You're the mouth breathing moron who doesn't understand what arbitrary means.
Saying you can't discriminate based on race is a clear-cut definition. Saying you can decide someone is too dirty to come in IS FUCKING OPEN TO INTERPRETATION. You, yourself, specified this.. YOUR NOSE, OTHER CUSTOMERS, ETC...
i.e. It's demonstrable that someone is going to be let in who might be a tad dirty, but not "too much" for a particular shop owner, yet maybe that person is too dirty for another shop owner.. DO YOU GET THIS? DO YOU FUCKING UNDERSTAND?
Here, except for race, and a few other classes, it is ALWAYS up to the shop owner. It's the same there, apparently, except we don't bullshit other people about it. Take your holier-than-thou bullshit and fuck off.
p>Again: it is illegal to offer a service/good and not serving if a customer raises hand and say: here! I pay!
Cant be so hard to grasp.
You just said you could kick out someone who has bad hygiene, regardless of his/her wanting to pay.. Anyhow, whatever. So it's illegal in Europe. It's not illegal here, and I was referencing BestBuy which is here.. So... yeah..
You are not allowed to discriminate. The only reason to point one to the door is crime like theft, unpleasant behaviour, lack of hygiene etc.
You do realize you contradicted yourself from one sentence to the next right?
Define unpleasant behavior. And yeah, kicking someone out for lack of hygiene would be discrimination. I happen to agree with it, but you don't get to redefine words.
What is next? I enter the store because it is freezing cold outside and I left my cloak at home? Walk around half an hur and because I buy nothing they try to ban me?
Yeah, that's also perfectly legal here. Private property... leased or owned, it doesn't matter. Most stores in the US have a sign that says "we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason". Now, that doesn't carry over to the protected classes of race, religion, sex, etc.. But it's perfectly legal to kick someone out of your store simply because you don't like their face (or they aren't buying anything). Y'all have decided it's fine to kick someone out because you don't like their smell... Okay.. Well, that's fine too. But it's hypocritical, in my opinion, to say you can boot someone because you don't like their behavior or hygiene, and then claim that's not discrimination.
Just because you don't have the skills to get a job that will allow you to live in California doesn't make it bad.
I have the skills and the job.. and I live in CA, but even I think you're a moronic cunt. Seriously, who the fuck says shit like that? That's about the level of sophistication one would expect from a nine year old.
This state is shit. It wasn't always shit, but you fucking liberals made it shit.
Wrong. I can give my SSL key to anyone. That person can use it to spy on the traffic.
Generally, outside of a few aberrations, SSL certs are given to the owner of a domain. i.e. You know you've landed at moron.com because the SSL cert was given to moron.com. Attaching the SSL cert to any domain other than moron.com is going to result in an error. Thus the primary reason to use a signed cert it to prove IDENTITY.
Please explain why you would think this is unenforceable?
In the US contracts are required to be equitable. They don't have to be perfectly fair, but there has to be an exchange. I get something and you get something. It would be child's play to show that your example is not equitable. Money for service is equitable... Giving your ISP your organs for nothing (you're already getting your internet service for money) without getting something in return means that it's an invalid clause.
There you essentially have to learn new grammar, with new vocabulary, because the words that you already know may not mean the same thing here than they usually do.
And, sometimes, a new language. Plenty of legal terms are in Latin.. It's a dead language but, for some reason, it's been decided it's appropriate for the law. I know part of this is due to the fact that Latin is a more precise language and English can be sorta fuzzy.. But sheesh.. There's got to be a way to write laws in English without having to use another language..
It's pretty well established that not everyone is equally intelligent. Some people are born smart, some people.. not so much.
I don't think it's unreasonable to require that contracts be written in plain language. Technical terms have their place (laws / medicine / science) but there are plenty of times it's more appropriate to be understandable by the majority of your audience.
When's the last time you told a friend you sprained your ankle and were experiencing Metatarsalgia? Yeah.. exactly. You just say "it hurts".
They were selling them for face value with free shipping, IN THE PAST. They were trying to encourage the adoption of the coins by making them as easy to source as possible.
The fact that a few enterprising individuals found a way to make a profit by getting "cash back" on their purchases of CURRENCY at face value, is well known internet lore at this point.
The fact that you cite what's being offered today as refuting what happened in the past as "bullshit" shows you lack comprehension and the ability to do a fucking google search, you retarded shit.
.....or they will create some kind of "list" of passengers that chronically ghost their flights and either refuse to sell them multi leg ticket, making them book each leg separately or automatically inflate the price if a listed passenger ties to purchase one
And that's perfectly reasonable. Best Buy (the electronics retailer), maintains (or at least did at one point) a black list of people that aren't allowed in their stores. Lots of electronics stores have "loss leaders" which is merchandise they sell below cost to entice you to come in the store. The theory is that you'll buy something else while you're there and the loss on the leader will result in an overall profit.
Well, Best Buy kept track, via the Best Buy Club card (or whatever the hell they called it) what you were buying.. If they decided you bought too many loss leaders without buying anything else, they concluded that you were a net loss on their bottom line and you were politely told to leave the store and never return.
I don't see why the Airlines can't do the same. But, Lufthansa wants to be a little bitch and go crying to the government. Fuck them
So you mean there will no longer be any cheap flights that have to transit somewhere? The airline will now charge per leg (a la carte)? Is that what you want?
If that's what it takes to retain the freedom to get off the plane at any fucking airport I want, then yes.. However, I suspect that capitalism will find a way to balance both sides. We don't need some fucking Judge deciding for us.
The airlines are going to have to fix this. I, personally, don't want to live in a society where I can't decide to get off a plane at a given stop, for whatever reason, because some asshole airline doesn't like it.
I get that it's costing them money. Too bad. We live in a free society.. I could agree to go on a road trip with a buddy and, at any gas station stop (for example), I have the full moral and legal right to exit the car and leave. I might lose a friend but, other than that, there's not a damn thing he/she can do about it.
Besides, what about emergencies? Say I'm flying to London, with a layover in Atlanta, and I get a phone call with bad news. I'm not supposed to be able to book a different airline back? Fuck Lufthansa.. They can go suck a bag of dicks.
It was a great commercial that essentially said "don't be a jerk". This greatly upset the jerks for some reason.
Bullshit. It implied that men are stupid and have to be reminded to not be jerks.. Here's a tip: The guys that are being jerks have been told "Don't be jerks" a million times.. But they're still jerks.. Virtue signaling isn't gonna do shit...
But hey, you pointed out that there are jerks and they get upset when it's pointed out.. You can go back to your SJW group and brag about how you set the story right... Your task is done..
I can count the number of American products I bought in the past five years on that many fingers. I'm willing to bet it's the same for you. Currently, #2 means we still have one factory left, somewhere. And there's another one we could get running in a week if it weren't cheaper to buy shit from China.
Yeah. It's not that bad.. it's not great, but it's not as bad as you imply..
The United States is the 3rd largest export economy in the world and the 7th most complex economy according to the Economic Complexity Index (ECI). In 2017, the United States exported $1.25T and imported $2.16T, resulting in a negative trade balance of $910B. In 2017 the GDP of the United States was $19.4T and its GDP per capita was $59.5k.
Generally speaking is the exact opposite of extraordinary circumstances.. Maybe their network is down? It's a good thing that the civilian network can function like a backup or alternate system.
trotting out security incidents is retarded. Apple has them too. Sometimes serious ones (see above).... If you're gonna do a comparison, at least base it on technical merits.
It was a simple question. But, I've noticed that the angrier someone becomes when you point out a spelling error, the greater the chance that they are a self-important asshole.
Listen, we get it. You didn't pay attention in school. You failed to acquire the skills to effectively communicate, in written form, in English.
The rules of grammar, punctuation, spelling, and all the rest are there to help YOU put your thoughts into a form that can be correctly interpreted by your audience.
Parties and Party's are two ABSOLUTELY DIFFERENT THINGS. To a certain extent, both words could have been used, plausibly, in that sentence.
Consider the following:
Can you help your uncle, Jack, off his horse.
Can you help your uncle jack off his horse.
A comma (or two) and a capital letter can be very important. They change the whole scope of what's being asked.
Amateur. You ALWAYS sign your work. If I'd wanted deniability, then you wouldn't ever find the subject to start with.
Only an amateur would think that a body disappearing wouldn't create a whole bunch of questions. A raving person with no marks can be written off as a nut job. Sometimes a cowed person is more valuable to "the cause" than another corpse.
Slashdot Mirror
You're the mouth breathing moron who doesn't understand what arbitrary means.
Saying you can't discriminate based on race is a clear-cut definition. Saying you can decide someone is too dirty to come in IS FUCKING OPEN TO INTERPRETATION. You, yourself, specified this.. YOUR NOSE, OTHER CUSTOMERS, ETC...
i.e. It's demonstrable that someone is going to be let in who might be a tad dirty, but not "too much" for a particular shop owner, yet maybe that person is too dirty for another shop owner.. DO YOU GET THIS? DO YOU FUCKING UNDERSTAND?
Here, except for race, and a few other classes, it is ALWAYS up to the shop owner. It's the same there, apparently, except we don't bullshit other people about it. Take your holier-than-thou bullshit and fuck off.
And I only was pointing out: it is illegal in Europe to kick one out of a shop for "arbitrary reasons".
Kicking someone out for bad hygiene is the definition of arbitrary. Who decides what the bar is?
p>Again: it is illegal to offer a service/good and not serving if a customer raises hand and say: here! I pay!
Cant be so hard to grasp.
You just said you could kick out someone who has bad hygiene, regardless of his/her wanting to pay.. Anyhow, whatever. So it's illegal in Europe. It's not illegal here, and I was referencing BestBuy which is here.. So... yeah..
I had not considered that.. Hrm.... This gives me some things to ponder for a while.....
You are not allowed to discriminate. The only reason to point one to the door is crime like theft, unpleasant behaviour, lack of hygiene etc.
You do realize you contradicted yourself from one sentence to the next right?
Define unpleasant behavior. And yeah, kicking someone out for lack of hygiene would be discrimination. I happen to agree with it, but you don't get to redefine words.
What is next? I enter the store because it is freezing cold outside and I left my cloak at home? Walk around half an hur and because I buy nothing they try to ban me?
Yeah, that's also perfectly legal here. Private property... leased or owned, it doesn't matter. Most stores in the US have a sign that says "we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason". Now, that doesn't carry over to the protected classes of race, religion, sex, etc.. But it's perfectly legal to kick someone out of your store simply because you don't like their face (or they aren't buying anything). Y'all have decided it's fine to kick someone out because you don't like their smell... Okay.. Well, that's fine too. But it's hypocritical, in my opinion, to say you can boot someone because you don't like their behavior or hygiene, and then claim that's not discrimination.
Why would the EU prohibit banning customers who financially harm you?
Just because you don't have the skills to get a job that will allow you to live in California doesn't make it bad.
I have the skills and the job.. and I live in CA, but even I think you're a moronic cunt. Seriously, who the fuck says shit like that? That's about the level of sophistication one would expect from a nine year old.
This state is shit. It wasn't always shit, but you fucking liberals made it shit.
Gates or Borg" in his parent's basement in Wisconsin.
It's Gates of Borg.. i.e. they are one and the same.
Wrong. I can give my SSL key to anyone. That person can use it to spy on the traffic.
Generally, outside of a few aberrations, SSL certs are given to the owner of a domain. i.e. You know you've landed at moron.com because the SSL cert was given to moron.com. Attaching the SSL cert to any domain other than moron.com is going to result in an error. Thus the primary reason to use a signed cert it to prove IDENTITY.
Please explain why you would think this is unenforceable?
In the US contracts are required to be equitable. They don't have to be perfectly fair, but there has to be an exchange. I get something and you get something. It would be child's play to show that your example is not equitable. Money for service is equitable... Giving your ISP your organs for nothing (you're already getting your internet service for money) without getting something in return means that it's an invalid clause.
There you essentially have to learn new grammar, with new vocabulary, because the words that you already know may not mean the same thing here than they usually do.
And, sometimes, a new language. Plenty of legal terms are in Latin.. It's a dead language but, for some reason, it's been decided it's appropriate for the law. I know part of this is due to the fact that Latin is a more precise language and English can be sorta fuzzy.. But sheesh.. There's got to be a way to write laws in English without having to use another language..
It's pretty well established that not everyone is equally intelligent. Some people are born smart, some people.. not so much.
I don't think it's unreasonable to require that contracts be written in plain language. Technical terms have their place (laws / medicine / science) but there are plenty of times it's more appropriate to be understandable by the majority of your audience.
When's the last time you told a friend you sprained your ankle and were experiencing Metatarsalgia? Yeah.. exactly. You just say "it hurts".
I call bullshit. A 25 coin roll of dollar coins costs $32.95, more than face value. And that is not counting any shipping costs that might exist.
They were selling them for face value with free shipping, IN THE PAST. They were trying to encourage the adoption of the coins by making them as easy to source as possible.
The fact that a few enterprising individuals found a way to make a profit by getting "cash back" on their purchases of CURRENCY at face value, is well known internet lore at this point.
The fact that you cite what's being offered today as refuting what happened in the past as "bullshit" shows you lack comprehension and the ability to do a fucking google search, you retarded shit.
https://www.creditcards.com/credit-card-news/mint-closes-loophole-ends-credit-card-coin-sales-frequent-flyer-flier-miles-1263.php
.....or they will create some kind of "list" of passengers that chronically ghost their flights and either refuse to sell them multi leg ticket, making them book each leg separately or automatically inflate the price if a listed passenger ties to purchase one
And that's perfectly reasonable. Best Buy (the electronics retailer), maintains (or at least did at one point) a black list of people that aren't allowed in their stores. Lots of electronics stores have "loss leaders" which is merchandise they sell below cost to entice you to come in the store. The theory is that you'll buy something else while you're there and the loss on the leader will result in an overall profit.
Well, Best Buy kept track, via the Best Buy Club card (or whatever the hell they called it) what you were buying.. If they decided you bought too many loss leaders without buying anything else, they concluded that you were a net loss on their bottom line and you were politely told to leave the store and never return.
I don't see why the Airlines can't do the same. But, Lufthansa wants to be a little bitch and go crying to the government. Fuck them
So you mean there will no longer be any cheap flights that have to transit somewhere? The airline will now charge per leg (a la carte)? Is that what you want?
If that's what it takes to retain the freedom to get off the plane at any fucking airport I want, then yes.. However, I suspect that capitalism will find a way to balance both sides. We don't need some fucking Judge deciding for us.
The airlines are going to have to fix this. I, personally, don't want to live in a society where I can't decide to get off a plane at a given stop, for whatever reason, because some asshole airline doesn't like it.
I get that it's costing them money. Too bad. We live in a free society.. I could agree to go on a road trip with a buddy and, at any gas station stop (for example), I have the full moral and legal right to exit the car and leave. I might lose a friend but, other than that, there's not a damn thing he/she can do about it.
Besides, what about emergencies? Say I'm flying to London, with a layover in Atlanta, and I get a phone call with bad news. I'm not supposed to be able to book a different airline back? Fuck Lufthansa.. They can go suck a bag of dicks.
It was a great commercial that essentially said "don't be a jerk". This greatly upset the jerks for some reason.
Bullshit. It implied that men are stupid and have to be reminded to not be jerks.. Here's a tip: The guys that are being jerks have been told "Don't be jerks" a million times.. But they're still jerks.. Virtue signaling isn't gonna do shit...
But hey, you pointed out that there are jerks and they get upset when it's pointed out.. You can go back to your SJW group and brag about how you set the story right... Your task is done..
I can count the number of American products I bought in the past five years on that many fingers. I'm willing to bet it's the same for you. Currently, #2 means we still have one factory left, somewhere. And there's another one we could get running in a week if it weren't cheaper to buy shit from China.
Yeah. It's not that bad.. it's not great, but it's not as bad as you imply..
The United States is the 3rd largest export economy in the world and the 7th most complex economy according to the Economic Complexity Index (ECI). In 2017, the United States exported $1.25T and imported $2.16T, resulting in a negative trade balance of $910B. In 2017 the GDP of the United States was $19.4T and its GDP per capita was $59.5k.
This is a good point... And it does need to be considered, at the very least..
Yeah, like all those macbook air's that have failed due to shitty video cables... Fixed for $500..
There was a time Apple was the best.. I don't dispute that, but they're shit now.
Always amazes me how monoculture is bad when it's MS, but good when it's Apple.
You fanboys are weird..
Generally speaking is the exact opposite of extraordinary circumstances.. Maybe their network is down? It's a good thing that the civilian network can function like a backup or alternate system.
I can't imagine why anyone would stay with Apple
https://www.theverge.com/2019/...
trotting out security incidents is retarded. Apple has them too. Sometimes serious ones (see above).... If you're gonna do a comparison, at least base it on technical merits.
It was a simple question. But, I've noticed that the angrier someone becomes when you point out a spelling error, the greater the chance that they are a self-important asshole.
Listen, we get it. You didn't pay attention in school. You failed to acquire the skills to effectively communicate, in written form, in English.
The rules of grammar, punctuation, spelling, and all the rest are there to help YOU put your thoughts into a form that can be correctly interpreted by your audience.
Parties and Party's are two ABSOLUTELY DIFFERENT THINGS. To a certain extent, both words could have been used, plausibly, in that sentence.
Consider the following:
Can you help your uncle, Jack, off his horse.
Can you help your uncle jack off his horse.
A comma (or two) and a capital letter can be very important. They change the whole scope of what's being asked.
Amateur. You ALWAYS sign your work. If I'd wanted deniability, then you wouldn't ever find the subject to start with.
Only an amateur would think that a body disappearing wouldn't create a whole bunch of questions. A raving person with no marks can be written off as a nut job. Sometimes a cowed person is more valuable to "the cause" than another corpse.