Slashdot Mirror


Chrome 57 Limits Background Tabs Usage To 1% Per CPU Core (bleepingcomputer.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from BleepingComputer: Starting with Chrome 57, released last week, Google has put a muzzle on the amount of resources background tabs can use. According to Google engineers, Chrome 57 will temporarily delay a background tab's JavaScript timers if that tab is using more than 1% of a CPU core. Further, all background timers are suspended automatically after five minutes on mobile devices. The delay/suspension will halt resource consumption and cut down on battery usage, something that laptop, tablet, and smartphone owners can all relate. Google hinted in late January that it would limit JavaScript timers in background tabs, but nobody expected it to happen as soon as last week's Chrome release. By 2020, Google hopes to pause JavaScript operations in all background pages.

154 comments

  1. Javascript 2017? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's literally 2017. Why are people still using javascript?

    1. Re:Javascript 2017? by tepples · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because making a web app in JavaScript is cheaper than making five native apps, one each for Windows, macOS, GNU/Linux, iOS, and Android.

    2. Re:Javascript 2017? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't you hear? JavaScript is the new S&M.

    3. Re:Javascript 2017? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      making a web app in JavaScript

      But nobody does that. They make ordinary webpages that use 500KB of javascript code to make something that looks (and feels) like a cheap 40KB HTML page based on iframes from back in 1996. Big static posters with HD stock images, 3 lines of text, and a download/email button. Why do these pages need javascript at all? What is javascript for?!

    4. Re: Javascript 2017? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ads and trackers

    5. Re:Javascript 2017? by bojackhorseman · · Score: 1

      the whole internet runs on javascript, just saying

    6. Re:Javascript 2017? by TheInternetGuy · · Score: 2

      Actually, it is Numerically 2017, literally it would be twenty seventeen.

      --
      If my comment didn't sound as good in your head as it did in mine, then I guess we all know who's to blame
    7. Re:Javascript 2017? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the whole internet runs on javascript, just saying

      The web isn't the internet, just saying.

    8. Re: Javascript 2017? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Thankfully that isn't even close to true. The vast majority of the internet "runs on" C. Now there is a lot of JavaScript on the World Wide Web, but you still couldn't say that it runs on it, as that honour goes to protocols like TCP/IP and HTTP(S) as well as HTML.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    9. Re:Javascript 2017? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's for idiots who don't know how to code HTML and CSS properly. I come across this all the time, while using NoScript in Firefox - sites that display nothing at all until you allow them to run Javascript!

    10. Re:Javascript 2017? by sabbede · · Score: 1

      Hah! Now that's some sweet pedantry!

    11. Re: Javascript 2017? by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      Lets start this off correctly. MOST of the internet runs on Linux(i can see the windows/osx noobs festering their incorrect responses now) :o

    12. Re: Javascript 2017? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      EXACTLY. If we talk about what RUNS the internet it is Linux, and thus C not JavaScript. Client side it is Windows / C++

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    13. Re: Javascript 2017? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work with Enterprise systems, and a lot of shit uses java, js, and (blech) even flash to manage a device or system.
      A lot of companies are slowly making the transition to html 5, but it's slow going. Until then I'm stuck with a couple dozen tabs open at a time doing my work.

      This change means that I'm going to have to either start opening shit in a new window, or ditch chrome entirely. There's too much janky bullshit that I open and wait 10 minutes for it to load, with throttling there's no point at all.

    14. Re: Javascript 2017? by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      It's funny that "tech nerds" don't realize that http traffic is a rather small portion of the overall Internet. But I guess if you're never on the backside it's hard to tell.

  2. Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All this does is make the user wait for the page to load after focusing on the new tab, instead of loading it before focusing.

    1. Re: Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the tab is allowed to go full speed for 30 seconds after opening

  3. Blame yourselves.... by bobbied · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Web developers who write javascript that just keeps chewing up resources are why we have to resort to this.... You have no one to blame but yourselves for abusing the privilege of having active content that just sucks resources to get more add revenue....

    I know some of you developers actually think about such stuff and care about the end user's experience, but there are a few of you out there that are messing stuff up for all of us, so now the browser has to throttle you.. Thank You for nothing (from the rest of us).

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    1. Re:Blame yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facebook & Gmail are the biggest resource hogs on my browser. They both consume an insane amount of RAM and CPU time. Thankfully there is hangouts.google.com and messenger.com respectfully.

    2. Re:Blame yourselves.... by Luthair · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Its not really site developers for the most part - its f*cking ad networks, content networks, user tracking, etc.

    3. Re:Blame yourselves.... by CrashNBrn · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's both. Javascript image transforms are still grossly inefficient compared to any native image tool. Javascript keyboard and mouse hooks can make the whole browser sluggish. Then add in adverts that do all of that on top of possibly inline DOM manipulation. It's a freaking disaster.

    4. Re:Blame yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      on 'normal' sites and services that most people use... it's THE FUCKING TRACKERS and ads.. not 'both' not even close. the actual scripting needed to make the typical site functional is so freaking tiny compared to loading 50+ trackers and ads.

      i long for the day of a usable web without scripting 'needed', and click-to-run' javascript for the very few places that actually absolutely *need* it.. e.g. google docs (and even then, you shouldn't need scripting on just to view a static document or download it)

    5. Re: Blame yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why we can't have nice things!

    6. Re:Blame yourselves.... by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      Ain't it crazy how that stuff just shows up stuck in your page, and there's nothing you can to stop it from being added?

    7. Re:Blame yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "more add revenue"

      Surely at least one of those words is redundant. Add means addition or additional, so "more additional" is a strange thing to say. just "more revenue" or "additional revenue" would be sufficient.

      Or maybe you should just fucking learn that the abbreviation for "ADvertisement" is "ad" with one fucking d, dipshit.

    8. Re: Blame yourselves.... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      The more Ds, the more Addidas!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    9. Re:Blame yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah, he shouldn't. but you're used to saying shit no one listens to and advice people ignore. you are not one to give advice or suggest things for people to do. you know what you do? look for shit unrelated to the topic, since you have nothing relevant to contribute but are lonely and want to somehow be heard, you pick out common typos people make because they're not paying attention. because it's just a slashdot comment, and they're probably talking to someone or watching tv while typing it. they swype it with their thumb while looking at the tv, then click send w/o proofreading. you then pretend they actually don't know what the word means, attack that strawman with empty sarcasm since you can't come up with anything actually funny, and proofread your post twice before clicking submit.

      we don't do what you do. we have errors, but this isn't a newspaper article, and us normals all know what we mean, and we're interested in the discussion, not someone spouting offtopic annoying crap. not only do we reject you from life and society because let's face it, you're a bit on the ugly side, but it's the annoying thing too.

      dipshit? he's not - he just has a life. you, you're an ugly piece of annoying useless nerd loser. loser. and by the way - those people who stuffed you into a locker in highschool - that was me. loser.

    10. Re:Blame yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC touched a nerve there, Bobbie? (I assume that the extra 'd' at the end of your username is a manifestation of the same problem...)

    11. Re:Blame yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blame the business folk forcing them to do these things

    12. Re:Blame yourselves.... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      with one fucking d, dipshit.

      Time to take your medicine, AC.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:Blame yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could be increasing the rate at which revenue is being added? Changing the slope, if you will.

      Also, you are a dick.

    14. Re:Blame yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if by "touched a nerve" you mean I enjoy it when ugly nerd losers say things like grammar correcting so I can spot them and make fun of them, yeah, he touched a nerve. kinda the same nerve that stimulated the muscles I used to stuff them into a locker in highschool. but in my brain. a brain nerve let's call it. I'm not here to contribute content either - I just like dissing losers to make myself feel good.

      and I have no idea about what "bobbie" is, or what username you're talking about. I don't speak dork.

  4. Grammar Nazi to the rescue! by Pfhorrest · · Score: 2, Informative

    something that laptop, tablet, and smartphone owners can all relate.

    Unless you mean that those people will all testify to the aforementioned something, you're missing either a "to" or a "to which" depending on how pedantic you want to be. Those people don't relate it; they relate to it. It is something they can relate to, or if you want to be fancy, it is something to which they can relate.

    --
    -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
    "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    1. Re:Grammar Nazi to the rescue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, thanks loser who is too dumb to say anything about the actual subject. we all know these basic rules. I realize you just learned a rule in your esl class, but we're cool w/o following them exactly. this isn't an office email, and we all understand what we're saying.

      people type stuff on here with a thumb on the phone while talking to someone. the errors are because we have a life, we don't bother proofreading our posts before submitting, and we don't want to spend time on a post everyone gets anywise.

      the super relaxed low attention errors-allowed rules on here are what we follow. if you think we should proofread and follow your rules instead.. well no one gives a fuck what you think. we do laugh at you when you show yourself too dumb to say anything meaningful so you have a whole post about a missing comma. you're one of those people who is completely useless at the office, but oh man, you're in at 9am sharp.

      Me - I come in on about half the days, between 9 and 11. you fucking loser waste of space. bet you're pretty fucking ugly too moron.

    2. Re:Grammar Nazi to the rescue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called 'communication'. Easily avoidable grammar and spelling mistakes increase cognitive load on the reader, making it more likely that they will misunderstand what you are trying to say. If you want the reader to respect the time and effort you took in writing your post, then respect the time and effort that they will have to take in reading it!

    3. Re:Grammar Nazi to the rescue! by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      Commenter grammar is one thing, editor grammar is another -- and quotes from the article grammar is something else entirely! The latter two categories profess to be increasingly professional writers. Writing is their job. So yeah, when they do it badly, that's shit.

      But when ordinary people who aren't professing to be producing writing as a product for money make casual mistakes, who cares, yeah.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    4. Re:Grammar Nazi to the rescue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they're only easily avoidable if you bother at all to avoid it. these are just slashdot comments, so we don't bother. using terms like 'cognitive load' for the content of what some random douche writes on the internet - get a fucking life. and by the way - my cognitive load wasn't increased - in fact, my brain autocorrects the error in the background w/o me even noticing it.

      >want the reader to respect the time and effort you took in writing your post

      and there's your problem. we spend minimal time and minimal effort. because it's a fucking slashdot post. why the fuck would i turn all my focus to writing it, or proofreading it? oh, because in your world, this is a formal discussion that should follow rules you set. gotcha. guess what fuckface - no one gives a fuck what your opinion is. loser.

  5. wow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats something an undergraduate highscool student could had come up with.. respect !

  6. Good uses for background by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to wish browsers would do this. But now I know that there are good uses for background processes, even though limiting them to 1% seems fine to me.

    For example, slack changes the tab title and icon when an event happens, like a new message. Gmail updates the title to show how many messages you have. These are reasonable use cases.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:Good uses for background by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      slack changes the tab title and icon when an event happens, like a new message. Gmail updates the title to show how many messages you have. These are reasonable use cases

      And don't forget my epic cookie clicker run, which I've left in some background tab somewhere for well over a year now!

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    2. Re:Good uses for background by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wish there was manual control on a per-tab basis (or better yet, per site basis).
      And I'd like to be able to set a tab to 0% cpu, just completely halt it, like a SIGSUSP signal.
      Mainly because I do not like web pages to contact the mothership if I am not using them, its a major privacy risk.
      I use a VPN and change my IP address on a regular basis. I can clear cookies, etc. But a web page that phones home with state data will be able to track me across IP addresses. And we all know that if it can be used to violate your privacy, there are 100 companies already doing exactly that.

    3. Re:Good uses for background by ohnocitizen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This feature should allow whitelisting domains to keep javascript fully active. I want my email client to keep running javascript. I don't want some random news page I left open to decide it's time to launch a video ad.

    4. Re:Good uses for background by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what if I want the audio in that background tab to keep playing while I browse in another tab?

      What if I never unplug my laptop?

      Can this be disabled?

    5. Re:Good uses for background by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Is that literally just clicking a cookie over and over? Did you set up a script to click it? What number are you on and what is the most epic achievement or whatever you've reached?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    6. Re:Good uses for background by jfisherwa · · Score: 4, Informative

      Added a comment above .. but don't want you to miss it .. The Great Suspender extension for Chrome:

      https://chrome.google.com/webs...

    7. Re:Good uses for background by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      It was a joke, but only barely. As for the "game" itself, you buy upgrades to make cookies for you and eventually there isn't much point in clicking anymore.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    8. Re:Good uses for background by houghi · · Score: 0

      We are talking browers and you start talking about what you want in your email client. Are we really there where even on /. people think that a browser is the same as an email client when you see your mail?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    9. Re:Good uses for background by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you use gmail, it is the same thing

    10. Re:Good uses for background by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Informative

      How much of your quad core 3GHz CPU does the email client need? 1% is still 4x30MHz cores. People used to read email on single core CPUs running under 10MHz, and those cores didn't have advanced features like cache or single cycle multipliers or branch prediction or out-of-order execution.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:Good uses for background by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      This feature should allow whitelisting domains to keep javascript fully active. I want my email client to keep running javascript. I don't want some random news page I left open to decide it's time to launch a video ad.

      So use a whitelisting system like ublock origin, adblock plus, or noscript. Problem solved. Why would you want every random site you visit to be able to run code on your computer?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Good uses for background by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      If you like that, check out "Kittens Game", it's been called "The Dark Souls of Idle Games".

    13. Re:Good uses for background by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He obviously meant gmail you tiny-dicked dolt. Shut up and go back to suckling your mom's vag.

    14. Re:Good uses for background by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably never heard of gmail. A lot of people use the web gmail instead of a dedicated email client, simply because there is one less thing to install, configure and maintain.

  7. Too bad you can't easily stop autoplay videos.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Has anyone found a simple way to disable autoplay withing post-Chrome 55?

  8. About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About time, I constantly have to be careful not to open too many tabs otherwise my linux desktop will freeze up.

    1. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have ~100 tabs open (like I often do) this still won't help that much as it'll still allow ~100% CPU utilisation.

    2. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have ~100 tabs open (like I often do) this still won't help that much as it'll still allow ~100% CPU utilisation.

      I have about 50 open at the moment. Usually I find that it's a few certain tabs using all the cpu, if those ones are limited to 1% then it should be ok.

    3. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      otherwise my linux desktop will freeze up.

      Then you've not configured your Linux system correctly. On any Linux distro, you can set limits on opened files, RAM usage, CPU usage, etc. to avoid fork bombs and to avoid freezes due to 100% consumption of system resources.
       

    4. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've added 'vm.min_free_kbytes=327680' and 'vm.vfs_cache_pressure=100' to /etc/sysctl.d/99-sysctl.conf, which makes a little bit easier to recover.

      I know there are programs to limit cpu/memory usage that you can run together with your individual apps, but haven't bothered as I wanted something system wide.

    5. Re: About time by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      You could start by telling your prices to play nice :-)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    6. Re: About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a moron for having 100 tabs open. That makes no sense.

      Bookmark shit. Focus on the maybe 5 or 6 you're actually using.

      Unless you're rocking 100 browser games ?

    7. Re: About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the update doesn't fix my problems I will use that.

  9. Re:Too bad you can't easily stop autoplay videos.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone found a simple way to disable autoplay withing post-Chrome 55?

    "Withing." Now enshrined in the English language for all time.

  10. What happens to notifications? by lucasnate1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm using facebook and google hangouts to communicate with people. Since I don't want to install applications, I use them as browser tabs. Does this mean I will no longer get noticed when someone messages me?

    1. Re:What happens to notifications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, you will continue to receive notifications. The tab is limited to 1% of CPU which is more than enough to pop a notification. The background Javascript will not be paused until 2020 as per the summary. I believe notifications go through GCM (Google Cloud Messaging) so will still work even if the background javascript is paused on those sites.

    2. Re:What happens to notifications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the first thing I was thinking about.

      I wonder if they are going to start forcing developers to implement service workers or something?

    3. Re:What happens to notifications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you decide to use google cloud messaging, which is their own proprietary system.

      No JS running in the background to me sounds like moving notification code to service workers (currently required for mobile notifications).

    4. Re:What happens to notifications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wat? F*** notifications. Worst feature ever.

      The first thing I do is disable notifications.

    5. Re: What happens to notifications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Standards based equivalents to GCM are being drafted.

    6. Re:What happens to notifications? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Say you have a crappy, low end Chromebook with a 2GHz dual core CPU. Background tabs are limited to 1% per core, so effectively 2x 20MHz cores. Javascript benefits from all the usual optimisations like just-in-time compilation, and the network/rendering stacks are excluded from the limit.

      Even limited to 1%, there is more than enough processing power there to deliver timely chat messages.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:What happens to notifications? by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      It's nice that you don't use them, but lots of people do.

    8. Re:What happens to notifications? by strikethree · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Does this mean I will no longer get noticed when someone messages me?

      If the notifications take more than 1% of a modern processor, then yes, you will not receive timely notifications. It should be noted at this time that fully memory-protected, graphical interface, mostly modernish operating systems used to run with less CPU than even .1% of a modern CPU (Amiga, m68k). I would commit suicide in despair if a notification takes more CPU power than a full operating system. (Why yes, I am preparing the nitrogen bag and morphine now.)

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    9. Re:What happens to notifications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends on what they'll do with the unhandled messages. e.g. queue them vs drop them.

      If handling your messages really is consuming more than 1% of cpu, then chances are they'll be queued, and flood the CPU once you open the tab.

      If they're dropped (unlikely, unless messages are designed to be "full update" kind) then you'll just get these full-update notifications less often.

    10. Re:What happens to notifications? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Why? They are opt in on a per website basis and many websites have a very good reason for using them. So why disable them when you specifically need to enable them for websites in the first place?

      Also it's a great feature. Just like the many other features I use in various software packages that you don't understand and don't see a need for.

  11. Timely story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just finished trying to figure out what website was causing "Web Content" (firefox) on my wife's machine to go nuts. Turns out it was the cards against humanity store.

  12. Dangit. Make it selective, though. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use some web-based IRC stuff, and I'd h ate to "pause" that since I frequently ask questions and step away or do something else before someone can answer. I mean, there's a lot of stupid shit on the web, but I can see some instances where I want background pages to continue to run.

    1. Re:Dangit. Make it selective, though. by tepples · · Score: 1

      Why would a web-based frontend to chat use more than 1 percent of CPU time on a desktop or full-size laptop? I could see a problem on a compact laptop with an Atom or ARM CPU, which is designed to sip power rather than run fast.

    2. Re:Dangit. Make it selective, though. by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Why would a web-based frontend to chat use more than 1 percent of CPU time on a desktop or full-size laptop? I could see a problem on a compact laptop with an Atom or ARM CPU, which is designed to sip power rather than run fast.

      Good question. It's one of the reasons why I hate slack - the web frontend for it causes Firefox to consume a good 30% CPU! Yes, I've diagnosed it - close the tab, it drops to 0%. Reopen it, back to 30%.

      Who knows what crap Slack is running... I gave up and tried their app version, and had to disable every "prettyifying" option to get its usage down. Seems like it displays the text first, then scans it via Javascript seeing if it can search and replace it with some graphics or something. Except, instead of running everytime someone said something, it ran continually.

  13. Firefox already there by Trogre · · Score: 2

    Pretty sure Firefox already does something very similar to this. The mobile version does, anyway.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    1. Re:Firefox already there by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 1, Funny

      True, but in Firefox's case, it is one CPU core per 1%.

    2. Re:Firefox already there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firefox for Android uses a timeout value of 15 minutes for background tabs

      Yep. I was amused when I noticed this. First I wondered, why does my music player stop between tracks, when it runs in a background tab? Then I wondered, why does it start playing again, after 15 minutes?

  14. I DON'T WANT Background tabsl to be stopped! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because sometimes I'll listen to a podcast/music in a another tab while surfing in the visible table. This is my biggest beef with firefox on android, background tasks are stopped (at least my old POS tablet that asus stopped upgrading years ago). That's why I don't use it anymore and use a laptop.

    HEY GOOGLE, give the users a choice what happens to background tabs, instead of being a fuckwit company and taking away choice.

  15. If this saves battery power... by viperidaenz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is Microsoft going to stop spamming me with notifications to use Edge on my laptop because my battery will last 30% longer when ever I open Chrome?

    1. Re:If this saves battery power... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is Microsoft going to stop spamming me with notifications to use Edge on my laptop because my battery will last 30% longer when ever I open Chrome?

      Go to the Windows 10 Settings app -> System -> Notifications & actions -> click on "Get tips, tricks and suggestions as you use Windows" so that it says Off.

      I'm not defending this one bit. Settings like this should not be enabled by default. BUT... I do get increasingly irritated that people are prepared to utilize a significant amount of emotional energy whinging about ads in Windows 10 without actually getting off their asses and looking for ways to solve their problems. People love to winge and make jokes, but they stop short of doing the most basic of searches to fix things and move on with their lives. It's really strange to see such a lack of pro-activity from people in the tech field.

      As a side note - anyone who thinks that moving to Linux is a reasonable response to this instead of click a couple of options and moving on with life is a complete moron and emotionally unstable. Just my opinion of course, and not directed to you in particular since you didn't even mention Linux; just most others on Slashdot and the greater web. :)

  16. Re:Too bad you can't easily stop autoplay videos.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too late... Withing (verb) to bind with withes. A withe is a willow twig. So I guess he wants to assult Chrome with a twig.

  17. Audio and WebSockets defeat this by tepples · · Score: 5, Informative

    sometimes I'll listen to a podcast/music in a another tab

    Then this does not affect you. From the featured article:

    The good news is that background tabs playing audio or maintaining real-time connections like WebSockets or WebRTC won’t be affected by the 1% CPU usage limit.

    1. Re:Audio and WebSockets defeat this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh.. then this is a non-article.

  18. Planned obsolecense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So once my computer isn't 100 times faster than required, I have to buy a new one?

  19. That explains it... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    No wonder 17 tabs of web comics were taking so long to load.

    1. Re:That explains it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Savage Chickens?

  20. Prey they don't alter it further..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who sees this and realizes they are essentially in control of the damn internet now?

    I thought they coded to a *standard* or something..... One which WE had a say in voting and discussing PRIOR to their involvement.

    I'm glad Google controls the internet now. Must have seen how IE6 ruined our lives over a decade ago and realized that was worth the pain of building a browser.

  21. I Like This Change by TranquilVoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    A step in the right direction. Next they'll be limiting chome.exe processes to only 80% of installed RAM!

    1. Re:I Like This Change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I limit Chrome to 0% — I never run the thing, because Google has proven, over and over, that they can't be trusted.

    2. Re:I Like This Change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As someone who runs LOTS of tabs on desktop I don't understand why the parent post has been scored Funny. I've never had cpu consumption issues with chrome while it eats up most of my ram with tabs that I haven't even looked at in my browsing session.

  22. Re:Too bad you can't easily stop autoplay videos.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, obviously the racist bastard just mis-typed whitening

  23. If only by CptLoRes · · Score: 1

    Microsoft engineers would do the same for Windows..

    1. Re:If only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would be a really hard problem to tackle. What happens to those of us that multitask? Say I want to encode a movie, listen to some music, and play a game while I wait?

      Since the game has focus, the other stuff should be throttled to 1% of CPU? Now my encode that used to take 30 minutes takes 90+? My music stutters?

    2. Re:If only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiots at Microsoft actually tried to do this with Windows 8, when they decided that all the applications are to be used as fullscreen only. Somehow they forgot that people use multitasking and keep multiple windows open at a time

  24. /. or log of Chrome release notes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I don't have to choose!

  25. Won't that just mean by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    folks that want to abuse it will use a web socket or silent audio to hack around it and sites that weren't abusing it get throttled? I guess it'll help with some poorly optimized sites though...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Won't that just mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, Yahoo Mail now always has an audio icon in FF

    2. Re:Won't that just mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shhhh... don't give the game away already!

  26. Slashdot one of the worst offenders by bollucks · · Score: 1

    How ironic, posting this on slashdot when I find it's one of the worst CPU users to leave open thanks to allowing its ads to run. I want to do the right thing but the slashdot ads are surprisingly heavy CPU users. I find myself hitting escape as soon as the news articles have loaded to prevent the ads from loading since it always winds my laptop CPU fan up.

  27. you know what the joke is? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    you know what the joke is?

    it's that they keep adding background stuff and webrtc and PUSH notifications that cause js to run and shit.

    and then they add this.

    is this going to leave the push stuff working? OR is this a ploy to make us enable the bg push stuff? I mean.. just give the option to shut them off with a timer or not.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  28. The Great Suspender by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

    Bleh, big whoop. I've been using the Great Suspender extension to do something similar for quite a while now. After x number of minutes, background tabs are suspended unless I exempt (whitelist) them. The tab is blanked, which frees up ram, and with a mouse click I can reload the page right where I was.

  29. The Great Suspender by jfisherwa · · Score: 2

    I've seen a few comments after something like this:

    I use The Great Suspender extension for Chrome. It can kill tabs after a certain period of time and also delays loading them on a Chrome restart (essential for 100+ open tabs) -- you can also whitelist sites.

    https://chrome.google.com/webs...

  30. Still too generous. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

    1% is still a huge amount because how absurdly fast our processors have become. Do you know how much you can do with 45MHz? Javascript is being dynamically translated into machine code, so you can still do a LOT. The only thing this addresses is sites that hog the CPU, not any of the nefarious bullshit that sites do to track you every 7 seconds.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Still too generous. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, this is chrome we're talking about, why would google want to stop the tracking js from running? (Without having a workaround in place for themselves, I mean.)

      Limiting CPU is still better than nothing. At least the tracking and adds won't also kill my battery quite so fast.

    2. Re:Still too generous. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      not any of the nefarious bullshit that sites do to track you every 7 seconds

      Yes and the group policy password enforcement in Windows does not fix that my printer cartridge is empty.

      Like seriously how did you come up with your comment! The answer is "no shit it doesn't as it was never a design goal in the first place".

  31. "Silent audio streams do not grant exemptions" by tepples · · Score: 1

    I apologize for not having the domain expertise to follow up on the WebSocket hack, but here's what I have for the other.

    The "silent audio" you mention probably won't work. I started chasing links from the featured article, "Background tabs & offscreen frames: further plans":

    Find more details here although note that the plans are subject to change based on developer feedback.

    "here" links to "Background Tabs in Chrome 57" stating:

    Exemption lasts for several seconds after audio stops playing to allow applications to queue the next audio track.

    Note that audio is considered audible when and only when Chrome shows the audio icon. Silent audio streams do not grant exemptions.

    So there'd have to be actual audio. I have not read Chromium's source code to determine whether it detects the further workaround of inaudibly high frequencies or inaudibly low volumes.

  32. Background as a premium feature by tepples · · Score: 1

    sometimes I'll listen to a podcast/music in a another tab while surfing in the visible table. This is my biggest beef with firefox on android, background tasks are stopped

    You can blame that in part on streaming providers' freemium model of requiring a paid subscription for background listening, particularly YouTube.

  33. I just block all of it by wakeboarder · · Score: 1

    I run hundreds of tabs, I use noscript to whitelist all the good stuff. Adservers almost always run stuff on thier own domain so its easy to blacklist. Now I just want this feature for firefox

    1. Re:I just block all of it by tepples · · Score: 3, Informative

      Now I just want this feature for firefox

      It's not quite the same, but opening about:config and setting privacy.trackingprotection.enabled to true will blacklist a lot of abusive adtech.

  34. Cookie Clicker is an RTS without the combat by tepples · · Score: 2

    And don't forget my epic cookie clicker run, which I've left in some background tab somewhere for well over a year now!

    Is that literally just clicking a cookie over and over?

    No. Cookie Clicker by Orteil is sort of like a distilled version of an RTS tech tree: you spend cookies to buy buildings and upgrades that produce cookies over time.

  35. This... by God+of+Lemmings · · Score: 1

    is going to fuck all kinds of software up.

    --
    Non sequitur: Your facts are uncoordinated.
  36. Your laptop still draws power by tepples · · Score: 1

    The featured article states that background audio still plays.

    A laptop connected to mains power through a transformer still draws power through the transformer, which still counts against your subscription to electric power. In addition, you may want other tasks running on your computer to have priority over ad exchanges' real-time bidding scripts.

  37. Not running ads gets more CPU back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This blocks ads the most efficient way in ANY browser APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-7 32/64-bit https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22APK+Hosts+File+Engine%22+and+%22start64%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/

    Ads & malware rob speed/security/privacy

    Hosts add speed (via hardcodes/adblocks), security (vs. bad sites/malware/poisoned dns), reliability (vs. dns down), & anonymity (vs. dns requestlogs/trackers).

    Less power/cpu/ram + IO use vs. DNS/routers/addons/antivirus + less security bugs/complexity & faster vs. addons/routers/remote dns!

    Avoids DNSChangers in routers/IP settings & dns redirects (99.999% of ISP DNS != patched vs. it) + lightens DNS load & resolves faster from local system RAM!

    * Via what u NATIVELY have built into the IP stack in FASTER kernelmode!

    APK

    P.S. - Safe https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/e01211ca36aa02e923f20adee0a3c4f5d5187dc65bdf1c997b3da3c2b0745425/analysis/1433430542/

  38. Making a web "app" is cheaper? WHAT YOU PAY FOR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You get what you pay for.

  39. If you block tracking, you end up blocking ads by tepples · · Score: 1

    I use a different method of blocking ads: Firefox with Tracking Protection enabled globally. It blocks only those ad networks and exchanges known to track viewers from one site to another to display interest-based ads, but that's pretty much all of them. Running a tracking blocker rather than an ad blocker also provides plausible deniability against those who claim that ad blockers take food out of writers' children's mouths, as a publisher could in theory instead sell ad space directly to advertisers without such a network.

    Other people use tools to configure an operating system's built-in DNS blacklist. But that doesn't work quite so well on mobile operating systems, where only the device manufacturer ordinarily has privileges to modify the device-wide DNS blacklist.

  40. JavaScript vs. Vagrant by tepples · · Score: 1

    Javascript image transforms are still grossly inefficient compared to any native image tool.

    Is it substantially less efficient than running a native image tool in a Vagrant box and using an X server on your machine to view the Vagrant box?

  41. Tripod is still around by tepples · · Score: 1

    Free web hosting services insert advertisements into HTML documents hosted thereon. GeoCities died long ago, but Tripod appears to be still around.

  42. Free JS with paywalled native by tepples · · Score: 1

    You get what you pay for.

    Or, in the case of a business limited by its finances, what its customers are willing to pay for.

    So would it be a good idea to make a web application available without charge but put corresponding native applications behind a paywall?

  43. Re:Not running ads gets more CPU back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suspected malware, stay far, far away. Developer is so incompetent it takes damn near an hour to sort a couple MB hosts file. Wtf is it doing during all that time? Author clearly has psychological issues and a clear lack of understanding regarding many programming concepts? And what's with this 2000's era shareware, "Virus Total says it's safe!" shit? Why risk it over an open source solution? It has literally nothing to offer over an open alternative other than worse performance, a terrible UI that looks as if it was created by a child, and possibly nefarious code.

    If you choose to respond to this post, positively or negatively make sure you do it anonymously or else you will be stalked and needlessly berated. If you respond positively, make sure you are okay with anything you say being quoted along with your username as an endorsement in his spam posts!

  44. Re:Not running ads gets more CPU back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suspected malware, stay far, far away. Developer is so incompetent it takes damn near an hour to sort a couple MB hosts file. Wtf is it doing during all that time? Author clearly has psychological issues and a clear lack of understanding regarding many programming concepts? And what's with this 2000's era shareware, "Virus Total says it's safe!" shit? Why risk it over an open source solution? It has literally nothing to offer over an open alternative other than worse performance, a terrible UI that looks as if it was created by a child, and possibly nefarious code.

    If you choose to respond to this post, positively or negatively make sure you do it anonymously or else you will be stalked and needlessly berated. If you respond positively, make sure you are okay with anything you say being quoted along with your username as an endorsement in his spam posts!

  45. Goodbye emulators by 0dugo0 · · Score: 1

    So much for JSMESS, jor1k, v86, em-dosbox and friends...

  46. Need option to turn it off.. ie: run full speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I run Android 2.3.x still... Android ICS+ suspend all the browsers I tried(even the same ver/apk from a working android 2.3.x) after a few minutes when the screen was turned off.

    I run security monitoring script/page and the newer androids just won't function with a browser interface... Sure someone could write a new app from scratch but it's easier, way way easier just to run legacy android or alternatives.

    I've had lots of others techs/hobbyists say this isn't true but I challenged them to try the script and , yup suspended in all their devices.

    I'd wager Google is just pushing this to force proprietary background technologies.

  47. 1% per tab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1% per tab? That's still 250% with 250 tabs open.

  48. Get a handle on RAM usage, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Alphabet, please tell your petulant child to get a handle on its RAM usage. I'm tired of my PC grinding to a halt only to find that it has run out of physical RAM due to Chrome sucking down 7GB of it because it never purges viewed pages from RAM.

  49. Javascript is the new Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since interactive Flash content has been/is being replaced with interactive javascript content, the processor issues that afftected Flash are now being recreated with javascript. At some point Adobe started to offload some of that CPU hog to the GPU in a similiar way CSS 3D transforms are deals with it.

    IMHO all non active tabs should not be running any javascript processes in the background because it will not be long before someone figures out that you can run a virtual currency mining client in a webbrowser and you will be exploited without knowing it.

    1. Re:Javascript is the new Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stealing 'cycles in the internet will be easier than stealing 'cycles in meat space.

  50. Hooray, now how about memory? by sabbede · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Do background tabs really need to eat a quarter-gig?

    1. Re:Hooray, now how about memory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. All browsers consume ridiculous amounts of memory and Chrome/Chromium are actually the worst of the top browsers. Just try running and using it for a few days in Linux. The memory usage just swells and swells. After a week or more eventually it will either be killed by the OS or you will have to close it because you computer has slowed to a crawl due to memory exhaustion.

      Shit software.

    2. Re:Hooray, now how about memory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost any browser today has some real issues with memory. But here's what always bugged me about Chrome. The way Chrome runs on its Chrome OS it can easily handle Chrome browser with 2GB ram. But you would never try that with Chrome browser on a Mac or Windows device. All browser seem really bad once you get a bunch of tabs open or get a few sites running all kinds of crap eating up tons of ram. I really don't know how users deal with it with only 4 Gb ram or less.
      my Android tablet chokes at about ten tabs and its froze up. Maybe this will help, maybe it won't.

  51. This will break a queued file uploader I made by iTrawl · · Score: 1

    I once made a file uploader that used a new window/tab as a upload queue so people can queue up files to be uploaded in sequence in order to get a better experience than uploading 10-20-100 files simultaneously. That window/tab is supposed to be left alone in the background to do its thing while you go on the main site to queue up more uploads.

    I was moving a "file" element from the main site to the queue window and then just looped and told blueimp/jQuery-File-Upload to upload each file in turn.

    With this queued upload mechanism were built into browsers so I don't have to do crazy stuff like the one described.

    --
    "Everybody's naked underneath" -- The Doctor
  52. /.ers disagree unidentifiable anonymous loser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine. Your software is well written, functional. The Host File Engine performs exactly as promised by mmell

    his hosts program is actually pretty good by xenotransplant

    I've never tried to belittle (APK's) work, I've flat out said it's good by BronsCon

    take a look at the APK hosts file engine by SuperKendall

    APK is kinda right. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works by bmo

    I like your host file system by Karmashock

    I find your hosts file admirable by vel-ex-tech

    his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources by alexgieg

    * Recommended & hosted by Malwarebytes' hpHosts!

    APK

    P.S.=> More coming... apk

  53. Libel gets you nowhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See my subject: Data in my replies prove it's no malware. Malwarebytes personnel verified it's sourcecode as safe. /. peer testimony does also.

    It takes 5-7 minutes on its default dataset to complete on an Intel CoreI7 4790k cpu to import/sort & deduplicate/resolve favorites for speed/assemble & save final hosts file. Your lies are astounding & see my subject.

    It's not shareware. It's freeware. I don't "OpenSORES" the code as I do NOT want a Google EFast on my conscience (that backfired on Google's Chrome).

    It's superior to any other program like it out there on many fronts (pure GUI ease of use, native 64-bit standalone multithreaded TRUE single non-interpreted executable that does hardcoded favorites properly reverse DNS resolved etc.) & your butthurt "opinion" is outnumbered by many orders of magnitude by actual registered /. users and malwarebytes own personnel who verified its sourcecode, both hosting AND recommending it.

    APK

    P.S.=> Get some preparation H for your butthurt! You have the psych issues you attempt to project onto me in constantly stalking by unidentifiable ac posts or unjustifiably downmoderating me... apk

    1. Re:Libel gets you nowhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes 5-7 minutes on its default dataset to complete on an Intel CoreI7 4790k cpu to import/sort & deduplicate/resolve favorites for speed/assemble & save final hosts file.

      If anyone had any doubt APK is utterly incompetent ... several minutes for something sort | uniq did in a few seconds. On a 20MHz SGI Indigo. 25 years ago.

  54. Breaks hundreds of sites. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Including many of Google's own services.
    Wait, never mind, Google probably added in a whitelist exception to their own sites. Fuck all those other pleb sites, maybe they should be owned by Google instead of their own crappy developers that aren't Google.

    This looks like a problem killed off with no solution. Very common of the Google-run web.
    See HTML5 and killing Flash. HTML5 is hardly even close to how Flash works for most people, not to mention it is hilariously slow and inconsistently so.
    That shitheap can barely run on modern hardware half the time due to lack of hardware acceleration.
    You can force it, good luck telling than to most retards and illiterates. (or even half of Googlers, going by the Google Groups!)

    A lack of a decent single-file vector animation standard to replace most uses of Flash, not to mention portable games, another huge use, are other problems caused by the termination of Flash by default.
    Google just come in and shit on everyone without saying, "hey, flash is now disabled by default, do you want this? yes / no [why?]", nope, forcing it on everyone.
    Now here they are killing off background timers that loads of notifications rely on, without a decent finalized replacement for it!
    Oh, wait:

    The good news is that background tabs playing audio or maintaining real-time connections like WebSockets or WebRTC won’t be affected by the 1% CPU usage limit.

    Meanwhile at every single site now updates to play low-volume audio in loop to keep all those resources.
    Causing even more problems than they started with.
    Thanks, mobile devices. Fuck off already.

  55. Slashdot will no longer make my CPU heat up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, this means that I'll be able to leave slashdot open in a tab now? I know when I have left slashdot open in a tab by the speed of my CPU fan. :)

  56. Technically, they are right by lucaiaco · · Score: 1

    Edge saves you 30% of battery time b/c Windows does not insist on checking and notifying you to switch browser when you are using it.

  57. 1% is just stupid by lucaiaco · · Score: 1

    If I am a web-developer (I am not), I would like to know the exact amount of processing power I am allowed to use when the tab of my page goes on the background, not a percentage. This way I can guarantee a uniform user experience. 1% could be a lot of processing power for some users, making the fix useless, but too little for others, which may lead to some functionalities to be disabled.

  58. It's about time. I've been whining about this for 2 years now. To hell with winning the fastest script prize when you grind everything to a halt. (This is the fault of terrible testing mags/sites who weight shit wrongly.)

    It has reached critical mass -- CNN.com takes forever due to massive advertising overlays and chatty stuff. You click the close box, irritated, and it takes 5s to close.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  59. hierarchy of antique bogoids by epine · · Score: 1

    AMD-K6 3D (90 bogoids)
      <=
    Intel Core i7-4771 @ 3.50GHz (9940 bogoids) * 1%
      <=
    Via C3 Ezra (100 bogoids)
      <=
    Intel Pentium III Mobile 750MHz (103 bogoids)
      <=
    AMD Athlon 64 2000+ (116 bogoids)
      <=
    Intel Pentium 4 1300MHz (119 bogoids)

    Wow, a couple of clown chips, and a searing indictment of Passmark, all rolled up together.

    You can really see how Passmark should have been properly named Parkay Malarkey Spinmark.

    Parkay Pentium 4, you are so busted.

    [*] Cooking instructions: apply Parkay to soggy white bread, wait five minutes, LET THERE BE TOAST.

    Source.

    In the least surprise ever, turns out pajamas man-child develops tight-loop benchmark suites for the trade press. Normally. Except for this one time.

    Setting: One unusual sunny morning.

    Right at the crack of too-damn-early, there's a loud, surprising knock on the door. Curious, he shambles in sloppy slippers to the front door, where he's greeted by a slight man in a slick seersucker suit, who warmly extends a cold hand, and exclaims "my good man, you are just who we need".

    "And who are you, again," asks pajamas man-child, with maximal crack of too-damn-early rhetorical sarcasm.

    "I'm from Butler, Shine & White, department of Natural Born Unusual Suspects."

    He lavishes upon his smooth introductory move a practiced pump on each of 'Butler', 'Shine', and 'White', Vaseline vise-grip apexing right on the 'na' in 'natural', relaxing on 'orn', then releasing precisely on second 'su'.

    "Me?" pyjamas man-child replies meekly, meaty ham agog and drifting.

    "True to form, true to form. Ewww, what's that sooty smell?"

    "Shit, you caught me mid-spread. Must have left a large, hot lump."

    "Well that's just the thing we'll be speaking about."

    "What is?"

    "Here's the thing. Here's the thing. We have it on good local authority that you're the king of shinola soliloquy."

    "Local authority? Man, I'm so going to sue that pesky early-bird arborist."

    "Don't be hasty. Let me tell you what we have in mind."

    Pajamas man-child scratches behind his hairy pinna for a moment. "Sure, okay, fire away. Do tell me about this soliloquy shinola business."

    "No, no, no! You've got that bass ackwards. Trust me, we've got all the soliloquy shinola money can buy. What we don't have ... yet ... is the natural born shinola soliloquy."

    "Uh, if I catch your drift ... what I mean is ... uh ... you know ... the spread ... it answers back."

    "For sure, we'll dub that in. Now how about let's discuss terms."

    "Really?"

    "In all high-margin, commodity seriousness."

    "Okay then, come on in. Want some toast?"

    "Uh, thanks but no thanks. Just in case, I brought us some fresh croissants." BS&W holds up large brown bag with hand-lettered accent marks on every vowel.

    "Looks like you brought the entire continental buffet."

    "Truth is, I'm here to see you spread."

    "That's going to take a lot of spread."

    "We'll use the big tub."

    "Uh ... you just said 'tub' right? Not, uh, 'tooh' as in 'toothbr—'."

    "—aw shucks, just between us, what's the big difference?"

    "Uh, tubes come with a screw top ... or so I've heard."

    "Yes, we did consider novel packaging, but it just doesn't say 'butter'."

  60. Re:you know what the beauty is? by hansbogert · · Score: 1

    You have to opt in / give permission, for the stuff you mention. So if you have background stuff going on in 2020, you have yourself to blame.

  61. Too bad we have Drumpf! by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    Because starting a war with Russia like the other party wanted is a better idea!

  62. Hope this feature can be turned off... by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

    This will surely break the ability to use things like plex web-app or streaming media without plugins... hope it can be turned off for sites you wish to allow...

    --
    120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
  63. Learn to read (it's not just a sort/dedup) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Filtering vs. false positives takes most time in it. You wrote sort & uniq? No. You're INCOMPETENT chump! It is sort/dedup/filter/favorites assemble/assemble all...

    APK

    P.S.=> No wonder YOU have to "hide" like the little weasel you are, lol - you aren't capable of creating anything yourself... apk

  64. Again: /.ers disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine. Your software is well written, functional. The Host File Engine performs exactly as promised by mmell

    his hosts program is actually pretty good by xenotransplant

    I've never tried to belittle (APK's) work, I've flat out said it's good by BronsCon

    take a look at the APK hosts file engine by SuperKendall

    APK is kinda right. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works by bmo

    I like your host file system by Karmashock

    I find your hosts file admirable by vel-ex-tech

    his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources by alexgieg

    * Recommended & hosted by Malwarebytes' hpHosts!

    APK

    P.S.=> You've done better YOURSELF? Did you write sort/uniq? No to both - YOU = INCOMPETENT unidentifiable chump... apk

  65. Yay by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

    And there was much rejoicing.

  66. Explorer Needs this so Desperately.. by lucien86 · · Score: 1

    What an incredibly good idea. Explorer so desperately needs this. - I know I'm an idiot for using Explorer - couldn't even really say why I ended up then kept using it. Should switch to Chrome - seems much better now than when I last tried it.. Used Netscape for decades until a year after it finally closed - then used Sea Monkey for a while, then somehow found myself using Explorer - despite all its flaws.

    Fixing the resource stealing by malware adds and poorly written web sites would fix most of Explorers worst flaws..

    --
    Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..