You really don't understand how this works do you? We're a Republic for the exact reason of "the people are stupid" and they cannot be trusted to protect their own interests.
Bleh, big whoop. I've been using the Great Suspender extension to do something similar for quite a while now. After x number of minutes, background tabs are suspended unless I exempt (whitelist) them. The tab is blanked, which frees up ram, and with a mouse click I can reload the page right where I was.
That's fine and dandy to say you expect the CIA to do this, and it doesn't bother you. But, you seem to think they aren't doing this to YOU and every other citizen as well. And, you'd only be partially right. They set up agreements. MI6 spies on American citizens and we spy on British citizens.. Everything is all legal.. And then they swap the data.. Sure, the CIA didn't spy on you directly, but they still have everything.. They followed the letter of the law, but they stomped the shit out of the spirit..
He's had two months, you twat.
Your guy had 8 years to fuck everything up. Well, in addition to the guy before that having 8 years to fuck everything up, and the guy before him with 8 years...
CIA is expected to spy on people being investigated, i.e., possible criminals and enemies of the state. Not fucking ignoring the right to privacy at all.
Hey look, another person who doesn't have a clue what he's talking about.
By law, the CIA is specifically prohibited from collecting foreign intelligence concerning the domestic activities of US citizens. Its mission is to collect information related to foreign intelligence and foreign counterintelligence. By direction of the president in Executive Order 12333 of 1981 and in accordance with procedures approved by the Attorney General, the CIA is restricted in the collection of intelligence information directed against US citizens. Collection is allowed only for an authorized intelligence purpose; for example, if there is a reason to believe that an individual is involved in espionage or international terrorist activities. The CIA's procedures require senior approval for any such collection that is allowed, and, depending on the collection technique employed, the sanction of the Director of National Intelligence and Attorney General may be required. These restrictions on the CIA have been in effect since the 1970s.
Unfortunately, the 4th Amendment only restricts the government. There's nothing restricting your neighbor, a private company, or the employees of a private company from collecting a reward if they happen to notice you doing something illegal.
Ah spoken by someone who hasn't a clue and instead starts playing the role of statist apologist.
When the government trains, directs, and pays a "private citizen", that person becomes an agent of the government. This makes those persons subject to the same rules; probable cause, warrants, oath or affirmation..
This bit I dug up on nolo.com
The admissibility of evidence found by a private citizen usually turns on the government’s “share” of the search. In other words, how involved was the government? While cases where the government ordered or paid a citizen to conduct the search are fairly straightforward, others aren’t. In determining whether to admit the evidence in question, courts consider questions like:
whether the government initiated the search
how much control the government had over the private citizen who conducted the search, and
what the private citizen’s purpose was in conducting the search.
And what was the FBI doing? Oh yeah... paying them..training them...giving them lists of people to search extra carefully. You clueless, statist, cocksucking fuck.
Now please go back to blowing your J. Edgar Hoover love doll.
You obviously haven't checked in a long time. A state can opt-out but it has to be the whole state. It is no longer legal to do it on a county-by-county basis. This has been the case for many years now.
Where the fed's got the authority to dictate this all-or-nothing is beyond me, but they do it.. Prob threaten states with funds or something....
Slashdot Mirror
you can have your NEA amount of $148M/year.... IF...... it's funded with money we actually have. Otherwise you are a debt spending cunt
You really don't understand how this works do you? We're a Republic for the exact reason of "the people are stupid" and they cannot be trusted to protect their own interests.
Bleh, big whoop. I've been using the Great Suspender extension to do something similar for quite a while now. After x number of minutes, background tabs are suspended unless I exempt (whitelist) them. The tab is blanked, which frees up ram, and with a mouse click I can reload the page right where I was.
That's fine and dandy to say you expect the CIA to do this, and it doesn't bother you. But, you seem to think they aren't doing this to YOU and every other citizen as well. And, you'd only be partially right. They set up agreements. MI6 spies on American citizens and we spy on British citizens.. Everything is all legal.. And then they swap the data.. Sure, the CIA didn't spy on you directly, but they still have everything.. They followed the letter of the law, but they stomped the shit out of the spirit..
Yep. That's my take on the whole situation as well. You've nailed it.
He's had two months, you twat. Your guy had 8 years to fuck everything up. Well, in addition to the guy before that having 8 years to fuck everything up, and the guy before him with 8 years...
CIA is expected to spy on people being investigated, i.e., possible criminals and enemies of the state. Not fucking ignoring the right to privacy at all.
Hey look, another person who doesn't have a clue what he's talking about. By law, the CIA is specifically prohibited from collecting foreign intelligence concerning the domestic activities of US citizens. Its mission is to collect information related to foreign intelligence and foreign counterintelligence. By direction of the president in Executive Order 12333 of 1981 and in accordance with procedures approved by the Attorney General, the CIA is restricted in the collection of intelligence information directed against US citizens. Collection is allowed only for an authorized intelligence purpose; for example, if there is a reason to believe that an individual is involved in espionage or international terrorist activities. The CIA's procedures require senior approval for any such collection that is allowed, and, depending on the collection technique employed, the sanction of the Director of National Intelligence and Attorney General may be required. These restrictions on the CIA have been in effect since the 1970s.
Unfortunately, the 4th Amendment only restricts the government. There's nothing restricting your neighbor, a private company, or the employees of a private company from collecting a reward if they happen to notice you doing something illegal.
Ah spoken by someone who hasn't a clue and instead starts playing the role of statist apologist. When the government trains, directs, and pays a "private citizen", that person becomes an agent of the government. This makes those persons subject to the same rules; probable cause, warrants, oath or affirmation.. This bit I dug up on nolo.com The admissibility of evidence found by a private citizen usually turns on the government’s “share” of the search. In other words, how involved was the government? While cases where the government ordered or paid a citizen to conduct the search are fairly straightforward, others aren’t. In determining whether to admit the evidence in question, courts consider questions like: whether the government initiated the search how much control the government had over the private citizen who conducted the search, and what the private citizen’s purpose was in conducting the search. And what was the FBI doing? Oh yeah... paying them..training them...giving them lists of people to search extra carefully. You clueless, statist, cocksucking fuck. Now please go back to blowing your J. Edgar Hoover love doll.
If you have nothing to hide, why should it matter either way?
Fuck you, you statist traitor.
You obviously haven't checked in a long time. A state can opt-out but it has to be the whole state. It is no longer legal to do it on a county-by-county basis. This has been the case for many years now. Where the fed's got the authority to dictate this all-or-nothing is beyond me, but they do it.. Prob threaten states with funds or something....