Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Is It Ethical To Purchase Electronics Products Made In China?

dryriver writes: A lot of people seem to think it's O.K. to buy electronics made in China. We get to buy products considerably cheaper than we otherwise would, and China by all accounts is growing, developing, and modernizing as a nation due to all the cool stuff they now make for the world. There is only one problem with that reasoning. 21st Century China has an atrocious human rights record, and almost all human rights watchdogs report that China is becoming more and more repressive each year. Freedom House put it this way in 2018: "It's worth noting that, in its attitude toward political dissent, the Chinese Communist Party has proven much harsher than the old Soviet regime of the Brezhnev era. Modern Chinese sentences are longer, the prospects for early release are far worse, and the Chinese authorities are generally unmoved by pleas for leniency from foreign diplomats." Basically, consumer dollars from around the world are not gradually creating a gentler, freer, more prosperous and more modern China at all. They are making the Chinese Communist Party richer, stronger, bolder and more aggressive and repressive in every respect. To the question: knowing what the human rights situation is in China, and that consumer dollars and euros flowing into the country from abroad is making things worse, not better, is it at all ethical to buy electronics or IT products manufactured in China?

375 comments

  1. It's not ethical to live in the US at all by bistromath007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    gonna keep doing it though because my life is really just a huge list of accidents anyway

    1. Re:It's not ethical to live in the US at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'mm gonna keep doing it because that's what capitalism say i should do. Buy low sell high. Don't blame me for following the market rules.

    2. Re:It's not ethical to live in the US at all by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      Refusing to buy from China will just make the people living there even poorer, it won't change their government.

      --
      No sig today...
    3. Re:It's not ethical to live in the US at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whataboutism.

    4. Re: It's not ethical to live in the US at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      China has enough wealth to construct entire replica cities for people to live in. They took foriegn investment and poured it into Chinese Paris, Chinese London, Chinese Jackson Hole, and many. many more. That money stayed in China and never doubled then returned to the countries who insisted on investing in China to begin with.

      Chinese middle class are currently at US 1950's level of prosperity for them. The rest of the world's middle classes vanished with smallnportions getting rich off of trade with China but the vast majority becoming much much poorer.

    5. Re:It's not ethical to live in the US at all by jpaine619 · · Score: 0

      This is a good point... And it does need to be considered, at the very least..

    6. Re: It's not ethical to live in the US at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A replica city people can live in?

      That's just a city dumbass. Most governments can afford cities.

    7. Re:It's not ethical to live in the US at all by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Ethics in personal purchases are up to the individual based upon the many choices available at the time relating to honesty, true product worth, reliability, country of origin. Why buy from a local company if all the local companies bullshit their customers, buy foriegn from where ever. Same with rip off pricing, government protected.

      Ethics, well, when it comes to essential infrastructure, well that is high level survival of the society ethics. Should all infrastructure elements be locally produced in preference to be extorted by a foreign nation, with regards to supply, control and interference, of course.

      So take Huawei, should countries ban Huawei from digital infrastructure, sure if there is a local producer, they should logically favour them in terms of control and ability to audit production. Along the same lines countries should probably extort local production of infrastructure products from Huawei ie accept Huawei products made in your own country, of course. Would I buy Huawei if it was made in Australia and expect the Australian government to give them preference in that regard, sure, it would be the sane decision. Where it is made does count but USA vs China, from a no USA basis, why would I give a fuck, probably the USA full of bullshit about the quality of the product and out of China probably not that reliable and given a preference probably just buy Made In Japan or made in Australia for a range of other products. If Huawei had a production facility in Australia I would give them preference, all other things being equal, for sure and I would expect the government to do the same, depending upon who else had production facilities in Australia or the depth of economic times with certain partners and giving them preference, for example Japan.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    8. Re:It's not ethical to live in the US at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it won't change their government

      At the very least it deprives the regime of valuable trillions. They'd be a lot more "pliable" if they had the military might of Ethiopia.

    9. Re:It's not ethical to live in the US at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Refusing to buy from China will just make the people living there even poorer, it won't change their government.

      Yes, it will change their government. Not in the way they think or operate internally, of course -- but rather, in the influence their government has on the rest of the world.

      If the PRC was a poor-as-fuck little nation (instead of the current economic powerhouse), do you think they'd still have the current impact on world affairs that they do?

    10. Re: It's not ethical to live in the US at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, also, is it ethical? Yes

    11. Re:It's not ethical to live in the US at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we want to answer that question then it should also be valid to ask "Is it ethical to import from Europe or the US" whom supported illegal torture and renditioning and as of yet no one has been held accountable. And whom also support the bombing of people through drones which involves a lot of "collateral damage". Those are also human rights violations. Is it ethical to import from countries that ship vast quantities of weapons to dictators who then use them to murder innocent people?

      Can we also ask "is it ethical to selectively blind side ourselves in the question of who we apply ethical questions to" ?

    12. Re: It's not ethical to live in the US at all by Type44Q · · Score: 0

      Pathetic attempt to change the subject, modded-up during the wee hours of the morning... can't possibly imagine what nation's Engrish-attempting shills would be online at that hour. ;)

    13. Re: It's not ethical to live in the US at all by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Oh, let's give up then.

    14. Re: It's not ethical to live in the US at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stop buying US products before Chinese ones. The US regime is repressive to a lot more people. China sucks, but the US is much worse.

    15. Re:It's not ethical to live in the US at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does ethics matter? To some people, I suppose it does.
      In the USA, there are laws to prevent chemical dumping which are actually enforced. Companies are allowed to be owned by anyone (almost) in the world. There is no mandate that the foreign company partner with a USA company to transfer technology and train the locals so they can throw the other foreign company out in a few years and have them compete around the world on similar projects.

      In China, there may be laws, but they are selectively enforced, usually in favor of any local company over a foreign company. The way chemical dumping is uncovered is by harm caused to enough Chinese - for large enough values of people. It tool China over a year to do anything after baby milk was found to be harming their own people. China mandates that Chinese companies must be used as partners with foreign companies in China, be trained on the technology and after a few years, that non-Chinese company will stop being selected for any local contracts. The Chinese company will be bidding throughout the world against the company who trained them, often with Chinese govt subsidies to which no other company can compete. Look at solar panels, high speed trains, long cable cars, nuclear reactors, just to get a small idea of what China has done.

      Is that ethical?

      By supporting/buying Chinese, we should approval of their economic model which steals from the world, low-bids on contracts, destroying the free market for any other company to compete. Get cheap stuff now, but you can bet it won't be so cheap once only Chinese vendors are left.

      Somethings to consider.

    16. Re: It's not ethical to live in the US at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chin has had a fantastic run of it, but their explosive growth is racking up a bill that will someday come due. Not an expert, but Chinaâ(TM)s centrally managed economy has produced a number of bubbles that have yet to burst. Their population is increasingly educated and affluent, and may be tiring of Communist tyranny. They have a titanic aging population, unheard-of levels of pollution and the ensuing chronic health problems. When they saturate markets and their economy cools, every other problem gets worse. We are seeing China at a peak.

    17. Re: It's not ethical to live in the US at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess that means we need to stop people from immigrating to the USA, if we want to ensure that the level of ethical behavior remains as high as possible worldwide.

    18. Re: It's not ethical to live in the US at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And paying ransom to kidnappers encourages them to keep kidnapping.

  2. The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    AFTER we have built the modern tech world using chinas stuff... /facepalm

    1. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by bistromath007 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Remember when America made things?

      Yeah, neither do I, but my parents keep talking about it.

    2. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The US is the #2 manufacturing nation on the planet.

    3. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by bistromath007 · · Score: 2

      I can count the number of American products I bought in the past five years on that many fingers. I'm willing to bet it's the same for you. Currently, #2 means we still have one factory left, somewhere. And there's another one we could get running in a week if it weren't cheaper to buy shit from China.

    4. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, most of what we manufacture are Big Macs to shovel down our pie holes

      Shout out to President T!

    5. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Manufacturing as a percentage of GDP has remained the same for the last 50 years. We shifted from labor intensive to capital intensive manufacturing. Automation has lowered the number of jobs in this sector. America is still a manufacturing powerhouse.

    6. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by zlives · · Score: 4, Insightful

      isn't that part of the question, do you try to buy local/US made?
      i do but its not always available even at a higher cost. and cost is part of the real equation. Not every one has the luxury to search for American made products, even the ones that are just packaged here.
      can't talk about manufactured in China without talking about job loss or income inequality.
      we must buy cheap because we can't afford anything more.

    7. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but they tell me the economy is doing GREAT now

    8. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pepperidge farms remembers

    9. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      All the furniture I bought has been made in America, same with my cookware. The cars are made in America, except one came from Japan. My bike was made here. The lumber, including the engineered wood, for the house remodel was made here. The screw and nails were made here as well, because I bought them. The drywall was made here too. The solar panels I put in for the pool were made here but some materials were sourced from China. The appliances were unfortunately made in Germany and South Korea. My lawnmower and weed wacker was made here though as was the air conditioner and heater, and tankless.

    10. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I can count the number of American products I bought in the past five years on that many fingers. I'm willing to bet it's the same for you.

      You must have really large hands.

      The largest manufacturing industries in the United States by revenue include petroleum, steel, automobiles, aerospace, telecommunications, chemicals, electronics, food processing, consumer goods, lumber, and mining. A large portion of U.S. industrial output, the United States leads the world in airplane manufacturing. American companies such as Boeing, Cessna (see: Textron), Lockheed Martin (see: Skunk Works), and General Dynamics produce a vast majority of the world's civilian and military aircraft in factories stretching across the United States.

    11. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by lgw · · Score: 2

      Manufacturing as a percentage of GDP has remained the same for the last 50 years. We shifted from labor intensive to capital intensive manufacturing. Automation has lowered the number of jobs in this sector. America is still a manufacturing powerhouse.

      This. Further, we've never had fewer manufacturing jobs decade over decade, though it's fallen as a percentage of jobs as the country has grown.

      It's mostly consumer goods that are made overseas, because US consumers mostly want cheap instead of good (though the story is reversed for cars). But there are many industries beyond consumer goods.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    12. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I can count the number of American products I bought in the past five years on that many fingers.

      You're thinking consumer products not B2B stuff. The US manufactured quite a lot, but it's not low margin stuff that relies on cheap labour, poor working conditions and nonexistent environmental regulations.

      Apart from big things like 787 airframes there's all sorts of incredibly obscure stuff that all sorts of industries run on that you won't have heard of.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    13. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Most of that stuff is assembled here; the guts are manufactured elsewhere. Air conditioner, for example. Don't be naive.

    14. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by NormalVisual · · Score: 4, Interesting

      i do but its not always available even at a higher cost. and cost is part of the real equation.

      This is something I often run into. For example, take the ubiquitous smart RGB LEDs like the WS2812 or APA102. They're great little devices that cost 15 cents or so and very useful for a lot of applications, but no one in the U.S. makes a comparable product at even 10 times the price, so you kinda *have* to get them from China if you want addressable RGB blinkenlights that fit in a 5050 form factor. TI makes some RGB controller chips, but they're not nearly as flexible or capable and don't have the controller and LEDs in a single package.

      It may be because the Chinese companies have patents on them in the U.S., but that brings up another problem - in the U.S., intellectual property on such things is usually respected because the courts will smack you down if you don't. In China, it's a free-for-all (despite their government saying otherwise), with outright counterfeits (complete with counterfeit branding) being allowed to be imported into the U.S. You can't compete with that kind of tilted playing field.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    15. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by chiefcrash · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm willing to bet you bought a lot more Made in America products than you think...

      Did you buy gas for your car?
      Did you or your office buy you some post-it notes?
      Have you bought any medications lately?
      Do you use Gillette razors?
      Drink any cheap beer lately?
      Plan on buying a Hallmark card for Valentine's day?
      Buy a car in the last 5 years?

      And this is just the kind of day-to-day products you'd probably run into. We *export* over $125 billion in machinery alone....

      --
      Show me on the 1st Amendment bobblehead where the moderator touched you...
    16. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      Remember when America made things? Yeah, neither do I, but my parents keep talking about it.

      You must be in that larger portion of Americans who were not living when men walked the surface of the moon.

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    17. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If one part is manufactured someplace else it doesn't qualify? Are iPhones really Chinese made if the semiconductors are made in other countries? The display and camera sensor are made in Japan. The memory and storage are made in South Korea.

      The Goodman AC we bought was made here, that includes the coolant, the copper coils, the fins, the casing, and the electronic assembly. Maybe the CPU was made in China or Taiwan, I am not sure.

      Maybe you need to get your head out of your ass and stop believe the myth that America doesn't manufacture anymore.

    18. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trouble with American made consumer goods is that they are also of bad quality. When you buy them you get high cost and bad quality. I have not bought a jet recently.

    19. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      The US doesn't make consumer products. So yes, unless you regularly purchase aircraft, industrial/heavy machinery, tractors/combines, or trains then you aren't very likely to have purchased something made in America lately

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    20. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can count the number of American products I bought in the past five years on that many fingers.

      Betray your country much? Yes, unless you're not American.

    21. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing you've never bought an airplane, a bus, or a sheetmetal stamping press. The US isn't really making a lot of consumer goods anymore, but for industrial equipment we're tops.

      Although now that I think about it, a lot of CPUs are fabbed in the US also.

      dom

    22. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Do you use Gillette razors?

      Not after that politically correct bullshit commercial.

    23. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No argument, but Hallmark cards are printed in China, and most books as well.

    24. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Peasant.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    25. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

      If it carries the Made In America tag, then substantially most or all of the parts AND labor must be provided in the US. You cannot bring parts from overseas and just assemble here; substantially most of the parts must be domestically sourced.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    26. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Most high end audio gear is Made in the USA. Yes, it's a niche, but it's dominated by USA-manufactured products utilizing USA-sourced parts. And that is consumer electronics. High end, sure, but still consumer electronics.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    27. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

      Thats nice, but the US is the #2 manufacturing nation on the planet with $8 trillion in yearly output. Manufacturing has increased 300% in the least 30 years. But OK. You know best.

    28. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, the cars sold in the US are typically made from parts coming from several countries, with components assembled in several countries, and generally only final assembly counting as to which country it is made in. Some Japanese cars are mostly made in the US or even have final assembly in the US.

      My experience at companies that make products is that very often overseas contract manufacturers are used when there are lots of them to be made, but local US manufacturers are used to make small lots of products such as for early testing or limited runs. And then there's often some sort of local in-house manufacturing step, such as final assembly, installation of software, customization, etc. The US manufacturers are convenient because they're close and you can easily visit them when there's a problem or you need a quick turnaround, but the cost is significantly higher.

      Often the difference isn't necessarily about labor costs. Most of these manufacturers are automated and most of the labor comes from setting things up. The traditional assembly line that wants an unskilled worker is relatively rare.

    29. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      It was a great commercial that essentially said "don't be a jerk". This greatly upset the jerks for some reason.

    30. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      I can count the number of American products I bought in the past five years on that many fingers. I'm willing to bet it's the same for you. Currently, #2 means we still have one factory left, somewhere. And there's another one we could get running in a week if it weren't cheaper to buy shit from China.

      Yeah. It's not that bad.. it's not great, but it's not as bad as you imply..

      The United States is the 3rd largest export economy in the world and the 7th most complex economy according to the Economic Complexity Index (ECI). In 2017, the United States exported $1.25T and imported $2.16T, resulting in a negative trade balance of $910B. In 2017 the GDP of the United States was $19.4T and its GDP per capita was $59.5k.

    31. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by jpaine619 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It was a great commercial that essentially said "don't be a jerk". This greatly upset the jerks for some reason.

      Bullshit. It implied that men are stupid and have to be reminded to not be jerks.. Here's a tip: The guys that are being jerks have been told "Don't be jerks" a million times.. But they're still jerks.. Virtue signaling isn't gonna do shit...

      But hey, you pointed out that there are jerks and they get upset when it's pointed out.. You can go back to your SJW group and brag about how you set the story right... Your task is done..

    32. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chinese electronics engineers are quite capable, me thinks. Instead of paying patent royalties Chinese companies buy replacements from other Chinese companies. e.g.: Instead of using FTDI USBSerial chips and paying royalties Chinese companies but them from WCH. Instead of using Pololu servo motor controllers and paying royalties Chinese companies buy them from HEROIC.

    33. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does the size of one's hands have to do with the number of fingers?

    34. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you are not jerk, just ruffian troll?

    35. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Literally none of the examples you mentioned are general made in the USA when you buy them in Europe.

    36. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      High-end audio gear is usually Japanese, British or German. Rarely from the USA.

    37. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CPUs and aeroplanes are good examples, but I don't think I have ever seen a US-built bus.

    38. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nevermind half of that is confort food manufacturing, which is what keeps it's citizens fatter than the rest of the world.

    39. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a minimum viable size in which a human finger can be biologically configured. Larger hands could support a larger number of such fingers.

    40. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by havana9 · · Score: 1

      I am from Italy. I have three items that are "Made in USA". A Kitchenaid, a pair of headphones and a GE toaster that was a gift for the marriage of my parents. I can attest that USA is exporting things abroad and are normally built to last.
      On the other hand I bought an IKEA (of sweden) kitchen, and the appliances were "Made in Italy" like most of the furniture with a bit of surprise, expecting to get them from asian countries. I think for the wooden parts is a logistic problem because normally kitchens are built just in time so the factory has to be near the customer. But the oven was interesting... because most electric gadgets in IKEA were made in China

    41. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      All the furniture I bought has been made in America, same with my cookware. The cars are made in America, except one came from Japan. My bike was made here. The lumber, including the engineered wood, for the house remodel was made here. The screw and nails were made here as well, because I bought them. The drywall was made here too. The solar panels I put in for the pool were made here but some materials were sourced from China. The appliances were unfortunately made in Germany and South Korea. My lawnmower and weed wacker was made here though as was the air conditioner and heater, and tankless.

      They were "assembled" here- but quite likely much of what you list had most of their components made overseas and then just screwed together in the US just so it can say made in America.

      This is doubly true for cars. If your car is an American brand such as GM, doesn't mean it is made in America. I'm not sure if this statistic is still true- but a decade or so ago, a friend of mine in the car industry told me a really interesting fact. He asked: What Company imports the most cars to the US? The answer was: General Motors. The next question was: What company EXPORTS the most cars out of the US? The answer was: Toyota.

      So, not sure if still true, but in the not so distant past the #1 importer of cars into the US was a Detroit firm and the #1 exporter was a Japanese firm.

      The morale is; if you want to buy an American car, buy a foreign car.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    42. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      What does the size of one's hands have to do with the number of fingers?

      I don't know, but might explain why Donald Trump only has three fingers on each hand.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    43. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      There is a minimum viable size in which a human finger can be biologically configured. Larger hands could support a larger number of such fingers.

      Even a baby can have five fingers though. I've grown 20 times over what I was as a baby. I want 100 fingers on each hand. Preferably before valentines day.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    44. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those RGB LEDs that you need so desperately? THAT is the real problem. Us Americans think we need to buy a bunch of useless shit all the time.

    45. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by chiefcrash · · Score: 1

      Hallmark has outsourced some of the printing, but not all of it. Most of the Hallmark cards I got for Christmas were printed in Kansas...

      Odd fact: while china is doing a lot more of our printing these days, they're doing a lot of it on US-manufactured paper...

      --
      Show me on the 1st Amendment bobblehead where the moderator touched you...
    46. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it can't provide a thing you need, then your need is wrong.


      What is this? An argument for switching to Linux?

    47. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      You mean Silicon Valley technology, right? I'm not aware of any of it having been developed in China.

    48. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by chiefcrash · · Score: 2

      Not really. Doesn't matter where you buy a Post-It note or Gillete razor: it was made in the US...

      Speaking of post-it notes, paper products are one of Europe's top imports from the USA. Right along with machinery, the last thing on the list...

      --
      Show me on the 1st Amendment bobblehead where the moderator touched you...
    49. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the last time America made things was half a century ago?

    50. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why can't the US manage to manufacture a decent car then ?

      They can build space shuttles and SR-71's but their cars are shit.

      Weird.

    51. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Informative

      Japan hasn't been relevant in high end audio for a few decades. Outside of Chord and Meridian, there is nothing from Britain. Germany has Burmester, and that's about it High end is YG, Magico, Von Schweikert, D'Augustino, Krell, Ayre, Cary, Manley, and many, many more - and they are US based. Go to a high end audio show like Rock Mountain AudioFest, or AXPONA and check it out...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    52. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by jbengt · · Score: 1

      The part that was probably made outside of the America would be the compressor, which is the heart of an A/C system.
      And if you buy a window A/C unit or a thru-the-wall PTAC (like they have in many motels & hotels) you can bet it's not Made In America. I know, because of a project funded by the American Reinvenstment and Recovery Act, where we had to specify Made In America wherever possible, and it wasn't possible.
      I also found out on that one that ARRA had a different definition of Made In America than the regular Made In America definition, and that both of those definitions included Made In Canada and Made In Mexico as Made In America.

    53. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by jbengt · · Score: 1

      It also depends on the definition used for the purpose. Simple assembly of a kit is not sufficient, but "Substantial Transformation" may be, even if all the parts & materials comes from outside America (at least for the American Reinvestment & Recovery Act definition) And because of NAFTA, Canada and Mexico could count as America as far as 'Made In America' goes.

    54. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blue bird and Thomas buses

    55. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe a big chunk of our industry advantage with China (and most other nations) is in aircraft. I read Crichtonâ(TM)s âoeAirframeâ years ago, when an aviation manufacturer was excoriated for building a wing factory in Japan. Reason being, wings are the hardest part to build, one Japanese workers can build wings, Japan can build (competing) aircraft. Guess where an American wing factory is open (ing)?

    56. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next to no generic prescription medicines are made in USA any more. The vast majority come from India. The only exceptions I'm aware of are dermatologics, ophthalmics, and vaccines. It's unclear where the feedstocks come from for Indian manufacturers, but China is a common source worldwide of pharmaceutical feedstocks.

    57. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      High end is .... and they are US based. Go to a high end audio show like Rock Mountain AudioFest, or AXPONA and check it out...

      What a surprise. You go to an audio show in Backwater, USA, and you find mostly US based manufacturers.
      You go to an audio show in Munich, Germany, and most of the exhibitors are European.

    58. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by chiefcrash · · Score: 1

      As some folks like to point out: Canada and Mexico are part of (North) America too...

      --
      Show me on the 1st Amendment bobblehead where the moderator touched you...
    59. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did that commercial hit a little too close to home?

    60. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by chiefcrash · · Score: 1

      Gasoline is a consumer product...
      Post-it notes are a consumer product...
      medication is a consumer product...
      Cheap beer is a consumer product....
      Crayola crayons are a consumer product...
      Gillette razors are a consumer product...
      Of the products Whirlpool sells in the U.S., it makes 80 percent in U.S. plants...

      --
      Show me on the 1st Amendment bobblehead where the moderator touched you...
    61. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As is Central America and the Caribbean. Everything north of Colombia is North America.

    62. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Toyota and Honda, (as well as other manufacturers) don't seem to any problem making quality cars in the USA considered they are at the top of the quality listings. In terms of trucks, both Ford and GMC dominant the top quality spots.

      Perhaps you are an idiot.

    63. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never heard of either brand. Are they common in the US?

      In Europe, essentially are buses are European.

    64. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. Doesn't matter where you buy a Post-It note or Gillete razor: it was made in the US...

      So the claim on Gilllette packages that they are made in Germany is a lie? How do they get away with this?

    65. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never heard of any of those US brands.

    66. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stamping presses are almost always German.

    67. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why is nobody outside of North America willing to buy these so-called quality products?

      Toyotas and Hondas sold in Europe are all made in either Europe or Japan and I have never seen a Ford or GMC truck. Before your post, I had no idea Ford made trucks and I had not heard of GMC.

    68. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many of your medicines these days a made in China. That's why it's a joke when the fda says you can't import from Canada (its the same product manufactured in the same place).

    69. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is pretty much how the US treated European IP until the 1900s. At the end of the day developing economies are pretty much all the same.

    70. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      Maybe cross "Gillette razors" off your list?

      https://www.truthinadvertising.org/gillette-summary-action/

      TINA.org investigated a national marketing campaign for Gillette, owned by Procter & Gamble, which is focused on its Boston factory and the people who work there, and found that the company is making the unqualified claim that the Gillette product line is made in the United States. However, the overwhelming majority of Gillette products (as represented on its website) that include origin information on their packaging are not entirely made in the United States. Most of these products are entirely made in foreign countries, such as China, Poland, Brazil, and Mexico, while others contain non-U.S. components. In fact, only a small minority of Gillette products that contain origin information on packaging meet the FTC’s legal definition of made in the United States.

      Bummer.

    71. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      US is the second biggest market behind APAC. Note that APAC has around 3.5 billion consumers, and is just barely larger than the 300 million consumers in the US market.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    72. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Go check Stereophile for a good introduction to high end audio.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    73. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And unless you go for the HIGH high end loudspeakers, you'll find "Made in China" on many of the parts. If you plan on making money from them and not charge $10K+ each, you have to manage costs. So you might design the speaker and build it up here, but the speaker drivers are probably Chinese because it's nearly impossible to get them in any quantity from a US supplier. As a practical matter, speakers that cost less than a couple K$ apiece are almost certainly Chinese except possibly for the design and final assembly.

      Electronics even more so. Yes, stupidly high-end (especially tube) stuff is mostly US and European (and a very few Japanese), but anything an ordinary mortal can afford even in theory (up to a couple K$/piece) is at least assembled from Chinese parts, if not built entirely in China by contract.

    74. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "American" ... built in the Western Hemisphere. Many "American" cars are built in Canada and Mexico. Many parts are made in various South American countries. I had an '80s VW that was built in Westmoreland PA. Yes, it was assembled (and painted - complete with drips and runs) there, but as far as parts available at the dealer were concerned the only truly US-sourced parts were shocks, brake pads, alternator, battery, and a few light bulbs.

    75. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand I bought an IKEA (of sweden) kitchen, and the appliances were "Made in Italy" like most of the furniture with a bit of surprise, expecting to get them from asian countries. I think for the wooden parts is a logistic problem because normally kitchens are built just in time so the factory has to be near the customer. But the oven was interesting... because most electric gadgets in IKEA were made in China

      As for the wooden parts and just-in-time building, I ca assure you that all IKEA kitchen parts are standardized. They swithed to new sizing in their kitchen parts a few years back, but the previous generation was available for 25 years. I.e. if you bought IKEA kitchen in 1990, you could have added a matching cabinet in 2010, and get it yourself from their self-help (term?) warehouse in their store.

    76. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why is nobody outside of North America willing to buy these so-called quality products?

      Toyotas and Hondas sold in Europe are all made in either Europe or Japan and I have never seen a Ford or GMC truck. Before your post, I had no idea Ford made trucks and I had not heard of GMC.

      GMC is not a recognizable brand in Europe, true, but you might have heard about the company itself, called General Motors (that being over 100 years old already).

    77. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, GM owned Opel (a well-known brand in Europe) and its British sister brand Vauxhall for almost 90 years. They don't have a very good reputation, though. They also sold Chevrolet brand cars for a few years, but that was not a very succesful endeavour.

    78. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by Evtim · · Score: 1

      Try searching that old Top Gear episode, where Clarkson talks about just that.
      Number one the US trucks are too large for European cities...

    79. Re:The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      manure manufacture?

    80. Re: The luxury of asking that question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Toyotas and Hondas sold in Europe are all made in either Europe or Japan...

      And? The statement was, "why can't the US manage to manufacture a decent car then?" I listed cars that are made in the US that are considered quality. I think you are implying that if the cars are so good, why are they not exported from the US to Europe. Are you trolling or profoundly stupid.

      It is cheaper to build them in Europe if there is a significant sales volume.

      If the US builds awful cars, why are Honda and Toyota building them in the US, why don't they just export them from Japan? Well, they do for some vehicles with lower sales volume. The cars made in the US, Canada, Mexico, and Japan for the US market all meet the same quality standards.

  3. As opposed to....? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seriously, where else are we going to buy our electronics from?

    1. Re:As opposed to....? by Luthair · · Score: 2

      Pretty much this, there really isn't any alternative unfortunately.

    2. Re:As opposed to....? by sabbede · · Score: 1

      Taiwan (the other China) and Korea? Unless LG makes stuff in China. And Foxconn is Taiwanese but I think they have factories on the mainland. But how do you even know? What electronic device doesn't have at least some components that were made in China?

  4. Right by aleck7 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    20 years late question.

    1. Re:Right by lgw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The context has also changed a lot.

      It used to be believed by reasonable people that communism and capitalism were fundamentally incompatible, and tat capitalism brought democracy along with it. History justified those beliefs, at the time. Sending business to China was seen as a way to subvert the communist/totalitarian system by injecting capitalism.

      However, China has proven that a totalitarian communist system can incorporate a lot of capitalism and just keep on oppressing. I think that changes the answer, at least for some of us.

      Of course, there's also the question of the ethics of globalism vs protectionism, but that's not specific to China.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Indeed. But it's even worse than that. The question as posed doesn't make sense. Quoth the submitter:

      that consumer dollars and euros flowing into the country from abroad is making things worse, not better

      How on earth do you possibly know that? You have access to a parallel universe where China didn't become an electronics manufacturing center? Perhaps you have a delorean? How on earth can you possibly claim to know that Western consumer dollars are making things worse not better?

      You're probably looking at all the fancy shmancy tech Western dollars support - great firewalls, social credit scores, surveillance and tracking technology, etc. What about the flip side - the rising Chinese middle class? The people getting jobs with Chinese electronics giants? I don't mean the manufacturers like Foxconn... more firms like Huwai, Xiaomi, ZTE, etc. Even the Foxconns, as bad as they are, may be a better alternative to rural farm life for unskilled workers. Tens of millions died in Chinese famines not that long ago.

      So you have a few hundred thousand people who get jailed and treated inhumanely, versus hundreds of millions moving into a vaguely middle class lifestyle. How do you weigh the social utility of that tradeoff and unflinchingly conclude that it's negative? How do you assume an authoritarian regime isn't what most people in China want, regardless of how abhorrent it is to Western cultures?

      Nation building doesn't work. Colonialism doesn't work. Mercantilism doesn't work. Of all the choices available, trade and economic prosperity seems by far the best choice. Even if it doesn't bring Western culture with it.

      Let the Chinese people deal with the Chinese government. Keep your nose in your own business.

    3. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You mean the same China who is putting people of certain religions in re-education camps, and who is sacking captured territories? The same China that uses people for medical research... or just sells their organs on the market? The same China making military fortifications as a way to harass ships and claim territory that isn't theirs?

      Sorry. I won't buy Chinese if I can help it. It can mean one less missile aimed at my kids, one less bullet aimed at a Western soldier. I refuse to support a totalitarian government which would commit (and has commited) genocide of Japan and the surrounding PacRim region, given the chance.

      If you are Han, keep your social credit score high, and toe the line, you will do decently in China. If you are not of the "master race", your fate will be way different on the mainland.

    4. Re:Right by swillden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      However, China has proven that a totalitarian communist system can incorporate a lot of capitalism and just keep on oppressing.

      I think China has proven that a totalitarian communist system can incorporate a lot of capitalism and just keep on oppressing for a while. Xi Jinping has been seriously cracking down, true, but I think it's still too soon to count out the rising middle class. The problem is that for capitalism to work you have to give people a fair degree of economic freedom, and that makes them begin to expect quite a bit of social freedom as well.

      How long will it take? That's hard to say. Chinese culture is quite different from Western culture, and especially American culture. We have a streak of independence and disrespect for authority that they largely lack (or flip it around, they have a respect for social good and authority that we lack). So it's a given that China will never mirror us. But I think they're going to move much further in that direction and that totalitarian control will be shaken off, due to capitalism.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    5. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If their system is really a superior system for the Chinese people and they're happy, then fine as long as it stays inside their borders, but China has its fingers in many places outside their borders and it's obvious that they have expansionist aspirations. You might wanna preach to the CCP that colonialism, empire building and mercantilism doesn't work because it doesn't look like they got the message.

      If authoritarianism is so great, then surely they should be able to implement and sustain it without charity from the west.
      As far as keeping to our own business, NOT buying from Chinese companies would be doing just that. We don't owe China shit, not sure why you think so unless you're a wumao or maybe a noble in the heavenly dynasty, in which case i doubt you give a shit what the dirty peasants think anyway.

      China has been in a fight with the west all this time, but it's only recently that the west has been waking up to that fact. The CCP tools wil predictably play the victim card every chance it gets.

    6. Re:Right by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Nothing will happen any time soon because for most Chinese people things are improving rapidly, and they are are happy about it. I've seen the house where my wife grew up - it's made of stone, no windows, no plumbing... And now her mother lives in a seven story mansion, as do most of her old neighbours.

      The Communist Party knows that things will have to keep changing though, if they want to avoid the firing squad forever. It will be interesting to see which direction they go with it. In some ways Hong Kong is an experiment for them, to see what the mainland's future could be like.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Right by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Conditions for most Chinese people have improved immeasurably in the last few decades. Factory jobs are sought after, the conditions are pretty good now too because there is so much competition for good workers. The young are rejecting the old "996" model (work from 9 AM to 9 PM, 6 days a week) seeing opportunities in education and new industries.

      Economic development brings social development and liberalization.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re: Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the treatment of prisoners of conscience that really concerns me, since reading about it recently, every time I think about buying something from AliExpress, I generally end up thinking "maybe not".

    9. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Capitalism is just as incompatible with democracy as communism. It needs heavy regulation and vigorous defending of freedom, or it simply becomes fascism.

    10. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people seem to miss that the Chinese government seems to be absolutely intent on ensuring that they build a stable country, and that probably means that in some instances they have to be heavy handed with dissent.

      The alternative is a lot worse, probably for all of us, for lots of reasons (tech/rare earths/etc drying up given most of that is in china).

      I suspect nobody wants an unstable china at civil unrest/war with itself.

      Pollution needs to be tackled though over there however.

    11. Re:Right by lgw · · Score: 1

      I think China has proven that a totalitarian communist system can incorporate a lot of capitalism and just keep on oppressing for a while. Xi Jinping has been seriously cracking down, true, but I think it's still too soon to count out the rising middle class. The problem is that for capitalism to work you have to give people a fair degree of economic freedom, and that makes them begin to expect quite a bit of social freedom as well.

      That sounded reasonable 20 and 40 years ago, too, but sadly there's no evidence to support this belief.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    12. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happened in the last few years? The first few searches I got about China's working conditions, I get things from 2016, 17 talking about how conditions are still pretty horrible

      https://www.theguardian.com/bu...

      https://www.theepochtimes.com/...

    13. Re: Right by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Sending business to China was seen as a way to subvert the communist/totalitarian system by injecting capitalism.

      We'll never know what Nixon/Kissinger/et al's true motives were for laying the groundwork that created this monster.

    14. Re: Right by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      I refuse to support a totalitarian government which would commit (and has commited) genocide of Japan

      You were spot-fucking-on until you totally reversed course with the above gem... unless you meant it the other way around?? The Japanese have a smaller leg to stand on than anyone on the planet if you want to start talking about genocide.

    15. Re: Right by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Conditions for most Chinese people have improved immeasurably in the last few decades.

      Thanks to the safety nets, no doubt.

    16. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Capitalism, Communism, Capitalism, and every other -ism you want to propose are all just theories. They look nice on paper and debaters can score points string together the standard tropes associated with each one, but all in all they really don't exist. All governments break down to this: How much power does the elite 9ruling or just plain moneyed) have over the non-elite?

      Please do not haul out that old saw about Capitalism defeating Communism. The West is currently returning to a series of totalitarian governments-by-the-elite, just with better P.R. and a thick gloss of cheap, shiny consumer goods and mindless entertainment for the proletariat. At the very least, China is meeting the west coming the other way. They started as a totalitarian government and are now somewhat softened by the sheer weight of all the Stuff they are responsible for.

      The world needs more watch dogs keeping an eye on the elite, making them behave and stopping the abuses of power. That means in the U.S. just as much as in China, Russia, Iran and everywhere else.

      Without good people watching the power, the rest of us are screwed.

    17. Re: Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you need to do to turn a capitalist nation to a fascist one is have the 1% make a deal with the government. This scares the shit out of me.

    18. Re: Right by lgw · · Score: 1

      All you need to do to turn a capitalist nation to a fascist one is have the 1% make a deal with the government. This scares the shit out of me.

      That's not how fascism happens, or what it is, outside of political propaganda. Fascism is a central planning system where the government controls all important business, but allow the "owners" to keep the profits (well, sometimes: Hitler imposed as 102% tax rate on corporate profits for anything war-related). It's a pretty bad deal for the 1%, and only looks appealing when compared to communism.

      Fascism is a system that applets to a dictator looking to take over the economy while minimizing resistance from the 1%. It's not a system that particularly appeals to the 1%.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    19. Re: Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not how fascism happens, or what it is, outside of political propaganda.

      You say that, but then you confirm what the GP said right after.

      Fascism is a central planning system where the government controls all important business

      ...which happens when the 1% (important businesses) make a deal with the government. The thing to remember is that you don't need all or even a majority of that 1% to comply. You could have 9 1%ers refuse, but that last 1 decides to make a deal, and the government kills the other 9 and gives the 1 a monopoly. That one might even do so believing he's doing the "right" thing (the path to hell is paved with good intentions and all that)

      Before you say "why not just kill all the 1%ers", consider that society still needs 1%ers to operate: they're the captains of industry, after all. They're Atlas holding up that globe. We need at least some of them on our side, willing to work for us (the government) to keep things running and to run things in the new regime!

      I know it's nice to imagine that people working for/under an authoritarian regime are doing so under duress/coercion, but THAT is political propaganda.

      What actually happens is that most who didn't want to work for the government would have fled, resisted, or died trying either. Those who remained and did their jobs properly, did so willingly. Even when they were "just following orders", they were WILLINGLY following those orders, and it doesn't hold up as a defense/excuse to whatever crimes they committed while "just following orders"

      It's a pretty bad deal for the 1%,.

      Bad deal or not doesn't matter. In a free capitalist society, people are free to make deals regarding their own capital. The 1%ers often said this to justify how they could "fleece" or "price gouge" the poor (according to certain 1%ers there is no such thing as fleecing or price gouging... it's just supply and demand! They charge whatever the market will bear!)

      and only looks appealing when compared to communism

      Well, 1%ers are often scared shitless about communism. And as above, they're free to make whatever deals they want, so if they're that scared, it's reasonable to assume that they thought those deals with government were great. They might even thought they're doing a great thing not just for themselves, but for society.

      Fascism is a system that applets to a dictator looking to take over the economy while minimizing resistance from the 1%. It's not a system that particularly appeals to the 1%.

      As above with bad deals, whether it's "appealing" or not doesn't matter. That doesn't stop some fraction of them from drinking the Kool Aid. And as said in beginning, you don't need a majority of 1% to find it appealing.

    20. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great response. Add to that:

      The US has almost twice as many people in prison as China--in many cases in what could be called barbaric conditions--with 1/4 the population. If you are a US citizen, this is the business your nose should be in.

    21. Re: Right by lgw · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but I think you'd be hard pressed to find anyone controlling vast inherited wealth who would willingly part with any control over that wealth. Power is pretty addictive, and seldom relinquished.

      Most US politicians - the Establishment - are owned thoroughly by the very rich, and would not act against their interests. Someone outside the Establishment who wanted to seize power would be going against both the will of the common man and the will of the wealthy and powerful. Not going to lose sleep over that possibility - he wouldn't live long enough to matter.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    22. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the technology China was given or has stolen, with the economic clout the short sighted Rich have bequeathed them in the name of profit and efficiency, and the crippling of the USA industrial might they are pretty much free to oppress almost anybody they want with little fear of retribution. So why are the ethics of this situation suddenly important? Looks like delayed outrage to me. Oh, yes. Don't forget the prisoner organ transplant horrors, also. Why does it take so long to react and what can we do now?

    23. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I very much doubt that 99% of the people that are "middle class" in China went from a stone house with no windows to a 7 story mansion, unless they are all simply renting rooms in it. They are very much an extreme exception and not a rule.

    24. Re: Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps, but I think you'd be hard pressed to find anyone controlling vast inherited wealth who would willingly part with any control over that wealth

      I doubt that, seeing as inheriting wealth is not the same as inheriting values. The father could be the most noble person who built the business empire, but the son could be a deadbeat who ruins it.

      The human mind is good at rationalizing things. The 1%er who decides go against everything his ancestors stood for to make a deal with government can come up with all sorts of reasons why they're doing it. He'll tell himself he's not giving up control. Or maybe he is, but he's doing it for a really really good reason.

      If they fail to convince themselves on their own, there's always propaganda to convince people to act against their own interest.

      Power is pretty addictive, and seldom relinquished.

      Power is also sought after, and I think you'd be hard pressed to NOT find someone amongst the 1% who wish to get more of it, despite all the wealth they already have.

      Furthermore, wealth isn't the same as power, and many 1%ers don't believe they have power, and/or don't believe their wealth translate to that much power. They think they're just "normal" people. Some might even think they are the oppressed ones, and they're just trying to reclaim something they're entitled to when they make a deal with government (whether that's true or not doesn't matter, if they believe it, that's how they'll see it)

      Most US politicians - the Establishment - are owned thoroughly by the very rich, and would not act against their interests.

      That just means the US is not/has not been a very capitalist nation for a while, and that there's another way capitalist nations can be corrupted: bought and sold, turning into an oligarchy.

      Someone outside the Establishment who wanted to seize power would be going against both the will of the common man and the will of the wealthy and powerful.

      First, there are 1%ers in the Establishment too, so it doesn't have to be "someone outside" that try to seize power. The guy from the inside can claim he's just cleaning up corruption or something like that (see: China's Xi Jinping)

      Second, the interests of the common man and of the wealthy and powerful are not always aligned. One can always engage in populism to turn the common man against the "elites".

    25. Re: Right by lgw · · Score: 1

      I doubt that, seeing as inheriting wealth is not the same as inheriting values. The father could be the most noble person who built the business empire, but the son could be a deadbeat who ruins it.

      You're thinking of the nouveau riche. No one in the American upper class has a living relative who has ever worked for a living - pretty much by definition. The upper class is the most rigidly conformist and tradition-bound group in America. Their whole social fabric is based on locking everyone into the same set of unchanging values. IMO evil values, but quite good at retaining wealth and power.

      many 1%ers don't believe they have power, and/or don't believe their wealth translate to that much power. They think they're just "normal" people. Some might even think they are the oppressed ones

      You are correct. And they are correct. They are not the ones in power here. Heck, most 1%ers have jobs!

      First, there are 1%ers in the Establishment too, so it doesn't have to be "someone outside" that try to seize power. The guy from the inside can claim he's just cleaning up corruption or something like that (see: China's Xi Jinping)

      I take your point, but it's been the same upper class culture, and basically the exact same families, since the Robber Barons. They seem to have worked it out. And since they're in charge, it's very hard to see what power any one of them would use to overthrow all the others. Certainly not the power of the US government, thoroughly owned as they are by that group as a whole. What's a guy with 5 Senators going to do against a group with 90?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    26. Re:Right by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 2

      "A few hundred thousand .." ? It looks like your count may be a bit low. Here's a report just about a single ethnic group in China:

      https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/08/22/chinas-mass-internment-camps-have-no-clear-end-in-sight/

      Around 1 million Uighurs have disappeared without trial. Worse may come.

    27. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and that capitalism brought democracy along with it. History justified those beliefs, at the time.

      Linked perhaps, but not strongly. Democracy of late is getting the shit kicked out of it due to noise, misinformation, tribalism, and shear laziness.

      Part of this is fixable. Did you vote? Well you get 10% off your taxes. You should have to pass a quiz on objective facts from current events to get that discount. In short, create a small, yet sufficient profit motive to get informed and vote.

    28. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chinese new middle class has several young generations that have not experienced a major economic slump, and won't know how to manage when a real crisis hits. Neither will the Communist Party. The Chinese internal and export economies are also very diverse, so if demand for one product falls, they have lots of other stuff to sell. They are also busily building infrastructure to counter logistics bottlenecks.

      For a time, the Soviet Union did rather well, too: even when stagnation hit during Brezhnev's era, the standard of living was comparable (though really smart people were already aware, that the differences were getting stark); even after the Soviet Union started the war in Afghanistan in late 1970s, and even despite the constant shortages (aka The Deficit) outside Moscow and Saint Petersburg, which were not severe, but affected everyday life for all common people. The Baikal–Amur Mainline (BAM) was begun and parts of it were in use already, and space station Mir was launched in early 1986. Until Chernobyl happened on that same fateful year of 1986. And the Armenian earthquake in 1988. By that time, the standard of living compared to the West had fallen back severely. By the end of the decade, the ruble suffered deep inflation, and there were shortages of even the basics.

      What may happen across the world, is, that many markets will get saturated with stuff as said markets mature, and many people will stop buying new gadgets at the current rate. While planned obsolescence is built into many products, consumers will ultimately choose the ones that will last longer for them. Companies stateside and in Europe must begin exploring emerging markets other than China.

    29. Re: Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it isnt about the 1% giving away control, it's about the 1%ers telling government what to do and government doing it. Do you know of any really wealthy people who love to get power increased?

    30. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now her mother lives in a seven story mansion, as do most of her old neighbours.

      "Mansion" likely isnt the correct word here. But assuming it is...

      Is the old woman cleaning/maintaining a seven story mansion by herself?
      Is it correct she does not permanently own the land, per the law?
      How's the build quality? Chinese friends of mine have interesting stories...

      On the other hand, if it's a shared, co-operative building, why not call it a condo/apartment?

  5. The Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Free Market does not care about ethics. Never has. Never will.

    1. Re: The Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's probably why he's asking people here, instead of asking the market.

    2. Re:The Free Market by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Working for pay is ethical. Paying for work is ethical. Both are major essential parts of the Free Market.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    3. Re: The Free Market by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the overly-simplistic assessment.

  6. Geopolitics in full flow by Stokey · · Score: 0

    Is it a binary answer to the question? No. 1. China wants to grow, build, raise its peopleâ(TM)s standard of living (I know, this is arbitrary) 2. China is a threat to the current political norm and will destroy the status quo (I know this is also arbitrary) So... pick your poison. And this is, by now a very well trodden path of globalised angst, accept a race to the bottom fo price or live with the higher prices of local manufacture. The ethics question is banal and hides a more insipid agenda. Stoked

    --
    Natsu gusa-ya, Tsuwamono domo-ga, Yume no ato
    1. Re:Geopolitics in full flow by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Well, the fact of the matter is that binary answers would still be one too many. They're a threat either way, and it's as unethical to buy from them as to boycott them, for the very same reasons. China is a humanitarian crisis. But we have bigger problems here right now.

  7. no, it isn't.. but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    not any more or less 'ethical' than buying gasoline or plastics made from oil from the middle-east.

  8. hmmm by zlives · · Score: 1

    Its a valid question from a western POV, however historically when was China this "gentler, freer, more prosperous"?
    I think any one culture cannot impose their ideology on another and come away feeling good.
    Chinese people Are more prosperous, free, and have always been gentle. can't say the same about their government but that is an internal Chinese issue.
    same can be said about other cultures we seem to be at an odds with.

    1. Re:hmmm by postbigbang · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Saying "... that is an internal Chinese issue" is a key point of discussion. That number is about 1/5th of the entire world's population. To ignore 1/5th of humanity and how they're evolving is an enormous mistake.

      The "eastern" point of view is becoming much like the "western" point of view, with onerous twists, like mass speech control, and enormous population shifts. Add to this, hundreds of thousands of encamped Western Chinese Muslims. Huge military growth. Ancient unsolved problems, like Taiwan and the madness of Tibetan sovereignty.

      The value of life is much different than the "western" legacies. Those western cultures decimated Africa, held huge pogroms for the past millennia, and have polluted and fouled the planet. The Chinese are just catching up to western mistakes, and learning how to amplify control for party success.

      There is no "we are at odds with". The planet is very small. You can fly anywhere in about a day. Radio, satellites, the Internet, all link us together. But there is also a common morality that should link us together, and we don't really think about that. Instead, it's the job of most politicians to factionalize us and make us feel our tribal urges, fattening military budgets, and scraping the cream for the kleptocrats. The Chinese face the same wealth disparities as westerners face. Their freedom is questionable and freedom/liberty are measured in ways that thinkers agree upon.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    2. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is also a common morality that should link us together, and we don't really think about that. Instead, it's the job of most politicians to factionalize us and make us feel our tribal urges, fattening military budgets, and scraping the cream for the kleptocrats.

      That's some mighty fine rainbows and lollipops you have there. Unfortunately, there are people in the world who do not think the way you do, and they will take your lollipops by force. Defense is necessary. Ask Crimea Ukranians. Ask Tibet.

    3. Re:hmmm by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      DIdn't say defense was optional.

      I can say that we spend vast sums of money on military endeavors that yield very little.

      Dissing a reduction in military spending does not imbue "lollipops", but it does twig insecurities in people that would choose violence first, rather than diplomacy.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  9. The world is not perfect by execthis · · Score: 1

    The world is not perfect. The United States is *far* from perfect and getting worse in many ways. But none of this excuses China from egregious rights violations so yes, there absolutely is an ethical responsibility to avoid purchasing products made in China, just as there is with Israel.

    1. Re:The world is not perfect by iNaya · · Score: 1

      How is avoiding purchasing products made in China going to help fix their egregious rights violations?

      --
      The Unicode standard is over 20 years old. Why does Slashdot not support it?
    2. Re:The world is not perfect by msauve · · Score: 0

      "How is avoiding purchasing products made in China going to help fix their egregious rights violations?"

      Instead of people having shitty jobs, they simply won't have jobs. Liberal guilt fixed.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    3. Re:The world is not perfect by markdavis · · Score: 0

      >"there absolutely is an ethical responsibility to avoid purchasing products made in China, just as there is with Israel."

      Did you just compare the human rights/freedom situation in China to the free/democratic ISRAEL?? Seriously?

      https://object.cato.org/sites/... (USA 17, Israel 49, China 135)

      https://www.heritage.org/index... (ISA 12, Israel 27, China 100)

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... (Israel #1 in middle east)

      https://www.cnbc.com/2017/03/2... (Israel #10 of happiest people on earth. USA #14. China- not even on list.)

      https://www.jewishvirtuallibra...

    4. Re:The world is not perfect by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 0

      Did you just compare the human rights/freedom situation in China to the free/democratic ISRAEL??

      We should be honoured the top post statement.

      US Congress Critter Rep. Ilhan Omar is participating on Slashdot to ramp up her 2020 Presidential campaign!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    5. Re:The world is not perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So you're fine with Israel's oppression and human rights abuses but not China's? Where do you draw the line exactly?
      If a country has worse abuses than China can we start buying chinese goods again?

    6. Re:The world is not perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did you just compare the human rights/freedom situation in China to the free/democratic ISRAEL?? Seriously?

      Where would you like to draw the 'moral line'? At what point does human suffering become acceptable when compared to another?

    7. Re:The world is not perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should just bomb them. Conservative desires fixed.

    8. Re: The world is not perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd consider china more ethical than israel.

    9. Re:The world is not perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Israel shot 17,000 unarmed protesters last year - I haven't heard of China doing anything like that!

    10. Re:The world is not perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If everybody stopped purchasing anything from China, it's likely there would be a revolution there.

    11. Re: The world is not perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      typical sjw, anything musl*m, bk*cks, lgb*q, j*ws are up on the pedestal, holy, and can do no wrong while white, china, christians are pos and totally evil

    12. Re:The world is not perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that how capitalism is supposed to work? Some company (in this case China) does evil and consumers (in this case including non-Chinese corporations) are going to stop buying from them, because they do not agree. So then China has to fix the problem to make customers return.

    13. Re:The world is not perfect by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      >"there absolutely is an ethical responsibility to avoid purchasing products made in China, just as there is with Israel."

      Did you just compare the human rights/freedom situation in China to the free/democratic ISRAEL?? Seriously?

      https://object.cato.org/sites/... (USA 17, Israel 49, China 135)

      https://www.heritage.org/index... (ISA 12, Israel 27, China 100)

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... (Israel #1 in middle east)

      https://www.cnbc.com/2017/03/2... (Israel #10 of happiest people on earth. USA #14. China- not even on list.)

      https://www.jewishvirtuallibra...

      I remember once a discussion on the American civil war and I made the comment that as much as I disagreed with the Southern position many things; I agree on the right of people deciding who rules them, so if the majority of people South wanted independence they had the right to Independence.

      Someone quickly pointed out my obvious mistake, that the black slaves didn't get a say, and would not have been in favour of splitting from the North. They were ABSOLUTELY right, and the fact that they didn't get a say completely invalidated the South's call for independence.

      I think your promoting of Israel as "10th happiest nation", etc is making the exact same mistake. You're completely ignoring all the people living in apartheid in Palestine, you're completely ignoring the daily human rights abuses against the Palestinians, etc.

      The European Jews living in Israel may be having a grand time and enjoying all sorts of rights, but the original inhabitants of that land are not having such a great time. Millions live in poverty and apartheid in Israel. Their voice deserves to be represented; just like the blacks in the Southern US deserved to be represented. The same human rights mistakes that happened with the colonization of the Americas and South Africa are happening today with the colonization of Israel and Palestine.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    14. Re: The world is not perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      F*ck the dirty Palestinian m0slem scum

      Although I'm not a big fan of the kyk3s at least they know how to deal with the sand n1ggers.

      F*ck 'em.......

    15. Re:The world is not perfect by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"You're completely ignoring all the people living in apartheid in Palestine, you're completely ignoring the daily human rights abuses against the Palestinians, etc."

      I am not ignoring it, I simply pointed out that comparing Israel to China is like comparing a kitten to a tiger. They might both be felines, but there are some HUGE differences between them.

    16. Re: The world is not perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unarmed because they already let go of their burning tires and molotov cocktails? Running out of rockets doesn't count either.

  10. "ethical"? by markdavis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >"Is It Ethical To Purchase Electronics Products Made In China?"

    Here are some reply questions: Do we even have a choice? Exactly what can I buy that isn't made in China? What is the proposed solution? Ban imports from China? Is THAT "ethical"? Drive prices up so high on products that poorer people here can't afford to buy anything? Is THAT "ethical"? Is it "ethical" to try and interfere with another sovereign nation's political and operational process? Even if we restricted trade based on "ethicality", how effective would that be? (We are far from their only market) And how much influence would we THEN have? Is there some difference between electronics/IT and any other products we buy from China? (Other than perhaps spyware, which has nothing to do with human rights inside THEIR borders).

    1. Re:"ethical"? by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who tries to buy goods that are at least not assembled in China. I keep telling him to start a blog to help other people do the same, but he won't do it. And as a shameless transition to a video clip, he's Jewish.

    2. Re:"ethical"? by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Informative

      What is the proposed solution? Ban imports from China? Is THAT "ethical"? Drive prices up so high on products that poorer people here can't afford to buy anything? Is THAT "ethical"?

      I think the answer is to place tariffs on goods from other nations based on how workers are treated in those countries. If it's legal and/or permitted to pay them slave wages, we should put sufficient tariffs on the products that it's not economically beneficial to pay them slave wages. If they get something in between that and an actual living wage, then the tariff should be somewhere in between, too.

      It's not a perfect solution because that alone will actually encourage some employers to pay slave wages, but it's not really feasible to place those tariffs on a per-corporation basis, and the goal is to put pressure on the governments.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:"ethical"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you must do, is accept your guilt, accept your fault, and accept that only through the grace and guidance of the most reverand Media can your ignorant and sinful soul be saved.

    4. Re:"ethical"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is ethical when the goods are designed in China and made in China.

      It's ethical to buy goods that were designed in USA, made in USA

      It's ethical to buy goods that are planed in USA, harvested in USA, served in USA.

      The crap - designed by ... in California/Texas/Florida/Washington, made in China (and sold with a markup) isn't.

      The crap - made in Japan, assembled in USA isn't.

      The crap - made in Germany, assembled in Mexico, sold in USA isn't.

      Some products designed and made in China have much more capabilities and are much better working and/or come without spyware than the designed in USA, made in China, sold to you with markup and suppository in USA shit.

    5. Re:"ethical"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do we even have a choice? Exactly what can I buy that isn't made in China?

      Lots of things, and that would grow heavily if suddenly you couldn't buy anything in China. It's not like China is the only place that can make things.

      What is the proposed solution? Ban imports from China? Is THAT "ethical"?

      One could argue it's ethical to ban imports, but it'd be enough if (1) your or I chose to stop buying from China, (2) the US governments did the same, (3) other countries governments did the same, etc. That's the simple solution: if you're doing something unethical, stop doing it.

      Drive prices up so high on products that poorer people here can't afford to buy anything? Is THAT "ethical"?

      The real answer to the question is, when products that are needed by poor are too expensive, is there a system in place to help subsidize the cost? If not, then your question is sort of irrelevant because we've already got plenty of products that the poor need, and they're dying for inability to pay. If we have such a system, then it's merely the concern of how to pay for what will invariably be greater costs as prices rise. If you're talking about products that are merely wanted but not needed, it's not really an ethical issue that the poor not get all that they want so is irrelevant.

      Is it "ethical" to try and interfere with another sovereign nation's political and operational process? Even if we restricted trade based on "ethicality", how effective would that be? (We are far from their only market) And how much influence would we THEN have?

      Is it "ethical" to force-ably harvest the organs of your prisoners? Should we have at least an incredibly minimal standard of ethics when it comes to who we do business with? Is the fact that our influence is potentially marginal justification to ignore all the unethical behavior of potential business partners? I think the answer to all that is pretty simple. Having a code of conduct* that concerns one's ethical relationship to others isn't tied to some idea, necessarily, of forcing change on another person. It's all about doing what you think is right. So, at what level do we start to refuse doing business with murderers?

      Is there some difference between electronics/IT and any other products we buy from China? (Other than perhaps spyware, which has nothing to do with human rights inside THEIR borders).

      This is "News For Nerds". The question applies to all things, but often with electronics/IT it's clear who the manufacturer is and therefore you have much more of an opportunity to judge whether to buy from a certain country or not for that government's behavior. Never the less, it'd seem here to word it in terms of electronics makes sense rather than asking about all the other ways in which you could buy Chinese made goods.

      PS - Even having stated all the above, I don't really support not buying from China or a ban. Mostly, I don't support it because while in principle I know continuing to support the Communist Party by buying Chinese made goods is unethical, it's also the best way to raise many Chinese people out of poverty. The ends don't justify the means, but precisely because I don't think the desired goal--ending organ harvesting, among other things--can be reached without unified support--boycotts on the scale of government involvement--, my ethical concerns don't absolutely trump the realization of the rest of the good that is happening for the people of China. That's no excuse and one could call it rationalizing. I honestly don't know of a solution or an answer.

      * The personal kind.

    6. Re:"ethical"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So as the USA pays minimal wage that is below an actual living wage, the rest of the world should put on a tariffs on goods from the USA.
      is that what your telling us?

    7. Re:"ethical"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could buy a new keyboard from China. One that DOESN'T randomly CAPITALISE words as you're TYPING

    8. Re:"ethical"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the soft racism of the lefty. Look at it closely. The paternalistic, moralizing, white man that thinks he knows what's best for those poor brown people in china.

      The sickening populism that inflicts useless taxes on his fellow man. Tariffs take money out of the pockets of the needy for no reason at all.

      He's no worse than the dipshit redhat magatards.

      Horseshoe theory is real.

    9. Re:"ethical"? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So as the USA pays minimal wage that is below an actual living wage, the rest of the world should put on a tariffs on goods from the USA.
      is that what your telling us?

      Yep. If it's good for the goose, it's good for the gander. I'm not proud of American wages or employment.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:"ethical"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely.

    11. Re:"ethical"? by stephenmac7 · · Score: 1

      Brilliant! Now those "wage slaves" will have no option but do work that's even less desirable. Why do you think they are working in electronics manufacturing? They would rather do that work than any other option they have. Do you presume to know better than they do about where they should work?

      You've also just made electronics (and whatever else you presume worthy of virtue-signaling tariffs) less affordable for the poor in the tariff-imposing countries.

      Two birds, one stone.

      Tariffs are only good for one thing: bestowing political favors.

      --
      "No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session." -- Judge Gideon J. Tucker
    12. Re:"ethical"? by smoot123 · · Score: 1

      I think the answer is to place tariffs on goods from other nations based on how workers are treated in those countries.

      That's cutting off their noses to spite their faces. They don't pay their workers what you think they ought to so you cut off the market for their goods so they employ even fewer workers?

      If you're trying to improve those workers' lots in life, that's working at cross purposes. "Here, we're going to subject you to some temporary hardship and difficulty but trust us, you'll appreciate the eventual outcome." I don't know about you friend but I wouldn't.

    13. Re:"ethical"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you should buy and read: The Choice: A Fable of Free Trade and Protectionism
      It's really short, but very insightful, easy and enjoyable to follow.

    14. Re:"ethical"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The poor in the USA would be considered wealthy in a number of other nations. Obesity is a better problem than malnutrition. When I was in Peru, the poorer parts did not have potable water, did not have potable water, brownouts happened every week. Minimum wage here would be a killing there. Conditions in China, I am not as familiar with, but comparing USA minimum wage to 3rd world countries, is not a serious comparison.

      Posting AC because this is not a popular opinion.

  11. Wrong question. by YukariHirai · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For huge numbers of end consumers, there's not much choice. With wage stagnation and general costs of living generally increasing, the cheap Chinese-made thing is all they can afford. If there even is an option made somewhere else. Assuming the other options aren't made by companies being just as exploitative.

    The real question should be, "is it ethical for corporations to outsource all their manufacturing to China?"

  12. STAR WNRS! by dbrueck · · Score: 1

    Electronics? No, totally unethical. For shame! Now excuse my while I go play with my totally legit Lego.

    https://legoways.com/wp-conten...

    1. Re:STAR WNRS! by turp182 · · Score: 1

      I bet these are produced at Lego factories in China (or copies of the manufacturing hardware used in China). They come with the custom springs, tubes, and non-rectangular things and have the same extra pieces, just without the company logo (probably a check box). Stickers are the same as well, mostly.

      Lego used to be produced only in Europe. Now China and Mexico are primary production areas.

      They had no qualms about moving production to reduce costs (but still charge $$$$), and I have no qualms about purchasing the comical off brands as the quality is the same (they come with the same instructions but with a knock off cover, but they aren't bagged in numbered bags).

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
  13. Data is needed by guruevi · · Score: 1

    Where is the data that the Chinese government is doing worse than eg during Tiananmen. Sure they have cracked down on "dissent" but that's partially because we've been politically rather quiet the last few decades because we wanted them to purchase our debt. I think China is all around better off, even though their politics still suck, society there has become markedly more "liberal" although still very much far left.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    1. Re:Data is needed by Knightman · · Score: 2

      Uhm, there are a lot of things going on in China that's fsck up.

      For example:
      China's hidden camps
      Organ harvesting in China
      Mass sterilization in China

      Just go to google and start typing china forced to see the common theme.

      --
      --- Reality doesn't care about your opinions, it happens anyway and if you are in the way you'll get squished.
    2. Re:Data is needed by guruevi · · Score: 0

      I agree, my point was that although still fucked up, it's a lot better than China in the 20th century. The summary makes it sound like they've gotten worse - physically crushing dissent on public media is no longer acceptable in their society. They're still politically on the far left so squashing dissent is kind of the natural go-to (see Stalin, Cuba, Twitter etc) and a political necessity to keep those in power from being overthrown.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  14. Missing from TFS ... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... "Sent from my iPhone."

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Missing from TFS ... by Mitreya · · Score: 1

      ... "Sent from my iPhone."

      Apple products typically say "Designed by Apple in California. Assembled in China". So that makes it ok, it is at least semi-ethical.

  15. Better question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A better question would be can you purchase any electronic products that wasn't specifically completely made, assembled or constructed with Chinesium anywhere?

  16. No. by AHuxley · · Score: 0

    Its not ethical to support any Communist government in any way.
    Try nations that are more supporting of freedom.
    Like South Korea, Taiwan the real China, Canada, Ireland, parts of the EU.
    Design in the USA, find a better place that likes US freedoms to place a production line.
    With robots and much more advanced complex design work, a lot of great nations that support freedom can be more competitive.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  17. Re: Pepridge Farms Remembers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be at least 40 to get that reference kids.

  18. Just give it a rest. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you want to be "ethical" and avoid products or raw materials from countries you don't agree with you're going to have to live with these trade-offs.


    • Be naked, the vast majority of clothes are made in places like Thailand or Bangledesh.

    • Have no electronics. Even if they aren't assembled in China or some other country people don't approve of, your electronics are likely to contain a rare earth metal mined from some place people don't like.

    • Not drive a car, use public transportation, eat food produced with the above or basically do anything. All these things use the above in some manner, so you're still "unethical". You can't be pure.

    So really, all you people that want to be "ethical", go live in a cave somewhere, don't bring anything with you, and don't request help from the outside world because we all rely on the above "unethical" things. Believe me, you'll be happier you're now independent in your cave, we'll all be happier with you gone.

    1. Re:Just give it a rest. by YukariHirai · · Score: 1

      Of course, as with any other stance, it's ultimately down to a question of just how much one cares to, or can afford to, or can stand to, or is practical, take it.

      Vegan? There's precious little made that doesn't involve bits of some dead animal at some point in its manufacture, even if we exclude oil.

      Gun control? It's generally accepted that it's a practical necessity for there to be at least some level of civilian firearm ownership, opinion just differs on where to draw what lines.

  19. I'm trying as best as I can to avoid Maid in Chian by TigerPlish · · Score: 2

    I'm really trying my best to avoid Made in China.

    Need labelmaker? Got a 1977 Dymo 1570 embosser for almost spare change. I'm not giving China (or Dymo) a red fucking cent. Refills? I buy vintage from ebay. Seriously, a few 9' rolls should last a lifetime.

    Somehow I lost my 30-year old Stanley measuring tape. Instead of getting one from Home Depot (made in China) I got an old Powerlock II from Ebay. Works fine.

    Need an umbrella after the handle on my Totes went to shit (and the "warranty replacements died like that too")? Bought a Fox, made in England. I'm not giving China (or totes) a red fucking cent. So what if it cost 4x what a Totes costs. It'll last 4x longer.

    Where they got me is the phones. Or "new" things. But if there's even a remote chance I can get Thing X that's old and made anywhere but china, I'll buy it.

    It's not really just Fuck China, it's more "Fuck the Companies that Manufacture in China, are based Here and don't even pay taxes."

    That's what voting with your wallet means. It would've been easier to get these things New, but no. Fuck 'em.

    I would like to think more people are thinking like this. SOme of the folks I work with do. Some of my friends do too.

    If you can afford it, don't buy China. Seriously. Don't. Fuck the companies who manufacture in China where it hurts them.

    This is not for everyone. Most people want it NAO NAO NAO DAMMIT! WAAAH! Fuck that. Patience is rewarded with sweet things.

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
  20. Ethical is a loaded question by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    It's not like there are a lot of options outside of Taiwan or South Korea for electronics.

    The real question should be "Is it safe to buy electronics from China?"

    Another good question would be "Is it safe to buy food from China?" Large amounts of pork and chicken products are processed in China, with 2 boat trips for the products.

  21. Ethical to Purchase from the US? by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 4, Informative

    By European/Canadian standards you make the same argument that it is unethical to purchase products from the US where workers are paid below-poverty wages, may not have access to health care and can be fired for disagreeing politically with their employer, plus some types of torture are deemed ok etc. So should we all stop buying each other's products or should we accept that the best way to change another's opinion is through leading by example and discussion rather than by refusing to talk/trade with them?

    1. Re: Ethical to Purchase from the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "may not have access to health care"

      But it's the law now, I even have to show a document when I file my taxes that I and everyone in my household had insurance every month of the year.

      And there's a minimum wage here, only people doing gigs can earn below that.

    2. Re: Ethical to Purchase from the US? by Xenx · · Score: 1

      Minimum wage is far from a livable wage for a lot of people. I'm not saying it's too low everywhere, but it's definitely too low in places.

    3. Re:Ethical to Purchase from the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Less than 9% of US population has no health insurance (and I would assume some of those without insurance do it on purpose, being young and immortal, or old and rich). Thus, you probably can avoid buying about 5-6% of american produce based on lack of universal medical care access.

    4. Re: Ethical to Purchase from the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is too low everywhere.

    5. Re: Ethical to Purchase from the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And by poverty, you mean the illegals who are still sending money back to central America.

    6. Re:Ethical to Purchase from the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whataboutism

    7. Re:Ethical to Purchase from the US? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      Leading by example and discussion? That doesn't work with Russia or North Korea or Venezuela, why do people think it's a valid solution? You know what works? Regime change.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:Ethical to Purchase from the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "[...] can be fired for disagreeing politically with their employer [...]"

      You can contrast this with the European view under which you are in the risk of getting sued by the state or state-like organs for politically incorrect opinions. (In particular, "immigration policy X doesn't work.") Most people have much better chances of finding a new employer than finding a new country to live in.

      I'm not at all thrilled of the willingness of some interest groups to turn EU into an ideological police state.

    9. Re:Ethical to Purchase from the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Less than 9% of US population has no health insurance

      Health insurance != health care. If you actually use health care, you could have a maximum out of pocket expense of $7,900 as an individual. Plus health insurance itself can cost 2.5% of your income. That means, if you work minimum wage all year (40 hrs/week, 52 weeks/year), you could have to spend ~54.5% of your income on health care. Of course, health insurance doesn't even cover everything so would actually be part of that $7,900 max and if you were actually sick enough to require $7,900 of treatment it's unlikely you could work 40 hrs/week, 52 weeks/year. Meanwhile, $15,080/year gross from that minimum wage job probably wouldn't be enough to live on even if you paid $0 on health care/insurance.

      But, yea, put it all on the young and immortals who avoid health insurance. They know they're fucked if the actually need any sort of health care. It's just now a lot more people pay into health insurance and are still fucked--but possibly less fucked, maybe.

    10. Re: Ethical to Purchase from the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say:

      "the best way to change anothers opinion is through leading by example and discussion rather than by refusing to talk/trade with them?"

      I recall a time when the prevailing wisdom was that if we trade with China and enrich the Chinese people that we would ignite a thirst for civil freedom to match their newfound economic freedom.

      What has actually happened is that we have helped to fund a technocratic nightmare society that our so-called free and open governments and corporations look at with envy. China proved to the world that you can openly repress people while still being rich and powerful.

      The Chinese model is an existential threat in that they have dispensed the figleaf. Their example threatens to shift norms in a direction that bends farther from the norms you and I both wish to see.

    11. Re:Ethical to Purchase from the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can handpick the same crap about ANY country. Nitpicking is not the same as finding the blaring cases of abuse. Where companies actively pollute despite having readily available alternatives. Where companies are abusing labor clearly and not just "from a certain point of view". There is also a clear difference from being able to find a handful of well publicized exceptions, and that being the rule. NO country has it perfect. When a particular country has become synonymous with these kinds of issues, it is not unreasonable to ask these questions.
       
      There are companies in Canada/UK/France/Germany/Spain/ that pollute/abuse employees/pay slave wages/manipulate markets/avoid taxes/receive undue protection from the local government. Pretending you are in a country that has none of that is to have perception that ends at the tip of your nose.
       
      Despite your (intentionally?) over the top apples to oranges comparison, I do agree with you that we should strive to lead by example and discussion. Lifting ones nose in the air however, and pretending that any place on this earth is not afflicted with problems will do nothing to further that aim.

    12. Re:Ethical to Purchase from the US? by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      Regime change.

      I'd be pretty careful going that route. By all accounts, Russia has been far more effective at implementing regime change in the US than vice versa. As for leading by example, no it does not work instantly, it takes time and I accept that in extreme cases, politics, not ethics, require that we take a firmer stance. However, if the argument is purely ethical then I remain unconvinced that forcing the issue with economic or military threats is going to help. If someone holds a gun to your head and tells you that e.g. using plastic is unethical you will probably give up plastic but only for as long as the gun is pointed at your head. If you want to change someone's mind so that you do not have to constantly threaten them then you have to engage with them.

    13. Re:Ethical to Purchase from the US? by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      You can contrast this with the European view under which you are in the risk of getting sued by the state or state-like organs for politically incorrect opinions.

      This is exactly my point. From the US perspective, the controls of free speech in Europe and Canada are "unethical" so should you stop trading with us for ethical reasons? Surely it is better to keep telling us that free speech is really important to encourage us to stop this sort of stupidity? We can all find things in another country that we think are unethical but that is a reason to engage with them to persuade them to change while they do the same with us so that we can all improve.

    14. Re:Ethical to Purchase from the US? by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      Nitpicking is not the same as finding the blaring cases of abuse.

      You can certainly say that about some of the examples I gave which were intended to show that we all think that other coutries are unethical in some regard. However, I think most of us in Europe and Canada would regard the sanctioned torture of prisoners by the US government is a "blaring case of abuse" and not at all "nitpicking". This is a major human rights abuse and is the sort of thing you expect from a country like the US.

    15. Re:Ethical to Purchase from the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are places in the US where the minimum wage is enough for food and housing, and places where it doesn't get you a box in an alley. If you're a minimum wage worker (absolutely zero skill, on the level of a high school student) then you're expected to go to a place where your wage can support you.
      The minimum wage does need to go up, but not by much. Right now it's $7.25, but it should be closer to $8. The last time it was raised to match inflation was 2009, so we're just a bit due.

    16. Re:Ethical to Purchase from the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reasons why the US has such strict controls on free speech compared to Europe and Canada are generally related to either security concerns or religion-inspired prudishness, not so much ethical concerns.

  22. ethical question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rabbi, should I buy a Chrysler?
    Can you re-phrase that as an ethical question?
    Rabbi, is it right to buy a Chrysler?

    1. Re:ethical question by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Deuteronomy 18:11-12.
      To drive around with evil magicians symbols.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  23. BDS China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You heard of these people called the Uygher? Your children won't, because the genocide is occurring. The Tibetan culture is being systematically eliminated. The reason you don't see the data is because the government controls the flow of data in and out.

    BDS against the Israelis is a blatant case of anti-Semitism. It's the Chinese government against who BDS should be focused.

    1. Re: BDS China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just another popular culture following sheep. wake up and smell the flowers, they are all the same! let's take India for example, do some research on sikkim and Portuguese goa, do skip the glossed over articles in wikipedia.

  24. Question really is just too narrowly framed by shilly · · Score: 1

    We should be considering: whether we need the product at all; the full weighted impact of a purchase -- yes, human rights, and also environmental impacts (CO2e, minerals extraction etc), and social costs and benefits, and so on; the practical alternatives and the differential impact of each choice (eg sourcing from S Korea vs China); etc etc.

    And while the choices are in the end binary (buy or don't buy), the world is more finely graded.

  25. Food, standard of living, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot is improving in China. This is an unfortunate side effect, but ask a starving man whether he'd be willing to shelve his thoughts on any subject for a meal. Not buying from China isn't the way to go about fixing this.

  26. The question is irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think that it's not ethical, then your abstinence lowers the price and someone else is even more inclined to buy. You can't will market forces away. Chinese electronics are bought and will be bought. The answer to your question doesn't matter. The question is irrelevant.

  27. Two Options by darkain · · Score: 1

    You have two options

    1) Buy from China

    2) Buy from Amazon, Ebay, etc from sellers who ultimately themselves buy from China

    So we can either buy direct from China, or buy indirect, at a higher price, from a reseller that buys from China.

    1. Re:Two Options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is it that you can't live without? Are you buying chinese food? You can get that locally.

    2. Re:Two Options by Octorian · · Score: 1

      Or buy products that claim to made somewhere that isn't China, while absolutely containing components and/or materials that did come from China.

  28. choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given the choice.. I would GLADLY pay more for American products if they were available.

    1. Re: choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The key word here is given the choice.. That doesn't happen because companies now have only one guiding principle - maximizing shareholder value.

      That means procurement at the lowest cost possible, and that in turn means buying from China.

      So no CEO has any incentive to buy or make in the US, unless they are forced to do so because of restrictions (defense, hi tech etc)

      So in most cases, the choice is to buy something that is fully or largely made in China, or not buy at all.

      Ultimately, this goes back to the unfettered loosening of regulatory shackles on corporations and the preferential tax treatment of capital gains under the guise of promoting risk taking and entrepreneurship.

      Top management therefore structure their compensation to include as much stock as possible, and then work on maximizing the value to the shareholders ie themselves.

      But hey, corporations are people too, right?

  29. Reverse the question ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... for the answer.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:Reverse the question ... by Xenx · · Score: 1

      ... for the answer.

      ?anihC nI edaM stcudorP scinortcelE esahcruP oT lacihtE tI sI

      Doesn't seem to clear it up for me.

    2. Re:Reverse the question ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Nice. :)

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    3. Re:Reverse the question ... by Xenx · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what your initial intent was by saying reverse the question. At least, nothing came to mind that made any more sense than what I did. But, then.. this isn't just some easy question with an easy answer. It's also a deeper question than just "made in china". At what point are you(or are you no longer) ethically responsible for the supply chain of the products you purchase?

    4. Re:Reverse the question ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      The question is in the form of "if A then B."

      What if it were reversed to, "if B then A?"

      Is it ethical for China to purchase products made in the US or containing parts made in the US?

      There's your answer.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    5. Re:Reverse the question ... by Xenx · · Score: 1

      The answer is that there isn't one. At least, not one universal answer.

    6. Re:Reverse the question ... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      ... for the answer.

      Yodarize it?

      Ethical to build Electronics made in China, is it?

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    7. Re:Reverse the question ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      I like it, but that's just shuffling the deck.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    8. Re:Reverse the question ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      My ethics tells me that the question is leading, and unethical.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    9. Re:Reverse the question ... by Xenx · · Score: 1

      I could see how you feel about it as it's presented here. My opinion is that it's unethical to not ask the question. Everyone will have their own answer, or be unable to come to one. But, people should be asking themselves these questions.

  30. china buying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What choice do you have? Pretty much anything electronic regardless of point of sale is coming from china one way or another. Even for things made elsewhere most of the parts are coming from china.

  31. Human rights... by musicmaker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think the poster should take the log out their eye, because the US is no better! Massive amounts of homelessness, 50% of bankruptcies due to healthcare costs, something that is considered a basic human right in the rest of the western world. MUCH higher prison population per capita than any other country. The government is literally stealing social security. Gerrymandering making elections all but a foregone conclusion. Voter suppression that isn't very different than ballot box stuffing that happens in Russia. I think this is the single stupidest post ever on slashdot.

    --
    Everyone is living in a personal delusion, just some are more delusional than others.
    1. Re: Human rights... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cite your sources.

    2. Re:Human rights... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Gerrymandering making elections all but a foregone conclusion.

      Right. Tell that to H.R.C

    3. Re:Human rights... by Trogre · · Score: 1

      The US is a laughing stock to many other countries, and can be considered rapidly sliding towards third world by several measures, but you are very foolish for comparing human rights infringements of the US to that of China.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    4. Re:Human rights... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Human rights... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm mortified to see the 50 Cent Gang has infiltrated Slashdot and is now directing conversations off topic with whataboutism. Go away, troll, you aren't welcome here.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re:Human rights... by swillden · · Score: 3

      I think the poster should take the log out their eye, because the US is no better!

      Bullshit. The US certainly has plenty of problems and is hardly the shining beacon on a hill it would like to think it is. But if you think China is the same, then you don't know much about China. Go read about the Great Firewall, and about social credit scores, and about the treatment of the Uighurs and the Tibetans. Learn something about how the Chinese government treats the poor rural people, especially the non-Han ethnicities. Take a look at how politics is conducted, with regular purges and disappearances of political enemies. Notice how Xi Jinping is very close to establishing himself as dictator for life, and how "Xi Jinping Thought" is being made into a mandatory doctrine not only for government officials, but for university educators, the media and even school children.

      Yeah, the US has problems, but you're creating one whale of a false equivalency.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    7. Re:Human rights... by azrael29a · · Score: 1

      And don't forget also this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    8. Re:Human rights... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also it's very ironic that in both cases (Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo) the US soldiers and CIA agents have used the torture methods developed by the communist China in the 50-60s.

    9. Re:Human rights... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, comparison is fine. Just look how you treat blacks, indians, muslims, poor people, ... Then take into account 100 years of colonisation of china in which you participated and to top it all, 20 years of isolation and military occupation of Taiwan, cause they dared to have a revolution. After they lost 10-20M fighting Japanese for you.

      USA is biggest state sponsor of terrorism and new imperialist, with top nothc propaganda, so it's understandable you believe you are somehow better. But it's just a ferrytale and people you opress have zero illusions about that. Just ask ppl in Iraq of Afghanistan, or any country south of you for that matter...

    10. Re:Human rights... by sabbede · · Score: 1
      Nobody is perfect.

      But there is a big difference between being an imperfect Republic and being an oppressive totalitarian-authoritarian police state run by a single corrupt party that thinks "human rights" refers to it's power to do whatever the hell it wants to the humans under its vile authority.

    11. Re:Human rights... by FleetingGerbil · · Score: 1

      Someone's triggered. They aren't trolling. We are torturers. The cops murder people. We have for-profit child concentration camps at our border. This isn't whataboutism. This isn't trolling. This is someone with some self-awareness calling out our national hypocrisy. You get out of here. You're regressive.

    12. Re:Human rights... by FleetingGerbil · · Score: 1

      As an American, THIS. This is true. Our propaganda has made us blind to our own failures.

    13. Re:Human rights... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      We were talking about China, and suddenly someone changes the subject to America. That's whataboutism, and it is literally in the handbook for the 50 Cent Gang. It's what they DO. You are either being paid as well, or you're on their side as a useful idiot. Don't do their work for free, that's being a sucker.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  32. Is international trade ethical? by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    That question leads to broader "Is international trade ethical?"

    We perform international trade because products are cheaper, but one of the causes for the price the difference are different labor and environmental laws that we would not want at home.

  33. It depends on what kind of ethics philosophy by redmid17 · · Score: 1

    You can justify pretty much anything with the right school of thought.

    Next dumb open-ended question?

  34. Hobbyist point of view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From a hobbyist point of view, I have to say that I tried to find US-manufacturers for one-offs of various circuit designs, and I couldn't do it for a reasonable price.

    From Chinese manufacturers, I could get 20mmx40mm circuit boards made for about 80 cents each, minimum order of 10.
    The SAME board from US manufacturers wanted $210 PER BOARD. Now keep in mind these weren't fully ready-to-go electronics boards, they were JUST the boards, no components, no assembling.

    Now is it ethical to buy from the Chinese firm? I would say there's no choice in this case. There's no way 2 square inches of plastic and copper is worth $200. For that price, I want a mid-range full size mother board WITH components!!

    1. Re:Hobbyist point of view by Octorian · · Score: 1

      From a hobbyist point of view, a while back I decided to actually tabulate the country-of-origin listed on Digi-Key for all the components I was using in a project of mine. While China was definitely at the top of the list, the complete list was actually a lot more distributed than I had expected.

      From that exercise, here's the list:
      (this is counting unique part numbers, not the actual number of components for each part number)
      China (11)
      Israel (7)
      Taiwan (5)
      Japan (4)
      Malaysia (2)
      United States (2)
      United Kingdom (1)
      Czech Republic (1)
      South Korea (1)
      Philippines (1)
      Vietnam (1)
      Mexico (1)
      Thailand (1)

    2. Re:Hobbyist point of view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you try https://oshpark.com/ ?
      20x40mm = 800 square mm
      800 sq mm = 1.240002 sq in
      USD$5 per square inch = USD$6.20$

      But that's for three PCBs, so that's only USD$2.07 per PCB. Yes it's more expensive than the 80 cents PCBs from China, but it's not 262 times more expensive. And OSHpark ships for free, all over the world.

      I could also give you quotes from other USA-based PCB manufacturers which are all well below USD$210 per PCB. You probably went to one which isn't "maker-friendly".

  35. I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My government takes so much of my money as taxes and wastes it on "charitable" causes. All the while jobs get outsourced and cheap labor imported to further reduce the money I actually get to keep.

    Caring about ethics is for the rich.

  36. People want more for their dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    American's sold out long time ago in order to get cheaper electronics. Companies like RCA, Zenith and others made TV's, stereo's in the US. But when China made goods were priced so much cheaper American's bought them instead. American's don't place much value on paying a little bit more for American made. People generally decide with their wallets on what they buy, and where its made isn't so important.

  37. Re:I'm trying as best as I can to avoid Maid in Ch by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    Need labelmaker? Got a 1977 Dymo 1570 embosser for almost spare change.

    I bought a new one. The letter spacing is much wider. The labels don't look nearly as nice and the labels take up more room.

    Bought a Fox, made in England

    TIL. I'll lokk out for them next time I'm in the market.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  38. Made by the Chicoms? by WCMI92 · · Score: 1

    Of course that is not ethical. The Chicom government's legacy is drenched in blood.

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
    1. Re:Made by the Chicoms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is the US government.

      The US happily sells weapons to the Saudis who have an atrocious human rights record. Just with week a 6 year old was decapitated infant of his mother with a broken bottle because he was the wrong king of muslim.
      https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/boy-beheaded-by-taxi-driver-in-front-of-screaming-mum/news-story/669b08aa405a5602a3b4592521aa31e8?nk=3c20cf7c2f3af2f99e966c0e43a4042f-1550020120

      But hey, so long as the new god of the USA (Money) keeps flowing into the USA, all is OK with the world.

    2. Re:Made by the Chicoms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The short & sweet answer. Well spoken.

  39. Of course not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But we're idiots

  40. Communists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The U.S. should in no way do any business with communist or socialist countries period.

    1. Re:Communists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course we should note that the US military is funded by socialist means, taxes forcibly taken from citizens by the government and then paid to the government owned military.

      There is no opt out for any tax payer.

  41. navel gazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i don't care.

    i really don't.

  42. Tye Opium wars ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. It's ethical to instead buy your products from countries built on a legacy of slavery, genocide, colonialism and imperialism. Made in America!

  43. WHAT?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tariffs? You realize that would make Democrat's heads explode right? They're all about a "living wage" and "human rights" as long as it doesn't involve anything proposed by their opposition. Though, to be fair, Republicans might have a heart attack if they realized they were agreeing with Democrats about something like that as well. NEVER COMPROMISE, just shoot yourself in the foot while trying to stick it to the other side and prove they are "wrong!"

    -Proud unaffiliated moderate.

  44. Boycotts based on ethics now illegal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Israelis have made it illegal to boycott countries based on ethical concerns, so it's a little late...

  45. Re:What to avoid in the US: Blacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While you state facts...
    I believe you are getting "FUCK OFF" because, let's be honest, your comment has absolutely nothing to do with the topic and could really be considered troll-like behavior. In fact by you attempting to insert your agenda into this thread you really do more harm to the facts your speaking about because others will see this as a racially motivated comment.

  46. I'm down so long as the world reciprocates by WaffleMonster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Given USA is the worlds top jailer and starter of elective never ending wars costing hundreds of thousands of lives I'm down with BDS China so long as the rest of the world does the same to the United States.

    1. Re:I'm down so long as the world reciprocates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given USA is the worlds top jailer

      To be fair, no other nation has anywhere near the number of African-Americans as the USA.

    2. Re:I'm down so long as the world reciprocates by radja · · Score: 1

      well yes, african americans are pretty rare outside of the americas. By definition.

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    3. Re:I'm down so long as the world reciprocates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know what you're talking about if you think the US is any comparison to China. Read a book. Check out the rest of the internet. Check out the Chinese internet. Are you sitting in the UK with your smug attitude? Where cameras follow you everywhere, you can be jailed for an internet post, and on even the simple appearance of having offended someone? If so, it's no wonder you love China so much with their social scoring, political disappearances, inability to actually own any of your own property, inability to talk about an increasing range of topics.

    4. Re:I'm down so long as the world reciprocates by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      You don't know what you're talking about if you think the US is any comparison to China.

      I don't think that.

      Read a book. Check out the rest of the internet.

      Curious, this site also suggested I read a book.
      http://hmpg.net/

      Are you sitting in the UK with your smug attitude? Where cameras follow you everywhere, you can be jailed for an internet post, and on even the simple appearance of having offended someone? If so, it's no wonder you love China so much with their social scoring, political disappearances, inability to actually own any of your own property, inability to talk about an increasing range of topics.

      Honestly I just believe if your going to BDS everything you don't like it's prudent to look in the mirror first. That's all.

  47. There are two lines of reasoning here by Solandri · · Score: 1

    The first line of reasoning is that we shouldn't have anything to do with corrupt regimes, and in fact should boycott them. That's the approach we took with Cuba. The result being that Cuba has stayed Communist 60 years with its people still mired in an economic backwater with little knowledge of the free world. Cuba's GDP per capita barely budged for 50 years until Castro gave up power, and his successor began to implement reforms, eventually leading to thawing of relations with the U.S.

    The second line of reasoning is that we need to have open trade and tourism with corrupt regimes, so that their citizens become more exposed to democratic ideals and culture. That's the approach we took with China. The result being that Chinese citizens have experienced a ten-fold increase in GDP per capita in the last 45 years since Nixon normalized relations with China. And Chinese citizens, while kept in the dark about certain embarrassing domestic events, are for the most part aware of how people in the free world live and frequently even travel there on vacations.

    If you believe in Democracy, then you believe that power ultimately flows from the people. And the only way a corrupt government can truly be overthrown is via the will of the people being governed, not by the influence of an outside state. The most we as outsiders can do is try our best to empower those people. So from an ethical standpoint, the question becomes: Does it help the Chinese people more if we boycott China, or if we continue free trade with them? From a strictly economic standpoint, medieval monarchies were able to hold onto power by keeping the masses in poverty, and thus unable to afford to overthrow the nobility. Modern developed nations eventually reach a point (around $10k/yr GDP per capita) where further economic growth requires the development of an economic middle class. e.g. For the U.S., 58% of the income goes to people making $30k to $200k per year, 15% to people making $200k-$500k, and those making over $500k only account for 19% of all income. As a result, it's the people making $30k to $200k who wield the most power in the country.

    So maintaining free trade with a corrupt regime means it must eventually empower its people if it wishes to continue economic growth. Whereas boycotting a corrupt regime means it can keep its people oppressed in perpetuity.

  48. Re:What to avoid in the US: Blacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't look down... your swastika is showing.

    Things like being able to wait for delayed gratification tend to correlate very highly with poverty... surprisingly, so does average IQ and a number of other things.

    Anyhow, there was never a point in replying to your racist rant. Seriously, have you been kicked off so many platforms that you just jump into random articles and post your verbal diarrhoea. How far Mr. Alex Jones has fallen that he has to resort to this.

  49. China by tquasar · · Score: 1

    Is it ethical to send manufacturing jobs to China? The horse is way out of the barn, not coming back. This has been debated again and again. Search for "made in USA" and try to find something you would like to buy. I used to buy cotton socks from a company in North Carolina using US grown cotton,but the place was bought and all the machinery was shipped to China. Likely bought by a Wall Street firm following cheap labor and lax or few rules or laws around the globe. To Mexico, India, Pakistan, Viet Nam, etc.

  50. Shill failed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You failed at shilling. The Chinese are automating the destruction of non-conforming cultures. t its getting worse, not better.

  51. Re:What to avoid in the US: Blacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Things like being able to wait for delayed gratification tend to correlate very highly with poverty... surprisingly, so does average IQ and a number of other things.

    Don't talk about sociology when you've clearly never done anything more than cherry pick data without looking at any of the context or structural causes.
    Go back to Tucker Carlson for more of your science.

  52. recent change by hdyoung · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Up until fairly recently, the strategy worked. We allowed them into the world of modern trade and commerce and bought their stuff. Overall, the country became more open and more modern. The strategy helped to pull about half a billion people out of poverty. Yes, we had to tolerate a highly flawed Chinese government with a bad human rights record and a lot of dodgy Chinese business practices, but nothing worse than we've tolerated from a dozen other countries we regularly do business with. Overall, the benefits were enormous.

    Then something changed. China started backsliding. The most obvious symptom of this is Xi Jingping, who has actively pulled the country back towards autocracy, but there's a long list of things that suggest our "do business with them and they'll improve" strategy isn't working any more. A lot of foreign policy types are concluding that a change is needed. I've read that even most pro-Chinese economists in the West have concluded that China is sliding backwards. The carrot isn't working any more, so governments are trying a bit of stick instead. They're not going to have much luck expanding their overseas businesses for the next decade or two.

    1. Re:recent change by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      It wasn't a recent change, China was always like this. They showed no movement towards western democracy at any point. China has 5000 years of autocratic government and zero experience with democracy. Xi is a big standard leader. If anyone expected China to suddenly become liberal, that is pure idiocy. How could anyone be so stupid and naive?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:recent change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They showed no movement towards western democracy at any point.

      That isn't what the "backsliding" statement refers to. It refers to human rights, and democracy is but one of those many rights. If democracy is the only thing you measure, you will indeed see no progress.

    3. Re:recent change by hdyoung · · Score: 1

      They've never been anywhere near a western democracy, but you're wrong that there was zero progress. Specifically, Deng (previous Chinese leader) had been encouraging small experiments in various kinds of democracy within China. Local-level government type of stuff to see if it would destablilize the society. They were doing it quietly but it was happening. They were experimenting with allowing higher levels of civic society to co-exist with the communist party. Their citizens were getting pulled out of poverty, getting at least a little internet access, getting more freedom to move and pick jobs, etc. etc. There was real debate within the Communist party as to how far to allow that stuff to progress.

      Xi pulled the plug on a lot of it. Back to Emperor-style politics. Oh well. China will be less adaptable, less innovative and eventually weaker as a result, though the effects will take decades to manifest. Ultimately, the result will be one less country to seriously contend with the U.S. for dominance.

    4. Re:recent change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They showed no movement towards "western democracy" at any point. How could anyone be so stupid and naive?

  53. Thank you for asking the question by whh3 · · Score: 1

    Thank you for asking this question. It is something that I think about constantly. When the reports about the poor working conditions in Foxconn factories first came out years ago, I decided to boycott Apple and never buy another one of their products.

    Now, yes, I do understand that it's hypocritical to continue to hold that boycott because there are so many places that manufacture their goods at Foxconn. I have tried to only buy goods that are not made in those factories, but it's virtually impossible these days if you want to participate in technology at all. As a programmer, I feel that I have no choice but to participate, but I understand that I am in a privileged position to be able to "have to" buy these things.

    Yes, I also realize the very good argument that the people moving to these "camps" (er, factories) are making better money than they would be making in their rural villages. They are able to save that money and they are able to send it back home to take care of their families. No, there is no opportunity for them to advance, though -- that's bothersome to me.

    I also realize that Foxconn, because of their privileged relationship with Apple, do the best at making sure their workers are treated fairly. I've read the China Labor Watch (Link) reports and they are damning -- of all the factories. It just sticks in my craw that when Foxconn had to decide how to tackle the problem of worker suicides, they decided to build a net to catch jumpers rather than, you know, address their misery.

    So, I continue to draw my little, silly line in the sand and boycott Apple products while trying to buy as little as possible from Foxconn.

    That said, the overall question is something that bothers me and something that I try to keep in the front of my mind as often as possible.

    Thanks again for asking the question.

    --
    remove nospam. to email!
    1. Re:Thank you for asking the question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where were the suicide nets at Foxconn made?

    2. Re:Thank you for asking the question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet it's okay to let significantly more poor people to die or go bankrupted for medical problems because of the flawed medical system that the country refuses to fix. There is still blood (and perhaps more) in the government's hands, just in different ways.

    3. Re:Thank you for asking the question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It just sticks in my craw that when Foxconn had to decide how to tackle the problem of worker suicides, they decided to build a net to catch jumpers rather than, you know, address their misery.

      You realise that Foxconn has below average suicide rates, right?

    4. Re:Thank you for asking the question by shmlco · · Score: 1

      "So, I continue to draw my little, silly line in the sand and boycott Apple products while trying to buy as little as possible from Foxconn."

      "I also realize that Foxconn, because of their privileged relationship with Apple, do the best at making sure their workers are treated fairly...."

      These two statements don't make sense. You're boycotting Apple, the one company that's seems to be doing its level best to ensure that workers in its entire supply chain are being treated fairly and welll?

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
  54. Re:I'm trying as best as I can to avoid Maid in Ch by _merlin · · Score: 1

    You avoid maids in China? Are you referring to house-maids, or are you using "maid" to refer to young women in general? Why are you so scared of women?

  55. who give a fuck morals are relative anyway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is ethical to buy gasoline made from oil in the middle east?
    Is ethical to buy technology form Israeli companies in the Gaza strip?
    Is ethical to buy from the U.S. companies with links to the weapons industry?
    is ethical to buy from Japan and their whaling industry?

  56. Re:What to avoid in the US: Blacks by Darinbob · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    No one ever wonders "how come rich people commit fewer crimes?" or "why do white people commit crimes against their white neighbors instead of driving across time to the black neighborhood?"

    Given that this is slashdot, I don't know what's worse. That this earlier AC is being sincere and is really that deluded, or that this is just another troll trying to wind people up.

  57. Better stop buying any and all electronics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your worry is China's human rights record then you just better stop buying all electronics. Think of ALL the components that make up a TV or iPhone or a computer or whatever. Most, if not all, of those components were made in China.

    Just because the box says "Made in the USA" doesn't mean that every part that makes up that thing were also made in the USA. Chances are all the parts are from China and the final assembly of finished product was done in the US.

  58. Re:I'm trying as best as I can to avoid Maid in Ch by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

    You avoid maids in China? Are you referring to house-maids, or are you using "maid" to refer to young women in general? Why are you so scared of women?

    Maid in Chian is a bit of an old joke in vacuum-tube hi-fi (and maybe the guitar/bass people too). In the early 2000's there was a run of tubes made in China that read "Erection Tube / Maid in Chian" instead of "Electron Tube / Made in China." If they can't even spell the fucking thing right, how do we know the complicated innards are well-made? (They weren't.)

    I'm open to maids from any country, but I want my vacuum tubes made in USA, Germany or the UK, por favor. I'll take JJ from what was Yugoslavia, and Svetlana in Russia also makes passable stuff.

    What did we call Chinese tubes? Firecrackers, especially 5AR4 rectifiers.

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
  59. Yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's 100% ethical.

    Our freedoms are fake in the United States anyway. They would throw people like Manning, Snowden, and Assange in jail with secret courts and secret charges etc. etc.

    Most state courts don't give a shit about your "rights". Here cops can murder people and get away with it under various "immunities". We are much more corrupt than people seem to notice. Sure the US might be *slightly* better in practice, but not by much. Not enough to establish moral supremacy, anyway.

    I'd love if I could buy from the US, but we aren't competitive. I buy parts from china because the USA and our shitty "profit" obsession has made things that should be a $0.20 part a $3.33 part.

    Fact is, there isn't enough competition in the states and I don't care how much propaganda you feed me. There's no reason that OP amp or transistor should be that damn expensive, it's made by a machine for christ sake.

  60. Re: What to avoid in the US: Blacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One idiot in the incredibly stupid Credit Default Swap could do more damage than a state's worth of poverty related crimes. And then there's Bernie Madhoff.....

    People who think rich people or white people or, in an stupendously ignorant display of idoicy rich white people don't commit crime or talk about it don't read any of the Thousands of newspaper and websites in the US reporting on stuff like that Every. Single. Damn. Day.

    Get out more grandpa or get the heck out of the way. You've become too blind to the world around you and no longer have a purpose in it....

  61. Just electronics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why stop at just electronics. Surely if you don't want to support an oppressive regime you just don't buy anything from them.

  62. Re:"Communist government". Nice one idiot by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    The US mil encountered lots of Communist gov support in Vietnam and Korea from China.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  63. Trying to manipulate the (US) public much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was seeing similar Slashdot posts to this one, for many years!
    I am sure, I am not the only one notices this!

    Again & again some people trying to send the same message to (US) public:
    "Evil Chinese Government is doing this now! What you gonna do about it (US) people? Why don't you protest China? Why don't you become SJW against China? Blah blah blah!"

    IMHO, the people trying to manipulate/brainwash the (US) public (for their own SJW stuff), should not even try to talk about ETHICS!!!

    There are over a billion people in China!
    If their government is doing anything they don't like, how about they protest it themselves?

  64. We in the US don't have standing to ask this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget that the percentage we incarcerate in the US is the most of the industrialized nations and 5x the world average.

    Having spent a few years in prison myself, I can say that there are ways in which our system might be worse than others. Inmates in the prison I was in would do almost anything to be sent to a work camp instead - not because they could make more than the $0.25 an hour or so that we made working as dorm janitors or kitchen workers, but because they could do real hard labor outside for many hours a day. Having virtually nothing to do is unbelievably torturous after two or three years. Many would have gladly built things for free just to get out of the dorms. The few hours we got to spend in the yard were so precious that we gladly went out rain, snow, or shine despite the complete lack of shelter in the yard.

    The prison I was in used to host sports events with local community leagues, send prisoners into the community to do free work, and actually help in reducing the isolation from family and society in general that can damage a person to the point they have no possibility of recovery after prison. Today, that is mostly gone. Inmates are charged as much as $10 for 15 minute calls to family, limited to 4 hour visits once a week even when family had to come 1000 miles to see them, and the performance of charitable work in the community was stopped because community tradesmen complained that it took their business!

    I also saw many cases where inmates were intentionally placed in situations that would cause conflict so that they could be sent to the hole and have their good time credits taken.

    The problem seemed to be that those running the prison did not truly believe in reform. So they did everything possible to make sure inmates would stay as long as possible and return as quickly as possible. There is a lot of room for employees with opinions different than the legislators to extend sentences without explicitly breaking laws or policies.

    Thankfully, I was not in need of reform. I had no troubles in my life prior to the events that sent me away, no trouble avoiding conflicts and promoting peace in prison, and have had no trouble in the years since.

    Sadly, many I left there have gotten out and returned since. This is despite the fact that only about 10% of the people I met behind bars were violent or bad in the ways I had expected. In most cases, their return was due to nothing more than lacking the skills to deal with life's everyday conflicts . They are good at heart but inept at navigating social and other life complexities. Some even returned intentionally to get health care they couldn't otherwise afford. Yeh, we really have the right to talk.

  65. Is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "is it at all ethical to buy electronics or IT products manufactured in China?"

        Is it at all possible to buy electronics or IT products -NOT- made in China?
                                                                    >to find components to make products
                                                                                        is it at all possible?

          Is it at all possible that enough people will make the effort, and accept the additional expense?
                I'd love to be able to say yes to any of the above, but at my advanced age, I sadly submit that ain't gonna happen.

  66. Evil Xi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you buy chinese cheap sh1t, you support the insane guy that finds Winnie the Pooh offensive (besides giving away all your secrets to his minions).

  67. To the question: knowing what the human rights sit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    except you don't. You don't live in China and probably never visited there. If you do, your post is motivated by something else.

    One can't even get proper news about the US in the US, just look at the news outlet there. And you expect what you hear about China written by western media isn't propaganda?

  68. Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Capital will flow to where itâ(TM)s used most efficiently. That place is currently China. Nothing will change until the US fixes the bloated, corrupt, billionaire friendly government we have.

    My healthcare costs more than an average worker in China makes in a year. Any kind of non-automated manufacturing in the US is dead until we fix that.

  69. Trade usually good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But with good and bad alike gets rich along the way.

  70. Try buying electronics NOT made in China by hambone142 · · Score: 1

    Nearly impossible. Almost all of the electronic components are made in China now. I'd say nearly 100% of the TVs, cellphones, a lot of the home appliances, pretty soon, Chevy passenger cars.

    How can we buy electronics that are not made in China?

    Our U.S. companies have shut down manufacturing and moved it to China in the majority of consumer products.

  71. RESPECT the Chinese ! They are wonderful people by Btrot69 · · Score: 1

    I can't believe this BS.
    Who are these people who think they can preach to China ?
    Are they from a country with a huge percentage of its population in jail ?

    China has had a civilization for >6000 years.
    They generally DON'T start wars try to tell the rest of the world how to live.

    They are incredibly smart and industrious.
    The have universal health care, guaranteed employment, and very low crime rate

    Sure they have problems, but they have shown time and time again that they can solve big problems.
    Most all of us could learn a lot from the Chinese, if we would just get to know them.

  72. Re: What to avoid in the US: Blacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahaha ! you american dudes are so funny. Hispano were in your country before white people and blakes are there as long as you are. Then all those people share the same culture and religion...
    Now come to Europe and see how diffrrent people are living together. people with different culture/religion like Indian in UK or Arabian in Fr,Ger,It... With colonial past and wars from the last century which make some of them hate the white.
    Just stop complaining.

  73. Here's what I do by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    - I buy refurbished whenever possible. On the upside: It's not only ethical in more ways than one, it gives you neat bargains aswell.
    - If I buy new, I see to it that the gear will/could last me 10 years - at least in theory. Point in case: My MB Air is from early 2011 and still is useful.
    - I always try to buy hardware that I could control or at least can usefully run offline if push comes to shove. With other things equal, I prefer hackable hardware over regular hardware.

    I presume this approach will become more important to me in the future (Stallmans "Right to read" comes to mind). There might even come a point in the near future where I stock up on older refurbished electronics in order to be able to control it when things go south.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  74. Definitely not ethical to buy electronics from the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just look at the record. They dropped two nukes on Japan. They went on to destroy and rob Iraq for the alleged possession of weapons of mass destruction that were never found. Recently they have destroyed countries in the North of Africa and Syria. And just look at their president. Definitely not ethical to buy electronics from them.

  75. tried to buy US made stuff - no luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried to buy US made stuff , but no luck ...
    sellers claimed ITAR, Dept of Commerce restrictions, distributor restrictions ... airline restrictions ...
    so I bought what is available ... Chinese products Works good.
    How many "US made" products are packaged and labeled in the US but manufactured in China?

    Solar panels? Batteries? processors ?

  76. one should buy the stuff.. by gl4ss · · Score: 2

    Stats wise, you should buy the stuff.
    I mean their egregious rights violations are not nearly as bad as during cultural revolution or during their civil war - so clearly buying the stuff is actually _working_ to improve the situation.

    Even their attitude towards piracy and rights violations is "better" than it has ever been.

    so. there's that. it's actually kind of working.

    however, as it is pretty hard to buy something that wouldn't have anything from china the whole question is kind of moot. It's also pretty hard to buy something that doesn't somehow(upline licenses, manufacturing tools,brand licensing, patents or whatever) benefit USA as well.

    How would you go on about buying non chinese parts electronics? sure you can buy non chinese assembled stuff.

    but it would be actually far easier to start buying non-chinese wrenches than cordless drill that didn't have any chinese parts in it.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  77. Is it ethical to trade with the Nazis? by nagora · · Score: 1

    Ooooh, that's a real tricky one, isn't it? I guess it depends on how much the slavery, oppression, and murder makes your life easier.

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  78. More repressive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you at all familiar with Chinese history? Even modern history under Mao Zedong? What do you think it was like living though the Cultural Revolution or Great Leap Foreard? Perhaps in the 80s after the Tianemen Sq protests?

  79. Condemn the Chinese People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No foreign power imposed the authoritarian system (in China) on the Chinese. The Chinese themselves created it.

    We should condemn the Chinese people.

    Get more info about this issue.

  80. Condemn the Chinese People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No foreign power imposed the authoritarian system (in China) on the Chinese. The Chinese themselves created it.

    We should condemn the Chinese people.

    Get more info about this issue.

  81. This post is total shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China does not make use of ex-territorial camps to imprison people by breaking all known international laws and customs.
    China does not produce people like Bill Gates or Jeff Bezos or that Apple Turtneleck dude who amass a wealth of a small country off the back of monopolies and business malpractice and workers who actually do the work.
    China does not engage in democracy wars around the planet so it can pillage and take raw materials and energy for free (and in the process destroy civilisations).
    China does not impose pollitical will on others not does it tell other countries how they should conduct their affairs.
    China does not charge you money if you get sick.
    There is however one country that does all these things.
    I see a question of ethics being raised in submitting a post like this, not in dealing with the subject of this post.

  82. The real question by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

    Is it possible to purchase electronics products that are not made in China?

  83. US human rights is not that great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US has a terrible human rights record and has much more people in jail per 1000 (China has 118 per 1000 while the US has 655 per 1000) . China executes more than the US 2,400 each year while the US did 24 (only eight states carry out judicial murders)

  84. Re: What to avoid in the US: Blacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are rich you can get a new TV now. No need for delayed gratification. If you are poor you either wait, get one on credit or steal one, or go without. However, if you look at things like shop lifting, which is a thrill - seeking behaviour, it's much more evenly distributed across the social strata.

  85. If America goes down this rabbit-hole, they lose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's not get into the whole human rights record thing, because there is no country that has committed so many war crimes, atrocities, violations and crimes in the last 100 years as the United States of America. Even these days, you engage in cyber espionage and sabotage against those you call your allies.

    It's sad to see America attempt to pass judgement onto others, when every single crime you accuse them of, you have already committed yourself.

    So yes, I think it's ethically permissible to buy electronics from China, because if you look at the historical record, they are the most peaceful of all the super powers.

  86. Re: What to avoid in the US: Blacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummm... smarter people HAVE wondered and found that white people have the most to fear from white people (6x more). Black people have the most to fear from black people (10x more). Asians asians, and hispanics hispanics.

    None seem to prefer driving anywhere specifically. The question we should be asking is... Why are non-black people scared so much of black people?

  87. Asking the wrong question... by Timothy2.0 · · Score: 1

    The question shouldn't be "Is it ethical to purchase electronics from China?" Rather, the question should be "Are you willing to create an alternative and use that?"

    Practically, ethics are an issue when one has a choice. When there's a need, but no choice, ethical considerations become hazy, at best. One can always revisit how much XYZ is a *need* vs. a *want*, but if we're talking about the practicality of operating in the modern world, those needs are often pretty real.

    So long as the cost remains cheap, versus manufacturing electronics in your home country, employing your neighbours, don't expect the ethical question to play well with the public.

  88. Re:What to avoid in the US: Blacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a direct descendant of Ramesses III, you insensitive plebeian.

    CAP === 'micron'

  89. USA have a questionable human rights record too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...what was the question again?

  90. yes, it is the most ethical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in as much social progress as China has made, it is because of their economic engagement with the west

    the mistake the USA made with Cuba was exactly the opposite, by isolated Cuba, it gave it nothing to lose and rather than 60+ years of embargo and hostility the USA could have effectively killed Cuba with kindness probably decades ago

    hostile relations only give hardliners in the country in question an enemy to rail against

  91. Is it ethical to purchase products made in USA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As the China government was never involved in a coup d'etat in my country, the question for me would be "is it ethical to purchase products made in USA?".

  92. Getting worse? by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    China is becoming more and more repressive each year

    That like saying global warming is a hoax due to a small recent downtick in an otherwise upward trend. China today is light years better than in the past, judging from the stories I hear from my in-laws and read for myself. That doesn't mean everything is fine

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  93. Brezhnev era by mandark1967 · · Score: 1

    Leonid Brezhnev...back when men were men and eyebrows were singular

    --
    Sig Follows: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." -- Mark Twain
  94. Re: What to avoid in the US: Blacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The question we should be asking is... Why are non-black people scared so much of black people?"

    Who is scared of black people? They're the least scary people on earth. If anything, they are treated with contempt.

  95. Re:What to avoid in the US: Blacks by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    Knowing that my ancestors were Irish, British, and Danish, I've got to go a ways back to find slaves in my family tree.

    My father's side was purely Irish, come to America after the Revolution, but before the Irish were tolerated without a racism normally reserved for others. They escaped indentured servitude by living at the edge of civilization, coming a bit south much later. My mother's side was as British as could be, having first settled in the Colonies before they were called Colonies, and all the intervening marriages were among other settler families, which presents other more interesting questions. None had slaves. One of my uncles moved to Washington, D.C., and adopted the racism prevalent then, and you might well describe his attitudes and business as soft slavery, but he himself? Never a slave.

    I'm still unable to shake the possibility that my family tree includes some Native American blood, though it is not recorded anywhere.

    If, however, you go back far enough, the claim that "not a single one of us is without an ancestor who was a slave" may be true. Back far enough, and you can make all kinds of irrelevant claims.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  96. Also don't buy from Japan or Irak or Syria.... by gDLL · · Score: 1

    Also don't buy from Japan, they butchered a defenceless fleet at Perl Harbor. Also don't buy from Irak as they invaded and enslaved Kuwait ! Ok you can buy from syria as they are totally nice and peaceful.

  97. Brain Drain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's also the systematic loss of skills and knowledge that occurs when so many goods are manufacturered someplace else, or as we will soon find out, by the rise in automation.

  98. Re: What to avoid in the US: Blacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you retarded or just stupid ?

    Try researching Barbary Coast Piracy.

    Even your Marine Corps sing about them.

    That was a lot closer to modern times than you obviously think.

    Newsflash for you boy....more whites have been enslaved over time than blacks.

  99. what is ethnical? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This seems so ignorant

    In 20 years half the stuff you do today will be considered evil or immoral. US society has long ago decided that morality is relative.

    So if you don't like the idea, don't buy it. If you feel like you need to help someone, help them.

    But what you can't do is tell other people how and what to do.

  100. Re: What to avoid in the US: Blacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Now come to Europe and see how diffrrent people are living together."

    You mean like how the middle easterners have changed Sweden? And France? And Germany? And the UK?

    It has not been a change for the good ...

  101. China is not different than the rest of the world by pegdhcp · · Score: 1
    It is as ethical as to buy your goods from:
    • Economies built on slave labor
    • Economies built on indentured racially profiled work force
    • Economies built on colonial resources
    • Countries utilising their military power to reach economical goals.
    • Economies differentiate between workers based on their gender, politics and/or religious beliefs.
  102. Ethical? No, at least. by Sqreater · · Score: 1

    How about it does not lend itself to our continuing survival? Lenin said that capitalists will sell you the rope to hang you with. We should add to that that consumers will buy the rope, then give it to you to hang them with. It is time to get back to the understanding of the true evil of communist China.

    --
    E Proelio Veritas.
  103. The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, of course it's not ethical.
    It would be much better to pay twice the price to have some company have the exact same products made in China for half the cost.

  104. Re: What to avoid in the US: Blacks by rickb928 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I know well the story of our Navy, the Marines, and the history and traditions embodied in the Marine Corps Hymn.

    But how that relates to the assertion that "regardless of color or ethnicity, not a single one of us is without an ancestor who was a slave." escapes me.

    Now, if you're wondering how it was that our nation, the United States of America, found itself battling Muslim pirates so early in our history, consider that this was a response to the restraint of trade imposed by the Barbary Pirates on so many nations, the inability of so many of those other nations to take the measures necessary to respond and re-establish free passage on the seas, and our need to trade cotton, slave-harvested, with Europe.

    Sound familiar? It ought to.

    At that time Europe was still battling the results of Muslim invasions, and feared antagonizing the Empire, which could not be good for them. Europe was also mired in their incessant internecine squabbles, especially at the time Western Europe, with colonization fever at the highest pitch. The French Revolution would not help this region. American influence was welcomed, tacitly, as we took the initiative, secured by our ocean border, and assumed our ongoing role as the world's policemen of (mostly) last resort. To this day our Navy has, as its primary mission, defense of the free flow of goods over the seas, for all nations. And we still find opposition to that free passage, don't we? Not just the Somali pirates, either...

    The Ottoman Empire, while by some measures decrepit in the end, wasn't disbanded that long ago, My mother would have been born before that. World War Two finally finished it off, and set off an era of Middle East unrest, with the entirely predictable consequences. The end of the 'Cold War' permitted Eastern European conflicts to reoccur, similarly predictable. And in all this, the militant Muslims are still looking to expand their control and dominance, not just in the Middle East, but to Europe and beyond. Not much has changed since the Crusades, it seems.

    And Europe finds itself in the midst of another invasion. So also are we now facing an invasion. And a revolution-in-the-making. A revolution coming, and one inspired by the same philosophies and intentions as so many in this era. We have choices to make, and soon.

    But the assertion, again, that "regardless of color or ethnicity, not a single one of us is without an ancestor who was a slave." is nearly specious. You have to go back, in my family tree, to the beginnings of Albion, and possibly before. What difference, at this point, does it make?

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  105. Corporate 'merka is no different than Communist Ch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kettle, pot. Pot, kettle. You 'merkins dont have the balls to stand up for yourselves and fix your shit. You deserve yourselves.

  106. What about in the USA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read the link from the original poster as well as the correlating link regarding human rights in the USA.

    Let's start with Guantanamo Bay, While I actually like GWB, during his administration, the department of justice decided that Habeus Corpus was more of a recommendation than an actual right. It goes downhill from there.

    The DHS, TSA, CIA, NSA and more are busted in what seems almost daily in violations of human rights.

    We can talk for ages about commercialization of prisons which has been used to have a massive positive impact on unemployment statistics... after all, you're not unemployed if you're either in prison or not qualified to work.

    There's the systematic preying upon the weak by exploiting the poor. This includes everything from supporting Walmart employing nearly a million welfare recipients under the presence of "If you don't want to work here, you don't have to". Then there is the issue of financial organizations who inflict harsh and cruel fines on people who have the least to begin with. This means that people will pay multiple percent per week in interest rates just to feed their children to take payday loans. They will pay large sums to cash their pay checks because they don't qualify for bank accounts in legitimate institutions mainly because they were indebted through overdraft fees.

    There poor quality of health care for poor people. Sure, everyone has a right to be treated at the hospital ... it doesn't mean they should have the right to a doctor with an absolutely terrible track record.

    We could talk about separating children from there parents by the current efforts of the government to criminalize migration.

    Look at the system behind being arrested and arraigned. Everyone has a right to legal representation, but most of the public servants are so overburdened they don't have the time to even read the report and they skip straight to summary and plea a deal with no regard for the rights of the accused.

    What about laws like "Stand your ground"... I won't even bother summarizing the problems with that.

    Should we also abandon India? This is a country which is so bad that when I talked with a pretty Indian girl working in Doha Qatar, the thing she liked best about living in such a wonderful country is that if she gets raped she can call the police.

    What about Indonesia? If you need examples of this, you're hopeless.

    We can attack most countries... consider even the best countries to live in in the world... the Nordics... ask the Sami people how they feel about the way they've been treated.

    Pick your battles, but if you look at China, they're actually practically innocent next to the USA and many others these days.

  107. Re:I'm trying as best as I can to avoid Maid in Ch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The computer, phone, routers, switches, servers, cables, connectors, memory, hard disks, etc that you use for your browsing to shop online....where do you think those are made?

    You CANNOT avoid items made in China. If you think you can, you better relook at the parts inside what you are using and buying.

    You listen to a podcast, watch a show online, even read/post here all utilize components made in China.

  108. Are Chinese parts safe? by JamesNorton · · Score: 1

    I'm concerned about buying Chinese electronics just because of the potential for the gadgets to include methods to infiltrate/enable hacking exploits on systems that use these devices.

  109. "seem to think it's O.K." - ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where else would you buy electronics? Every single thing you get is Made In China, from computer parts to assembled devices. What choice do you have besides no choice? I can't think of one single electronic product for consumers that isn't Made In China. Maybe some specialized niche technical products aren't, but I'm not going to be buying them. The question, therefore, presupposes that people have some sort of choice. The question is really if it's ethical to live on the grid, or if we should revert back to 19th-centry living.

  110. As opposed to? by kimgkimg · · Score: 1

    Even if you buy something not stamped "Made in China" you're going to be buying something that contains components made there. There's no getting around the global supply chain now.

  111. No... and good luck. by fish_in_the_c · · Score: 1

    No it isn't ethical. Good luck finding things that are not or do not have components made in China ( a preferred trade partner). Thank you Pres. Richard Nixon.
    On the other hand more then a few alternate places things might be bought from ( North Korea? , etc. aren't much better).
    Basically it would be better not to, but it would also be better not to every drive a car or use a product transported with a vehicle that uses or is charged by electricity generated with fossil fuels. You can't though, even if you wanted. Good luck.

    --
    âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
  112. Better option by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Rather than buying Chinese goods cut China off completely. It's far more ethical to plunge a country of 1.4billion people into a recession. Those poor people have had it too good for too long with their crappy low income jobs.

  113. bad summary, bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is only one problem with that reasoning

    I think the summary is missing a few zeros. 10 problems? definitely. 100 problems? likely. 1000 problems? entirely possible.

  114. Is it ethical to let them starve instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How are the Chinese people ever going to escape from poverty with no jobs and no money coming in to their country? As standards of living increase, people start demanding more rights, but none of that stuff matters when you're just struggling to feed your family. The working environment in the United States was repressive and dangerous for many people for a long time, but we expect other countries to just jump straight from 3rd-world to 1st-world standards? It's not realistic.

    1. Re: Is it ethical to let them starve instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it ethical to pay ransom to kidnappers who pointedly make kidnapping their primary business? Or is it ethical to refuse to pay ransom and leave the captives to fight for their freedom or die trying?

      In the latter case you fail to help one suffering victim. In the former case you perpetuate a cycle that creates countless future victims.

  115. Answer: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No.

  116. yes but just a trickle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #1 nearly impossible to buy a phone or computer which is not 50% made of Chinese parts.
    #2 buy such electronics at a sloth pace to limit what you buy from China
    #3 buy as little made in China as possible (low consumption)

    Today, it's nigh impossible to buy 100% non-China made / sourced products.

    Lastly, it's important to limit this when buying kid's toys and kid necessities. It's not as hard as you think, we've spent $10 last two years on Star Wars (SJWars) related merchandise/moves since Disney mangled them.

    #1 to #3 all fit into a greener low consumption lifestyle.

  117. Re:I'm trying as best as I can to avoid Maid in Ch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where they got me is the phones.

    Try LG phones. They're made in South Korea. I'm very happy with my LG V40. It has a nice screen, good camera, good battery life (I use it quite a bit during the day and never have to charge it mid-day), and a headphone jack with great audio quality. My next tv will probably be an LG too.

  118. Re:I'm trying as best as I can to avoid Maid in Ch by thesupraman · · Score: 1

    You do realise that almost certainly deep down his decision is based on racism, that asians are someone 'lower' than him, and all those damn gooks are the same, right?

    After all, other than that, why not buy chinese? its not him supporting america, since by his own admission he happily buys english...

  119. WTF? by thesupraman · · Score: 1

    I would suggest only America has African Americans.
    However Africa has one hell of a lot more Africans.
    And southern France and Spain have quite a few also..

  120. Re: What to avoid in the US: Blacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So also are we now facing an invasion.

    That invasion has already arrived, and from Russia. Not Mexico or other Latin American countries.

  121. Yes it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because fuck you all, i got mine and i need more. Next question!

    Oh, i see... you are getting in doubts now cause things don't work out as well as advertised? Well who'd have thought? Its shocking i tell ya, SHOCKING!
    Totally unexpected right? If you take something from others and don't give back equal value things will get real bad, who knew - its scientific discovery of the millenium. This behaviour is called thievery and parasitic relationship - just look in the dictionary.

  122. Re:I'm trying as best as I can to avoid Maid in Ch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Need labelmaker?

    No. I have never in my life saw any use for one.

  123. What a load of errant bollocks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, facism is not government controlling the economy, it's the capitalisist running the government. Like you have in the USA.

    Communism is abut the means of production, owning it on behalf of the people.

    And if you want to whinge about that, it's no different from the claims about shareholders owning the company they're holding shares on.

  124. Not all had them. And against a 20 ft wall? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you're armed with machine guns and are standing behind a wall that is 20 feet above them, in what way are molotvs and bricks a terrifying weapon, you chickenshit?

  125. They asked WORSE, not bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to just go bad, go look for the USA atrocities, for example (this is a merkin centric site, if you're not a merkin, your own country is seriously fucked up historically). E.g. the genocide of the native americans, the deliberate infection of blacks in the name of testing colds (it was not a cold), bay of pigs, the idiocies that left Afghanistan and Iraq in the state they were in (they put saddam in charge, so they get it twice, for putting him in and then putting ISIS in by creating a power vacuum), bay of pigs, the apache pilots, they caused the recent depression.

    And so on.

  126. Histrionics to avoid answering or considering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When your own country's diabolical nature is pointed out, you scream WHATABOUTISM!!!! but you only do that so you can refuse to consider the claim that the USA is, if anything, worse than China for unethical practices by the government. Especially now. That you cannot handle the question "What about the USA" shows that you know the answer is "We have nowhere to stand morally".

    It isnt whataboutism. It's pointing out that you have no basis to make a claim on ethics if you're a USian, making the question post on a US centric site, irrelevant.

    We don't have to answer the question because it is posed by someone who has no moral highground to ask us.

  127. Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There were two sets of men, the minority who were jerks and the majority who did nothing and a larger minority who upbraided the jerks.

    You concentrated on the jerks, because you WANT to be offended.

    Snowflake.

  128. Re:I'm trying as best as I can to avoid Maid in Ch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >This is not for everyone. Most people want it NAO NAO NAO DAMMIT! WAAAH! Fuck that. Patience is rewarded with sweet things.

    Sure, a large % is people buying crap on a lark but sometimes you're on a job and you need a tape measure. You're not getting paid to take a research sabbatical to find the optimum made outside of china solution. You want to export your hobby to the masses? Good place to start would be free childcare and a 20 hour work week.

  129. Missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem of using Tech from China isn't cost etc...
    Its giving them ways to steal secrets and any technological we may still have.
         

  130. Good luck with that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I feel like pretty much fucking EVERYTHING is made in China, and what isn't will cost around 200% more than what is.

  131. ROLF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good luck trying to buy IT products made out of China then...