Slashdot Mirror


Star Wars Uncut Project Complete

An anonymous reader writes "In 2009 we discussed the Star Wars Uncut Project, a crowd-sourced effort to re-create the entirety of Episode IV as series of 15-second clips filmed and submitted by fans. Well, it's done at last, and CmdrTaco has written his review of the two-hour film. He says, 'A great number of shots demonstrate technology well beyond what was available when the original Star Wars was made. Other shots are stylishly animated in CG. Others are rotoscoped in mediums from chalk to pencil to marker. There’s also a plethora of stop motion, claymation, and even some puppetry to go around. [A] few shots are only slightly modified from the originals, but those are the rarity, and generally done to pull off a specific joke. ... It's a glorious achievement.'"

175 comments

  1. cant wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    until the copyright U.S. gov't troll arrests them all for illegal profits.

    1. Re:cant wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, there is a possibility of take downs. Several of the clips do use the original audio. I doubt that even the MPAA would care, but there is that possibility. I know if I was doing one of those clips I would not have used the original audio to be safe. I do believe copyright is necessary, but should only be about 15 years tops (no renew option). If we were to get rid of it altogether, all films would be as professionally done as this one. This was funny, interesting, and all that - but ONLY because it was a crowd sourced version of something we all know and love. If it was an original work, I would have dumped it after 1 minute. It certainly made me think...

    2. Re:cant wait by Jeng · · Score: 1

      Isn't fair use under 30 seconds? So individually perhaps the videos may not violate copyright law, but I am unsure on the final product.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    3. Re:cant wait by LoyalOpposition · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I do believe copyright is necessary, but should only be about 15 years tops (no renew option).

      Why is that? Seriously. Do you believe that authors and inventors would no longer create writings and discoveries if there were no copyright? I imagine that ancient Rome's monopolies on copyright were quite below par, but I doubt there would be many people claiming that there was no art in ancient Rome.

      Or, look at it another way. The beneficiaries of writings and discoveries are the people who read the writings and use the discoveries. (That's interpreted loosely: obviously, one doesn't read a painting.) The copyright monopoly is part of the price we pay in order to do that. In the same way that I want to pay as little as possible when I buy a gallon of gasoline, I want to pay as little as possible when I read a writing. We shouldn't be looking at the most length for copyright monopolies, we should be looking at the least. In fact, I've seen reference to studies purporting to claim that two years is plenty long enough for a copyright in contemporary times.

      I really think that the reason things have gotten so turned around is that our legislators and artists have conspired against us. By that, I mean that copyright owners have given large amounts of money to legislators who promote strengthening of copyright, and the legislators have in turn passed copyright laws that give much more profit to copyright owners who are then able to give large amounts of money to legislators. In fact, I've read that the original copyrights were for that very purpose. Monarchs granted letters of patent to their supporters.

      I would like to see copyrights reduced to two years. I would also like a return to the previous requirement that a copyright notice appear on the writing. In fact, I would like to see a requirement that current contact information appear so that it would always be possible for people who want to copy to negotiate a license. If the contact information goes dead, then so does the copyright.

      I would also like to see patent reduced to two years. I would also like it to be limited to things that can't be reverse engineered. Patent declarations tell us how to make something, and is part of the payment an inventor makes to receive a monopoly. If it's obvious how to make something then the payment is worthless.

      I would also like to see trade secret eliminated entirely. Why are we paying the monopolists if we can't ever get the benefit?

      I would also like to see trademark weakened considerably. However, I'm not sure how to do that. Maybe allow each company only a single trademark? And it has to refer to the company name somehow? The reason I'm suggesting this is that it's supposed to give consumers confidence that the quality of the product is sufficiently high, and that it's not being counterfeited by a lower-quality producer.

      Finally, I would like to see free unicorns and rainbows. Frankly, I think I'll see the latter before I see the former, so long as the conspiracy of monopoly continues.

      ~Loyal

      --
      I aim to misbehave.
    4. Re:cant wait by Ihmhi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've said it before and I'll say it every time. A year from the first day of sale is more than enough. Damn near every medium you hear of (books, movies, games, etc.) makes it money in the first few weeks. A saying in the game and movie industries is that if you don't turn a profit by the end of the sixth week then it's a flop.

    5. Re:cant wait by symbolset · · Score: 1

      When copyright is banned outright you'll be coming round with your hat in hand begging for fifteen years. People are getting really pissed off right now. Congress is granted the power in the Consitution to grant copyrights - but it is not REQUIRED to do so. Copyright is not a natural right.

      Freedom of speech and due process of law are, however natural rights that are beyond the power of the government to take away. And when you start trying to screw with those natural rights to maximize the benefit of your "IP" privilege you're going to find that we don't care so much about your rents any more.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    6. Re:cant wait by afabbro · · Score: 1

      Isn't fair use under 30 seconds?

      No. There is no specific standard. The purpose of law is not to make rules but rather to create interpretation opportunities that enrich attorneys through litigation.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    7. Re:cant wait by Undead+Waffle · · Score: 1

      I've said it before and I'll say it every time. A year from the first day of sale is more than enough. Damn near every medium you hear of (books, movies, games, etc.) makes it money in the first few weeks. A saying in the game and movie industries is that if you don't turn a profit by the end of the sixth week then it's a flop.

      The problem is that if it were only a year the studio would just not pay the artist and after a year mass produce the book/song/whatever and keep all the money. You need a long enough duration so the people with the means of distribution and control over advertising would rather pay the artist than wait out the copyright.

    8. Re:cant wait by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      if copyright was a short time from creation (as opposed to a short time from publication), that might not work.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    9. Re:cant wait by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      If the studio did that, the artist could publish it themselves after a year. It'd be public domain.

      Also, studios do that now anyway. There's been more than few instances of a band/artist saying "I know my name's on this, but don't buy it. It'd bad."

    10. Re:cant wait by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      A year from the first day of sale is more than enough. Damn near every medium you hear of (books, movies, games, etc.) makes it money in the first few weeks.

      You may argue that this is making your point, but I VERY often buy/rent/watch things over a year old. I'll even rent old TV shows from netflix (not even "classic" TV shows, just ones I liked that were short lived that I didn't end up seeing all episodes of, or often in cases where they didn't even air all of the episodes they made).

      For video games, they go into Greatest Hits/GOTY editions over a year after they originally came out (in the $20ish range). I usually buy the Greatest Hits/GOTY editions BECAUSE I want to buy a new copy, and not get one off eBay for a few bucks less. (I have gotten a couple of games off of eBay, but not many).

    11. Re:cant wait by mgiuca · · Score: 1

      I agree with you entirely, up to this point:

      I would also like to see trade secret eliminated entirely. Why are we paying the monopolists if we can't ever get the benefit?

      I'm not sure if you mean eliminate all trade secrets, or just those associated with protected intellectual property. I don't have any qualms with trade secrets: if Coke wants to have a secret formula for their drinks, and they don't want to tell me how to replicate it, fine. That is absolutely their right, just as it is my right not to tell you the contents of my hard drive. But where I agree with you is that it should not be legal to keep a trade secret and enjoy protection under IP laws. If you are going to get the benefit of a government-sponsored monopoly in exchange for releasing some knowledge into the world, then by damn you had better release that knowledge.

      That is essentially the converse of your demand that patents be limited to things that can't be reverse engineered. If you are going to have a patent on something that is easy to learn by inspecting the product, then the patent isn't worth anything to society because it isn't telling us anything we can't already find out. Conversely, if you are going to patent something that is ridiculously complicated, then you must tell us how it works or the patent isn't worth anything to society because we can't replicate the invention after it expires. I realise that the patent does theoretically describe the invention, but all the patents I've read have only described the invention in enough detail that you could be sued if you invented one, not enough detail for an engineer to implement it.

      I would also like to see trademark weakened considerably. However, I'm not sure how to do that. Maybe allow each company only a single trademark?

      I don't have a very big problem with trademark law. You don't want to force companies to have one trademark that refers to their own name. Then nobody can protect the name of a product they might create -- I don't see how that would help. Also, anybody rich enough would easily get around it by creating dozens of shell companies with the name of each product.

      Now, were we talking about Star Wars?

  2. Early reviews by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Funny

    Early reviewers say that the result is worse than the original, but much better than the Special Edition.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
    1. Re:Early reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's utter garbage. Terrible fanservice even for the scifi con crowd. Sure there are diamonds in the rough, but there are better ways to spend 2 hours of your life.

    2. Re:Early reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I realize you were joking, but to be honest, it's a really cool idea that produced something completely and totally unwatchable. I made it through less than five minutes, and that was extremely painful.

    3. Re:Early reviews by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I realize you were joking, but to be honest, it's a really cool idea that produced something completely and totally unwatchable. I made it through less than five minutes, and that was extremely painful.

      Well, the first thought that came to my mind was "wait, this is not unlike Plan 9 from Outer Space with two actors alternating for a single character"...only this is even worse. ;)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:Early reviews by Niedi · · Score: 1

      So then I guess I don't need to be THAT upset that youtube blocked this video in Germany due to licensing issues with the music :/

    5. Re:Early reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People whine about the revisions, yet the originals themselves are full of annoying crap like ewoks, not to mention an incestuous luke.

    6. Re:Early reviews by somersault · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Such as.. commenting on Slashdot? This is a really unique arts project, and it's probably worth watch through just for the laughs.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    7. Re:Early reviews by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I don't see why they didn't bother redoing episodes I,II, III. by redoing everything... I think Fan Fiction of what happened would be a better story then the Cannon version. Even if it does mean that Skywalker will befriend some quite backroom guy who wants to be a writer to join him on his amazing adventures, heck that is still better then Jar-Jar.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    8. Re:Early reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i 'watched' it while doing something else and quite a few times i would look up and quite enjoy
      the movie (both because of humor and impressive re-interpretations)

    9. Re:Early reviews by LateArthurDent · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I realize you were joking, but to be honest, it's a really cool idea that produced something completely and totally unwatchable. I made it through less than five minutes, and that was extremely painful.

      I personally had the exact opposite reaction. I thought it would be completely unwatchable, but once I started watching it, I couldn't stop, because it was awesome.

      I plan to watch it again with a group of friends.

    10. Re:Early reviews by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 2

      Episode I:
      "So who is this pilot, master?"
      "His name is Skywalker. He's an ace for the Republic, amassing an incredible array of kills. We're to award him a medal."
      "Sending two Jedi is a great honour."

      Then the two Jedi meet the adult Anakin, realize he's force sensitive and off the charts, so they start training him in secret. Darth Maul kills Liam Neeson.

      Episode II:
      Anakin falls in love, Jedi council encourages the marriage. Padme gets assassinated and then Anakin finds out there's a Sith way to bring people back. He goes to Korriban, learns from the Sith there, and brings Padme back.

      They have two kids, the Jedi have to kill Padme and the kids because they're all Sithy. Obi-wan fakes the kids deaths instead.

      Episode III:
      Darth Vader goes on a Jedi-hunt.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    11. Re:Early reviews by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

      Uh-huh.... Thus demonstrating that it's still impossible to reconcile Episode IV with Episode V and all the crap that followed without rewriting Episode V. And, of course, all the other crap that followed.

      Or, we could just turn our attention to a prequel that's not doomed to utterly suck.

    12. Re:Early reviews by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 2

      What about IV is impossible to reconcile with V? I'm just curious, not trying to say you're wrong. Did you mean the 4th and 5th movies made? (I and II ?)

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    13. Re:Early reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I had a hard time watching the Star Wars Christmas Special too.

    14. Re:Early reviews by jd2112 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Early reviewers say that the result is worse than the original, but much better than the Special Edition.

      So, Han and Greedo shoot at the same time?

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    15. Re:Early reviews by somersault · · Score: 2

      I've watched an hour so far, and it's surprisingly watchable for such a mish-mash! There have been plenty of comedy moments, and some awesome ideas/styles :)

      I wouldn't recommend it to those who haven't seen the original a few times, but that's unlikely around these parts!

      --
      which is totally what she said
    16. Re:Early reviews by funkatron · · Score: 3, Funny

      I realize you were joking, but to be honest, it's a really cool idea that produced something completely and totally unwatchable.

      So it's art!

      --
      "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
    17. Re:Early reviews by gnalre · · Score: 1

      Early reviewers say that the result is worse than the original, but much better than the Special Edition.

      But still better than Red Tails

      --
      Choose your allies carefully, it is highly unlikely you will be held accountable for the actions of your enemies
    18. Re:Early reviews by Sparx139 · · Score: 1

      The trick is to watch it with someone else, same tactic as watching (and enjoying) B-grade films

      --
      Our culture doesn't get smarter, it just finds new ways of being retarded.
    19. Re:Early reviews by sootman · · Score: 2

      Depends on who you are. I'm not even 4 minutes in and I've laughed out loud repeatedly, most recently at a perfectly serious-looking Rebel soldier wearing a newspaper hat. Obviously, anyone looking for Oscar-winning cinematography throughout will be disappointed, but it's thoroughly entertaining.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    20. Re:Early reviews by trawg · · Score: 1

      I personally had the exact opposite reaction. I thought it would be completely unwatchable, but once I started watching it, I couldn't stop, because it was awesome.

      Exactly the same here. I planned to give it a few minutes before the inevitable closing, but it was just so creative, so different and so hilarious in parts I couldn't stop.

      One of the best things I've seen on the Internet and such a great example of the culture of the remix and why it is so important that copyright is not further bastardised so that projects like this can not go ahead.

      It was so great to see such a wide range of people involved too - young kids to the elderly. All having a blast making it. Awesome.

    21. Re:Early reviews by nschubach · · Score: 2

      The C3P0 "sex bot" scene (After Luke buys the droids and is cleaning them) was rather disturbing, but I couldn't help but laugh my head off.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    22. Re:Early reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, they created a new film in the Star Wars franchise. par for the course (with one exception, the second. first doesnt count, sort of like 1 isnt really prime or composite)

    23. Re:Early reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of it is pretty bad, but I did laugh at the scene where Ben is pulling off his beard and Luke has a horrified stare on his face.

    24. Re:Early reviews by thereitis · · Score: 1

      I did a quick skim to 5 scenes and if what I saw was any indication, you're better of doing something else for 2 hours.

    25. Re:Early reviews by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      I am quite pleased with having spent two hours watching, laughing, enjoying. Sorry, did I waste my time being entertained? Guess I should get back to breaking rocks in the hot sun or something.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    26. Re:Early reviews by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't go so far as to call it 'awesome' but I enjoyed it. A good laugh. Some people take this kind of thing too seriously and what was fun and successful about this is that almost all of the input was deliberately humourous/tongue in cheek/satirical. It would probably be even more fun to watch with friends, beer, pizza...

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    27. Re:Early reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check at 50:00 : Han shot first ! :)

    28. Re:Early reviews by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Early reviewers say that the result is worse than the original, but much better than the Special Edition.

      Like time travel back in time that would create the grandfather paradox, so it is logically impossible for any film to be worse than the original Star Wars, except of course its sequels.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    29. Re:Early reviews by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I am quite pleased with having spent two hours watching, laughing, enjoying. Sorry, did I waste my time being entertained? Guess I should get back to breaking rocks in the hot sun or something.

      I fought Star Wars and Star Wars won.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    30. Re:Early reviews by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

      It was so great to see such a wide range of people involved too - young kids to the elderly. All having a blast making it. Awesome.

      I think that was definitely what I enjoyed the most. It evoked a strange sense of community between people who have never met one another, spread across vast distances, sharing one piece of common culture in great fun. A collaboration of all skill levels, with some just having a bit of fun, while others are showing off their considerable talents, and yet all contributing equally to the whole.

      Speaking of talent, the people who edited all of this together did a great job. It actually feels like one single whole, not just a bunch of pieces thrown together.

      why it is so important that copyright is not further bastardised so that projects like this can not go ahead.

      I think it's definitely a good example of why copyright shouldn't be treated as property. The creators of art can't really say to "own it". There is a Star Wars culture out there and the actual movies are a small part of it. When people incorporate what they watch, read, and listen to in their daily lives, it really becomes a part of them. This whole movie is about people expressing that.

      I'm not really against copyright, but I'm definitely a big proponent of limited copyright. Limited time, and plenty of respect for fair use.

    31. Re:Early reviews by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      Sorry about your lack of a sense of humor.

    32. Re:Early reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only an American would think of Star Wars as being culture.

    33. Re:Early reviews by CtownNighrider · · Score: 1

      I really like the entire irony of Episode III, he spends the whole movie trying to stop something that only happens because he's trying to stop it. Makes the movie hard to watch a second time, you want to just tell Anakin why he's having the visions. Well that and you want to beat up Lucas for not hiring a science adviser. Seriously, the space fights would look so much cooler if the orbital mechanics were even somewhat realistic, also large ships should never be in atmosphere (something the Halo books get right that Reach completely screwed up)

      What should have been changed in the first two was more lead up to where Episode I drops in, a half hour of movie before it and the plot would make much more sense

  3. Is it in 3D??? by RapidEye · · Score: 1

    No - great!!!

    --
    "Murderer? Well, that's a harsh word. I prefer to think of myself as a Mortality Technician."
  4. Don't get attached...Lucas will just re-cut it by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Next edit will replace everything with bad CGI, have a crying Han Solo beg Greedo for his life, and feature an extended 3D sequence of an aged Jar Jar Binks dancing a jig and flipping off the camera.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Don't get attached...Lucas will just re-cut it by AngryDeuce · · Score: 0

      All while snorting mountains of cocaine off of dead hookers, because why not? Can't make it any worse...

    2. Re:Don't get attached...Lucas will just re-cut it by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 4, Funny

      All while snorting mountains of cocaine off of dead hookers, because why not? Can't make it any worse...

      I always wondered what led to the creation of the Holiday Special.

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    3. Re:Don't get attached...Lucas will just re-cut it by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      All while snorting mountains of cocaine off of dead hookers, because why not? Can't make it any worse...

      I always wondered what led to the creation of the Holiday Special.

      Bad acid. We'd already eaten up all the good stuff in the early 70's, all that was left was Orange Barrel.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    4. Re:Don't get attached...Lucas will just re-cut it by FrootLoops · · Score: 1

      Wookieepedia has a brief discussion on the Holiday Special's inception, and there's a very long Vanity Fair article with many more details.

    5. Re:Don't get attached...Lucas will just re-cut it by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      I can see the future argument about the new Han and Greedo encounter where they put their differences aside and make up, being, "Han hugged first!!"

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  5. Just one question by Baloroth · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does Han shoot first?

    --
    "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    1. Re:Just one question by oodaloop · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes he does.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    2. Re:Just one question by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 4, Informative

      Does Han shoot first?

      See for yourself, at the 49 minute 12 second mark. Here's the time-coded link:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ezeYJUz-84#t=49m12s

    3. Re:Just one question by stms · · Score: 1

      Does it blend?

    4. Re:Just one question by Alranor · · Score: 5, Informative

      Han has much nicer boobs than I remember.

    5. Re:Just one question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Han has much nicer boobs than I remember.

      Wait, what? *CLICKCLICKCLICK*

    6. Re:Just one question by oscarwumpus · · Score: 1

      It would appear Greedo doesn't shoot at all. Oh yeah: SPOILER!

    7. Re:Just one question by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Yes ;)

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    8. Re:Just one question by Palshife · · Score: 1

      Better question: does Greedo shoot?

      --
      Attention deficit disorder is a complicated issue, spanning several major... HEY LET'S GO RIDE BIKES!
    9. Re:Just one question by root_42 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Only on Slashdot this gets moderated informative... :)

      --
      [--- PGP key and more on http://www.root42.de ---]
    10. Re:Just one question by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      There is a blender at one point which is asked for repeatedly.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
  6. Watched it this weekend by oodaloop · · Score: 5, Informative

    Overall, I found it hysterical and very creative. 2 of my favorite parts: After the initial iconic text scrolls off the screen, there appear several Facebook-like comments, one of which is by Alderon_Dude, "Thank god I live on a peaceful planet!" The other is when Obi Won first shows Luke his father's lightsaber, done in a noir setting, apparently done just so he can say, "in a more civilized age" like Humphrey Bogart. There's a few Kill Bill references sprinkled here and there, a scene done like The Big Lebowski, etc. I loved it.

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    1. Re:Watched it this weekend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was an interesting idea, but I honestly don't think I can sit though 2 hours of fan service, meta-references, and overly elaborate forced jokes.

    2. Re:Watched it this weekend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      What, you mean it's like the 2-hour film version of slashdot?

    3. Re:Watched it this weekend by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I sat through the Star Wars Holiday special. I don't think this will be any worse.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    4. Re:Watched it this weekend by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

      True. The whole thing is a half and half mix of creatives and kids in backyards. The bright spots are pretty fun. The burning cardboard Star Destroyer definitely gave me a chuckle as well the trashcan Sand Crawler (literally a model of a massive brown plastic trashcan that someone clearly spent a bit of time on).

      More shop vac R2's than you can throw a [insert Star Wars reference here] at.

    5. Re:Watched it this weekend by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      I have sat through the Holiday (or should I say Life Day?!!!!) special twice and I can assure you that this is far superior. I would call it charming entertaining rubbish with lots of laughs.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
  7. Link to the project by sirdude · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's the link to the project. Very considerate of the OP and SoulSkill to not provide it with the post :S

    1. Re:Link to the project by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Hey, the link doesn't work! What an unfortuante concidence. This happens to me all the time!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Link to the project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or https://thepiratebay.org/torrent/6975129/Star_Wars_Uncut_-_Director_s_Cut.mp4

    3. Re:Link to the project by sirdude · · Score: 1

      Your situation explains why there are so many /.-ers obsessing over FPS rates. They're all wasting away from First-Post-Syndrome, a malaise that is triggered by the need to be the first to access a new /. post in order to experience functioning links.

    4. Re:Link to the project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you! It's downloading over 1mbps, I'll share as long as I can

  8. Blocked in Germany. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Oh GEMA, how I hate you.

  9. Already blocked for german IP adresses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    "This video is unavailable in Germany since it might possibly contain music for which the necessary rights have not been granted by GEMA" (my translation).

    1. Re:Already blocked for german IP adresses by devent · · Score: 2

      Yupp. Fuck GEMA. Make sure to never buy any GEMA music, instead you could just pirate the music and give the musicians a donation.

      --
      http://www.mueller-public.de - My site http://www.anr-institute.com/ - Advanced Natural Research Institute
    2. Re:Already blocked for german IP adresses by Mista2 · · Score: 1

      Interesting, as this could be considered fair use, as parody. It's not like anyone is making money off it!

    3. Re:Already blocked for german IP adresses by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Yupp. Fuck GEMA. Make sure to never buy any GEMA music

      GEMA pretty much handes music publishing for Germany. Almost all labels use them and many independents do too. One of the reasons why they apparently stay in a good position for publishing in Germany is that the deals they negotiate with labels and independents tend to be very much in their favour with a democratic voting scheme on various policies they take.

      instead you could just pirate the music and give the musicians a donation.

      You could potentially cause those musicians to end up on the wrong side of a lawsuit (maybe not by GEMA, but by their label or even a different publisher they use in a different country) if they accepted the donation.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  10. Cue Lawsuit From Lucasfilms... NOW! by Greyfox · · Score: 2

    Does Hans shoot first in this version?

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Cue Lawsuit From Lucasfilms... NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Does Hans shoot first in this version?

      *eye twitch*

    2. Re:Cue Lawsuit From Lucasfilms... NOW! by Dishevel · · Score: 2

      Only an eye twitch?
      I just killed three hookers after seeing that line.
      I bet he thinks his last name is Olo. :)

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    3. Re:Cue Lawsuit From Lucasfilms... NOW! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2

      Does Hans shoot first in this version?

      Ja. :)

    4. Re:Cue Lawsuit From Lucasfilms... NOW! by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Ok, seriously guys, awesome sauce. I hope Lucas doesn't sue you TOO hard!

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    5. Re:Cue Lawsuit From Lucasfilms... NOW! by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      of course it's not Hans Solo

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    6. Re:Cue Lawsuit From Lucasfilms... NOW! by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Does Hans shoot first in this version?

      No, John McClane shoots first.

  11. link plz by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

    So where do we get it?

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    1. Re:link plz by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Just look for 'Star Wars Uncut' on You Tube. Easy.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
  12. CmdrTaco! by jdavidb · · Score: 2

    I knew it! I knew you couldn't stay away! Thanks for stopping by to be part of the omelet today!

  13. Who's this CmdrTaco guy... by MikeTheGreat · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and why do his posts jump to the front page?
    Man, how many more people is Slashdot going to auto-post (I mean, how many more people beyond Ian McAllister and this "CmdrTaco" )?

    This is totally unfair

    *ducks*runs* :)

    1. Re:Who's this CmdrTaco guy... by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

      *ducks*runs* :)

      They normally fly.

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
  14. Off-Topic but your sig... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is a plain lie : Karma-Bonus Modifier +1

  15. Nerds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on nerds stop wasting your time with this! You are overloading the server and I'm trying to watch it.

  16. The best joke.. by wbr1 · · Score: 5, Funny
    At 6:33 there is a poster in the background:

    JOIN STARFLEET
    [starfleet logo]
    We Don't Choke Minions

    Hilarious

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  17. Already blocked for US addresses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "This video contains content from SME. It is restricted from playback on certain sites."

    Fuck you, Youtube. ContentID and your CMS is shit and you know it.

    1. Re:Already blocked for US addresses by M0j0_j0j0 · · Score: 1

      It seems things have actually went to far...

    2. Re:Already blocked for US addresses by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Trying to get my head around your grammar. What is that you are trying to say? The YouTube video plays OK for me...

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
  18. Lame and Dorky! by na1led · · Score: 1

    I doubt I could be amused enough to watch it. If it had some sexy women in it, maybe.

    --
    -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    1. Re:Lame and Dorky! by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      I doubt I could be amused enough to watch it. If it had some sexy women in it, maybe.

      Did that stop you from watching the actual movie? :-)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    2. Re:Lame and Dorky! by na1led · · Score: 1

      The original movie is nothing like this. There is too much switching between odd scenes that it gives me a headache. I skipped through some of it, but could only handle about 10 min of it.

      --
      -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    3. Re:Lame and Dorky! by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Woosh! I was implying that there were no sexy women in the movie. Sure Carrie Fisher was cute, perhaps attractive - for a sister, but sexy? (For reference, the women on Serenity in Firefly were sexy.)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    4. Re:Lame and Dorky! by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

      If you were 15 back in 1977 - Carrie Fisher was very sexy. Anyone much younger than that has lived through the MTV and Baywatch eras... and may have different views due the media sexuality overload that started in the 80's/90's.

    5. Re:Lame and Dorky! by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      I can't help but spell this out - the original was pretty much lame and dorky and didn't have any sexy women in it. It also didn't really have any compelling hero characters or inspiring elder guru figure. Both have a memorable creepy villain. Hmm. So this one stands up pretty well on its own merits!

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    6. Re:Lame and Dorky! by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      The Baywatch and MTV stuff have no meaning, for me anyway. None of them sexy. Almost nude, but not sexy. Carrie Fisher was just never sexy. Now if you talk about it in terms of being 15 and desperately horny then yeah - I would have gone for Carrie Fisher, Heather Locklear in TJ Hooker, Daisy Duke and the hideous Sondra Locke (as if that would have ever happened!) - but that was really a matter of hormone goggles - and being allowed to stare at a woman on a screen for a significant amount of time unlike in real life.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
  19. SOPA by gmuslera · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is a great example on why SOPA, PIPA and all the bunch should not exist. There is a whole world of crazy things like this that could be done and won't because this kind of laws, that could enrich us all (and yes, i saw it). I think that George Lucas approved that this could be done, but there are too much other things that this kind of idea could be applied.

    1. Re:SOPA by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      The laws that limit how much of this can be done are hundreds of years old. There is only so much you can do without the copyright holders permission. PIPA and SOPA are objectionable not because they are protecting copyright holders but because of how they are trying to do it.

    2. Re:SOPA by Fned · · Score: 5, Informative

      The laws that limit how much of this can be done are hundreds of years old.

      Under the original terms of American copyright, Star Wars would have gone into the public domain six years ago.

    3. Re:SOPA by devent · · Score: 2

      And with the current politics it may never go into public domain.

      --
      http://www.mueller-public.de - My site http://www.anr-institute.com/ - Advanced Natural Research Institute
    4. Re:SOPA by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 2

      Just IMAGINE if Disney hadn't lobbied nonstop to get patent law extended time and again. Star Wars would be in the public licence, and all manner of aspiring directors could make their own episodes set in the universe. Creativity could flourish in the land of the free...

      Except that once you become rich, you use your power to make sure nobody else does the same thing. Disney profited on public works when they were getting started and had a hard enough time just doing the animation. Now others can't use their stories to do the same?

      The word is Hypocrisy.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    5. Re:SOPA by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      Coming up, Pongo's review of Rocky five....thousand. Pongo.

      --
      ~X~
    6. Re:SOPA by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Is a great example on why SOPA, PIPA and all the bunch should not exist. There is a whole world of crazy things like this that could be done and won't because this kind of laws, that could enrich us all (and yes, i saw it).

      By God you're right. You've convinced me to promote SOPA and PIPA now. We won't have any more of this shit enriching our lives! :D :D :D

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  20. Awful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just awful. What it achieves that is so incredible, I don't know.
    Reading the summary I thought some fans had seriously redone the movie, with actors, costumes, special effects, etc.

    But it's none of that. It's bad acting, costumes made out of paper, filmed in bars and dorm rooms. There's even a scene where they printed and glued character faces on beer bottles and shot it in stop-motion.
    And don't tell me it's art, it's just what a bunch of elementary/middle schoolers would do if they tried making their own movie.

    This thing takes "shitting in a jar and calling it art" to a whole new level.

    1. Re:Awful by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      humourless shit! Yes, you are right, you don't know. And anyway, just who besides yourself is bringing the 'art' notion into the discussion? All good, silly fun. Don't take a dump on it.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    2. Re:Awful by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Reading the summary I thought some fans had seriously redone the movie, with actors, costumes, special effects, etc.

      Considering that the summary indicates it's made up of 15 second segments, it seems to me you'd have to be borderline brain damaged to think that.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  21. Re:35 years old, get over it! by Stargoat · · Score: 1

    Oh. Thanks. I was going to watch Star Wars again tonight. But now, thanks to the anon....

    You know. Nevermind. I'm too bored to actually finish this post.

    --
    Hoist Number One and Number Six.
  22. BLOCKED IN GERMANY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I thought this was user created content?

    Unfortunately, this video is not available in Germany because it may contain music for which GEMA has not granted the respective music rights.

    1. Re:BLOCKED IN GERMANY by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      It contains John Williams' original score. I guess they got permission from him or ASCAP/BMI but not from GEMA.

    2. Re:BLOCKED IN GERMANY by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      there's no fair use under GEMA, not even if you were the original creator.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:BLOCKED IN GERMANY by alex67500 · · Score: 1

      Ziss iss not the fideo you vere looking for!

  23. And you thought episode 1 was bad... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    Turns out in relative terms not so much.

  24. ABD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "I can’t imagine another movie bringing together fans like this"

    For what it's worth, a similar fan-made remake of Footloose was released online a year or two ago. Equally ridiculous, although I think participants were assigned a bit more than 15 seconds.

  25. Goddammit, I hate my countrymen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The part starting at 49:30... what he says doesn't correspond to the subtitles. He's using very informal manner of speech so I find it a bit difficult to translate properly but it's something along the lines of "Solo, son of a bitch, you owe me. You haven't paid your debts. Scoundrel! Wanker! Mother of all clows! Minion of a capitalist! Fuck! Hell!".

    I kinda like what they're doing: They're obviously having fun, have made an effort and the result is kinda stylish... Very interesting concept to bring some 70s class warfare flavor to the scene about paying debts. Even so, I wish they wouldn't have altered the content so much (=leaving out the mention of bounty hunters seeking Solo and leaving out the offer that Solo could just pay the bounty hunter to get out of the situation), especially when it doesn't make sense (It would make sense for Solo to call the bounty hunter a minion of a capitalist but not the other way around, I think).

    That's almost as bad as Solo not shooting first.

  26. Star Wars Uncut: Special Edition by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2

    In the Star Wars Uncut: Special Edition, not only does Han shoot first, he then goes on to shoot George Lucas several times, and then fits Lucas with a Colombian Necktie. Like a boss!

    Alternate ending: Han Solo teams up with Boba Fett and Darth Maul to hunt down Lucas and toss him in the Sarlacc, after fitting him with a restraining bolt.

  27. Look, Honey... by mb1 · · Score: 2

    Nerds!

  28. wonderful by basecastula+ · · Score: 1

    A masterpiece. Hopefully George lets it live.

  29. You watched it wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /comical hat=on
    You watched 5 minutes, and expected what: brilliance?

    To be honest, the first 15 minutes WAS abyssmal. Honestly, it really did take a bit for it to get going.

    No, you should watch it to see how creative, or generic people got with which scenes. Overall, the clips were over the entire spectrum of production. Ranging from, 'dear lord what idiot chose those 10 seconds' to , 'wow, that section was just as good as the original'. For that concept anyways...

    I would fast forward a bit though. There are gems to be had, but they're few and far between.
    /comical hat=off

  30. R2D2's USB sound effects! by antdude · · Score: 1

    Those were good too. They actually fooled some viewers on Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/op2ep/the_final_version_of_star_warsuncut_is_up_for/c3ixgdd ...

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:R2D2's USB sound effects! by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      I was a little disappointed that some Brit didn't include Clangers sounds for R2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clangers But I had my own little chuckle about the idea...

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
  31. 20th Century Fox light sabers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first 20th Century Fox movie I ever saw was Star Wars; so, as a little kid I always thought the spot lights in the into/logo were light sabers.

  32. Goofy but funny by UttBuggly · · Score: 1

    I watched the first 30 minutes of this over the weekend.

    Having done a few film projects of my own, including a parody of The Twilight Zone, I appreciate the efforts of all involved.

    Kudos.

    --
    I am my own gestalt.
  33. Re:35 years old, get over it! by Sentrion · · Score: 1

    Sorry dude, but Star Trek and Star Wars will always be to popular SciFi TV and Film what Homer and Shakespeare have been to drama and literature. They set the benchmark a magnitude higher than the previous works and future works are and will be graded by how they compare to these great standards.

    What sets Star Trek and Star Wars apart from the classical works of centuries ago of course are the roles played by realistic props, special effects, and theatrical musical scores. John Williams is known first and foremost as the composer of the Star Wars anthem, and achievement that has entitled him to compose the scores of dozens of other top rated films. History will probably remember him as the greatest composer of the 20th century and for making classical orchestra fun again for the masses.

    When you watch the latest action packed scifi movie years from now with your grandkids, you will still be able to point out which ideas first came from Star Trek or Star Wars. At some point movies might reach a level of quality such that teenagers would be too bored to watch classic Star Trek or Star Wars, but not any worse than youth for decades have been bored by mandatory school studies in Homer and Shakespeare. But the truth will be undeniable, that these great works introduced new concepts that are still borrowed from today by writers, artists, actors, and producers.

    Of course, a movie is just a movie and a play is just a play. Changing the world with real inventions and technology is way cooler, so back to work for me.

  34. Re:35 years old, get over it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except they're mostly crap.

    Star Wars.

    • Ewoks Disney movie
    • Holiday Special
    • Droids
    • Episode 1
    • Episode 2
    • Episode3

    Star Trek

    • The Cartoon
    • The Motion Picture
    • Search for the popular character
    • The Quest for God
    • The Undiscovered Country
    • Star Trek Generations
    • Star Trek: First Contact
    • Star Trek: Insurrection
    • Star Trek Nemesis
    • STNG
    • Deep shit 9
    • Gilligan's Starship.
    • And space is cold, the Vulcan nipples prove it.
      • 4 good movies out of a 40 years franchises do not make them good. They actually make it pretty bad.

        Even Macross has a much better batting record, and its a fucking cartoon. Hell Macross 7 was a better watch than Gilligan's Starship, that's some pretty low hanging fruit.

  35. Fair use... by Endo13 · · Score: 1

    ...shouldn't even be an issue. Episodes 4-6 should already be in the public domain. And would be, if it weren't for infinite copyright.

    --
    There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
  36. Inconsistencies between IV and V by mbessey · · Score: 1

    The most obvious problem is that in Episode IV, Darth Vader killed Luke's Father. In Episode V, it's "revealed" that Darth is Luke's father. It's not "impossible" to reconcile, but Obi-wan saying "what I told you was true, from a certain point of view", is an obvious attempt to wallpaper over this inconsistency. Best case, it just makes Obi-wan look like a liar and untrustworthy.

    Another issue comes up when Obi-wan's ghost and Yoda are discussing Luke's running off to save his friends at Cloud City:
    Yoda: Told you I did. Reckless is he. Now, matters are worse.
    Obi-Wan: That boy is our last hope.
    Yoda: No. There is another.

    Seriously? Obi-wan doesn't remember that Luke has a twin sister?

    Anyway, those are just off the top of my head. Nothing like the horrible plot holes ewhen you try to connect the prequels with the original movies, but not great for movies that were made one after the other, a couple of years apart.

    1. Re:Inconsistencies between IV and V by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      The way I interpreted it was, he was trying to avoid Luke following in Anakin's footsteps. So he made up the story that his father was this great jedi who was killed by Vader. Yeah, it was a bit of a retcon, but hey, in the original draft Darth Vader was Grand Moff Tarkin, so whatever. (Also, he probably should have seen coming that this was going to inspire him to dedicate his life to slaying Vader, thus putting him up to join the dark side just as much, but I guess that was Obi-wan's plan)

      Yeah, Obi-wan (and especially the droids, given the unnecessary insert they got in I, II, and III) seem to kinda fail to remember some important stuff.
      But that one could just be that Obi-wan hadn't considered that the female daughter of Anakin could also grow to be a powerful jedi to balance the force. Sexism on Obi-wan's part, maybe?

      It wasn't part of the prophecy that Anakin's children would be powerful and would be able to confront him; the prophecy didn't have to do with someone's children or Anakin in particular at all. It could be anybody. After all, they thought it was Anakin himself originally. So with Anakin proven not to be the savior, it could be anybody. Their best candidate was Luke, he seemed to be a powerful natural jedi like his father, so it seemed obvious he would be the one. With him gone, the search is more or less back to 0, it could be any child.

      Yeah, I can come up with about 2,000 plot holes between I and III, but IV, V, and VI the problems seem pretty minor, fixable certainly with a little lee-way. I was curious though if you'd found some glaring problem I hadn't yet :)

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    2. Re:Inconsistencies between IV and V by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always interpreted it as Anakin proving to be the saviour (as Darth Vader) by killing the Emperor and then dying, thus killing off the last of the Sith, and having the epiphany that made him a good human(-oid) again.

    3. Re:Inconsistencies between IV and V by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So with Anakin proven not to be the savior, it could be anybody.

      But Anakin DID turn out to be the one.

    4. Re:Inconsistencies between IV and V by CtownNighrider · · Score: 1

      I think within the story Vader really did kill Anakin. The emotional turmoil in Episode III is immense, Anakin really does die.

  37. Parody in German copyright law by tepples · · Score: 1

    To what extent does German copyright law permit parody? U.S. fair use originally developed as a judicial reconciliation of copyright with the First Amendment; is the free press guarantee under German law as strong as the First Amendment?

    1. Re:Parody in German copyright law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not even close.

      Start with Holocaust denial, incitement of genocide, and calling for the overthrow of the government and work your way down to fair use.

    2. Re:Parody in German copyright law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Germany

      See also: Censorship in Germany
              Wikisource has original text related to this article:
      Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany

      Freedom of expression is granted by Article 5 of the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany:[29]

              Every person shall have the right freely to express and disseminate his opinions in speech, writing, and pictures and to inform himself without hindrance from generally accessible sources. Freedom of the press and freedom of reporting by means of broadcasts and films shall be guaranteed. There shall be no censorship.
              These rights shall find their limits in the provisions of general laws, in provisions for the protection of young persons, and in the right to personal honor.
              Art and scholarship, research, and teaching shall be free. The freedom of teaching shall not release any person from allegiance to the constitution.

      The most important and sometimes controversial regulations limiting freedom of speech and freedom of the press can be found in the Criminal code:

              Insult is punishable under Section 185. Satire and similar forms of art enjoy more freedom but have to respect human dignity (Article 1 of the Basic law).
              Malicious Gossip and Defamation (Section 186 and 187). Utterances about facts (opposed to personal judgement) are allowed if they are true and can be proven. Yet journalists are free to investigate without evidence because they are justified by Safeguarding Legitimate Interests (Section 193).
              Hate speech may be punishable if against segments of the population and in a manner that is capable of disturbing the public peace (Section 130 [Agitation of the People]), including racist agitation and antisemitism.
              Holocaust denial is punishable according to Section 130 subsection 3.
              Membership in or support of banned political parties (Section 86). Currently the only banned party is the Nazi Party, but historically all non-Nazi parties have been banned (1933-1945), as well as the Communist Party (1933-1945, 1956-1968).
              Dissemination of Means of Propaganda of Unconstitutional Organizations (Section 86).
              Use of Symbols of Unconstitutional Organizations (Section 86a). Items such as the Swastika, but also the hammer and sickle when the Communist Party is banned.
              Disparagement of
                      the Federal President (Section 90).
                      the State and its Symbols (Section 90a).
              Insult to Organs and Representatives of Foreign States (Section 103).
              Rewarding and Approving Crimes (Section 140).
              Casting False Suspicion (Section 164).
              Insulting of Faiths, Religious Societies and Organizations Dedicated to a Philosophy of Life if they could disturb public peace (Section 166)
              Dissemination of Pornographic Writings (Section 184).

      Blasphemy against religion is illegal in Germany under Blasphemy laws.[30]

      Outdoor assemblies must be registered beforehand.[31] Assemblies at memorial sites are banned.[32] Individuals and groups may be banned from assembling, especially those whose fundamental rights have been revoked and banned political parties.[32] The Love Parade decision (1 BvQ 28/01 and 1 BvQ 30/01 of 12 July 2001) determined that for an assembly to be protected it must comply with the concept of a constituent assembly, or the so-called narrow concept of assembly whereby the participants in the assembly must pursue a common purpose that is in the common interest."

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_by_country#Germany

  38. I participated in this project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    And if you look closely at the background in my scene, you'll find a disk, a back flap, and a scorpion.

    1. Re:I participated in this project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you look closely at the background in my scene, you'll find a disk, a back flap, and a scorpion.

      Filmed on location on Venus

    2. Re:I participated in this project by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Oh, well done sir. Well done! Why AC? Take credit for your achievement!

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
  39. Re:35 years old, get over it! by next_ghost · · Score: 1

    When you watch the latest action packed scifi movie years from now with your grandkids, you will still be able to point out which ideas first came from Star Trek or Star Wars.

    Except they didn't.

  40. A short history of Star Wars by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2

    The original was the result of a lot of talented people, many barely recognized by the casual fan, coming together and doing what they do best without to many pressures to deliver because nobody expected a Sci-Fi movie to do all that well in the late 70's.

    The next two movies were made with bigger budgets but also greater expectations, partly this was delivered on with greater special effects and better writing in the second, even better special effects in the third but at that time the demand for merchandise had overridden the need for a good story and so we got the ewoks.

    Then insane demand for more with extreem greed and no budget gave us the Holiday Special when the entire US was consumed with the idea that you could continue outsourcing animation to the lowest bidder and still have the old school classic quality of 30 years before.

    Then the special editions hit which was basically one of the talented guy's who made the original crapping over the rest of the teams work.

    The prequels of course never happened so they cannot be discussed here but if they had been made it would be by the one guy who was very good at getting a team together not getting a team together and doing everything himself...

    Rule34 then came along and redid star wars if it was a porn story.

    And now this movie shows what the original would have been like if social media users had made it... Star Wars: The Greater Internet Fuckwad cut.

    The only people that find this funny are Family Guy fans. I get the joke, doing a classic scene in another format, haha... that is funny for about 10 seconds and then it is time to cut to the next joke. It has been done! We have had lego Star Wars, ascii Star Wars and even Family Guy Star Wars (granted only watched a bit until I realized that the entire singe joke was that Family Guy did Star Wars and that parodie apparently is some kind of bird to the writers).

    The movie lasts 2 hours and 3 minutes, that is 2 hours to long. The joke of a redone Star Wars has been done to death. Let it die, stop beating that dead horse, let it rest, put it out of its misery, don't repeat yourself over and over again... get it?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:A short history of Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might be the bitterest sack of shit I've seen in nearly a month.

    2. Re:A short history of Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah the Family Guy fans might find this funny.
      I'm a Family Guy fan, some parts were funny. Like the parts that were funny in the original.
      Seriously if you don't like Family Guy stop bringing it up already.

      Some people just find this interesting, but you apparently lack the capacity.

    3. Re:A short history of Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything OK at home there son? You seem a little humourless and grumpy. Walk up the stairs and get yourself a breath of fresh air.

    4. Re:A short history of Star Wars by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      The movie lasts 2 hours and 3 minutes, that is 2 hours to long. The joke of a redone Star Wars has been done to death. Let it die, stop beating that dead horse, let it rest, put it out of its misery, don't repeat yourself over and over again... get it?

      I think the things you enjoy doing in your spare time are stupid. You should stop doing them NOW and do something else that a random slelection of slashdotters approve of instead.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    5. Re:A short history of Star Wars by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      The only people that find this funny are Family Guy fans

      So basically, a group that was initially small, but grew big enough to get a show *un-cancelled*, and cause its creator to be one of, if not the, most highly paid people in Hollywood?

  41. Wow, have you ever read a book? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2

    That Vader killed Anakin is hardly unknown in story telling, in fact quite a few stories tell that of the adult version killing the child version of the same person.

    In Red Dwarf, Rimmers lost good points are shown as graves in his sub concious.

    It is a pretty weak attempt to show a loop hole just because someone uses a bit of flowery language. What next, if you found out your grandfather didn't really go to sleep but croaked you are going to claim you parents lied as well? Really kid, read a book. Just one.

    The twin sister bit is also easily explained, Leia shows no signs of being a Jedi, Luke does. It isn't until the expanded universe that sorce sensitivity in Leia is ever mentioned let alone developed as her being nearly as powerful.

    Granted it is rather sexist but the son following the father and the daughter just being there to look pretty is hardly unheard off in fantasy stories.

    Ooh, I got another one for you, how come a Star Destroyer is less powerful then a Death Star that can only kill planets?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Wow, have you ever read a book? by mbessey · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the "adult is the murderer of the child' metaphor is fairly common in literature, but it's not something people use in everyday conversation, which is what the dialog in a movie supposedly represents. Like I said, even if Obi-wan is just trying to skirt around the truth, it really doesn't reflect well on him, or on the Jedi in general. Yes "your father is a mass-murderer who turned to the dark side of the force and now calls himself Darth Vader" wouldn't be a nice thing to hear, but keeping Luke's parentage a secret from him is leaving him open to be pretty badly blindsided in the future.

      The twin sister bit is also easily explained, Leia shows no signs of being a Jedi, Luke does. It isn't until the expanded universe that sorce sensitivity in Leia is ever mentioned let alone developed as her being nearly as powerful.

      Not that it's particularly relevant, but that's simply not correct. Here's what the ghost of Obi-wan has to say about Leia in Episode VI, after Luke figures out that she's his sister:

      BEN
      She hasn't been trained in the ways of the
      Jedi the way you have, Luke ... but the Force
      is strong with her, as it is with all of your
      family.

      Anyway, like I said, these are relatively minor nots compared to the problems trying to tie the prequels and the originals together (for example, nearly everything Obi-wan says to Luke in episode IV makes no sense taken in the context of the prequels), but it's pretty clear that the original movie was written as a stand-alone, and the plot twists in later movies were not planned for in the original.

  42. and we learned that the grinch's heart by decora · · Score: 1

    was two sizes, too small!

  43. WTF is 'Episode 4'?? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    I went to see Star Wars in 1977 at the movie theater, and haven't wanted to spoil the experience by going to any of the sequels.

  44. Re:35 years old, get over it! by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    Star Wars was no more influential in it's era than the Hula Hoop. When Lucas dies, and they can finally screw down the lid over the film, it will be remembered as a phenomena. But so was Gilligans Island and the Dick Van Dyke show.

  45. Torrent? by asn · · Score: 1

    Is there a link to a complete version of this? The site is hosed....

    1. Re:Torrent? by LightForce3 · · Score: 1

      You can download it from their Vimeo page. You'll need a Vimeo account, and you might have to wait, since videos are limited to 100 downloads a day.

    2. Re:Torrent? by PwnzerDragoon · · Score: 1

      Anyone have a link to a torrent of the original 2GB .mov file from Vimeo? I keep trying to download it, but every time I try it says it can't be downloaded anymore today.

  46. Could be more glorious... by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

    I think the project could evolve to true greatness if the individual scenes could be put into competition, with the highest voted scenes making the final cut in a monthly release...

  47. My favourite bit so far: usb noise by FilthCatcher · · Score: 1

    I've only watched a couple of minutes as I need to get back to work but there's two things already that are the best thing I've seen/heared all week..

    1) As princess leia takes her hand away from R2D2 at the end of recording her message to Obi-Wan you hear the windows "USB device removed" noise
    2) The baby stormtrooper that pops into shot behind Darth Vader as he boards the Tantive IV

  48. Download? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there anywhere I can download the movie in its entirety?

    1. Re:Download? by Jaxoreth · · Score: 1

      Is there anywhere I can download the movie in its entirety?

      YouTube? You can use Video DownloadHelper with Firefox, or one of the command-line equivalents.

      --
      In general, it is safe and legal to kill your children. -- POSIX Programmer's Guide
  49. It just goes to show . . . by cashman73 · · Score: 1

    . . . that if an infinite number of nerds were given an infinite amount of time and an infinite amount of bandwidth, they would eventually produce the works of George Lucas.

  50. Charming and funny by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    I just watched the whole thing. I really thought I'd just watch a few minutes and give up but I was charmed by the efforts of the contributors. I'm not much of a Star Wars fan, so I had no concern about the treatment the film got in this piece. The scenes range from the obviously talentless (but usually funny), to the tongue in cheek all the way through to genuinely accomplished. If something like this gets shut down it would be a giant fuck off to the fans of the film who contributed and anyone else who wants to try something similar. I say best of luck to all of them and others who do this sort of thing. Essentially it is harmless fun and I hope it tests the tolerance of the copyright fascists (in a positive way). As others have pointed out, a weakness in this is that they used actual video from the film and also audio. They really didn't need to, so they are asking for trouble. Also included are some obvious brand names and toy lines which would probably have been better left out. This may not be for Star Wars purists, but I enjoyed a few good belly laughs from it.

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  51. Seems pro-SOPA to me by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

    All this is missing is James Earl Jones doing voice-over saying "Imagine a world where intellectual property laws didn't exist." Nothing really makes a better argument that if the movie studios couldn't protect their megabuck income, the future of entertainment will be nothing but reality shows and poor quality YouTube "stars" like Fred.

    As a parody or "just because we can" undertaking, it's fine. Purely judged on the basis of cinematic quality, however, it makes Disaster Movie look like Gone with the Wind.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  52. Re:35 years old, get over it! by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    Hey young fella! What about Star Trek TOS? That's the only Star Trek I like and you've completely ignored it. Is this real ignorance or a deliberate omission that reveals that you too love that series as much as people such as myself? Are we kindred spirits? - oh, thought not.

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  53. Re:35 years old, get over it! by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    singular: a phenomenon. plural: phenomena. Glad to be of help.

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  54. Because it is not a parody by aepervius · · Score: 1

    "Im Urheberrecht versteht man unter ``Parodie'' die antithematische Behandlung eines vorbestehenden Werkes wobei dessen Elemente zwar aufgegriffen, aber in einen anderen Kontext gestellt werden mit dem Ziel, die übernommenen Werkteile komisch oder satirisch wirken zu lassen. Die Parodie stellt eine ``freie Benutzung'' des Ausgangswerkes im Sinne von Â24 Abs. 1 UrhG dar und ist bis zur Grenze der Entstellung auch ohne Zustimmung des ursprünglichen Werkes zulÃssig. "

    freely translated : parody takes the same element but in another context for comic and humoristic effect or satyr. Parody is protected in germany too. But this is definitively not a pradody under german law. And thus must require/acquire licence to be shown/bow to the GEMA. Sad but it is the way it works in germany.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  55. Obviously Nothing better by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1
    to do with my time tonight. Just watched the original film and frankly I enjoyed the recut more! Episode IV, A New Hope, Star Wars, whatever it is called is a big ball of cheese. The effects are great fun, the script is functional and the acting is mediocre at best. There is really not much in it. The story is garbled and much of it doesn't really make sense.

    It doesn't matter because of the kind of film it is, but it really amazes me that there are so many that think there is some depth, importance, significance to it. I can understand the nostalgic importance, but really what it is, is not much. The dramatic import in many scenes is thrown away by hurried one liners and a rush to blaster shoot outs. Pure cheese.

    So many lost opportunities. Irwin Allen would have been proud. Not saying that is a bad thing, just that Star Wars is in the same league as that kind of thing. At least Irwin Allen used talented actors, though they were so soaked in booze and drugs that they were hit and miss in their performances.

    I can't imagine that genuinely talented actors like Peter Cushing and Alec Guinness were the least bit proud of their contributions and instead took the paycheck gladly and forgot they ever made this kind of tat.

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  56. excellent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fantastic, thought was a joke to begine with, but its quite good infact, had a few good giggles through it too, great stuff

  57. i never thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    star wars was circumcised