Slashdot Mirror


Chicken Run

Applying modern technology to the task of corraling chickens for the slaughterhouse results in a chicken-catching machine that surprisingly is not as gruesome as it appears. Never thought about a "chicken vacuum" before? After reading this, you won't be able to get it out of your head. :) Sadly, scientists are already researching ways for the chickens to fight back.

550 comments

  1. It had to be said... by CptChipJew · · Score: 0, Funny

    Who needs machinery when you can just choke your chicken?

    --
    Vonal Declosion
    1. Re:It had to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, all the mods are jealous that they didn't get to it first. Classic Slash!

    2. Re:It had to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This got modded as Troll? You're joking right?

  2. but it's more humane! by sweeney37 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Some of the biggest fans are animal-rights groups, including People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. The machines are far more gentle on the birds than human handlers are. "We support using machines that reduce the panic, fear and horror of chickens," says Karen Davis of United Poultry Concerns, a Machipongo, Va., group that opposes eating chickens and also runs a sanctuary for a few lucky birds that manage to escape the farms (usually by falling off a truck).

    They do realize the bird's final destination, right?

    Mike

    1. Re:but it's more humane! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm all for reducing the "panic, fear, and horror" of chickens. Animals that die scared don't taste as good, because the chemical soup that gets released into the bloodstream (adrenaline and so on) gives the meat a tainted flavor. Yuck.

      Animals should die happy. They taste better that way.

    2. Re:but it's more humane! by RollingThunder · · Score: 4, Funny

      New worst job: chicken masturbator

      Makes the chickens die euphoric, for the best taste ever! Or something.

      *shudders*

    3. Re:but it's more humane! by frankthechicken · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, I guess its more humane than using my Dyson. Still I would've thought that the noise coming from that contraption's eggshaust and engine would've scared them away before they had a chance to be sucked in. I mean eggsactly how bloated have these chickens been raised, so as not to run at first sight from that thing?

      Sorry.

    4. Re:but it's more humane! by flyneye · · Score: 4, Funny

      It could be worse. Boeing has a "chicken cannon" to test impact of birds on jet engines.(hahahaha I wanna be the guy runnin that one!)

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    5. Re:but it's more humane! by azav · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, but it their path to their destination traumatic or humane?

      Temple Grandin did research and studies on humane cattle harvesting. As it turns out, it's not only better for the animals to die in a non stressed manner but it's better for the quality of the meat and the profits of the company.

      Very interesting story.
      http://www.grandin.com/
      Interesting read.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    6. Re:but it's more humane! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      New worst job: chicken masturbator
      Correction: Assistant chicken masturbator.
    7. Re:but it's more humane! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many animal rights activists are all about minimising harm in any way they can (no matter how small)... So in this case they like the idea the chickens are spared the extra harm..... Although I find the whole idea of a more efficient way to eat flesh a bit disturbing.

    8. Re:but it's more humane! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This reminds me of a story I heard once about a type of beef that costs hundreds for one steak. It's from some asian country (japan, most likely), and the cows are nurtured and cared for their entire lives by people, on an individual basis. They're treated like humans, basically.. costly, costly meat. Forget what it was called, though. Maybe someone can remind me.

    9. Re:but it's more humane! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ahh, you mean a fluffer?

    10. Re:but it's more humane! by cheshiremackat · · Score: 4, Funny

      You do realise that all chickens are female, right? So a chicken masterbater is more like the chicken fscker/ book mobile guy from southpark... -CMK

      --
      Bad spellers of the world untie!
    11. Re:but it's more humane! by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's called Kobe beef, and damn is it tasty.

      --

      --
      the strongest word is still the word "free"
    12. Re:but it's more humane! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean it's not pet stores! Dammit, they tricked us!

    13. Re:but it's more humane! by cyril3 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Is it true that boeing was worried when they first used the machine that all their jet engines would have to be redesigned until they realized that the techs wheren't thawing the chicken out before use.

    14. Re:but it's more humane! by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 1
      That final destination is, after all, their raison d'etre, for the individuals as well as the species.

      Anyway, I respect PETA for advocating incrementally better treatment even if many of them would prefer that the animals not be eaten at all.

    15. Re:but it's more humane! by g_attrill · · Score: 1

      Ah, you've been reading about the guilt-free Christmas turkey.

    16. Re:but it's more humane! by snarkh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are going to die too. Should you not be able to enjoy it meanwhile?

    17. Re:but it's more humane! by Doc+Hopper · · Score: 5, Funny

      The worst job I've ever heard of is a friend of mine who works at a pig farm. His job is to "plug in" the male pigs to the female pigs because the male pigs are too lazy to do it themselves.

      True story, not kidding. And the guy lives, curiously enough, in "Beaver, Utah". Gross job, man.

    18. Re:but it's more humane! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ewww!

    19. Re:but it's more humane! by ahaning · · Score: 1

      Lame. You need to break out of your shell and find some more original material.

      --
      Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
    20. Re:but it's more humane! by Anonymous+User+2000 · · Score: 1

      Of course they do.

      But animal-rights groups also realize that everyone isn't going to eating chicken anytime soon, and since the birds are going to be killed no matter what, they would prefer it to be done as humanely as possible.

      You do realize that even people on death row have to be killed humanely, right?

    21. Re:but it's more humane! by zcat_NZ · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    22. Re:but it's more humane! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Um, if all chickens are female, how do they make more chickens? Budding? :)

      Seriously, female chickens are called hens, and male chickens are called cocks. So, the female equivalent of the insult "cocksucker" would be "hensucker"

    23. Re:but it's more humane! by uncoveror · · Score: 3, Funny

      Tyson and Pilgrim's Pride could save themselves a lot of time and trouble by switching to Chick'N. They will just need to contact New Dawn Biotech in Alberta to negotiate licensing.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    24. Re:but it's more humane! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But remember, it doesn't come out to play during the regular season.

    25. Re:but it's more humane! by swillden · · Score: 1

      True story, not kidding. And the guy lives, curiously enough, in "Beaver, Utah". Gross job, man.

      And on top of all that, he has a long commute to work, since Beaver is a 40-minute drive from the pig farms. He should at least move to Milford, it's a lot closer.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    26. Re:but it's more humane! by emo+boy · · Score: 2, Funny

      They only shoot dead chickens. They previously used gelatin but it didn't model chickens properly.

    27. Re:but it's more humane! by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 5, Funny

      >> New worst job: chicken masturbator

      What do they do, choke them to death?

    28. Re:but it's more humane! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats pretty damn funny, but Shaq beef would be more accurate. Still, you deserve all 5 mod points for thinking outside of the box.

      Good job!

    29. Re:but it's more humane! by metamanda · · Score: 3, Funny

      I had a friend who used to have to collect bull semen. Part of the process involves stimulating its prostate with a cattle prod. Think about that for a second. Think about where that cattle prod has to go. That's a pretty scary job.

    30. Re:but it's more humane! by laemas · · Score: 1

      no. Meat chickens are both sex's. The males grow faster , but trust me , they are both. When we grow the chickens , we sometime seperate the males from the females (actualy we buy them pre - sexed , but they are in the same shed with a partition) If we think that we may need bigger chickens for a certain market. You may be thinking of the layers , of course they are all femal.

    31. Re:but it's more humane! by dheltzel · · Score: 5, Informative
      You do realise that all chickens are female, right?

      Not the kind that you buy in the store. Laying hens are (obviously) female, but broilers (the kind you get cut up in the supermarket) are "straight run", meaning unsexed, about 50/50 sex ratio. They are killed at 8 weeks of age, before any significant hormonal effects take over.

    32. Re:but it's more humane! by Herkum01 · · Score: 1

      As I recall, they used frozen chickens fired at fighter jets cockpit windows. They were testing new canopies so a bird in flight would not wreck a plane by hitting and destroying the cockpit window.

    33. Re:but it's more humane! by Snowdog668 · · Score: 1

      I brings new meaning to the Perdue slogan "It takes a tough man to make a tender chicken" doesn't it? I always though that guy was a little creepy.

      --
      I wouldn't say I'm a bad gambler but the last time I went to Vegas I even lost a buck on the soda machine.
    34. Re:but it's more humane! by orangesquid · · Score: 1

      Wait, what would the assistant be doing?

      Hrmm...

      Btw, props to michael for run-lola-run :) Damn great movie!

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    35. Re:but it's more humane! by ion_ · · Score: 1

      They do realize the bird's final destination, right?

      You mean this?

      (If the link doesn't work for some reason, the video can be found from here.)

    36. Re:but it's more humane! by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Cool I want a gelatinous chicken so I can serve supper up for cyril3 with a steamin cup o that craponade you mentioned.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    37. Re:but it's more humane! by Red+Pointy+Tail · · Score: 3, Funny

      Poor chicken.

      For its suffering, it hope it will be cannonized....

      (ducks to avoid flying chicken)

    38. Re:but it's more humane! by Superx22 · · Score: 0

      Respect and PETA should never go in the same sentence.

      After starting this campaign Mass Killing I have wanted to eat more meat just to spite them.

      I hate to rant, but an organization that wants to be respected should not compare the killing of animals for food, to the systematic slaughter of people based on their religion, skin color, or anything else.

      In other words, I eat chicken, regardless if it is white chicken, black chicken, kosher chiken, or if the chicken was a little bit "cockeyed"

    39. Re:but it's more humane! by flyneye · · Score: 1

      chicken to avoid flying ducks

      21 bird salute for col.sanders

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    40. Re:but it's more humane! by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 1

      I agree. A game animal shot on the run definately tastes less appealing than one who never saw it coming.

    41. Re:but it's more humane! by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      New worst job: chicken masturbator

      I guess it would be similar to this: http://store.yahoo.com/floridagen/noname2.html

    42. Re:but it's more humane! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go look up the definition of Kosher or Halal chicken then. Much much healthier, and the animal doesnt suffer.

    43. Re:but it's more humane! by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      On monkeys (my other non-programming job is a monkey's butler), they stick electrodes to its schlong. Electro-ejaculation.

      I'd much rather stick electrodes on a monkey weiner than put a cattle prod up a bull's ass.

    44. Re:but it's more humane! by gooberguy · · Score: 1

      Ahahaha! You have been sigged!

      --


      Karma: Meh (Mostly from meh.)
    45. Re:but it's more humane! by gooberguy · · Score: 1

      Yet another reason why you should be wary of any man that keeps a pig farm!

      --


      Karma: Meh (Mostly from meh.)
    46. Re:but it's more humane! by nurbman · · Score: 1
      About 20 years ago I remember seeing an ad in the local paper for:

      AI Technician

      Cool, I thought. But then I read the fine print. EE didn't stand for Electrical Engineer either.

      Picture balding, tall, skinny guy with small round glasses and scruffy beard being handed a face mask, arm-length rubber gloves and an electroejaculation prod.

      Says guy: " Hey! ... (fill in your own joke here)"
    47. Re:but it's more humane! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, the way you said "we" all through that post, I just had this bizarre mental picture of a fat guy in overalls and a CAT cap sitting in the middle of a chicken pen with an iBook.

    48. Re:but it's more humane! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why is THIS only a 4?? It's got sex, perversity, innuendo and Mormons. Damn it, Moderators, this is good stuff!

    49. Re:but it's more humane! by rc5-ray · · Score: 2, Funny

      I grew up just north of Beaver, Utah. My hometown's name is "Fillmore". Look it up-it's on the interstate.

      When asked where I was from, I could calmly respond:

      "I'm from the Fillmore-Beaver area!"

    50. Re:but it's more humane! by ccwaterz · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah.... that explains everything. Like that documentary footage where I saw the cheetah do the stand-up routine just before he took a mouthful out of that gazelle's neck....

    51. Re:but it's more humane! by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

      The worst job I've ever heard of is a friend of mine who works at a pig farm. His job is to "plug in" the male pigs to the female pigs because the male pigs are too lazy to do it themselves.

      Sounds like animal cruelty. The pigs are raised by humans, they are not "lazy" all by themselves. The humans breeding them should take responsibility for a natural breeding that doesn't make animals into walking meat.

      In our worst sci-fi horror movies we depict aliens breeding human for flesh in big machines. Entertainment picturing what kind of society we live in now.. Too bad most people don't have the imagination and empathy to put themselves in the other's place.

    52. Re:but it's more humane! by beders · · Score: 1

      ...(usually by falling off a truck).

      Man in pub 1: So where did that chicken come from?

      Man in pub 2: Fell off the back of a lorry mate

    53. Re:but it's more humane! by JamochasWitness · · Score: 0

      I wonder if, after a long hard day's work at the office, he has enough stamina to "plug in" his wife.

    54. Re:but it's more humane! by JamochasWitness · · Score: 0
      "I'd much rather stick electrodes on a monkey weiner than put a cattle prod up a bull's ass."

      Isn't that a quote from the movie, "Tommyboy"?
    55. Re:but it's more humane! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm..., the pasty-white social reject is trying to insult the inbred hick.

    56. Re:but it's more humane! by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Trust me dude, 40 miles is close enough to a pig farm.

      If you ever drive through West or East Texas during a rainstorm, you may smell something foul in the wind. That, friend, is pig shit and/or cow shit. You can never live too far from a pig farm, it's the worst ever.

    57. Re:but it's more humane! by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Gives new meaning to the term "money shot". I bet bull semen is valuable. :)

    58. Re:but it's more humane! by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      It's called being a realist. They're a noisy minority in the greater scheme of things but at least they're being realistic about it now.

      When I devolve and all my teeth are flat, I'll eat a strict vegetarian diet. Until then, my canines are still sharp, and meat is definitely on the menu. :)

    59. Re:but it's more humane! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much how all non-intensive farmed beef is produced. That said, even intensive farming in the UK is not quite as intensive as in the US, and you can immediately spot the difference between good US beef and even cheap and nasty UK beef.

    60. Re:but it's more humane! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Cow shit is not too bad. Sheep shit, while a little worse, isn't that bad either. Horse shit barely smells at all, unless the stables are really dirty (in which case, why did you let them get that bad?), but pig shit - holy fsck. Forty miles *upwind* of a pig farm is probably not far enough.

      And let's not get onto chicken shit either. You do *not* want to be near a chicken farm, ever.

    61. Re:but it's more humane! by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 4, Funny

      You do realize that even people on death row have to be killed humanely, right?

      For the same reasons, actually. Stressing a person before killing them pumps them up full of hormones (adrenaline) that totally screws up the flavor. Also makes the meat pretty tough.

      Actually, I'm surprised there are this many comments and I'm the first to make a cannibalism joke.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    62. Re:but it's more humane! by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      Then the chicken died of autoerotic asphyxiation.

      Atleast it died happy and humanely.
      Now where did I put that KFC coupon...I'm sick of animal rights protesters making me eat soylent green!

      -Grump

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    63. Re:but it's more humane! by erlando · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one thinking that chickens are kind of the WRONG type of bird to use..? What is the odds of meeting a chicken (or turkey for that matter) in 30000 feet? I think the chicken would be just as surprised to suddenly be flying.. :o)

      --
      Remember, there are no stupid questions. But there are a lot of inquisitive idiots.
    64. Re:but it's more humane! by KlausBreuer · · Score: 1

      Heh - should we say that it's a pity the chickens fired from this cannon are deep-frozen?

      Live might be more fun: cluckBAM cluckBAM cluckBAM

      --
      Free PC version of ChipWits at http://www.breueronline.de/klaus/chipwits/
    65. Re:but it's more humane! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And to top that: An arrogant mofu, trying to dis them both.

    66. Re:but it's more humane! by xe54 · · Score: 1

      no no no! female chickens are hens - male chickens are roosters! This chicken hoover doesn't discriminate between sexes. Fianlly, after thousands of years of repression, feminist chickens have the equality they've been demanding. For all its worth, Im sure most of these hens have realised by now it wasn't worth the struggle, and surely some of the more opinionated hens have ended up with egg on their faces.

      --
      __ [Xe]54 __
    67. Re:but it's more humane! by haggar · · Score: 1

      Actually, I can think of one worse: chicken-masturbator escalation engineer. "When nothing else makes 'em cum."

      --
      Sigged!
    68. Re:but it's more humane! by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the other ones, but at the jet engine company I work for, the birds are never frozen, and have not been dead for very long before the test...

      I thought the FAA required it that way, but I don't know about that for sure...

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    69. Re:but it's more humane! by MouseR · · Score: 1

      They do realize the bird's final destination, right?

      Let me give the clueless a hint: the other end of the sucking machine.

      Then, it all goes to to packaging and distribution.

      Hmmm!

      Finger-licking good.

    70. Re:but it's more humane! by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      like humans, basically..

      So, they taste like pork?

      mmmmmm, long pig...

    71. Re:but it's more humane! by RichardX · · Score: 1

      New worst job: chicken masturbator

      You may have been joking, but that's actually a real job. You don't want the exact details, but basically it's basically a way to get them to reproduce at faster than natural rates. Nuff said.

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    72. Re:but it's more humane! by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      Yay! Now there's 2 sig lines of my quotes.

      seregmcw uses: "Oh, I'm a janitor. I used to be a computer geek, but I got wacked in the head". --Dave um... "Smith"

    73. Re:but it's more humane! by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      We call him the chicken lover.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    74. Re:but it's more humane! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My girlfriend worked a couple floors down from a lab where they did this. They told her the monkeys practically hooked themselves up to the machine. Apparently, they *really* enjoyed it.

    75. Re:but it's more humane! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Pasty-white?" Um. Friend, my skin is chocolate-brown.

      Funny. On the Internet, no one can tell you're a brother.

    76. Re:but it's more humane! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two questions. One: what the hell was your point? Two: it's "substitute for," not "substitute to."

    77. Re:but it's more humane! by Dirtside · · Score: 1
      Correction: Assistant chicken masturbator.
      Further correction: Chicken masturbator trainee.
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  3. Palladium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is this the alternative to Palladium that Researchers have been looking for?

  4. Build a better chicken trap... by DavidBrown · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...and the world will come clucking at your door.

    --
    144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
    1. Re:Build a better chicken trap... by ErikTheRed · · Score: 2, Funny

      Finally! A technological advancement in processing animals that doesn't have the PETA people crying fowl... heh... heh...

      --

      Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    2. Re:Build a better chicken trap... by senor_burt · · Score: 1

      Eggs-actly my sentiment.
      And it's popular here, 'cause it lets guys pick up lots of chicks... (Or should that have been "...'meat' lots of chicks"?)

      Incorrigible punster. Do not incorrige.

  5. If they could ramp this up… by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    â¦to toddler size, this could revolutionize the daycare industry.

    1. Re:If they could ramp this up… by Robber+Baron · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Never mind daycare...how about designing an even larger version to help rid the inner cities of their vagrants, or better yet...skateboarders?

      --

      You're using her as bait, Master!

    2. Re:If they could ramp this up… by l810c · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Or one size larger would be great for crowd control. The HS2000(Hippy Sucker) with a clear tube would give you quite a show at a 'peace' rally.

    3. Re:If they could ramp this up… by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that you're modded insightful deserves a funny rating of it's own... slashdot recursion?

    4. Re:If they could ramp this up… by Exatron · · Score: 1
      Unless this is a nude love-in, get off my property!

      You can't own property, man.

      I can, but that's because I'm not a penniless hippy.

      --
      "I think so, Brain, but 'instant karma' always gets so lumpy." - Pinky
      "Decepticons FOREVER!!!" - Ravage
    5. Re:If they could ramp this up… by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 1

      yeah, if only the Chinese had that they wouldn't have needed to gun down protesters at Tienemen Square. We could call it the RTAFSE (right to assemble/free speach eliminator). Then we can once and for all stop this problem of people questioning the government.

      --
      "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
    6. Re:If they could ramp this up… by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1

      Soylent Industries has this under development.

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
  6. Somehow ... by BillsPetMonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    KFC will never seem the same again with Colonel Sanders driving that thing.

    --
    "It's not your information. It's information about you" - John Ford, Vice President, Equifax
    1. Re:Somehow ... by Fishstick · · Score: 2, Funny

      KFC? Chicken? Everyone knows the reason they changed their name from "Kentucky Fried Chicken" to "KFC" is because they no longer use chickens in their meals.

      Kentucky Fried Chicken has become KFC. Does
      anybody know why? We thought the real reason
      was because of the "FRIED" food issue. It's
      not. The reason why they call it KFC is
      because they cannot use the word chicken
      anymore. Why? KFC does not use real chickens.
      They actually use genetically manipulated
      organisms.


      C'mon... I saw it on my innernet, so it must be true!

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    2. Re:Somehow ... by Obfiscator · · Score: 0

      The reason I heard is that Kentucky owns the rights to the word "Kentucky." Maybe that's just an urban legend, too.

      I bet the real reason they did it was because people's attention spans have gotten too short. Six syllables? Not anymore!

      --
      "Nothing shocks me. I'm a scientist." -Indiana Jones
  7. Ewww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iâ(TM)m... well I was, eating chicken in gravy right now.... But reading the words "Tyson Foods Inc. slaughter plant in Georgia" just made this pile of chicken and brown gravy quite unappetizing...
    Well, in any case it looks like it'd be hilarious to make 2 of them and have them remote controlled and have battles against friends to see how many chickens you can slaughter... Hey, A new, more bloodier form of battlebots!!! Chic-Sil-Ay!

    1. Re:Ewww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, in any case it looks like it'd be hilarious to make 2 of them and have them remote controlled and have battles against friends to see how many chickens you can slaughter.

      Or add some dwarves for a theme bar!

  8. Very nice, humane, but... by SamBC · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I personally would like to see more effort and ingenuity go into finding ways to kill the birds more humanely. I for one wouldn't want to go by being dipped in electrified water *then* beheaded. Just the beheading will do me, if it has to be done.

    Don't get me wrong - I support the eating of meat, for those who choose to (like me) - I just wish we could do it in more sensible, humane ways.

    1. Re:Very nice, humane, but... by SamBC · · Score: 1

      Just to pretend you put that more politely, I will reply to the valid question (in case people aren't familiar with the idea of humane slaughter).

      If you were (or indeed are) in a country/state with the death penalty, would you rather be hung, gassed, put in the electric chair, or killed by lethal injection? Tip: one is far less painful than the others. In just the same way, there is no good reason to cause an animal more pain than necessary when slaughtering it for food. Lethal-injection equivalents are obviously out, as they tend to be expensive, and make the meat poisonous. However, there are usually better solutions than those that are currently practiced.

    2. Re:Very nice, humane, but... by phelddagrif · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well there are many ways to slaughter animals, but not too many of them are feasible at the scale at which chickens are usually done. You can gas the animals, It's not overly painful but then you need to keep a ton of poisonous gas around, and run the risk of accidentally gassing your co-workers, not good. Furthermore, I don't know much about chemistry but I can guess that eating gassed meat isn't too good for you. You can lethally inject the birds but then you'd need more syringes than an army of heroin junkies, and the cost is insane. And who would adminster the injections? a squad of specially trained monkeys I think not. However, injections are not too painful, but at the same time they can make the mean poisonous.. You can Chop all their heads off, while they're still running around. But that's really messy, and painful to boot, espescially if it's not done right because they keep running around. Not good. You could shoot them all, painful as hell, and uses a lot of ammo, and you'd need you own team of snipers for a bigger abatoir. Plus gun shot wounds are hard to explain at the grocery store. You could drop them off something high. But that would bruise them, amongst other wounds, and that's not good for the bottom line.. So I can't really think of anyother way to kill large amounts of small creatures. Sure electrocution is not the best way to do it, but I guess we just have to hope that some creative person can think of a way. Until that time, I think that the most cost/humanity ratio would have to be electrocution.

    3. Re:Very nice, humane, but... by SamBC · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sure electrocution is not the best way to do it, but I guess we just have to hope that some creative person can think of a way.

      Just to point out - the electric shock does not kill them, merely hurt like hell and stun them so the corpse doesn't keep moving.

      The chickens aren't really alive after beheading, when they run around, just certain bits of muscle and nervous system keep going on inertia. The chicken no longer perceives pain. The only reason not to behead without the shock is to make the execution easier and thus cheaper.

    4. Re:Very nice, humane, but... by Squarewav · · Score: 1

      reminds me of a south park eps. ware they had turkey factory ware they did humane killing by throwing the turkeys into a room then showed a film with a sunset and when all the turkeys heads poped up to watch it a big saw swept by cutting off their heads

    5. Re:Very nice, humane, but... by droleary · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you were (or indeed are) in a country/state with the death penalty, would you rather be hung, gassed, put in the electric chair, or killed by lethal injection? Tip: one is far less painful than the others.

      Tip: Chickens are not people. Bonus tip: Dead is dead. Even if you believe in an afterlife, are you going to sit and dwell for eternity about how that last couple seconds/minutes of your life passed?

      In just the same way, there is no good reason to cause an animal more pain than necessary when slaughtering it for food.

      Of course there is! Humane too often means "in a way that makes humans feel good". How about we kill them in a way that makes the animal feel better, or at least gives them a chance to live another day? I think it is far better to have the chicken killed in a survival-of-the-fittest manner. Realistically, I actually expect animals would/should be killed in a manner that makes their meat most tasty and tender.

    6. Re:Very nice, humane, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Older geeks may have recognized this, or film geeks, but this was a Soylent Green reference. I think they even used the same damn sunset right from SG......the whole thing was, when you would die you got to pick your favorite color, they showed you some tranquil footage, played your favorite music, jacked you up with some narcotics and a lethal injection, and off you shuffled your mortal coil. :) And then they ate you.

    7. Re:Very nice, humane, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go eat kosher. Or Halal.

    8. Re:Very nice, humane, but... by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
      How about we kill them in a way that makes the animal feel better, or at least gives them a chance to live another day? I think it is far better to have the chicken killed in a survival-of-the-fittest manner.

      "Two chicks enter! One chick leaves! Two chicks enter! One chick leaves!" [/thunderdome]

      -T

    9. Re:Very nice, humane, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fail to empathise with chickens. When ya behead them in a farmyard, the first thing their buddies do is start pecking at and eating the heads and other leftovers. They are not advanced enough to merit compassion.

    10. Re:Very nice, humane, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      modded insightful?? this guy's trolling.

  9. McDonald's by MrCocktail · · Score: 5, Funny

    McDonald's Corp. is encouraging its chicken suppliers to mechanically collect at least half the birds it buys by year's end.

    McDonald's actually uses real chicken?

    1. Re:McDonald's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they never said they used the birds they bought. They just buy the birds to make you think that they are using real birds.

    2. Re:McDonald's by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1, Troll

      The chicken mcnugget is 51% chicken. Otherwise they can't call it the "chicken" mcnugget. The other 49% is fish. Cod, probably.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    3. Re:McDonald's by squidfood · · Score: 4, Informative
      The other 49% is fish. Cod, probably.

      Nope.. (And the McFish is invariable pollock).

    4. Re:McDonald's by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Oh. Thanks.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    5. Re:McDonald's by Doppler00 · · Score: 4, Funny

      But the McNuggets do contain:
      dimethylpolysiloxane
      sodium acid pyrophosphate
      sodium aluminum phosphate
      monocalcium phosphate

      whatever those are!

    6. Re:McDonald's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be more concerned that they probably contain organ meat. Not that organs are by their nature unhealthy (I have been known to eat beef liver on occasion), but breast, wing, and leg meat are all considerably less fatty and more tasty.

    7. Re:McDonald's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've eaten a boiled then ground beef heart sandwich. It was made kind of like tuna fish, mixed in with mayonnaise or salad dressing (a.k.a. Miracle Whip). It was very good. Slightly chewy, but good.

    8. Re:McDonald's by Spellbinder · · Score: 1

      what you got no curry sauce to your chicken nuggets????
      so you miss the best =(( in exchange we got no honey to them
      sick idea anyway =)))

      --


      stop supporting microsoft with pirating their software!!!!!
    9. Re:McDonald's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When were you on Fear Factor?

    10. Re:McDonald's by jd_esguerra · · Score: 2, Funny

      But the McNuggets do contain:
      dimethylpolysiloxane
      sodium acid pyrophosphate
      sodium aluminum phosphate
      monocalcium phosphate


      Oh, thank god! I was afraid I wasn't getting enough dimethylpolysiloxane in my normal diet. So a 9-piece a day and I should stop foaming, right?

    11. Re:McDonald's by laemas · · Score: 1

      quite possible , the minced chicken is "massaged" at the plant where the nuggets are made. basicly put in a tumble drier like contraption with this gelatonous stuff , which "fluffs" the chicken up to up to twice its weight. um its like water and shit. I dont know hat it is , but i have preformed the procedure. Maybe a proper bucther can elaborate :)

    12. Re:McDonald's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think some of those are created when something is fied in oil, or at least a lot more of it then if cooked a different way.

    13. Re:McDonald's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, two of those look like baking powder to me. Probably it's in the breading. one of those looks like a stabilizer, presumably to stabilize you when you realize that your money's gone.

      The monocalcium phosphate probably has a dual function, both as a flavor enhancement and as an antacid.

      These McDonald's folks really do know their business!

    14. Re:McDonald's by Imazalil · · Score: 1

      dang, you mean those aren's chickens?

    15. Re:McDonald's by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 1

      OH MY GOD! Did you know they'll also serve you a full cup of dihydrogen monoxide FOR FREE?!?!

      Those bastards... :)

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    16. Re:McDonald's by RichardX · · Score: 1

      There's a very good article about this practice amongst others here

      Note, I actually got that link from another post (by MouseR) who linked to it earlier in the discussion - just re-posting it here for convenience.

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
  10. in the long term..... by maliabu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    will chicken eventually learn to avoid the machine after a while?

    1. Re:in the long term..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hate to be the one that breaks this to you, but the chikens are only picked up once.

    2. Re:in the long term..... by kaltkalt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Aside from the fact that these are incredibly dumb animals, they have no reason to learn to avoid the machine. First time they experience it, they get sucked in and end up on my plate.

      --

      Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
    3. Re:in the long term..... by DoomHaven · · Score: 1

      Er, only if they re-incarnate, I guess.

      --
      "Don't mind me cutting myself on Occam's Razor"
    4. Re:in the long term..... by Josh+Booth · · Score: 1

      Uh, probably not, considering that that chickens don't realize that they are going to be killed, and no chickens are going to survive to remember not to go into the machine. Heck, they're not even smart enough to avoid the people picking their friends up by the legs!

    5. Re:in the long term..... by maliabu · · Score: 1

      hmmm... does it mean that once chickenator is out, it will collect all chicken?

      i was thinking about the "learn by seeing others died" kind of learning.

    6. Re:in the long term..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen the size of a chicken's brain?

      It'll take them quite some time to evolve far enough to figure out what's going on.

    7. Re:in the long term..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The birds that avoid it for whatever random reason will survive and that's all evolution needs. It'll probably take a few hundred years for them to "learn", though.

    8. Re:in the long term..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think so. Domesticated turkeys haven't learned to stop drowing in their own water troughs yet, and I don't think chickens rank much higher on the poultry intelligence scale.

    9. Re:in the long term..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, because they're dead.

    10. Re:in the long term..... by samsonov · · Score: 1

      They will create a large flying apparatus and fly directly out of the chicken coop. Of course this is after many failed attempts of digging under the fences. Oh wait, I'm having deja vu

      --
      "You killed my yogurt!" --Fred Fredburger
  11. WSJ slashdotted? I think not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like a really inept Karma Whore to me. You even included the WSj tagline!

  12. Bawk? Are you Jhn Clux0r? by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
    Chickenator Three: Rise of the Machines!

    Looks like a cross between an EE grad student's robotics project and something out of the Transformers.

    Hook up a flamethrower to it, and we've got a mobile autonomous BBQ station. Where's Mark Pauline and Survival Research Labs when we need 'em? Bring on the Chickenators!

  13. Re:Slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the WSJ is not going to get slashdotted, whore

  14. ROT IN HELL, KARMA WHORE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Wall Street Journal is not going to be slashdotted. I hope you get modded down to -1 where you belong, asshole.

  15. A Chicken Catcher's Union? by Sean80 · · Score: 1
    Ok so if there's one thing that stands out about this story, it's that they were trying to form a chicken catcher's union? ;)

    I can see the list of demands already: 1. No chicken meat on the lunch menu. 2. Will not run more than 1000 meters per day in pursuit of chickens. 3. Safety equipment, including crotch protectors, in case the birds suddenly realise where in the hell they're going.

  16. Sure... by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Funny

    McDonald's actually uses real chicken?

    For the McRib!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Sure... by davidhan · · Score: 1

      They also use chicken oil for cooking the french fries.

    2. Re:Sure... by Jonner · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean the Ribwich? (gurgle gurgle)

  17. quoteness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mr. Tweedy: What is it?
    Mrs. Tweedy: It's a pie machine, you idiot. Chickens go in, pies come out.
    Mr. Tweedy: Ooh, what kind of pies?
    Mrs. Tweedy: Apple.
    Mr. Tweedy: My favorite.
    Mrs. Tweedy: Chicken pies, you great lummox!

    1. Re:quoteness by haggar · · Score: 1

      Ah, but my all-time-favourite, and very apropos for lots of situations: "I told you that the chicken was organised!!"

      --
      Sigged!
  18. Qa team? by geekd · · Score: 1

    I'd hate to be on the QA team for that one.

    "30 birds killed in 5 minutes. That's a bug. P1, too, I'd say."

    The article says it's smelly work, too.

    No thanks.

    1. Re:Qa team? by Merlinium · · Score: 1

      Yes its a very smelly job, I worked on an Eggfarm for a summer, took me 5 years before I could eat an Egg, and almost 10 years before I could eat chicken again. Trust me, those barns really smell bad.

      --
      If firefighters fight fire and crime fighters fight crime, what do Freedom fighters fight?
  19. 150 per minute? by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

    Editors... :-)

    1. Re:150 per minute? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's only 2.5 chickens per second. Not terribly inconceivable.

  20. Seriously by DavidBrown · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is more of a "News for Farmers, Stuff that Moos" story. But from a technological viewpoint, it's an interesting story. I for one didn't realize that chickens bred for meat were actually allowed to run free (albeit in a darkened warehouse). It's actually more "humane" than I had thought.

    But this isn't really an advance in treating chickens more humanely. The farmers profit because of 1) reduced labor costs; 2) reduced worker's comp claims; and 3) reduced "breakage" allowing them to send more chickens to market. I can see why animal rights groups would be supportive of this technology, but it's really only a change on the level of replacing the axe-man with the guillotine.

    --
    144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
    1. Re:Seriously by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      i Seriously don't see how this made the front page

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    2. Re:Seriously by mactov · · Score: 1

      I can see why animal rights groups would be supportive of this technology, but it's really only a change on the level of replacing the axe-man with the guillotine.


      If they can lower the rate of injury and premature death, then the total number of chickens subjected to farming goes down -- from an animal-rights point of view, if they treat the chickens better, they'll also kill fewer chickens in the long run.

      That line about the chickens being basically babies in adult bodies gave me pause, though -- I am a confirmed carnivore, but some of the stuff we do in the name of taste and profit is hard to digest.

      --
      OK, now what?
    3. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is more of a "News for Farmers, Stuff that Moos" story.
      Chickens don't moo.

    4. Re:Seriously by eht · · Score: 2, Funny

      because there isn't much of a back page

      it could be dumped to section, but almost no one reads those unless you have the collapse section option turned on which makes everything front page

    5. Re:Seriously by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      ok then, I seriously don't see how this story got accepted/posted/whatnot

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    6. Re:Seriously by secolactico · · Score: 2, Funny

      i Seriously don't see how this made the front page

      I guess we could use a "farmhands.slashdot.org"

      --
      No sig
    7. Re:Seriously by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      "because there isn't much of a back page"

      Just turn your monitor around...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    8. Re:Seriously by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      It's all a lie. Chickens bred for meat are actually shakled to benches on a galley and made to row back and forth across the Adriatic.

    9. Re:Seriously by nolife · · Score: 1

      It already has more comments then the C&W Bails Out article that was posted earlier today..

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    10. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the author of the article may be lacking somewhat in perspective. In terms of dogs, it would not be so surprising to see that a two month old Great Dane is larger than an adult pug dog.

      And since chickens mature much faster than larger animals (*especially* humans), an eight week old chicken is really not a baby.

      But yeah, the results people get with selective breeding can be shocking and sometimes rather inhumane.

    11. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently read Fast Food Nation. Very Intreasting in the power that McDonalds wields over producers. I highly recommend it.

    12. Re:Seriously by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
      'Running free' in these barns is akin to how sardines get to run free in the tin.

      I live in the UK, and rarely eat chicken, because I won't eat it unless it's been organically reared out in the open air.

      Organic chicken is a bitch to find in the UK, but luckily the butcher I use for beef, lamb and pork happens to have his own organic farm, so I don't go hungry.

      If you ever see one of these chicken barns, you'll see what I mean.

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
  21. Re:PETA by PukkaStoryTeller · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    nah, PETA won't bother to post comments. they'll just order their connections to start blowing up the complex in which the slashdot webserver is housed.

  22. New .sig for me! by Theaetetus · · Score: 3, Funny
    "We support using machines that reduce the panic, fear and horror of chickens,"

    Horror of chickens... I like that.

    -T

  23. O/T: Duck Hearding by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Several years ago, I visited Oxford university on an open day. One of the students was developing an electric sheep-dog as a final year project. Since they did not have a ready supply of sheep, they were testing it by making it round up ducks. I can't help feeling that these two projects might be related...

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    1. Re:O/T: Duck Hearding by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

      Ducks are way easier to heard than chickens.

      --
      Engineering is the art of compromise.
    2. Re:O/T: Duck Hearding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the students was developing an electric sheep-dog

      One android that probably does dream of electric sheep...

      *bzzt* MOVE IT, YA FUCKERS *bzzzzt*

    3. Re:O/T: Duck Hearding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ducks are way easier to heard than chickens.

      Well, yeah, they make a lot more noised.

    4. Re:O/T: Duck Hearding by killenheladagen · · Score: 1

      That is actually the way real sheep dogs are taught sheep hearding, rounding up small groups of ducks or geese.

    5. Re:O/T: Duck Hearding by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      The project is now running under the name of "building a better robot duck". Having robotic ducks is a good way of testing your herding model, and then you can test the robotic duck-dog on yur robotic ducks. A friend of mine was doing this project, but he didn't have enough memory left in the micocontroller ROM to store a quacking sound.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    6. Re:O/T: Duck Hearding by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      Just curious - how do you know that? No doubt it's true, chickens are about as smart as cows (not very), I'm just curious.

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
  24. reminds me of Baraka by Tancred · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone else seen Baraka?

    Among other glorious and terrible images, there are shots from a chicken processing plant. It shows thousands of chicks tumbling off a conveyor belt, swirling down a giant metal funnel and having their beaks burned.

    1. Re:reminds me of Baraka by ffsnjb · · Score: 1

      Sadly, I own it. It came with my DVD player. Haven't watched more than 5 minutes though. The intro sucked too much to watch the rest of it.

      --
      "Why do you consent to live in ignorance and fear?" - Bad Religion
    2. Re:reminds me of Baraka by ahaning · · Score: 1

      I've never seen this Baraka movie, but it sounds interesting. Something along those lines (disturbing treatment of animals) was/is featured on rotten.com (a fascinating site, if you can handle it). http://dickweed.rotten.com/german-luau/ has links to video of the torching of a tied up pig. You can hear the pig crying in pain as the videographer zooms in on the blistering skin.

      According to the site, this was done by the U.S. military during WW2. As you can see at the Google-cached version.

      Unfortunately you won't be able to view the videos as dickweed.rotten.com seems to be down and they are not in the WayBack Machine. Hopefully dickweed will return.

      --
      Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
    3. Re:reminds me of Baraka by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa. Who was selling Baraka with their DVD players?

    4. Re:reminds me of Baraka by ahaning · · Score: 1
      Whoops. Try http://vatican.rotten.com/german-luau/

      From rotten.com:

      This is a horrible, horrible video. Two pigs squeal in horror as important men in lab coats use a blowtorch to burn their flesh to a crisp. You probably shouldn't view it; those with a delicate constitution may find it too painful to watch.

      That's a pretty strong statement, if you're familiar with rotten.com.
      --
      Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
    5. Re:reminds me of Baraka by Tancred · · Score: 1

      Let me guess. MTV generation?

      Chacun ses gouts. I loved the intro.

  25. that movie was ahead of it's time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    never thought of a chicken vacuum ? haven't you seen BASEKETBALL ?

  26. Re:Bawk? Are you Jhn Clux0r? by DavidBrown · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please don't refer to it as the "Chickenator". The technical term you should be using is the "Chicken Zamboni".

    --
    144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
  27. Already got that by CausticWindow · · Score: 4, Funny

    My appartment is about 1800 cubic feet.

    There are exactly zero chikens in my appartment.

    So: chiken density = 0 / 1800 = 0 = chicken vacuum

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    1. Re:Already got that by bravehamster · · Score: 1

      1800 cubic feet? Thats a damn small apartment...assuming an 8 foot ceiling, thats only a 15 x 15 foot space. And I thought my apartment was small...

      --
      ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    2. Re:Already got that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmmmm, one might almost suspect that, for a given volume, the density of live chickens is quantized...

    3. Re:Already got that by CausticWindow · · Score: 4, Funny

      Any bigger than that and I would have to work hard keeping the chickens out.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  28. More out of work by mesach · · Score: 1

    "Looking like a combination airport baggage carousel and tank, the devices can capture 150 birds a minute. That's as many as a team of eight skilled men can corral."

    So they plan on putting more people in the heartland out of much needed work...

    Where will my future job prospects end... if an decent IT worker cant get a job catching chickens, then all is lost

    hmmm maybe they need someone to network these together(beowulf anyone) and build AI then the robots to do the dirty work for us... then we can sit back and watch as the machines uprise, start using this on humans and build their own city somewhere in the desert of Saudi Arabia called 01(obligatory Matrix reference)

    --
    moo.
    1. Re:More out of work by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      well....if you had finished reading the article....it said that most chicken catchers don't stay at the job very long....and that a team gets reduced from 8 to 6, and that those 6 (see the direct quotes at the end) enjoy a much higher job standard than before, get paid about the same, and the less chickens are hurt or killed

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    2. Re:More out of work by blenderfish · · Score: 1

      > So they plan on putting more people in the heartland out of much needed work...

      <rant>
      If the work they're doing is not necessary, then I see no reason I, the consumer, should pay them to do it. I'm perfectly happy to have Welfare deducted from my paycheck without also paying it when I buy groceries.

      (Just like these people complaining about the vanishing of the family farm.. nobody put a gun to the farmers' heads and forced them to sell their land.)

      If your job is no longer relevant, find a new job.
      </rant>

      Getting rid of unnecessary jobs as a society is a good thing.. with each new labor-saving invention, more work gets done with fewer man-hours of labor, and our quality of life improves.

    3. Re:More out of work by knobmaker · · Score: 1
      (Just like these people complaining about the vanishing of the family farm.. nobody put a gun to the farmers' heads and forced them to sell their land.)

      As a public service, here's a clue: When the bank forecloses on your farm, and the sheriff comes to evict your family, he will bring guns. If you refuse to leave, a gun will be put to your head.

  29. Laid Off by pyrrho · · Score: 1

    ... if you see one of these coming, you've been laid off.

    --

    -pyrrho

    1. Re:Laid Off by mesach · · Score: 1

      I didn't need to see one of those to get laid off...

      I just saw someone from HR, Wait... that sounds familiar tho...

      Employee Vaccuum® capable of laying off, gathering up personal belongings, and shooting them out the door at a rate of 150 per minute...

      --
      moo.
    2. Re:Laid Off by jd_esguerra · · Score: 1

      ...if you see one of these coming, you've been laid off.

      Or you're a chicken.

    3. Re:Laid Off by pyrrho · · Score: 1

      possibly both.

      --

      -pyrrho

  30. Chickien Cutching mashine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We know J0n Katz likes beaked animals other than his mom, so now he catches Chickens?

    Oh for crying out loud, where is Jon Katz to post this story? I miss brother Katz! Jon Katz put a review of Chicken Run, the movie with Gromitz and a dog and an EVIL BSD PENGUIN (ha, what'd you expect...).

    Jon Katz! Jon Katz! Jon Katz**S@$#% SMACK

    Kate Fent! Kate Fent! I love cats! I love cats!

    Someone help me! If I don't say anything but Cats, my wife said she will not kiss me! My house's drapes are yell, from what I don't know! My wife is my life! C'mon! Touch me baby! What was that promise that you made?

    -decommisioned and retired Taco, underling of the recently appointed CmdrFent

  31. Why not... by morganjharvey · · Score: 1

    Why not add some of the features of the robots from BattleBots?

    You have that one with the flamethrower that could cook 'em. Then there's the one with the big saw blades - 'nuff said... And what about the one with the giant hammer? Pre-tenderized chicken bits. Aw yeah.

    Then all you'd need is a machine to dredge 'em in eggs 'n' breading and fry 'em up...

  32. Chicken Run by EngMedic · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oblig. Chicken Run quote:
    "chickens go in...pies come out!"

    --
    filter: +3. Hey, look! all the trolls went away!
    1. Re:Chicken Run by bakes · · Score: 1

      Ooooh. What kind of pies?

      --
      Ho! Haha! Guard! Turn! Parry! Dodge! Spin! Ha! Thrust!
    2. Re:Chicken Run by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      But I don't *want* to be a pie! ...

      I don't like gravy!

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    3. Re:Chicken Run by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      Apple!

      Oooh! My favorite!

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  33. Moo... by Chagatai · · Score: 2, Informative
    I work in the food service industry, particularly in the area which makes steak and pork. This device is nothing compared to some of the nightmare fuel machines that are in our plants. To give you guys a good idea, check out the Semi-automatic Neck Breaker (this is designed for poultry, not for cows or hogs, though). Just remember to thank the people who put the food on your table sometimes. And check out the rest of that site for more H. R. Geiger-borne instruments of fun.

    --
    --Chag
    1. Re:Moo... by mesach · · Score: 1

      "particularly in the area which makes steak and pork"

      you must work for a division of McDonalds...

      --
      moo.
    2. Re:Moo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel juvenile and macabre, but still this amused me

    3. Re:Moo... by idiotfromia · · Score: 0

      "Vacuum System" *shudder*

    4. Re:Moo... by multiplexo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm surprised that they aren't selling this on thinkgeek. It's the ideal accessory for a large pr0n collection.

      --
      cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
    5. Re:Moo... by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      Upon looking through that site, all I can say is YUCK! If you really want to look at it, you can view the entire site here.

      Their parent company also has some really strange cartoons on their site.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    6. Re:Moo... by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > I feel juvenile and macabre, but still this [http://www.technex.pl/supplier/Jarvis/engl/bung_d roppers.htm] amused me

      Somebody bring me a live spammer!

    7. Re:Moo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And people wonder why I game up meat for ethical reasons.

  34. MOD THIS BOZO DOWN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The WSJ? Slashdotted? Riiiiiight....

    If you want to gain karma points, contribute something thoughtful. If you want to "do a good deed" and repost a slashdotted article, do it anonymously.

    You are just pathetic.

  35. International Chicken Day? by Shazow · · Score: 1

    Speaking of chickens, someone pulled a prank at my school today. They unleashed four chickens in the cafeteria. That and some insects, too.

    What's with all the chicken mania today?

    Chickens overrunning schools AND a chicken catcher on the same day... coincidence? I think not.

    - shazow

  36. ObUnreal Tournament comment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...CHICKEN BLENDERS!

  37. as someone who has caught chickens for vaccination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    as a job in my teens:

    1. It is probably one of the worst jobs in North America. It stinks like ammonia all day in the barn, it's hot, hard to breathe, and they leave the lights off to calm the birds. (picture rolling yourself up in a thick blanket that 30 people have urinated on, and stay in their all day with the heat cranked up in the house). When you get home from work, you have to strip naked before you go in your home, and hose off in the yard, or the smell gets everywhere. (I took to burning clothes at one point outside.)

    2. Unfourtunately, I can't possibly see this machine keeping up with a human. When yo get good at it, you can catch and hold 6 birds at a time. And, regardless of what the article says, it's very easy to catch a chicken in a dark barn with practice. It's just hard work.

    Basically, I can't see this replacing cheap student labour. Just my two cents.

  38. what if tolkien... by QEDog · · Score: 2, Funny

    The chicken, sunlight coruscating off its radiant yellow-white coat of feathers, approached the dark, sullen asphalt road and scrutinized it intently with its obsidian-black eyes. Every detail of the thoroughfare leapt into blinding focus: the rough texture of the surface, over which countless tires had worked their relentless tread through the ages; the innumerable fragments of stone embedded within the lugubrious mass, perhaps quarried from the great pits where the Sons of Man labored not far from here; the dull black asphalt itself, exuding those waves of heat which distort the sight and bring weakness to the body; the other attributes of the great highway too numerous to give name. And then it crossed it.

    --
    "There is no teacher but the enemy."-Mazer Rackham
    1. Re:what if tolkien... by janda · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ok, this is just a wee-bit off-topic, but...

      It's already been done. Check out "Watership Down".

      --
      Karma: Food Fight (Mostly affected by Date Plate).
  39. Permaculture Chickens and Cows by spun · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I read recently about an experiment in permaculture, which is the science of making food production ecologically sustainable. The Chinese have been making an art of it for thousands of years, with complicated interlocking cultivation systems, where the waste from one part is always recycled in some other part.

    In this system, chickens were kept in small flocks in 20x20 foot covered cages. The cages were on wheels. Small herds of cows were also kept, in constant rotation among many small pastures. After the cows were done in one pasture, the chicken cages were rolled in. The chickens broke the cow patties apart looking for bugs, which were plentiful. This allowed the cow manure to break down faster, resulting in quicker regrowth of the grass, as well as lower rates of disease among the cows. The chickens were healthier as well, and got to run about and hunt for bugs, which if I were a chicken, I would vastly prefer to living in some overcrowded factory. Overall, the production of both beef and chicken increased dramatically over other organic ranching methods, putting it on a par with non-organic methods.

    The inventor of the system based the idea off of the fact that in nature, herds of wild ungulates are always followed by flocks of birds. Pretty clever, eh? Another thing: you don't need a robot chicken catcher, you just wheel the cage up to the slaughterhouse and pull the chickens in with a net.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Permaculture Chickens and Cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the advertizing's a bitch:

      Cow-flop fed chicken?

    2. Re:Permaculture Chickens and Cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh, you'd be suprised at what you eat in an average day.

      They eat the bugs anyway, not the crap. Although I guess some would get in there.

      Think of the chicken as a cow shit purifier. Mmmmm, tasty.

    3. Re:Permaculture Chickens and Cows by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      you gonna wheel the cage 20 miles down the road? didn't think so....

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    4. Re:Permaculture Chickens and Cows by spun · · Score: 1

      Well, combine the two ideas: Robot cages that automatically follow the cows, and a computerized system of gates in the pastures that keep the cows circulating, viola, you have a system that scales very well.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    5. Re:Permaculture Chickens and Cows by Jonner · · Score: 1

      Just more proof that the more one examines the source of one's food, the more disgusted one will be. I guess that's what city slickers get for forgetting how things work in nature. But, seriously, that's a very interesting project. It certainly makes sense to me.

    6. Re:Permaculture Chickens and Cows by duck_prime · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The Chinese have been making an art of it for thousands of years, with complicated interlocking cultivation systems, where the waste from one part is always recycled in some other part.
      This is currently illegal in the United States, because doing this promotes the lifecycle of certain parasites.
    7. Re:Permaculture Chickens and Cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is currently illegal in the United States, because doing this promotes the lifecycle of certain parasites.

      Well, so does slashdot, but I don't see that being made illegal.

      But seriously, which parasites?

    8. Re:Permaculture Chickens and Cows by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 2, Funny

      Better yet, combine your two ideas. Robot cows could automatically follow the cages, and a computerized system of pastures would keep the gates circulating, violin, you have a scale that systems very well.

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    9. Re:Permaculture Chickens and Cows by garyok · · Score: 1

      Uh, your forgetting the other benefit the chinese animal husbandry has brought to our world: a fresh stream of animal hosted viruses (note to the pedantic: virii, as a word, sucks balls) to infect our biped bodies and boost our immune systems. If we don't choke on our own mucus first.

      --
      One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors - Plato
    10. Re:Permaculture Chickens and Cows by Hamster+Of+Death · · Score: 1

      This is the method in which mad cow disease is spread. Although it's not a parasite, it's spread by feeding carrier animals (ground up sheep for example) to cows.
      Works the same for parasites.

    11. Re:Permaculture Chickens and Cows by Demon+of+the+fall · · Score: 1
      The chickens broke the cow patties apart looking for bugs, which were plentiful.

      Ah, so THIS is why chinese chicken tastes like shit. :)

      --
      Be an elitist - read Slashdot at +4.
    12. Re:Permaculture Chickens and Cows by spun · · Score: 1
      I got this picture in my head of a mecha cow, bristling with armament: lasers in the horns, electric tail, nostril rockets, and we won't even go into what the udders do... And of course, the cows aerial assult force: chickens in choppers! (anyone remember the song "Cows with Guns"?

      I was going to post the lyrics, it's hilarious, but slashdot's lameness filter thinks that 29 characters per line is too few. After futzing around for ten minutes trying to get it to accept the song, I gave up. Here's a URL instead. Cows With Guns

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    13. Re:Permaculture Chickens and Cows by spun · · Score: 1

      The Chinese doesn't involve grinding up animals to feed to other animals that wouldn't normally eat them. Leguminous, nitrogen-fixing trees are grown on a ridge top. Animals are grazed on the high hill slopes. The nitrogen and other nutirents from the trees and animals enriches soil lower down where grains are grown. In the valley, fish are rotated among several ponds, while in the empty ponds, nutrient intensive crops such as broccoli are grown. Bees are kept near the ponds, so the dead bees are eaten by the fish. That is a simplified explanation, there is much more to it, including anaerobic composting of waste, graywater systems, and so on. No cow cannibalism.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    14. Re:Permaculture Chickens and Cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Violin... you deserve at least a +4 for that.

  40. Re:Bawk? Are you Jhn Clux0r? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of course, that'd be a copyright violation. to save yourself some trouble, go for "Chicken Ice Resurfacer"

  41. pathetic by ravinfinite · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    PETA is starting to lose it's integrity. They're supposed to be protecting animals from unnecessary death in the first place, but instead they're supporting this new technology simply because it's more "humane"? What different is it for the chickens that are going to die? They get spared from a few seconds of torture? I know ever second counts, but this questions the very existance of Peta.

    And that's not all. Peta is sending it's message to protect and save animals via strippers, pr0nstars and supermodels. What surprises me is that there's no feminists who oppose this.

    It seems Peta is in a very desperate situation trying to save the lives of animals. I, myself have always been vegetarian simply because it is morally wrong to take the life of one being only to benefit yourself.

    The recent SARS outbreak is just one implication of factory farming. Then there's foot and mouth disease, mad cow and what not.

    Peta should be advocating the fact that animals are sentient beings, not a renewable resource. And for those pathetic scientists who even created such a device should deserve death at the least, using their own stupid machines. Go ahead, FLAME ME. But it's the truth.

    1. Re:pathetic by negacao · · Score: 1
      Wait a sec..

      You value the life of a chicken greater than that of a human (scientist)?

      (ps.. since when are sentient beings not a renewable resource? i know where i'm at, but this is called "breeding.")

    2. Re:pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're just pissy 'cuz you haven't had a good steak in a long time. The anemia and lack of animal protein (and yummy umami flavor) is probably getting to you.

    3. Re:pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey man, I'm a vegetarian too. We both want people to stop eating animals, because we both believe that it's wrong. But what's going to be the more effective strategy here: bin Laden or Ghandi? Face it, we aren't going to convert everyone overnight. In the meantime, any reduction in animal suffering is a good thing. Live well, lead by example, and eventually reasonable people will come around to your side.

    4. Re:pathetic by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      i think you missed the part where this machine can cut unecessary handling-caused injuries and deaths by 50%

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    5. Re:pathetic by Flower · · Score: 1
      PETA should be rejoicing! Less injured birds mean more that get to my plate. This is a triumph for humanity here.

      Oh wait, you meant that PETA. Nevermind....

      --
      I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
    6. Re:pathetic by cyril3 · · Score: 1
      PETA is for Ethical treatment isn't it. Does not ethics have something to say about lessening of pain.

      because it is morally wrong to take the life of one being only to benefit yourself.

      So if scientists could genetically modify an animal so that at the peak of its food value it died quickly and painlessly, you would be in line with your bun.

      The recent SARS outbreak is just one implication of factory farming

      That may prove to be the case but you saying it doesn't make it so.

      But it's the truth

      I love fanatics who arrive at their firmly held belief after years of consideration and reasoned thinking and then expect me to immediately accept their truth because they shouted it out at me.

      I'm not going to abuse you. You do enough of that to yourself already.

    7. Re:pathetic by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      I, myself have always been vegetarian simply because it is morally wrong to take the life of one being only to benefit yourself.

      I love this argument. I mean, it's one thing to say, "I'm healthier now that I've stopped eating red meat."

      But it's something completely different when you try to value the life of one organism over another.

      That's right: do you eat carrots? Potatoes? Beets? You've gotta kill the plant to get at the food. Why is a carrot's life force less valuable than a chicken's?

      Even eating apples and other fruits can be seen as "evil" -- you're depriving the tree's children (the seeds) from their nurturing environment (the reason the tree makes apples is to feed the seeds).

      You, sir, are a hypocrite. And especially in your last paragraph, where you state that certain humans should be put to death for killing animals. You value animal life over human life? This appears nowhere in either our laws or our religious documents (for any religion). So my question is, how did you arrive at this belief?

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    8. Re:pathetic by ravinfinite · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I haven't made any comparisons with words like less/more. Humans respond similarily when exposed to the same stimulus that animals are put through.

      When I said renewable resource, I meant renewable at the expense of life. I am familiar with "breeding". And I'm even more familiar with "breeding farms" when animals are raised just to fulfill you're appetite when then are definetely alternatives that don't require senseless killing.

    9. Re:pathetic by ravinfinite · · Score: 1

      Thank you, I appreciate your support. You're correct, the Ghandi approach is defintely the way to go. But even Ghandi had to face oppresion along his way for power. I am simply trying to "educate" the hapless individuals who know abosolutely no facts about what they're talking about. I bet if most of them knew what is REALLY inside their meat they purchase at the grocery store, they would probably puke on the spot.

    10. Re:pathetic by ravinfinite · · Score: 1

      Handling-caused injuries and deaths by 50%? You're telling me that chickens cause "death" to the humans that are handling them? Very amusing. Injuries? sure, makes sense, except the fact then when the chicken attacks, it is trying to defend itself, similar to what you would do if someone unnecessarily harassed you. Ultimately, the chicken still gets killed. This has no benefit for the chicken. This is just statistical malpractice at its best.

    11. Re:pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What surprises me is that there's no feminists who oppose this.

      It's because they're all "chicken." :-o Oh shit, here they come!

      Peta should be advocating the fact that animals are sentient beings, not a renewable resource.

      Yes, they're sentient. And also very tasty with tobasco or A-1 sauce. Just remember that if it ever becomes illegal or otherwise "difficult" to get poultry or beef, "Soylent Green" might become the most easy-to-get meat.

      Right or wrong, I will eat meat while it is convenient, nutritious and tasty. I don't have time to graze all day.

    12. Re:pathetic by ravinfinite · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I have dealth with many fools like you all my life. I did not value the life of one organism over other. I said they are EQUAL. Do you know basic math? Probably not. When things are equal, they are said to have the same value. Sign. This is just a waste of my time. Get an education and then we'll talk.

      Even eating apples and other fruits can be seen as "evil" -- you're depriving the tree's children (the seeds) from their nurturing environment (the reason the tree makes apples is to feed the seeds).

      Making these comments shows how much crack you've been smoking lately. Plants do not possess a nervous system, which controls all feeling of pain. Unlike animals, if an apple is broken off the tree, first, it doesn't feel pain (no nervous system) and second, it can REGROW the apple i.e. regenerate. How many chickens do you know that can do that? You Americans seriously have a real lack of quality education. EDUCATE YOURSELF at www.peta.org. Pathetic moron.

      You, sir, are a hypocrite. And especially in your last paragraph, where you state that certain humans should be put to death for killing animals. You value animal life over human life?

      I guess you still don't understand what = means. GET a real education, and then we'll talk.

      This appears nowhere in either our laws or our religious documents (for any religion) The whole purpose of Peta is to treat animals just like humans and vice versa. The fact that it's not included in our laws doesn't mean that we shouldn't put it in consideration. It's also not a law in a lot of countries to write malicious code, i.e. viruses. Religious documents? READ the BIBLE. "Live and let live" is one example. There are MANY others throughtout the bible and other religious scriptures.

      I have dealth with many foolish people all my life, and you're no different. Lack of any education is quite evident in your comments. EDUCATE YOURSELF.

    13. Re:pathetic by ravinfinite · · Score: 1

      a PART of ethics is the lessening of pain. That does not create any results. We need solutions that work, not skeptical games. It's time to cut the crap talk and start doing something serious.

      That may prove to be the case but you saying it doesn't make it so.

      READ www.peta.org and EDUCATE yourself.

      I love fanatics who arrive at their firmly held belief after years of consideration and reasoned thinking and then expect me to immediately accept their truth because they shouted it out at me.


      Fanatics? Maybe you should use your stupid computer and READ on the INTERNET. The stuff I've said is FACT, not something I've made up without basis, as you have. You're useless statement about scientists genetically modifying animals for the purpose of "cultivation" truly exemplifies you're inability to try to LEARN and CHANGE. And no, I wouldn't be in line with my bun, I've got stuff a lot healthier and tastier already infront of me. You've abused your already depleting brain enough for one night.

    14. Re:pathetic by ravinfinite · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Nutritous? A common myth among meat eaters. Meat at grocery stores contains plenty of additives; it's not pure. It's also the leading cause of food poisoning in the US. EDUCATE YOURSELF.

    15. Re:pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't equate an animal's life with a human but I am still a vegetarian. The fact is that eating meat is not necessary and in fact, it requires considerably more resources to raise livestock than to grow crops. Why eat meat? Because it is delicious? That is just not a compelling enough argument for me. Take a look at the livestock industry and see how animals are handled and then decide if the selfish desire to eat meat is worth the suffering of a living thing. If you think it's a fair trade-off, fine. Just don't try to pretend that eating meat is necessary or harmless.

    16. Re:pathetic by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      no injuries and deaths to the chickens caused by handling (pre-slaughterhouse)....chickens with broken legs, wings, etc, can't be sold as food...RTFA

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    17. Re:pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know what's inside it, and I eat it anyway. Enjoy your pesticides!

    18. Re:pathetic by Requiem · · Score: 1

      "your" useless statement, not "you're", monkey.

      PERHAPS you SHOULD stop talking LIKE zippy the PINHEAD.

    19. Re:pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been eating meat from grocery stores for twenty-one years, and I've been sick something like three times in my entire life, all the flu. Damn. I guess it's unhealthy!

    20. Re:pathetic by Thing+1 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You're very funny. Let me directly quote the great-grandparent which you wrote:

      Peta should be advocating the fact that animals are sentient beings, not a renewable resource. And for those pathetic scientists who even created such a device should deserve death at the least, using their own stupid machines.

      Where did you use the "=" sign there? You said scientists who create a technology should be put to death "at the least" (I'm wondering what your "most" would be...). You did not say the users of the machines should be put to death, you said the creators. That's like suing Ford for a drunk driver killing your relative. (Pssst... it's not equal.)

      I didn't insult your education, call you a fool, or discuss your drug use or lack thereof. I merely said you were being hypocritical, and you didn't answer my question: do you eat vegetables for which you must kill the organism in order to produce the food? (Carrots, potatoes, beets?)

      Unlike animals, if an apple is broken off the tree, first, it doesn't feel pain (no nervous system) and second, it can REGROW the apple i.e. regenerate.

      But carrots, potatoes and beets cannot regenerate; you kill them by harvesting them.

      And just because a plant doesn't have a nervous system doesn't mean that you're not removing a life force from the Earth when you kill plants. They have a Kirlian aura which you're snuffing out. And check out PEVA, who argue that plants and even single-celled organisms can feel pain ("Some single cell organisms are known to react and withdraw (run!) from heat. Is this not a single-cell pain reaction without a complex human-like nervous system? How can a single cell make this determination without having a 'brain'?")

      Oh, and as for religious references? Let's take Genesis:

      "26": And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

      Now, from Dictionary.com, dominion is:

      1. Sovereign or supreme authority; the power of governing and controlling; independent right of possession, use, and control; sovereignty; supremacy.

      Combining the two: God gave us supremacy over the animals. The power to govern, control, possess, and use them for our purposes.

      And if you follow a more scientific track, we evolved as omnivores and the few people who I have seen attempt a vegan lifestyle ended up emaciated, weak, pale, and short. (Yes, this is anecdotal evidence.)

      I'm not trying to pick a fight -- but you obviously are, given the wording in the great-grandparent post:

      Go ahead, FLAME ME. But it's the truth.
      Calling something the truth without providing references is a Fallacious Argument. There's lots on that page; take your pick. ;-) (My vote is for Burden of Proof, but several others fit.) Now, if you're willing to provide references, as I have above, and not resort to name-calling (that's an Ad Hominem attack, by the way) then we can have a discussion.
      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    21. Re:pathetic by ravinfinite · · Score: 1

      You may purchase your meat from farmers who only feed organic produce to their livestock. However, most farmers don't. Lucky you.

    22. Re:pathetic by ravinfinite · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the spelling correction, grammar troll. That's hardly on-topic.

      Zippy the pinhead? I've never heard of such person. Well, I guess it takes one to know one.

    23. Re:pathetic by ravinfinite · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, I happen to be a farmer and I grow my own vegetables and incidentally, I don't use pesticides. So why won't you enjoy for hot dogs full of chicken crap and ground beef full of just about everything.

    24. Re:pathetic by The_dev0 · · Score: 1
      I bet if most of them knew what is REALLY inside their meat they purchase at the grocery store, they would probably puke on the spot.

      Now I KNOW I've been baited by your troll, but this is the sort of bullshit rhetoric that reinforces other's opinions of vegetarians thinking they are superior to everyone else. What do YOU know that others don't simply because they are meat eaters? Absolutely nothing? I thought so. Do they give you some sort of book when you join PETA that fills you in on the secrets of the omnivore infidels that others are not privvy to?

      I am simply trying to "educate" the hapless individuals who know abosolutely no facts about what they're talking about.

      Here's a suggestion for you, keep that shit to yourself, and worry about all the hypocritical shit you are doing. Don't worry about me and what my friends are doing, because (contrary to what your ego may tell you) we do not give a flying fuck what you think. You wanna limit your diet to vegetables that have been genetically modified and then marinated in a pesticide stew, be my guest. But don't play all high and mighty because you disagree with a lifestyle choice made by others, because believe me, that's all you're doing. When other groups campaign against a lifestyle choice they disagree with they are painted as racist or sexist, militant vegetarians are just lucky their "cause" is socially acceptable right now in exactly the same way hating negroes or gays has been accepted in the past. See where this is going? You look after yourself, and give others the courtesy or respect to do the same.

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
    25. Re:pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately dickhead, not everybody buys all their meat from the grocery stores in America that you decry. Some of us farm our own meat and vegetables or buy them from organic outlets, and actually understand how a symbiotic relationship with the world around us works. Instead of spouting more dimwitted rubbish, you should EDUCATE YOURSELF.

    26. Re:pathetic by cyril3 · · Score: 1
      I do not understand your first statements. "solutions that work, not skeptical games". If these terms are meaningful in the context of your activism they aren't really so in the current discussion.

      I read PETA and found the newslink to yahoo news. I hadn't seen that report before but I tend to get my hard info from newspapers, magazines and radio. So I assume if there is any value to it I'll hear about it next week. READing on the INTERNET is fun but you can't believe everything you see there, can you.

      That was about the only fact in your entire post. The rest was basically opinion or statements about what PETA should be doing.

      My scientist statement was a serious question to your statement that you were a vegitarian because it is morally wrong to take the life of one being only to benefit yourself. I didn't understand the 'only to benefit yourself' qualifier.

      But I didn't particularly want to discuss freshly dead animals and the attendant disease risks etc so I picked animals that died naturally but were suitable for use. I had to invent them first. I don't see how all that exemplifies my inability to learn and change.

      You've abused your already depleting brain enough for one night.

      Yeah well I'm not the one who forgot the closing i / am I. And I wrote all that stuff at 10.30am Friday here on the east coast of Australia. I can believe it's very late at night wherever you are.

    27. Re:pathetic by cyril3 · · Score: 1
      But it is perfectly resonable to believe that there are sufficient differences between humans and the animals that we commonly eat to have no moral problems with the concept of killing them for food.

      I stand by my statement in another post that i dislike people who arrive at a position through years of seeking and then expect me to believe something on their say-so. I equally dislike people who insist on me getting educated about something (going on the same years of seeking) and assume that this education will give me the same views on things as they have.

      The more I learn (v.) the less I know (n.) When I help my kids with their school work I try to get them to focus on the right question. You don't get smarter getting the right answer to the wrong question.

      All you have are answers. Shit, I can get them anywhere. I don't need an education for that. You prove that.

    28. Re:pathetic by ravinfinite · · Score: 1

      "My scientist statement was a serious question to your statement that you were a vegitarian because it is morally wrong to take the life of one being only to benefit yourself. I didn't understand the 'only to benefit yourself' qualifier. "

      When a person kills an animal to eat the animal, that only benefits the person. That doesn't benefit the animal to take it's life.

      Animals that die naturally are ones like cows that die at the age of 15, not ones that die in two years at factory farms. I think you'll find that a sensible example. Not willing to face the truth is called a state of "denial". That truly exemplifies your inability to learn and change since you are unwilling to do either.

      Yeah well I'm not the one who forgot the closing i / am I

      Thank you, grammar troll, I'll keep that in mind.

    29. Re:pathetic by ravinfinite · · Score: 1

      Actually, I enjoy eating a lot of soy which, if you didn't know, has more protein than any kind of meat. Thank you for your worthless comment, and next time, before you try to make a point, make sure you know what the hell you're talking about.

    30. Re:pathetic by JM_the_Great · · Score: 1

      PETA is starting to lose it's integrity.

      Whoa... I wasn't aware it ever had integrity ;)

      --

      --Justin Mitchell
      "2nd Place is a fancy word for losing" --Bender (Futurama)
    31. Re:pathetic by cyril3 · · Score: 1
      That doesn't benefit the animal to take it's life.

      Thank you for explaining that. Now I understand your statement better.

      Not willing to face the truth is called a state of "denial"

      The truth is that animals are not humans nor are they equal to humans or the same as humans. They are not better or worse than human; they just are not human. I do not have any moral problems with killing animals for food. Nor should you, it's perfectly natural for humans to eat meat. I would not knowingly cause an animal unnecessary pain or stress. Nor should you, it displays a lack of concern for obvioulsly sentient beings. It is possible to reconcile these two statements.

      That is the truth.

      I read somewhere on the internet that not being willing to face the truth is called a state of denial.

      I hardly think I qualify as a grammar troll on the basis of one comment (meant humourously) that related one of your typing errors to the insults you were hurling at me about my lack of education and sleep.

    32. Re:pathetic by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Actually, I enjoy eating a lot of soy which, if you didn't know, has more protein than any kind of meat. Thank you for your worthless comment, and next time, before you try to make a point, make sure you know what the hell you're talking about.

      It also causes brain damage. Apparently, the reason this doesn't happen in asian countries is because there's something in the fish they eat that counteracts this.

      And, no, I don't have a source for this. You'll have to google it up yourself.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    33. Re:pathetic by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      When a person kills an animal to eat the animal, that only benefits the person. That doesn't benefit the animal to take it's life.

      Disrupt the food chain, cause genocide. There's a time and place when it's better for you, better for them, and better for everyone (the chickens included) to take your place in the world, and the food chain is one of those places.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    34. Re:pathetic by thefinite · · Score: 1

      Just one question: Where does the Bible say "live and let live"? I don't remember it, but if it is there I would like to know the context.

      Also, it seems a little wierd using the Bible to support your arguments considering Jesus ate meat, all of the prophets and Apostles ate meat, and most of the Old Testament involved the Mosaic practice of sacrificing animals.

      I am curious how you resolve all that.

      --
      Boom Shanka
    35. Re:pathetic by Zeriel · · Score: 1

      *nods* Same reason I buy organically raised beef and chicken. Better taste, happier animal, fewer poisons.

      --
      "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
    36. Re:pathetic by Darby · · Score: 1

      I, myself have always been vegetarian simply because it is morally wrong to take the life of one being only to benefit yourself.

      So are we to assume that you eat only rocks?
      Plants are every bit as alive as animals, so you kill to live just like every other animal on this planet.
      All you are doing is drawing an arbitrary line.
      I draw my line at eating people (and dogs and cats and stuff), but this isn't an absolute moral thing.

    37. Re:pathetic by b-baggins · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Ghandi responded to stimulus just like any animal. So did Joan of Ark and the firefighters in the WTC, and the people on the flight who took down the hijacked airplane.

      This is such a stupid comment that it hardly deserves a reply.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    38. Re:pathetic by ravinfinite · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you didn't know, but Einstein was vegetarian. Most would agree that he wasn't brain damaged. Also, I'm not the smartest person from where I'm around, but I'm definetely smarter than most average people, which somewhat contradicts many articles I've found on google.

    39. Re:pathetic by ravinfinite · · Score: 1

      The truth is that animals are not humans nor are they equal to humans or the same as humans.

      A very egoistic and self-centered comment.

      Nor should you, it's perfectly natural for humans to eat meat.

      Perfectly natural? Most women that die of breast cancer are meat eaters. Same for men when it comes to many other different diseases. If you think it's perfectly natural, then perhaps you can explain why Einstein was vegetarian. Apparently, he didn't think the same either.

      I do not have any moral problems with killing animals for food.

      I would not knowingly cause an animal unnecessary pain or stress. Nor should you, it displays a lack of concern for obvioulsly sentient beings.


      You'd be surprised how much "unnecessary pain and stress" is involved with modern factory farming. Besides, "killing" and "sentient" don't go together.

      THAT is the truth.

    40. Re:pathetic by RichardX · · Score: 1

      tend to get my hard info from newspapers, magazines and radio. So I assume if there is any value to it I'll hear about it next week. READing on the INTERNET is fun but you can't believe everything you see there, can you

      What, unlike say, the New York Times, you mean?

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    41. Re:pathetic by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      It's kind of funny that you keep demanding that he "get a real education," yet you're incapable of spelling the word "dealt." In fact, you misspelled it twice, the same way ("dealth").

      Here's another word you might not know how to spell: hipocrisy.

      Anyway, what your argument seems to have changed to is something along the lines of, "It's wrong to cause pain to any living being (that is capable of feeling pain)." The obvious question is, why is that the case?

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    42. Re:pathetic by lmfr · · Score: 1
      "Just one question: Where does the Bible say "live and let live"? I don't remember it, but if it is there I would like to know the context."

      It doesn't. Well, not in those words. Some people like to decude that from other texts, most notably "judge not, that you be not judged".

      " Also, it seems a little wierd using the Bible to support your arguments considering Jesus ate meat, all of the prophets and Apostles ate meat, and most of the Old Testament involved the Mosaic practice of sacrificing animals."

      Yes, but it's interesting to note that only after the "flood" (I don't know the exact english word) were humans allowed fish and meat (Genesis 9), and the curse on the ground was removed (end of Genesis 8).

    43. Re:pathetic by ravinfinite · · Score: 1

      Yes, without doubt, plants are also very well alive as animals.

      ... so you kill to live just like every other animal on this planet.

      Actually, it's not that simple. Maybe some useful information here. Plenty of other stuff if you search at google.

      I draw my line at eating people (and dogs and cats and stuff), but this isn't an absolute moral thing.

      My line also isn't an absolute moral thing. It involves the environment, health and many other things as well.

    44. Re:pathetic by Requiem · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess it takes one to know one.

      Wow, you really put me in my place!

    45. Re:pathetic by ravinfinite · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Ghandi responded to stimulus just like any animal....

      ...Which is my point. That's sufficient evidence that animals (not just humans) infact DO experience pain when put through similar traumatic stimulus and there's no need for skeptical games questioning if other animals feel pain.

      This is such a stupid comment that it hardly deserves a reply.

      Yes, I agree that you're comments are full of so much doggerel that they hardly deserve a reply.

    46. Re:pathetic by ravinfinite · · Score: 1

      ...but this is the sort of bullshit rhetoric that reinforces other's opinions of vegetarians thinking they are superior to everyone else.

      Please cite where I stated that "vegetarians are superior to non-vegetarians".

      What do YOU know that others don't simply because they are meat eaters?

      I, in fact, know quite a lot. How? Because I've got evidence, unlike you who resides to ad hominem, the coward's way of trying to make a point (no offense).

      Do they give you some sort of book when you join PETA that fills you in on the secrets of the omnivore infidels that others are not privvy to?

      I'm not a member of Peta. AFAIK, Peta resorts to undercover footage via audio and video on real factory farms. Can you suggest a better method?

      Here's a suggestion for you, keep that shit to yourself, and worry about all the hypocritical shit you are doing.

      Perhaps you'd like to know that Einstein, da Vinci and many others famous people were vegetarians (search on google). Most people would hardly agree that they were hipocrits.

      Don't worry about me and what my friends are doing, because (contrary to what your ego may tell you) we do not give a flying fuck what you think.

      This is typical arrogance and ignorance. You won't believe how many people I've known like you.

      You wanna limit your diet to vegetables that have been genetically modified and then marinated in a pesticide stew, be my guest. Perhaps you haven't read some of my other posts, but just to fill you in, I'm a farmer and I own my own farm. Incidentally, I don't use GE foods. Besides, you think that a person that cares so much about what he eats will overlook that so easily?

      When other groups campaign against a lifestyle choice they disagree with they are painted as racist or sexist, militant vegetarians are just lucky their "cause" is socially acceptable right now in exactly the same way hating negroes or gays has been accepted in the past.

      Actually, maybe you didn't know, but we're I'm from, vegetarianism has always been accepted. I don't know of a place or time when it wasn't. Granted, it was considered obscure or radicle back in the days, but it certainly isn't today by the vast majority of the population.

      You look after yourself, and give others the courtesy or respect to do the same.

      Thank you, I certainly *DO* look after myself. I expect the same for yourself.

      You may have felt offended by my comments but that certainly wasn't my intention. When I made the comment about people puking on the spot, I wasn't kidding. Unfortunately for me, it's happened right in front of me.You'll *seriously* be surprised when you learn what is really inside the meat you eat (even with supposedly "organically" raised cow). I'm not going to make lists or anything; I'll let you figure it out (if you've got the courage). Where and when you learn is for you to decide. True, some people seriously don't care what they eat and don't want to know and that type of attitude is the most dangerous to health. To wrap this up, I'm going to leave you with a quote. You may or may not agree with it right now, but I hope one day you will.

      âTrue human goodness, in all its purity and freedom, can come to the fore only when its recipient has no power. Mankindâ(TM)s true moral test (which lies deeply buried from view) consists of its attitude toward those who are at its mercy: the animals. And in this respect, mankind has suffered a fundamental debacle, a debacle so fundamental that all others stem from it.â(TM) (Can't remember who or where; if someone knows, PLEASE let me know).

    47. Re:pathetic by ravinfinite · · Score: 1

      "Organically" is a word that the meat industry has affectively assimilated into culture to lure customers. I would hardly agree that the animals are "happier" or have less "poisons" (actually, they're used to make the cattle grow faster and fatter and are known to contain traces of lead and arsenic). So now we've got a "organic" meat industry versus a "non-organic" meat industry.

      *nods* Same reason I buy organically raised beef and chicken. Better taste, happier animal, fewer poisons.

      Pure evidence that they've managed to fool the average individual.

    48. Re:pathetic by Zeriel · · Score: 1

      *snore* I live in farm country. I buy beef from people whose cattle I can visit. =P

      --
      "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
    49. Re:pathetic by The_dev0 · · Score: 1
      Please cite where I stated that "vegetarians are superior to non-vegetarians".

      You didn't and we both know that. What pissed me off is they way you imply that the rest of the world are uneducated morons who do what they are told without question, while you are some far too intelligent to behave like the rest of us. And in fact, it is up to you to "educate" the poor unwashed masses of the error of their ways.

      I, in fact, know quite a lot. How? Because I've got evidence, unlike you who resides to ad hominem

      Yes, well, I remain unconvinced about a lot of the so-called evidence that is touted by groups with their own interest at heart. It's like the tabacoo industry saying there is nothing wrong with smoking. It's hard to take seriously the arguments put forward by groups who have their own agenda. Also, what makes you think I have absolutely no knowledge on the subject myself? Making blind assumptions about me does not strengthen your arguments.

      Perhaps you'd like to know that Einstein, da Vinci and many others famous people were vegetarians (search on google). Most people would hardly agree that they were hipocrits.

      We aren't talking about them (nice deflection) we are talking about you, and my point remains. Do what you like in life, just don't feel obliged to grace us with your wisdom regarding your own lifestyle choice. You know, many famous people were also drug users, or spouse abusers, so is that also prove some kind of point about the validity of your (or their) lifestyle choice?

      This is typical arrogance and ignorance. You won't believe how many people I've known like you.

      THIS is exactly my point. You don't know shit about me, yet not only do you make a personal attack about my intelligence (again, I must not be as smart as you because I disagree), but you go on to compare me (a person you know nothing about) to some arbitrary group so as to (again) divert attention away from the point I was making, which is KEEP IT TO YOURSELF. I don't disagree with vegetarianism, and as a matter of fact I do agree with the validity of some of the arguments put forward supprting a vegetable-based diet. What rubs me is the way you made your point. It wasn't the message, it was the delivery.

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
  42. Version for humans by Animats · · Score: 4, Funny
    The large version, for riot control, will be really something.

    "The scoops are on the way!" - Soylent Green.

    1. Re:Version for humans by squeakygeek · · Score: 0
      Starting in the early 1980s, Britain's Silsoe Research Institute received about $200,000 a year from the government to design a humane harvesting machine.

      At first glance I actually thought it said human harvisting machine!

    2. Re:Version for humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      From here on, beware of sidewalks that suddenly start moving under you.

      Or always have classical music on you.

  43. I've seen this once before... by Gandalf_Greyhame · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember Baseketball from the creators of South Park? There is a scene in that where they are vacuuming chickens...

    --
    I am not stubborn. I am right!
    1. Re:I've seen this once before... by Flounder · · Score: 1

      That was the first thing I thought of when I read this story. Chickens go in the big tube, a burst of feathers out the other end.

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

  44. Chicken Run! by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't want to be a pie. I don't like gravy.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  45. cross-job skill development by thomasmd · · Score: 1

    a potential new job for all those unemployed guys that drive the machines that suck up golf balls...

  46. Why did the chicken crossed the road? by QEDog · · Score: 1

    It was forced to do so by the chicken-hole principle.

    --
    "There is no teacher but the enemy."-Mazer Rackham
  47. ROFL by ratajik · · Score: 1

    Early devices included the chicken vacuum, which sucked up birds and shot them through tubes to waiting trucks. But the birds tended to plug up the tubes and turn somersaults as they traveled inside the contraption. We had too many die on us, recalls Buddy Burruss, vice president of operations at Tip Top Poultry Inc. of Marietta, Ga., which tested and quickly abandoned the pneumatic approach two decades ago.

    Hahahahahahah, he's right, I'm not going to be able to get the image of somersaulting chickens getting sucked up in a huge chicken vacuum cleaner out of my head! When they got plugged up, did all the chickens start getting sucked into a giant nasty chicken hair-ball like mass??

  48. chickens fight back! by pzilla · · Score: 1

    I was expecting something like Ginger teaching the chickens how to fly.

    --

    --
    Karma is overrated, whoring is ok.
  49. I've done it by fava · · Score: 5, Informative

    I did chicken catching once when visiting relatives out in the country. I must say that chickens are very stupid.

    Imagine a large barn with chickens covering the entire floor. As chickens are removed from the barn the remaining chickens do NOT move into the empty space, they remain packed together as the barn empties. There is no chasing involved.

    The chickens do not react at all until you grab them by the legs, the most common reaction is to peck, scratch or shit on your hands. And it stank.

    I do remember that I was paid well (for a 13 year old) for a few hours work and the farmers wife had a very nice breakfast ready for us when we were done.

    I certanly wouldn't want to do it for a living.

    1. Re:I've done it by cybercuzco · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact you got to shag the farmers daughter after you washed up ;-)

      --

    2. Re:I've done it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yea...

      I remember that game!

      This solution leaves out a lot of the "color" in the game... the overalls were "piss stained/smelling" from what I remember, to get past the dog(s) (step 13). The radio played "rock music". This was an text-based game for those wondering, like Zork.

    3. Re:I've done it by Johnny+Pissoff · · Score: 1

      Uh, that would probably be his cousin.

    4. Re:I've done it by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      Just more reasons to go veggie. No one ever got hurt taking down a wild tofudebeast....

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    5. Re:I've done it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, but no-one ever felt satisfied eating the sonofabitch either.

    6. Re:I've done it by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

      I did chicken catching once when visiting relatives out in the country. I must say that chickens are very stupid.

      I'm sure the breeder-chickens are very stupid. Who do you think did that to them? They're bred that way. How would you like to be bred stupid and put on a docile hormone diet?

    7. Re:I've done it by martyros · · Score: 1

      Well, I worked on a sheep farm one summer: sheep are really dumb too, but they still run away from you. =)

      --

      TCP: Why the Internet is full of SYN.

    8. Re:I've done it by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

      Maybe the chickens are REALLY smart? They *know* there's no escape ;-)

  50. i'd use it to catch america's most wanted by double_plus_ungod · · Score: 1

    now all they need is for it to catch humans and we've got any number of sci-fi movies come to life...

  51. Upload a video by halo8 · · Score: 1

    OMG!! Some one HAS to upload a video of this...

    forget ellen fliess, forget that porky starwars geek, this could be the newest craze!! this thing looks AWSOME!!

    --
    The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
    1. Re:Upload a video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The StarWars Kid is suing !!!! We don't want the chicking Suing us as well !!

      http://www.waxy.org/archive/2003/05/29/ghyslain. sh tml

  52. Offtopic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never thought about a "chicken vacuum"

    maybe they meant "chicken vacuumer"?
  53. Not very humane by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    sure you can make it more humane. Just don't buy the inhumanely kept and slaughtered stuff.

    By the time a chicken hits your plate it has been de-beaked, pumped with hormones, lived in huge stressful flocks (natural flock size is arounf 12 birds), denied perching, gathered then inhumanely slaughtered.

    Seems to me like the major reason for introducing this device is the mighty buck. The industry is pushing the humane side, though in fact this contributes only a small fraction of the inhumanity in raising chickens.

    Another approach would be to eat ducks. Ducks are far more stupid than chickens and are far less stress prone too. However, ducks don't produce meat as fast, so the mighty buck kicks in again....

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Not very humane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be all in support for eating ducks, but I'm scared that they'll turn out to be cigar-smoking comic book heros from an another planet in an awful movie

    2. Re:Not very humane by laemas · · Score: 1

      >By the time a chicken hits your plate it has been de-beaked, pumped with hormones

      I have never personnally seen any birds being de-beaked although i have heard of it being done. it is a complete waste of time. It is also only done to caged layers , not meat chickens.
      Now the hormone issue. How the fuck do you administer hormones to 10,000 + birds? With a little siringe and a fuck load of time? Do you no how much that would cost? in man hours? in chemicles (probably not that much)?
      Well we could put those hormones in their food. so okay we have birds that are way overdosing on them , and some birds that get fuck all of them (peaking order and all). Then we get all the dead birds , or uneadible meat , resulting from growth that is to fast which causes tumors. Of course there are hormones in chickens , they occur naturally. I have lived , and worked , a chicken farm for the last 15 years. I have personnally made their feed , and i can tell you it consists of nothing more than crushed wheat and barly. oh , the layers get cloraphle , it makes their eggs yellower.

    3. Re:Not very humane by Catnapster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What PETA seems to realize - and you don't - is that no matter how zealous they are, there's not going to be a widespread ban on animal food anytime soon, and chickens will continue to be "inhumanely kept and slaughtered".

      Activists like to make you think that the act of buying one brand of chicken over another is a strike against the huge, faceless, cruel chicken industry and its sadistic practices. It's not. They won't even know it happened, because the store already bought the chicken.

      Furthermore, it's "almighty buck". And what you imply to be obsession with profit is actually just being efficient with money. If you have two gas stations to patronize, and one is clean, has efficient service, high-quality gas and a lower price, and the other is expensive and has crap gas, are you going to go to the better, less-expensive one or the other?

      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
    4. Re:Not very humane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They won't even know it happened, because the store already bought the chicken."
      Like buying Elephant horn. Hey, its already dead right? If enough people didn't buy the chicken, then the supermarket would notice it's no longer selling and stop stocking it.
      It's like walking across grass, one person doesn't make much of a difference, but enough people will wear it down to the dirt.

  54. Only a partial solution by Bueller_007 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Yes. Animals are treated cruelly in factory farms.
    Anyone who wishes to view the way that chickens are treated in captivity can look here. Granted, this is a video of the way that Kentucky Fried Chicken treats their birds, and they are known to be particularly cruel.
    Some interesting facts about chickens raised for eggs and/or slaughter:

    Percent of laying hens that suffer broken bones in their cage: 30%
    Male chicks (from laying hens) killed per year by suffocation, gas, or grinding in the U.S.: 200 million
    Male chicks used per day for fertilizer, chicken food, and pet food in Canada: 40000 (Note the cannibalism here. Also, cow parts are fed to chicks, and chick parts are fed to cows, which can possibly lead to the spread of BSE ("Mad Cow"))
    Broiler chickens that have trouble walking: 90%
    Chickens still alive at the scald tank: 20%
    Not to mention the fact that the agriculture industry is the number one polluter in America.
    (Plus, in case you didn't know, chicken has more cholesterol than beef.)

    I'm glad to see this machine in action, because it will reduce the suffering, but I'd rather see people just stop eating meat.
    It amazes me how many people are bothered by the scene in 'Roger and Me' where the woman kills and strips the rabbit, yet they still eat meat...Does the end justify the means?
    -- End vegan propoganda --

    1. Re:Only a partial solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep I was right as usual. The idiot PETA morons are already getting modded up. Just another reason why slashdot is regarded as a big-time joke, unless you're a braindamaged eurocommie.

    2. Re:Only a partial solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just because you have tender emotions, doesn't mean we all should

    3. Re:Only a partial solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I'm not bothered by a scene of rabbits being killed, is it OK for me to eat them?

    4. Re:Only a partial solution by jd_esguerra · · Score: 1

      Granted, this is a video of the way that Kentucky Fried Chicken treats their birds, and they are known to be particularly cruel.

      It the 11-Herbs-and-spices that really get 'em.

      Not to mention the fact that the agriculture industry is the number one polluter in America.

      Lets get rid of agriculture then. It's the fertilizer right? Or is it still the cows and pigs farting?

      (Plus, in case you didn't know, chicken has more cholesterol than beef.)

      But what kind of cholesterol?

      It amazes me how many people are bothered by the scene in 'Roger and Me' where the woman kills and strips the rabbit, yet they still eat meat...

      I'm not bothered by the killing an skinning of rabbits nearly as much as I am bothered by the number of people who think Mike Moore is Jesus. Some good stuff, but also some PAINFULLY bad logic. Also interesting is that I've never found any of his work to be at all humorous--everyone who has encouraged me to see/read his work insists it is hilarious. And it probably is, to him: A millionaire paid to talk "angrily" out of his ass. Hell, me or the Filthy Critic could do that. (I'm doing it now...) I guess you just have to be the type of person who sits (sat) at the mall all day making fun of all the people around you--who actually have a reason to be there--to really enjoy his humor. I recommend reading some classical philosophy stuff if you want "deep" or the Filthy Critic if you want "angry." But, no no, go ahead and buy his book, pay to see his mock documentaries. Everyone else is doing it.

      Let's see...Killing and carving up an animal, or "food preparation" as it is occasionally known, has been around for a LONG time. Way back when individual families had to find/raise and prepare their own meat (which is still available--fresh--in winter), everyone killed and gutted animals. And they probably got used to it-- in much the same way doctors get used to gutting people and their wallets.

      There isn't a chance in hell that I will stop eating meat. It is embedded in my heritage, my culture and my lifestyle. To think that I could be "persuaded" to change that with no apparent benefit to me or my family is ludicrous. (Informing me of the dangers of meat ie mad cow, 'roids, antibiotics, etc. isn't going to make me not eat meat. I'll just get it from somewhere else.) It might be that in the future everyone is vegetarian, but it will take a lot of time, a lot of pressure, and "The Great Meat Catastrophe of 2067" to get there. As long as you understand that, and are patient, I applaud your efforts in promoting a vegetarian lifestyle.

    5. Re:Only a partial solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Killing and carving up an animal, or "food preparation" as it is occasionally known, has been around for a LONG time.

      There isn't a chance in hell that I will stop eating meat. It is embedded in my heritage, my culture and my lifestyle.


      Slavery lasted a long time too. It was ingrained in culture and lifestyle. Did that make it "right"? Well, obviously not so right that it wouldn't eventually collapse. What will it take for animal slavery to collapse? Sadly, it may never do so. Most people only care about themselves. They don't give a damn about the shortened lifetime of suffering that goes into their 30 minute meal, just like folks didn't care about slavery. the only difference is that animals can't fight back, so it is incumbent on people who care to speak up on their behalf.

      And if the modern animal slaver comes accross someone who does care, so much the better, they can have a smug and comfortable argument belittling vegetarians and intellectualising suffering.

    6. Re:Only a partial solution by Abm0raz · · Score: 1

      As an owner and proud wearer of the "I {heart} EATING COWS" t-shirt by Rhubarb, I will offer you the same deal I offer every vegetarian the tells me eating meet is bad and I should stop:

      I will respect your beliefs and not eat meat for as long as you like ... as long as you convey the same respect for my beliefs over the same time period and eat at LEAST 1 pound of meat a day between your meals and at least 1.5 pounds per week of chicken, cow, and pig.

      I have yet to have a vegetarian take me up on it.

      -Ab

      --
      Nothing fails quite like prayer.
    7. Re:Only a partial solution by jd_esguerra · · Score: 1

      And if the modern animal slaver comes accross someone who does care, so much the better, they can have a smug and comfortable argument belittling vegetarians and intellectualising suffering.

      Nah. I don't care enough about the issue to have an argument about it. It's just not the same caliber issue as abortion rights, privacy, etc, where the population is essentially split down the middle. Meat/no meat will never get seriously debated in the same way pro-life/pro-choice arguments do, which is a shame. It is less like the slavery argument you mention, which if you remember required a war to resolve, and more like prohibition-- where people who don't drink have nothing to lose, and more to gain (like safety and lower crime). Those who "enjoy" the occasional drink do lose. They lose the right to drink. Is consuming alcohol wrong? Prohibition didn't work because alcohol is part of some cultures. (Some more than others!) I figure (but don't know, obviously) that banning consumption of meat would fail in a similar fashion as banning alcohol. But the odds of illegalizing meat consumption are slim; there are no strong lobbying forces for making meat illegal, and there isn't enough of a two-sided ethical issue two ever make it a hotly debated issue. (I've never been to a rally againt any meat proc plants or similar; is there ever any opposition the protest? Other than maybe plant workers or those who are somehow related to the industry?)

      I doubt anyone is reading this, since it was posted way after the article scrolled off, but I would like some honest comments on this scenario: If you are vegan, pro-animals rights, et cetera, and also the most powerful lawmaker in the known world, what would you do to change people's eating habits? Would you outlaw domesticating/eating animals? Keep in mind that this is not an "it's right" or "its wrong" question. I want to hear justification, just what you would do, and whether or not you think it is feasable.

      By the way, when you live on an island (Philippines) that has too large a population to live on agriculture alone, you have to raise animals (chickens, for example) and fish to eat. I imagine a similar situation in the desert. I don't see where being smug or intellectualizing needs to be part of rationalizing eating meat then. But then, you probably never thought about that sitting in Starbucks complaining about how everyone else sucks for not seeing "what's right" like you do. It seems your world is pretty small and uncomplicated. I envy you.

    8. Re:Only a partial solution by sukottoX · · Score: 1

      i wish you would have put a --Begin vegan propoganda-- tag there so I wouldn't have read it. lol

  55. obligatory matrix quotes by QEDog · · Score: 1
    Morpheus: Throughout human history, we have been dependent on machines to survive. Fate, it seems, is not without a sense of irony.

    Mouse: That's exactly my point. Exactly! Because you have to wonder: how do the machines know what Tasty Wheat tasted like? Maybe they got it wrong. Maybe what I think Tasty Wheat tasted like actually tasted like oatmeal, or tuna fish. That makes you wonder about a lot of things. You take chicken, for example: maybe they couldn't figure out what to make chicken taste like, which is why chicken tastes like everything!

    --
    "There is no teacher but the enemy."-Mazer Rackham
  56. Great for border patrol by kaltkalt · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I can see these things sweeping the lush banks of the Rio Grande, greatly reducing the burden on US Border Patrol. One US Border Patrol agent can round up about a dozen illegals per hour, whereas I'll bet this machine could snag at least 40 or so (with minor modifications). Technology kicks ass!

    --

    Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
    1. Re:Great for border patrol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The irony in your sig is blinding.

    2. Re:Great for border patrol by kaltkalt · · Score: 1

      Ok, they can go on the norther border, too. As George Washington once said, the best way to protect our freedom is to protect our borders and keep the illegals out. No "freedom" is involved in crossing our borders w/out permission (which I am all for granting), so there is no irony in my sig at all.

      --

      Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
  57. I'm impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I saw this story go up, I was sure that there would be a flood of vegitarian/PETA comments. Hell I had Michael pegged as a vegitarian from the very beginning.

    I'm impressed. Slashdotters are carnivores.

    1. Re:I'm impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they are. The majority of Slashdotters are at least partially educated and open minded enough to think for themselves, not to be blinded with sketchy information from hate groups.

  58. Re:PETA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha Michael! Why don't you just kill yourself now. I'm surprised that someone hasn't murdered you already.

  59. Machines learn about chicken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we finally know why everything tastes like chicken.

  60. Yeah, but what I need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "... chicken harvester can catch 150 birds a minute."
    ..is a _chick_ harvester that can catch 150 birds a minute.

  61. Mmmm...peta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People Eating Tasty Animals...

  62. Link whoring by morcheeba · · Score: 2, Informative

    mfg website (uses frames - scroll top frame down for selections)
    bigger picture
    specifications page

    my sig:

  63. Re:as someone who has caught chickens for vaccinat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will because you guys break too many chickens.

  64. A better look at this thing... by pjdepasq · · Score: 1

    Here's a much better look at this contraption (http://www.lewismola.com/) including a person in the frame to give it much better scale!

  65. Mod parent up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    No trolling taking place here. Just your run-of-the-mill masturbation joke.

    tee-hee I said masturbate.

  66. even more interesting.... by joshsteadmon · · Score: 1

    an Air Force research base near where I live has a Chicken Gun. It shoots frozen chickens out of a GIGANTIC pipeline in order to test airplane cockpits for collisions with birds. You can't even believe the gore and the smell on a nice hot summer day.

    1. Re:even more interesting.... by Tyrdium · · Score: 1

      Got a picture? Or even better, a movie?

    2. Re:even more interesting.... by bakes · · Score: 1

      I saw a story somewhere about this - the chickens were not supposed to be frozen though, but someone made the mistake of using frozen chickens and blasted a hole through the cockpit glass. I'm guessing that very few birds that a plane would be likely to collide with would be frozen.

      --
      Ho! Haha! Guard! Turn! Parry! Dodge! Spin! Ha! Thrust!
    3. Re:even more interesting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My first job as an EE student intern was to make design changes to a "Chicken-chucker" machine. It would fling LIVE chickens into the spinning turbines of aircraft jet engines. The chickens were sedated and very calm. The entire process would be filmed and analyzed in slow motion for safety of flight issues--bird strikes.
      The technicians wore raincoats and had strong stomachs.

    4. Re:even more interesting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Birds pack quite a wallop.
      One of our F-16s recently came back from a sortie with a damaged canopy that had been pushed back so far by a bird strike that it flexed enough to contact the back of the HUD!

  67. ya know... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    The first time I heard the phrase 'rendered chicken parts,' the first thing that came to mind was computer-generated 3D graphics of chicken parts.

    *shudder*

  68. You're pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Peta should be advocating the fact that animals are sentient beings, not a renewable resource. And for those pathetic scientists who even created such a device should deserve death at the least, using their own stupid machines. Go ahead, FLAME ME. But it's the truth.

    No. It is your opinion and you are entitled to it. It is my opinion that animals are a renewable resource and that the best place for them is over a fire.

    Hey Honey, what's for dinner?
    Beef.
    Oh yeah. Duh.

    1. Re:You're pathetic by ravinfinite · · Score: 1

      Yes beef. Beef which is the leading cause of food poisoning in the US since it's full of additives. Go ahead, enjoy yourself. Just don't try sueing anyone if you find it a bit poisoned.

    2. Re:You're pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enjoy your pesticide-soaked vegetables, you pathetic sack of shit.

    3. Re:You're pathetic by ravinfinite · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, I happen to be a farmer and I don't use pesticides.

    4. Re:You're pathetic by b-baggins · · Score: 0

      No, you just break the backs of people you employ at slave wages to stand and pull weeds and bugs off your plants so you can enjoy about 1/3rd the yield of a modern farm, thereby wasting land by using it inefficiently, and then charging so much for your food that only the wealthy can afford to buy and eat it.

      But, hey, you feel good about yourself for all that you do to contribute to the environment.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    5. Re:You're pathetic by ravinfinite · · Score: 1

      First of all, I don't sell my food, dickhead. Second, more than half of the water used in the US is wasted just for raising cattle on farms.

      You're comments are full of so much doggerel that even you're parents wouldn't be impressed. Load up google, search some articles, read them and then talk.

  69. Can't resist... by HungWeiLo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Never thought about a "chicken vacuum" before?

    Must...not...make..."suck"..."cock"...jokes...

    --
    There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  70. but those really aren't chickens.... by Malor · · Score: 1

    The experiment in the second link is very interesting, but not for the reason that the media picked it up. They're talking about this development as "they've turned the genes for teeth back on in chickens!", but that's not really true.

    The scientists implanted mouse cells in chicken embryos. The mouse cells then migrated to the jaw and started growing teeth. This means that the creatures aren't really chickens, they are "chimeras" -- a combination of two species.

    Despite the headlines, in other words, these are NOT CHICKENS. They're not even birds.

    It is interesting, though, because it shows that the chicken genome still has the information for teeth in it. Apparently, chicken cells ignore the 'make teeth' command, and the mouse cells don't. (I don't know whether mouse cells had mouse DNA in them, or if they had the chicken DNA implanted.)

    It's a long way from here to what the media seems to imply. REAL chickens-with-teeth are a heck of a lot harder than chimera-chickens-with-mouse-teeth.

    Ergo, I can promise you that next week's KFC will have only bones left over. :-)

  71. out of a job by beavmetal · · Score: 1

    I think the Chicken pickers would be happy to lose this job, especially at 21 yrs old. Maybe he could go join the Transistor Sorters Union. I hear they pay 1 per 1000 transistors.

    --
    Looks like it is time to replace your Personality Module. You are a bit to clingy, guess I better replace your fuser to
  72. I know what you mean. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was in the FFA for awhile. When I wasn't busy managing chicken project, I was experimenting on them with hypnosis... :)

    I would fold their head under their wing, shake them quickly in large round circles away from my body, put them on the ground, and they would stay there as I left them for about 20 minutes. When working with chickens without rubber boots and fishing waders, it is not worth your time as cleaning your two pair or so of work clothing would start to make too much wear and tear.

    May I suggest installing an electric fence in the floor of the barn? When you want to collect chickens, give them 70,000 volts to think about it. It will not fry them, honest...it'll stun them. I know this one guy that would hold a 50,000 volt taser upto his arm and shock himself without being stunned. He always cracked us up. He'ld shake his body to insult the taser and say "Oh yeah, this feels great...you try." And we'ld pass on that notion because Ol' Kike Thomas couldn't be trusted around us if we were ever unconcious, if you know what I mean.

    Just my two schillings.

  73. Sim-City 2k3 by RyanFenton · · Score: 1

    That article about chickens/teech = baldness cure reads just like a randomly generated SimCity article. Ack - here's hoping President bush stays away from that 'Disaster' menu!

    Ryan Fenton

  74. I'll pass on that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *pass gas, lol

    No realy, I hear the nutty coffee is quite good.

  75. Chicken with teeth? by kwiqsilver · · Score: 1

    Great! Now the Department of Agriculture will want to implement a dental care programs for rural chickens.

  76. I'll bite by maddogsparky · · Score: 1
    Seriously, I've always wondered what PETA and the like think about natural predators. Do they find it, for example, morally wrong to let wolves roam free knowing that all they eat is other animals they have killed? Wolves were extinct in some parts of the country; does that make it immoral to reintroduce them to areas they once roamed?

    I don't see where killing a chicken in a factory is any less horifying to the chicken than being killed by wolf, fox, mink, etc.

    --
    science is a religion
  77. Wait until the ST:TNG fans hear about this. by janda · · Score: 1

    Picard is nothing if he isn't bald!

    --
    Karma: Food Fight (Mostly affected by Date Plate).
  78. why do they run? by axxackall · · Score: 1
    What's wrong with the industry? Why do chicken run? Why not just keep them from the day 0 in individual small cages?

    I'd rather invest money to individual cages than to catching machine.

    --

    Less is more !
  79. Job Satisfaction by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
    The birds flap, scratch and befoul their captors. Most people can tolerate only a few months of that before flying the coop.

    So you think your job sucks. Then you read something like this.

    Only a few months?!?! Hell, I wouldn't last til lunch. So this is what migrant workers are for...

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  80. Neck breaker by Jac_no_k · · Score: 1

    McDonalds standard issue...

  81. Kobe (koh-bee) by mskfisher · · Score: 1

    Kobe beef.

    I remember seeing it on Food Network... The guy they were interviewing was happy to eat a bit of it raw, which the food reporter and cameraman watched with some apparent amazement.
    I've tried raw steak, and unfortunately it tastes pretty much like it smells - not too enticing. So to be enjoyable, that stuff must be dramatically different.
    Or maybe I didn't add enough salt.

    --
    0x0D 0x0A
    1. Re:Kobe (koh-bee) by renehollan · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I've tried raw steak, and unfortunately it tastes pretty much like it smells - not too enticing. So to be enjoyable, that stuff must be dramatically different.

      Mmmmm, steak tartare. Mmmmm.

      Scrape filet mignon fine, with a sharp blade, add a raw egg (you can skip this, but the scraping leaves the fat on the back of the blade, and some find the resulting meat a bit dry -- the danger of raw eggs is duly noted), some fresh ground black pepper, shallots (just a hint), and smear thickly on freshly baked Cuban bread, like 1/4 to 1/2 inch thick.

      Mmmmm.

      Of course, you'd damn well better trust your butcher. Beef is one of the few meats that are generally safe to eat raw: about the only thing it hosts is penicillin. However, if fouled from the contents of the entrails (E. Coli), or comes from a cow infected with Mad Cow disease (transmitted via the spinal cord and brain), it can be dangerous. In the simple case of surface fouling, of meat from an otherwise disease-free cow, a quick searing will do the trick. This is why rare steaks (from a reputable source) are perfectly safe to eat, but rare hamburger is not.

      Now, in the case of steak tartar, the meat has to be free of contamination from the start, and shredded with clean knives, hence the need to trust your butcher.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    2. Re:Kobe (koh-bee) by mskfisher · · Score: 2, Interesting
      However, if fouled from the contents of the entrails (E. Coli), or comes from a cow infected with Mad Cow disease (transmitted via the spinal cord and brain), it can be dangerous.

      Yeah. Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy. One of the creepier diseases out there.
      And the infectious agent is impervious to normal cooking methods.

      I interned at a gelatine processing plant a few years ago. They didn't have anything for me to do for my first few days, so they gave me a book to read that had some bearing on the industry (I think it was this one, but I can't recall for sure). It detailed BSE and it's human equivalent, Creutzfeldt-Jakob
      Disease.
      Wow. It's the stuff of nightmares - you lose your mind slowly, there's no known treatment, it can't be easily detected, the prions (damaged proteins that are the carriers) are indestructible, etc... No wonder the US cut off imports from Canada when a single infected cow was discovered in Canada.

      Worst part, CJD can have an "incubation" period of years.

      When they actually find a treatment for the disease, I'll be quite fascinated to know how it works.
      --
      0x0D 0x0A
    3. Re:Kobe (koh-bee) by RichardX · · Score: 1

      Of course, you'd damn well better trust your butcher.

      Well.. your butcher, and the USDA inspector who has on average 30 seconds to inspect an entire cow carcass, and 2 seconds to inspect a chicken (#41 on the linked-to page)

      Please note these are 1998 figures, however, I believe if anything the numbers have actually got WORSE since then.

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    4. Re:Kobe (koh-bee) by RichardX · · Score: 1

      IANAExpert, but as far as I'm aware, BSE is basically the cow form of Kuru - the brain rotting disease humans get from cannibalism (specifically eating human brains)

      Of course, this follows, as most farmed cows until recently were forced into cannibalism, being fed the ground up remains of other cows for cheap efficient feed. Not surprisingly cow-Kuru came about, which we call BSE, and when it transfers to a human from a cow, we call it CJD.

      Please correct me if my facts are incorrect (I realise they're almost certainly over-simplified).. as I said, I'm no expert, but that's the understanding I have of the situation.

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    5. Re:Kobe (koh-bee) by renehollan · · Score: 1
      No wonder the US cut off imports from Canada when a single infected cow was discovered in Canada.

      Yes, no wonder. Of course, on this side of the border, as usual, there was the typical "Americans blowing things out of proportion" flap again, but, IMHO, quite justified. [Having lived in the U.S. for over five years, and liking it, it is fascinating to see the different spins both governments put on issues. Do note: not all Canadians agree with (a) their government, (b) popular opinion here. Some of us, like me, hate the government of Canada greatly. Like all socialist regimes, I consider it, and all who support it, murderous bastards. Note to Americans: Nationalized health care lets the state chose who lives and dies. By cutting off or back on service to the elderly, you can "save" social security, for example. It is no wonder 25% of all cardiac patients die in Canada before getting to see a specialist. Convenient. But, that is a rant for another day.]

      Given the nature of BSE and CJD, U.S. paranoia was well-justified, though, it does look at this point that a single cow was infected.

      Canada, unlike the U.K. has not changed its cattle feeding practices the same way, in response to this disease. The U.K. banned the feeding of offal (basically, the left over stuff when animals are slaughtered), back to cattle -- a major factor in the spread of BSE.

      Canada merely banned the feeding of bovine offal back to cattle. So, you have bovine offal fed to pigs and chickens, and their offal fed back to cattle. Some have theorized that this offers a vector for BSE to reinfect cattle herds, though, as speculation, this has been ridiculed. But, because of the difference in Canadian and U.K. feeding practices, and government ignorance of this speculative threat, there is now quite a scandal about it.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    6. Re:Kobe (koh-bee) by mskfisher · · Score: 1

      Yep, you're right. Kuru is another name for CJD.
      The main culprit in cannibalism (whether man or cow) is the brain tissue, where the protein fragments (prions) are in highest concentration.
      In fact, the human form was discovered in highest concentration (double-digit percentages, IIRC) among a tribe that still practiced cannibalism on death. The incidence of CJD/Kuru was quite a lot higher higher among the women... who were traditionally given the brain to eat.

      There's also a version of Kuru in sheep called "scrapie," so-named because the affected animals lose enough of their lower brain functions that they will rub on things until a patch of skin is rubbed raw.

      --
      0x0D 0x0A
    7. Re:Kobe (koh-bee) by renehollan · · Score: 1

      By butcher, I didn't mean the dude at the supermarket. When I buy beef, I generally know the name of the cow from which it came, how it lived, how it died, and how it was handled after it's death.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    8. Re:Kobe (koh-bee) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the record, it's not "koh-bee." It's kind of halfway between "koh-beh" and "koh-bay." Saying "koh-bee", rhymes with "flo-bee", will get you dirty looks at best, and thrown out of the restaurant at worst.

    9. Re:Kobe (koh-bee) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Note to Americans: Nationalized health care lets the state chose who lives and dies. By cutting off or back on service to the elderly, you can "save" social security, for example. It is no wonder 25% of all cardiac patients die in Canada before getting to see a specialist. Convenient. But, that is a rant for another day.]

      Well then, Yank-lover! Why don't you just fsck off to Yankland then, where you can become part of that ONE THIRD of the population that has NO HEALTHCARE WHATSOEVER! It's the Right Wing up here that has been destroying our healthcare system on the altar of tax cuts. If it were properly funded as it should be--has to be--there would be proper, decent healthcare for all.

    10. Re:Kobe (koh-bee) by renehollan · · Score: 1
      Why don't you just fsck off to Yankland then, where you can become part of that ONE THIRD of the population that has NO HEALTHCARE WHATSOEVER!

      I did.

      And, I purchased far better health insurance than I could get in Canada.

      Get this: I don't give a flying fuck about those who can't afford health insurance. I do give a damn when my hard-earned money is stolen to the point where I can't get adequate health care.

      Canada's healthcare system is third-rate, befitting of the third-world slumhole that it is. Yes, I hate it that much, and will leave as soon as possible, no doubt pleasing both you and I.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    11. Re:Kobe (koh-bee) by mskfisher · · Score: 1
      For the record, it's not "koh-bee." It's kind of halfway between "koh-beh" and "koh-bay." Saying "koh-bee", rhymes with "flo-bee", will get you dirty looks at best, and thrown out of the restaurant at worst.
      Ah, thanks for the pronunciation info.

      Though I hope I might just get a mild correction instead of certain death. :)
      At least, that's what I try to do for fellow audiophiles that mispronounce brand names...
      --
      0x0D 0x0A
  82. Once again, another of my 1337 job skillz hosed! by zogger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!1!11!! I've DONE this job, lots, catching chickens in the dark and putting them in cages. It's one of the "fowl"er jobs out there. If at all possible, it's scheduled on new moon nights,or as close as possible, as dark as possible. On one farm where I worked doing this (back early 70's,pure fox platinum blonde farmers daughter, weekend job, etc, you know how it is....), we'd even ride up in the front end loader and put a hood over the public street light on the road out front, to further make it darker. The darker it is, the less they freak out. Next, the farmer, who was a closet alky and hid bottles from his old lady all over the farm, would give all us young fool morons dragooned into this cluck burger transportation service multiple shots of his wild turkey. Thus fortified, we are off! You slide into the chicken house, bend over, feel along the floor, find a chicken leg and snatch it, holding it with one finger, you find another, and another, three in each hand finally, for a total of 6. Then you trudge outside to the truck, load these now non-sleepy bundles of flapping indignation into wooden cages, then someone else would stack the cages. Back and forth and forth and back, on into the wee hours. This was BUHZILLIONS of chickens per chicken house, usually over 20,000 or so. That farm was slightly different from the story, these were egg layers going to the battery cages, before that, free ranging in open houses. Same deal though, ya gots to get cackleberry squatter from point A to B. Each chicken ran around 6-7 lbs. Do the math by the end of the night of what you probably carried in livestock tonnage, maybe 4 or 5 guys doing it.

    I think I made a whopper 2 clams an hour back then. If it wasn't for that girl, well, I just don't know how long I would have done that job...

  83. Re:I Modded Down 5 European Posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    actually, have you ever seen european pussy? visit a place like madrid and maybe you'll think twice about american fat asses when it comes to hot spanish girls. and if you haven't been to madrid, don't open your fucking mouth.

  84. What ever happened to KISS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What a contraption, a $200K contraption.

    Why not just scoop out the building? Some simple chicken wire like "bull dozer" that starts at one end of the building and slowly nudges all in its path towards the business end.

    After all, this thing just nudges them along.

    Some simple machinery (way less than $200K worth) along 2 sides of the barn, a 6' "plow" between the two, and a hole at one end. As an X' by Y' barn slowly becomes 0 by 0, chickens emerge.

    I mean, hell, if your going to put God damned EVERYBODY out of work you should at least do it as cheaply as you can.

    Patent pending.

  85. PH2000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I honestly want to know what the "PH" in "PH2000" stands for...

    My only guess is "Poultry Harvester" which has that oh-so-quant ring to it.

  86. Re:I Modded Down 5 European Posts by cyril3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    You think we read this stuff for comment by the elite levels of the US corporate and academic sector. In Europe and Australia /. is preloaded in the Opera hotlist under Humour.

  87. Chicken Matrix by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 4, Funny

    What else needs to be done to make chickens into batteries?

    1. Re:Chicken Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What else needs to be done to make chickens into batteries?

      How about identifying the POS and NEG ends of the egg?

    2. Re:Chicken Matrix by sharkey · · Score: 1
      What else needs to be done to make chickens into batteries?

      They must be injested by humans who are plugged into the power collecting towers.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  88. News for nerds? by lophophore · · Score: 1

    Is this news for nerds? Does it matter?

    seriously bored nerds, perhaps. But it does not matter one bit to me.

    What is this doing on Slashdot?

    Taco and Hemos must be on vacation or something.

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
  89. Here's a movie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    On this page is a movie from a competing system, using rubber fingers.
    Bas

  90. It caught a person! by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

    If you look close, theres a hand sticking out for help in the bottom part of the chicken catcher. Kinda funny.

  91. Re:Bawk? Are you Jhn Clux0r? by bad_fx · · Score: 1

    Hook up a flamethrower to it,...

    ...and a FRIKKIN' laser beam!

  92. PETA = troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And that's not all. Peta is sending it's message to protect and save animals via strippers, pr0nstars and supermodels. What surprises me is that there's no feminists who oppose this.

    Objecting to PETA is like feeding a troll - it's what they want you to do.

  93. Ugh. by be-fan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's nice to see technology being applied to making the food industry more humane. However, I must use this opportunity to bitch about the quality of meat in the US. The poultry here, at least the stuff you buy at Giant or Safeway, sucks. Totally bland and tasteless. My family lived in Bangladesh until I was 4 or so. There, it takes six months to get a chicken ready for sale. Here, thanks to all the growth hormones, it takes a few weeks. In the process, the chicken is robbed of all flavor. When we moved here, it took me months to get used to the chicken here. Even now, the only way I can stand it is to cook it in tons of spices or deep fry it in grease.

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    1. Re:Ugh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just out of curiosity, how would you remember what chicken in Bangladesh tastes like, given that you moved away when you were 4 or so?

    2. Re:Ugh. by be-fan · · Score: 1

      I've got a really good long term memory. I can remember pretty much everything from age two onwards. Besides that, I go back every so often, mostly to eat :)

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  94. Here. by blair1q · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Let me show you how squeeze the fish.
    (*Squeeeeech!*)

  95. Re:Why did the Feminist chicken crossed the road? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because all men are potential rapists!

  96. How do you connect SARS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How exactly do you connect SARS with factory farming? If anything, it is hypothesized that new viruses are created when multiple types of animals live together in close confines with people as is the case in rural china. This is hardly an example of factory farming which does its best to sepparate all the different types of animals.

    1. Re:How do you connect SARS? by ravinfinite · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's not hypothesized. Scientists at Hong Kong have confirmed that it is a result of factory farming. Lack of knowledge. Read and educate yourself at www.peta.org

    2. Re:How do you connect SARS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHA! That's like saying "educate yourself" at www.whitepower.org or www.hatechristianity.net. Talk about believing your own propaganda. I feel sorry for you.

    3. Re:How do you connect SARS? by ravinfinite · · Score: 1

      Propaganda? It's in the news. Do you think you have better scientific merit or expertise that could prove otherwise? I don't know where you're from, but I don't think I want to know.

  97. Re:I Modded Down 5 European Posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AFAIK, contrary to in Europe, patriotism isn't illegal in the US

  98. Asounding Improvement! by utahjazz · · Score: 4, Funny

    A five-man crew using a mechanical harvester can do the work of eight men

    My god, it's like something out of science fiction.

    1. Re:Asounding Improvement! by dfries · · Score: 2, Informative
      Two years with the mechanical catcher system, (2 year, 16 per your, 40 hours per week, 52 weeks per year, 5 works, 200,000 for the machine)
      2*16*40*52*5+200000=$532,800
      two years for 8 workers
      2*16*40*52*8=$532,480

      After two years the owners reduce their costs by,
      16*40*52*3 = $99,840 / year

      What chicken farm owner wouldn't go for it?

    2. Re:Asounding Improvement! by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 2, Funny
      Yes, I believe that's what Dave Bowman said when he encountered the monolith floating out there around Jupiter:

      "My God, it's full of chickens"

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    3. Re:Asounding Improvement! by utahjazz · · Score: 1

      "My God, it's full of chickens"

      Ah, now that movie makes sense.

    4. Re:Asounding Improvement! by unsupported · · Score: 0

      This is going to take jobs away from hard working illegal aliens!

      --
      Yopu for you?
  99. Link to product by SparkyTWP · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those interested, here's a link to the product page, with a handy dandy video of it in action.

    1. Re:Link to product by mbourgon · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points... this is priceless. It's like a frickin Chicken Lawn Mower. *still laughing*

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
  100. Chicken maturity matters? by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 2, Interesting
    That line about the chickens being basically babies in adult bodies gave me pause, though -- I am a confirmed carnivore, but some of the stuff we do in the name of taste and profit is hard to digest.
    Eggs are essentially the most-immature form of chickens. Pot pies, chicken franks and such are, IIRC, made from old laying hens: the most mature chickens in commercial farming. Broilers are in the middle. I suspect that you've eaten all of the above.

    Is there anything about broilers (the 8-week wonders) being so young that makes them more pitiful than the other ends of the spectrum? All they are is a population which has been bred (selected) for certain traits; I doubt very much that they feel any more discomfort in their lives than laying hens, and probably less.

    1. Re:Chicken maturity matters? by petsounds · · Score: 3, Funny

      All they are is a population which has been bred (selected) for certain traits; I doubt very much that they feel any more discomfort in their lives than laying hens, and probably less.

      Thanks for the insight, Agent Smith.

  101. interesting facts on Kobe beef[OT] by Achoi77 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Apparently Kobe beef isn't the best Japan's got. One of my friends went to Japan this past winter, and scored himself a $600 steak - for free (but that's another story). Anyways, he asked the chef if this was Kobe beef, and the chef gave him a funny look, "Kobe beef!? That's nothing comapared to this!"

    Apparently there is all kinds of high quality beef in Japan prohibited from exporting, something about protecting its domestic beef industry. The restaurant buys the entire cow live, and they do all the work in-house. Everything of the cow is used - the menus are made out of the leather of their previous purchases, the bones are used for soup. Those wacky japanese love their stuff fresh..

    1. Re:interesting facts on Kobe beef[OT] by Santos+L.+Halper · · Score: 1

      This sounds suspiciously like a Simpsons episode I saw once....

      --

      "Ask not for whom the bone bones. It bones for thee." --Bender
    2. Re:interesting facts on Kobe beef[OT] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simpsons are big in Japan.

    3. Re:interesting facts on Kobe beef[OT] by Pirogoeth · · Score: 1

      Apparently Kobe beef isn't the best Japan's got.

      That would be Mishima Beef

      --
      Happiness is like peeing yourself. Everybody can see it but only you can feel its warmth.
  102. Re:as someone who has caught chickens for vaccinat by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

    From the article, it sounds like the five man team beats the eight man solos because it not only catches them, but automatically plunks 'em into cages too. That part of the process can't be fast when you have six chickens per hand. :)

  103. Gladiator by maudite · · Score: 2, Funny

    I love chicken catching. The only way to do it with finesse is to dress up like gladiator. I hold a net with one hand and a frog gig with the other. I pretend the frog gig is my trident. I usually have a mp3 cd with nothing but canned crowd yells and Conan music. Talk about a rush!

  104. Re:as someone who has caught chickens for vaccinat by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

    It's fast. Someone stands at the barn door with a stack of cages. You pass two handfuls of chickens to him, he plunks em in a cage, and when it's full fires it up to the guy who owns the truck. The driver is responsible for placing the full crates, but doesn't touch the chickens. As far as I was concerned, the worst part was having all that pissy dust collect in your eyes... used to clean my eyes with a Q-tip after I got home so they wouldn't be glued together in the morning.

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  105. OB Trasher Reply by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1

    Dude! Skateboarding is not a Crime! Actual I would support getting rid of them as I ride street (bmx) and the the damn thrashers will hog a nice grind rail like nobody's business...

    --

    My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

  106. more info at the manufacturers site by robdeadtech · · Score: 2, Informative

    more info at the lewismola site. http://www.lewismola.com/

    Also from the site....
    "The PH2000 is powered by a 4-stroke Kubota 3300-TE. This engine has twice as much horsepower as any mechanical harvester on the market. This extra power significantly reduces engine strain which results in greatly extended machine life. Due to its combination of the Kubota 3300-TE along with high quality hydraulic, electronic and belt systems, the PH2000 has proven to have unparalleled 'on the job ...day in & day out' reliability."

    and a detailed pic here..
    http://www.lewismola.com/lmfrmspecphoto.ht ml

    --
    Heil Sig! -Rob
  107. Re:snopes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You actually believe anything that snopes spews?

    Barbara "Bullshit Artist" Mikkelson

  108. For turkeys... by BradNelson · · Score: 1

    I grew up on a turkey farm. We had to ship (actually truck) the turkeys to the plant we contracted with, where they were butchered. The system the used, and still do, is basically a big enclosed conveyor belt. The turkeys are "chased" onto the bottom of it, and then are carried up to the top, where two people push the turkeys into cages on a semi trailer.

    It's not as fancy as this contraption, but it works. Something more efficient would be nice, but it would actually be hard to accomadate a machine like this. Plus, I doubt that Jennie-O Turkey Store wants to cough up the money for those when these 15-20 year old contraptions still work.

  109. Huh, WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless... wow! Does this mean I'll finally get some chicks?

    BTW, is this Linux-powered or something?

    Hmm, this maybe related to M$, like that SCO thing... after all the owner there wanted to get some chicks...

    Lawyers, please read this: It's a satire, don't even bother trying. Kisses.

  110. old school catching by laemas · · Score: 1

    In new zealand , over the last 7 or 8 years , there has been a move by farmers to catch the chickens in a diferent manner. Instead of grabbing the little fuckers by the feet , we now catch them by their bodies , basicly putting both hands around their bodies over the wings , and lifting them up that way. You can catch 2 birds at once via this method , you just push them together side by side. They are as placid as pudding when using this method , and its just as fast :) I assume that the industry world wide is moving to this method , i can only speak for nz. Any fellow chicken farmers/geeks out there can back me up? But i want this chicken catching machine , it looks fucking cool >8)

  111. Who makes the crash-test dummies? Insightful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My mate Adrian was right all along: http://www.abarnett.demon.co.uk/theories.html#TURK EY

  112. Screwed... by dbretton · · Score: 1

    Thank God Afro-Man had that hit, "Then I got High". Otherwise, with this thing, he'd be royally screwed out of a job!

  113. Re:Once again, another of my 1337 job skillz hosed by dheltzel · · Score: 1

    Did it work out with the girl ?

  114. The Cluck Sucker by gurudyne · · Score: 1

    I was involved with another kind of chicken vacuum a few years ago.

    It was basically a large stainless steel drum with a bolt-on lid and a sharpened pipe with a butterfly valve sticking straight up from the lid. The drum was drawn down to a 14 psi vacuum.

    A fresh, headless bird would be impaled tail-down on the pipe, the valve tripped and BUCK-AWWK!

    It was an offal job, but someone had to do it.

    --
    Hey, Mom! Is it beer, yet?
  115. Re:as someone who has caught chickens for vaccinat by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 2, Funny
    Basically, I can't see this replacing cheap student labour. Just my two cents.

    Just two cents? Student labor is cheaper than I thought....

    --
    http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  116. The Lesson Of The Chicken by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

    A text-based adventure here

  117. chicken-vac.... by BobSutan · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the ill-fated chicken-vac looked anything like the one in BASEketball? I always got a laugh out of the scene because of it.

    Foomp! Ba-kaaak!

    --
    "On a scale from 1 to 10, people are stupid"
  118. I like fried chicken by cyranoVR · · Score: 1

    It's mmm-mmm good! (tm)

  119. Rotating knives (Python quote) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Architect sketch

    Original Cast:
    o Mr Tid: Graham Chapman
    o Mr Wiggin: John Cleese
    o City Gent One: Michael Palin
    o Client 2: Terry Jones

    Scene: A large posh office. Two clients, well-dressed city gents, sit facing a large table at which stands Mr. Tid, the account manager of an architectural firm.

    Mr. Tid: Well, gentlemen, we have two architectural designs for this new residential block of yours and I thought it best if the architects themselves explained the particular advantages of their designs.

    (There is a knock at the door)

    Mr. Tid: Ah! That's probably the first architect now. Come in.

    (Mr. Wiggin enters)

    Mr. Wiggin: Good morning, gentlemen.

    Clients: Good morning.

    Mr. Wiggin: This is a 12-story block combining classical neo-Georgian features with the efficiency of modern techniques. The tenants arrive here and are carried along the corridor on a conveyor belt in extreme comfort, past murals depicting Mediterranean scenes, towards the rotating knives. The last twenty feet of the corridor are heavily soundproofed. The blood pours down these chutes and the mangled flesh slurps into these...

    Client 1: Excuse me.

    Mr. Wiggin: Yes?

    Client 1: Did you say 'knives'?

    Mr. Wiggin: Rotating knives, yes.

    Client 2: Do I take it that you are proposing to slaughter our tenants?

    Mr. Wiggin: ...Does that not fit in with your plans?

    Client 1: Not really. We asked for a simple block of flats.

    Mr. Wiggin: Oh. I hadn't fully divined your attitude towards the tenants. You see I mainly design slaughter houses.

    Clients: Ah.

    Mr. Wiggin: Pity.

    Clients: Yes.

    Mr. Wiggin: (indicating points of the model) Mind you, this is a real beaut. None of your blood caked on the walls and flesh flying out of the windows incommoding the passers-by with this one.

    Client 2: Yes, and well done, but we wanted an apartment block.

    Mr. Wiggin: May I ask you to reconsider.

    Clients: Well...

    Mr. Wiggin: You wouldn't regret this. Think of the tourist trade.

    Client 1: I'm sorry. We want a block of flats, not an abattoir.

  120. Fortune Quote by dunelin · · Score: 1

    "Old MacDonald had an agricultural real estate tax abatement." Slashdot is going agricultural on our asses.

  121. The Big Bad Bung Dropper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just pray bubba in the next cell doesn't get one of these .

  122. Re:Once again, another of my 1337 job skillz hosed by Dirtside · · Score: 1

    I guess, on chicken farms at least, that 20,000 is a sufficiently close approximation to a buhzillion (which, as we all know, is 1,000 gazillions or 1,000,000 bajillions).

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  123. Re:I Modded Down 5 European Posts by HBI · · Score: 0, Troll

    Damn straight, and a good thing that.

    Good job for the traffic throttler too. Hurt 'em where it counts. Assholes.

    I hope the moderations get their rocks off - it's about all the pleasure they're likely to get in their socialist paradise.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  124. Chicken Fluffer by repetty · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually, the correct term is chicken "fluffer".

    1. Re:Chicken Fluffer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should have seen that one coming.

  125. Hot Boning by LauraW · · Score: 1

    Hey! It even says that it Helps Hot Boning. Ooooh baby!

  126. Chicken Hypnosis by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Funny

    Berry tried everything to force the birds to move under their own power. He flashed strobe lights in their eyes...

    Anybody else get the feeling he also tried a pendulum, but won't admit it?

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Chicken Hypnosis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You can't take the sky from me...

      But I can lock you in an underground dungeon.

  127. Re:Once again, another of my 1337 job skillz hosed by zogger · · Score: 1

    I was with her about 2.5 years or so. She went away to art school,then switched and went into nursing, We both drifted apart, not enough day to day seeing each other, both young people, etc, we found new friends. We stayed cordial. She was a fox, one of only two girls I ever met who had that naturally "white" sort of blond hair.

  128. Re:Funny you should mention Ol' Kike Thomas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, you have WAYYYY too much free time.

  129. Re:Once again, another of my 1337 job skillz hosed by zogger · · Score: 1

    It sure felt like buhzillions! You have to remember, too, as you are carrying this weight, it's also the distances involved in walking back and forth. Chicken houses are at least 300 feet long, those were closer to 500 if I am remembering correctly. The last ones I worked at, earlier this year and late last year (different job, part time weekends picking eggs), are 400 feet long. Now walk back and forth all night long inside that distance, 50% of the time carrying six cluckers, ya, it gets into the real physical work range. It has to be many miles of walking carrying weight in your hands. And that doesn't count the slipping and falling down and getting slimed part either. Tell you, we should be thankful that our chickens at the store or restaurant are still so inexpensive to purchase given the work combined with the extremely dismal pay at that end of the industry. The workers in the plants have it fairly rough as well. Personally,it wouldn't bother me a bit if chickens only costed 25 or 50 cents more, and that loot got distributed to the people doing the really nasty work, they sure would appreciate it.

    I have mixed feelings on the machine in the article, I understand that automation is here to stay, I also feel it's necessary to keep some sort of actual contact with the idea that these are living creatures, and should be treated with the idea of compassionate husbandry, and the physical contact (somewhat) between human and stock critter I think helps that process. They claim the machines are more humane, maybe, they certainly eliminate some jobs, but create others. I'd have to see one working, I never have, so I really can't tell if it's as rosy as they make it out for the birds.

  130. Mad Libs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LONDON, England -- Scientists have grown chicken embryos with teeth which may lead to a breakthrough against baldness.

    Mad Libs anyone?

  131. Baldness??? How about regrowing TEETH?? by serutan · · Score: 1

    Gosh, it's great to know that this research might lead to exciting breakthroughs in the treatment of baldness. Certainly that possibility dwarfs the implications that humans might one day be able to grow a new set of teeth.

    The priorities of mainstream media! Too bad they couldn't work Martha Stewart into the story somehow.

  132. Poultry Science Department? by joebeone · · Score: 1

    "Being held upside down freaks out the birds," says Michael P. Lacy of the University of Georgia's poultry-science department.

    University of Georgia has a Poultry Science department? That's about the most ridiculous thing I've heard in at least one week. Wow. Maybe I'm in the wrong biz.

  133. Not chicken oil... by nhaines · · Score: 1

    "natural beef flavoring." Some sort of extract.

  134. Don't go there ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You *do* realize exactly how fish farms operate, don't you ?!

    ..._|_
    _( o )_
    ooooooooo
    oooooo
    ooo

  135. Obligatory.. by Lord+Fren · · Score: 1

    All your coop are belong to us!

  136. Overclock it... by marko123 · · Score: 1

    ...and take the catcher off it.

    NOW WE'RE TALKING VISUALS

    --
    http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
  137. Chicken defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Could it be adapted to provide AA defense for very tall buildings ? Hmmm.

    They would have to set up a grease joint near the top floors, as a disguise. Or, ...

    Oops ! hey ! I was just joking ! Lemme go, hey, I.... (ack!) ...

  138. How to serve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why their feed has so much tranquilizer in it.

    Of course, the authorities assure us that absolutely no harmful residues *ever* reach us. Isn't that a relief !? :>

  139. Great for making "Soylent Green" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    eom

  140. This article is "+5, Funny" Gold! by Ignorant+Aardvark · · Score: 1

    Here are some choice cuts from the article (some parts modified for funniness):

    "You can't herd chickens."

    The birds flap, scratch and befoul their captors. Most [manual chicken scratchers] can tolerate only a few months of that before flying the coop.

    Now after years of attempts that ended in failure, including one ill-fated chicken vacuum, a robotic chickenator, and a chicken spring, manufacturers have finally produced machines capable of catching and caging chickens.

    Looking like a combination airport baggage carousel, tank, and mound of feathers ...

    The nine-ton, 42-foot-long contraption crept closer, slowly sweeping a low metal ramp back and forth through the flock like a giant scythe.

    Whoosh! Each chicken was whisked up the belt into a small compartment, where a burst of air pushed it into a metal chute. Within seconds, the bird came to rest, blinking, still on its feet inside a wire cage.

    "We support using machines that reduce the panic, fear, horror, and downright indignation of the chickens," says Karen Davis.

    Human catchers are expected to snag as many as 1,000 birds an hour. As the men tire during eight-hour shifts, they accidentally slam birds against the cages, breaking wings and legs. Ouch!

    Early devices included the chicken vacuum, which sucked up birds and shot them through tubes to waiting trucks. But the birds tended to plug up the tubes and turn somersaults as they traveled inside the contraption.

    At Silsoe, Mr. Berry tried everything to force the birds to move under their own power. He flashed strobe lights in their eyes, hoping to startle them into action. He tried goosing them along with tiny jets of air. Nothing worked. Obviously he didn't try putting a road between the slaughterhouse and the pen, 'cause, then, y'know, the chickens would've crossed it ...

    His eureka moment came after realizing that soft rubber fingers could be used to gently close around each bird, ushering it onto a conveyer belt -- a sort of Venus' flytrap for chickens.

    This is definitely the best article /. has seen in a long while - thank God for chicken Venus flytraps! This stuff is comedic gold!

    Oh, by the way, my friend from highschool made a game called Chickenator 2000. Here's a URL:
    http://gamestation.gamesweb.sk/games/chicken /hra.p hp3

  141. Chickens are people, damn you! by Wynken+de+Word · · Score: 4, Funny

    The scoops are coming!

    I missed the 'e' in 'humane' from this line in the article:

    "Starting in the early 1980s, Britain's Silsoe Research Institute received about $200,000 a year from the government to design a humane harvesting machine."

  142. chicken cannon / dethaw by lingqi · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was told by an aquaintance who worked at a major airplane engine manufacture stories about this. (note to everyone - Boeing actually DOES NOT MAKE ENGINES - so it would be quite silly if they did compliance and validations on the engines as much as engine manufactures, no?)

    Anyhoo - apparently the method of the "chicken cannon" uses anything from a quail to a small turkey. They bird is stuck in a ball-like styrofoam shell, and when the entire apparatus leaves the cannon, the shell disintegrates, and the dead bird flies toward the intake of a full-power jet engine at maybe 3-500 mph.

    The thing is, though - unless you have some REALLY big birds, they (dethawed) don't do any damage to the engine at all. The highspeed photograph would show in one frame the chicken flying toward the blades, and the next frame the head is chopped off, and the next part of the neck, one after the tip of the chest, etc. Apparently the blades are going so fast that the chicken's inertia alone will let it "float" while being chopped up and spit out through the back.

    The humorous part is when they lent the chicken-cannon to france rail companies to test their high-speed trains. Apparently when the french set up the cannon and fired the small turkey toward the front-windshield, giddy with anticipation of everything going well, the bird went through the widshield, punched a hole in the dummy sitting in the operator's seat, went through the wall behind the dummy operator, and landed about halfway down the train car after causing quite some havoc within it. Everyone was scratching there heads with jaws to the ground (obviously you would not want to drive this thing if it will leave you a turkey-sized entry+exit-wound). Eventually it turned out that it was because they only (!) thawed the bird for 6 hours or something... When they did it with a proper bird it damaged the wind(bird)shield but the driver remained intact.

    moral of the story? you can hear some interesting stuff from aerospace industry engineers.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:chicken cannon / dethaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Wow, this is almost word for word with the story shown to be false by the snopes link above. :)

    2. Re:chicken cannon / dethaw by Imazalil · · Score: 1

      I know how we all hate those evil french because they didn't want to back a war over imaginary weapons, but it was in fact the british that borrowed the 'chicken cannon'

    3. Re:chicken cannon / dethaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course if you had actually bothered to check out www.urbanlegends.com ......

    4. Re:chicken cannon / dethaw by Scooter · · Score: 1

      LOL I once did a contract at BAE and have seen this done (they don't make engines either btw...) As I recall, at the time, we all made the obvious "so do you get them from Tesco's frozen food section?" joke which, of course, the testers had heard thousands of times. The SNCF semi-frozen turkey story is legend down there..

    5. Re:chicken cannon / dethaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Please note!!! As stated in another follow-up to the parent, the "chicken piercing the windshield & driver & seat" is the part that is an Urban Legend.

      The Chicken Canon is 100% real, and is part of the FAA certification process for new engines (which also includes something called the "blade out" test where the litterally blow a fan blade out of a running engine). I've seen the video my own personal self (I used to work at Pratt & Whitney, which makes engines for jumbo jets), and it looked like the parent post described. The technical term is an "ingestion test". To pass, the engine must basically survive undamaged (which will be a great relief to all air travellers, I'm sure).

      Also note, the ASPCA requires that all birds (including the turkeys, which are raised on farms) used in these tests die of natural causes. Oh, and the smallest bird used in the canon is a starling; they fire many starlings at once to simulate a plane taking off through a flock.

  143. Sorry to be pedantic.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I can see why animal rights groups would be supportive of this technology, but it's really only a change on the level of replacing the axe-man with the guillotine."

    ...But you mean animal welfare groups. An animal rights group would argue that such technology is entirely irrelevant, even harmful, as it fosters the idea that there is such a thing as "humane" animal slaughter. Animal welfare groups are namby pamby idiots who don't actually care about animals, because they argue that animals are fair game for food, clothing, research tools, entertainment etc. just so long as an effort is made to be "kind" in the process. These fuckwits undermine the efforts of people who really give a damn.

    1. Re:Sorry to be pedantic.... by nurightshu · · Score: 1

      Okay, let me get this straight: you believe that humans, who are all physiologically set up for omnivorous behavior, have no right to slaughter animals (I'm assuming you missed the day in freshman bio where they went over the whole "food chain" bit). I can understand, while vehemently disagreeing with, your position. But you have the nerve to say that the animal "welfare" groups are "namby-pamby?"

      The mind boggles.

      --
      They that would sacrifice their .sig space for that cliched Franklin quote deserve neither.
  144. Ocarina Reference by JohnnyX12 · · Score: 1

    One of these would rock in Zelda. :)

  145. I hate it when that happens by MyHair · · Score: 1

    I'm reading at score 4, and I just followed the link from the previous story in my list to the Snopes article about chicken cannons. I still had chicken cannons on the mind when I read your post:

    If they could ramp this up⦠â¦to toddler size, this could revolutionize the daycare industry.

    It took me a few seconds of horror before I remembered the original article topic.

  146. Easier way to catch chickens by earthforce_1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    A former neighbour told me this trick...

    He used a small ball of twine, which he would coat with suet and toss into the chicken pen. One of the chickens would inevitably swallow the twine, and pass it after a few days. He would then collect roll the remaining twine back into a ball, add some more suet and toss it back to the chickens. Another chicken would soon swallow the suet covered ball, which was still attached to the first chicken. After a week or so you have a whole chain of connected chickens on a rope following each other around head to tail. Makes them real easy to catch!

    --
    My rights don't need management.
  147. Wholly agree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PETA started losing its integrity a long time ago. I was a member, and this year I chose not to renew my membership after their promotion of Burger King. They have changed the way giants like McDonald's do business, they have made some fantastic leaps for animal kind, but recently I think they've been doing just about more harm than good. They have become myopic and are re-inforcing the image of the militant, holier than thou animal rights person, which personally I can do without.

    And for those who have been so quick to jump down ravinfinite's throat, hold your thoughts for a second and go read about vegetarianism/veganism and find out why it's a better choice for yourself, for animals, and for the environment. Personally, I'm vegan, and at first made the change for purely selfish reasons (health). It was easy, and I feel better about living without causing so much suffering and environmental depletion. Of course I'm not perfect, no-one is, I could still stand to recycle more, eat more organic/locally grown food, etc. but I don't turn my nose up at people who haven't thought to change their lifestyle as I have, just the people who get ignorant and personal with me over it without any provocation, which sadly happens alot. Please don't feel "threatened" when a vegan/vegetarian tells you something they think you should know. Just take it on board as an opinion. Get a second opinion. Get a twenty-second opinion. But whatever you do, don't be ignorant or arrogant! We're not the only species on earth, but too often, we act like we are.

    1. Re:Wholly agree... by ravinfinite · · Score: 1

      Thank you brother, I feel glad that there is someone amongst myself. After having to try to face many people by myself, at last, there is another voice. There is light at the end of the tunnel.

      I must admit that I don't always take the best approaches to try to advocate vaganism/vegetarianism, but I'm trying and willing to learn. Thank you and God bless.

    2. Re:Wholly agree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Thank you brother, I feel glad that there is someone amongst myself.

      * Austin Powers *>

      Allow myself to introduce my...self.

      * /Austin Powers * >
    3. Re:Wholly agree... by Obfiscator · · Score: 1

      Can't say I agree with everything you've said, but I'll give you another reason to not eat meat: I've been to several environmental chemistry seminars in the past year that have mentioned studies showing 10-20% of air pollution in several major cities (e.g. Los Angeles) comes from fast food restaurants (i.e. they've observed high concentrations of organic molecules seen as byproducts of grilling meat but not connected to other processes, such as fuel combustion). Don't have any references for you, but if you have access to SciFinder they shouldn't be too difficult to find.

      You probably shouldn't use this statistic if you like to grill mushrooms or veggies, though, because that will create some pollution as well.
      Personally, I eat a variety of food (inlcuding meat) and find this helps me stay healthy and happy.

      --
      "Nothing shocks me. I'm a scientist." -Indiana Jones
  148. Fight back? by cornice · · Score: 1

    It's an article on how understanding how a gene that once caused birds to have teeth could help fight baldness!?

    Baldness Specialist: Here you go sir.
    Bald Guy: What's that.
    Baldness Specialist: No big deal. It's just a GM retro virus.
    Bald Guy: Retrovirus?
    Baldness Specialist: Yea. It contains a gene that once caused birds to grow teeth.
    Bald Buy: Birds that grow teeth?
    Baldness Specialist: Don't worry sir they did 5 years of bird teeth replacement trials before working on hair growth.
    Bald Guy: Bird teeth replacement trials?
    Baldness Specialist: Please sir, just be still.
    Bald Guy: When hens have teeth! Doh!

  149. Re:Bawk? Are you Jhn Clux0r? by Degrees · · Score: 1

    I showed the picture to my step-son and he thought it was something for the extra heavy-weight division in Battle Bots. PH2000 = Pummel House 2000, right? ;-)

    --
    "The most sensible request of government we make is not, "Do something!" But "Quit it!"
  150. the defense... by ravinfinite · · Score: 1

    âoePeta should be advocating the fact that animals are sentient beings, not a renewable resource. And for those pathetic scientists who even created such a device should deserve death at the least, using their own stupid machines.â

    Firstly, your car analogy is flawed. A car is a device which is created to transport, not to destroy. It could be used to destroy if used carelessly, but thatâ(TM)s not what itâ(TM)s created for. On the other hand, and device designed to destroy is created specifically to destroy, so your analogy is moot. Now, if a hydrogen bomb goes off in a large city, would you blame the user or the person who solely used his entire life to create and perfect such a weapon? Most people would probably blame both.

    âoeWhere did you use the "=" sign there? You said scientists who create a technology should be put to death "at the least" (I'm wondering what your "most" would be...). You did not say the users of the machines should be put to death, you said the creators. That's like suing Ford for a drunk driver killing your relative. (Pssst... it's not equal.)â

    Actually, I was answering a question from your previous thread that readâ¦

    âoeBut it's something completely different when you try to value the life of one organism over another.â

    I never did try to value the life of one organism over another, in fact, Iâ(TM)ve been advocating for the whole time that animals deserve the same respect and treatment as humans, i.e. equality, so I donâ(TM)t know where youâ(TM)re getting your point from.

    âoeBut carrots, potatoes and beets cannot regenerate; you kill them by harvesting them.â

    Actually, they can. If you take the top part of a carrot or beet (part with the green leaves) and put it back in soil, it DOES regenerate and I even do it myself (why wonâ(TM)t you try it and see for yourself?â. A similar thing is possible with potatoes, although it takes longer and to tell you the truth, I donâ(TM)t do that with them. You have to soak the green stuff that appears after two to three weeks or so (could take longer). This can also be done with pineapples (top part), sugar cane, cucumber and many other vegetables.

    "Some single cell organisms are known to react and withdraw (run!) from heat. Is this not a single-cell pain reaction without a complex human-like nervous system? How can a single cell make this determination without having a 'brain'?"

    Interestingly, the same web site says the following:

    âoeWhat about the 'gifts' thing? Here is where plants are much nicer to us than we are to them. They give us FRUIT! Fruits are the gifts from plants to animals. It's much better than what we give them! But there is a catch - a payback is required! The implied contract is that we help them distribute their seeds, which in turn benefits both animals and plants - the plant babies grow up to make more fruit.â

    I certainly do eat my fruits (plenty) but I admit I donâ(TM)t redistribute the seeds. Thank you for enlightening me, I really appreciate it. Also, we are, after all, only human. We are not God or anything even close. Now, am I against eating meat? No. Am I against the way we cultivate meat? Yes. If a person has to hunt and kill his prey and then eat his prey, which is perfectly acceptable. It is an instinctive practice that all carnivores do. Also, back in the days, animals used to be respected and thanked when they gave their lives for whoever ended up eating them. How many people do you know that do that today? People simply accept meat and take it for granted, without even caring about the animal itself or what its sacrifice.

    âoe26: And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creepi

    1. Re:the defense... by Gunzour · · Score: 1

      Iâ(TM)ve been advocating for the whole time that animals deserve the same respect and treatment as humans, i.e. equality

      I don't agree with this, and I expect very few humans do. Other animals are not humans. They are not equal. I would agree that animals (and natures in general) deserve much better respect and treatment than they get from humans now, but I think equality is taking it a bit too far.

      I've recently been doing a lot of reading about nutrition and it is becoming clear to me that we, as humans, are killing ourselves by the way we treat our food. If you look at my Slashdot journal I have a link to Amazon for a book that contains a lot of interesting information about the food we eat and how it affects our health. By the way, this book asserts that meat is essential in the diet, and even cites a herbavore relative to homo sapien that became extinct long ago -- possibly because some the nutrients our bodies need only exist in food from animal sources. But, it seems clear to me both from this book and other related books that the amount of meat in the standard american diet far exceeds any dietary need.

    2. Re:the defense... by autechre · · Score: 1

      Meat isn't essential so much as complete proteins. Some cultures have discovered that complete proteins can be formed in other ways, such as rice and soy (Asia), corn and black beans (native Americans), and even macaroni and cheese.

      Personally, I eat seafood. Most seafood is caught in the wild, not raised/bred for food purposes, and that suits me better. There's also something about lesser intelligence (except for some mollusks, which I do still eat). I try to avoid seafood that is raised in a "bad" way; for example, current salmon farming practices are very harmful, but mussel farming practices are not.

      That said, at least half of my protein comes from non-seafood sources (those mentioned above and others).

      --
      WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
    3. Re:the defense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hilarious that the troll got modded 0 Flamebait for the first, and -1 Flamebait for his reply, and the hapless "Thing 1" responding (YHBT, Thing!) got modded up to 5 for being level-headed.

  151. Answer This by mnmn · · Score: 1

    it is morally wrong to take the life of one being only to benefit yourself. This is a tough one. Millions or Billions of plants are killed, farmed in the name of humanity. Think of the bales of wheat during harvest season. Theyre all lives lost. Oh yeah its OK for you to take vegetables because they dont feel pain and arent really alive right? Some people say the same of fish. Other vegetarians even avoid eggs and milk. So where do you draw the line and on what basis? Its hard to believe but we're part of the food chain and taking care of ourselves comes before caring for the environment and other live creatures. why am I even arguing with you?

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    1. Re:Answer This by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      why am I even arguing with you?

      Here I go again...

      My mommy told me not to argue with my food.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    2. Re:Answer This by ravinfinite · · Score: 1

      And many millions and billions of plants are killed just to feed cattle whom are killed afterwards anyways. It is true that plants (like all other lifeforms) do in fact possess a physical response system. Whether or not it can be considered pain is a philisophical question.

      Other vegetarians avoid egg and milk on not on the false basis that they feel pain.

      ...and taking care of ourselves comes before caring for the environment and other live creatures.

      Typical arrogance/ignorance. Trying to explain to a person like you (who isn't willing to even try to learn) is a waste of my time.

  152. Did you read the article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It stated that injured chickens are relegated to livestock feed...so the system in the u.s. _still_ mimics the process by which BSE spread...

  153. Ethernet cows? by mt-biker · · Score: 2, Funny

    "It's a snap to coax barnyard animals like pigs and cattle..."

    Anyone else read that the way I did? :)

  154. Mad Science Awards by zoeblade · · Score: 1

    At least it beats the "science" depicted in the Mad Science Awards.

  155. So how soon... by pyr0 · · Score: 1

    ...until they figure out how to de-evolve a species? I think it would be pretty cool if they could figure out how to turn on all the dormant genes in a species no longer being used.

  156. Sickens me by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

    Reading the article about how arrogant humans can allow themselves to treat animals, confirms my choice of becoming strictly lakto-ovo vegetarian two years ago.

    Reading the so-called "Funny" posts and comments here on /. makes me thoroughly sick in my stomach and it amazes me how ignorant people are here regarding respect for life.

    Just because we can, doesn't always mean we should.

    1. Re:Sickens me by unsupported · · Score: 0

      "That's a start. I'm a level 5 vegan. I do not eat anything that casts a shadow" - Jesse Grass, Eco-Hunk, on The Simpsons (voiced by Joshua Jackson aka Pacey from Dawson's creek)

      --
      Yopu for you?
  157. Influenza Farming by wfolta · · Score: 1

    Wonder why all flu's start out in China? Because they breed pigs and ducks close together and in close proximity to humans. It turns out this ancient custom is in fact the oldest known instance of biological engineering to create WMD. Are we up to hundreds of millions dead from flu pandemics yet?

    1. Re:Influenza Farming by Urkki · · Score: 1
      It's a conspiracy! They are trying to harden the immune systems of their own people, and then as soon as most of them are resistant, they'll unleash horrific viral diseases that will wipe out the unsuspecting western upstart civilization! Sars is just a harmless test of the concept, the real mean bugs are yet to be released!

      Yes, US should clearly intervene, before it's too late! China's evil communist regime must be stopped!

    2. Re:Influenza Farming by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
      Not put in the most diplomatic way, but I'd mod you up as insightful if I had any pionts today.

      You're exactly right - this sort of agriculture is very good for making viruses cross species barriers.

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
  158. A what? by richie2000 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Britain's Silsoe Research Institute received about $200,000 a year from the government to design a humane harvesting machine

    Anyone else read that as "human harvesting machine"?

    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free
    1. Re:A what? by VCAGuy · · Score: 1

      Aren't they getting ahead of themselves? I thought those machines were made by "the machines" after they enslaved the human race?

      --
      Q: "Why do sound techs say 'check 1, 2'?"
      A: "Cause if they could count any higher they'd be lighting techs."
  159. Re:as someone who has caught chickens for vaccinat by Steeltoe · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It is probably one of the worst jobs in North America. It stinks like ammonia all day in the barn, it's hot, hard to breathe, and they leave the lights off to calm the birds. (picture rolling yourself up in a thick blanket that 30 people have urinated on, and stay in their all day with the heat cranked up in the house). When you get home from work, you have to strip naked before you go in your home, and hose off in the yard, or the smell gets everywhere. (I took to burning clothes at one point outside.)

    At least you can go home and wash off, the chickens live this hell every minute of their lives!

  160. As Rare as Hens Teeth...not any more by Solo-Malee · · Score: 0

    "Scientists have grown chicken embryos with teeth" How long before Scientists find a way to make Rocking Horses Sh1t I wonder? We better start thinking of some new 'rare as' idioms for the 21st century...."as rare as a Micro$oft program with no bugs"...sorry too easy!

    --
    "If it's lost, it'll turn up. Things always do" "I love it when a plan comes together"
  161. Crazy Killing Tools For Sale by cjsnell · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ok, so the subject is a bit misleading...thesen't aren't all killing tools but they're pretty crazy. It's worth a karma troll anyway. :)

    Spinal Cord Remover

    De-Horner

    Bung Ring Expander (!!!!)

    The Stun Box

    Bung Droppers (Removes 1200 assholes an hour, no shit.)

    Head Cutter

    The Lung Gun (i don't want to know)

    "Electrical Stimulation" (somehow, i think it does more than stimulate them...)

  162. Heh by MeatMan · · Score: 0

    Chickens with teeth. Now they'll turn into meat eating carnivores. The cows and pigs won't be safe anymore... or the farmers infant children either for that matter. If they try really hard, scientists could make them grow lips too. I guess the chicken vacuum's have come just in the nick of time. I wouldn't want to be one of them chicken herders chasing after pissed-off carniverous chickens with gnashing teeth and lips like Mick Jagger *shudder*
    Does the name "Frankenstein" ring a bell?
    Actually, imagine what it could do for the nations with insect plague problems, and food shortages. Like China for instance. They already employ killer chickens. "Specially trained" killer chickens. But with this new breed, their efficiency in erradicating insect plagues would be amazing. With grasping lips and gnashing teeth they could save millions or perhaps even billions in costs of fighting insect plagues. Give them fingers and opposable thumbs and hey, it's on! If they can be trained properly and even more specially, they could become Chicken Warriors.
    China has trained an army of 10,000 chickens to battle locusts in northwestern Xinjiang, Xinhua news agency reported last month. The chickens, with gnashing teeth, grasping lips, and fingers with opposable thumbs, backed by tens of thousands of starlings with bat ears and sonar, are a last desperate attempt to erradicate swarms of the hungry insects that have infested grasslands, housing complexes and offices. Attacks on humans and aircraft are minimal according to Chinese authoritys. The chickens receive a special 60-day training program, the report explains, but it doesnt give specific details of the young birds' training regimen. It is rumored that Chinese Spec-ops and Psycorp conduct the training in special camps inaccessible except by air. Thousands of nests made by old Chinese women and small children in Chinese sweatshops were placed in the worst infested areas to attract the starlings to the areas they are needed most. Xinjiang's worst locust infestation in a decade has affected 174,500 hectares of grassland.

  163. It's amazing! by whm · · Score: 1

    Your friend is a real pig fucker!

    Hey hey, don't look at me, I learned it from the cartoons :P

    1. Re:It's amazing! by lizrd · · Score: 1

      Dude, don't say pigfucker in front of Jesus!

      --
      I don't want free as in beer. I just want free beer.
  164. Chicken Catching Goes High-Tech by rpiquepa · · Score: 0

    For those of you who do not have access to the Wall Street Journal online articles, I wrote a summary of the original story. This column also shows a picture of one of these mechanical chicken harvesters.

  165. Off topic danger ... by fjin · · Score: 1

    hmm... actually do you really mean: Chickens or ... Chick's :-)

  166. stupid Americans/ French / British? by fantomas · · Score: 1

    Interesting... so far I've heard the "undefrosted chicken error" story as UK scientists lending machine to dumb Americans, Americans lending machine to dumb French, Americans lending machine to dumb British ...hmm... truly in folklore territory methinks! Anybody actually got a credible reference they can provide? or is it alas just another cool urban myth to laugh at the people we currently think are stooopid?

  167. Better idea by kinnell · · Score: 1

    Feed them iron pellets over a period of time, so they have gizzards full of iron. Then at harvest time, just pass a giant electromagnet over the flock, and carry them off to the cage.

    --
    If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
  168. Do you have a hard time enjoying ..... by oliverthered · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Do you have a hard time enjoying the things you used to? Do you frequently feel overwhelmed? Have uncontrollable feelings of guilt or worthlessness and low motivation? Find it difficult to concentrate? Notice that you're sleeping too much or too little? Many of the signs of depression are easy to miss. These symptoms are often your mind's way of telling you something is wrong. They can be part of everyday life, or persistent signs of medical illness. Sometimes depression can be triggered by serious life events like death or divorce. Many times it can appear in someone's life for no apparent reason. If you think you might be depressed take our quiz and discuss your symptoms with your doctor today.

    Prozac?

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  169. Chicken Cannon by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

    Whats that game where you fire chickens at things. Its a bit old, I can't remember what it is. Maybe Earth Worm Jim.

    --
    -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
  170. So have they got a chicken pie attachement? (NT) by More+Karma+Than+God · · Score: 1

    Ok, I lied, there is text.

    --
    Go here to create your own Slashdot dis
  171. Re:I Modded Down 5 European Posts by KingRamsis · · Score: 1

    LOL LOL !!
    I sure want to hear from you when they outsource your job to india in the name of capitalism
    maybe your wife can get a better outsourced husband also...
    come on I'm waiting for the -1 it is only karma

  172. ObFiresignTheatre by tbone1 · · Score: 1
    I used to work with chickens; I was a cock-teaser at RoosterRama. I used to enrage the bantams before the big bout. That's not an easy job, ask Pedro here.

    --

    The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
  173. Not only +5 Funny, +5 True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same thing happens with women and their fetuses....emotional stressors of the mother affect development of the baby in the womb.

  174. Rachet and Clank Suck Cannon by theoldmoose · · Score: 1
    Eh, Ratchet and Clank has prior art in this area, with their very effective Suck Cannon. You can even use the Morpho Ray to turn anything into chickens, and then suck 'em up with the Suck Cannon. Best feature is that you can than use the Suck Cannon to fire those chickens at anything else you care to mow down.

    You getcha' ammo for nothin', and your chickens for free...

  175. The ultimate in Chicken Cannon by Black+Rabbit · · Score: 1

    www.airfarce.ca ...for those of us in the know, this isn't offtopic, it's become a Canadian institution!

  176. Technology humane? - not really by BigFootApe · · Score: 1

    It's only been a few short years since I graduated from high school and hung up my shit-soaked boots. I remember our crew of catchers as being a tough bunch of bastards who knew what we were about. So, from this perspective, I know what the article is trying to say.

    New technology will be introduced for the express purpose of harvesting a barn of chickens faster while damaging the (poultry) product to a minimal degree. The reality is that consideration of a chicken's feelings is at the bottom of the list of grower's priorities. If humane treatment were a concern, the chickens would probably spend their lives laying eggs in a coup and die of old age rather than ending up on the packing floor, and we wouldn't eat chicken any more than we'd eat other people.

    For illustration, in large egg barns, old hens are now being harvested by large vacuum cleaners (called macerators). These machines suck the hens out of their cramped cages through sets of whirling blades, which chop them up into little pieces. The result is packed in transport trucks and shipped to a central plant, where the chicken bits are deboned mechanically and then manufactured into such diverse products as chicken nuggets, chicken patties, chicken noodle soup, and pet food. This technological 'innovation' is clearly more brutal than a properly run, labor intensive operation. However, in this case, the chickens are simply too old for the grower to be troubled with the expense and time of using gentle to harvest them.

    I think I should be crystal clear on this issue; killing animals for food is not humane. We choose to relegate animals (and plants, too) to a lesser status when we kill them for food - usually in a horrible fashion. I don't claim it's right or wrong to kill animals for food, just not humane.

    -G

    Note to PETA: if you guys knew anything, you'd know that chickens calm down in dim light. Conversely, they get aggrevated and crowd when the lights are on. Operating in dim light, chickens remain astonishingly calm when caught.

    Another note to PETA: a chicken's life is almost perpetual fear anyway. It's a healthy reaction to being used for food.

  177. Re:as someone who has caught chickens for vaccinat by Zebbers · · Score: 1

    Basically, I can't see this replacing cheap student labour. Just my two cents. did u read the article? it already is....

  178. SCIENCE THAT IMPROVES ANIMAL WELFARE by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    Are drugs the answer then? Should we just put all our livestock and laboratory animals on Prozac? Dr. Mench feels that while "mood altering" drugs are an important tool in helping animals to cope or preventing stress or injury we should view them as a band-aid until we design management practices that improve welfare.

    Prozac

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  179. Close shave by GizmoDuck · · Score: 1

    Anyone else thinking of the combination sheep vacuum/shearer from Wallace & Gromit? In goes a chicken, out comes a chicken wandering around with its appendages sticking out of a down pillow...

  180. Why did the chiken cross the road? by Aslan72 · · Score: 0

    To get the HELL away from the chiken vaccuum Just thought I'd share... --Aslan

  181. WSJ? by krygny · · Score: 1

    I thought I was reading a one of those Area Man ... articles on The Onion when I read this paragraph:

    "Early devices included the chicken vacuum, which sucked up birds and shot them through tubes to waiting trucks. But the birds tended to plug up the tubes and turn somersaults as they traveled inside the contraption. "We had too many die on us," recalls Buddy Burruss, vice president of operations at Tip Top Poultry Inc. of Marietta, Ga., which tested and quickly abandoned the pneumatic approach two decades ago."

    --
    Research shows that 67% of those who use the term "research shows", are just making shit up.
  182. Chicken ARE Funny by InfraMan · · Score: 1
    for some reason there is just something inherently funny about chickens.

    A plus is the picture. In the SE section is the catcher. At first glance it looked like a huge chickens foot is sticking out of conveyer side.

    Another goodie is the PETA folks.

    "We support using machines that reduce the panic, fear and horror of chickens," says Karen Davis of United Poultry Concerns, a Machipongo, Va., group that opposes eating chickens and also runs a sanctuary for a few lucky birds that manage to escape the farms (usually by falling off a truck) "Being held upside down freaks out the birds," says Michael P. Lacy of the University of Georgia's poultry-science department. "As long as they are on their feet, they feel like they are in control, like people."

    Oh man. There goes my idea for a âoechicken horrifierâ. âoeThe chicken will put the lotion in the basket or the chicken will get the hose.â We'll see whose in control here.

    A sanctuary for fallen chickens? Dude, thatâ(TM)s like a waste of time and space. Plus they are probably all messed up from falling 10 feet from a speeding rig.

    Whoâ(TM)s footing the vet bills?

    Also, are there like a group of people who follow these trucks around all day hoping some hapless chicken will take a tumble and do they have to fight hillbillies and vagrants for them?

    Oh wait, it gets better :

    Early devices included the chicken vacuum, which sucked up birds and shot them through tubes to waiting trucks. But the birds tended to plug up the tubes and turn somersaults as they traveled inside the contraption. "We had too many die on us," recalls Buddy Burruss, vice president of operations at Tip Top Poultry Inc. of Marietta, Ga., which tested and quickly abandoned the pneumatic approach two decades ago.
    Damn. You KNOW most of these first engineers were doing this for fun. Hell, most probably worked for free. I mean cummon, freakinâ(TM) live chicken cannons?!? Canâ(TM)t you just see these dudes on a Friday? âoeLetâ(TM)s see how far we can shoot a chickenâ : probably some of the most sweetest words ever uttered by man.
    The technological breakthrough came from Europe, where the industry is under more pressure from animal welfare groups to reduce livestock suffering. Starting in the early 1980s, Britain's Silsoe Research Institute received about $200,000 a year from the government to design a humane harvesting machine. At Silsoe, Mr. Berry tried everything to force the birds to move under their own power. He flashed strobe lights in their eyes, hoping to startle them into action. He tried goosing them along with tiny jets of air. Nothing worked. His eureka moment came after realizing that soft rubber fingers could be used to gently close around each bird, ushering it onto a conveyer belt -- a sort of Venus' flytrap for chickens. Techno-Catch of Kosciusko, Miss., uses the technology in its Chickat harvester and sees a U.S. market for 600 of the machines.
    But then some chicken molester came along and spoiled the fun with his rubber fingers. $200k/yr ?! since the 80â(TM)s?! Thatâ(TM)s like $4 million minus the $10 strobe light from Radio Shack!! ( you know he already had the rubber fingers ). Where was I on career day when this option came up? I missed this job posted on monster.com.
    20 year contract. $200k/year. Applicant must be able to come up with a way to make chickens move. Experience with cannons and chicken horrifiers a plus.
    I'd be like gone for 19 years and 11 months, then show up with a high pressure hose. Check please.
  183. Re:in the long term.....critical mass theory by sunscream · · Score: 1

    Actually, if the theory of the 100th monkey is correct, only 100 chickens need to somehow figure out how to avoid being caught, before the all chicken becomes immune to this method.

    Theory found here:
    http://perdurabo10.tripod.com/themindofjame sdonahu e/id404.html

  184. The Chicken Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chicken Morpheus: We don't know who struck first, us or them. But we know that it was us that scorched the barn. At the time they were dependent on beef and and it was believed that they would be unable to survive without an energy source as abundant as the cows. Throughout chicken history, we have been dependent on humans to survive. Fate, it seems, is not without a sense of irony. The chicken body generates more McNuggets than a 120-pound turkey and over 25,000 BTUs of suicide wings heat. Combined with a form of barbeque sauce, the machines have found all the energy they would ever need. There are fields, endless fields, where chickens are no longer born. We are grown. For the longest time I wouldn't believe it, and then I saw the fields with my own eyes. Watch them suck up chickens with their giant chicken vacuum machine....

  185. This reminds me of a story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A friend of a roommate of mine worked in a lab where her experiments required the use of rabbit sperm. So she had to manually collect it.

    That's not the weird part.

    The weird part is that after a while the rabbits realized that was the only reason she came into the room, and they would get excited and start thumping their hind legs upon sight of her.

    Ever turn a rabbit on?

  186. That sounds bad, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never done any of this, so really I have no real concept, but somehow the job of chicken sexer sounds particularly bad. This is the person (so I've been told) who spends her entire day picking up baby chicks, flipping them quickly to invert their anus, and looking for a line to determine if the chick is male or female. This does not sound fun to me...

  187. horrible smell by smartfart · · Score: 1

    I used to work as a courier, and made a couple of deliveries to a chicken plant (they needed parts for some machine occasionally). I have to tell you that that processing plant stank worse than anything I've ever had the misfortune to be around. Worse, in fact, than a hog farm after a rain. I don't know how the regular employees could stand it. I'm glad I only went there 2 or 3 times.

  188. Kuru != CJD by renehollan · · Score: 1

    I'm no expert, but I've read that Kuru and CJD are different prion-borne diseases.

    --
    You could've hired me.
  189. Re:as someone who has caught chickens for vaccinat by b-baggins · · Score: 1

    What is hell to you may be heaven to an animal. Quit projecting your human prejudices onto non-human creatures.

    That advice goes to all animal "rights" people.

    --
    You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
  190. Re:I Modded Down 5 European Posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would mod you up.
    Scum should float on top of the piss.

    Hm. Time to fire up the /.-Bot again, the one which can create 600 accounts / hour. A week or two later, you will get modded down so far, Korean spammers start to cry about the stink of Belgian whores in their basements.

  191. human or humane by ripcrd · · Score: 1

    "Starting in the early 1980s, Britain's Silsoe Research Institute received about $200,000 a year from the government to design a humane harvesting machine"

    I first read this as, design a HUMAN harvesting machine. Oooohhh, yuk, Soylent Green anyone? Nasty.

    --
    --Somewhere there is a village missing an idiot.
  192. Your logic is lacking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your logic is flawed in that you assume that fewer lives will be lost if everyone was vegan.

    Do you have any clue how many rodents, insects, and other animals (snakes, etc.) are killed during crop harvesting? - I don't know either, but I guaran-damn-tee that we're not talking trivial numbers here.

    - Hell, I can kill a single animal (let's say a deer for the sake of argument) and live for months, or I can indirectly kill scores of animals and live for that same amount of time on vegetables... - But nobody ever mentions that!

    I guess you vegan idiots only care about the popular animals -- rodents, insects, and others simply don't count. Damn hypocrites.

  193. Re:I Modded Down 5 European Posts by HBI · · Score: 1

    That might explain why your economies are a joke, compared to the US.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  194. Chicken vacuum by Harinezumi · · Score: 1

    Otherwise known as the Cock Sucker

  195. Old news-better machines around by Darth+Fredd · · Score: 1

    I am a chicken farmer (or "Poultry Producer", if you prefer) on the eastren shore. I grow for perdue.

    We usually machine-catch the chickens, but there are some points to be made about this article:

    -The reason we like machines better: Cheaper, faster, and machines don't wrap their crap up in paper and leave it around. (Hand catchers do)

    -We don't work in the dark. We use red or blue lights.

    -A CHICKEN VACCUM?? I have never heard of this. Personally, I think this is a fabrication: how do you keep from sucking up manure (or "litter", as its usually called) with the chicken.

    -The machines used aren't these huge Beasts. We use converted John Deers that have revolving rubber-finger-drums. The chickens are kept in a small bay in the back, then dumped into a "packing machine", which puts the chickens into cages for transportation. There are usually 2 catching machines a house, and 1 packer.

    Oh, and while we're talking about chickens-PETA would have you believe we make the chickens sit on the ground, in their own crap. We do! And, contrary to urban myths, modern chickens don't really like straw. And they don't like to roost. They like to wallow in their crap.

    There, I've finished with my rant/correction. I will probably get flamed by people who accuse me of all sorts of things, but WTH, I've said my piece.

    --
    "The most looniest, zaniest, spontaneous, sporadic Impulsive thinker, compulsive drinker, addict"
  196. Re:Once again, another of my 1337 job skillz hosed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    pure fox platinum blonde farmers daughter

    URL please. =)

  197. Re:Once again, another of my 1337 job skillz hosed by zogger · · Score: 1

    hehehehe that comment of mine sure has garnered some interest. I don't think there's an URL anyplace, but I can describe her as I remember her. About 5' 8" , 130 lbs or so, curvy as ya need, face very similar to a young version angelica houston (near as I can get with a public figure person), but with that amazing pretty hair, down to her butt, very straight and fine. Now you'll just have to fantasize.

    She was interesting ethnicicity background, her mom was a direct immigrant, from northern italy, and was a blonde, her dad was a second generation finnish immigrant, also a blond. I learned to make finnish pancakes from her, pure cholesterol tasty goodness, and some italian stuff I don't remember the names of anymore. It wasn't like the italian stuff you would be most familiar with, it was closer to german styled food, probably from that tyrolean I guess it is influence of her mom, that style of cooking. Good eats, and good treats!

  198. Re:Kobe (koh-bay) by Alkaiser · · Score: 1

    Except you're phoneticizing it wrong. It's Koh-bay, as in, not like the basketball player's name.

    It comes from cows raised in the city of Kobe.

    --
    Netjak.com independent reviews of domestic & import video ga
  199. Oh please. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Get off your high horse, honestly.

    I am sure you milk your own cows and get your own eggs from your own hens.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Oh please. by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

      I buy ecological milk and when I very rarely buy eggs, I buy only those that come from hens walking freely on farms.

      It's a start. Why criticise me when you have not even begun? I don't claim to be superior in any way, I just state what I observe and live what I preach to the extent I am able to in the moment.

  200. Re:as someone who has caught chickens for vaccinat by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

    Being imprisoned with noise, smell and dirt being heaven to animals?

    You know, if you really believe that, I feel very sorry for you. Animals love to live free. Just look at any cat that has tasted the life outside, they always try to escape outside.

    Do not even try to justify it, because that's doomed from the very beginning.