Slashdot Mirror


User: dfries

dfries's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
234
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 234

  1. Re:Pilot Precise V5 on When Word Processors Are Out: What's The Best Pen? · · Score: 1
    I read the blurb on the main page, and then thought I might just write that I've been using the ink pens with liquid ink at work, and I fliped over the pen on my home desk, 'Pilot Precise Rolling Ball V5 Extra Fine,' and it is the same one this guy is talking about. The ones at work seem better, but I don't remember what kind they are.

    I can't say anything about the price though, it has been a long time since I bought them at home, and I just stop by the secretary at work for more.

    You can always get the squeezy grips to put on a pen. I've been happy with the pens are theyare.

    • Good points
    • not much presure needed
    • very sharp consistent lines (compared to non liquid lines)
    • black, red, blue, green, and like vim I like the brigher colors
    • tradeoffs
    • can't think while the pen is on the paper, you will soak through to the next layer
    • they bleed more if you get the paper wet
    • don't ever crack one open
    • they always seem to have a lid, which takes two hands
  2. Re:Hmm on Booting Linux Faster · · Score: 1
    Quick answer, it is faster but no I don't recommend it for most Linux systems. I'm using it on my laptop, but not my other systems.

    There are bound to be other ill effects of programs that expect the file access times to be updated. I've been running my laptop like this for years, but then I don't do e-mail on it, or many other demanding programs.

    Mail on Unix has three states, no mail, read mail, and new mail. Some programs bash and others will periodically look at your mail file to see which state it is in. No mail is easy, zero sized file, or no file. The other two are more trickey. There is the access time and modification time of the file. Writing to a file updates the modification time, reading from a file updates the access time. If the modification time is later there is mail that hasn't been read yet, if the access time is later you've already read the mail.

    So, if you tell the computer not to update the atime your computer will tell you that you have new mail every time a program checks even if you've read it.

    I think the noatime option came about because of the usenet news servers and the vast quantity of files that were continually being read, so they were in memory, but everytime they were read the atime needed to be updated and something needed to be written to disk.

  3. Re:TV license ? on Slashback: Blaster, Sabers, Canada · · Score: 1
    That's why you use a VCR. That way you don't even have to be around when the show is on, and you can watch it in 3/4 the time it took them to broadcast. That's if you find the whole thing interesting enought to watch. Some shows you just want to see how it ends, stop, ff, play. Couldn't be easier.

    (Unless you wanted to play ~$10/month).

  4. KDE? That's your problem. on Booting Linux Faster · · Score: 1

    I just timed it, KDE took just over 35 seconds to start on my system. I use fvwm, it is hardder to time, but I got something like 2 seconds.

  5. Re:Hmm on Booting Linux Faster · · Score: 2, Interesting
    For me it is in /etc/cron.daily/find
    rm it.

    If you can stand it, add "noatime" to /etc/fstab for your Linux partitions. You will always have 'new mail' mail instead of just 'mail', but if things are just reading from the drive, the drive can actually spin down instead of having to write just to say what it read.

  6. Re:PowerPC Linux users had compiled boot 'scripts' on Booting Linux Faster · · Score: 1
    My biggest complaint of the latest RedHat 9 is how many times it causes the monitor to loose sink on bootup. It seems like it is five or six times. Why does it have to change the default fonts and what ever other reason it does. YOu can't see what is going on in boot because your monitor is off half the time and when it gets done it clears the screen.

    Then when you login it sets the console to unicode blanking the screen yet again, so you have to wait before you can see anything. It does something that causes the screen to resync everytime you switch between the virtual consoles, so you can't hardly use those.

    I'm sure glad I use Debian at home.

  7. Re:blackout? on Mars at Opposition - Earth at Transitition · · Score: 1
    I did get out and look and it was brighter than I expected. There are only a few stars visible in the middle of the sky (St. Louis area), and none around Mars, but Mars definately outshone the background.

    It didn't seem red at all to me though.

    I don't mind all the lights when I'm out for a late night walk, but I sure would like to see the starts once and a while.

    We should come out with one day of the month when all outdoor lights are required to be off for three hours in the middle of the night. That way we wouldn't have to schedule power outages to see stars and people might just be more interested in the space program.

  8. Re:Well on "Stolen" SCO Linux Code Snippets Leaked · · Score: 1

    And the GPL license they were distributing Linux under earlier this year is?

  9. Re:Genious! on Russia Plans Martian Nuclear Station · · Score: 1
    It seems to me that the only economical way to do it is to use as much of the local material as they can, and ship what they can't (Uranium, comes to mind). After all Mars is rockey (concrete), red (iron), or is it red because of rust (Fe2O3 and CO2 from the air, gives you metal and water).

    For what? If it ends up supporting even just the six engineers (and wives if they already have had children see the comments about radiation), I would say it is worth it. It proves that someone can get people to the red planet and we can survive there. People are bound to go back. Of course that didn't happen for the moon.

    Um, what an I thinking, we can't let those Russians beat US to Mars. Call up NASA and tell them the space race is on again! O, and tell them to chuck the shuttle and start again.

  10. Re:SHIT. on Russia Plans Martian Nuclear Station · · Score: 1
    Come on now, the article was talking about building the power plant, not shipping the electricity!

    That makes one thing though. How long were people without power in New York? If they only have one power plant on Mars, and it stops, How long are you going to be able to hold your breath until it starts going again?

  11. What's her slashdot username? on Ask the 'Geek Candidate' for California Governor · · Score: 1

    She reads Slashdot? What's her username? You can't be serious about slashdot without having one.

  12. Re:Image gallery /.'ed on Ask the 'Geek Candidate' for California Governor · · Score: 1

    How can an image gallery with two images be slashdoted? This isn't a web cam, stop reloading they won't change every five minutes.

  13. Re:Get up and walk. on Getting Back Into Shape While At The Office? · · Score: 1
    What was the common form of heart disease before 1910? Or did they just start cutting people open to see what really killed them?

    My grandmother had a heart attack and she was blaming the unhealthy food she ate as a kid. Less sweets, but much more cream and the like.

  14. USPS might be the cheapest, but it is too slow on Mailing Disks is Faster than Uploading Data · · Score: 1
    I live almost 7 miles away from my parents and mailed a letter by the US Postal Service box at my apartment complex on a Monday. That Monday was a holiday. If I had wanted to I could have walked to their house in under three hours, or drove it in about 15 minutes. But I put 37 cents on the letter.

    It has been postmarked on Tuesday, the day after I mailed it, but they didn't receive it until the following Monday. An entire week after I mailed it. Why it would take that long to get there I have no clue.

    Maybe there is a lesson to be learned. Being lazy isn't always the fastest way to get something done.

  15. Re:Last time with ISO protocols. on U.S. DoD Commits To IPv6 · · Score: 1
    I tried. Bill Stewart was correct at saying 1988. I even went back to my networking book before I posted it and still typed it in wrong.

    Sorry.

  16. Last time with ISO protocols. on U.S. DoD Commits To IPv6 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    In 1998 the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) mandated that equipment must support the ISO protocols (rather than TCP/IP) or demonstrate how their systems could support them. It was expected the commercial sector would adopt the ISO standards. It didn't happen, computers were shipped with ISO-compliant code, but people kept using TCP/IP. The requirement was dropped in 1994.

    It is definitely a good thing, but the US isn't going to shift to IPv6 just because one government department has decided to use it. It will happen by people getting involved with IPv6. Jump on the 6-bone today.

    www.freenet6.net, it's free.

  17. Re:Slight wording difference on USB 1.1 Renumbered To USB 2? · · Score: 1
    What is with all these companies and bits per second anyway? It isn't like they can send 5 bits and and stop. Sure it is a serial connection of 1 bit at a time at the physical connection, but didn't hear people talking about how wide scsi could send 10 mega-short-integers per second. Assuming short integers are 16 bits each. No, they just said 20megabytes per second. I think it is time for them to renumber everything to use bytes per second (with kilo, mega, giga, tera, as acceptible prefixes.)

    The merits for adpoting of KiB, MiB, and GiB as some Linux tools have adpoted will be discussed at a future date.
    Ranting
    Reference

  18. Re:Not everyone can afford cable.... on Putting the TV Broadcast Spectrum to Better Use? · · Score: 1

    I got cable when we were at war, I just didn't find much else of interest to watch after that.

  19. Re:Not everyone can afford cable.... on Putting the TV Broadcast Spectrum to Better Use? · · Score: 1
    I get cable. But that is because I'm in an apartment and can't just put a big antenna on top of the house. I tried an amplified bunny ear antenna, but they could only pick three channels and two had two much static to be useful. Cable provides about 30 channels for $14.41 a month. That is much more than I wanted to pay for the 4 or so hours of tv I watched a month before Star Trek Enterprise finished their season.

    I'm really just watching what I could get over the airwaves for free if I could just get the signals. That is what I want.

  20. Re:Asounding Improvement! on Chicken Run · · Score: 2, Informative
    Two years with the mechanical catcher system, (2 year, 16 per your, 40 hours per week, 52 weeks per year, 5 works, 200,000 for the machine)
    2*16*40*52*5+200000=$532,800
    two years for 8 workers
    2*16*40*52*8=$532,480

    After two years the owners reduce their costs by,
    16*40*52*3 = $99,840 / year

    What chicken farm owner wouldn't go for it?

  21. Re:Kernel Series 2.2 on Kernel 2.2 - It Lives! · · Score: 1
    Where can I purchase this telephone?

    That's odd, I thought for sure I included the link, O-well, TuxScreen, but sorry they are all out according to the web page, Sold Out, your best bet it to look around for someone who wants to sell them. I have two, but I'm not looking to sell them.

    There are other Linux based phones out. One of them is SNOM. It is a VoIP phone as opposed to the TuxScreen which plugs in to the standard telephone jack. The TuxScreen has a 640x480 color screen while the SNOM has a tiny LCD window. One of my friends found the SNOM phone while browsing the web and I don't know anything more than what the web page says.

  22. Re:Kernel Series 2.2 on Kernel 2.2 - It Lives! · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm running 2.4.18 on my Telephone so I'm not so sure how long 2.2 will last in the embedded market either.

  23. Re:Bittersweet news on U.S. Army's Future Combat System Will Run Linux · · Score: 1
    How about a modification of GPL with a 'mechanisms of war' exclusion, so that pacifists can contribute code and be assured it can't be legally used to wage war.

    It is quite common for Licenses to exclude medical and or nuclear facilities. I assume it could be done for other industries as well. That being said you aren't responsible for the actions of others. If one of the uses for some code is to blow something up, as long as the pacifist didn't write it for that purpose they shouldn't feel like they made the bomb.

    Just by being a productive citizen you are paying taxes of which some goes to the military for making bombs. Excluding war time use for software seems about as smart as going on welfare so pacifits cost the government money rather than pay taxes to what makes bombs.

    Besides, if we started putting exclusions in our code on which groups can use or not use it things could get pretty bad pretty soon. Maybe couch potato war enthusiasts will start saying their code could not be used by those releasing anti-war encombered code. I'm sure a few people wouldn't mind adding, the following code may not be used by Microsoft corporation. They may just turn around and say their os may not be booted on computers that have run any open source software.

    I think many people would agree that we don't want to go down that route of restricting licenses absurdly.

  24. Re:Bittersweet news on U.S. Army's Future Combat System Will Run Linux · · Score: 1
    Tell that to the soldiers and the people they protect who die because their weapons system failed to function properly. The other side won't just lay down their rifles if yours jams.

    Very true! It's happened before it'll happen again. Take the GPS unit that gave the soldier's position instead of the enemy and had a bomb dropped on them, http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0114/p03s01-usmi.htm l call it user error, but maybe their system should reject fire coordinates that are at the same location as friendly troops.

  25. Re:Bittersweet news on U.S. Army's Future Combat System Will Run Linux · · Score: 1
    Quite possibly, but since they won't be required to release the source since they will be using it in-house (thus the GPL won't be in effect), we don't know if the public source tree will see much/any of it.

    Their customer is DOD right? That isn't exactly an extension of Boeing (last I checked).