No, the problem is that Safari doesn't utilize the functionality Windows has for marking files as safe or unsafe when it downloads something, thus allowing IE to open said files.
Safari isn't implementing the basic security that is implemented in Windows. No, the problem is that you are confusing Safari with Firefox. Oh yeah, and that IE doesn't check the basic security that is implemented in Windows when it starts any old DLL on the Desktop.
Don't believe me? Download the DLL from the page to your Desktop and restart IE - presto.
Also, on OSX Safari tags the downloaded file as 'unsafe', but it fails to use the Windows functionality to do the same on Windows. Wrong. Safari does use the Attachment Execution Service of Windows XP SP2 - unlike Firefox.
The ability to hibernate your Mac with 16TB of RAM:) No one can afford 16TB of FB-DIMMs, there's not that much money in circulation. Even at Apple's RAM prices it will cost less than a hour of non-war in Iraq. Far less.
Creationist: "Evolution can't be true, because it would require huge sudden changes to organisms that are completely impossible."
Scientist: "Actually no, look at this study..." Creationist: "That's an uncalled for ad hominem attack on my believes - you are nothing but a big old meany." Bill O'Reilly: "It is clear that these so-called "scientist" have an anti-religious agenda, and everything they say can easily be ignored."
Ohh, right. They took the code and then threw everything away. And saying "Openoffice is not a real open source project" is closer to the truth than all the bullshit the OP said - I didn't see you complain about that; actually you were probably the idiot who said it.
The sad thing is - you are NOT joking and actually believe that bullshit. Yeah. And you believe yours, which is not as sad as the following:
What really gets me is how you, one who claims that environmentalists are always right Why would anyone believe anything you say when the first thing you claim is a lie? I said "damn right most of the time". And that's just 3 posts up.
Considering that HUMAN generated Greenhouse gasses contribute to 2% or Less of the total atmosphere, I doubt that it is a greenhouse gas effect. Yeah, when you add 2% water to a full glass, it's obviously not that added 2% that made it overflow, they could never have such a drastic effect.
I think many alarmists forget that Earth was once significantly warmer than it is now, and had significantly higher levels of atmospheric CO2 than it has now. So why don't you hop in your time machine and go back to the time where it was so cosy and warm?
Crops have higher yields when more CO2 is available, even if growing conditions arenâ(TM)t perfect.
"But there's a tradeoff between quantity and quality. While crops may be more productive, the resulting produce will be of lower nutritional quality."
"Wild plants are constrained by what they can do with increased CO2. They may use it for survival and defense rather than to boost reproduction."
Nutritional quality declines because while the plants produce more seeds under higher CO2 levels, the seeds contain less nitrogen.
"The quality of the food produced by the plant decreases, so you've got to eat more of it to get the same benefits," Curtis said. "Nitrogen is a critical component for building protein in animals, and much of the grain grown in the United States is fed to livestock.
It seems to me that when we see something happen, we immediately try to figure out what WE did to cause it. It's the same kind of self-centered belief system that led Native Americans to believe that a certain dance or sacrifice would lead to rain. No, WE try to find out what caused it, period. SOME try to "prove" that it can't have been us by babbling endlessly about how we didn't do it in the past. Sorry, but the fact that you weren't even alive at the time of the first bank robbery will not cut it with any judge when you are on trial for robbing a bank now.
Environmentalists were around long before global warming. GW is just their latest tactic. Yup, and the fact that they were damn right most of the time should tell you something.
you mean once the connection charge and minimum call charge have already been made. Why would there need to be a connection? The calling number is transmitted without one. Oh wait, you live in the US, they charge you for getting a call, so why not when you call and don't get a connection.
If it weren't for the fact that you can "Transfer inbound calls from a regular cell call to WiFi instantly and seamlessly". And how does one do that? Don't ask me, ask the guys who wrote the app.
Since the iPhone SDK doesn't allow for [3rd party] background processes, how are you going to be notified of an incoming VOIP call? Answer: you're not, unless you already happen to be in the VOIP app. So it will be fine for outgoing calls, but pretty limited otherwise... If it weren't for the fact that you can "Transfer inbound calls from a regular cell call to WiFi instantly and seamlessly".
OpenOffice? That's not a real OpenSource project, but started on the Amstrad CPC as a commercial app, and was actually on the Mac before it was available for Linux. Go suck a lemon.
"Google has long had a fondness for the Mac, with upwards of 6,000 of its 20,000 current employees opting to use the Mac over Windows."
So you can only use these 2 operating systems @ google? I was expecting a bit more accuracy from the article... Yeah, obviously they meant to say "... opting to use the Mac over Windows and Linux." - Happy now?
Slashdot Mirror
Don't believe me? Download the DLL from the page to your Desktop and restart IE - presto.
German journalist Paul Sethe once said "Freedom of the Press is the freedom of two-hundred rich people to promote their opinion."
Creationist: "Evolution can't be true, because it would require huge sudden changes to organisms that are completely impossible." ..."
Scientist: "Actually no, look at this study
Creationist: "That's an uncalled for ad hominem attack on my believes - you are nothing but a big old meany."
Bill O'Reilly: "It is clear that these so-called "scientist" have an anti-religious agenda, and everything they say can easily be ignored."
Well, Saddam Hussein is/was "real", that doesn't prove that he was responsible for 9/11, which is something >40% of Americans "believe" in.
Come on, be fair - you can't really run Crysis on almost any x86 either.
Nobody else could be that stupid - hello WMF.
Wow, you got my point without understanding you did. That must mean I'm smarter than you.
Ohh, right. They took the code and then threw everything away. And saying "Openoffice is not a real open source project" is closer to the truth than all the bullshit the OP said - I didn't see you complain about that; actually you were probably the idiot who said it.
The sad thing is - you are NOT joking and actually believe that bullshit.
Crops have higher yields when more CO2 is available, even if growing conditions arenâ(TM)t perfect.
"But there's a tradeoff between quantity and quality. While crops may be more productive, the resulting produce will be of lower nutritional quality."
"Wild plants are constrained by what they can do with increased CO2. They may use it for survival and defense rather than to boost reproduction."
Nutritional quality declines because while the plants produce more seeds under higher CO2 levels, the seeds contain less nitrogen.
"The quality of the food produced by the plant decreases, so you've got to eat more of it to get the same benefits," Curtis said. "Nitrogen is a critical component for building protein in animals, and much of the grain grown in the United States is fed to livestock.
There are people living in Antarctica - so that's obviously the ideal habitat for humans.
OpenOffice? That's not a real OpenSource project, but started on the Amstrad CPC as a commercial app, and was actually on the Mac before it was available for Linux. Go suck a lemon.