Slashdot Mirror


Amazon's Mechanical Turk

rscoggin writes "Amazon.com has a new program that wants you to 'Complete simple tasks that people do better than computers. And, get paid for it.' (example: 'Is there a pizza parlour in this photograph?'). For each task you complete you get a small payment, usually ranging from a few cents to a little under a dollar. It's named the Amazon Mechanical Turk after a famous hoax from the 19th century. Kill time and get paid in tiny increments to boot!" Similar to Google Answers, there seems to be a reliability ratings system and some incentives.

375 comments

  1. Great... by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great... Another way for /.'ers to waste time at work.
    GOOD JOB AMAZON

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Great... by phase_9 · · Score: 5, Funny

      News just in, people getting paid to look at webpages they're not meant to at work! In unrelated news, slashdot hits drop off...

    2. Re:Great... by khallow · · Score: 1
      Great... Another way for /.'ers to waste time at work.

      And get PAID for it!!!! :-)

  2. Micropayment mercenary by mrseigen · · Score: 2, Funny

    This could get addictive.

    1. Re:Micropayment mercenary by suwain_2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, you gave me an interesting idea.

      "Micropayments" are used a lot of send small payments to 'charitable' organizations--not just bona fide charities, but things like Open Source projects.

      Suppose you could sign up and do this, but have the proceeds sent to charity? Getting 3 cents isn't at all useful for me. If many people sent their 3 cents to a developing country, it would matter.

      I can't navigate the site that well right now (everything's returning errors), so I'm not sure if this is in the works or not. But it'd be a nifty idea.

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
  3. CAPTCHAs by CableModemSniper · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does this mean I can get paid for breaking CAPTCHAs?

    --
    Why not fork?
    1. Re:CAPTCHAs by Agelmar · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, yes. The whole motivation from this came from the same person who invented the CAPTCHA, and was explained in his thesis defense on Wednesday. Abstract for those who care:

      Subject: Thesis Oral - Luis von Ahn

      November 2, 2005
      Luis von Ahn
      12:00 PM, 3305 Newell-Simon Hall
      Thesis Oral
      Title: Human Computation

      Abstract:

      Tasks like image recognition are trivial for humans, but continue to
      challenge even the most sophisticated computer programs. This thesis
      introduces a paradigm for utilizing human processing power to solve
      problems that computers cannot yet solve. Traditional approaches to
      solving such problems focus on improving software. I advocate a novel
      approach: constructively channel human brainpower using computer games.
      For example, the ESP Game, introduced in this thesis, is an enjoyable
      online game -- many people play over 40 hours a week -- and when people
      play, they help label images on the Web with descriptive keywords. These
      keywords can be used to significantly improve the accuracy of image
      search. People play the game not because they want to help, but because
      they enjoy it.

      I introduce three other examples of games with a purpose: Peekaboom,
      which helps determine the location of objects in images, Phetch, which
      collects paragraph descriptions of arbitrary images to help
      accessibility of the Web, and Verbosity, which collects common-sense
      knowledge. I also show that, in principle, every problem that could be
      solved by a computer, today or in the future, could be solved using
      enjoyable computer games.

      In addition, I introduce CAPTCHAs, automated tests that humans can pass
      but computer programs cannot. CAPTCHAs take advantage of human
      processing power in order to differentiate humans from computers, an
      ability that has important applications in practice.

      The results of this thesis are currently in use by hundreds of Web sites
      and companies around the world, and some of the games presented here
      have been played by over 100,000 people. Practical applications of this
      work include improvements in problems such as: image search,
      adult-content filtering, spam, common-sense reasoning, computer vision,
      accessibility, and security in general.

      Thesis Committee:
      Manuel Blum, Chair
      Takeo Kanade
      Michael Reiter
      Josh Benaloh, Microsoft Research
      Jitendra Malik, University of California, Berkeley

    2. Re:CAPTCHAs by mattyohe · · Score: 1

      Why not make a program that captures the CAPTCHA image on slashdot and uploads it on a webserver for people to read it and enter the text and then that information is sent back to a robot trying to post and then voila!

      --
      - what is the definition of simultanagnosia?! I've been meaning to look it up!
    3. Re:CAPTCHAs by TheSync · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the Army can put together a first-person shooter, except you are actually controlling a robot in Iraq shooting people...

    4. Re:CAPTCHAs by idokus · · Score: 1

      The webserver(s) will fail.

      The /. effect

    5. Re:CAPTCHAs by glinden · · Score: 2, Funny
      The whole motivation from this came from the same person who invented the CAPTCHA, and was explained in his thesis defense on Wednesday.
      When you say this thesis was the motivation for Amazon Mechanical Turk, what exactly do you mean? Luis von Ahn isn't at Amazon, is he?
    6. Re:CAPTCHAs by xaque · · Score: 1

      Get your college degree! Buy vi-a-gra! Windows XP only $5! e g g e dcwe hi ;)

    7. Re:CAPTCHAs by xygorn · · Score: 1

      That guy has quite a Thesis committee. Look up some of those names (Malik and Kanade in particular) and you will find incredible contributions to computer vision. That has got to look good on a resume.

      --
      I am a sig. I wish I were a more creative sig, but I am not. I guess everyone has something to strive for.
    8. Re:CAPTCHAs by bravej · · Score: 1

      So Amazon found out about the thesis on 2 November and launched a beta the next day? Um... no. I'm curious if any of the people on the thesis committee are somehow connected to Amazon and started work earlier.

  4. i can see it already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    - can you see boobs in the picture ?
    - Is there a donkey in the picture ?
    - Can you see the can of whipped cream ?
    - is there chocolate paint involved..

    Advanced indexing of Pr0n, humanity is moving forward, no doubt.

    1. Re:i can see it already... by ErroneousBee · · Score: 1

      I think autopr0n is prior art.

      --
      **TODO** Steal someone elses sig.
    2. Re:i can see it already... by ottothecow · · Score: 1

      but going to autopr0n.com doesnt show you the prior art anymore

      --
      Bottles.
  5. This could be brilliant. by RandoX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pepsi pays Amazon 3 cents for product placement. You are shown an image of a Pepsi can. "What kind of soda is this?" "pepsi", you answer. You get paid 2 cents.

    1. Re:This could be brilliant. by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think that qualifies as a business method. start filing those patent papers quick

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:This could be brilliant. by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 3, Funny

      Even better would be if there were pictures of people enjoying pepsi with the same question and answer as you gave and then they also had ugly people drinking coke and cringing, etc. with the same question, but new answer, "coke."

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    3. Re:This could be brilliant. by Astatine210 · · Score: 1

      Ah, but would you still get paid if you replied with, say, "Generic Cola", "Ceci N'est Pas Un Cola" or "Sugar, Caramel & Battery Acid"?

    4. Re:This could be brilliant. by borawjm · · Score: 1

      Amazone pays you 2 cents but then charges you 3 cents to click on the link that leads to the picture.

    5. Re:This could be brilliant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Partial Credit!

    6. Re:This could be brilliant. by stienman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Even better:

      Question: What kind of pop/soda do you see in this picture:
      First picture shows a party with several attractive men and women and [good soda].

      Second picture shows a senior care hospice and one can of [bad soda] being shared between 5-6 individuals.

      Third picture shows a couple in a fast car along a mountian pass, each holding [good soda].

      Fourth picture shows a prison cafeteria with a badly maintained [bad soda] machine.

      I can't wait for the next election. This kind of "advertising" could be much worse than the kind of adverts we see on TV and in newspapers.

      -Adam

    7. Re:This could be brilliant. by secolactico · · Score: 1

      "Sugar, Caramel & Battery Acid"?

      Holy crap! Don't spew the secret formula like that or you'll get sued for revealing trade secrets!

      --
      No sig
    8. Re:This could be brilliant. by Stormwatch · · Score: 2, Informative

      How about this one?

    9. Re:This could be brilliant. by Neoncow · · Score: 1
      Fast forward 15 years:

      Pepsi Cola corporation is proud to announce that it has offically the number one soda reccommended by homeless people, inmates, and third world nations!

  6. So this is going mainstream now... by Dekortage · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to this earlier Slashdot report, the spam industry has been doing this for awhile with free porn.

    I'm curious to know if Amazon is going to use the cumulative results to try to "train" computers, or if it really is just for the money. The requirements include being over 18, so you can't pimp your kids to click through this stuff for cash (though I'm sure it will happen).

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    1. Re:So this is going mainstream now... by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 1
      1. Find woman and have lots of kids.
      2. Chain kids to computer to take part in Amazon Mechanical Turk
      3. ...
      4. Profit!
      Something tells me step one is going to be the toughest.
      --
      "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
    2. Re:So this is going mainstream now... by kryten_nl · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've revised your business model:

      1. Volunteer at an orphanage in China.

      --
      For the perfect anti-Unix, write an OS that thinks it knows what you're doing better than you do and let it be wrong.
  7. Doesn't pay enough by slavemowgli · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe it's just me, but it seems that it's not really worth it. Consider the following task, for example:

    Your task is to create a new product description for a product in the Amazon.com Automotive catalogue. The Product Description provides an additional opportunity to tell the customer about the product. This HIT will require some product research to complete. Approval depends on following the instructions and the quality of your submission, determined by a manual review.

    Guess how much you get paid for that. 2 dollars? 3? That wouldn't be unreasonable, I think, considering that you're supposed to write an entire product description from scratch for which additional "research" is required. The actual amount paid is only 65 cents, though.

    Maybe it's just me, but if I check to see how much I need to work in my regular job to make 65 cents, then it does not make any sense to invest more than a few minutes into a task like this, and it seems that it would take more than that to actually complete it. The fact that there's a review required afterwards doesn't exactly make things better, either - if what you did gets rejected, then you've essentially worked for nothing (I wonder if there's anything that keeps amazon from still using your description in this case, too...).

    In other words, the whole thing seems like a good idea in theory, but it won't really take off until they're willing to actually pay you a reasonable amount.

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    1. Re:Doesn't pay enough by RandoX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just do it AT work. Get paid twice.

    2. Re:Doesn't pay enough by manno · · Score: 1

      I was about to post exactly this, this thing is the greatest scam going. I'm impressed with Amazon, this is a damn good way to save money, instead of hiring a pro. This is ingenious their paying outsourced labor wages to native English speaking Americans. Replacing a position that they either had to pay 25-30k to a college grad for. Or paid some stenography service per word for. It's frigging brilliant. P. T. Barnum holds true as ever.

      -manno

    3. Re:Doesn't pay enough by wpiman · · Score: 1

      It isn't worth it for you- maybe not for me- but for someone in a third world country it could definitely be worth their time. This is just another example of globalism.

    4. Re:Doesn't pay enough by amigabill · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's not your idea of worthy pay, but in some parts of the world it might be pretty darn good pay for the time to do the task.

      Just imagine setting up a sweatshop in some 3rd world country, invest enough training to get people doing well, then get them going, pay them part and keep some portion of each item reward for "the company".

      You know someone will do this...

    5. Re:Doesn't pay enough by griffjon · · Score: 1

      That was my thought as well. "Write a product description, research required" seems to me that .65 (or less in some cases) is... piddly?

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    6. Re:Doesn't pay enough by nine-times · · Score: 1
      Maybe it's just me, but if I check to see how much I need to work in my regular job to make 65 cents, then it does not make any sense to invest more than a few minutes into a task like this, and it seems that it would take more than that to actually complete it.

      Ah, but I think you miss the point. How much to you get paid for a couple minutes at your regular job? Add 65 cents to that, and that's how much you'll get paid at your normal job to slack off and surf Amazon.

    7. Re:Doesn't pay enough by iphayd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to mention that this is the type of thing a copywriter at a marketing firm gets big bucks to do, so essentially you are doing their job for free for Amazon.

    8. Re:Doesn't pay enough by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      I agree. The jobs that really are trivial pay nothing and the ones that pay aren't at all trivial. 65 cents or 75 cents isn't nearly enough for what they are asking.

    9. Re:Doesn't pay enough by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      This is ingenious their paying outsourced labor wages to native English speaking Americans.

      I see nothing to indicate that only us wealthy gringos can participate. I haven’t yet checked out the payment end of it, but I would assume that it will eventually be a worldwide thing, making it a nice, level, globalized playing field.

      Whether that’s a good thing or a bad thing is left as an exercise to the reader.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    10. Re:Doesn't pay enough by Brushfireb · · Score: 1

      And probably doing it much worse.

      B

    11. Re:Doesn't pay enough by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      If you notice most are "find the best picture" for $0.03. Of course the site rules really slow right now so its not worth your time, but if it ran faster it would be something to do if you could crank through a hundred an hour. Yes, the write descriptions are stupid, though I think correct this grammer might work..

    12. Re:Doesn't pay enough by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's not about the money; it's about fucking with Amazon, by giving hilariously incorrect answers.

    13. Re:Doesn't pay enough by egomaniac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you notice most are "find the best picture" for $0.03. Of course the site rules really slow right now so its not worth your time, but if it ran faster it would be something to do if you could crank through a hundred an hour.

      100 images / hour * $0.03 / image == $3.00 / hour.

      So, you've just busted your ass to crank through one image every 36 seconds for a solid hour, and you have three dollars to show for it. There are definitely parts of the world where that would be a fantastic income, but my home country isn't one of them.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    14. Re:Doesn't pay enough by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Sorry I meant to say several hundred and hour. But yes its pithy money but from what I can see as you built up more trust you get paid more.
      Think of it this way at the base of zero trust the site probably needs 10 or more people to all choose the same image for it to clear. At a high level of trust it could do it with 1 or 2 people.

    15. Re:Doesn't pay enough by skiflyer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That job would never be worth 65 cents to me, but if I were a mechanic and the additional research could be labelled as my common knowledge, and I was IM'ing with my girlfriend at midnight and she was a slow typer...

      Let me translate... If it were write a product description for the pictured computer parts and you were waiting for your kernel to compile while twiddling your thumbs, why not make 65 cents?

    16. Re:Doesn't pay enough by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      If I were a company, I would hire someone to write product subscriptions for the competition that subtly make their products look inferior. And those $0.65 would be just a bonus to that guy to boot;)

      As it is, while crappy pay in the US, I think this could be a good opportunity for an English speaking person in a poor country.......

    17. Re:Doesn't pay enough by photon317 · · Score: 3, Informative


      So basically, if it takes you 5 minutes to write a brief product description, and you churn through them all day, you're making $7.80, which is better than minimum wage. Not a good proprosition if you're clueless about auto parts and have to research everything as described, but I don't think that's the intended optimal target for completing the task (although it someone's dumb enough to spend half an hour or more per description for a crappy hourly wage, they're more than welcome). The optimal target to take up that task is someone who already knows a lot about car parts. Chances are if you're an Autozone (auto parts store chain) employee, you could get most of the descriptions done in under 5 minutes with little to no side research, because you already have the domain-specific knowledge. That's the guy who will be drawn to answer that question.

      So the key to making effective money at this scheme is to skip tasks that you don't think you're "better than average" at - kinda like the job marketplace in real life.

      --
      11*43+456^2
    18. Re:Doesn't pay enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get a lot of mud for 65 cents in a country like Elbonia.

    19. Re:Doesn't pay enough by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Bad accounts are easy to detect. This system could easily be made quite fraud-proof.

      1. Tie accounts to something valuable, like Amazon accounts with a verified purchase history, to prevent mass signps. Easy.
      2. Randomly check answers by randomly posing the same question to two different accounts. This step is infinitely tuneable; more checks means more fraud resistance at a higher overhead cost. New accounts and accounts with suspicious activity could be checked much more often. Reliable accounts could be checked less and used more for checking others.
      3. The system is self-correcting and self-sustaining; money goes in and quality results come out.
      This is really a brilliant idea; I predict that the first company to use this technology to weed out search result spam and tune their algorithms is the first company to finally provide better search results than Google. The first company to use this technology to improve targeted ad relevance is the first company to provide more relevant ads than AdSense. I believe Google has too much pride in their algorithms to use this "Mechanical Turk" method unless forced to, so it's wide open for Yahoo or MSN or some upstart to come in and take their crown. If so it would be Google's first big misstep.
      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    20. Re:Doesn't pay enough by CrankyFool · · Score: 1

      That's the problem with Americans! We bitch and moan that the Chinese or Indian are taking our jobs, but when someone gives us -- HANDS US ON A PLATE -- an opportunity to make some money, we scoff at it because "you couldn't possibly live on that," or "that's under minimum wage," or "I could make more money being a sperm donor," or "it's stupid to work that hard just so I can buy a tall latte at Starbucks once an hour."

      Carly was right!

    21. Re:Doesn't pay enough by CarrotLord · · Score: 1

      65 cents is good money in some countries, but you have to speak english, and have a US bank account to use it. If you could put the interface in Elbonian, and create a way to pay them for work, it could really work well, and I'd actually think would be a Good Thing.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
    22. Re:Doesn't pay enough by cagliost · · Score: 1

      Unless this is a scheme designed to avoid paying people minimum wage. Because the work is paid by task, they can pay a lower amount than they would have to if employing people on salary.

      This may actually bring about more good than you think. What if extremely poor people in, say, Thailand, start doing this (assuming somehow they get access to internet, using, say, one of those new "$100 laptops" they were given). In countries where a dollar is an enormous amount of money, if there was some way for them to actually get the money, this would be a fantastic scheme.

    23. Re:Doesn't pay enough by TheSync · · Score: 3, Informative

      One billion people on planet earth make less than $1 per day. Perhaps you are not the target audience...

    24. Re:Doesn't pay enough by socalmtb · · Score: 1

      Somehow I doubt a person who actually knows how write good copy will be be submitting anything. Pitty the company that actually uses it.

    25. Re:Doesn't pay enough by clem · · Score: 1

      That is, unless the original poster is working piecemeal in a fish cannery. I have to say, good on ya for finding a way to post to Slashdot if that's the case.

      --
      Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
    26. Re:Doesn't pay enough by fm6 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Fine. I'll give you 50 cents to come to my house and perform degrading sex acts. Where's your work ethic now?

    27. Re:Doesn't pay enough by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      The pictures are interesting. They look like they were taken from a camera set on auto-repeat from a moving car. Most of the pictures are obscured or there is no identifier on the buildings. I can't imagine what they are using them for but I hope it isn't for anything where image quality counts.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    28. Re:Doesn't pay enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Fine. I'll give you 50 cents to come to my house and perform degrading sex acts. Where's your work ethic now?

      Where do you live?
    29. Re:Doesn't pay enough by mkramer · · Score: 1

      Thank god they all have computers and internet access.

    30. Re:Doesn't pay enough by webview · · Score: 2, Funny

      There are definitely parts of the world where that would be a fantastic income, but my home country isn't one of them.

      Yes, and I am sure they all have Amazon.com accounts with credit-cards hooked up to them.

    31. Re:Doesn't pay enough by mrgreen4242 · · Score: 1
      If the site ever goes back to being responsive I'll probaby spend a few hours a week click through these "chose an image" for 3 cents HITs. They are completely mindless, don't involve the keyboard, and I can do them on a second monitor or in a smallish window while I watch downloaded TV shows, sports events, etc. The money isn't much, but it is SOMETHING, and if I'm going to be sitting there anyways I mind as well make a few bucks.

      I think that your estimate of 100/hour is pretty low. If the site responds at a "reasonable" speed (ie, more or less immediately like most sites do over broadband) I could see doing 180 an hour (3 per minute) pretty easily. That's $5.40/hour - round down to $5/hour to be a decent estimate. Say 4 hours a week, 6 if I spend half my lunch hour clicking away, and I've earned beer money for the week easily. Save up a couple weeks or a months worth and I could buy a new video game, computer toy, , without my wife getting on me about spending "our" money on it.

    32. Re:Doesn't pay enough by uncqual · · Score: 1
      These are almost certainly from the A9 (now owned by Amazon) search/map pages. They know the addresses of the businesses and know where the photo SUV is (via GPS), but really have no idea which picture best represents the business searched for (due to just where the signage is, if a bus is in the way in some pictures, bad angles on signs etc). So, they are paying you to pick the "best" image to show when that address is requested. When you search on this site, it asks you to identify the "best" picture, but I guess free labor (vs. that you pay $.03/image) isn't very easy to come by.

      The A9 thing is pretty neat. Doing a 'virtual drive-by' is helpful so you can see that the place you're looking for is just a few doors down from something that stands out (like a fast food place).

      Here's a nice starting point to play with (it's the (Mann) Grauman's Chinese Theater in Hollyweird) for the maps.a9.com experience.

      Here's an example of the first hit searching for "Sex" in Los Angeles at the Yellow Pages site (yp.a9.com) - I guess the City of Los Angeles keeps track of sex acts in the Hall of Records?

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    33. Re:Doesn't pay enough by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      $3 an hour, that can be done at home, at your computer, at your own pace, on your own time, whenever you 'feel' like it.

      In reality, if you don't bother spending 36 seconds per set, and only spend 18, that's $6 an hour. With no uniform requirements, no $3 a gallon gas, transportation, etc required to do the work.

      Take a parttime job paying $6 an hour, for 4 hours. It's 15 miles away, and your car gets 30mpg. That's $3 out of your pocket whenever you go to work and return. Not including maintenance and wear and tear. Oh, yeah, and you have to pay social security/medicare one your wages(you don't as a self-employed contractor). There's another couple bucks. Maybe even clothing. Suddenly, even $3 an hour, spread over time when doing other things, makes sense.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    34. Re:Doesn't pay enough by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the vast majority of those making less than $1 per day are illiterat, don't have computers or speak english.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    35. Re:Doesn't pay enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll pay 50 cents to come to your house and perform degrading sex acts, Mrs. Jolie.

    36. Re:Doesn't pay enough by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      You could actually be doing 3 windows at the same time. When one pops up, categorize it and hit OK, move on to the next one while the other two are submitting or reloading.

      It reminds me of when my daughter came in and said "My friend surfs the way you do." Which is to say, in pre-broadband days, you open a link in a new window, alt-tab back to the original, open another link in a new window, alt-tab back, and read while the new stuff loads.

      I dunno, it just seemed obvious to me. Rather than staring at one window while it loads, be multi-task surfing.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    37. Re:Doesn't pay enough by Annoying · · Score: 1

      As a broke-ass college student trying to save what meager money I have from work to go on a spring break vacation this year, I can say being able to pull together even another $10 a week would help me immensely, that is the difference between feeling like I am living comfortably, and feeling like I'll tightened my belt till my eyes are bulging so I can go on vacation.

    38. Re:Doesn't pay enough by Colz+Grigor · · Score: 1
      Interesting...

      On my screen it says you get paid $0.40 for that task.

      I wonder if Amazon is playing the dynamic pricing game again...

      ::Colz Grigor

    39. Re:Doesn't pay enough by bentcd · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just me, but it seems that it's not really worth it.

      Even if this is the case and even if the poor people who might love the chance to do this don't actually have the computer equipment required, consider this: People have been spending all their spare time - and lots of non-spare time - for years on end, missing sleep, losing significant others, dropping out of contact with friends and family, dying from exhaustion even, on playing online games ever since the first MUD went on the air. And what is it that draws people to these games? They're all really only about watching numbers grow - even after someone has fully mastered a MUD, I've seen them spend months on end going through the exact same routines, killing the same monsters in the same areas over and over again, just to increase their XP and level. With no real benefit other than, perhaps bragging rights.

      Mturk does all this, but with the additional benefit that you can actually cash in afterwards. It has XP (performance stats, or "Qualifications"), it has a varied set of missions (or probably will have once this starts taking off), it gives you different missions as you advance in "level", and I am sure it will be possible for you to display your achievements to other playe^H^H^H^H^HProviders for the bragging rights.

      The only question is: will it have PKing? :-)

      --
      sigs are hazardous to your health
    40. Re:Doesn't pay enough by raoul666 · · Score: 1

      But the people who make less then $1 a day don't have computers and internet access, generally.

      --
      When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl
    41. Re:Doesn't pay enough by RoverDaddy · · Score: 1

      With the really low priced tasks, I don't see why they wouldn't just give -every- task to 2 or 3 people, and only accept the result if they all agree. So they pay 2x or 3x the base price: they get a very high probability that they haven't been punkd.

      --
      RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
  8. $/hr by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone want to make an estimation of $/hr earned doing this? I'm at work, and don't have the balls to spend 20 minutes earning cash online ;)

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:$/hr by yellowbkpk · · Score: 4, Informative

      I did nine 3-cent HITs in about 5 or 6 minutes, so that's about 3.25/hour. The lag for me was in waiting for the images to download and clicking on the "Accept HIT" button repeatedly.

      There is an API, maybe if someone made a page that just displays the images and sends in the result when you click on the image instead of having to click twice for each HIT, you could go faster and make much more money.

    2. Re:$/hr by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 1
      At $0.03 cents/hit, you'll want to aim for around 5 sec/hit to earn about $20/hr.

      If it takes you more than 10 or 15 seconds from the instant you read the description for a hit to the instant you are available to read the description for the next hit after successfully completing the first one, it's not really worth your time (at least, IMHO).

      --
      Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
    3. Re:$/hr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn! $3.25 an hour, you say? I should be able to retire on my earnings in about, ummmm, 300 years... : /

    4. Re:$/hr by TheDawgLives · · Score: 1

      Well, if you get an average of $0.03 per hit, and you can successfully complete 1-2 hits per minute, then you'd make around $3/hour. If you work at a rabid pase, and complete 10 hits/minute, then you'd make $18/hour. Judging from the interface, 2 hits/minute is pretty fast.

      --
      -TheDawgLives suckitdown
    5. Re:$/hr by socalmtb · · Score: 1

      I think the API is for those who want to submit items for review. To access the API, you have to send a deposit to cover the fees that Amazon.com will have to pay to people sending you information. Nice try though.

    6. Re:$/hr by autophile · · Score: 1
      The API idea is great, because you're right, the interface is clunky.

      However, 9 HITs in 6 minutes is nothing. Keep it up for an hour at that rate, then we'll talk about your hourly rate! Fatigue would certainly end up cutting that down.

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    7. Re:$/hr by mrgreen4242 · · Score: 1

      The site is also really slow right now. If it was running at a speedier pace you could probaby up that, even factoring n fatigue. After the page loads for example, even including the 2 "extra" clicks needed to accept and submit the form, it takes MAYBE 10 seconds to chose the "correct" answer. I wonder if you could write a grease monkey script that automatically accepted an HIT that you were presented (it looks for the "accept this HIT" button and follows that link) and then also submitted the selection automatically after you selected an answer (once you choose a radio button it follows the form submit link)? That would surely speed things up.

    8. Re:$/hr by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

      I just did a few, and I spent more than ten seconds on each... mainly because for most of them, none of the pictures were really good matches. (I ended up selecting "None of the Above" twice, and returning it once.) It's an interesting idea, though. I'll try again when it's not so slow.

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  9. 3 cents for 1 hours work? by mustafap · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, I can give up my day job!

    --
    Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    1. Re:3 cents for 1 hours work? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 0

      Read closer. The task may pay 3 cents, and you have a one hour limit, but it generally will not take more than a couple minutes. I don't have exact numbers, but it probably is worth less than McD's assistant fry vat job.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:3 cents for 1 hours work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      even if it took 1 minute you're only going to make $1.80 an hour.

    3. Re:3 cents for 1 hours work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you live in India.

      Nathan

    4. Re:3 cents for 1 hours work? by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but with this, I don't have to expose myself to dangerous grease spatter. Or get out of my chair.

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  10. Sounds interesting but.... by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm a bit too paranoid to type my Amazon user name and password into a site that isn't on the main amazon.com domain....I can't find it mentioned anywhere on amazon's main site. Can somebody a little bit less of a wuss tell me if it is legit?

    1. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by Dekortage · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, mturk.amazon.com redirects you to www.mturk.com... seems to imply something.

      --
      $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    2. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://mturk.amazon.com/ redirects to it

    3. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by RandoX · · Score: 1

      I'd be careful. A whois lookup reveals mechturk1@hotmail.com as the contact address. Why would Amazon use hotmail?

    4. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Google for "MTAI inc" only turns up this one result:
      www.dkpto.dk/publikationer/tidender/ugeliste0542_2 31005.pdf
      Google for "PO Box 80626" 98108 Seattle Washington pulled up this:
      http://www.usaexporters.net/companyprofile.asp?cat ID=10260

      Registrant:
      MTAI, Inc.

      P.O. Box 80626
      Seattle, Washington 98108
      United States

      Registered through: GoDaddy.com (http://www.godaddy.com/
      Domain Name: MTURK.COM
      Created on: 22-Oct-01
      Expires on: 22-Oct-06
      Last Updated on: 11-Oct-05

      Administrative Contact:
      Hostmaster, MTAI mechturk1@hotmail.com
      MTAI, Inc.
      P.O. Box 80626
      Seattle, Washington 98108
      United States
      2065794562

      Technical Contact:
      Hostmaster, MTAI mechturk1@hotmail.com
      MTAI, Inc.
      P.O. Box 80626
      Seattle, Washington 98108
      United States
      2065794562

      Hotmail? They registered with a hotmail account.
      That strikes me as incredibly unprofessional.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    5. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by stefanb · · Score: 4, Informative
      I'm a bit too paranoid to type my Amazon user name and password into a site that isn't on the main amazon.com domain

      The whois info looks a bit dodgy. I would have expected Amazon knew how to properly register domains...

      Registrant:
      MTAI, Inc.
      P.O. Box 80626
      Seattle, Washington 98108
      United States

      Registered through: GoDaddy.com
      Domain Name: MTURK.COM
      Created on: 22-Oct-01
      Expires on: 22-Oct-06
      Last Updated on: 11-Oct-05

      Administrative Contact:
      Hostmaster, MTAI mechturk1@hotmail.com
      MTAI, Inc.
      P.O. Box 80626
      Seattle, Washington 98108
      United States
      2065794562 Fax --
      Technical Contact:
      Hostmaster, MTAI mechturk1@hotmail.com
      MTAI, Inc.
      P.O. Box 80626
      Seattle, Washington 98108
      United States
      2065794562 Fax --

    6. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by droptone · · Score: 1

      Whois Data

      mturk.com

      The data contained in Go Daddy Software, Inc.'s WhoIs database,
      while believed by the company to be reliable, is provided "as is"
      with no guarantee or warranties regarding its accuracy. This
      information is provided for the sole purpose of assisting you
      in obtaining information about domain name registration records.
      Any use of this data for any other purpose is expressly forbidden without the prior written
      permission of Go Daddy Software, Inc. By submitting an inquiry,
      you agree to these terms of usage and limitations of warranty. In particular,
      you agree not to use this data to allow, enable, or otherwise make possible,
      dissemination or collection of this data, in part or in its entirety, for any
      purpose, such as the transmission of unsolicited advertising and
      and solicitations of any kind, including spam. You further agree
      not to use this data to enable high volume, automated or robotic electronic
      processes designed to collect or compile this data for any purpose,
      including mining this data for your own personal or commercial purposes.

      Please note: the registrant of the domain name is specified
      in the "registrant" field. In most cases, Go Daddy Software, Inc.
      is not the registrant of domain names listed in this database.

      Registrant:
            MTAI, Inc.
            P.O. Box 80626
            Seattle, Washington 98108
            United States

            Registered through: GoDaddy.com
            Domain Name: MTURK.COM
                  Created on: 22-Oct-01
                  Expires on: 22-Oct-06
                  Last Updated on: 11-Oct-05

            Administrative Contact:
                  Hostmaster, MTAI mechturk1@hotmail.com
                  MTAI, Inc.
                  P.O. Box 80626
                  Seattle, Washington 98108
                  United States
                  2065794562 Fax --
            Technical Contact:
                  Hostmaster, MTAI mechturk1@hotmail.com
                  MTAI, Inc.
                  P.O. Box 80626
                  Seattle, Washington 98108
                  United States
                  2065794562 Fax --

            Domain servers in listed order:
                  PDNS1.ULTRADNS.NET
                  PDNS2.ULTRADNS.NET
                  PDNS3.ULTRADNS.ORG
                  PDNS4.ULTRADNS.ORG
                  PDNS5.ULTRADNS.INFO
                  PDNS6.ULTRADNS.CO.UK

                    The previous information has been obtained either directly from the registrant or a registrar of the domain name other than Network Solutions. Network Solutions, therefore, does not guarantee its accuracy or completeness.

                        Show underlying registry data for this record

      Current Registrar: GO DADDY SOFTWARE, INC.
      IP Address: 207.171.163.60 (ARIN & RIPE IP search)
      IP Location: US(UNITED STATES)-WASHINGTON-SEATTLE
      Record Type: Domain Name
      Server Type: Apache 1
      Lock Status: REGISTRAR-LOCK
      Web Site Status: Parked
      DMOZ no listings
      Y! Directory: see listings
      Web Site Title: Amazon Mechanical Turk - Welcome
      Secure: No
      E-commerce: No
      Traffic Ranking: Not available
      Data as of: 14-Jun-2005

      --
      Every post I make begins with the assumption P=~P.
    7. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by ingsocsoc · · Score: 1

      Want proof that it's not legit? We've slashdotted it. Yeah, that doesn't really happen to a big site such as Amazon.

    8. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Godaddy registered site with hotmail contact address=phishing.

      Slashdot got phished?

    9. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by droptone · · Score: 5, Informative

      Amazon has a page on their site about MTurk

      --
      Every post I make begins with the assumption P=~P.
    10. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by bibi-pov · · Score: 2, Informative

      When you try to login, the login page is amazon's genuine page sitting on https://www.amazon.com./ You can verify for yourself but there's nothing phishy here (pun intended). I have to admit the whois record is not very enticing though.

    11. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by Hedgethorn · · Score: 3, Informative
    12. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by pliftkl · · Score: 1

      I'm especially paranoid about typing in my account information when the web browser address page reads "https", but the browser doesn't seem to be in SSL mode. Anytime you log in to your Amazon account, you can verify that you are logging into Amazon by checking the certificate of the web site and ensuring that it is legit. On the Turk website, there's no certificate to back up the SSL claim...

    13. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by Janacek · · Score: 1

      Does this inspire confidence: from whois on mturk.com "Hostmaster, MTAI mechturk1@hotmail.com" and a post office box in Seattle? ;)

    14. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by benito27uk · · Score: 1
      The press button also goes to a page that's not on amazon.com, even if it say's it is on the browser header:

      http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=176060 &p=irol-InfoReq

    15. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the hotmail contact address is just plain wrong.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    16. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by renelicious · · Score: 2, Informative

      Once you click login it redirects you to the actual amazon.com domain to sign in. So when you type in your username and password you actually send that to amazon.com (of course I am assuming that there is no spoofing and other crazy things going on since the whole things seems fairly legitiamte).

      --
      "Luke, I am your node.parent();"
    17. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by gb7djk · · Score: 1

      The IP address of the server is in Amazon's netblock and the webserver is obviously also an (just one) amazon machine:-

      host mturk.amazon.com
      mturk.amazon.com is an alias for rewrite.amazon.com.
      rewrite.amazon.com has address 207.171.163.18

      whois 207.171.163.18

      OrgName: Amazon.com, Inc.
      OrgID: AMAZON-4
      Address: 605 5th Ave S
      City: SEATTLE
      StateProv: WA
      PostalCode: 98104
      Country: US

      NetRange: 207.171.160.0 - 207.171.191.255
      CIDR: 207.171.160.0/19
      NetName: AMAZON-01
      NetHandle: NET-207-171-160-0-1
      Parent: NET-207-0-0-0-0
      NetType: Direct Assignment
      NameServer: NS-1.AMAZON.COM
      NameServer: NS-2.AMAZON.COM
      NameServer: NS-3.AMAZON.COM
      NameServer: AUTH00.NS.UU.NET
      Comment:
      RegDate: 1999-09-23
      Updated: 2002-03-19

      RTechHandle: AC6-ORG-ARIN
      RTechName: Amazon.com, Inc.
      RTechPhone: +1-206-266-2187
      RTechEmail: NOC@amazon.com

      OrgTechHandle: ROLEA19-ARIN
      OrgTechName: Role Account
      OrgTechPhone: +1-206-266-2187
      OrgTechEmail: noc@amazon.com

      # ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2005-11-03 19:10
      # Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database.

      Seems legit, if rather strange branding, to me.

      Dirk

    18. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by whois_drek · · Score: 1

      You want an amazon.com domain name to feel safe? aws.amazon.com/mturk

    19. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by trib3003 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Agreed: whois looks pretty odd. Amazon slashdotted ? Jep, another odd point.

      But in case this is some kind of phishing, they at least manipulated some reverse
      records too :)

      traceroute to www.mturk.com (207.171.166.182), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
      [...]
      11 amazon-above.mpr1.iad5.us.mfnx.net.175.185.208.in- addr.arpa (208.185.175.66) 96.801 ms 97.656 ms 97.633 ms
      12 72.21.201.27 97.109 ms 97.347 ms 98.164 ms
      13 166-182.amazon.com (207.171.166.182) 98.107 ms 97.069 ms 97.510 ms

    20. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by khazad · · Score: 1

      It's legit. The url is strange for amazon, and the whois looks dodgy, but this is from Amazon's website.

      Mechanical Turk info

    21. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by shawb · · Score: 1

      My guess? Somebody came up with the concept, put together a proof of concept demo (with website already existing) and then sold the whole thing to Amazon. The Whois information just hasn't been updated yet, or the original creator is now an Amazon employee or subcontractor.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    22. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Last hop is Amazon owned IP space they might have been looking to hide the whois on the domain.

      whois 207.171.166.182
      [Querying whois.arin.net]
      [whois.arin.net]

      OrgName: Amazon.com, Inc.
      OrgID: AMAZON-4
      Address: 605 5th Ave S
      City: SEATTLE
      StateProv: WA
      PostalCode: 98104
      Country: US

      NetRange: 207.171.160.0 - 207.171.191.255
      CIDR: 207.171.160.0/19
      NetName: AMAZON-01
      NetHandle: NET-207-171-160-0-1
      Parent: NET-207-0-0-0-0
      NetType: Direct Assignment
      NameServer: NS-1.AMAZON.COM
      NameServer: NS-2.AMAZON.COM
      NameServer: NS-3.AMAZON.COM
      NameServer: AUTH00.NS.UU.NET
      Comment:
      RegDate: 1999-09-23
      Updated: 2002-03-19

      RTechHandle: AC6-ORG-ARIN
      RTechName: Amazon.com, Inc.
      RTechPhone: +1-206-266-2187
      RTechEmail: NOC@amazon.com

      OrgTechHandle: ROLEA19-ARIN
      OrgTechName: Role Account
      OrgTechPhone: +1-206-266-2187
      OrgTechEmail: noc@amazon.com

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    23. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by riven1128 · · Score: 1

      My first clue would be that the domain was created in 2001 ..

      Possibilities:

      * They bought the domain from another company and haven't updated the registration.
      * Someone at Amazon owned the domain before for other purposes
      * They're paying for use of a domain someone else owns
      * Something I haven't thought of because I'm too lazy to keep making bullets.

  11. They probably patented it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That way probably works to prevent cheating due to the fact that multiple people can verify it, and you can get rid of known cheaters (though that's a bit Stalinist).

    I'd go with telling people to write keywords about the images based on some rules/criteria. "ancient building, square windows, desert" etc. cause the questioning approach takes too long. Unless you do a blend of both .. questions to categorize and then add keywords .. or vice versa.

    Knowing amazon they've patented this .. even though it's a known technique etc.

    1. Re:They probably patented it by Electrum · · Score: 1

      Knowing amazon they've patented this .. even though it's a known technique etc.

      Amazon patents things for protection, as do most other large companies. They recently paid $40m in a patent settlement.

    2. Re:They probably patented it by BlueTooth · · Score: 1

      Knowing amazon they've patented this .. even though it's a known technique etc.

      Indeed...prior art in hotornot.com

      --
      SPAM
  12. How long until some sick slashdotter posts the ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    following HIT: "Is there a goat in that picture?"

  13. Do what?!? by Viraptor · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm not getting the idea right, but isn't it a work for a person skilled, for example, in marketing and adv. to make up descriptions for products? Or if it's a product, that doesn't require a special advertising description, can't it be done by person who spends about the same time to write an ad about that?

  14. The Future of Surveillance by wombatmobile · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Crime in your neighborhood?

    Get a webcam...

    1. Re:The Future of Surveillance by wed128 · · Score: 1

      This isn't offtopic! you could pay somebody 3 cents to tell you "is there someone robbing this house?"

    2. Re:The Future of Surveillance by g4c · · Score: 1

      This is not off-topic at all. Re-mod, please.

    3. Re:The Future of Surveillance by benjamindees · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's a good idea. I would actually pay for that.

      Lets say I've got a herd of cows in a remote location. I setup a few webcams. I put tracking anklets on the cows. If a tracker shows a cow leaving the fenceline, or malfunctions, or is tampered with, the webcams come on. Some random person on the internet gets the task of "count the cows, identify any people". In fact, two people get that task, for redundancy. They can pan and zoom and get a bonus for finding trouble. The whole thing could be run by a security company. If there's somebody stealing my cows, the security company can call the cops.

      That would be worth a reasonable monthly fee.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    4. Re:The Future of Surveillance by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

      The real future of surveillance is to replace "cows" in parent with "people." The rest still works... except maybe the last bit.

    5. Re:The Future of Surveillance by raoul666 · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of a teacher I had in high school. Head of Drama, we got along well. Anyway, one day I go in to see him about something, he's staring at his computer screen, utterly fascinated. He motions me over, and says, "Look at this. It's a field in England."

      Somebody put up a webcam feed. Of their empty field. It refreshes every 10-15 seconds. My teacher is sitting their, watching for the smallest change. I just backed away reallll slow.

      --
      When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl
  15. Contracting work worth big bucks by Silverhammer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    After a quick review of the available tasks, I must say this looks like a huge scam. Most of the tasks are marketing oriented (e.g. copywriting, photo manipulation), for which experienced contractors get paid $30 to $50 per hour.

    Only 75 cents to research and write a complete automotive product description? Are they kidding? Sure, they say I can copy the description from the manufacturer's Web site, but my time is still worth more than that. Besides, I think it's the responsibility of the manufacturer to make sure their Amazon listing is correct. That's how they do it on IMDB.

    I can only hope the program will make more sense as they add more requesters and more tasks.

    1. Re:Contracting work worth big bucks by ObjetDart · · Score: 1
      I think it's the responsibility of the manufacturer to make sure their Amazon listing is correct. That's how they do it on IMDB.

      Which, by the way, is owned by Amazon.

      --
      I read Usenet for the articles.
    2. Re:Contracting work worth big bucks by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So, don't do it.

      Most of the ones I saw were trivial tasks. Even the auto description was edit the auto description until it was human readable. Since they are trivial, people get bored doing them. The common solution has been to over-pay someone to do them, and have the pay offset their boredom. This interface provides a new idea: let people do them until they get bored, and pay them by the piece.

      If your time is truly worth more, don't do them. But there are people who will find it an interesting diversion for a few minutes, and they get paid a bit for it. All in all, not a bad extension of the free market.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    3. Re:Contracting work worth big bucks by johnty · · Score: 1

      huge scam, or outsourcing?

      --
      I am unique, just like you, and you, and you...
    4. Re:Contracting work worth big bucks by toiletmonster · · Score: 1

      75 cents might not be worth it to you, but what about the guy in china? it is cheap labor without all the horrible labor rules and regulations that makes doing business overseas hard.

      i think this could be brilliant.

    5. Re:Contracting work worth big bucks by Silverhammer · · Score: 1

      75 cents might not be worth it to you, but what about the guy in china?

      If a person in China has high-speed 'Net access and is proficient enough in English to do these tasks, not even they are going to waste their time like this. They already have jobs in international shipping, banking, marketing, manufacturing, journalism, government, etc.

  16. I smell burning gears by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Apparently mturk's webserver is from the 19th Century as well.

  17. Good idea but for work required it should pay more by digitaldc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They are asking you to rewrite product descriptions and will pay you 60 cents?
    Not only will the work most likely be shoddy, but it seems like they are trying to replace someone else's job by using this cheap online service.
    Yes, for some it may provide rewards but if you calculate the amount of time spent on each item VS. the payment reward (usually a few pennies) it is just not worth someone's free time.
    Why don't they just hire a staff of people to work on these 'HITS'?

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  18. Willing to compete with the Indians? by nysus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm interested to know if those living overseas can participate. If so, they would drive down the labor costs so much that only truly desperate Americans would participate in this piecework scheme.

    --

    ---Technology will liberate us if it doesn't enslave us first.

    1. Re:Willing to compete with the Indians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I can see the opportunity for cost savings if this work was outsourced to more reasonable labor prices, the reality is that you might view this as a possible future wave for American labor. At the risk of trolling, it seems as if America produces more sit-down-and-click culture than other nations, so Amazon is smart to simiply tap the largest natural labor pool. Plus, that frees up the previously-ignored millions of competent, intelligent persons overseas to step up a level and join the technologically spoile^H^H^H^H^H^Helite in helping shape the future.

    2. Re:Willing to compete with the Indians? by DavidHumus · · Score: 1
      Since this scheme may take advantage of local knowledge - i.e. distinguish between a Greek deli and a Jewish one - there may be some barrier to entry, at least across cultures.

      Of course, this makes the assumption that quality matters and they care enough to verify the inputs they're getting. In any case, the future of unskilled labor in G7 countries may be low-paid piece-work with no benefits. Sounds like a wealthy conservative's wet dream.

    3. Re:Willing to compete with the Indians? by khallow · · Score: 1
      I'm interested to know if those living overseas can participate. If so, they would drive down the labor costs so much that only truly desperate Americans would participate in this piecework scheme.

      I imagine overseas participants would be permitted for obvious reasons (unless the goal is to hook in relatively wealthy participants for some other scheme). And the problem with that is? My point here is that if this sort of thing gets off the ground and is genuine, then anyone in the developed world can now hire third world labor rather than just the big corps with a cadre of lawyers. Finally, this is some really mundane labor that simply might not get done any other way. We finally have a globalization of labor that really does benefit all parties. For example, there's a number of things in scientific research that depend on using a really cheap person (ie, a graduate student) to search for a particular type of pattern (whether it be finding asteroids/moving dots in astronomical photographs, maybe looking for certain types of deformities in a pile of fruit fly larvae, or just entering relevant data from a vast pile of scanned records into a database).

    4. Re:Willing to compete with the Indians? by RexRhino · · Score: 1

      You can do the work and live anywhere. But you can only request work if you are a legal entity in the U.S according to the tax code...

  19. none of the above by rayde · · Score: 1
    i'm finding a bunch of these storefront pictures as being horrible pictures... perhaps they're testing the reliability of the system here?

    for example, the storefront that is being asked about might be cut off completely, showing instead the entirety of the neighboring store. This might be the "best" photo, however, it would NOT be what the requesting storefront would be looking for. If people consistently chose the nicest photo as opposed to the one that most closely matches the request, i think this system will be proven invalid.

    1. Re:none of the above by droptone · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I've been noticing. The majority of the tasks I've completed have contained no worthwhile photos, and especially none I would want representing any business.

      --
      Every post I make begins with the assumption P=~P.
    2. Re:none of the above by yellowbkpk · · Score: 1

      They're not asking for a photography judge here, they're asking for you to pick the best image of the storefront in question. If the storefront isn't there, then you choose "None of the Above" and move on to the next one.

    3. Re:none of the above by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      These could be bogus tasks just created to get the project moving..

    4. Re:none of the above by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

      My sample HIT had me pick the storefront of a Karate place. It was a deserted parking lot and some trees.

      Where are these pictures even coming from?

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    5. Re:none of the above by mrgreen4242 · · Score: 1
      I had a similar one to that. It looks like they have a system where they drive down a street and pictures are automatically taken every second or so, with a very high speed shutter, so there is no motion blurring. I'd guess that the photo's are tagged with GPS data as they are taken and then the address of a business is used to get a set of photo's they think are nearby it. After a few people select a given picture as actually being that business they could put it into an online yellowpages/mapping service. You enter in a business category, pick a place, get the phone number/address/website/whatever info, a map leading you there and a picture of the destination to help you ID it when you get there. That'd be pretty helpful.

      All the pictures I have seen have been of pretty dodgy looking neighborhoods/businesses though, so that might dissuade me from going there!

  20. Will the real mechanical turk please stand up.... by geek42 · · Score: 1

    How long until someone makes a series of bots smart enough to make money at this?

  21. Lousy payscale. by Joehonkie · · Score: 0, Troll

    I doubt most people's time is worth that little.

    1. Re:Lousy payscale. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In third world countries, it could be. The unemployment compensation is u$50 a month in Argentina, so every penny counts.

    2. Re:Lousy payscale. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't work where I do.

    3. Re:Lousy payscale. by Joehonkie · · Score: 1

      You have a good point, so I'm not sure you were modded down (I know other people said the same thing, but still). The question is, do those people who have computers and decent high speed internet access in Argentina need the money, or just the average poor guy on the street?

    4. Re:Lousy payscale. by Andrewkov · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Internet Cafe's are popular in many countries, although if you're paying by the hour to use a PC, that would really eat into your proffit margin.

    5. Re:Lousy payscale. by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Set it up like gold farmers for MMO- 1 person with money buy 20 computers, take 70% of the profits, and its still a good job for them.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  22. Artificial artificial intelligence... Heh by ankura · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of spammer CAPTCHA solvers...

    More here:
            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captcha#Circumvention

    1. Re:Artificial artificial intelligence... Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You linked to a page (the wiki) that has a link to a page (http://sam.zoy.org/pwntcha/) with Goatse on it, (thankfully?) distorted for use as an image captcha.

      This is clearly an example of the Stealth Goatse - well played.

  23. Oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was wondering why it suddenly slammed to a halt. Gee, thanks, Slashdot.

  24. Profit? by DevolvingSpud · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since this is all web-services driven, it seems to me you could create an interesting cycle with a simple program:

    1) Use the API to find a HIT, and sign up to complete it.
    2) Create a new HIT that basically asks someone to complete the first HIT,
          only for $0.01 less than the original HIT was offering.
    3) Do this for every existing HIT.
    4) Profit?

    --
    Keep your friends close.
    Keep your enemies in a little jar on your desk.
    1. Re:Profit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, until someone writes a program that answers the HITS in decending order of pay. Then your fscked.

    2. Re:Profit? by moof1138 · · Score: 1

      Here's another variation:

      1) Create a porn site where the user must click through an 'age-verification puzzle' to get to each movie/image gallery.
      2) Use the API to find a HIT, sign up to complete it, and post it to the porn site.
      3) Profit?

      --

      Hyperbole is the worst thing ever.
    3. Re:Profit? by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1
      1. Only the clueless would use the middlemen for less when they could be going straight to the source and getting the full price.
      2. The secondary services would have to verify the answers of their users to prevent click fraud; this would mean that they would have to send many questions out to two different users for verification. This would cut into their profits. (The main service must do the same thing, but the secondary services basically have to duplicate that effort, making things even less efficient.)

      Sorry, doesn't add up.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    4. Re:Profit? by galdosdi · · Score: 1

      There's a word for that, and that's arbitrage. If you did that, you'd make the market more effecient-- HIT prices would be driven down to the point where you couldn't conduct this scheme anymore because nobody would complete the HITs at 1 cent less than the current market prices.

  25. Re:Will the real mechanical turk please stand up.. by Agelmar · · Score: 1

    That would actually be a good thing. The whole point is that this is a "hard" AI problem (And I use "hard" in the AI sense of the word, which is much stricter than the english meaning of "hard"). If the problem is solved, it would be a huge advance for artificial intelligence.

  26. What is your time worth? by shoolz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Rather than think about how much you could make per hour on this, think about how much your time is worth. Are you worth $65,000 per year? Maybe you're worth more or you value your time more? In any case, at $65,000 per year, you make about $0.52 per minute.

    So to accomplish the 3 cent task and make your time worth it, you should spend no more than about 2 and a half seconds from the second you begin to the second you finish and get approval.

    On some of the higher paying ones, oh, say $0.40 for writing a full product review, you could devote almost a full minute!

    1. Re:What is your time worth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, as we all know noone in America has sucessfully raised a family on less than $65,000 per year.

      Christ people, this isn't skilled labor we're talking about here - it's "Do you have funcional eyes? Then we've got a job for you!"

      Kevin

    2. Re:What is your time worth? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Are you worth $65,000 per year? Maybe you're worth more or you value your time more?

      The price you expect to be paid depends entirely on the structure of the job. If I have to drive there, put in my 40+ hours doing things I dislike, etc., you can bet it will take a lot of money to keep me there.

      OTOH, if it's something easy, generally enjoyable, that I can do as much as I want, and whenever I want... then I would be willing to take a lot less money for my time.

      How many people here get a 6-digit salary, but will happily spend a couple days fixing an old $40 VCR/DVD-player?
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:What is your time worth? by khallow · · Score: 1

      What happens if your annual salary is say, $3,000 a year? Or $0 a year? If this site were genuine and could handle real volume (and actually have a bunch of customers too), then you could boost the income of a bunch of third world people. Literally become the largest employer in the world within a few years.

    4. Re:What is your time worth? by NFJ25 · · Score: 1

      What about those countries where people makes less than 1000 dollars per year?

    5. Re:What is your time worth? by 3-State+Bit · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Are you worth $65,000 per year? Maybe you're worth more or you value your time more? In any case, at $65,000 per year, you make about $0.52 per minute.

      Well, Google says $65000 per year = $0.123586182 per minute.

      For people "worth" $65,000/year there are three cases:
      1. You are on salary at a day-job ($65,000 / year, irrespective of what you're doing as long as you don't get fired - commute, come in one saturday to meet a deadline, read slashdot instead of working, slip out early, come in late, or come in early, work a little late, etc.) In this case when you're off work you're still making the $0.12 per minute, assuming you're not currently doing something that makes you lose your job or that must be considered part of your next job (to pay off later when you get a higher salary doing something different). When you decide (off work) at seven PM to close your other windows and do this shit for an hour, it's like trading an hour of your time for the appropriate-sized bill appearing on your floor. There's no loss, you're already "being paid" your annual salary. Plus maybe it's fun.
      2. You are employed by the hour (the number of hours you actually put in is what comes to $65,000 / year, with the assumption you could take more hours if you wanted 'em. If you couldn't take more hours it's the same as case 1.). In this case we shouldn't just divide your minutely earning for the whole year, we should say that you make money when you're on the clock, and no money when you're off the clock. The question is, if your on-the-clock job is worth more than this shit, then why would you take an hour of this shit instead of just clocking one more hour? If you consider this shit work and not just relaxation or something, you probably wouldn't. You'd just put in one more hour at work.
      3. You are unemployed. In this case your profession could very well be worth $65,000 / year, but you might not be seeing any of this because you are currently unemployed. Maybe you spend 8 hrs a day interviewing or job-searching (sometimes to include learning something, getting a certificate, etc). In this scenario I think someone is in the same case as 1 (salaried) if they have enough savings (or can take on enough debt) to reach their next job [let's say the signing bonus pays you back these invested days/weeks -- no matter how many hours you actually spent doing them] , and case 2 (hourly) if they don't have enough savings to reach their next job -- except that the hourly wage should be considered slightly negative (you spend something during your job hunt, but don't actually make anything).

        Why would someone invest work in a negative hourly wage? Because they don't know that they don't have enough savings / can't take on enough debt to reach their next job on that investment!


      I think this is a nice way of showing the different cases someone could be in who is "worth $65,000/yr" (interestingly I think the first case works for a completely passive income too, like if you live off of interest. You're still salaried, you just never have to come in to work "in order not to get fired". If you invest time, however, in making sure you get that interest, then that's what coming into work consists of. (Or think of absentee landlords, who must "come into work" for their salary only very rarely if at all.)

      I can very well imagine someone is "worth 65,000/yr" whose "job" consists of reading the Wall Street Journal in the morning and making sure they don't have to head for the hills (the $65,000 is from the interest on "very safe" bonds). The rest of their day is as in case 1.

      Also, please think about case 3, because I could be wrong and maybe there is a better way to analyze this one.
    6. Re:What is your time worth? by Stormwatch · · Score: 1
      On some of the higher paying ones, oh, say $0.40 for writing a full product review, you could devote almost a full minute!
      People already write reviews without being paid a dime, just check... you know... pretty much any product on Amazon.
    7. Re:What is your time worth? by shoolz · · Score: 1

      Yes, and approving pictures of places they've never seen, and writing product reviews of products they could never understand.

    8. Re:What is your time worth? by shoolz · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between somebody who's bought a product and wants to share their personal opinion with the world, vs. somebody who's being paid three to seventy-five cents to write something they know nothing about.

  27. Do A9's Dirty Work For Them by MaceyHW · · Score: 2, Informative

    Acutally, all the tasks that I saw involved processing data for A9's block-level search and "tour". Seems like a clever, cheap way to organize the insane amount of data they have mapped for this project.

  28. In the other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    India's economy sky-rockets as the unemployment rate drops below zero percent...

  29. slowness by ickleberry · · Score: 0

    It looks like the site is having a hard time putting up with its slashdotting session. that can mean one of 2 things.

    It is hosted on a really slow server
    They are using IIS

  30. Reverse auction by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Increase the value of the job till it's worth someone's while to actually do it. Everyone benefits. Any rejected work remains owned by author.

    --
    Deleted
  31. Philip K. Dick by baxissimo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The reminds me of the Philip K. Dick novel in which the main character thinks he lives an ordinary life, and who solves the daily puzzle in the newspaper every day for cheap entertainment. In reality, though, the whole town he lives in is a front, and the fun puzzles he's solving in the newspaper are actually cleverly disguised military strategy problems of some sort.

    Quick -- someone patent that storyline and sue Amazon for infringement!

    1. Re:Philip K. Dick by Joehonkie · · Score: 1

      Title?

    2. Re:Philip K. Dick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Time out of joint.

    3. Re:Philip K. Dick by layzee · · Score: 5, Informative

      Time out of Joint

    4. Re:Philip K. Dick by Joehonkie · · Score: 1

      Ah, excellent. Know the title, but I haven't read that one. Many thanks to the both of you.

    5. Re:Philip K. Dick by layzee · · Score: 1

      Was the second PKD I read, and it is pretty good. Gets a bit silly towards the end, apparently he was urged by the publishers to sex it up a bit as there was a big craving for alien and outer space stories at that period in the 50s.

    6. Re:Philip K. Dick by eth1 · · Score: 1

      "Quick -- someone patent that storyline and sue Amazon for infringemen"

      Sorry, the Mice have prior art :)

    7. Re:Philip K. Dick by drudd · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you should have charged $0.03 for that information.

      Doug

      --
      Venn ist das nurnstuck git und Slotermeyer? Ya! Beigerhund das oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
    8. Re:Philip K. Dick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew there was something slightly sinister about sudoku...

    9. Re:Philip K. Dick by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      Sounds like Orson Scott Card's Ender's Game http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ender%27s_game

      O

    10. Re:Philip K. Dick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice one!

  32. Ad Copy Copies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Ad copy is something that many online retailers (such as myself) find important. I spend quite a lot of time writing a product description for my products. It might take 20-30 minutes to do the research and write something good enough to get the product to sell.

    So what happens if your product scores well in Google.. well, people just copy your ad copy. And since Google hates duplicates, it will eliminate all except one page from the results. And very often that can be the original page. And yes, I have had Amazon copy my product descriptions, even with properly paid staff.

    So what's likely to happen here is that some takes on a task of writing a series of product descriptions. But for less than a dollar per description, they're just going to be tempted to copy-and-paste from someone else. Now, Google is always likely to assume that Amazon originated the content, and drop the actual originator from the index.

    Net result? Well, DMCA complaints being filed, lawyers and other unpleasantness.. simply because it's not worth anybody's time to write a product description from scratch for less than a buck.

    My feeling is that $5-$10 is probably the base value of these sort of things, plus some proper quality control management. As it is, it looks like a cost-cutting exercise that could backfire hugely.

  33. Japanese manuals? by Crouty · · Score: 3, Funny
    Wow, I can't wait to unleash my grammar nazi skills on the automated translations of japanese manuals of electronic devices!

    Keep them coming, Amazon!

    --
    On se Internetz nobody noes your German.
    1. Re:Japanese manuals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A grammar Nazi who spells kraut crout ? (Assuming from your sig and name that crouty is krauty )
      You sir need a new job .

    2. Re:Japanese manuals? by LeDopore · · Score: 0

      My fav:
      On a motorcycle manual:
      "Beware the slippery grease-mud, for therein lurks the evil skid demon."

      --
      Expected time to finish is 1 hour and 60 minutes.
  34. Learning from experience by dmccarty · · Score: 1
    Very smart...someone is keeping tabs on these things. At the top of the Wikipedea page:

    This article has recently been linked from Slashdot.
    Please keep an eye on the page history for errors or vandalism.

    --
    Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
    1. Re:Learning from experience by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      wow, when did Wikipedia add this neat feature to their system. dont tell me they have a trained monkey to do it... cause i want that monkey now damn it.

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
  35. Highly suspectful site. Do NOT give any detail by Ilgaz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Guys, let me tell.

    It's registered through Godaddy.com, one of the companies spammers/phishers love to use.

    It has hotmail contact addresses in whois. Impossible for a company like Amazon

    No clue of such thing on official Amazon press room
    http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=176060 &p=irol-news

    So if it looks like,acts like,runs like (amazon gigantic server farm slashdotted?) a regular phishing site, it is. Even if it made to Slashdot. I'd say pull the story until Amazon comes up with an explanation. Before any harm done.

    It could be even a more "elite" hack including subdomain/DNS hacking. I am a spamcop mail customer and I see amazing things everyday.

    In risk of looking very funny if it is not anything above, happily posting it.

    1. Re:Highly suspectful site. Do NOT give any detail by Number13 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Either the phishers already have access to my account information under Amazon (including mailing address and the unique fake name I gave Amazon), or it's actually connected to Amazon's database.

    2. Re:Highly suspectful site. Do NOT give any detail by Dynamoo · · Score: 3, Informative
      It's hosted on 207.171.166.182 which is part of Amazon's netblock of 207.171.160.0 - 207.171.191.255.

      Anyhow, I tried it. It recognised me and new my address. It's Amazon alright.

      --
      Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
    3. Re:Highly suspectful site. Do NOT give any detail by Doppleganger · · Score: 2, Informative

      "If you are a software developer and would like to learn more about using Amazon Mechanical Turk APIs, click here."

      The link ultimately goes to:
      http://www.amazon.com/gp/browse.html/104-7108086-1 879910?node=15879911

      Which has links back to www.mturk.com

      Looks legitimate, unless someone has really managed to pull one over on Amazon (and if so, why put it on its own domain?)

    4. Re:Highly suspectful site. Do NOT give any detail by baroquecycle · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Of course, all that means is that when you logged in, they could have behind the scenes connected to Amazon as you and pulled up your address and other info to make it look legit.

    5. Re:Highly suspectful site. Do NOT give any detail by AdamWeeden · · Score: 1

      I thought that too at first, but then I realized it's a pretty simple task to act as a middle man between you and amazon. 1) Take your login. 2) Login to amazon with your login. 3) Pull down your account info. 4) Display it back to you.

      --
      I was quoted out of context in my autobiography...
    6. Re:Highly suspectful site. Do NOT give any detail by Bobulusman · · Score: 1

      Amazon now apparently provides web-hosting services. I've only skimmed, since I wanted to type this fast, but, hypothetically, but couldn't it be someone hosted? The fact that I can't navigate to that page from the main Amazon page sends up a red flag to me.

      --
      Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
    7. Re:Highly suspectful site. Do NOT give any detail by xnderxnder · · Score: 1
      It is kinda weird..

      However, I did find a page on amazon.com that talks about Mechanical Turk:

      http://www.amazon.com/gp/browse.html/ref=sd_allcat pop_ws/102-8545451-5949729?node=3435361

      "Announcing Amazon Mechanical Turk (November 02, 2005)
      Today, humans still significantly outperform the most powerful computers at completing such simple tasks as identifying objects in photographs - something children can do even before they learn to speak. However, ..."

      So, I guess it's ok?

      meh..
      --
      hooked up funny
    8. Re:Highly suspectful site. Do NOT give any detail by ubernostrum · · Score: 1

      Amazon now apparently provides web-hosting services. I've only skimmed, since I wanted to type this fast, but, hypothetically, but couldn't it be someone hosted? The fact that I can't navigate to that page from the main Amazon page sends up a red flag to me.

      I clicked through to try one of the tasks, and was asked to confirm my full name and mailing address, which were displayed correctly and match exactly the contact information I've provided to Amazon in the past. So either A) someone has cracked Amazon's custoimer database and found a way to hijack the amazon.com domain cookie in every existing browser, or B) it's legit. Which one do you think is more likely?

    9. Re:Highly suspectful site. Do NOT give any detail by Vallimar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Seems to be listed quite prominently and thoroughly at aws.amazon.com.
      I don't know what the deal is with the dodgy looking registration but
      that doesn't all look like part of a phishing site to me.

    10. Re:Highly suspectful site. Do NOT give any detail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could be Amazon made a partnership with the original developer, in order to leverage Amazon's "secure identity and payments infrastructure" as it mentions in their FAQ. If the site was registered before the association existed, this could be legit.

      One use I can think of for this is to SPAM by submitting the word-recognition image here on Slashdot and elsewhere to be identified as an HIT. Not a good thing, I would say.

    11. Re:Highly suspectful site. Do NOT give any detail by D14BL0 · · Score: 0

      Then tell me, why would Amazon promote it on their site, themselves, as shown here below?

      http://www.amazon.com/gp/browse.html/ref=sc_fe_c_1 _3435361_1/103-1222474-4643020?_encoding=UTF8&node =15879911&no=3435361&me=A36L942TSJ2AJA

      Also, if it's the WHOIS record that's concerning you, remember that it might be out dated. Also take into consideration that this is still a beta project.

    12. Re:Highly suspectful site. Do NOT give any detail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe amazon didn't want a bunch of nosy whois-divers pestering them before launch ("Amazon hates Turkey! See, they even registered a domain name for their turk-bashing!")?

    13. Re:Highly suspectful site. Do NOT give any detail by fm6 · · Score: 0, Redundant
      Well duh!

      What amazes me is that it took over an hour for somebody to post a message noting such obvious signs that this is a phishing scam. Slashdotters love to see conspiracies everywhere, but they're all fooled by a site that isn't even in the Amazon.com domain, just because it has an Amazon logo.

    14. Re:Highly suspectful site. Do NOT give any detail by mgdupont · · Score: 0

      I'm with you. Why is this still on the /. front page, posing as a real site with Zonk's personal blessing? WTF?

    15. Re:Highly suspectful site. Do NOT give any detail by corblix · · Score: 1
      One thing that comes through loud and clear when I look at this site is: shoddy.

      The page looks shoddy. The WHOIS entry is shoddy. The name is shoddy. Naming a site after an ethnic group is just asking for retaliation from the PC nuts. I'm not a PC nut, but no company with the status of Amazon.com would ever do anything like this. It's dumb. It's shoddy.

      Amazon.com does not do things like this.

      Various posters have offered evidence that this is a legitimate Amazon thing. Well, if so, it's an independent project from someone in Amazon who has no idea how Amazon does things and should never have been allowed to touch the web servers.

  36. What about federal labor laws? by britneys+9th+husband · · Score: 1

    $5.15 minimum wage and all that. Is Amazon breaking the law by paying people 65 cents for work that obviously takes more than 60*(.65/5.15) minutes?

    --
    Hear recorded Slashdot headlines on your phone! New service beta testing. Just call (248) 434-5508
    1. Re:What about federal labor laws? by Intron · · Score: 1

      You aren't an employee. As a contractor, you make whatever you agree to. Personally, I'm going to give up making shoes for Nike and do this full time.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    2. Re:What about federal labor laws? by generic-man · · Score: 2, Informative

      Contract work is not subject to minimum wage laws because it is not paid on an hourly basis. If you as a contractor feel that the pay is not substantial, you have the right not to sign.

      --
      For more information, click here.
  37. As McEnroe said, "You can not be serious"... by DataCannibal · · Score: 2, Funny

    or as we used to say in the UK, "Pull the other one, it's get bells on"

    Or as I say today, "40 cents for a product description!?!?! Fuck off!"

    --
    No but, yeah but, no but...
  38. Re:Will the real mechanical turk please stand up.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're thinking too much, which in your case unfortunately makes your reply look like you didn't think at all.

    You were supposed to infer that the "bot" would just "christmas tree" the forms, filling in random answers.

  39. Agent Smith, is that you? by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 5, Funny
    I hope you all can see where this is going:

    • 2005: Amazon introduces Mechanical Turk program. Thousands of underpaid geeks sign up and start clicking mindlessly.
    • 2010: Home catheterization and feeding tube kit eliminates need to leave workstation. Productivity skyrockets.
    • 2015: Direct neural interface improves response times one million-fold.
    • 2020: The Matrix

    Don't say I didn't warn you.

    --
    Soylent Green is peoplicious!
    1. Re:Agent Smith, is that you? by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Let me be the first to say...

      Repent! The Singularity is upon us!

      Or something like that... Truth be told I could do my job from home if the technological infrastructure could support.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    2. Re:Agent Smith, is that you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Singularity? But this doesn't give us artificial intelligence... And then I got thinking. What if this principle could be used to create an artificial intelligence, consisting of thousands, maybe millions of people clicking on little puzzles that solve parts of the whole, and none of them is actually aware what the whole system is thinking and doing? In other words, we could create an intelligent hive-mind... perhaps someone is already doing it. Woah.

    3. Re:Agent Smith, is that you? by Phixxation · · Score: 1

      You forgot: 2025: PROFIT!

      ROFL - this made me laugh out loud at work...

      --
      "In a world without walls or fences, who needs Windows or Gates?"
    4. Re:Agent Smith, is that you? by thehubbell · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you would probably have more friends than those Quickstar jerks.

  40. wow - getting paid for this! by sprocketonline · · Score: 1

    Stop the gripe about the pay. $0.03 is better than nothing. Now all we have to do is link it up to RateMyVomit.com or HotOrNot.com!
    If millions of people are happy to spend hours of their life rating pictures for free on these websites, then getting a few cents to rate some equally meaningless pictures is good pay.

  41. Enough with job interviews that get your ideas... by xtracto · · Score: 1

    Your task is to edit an existing Automotive product title to make it more human readable and update and add additional feature points about the product. This HIT will require some research to complete. Approval depends on the quality of your title and feature points, determined by a manual review.

    So, they get a lot of results and they do not approve anyone of them because the quality is not enough. And they get the job done uh?

    Yeah, sure... where do I sign... *sigh*

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  42. Good to know by Explorador · · Score: 1

    It is good to know that us humans are still not obsolete, even though we have been relegated to the menial jobs...

    1. Re:Good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It is good to know that we humans are still not obsolete, even though we have been relegated to the menial jobs...

      It looks like you're trying to post to Slashdot!

      Do you want to:

      a) make the grammatical correction above;
      b) go back to flipping hamburgers; or
      c) commence robot-smashing?

      -Clippy

  43. Not linked off of amazon.com, possible phishing? by webappsec · · Score: 1

    This isn't linked off of www.amazon.com this could be a phishing scam......
    - webappsec
    Web Security

  44. Sweatshop of the future? by YoFadosa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Are the 3rd world drones that will do this pulling themselves up by their bootstraps into the information age or is this some kind of futuristic Dickensian sweatshop where piecemeal work is paid at three cents a click?

  45. automating this by mboedick · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For the image ones, couldn't you create 5 bots each with a different account and each one picks a different image and one picks None of these? One of them would be approved and you'd get paid, right?

    Also if they are having humans approve your image selection before you get paid, isn't that as much effort as you making your original choice?

    1. Re:automating this by Wonda · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Also if they are having humans approve your image selection before you get paid, isn't that as much effort as you making your original choice?"

      Not if they just send the same to 5 people, and pick the most popular result as correct, massive use of bots could give them some nasty surprises if they do that though!

    2. Re:automating this by booch · · Score: 1

      They could use the SAT method of scoring. For a question with 4 possible answers, you get 1 point for a correct answer, and lose 1/3 point for an incorrect answer.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    3. Re:automating this by BondGamer · · Score: 1

      They probably have a method to track submissions. If you preform poorly (get 1 out of 10 projects correct) they will probably disable your account. There is no good way to automate this.

    4. Re:automating this by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      As someone else mentioned, they track the reliability of all accounts. Having an account with only a 20% approval rating would not get you very many HITs if any at all. Most likely new jobs will require some more reliability before allowing people to work on them.

  46. Market based? by wren337 · · Score: 1

    I don't know if all of the tasks are going to be from Amazon. It looks to me like anyone can submit "work" through the API, and the market will decide what gets done and what does not. If that 65 cent job sits long enough, and Amazon wants to get it done, they'll pony up more cash until someone thinks it's worthwhile.

  47. another redirect by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

    If you cut off the phoenix.zhtml crap, the base url redirects to http://www.ccbn.com/

    It seems like the company does investor relations,
    hence the corporate-ir (investor relations)

    I wouldn't worry too much about this, if its good enough for EarthLink its good enough for me

    btw- how did you convince /. not to display the site's domain name after the link in your post?
    same link but /. inserts domain name
    http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=176060 &p=irol-InfoReq

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  48. Review??? or Multiple Tests/Hits by Dareth · · Score: 1

    If a person has to review each and every hit, then that person could have done the work themselves.

    How many "agreeing" hits would you need before you can "accept" that the result is valid?

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
    1. Re:Review??? or Multiple Tests/Hits by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      I disagree strongly.. I can read an article and value it's content a lot quicker than I can generate an article.

      One proofreader could oversee the work of many submitters.

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  49. It's the real deal by YoFadosa · · Score: 1

    I had lunch with a guy yesterday who works at Amazon and said "Hey we just launched this cool web service called Mechanical Turk."

    There is an announcement from Amazon.

    1. Re:It's the real deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can vouch *ahem* that it is legit.

      Why is it slow? Although Amazon may have a huge server farm, who's to say they've allocated alot of servers to this task?

      Few servers + slashdot effect = really slow. Anyone know how many servers in a farm it takes
      to become immune to the /. effect (loaded question with lots of variables)? Smart ass answer would be "more than they're running now..."

      Also, it's not uncommon for Amazon to register domains under funny companies and email addresses. And no, I will not back that up with examples.

  50. Elbonia by HermanAB · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, that is probably a whole month's average income for someone in Elbonia...

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  51. Netcraft confirms it, am I stupid or amazon.com? by Ilgaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OK, I hurried a bit but I felt as I had to.

    http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http:/ /mturk.com

    It is indeed in Amazon netblock but registering it through godaddy.com with a hotmail address... Gee, I wish I could show like 40 phishing mails I received with the same pattern.

    Sadly there are many victims of phishing sites, and they get slashdotted because the database software can't handle that many requests.

    I have never seen such a unserious whois from a big company like amazon. There are many registrars REJECTING hotmail.com contact addresses even!

  52. Alternative to RentACoder for non-coding tasks. by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

    A lot of very small copywriting and image manipulation tasks crop up on RAC. If MTurk has lower transaction fees then I expect to see most of them moving over, providing a very nice user base for the service.

  53. Re:Good idea but for work required it should pay m by Andrewkov · · Score: 1
    Well I'm in Canada, so that 60 cents is almost a dollar here!! All I'd need is another 20 cents and I could buy a cup of coffee!

    Of course, after transfering that money to my bank account, I'd probably be in the red after service charges.

  54. Nirut Test by Dwonis · · Score: 1
    Hmm... I wonder how long it will be until these people can pass the Nirut Test:
    The Nirut test is a proposal for a test of a human being's capability to perform machine-like computation. Described by Nala Nirut in the 1993 paper "Computing and human intelligence", it proceeds as follows: a human mathematician engages in a conversation with two other parties, one a human and the other a machine; if the judge cannot reliably tell which is which, then the human subject is said to pass the test. In order to keep the test setting simple and universal (to explicitly test the computational capability of the human instead of his or her ability to render words into audio), the conversation is usually limited to a text-only channel such as a teletype machine as Nirut suggested or, more recently, IRC, IM, or electronic bulletin boards like Slashdot.
    1. Re:Nirut Test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What happened to the "G" in the anagram of "Alan Turing"?

  55. A rose by any other name... by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

    So basically it’s Rent-A-Coder for stoners, right?

    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  56. I think I get it... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... basically it's just like a sneaker factory in Vietnam, but with a cool-sounding name.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  57. ^bump^ by TubeSteak · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    okay, you win mister coward.

    I accidentally made a first post
    then purposely bragged about it.

    and you know what, I do feel like a champ.
    I hope you spend the rest of your days on dial-up
    trying to make money of this Amazon mturk thing.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:^bump^ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      If you're a champ for getting one frist Pr0st then Trip MasterMonkey is indeed Yoda.

      .

  58. Re:How long until some sick slashdotter posts the by BushCheney08 · · Score: 1

    "I'm sure he's in there somewhere..."

    --
    Be a real patriot: Question authority. Think for yourself. Formulate your own conclusions.
  59. How to avoid paying out: by wampus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Make the site dog ass slow so you can ID 3 photos in 10 minutes. I'm up to 9 cents! I guess I should get back to coding, since thats what the OTHER people are paying me to do right now...

  60. Re:Good idea but for work required it should pay m by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1

    I'm in Canada too - isn't it possible to use that credit on Amazon.com? I'd much rather do that than actually get the cash!

    --
    Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
  61. Re:Good idea but for work required it should pay m by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

    Yes, the web site says that any earnings are credited to your Amazon account. You can later cash out if you want to, or spend it at Amazon.

  62. Spammers and pornographers are always first by ttul · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Always look to spammers and pornographers to solve the world's most challenging computational puzzles before anyone else.

  63. Re:Does Seem Phishy... by baroquecycle · · Score: 0

    Ok, nevermind. Follow this path:

    Go to http://www.amazon.com/

    Scroll way down, and on the left hand side under "Make Money" and click "Web Services". On the resulting page, you'll see MTurk being advertised.

  64. Not a phishing site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At last, here is an official page on the Amazon site:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/browse.html/ref=sc_fe_r_1 _3435361_1/103-6895399-1861459?_encoding=UTF8&node =15879911&no=3435361&me=A36L942TSJ2AJA [amazon.com]

  65. Quality MATTER? Don't make me laugh... by abb3w · · Score: 1
    Sounds like a wealthy conservative's wet dream.

    The correct phrase is Cheap-Labor Conservative.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    1. Re:Quality MATTER? Don't make me laugh... by nysus · · Score: 1

      Dude, I love that cheap-labor conservative label. Good stuff.

      --

      ---Technology will liberate us if it doesn't enslave us first.

  66. Outsorced Again... by Loether · · Score: 1

    Great! One more American job being Outsorced. :)

    --
    TODO create witty sig.
  67. We slashdotted Amazon? by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Funny

    Complete simple tasks that people do better than computers.

    I wonder if serving web pages counts as such a task. Because their computers sure are doing a crappy job of it at the moment.

  68. Sauerkraut by Crouty · · Score: 1
    Well, there aren't genuine German words ending with 'y' either. It's just a nick I made up. But don't get me started about how Americans spell Germicisms :o).

    BTW: It's "Anonymous coward" with small 'c'. ;-)

    --
    On se Internetz nobody noes your German.
    1. Re:Sauerkraut by kosmicki · · Score: 1

      But as a proper name (Mr./Ms. Coward) it would be capitalized wouldn't it?

  69. Mod parent up! by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    *And* it gets around any sort of foreign employment restrictions! All they need to do is modify it to give tasks based on your skillset and they'd have a global, cheap, semi-anonymous group of programmers working for them 24/7.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  70. Amazon steal ideas, then file patents by schestowitz · · Score: 1

    All right, so Amazon have decided to handle manual labour which is necessary and it also rewards users in return for the service. They get a description of photos without much effort and re-pay back in some form of 'coupons'. More sophisticated things have been done for quite some time. There is a full object-labelling framework where surfers compete with one another and the Web site of the game is http://www.espgame.org/ . To quote an article from Post-Gazette: "Since the Post-Gazette first wrote about the ESP Game in October 2003, more than 80,000 people have played the game and in the process have generated more than 10 million descriptive words for 1 million images"

    --
    My Linux - (L)ove (I)s (N)ever (U)tterly eXPensive
  71. Re:Will the real mechanical turk please stand up.. by Lucractius · · Score: 1

    its like slicing only legal!

    "slicing" that neat trick where the program tries to send all the fractions of a cent lost in calculations to some account for latter collection.

    --
    XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
  72. Overheard at Amazon... by lordofthechia · · Score: 1

    "Could you Imagine a Beowulf cluster of people doing complex tasks?"

    --
    Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
  73. As a mechanical Turk, by operagost · · Score: 1

    I am offended! Mechanical Turks are capable of much more than decoding captchas or sorting pr0n! My great-granddaddy was a chess master, for crying out loud! *grumble*

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  74. Reference to this on amazon's site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is reference to this from amzon's site. On the left hand sidebar, uner the "Make Money" heading, there is a "web services" link. Click on this and you will see reference to the Mechanical Turk service.

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/browse.html/104-3920625-1 620764?node=3435361

  75. Re:Good idea but for work required it should pay m by StarvingSE · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to argue with your point on replacing someone's job with cheap online labor, but it does look like the HIT's that require editing product descriptions are reviewed, and you only get paid if your descriptions is chosen.

    --
    I got nothin'
  76. Slahdot should use this.. by objekt · · Score: 3, Funny

    ..they could ask us questions like "Is this a dupe?"

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
    1. Re:Slahdot should use this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is exactly the idea for this kind of thing. People who follow Slashdot will recognize a dupe even if none of the keywords are exact matches. Having a computer check would generate too many false positive/negatives.

  77. West, meet the East! by StarvingSE · · Score: 1

    Wow, these are jobs people in developing countries would kill for!!! $0.40!?!? Sign me up!!!

    --
    I got nothin'
  78. I read in India there's a captcha sweatshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read somewhere that in India there's already a captcha sweatshop.

    I would have posted this earlier, but since I am a robot, it took a while to create an Amazon Turkish Guy Human Intelligence Task to type this captcha from Slashdot below.

  79. Employee or Lab Rat. . ? by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Interesting
    While this Amazon thing might be a genuine attempt to farm out real work to people for chump-change, with the site Slashdotted, I can only sit here and wonder. . .

    It reminds me of a little semi-scam some company had going in my town a few years back. . .

    "You are invited to participate in a screen test of a new television series!"

    People would go down and be a test-audience for a television pilot, and then fill out a questionnaire at the end. People, loving their TV culture, were tickled pink to be asked to do this. --Heck, they were even paid something like $15 for their participation!

    So, a buddy of mine went to see what it was all about. . .

    Basically, some marketing research firm had acquired the rights to an old pilot which never made it to air. They played this for people, and also played a bunch of adverts during the commercial breaks. The questionnaire asked a few boring questions about the pilot, but it also asked a curiously high number of questions about the ad spots. Stuff like, "Which of the two detergent packages in the ad did you find more appealing? The Blue or the Red?"

    --Obviously the whole contrivance was designed to test market, uh, marketing.

    Either way, by friend was amazed that nobody else seemed to catch on, took his fifteen bucks, and left shaking his head.


    -FL

  80. Interesting idea by TurkishGeek · · Score: 1

    Something like this might be beneficial for people in Third World countries or Africa. This is basically a "human computing grid", facilitated by Amazon and the Internet. People in poorer countries are already doing something along these lines in "click fraud farms"; and this is not only infinitely more ethical and useful, it is legal, too. I don't think anyone but the most idle in the developed and developing countries will devote more than a couple minutes of his/her life to this, but I can see armies of English-speaking African youths earning money by helping tag images and improve the semantic Web.

    Now if you excuse me, I have to finish this letter to our embassy here in the US so they can complain about the "mechanical Turk" name officially.

    --
    Zigbee Central: A Zigbee weblog
  81. Waldo? by Ossifer · · Score: 1

    So how much do I get paid for finding Waldo?

  82. Oh well by Sierpinski · · Score: 1

    Your request was not completed successfully.
    Please try it again. If you continue to receive this message, please try your request again later.


    I tried it again. I tried it later. Maybe I should 'try later again' and perhaps then it might work!

    1. Re:Oh well by mprindle · · Score: 1

      /. effect? I'm getting the same...

  83. Legit site. Ignore idiots. by ubernostrum · · Score: 2, Informative

    To verify the legitimacy of the site, manually type "amazon.com" into your browser's location bar, and hover over the "See all 32 Product Categories" tab. When it pops up the list, click "Web Services" and read the first item listed on that page, which is a press release announcing Amazon Mechanical Turk.

    For extra points, do this only a machine which has been booted from a liveCD with DNS utilities and hosts file that you have personally audited.

    Or just, you know, look at the fact that the Turk will, by default, display the name and address you've given to Amazon as your contact info, and conclude that yeah, it's an Amazon property.

    1. Re:Legit site. Ignore idiots. by uofitorn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Re:Legit site. Ignore idiots.

      Since when does a little bit of healthy skepticism make one an idiot?

      --
      "What kind of music do pirates listen to?" -Paul Maud'dib
      "Yeeeaaarrrrr n' Bee!!" -Stilgar, Leader of Sietch Tabr
    2. Re:Legit site. Ignore idiots. by malakai · · Score: 1
      Or just, you know, look at the fact that the Turk will, by default, display the name and address you've given to Amazon as your contact info, and conclude that yeah, it's an Amazon property


      I agree this site is legit, but that is a flawed test to postulate. If I was to make an Amazon phishing site, I would have my backend proxy username/password to the Amazon APIs. Or if the API's didn't provide what I needed, I would screen scrape/parse out what I needed from http://amazon.com/ directly (your e-mail info, address, shipping prefs..etc). I'd even yell at you if your password was wrong.

      Sure there would be a delay, but I doubt anyones spidy sense would tingle.

      Truth is, this was dangerous of Amazon to not place this site on their root domain. Even though mturk.amazon.com exists, redirecting to www.mtrurk.com proves nothing as those of us who have been on this net long enough have seen DNS cache poisoning work with catrosphic effect.

    3. Re:Legit site. Ignore idiots. by ubernostrum · · Score: 1

      If I was to make an Amazon phishing site, I would have my backend proxy username/password to the Amazon APIs.

      The Turk site doesn't ask for my username and password; it shows me my information without my having to enter it> So your hypothetical phishing site also needs an XSS hole in every major browser which allows it to read the cookie Amazon uses to store session info.

  84. amazon.com URL by nanamin · · Score: 1

    A URL on amazon.com's site about this is here

  85. Re:Good idea but for work required it should pay m by Surt · · Score: 1

    Ah, but thanks to the magic of the internet, these tasks could be done by someone in a country where they would actually be earning a good hourly wage. In the world of free trade it's a race to the bottom!

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  86. A new kid-powered architecture! by Resseguie · · Score: 3, Funny
    Would that qualify as a beowolf cluster of children?

    Or maybe this would require a new "Grid Kid" architecture with an advanced resource broker to farm out the questions based on difficulty and school grade level.

  87. Genius way of making people shop at Amazon by NekoXP · · Score: 1


    I find it really odd that people are checking out payscales and how much they could be "paid" for doing this.

    Remember guys, it's Amazon credit you get. 3 cents for every image clicky thing, is 3 cents off your next DVD purchase. Now, Amazon sell a lot of things but they don't sell rent checks, electricity bill payments or have a partnership with Speakeasy to fund your ADSL. How are you going to EAT if you need to shop at Amazon?

    I guess you could buy items and resell them on eBay? Use your first $70 from eBay to sign up to Amazon Prime in order to get fast FedEx delivery of your goods and get a high turnaround.

    Essentially this is great marketing for Amazon though; for the things you CAN buy at Amazon, by doing this work you are forced to shop there. For the small amount of credit the vast majority of people will gain, they will retreive it on the markups and variable discounts that they put on most products.

    Very very clever.

    1. Re:Genius way of making people shop at Amazon by nuggetboy · · Score: 1
      Nope, per step 3 (if you can get to the front page):
      The money you earn is deposited into your Amazon.com account, where you can turn it into cash at any time by transferring it to your personal checking account.
  88. "Decide what you earn!" says Amazon by nysus · · Score: 1

    Yeah, just like the homeless aluminum can collectors.

    --

    ---Technology will liberate us if it doesn't enslave us first.

  89. AAAI by pyrrhos · · Score: 1

    great, now write an AI program that can do that without your help and make money fast :-)

  90. The driveby pictures by MetaMarty · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Has anybody noticed that amazon is trying to build a database of storefront images? It looks like they have cars driving around taking random shots and storing the images with GPS coordinates. They then look at what businesses should be around and present this information with some random driveby shots to ask us if the business is on the picture.

    I even got a photograph that clearly showed the car taking the photographs reflected in a window.

    Not sure what this information is worth, but it seams they are building a database of storefront photo's.

    1. Re:The driveby pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems that amazon is using the mechanical turk system to label images for another company that they are starting called A9.com Maps. That is why the images are called BlockView(TM). Here is an article mentioning the maps service ... http://www.pti.org/gisforum.asp?pref=http://www.pt i.org/elib/publish/article_3559.asp

  91. Nothing like by MajorDick · · Score: 1

    Saying "Getting Paid" on a slashdot article to hasten the griding of hard drive bearing of the hosting server.

  92. How come the padlock has a red stripe? by patmandu · · Score: 1

    Dunno if this means anything, but...

    Using Mozilla:

    If I go to the amazon.com site and sign in, then go to something on the 'my account' page, I get the locked padlock symbol at the lower right (signed/encrypted page.)

    When I go to the signin page on mturk.com, the same locked padlock is there, but it has a red diagonal bar through it.

    Why?

    1. Re:How come the padlock has a red stripe? by Derek+Pomery · · Score: 1

      I believe that states that part of the page does not come from a secure server, or the same secured server.
      If I had to guess, it could be related to:
      <link href="http://www.mturk.com:80/css/mturk.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"/>

      --
      -- perl -e'print pack"H*","6e656d6f406d38792e6f7267"' /. ate my old sig. Bastards.
  93. Don't help Amazon outsource my job!! by snowwrestler · · Score: 1

    I am a mechanical Turk you insensitive clods!!

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  94. This website is about as stable as courtney love by blhack · · Score: 0

    Appearantly this thing was designed by the people at myspace.

    Your request was not completed successfully. Please try it again. If you continue to receive this message, please try your request again later.

    --
    NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
  95. insulting to turkish people by iamnotanumber6 · · Score: 1

    amazing - in these days of strife, stereotyping and intolerance between the u.s. and many muslims, amazon comes out with a near-slave-labor waged system for doing mindless repetetive tasks, and calls it the "mechanical turk"! yeah, yeah, i know about the history of the mechanical chess player. i'll try to explain that to all the turkish people in my neighborhood here in germany... i'm sure they'll understand that amazon has nothing but the highest regard for "turks"... what are they going to call their next product, "lawn jockey"? sheesh.

    1. Re:insulting to turkish people by heritage727 · · Score: 1

      Amazon is just lucky that Serdar Argic isn't around anymore.

  96. Using Distributed Wetware To Analyze Mars Craters by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1
  97. it's the green stuff by Knights+who+say+'INT · · Score: 1
    from TFW:




    The money you earn is deposited into your Amazon.com account, where you can turn it into cash at any time by transferring it to your personal checking account.
    .

    It's cash, dough, green cheese, vile metal, the actual stuff.
  98. It depends by rk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you're scoffing because you're already employed at a job that pays better, then you're doing what you should. Somebody already values your labor more presumably because you are more productive doing that job rather than identifying items in pictures. I work plenty of hours and am well compensated for it. My remaining time is very valuable to me. Perhaps one should not scoff, but politely say "No, thanks." The job one might scoff at today might be the job that saves your ass tomorrow.

    On the other hand, if you're not working, underemployed, or paid really low, scoffing is probably not the right thing to do, and instead of moping about having no job, you should get busy and start looking for pizza places in pictures, and if they're close, maybe see if they have a job. When I'm not employed and work is hard to come by, I'll pump gas, work a car wash, flip burgers, sweep floors, empty trash, deliver pizza, whatever it takes. It might not be enough to live on, but it's closer to livable than making nothing.

    1. Re:It depends by DaveJay · · Score: 1

      So if I were homeless, could I sit at the library computers and do this all day to buy my dinner?

    2. Re:It depends by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 1

      If you have a bank account.

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
  99. Sounds good to me by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I've always been fond of the idea of people giving me money directly as a form of advertising.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  100. IP is Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you look at the IP for www.mturk.com it is Amazon's IP (207.171.163.60):

    Location: United States [City: Seattle, Washington]

    NOTE: More information appears to be available at AC6-ORG-ARIN.

    Using 22 day old cached answer (or, you can get fresh results).
    Hiding E-mail address (you can get results with the E-mail address).

    OrgName: Amazon.com, Inc.
    OrgID: AMAZON-4
    Address: 605 5th Ave S
    City: SEATTLE
    StateProv: WA
    PostalCode: 98104
    Country: US

    NetRange: 207.171.160.0 - 207.171.191.255
    CIDR: 207.171.160.0/19
    NetName: AMAZON-01
    NetHandle: NET-207-171-160-0-1
    Parent: NET-207-0-0-0-0
    NetType: Direct Assignment
    NameServer: NS-1.AMAZON.COM
    NameServer: NS-2.AMAZON.COM
    NameServer: NS-3.AMAZON.COM
    NameServer: AUTH00.NS.UU.NET
    Comment:
    RegDate: 1999-09-23
    Updated: 2002-03-19

    TechHandle: AC6-ORG-ARIN
    TechName: Amazon.com, Inc.
    TechPhone: +1-206-266-2187
    TechEmail: ***@amazon.com

    OrgTechHandle: ROLEA19-ARIN
    OrgTechName: Role Account
    OrgTechPhone: +1-206-266-2187
    OrgTechEmail: ***@amazon.com

    # ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2005-10-11 19:10

  101. Average response time by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Funny, the average response time for someone to describe a porn picture is about 2 minutes, about the same time it takes to...eeewww

    "You are now qualified to respond to tentacle hentai!"

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:Average response time by krakelohm · · Score: 1

      Two minutes? Are you crazy. Within two minutes the deal is done, cleanup has completed, and its nap time.

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    2. Re:Average response time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sheep aren't very demanding. ;)

  102. Paid to be bored by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Indeed it's probably not going to replace a day job for a lot of people. But for people with free time who are bored, why not be paid for being bored while doing something interesting?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  103. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU pay Amazon to do small tasks.

    (sorry)
    (this won't be seen by anyone though with a score of 0)

  104. Vinge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is similar to an idea in the Vernor Vinge novel, "A Deepness In The Sky." A culture that appears to have very intelligent computers turns out to be employing stables of idiot savants for tasks like surveillance, target acquisition, translation, etc.

  105. and Orson Scott Card, of course by kalpol · · Score: 1

    also a bit like the plot of Ender's Game...not many original ideas in literature. Of course even Shakespeare stole plotlines shamelessly so what the hell.

    --
    12:50 - press return.
  106. Message from Amazon Mechanical Turk Team by Amazon+Mturk+Team · · Score: 5, Informative

    We're grateful to have been Slashdotted! Our beta site, mturk.amazon.com, is experiencing the Slashdot effect. You can still read about Amazon Mechanical Turk and its web services APIs at www.amazon.com/webservices. Also, send a blank email to aws@amazon.com if you want us to email you when page load times recover. The Amazon Mechanical Turk Team

    1. Re:Message from Amazon Mechanical Turk Team by Wizy · · Score: 1

      Care to explain how an amazon.com based website gets horribly slashdotted? It just amazes me. The only thing I can possibly think of is amazon putting it on a low end server since its in beta. Maybe you could elaborate?

    2. Re:Message from Amazon Mechanical Turk Team by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I work at Amazon.com too.

      Put it this way, we didn't expect for it to become so popular so quickly. I'm sure enough boxes were allocated for the expected initial load, but then someone submitted it to Slashdot.org.

      It's hard for anyone to take the load... :)

      The Amazon.com mainsite could probably handle it, but Turk just rolled out, and we didn't expect the sudden hammering it recieved.

    3. Re:Message from Amazon Mechanical Turk Team by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case this is legit, and in case you're actually going to check for responses, I just want to say that whatever system you're using to check accept/reject HITS sucks. Seriously. I'm not against killing odd spare time to make a little chump change to use on frivolous Amazon purchases - on the contrary, I think it's a cool idea. But after doing 37 of these 3 cent image recognition things, 10 have been rejected, 10 accepted, and 17 pending. I'm sorry, but an acceptance rate of 50% is just miserable, and I'm pretty damn sure it's not my fault, unless there's something I'm really not getting here.

      I'm not rushing through things, I'm not trying to scam the system, I'm spending I'd say at least 30 seconds on each set of images, looking at each for identifiable information about whatever storefront I'm supposed to locate. If none of them have anything identical, I say none of the above, if multiple do I pick whichever picture looks the clearest and most centered.

      Anyway, I can understand you need some security to stop people from rushing through and clicking whatever to make money, but whatever system you have is overly stringent. You're only paying 3 cents here, I'm willing to accept that since it is a menial task, but not if you also have a 50% rejection rate for genuinely thoughtful and human responses. Loosen up a bit, maybe a few screwballs will get through, but let democracy fix that (e.g. you'll get a high enough volume of responses to outweigh those who are just messing with it and get through), and again, you're only paying 3 cents here, most of which will come back to you anyway, so I'm sure you can afford to pay out a few false positives. It's worth it to keep the real folks who really are trying happy - I'm on the verge of giving up on this thing here if the 17 pending receive a similar rejection rate.

  107. Ender's Game by Tekgno · · Score: 1

    So something like Ender's Game then?

    For those who haven't read this book by Orson Scott Card, it involves a training camp for gifted children where they play in battle sims. Thing is these sims are actually real battles carried out across the galaxy and result in the decimation (xenocide) of an entire alien species save a single egg.

    1. Re:Ender's Game by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Well, to be a bit more accurate, it's Ender alone who plays those games...
      The earlier graduates of the camps became the officers & crew of the ships involved in the battles.

      ****SPOILER****
      To avoid any possible problems with Ender's talent, he was deceived into thinking he was playing against a human expert playing the other side, when in fact he was sending digital orders to the fleets.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    2. Re:Ender's Game by syrinx · · Score: 1

      and result in the decimation (xenocide) of an entire alien species

      If I remember the book correctly, he killed almost all of them, not just a tenth of them.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    3. Re:Ender's Game by Tekgno · · Score: 1

      Ok, Ok, fine. Be a GN if you want, I did not consider the roots of the word. I used the definition of "large-scale extermination". If you want to get picky though, it was deemed acceptable to say the "Germans decimated the Jewish population of Europe" during the Holocaust even though more than a tenth of the population was killed.

  108. Where do the images come from? by Mo+B.+Dick · · Score: 0

    Where the hellare these images coming from? I sirned up for the site and have done a few hits, and it looks like a complete retard took the pictures. I mean the shots aren't on target and sometimes the pictures are of like a pole or something. It baffles me

    1. Re:Where do the images come from? by MetaMarty · · Score: 1

      As I stated earlier, but was modded troll for, I believe these images are shot semi randomly from a car. A GPS device records the location that the image was taken. You'll see that you sometimes get a series of photographs all taken about 20 feet apart. If you look closely you'll sometimes notice a reflection of the car taking the images. Doing it this way will result in a huge database of pictures with little effort.

      The GPS locations are then used to lookup what businesses are supposed to be in the area of the pictures and we get the task of matching images with stores. You'll notice that most of the time, the indicated store is not visible, so I think amazon simply tries a set of images untill enough people report that the store is visible on one of them.

      What amazon tries to achieve is anybody's guess. I believe they are building a database of photographs of store fronts in the indicated areas, but the stores that come up sometimes seem to be so small that it would probably never pay amazon for this service.

    2. Re:Where do the images come from? by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

      I think the idea is that you do an A9 search -- e.g., "pizza mytownsname", or something like that -- and get pictures of establishments that match, along with their addresses. The revenue would come from the usual sponsors of A9, not (necessarily) from the business at the pictured location.

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  109. The Truman Show by Tipa · · Score: 1

    When "The Truman Show" came out, about a guy whose whole life was a reality TV show, many people commented on how similar it was to Dick's "Time Out of Joint".

    ** spoiler **

    TOoJ's "newspaper game" is actually predicting bomb attacks from orbital stations. Obviously, they want him to "win" - correctly predict the attacks - every day. And to this end, they make this whole town to convince him he is freeloading off his sister and her husband and wasting his time on this stupid game.

    So.

    I suddenly feel better about playing World of Warcraft. In REALITY, I am beating back enemy troops every time I think I am killing a dwarf hunter.

  110. Beta testing by jangobongo · · Score: 1

    And on that page it is important to note the word "Beta". They are just testing the waters with this program. Will people sort pictures for $.03 each? Can we (Amazon) make/save money on this? etc.

    Maybe that's why this is on GoDaddy... If Amazon doesn't like the way the beta testing is going, they can just yank the whole thing.

    --

    Sig cancelled due to lack of interest
  111. Your first HIT: by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

    What's wrong in the story submission? (You will be paid in Zonks)

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  112. Collaborative Human Interpreter (CHI) by LionKimbro · · Score: 2, Informative

    There was an interesting article a while back about a Collaborative Human Interpreter (CHI).

    The idea is to harness this kind of thing to develop software for the global brain.

  113. MOD PARENT UP by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

    that would explain the constant shots of rundown gheto houses where stores are supposed to be

    i think you nailed it

    --
    May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
  114. Economics doesn't sound very good either way by abb3w · · Score: 1
    that's about 3.25/hour. The lag for me was in waiting for the images

    That's not even enough to get kids in the US to do it for pocket money. I'd bet it's also set up as contract work, so Amazon doesn't need to pay the Social Security contribution or take out any other taxes; contractors are required to handle that themselves to stay legal under US tax law.

    However, it might be decent money in some parts of the global economy, so many might not be subject to US tax law. (Or are they?) Of course, for the contractor there's the capital cost of a computer and monitor, and the question of how the economics changes if high speed network connections aren't available, and for the employer there's the problem of paying someone to write up the HIT descriptions..

    The economics might sound viable to me at about double the pay rate; I don't think that the described current pay rates give a business model that will last over a year.

    I'll play with it the next time my insomnia is acting up.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    1. Re:Economics doesn't sound very good either way by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      I bet once they fix the site you could easily double your speed and start earning more like 6.50 an hour. That's starting to get into the kinds of wages teenagers earn, and is probably better for students. Still no overtime pay or benefits, but there's also no boss, no stupid uniforms or punishment if you come in late.

      On the other hand, so far the only people using mturk is amazon for some fairly trivial stuff. I would hope that Amazon figures out how to attract other people to their marketplace. There seems to be all kinds of things that one might do with it, but the method is so extraordinary that they'll definately need a serious market boosting mechanism. Perhaps we'll see some "grade my paper" type scholarships, where amazon hands out 10 dollars of money to students to spend on this, and via mturk they get back 20 reviews. Something to get people to try it without risking much, ya see? And of course, by hitting up students like that, they'll also bring in more people on the work side. Certainly interesting stuff here, hopefully they can pull it together into something new and amazing.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

  115. Tagline suggestion.. by andypoole · · Score: 1

    Buy a movie, get a free rootkit!

  116. Oh can you? by abb3w · · Score: 1
    Advanced indexing of Pr0n, humanity is moving forward, no doubt.

    One little problem with that:

    - can you count?

    People are not so good at noticing stuff when concentrating on something else...

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  117. Or.... by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    .. you could skip all that, and build a barn for 1/10 the price of the anklets alone.

    1. Re:Or.... by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      Then how do the cows eat?

      You've either got an employee to pay or you've replaced cows getting stolen with automated machinery getting stolen. Not to mention now you have energy costs of cutting hay and pumping water. And on top of all that a rustler can still break into your barn and cart away your cows.

      Even then, a barn cheaper than anklets? I don't see that...

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  118. Re:How long until some sick slashdotter posts the by autophile · · Score: 1
    Even worse: "Is there a goatse in that picture?"

    Better be worth more than 3 cents just to look at it. --Rob

    --
    Towards the Singularity.
  119. Why not? by Phantasmo · · Score: 1

    The pay isn't great, but it's something I can do when I have free time, it carries no obligation, plus I can listen to music and chat on Skype/Wengo/TS while I do it.

    --

    The US Army: promoting democracy through unquestioned obedience
  120. Will the answers be correct? by glinden · · Score: 1

    I think a big concern with this is whether the answers people give are correct.

    Given that money is involved, I think Amazon is going to find these pesky humans are pretty clever at doing things that might be in their self-interest, but not in the interest of people trying to get correct answers.

  121. Perform HITs while you sleep! by Seekerofknowledge · · Score: 1

    Well Google didn't take the time to figure that people can't perform HIT's while sleeping, eating, etc.

    The grandparent arrived at that calculation based off of a 40-hour week, which I think is appropriate.

  122. It's a Trap by mgdupont · · Score: 0
    I'm not going to http://www.mturk.com/mturk/welcome . That's not Amazon.com. If it were Amazon, then http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=www.mturk .com+site%3Aamazon.com&btnG=Search would return a hit.

    Why is this article posted as "news"? Is it April Fool's already?

  123. Or Neal Stephenson... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, it sounds more like an idea presented in Neal Stephenson's Diamond Age where the main character has an electronic book that teaches her by reading itself to her. In order to give the best possible speech synthesis, the book is subscribed to a global service where actors provide on-demand voiceovers.

  124. ILLEGITIMATE SITE - DIFFERENT LINKS by mgdupont · · Score: 0

    The /. article points to www.mturk.com. Amazon points to http://mturk.amazon.com./ For those just learning to read, know that these are TWO DIFFERENT SITES. Get it straight. The /. site is NOT Amazon.com. I don't know how this got by Zonk's radar. WTF? G0ddamn scammers.

  125. Need an extra $20? by llamalover · · Score: 1

    The advantage this seems to have is that you don't need any commitment to make a little extra cash. Great advantage if you don't want to work regular hours and just occasionally need a little spending money.

  126. Get your training sets here... by llamalover · · Score: 1

    A few years ago I worked at a company that was heavy into machine learning. One of the problems in that space is getting a big enough training sets to train the various algorithms. You need enough examples to train the classifier and test it (i.e. several hundred). The company had a bunch of part time workers assigned to do that.

    Now you had a small budget and clear guidelines, you could have other people do it for you.

  127. THE SITE IS A FAKE by mgdupont · · Score: 0
    True: Amazon has a mechanical turk. It's at http://mturk.amazon.com./ FALSE: It is NOT at http://www.mturk.com/mturk/welcome, as reported by /.

    I feel like I'm trying to be heard over the "me too"s of a million AOL users. Why is this scam still on the /. front page?!?

    1. Re:THE SITE IS A FAKE by Newrad · · Score: 1

      Then why does the mturk.amazon.com go to mturk.com? Or were you trying to make a lame joke?

    2. Re:THE SITE IS A FAKE by mgdupont · · Score: 0

      1) Have you ever set up a redirect? 2) Don't you find it odd that Amazon would direct traffic away from their domain?

    3. Re:THE SITE IS A FAKE by Ceribia · · Score: 1

      Right, before some one accidently beleives you on this being a fake http://www.amazon.com/gp/browse.html/ref=sc_fe_r_1 _3435361_1/103-5211148-7135016?_encoding=UTF8&node =15879911&no=3435361&me=A36L942TSJ2AJA Thats the link to the article, on the amazon.com domain name, talking about the turk.

      --
      It has yet to be proven that intelligence has any survival value. Arthur C. Clarke (1917 - )
  128. Parody of Mturk at JokeWallpaper.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Check out:

    http://www.jokewallpaper.com/mtruk

    for a parody of the Amazon Mturk.com site

    1. Re:Parody of Mturk at JokeWallpaper.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      also found it at:

      http:///www.mtruk.com

  129. Re:Will the real mechanical turk please stand up.. by kosmicki · · Score: 1

    It is called Salami slicing. Some info for the masses: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salami_slicing/

  130. MOD PARENT UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please, please! Mod parent up for standing up for the proper usage of language.

  131. Delphi by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

    I'd only do this if I could Zot people.

    The Usenet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was:

    > Why is a cow?
    And in response, thus spake the oracle:

    } Mu.

  132. Here's why the WHOIS is strange: by foldgate · · Score: 1

    Amazon bought the domain from a previous owner. Check the Internet Archive, and you'll see a Matthew Turk, among others, who owned it previously. http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.mturk.com

  133. hmm... by emseabrown · · Score: 1

    Slashdot already uses a much more ingenius method.

    People post comments (HITs)

    Comments get moderated (Human Task)
    Moderations get meta-moderated (Approval of Result)
    Meta-moderators are more likely to get moderation points. (Payment)

    The best part about this:
    Slashdot pays you for your work with more work!

  134. Amazon's Mechanical Turk ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who read that as Amazon's Mechanical Turd ?

    Ugh....Bad images!

  135. Gum Arabic by Ira+Sponsible · · Score: 1

    From your link:

    Gum Arabic: It is very important that you get only food-grade Gum Arabic. There is also an art-grade, which is readily available at art supply stores - never use art-grade Gum Arabic! Art-grade Gum Arabic is toxic. It will make you ill. You'll be sad. We'll be sad.

    Maybe this (the art-grade Gum Arabic) is Coca-Cola's secret ingredient that makes the stuff so vile?

    --
    1.Netcraft confirms:In Soviet Russia all your base welcomes a beowolf cluster of CowboyNeal overlords. 2.? 3.Profit!!1!
  136. CHI, a Collaborative Human Interpreter by j_philipp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I like the Mechanical Turk service. It's just like my CHI proposal from half a year ago made real.
    http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2005-03-25-n43 .html

    While most of the comments here seem to focus on the Worker side of this (those getting paid for answering simple questions), there's also the Requester side -- programmers tapping into the power of "fake" (but working!) AI. (Ladies and gentleman, we present you the global brain... it can think for you if you micro-pay!) I think we can implement many new programs/ websites in completely new ways, and there may even be fresh commercial niche programs coming out of this. Maybe in 50 years, we'll include AMT (or similar services) into our software as naturally as we now include, say, SQL.

    I wish the site was working better at the moment (even before it has been Slashdotted, it was behaving strangely), and I wish it wouldn't ask me for a US bank account (being from Germany, that kinda hinders me from working with it).

    1. Re:CHI, a Collaborative Human Interpreter by rtechie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's amazing what you can accomplish with a massive source of exploitable labor! Go slavery!

  137. Inflation through money supply increase by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

    What's to stop Amazon just crediting people's account for the work they've done, without having to part with any of their oown funds? This labour's cheap alright. It could be free & no-one would know. I hope whatever regulators look after this are in position & doing their job.

  138. Kafka-esque EULA contract. I don't think so! by sanermind · · Score: 1
    So they want to be able to, at any time, change the terms of a contract that I am bound to, without notifying me... unless I want to re-read the entire contract each time I log into the site. Otherwise, sounded kind of cool... I would have done it!
    Amazon Mechanical Turk reserves the right to change any of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement and/or any Policies governing the Site, at any time, in its sole discretion. Any changes will be effective upon posting of the Agreement or Policies on the Site and may be made without any other notice of any kind. You are at all times responsible for reading and understanding each version of this Agreement and the Policies. YOUR CONTINUED USE OF THE SITE FOLLOWING AMAZON MECHANICAL TURK'S POSTING OF ANY CHANGES WILL CONSTITUTE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF SUCH CHANGES. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO ANY CHANGES TO THIS AGREEMENT (INCLUDING TO ANY OF THE POLICIES INCORPORATED HEREIN), DO NOT CONTINUE TO USE THE SITE.
    --

    ---
    the pen is mightier than the sword, the sword is mightier than the court, the court is mightier than the pen.
  139. wait a minute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone written a bot on this already? sure it's only 3$/hour but think of the spyware capabilities of it. Your bot earns 3$/hour and it infects another computer and it earns 3$/hour and soon enough you are a digital own slave master.

  140. I smell by idlake · · Score: 1

    more bogus Bezos patents, based on results developed with ourlabor. Just say no.

  141. Holy crap, waste of time is right. by Deal-a-Neil · · Score: 1

    To think that I've spent the last 10 minutes trying to earn $0.40. What the hell. I'd do better with a squeegee out on some highway exit in Phoenix. And by the way, it never did accept my HIT submission.

  142. But hey.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...none of them has hi-speed DSL access. So I keep on thinking that the prices paid are stinky!

  143. Wife Work by slashmojo · · Score: 1
    Signing the wife up for it now.. 'bout time she went back to work and brought some beer money into the house.. ;)

    But seriously.. if its legit it could be a really useful system that does fill a need.

  144. It's a joke. Laugh. by wintermute1974 · · Score: 1

    Whether [a gloalized playing field is] a good thing or a bad thing is left as an exercise to the reader.

    And how much are you willing to pay me for the answer for this particular Amazon HIT?

  145. Needs Some work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I completed several. Not really focusing on the money aspect (think I averaged about -0 seconds depending on pic load times).
    On the app end of it, it seems to have an achilles heel. It asks a human to pick out a subjective picture genrically they all say x company photo taken near x adress pick which photo best represents the storfront.
    That is not enough info to really choose based on the craptastic pictures available. I think in the 11 or so I did, only one was framed halfway decent (ie it was the whole storefront and not just half of it). Most were backdoors, shrubs, parkinglots, or half a building...now if they WANTED a picture of a parking lot or landscape for a job bid, or a sideview of the building then some pics would have been accurate representations. The ones that seemed to represent the place best in others had horrible lighting or were out of focus. There is much different level of acceptable pictures for say someone trying to find a place vs say someone writing an app for real estate pictures.

    Until they up the standards of requests it's pretty hard to pick anything but "none of the above" with the current generic requests.

  146. http://www.mturk.com/ 1 minute ago by psergiu · · Score: 1

    Not Found

    The requested URL / was not found on this server.

    Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

    --
    1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
  147. Yup. It's a rip-off. by bre_dnd · · Score: 1
    I've played "worker bee" for a bit, just trying to understand what this does - I was intrigued by the concept. At this moment I feel ripped off, but hey, it's my own fault if I'm willing to work for pennies an hour right? No hard feelings, but I'll try explain why.

    What gives?

    The $0.03 a piece for judging the photo shoots seems like a nice brainless exercise to cure your insomnia. Click around and see what you get. I've worked on Las Vegas.

    My theory of how this works, is that they've mounted a video camera on a car, kept the GPS coordinates for each of the shots. Now, the trouble is that you need to convert a street address into a GPS coordinate to be able to match up a photo with the business. These conversions exist, but are not always accurate. If you're unlucky enough to hit a street that does not have accurate streetnumbers-to-GPS-coordinate mappings, your photos won't match up.

    So you'll get Sahara Avenue 2100, and the photo's you see are way off - you'll be shown some photo's around Sahara Avenue 2500.

    There is no match.

    And lo-and-behold: Amazon does not pay for "no match".

    (It didn't say that. It said: you are paid for each HIT / click. I did not get paid for the "no match" clicks. I'm not happy.)

    I've done my hour of clicking around and learnt my lesson. Working for 27 cents an hour might not even be tempting for sweatshoppers.

    1. Re:Yup. It's a rip-off. by karthikg · · Score: 1

      I agree with your reasoning of why they have this store identification HITs -- about GPS enabled SUV mounted digicams taking thousands of pictures. When I gave it a try, in 36 HITs, I found one which I qualified as a correct image - the rest 35 had 'none of the above' as answer. We can see the reason - blind taking of images from a moving vehicle is not the most efficient way of solving the problem.

      Why not ask users to upload the images of say a given street in a given ZIP as a task? There are so many willing to use their digicam to capture an accurate image and upload to amazon. I see the benefit of computers getting help from humans; but using this for this kind of image recognition is pretty lame.

      Karthik

    2. Re:Yup. It's a rip-off. by Markus+Landgren · · Score: 1

      Today I have submitted 15 HITs; 2 matches and 13 "none of the above". Of these 5 are approved, 10 pending and 0 rejected. My earnings for today are thus 15 cents so far.

  148. Why are we doing this? by mikedot · · Score: 1

    For those who have wondered why we are being asked to do this... check out http://maps.a9.com/ Since everyone seems to have their own spin on mapping applications, why not amazon too? But the bigger issue... What are the ethical implications of this? Is this just a way of skirting employment laws? Clearly anyone who is participating is working far below minimum wage with no benefits whatsoever.

  149. Not so great... by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 1

    I've been doing HIT's for Mechanical Turk over the last few days, and I've gotta wonder what they use as criteria for rejection. Yesterday, I did 152 of the "Album Artist Verification" HIT's (they show you an album cover and a list of possible artist names and you have to choose or enter the proper name in "First Last" format), and all 152 were rejected! Some of the names were verbatim off the album cover, so I wonder what they're actually doing. Perhaps they've realized they can get almost as much work out of people for much less cost by rejecting many of their answers?

    1. Re:Not so great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are fixing those now. You should have gotten an email about this today. You will also get credited an Amazon gift certificate for $5 on top of the fix.

  150. Re: slavery treadmills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The OWNER of the threamill house will provide the computers, and get the cash in.

  151. I've done about 700 HITs by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1


    For some reason I find this activity to be strangely addictive, and since I'm between tasks at work it's the perfect timekiller. Like Minesweeper but for cash.

    Anyway, here's what I've found. My reject rate is higher than I thought it would be, almost 9%. At first I was a little offended by this, as I was actually trying to do a good job. I even went to a company's website to verify the storefront. Then I realized why it doesn't pay to do a great job, just a good job.

    It is my theory that the verification and acceptance is done automatically, by having multiple users verify the same business. The answer with the most votes wins. Most people won't go to the effort required to verify a difficult identification (one where the sign or address is not clear) so they click "none of the above". I've found I can get through most HITs in a couple of seconds, especially if I've done a bunch from that city. After a while you get to know the blocks.

    As for the content of the pictures, I've a theory for that too. The "select the best pic" thing has been going on at A9 for a while now. Search for a business and you get asked to select the best picture. These Turk pictures are the leftovers. This explains why the pictures are mostly 1) open fields or blank walls, 2) business run from a home (can't tell which picture is the best because you don't know which house it is), or 3) inner city pictures. People using A9 to find a business are probably not looking for the inner city liquor store, hair salon, or check cashing place.

    I've only found one truly interesting picture so far. I was working on Sacramento and the HIT was for a Walgreens. This was one of the pictures I was presented.

    1. Re:I've done about 700 HITs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was awesome. I like this service too - it's like a little window into the parts of America that we usually don't see in Movies and Television.