Investing in the American people? Silicon Valley regards them as deplorable. Dangerous people who have to be kept in check lest California lose all that sweet indentured labor from overseas.
What is the deal with people bowing down to show obedience to a major corporation's preferred nomenclature? We'll call them whatever we damn well please. Is this due to the gender confusion thing? Fuck what people think.
Well good, it will be nice for someone else to be hated for a while. It's way past time we Americans stopped serving the world and started helping ourselves. All we ever got for it was hate.
Your horrifying, genocidal comment reveals you went off the deep end quite some time ago and are now in a pit of evil darkness. I'm sorry your life is like this. I hope it gets better.
The rest of the world relies on America to develop the technology and pay for the development. Then they complain it's not good enough or they hate American cultural contamination. It's the no-win situation. The only winning move is not to play.
Seriously? Leading an article with Trump Derangement Syndrome? You know you people are a minority, right? It's not healthy to stay in echo chambers, you get the idea that everyone thinks like you do and deliberately inflammatory rhetoric is noncontroversial.
All I ever heard was how non-serious this was, and what a trivial violation it was, and mishandling top secret documents in a way that guaranteed they fell into the hands of Russian intelligence (It was a windows server computer and the program was **Microsoft remote desktop**. No shell requirement to get into her shit. It was that **easy**), and the only remediation should be mandated training for the personnel involved.
In the interest of consistency and fairness, the following must be done: an exoneration letter must be drafted in advance. Immunity given to top Trump aides. The #2 official's family has received large donations from Trump's political friends. Prior to the interview, the lead official meets privately on plane tarmac with Trump's wife (to discuss grandchildren). As long as they believe no harm was intended, he's let off the hook for any violations. Trump aides should be permitted to destroy subpoenaed or relevant public records and wipe relevant servers with a cloth or something.
Hillary proved beyond the shadow of a doubt that top government officials are exempt from these kind of laws. Why is it a surprise that the practice continues?
The mainstream media is not motivated by profit. Most of them don't make money any more. Now they are the mouthpieces of billionaires like Carlos Slim (New York Times) or Jeff Bezos (Washington Post). It turns out what "we" demand is incisive, detailed content that takes time to examine the issues. Have you seen the Joe Rogan show? The segments are 2-3 hours and he has millions of viewers. His recent triumph was with Tim Pool tearing the Twitter CEO and his media lapdog a new asshole for their obvious political bias. It was awesome. And your idea that our political and media establishment don't aspire to a world order is utterly false.
What you said is literally not true. You are fake news.
By providing a platform, the Times is implicitly endorsing each of these articles. If what was said was objectionable, the Times would naturally no-platform the offender.
'Memba when a New York Times reporter called Melania a hooker and they wouldn't even release the name of the reporter that said it, let alone fire her.
'Memba when NYT journalist Ali Watkins blamed Trump lawyers for leaks, while she was fucking a Senate committee staffer twice her age who was leaking her classified info? Her punishment? The journalist was reassigned and given a "mentor" instead of being fired for breaking one of the most basic rules of journalism.
'Memba when the New York Times praised a coup in Venezuela? And stated in print, falsely, "With yesterday's resignation of President Hugo ChÃvez, Venezuelan democracy is no longer threatened by a would-be dictator. Mr. ChÃvez, a ruinous demagogue, stepped down after the military intervened and handed power to a respected business leader, Pedro Carmona."
This is somewhat easy to misconstrue. Most people will take that as the data was used in the general election, when according to the mainstream media:
"In late September 2016, Cambridge and other data vendors were submitting bids to the Trump campaign. Then-candidate Trump's campaign used Cambridge Analytica during the primaries and in the summer because it was never certain the Republican National Committee would be a willing, cooperative partner. Cambridge Analytica instead was a hedge against the RNC, in case it wouldn't share its data.
The crucial decision was made in late September or early October when Mr. Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner and Brad Parscale, Mr. Trump's digital guru on the 2016 campaign, decided to utilize just the RNC data for the general election and used nothing from that point from Cambridge Analytica or any other data vendor. The Trump campaign had tested the RNC data, and it proved to be vastly more accurate than Cambridge Analytica's, and when it was clear the RNC would be a willing partner, Mr. Trump's campaign was able to rely solely on the RNC. "
Where this is heading is control. Drivers will no longer control their cars. The company (or the government, which is pretty much the same thing under the corporatist tyranny) will control the car. You'll have to satisfy their requirements, whatever they decide they might be, before the car will turn on. Then your destination will have to qualify. Going to the shooting range? Your car will decide if that's suitable for you or not.
They tried using exams to qualify voters, this is basic American history. It was racist as fuck, just like you. Of course you knew this when you wrote your comment because you are so worldly and wise.
Opera was bought out by the Chinese. They no longer make their own browser; it's Chrome with a skin. Most of the old Opera staff moved on to Vivaldi. If you want the old Opera back, Vivaldi is the closest thing you'll get.
Universal laws, universal moral truths, universal values. When people are oppressed by their governments, it is America's job to intervene and implement regime change. Just like we're doing in Venezuela right now.
What's that, China doesn't have any oil? Well they can have their own laws then, who cares?
Well it's about time, the world has been groaning under the weight of the fascist USA's corporate dystopia. America is the most widely hated nation on the planet, and with good reason. It's about time the world started fighting back.
Without the American market to absorb every piece of crap the world can shit out, who are they going to sell to? American money pays for the entire planet. Add to that the free-as-in-beer naval protection for the world's exports. EU profits handsomely from trade with the US, not so much from with China.
So the issue that American companies are getting hit with fines by European governments isn't a thing? Seriously? Because that's a thing. Where were they on the VW emissions scandal? Certainly not investigating their own. You know who broke the story? University of West Virginia. It took a bunch of toothless hillbillies from smack in the middle of flyover territory, inbred sister-fuckers...in a word; deplorables. You know something's wrong when they're right. Somehow the EU's vaunted investigations never find anything when it's their own companies.
And another oh-so-superior Europe supremacist jumps in the conversation to crap all over Americans and remind them just how stupid and culturally backwards we are. We know, we've heard it a million times. If anyone wonders why NATO failed, just refer to this comment. Have fun with your new buddies in Communist China. Bet they won't pay for your defense or let you rip them off for $150 billion a year in unfair trade agreements. Good riddance.
Slashdot Mirror
Investing in the American people? Silicon Valley regards them as deplorable. Dangerous people who have to be kept in check lest California lose all that sweet indentured labor from overseas.
Why don't you fund your own research and stop complaining about the Americans doing their own? Then you can have all the Celsius you want!!
Every American on Slashdot, an American website.
What is the deal with people bowing down to show obedience to a major corporation's preferred nomenclature? We'll call them whatever we damn well please. Is this due to the gender confusion thing? Fuck what people think.
You kissing Chinese ass either makes you a paid shill or a panda-hugger. Either way, fuck off, wumao.
Well good, it will be nice for someone else to be hated for a while. It's way past time we Americans stopped serving the world and started helping ourselves. All we ever got for it was hate.
Your horrifying, genocidal comment reveals you went off the deep end quite some time ago and are now in a pit of evil darkness. I'm sorry your life is like this. I hope it gets better.
The rest of the world relies on America to develop the technology and pay for the development. Then they complain it's not good enough or they hate American cultural contamination. It's the no-win situation. The only winning move is not to play.
Seriously? Leading an article with Trump Derangement Syndrome? You know you people are a minority, right? It's not healthy to stay in echo chambers, you get the idea that everyone thinks like you do and deliberately inflammatory rhetoric is noncontroversial.
All I ever heard was how non-serious this was, and what a trivial violation it was, and mishandling top secret documents in a way that guaranteed they fell into the hands of Russian intelligence (It was a windows server computer and the program was **Microsoft remote desktop**. No shell requirement to get into her shit. It was that **easy**), and the only remediation should be mandated training for the personnel involved.
In the interest of consistency and fairness, the following must be done: an exoneration letter must be drafted in advance. Immunity given to top Trump aides. The #2 official's family has received large donations from Trump's political friends. Prior to the interview, the lead official meets privately on plane tarmac with Trump's wife (to discuss grandchildren). As long as they believe no harm was intended, he's let off the hook for any violations. Trump aides should be permitted to destroy subpoenaed or relevant public records and wipe relevant servers with a cloth or something.
Hillary proved beyond the shadow of a doubt that top government officials are exempt from these kind of laws. Why is it a surprise that the practice continues?
The mainstream media is not motivated by profit. Most of them don't make money any more. Now they are the mouthpieces of billionaires like Carlos Slim (New York Times) or Jeff Bezos (Washington Post). It turns out what "we" demand is incisive, detailed content that takes time to examine the issues. Have you seen the Joe Rogan show? The segments are 2-3 hours and he has millions of viewers. His recent triumph was with Tim Pool tearing the Twitter CEO and his media lapdog a new asshole for their obvious political bias. It was awesome. And your idea that our political and media establishment don't aspire to a world order is utterly false.
What you said is literally not true. You are fake news.
By providing a platform, the Times is implicitly endorsing each of these articles. If what was said was objectionable, the Times would naturally no-platform the offender.
'Memba when Glenn Thrush of Politico was exposed seeking Podesta's approval of articles about Clinton. Even Thrush wrote "please don't tell anyone" and "I'm such a hack". The consequences for Thrush? He was hired by the New York Times after the election.
'Memba when a New York Times reporter called Melania a hooker and they wouldn't even release the name of the reporter that said it, let alone fire her.
'Memba when The New York Times used eliminationist rhetoric as the lead sentence of an article on the op-ed page in December 2009: "A message to progressives: By all means, hang Senator Joe Lieberman in effigy." Burning an effigy, like burning an American flag, is constitutionally protected symbolic speech. It is also about as eliminationist as speech can get, short of a true threat or incitement.
'Memba when New York Times advocated for authoritarian China-style government?
'Memba when NYT journalist Ali Watkins blamed Trump lawyers for leaks, while she was fucking a Senate committee staffer twice her age who was leaking her classified info? Her punishment? The journalist was reassigned and given a "mentor" instead of being fired for breaking one of the most basic rules of journalism.
'Memba when the New York Times praised a coup in Venezuela? And stated in print, falsely, "With yesterday's resignation of President Hugo ChÃvez, Venezuelan democracy is no longer threatened by a would-be dictator. Mr. ChÃvez, a ruinous demagogue, stepped down after the military intervened and handed power to a respected business leader, Pedro Carmona."
'Memba when the New York Times finally admitted in print to being a liberal newspaper?
"Proves"? You've got no proof. You're just engaging in conspiracy theory. The RNC had their own data.
This is somewhat easy to misconstrue. Most people will take that as the data was used in the general election, when according to the mainstream media:
"In late September 2016, Cambridge and other data vendors were submitting bids to the Trump campaign. Then-candidate Trump's campaign used Cambridge Analytica during the primaries and in the summer because it was never certain the Republican National Committee would be a willing, cooperative partner. Cambridge Analytica instead was a hedge against the RNC, in case it wouldn't share its data.
The crucial decision was made in late September or early October when Mr. Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner and Brad Parscale, Mr. Trump's digital guru on the 2016 campaign, decided to utilize just the RNC data for the general election and used nothing from that point from Cambridge Analytica or any other data vendor. The Trump campaign had tested the RNC data, and it proved to be vastly more accurate than Cambridge Analytica's, and when it was clear the RNC would be a willing partner, Mr. Trump's campaign was able to rely solely on the RNC. "
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-campaign-phased-out-use-of-cambridge-analytica-data-before-election/
If there's a table with a Nazi and ten people talking to him, you got a table with 11 Nazis.
Where this is heading is control. Drivers will no longer control their cars. The company (or the government, which is pretty much the same thing under the corporatist tyranny) will control the car. You'll have to satisfy their requirements, whatever they decide they might be, before the car will turn on. Then your destination will have to qualify. Going to the shooting range? Your car will decide if that's suitable for you or not.
Why am I not surprised to see praise for genocidal authoritarians. Sad.
They tried using exams to qualify voters, this is basic American history. It was racist as fuck, just like you. Of course you knew this when you wrote your comment because you are so worldly and wise.
Opera was bought out by the Chinese. They no longer make their own browser; it's Chrome with a skin. Most of the old Opera staff moved on to Vivaldi. If you want the old Opera back, Vivaldi is the closest thing you'll get.
Universal laws, universal moral truths, universal values. When people are oppressed by their governments, it is America's job to intervene and implement regime change. Just like we're doing in Venezuela right now.
What's that, China doesn't have any oil? Well they can have their own laws then, who cares?
Well it's about time, the world has been groaning under the weight of the fascist USA's corporate dystopia. America is the most widely hated nation on the planet, and with good reason. It's about time the world started fighting back.
Without the American market to absorb every piece of crap the world can shit out, who are they going to sell to? American money pays for the entire planet. Add to that the free-as-in-beer naval protection for the world's exports. EU profits handsomely from trade with the US, not so much from with China.
So the issue that American companies are getting hit with fines by European governments isn't a thing? Seriously? Because that's a thing. Where were they on the VW emissions scandal? Certainly not investigating their own. You know who broke the story? University of West Virginia. It took a bunch of toothless hillbillies from smack in the middle of flyover territory, inbred sister-fuckers...in a word; deplorables. You know something's wrong when they're right. Somehow the EU's vaunted investigations never find anything when it's their own companies.
And another oh-so-superior Europe supremacist jumps in the conversation to crap all over Americans and remind them just how stupid and culturally backwards we are. We know, we've heard it a million times. If anyone wonders why NATO failed, just refer to this comment. Have fun with your new buddies in Communist China. Bet they won't pay for your defense or let you rip them off for $150 billion a year in unfair trade agreements. Good riddance.