One of those "investments" could simply be to buy into a non-inflationary currency (foreign or possibly crypto).
Andrew Yang has suggested paying for it with VAT, which sounds like a good idea..
Stop shifting the argument.
NN is about the physical transport layer. The layer that ends up being a natural Monopoly, and gets government subsidization to implement. End of story.
What's going on with content creators is a discussion worth having, but a completely different one.
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. The general populace overwhelmingly supports Net Neutrality -- it has tremendous bipartisan support. What we don't want is them pushing it back.
Bad analogy, you don't have to register your bitcoin either. The exchanges just have to register. So it's the same as if you were buying GLD through Fidelity or whatever.
Because it's not possible for all of us to live in a cabin in the woods and hunt game for food anymore. We're living in a world-wide economy, like it or not, and everything is increasingly interconnected. Letting your fellow Americans starve in the streets because AIs took their jobs is neither humane nor economical in the long run.
Do you have any sources on light frequencies being used for depth perception? I've never heard of this before.
3d movies and vr headsets work just fine even though the displays are limited by bitdepth.
You can explain why ideas like this (adding backdoors into software, etc) over and over again, but the people willing to see this as a good idea just won't get it, because they don't want to.
You're misinterpreting the result there. NN stands for "nearest neighbor". It's just the closest match in the DB (I guess the one they used to train?), not what their algorithm produced.
Automating is great for repetitive tasks. Where location is static. ie things like manufacturing. What it's not good at is anything highly mobile, complex or something that requires creative reasoning.
This is line of thinking is becoming outdated. Deep and reinforcement learning is rapidly enabling robots to adapt to more and more dynamic situations.
Creative reasoning will take a while longer, but it will happen eventually as well.
There will be new jobs, but there won't be nearly enough of them to replace the ones that are going away.
The thing is we're not just replacing people's bodies with better tools and technology, allowing them to be productive in different ways -- we're replacing their minds. The niche where humans will continue excel vs an expert system that could take only a few days to train is going to keep getting smaller and smaller.
Slashdot Mirror
One of those "investments" could simply be to buy into a non-inflationary currency (foreign or possibly crypto). Andrew Yang has suggested paying for it with VAT, which sounds like a good idea..
Have you never heard of an opportunity cost?
Stop shifting the argument. NN is about the physical transport layer. The layer that ends up being a natural Monopoly, and gets government subsidization to implement. End of story. What's going on with content creators is a discussion worth having, but a completely different one.
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. The general populace overwhelmingly supports Net Neutrality -- it has tremendous bipartisan support. What we don't want is them pushing it back.
Bad analogy, you don't have to register your bitcoin either. The exchanges just have to register. So it's the same as if you were buying GLD through Fidelity or whatever.
Because it's not possible for all of us to live in a cabin in the woods and hunt game for food anymore. We're living in a world-wide economy, like it or not, and everything is increasingly interconnected. Letting your fellow Americans starve in the streets because AIs took their jobs is neither humane nor economical in the long run.
Well, so then what's the alternative?
Do you have any sources on light frequencies being used for depth perception? I've never heard of this before. 3d movies and vr headsets work just fine even though the displays are limited by bitdepth.
You can explain why ideas like this (adding backdoors into software, etc) over and over again, but the people willing to see this as a good idea just won't get it, because they don't want to.
On timewarner this only happens with http, not https.
Pretty sure they both lost in that situation....
Can't they be upset precisely because CBP did not show authorization to access that level of secrecy?
You're misinterpreting the result there. NN stands for "nearest neighbor". It's just the closest match in the DB (I guess the one they used to train?), not what their algorithm produced.
Yes, but the rest of my comment addresses why this will likely not be the case in the future.
Automating is great for repetitive tasks. Where location is static. ie things like manufacturing. What it's not good at is anything highly mobile, complex or something that requires creative reasoning.
This is line of thinking is becoming outdated. Deep and reinforcement learning is rapidly enabling robots to adapt to more and more dynamic situations.
Creative reasoning will take a while longer, but it will happen eventually as well.
There will be new jobs, but there won't be nearly enough of them to replace the ones that are going away. The thing is we're not just replacing people's bodies with better tools and technology, allowing them to be productive in different ways -- we're replacing their minds. The niche where humans will continue excel vs an expert system that could take only a few days to train is going to keep getting smaller and smaller.