Slashdot Mirror


Joe Cornish To Write and Direct Snow Crash Movie

SomePgmr tips this quote from Geek.com: "Fans of the cyberpunk novel Snow Crash have reason to rejoice today, as it's been announced that the film adaptation of Neal Stephenson's classic has been revived once again, this time with an exciting writer and director at the helm in the form of Joe Cornish. Cornish is known for his recent sci-fi alien invasion flick Attack the Block, which was filmed and released in the UK by the same studio that put out Shaun of the Dead. Cornish's first film came to the U.S. in a limited release in 2011 and did well enough that Paramount took notice and pursued Cornish for the Snow Crash project."

256 comments

  1. Let's just hope by taktoa · · Score: 1

    this doesn't crash and burn

    1. Re:Let's just hope by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Let's hope it isn't anything like the second and third matrix movies. And not very much like the original Matrix either, which actually kind of sucked in many respects but got a pass for its stylish moments and of course gave us some nice scren savers.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    2. Re:Let's just hope by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

      Wow, so what movies do you think didn't suck at all? I was perfectly happy with the Matrix, but maybe I just have an unusually low entertainment threshold or something.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    3. Re:Let's just hope by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Apparently you do have an unusually low entertainment threshold.
      The second took a multifaceted storyline that could run in so many directions at the same time, and turned it into a linear single-storied fight plot. It saddened so many people, it was worse than Star Wars 1-3.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    4. Re:Let's just hope by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

      I was saying I was perfectly happy with the first one.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    5. Re:Let's just hope by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Wow, so what movies do you think didn't suck at all?

      Lord or the rings? Except for a few stupid lapses like ridiculously oversized elephants, unecessary dwarf tossing and excessive reliance on the ghost army to win the day at Minas Tirith.

      I just watched Lawrence of Arabia and was incredibly impressed. Nobody can afford to make movies like that any more, it would cost billions.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    6. Re:Let's just hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think we'll see any more LotR-like movies, either, for that matter. It's too expensive to shoot epic live action films anymore. Once the studios think they can do it all with a green screen and radiosity solver, that's all it'll take to cause them to abandon classical moviemaking altogether.

    7. Re:Let's just hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much dwarf-tossing is strictly necessary.
      I think LOTR had one.
      How big should giant elephant-like beasts be. You know, compared to orcs and Nazgul dragons and talking trees and all.

    8. Re:Let's just hope by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      How much dwarf-tossing is strictly necessary. I think LOTR had one.

      Wrong, two: once in the escape from Moria and again in the defence of Helm's Deep. And now that you remind me, the tipping rock sequence was just plain stupid and needless to say none of this came from the books. The right amount of dwarf tossing is: zero. Tolkien didn't write it and it is offensive (full disclosure: I am not a dwarf).

      How big should giant elephant-like beasts be.

      Big, but not the size of hot air balloons. Come on, it's hard enough to suspend disbelief as it is. Bigger does not necessary equate to better.

      In nearly all the cases where the screenwriters departed radically from the story, the departure was unnecessary and not as good as the original. This is a weakness that screenwriters and directors tend to have: they feel compelled to add their own changes whether or not they detract from the original work just to show they are not a mere servant of the author. But this is just plain bad attitude.

      Not to say LoTR is anything less than monumental, but it is not without flaws, far from it.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    9. Re:Let's just hope by NoseyNick · · Score: 1

      The matrix was great - too bad they never made any sequels :-/

      --
      Nick Waterman, Sr Tech Director, #include <stddisclaimer>
    10. Re:Let's just hope by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      it was worse than Star Wars 1-3.

      No, no, I'm sorry. Nothing was worse than Star Wars 1-3

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    11. Re:Let's just hope by riT-k0MA · · Score: 1

      An Uwe Boll movie is worse than Star Wars 1-3.

    12. Re:Let's just hope by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      An Uwe Boll movie is worse than Star Wars 1-3.

      Oh, sorry, so sorry, wrong answer. The correct answer is "Nothing is worse than 'Star Wars Episode I, II, III." But we have some lo0vely parting gifts including a home edition of our game. Johnny, who's next?

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
  2. new ending? by cthlptlk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is Stephenson going to write a new ending for the movie? As I recall the book didn't really have one in the first place.

    1. Re:new ending? by bsane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The ending was fine... the main bad guy was dealt with and the henchmen slips into the night (figuratively).

      What else do you need?

    2. Re:new ending? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      iirc, it was a big shootout on the tarmac, so hollywood will make that bigger than it was in the book and rub a little feel-good follow-up on it.

      The book did feel like Stephenson just got tired of all the awesome and wrapped it up in a few pages, though.

    3. Re:new ending? by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Would that be so bad? Blade Runner didn't really have an ending either in the Director's Cut, which is considered the better version now.

    4. Re:new ending? by squidflakes · · Score: 2

      Yeah, the Rat Thing plowing through the fuel storage tank and taking out Rife in a huge fireball of awesome seems pretty damn Hollywood to me.

      Sweet Jesus, that whole scene needs to bring the noise.

    5. Re:new ending? by CFTM · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...Wow I just about went all internet fan boy...

      So rather than making a declarative statement on my internet soapbox, let me say that it's my point of view that Blade Runner was terrible. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep dealt with some beautiful ideas, the movie bastardizes most of them.

      Dick's writing revolved around less-than-ordinary individuals thrown into extraordinary situations. This mechanism created some deeply powerful moments were Dick was able to make comments on globalized culture and the introduction of advanced technology to culture.

      Time and time again, people try and turn Dick's books into movies and every time the real heart of the story is lost in translation. ...Resisting urge to be Phillip K. Dick fan boy...

    6. Re:new ending? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is going to be getting the rat thing's reasoning to shine through so it doesn't seem completely random.

    7. Re:new ending? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Two words: doggie flashbacks.

    8. Re:new ending? by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 1

      I think the ending was fine at the time it was written. Nowadays, selling AV software doesn't seem a better job than high-speed pizza delivery, but that's not Stephenson's fault.

    9. Re:new ending? by netsavior · · Score: 1

      You just have to establish it way earlier... Show YT loves fido and feeds him and then when she is leaving the trashed out apartment building someone jumps her and she screams or makes some noise. He jumps through the window and bites the attacker, getting fatally injured and is picked up by an automated greater hong kong garbage drone.

      When she jumps from the chopper she makes the same noise, 2 second onscreen flashback as he crashes through the glass/jumps the brick wall and races to the finish.

      Basically the exact thing that really happened in the book but with a tiny foreshadow added to dumb it down for the audience, and remove the need for us to live inside the dog's head, which doesn't work in movies (or books usually hah).

    10. Re:new ending? by B1oodAnge1 · · Score: 1

      I thought A Scanner Darkly was pretty close to the book...

      --
      RUGBYRUGBYRUGBY
    11. Re:new ending? by CFTM · · Score: 1

      I've actually avoided that one. The book was a treatise on the consequences of drug addiction; when I asked a good friend if that was there he laughed. So I'm working on second hand information, but in my mind that book is actually the hardest of Dick's library to translate to film.

      I have not seen it though, so I can only base things on second hand information.

    12. Re:new ending? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 5, Informative

      Are you seriously suggesting that Blade Runner (the movie) has nothing to say about "globalized culture and the introduction of advanced technology to culture"? The visualization of the city alone is an incredible (and increasingly prescient) commentary on these subjects.

      Are you aware that Philip K Dick, while sadly dying before the final film was complete, saw some early footage and LOVED it? A letter he wrote:

      I happened to see the Channel 7 TV program "Hooray For Hollywood" tonight with the segment on BLADE RUNNER. (Well, to be honest, I didn't happen to see it; someone tipped me off that BLADE RUNNER was going to be a part of the show, and to be sure to watch.) Jeff, after looking --and especially after listening to Harrison Ford discuss the film-- I came to the conclusion that this indeed is not science fiction; it is not fantasy; it is exactly what Harrison said: futurism. The impact of BLADE RUNNER is simply going to be overwhelming, both on the public and on creative people -- and, I believe, on science fiction as a field. Since I have been writing and selling science fiction works for thirty years, this is a matter of some importance to me. In all candor I must say that our field has gradually and steadily been deteriorating for the last few years.Nothing that we have done, individually or collectively, matches BLADE RUNNER. This is not escapism; it is super realism, so gritty and detailed and authentic and goddam convincing that, well, after the segment I found my normal present-day "reality" pallid by comparison. What I am saying is that all of you collectively may have created a unique new form of graphic, artistic expression, never before seen. And, I think, BLADE RUNNER is going to revolutionize our conceptions of what science fiction is and, more, can be.

      Let me sum it up this way. Science fiction has slowly and ineluctably settled into a monotonous death: it has become inbred, derivative, stale. Suddenly you people have come in, some of the greatest talents currently in existence, and now we have a new life, a new start. As for my own role in the BLADE RUNNER project, I can only say that I did not know that a work of mine or a set of ideas of mine could be escalated into such stunning dimensions. My life and creative work are justified and completed by BLADE RUNNER. Thank you..and it is going to be one hell of a commercial success. It will prove invincible.

      Cordially,

      Philip K. Dick

      (Source: http://www.philipkdick.com/new_letters-laddcompany.html)

      So as another Philip K Dick fan (and yes I've read Androids), if you want to say the movie isn't as good as the book, fine (an incredibly boring & obvious statement, but fine). But calling it terrible? Something the author himself described in transcendant terms, as a new birth for the genre, and as justifying his life's work? Philip K Dick would punch you in the face, "fanboy".

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    13. Re:new ending? by RMingin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      To build on the AC who beat me to it, they should introduce the Rat Thing as a machine, and not at all make it look dog-like, but have a series of flashbacks when it realizes Hiro is in trouble, having a younger-but-recognizable-Hiro playing with the dog, the dog remembering being kidnapped, remembers a flash of machines in a lab, Robocop-style, flashes back again to the boy-Hiro, calling him. Rat Thing blasts through wall, maybe barking in a techo-distorted fashion, and begins terminal acceleration. You can throw in a variable number of flashbacks from dog POV, running towards the boy, intercutting with shots of Rat Thing going multi-Mach on the highway, to make it even clearer. As the Rat Thing hits the fuel tank, have a slow-mo of it starting to fly apart from the impact, intercut with scenes of the boy and the dog, falling down, laughing and rolling around.

      No sweat. I could do it myself. It's all CGI, so it's infinitely malleable.

      I just want to cry a little for the Rat Thing at the movie, like I did when I read the book. Best unexpected tragic hero figure in years.

      Hollywood, call me. I remember how really good movies worked, and can help you remember.

      --
      The preceding comment is my own, and in no way construes an opinon of the Emperor of Mankind.
    14. Re:new ending? by RMingin · · Score: 1

      Whoops. YT's dog, not Hiro's dog. Please run s/Hiro/YT on my post, before flaming.

      --
      The preceding comment is my own, and in no way construes an opinon of the Emperor of Mankind.
    15. Re:new ending? by netsavior · · Score: 4, Interesting

      it was YT's dog. But yeah, same general rules apply, and I would love to get misty for a dog robot thing who sacrifices his life because once a girl fed him when he was abused and starving.

    16. Re:new ending? by Qzukk · · Score: 0

      But calling it terrible? Something the author himself described in transcendant terms, as a new birth for the genre, and as justifying his life's work?

      Yeah, but that guy did drugs, so his judgement's already suspect *runs for his life*

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    17. Re:new ending? by CFTM · · Score: 1

      lolz

    18. Re:new ending? by harl · · Score: 1

      What happened to the nuke?

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
    19. Re:new ending? by RMingin · · Score: 1

      Caught myself, but not before I posted. Thanks for letting me know I'm not the only one who got misty for Rat Thing, who got to do the Dog Loyalty Payback program, writ large.

      --
      The preceding comment is my own, and in no way construes an opinon of the Emperor of Mankind.
    20. Re:new ending? by HeckRuler · · Score: 1
      One which doesn't presume that early hominid's were all programmable autistic freaks and that we somehow evolved the ability to program ourselves giving us the spark of sapience that puts us above animals. And that this mystical ur-language can be used to hack the minds of people if they look at a screen with this writing on it, reprogramming them to do your bidding.

      The setting is interesting. As long as you view the whole thing as satire. The writing style is enjoyable. But as soon as they start to get to that "plot" thing? It kind of turns into a shit sandwich of bullshit wrapped with unbelievability. Here we go, ala wikipedia:

      Hiro, at the prompting of his Catholic and linguist ex-girlfriend Juanita Marquez, begins to unravel the nature of this crisis. It relates back to the mythology of ancient Sumer, which Stephenson describes as speaking a very powerful ur-language. Sumerian is to modern "acquired languages" as binary is to programming languages: it affects the entity (be it human or computer) at a far lower and more basic level than does acquired/programming language. Sumerian is rooted in the brain stem and related to glossolalia, or "speaking in tongues"—a trait displayed by most of L. Bob Rife's convertees. Furthermore, Sumerian culture was ruled and controlled via "me," the human-readable equivalent of software which contains the rules and procedures for various activity (harvests, the baking of bread, etc.). The keepers of these important documents were priests referred to as en; some of them, like the god/semi-historical-figure Enki, could write new me, making them the equivalent of programmers or hackers.

      And at this point we have jumped ship from science fiction, even the cyberpunk sub-genre, and dove head-first into fantasy-land.

      But the first half of the book was pretty good, as long as you didn't take it too seriously.

    21. Re:new ending? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      Care to expand on that?

      I'm not saying your opinion is "wrong", I'm giving MY opinion that you're being incredibly presumptuous about speaking for how well Dick's ideas were translated.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    22. Re:new ending? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      Haha no doubt. Saw "Radio Free Albemuth" a while back at a film fest (even got to meet the writer/director). Phil had.. an interesting mind. :)

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    23. Re:new ending? by bsane · · Score: 1

      He was the henchman, he got away...

      He'll show up in the next Bond movie, except this time he'll have metal teeth and won't talk.

    24. Re:new ending? by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure - I mean, sure he's taken something and polished it up to technobabble, but suggestion is very powerful, as is hypnosis, and the same can apply to Neuro-linguistic programming. Even cognitive-behaviour therapy could be considered as some form of language-therapy, so Stephenson's Sumerian as a primitive language that affects us at a more instinctive level and has a stronger effect.

      Well, that's my rationale for it - but whatever, the big thing is that its no as unbelievable as much of the stuff that hollywood has given us over the years, so suspend your disbelief a teeny bit and you'll enjoy it more.

      Mind you, you seem to accept supercooled dog brains implanted into supercharged robot bodies as acceptable :-)

    25. Re:new ending? by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Makes you want to "Reason" with them, doesn't it.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    26. Re:new ending? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went through a big PKD phase around 2004-present. I've read all the short stories and several novels. I read A Scanner Darkly before the movie came out, before I even knew it was coming out (I'm behind the curve on media news, only finished the book a couple month before the movie came out). Dick's daughters took great care to ensure that that property was treated well in its film conversion. Overall, the movie accurately conveyed the consequences of drugs on the lives of the various characters and Substance D's effects on Arctor in particular, with respect to the book. Only a couple characters (debatable) are changed, and that's minor and really needed to help the narrative in film vs novel. It's certainly a surreal experience in many ways, especially with the rotoscoped visual style Linklater used.

      Overall, most of the scenes (admittedly recalling my impressions from years ago) made it into the movie intact, most character relationships and dialogue came from the book with perhaps a few extra lines added to present ideas conveyed via internal dialogue or flashback in the book.

      I felt that it was a fair conversion. One thing I particularly liked, unlike many conversions of books to movies where the timeframe of the book has passed, Linklater didn't try and push this story further into the future (I believe the line on the screen setting the time was something like, "In the near future" or "In 10 years"). He didn't modify the tech beyond what Dick had introduced... I'm not even sure he even introduced cell phones actually, which were absent in the novel.

      Crap, going to have to find my DVD, want to watch it again. My recommendation, if you like the book, you'll like this movie. And if you don't, and can figure out who I am in the real world I'll let you tell me off for making a bad suggestion.

    27. Re:new ending? by jared9900 · · Score: 1

      Doh, didn't log in. Not sure how I didn't catch that earlier...

    28. Re:new ending? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your friend laughed for no reason. Go watch it.

    29. Re:new ending? by bughunter · · Score: 1

      Really? I thought the suggestion "let me pound your cervix into jelly" was a pretty good closing line...

      Or am I thinking of the wrong c-punk novel? I could be. All those Nineties/Aughties novels blur together now.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    30. Re:new ending? by SteveFoerster · · Score: 2

      That shows up in Snow Crash 2: The Search for More Money

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    31. Re:new ending? by CFTM · · Score: 2

      It's a subjective thing. The most important element in Do Androids... to me, was the juxtaposition of a less-than-ordinary man in an extraordinary circumstance. Northrop Frye, a 20th century literary theorist, postulated that the hero has undergone an extraordinary transformation starting with our first written stories and moving forward to today. Basically, he argues that things exist on a spectrum and that different ages have different takes on what the story protagonist should be like. In Ancient Greece, they were god-men, and they've slowly taken on more and more human traits. In a sense, protagonists have become more authentic.

      In stories, and especially in film, I want that authenticity. The handsome, brilliant super-man protagonist is boring. It has no life, no character and no artistry. And in the case of Androids, it actually changes the stakes. In the movie, we know Deckard is out-matched but we think he has a shot. In the book, he's the worst cop on the force. He's afraid he's going to get fired. He can't leave Earth even though it's royally fucked. He's boxed in, and has no choice but to move forward, everything is removed from him. The movie never, ever captures this, and to me, it's the most important thread in the story.

      Story's and audiences coexist together, one is not without the other. The consequence of this is a completely subjective realm. I am not saying that Dick is in any way wrong with his assessment of his work. I'm looking at a different part of the story, because it's the part that speaks to me at the deepest level. This is how art works...

    32. Re:new ending? by CFTM · · Score: 1

      I'll give it a shot...

    33. Re:new ending? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that language IS the "language" of ideas, hence how humans are programmed. Every little meme, from how to make fire to how to make bread, is passed on via language. Humans were biologically able to handle advanced ideas a very very long time ago. However the operating system, the meme bank, hadn't developed yet.

      His ideas are very much in line with how humans evolved intelligence, developed societies and cultures, etc. What is so fantasy about that? His colorful language?

      Its just an analogy, obviously gone way over your head. It is, after all, a very smart book.

    34. Re:new ending? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Scanner Darkly wasn't just about drug addiction, it was about the War On Drugs as well. Like many people in the creative fields, Philip K Dick saw a lot of lives destroyed by drugs - and many destroyed by the drug war.

    35. Re:new ending? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The setting is interesting. As long as you view the whole thing as satire.

      The hero/protagonist is named Hiro Protagonist; how else could you view it?

    36. Re:new ending? by cthlptlk · · Score: 1

      Blade Runner is a pretty good movie but not a good adaptation in any sense.

      Scanner is right on the money in my opinion. Even casting stars with drug histories was an inspired touch.

      Strangely, the movies that best capture the PKD spirit for me are Inception and Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, which have no PKD connection at all.

    37. Re:new ending? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I'd say it's a very different story and it's a bit of a dissapointment they went with the one in "Blade Runner" than a plot from "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep". Maybe I'd feel better about if I'd never seen the last ten minutes of the movie (or the directors cut) - it's a good movie despite it's flaws but reading the book makes you wonder what it might have been instead of the stupid "is Decker an android" speculation the movie inspires.
      I suppose the Hollywood machine and script by committee does that sort of thing.
      Your quote above is interesting in that it did open the way for more quality SF films.
      To me Blade Runner is yet another flawed Hollywood masterpiece (like the Mel Gibson directed Inca thing), a lot of people putting in amazing work and just a few really stupid bits in the script letting the side down and making the viewer wonder for a few seconds why they are bothering to watch it.

    38. Re:new ending? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was Freezone.

    39. Re:new ending? by tooyoung · · Score: 1

      Resisting urge to be Phillip K.
      Dick fan boy

      You left out a line break.

    40. Re:new ending? by cthlptlk · · Score: 1

      yet another flawed Hollywood masterpiece

      I can see how younger people might see it that way, but for scifi loving kids growing up in the 70s, the pickings were pretty slim other than the Star Wars franchise. Lots of things look like Blade Runner now but it was like nothing I had ever seen. (Yeah, Metropolis and other antecedents had been made, but there weren't even VCRs back in the day, so no one had seen that stuff.)

    41. Re:new ending? by neurojab · · Score: 1

      >I thought A Scanner Darkly was pretty close to the book...

      The movie was pretty accurate reading of the events in the book, but the telling of it was lacking. The book is gripping in some ways, but the movie was largely emotionless with flat voice acting and toned down dialogue. For a better passive experience than the movie, I recommend Paul Giamatti's audiobook version.

    42. Re:new ending? by dbIII · · Score: 2

      Hey! I was one of those scifi loving kids growing up in the 70s! I probably did see Metropolis on TV before I saw Blade Runner though. I had read "When Androids Dream of Electric Sheep" a few times before Blade Runner which is probably why I thought of what it could have been instead of what it was - so close but so many little things that just didn't fit together - so many little bits even connected to bits of the book but connected to nothing else in the movie. It's a very different story and a bit of a let down that it's not necessarily a better story for a movie format. I think that's why it's a "cult classic" instead of something as popular as E.T., Trek II, The Best Little Whorehouse in Texas, Ghandi, Firefox, Dark Crystal, Tootsie, even crap like "The Sword and the Sorceror" which all outsold it that year.
      IMHO it was so close to being a masterpiece and had so many good parts to it but ultimately it had a few little bits that let the side down.
      So close, in fact a few cuts and removing the stupid unicorn subplot could have probably turned it into a classic.

    43. Re:new ending? by cthlptlk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was disappointed in the same way when I first saw it. I practically slept with a copy of Ubik under my pillow. But I let myself like the movie on its own merits. All I meant by quoting "yet another" was the look of the movie was anything but a cliche at the time. And faithfulness aside, it was real science fiction, not space opera.

    44. Re:new ending? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was actually a famous nutjob named Chomsky who got all the real linguists believing language was built-in at birth for a long time before it was disproved...

    45. Re:new ending? by mfnickster · · Score: 1

      It's been a while since I read Pinker's The Language Instinct, but IIRC he made a pretty good argument that language acquisition is natural and innate, if not language itself.

      I think Stephenson's premise owes more to Julian Jaynes than Chomsky, thoug. He was more direct about it in The Big U.

      --
      "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
    46. Re:new ending? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rat Thing was possibly the best part of the book.

    47. Re:new ending? by sFurbo · · Score: 1

      Early homonids? Sumerians? Not that much evolution have been going on in humans in the last 6.000 years (300 generations is far too short a time if you don't have a massive pressure, like humans wanting the damn dog to look ridiculous). They weren't that different from people today, except for the culture. If you took an infant from that time and let it grow up in our culture, it would fit right in as an adult.

    48. Re:new ending? by sFurbo · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the whole electric sheep situation.

      Furthermore, I think the movie ruined the Voigt-Kampff test. The questions in the book would not elicit an emotional respone in most people today. I am not going to get emotional about the poor wasp being smashed, or the calf whose skin is has been turned into a leather wallet. We would fail the very definition of what it is to be human in the book, but you can't show that without showing just how emotionally precious animals are, which the movie really doesn't.

    49. Re:new ending? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this is a Stephenson thing. I felt like the ending of Cryptonomicon was a bit half baked also. Like he just got sick of writing.

    50. Re:new ending? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      This is pretty typical Stephenson. Actually, I'd go a step further and call it pretty typical science fiction.

      The whole idea is to take an interesting concept and explore it using a story as a medium. Stephenson has a tendency to weave a bit too much lecture hall into his stories, like extended periods of librarian dialogue or reminiscing about the polycosmic nature of consciousness on the mountainside. However, I can appreciate that his novels actually explore interesting ideas, whether or not they have true basis in reality.

      If all you want is James Bond, well, then watch James Bond. :)

    51. Re:new ending? by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      What else do you need?

      They hero gets the girl, an orphan finds a home, the lost dog makes it home, and they all live happily ever after?

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    52. Re:new ending? by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      A friend suggested it in college and I read it like it was playing it straight. I got to the point where mr. badass revealed he delivered pizzas and that this was an important job and I simply put the book down. That was, what? Page 5?

      Later on I re-read it accepting that the characters are shaped by a satirical, cynical view of society. Nay, the world is formed around this view, so that yes, it's perfectly reasonable to bring a sword to a gunfight and 15 year old skater-punks can have side-jobs delivering mail in a lawless war-zone. Once I accepted that, it was more enjoyable.

      With a movie you've got to do something that sets this tone. Hopefully it'll be more like Scott Pilgrim and less like Blade Runner. It's simply doomed if it takes itself too seriously.

  3. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Odds they make Y.T. a 15 year old girl? Zero.

    1. Re:Hmm by squidflakes · · Score: 1

      Yeah, how will the whole Raven/Dentata scene get handled? Really, its not huge to the plot, so if that gets left out I wouldn't be terribly upset.

    2. Re:Hmm by Jeng · · Score: 1, Informative

      This person may be able to fill the role well.

      http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0989959/

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    3. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Like this:
      PRODUCER: (sticking fingers in his ears) "I can't hear you."
      You know, the usual Hollywood way.

    4. Re:Hmm by Jeng · · Score: 3, Funny

      Instead of a Dentata they'll probably do something lame like knock-out lipstick.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    5. Re:Hmm by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      Excellent choice! Something tells me this one could do a good job with it, too.

    6. Re:Hmm by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 0

      That IS her. Perfect match. Get a career in casting actors, you know what you are doing.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    7. Re:Hmm by Jeng · · Score: 1

      Excellent choice! Something tells me this one could do a good job with it, too.

      Could, but doubtful. Take a look at what she has been in, it's all goody goody family friendly shows with some voice work thrown in.

      Then again, this could end up being her coming out movie. Like when Woody Harrelson who was known mainly for his Woody Boyd character on Cheers went and stared in Natural Born Killers.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    8. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'd rather the whole subplot be cut completely. Having YT and Raven never meet is preferable to whatever botch job they'd have to do to make their encounter tolerable to movie-going audiences. Huge bad-ass Asian dude penetrates tiny underage white minor? The pedo cries from lunatics are going to be all over Christian "news" shows even if the subplot is entirely omitted (if the movie ever actually makes it to theaters).

      Another post commented that it's unfortunate that no one is trying to make Neuromancer into a movie. It makes me sad to consider that an explicit depiction of the razor blade stage show would be more socially acceptable than even a censored YT/Raven scene. America is fucked up about sex.

      (Capcha: priest)

    9. Re:Hmm by Smauler · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it'll be handled much in the same way that the way that Sherlock Holmes being a cocaine user has always been handled.

    10. Re:Hmm by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      Cocaine was in The Seven-Per-Cent Solution. And alluded to a few times in the recent BBC Sherlock.

    11. Re:Hmm by HereIAmJH · · Score: 1

      America is fucked up about sex.

      That may be, but there is still something wrong with a story line that has an underage girl (child) having sex with a man more than twice her age. It's pretty pervy and even without the deep dive into religion it turned me off on Stephenson's books. They can simply make her 3 years older and avoid the whole problem.

      --
      Another day, another update to a Google android app.
    12. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is a good illustration of the weird American attitude toward sex. For one thing, a 15-year-old, though legally underage, is not a "child." Adolescents are sexually mature. Nature puts us through puberty before that age, as females become fertile and start showing secondary sex characteristics to attract a mate. Adults being sexually attracted to adolescents may be considered wrong for social reasons, but biologically it is normal and natural. Of course, that doesn't make it appropriate by our society's norms.

      The thing is that Snow Crash doesn't take place in our society. America as we know it has pretty much descended into anarchy as Y.T. points out "we don't have laws," so the legality of it isn't an issue. Yes, Stephenson could have just made her 18 (which will probably be how the producers choose to handle it in the movie) but there's no natural line which makes it "perverted" the day before her 18th birthday and okay the next day, it's purely a legal criterion. In many places the age of consent is 15 and I don't think they consider it perverted.

  4. I was hoping for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was hoping this would have been picked up by the Wachowski brothers. It would have been great to see what they could do with this.

    1. Re:I was hoping for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You clearly never saw the second two Matrix movies.

    2. Re:I was hoping for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did see the first one.

    3. Re:I was hoping for by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 5, Funny

      There was only one Matrix movie.

    4. Re:I was hoping for by Jeng · · Score: 1

      I did and I know this isn't a popular opinion, but I rather liked them.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    5. Re:I was hoping for by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I was hoping this would have been picked up by the Wachowski brothers. It would have been great to see what they could do with this.

      God no. They've been making a lot of horrible movies lately.

      Give it to someone fresher. I think having the Attack the Block guy take a shot at it is a very good idea.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    6. Re:I was hoping for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And it was called "Dark City"

    7. Re:I was hoping for by Zaphod-AVA · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Correct. There is also only one Highlander movie, no Star Wars prequels were made, there was only one season of Heroes. The world is a better place this way.

    8. Re:I was hoping for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't I like this comment!?!?!?!!?!?

    9. Re:I was hoping for by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Apparently you aren't good at math... the second two means everything after the first.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    10. Re:I was hoping for by Hentes · · Score: 1

      What is this Matrix you are speaking of?

    11. Re:I was hoping for by Elbart · · Score: 1

      I was hoping this would have been picked up by the Wachowski brothers.

      You mean the Wachowski siblings.

  5. Dwayne Johnson as Raven. by AuralityKev · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If they don't cast The Rock as Raven I will be very disappointed. And still see it opening night.

    1. Re:Dwayne Johnson as Raven. by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      Nah. Clancy Brown (the Kurgan).

    2. Re:Dwayne Johnson as Raven. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, can he fill the role a freakishly tall ethnic Aleutian? It seems like a tough casting choice.

      Maybe Dolph Lundgren or Richard Kiel with some makeup?

    3. Re:Dwayne Johnson as Raven. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other than being too short, probably too old, and not the right type of Native, I really somebody like Danny Trejo for the part. Dwayne Johnson seems a little too clean-cut.

    4. Re:Dwayne Johnson as Raven. by CFTM · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Depending on how long it takes to get this off the ground, my money would actually be on Jason Momoa - http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0597388/

      Height doesn't particularly matter on film, they have all sorts of tricks to make someone look taller than they are. And the rock is quite a bit more muscular than I ever pictured Raven but maybe that's just me.

    5. Re:Dwayne Johnson as Raven. by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      I don't think either one could pass as an inuit native American.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    6. Re:Dwayne Johnson as Raven. by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      Like Joe Sixpack has the slightest clue what an Inuit looks like.

    7. Re:Dwayne Johnson as Raven. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's got to be a real Aleutian fitting the image. I'd suggest the casting agency gets off its fat, lardy arse and finds one instead of filling the role with the usual action hero guy posing for native.... Bitch please, some effort....

    8. Re:Dwayne Johnson as Raven. by Zaphod-AVA · · Score: 1

      My vote would be Tahmoh Penikett.

      http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0671886/
      (Helo from Battlestar Galactica for those that don't click the link)

    9. Re:Dwayne Johnson as Raven. by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Their numbers have dwindled to about 2,000 as a consequence of disease and disruption of traditional lifestyles, though people with partial Aleut descent may number around 15,000.

    10. Re:Dwayne Johnson as Raven. by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      It's nothing but dreaming/speculation anyway. I wasn't interested in dream about dumbing it down to Joe Sixpack level.

      It wouldn't even need to be an Inuit, but someone who looks more native American I think would make a better fit.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    11. Re:Dwayne Johnson as Raven. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tahmoh can't play badass. In fact, I haven't seen anything that he could play.

    12. Re:Dwayne Johnson as Raven. by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      "Hi, Central Casting? This is Joe Cornish. Yeah. I need a seven-foot tall radioactive mutant Eskimo drug lord. With muscles. Yeah, it's a speaking role. How many can you send over for audition tomorrow? Sure, twelve would be great."

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
  6. Joe Cornish? by Translation+Error · · Score: 1

    Really? Going by recent Hollywood works, I'm amazed it isn't going to be directed by Michael Bay and star Keanu Reeves.

    --
    When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
    1. Re:Joe Cornish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh; I'm just glad it's not Zack Snyder.

    2. Re:Joe Cornish? by SteveFoerster · · Score: 2

      "I want... ROOM SERVICE!!!"

      No... just no. A thousand times no.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
  7. Read this when it was Hugo nominee by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

    But I didn't pick it on my voting ballot. I think I picked "Doomsday Book" instead. (Oh and also Babylon 5's "Coming of Shadows".) I was unimpressed by the novel, and thought it very depressing. Like film noire; another genre I've never enjoyed.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    1. Re:Read this when it was Hugo nominee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got a little into the novel, myself. Didn't take too long before I got sick of reading about how awesome some guy was, with a sword, when I didn't give a crap about him in the first place. When they kept saying how awesome he was with his sword, and nobody could possibly be better and and and...

  8. Just...... by StinyDanish · · Score: 0

    Don't put Tom Cruise in it. We don't wish to see Snowcrash Impossible

    1. Re:Just...... by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Considering the theme of viral religion, that would be some neat meta-irony.

  9. Re:Not excited. Attack the Block was terrible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What was wrong with Attack the Block? Good idea and well executed enough to be entertaining. Shaun of the Dead, now there's a naff film!

  10. Tagline: by dutchd00d · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everyone listens to Reason.

    1. Re:Tagline: by GoNINzo · · Score: 1

      I have high hopes for this.

      Because there are four things we do better than anyone else: music, movies, microcode(software), and high-speed pizza delivery.

      --
      Gonzo Granzeau
      "Nothing the god of biomechanics wouldn't let you into heaven for.." -Roy Batty
    2. Re:Tagline: by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Everyone listens to Reason.

      And in the trailer will be both my sig and "I just nuked America"

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Tagline: by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      I hope they actually consult a physicist when they do that gun, the lack of recoil needs an explanation.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    4. Re:Tagline: by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      And nothing of lasting cultural value ;)

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    5. Re:Tagline: by Cinnamon+Whirl · · Score: 1

      I'll keep my fingers crossed fro something involving "Chiseled Spam"

    6. Re:Tagline: by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      There was something about their boat banging up against another boat after he fired. It had recoil, just not enough.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    7. Re:Tagline: by Moofie · · Score: 1

      What lack of recoil? The gun moved the boat. That's recoil.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    8. Re:Tagline: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kinetic energy is 1/2*Mass*Velocity^2 . Momentum (which is the cause of recoil) is simply Mass*Velocity. So, if the projectiles have very low mass, but are travelling very fast (consistent with the description of Reason), the recoil would not be heavy even though the delivered kinetic energy is high. A T-shirt gun has substantially more recoil than a .22 rifle, for example.

    9. Re:Tagline: by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      What lack of recoil? The gun moved the boat. That's recoil.

      See, you perfectly demonstrated why they need an actual physicist. Not enough recoil for the energy that was transfered to the depleted uranium fleshettes. Why bother with the nod to the believable depleted uranium idea if the rest of the physics is just a mockery? I'm willing to suspend my disbelief on the question of packing a nuclear power plant into a suitcase without shielding, but not simple Newtonian mechanics.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    10. Re:Tagline: by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Kinetic energy is 1/2*Mass*Velocity^2 . Momentum (which is the cause of recoil) is simply Mass*Velocity. So, if the projectiles have very low mass, but are travelling very fast (consistent with the description of Reason), the recoil would not be heavy even though the delivered kinetic energy is high.

      Oh nice, you just refuted Newton's third law. Now I await with breathless anticipation the announcement of your star drive.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    11. Re:Tagline: by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Various navies around the world have been able to put really big guns on ships and boats because of the way it shifts the recoil problem.

    12. Re:Tagline: by dbIII · · Score: 1

      We don't know the mass of the ammo (needles?), it's velocity or how much the boat moved, so it works in the book.
      You do have a point that some sort of gun specialist taking physics into account should be involved, just like is done in Japan with some of the gun focused anime.

    13. Re:Tagline: by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      This dude was carrying the gun.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    14. Re:Tagline: by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      We don't know the mass of the ammo (needles?), it's velocity or how much the boat moved, so it works in the book.

      Maybe it worked for you. Those depleted uranium needs went right through a patrol boat and sunk it. Doesn't work for me without an explanation of what happened to all the equal and opposite. Left me with a big oh yeah right, magic is real.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    15. Re:Tagline: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you misunderstood Newton's third law. Don't feel bad, lots of people misunderstand it, but please do your research before you call people out who actually remember first-year physics correctly.

    16. Re:Tagline: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone else think Christopher Walken is a natural for Fisheye? Would be an awesome cameo type role.

    17. Re:Tagline: by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I'd forgotten that and assumed it was on a tripod in the life raft or something.

    18. Re:Tagline: by dbIII · · Score: 1

      There's an anime that gets around that :)
      With "Hellsing" the premise is that if vampires exist and are really strong they can use bigger guns (double barrelled 30mm!). It's the sort of mostly pointless gorefest suggested by that but the drawing style and music give it the style of the UK "2000AD" comic. Of course you'd need supernatural strength to hand carry a serious "recoilless" weapon since they rely on having a lot of moving mass to cancel the recoil.
      I see your point now. That is a bit of a plot hole that requires magic or superheroes to fill.

    19. Re:Tagline: by mfnickster · · Score: 1

      Walken's too old now to play Fisheye. Besides, Fisheye is an important character to the plot - a cameo is just a walk-on by someone famous in an inconsequential role (i.e. anyone could play it).

      I always pictured Fisheye as more like Harvey Keitel or Dan Hedaya.

      --
      "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
    20. Re:Tagline: by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Doesn't work for me without an explanation of what happened to all the equal and opposite.

      Obvious fix for the movie: the gun shoots a projectile in the opposite direction simultaneously. (it might make the device difficult to operate safely, but then that was already the case and it didn't stop anybody... ;))

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    21. Re:Tagline: by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      I believe it is you who is confused. Let's say your goal is to quadruple the damage done by your projectile by doubling its velocity. By conservation of momentum, this will double the velocity of the recoil. Which quadruples the kinetic velocity of the recoiling weapon, which directly equates to the damage done to your shoulder. Amazing how it all works out, isn't it?

      What you remember from your first-year physics is more like a feeling of almost having understood what work is, without actually understanding it.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    22. Re:Tagline: by Savantissimo · · Score: 2

      Well, maybe if you're dealing with frictionless, spherical cows.
      It will double the momentum of the recoil, not the velocity. The mass of the gun + boat + water moved by the boat is much, much higher than the mass of the projectiles. The drag from the water will go up steeply with velocity, at least the square. Also the damage done is related more to the impulse rather than the momentum per se. The projectile acts over perhaps a two tenths of a microsecond on the hull of the target, the recoil can be spread over perhaps 200 microseconds, and the area ratio is going to be about a factor of 10,000 between the gun mount and the projectile impact point, for a factor of around 1e7 difference in pressure, and more than that difference in damage done to to the nonlinearity in the strength of materials.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    23. Re:Tagline: by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      It will double the momentum of the recoil, not the velocity.

      You can't be serious.

      p = mv

      Tatoo it on your ass.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    24. Re:Tagline: by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      "p=mv "
      Yes, my point exactly. The effective mass is not a constant, it depends on water drag. Bad idea to tattoo it on my ass, though, given your propensity for fucking up things with that equation.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    25. Re:Tagline: by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      You're right and should get an "insightful" mod.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    26. Re:Tagline: by Savantissimo · · Score: 2

      What lack of recoil? p.337-8:

      Hiro's feet go out from under him as the raft moves suddenly; he can see Eliot falling down next to him.

      He looks up at Bruce Lee's ship and flinches involuntarily as he sees what looks like a dark wave cresting over the rail, washing over the row of standing pirates, starting at the stern of the trawler and working its way forward. But this is just some kind of optical illusion. It is not really a wave at all. Suddenly, they are fifty feet away from the trawler, not twenty feet. ...
      "Fucking recoil pushed us halfway to China," Fisheye says appreciatively.

      Since I'm on that page, here's the best line:

      "I didn't mean to blow it all up. I guess the little bullets just go through everything."
      "Sharp thinking, Fisheye," Hiro says

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    27. Re:Tagline: by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      You seem to have trouble with the concept of multiplication. Oh well, that's you. Just remind me not to take seriously anything you say. Also note that the gun was hand held, which you would know if you had read the book or the thread. My apologies if this all sounds flip, but maybe you won't get that response if you post stuff that you spend a few nanoseconds reviewing for correctness.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    28. Re:Tagline: by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Let's continue the book review:

      Major structural elements of the trawler are losing their integrity. Enormous popping and wrenching noises are coming from inside as big pieces of Swiss-cheesed metal give way, and the superstructure is slowly collapsing down into the hull like a botched souffle.

      It's a hand held gun. We're talking about ripping apart a good sized trawler with kinetic energy alone. That is magic, not physics. And please no baffegab about mv**2/2, it's debunked above in terms that are easy to understand. Executive summary: hypervelocity is a scam perpetrated on people with no arithmetic ability. It does not magically reduce recoil.

      I said "not enough recoil" not "no recoil".

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    29. Re:Tagline: by Samizdata · · Score: 1

      Reason was originally designed with sort of a harness to allow the user to handle the recoil. So, despite the fact Fisheye was using it incorrectly, I wouldn't exactly call it handheld.

      --
      It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
    30. Re:Tagline: by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      It was not handheld. It weighed over 300 hundred pounds, maybe as much as a tonne. The connection between the barrels and the main box must have been structural, though active and flexible - "a wrist-thick bundle of black tubes and cables" is all he says about that.

      It made so many holes that it destroyed the structural integrity of the boat, and the unsupported upper bits started collapsing due to their own weight. The rounds are 0.3mm wide and lets say we need 1km of holes - that's 3.33e6 rounds. If the rounds are 2mm long cylinders made out of uranium, that's exactly 9kg of ammo. Over ten kilometers worth of holes would be possible. This thing was like a waterjet, but using uranium moving at a substantial fraction of orbital velocity.

      The power is not impossible given that it's nuclear-powered and is using the ocean as a heat sink. If the rounds are moving at 5km/s and firing 27kg per minute, that's 5.6MW.

      Given those numbers, the force is 2250N = 506 lbf. There are four guys, some equipment and supplies and this super-weapon on the raft. It's likely an under-estimate, but let's say 1250 lbs. That's 4m/s acceleration, 0.4 gravity. That would get them up to 23 knots in 3 seconds, if there were no drag. But there is a lot of drag, it's a raft. Just like in the book, they'll move away quickly, but the acceleration will fall off quickly, too. When firing stops, they'll slow down quickly.

      Yes, it's extreme. That's the whole point. But it isn't physically impossible.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
  11. If he's allowed free reign... by Vulch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This could be very good. Joe Cornish appears in both Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz (OK, in Shaun it's as "uncredited zombie") and seems to have much the same interests and outlook on life as Simon Pegg and Nick Frost.

    I can see The Deliverators run being done as a Bond style pre-credits sequence and being awesome...

    1. Re:If he's allowed free reign... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If he's allowed free rein".

      Goddammit.

    2. Re:If he's allowed free reign... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      It's "free rain" Everyone deserves some free rain.

    3. Re:If he's allowed free reign... by bughunter · · Score: 1

      As long as it's not Free Chocolate Rain.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
  12. Whelp by squidflakes · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seeing as how screenplays for Snow Crash have been kicking around almost as long as the book itself, I'm amazed it finally got picked up. Still, I don't have high hopes. What made the book great for me were the odd turns of phrase, the staccato pacing, and the entirely correct number of giant penis avatars wandering around The Street.

    How are they going to represent Vitaly Chernobyl's Nuclear Fuzz Grunge? Are we going to get the glorious Nipponese rap styling of Sushi-K?

    How much in the future will this take place? Are they going to whitewash Hiro?

    Obviously, these are all rhetorical and after what Disney did to John Carter of Mars... well.

    1. Re:Whelp by BetterSense · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have always felt that a Snow Crash motion picture would have to me animated. It's too cartoonish to be live action.

    2. Re:Whelp by firewrought · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Seeing as how screenplays for Snow Crash have been kicking around almost as long as the book itself, I'm amazed it finally got picked up. Still, I don't have high hopes.

      Perhaps Stephenson's depiction of a hyper-privatized society struggling with disruptive technologies, unpredictable religious groups, and the complete usurpation of rational discourse (all while a marginalized federal government steeps ineffectually in its own paranoia) has never been more applicable to current events. The text is ripe for exploiting (and commenting on) the current political zeitgeist...

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    3. Re:Whelp by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      They can cast Gackt for sushi-k. Hiro is half black half nippoese, will be interesting who is cast, and will they use google earth? Will the gargoyles wear google glasses?

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    4. Re:Whelp by squidflakes · · Score: 1

      For some reason, I always imagined Sushi-K as fat and blubbery.

    5. Re:Whelp by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      Obviously, these are all rhetorical and after what Disney did to John Carter of Mars... well.

      I wanted to cry when I saw how badly they butchered the story. The one thing, the ONLY THING that saved me from getting completely stabby was that they did Woola *perfectly* and probably only that because he has no speaking lines.

      All they had to do was stick with the story and it would have been brilliant. Yes, it's a horribly sexist adolescent wet dream, yes we know it has zero connection with reality we don't care make it like it was supposed to be and we'll enjoy it for the mindless entertainment that it is! Stop "fixing" the classics. Heaven help us if they ever "adapt" the Lensmen series.

      Snow Crash, I have good hopes for. There's nothing directly offensive to any of the political hot button groups of the moment, and they have a real chance to shine in showing off cool CG effects whenever they're jacked in. It's going to be hard to explain neuro-linguistic hacking to your average studio audience though.

    6. Re:Whelp by tgv · · Score: 1

      O sure, but how are they even going to show the sentiment of the opening page on screen, and not p*ss off all those self-righteous "Americans", you know this bit:

      There's only four things we [the US] do better than anyone else
      music
      movies
      microcode (software)
      high-speed pizza delivery

      And microcode shouldn't even be in that list, of course.

    7. Re:Whelp by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >I have always felt that a Snow Crash motion picture would have to me animated. It's too cartoonish to be live action.

      It was written with a graphic novel in mind... that's one of the reasons why the visual imagery in the novel is so powerful.

    8. Re:Whelp by Jookey · · Score: 1

      William Hung as sushi-k

    9. Re:Whelp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > How are they going to represent Vitaly Chernobyl's Nuclear Fuzz Grunge?

      System of a Down.

  13. Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately, people now will be completely nonplussed when they see the app.

    > I want to see some awesome skating scenes (featuring pooning an electric car going its top speed of 10 mph)

    1. Re:Earth by netsavior · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, people now will be completely nonplussed when they see the app.

      > I want to see some awesome skating scenes (featuring pooning an electric car going its top speed of 10 mph)

      Please don't use that word. It doesn't mean what you think it means.
      nonplussed - Surprised and confused so much that they are unsure how to react. it can also mean "not troubled."

      If you mean unimpressed, just say unimpressed. If you mean underwhelmed, say underwhelmed.

  14. It says SnowCrash... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but I thought SkiFree. "They're making a movie of some Flash game? Well, wouldn't be the first time I suppose..."

  15. Re:Am I the ony one who didn't like Snow Crash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Re:Am I the ony one who didn't like Snow Crash? Yes

  16. Re:Am I the ony one who didn't like Snow Crash? by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

    No you're not the only one. I read it when it was a Hugo nominee, but was unimpressed by the novel, and thought it very depressing. Like film noire (black film) which is another genre I've never enjoyed.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  17. Re:Am I the ony one who didn't like Snow Crash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it was crap. it felt like johnny mnemonic the movie.

  18. Cloe Moretz as YT by invid · · Score: 2

    Nuff said.

    --
    The Moore-Murphy Law: The number of things that will go wrong will double every 2 years.
    1. Re:Cloe Moretz as YT by netsavior · · Score: 1

      Pretty much I assume that is why they revived the project, there is finally someone who can play that role.

    2. Re:Cloe Moretz as YT by Jeng · · Score: 0

      Ksenia Solo would be a better fit.

      http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0989959/

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    3. Re:Cloe Moretz as YT by invid · · Score: 1

      Um, Chloe is 15 years old, Ksenia is 25.

      --
      The Moore-Murphy Law: The number of things that will go wrong will double every 2 years.
    4. Re:Cloe Moretz as YT by Jeng · · Score: 1

      It's not how old they are, it's how old they look.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    5. Re:Cloe Moretz as YT by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Unless they cut the hell out of the story, YT will not be played by a kid. Doubt even the character could remain a minor in the movie version.

    6. Re:Cloe Moretz as YT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? Hollywood ADORES teen-girl-with-disfunctional-relationship-with-her-mother-but-saves-world-and-makes-up-with-her-mother movies. They'll keep YT a teen and pretend she doesn't know what sex is. Roadkill will get completely cut. YT captive in the basement won't do anything remotely sexual. YT will either never meet Raven or they'll just hack that whole subplot into something unrecognizable. No way they're going to let YT be anything other than a teen though.

      Shit, expect them to completely rewrite it so the whole story revolves around YT, not Hiro. Hiro isn't white.

      (Captcha: diminish. Slashdot's semantic parser is getting downright creepy.)

    7. Re:Cloe Moretz as YT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Shit, expect them to completely rewrite it so the whole story revolves around YT, not Hiro. Hiro isn't white.

      He will be.
      He. Will. Be.

    8. Re:Cloe Moretz as YT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's also what the Australian government decided. No pictures of A-cups for you!

    9. Re:Cloe Moretz as YT by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      To be fair, it's next to impossible to find half-Black, half-Asian actors that can carry a lead role in a big-budget film. I'd go with a medium skin tone black actor and add a hint of epicanthal fold in makeup. The other option is to use an Asian lead and do skin darkening in post-production (makeup never seems to look right), but that will get you pilloried in the media.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    10. Re:Cloe Moretz as YT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC, the New South African encounter is the only scene that requires Hiro to be black. That and one other incidental scene are the only instances that require him to look Asian.

  19. A little baffled... by thesameguy · · Score: 1

    As great as Attack the Block and Shaun of the Dead were, I'm not sure how that experience translates into directing Snow Crash. And, while direction is certainly important, I think for a movie like this all the important bits are tied up in the screenplay and the acting. I really hope this turns out to be amazing, but I have little expectation it will. Hopefully Mr. Stephenson is heavily involved with all aspects and can guide his baby safely.

  20. Re:Am I the ony one who didn't like Snow Crash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Okay ... . Now you've peaked my curiosity.

    Why, exactly, did you feel the need to explain to world+dog that film noire translated as black film? I'm hoping you know that some of the best films ever made, include Blade Runner, are in the film noire 'style'.

    I just get this feeling that you think Shaft is film noire, and I've had enough headaches today.

  21. Re:Am I the ony one who didn't like Snow Crash? by netsavior · · Score: 1

    It was a like an Ritalin-addicts pastiche of William Gibson.

    Hah, there is no accounting for personal taste. That tagline would sell me any book that bore it.

  22. Just coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    STEPHEN!

    1. Re:Just coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JUST COMING!

    2. Re:Just coming by sugar+and+acid · · Score: 1

      Just coming.

  23. Fingers crossed by mako1138 · · Score: 1

    The book definitely has no shortage of movie-worthy scenes, but it's gonna take a really good director to string it all together.

  24. Re:Am I the ony one who didn't like Snow Crash? by foradoxium · · Score: 1

    I randomly picked up snowcrash as a teenager, no idea who wrote it or anything. I just liked the computer-ness of the synopsis.

    As I read it, I began to love it more and more, because of its basic ideas of the future of internet. Oddly enough, second life pretty much put his idea in place. To me this makes the book even more hilarous..and it makes me wonder what other possibilities that sci-fi writers think of might come to truth (3 organizations owning the world, ugly/limited internet access for the poor)

    I also liked the idea of the church re-programming someone using tongues. lol

    Personally, snow crash is on my list of lifetime favorites.

  25. One thing.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Love the novel. Excellent work, but can we ask a favor of mr Cornish?
    Can you change his name?
    Hiro Protagonist is just...............

    1. Re:One thing.... by Coren22 · · Score: 2

      The name is meant to be a pun, you missed that?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    2. Re:One thing.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hard to believe anyone could miss it. And without that one piece of rather obvious information, the entire tone of the novel is changed.

  26. Re:Am I the ony one who didn't like Snow Crash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's "piqued".

  27. Re:Am I the ony one who didn't like Snow Crash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think he figured out proper grammar at some point.
    The stories are awesome, but the writing didn't lend itself to much of anything.

  28. Re:Am I the ony one who didn't like Snow Crash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was a parody.

  29. Re:Am I the ony one who didn't like Snow Crash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe GP meant that this is the most curious they have ever been?

  30. I hope it's filmed in 3D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or even better, a Tron Legacy alike where only the bits in cyberspace are in 3D. I realise that's not what Tron Legacy actually did, but it's what they should have done.

  31. Re:Am I the ony one who didn't like Snow Crash? by Bill+Hayden · · Score: 1

    To each his own I guess. I loved Snow Crash, and Cryptonomicon might be my all-time favorite book. However, I gave up on the Baroque Cycle very early, as I found it too be too wordy and slow -- a tough slog.

    --
    Protect your browser with the Force Safe Search add-on
  32. Inscrutable by haapi · · Score: 4, Informative

    I took a class in Mandarin, and was sorely disappointed to learn that KFC is not actually called the "House of the Ancient and Inscrutable Colonel".

    --
    Well, apparently, you only have to fool the majority of people for a little while.
    1. Re:Inscrutable by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      (That's from Diamond Age though.)

    2. Re:Inscrutable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh yes you are correct sir.

    3. Re:Inscrutable by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>I took a class in Mandarin, and was sorely disappointed to learn that KFC is not actually called the "House of the Ancient and Inscrutable Colonel".

      My wife is Chinese, and is also a Neal Stephenson fan, so she calls it that every once in a while.

      So be happy. There's at least one Chinese person out there using that phrase. =)

  33. Re:Am I the ony one who didn't like Snow Crash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The beginning is trying way too hard, but it smooths out for the rest. I almost quit. It's not a great novel, but better than the beginning implies.

  34. Re:Am I the ony one who didn't like Snow Crash? by jgrahn · · Score: 1

    I tried to read it, but couldn't get past the first 100 pages. It was trying soooooo hard to be cool & edgy it turned me off.

    Never thought about it before, but now that you mention it I think it's a bit tounge-in-cheek. Works out well with that in mind. Although I never cared much for Gibson ...

  35. Re:Am I the ony one who didn't like Snow Crash? by Maltheus · · Score: 1

    I read this shortly after reading Neuromancer, and it paled by comparison for me. Never understood the hype either and I had to force myself to finish it. It just felt kind fo goofy. Not to knock anyone who enjoyed it.

  36. Tough cram job. What to cut? by Animats · · Score: 2

    It's going to be tough. There's too much in that book to cram into a movie, and most of it contributes to the main plot. What to cut?

    Probably most of the virtual reality. VR was more promising in 1992 than it is now. It's been way overdone in movies. Show Hiro in gloves and goggles gear in his storage space, and others briefly in similar gear when appropriate, but spend little screen time on VR.

    Use Juanita Marquez, Hiro's ex-girlfriend and linguist/mythologist , as the designated explainer for the psycho-religious stuff. Somebody has to do that job.

    If they're lucky, they might be able to get Chloe Grace Moretz ("Hit Girl") as Y.T. That's the toughest casting decision. Any of the usual big hunks can play Raven. A number of older actors could play Uncle Enzo. Ng is a CG character. No idea who should play Hiro.

    1. Re:Tough cram job. What to cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mark Margolis would make a good Uncle Enzo. The librarian has great potential for comedic relief, either in the form of Alan Rickman or Stephen Fry, depending on how they run with it. For Raven, I'm thinking Danny Trejo - you want someone who looks tough, not just physically strong. And with the right makeup and haircut, he'll pass as well as anybody for Inuit.

    2. Re:Tough cram job. What to cut? by Rosy+At+Random · · Score: 1

      A modern take on VR would probably be better - perhaps some directed-to-retina laser displays, and Kinect-style motion-sensing, or nerve-impulse tracking so the person doesn't have to move.

      I hope Adam Buxton gets to play someone. The librarian would do.

      --
      Would you like a slice of toast?
  37. Re:Vote for B i l l S t i l l 2 0 1 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you for spamming off-topic bullshit.

  38. So it's directed by the guy who... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Cornish is known for his recent sci-fi alien invasion flick Attack the Block, which was filmed and released in the UK by the same studio that put out Shaun of the Dead

    That's a few too many degrees of separation to really give it a good pedigree.

    Not that this means it will be a bad film. There are plenty of great directors that we haven't yet heard of. Just feel that trying to tell us who he is is pointless.

  39. Re:Am I the ony one who didn't like Snow Crash? by sn0wcrash · · Score: 1

    You are both wrong.

  40. Hardcore sex scene with a 14 year old girl? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plus the needle? Definitely not, which is almost a shame since for such a bizarre scene that could have so easily gone wrong it ended up as one of the most oddly funny and entertaining ones of the book.

  41. Not Damon Lindelof by Outlander+Engine · · Score: 1

    Don't let Lindelof get near your script and you might have a chance.

  42. Adam & Joe by illtud · · Score: 1

    Joe Cornish was also one of the 2 screenwriters on Adventures of Tintin (meh). But better known in the UK as half of 'Adam & Joe' of TV long past and radio (but not recently). Podcasts here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/series/adamandjoe

    I enjoy the podcasts, and would (selfishly) rather that he returned to radio than futz about in Hollywood. They probably pay better than the BBC, though.

    1. Re:Adam & Joe by Rosy+At+Random · · Score: 1

      I really enjoyed Tintin, for one.

      --
      Would you like a slice of toast?
    2. Re:Adam & Joe by illtud · · Score: 1

      I really enjoyed Tintin, for one.

      Fair enough (I'm not sure what he was responsible for or when he was brought in to the process), but I would recommend the A&J podcasts, they're pretty orthogonal to his screenwriting/directing, except for the obvious steeped-in-movies (rather than 'film') that they share with Simon Pegg.

  43. Re:Am I the ony one who didn't like Snow Crash? by dpilot · · Score: 1

    I found the writing to be horribly flawed, but he threw such fun ideas at me so fast that I didn't care. From Rat Thing to Reason to pizza delivery to smart wheels to the whole Sumerian language thing, to name only a few.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  44. Re:Jason Momoa as Raven. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Khal Drogo, only needs massively thicker neck.

  45. Re:Am I the ony one who didn't like Snow Crash? by f3rret · · Score: 1

    Okay ... . Now you've peaked my curiosity.

    Why, exactly, did you feel the need to explain to world+dog that film noire translated as black film? I'm hoping you know that some of the best films ever made, include Blade Runner, are in the film noire 'style'.

    I just get this feeling that you think Shaft is film noire, and I've had enough headaches today.

    Technically speaking, 'film noir' does mean 'black film' in French. Of course this only applies if you assume that it is a term that needs to be translated, it really doesn't.

    --
    Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
  46. Soundtrack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hans Zimmer please.

    1. Re:Soundtrack by sixsixtysix · · Score: 1

      it's likely going to be filled with some of this newschool cheese-core bullshit like skrillex. i say let richard d. james (aphex twin) have at it.

      --
      ...
    2. Re:Soundtrack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? You don't think the thrashers would have gone wild for a Skrillex remix of Sushi K?

    3. Re:Soundtrack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The two actually have a lot in common. Skrillex cites Aphex Twin as one of the influences he grew up on, and I heard the echoes of that in some his tracks long before I heard him mention it in an interview. Go re-listen to, e.g. "Come to Daddy" from Aphex, and then flip over to listening to "First of the Year" by Skrillex. Different sub-genres and eras, but you can hear the influence clearly.

  47. Really? Snow Crash? by bughunter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of all the Stephenson novels to be made into film, why Snow Crash?

    Zodiac is perfect for cinema in terms of scope, relevance, and length. When I read it I thought, "this would lend itself to a screenplay."

    Cryptonomicon. Just wow. It could be a cornerstone of 21st century cinema if it was done right.

    And the Baroque Cycle. It would have to be a trilogy like LotR, but IMO it's far more easily adapted for the screen than Snow Crash. Or at least, it has more of a mainstream appeal. (Come on, the penultimate climax scene where Peter the Great, Isaac Newon, Baron Leibniz, and Daniel Waterhouse come together is epic.)

    Finally. Diamond Age. If there was one C-Punk movie I could ask to be made into a film, by a devoted producer/director, it would be The Diamond Age: Or, A Young Lady's Illustrated Primer. Really, it's like the Ender's Game of cyberpunk.

    The only reason it's Snow Crash is because that title sold more copies. Pure and simple. Name recognition = box office sales. Nothing else matters in Hollywood these days.

    --
    I can see the fnords!
  48. A Win? by mchappee · · Score: 1

    tldr; Flop.

    MC's preliminary review of the movie adaption of this iconic novel is: 2 1/2 Stallmans and an opening weekend of $382,000. Fail.

    Give me a mainstream writer/director with a big budget any day. Not six degrees of separation between the director and success. Dragonlance all over again.

    MC

    --
    /. finds me to be 20% Troll, 80% Funny
  49. Re:Really? Snow Crash? by bughunter · · Score: 1

    Or at least, it has more of a mainstream appeal. (Come on, the penultimate climax scene where Peter the Great, Isaac Newon, Baron Leibniz, and Daniel Waterhouse come together is epic.)

    Rereading my post, these two sentences don't go together. I mean what I say in both, but the latter doesn't follow the former.

    Mainstream Appeal = Eliza's beauty and intelligence and devotion... her courage and almost all of her scenes in Versailles... she's a great character for cinema. (Not sure if the scene with the sheep's intestine will make it past the ratings board but who knows.) Also, almost all of the chapters featuring Jack and Bob Shaftoe. Many of the Waterhouse chapters are not cut out for film, but then something's gonna have to be abbreviated for film.

    Geek Appeal = All of the chapters featuring Newton and/or Leibniz. What geek wouldn't want to see a film dramatizing the rivalry between the two inventors of the calculus, especially with the kind of flourishes added by Stephenson?

    --
    I can see the fnords!
  50. The actual casting: by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2

    Hiro Protagonist - Hologram Tupac
    Y.T. - Flo from Progressive Insurance
    Raven - Peter Dinklage
    Rife - Michael J. Fox
    Juanita - Sarah Jessica Parker

    1. Re:The actual casting: by countjocular · · Score: 1

      How about Steven Yeun (Walking Dead) as Hiro?

  51. I can't believe this is going to get made before.. by spagthorpe · · Score: 1

    ...Neuromancer.

    --

    WWJD -- What Would Jimi Do?
    (Smash amp, burn guitar, take home the groupies)

  52. i can't see it really working by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

    they could make a pretty good movie based on snow crash but so many of the ideas would just not translate to screen or just look plain retarded.

    --
    This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
  53. Re:Really? Snow Crash? by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Cryptonomicon. Just wow. It could be a cornerstone of 21st century cinema if it was done right.

    I can't see it fitting into less than a TV series. It probably wouldn't cost a huge amount to make since a lot of stuff for WWII movies is still around, and it wouldn't need "name" actors, just experienced ones.

  54. Re:Am I the ony one who didn't like Snow Crash? by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

    >>>that film noire translated as black film?

    For the same reason I translate "felo de se" to "act of suicide" when I am quoting Thomas Jefferson's comments about the Supreme Court. And no I didn't really like Blade Runner. I don't think life is such a sucky mess that the main character had to mope-around like one of the Twilight vampire. (Frankly I think the cop should have taken some prozac or something, because that's just not normal behavior.)

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  55. Re:Really? Snow Crash? by jonwil · · Score: 1

    Cryptonomicon would make an awesome movie.
    As for turning cyberpunk into films, forget Snow Crash, go with the original (and still one of the best IMO) and make Neuromancer into a film. Now THAT'S a film I would pay to go and see. (I would love to see how the CGI guys interpret the Kuang virus and Tessier-Ashpool data cores). Plus, if its successful they can move on and make Count Zero and Mona Lisa Overdrive.

  56. Re:Casting by Mateorabi · · Score: 1

    Why not Tiger Woods for Hiro? "Hiro" was the first thing I though back in the day when Tiger was just becoming known.

    --
    "You saved 1968." - Ms. Valerie Pringle to the crew of Apollo 8

  57. Re:Am I the ony one who didn't like Snow Crash? by Mateorabi · · Score: 1

    His books are "story, as a string of awesome anecdotes." I mean, anyone who can go on for pages about how to eat Captain Crunch cereal......

    --
    "You saved 1968." - Ms. Valerie Pringle to the crew of Apollo 8

  58. Re:Really? Snow Crash? by Mateorabi · · Score: 1

    Also, Cryptonomicon suffered from "don't know how to end it, so it just stops in the last few pages" even more so than Snow Crash. He's getting better, but he still needs to learn how to write an ending. Anathem probably was his best effort at a decent ending. Reamde had that stupid cat.

    --
    "You saved 1968." - Ms. Valerie Pringle to the crew of Apollo 8

  59. Re:Am I the ony one who didn't like Snow Crash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's very odd, given that it is generally considered a parody of cyberpunk, and thus is supposed to be *funny*, not depressing.

  60. There already is a Snow Crash movie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...in my imagination, when I read the printed page. In no way do I need a film to be made. How about making a movie with an original story instead?

  61. Re:Casting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well for one thing, Tiger isn't an actor. He also just seems like a nice guy (despite his indiscretions), not a swashbuckler-Mafia-pizza type.

    Stephenson said he had Roland Gift from Fine Young Cannibals pictured when he wrote Hiro, but Roland is also not an actor (despite his acting career). He's also English, not American. And he's old now. But he can handle a sword - he proved that as Xavier on Highlander: The Series.

  62. rejoice? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    We've just done "rejoicing" over John Carter.

    Fans will certainly be interested to see what happens, but "rejoice? Maybe it will turn out to be the next Blade Runner, but the most likely outcomes are 1) it stays in development hell or 2) is changed beyond recognition and dumbed down into a generic (3D!) action movie.

  63. Zodiac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Snow Crash the movie, nice!
    Zodiac the TV series or movie would be nice as well...
    Just saying.

  64. Re:Am I the ony one who didn't like Snow Crash? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

    Okay ... . Now you've peaked my curiosity.
    Why, exactly, did you feel the need to explain to world+dog that film noire translated as black film?

    Well, at least he didn't confuse peak and pique.

  65. Re:Really? Snow Crash? by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

    It would have to be a 30-60 hour TV series to be close to the original, at least 12 hours even after massive cuts. It would have to have a lot of work done to make it filmable at all. The connections and deeper points of the book make Lost seem almost straightforward. It has a gazillion characters and dozens of locations. The jumping around between different storylines would be a bitch to make work on screen, too. The parts that appeal to one audience run a risk of losing the others rather than broadening the appeal. It practically requires Johnny Depp to play Jack Shaftoe, or at least someone who doesn't mind being accused of imitating him. The best choices for Eliza wouldn't be cheap either (Keira Knightly, Natalie Portman). There would be many difficult-to-cast roles, several of which would have to be cast multiple times at different ages.

    I'd like to see it, but it would be a huge, expensive risky project.

    --
    "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
  66. Re:Really? Snow Crash? by NotSoFastEddie · · Score: 1

    Cryptonomicon. Just wow. It could be a cornerstone of 21st century cinema if it was done right.

    I can't see it fitting into less than a TV series. It probably wouldn't cost a huge amount to make since a lot of stuff for WWII movies is still around, and it wouldn't need "name" actors, just experienced ones.

    It would probably be very expensive - many of the cinematically interesting scenes involve a lot of water, which makes budgets skyrocket. (See James Cameron, The Abyss and Titanic).

  67. Re:Really? Snow Crash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly. There is a lot of great stuff of Stephenson's, but they would be very wise to start with the book that got me and everyone I know into his work: Snow Crash. Its popular, its accessible, and its got several scenes with lots of visual flare.

    Making this movie opens the gates for several of his other books to become movies, especially if they market a lot of it with Stephenson's name on it.

  68. Re: Am I the ony one who didn't like Snow Crash? by karnowski · · Score: 1

    No, he's not. Poor character development, no shades of gray, and very forgetable. A lame novel that reminds me, with a few great exceptions, that sci-fi is a good place to for second rate writers to gain adulation and a living.

  69. Re: Am I the ony one who didn't like Snow Crash? by wild_berry · · Score: 1

    I took is as grand satire, merciless in ridiculing its targets, and I laughed most of the way through it.

  70. Re:Am I the ony one who didn't like Snow Crash? by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

    His books are "story, as a string of awesome anecdotes." I mean, anyone who can go on for pages about how to eat Captain Crunch cereal......

    Translation: He needs a fucking editor to hold his head underwater until he learns how to stitch a story together and wrap it up properly.

    There were some great concepts in Snow Crash, but the execution and pacing was just horrid.

    --
    Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  71. But... by Meski · · Score: 1

    It's already been written, why would it need a writer?

    1. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It's already been written, why would it need a writer?

      Um, because you still need a screenplay? You can't show up on a movie set with a novel and just start shooting.

  72. Re:Am I the ony one who didn't like Snow Crash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the same reason I translate "felo de se" to "act of suicide" when I am quoting Thomas Jefferson's comments about the Supreme Court.

    And that reason would be...? I've never heard of "felo de se" before, but I have heard of "film noire", which is a loan phrase from French. Is "felo de se" also a loan phrase from some other language? Do you also translate sushi, kamikaze, sashimi, schadenfreude, reich, bratwurst, and other loan words?

    Again, genuinely curious.

  73. Cyberpunk's back! by RandomStr · · Score: 1

    I hope it happens, Snow Crash is one of my favourite books of all time.

    The Diamond Age would also be an incredible film too; if the Syfy Channel miniseries doesn't materialise, or even if...

    And to top off a(non-Gibson) cyber-punk trilogy/cycle, I'd vote for a film adaptation of Only Forward by Michael Marshall Smith.

  74. Re:Really? Snow Crash? by TechMouse · · Score: 1

    (Minor Spoiler) There is one plot point from The System of the World which is critical to the narrative, but IMHO unfilmable. Specifically around the character of Sean Partry. I've been racking my brains and I can't see how you'd do it.

  75. Re:Really? Snow Crash? by bughunter · · Score: 1

    If you didn't know who Sean Partry really was all along, or at least suspect it, then you weren't reading very closely.

    If you really wanted to film it to preserve the surprise, then you could have had the character pick up some art of disguise tips from-- oh, who was it? Enoch Root? Then you could have a classic scooby doo moment where Partry pulls of his mask and reveals himself to be....

    --
    I can see the fnords!
  76. What to cut? by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking that scene where Raven forces himself on the teen Hiro whilst implanted sedative needles are injected into his unmentionables.

    I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that is going to get cut...

    1. Re:What to cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm thinking that scene where Raven forces himself on the teen Hiro whilst implanted sedative needles are injected into his unmentionables.

      Teen Hiro? I think you're a little confused; if you're talking about Raven and Y.T, read that passage again. She is a consenting sex partner and later refers to Raven as her "boyfriend."

      It's funny what makes different folks squeamish. There was a guy on Amazon who reviewed Snow Crash and said he couldn't recommend it to anyone, entirely due to the "gag and gauge" scene with Bruce Lee's pirates. Presumably he was okay with the gory violence that followed... but gay sex? Yech!

  77. Re:Am I the ony one who didn't like Snow Crash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try to get past it - it picks up quite a bit and it's really a good read.