If it was a primordial super-massive black hole wouldn't that just mean it sucks so hard that the universe is being pulled forwards into it? Quick!! Check for Hawking Radiation!!
The Discovery cast are going to use their non-binary antifa boots to kick some patriarchal Klingon butt. Now what would have been an interesting show would be a show centered around the Klingon's rather than the Federation. Heghlu'meH QaQ jajvam!
Western world is far to worried about its gender, which bathrooms to use, what pronoun to use and if there are any nearby safe spaces with cuddle puppies in case they are triggered by a microaggression.
Gosh darn those pesky plants taking in billions of tons of CO2!! They are not toe'ing the "We are Dooooomed" narrative.
Stop growing!
http://www.nasa.gov/feature/go...
We see the future touted as one of a cashless society. The technology is possible but with shenanigans like this how can we possibly trust the financial institutions charged with managing such a change? Right now, the answer seems to be, we don't.
No speculation needed, Motives of the climate scientists in the mass media are, (as used and paid for in both the "global cooling" scare and later on in the ongoing "global warming", "climate change" and now "climate disruption") are quite apparent. Motives include, money (22 billion a year), recognition, 15 minutes of fame, and power over the narrative. Still despite all this, climate science will advance. Well, at least until they call it "settled science".
The sky is blue, water is still wet, and windows is still insecure. Wonder if Microsoft is colluding with the 3rd party software market to keep windows insecure? Would make for some nice kickback payoffs from the Anti-virus / Anti-malware vendors. Winception.... How deep down the money hole does it go.
Yes I do remember that. Here, I will do the 20 sec of google search work for you and give you a link with 200 plus 1970's articles describing the global cooling ice age theory. http://www.populartechnology.n...
There was that so difficult.
I remember reading numerous science and mass media articles in the 1970's that the world would be glaciated by 2020. I also remember reading in the 1990's numerous science and mass media articles that the world was fast on its way to becoming warm like Venus. Yet when the Geologists look at climate data on the geologic time scale the past 15,000 years have been the calmest and most boring in terms temperature swings in earth's geologic history. That lead to the development of what we like to call civilization. Even the swings we have recently seen are tiny on the geologic scale. This makes me think that all the calamitous news about climate change, is more centered around climate scientists realizing that fear sells and brings in grant money from politicians.
Slashdot Mirror
They say it moves the universe forwards.
So ... it's a supermassive black hole?
If it was a primordial super-massive black hole wouldn't that just mean it sucks so hard that the universe is being pulled forwards into it? Quick!! Check for Hawking Radiation!!
The Discovery cast are going to use their non-binary antifa boots to kick some patriarchal Klingon butt. Now what would have been an interesting show would be a show centered around the Klingon's rather than the Federation. Heghlu'meH QaQ jajvam!
Western world is far to worried about its gender, which bathrooms to use, what pronoun to use and if there are any nearby safe spaces with cuddle puppies in case they are triggered by a microaggression.
Highly rated in terms internet freedom. One of the best ratings in the world. https://freedomhouse.org/repor...
Gosh darn those pesky plants taking in billions of tons of CO2!! They are not toe'ing the "We are Dooooomed" narrative. Stop growing! http://www.nasa.gov/feature/go...
We see the future touted as one of a cashless society. The technology is possible but with shenanigans like this how can we possibly trust the financial institutions charged with managing such a change? Right now, the answer seems to be, we don't.
No speculation needed, Motives of the climate scientists in the mass media are, (as used and paid for in both the "global cooling" scare and later on in the ongoing "global warming", "climate change" and now "climate disruption") are quite apparent. Motives include, money (22 billion a year), recognition, 15 minutes of fame, and power over the narrative. Still despite all this, climate science will advance. Well, at least until they call it "settled science".
If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever.
Unless they just want you to think its incompetence. Plausible deniability is all the rage.
The sky is blue, water is still wet, and windows is still insecure. Wonder if Microsoft is colluding with the 3rd party software market to keep windows insecure? Would make for some nice kickback payoffs from the Anti-virus / Anti-malware vendors. Winception.... How deep down the money hole does it go.
Yes I do remember that. Here, I will do the 20 sec of google search work for you and give you a link with 200 plus 1970's articles describing the global cooling ice age theory. http://www.populartechnology.n... There was that so difficult.
I remember reading numerous science and mass media articles in the 1970's that the world would be glaciated by 2020. I also remember reading in the 1990's numerous science and mass media articles that the world was fast on its way to becoming warm like Venus. Yet when the Geologists look at climate data on the geologic time scale the past 15,000 years have been the calmest and most boring in terms temperature swings in earth's geologic history. That lead to the development of what we like to call civilization. Even the swings we have recently seen are tiny on the geologic scale. This makes me think that all the calamitous news about climate change, is more centered around climate scientists realizing that fear sells and brings in grant money from politicians.