Slashdot Mirror


Glimpse of Stephen Hawking's Computer

kenekaplan writes "Intel application engineer Travis Bonifield has been working closely with Hawking to communicate with the world for a decade. He's traveled from the United States to England every few years to hand-deliver Hawking a customized PC. Bonifield talks about the technology that powers the customized system." Hawking's latest machine is a Thinkpad x220. Lately he's been trouble speaking due to weakened cheek muscles (down to one word per minute). New Scientist has a brief interview with Hawking's outgoing technician on the challenges he faced. It turns out Hawking is still using a DECtalk (despite some reports suggesting otherwise).

146 comments

  1. DECtalk by Sockatume · · Score: 5, Funny

    With a cat for scale. That's it, Wikipedia, we're through.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    1. Re:DECtalk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You'd rather the cat be in a box?

    2. Re:DECtalk by chilvence · · Score: 0

      He'd rather the world be bereft of humour

    3. Re:DECtalk by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      See I saw that and I thought you know from now on any time I need to show scale in a photo I think I'll use my cat

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    4. Re:DECtalk by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nice try, Schrodinger.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    5. Re:DECtalk by LizardKing · · Score: 1

      I wonder if DECTalk used Cat 1 cable?

    6. Re:DECtalk by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Funny

      Humor. You don't have it.

      --
      No sig today...
    7. Re:DECtalk by SeaFox · · Score: 2

      According to the image description on Wikipedia it was a "convenient cat". Maybe the photographer forgot the ruler or whatever he originally meant to use for scale.

    8. Re:DECtalk by Sockatume · · Score: 5, Funny

      Without knowing whether it's an imperial or metric cat it's completely useless, though.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    9. Re:DECtalk by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      Maybe the photographer forgot the ruler or whatever he originally meant to use for scale.

      ...or maybe he just thought it would be fun.

      --
      No sig today...
    10. Re:DECtalk by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      Please, there are kids reading this site!
      There's no "cat" in a "box", it's a thinkpad! (*)

      (*) keyboard may contain a nipple.

    11. Re:DECtalk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Temperature scale that is - comfy for a cat to want to sit on.

    12. Re:DECtalk by Rumagent · · Score: 3, Funny

      Neither dead nor alive! it is undead I tell you! UNDEAD cats roam the land!!!

    13. Re:DECtalk by neokushan · · Score: 1

      Have you noticed that the cat in the picture has a penis on its face?

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    14. Re:DECtalk by willworkforbeer · · Score: 1

      It was supposed to be a Klatt for scale.

      --
      Pretending this is my office full of bitter coworkers..
    15. Re:DECtalk by MiniMike · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, he's right- a cat makes a terrible scale. It only tells you if you're heavy enough to squish a cat.

    16. Re:DECtalk by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 2

      Nice to see a vestige of DEC still doing something useful. Perfect Paul is probably the only DEC employee who still has a job :-)

    17. Re:DECtalk by Stenchwarrior · · Score: 2

      And a bunny on his back. Or India, depending on how you look at it.

      --
      Loading...
    18. Re:DECtalk by Golddess · · Score: 1

      I don't know.. that cat has a sort of "I'm only on here because someone off camera is in my way" look to it.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    19. Re:DECtalk by operagost · · Score: 1

      Actually, my experience tells me that he has claimed dibs. I also have a cat that will claim anything you place on the floor for catdom.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    20. Re:DECtalk by slashmojo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Cats rule so it would have to be imperial.

    21. Re:DECtalk by nomoreunusednickname · · Score: 5, Funny

      It only tells you if you're heavy enough to squish a cat.

      I find it useful to determine if a room is large enough to swing a cat.

    22. Re:DECtalk by nman64 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Careful, there. Five out of six ends of a cat are sharp.

    23. Re:DECtalk by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Since this is from Digital, they clearly should have used a PDP-10 for scale.

    24. Re:DECtalk by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      no they roam boxes containing bombs with radio isotope triggers.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    25. Re:DECtalk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are metric rulers too.

    26. Re:DECtalk by treeves · · Score: 1

      It was probably unplugged just before the photo was taken. Everyone knows that cats love sitting on top of warm things.
      Heck , when I was a kid, we had a cat that would rest on top of the dog!

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    27. Re:DECtalk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if DECTalk used Cat 1 cable?

      Only if the Cat ate Serial.

    28. Re:DECtalk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely that's : African or European cat?

    29. Re:DECtalk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's your problem? To relate it to something familiar, the DECtalk box is exactly the same size as a VT240 box. OK?

      (Yes, I had a VT240 for a long time, and even had a DECtalk. Can't remember why...)

  2. He identifies with the voice now by Viol8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So why the surprise that he still uses the DECTalk?

    In this case if it is broke then someone probably will fix it.

    1. Re:He identifies with the voice now by Nick+Fel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But I've never understood why the DECTalk voice can't be replicated in software. There must be someone capable and willing to do it for the publicity.

    2. Re:He identifies with the voice now by HyperDrive · · Score: 4, Informative

      MESS has preliminary support for emulating the DECTalk.

    3. Re:He identifies with the voice now by ciderbrew · · Score: 2

      It does have a software version. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DECtalk

    4. Re:He identifies with the voice now by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I read an article where he said he takes the robotic voice very personally, he regards it as his voice.

      He's a geek so wants the real thing, not some stupid software emulation. What's the fun of a wheelchair if you can't strap loads of wires and circuit boards to it?

      --
      No sig today...
    5. Re:He identifies with the voice now by vlm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I read an article where he said he takes the robotic voice very personally, he regards it as his voice.

      He's a geek so wants the real thing, not some stupid software emulation.

      The first thing that instantly struck me is its rather like women and their rack. Some fraction love the idea of an upgrade, some hate the idea of an upgrade, but the feature that makes it most like the female chest situation is that Everybody Seems to Have A Strong Opinion about what upgrade strategy, if any, is best, and all the women I've talked to about that topic pretty much want all the folks with opinions one way or another to F off and when they want an opinion they'll darn well ask for it first.

      The other interesting thing Ive not considered is the legal / financial / employment minefield of whoever is the "new voice of Hawking" is absolutely going to advertise that, and he might not be cool with getting into that whole scene. So on one hand he should get money, on the other hand he doesn't need money, on the other hand the money would be coming from his fellow sufferers so that would make him a jerk, on the other hand he could donate his endorsement money to a charity, but what if the device he signs the contract for sucks and he wants to switch back, but if he doesn't sign an endorsement contract he's basically pulling money out of a charity, I can see a guy just saying F-it forget about the whole topic now back to black hole thermodynamics.

      The final part is /. and IT in general are populated by noobs who think nothing of upgrading because they've only been in the game 2 years so whats one upgrade during an entire lifetime? But he's pretty much in it for life, and I know from personal experience that when you can skip upgrade cycles, you're best off doing so if at all possible. Sometimes not possible. At work I do not scrap the old gear and spec out an entirely new amplifier line solely because one corporation released one new microwave RF transistor today (and someone will release another next week, repeat into the indefinite future). I can totally see the guy saying there is no point in upgrading every time something new is released and therefore living life as a perma-noob, especially if the performance gain is minor. I'm sure the world would rather have him thinking about physics than endlessly re-learning this months new synth release.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    6. Re:He identifies with the voice now by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      What's the fun of a wheelchair if you can't strap loads of wires and circuit boards to it?

      Bashing in to people, then waiting for them to apologise. That must be a giggle.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    7. Re:He identifies with the voice now by mwvdlee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, that statement says nothing about whether he's a geek or not. It only states he does not want the voice changed; i.e. the audio coming out of some speaker. He says nothing about what hardware of software that should be used.
      Judging from his attitude towards switching control mechanisms, I'd say he's anything but a nerd; he seems to prefer stability/reliability above all else. Logical, considering without controls, he's effectively a vegetable.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    8. Re:He identifies with the voice now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Are women really that personal about their racks?

      I just care if mine can handle my all the pieces of my computer and won't melt them while operating.

    9. Re:He identifies with the voice now by ae1294 · · Score: 0

      I can see a guy just saying F-it forget about the whole topic now back to black hole thermodynamics.

      Why does everything have to go back to GOATSE with you people?

    10. Re:He identifies with the voice now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes it *could* be replaced with software. Probably sound exactly the same. However think about this.

      You buy a bit of kit for say 4500 in 1980ish. It works does exactly what you want (it talks). You know exactly how to use it. It integrates into your system. It may have bugs but you know how to work around them. It is a sunk cost with both time and money.

      Now lets upgrade.

      You buy another bit of kit for say 500.. It works does exactly what you want (it talks). You need to relearn how to use it (probably). It may/may not integrate into your system (another dollar/time cost). It may have bugs to work out and you need to spend time working around the probably existing ones and any new ones (time cost). You end up with the exact same functionality at the end but at a higher time cost.

      If it were me I would probably buy a couple of spares. Then just send them out to get fixed somewhere if they broke and do a swap if they do break.

      Remember this is a person how types about 5-7 characters a minute in effect. So he is not going to want to be able to play the latest fps on his wheel chair. He is too busy typing! And if he wanted that he could get a laptop that does it, and still retain the existing functionality he has in an interface he understands perfectly. To this man time is his commodity. Not smaller/faster/cheaper. He is living as if he has 6 months to live. Also at nearly 70 he probably doesnt have much time left and doesnt want to spend that time farting around with some new computer. He doesnt care about the latest gizmos (like many people in their 70s, not saying all but many)... If he wanted a new computer he would have had it by now. He is being eminently practicable about the matter.

      He probably thinks of it more as a wrench. You dont need a new wrench all the time. You only swap it out if you broke your previous one. Then you go buy one exactly like it as the last one lasted 30+ years... You just do not get that reliability out of newer stuff.

    11. Re:He identifies with the voice now by vlm · · Score: 1

      I just care if mine can handle my all the pieces of my computer and won't melt them while operating.

      Also, I think there's a request for colo space joke lurking around in here somewhere.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    12. Re:He identifies with the voice now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why in the hell are ponies the first hit on Youtube search when searching for Dectalk?
      http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=dectalk

    13. Re:He identifies with the voice now by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It's obsolete because it's clearly not an iPhone.

    14. Re:He identifies with the voice now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it's just habit and reliability.

        Stephan's interface to the voice synth is of very low bandwidth. He can only move a couple of muscles, and not very fast. The problem with more complex voice synthesis computers in this instance is that they put inflections and information into the speech that were not created by the user. He simply cannot pratically control a complicated machine. So the simple synthesis is much closer to what he is actually 'saying'.

    15. Re:He identifies with the voice now by drfreak · · Score: 1

      +1 Funny.

      Sorry, no mod points right now, so I just said it.

    16. Re:He identifies with the voice now by drfreak · · Score: 1

      Agreed. What Mr Hawing (Sir Hawking, would be more appropriate because I think he should be knighted if not already) needs is a solid system which conforms to his needs. This is a person who cares not what the age is of the technology, he just needs it to work.

      Although Mr Hawking has special needs I think those of us who are developers (me included) need to consider what he has gained and lost in certain upgrades and pass the results of studying that on to our own users. Sure, we don't need to support users who type a word-per-minute as a priority, but understand where upgrades we give our own users regress in their day-to-day ability to function.

  3. One word a minute by EponymousCustard · · Score: 4, Insightful
    And twitter users think they have problems with 140 characters.

    At one word a minute, you get to really think about what you are gonna say.

    1. Re:One word a minute by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

      It seems odd that there aren't some brain-computer interfaces that would allow better performance than that.

      --
      Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    2. Re:One word a minute by Luckyo · · Score: 5, Informative

      There are, but if you read the article, his problem is learning curve and the fact that if he's disconnected from the working machine and something is wrong, he can't call for help.

      I really suggest reading the articles linked. They are far more interesting then average stuff you get on slashdot and it answers a lot of questions as to "why is he still using this dated stuff". Especially the part that notes that when someone pitching a new system is in the room, Hawking's talking speed goes up because of his competitiveness and stubbornness.

    3. Re:One word a minute by XrayJunkie · · Score: 1

      lol, rofl, omg, ...

    4. Re:One word a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine making a mistake or being misunderstood. Backtracking must be a nightmare. "That's not what I meant!" is 5 minutes gone just there.

    5. Re:One word a minute by Noughmad · · Score: 5, Funny

      A brilliant theoretical physicist cannot learn a new (arguably easier) technology over a ten year period, yet alone flourish?

      Have you ever seen a professor trying to turn on a projector?

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    6. Re:One word a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He does have a library of pre-programmed sentences he can select from. While "that's not what I meant" may not be the most referenced of said list, it'd still be just a minute for the most common of phrases.

    7. Re:One word a minute by Luckyo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Funny my ass dear mods. That's about as informative as it will ever get on slashdot!

    8. Re:One word a minute by camperdave · · Score: 4, Funny

      You, sir, just wasted three minutes of my life!

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    9. Re:One word a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it makes you feel any better, you got my last 'informative' mod :)

    10. Re:One word a minute by ajo_arctus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A very smart guy whom could average a few words a minute jumped at the concept of switching architectures on the suggestion of an industry shill at a conference?

      What? You appear to have read the article but completely missed some really important pieces of the puzzle. Here,

      Stephen and Gordon met at a conference around 1997. Gordon noted that Stephen was using an AMD machine. Gordon asked Stephen, "Would you like to use an Intel computer moving forward? We'd be happy to build that for you and support it."

      The article makes it very clear that the Gordon in that sentence is Gordon Moore. You know, of Moore's law fame. One of the guys who started Intel the first place. Calling Moore an industry Shill is like saying Gates shilled for Microsoft or Jobs shilled for Apple.

      The article is just some guy's anecdote. Don't get so worked up.

    11. Re:One word a minute by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      the concept of switching architectures

      AMD and intel have the same instruction set architectures. Yeah the internal microarchitecture is different but then that is also true of different generations from the same vendor and it doesm't really matter for the user.

      jumped at the concept of switching architectures on the suggestion of an industry shill at a conference?

      It sounds like intel offered to give him a new* and better computer do the work of upgrading him to said better computer (which is probablly quite considerable given the system built for him arround it) and then support that computer afterwards for free. I'm not surprised he took the offer.

      *Afaict laptops that are carted arround all the time have a finite lifetime so in an application like this you probablly do want to replace the laptop every so often.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    12. Re:One word a minute by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      There are differences between AMD & Intel in the newer technologies.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    13. Re:One word a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Among his most commonly used phrases is "Einstein was a fucking retard" and "Excuse me, I've soiled myself again"

    14. Re:One word a minute by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      If an education is about how to learn, the professor should be better able to turn the projector on than the technician.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  4. DecTalk is a warhorse by assemblerex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why the Dectalk hate? It served the world well for many many years and will for a lot longer than most people think.

    1. Re:DecTalk is a warhorse by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      What hate? I don't see any hate. Nobody has posted anything negative about DECTalk. I don't think asking why someone uses a 30 year old electronic device when newer and therefore likely more capable options exist is hate. Actually I'd be really interested to hear some reasons. Are the technical considerations as well as peference here? Does DECTalk posses some unique quality that is not easily replicated?

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    2. Re:DecTalk is a warhorse by ciderbrew · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe he want to keep using it as it is now *his* voice. Beyond any technical issue, that bit of kit is synonymous with him and he doesn't want it replaced upgraded or changed.

    3. Re:DecTalk is a warhorse by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      He regards it as HIS voice.

      Would you want somebody to replace your voice with 'something a bit more more modern'?

      --
      No sig today...
    4. Re:DecTalk is a warhorse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I just heard a podcast the other day, NPR's "Fresh Air", with author Kitty Ferguson about her new Stephen Hawking biography, "An Unfettered Mind". She supposedly spent a lot of personal time with him writing this book and says that it's mainly him being resistant to change, and insisting on not being helped during conversation, for example. One word per minute seems awful limiting, as does having to have someone push you everywhere in your wheelchair, which he had to do after being reduced to the one cheek muscle... It seems he would be a lot better off with some new type of interface, gaze tracking perhaps? But, she says he is totally resistant to even attempting anything new.

    5. Re:DecTalk is a warhorse by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Does DECTalk posses some unique quality that is not easily replicated?

      It is Hawkings voice.

    6. Re:DecTalk is a warhorse by semi-extrinsic · · Score: 1

      According to the Wikipedia article linked, he identifies with its "voice", having used it for over 20 years. I can understand that, I would certainly be uncomfortable with an "upgrade" changing my voice to someone else's. Of course you could replicate the voice in a new machine, but if it ain't broke, don't fix it, I guess.

      --
      for i in `facebook friends "=bday" 2>/dev/null | cut -d " " -f 3-`; do facebook wallpost $i "Happy birthday!"; done
    7. Re:DecTalk is a warhorse by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Someone found recordings of his original voice and offered to build a voice around this, but Hawking said that he did not even recognise it as his own voice anymore ...

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    8. Re:DecTalk is a warhorse by Sockatume · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's a company in Edinburgh that's doing the same thing with Roger Ebert, drawing on the large body of recordings of his voice. Wonder if it's the same one.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    9. Re:DecTalk is a warhorse by martin-boundary · · Score: 5, Funny
      I could totally see Hawking with the voice of HAL 9000.

      Student: What if I integrate this term on the left here?

      Hawking: I'm afraid you can't do that, Dave.

    10. Re:DecTalk is a warhorse by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

      He regards it as HIS voice.

      Would you want somebody to replace your voice with 'something a bit more more modern'?

      If it allows me to communicate at a significantly higher speed than earlier, then maybe.

    11. Re:DecTalk is a warhorse by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      the DEC talk is easily replicated. AT&T 's voice project has a version that sounds identical to a DEC talk.

      It's called, when you have a genius that wants what he wants, you give him what he wants.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    12. Re:DecTalk is a warhorse by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      Oh hell yes,

      I want http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zapp_Brannigan as my voice.

      Or to sound like the movie phone guy all the time.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    13. Re:DecTalk is a warhorse by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      There are three parts to the system, the controller (which has changed several times as his ALS has progressed), the interface which he is used to and can operate easily, and does much more than speech (it controls the chair, his home, Voip phone etc...) and the speech synthesiser which seems to be in two parts (software which is up to date, and the voice generator which is still the old hardware)

      Updating the speech synth is impossible without changing the voice

      the interface software is old, but he is used to it and it is fast enough ...

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    14. Re:DecTalk is a warhorse by ae1294 · · Score: 2

      You know I think we are forgetting that the guy is 70! What guy that age is happy about anything new.

    15. Re:DecTalk is a warhorse by gman003 · · Score: 1

      Would you want somebody to replace your voice with 'something a bit more more modern'?

      Yes, please.

    16. Re:DecTalk is a warhorse by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It isn't a new thing. People have been using voice samples for speech synthesis for years now. It sounds more natural. The only new-ish thing here is getting those samples from recordings of normal speech rather than a dedicated session in a sound booth.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    17. Re:DecTalk is a warhorse by karnal · · Score: 1

      Duh, the recently divorced who want some arm candy, that's who.

      --
      Karnal
    18. Re:DecTalk is a warhorse by Sockatume · · Score: 2

      The novelty in this case is that they're offering Ebert's voice to Ebert as a prosthesis.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    19. Re:DecTalk is a warhorse by operagost · · Score: 1

      Or Don LaFontaine. Although you'd have to preface everything with, "In a world..."

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    20. Re:DecTalk is a warhorse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More important, why PC? Poor guy has to work with windows?

    21. Re:DecTalk is a warhorse by petermgreen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The big difference between Ebert and hawkings situation is that ebert was only forced to use a speech synth fairly recently. So probablly more people are going to know him by his natural voice than by the synth he uses.

      Hawking has been using that speech synth for many years and I strongly suspect more people know him by that voice than know him by his natural voice.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    22. Re:DecTalk is a warhorse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a world...where I can't reach the top shelf...can you get me the box of Cheerios?

    23. Re:DecTalk is a warhorse by drfreak · · Score: 1

      Totally. Sean Connery with a dash of Dwane "The Rock" Johnson, please; that is my first request. Next, I'd like the ability to choose or mix voices as the mood arises. Arnold as The Terminator also comes to mind. Imagine if you could change voices on the fly... "F*** you, a**hole!" I'd personally put that on my answering machine for blocked CID numbers.

  5. Wrong question by Viol8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "asking why someone uses a 30 year old electronic device when newer and therefore likely more capable options exist"

    You should be asking - why someone WOULDN'T use a 30 year old device when it does everything they need it to do. Not everyone thinks upgrading for the sake of it is a worthwhile pursuit especially if its as critical as your only means to communicate.

    1. Re:Wrong question by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      From my experience.. the 30 year old device is built better, higher quality and will continue to operate for another 50 years. Unlike the utter crap that is available today that you will be lucky to keep working for 5 years.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Wrong question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      let's compare your sony walkman to my ipod flash. we'll both throw them up in the air and have them hit the concrete and see which still works? keep your stupid ill thought generalizations to yourself please.

    3. Re:Wrong question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a plan. your cracked screen = broken.

      the walkman WILL continue to work.

      Keep your low IQ to yourself please.

    4. Re:Wrong question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's because the utterly crap devices from thirty years ago haven't survived.

    5. Re:Wrong question by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      You should be asking - why someone WOULDN'T use a 30 year old device when it does everything they need it to do.

      Talk about an unstated major premise!

      "I don't get why you want to replace your beowulf cluster of Commodore 64's when they do everything you need them to do!"

    6. Re:Wrong question by maztuhblastah · · Score: 1

      From my experience.. the 30 year old device is built better, higher quality and will continue to operate for another 50 years. Unlike the utter crap that is available today that you will be lucky to keep working for 5 years.

      Confirmation bias ahoy!

      There was *plenty* of crappy hardware back in the 70s/80s. It's just that the crappy stuff never lasted long enough for geeks like you and I to get all nostalgic about it.

    7. Re:Wrong question by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      I was alive 30 years ago. (1981)
      Believe me, the things back then were by far not built better with higher quality. Nor will they continue to operate for another 50 years.
      I've come to one conclusion about things from the past, and our feelings. Things from the past seem to last longer than things in the present because the few items that were built decently survived until the current day. The same has happened since the beginning of creation, and continues with our items even today.

      Most televisions from 1981 were horrid.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    8. Re:Wrong question by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      When was the last time you threw a sony walkman up in the air and let it hit concrete?
      It's not just the front that shatters... that happens when it slips out of your hand... much less from a large distance.

      Check, and mate.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    9. Re:Wrong question by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      appending: at the speed necessary, since faster is not possible as the interface is the issue not the processing.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    10. Re:Wrong question by oursland · · Score: 1

      Check, and mate.

      Keep your snarky self-congratulating to yourself.

      My experience is that the older equipment tended to be more durable than modern glass-screened devices of today.

    11. Re:Wrong question by giorgist · · Score: 1

      A 30 year old working device has gone through the natural selection and survived. There is a scrap heap somewhere of devices that where made 30 years ago that didn't last a week.

      Modern devices are a lot more reliable, but picking the 30 year survivor in it's first month is not very easy.

    12. Re:Wrong question by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Materials science has come a long way. That flimsy looking device can probably take quite a bit more of a beating than older devices in the same class. How about Gorilla Glass, did that exist back then? The problem with comparing older stuff to newer is selection bias, many times the 1% that are still working are seen, rather than the millions that broke.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  6. Typo in summary by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 4, Funny

    Lately he's been trouble speaking due to weakened cheek muscles (down to one word per minute).

    I see Slashdot's come up with a simple solution that just involves skipping words that don't seem necessary :)

    1. Re:Typo in summary by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      Slashdot's ultimate goal is to have every summary be one word. It's a tribute to Hawking.

    2. Re:Typo in summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see Slashdot's come up with a simple solution that just involves skipping words that don't seem necessary :)

      Since I'm in Canada, and have to deal with the stupid-ass data caps, I appreciate the effort of Slashdot to save on my monthly bit allowance.

    3. Re:Typo in summary by gman003 · · Score: 2

      Tommorows headlines:
      Politics
      Microsoft
      iPad
      China
      Nuclear
      Cat

      Arguments in comment threads will continue much as they have, since few people read even the summary before wading into the flamewars. The only complaint they'll have tomorrow is not knowing whether to argue about nuclear power, or nuclear weapons, in the "Nuclear" story.

    4. Re:Typo in summary by operagost · · Score: 1

      They accidentally the verb.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  7. Same for everyone with recordings of their voice by Viol8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    None of us really recognise our recorded voice as our own even though we know it is so I guess thats not much of a surprise especially given that 30 years has passed in his case too. I'd be interested to know what Hawkings internal voice in his head sounds like - is it his original voice or is it his speech synthesizer?

  8. Hawking's New Customized PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, look, it's just a clunky Lenovo laptop. Big whoop.

  9. The most profound mystery in the Universe is ... by Framboise · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the Telegraph link, we happily learn:

    In an interview with the New Scientist magazine to mark his 70th birthday on Sunday, January 8, he was asked: "What do you think most about during the day?" to which he replied: "Women. They are a complete mystery."

  10. DEC flags by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Why does this story have the digital flag on it? Yeah, it involves DECTalk, but that's all it takes to make it about DEC? Had the story been DEC centric and about various DEC technologies, such as VAX, OpenVMS, Alpha, DECNET, Clustering or PDP, then I'd agree, and there could be an interesting (depending on one's POV) discussion about it. But since none of that is involved here, except DECTalk, how does that alone make this a story about DEC?

    1. Re:DEC flags by vlm · · Score: 1

      your alternative is what, put the Apple flag on it?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:DEC flags by unixisc · · Score: 1

      No, given what the story was, use whatever flags are used for Science, Thinkpad or Hardware. Preferably the first 2. Not Digital or Intel - the technologies that he uses aren't Intel-centric either, such as Paragon or Itanium. Simply using an off the shelf laptop like Thinkpad doesn't by itself make it an Intel story.

  11. What about Dasher with eye control? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have often wondered whether Hawkins has ever tried using dasher.

    http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/dasher/

    Occurs to me it is ideal for people with very little or no physical mobility

    http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/dasher/SpecialNeeds.html

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0d6yIquOKQ0

    Just a thought....

  12. US Customs, TSA by Tokolosh · · Score: 2

    What does he do when US Customs decides to take his computer for a year of analysis? How the hell does he get by the TSA? Or is he just one of many influential people who avoid traveling to the USA?

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    1. Re:US Customs, TSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or he is smart enough to overnight it via UPS.

    2. Re:US Customs, TSA by Flipstylee · · Score: 1

      What does he do when US Customs decides to take his computer for a year of analysis? How the hell does he get by the TSA? Or is he just one of many influential people who avoid traveling to the USA?

      Considering who he is, he could probably go about anywhere provided he is physically able,
      and, i seem to remember an article here in the past few days of him floating in a space sim of some sort.

      Usually this executive treatment in society sincerely pisses me off, but all things considered, provided
      he doesn't go senile in his old age, i can't say i mind it.

      My opinion.

    3. Re:US Customs, TSA by ae1294 · · Score: 2

      What does he do when US Customs decides to take his computer for a year of analysis? How the hell does he get by the TSA? Or is he just one of many influential people who avoid traveling to the USA?

      They think he is their robotic overlord.

    4. Re:US Customs, TSA by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      Isn't it attached to his wheelchair? They would have to take both. I could just see them (stereotypical TSA goons) wheeling him to the curb on a rental luggage cart, then dumping him next to the bus lane for the 25 cent refund. Have they done that to anyone yet?

    5. Re:US Customs, TSA by Amouth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Simple - don't fly on the mass transit passenger planes.. Private charter planes do not have to go through TSA check points.. So the real rich and government guys never even experience it..

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    6. Re:US Customs, TSA by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      What does he do when US Customs decides to take his computer for a year of analysis?

      Probably the same thing he does when a meteor hits his house. Nothing, since it's so rare that it's unlikely to happen in the average persons lifetime.

  13. Re:The most profound mystery in the Universe is .. by vlm · · Score: 2

    This opens up a million (bad) quantum mechanics Heisenberg Uncertainty principle jokes.
    Women, either you're drunk, or they don't make any sense, never both at the same time (which is closer to a pauli exclusionary principle joke I guess)
    or
    something to do with their emotional state being an unknown quantity until the wavefunction collapses?

    In Hawkings honor, any black hole thermodynamics jokes? I'm thinking something along the lines of every time a male makes a mistake that information never escapes past the female event horizon, or make something weird (even for me) involving sex, virtual particle emission, and childbirth?

    As a closely related issue, everyone is aware that there exists "nerdy hiphop rap". But does anyone know of "nerdy stand up comedy"? Clearly this post shows I'm not cut out to blaze a trail thru that new genre, but the non-internet equivalent of /. +1 funny mod must exist for some sorta technical stand up comedian? I just want to hear someone say the F word 6 times per minute while saying something funny about microsoft, to laughing drunks, or something like that. The closest I can think of is some podcasts like "the phone show" by the PLA, but thats not quite it.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  14. Re:What about Dasher with eye control? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    As I understand it, Hawking is limited to a single muscle effectively acting as a boolean switch.
    Dasher, cool as it may be, requires more interaction than that.
    I've tried Dasher years ago; the speed you can achieve is suprisingly high with a very short learning curve. Though I've never seen a practical application of it; it seems more like a proof-of-concept than an actual usable product.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  15. Speechfx still makes DECtalk RT available by ccandreva · · Score: 1

    The article says the company that made the synth is out of business, yet the wikipedia entry for DECtalk links to the company that owns the rights, and it looks like they still make an RT available for linux:
    http://www.speechfxinc.com/dectalk_linux.php

  16. Re:The most profound mystery in the Universe is .. by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

    The only nerd comedian I can think of at the moment is Dan Telfer, but I'm sure there are more.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  17. The real question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how many cats per library of congress?

  18. Re:The most profound mystery in the Universe is .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm... MC Chris, one of the "nerdcore" rappers, does standup lite at his shows. It's been about 4 years since I went to his show, but IIRC maybe a quarter of the whole show was comedy. He's like nerdcore for non-nerds though. Or a different type of nerd than the Slashdot nerd. I recall him going on and on with references to a movie called Goonies, which I have never seen and have barely heard of.

  19. Three stories... by Vary+Krishna · · Score: 1

    ...about Stephen Hawking's personal life in two weeks. Not that he isn't a fascinating man, but with this much coverage I have to wonder if he's hired a new PR guy or something...

    1. Re:Three stories... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      might be because hes turning 70..

  20. Emotiv by DeFKnoL · · Score: 2

    Has no one thought to give him an emotiv? It seems like he could even map out each letter or even words with one of those. http://emotiv.com/

  21. windows?! by Cyko_01 · · Score: 1

    Of those who read the article and watched the youtube videos (a small percentage, I know), was I the only one who was slightly disappointed to see the windows 7 logo come up on the screen when they turned it on?

  22. Re:The most profound mystery in the Universe is .. by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1

    Most bad comment made by Hawking at my sense. Lack of imagination and originality in this very used bad macho joke. But I guess everyone is supposed to find it cute since it's from Hawking.

    --
    Achille Talon
    Hop!
  23. Re:Same for everyone with recordings of their voic by davewoods · · Score: 1

    What an astute observation... I wonder as well. Maybe someone out there will see this and get the courage up to ask him.

    On a similar note: I have asked multi-lingual people which language they think in, and they have all said that they just go with whichever is more accurate, or sounds better. Like if they were primarily Spanish speaking, but also fluent in English, and they were thinking of the phrase "To be thrown out of a window" in Spanish (I am not even going to bother figuring out what it really is in Spanish, I could Google Translate, but then again, so could you), it would just be easier to use the English word "Defenestrate".

  24. Brain Computer interface by MistabewM · · Score: 1

    Why not set him up with a brain computer interface?. At its most basic level it should work as well if not better / faster then his cheek switch.

    --
    "A learning experience is one of those things that says, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.'" - DNA
  25. Re:The most profound mystery in the Universe is .. by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

    Slow down, white knight. Defending women on Slashdot isn't going to get you laid.

  26. Lame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No Wi-Fi. Less space than a nomad. Lame.

  27. If a monkey can control by iplayfast · · Score: 1

    If a monkey can control a robotic arm with 7 degrees of freedom http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnWSah4RD2E
    http://singularityhub.com/2010/06/12/monkey-controls-robot-arm-with-7-degrees-of-freedom-video/
    http://www.physorg.com/news194796581.html
    you would think a brain implant would be a useful thing at this point for him. Yes it is a risk, but really, wouldn't it be worth it?

  28. Re:Same for everyone with recordings of their voic by Novus · · Score: 1

    Like if they were primarily Spanish speaking, but also fluent in English, and they were thinking of the phrase "To be thrown out of a window" in Spanish (I am not even going to bother figuring out what it really is in Spanish, I could Google Translate, but then again, so could you), it would just be easier to use the English word "Defenestrate".

    The Spanish word is "defenestrar". I suspect a better example would be something specific to a certain culture, e.g. "vihta" in Finnish.

  29. Re:Same for everyone with recordings of their voic by davewoods · · Score: 1

    Drat... I knew I should have looked that up first, does that mean I lose nerd points?

  30. Re:What about Dasher with eye control? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is perfect for the thought I had:

    Eye tracking. Presumably he can still move his eyes and look around, and there's already an IR camera tracking light mounted on his glasses. Convert that into an eye-tracking camera, connect it to this software.. Revolutionize!

    Actually, this software looks like it'd be pretty good for cell phone input as well. Maybe it couldn't beat real typing, but it might help fix spelling errors.

  31. Breathing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is he still able to breathe by himself? If so, could he use timed breathing as a method of data-entry?

  32. Re:Same for everyone with recordings of their voic by Novus · · Score: 1

    I'd say you lose nerd points not just for not bothering to look it up, but for failing to recognise that the "English" term you mention is, essentially, Latin, and therefore very likely to occur in languages related to Latin.

    Getting slightly more on-topic, I've found that being multi-lingual means you end up thinking about things in the language you normally use to communicate about them in. So, for example, I end up thinking about university administration in Finnish, the upcoming presidential election in Swedish and computer science in English. In part, this is simply to avoid making the effort to translate (for example, the admin staff at our university is predominantly Finnish-speaking), but also because some of the terminology may be unfamiliar in some languages (the more esoteric a subject is, the more likely it is that everything I read about it is in English) or simply not standardised.

  33. one word per minute by shnull · · Score: 0

    and still not giving up? in my church the main would definitely be a saint

    --
    beware he who denies you access to information for in his mind, he already deems himself to be your master (SMAC-ish)