Why are they trying to protect me? I'm over 21, and it's my damn money, if i want to throw it away on some stock certificates that might become useless, that should be entirely up to me.. Secondly the only one suffering if I mess up with the IPO investment is me, i pretty much game my money away.. so what it's MINE
really ? that's the same thing i tried.. guess what.. i'm typing this reply from M7:-) i like it.. the edit->preferences doesn't work right for me.. it's all messed up.. oh well.. too bad i don't have the time to help
"Linux is just beginning to be retrofitted for symmetric multiprocessing. " excuse me? "Windows NT Server Enterprise Edition ships with a full complement of Internet services, including Web, proxy, index, messaging, database, transaction and firewall services." To my knowledge you have to purchase all those features separately.. and the firewall "feature" that comes with M$ proxy is laughable.. He mentiones the above when he argues for "Windows supporters still outnumber Linux supporters because Microsoft provides a better value proposition" He hasn't even looked at ANY Linux distribution, because I know that all of the services he mentiones come standard with all the dists. I tried.. more FUD if you ask me..
Seems like they 'forgot' a couple of ports (maybe to make NT look less bad?) like the Corel netwinder (ARM), palmpilot (like someone else said), SGI's MIPS systems. And -plug- support for more is on the way.. see http://www.linuxce.org/ linux as a windows CE replacement on MIPS/SH3/(ARM maybe?) devices. -/plug- Their "table" said that NT4 supports IP masquerade, yah right.. win2K and the latest win98-osr2 ? support it (but who knows how good it's going to be).
They also claim that linux 2.2.x adds Raid support.. wasn't it an improved version of 2.0.x ?
Once again 4 intel ethernet cards
on
NOS Crossroads
·
· Score: 5
And again they are using 4 intel ethernet adapters, probably configured to do some sort of striping/loadsharing/whatever.. i think that's what gives NT it's edge in every benchmark.. I think there's going to be a lot more like this.. watch for the 4 ethernets:(
It shouldn't be to hard to implement into linux, bind 1 ip to 4 ethernets and send through whichever one is free..
Slashdot Mirror
I didn't get the letter but ...
.. so what it's MINE
:-)
Why are they trying to protect me?
I'm over 21, and it's my damn money, if i want to throw it away on some stock certificates that might become useless, that should be entirely up to me..
Secondly the only one suffering if I mess up with the IPO investment is me, i pretty much game my money away
rant off
Gerard Saraber
http://saraber.dhs.org
> And yes, porting Linux to it would be a fun thing to do.
be sure to check out www.linuxce.org
--
G.
really ? .. guess what.. i'm typing this reply from M7 :-) .. the edit->preferences doesn't work right for me .. it's all messed up .. oh well .. too bad i don't have the time to help
that's the same thing i tried
i like it
"Linux is just beginning to be retrofitted for symmetric multiprocessing. " .. and the firewall "feature" that comes with M$ proxy is laughable..
excuse me?
"Windows NT Server Enterprise Edition ships with a full complement of Internet services, including Web, proxy, index, messaging, database, transaction and firewall services."
To my knowledge you have to purchase all those features separately
He mentiones the above when he argues for "Windows supporters still outnumber Linux supporters because Microsoft provides a better value proposition"
He hasn't even looked at ANY Linux distribution, because I know that all of the services he mentiones come standard with all the dists. I tried.. more FUD if you ask me..
Seems like they 'forgot' a couple of ports (maybe to make NT look less bad?) like the Corel netwinder (ARM), palmpilot (like someone else said), SGI's MIPS systems. .. see http://www.linuxce.org/ linux as a windows CE replacement on MIPS/SH3/(ARM maybe?) devices. -/plug-
.. wasn't it an improved version of 2.0.x ?
And -plug- support for more is on the way
Their "table" said that NT4 supports IP masquerade, yah right.. win2K and the latest win98-osr2 ? support it (but who knows how good it's going to be).
They also claim that linux 2.2.x adds Raid support
And again they are using 4 intel ethernet adapters, probably configured to do some sort of striping/loadsharing/whatever .. i think that's what gives NT it's edge in every benchmark.. .. watch for the 4 ethernets :(
..
I think there's going to be a lot more like this
It shouldn't be to hard to implement into linux, bind 1 ip to 4 ethernets and send through whichever one is free