Dutch prodigy.... and Amsterdam University Professor
entropy re-arrangement of sub-atomic "strings" that live in a negatively curved spacetime
We are probably looking at Nobel-prize material here,
This is Slashdot. We don't bit on bullshit, and we know it when we smell it. Go ahead and call us vulgar and racists because we're not stroking your ego hard enough. That seems to be the standard response to everything these days.
i agree with you. when i read that i was thinking "so what someone has a theory? is there anything meaningful to it?"
no, it's just some guy's guess. why is there no meaning to it.... because it's based on strings.....string theory is untestable and thus so is this theory......i guarantee there will be no nobel prize forthcoming. there are tons of scientist who think there is something to string theory, anyone of them can conjecture anything they want, they know that.
this theory can be interesting for discussion purposes, much like reality as a holographic is.
if this could garner a nobel prize then you'd have to give to the the holographic principle first and string theorists even before that. the biggest news would be that string theory would turn out to be fact.
the OP is a bit of a troll himself. go check out the scientific community, see if they are all gaga over this (non) revelation.
again not trying to say there is nothing of interest in it, it's just that it's nothing more than untestable conjecture and therefore very limited in what it contributes to science.
Lol. Better tell and about the printing technique. They can kill intel now by simply printing their cpus. Ohh. That's not what you meant? Let's call the icus then and you an idiot. Go watch star trek some more looser
you really think computer parts won't be 3d printed one day and you call me a "looser"? better you drop out of beauty school and go back to high school.
"a real neural net running on a phone in real time."
Running a neural net does not take much processing power, It is a mostly just a series of adds and multiplies.
Training a neural net takes lots of computing power. I doubt they are doing that on a cell phone.
excuse me, but if a "real neural net" runs on a computer, then what is the network of neurons that run in your head called? a "really real neural net"?
i know what you mean.....i'm just pointing out machines we build don't neurons no matter how "intelligent" they may be.
doublespeak and big brother are the reality in this age, as well as paid liars posting fake comments and content.
but spying cuts both ways, at the end of the day no one has exclusive technology. there is no reason for there to be any back room politics anymore, no more secret meetings and secret deals. the old question used to be "who watches the watchers?" the answer has become clear, "the watched watch the watchers". eventually all this spying capability will be used against those doing the spying.
who says it's benign? ask a cat if swallowing a canary is benign, see what it says.
there are so many astroturfers around........but just it's your world too jack, you too have to live in what you help create.
Slashdot Mirror
Your submission read:
Dutch prodigy .... and Amsterdam University Professor
entropy re-arrangement of sub-atomic "strings" that live in a negatively curved spacetime
We are probably looking at Nobel-prize material here,
This is Slashdot. We don't bit on bullshit, and we know it when we smell it. Go ahead and call us vulgar and racists because we're not stroking your ego hard enough. That seems to be the standard response to everything these days.
i agree with you. when i read that i was thinking "so what someone has a theory? is there anything meaningful to it?" no, it's just some guy's guess. why is there no meaning to it.... because it's based on strings.....string theory is untestable and thus so is this theory......i guarantee there will be no nobel prize forthcoming. there are tons of scientist who think there is something to string theory, anyone of them can conjecture anything they want, they know that. this theory can be interesting for discussion purposes, much like reality as a holographic is. if this could garner a nobel prize then you'd have to give to the the holographic principle first and string theorists even before that. the biggest news would be that string theory would turn out to be fact. the OP is a bit of a troll himself. go check out the scientific community, see if they are all gaga over this (non) revelation. again not trying to say there is nothing of interest in it, it's just that it's nothing more than untestable conjecture and therefore very limited in what it contributes to science.
Lol. Better tell and about the printing technique. They can kill intel now by simply printing their cpus. Ohh. That's not what you meant? Let's call the icus then and you an idiot. Go watch star trek some more looser
you really think computer parts won't be 3d printed one day and you call me a "looser"? better you drop out of beauty school and go back to high school.
fuck Lenovo. the future is print your own computer anyway. these kinds of things just speeds that plow.
fair enough jack.......but still, that doesn't mean it is benign.
the scary thing is that they could prevail. stupid seems to win too often these days.
"a real neural net running on a phone in real time."
Running a neural net does not take much processing power, It is a mostly just a series of adds and multiplies.
Training a neural net takes lots of computing power. I doubt they are doing that on a cell phone.
excuse me, but if a "real neural net" runs on a computer, then what is the network of neurons that run in your head called? a "really real neural net"? i know what you mean.....i'm just pointing out machines we build don't neurons no matter how "intelligent" they may be.
how can facebook and fortune not be embarrassed by putting out such drivel? they should have saved this for april 1st.
doublespeak and big brother are the reality in this age, as well as paid liars posting fake comments and content. but spying cuts both ways, at the end of the day no one has exclusive technology. there is no reason for there to be any back room politics anymore, no more secret meetings and secret deals. the old question used to be "who watches the watchers?" the answer has become clear, "the watched watch the watchers". eventually all this spying capability will be used against those doing the spying.
who says it's benign? ask a cat if swallowing a canary is benign, see what it says. there are so many astroturfers around........but just it's your world too jack, you too have to live in what you help create.