Which is great up to the point that you leap over the cover into oncoming fire instead of interacting with the thing 3 pixels to the left of your crosshair...
The ruling was a victory for Talk America Inc. in its fight with AT&T’s Michigan Bell Telephone unit. The case centered on so-called entrance facilities -- the wires or cables that connect the networks of two carriers. AT&T argued unsuccessfully that those lines aren’t covered by the 1996 law.
The problem with red light cameras is lack of context; the camera triggers because you were in the intersection during a defined time period, but it doesn't know and cannot see *why* you were in the intersection at that time.
No, you don't get to blame Sony for the crime, but saying that Sony have been (criminally?) negligent in protecting their customers' data? That they've failed to learn from their multitude of security mistakes? That actually they kind of deserve it in this case?
A simple "We apologise for our douchebaggery over the OtherOS stuff" months ago would probably have been enough to have avoided all this trouble, but they wanted to save face at a cost of what is fast becoming a PR nightmare. If LulzSec don't have something planned to coincide with Sony's E3 keynote then I'll be amazed.
Better than N-1 support is N-1 or, say 24 months, whichever is longer - that way you don't end up having to retire support for browsers every 6 weeks to keep up with the development cycles.
As I posted above, it's to test that you, as an IPv4 user, can still connect to the site when it's being advertised via IPv4 *and* IPv6, not that you can connect to it via IPv6.
No, it says you're good for connecting to sites that are IPv6 enabled, not that you're good for connecting via IPv6.
A lot of people are concerned that shoddy configuration by ISPs will mean that sites advertising on IPv6 *and* IPv4 will be unreachable by people trying to connect over IPv4.
Portions of the service will be free, including features inspired by Facebook Inc. that will let Call of Duty players meet for online gun battles with others who share various affiliations and interests.
Because my primary concern when looking for people to shoot in the face, in the conversationally-focused Call of Duty world, is whether they also happen to be fans of Firefly.
It's the same reason I refuse to hire anyone who graduated highschool; in fact I usually prefer people who misspell half their CV, it shows they haven't wasted their time on useless things like educating themselves and have instead focused on what's important: Experience!
Usernames and passwords are trivial to socially engineer; most people you ask will give you their password without you even asking for it if you claim to be "from IT".
I'm not sure where they're getting these numbers from, because the IDC Graph they're re-printing shows business sales going from ~870,000 in Q4 2010 to ~890,000 in Q1 2011. Now I'm no mathematician, but that doesn't look like a 66% increase to me.
I'm all for flexibility, but allowing unmanageable, unsecurable, unmonitorable devices like the iPhone (Android isn't much better, Phone 7 is better but still a big step back from WM6), that IT departments will somehow have to support every time they go wrong because they're "being used for work" is simply unworkable.
A Cisco spokesman said the networking vendor was serious about security and advised users to apply the relevant recommendations in the manual to secure their systems. [...] The weaknesses result from Cisco's reliance on web functions that gave users functions at the cost of easier penetration for hackers. [...] “The book says to shut off web services,” Wesley said
So why the hell is Cisco shipping devices with features that they themselves recommend disabling for security reasons, unless you have specific need for them, enabled by default?
Sure, just sign this document accepting complete liability for anything that happens to our network as a result of you connecting up your latest penis extension de jour to it.
Which is great up to the point that you leap over the cover into oncoming fire instead of interacting with the thing 3 pixels to the left of your crosshair...
The ruling was a victory for Talk America Inc. in its fight with AT&T’s Michigan Bell Telephone unit. The case centered on so-called entrance facilities -- the wires or cables that connect the networks of two carriers. AT&T argued unsuccessfully that those lines aren’t covered by the 1996 law.
There, now you've read the entire article
The problem with red light cameras is lack of context; the camera triggers because you were in the intersection during a defined time period, but it doesn't know and cannot see *why* you were in the intersection at that time.
Like lacking a sound legal basis for a lawsuit has ever stopped anyone before...
That's $365 for the Wi-Fi and $439 for the 3G in the EU - they don't list UK prices, but assuming £249 and £299 that's $409 and $491 respectively.
Laughable.
No, you don't get to blame Sony for the crime, but saying that Sony have been (criminally?) negligent in protecting their customers' data? That they've failed to learn from their multitude of security mistakes? That actually they kind of deserve it in this case?
A simple "We apologise for our douchebaggery over the OtherOS stuff" months ago would probably have been enough to have avoided all this trouble, but they wanted to save face at a cost of what is fast becoming a PR nightmare. If LulzSec don't have something planned to coincide with Sony's E3 keynote then I'll be amazed.
Not to mention Windows XP...
Better than N-1 support is N-1 or, say 24 months, whichever is longer - that way you don't end up having to retire support for browsers every 6 weeks to keep up with the development cycles.
As I posted above, it's to test that you, as an IPv4 user, can still connect to the site when it's being advertised via IPv4 *and* IPv6, not that you can connect to it via IPv6.
No, it says you're good for connecting to sites that are IPv6 enabled, not that you're good for connecting via IPv6.
A lot of people are concerned that shoddy configuration by ISPs will mean that sites advertising on IPv6 *and* IPv4 will be unreachable by people trying to connect over IPv4.
Don't knock it, for all you know, Larry Ellison's cat is a programming genius
Portions of the service will be free, including features inspired by Facebook Inc. that will let Call of Duty players meet for online gun battles with others who share various affiliations and interests.
Because my primary concern when looking for people to shoot in the face, in the conversationally-focused Call of Duty world, is whether they also happen to be fans of Firefly.
It's the same reason I refuse to hire anyone who graduated highschool; in fact I usually prefer people who misspell half their CV, it shows they haven't wasted their time on useless things like educating themselves and have instead focused on what's important: Experience!
Usernames and passwords are trivial to socially engineer; most people you ask will give you their password without you even asking for it if you claim to be "from IT".
Radio Times *advertises* Internet Explorer 8, not exactly the same as recommending it.
Quoth the article:
Mac sales in the enterprise during Apple's last fiscal quarter grew a whopping 66 percent
The TCO claims from that article appear to be ass-sourced without any actual evidence to back them up.
Looking at it again, maybe they mean 66% in the last *year* as those numbers look more plausible at ~540,000 for Q1 2010.
I'm not sure where they're getting these numbers from, because the IDC Graph they're re-printing shows business sales going from ~870,000 in Q4 2010 to ~890,000 in Q1 2011. Now I'm no mathematician, but that doesn't look like a 66% increase to me.
I'm all for flexibility, but allowing unmanageable, unsecurable, unmonitorable devices like the iPhone (Android isn't much better, Phone 7 is better but still a big step back from WM6), that IT departments will somehow have to support every time they go wrong because they're "being used for work" is simply unworkable.
Sony would never be so evil as to threaten Rockstar Games with new firmware that prevents all Rockstar Games' games from working at all.
Even Sony wouldn't be that stupid.
A Cisco spokesman said the networking vendor was serious about security and advised users to apply the relevant recommendations in the manual to secure their systems.
[...]
The weaknesses result from Cisco's reliance on web functions that gave users functions at the cost of easier penetration for hackers.
[...]
“The book says to shut off web services,” Wesley said
So why the hell is Cisco shipping devices with features that they themselves recommend disabling for security reasons, unless you have specific need for them, enabled by default?
They're not artefacts of an ancient civilization; if there's no Ethernet port where you need it, get one installed.
Sure, just sign this document accepting complete liability for anything that happens to our network as a result of you connecting up your latest penis extension de jour to it.
True, but your reference docs rarely need to run at 60fps.