I'm having difficulties interpreting that in any way that would make sense...
Are you slow, or just under 21? It's a pretty straight forward concept that I've actualy seen for decades. Food comes in, and regime leaders send forces to take ownership of the dropped food. It's a control tactic, and has been used for so damned long that it's well known across the globe.
And even if such a blanket statement was true, it still wouldn't be all that appropriate response to the criticism of utterly ridiculous wealth disparity in the world.
If you have stuff, you aren't responsible to distribute it to people who don't have it.
By that logic, everyone how works, buys food from a grocery store, buys fuel for their vehicle, uses electricity to charge their phone, is a a slave to the grocery store corps/oil companies/energy companies.
It is possible to think for yourself, and go to school. I'm a wonderful example of that.
As a human, you can create a business of your own, or even grow your own food and build your own housing. Of course, you'll need to buy land, but that's getting into other things.
Yes, bad things happened in the past, and will continue to happen. We're lessening our bad things by the century, though.
Apparently you do have an unusually low entertainment threshold. The second took a multifaceted storyline that could run in so many directions at the same time, and turned it into a linear single-storied fight plot. It saddened so many people, it was worse than Star Wars 1-3.
Intel lost the CPU wars about as much as Microsoft lost the computer market.
It's still out there, and it's used in lots of places. ARM is just making a dent, it's nowhere near cornering the CPU market. I'm not saying it's inferior, I'm saying it's not as prevalent as you think it is apparently.
I'm thinking there are far less licensed pharmacists skirting the law than unlicensed ones... which by very definition are skirting the law, in every way.
Well, as much as I am for choice and not being locked down to specific companies, I don't trust companies that bypass every known safeguard of medicine. (i.e. skirting the FDA, and maybe getting their drugs from the UK or something) I don't want to get gangrene from my prescription obtained from Finland.
The whole "expansion interface" aspect of it just makes it more of a security headache as does the display requirement.
You haven't used USB, firewire, nor SCSI much, have you?
All of them began as expansion interfaces. None of them are security headaches at the hardware level. Now, if you have a retarded operating system that automatically mounts and loads contents from an interface once it's hot-mounted, that's another story. Also, we could care less that you gave up your mac mini and went with a compaq. I went from a 486sx/25 to an 8086 in 1995, you don't see me bragging about that.
(As for why I have a MacBook vs. a Windows laptop... well, it's rather well built (and has survived a few drops to date), is Unix-y enough to allow me to develop on it and still deploy the results to our Linux servers, and has built-in grep and zsh.)... and it can run all three operating systems (Windows, Linux, OSX) natively without any fuss.
Slashdot Mirror
I'm having difficulties interpreting that in any way that would make sense...
Are you slow, or just under 21?
It's a pretty straight forward concept that I've actualy seen for decades.
Food comes in, and regime leaders send forces to take ownership of the dropped food. It's a control tactic, and has been used for so damned long that it's well known across the globe.
And even if such a blanket statement was true, it still wouldn't be all that appropriate response to the criticism of utterly ridiculous wealth disparity in the world.
If you have stuff, you aren't responsible to distribute it to people who don't have it.
By that logic, everyone how works, buys food from a grocery store, buys fuel for their vehicle, uses electricity to charge their phone, is a a slave to the grocery store corps/oil companies/energy companies.
Slaves are held to do things against their will.
and if you don't pay your buck o'five, who will?
It is possible to think for yourself, and go to school. I'm a wonderful example of that.
As a human, you can create a business of your own, or even grow your own food and build your own housing. Of course, you'll need to buy land, but that's getting into other things.
Yes, bad things happened in the past, and will continue to happen. We're lessening our bad things by the century, though.
What's your reasoning on this?
In case you didn't notice, the GP was referring to people shifting from using PCs to mobile devices, not cell phones.
Smart phones are only one demographic of the mobile device market. I'm willing to bet tablets were the environment being referred to...
I hate to break it to you, it's already being used.
The difference would be that Mozilla would be on it to use.
nonsense, crackers are manmade.
I've yet to see any crackers made with assburgers attached, yet.
Apparently you aren't good at math... the second two means everything after the first.
Apparently you do have an unusually low entertainment threshold.
The second took a multifaceted storyline that could run in so many directions at the same time, and turned it into a linear single-storied fight plot. It saddened so many people, it was worse than Star Wars 1-3.
Intel lost the CPU wars about as much as Microsoft lost the computer market.
It's still out there, and it's used in lots of places. ARM is just making a dent, it's nowhere near cornering the CPU market. I'm not saying it's inferior, I'm saying it's not as prevalent as you think it is apparently.
Macs switched from POWER to x86 too.
... and there were greater than zero legacy compatibility requirements.
more like two men fighting on the top of a building being constructed still.... and towering over everything else.
I'm thinking there are far less licensed pharmacists skirting the law than unlicensed ones...
which by very definition are skirting the law, in every way.
Well, as much as I am for choice and not being locked down to specific companies, I don't trust companies that bypass every known safeguard of medicine. (i.e. skirting the FDA, and maybe getting their drugs from the UK or something)
I don't want to get gangrene from my prescription obtained from Finland.
The whole "expansion interface" aspect of it just makes it more of a security headache as does the display requirement.
You haven't used USB, firewire, nor SCSI much, have you?
All of them began as expansion interfaces. None of them are security headaches at the hardware level. Now, if you have a retarded operating system that automatically mounts and loads contents from an interface once it's hot-mounted, that's another story.
Also, we could care less that you gave up your mac mini and went with a compaq. I went from a 486sx/25 to an 8086 in 1995, you don't see me bragging about that.
It's too easy to pick apart what you said. I'll just be nice and say: study.
What are you talking about? It's used for high-bandwidth solutions like video and external harddisks.
It's just that YOU don't use it.
What, does Intel need to hold your hand in creating operating system drivers? They invent the bus & concept, the chipsets and such are made by the market.
http://www.ti.com/ww/en/analog/tps22985_thunderbolt/index.shtml?DCMP=hpa_int_thunderbolt&HQS=thunderbolt-bt1
(As for why I have a MacBook vs. a Windows laptop... well, it's rather well built (and has survived a few drops to date), is Unix-y enough to allow me to develop on it and still deploy the results to our Linux servers, and has built-in grep and zsh.) ... and it can run all three operating systems (Windows, Linux, OSX) natively without any fuss.
wtf, are you just drooling on your chair bitching?
LMGTFY. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=thunderbolt+expansion+cards
nope.
No.
Yep, same here....
*in the Dos Equis guy's voice*
I don't run a Linux desktop very often, but when I do I use Window Maker.