No idea for the cost of those Wi-Max routers. Maybe other ideas would be better. Maybe the wires only run the streets and you connect the subscribers via Wi-Fi or Wi-Max.
I wouldn't mind smart tech to let me know about the state of basic things (temperature, lights, locks) but I would never give it any control over it nor would I want anything with microphones or cameras.
And yes, I store my smartphone in a sealed tube with a built-in faraday cage when I get home.
In fact, do exactly that. Charge twice the cost to allow for profits and to run the company, so: 5Mbps for $1.50 per month. 10Mbps for $3.00 per month. 50Mbps for $15.00 per month.
At those prices, EVERYONE will want to be connected and everyone will be able to afford it, even the poor who are using a computer they got for free at the recycling center.
Heck, even at four times the cost, it's still cheaper than most places. Nobody offers 5Mbps for $3.00 per month. And 5Mbps is more than enough to connect the dirt poor. Even the homeless could probably afford that.
Slashdot Mirror
I never said Python would make things worst. All I said was that allowing such things is a terrible idea, whatever the language is.
...after a thirty-day delay due to high Bitcoin network fees.
No idea for the cost of those Wi-Max routers. Maybe other ideas would be better. Maybe the wires only run the streets and you connect the subscribers via Wi-Fi or Wi-Max.
http://weknowmemes.com/generat...
I wouldn't mind smart tech to let me know about the state of basic things (temperature, lights, locks) but I would never give it any control over it nor would I want anything with microphones or cameras.
And yes, I store my smartphone in a sealed tube with a built-in faraday cage when I get home.
Do you want to make insecure software? Because that's how you make insecure software.
I guess it depends on your definition of "filled"...
I just felt a great disturbance in the Net, as if millions of hackers were preparing to attack.
Make your subscribers use Wi-Max routers and do a mesh link between everyone, connect only a few users directly via cable?
Does it make sense or was that buzzword bingo?
Nope, you're the only one. And you might be dyexslic.
"Laser" Tech /Dr.Evil
Is that better?
The only smart technology I want in a house is empty conduits to pass my own wires.
Let's make that the official quote:
Smart speakers are surveillance devices for dumb people.
They are extrapolating numbers from early sheep adopters. What they don't realize is that the whole planet is not filled with sheep.
In fact, do exactly that. Charge twice the cost to allow for profits and to run the company, so:
5Mbps for $1.50 per month.
10Mbps for $3.00 per month.
50Mbps for $15.00 per month.
At those prices, EVERYONE will want to be connected and everyone will be able to afford it, even the poor who are using a computer they got for free at the recycling center.
Heck, even at four times the cost, it's still cheaper than most places. Nobody offers 5Mbps for $3.00 per month. And 5Mbps is more than enough to connect the dirt poor. Even the homeless could probably afford that.
At $1.50 per month you can lock me to 10Mbps and I'll be happy about it.
No, you dimwit. Unused fiber is dark fiber .
With Blackjack, and hookers!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
It's the freakin' blob, another Hollywood invention.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Walt was gay, the guy is the tramp. I guess it fits.
And their population has been decreasing for the last few decades.
That's true, I didn't think of it because I only have one contact who's using it.
Messages on the Mac supports both AIM and iMessages. With AIM gone, there's only iMessages left.
A lot of Mac users. AIM was the default protocol for all accounts a while back.
Today I had to remind three friends to (finally) drop AIM and switch to iMessage.