"There is clearly no music in your video" vs 'All content owners have reviewed your video and confirmed their claims to some or all of its content: Entity: rumblefish; Content Type: Musical Composition.'
That sounds pretty much like an admission of fraud to me
You say that the necessary actions were taken shortly after you became aware of the issue, but how can you reconcile that with the "All content owners have reviewed your video and confirmed their claims to some or all of its content" answer that the video uploader was given when he disputed the takedown notice?
Either Google are lying about you having responded by confirming that you own the copyright to the birdsong, or you're lying about having reviewed the video.
Yeah, the problem with government mandated insurance purchases is that it's not single payer government provided health cover, like the rest of the civilised world provides.
I love how it's always "because the government knows better than you or your Doctor", but I never see "because the insurance company whose main purpose is to make as much profit as possible knows better than you or your Doctor"
Having worked in a Army reserve unit in the early 90s in an IT-like capacity, we were told if we were overrun, the ammo depot's records had to be wiped by thermite, not "writing zeros" or whatever. This is public knowledge, read the public TMs. There is probably a very good reason when going up against "the bad guys" you only trust thermite, and going up against internal investigators and auditors, "trust us, writing zeros is good enough"
Of course, that might have something to do with the fact that zeroing out the hard drives takes a not insignificant amount of time compared with just blowing them up. I've never been in the military myself, but I would hazard a guess that you might be under some time pressures if your base is being overrun by the enemy.
I'm just not sure I understand the fundamental difference between "you're not allowed to do this, and if you do it you'll get punished" and "you're allowed to do this, but if you do it you'll get punished"
You know when I look at the Constitution, I don't find in there any place where it mentions a right to be free from libel. I do, however, find a right to freedom of speech. I have trouble seeing how an enumerated right is trumped by an interpreted right.
So, as I asked above, what would your recourse be if I decided it would be a fun idea to cover your local neighbourhood with posters accusing you of raping small children?
You know when I look at the Constitution, I don't find in there any place where it mentions a right to be free from harrassment. I do, however, find a right to freedom of speech. I have trouble seeing how an enumerated right is trumped by an interpreted right.
Presumably you'd have no problem with me plastering your local neighbourhood with posters informing everybody that you're a paedophile?
a) Median is a form of average b) If you're measuring intelligence over a large population, the results aren't all that far from a normal distribution, in which case the mean, median and mode will all be the same number anyway/but yeah, I know how you feel:)
More likely is that the TV makers will look at this and put a chip in the display to make sure that you're properly licensed to be viewing whatever content you're passing to it, and DRM strikes again.
The 'nothing to hide' argument is perfectly valid when you're talking about a voluntary service that you have chosen to sign up for, as opposed to the government watching everyone
We've got several billion years until the sun stops giving us power (and destroys the planet, coincidentally), so for all intents and purposes, solar power is limitless.
That's not to say it doesn't have other issues, but we're not going to run out of it
Better than that, why not actually go there and see for yourself. Oh wait, I did, and there were plenty of black and asian faces in the sea of people helping to clean up the streets after the rioting.
Except that this is, by its very nature, a tracking app, otherwise there wouldn't be much point in it.
Opening the source might tell you what data the app collects, but it's not going to tell you what the company that collects it is actually going to do with it.
Except that's not actually relevant. Those folks snooped the traffic on a tor exit node, which meant they saw whatever it was that the person on the other end of the tor connection was doing, but it didn't let them work out who that was
Unless i'm mistaken, all of the EU falls under the same regional zone as far as DVDs are concerned, and thus they won't fall foul of this law as it only regulates sales within the EU.
Slashdot Mirror
"There is clearly no music in your video" vs 'All content owners have reviewed your video and confirmed their claims to some or all of its content: Entity: rumblefish; Content Type: Musical Composition.'
That sounds pretty much like an admission of fraud to me
” To understand that, you have to grasp that “the Internet” isn’t just a network of wires and switches"
Well of course not, as every (ex-) politician knows, it's a series of tubes.
As soon as it came to our attention today that people were drawing attention to the fact that we had made a mistake.
Fixed for accuracy.
You say that the necessary actions were taken shortly after you became aware of the issue, but how can you reconcile that with the "All content owners have reviewed your video and confirmed their claims to some or all of its content" answer that the video uploader was given when he disputed the takedown notice?
Either Google are lying about you having responded by confirming that you own the copyright to the birdsong, or you're lying about having reviewed the video.
Which one is it?
Yeah, the problem with government mandated insurance purchases is that it's not single payer government provided health cover, like the rest of the civilised world provides.
And btw, i'm not an American.
Yeah, you most certainly could change your insurance company.
Unless, of course, you wanted to change because you were dissatisfied with the way your current provider was dealing with your current condition.
I love how it's always "because the government knows better than you or your Doctor", but I never see "because the insurance company whose main purpose is to make as much profit as possible knows better than you or your Doctor"
Han has much nicer boobs than I remember.
Having worked in a Army reserve unit in the early 90s in an IT-like capacity, we were told if we were overrun, the ammo depot's records had to be wiped by thermite, not "writing zeros" or whatever. This is public knowledge, read the public TMs. There is probably a very good reason when going up against "the bad guys" you only trust thermite, and going up against internal investigators and auditors, "trust us, writing zeros is good enough"
Of course, that might have something to do with the fact that zeroing out the hard drives takes a not insignificant amount of time compared with just blowing them up. I've never been in the military myself, but I would hazard a guess that you might be under some time pressures if your base is being overrun by the enemy.
Somehow you missed the very next line of the article ....
All the data that Johnson was able to retrieve from un-allocated space came after that overwrite, he said.
I'm just not sure I understand the fundamental difference between "you're not allowed to do this, and if you do it you'll get punished" and "you're allowed to do this, but if you do it you'll get punished"
You know when I look at the Constitution, I don't find in there any place where it mentions a right to be free from libel. I do, however, find a right to freedom of speech. I have trouble seeing how an enumerated right is trumped by an interpreted right.
So, as I asked above, what would your recourse be if I decided it would be a fun idea to cover your local neighbourhood with posters accusing you of raping small children?
You know when I look at the Constitution, I don't find in there any place where it mentions a right to be free from harrassment. I do, however, find a right to freedom of speech. I have trouble seeing how an enumerated right is trumped by an interpreted right.
Presumably you'd have no problem with me plastering your local neighbourhood with posters informing everybody that you're a paedophile?
a) Median is a form of average /but yeah, I know how you feel :)
b) If you're measuring intelligence over a large population, the results aren't all that far from a normal distribution, in which case the mean, median and mode will all be the same number anyway
No, that's the Chinese version
More likely is that the TV makers will look at this and put a chip in the display to make sure that you're properly licensed to be viewing whatever content you're passing to it, and DRM strikes again.
The 'nothing to hide' argument is perfectly valid when you're talking about a voluntary service that you have chosen to sign up for, as opposed to the government watching everyone
'fear prosecution for doing their job after Tomlinson'
Perhaps you could explain exactly how striking an unarmed man in the back for no reason counts as 'doing his job' for a policeman
Or are you one of those people who thinks the laws shouldn't apply to police officers?
We've got several billion years until the sun stops giving us power (and destroys the planet, coincidentally), so for all intents and purposes, solar power is limitless.
That's not to say it doesn't have other issues, but we're not going to run out of it
Better than that, why not actually go there and see for yourself. Oh wait, I did, and there were plenty of black and asian faces in the sea of people helping to clean up the streets after the rioting.
Go crawl back under your rock.
Except that this is, by its very nature, a tracking app, otherwise there wouldn't be much point in it.
Opening the source might tell you what data the app collects, but it's not going to tell you what the company that collects it is actually going to do with it.
Except that's not actually relevant. Those folks snooped the traffic on a tor exit node, which meant they saw whatever it was that the person on the other end of the tor connection was doing, but it didn't let them work out who that was
Or alternatively
Wenn ist das Nunstruck git und Slotermeyer? Ja!...
Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput.
Unless i'm mistaken, all of the EU falls under the same regional zone as far as DVDs are concerned, and thus they won't fall foul of this law as it only regulates sales within the EU.