You mean people commented without reading the article? Big surprise there.
I agree with you- love that there are options. I might go ribbon (have to use Office at work) or at least sidebar. Regardless, looks better than the current interface in my opinion (which you can still use even after they introduce this.)
The crux of this is that scientists brought it forward. I would assume they'd sooner have Clinton but who knows. With the fact that it's so close, I wouldn't have an issue with checking them. I'd say the same if Trump was on the other end and was that close.
I highly doubt it'll change the election but if there is evidence, why not audit it like any other election would?
Ubuntu is easier to get into in my opinion. It allows for easy install of codecs, etc. that are otherwise slightly harder to get on Fedora. If you want that same type of ease of use but on Fedora, go for Korora. Pretty stable and a decent mix of new stuff with reliability. Offers an LTS version if you want good reliability/durability.
Fedora is one of the best distros for using the latest technologies, one of which is the latest Gnome DE edition to drop. It's good for previewing things that will eventually come down to RHEL and CentOS. Little harder to get stuff like flash, MP3, etc. working because it relies on RPMfusion (or United RPM if you want) which usually are slightly behind Fedora's quick release schedule. Although it's more bleeding edge than Ubuntu it is pretty stable if you ask me.
I use both and they're both fine for what they are. I've moved to Fedora on my workstations simply because I like Gnome and it offers the latest Gnome and doesn't mix them like Ubuntu (3.22 Nautilus with 3.20 shell for instance.)
Fedora is one of few distros with the most up to date Gnome environment. That and testing out changes and developing for RHEL and CentOS makes sense on Fedora.
Slashdot Mirror
You mean people commented without reading the article? Big surprise there. I agree with you- love that there are options. I might go ribbon (have to use Office at work) or at least sidebar. Regardless, looks better than the current interface in my opinion (which you can still use even after they introduce this.)
The crux of this is that scientists brought it forward. I would assume they'd sooner have Clinton but who knows. With the fact that it's so close, I wouldn't have an issue with checking them. I'd say the same if Trump was on the other end and was that close. I highly doubt it'll change the election but if there is evidence, why not audit it like any other election would?
Ubuntu is easier to get into in my opinion. It allows for easy install of codecs, etc. that are otherwise slightly harder to get on Fedora. If you want that same type of ease of use but on Fedora, go for Korora. Pretty stable and a decent mix of new stuff with reliability. Offers an LTS version if you want good reliability/durability. Fedora is one of the best distros for using the latest technologies, one of which is the latest Gnome DE edition to drop. It's good for previewing things that will eventually come down to RHEL and CentOS. Little harder to get stuff like flash, MP3, etc. working because it relies on RPMfusion (or United RPM if you want) which usually are slightly behind Fedora's quick release schedule. Although it's more bleeding edge than Ubuntu it is pretty stable if you ask me. I use both and they're both fine for what they are. I've moved to Fedora on my workstations simply because I like Gnome and it offers the latest Gnome and doesn't mix them like Ubuntu (3.22 Nautilus with 3.20 shell for instance.)
Fedora is one of few distros with the most up to date Gnome environment. That and testing out changes and developing for RHEL and CentOS makes sense on Fedora.