Yes, do that. The only thing close to helping Sekhon is "Sekhon is correct about Darwin's system calls." - which (even if it were true) doesn't change anything about the rest of the argument.
How likely is it for a zero-day exploit to be embedded in slashdot.org or cnn.com?
Just upload a bugged WMF (or PNG for that matter, to get those libpng users) on imageshack, post the link on Slashdot, and you could catch hundreds of people - probably even today - before it gets taken down.
By "trusted source" I meant "bought it at Best Buy" or possibly "downloaded from Download.com". What do I run on a system: Adobe Reader, Eclipse, Gaim, Quicktime, Winzip, Office, a few games. Imho, worrying about downloading malicious code from a hacked eclipse.org or apple.com isn't worthwhile.
Don't forget that Sourceforge was once hacked, just like somebody could hack a Download.com mirror, not to mention DNS spoofing attacks.
Re:economic model and pressures on governments
on
The Cost of the iPod
·
· Score: 1
To coin a word, you have to actually use it.
Re:economic model and pressures on governments
on
The Cost of the iPod
·
· Score: 1
We have all heard about Apple's outraged reaction to the so-called "iTunes law" (which really isn't an iTunes law except in Apple's propaganda, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DADVSI for more information).
Oh yes, let us see:
some news sources even went as far as to nickname the DADVSI law the "French iTunes law"
Measurements indicate that Mars is definitely getting warmer also.
Measurements show that the usual pseudo-journalistic sites the GW Denier get their info from don't understand what this is actually about. Reminds me of IDers.
Why do you claim to find "REAL science" in the ramblings of a PR specialist?
Appearing before the Commons Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development last year, Carleton University paleoclimatologist Professor Tim Patterson testified, "There is no meaningful correlation between CO2 levels and Earth's temperature over this [geologic] time frame. In fact, when CO2 levels were over ten times higher than they are now, about 450 million years ago, the planet was in the depths of the absolute coldest period in the last half billion years." Patterson asked the committee, "On the basis of this evidence, how could anyone still believe that the recent relatively small increase in CO2 levels would be the major cause of the past century's modest warming?"
In Thursday's issue of the journal Geology, Ohio State University scientists report that a long-ago ice age occurred 10 million years earlier than once thought. The new date clears up an inconsistency that has dogged climate change research for years.
I like shake, but it's never really fit in amongst the other Apple apps. But to EOL it for their (rumored) own app seems short-sighted. It's more likely people will migrate to Nuke in the meantime, which has jumped ahead while Apple has mostly let shake wither on the vine.
Beg your pardon?
Apple will no longer be selling maintenance for Shake and no further
software updates are planned as we begin work on the next generation of
Shake compositing software.
You see, when you want to know something about the current climate, you ask an actual climatologist, not the quoted paleoclimatologist, who studies long past climate. Especially when he is wrong. But then, he actually seems to be an fishy expert. Another scientist the article's author would dismiss if he weren't on his side.
Yeah, sorry, car manufacturers DO care, that's why they build cheap SUVs and tell people they are safer than sedans. Not that they are, but they care that they are cheaper for them. You have also detected the faint use of irony in my post.
And if you think for a moment that corporations wouldn't sell their grandmothers (well, maybe not those of their manager's, but those of their employees) for a measly buck, you are living in a non-regulated Libertarian dream world. But as long as corporations know what's good for them, everythings great, right?
So why can't this person look at climate data and say "that rate of change is faster than ever before - I know: I see it in the data I get. This could be serious"?
Don't tell me, tell the author of the article. According to his own rules, scientist who aren't "real" climatologists don't count - unless they are on his side of course.
Sure, all good things come from corporations not hindered by evil laws. Why, without laws earth would be much cleaner and all products would be safe. And without laws, car makers would gladly spend a few bucks per car to make them more fuel efficient - because they care.
Yes, do that. The only thing close to helping Sekhon is "Sekhon is correct about Darwin's system calls." - which (even if it were true) doesn't change anything about the rest of the argument.
Only if you, like Sekhon, still ignore that his test is not realistic, because it allocs, writes to the buffer and then immediately deallocs.
You predicted the msPod for 2007, but you cleverly didn't say 2007 of which calendar.
Debunked.
Just upload a bugged WMF (or PNG for that matter, to get those libpng users) on imageshack, post the link on Slashdot, and you could catch hundreds of people - probably even today - before it gets taken down.
By "trusted source" I meant "bought it at Best Buy" or possibly "downloaded from Download.com". What do I run on a system: Adobe Reader, Eclipse, Gaim, Quicktime, Winzip, Office, a few games. Imho, worrying about downloading malicious code from a hacked eclipse.org or apple.com isn't worthwhile.
Don't forget that Sourceforge was once hacked, just like somebody could hack a Download.com mirror, not to mention DNS spoofing attacks.
Is it likely - No. Is it possible - Yes.
Because I use a Mac.
So that is why so many people tried to rob Fort Knox.
Sit behind a cheap $50 router.
And hope that it isn't vulnerable itself.
Regularly update Windows/IE with critical patches.
And hope you don't run into Zero Day eploits.
Only run software obtained from a "trusted" source.
And hope it hasn't been hacked (or a proxy inbetween).
Welcome To Crazy Ubuntu Rumors Site!
To coin a word, you have to actually use it.
And while you're at it, read this.
In Thursday's issue of the journal Geology, Ohio State University scientists report that a long-ago ice age occurred 10 million years earlier than once thought. The new date clears up an inconsistency that has dogged climate change research for years.
And another Global Warming Denial Myth goes poof.
Sure, just have all contestants wear the stickers of their sponsors.
Sure, a 96kbit MP3 from a pirat site is going to be better quality than a 192kbit MP3 re-rip from an iTMS tune. Whatever you say.
You see, when you want to know something about the current climate, you ask an actual climatologist, not the quoted paleoclimatologist, who studies long past climate. Especially when he is wrong. But then, he actually seems to be an fishy expert. Another scientist the article's author would dismiss if he weren't on his side.
Is that supposed to make sense? Can you prove me wrong? Why don't you start with "There is no hockeystick - if you just ignore enough data".
Yeah, whatever, corporate scumbag. Sell your own granny.
Just tell him it's the Captain's chair of the Enterprise.
That's exactly what the Dinosaurs said.
And if you think for a moment that corporations wouldn't sell their grandmothers (well, maybe not those of their manager's, but those of their employees) for a measly buck, you are living in a non-regulated Libertarian dream world. But as long as corporations know what's good for them, everythings great, right?
Don't tell me, tell the author of the article. According to his own rules, scientist who aren't "real" climatologists don't count - unless they are on his side of course.
Sure, all good things come from corporations not hindered by evil laws. Why, without laws earth would be much cleaner and all products would be safe. And without laws, car makers would gladly spend a few bucks per car to make them more fuel efficient - because they care.