoke slavery regard their masters as worthy of all honor, so that the name of God and the teaching may not be defamed. Those who have believing masters must not be disrespectful on the ground that they are brethren; rather they must serve all the better since those that benefit by their service are believers and beloved."

      1Timothy 6:1

      "Bid slaves to be submissive to their masters and to give satisfaction in every respect..."

      Titus 2:9

      "And that servant who knew his master's will, but did not make ready or act according to his will, shall receive a severe beating." (Jesus speaking through a parable)

      Luke 12:47

      But if the thing is true, that the tokens of virginity were not found in the young woman, then you shall bring out the young woman to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her to death with stones..."

      Deuteronomy 22:20

      "Behold the day of the Lord is coming, when the spoil taken from you will be divided in

  184. Whaddaya know - moderator abuse resumes by Moryath · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You reply to someone's comment, they mod you troll.

    They never moderate the islamofascist terror-appeaser troll, however. Nosiree.

  185. The Digital Bits has more details... by antdude · · Score: 1, Informative

    "The release will be a 4-disc set, encompassing 3 movie discs and a 4th bonus disc of supplemental material. All three films will be digitally-remastered and THX-certified, and will be available in anamorphic widescreen video (there MAY also be a separate full frame edition, but this is still TBD). The audio for the films will be English Dolby Digital 5.1 (they may also be EX, although again this is still TBD), with subtitles in English, French and Spanish. The films will also be closed-captioned. Each film will include new audio commentary with creator George Lucas, along with various members of the cast and crew (the specific participants will be announced at a later date). The highlight of the bonus disc will be an all-new, feature-length documentary about the making of the films, which will include never-before-seen footage and other material. There may also be DVD-ROM weblinks to the official Star Wars website (TBD). There WILL be additional supplemental features, which will be announced at a later date. The films will only be available as a box set, the retail price for which has yet to be decided (despite reports to the contrary). I have officially confirmed that the films will be the 1997 Special Edition versions, as determined by Lucas himself. You should also know that, as with the Indiana Jones DVDs, the folks at Lowry Digital are once again involved in the remastering process. They're doing digital restoration and clean-up work on the new masters."

    from http://www.thedigitalbits.com/#mytwocents (2/10/2004).

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  186. Re:Wrong menu option Lucas! Whoops! by WanChan · · Score: 1

    every year or so, a true gem of a comment comes along. That was one. Brilliant.

  187. Boycott Special Edition by Atroxodisse · · Score: 1

    I for one will not purchase the special edition set. I would certainly buy the original set unaltered on DVD, that is what I want, but the special edition versions suck ass. Boycott with me!

    --
    Read my short stories - You won't regret it.
  188. Good movies do both by dancingmad · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Acting? Cinematography? Sorry, but who the heck cares? The difference between us is that I go to a movie to be entertained for 2 hours, not to find a new philosophy in life.

    Good movies do both. Take Kurosawa's films for example. His movies entertain, they impart strong messages, and part of that is because he pays attention to great acting (Toshiro Mifune, Takashi Shimura) and cinemoatography. A great actor can make people feel something (and that is entertaing!) in 1 motion which would take normal people 10 to convey (Kurosawa said something similar about Mifune). Great actors a part of the story and they make it their business to play their role and show the audience their role in the film. By your logic, blocks of wood be as entertaining as actors (even the masses don't believe that - look at Keanu in the last to matrix films and fan reactions).

    Cinematography too does the same thing; the way a shot is light, balanced, etc. subtly imparts a mood or vibe for a movie. Take the balances in Seven Samurai - they show a lot of how the samurai see other, the villagers, etc. Take The Royal Tenenbaums for example - the cluttered Tenenbaum house says a lot about the family themselves. Unless you're stuyding it, you might not see it the first time through, but it does affect your perception of the characters.

    Cinematopgrahy and acting are paramount to a great, entertaing film. It's the difference between a 2 page plot synopsis of Lord of the Rings and reading the novels; there's no comparsion.

    Take a film class somewhere, I promise you'll learn quite a bit about visual story telling.

    --
    "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
    1. Re:Good movies do both by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 1

      If I have to take a class to enjoy a movie, then am I really being entertained, or am I wallowing in beret-wearing David Lynch-style pretentiousness?

      Different strokes for different folks, but I don't go to the movies to obsess over the director's choice of framing and blocking in a particular scene.

  189. It is not similar to what Peter Jackson has done.. by weedenbc · · Score: 1

    Jackson had no choice in the matter. He was forced by the studios to cut his movies to 3 hours for theater release. He knew this would alter the story and leave out important points and plotlines. So he requested that he be able to release the extended versions on DVD before the next theatrical movie came out. They refused, he threatened to quit, the studios relented. If it wasn't for Jackson we would have never gotten the extended versions before seeing the next one and as we all know the extended versions are the TRUE versions of the LOTR films. PJ did us all a favor. IMHO he set the gold standard for value when to comes to making an extended edition.

    --

    "Trying is only the first step towards failure." - Homer
  190. Finally? by KathleenLePirate · · Score: 1

    Finally? What?

    I've had my Malaysian DVDs of the trilogy for for a couple years now.

  191. Where the f... do you get that number? by Kjella · · Score: 1

    Combine that with the high resolution that digital films are ususally shot at (3840x2400), and I think the experience will be superior.

    As far as I know, even the Sony HDW-900 is only recording 1920x1080x30p at a maximum. Twice that? in 16:10 format? I think you're way off. Maybe you're thinking of some special effects, they can typically be rendered at 2x the final resolution before being superimposed on the footage...

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Where the f... do you get that number? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      You're right, I was incorrect, the camera is HDTV, it is the DLP projector that is double HDTV.

  192. Keep it coming, modfuckheads. by Moryath · · Score: 1

    I can keep it up all day long. You know you're abusing the system when you mod down a reply but not the post that caused the reply.

    1. Re:Keep it coming, modfuckheads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We will.

      --modfuckhead

  193. Re:A marketing mistake hiding an evil marketing pl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most retailers break up box sets and sell the units individually after about a month (according to CNN).

  194. Can anyone confirm if the original prints exist? by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    I heard rumours these were "destroyed" during the making of the SE editions of the movies 7 or so years back.

    Does anyone know if this is true - or just one of those little quirky internet rumours started to infuriate star wars fans even more?

    I really would love to see the original movies cleaned up on DVD - hell I'm not even a hardcore SW fan but the new ones just grate me.
    I haven't seen star wars since those theatre releases either - it's high time I saw it! :(

  195. Re:It's official, George Lucas can suck on my ball by inkswamp · · Score: 1
    Step away from the computer and go outside. There's more to life than Star Wars.

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
  196. "It's official..." by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

    There's yet to be an actual press release

    So what you're saying is...it's NOT official.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
  197. Re:Oh, yes, LOTR is sooo much better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that was a very funny read. thank you.

  198. DIVX - MPEG-4 by meehawl · · Score: 1

    Why not try using XVID or DIVX or one of the other MPEG-4 compression formats? Then you can get extra-high quality. Here is a list of DVD players that also play DIVX. And hey, if and when you do your super-transfer, please do send me an email ;-)

    --

    Da Blog
    1. Re:DIVX - MPEG-4 by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Are there players out there that can do extremely high bitrate DivX? It would be interesting to see a version of the film that takes up 4 gigs but is mpeg-4 :)

    2. Re:DIVX - MPEG-4 by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Are there players out there that can do extremely high bitrate DivX?

      Yes, two caveats tho:

      - The medium must be able to handle it. DivX on a CD-R can stutter in some drives; can't read fast enough

      - Most CD/DVD techs have an upper limit file size of 2gig. This is why DVDs use VOB (I think).

  199. Re:Democracy does not mean you get to buy Star War by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    [...] if the country votes for a government-controlled socialist utopia, it's democratic, and when another country invades and forces a market-based economy upon them, it's not (or vice versa).
    Quick example: September 11, 1973 - A US funded military coup, lead by General Augusto Pinochet, overthrows Chile's democratically elected Marxist president Salvador Allende.
  200. Re:Democracy does not mean you get to buy Star War by Richthofen80 · · Score: 1

    Until the people in such-and-such a country vote for a law that says George Lucas must release the original Star Wars trilogy on DVD,

    We all love Star Wars, or at least the original Star Wars. But the rights to call something Star Wars, the rights to the films, the movies, the characters, all that.. they were created by George Lucas. They are his property. He is free, because he owns it, to make whatever ill-guided decisions he wants about it. He is free to be irrational, to ignore the thousands of fans who made him rich to experience star wars. and we are free to not trade with him.

    You couldn't pass a law that says Lucas must do X with his property. Well, you could, but it would be immoral. Democracy is a principle of self-rule, not mob rule. Meaning those governed control their fate through votes. but almost every modern democracy has restrictions that democracies or majorities cannot vote against the rights of individuals.

    having said all that, Lucas is a jerk. Why? Almost every artist who's ever lived has created new art instead of butchering his old art. And to hide his old art as if he never did it, and as if the new versions are definitive, is a travesty. I'd respect him a lot more if he just made new creations instead of rehashing his old ones.

    PS... does anyone know if he butchered indiana jones when he pressed the DVDs recently? he might have done the same thing there, too

    --
    Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
  201. CAV-ripped DVD by uberdood · · Score: 1

    Thank goodness for technology. I ripped the CAV original LaserDiscs of the trilogy and burned my own DVDs.

    --
    "Population 1,656"
  202. Re:you pedantic fags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I seem to remember seeing the emperor. ... yeah.. yeah... there was a shot of him, ... dork.

  203. Uh? by Kjella · · Score: 1

    1. 5 minutes of yet unseen footage of Princess Lea in chains and bikini

    2. 15 minutes of extended (grusome) Ewok death scenes during the final battle.


    You must really hate Ewoks. May I suggest you take a little less interest in completely fictional creatures and a little more in solid real-world attributes?

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  204. Re:Wrong menu option Lucas! Whoops! by wizardguy · · Score: 1

    You mean he did not have SVCS or SourceSafe (shudder !!!)

  205. Re: [movie film resolution] by Skipio · · Score: 1

    It depends, sometimes 2.35 and 1.85 films use a special anamorphic lens which compresses the whole image so it fits within the usual 1.33 24mm by 18mm frame but some directors don't like anamorphic lenses so they instead mask the film during shooting or afterwards. James Cameron usually uses the latter process and shoots on Super 35.

  206. There's an art alright.... by Cappy+Red · · Score: 1

    I am... was a big fanboy for the movies. I got through the Special Editions, and persisted in liking them. I got through Phantom Menace, and wavered a touch, but held my ground. I even defended Jar Jar. Then Attack of the Clones came out. My initial reaction was "that was pretty good... minus this, that, and the other thing."

    Then it sat in my head a while, and the sheer weight of the suckage in the two prequels brought the whole facade down. Now I'm bitter, resentful, and accusatory about the movies.

    I don't know about filmmaking, but there definately is an art to crushing one's love for a childhood fantasy, and in that art George Lucas is a grand master.

    *honk*

    --
    This is my sig. It's prescription, I swear. I need it for reading things... on the other side of things
  207. The Matrix trilogy by bonch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's sort of how the first drafts of The Matrix are hokey and suck, and the studio made the Wachowskis change a lot of things and streamline it, and the movie was deliciously paced and really good.

    Then for Reloaded and Revolutions, they were given free reign. Hmm.

  208. The fat fighter in death star battle from 1st sw. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I seem to remember some scenes & lines from him that I liked, that aren't there in the re-release.

    Supposedly ppl have the original cuts available on p2p networks but I've searched to no avail.

    I guess I'm using the wrong search words? It would be nice to see the unbutchered versions again.

  209. How about 140Megapixels? by jriskin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "...good ol' photographic film, which offers a resolution far higher than any existing digitised video format..."

    Ok, i'll give you the benefit of the doubt here and assume you mean physical medium formats (e.g. DVD, etc...)

    But here, you're WAY wrong.
    "Same goes for digital cameras - even the best still don't match the resolution of a decent 35mm film."

    First, standard DSLR's have advanced a LOT in the past few years. Although megapixels are fast becoming irrelevant (color depth, CCD sensitivity, etc... are becoming much more important) the top of the line cameras are much higher resolution than they used to be. The Kodak DCS 14n which isn't even new is 13.8Megapixels. As mentioned the Canon EOS-1Ds is 11MP.

    But if you want to compare against the high end, how about a PhaseOne H25 22Megapixel 4x5 scanback?

    Or how about a 140.76Megapixel Super10K-2 from BetterLight.com?

    Super10K-2
    10200 x 13800 pixels - Native CCD resolution
    402 MB max. file 24-bit RGB (804 MB in 48-bit RGB)

    Now you may argue I'm comparing apples and oranges (4x5 vs. 35MM), but your comment was that the best digital cameras don't match 35MM...which IMHO is wrong when compared to the best format digital cameras.

  210. Mega set sort of confirmed by sbszine · · Score: 1

    Plenty of people thinking they will put out some form of mega-collector's set after the final (extended) movie comes out.

    I recently read an interview with some of the crew in an audio nerd magazine (either Audio Technology or Sound On Sound), and they let slip that there was going to be a boxed set, including a new special feature thingy about the audio production techniques used in LoTR.

    --

    Vino, gyno, and techno -Bruce Sterling

  211. There's also... by Cappy+Red · · Score: 1

    The "Kate and Leopold" DVD has something similar. There are one or two story points that the studio wanted dropped for the theatrical release, and the DVD has both versions of the film.

    *honk*

    --
    This is my sig. It's prescription, I swear. I need it for reading things... on the other side of things
  212. What a total load by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone read the statement in the release ?

    "With that in mind, we designed our release strategy to pick the best release date that had the most gentle sales curve decline on home video." -

    err can someone translate that to me in english, or any other UNDERSTANDABLE FARKING LANGUAGE ?!?!
    They've had 10 million viewers just dying to get a DVD copy of the original series and they have been 'making' money by denying us ?? I can think of several people who won't have a thing to do with Star Wars anymore after the last pathetic theatre fiasco. I can hardly believe that they think they made more money by putting out crappy movies to turn off new and potential paying customers while shitting on the grandiose memories the rest of us had of Star Wars with that crap the called the Phantom movie..I mean menace.
    Once again someone told Lucas how good he was too many times and he now believes that the story of Star Wars is somehow pre-naturally good or sacrosanct...You'd think the slap in the face LoTR was to his releasew plans might have been a wakeup call but I think Lucas is beyond that...
    Hard to stay objective living in the center of the universe....

  213. release date by olivrwendl · · Score: 1

    Of course George Lucas is going to release this set before he finishes episode three. That way he can get all of the fans to buy this set and the in another two or three years get them to buy the six movie set. If he waited another year to release it , a lot of people would wait to buy, but by doing it now he can make more money. It's the same tactic many companies follow releasing the basic movie first, then the "gold edition" in wide screen, then the extra special "platinum edition" with bonus footage. That way they sell three copies to the same person. I will wait until they have all six in a set before I buy it.

  214. I'm Making My Own Damned DVDs... by Guncrazy · · Score: 1
    I've got a Sony LaserDisc player, and the Star Wars Trilogy Definitive Collection is a regularly listed item on eBay. I'll probably pick up a copy there and convert it to DVD using my PC, the same as I've done to Song of the South, The African Queen, Schindler's List, Freaks and many other titles that have not yet made it (and may never make it) to DVD.

    Of course, if someone has a link to a .torrent of this, I'd love to know where it is. I should be able to download it legally, since I already own the VHS tapes, right?

  215. I don't get it.. by bmantz65 · · Score: 1

    Some people are really upset the original versions aren't being released on DVD. I could see their reasoning, especially if they saw the original versions in the theaters. Fans of thingd just don't let the creators work how they want it. Anyway, I'm psyched for this.

  216. News Flash by knautilus316 · · Score: 1

    Slashdot corrospondants would like to apologize for this story, but asks readers to understand that absolutely nothing better is going on.

    ~Knautilus

  217. Original Trilogy nicely transferred version by keithf777 · · Score: 1

    Can anyone help me find this: "a nicely transferred version is floating around the internet already - complete with high resolution covers and a "bonus" DVD full of extra material." A number of people have stated that boot versions of this are floating around on DVD. Since I don't have the copying equipment or the Laserdiscs I need to aquire these. And since Lucas states thus far that he has no intention of releasing the original triliogy in it's original form, I have no moral problem with obtaining bootleg copies. I am absolutely NOT associated with law enforcement... could someone suggest where I might look? I sincerely thank anyone who will help.

    1. Re:Original Trilogy nicely transferred version by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1

      Download e-Mule plus and search www.sharereactor.com for hash links to the files.

  218. Re:Democracy does not mean you get to buy Star War by jazzmans · · Score: 1

    I watched all three Indiana Jones movies on DVD, and found they are chock full of what the prequels lack. As far as I could tell, there were NO stupid re-processing of special effects, every cheesy face-melting, truck fliping-but-able-to-see-the-flip-mechanism effect was still there. Spielberg didn't Fux up them that I could tell, and obviously didn't let Lucas screw them up either. jaz

    --
    Life is what happens to you while you are busy making other plans. No-one sees motorcycles
  219. Re:A marketing mistake hiding an evil marketing pl by dionwr · · Score: 1

    > Except that the cost of owning all 4 Indiana
    > Jones is about the same as two separate DVDs.

    That's one way of figuring it. I pre-ordered the box set and sold all but "Raiders" on ebay. I came out $10 ahead on the deal.

    --
    Make a man a fire, and he's warm for a day. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  220. Re:Democracy does not mean you get to buy Star War by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Did you read the parent post?

    But the rights to call something Star Wars, the rights to the films, the movies, the characters, all that.. they were created by George Lucas. They are his..

    Which is pretty much what I was implying.

    You couldn't pass a law that says Lucas must do X with his property.

    You could, and if it was passed under a democratic system, that would be "democratic".

    Well, you could, but it would be immoral.

    You could- exactly. And I don't think you can dismiss it as "wrong", let alone "immoral" that easily. The descendants of the Brothers Grimm did not have the right to stop Disney nicking their stories, hacking them about and have the copyright to that particular version.

    Democracy is a principle of self-rule, not mob rule.

    No, that is liberty.

    Democracy is self-rule of the whole group, but not necessarily individuals. To quote someone "Democracy is two wolves and a rabbit deciding what to have for lunch; liberty is a well-armed rabbit contesting the vote." See grandparent post for more details.

    almost every modern democracy has restrictions that democracies or majorities cannot vote against the rights of individuals

    This is not an inherent part of democracy per se; they were included after the majority of people decided they would be A Good Thing. If they were forced upon a constitution without any sort of vote, then they are not "democratic".

    To make my point briefly; my dispute is that you discuss democracy as if there is something inherent in the principle that guarantees such-and-such freedoms for individuals. It doesn't. Democracy isn't an ideal, it isn't the free market and it isn't liberty. It's a system, and it's up to the people to use it wisely.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  221. OR even better by Pamplemousse · · Score: 1

    You can go to fantasymovie.com and buy them on DVD today! Original set, not special edition, and an added bonus! Subtitles in English, Chinese, Thai and Malay! Only $34.99! Direct from Asia to your television:)

  222. High Bitrate MPEG-4 by meehawl · · Score: 1

    would be interesting to see a version of the film that takes up 4 gigs but is mpeg-4

    That is exactly the approach of M$ and others now pushing the pseudo-HD MPEG-4 "DVD" discs. Using 4 Mbps DIVX they can get super high resolutions on discs using regular DVD laser pickups.

    --

    Da Blog
  223. It's official, you and Lucas can suck on my balls by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    I have two, you and George Lucas can have a deep intellectual conversation while sucking on them.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  224. Stop all the useless hatin' by CyberSeth · · Score: 1

    It's really sad; but what it really boils down to is that people just can't stand it when somebody's really successful. It's just not fair that somebody can make so much money off of an idea/skill. And we all have to find one reason or another to hate that person for it...

    Whether or not SW sucks is a matter of taste. Whether or not CG makes good effects is also a matter of taste. IMO I think Starwars is a great Saga, and I hope it never ends. And as an aspiring CG artist, I totally dig the direction film making is taking towards using blue screens and CG; the possibilities for creative film-making are now limited only by our imagination...

    I enjoyed the original trilogy, I enjoyed the SE, and I enjoy the prequels. I enjoy the video games, and love hanging out at online SW fan websites chattin it up with fellow fans. What got me hooked? The Jedi part of SW. I think the mesh between sci-fi and ancient myth is what got me interested. Lightsabres (a futuristic spin on an ancient weapon), the Force, the mysticism and the ancient style robes... all mixed in with blasters, and land speeders; pure genius.

    But anyway, it's all a matter of opinion. Some think SW now sucks, others think it rocks. But I'll tell you this; you have to admire the sheer amount of work that has gone into Starwars, and the depth and detail of the entire Starwars Universe. Here you have a make-believe universe, with different solar systems\planets, cultures, languages, species, races, and religious/political systems; and hence an infinite number of possible stories, and sagas that can be derived from such a rich universe. It's pure genius; whether it is to be liked or not is a matter of opinion.

    IMO I couldn't give a rats ass whether or not Greedo shot first. But the edit was clever; and if you truly had a sharp eye, you'd notice that Han's head was made to shift slightly to "dodge" the shot, that would have otherwise blasted his head off. In other words; Greedo's shot was dead-on; he didn't miss by a mile. I see all the other edits in the same light; clever work arounds to show what can be done to old footage... but this is an entirely separate issue that I could rant on for hours.

    Anyway, I liked the special edition, because the effects looked much better; and the editions made the movie much more interesting to watch. It really breathed life into some scenes that seemed rather cramped and stuffy; I'm glad that Lucas was finally able to do things the way he really wanted. Although I must admit that the 'Yub Yub!' song at the end should have stayed...

    I can't wait for Episode III; and I'll definitely be getting those DVD's

    --
    garbage in, garbage out...
  225. Re:Can you believe it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FYI, you can listen to a short clip at iTMS - search for "Rite of Spring"...

  226. Re:Democracy does not mean you get to buy Star War by m1kesm1th · · Score: 1

    Democracy; various flavors, but the intention is that what the majority of people want, they get. This means that if the country votes for a government-controlled socialist utopia, it's democratic, and when another country invades and forces a market-based economy upon them, it's not (or vice versa).

    Marketplace; people have money and goods. Money and goods are exchanged at the highest perceived benefit to both parties. Those with more money have more buying power. Those with goods/rights can do what they like with them. Those with no money or goods/rights have no power.

    I think most governments are Marketplaces rather than Democracies then.

  227. Re:Can you believe it? by mrgeometry · · Score: 1

    I don't remember seeing any of the other actors in anything else since.

    Actually, Carrie Fisher was the therapist in Austin Powers 2 for the support group that Dr. Evil and his son go to. I enjoyed this very brief role at least as much as all the Princess Leia stuff and to some degree it has replaced her Star Wars appearance as my primary Carrie Fisher association.

    They have all appeared in other stuff, but like you I remember mercifully little of it. Mark Hamill was in "A Boy and His Dog", another sci-fi flick. He was also in a Simpsons ep, "Mayored to the Mob" in 1998, where he pretends to have a broken ankle to make Homer carry him through an angry crowd. Some characters never change. :-)

    zach