What does it matter if the car in your path is just temporarily passing at an intersection? If that's the case and you're moving brakes are still appropriate.
Your tying to use semantics to draw a line that just isn't there. Have your wife walk into a police station "not showing her genitals" and see what happens.
Nudity in film isn't a legal issue so the police have no say in the matter. It's a cultural issue, and our culture tends to perceives female frontal nudity as less explicit than male frontal nudity. Now when you have a woman spread-eagle on film, that's a different story.
Seriously, are trying to use the logic that something being natures way of getting creatures to do things vital to their survival is in any way contradictory to it being sexual?
No I'm not, that would be stupid. You implied pleasure==sex, I was simply pointing out how you are wrong.
if we are going to start arresting people for that behavior, or come up with a new crime to charge them with - fuck it. No public breastfeeding for you. Get over it. We don't need more shit to put people away for.
So what are you going to do to the woman who breastfeeds in public if you want her to stop but you don't want more silly things to ban people from doing?
There's loads of content on Facebook and MySpace that I'm not interested in seeing, but they'd barely have a functioning site if they removed it all just to satisfy my standards. Why should your disinterest in seeing a boob be any more relevant than my disinterest in a strangers wedding photo?
In case you haven't noticed, you can't really see a woman's genitals in a full frontal shot. Because of that, while it's true that you see a lot more female frontal nudity in movies then male frontal nudity you actually see a lot more male genitals than female genitals.
And yes you do see male genitals in R rated movies occasionally, as long as they aren't aroused it's allowed.
Has it occurred to you that breastfeeding feels good because pleasure is natures way of encouraging creatures to do things that are vital for their survival? You know, just like how eating, drinking and breathing all feel good too. Please don't tell me drinking a cold glass of water on a hot day is also a sexual act.
There is really something wrong with people who think if something feels good it must be bad.
One of the first things I do with a new computer is remap the caps lock to control. It's so much nicer having your favorite modifier on the home row then it is having a caps lock key I would use once a year at best. Why exactly would you hate to go back to that? Do you actually use your caps lock regularly for something?
Actually the cause of death may have been the trauma, or it may have been the rapid depressurization preceding that. The report wasn't able to determine which was the actual cause.
On a positive note however, at least it seems the depressurization knocked them unconscious quick enough that they didn't suffer much.
This just illustrates how ridiculous it is to talk about the age of a fictitious character.
Sure Bart Simpson is depicted as 10, but does that mean a 12 year old depicted as 18 wouldn't be illegal? Obviously not, because the agre they are depicted as isn't what is relevant.
The problem is that the Executive branch hires the admin who has been managing this data and we happen to be getting to the end of an administration that does everything they can to prevent the office of the president from being held accountable to the good citizens of our nation.
From the very beginning with Executive Order 13233 to the present day with Cheney claiming whatever he wants are personal papers. They just don't think we have any right to know what they are doing.
Wow, how high were you when you wrote that? I only skimmed it so I can't respond to the whole thing but you are however right that the lyric is quite dark. However that's fitting really since it's about Romeo and Juliet carrying out their suicides together. That being the case, the everlasting peace isn't really of the desirable sort either.
The inclusion of the lyric is not meant as an endorsement of either mutual suicide or wishing death on the Montague and Capulet clans, I am in fact a rather strict pacifist. Regardless the lyric has always struck me as hauntingly beautiful and so long ago it ended up in my sig file.
Hope that explanation satisfies you. Now please pass the bong.
I don't know really, I'm just trying to interpret what the article is saying. All I do know is that the algorithm is being used to ID your music, not theirs so that's why just tagging their music correctly is not an option.
You are responsible for who uses your computer to access websites in your name? How is that yuck? That would be true regardless of whether they said it.
They use the algorithm to determine what you're playing, not what they're playing. It sounds like they are saying they can figure out what song you are scrobbling without looking at the songs tag info.
They could run it in a virtual desktop that can be zoomed in and out like the iPhone web browser. That would make most apps at least somewhat usable probably.
Don't be obtuse. It's called solar power and it's a good thing. If we don't use that energy from the sun we'll need to get it some other way usually involving the release of unwanted chemicals into the atmosphere.
Slashdot Mirror
What does it matter if the car in your path is just temporarily passing at an intersection? If that's the case and you're moving brakes are still appropriate.
I'm not sure respect is the word you're looking for.
Nudity in film isn't a legal issue so the police have no say in the matter. It's a cultural issue, and our culture tends to perceives female frontal nudity as less explicit than male frontal nudity. Now when you have a woman spread-eagle on film, that's a different story.
No I'm not, that would be stupid. You implied pleasure==sex, I was simply pointing out how you are wrong.
Really, what exactly is the difference? Color? What if the photo of the real breasts is BW?
So what are you going to do to the woman who breastfeeds in public if you want her to stop but you don't want more silly things to ban people from doing?
There's loads of content on Facebook and MySpace that I'm not interested in seeing, but they'd barely have a functioning site if they removed it all just to satisfy my standards. Why should your disinterest in seeing a boob be any more relevant than my disinterest in a strangers wedding photo?
In case you haven't noticed, you can't really see a woman's genitals in a full frontal shot. Because of that, while it's true that you see a lot more female frontal nudity in movies then male frontal nudity you actually see a lot more male genitals than female genitals.
And yes you do see male genitals in R rated movies occasionally, as long as they aren't aroused it's allowed.
Has it occurred to you that breastfeeding feels good because pleasure is natures way of encouraging creatures to do things that are vital for their survival? You know, just like how eating, drinking and breathing all feel good too. Please don't tell me drinking a cold glass of water on a hot day is also a sexual act.
There is really something wrong with people who think if something feels good it must be bad.
One of the first things I do with a new computer is remap the caps lock to control. It's so much nicer having your favorite modifier on the home row then it is having a caps lock key I would use once a year at best. Why exactly would you hate to go back to that? Do you actually use your caps lock regularly for something?
Actually the cause of death may have been the trauma, or it may have been the rapid depressurization preceding that. The report wasn't able to determine which was the actual cause.
On a positive note however, at least it seems the depressurization knocked them unconscious quick enough that they didn't suffer much.
This just illustrates how ridiculous it is to talk about the age of a fictitious character.
Sure Bart Simpson is depicted as 10, but does that mean a 12 year old depicted as 18 wouldn't be illegal? Obviously not, because the agre they are depicted as isn't what is relevant.
Um, no. Why would it?
No, this is slashdot in a nutshell:
"Help! I'm in a nutshell! How did I get into this nutshell? Look at the size of this bloody great big nutshell."
The problem is that the Executive branch hires the admin who has been managing this data and we happen to be getting to the end of an administration that does everything they can to prevent the office of the president from being held accountable to the good citizens of our nation.
From the very beginning with Executive Order 13233 to the present day with Cheney claiming whatever he wants are personal papers. They just don't think we have any right to know what they are doing.
Wow, how high were you when you wrote that? I only skimmed it so I can't respond to the whole thing but you are however right that the lyric is quite dark. However that's fitting really since it's about Romeo and Juliet carrying out their suicides together. That being the case, the everlasting peace isn't really of the desirable sort either.
The inclusion of the lyric is not meant as an endorsement of either mutual suicide or wishing death on the Montague and Capulet clans, I am in fact a rather strict pacifist. Regardless the lyric has always struck me as hauntingly beautiful and so long ago it ended up in my sig file.
Hope that explanation satisfies you. Now please pass the bong.
I don't know really, I'm just trying to interpret what the article is saying. All I do know is that the algorithm is being used to ID your music, not theirs so that's why just tagging their music correctly is not an option.
You are responsible for who uses your computer to access websites in your name? How is that yuck? That would be true regardless of whether they said it.
Last.fm counts a song as played after you listen to half of it.
They use the algorithm to determine what you're playing, not what they're playing. It sounds like they are saying they can figure out what song you are scrobbling without looking at the songs tag info.
They can notify you when a band you might be interested is playing in the area, just subscribe to their recommended events calender or RSS feed.
They could run it in a virtual desktop that can be zoomed in and out like the iPhone web browser. That would make most apps at least somewhat usable probably.
Acute, obtuse. Either way it's just not right ;-)
There are plenty of LED traffic lights around me and I've never noticed any flicker. I imagine it isn't a problem.
Don't be obtuse. It's called solar power and it's a good thing. If we don't use that energy from the sun we'll need to get it some other way usually involving the release of unwanted chemicals into the atmosphere.