If it's the algorithms that Kodak invented it's another story. It's not though, that's the problem. Downgrading/upgrading resolution is not something you patent...
Are you seriously going to say (with a straight face, we'll have no giggling or chuckling) that transmitting a digital image by reading a configuration file to know where to put a file and then transmitting it to that location is considered innovative? Or how about previewing a picture? I mean.. these are ideas that were out since MS-DOS was around. Using the idea in another product is not innovation.
If I invent a hovering wallet, do you think it's innovative if I patent how to open that wallet? It's the same kind of thing... so obvious.
What if someone wanted to innovate and DIDN'T have a war-chest of patents to protect the gates? Besides, money diverted from research & innovation is money wasted in this case. Let's not get stupid in the discussion.
it's fine, let him rant. It's always the same argument, without thought. If the human body was a perfectly working machine, it'd be just what's said. It isn't, unfortunately.
When was the last time you threw a sony walkman up in the air and let it hit concrete? It's not just the front that shatters... that happens when it slips out of your hand... much less from a large distance.
I was alive 30 years ago. (1981) Believe me, the things back then were by far not built better with higher quality. Nor will they continue to operate for another 50 years. I've come to one conclusion about things from the past, and our feelings. Things from the past seem to last longer than things in the present because the few items that were built decently survived until the current day. The same has happened since the beginning of creation, and continues with our items even today.
No vehicle should bounce more than the maximum of twice or the suspension system needs to be checked. This includes SUVs as they are vehicles, also. Sports cars (and other cars with a low center of gravity) slow down because of the possibility of bottoming while going over those god forsaken speed bumps. Suspension has nothing to do with snow travel.
The slowest people I see going over speed bumps are ricers.
Slashdot Mirror
If it's the algorithms that Kodak invented it's another story. It's not though, that's the problem.
Downgrading/upgrading resolution is not something you patent...
Are you seriously going to say (with a straight face, we'll have no giggling or chuckling) that transmitting a digital image by reading a configuration file to know where to put a file and then transmitting it to that location is considered innovative?
Or how about previewing a picture? I mean.. these are ideas that were out since MS-DOS was around. Using the idea in another product is not innovation.
If I invent a hovering wallet, do you think it's innovative if I patent how to open that wallet? It's the same kind of thing... so obvious.
What if someone wanted to innovate and DIDN'T have a war-chest of patents to protect the gates? Besides, money diverted from research & innovation is money wasted in this case.
Let's not get stupid in the discussion.
Im thinking in this case that digital has a relation to binary.
Homeopathy has nothing to do with trying to fix the problem directly.
TEST. This is a TEST.
It's what labs do before it's tested on humans.
it's fine, let him rant. It's always the same argument, without thought.
If the human body was a perfectly working machine, it'd be just what's said. It isn't, unfortunately.
*in simpsons laugh*
hah hah!
However, it sure deserves trials in humans to qualify it as non-working.
There are differences between AMD & Intel in the newer technologies.
appending: at the speed necessary, since faster is not possible as the interface is the issue not the processing.
When was the last time you threw a sony walkman up in the air and let it hit concrete?
It's not just the front that shatters... that happens when it slips out of your hand... much less from a large distance.
Check, and mate.
I was alive 30 years ago. (1981)
Believe me, the things back then were by far not built better with higher quality. Nor will they continue to operate for another 50 years.
I've come to one conclusion about things from the past, and our feelings. Things from the past seem to last longer than things in the present because the few items that were built decently survived until the current day. The same has happened since the beginning of creation, and continues with our items even today.
Most televisions from 1981 were horrid.
Oh the bitter irony of your post...
Tebow could never be wrong.
I think we're talking about more than the last 3 years, which is how long Barrack Obama has been in presidential office.
Spoken like a brit.
Man, your boyfriends rough on you...
Do we need to spell EVERYTHING out for you?
Unfortunately, I'm looking at 72 :(
With the physical damage I've taken in life, I'll be DEAD by that time lol
I feel sorry for this world with people like you... ugh...
No vehicle should bounce more than the maximum of twice or the suspension system needs to be checked. This includes SUVs as they are vehicles, also.
Sports cars (and other cars with a low center of gravity) slow down because of the possibility of bottoming while going over those god forsaken speed bumps.
Suspension has nothing to do with snow travel.
The slowest people I see going over speed bumps are ricers.
No, fuck you.
It hurts my brain just thinking about what it'd be like cleaning my car after that :)
That happens in every lane, not just the left lane.