You are implying that masturbation arises from a partner with poor bedroom skills, that masturbation is a sign of a troubled relationship and that ideally no one would ever masturbate. You poor, deluded sap. You are part of the problem. PS - I hope you feel really guilty when you masturbate.
The "risk" involves death or permanent disability. And you are advocating that this risk is acceptable for something as simple as travel. Dear sir, where were you when they were handing out ethics? You are prepared to actually kill people to support your crackpot idea. You're just as bad as the terrorists.
Yeah because there are NO complications involved with sedation. You know, anyone can do it. You don't need any skill or equipment. Doctors are just lying to everyone else about the risks to prevent others from cashing in on their lucrative business..../sarcasm
After all, every patient eventually stops bleeding and becomes stable. 0/0 is a stable blood pressure. That's my favorite OR joke for when things are going wrong. My colleagues love me.
These would be very uncomfortable, perhaps enough such that behavioral indicators (how one bends or sits down) can be used effectively to narrow the profile of such people without resorting to physically checking everyone for scars.
Oh great - after you've had to take your shoes and belt off and deal with putting your laptop in the separate tray and put up with the obnoxious tone of the TSA employee who waved you through the metal detector and gave you a pat-down anyway, you get a calisthenics program! Do 10 sit ups, 10 jumping jacks, and bend over to touch your toes 10 times to see if you're moving adequately WHAT DO YOU MEAN YOU HAVE OSTEOARTHRITIS - Jack, get the cops here, we've got a terrorist....!
If you are removing publicly available (and seemingly correct) information about a competitor from a publicly available website, this can be easily be considered anticompetitive behaviour.
I smell a whole new breed of internet troll awakening.
Right. Proper climate science works with periods of at least 30 years, preferably 100. These show a hefty upward trend.
Your definition of "proper climate science" being "only looking at the window of data that supports my posit". How about broadening the window a little - say the last 2 million years? Yeah, the trend is quite evident - we're in a warming phase. Oh shit, wait, people were causing global warming 1 million years ago?
Carbon cycle - elementary school "natural science" class. For extra credit look up the water cycle and the nitrogen cycle as well, and I will give you a gold star.
Growing trees fix a lot of CO2 from the atmosphere. Mature trees only need enough carbon to replace losses due to falling leaves/branches, etc. Growth is not exponential, at one point you get diminishing returns as the optimal size/girth for the species is approached. GP is correct, trees not only fix carbon from atmospheric CO2 via photosynthesis but they also respire, re-releasing CO2 into the atmosphere. The difference between the two is only a few kg/hectare per year in a mature forest.
Yeah it's a classic example of post hoc rationalization. Current data has departed from the predicted doomsday scenario, so scapegoats are looked for to explain why the original theory is inaccurate - instead of accepting that perhaps the original theory was BS to start with. Best yet is that now the end of the world has been delayed, but somehow it's going to be worse. Send more dollars please!
Funny, where were all these self proclaimed climate change experts before "An Inconvenient Truth" was written?
Sure, if it makes you happy. By the way I have a coin that I say is worth 10 million dollars in my right pocket. And in my left pocket I wrote myself an IOU for 10 million dollars. Should I tell everyone how rich I am? Do you think this will improve my credit rating, or are they just going to look at my debts to third parties?
Slashdot Mirror
What, you want to make 100 billion dollars through an IPO and you moan because you might actually have to WORK?
Waiving a bunch of money. It was a typo, I hope, but still - lol. Sounds like a job for the Fed.
Eh, I guess you're too young to remember transatlantic phone calls in the pre-internet era.
You are implying that masturbation arises from a partner with poor bedroom skills, that masturbation is a sign of a troubled relationship and that ideally no one would ever masturbate. You poor, deluded sap. You are part of the problem. PS - I hope you feel really guilty when you masturbate.
Of course they're not property. They're more like a sort of pet.
He avoids them by not confusing his right hand with a "wife" or "girlfriend" as you obviously do.
You don't get it. Bitcoin transactions are VIRTUALLY anonymous, not REALLY anonymous.
That has never stopped the US patent office from granting a patent before...
willfully allow infringement
Yes and women who willfully allow themselves to be raped should be stoned to death. See how fun this logic is?
The "risk" involves death or permanent disability. And you are advocating that this risk is acceptable for something as simple as travel. Dear sir, where were you when they were handing out ethics? You are prepared to actually kill people to support your crackpot idea. You're just as bad as the terrorists.
Yeah because there are NO complications involved with sedation. You know, anyone can do it. You don't need any skill or equipment. Doctors are just lying to everyone else about the risks to prevent others from cashing in on their lucrative business.... /sarcasm
After all, every patient eventually stops bleeding and becomes stable. 0/0 is a stable blood pressure. That's my favorite OR joke for when things are going wrong. My colleagues love me.
I have a pacemaker, you insensitive clod...
These would be very uncomfortable, perhaps enough such that behavioral indicators (how one bends or sits down) can be used effectively to narrow the profile of such people without resorting to physically checking everyone for scars.
Oh great - after you've had to take your shoes and belt off and deal with putting your laptop in the separate tray and put up with the obnoxious tone of the TSA employee who waved you through the metal detector and gave you a pat-down anyway, you get a calisthenics program! Do 10 sit ups, 10 jumping jacks, and bend over to touch your toes 10 times to see if you're moving adequately WHAT DO YOU MEAN YOU HAVE OSTEOARTHRITIS - Jack, get the cops here, we've got a terrorist....!
I will fail to mention that FLIR cannot see though glass...
If you are removing publicly available (and seemingly correct) information about a competitor from a publicly available website, this can be easily be considered anticompetitive behaviour.
I smell a whole new breed of internet troll awakening.
You can't write off MMO fees.
Right. Proper climate science works with periods of at least 30 years, preferably 100. These show a hefty upward trend.
Your definition of "proper climate science" being "only looking at the window of data that supports my posit". How about broadening the window a little - say the last 2 million years? Yeah, the trend is quite evident - we're in a warming phase. Oh shit, wait, people were causing global warming 1 million years ago?
Carbon cycle - elementary school "natural science" class. For extra credit look up the water cycle and the nitrogen cycle as well, and I will give you a gold star.
Are you seriously trying to equate climate research with classical physics? Rofl, thanks for the laugh.
How anyone cannot see that a decade is absolutely insignificant on a geologic time scale is beyond me.
Growing trees fix a lot of CO2 from the atmosphere. Mature trees only need enough carbon to replace losses due to falling leaves/branches, etc. Growth is not exponential, at one point you get diminishing returns as the optimal size/girth for the species is approached. GP is correct, trees not only fix carbon from atmospheric CO2 via photosynthesis but they also respire, re-releasing CO2 into the atmosphere. The difference between the two is only a few kg/hectare per year in a mature forest.
Yeah it's a classic example of post hoc rationalization. Current data has departed from the predicted doomsday scenario, so scapegoats are looked for to explain why the original theory is inaccurate - instead of accepting that perhaps the original theory was BS to start with. Best yet is that now the end of the world has been delayed, but somehow it's going to be worse. Send more dollars please!
Funny, where were all these self proclaimed climate change experts before "An Inconvenient Truth" was written?
As long as no children/kittens are strangled in the product's production, what do I care how much the developer got paid for it?
How do you feel about puppies?
Sure, if it makes you happy. By the way I have a coin that I say is worth 10 million dollars in my right pocket. And in my left pocket I wrote myself an IOU for 10 million dollars. Should I tell everyone how rich I am? Do you think this will improve my credit rating, or are they just going to look at my debts to third parties?