If you're going to insist on that level of apples-to-apples, why not go all the way and look at intentional murder by gun vs intentional murder by vehicle?
" The content of those discussions probably fall under executive privileged communications and will continue to be so even after Comey left office. "
Which would mean that Congress can't compel Trump to provide such documentation. It has no bearing on whether or not Comey can legally disclose what happened in the meeting. Further, it almost certainly doesn't apply because Trump spoke about the conversation in public.
Probably because government is the only entity that can protect internet service. It seems to me that they - rightly - don't trust the current government to do so.
My opinion of that is irrelevant to my point, which is that political affiliation doesn't matter when it comes to matriculating at Harvard. But if you must know, I would certainly count such things as a big mark against someone if I were deciding whether or not to bring them into an institution. In this case, Harvard has far more qualified applicants than they have opening. It shouldn't be a surprise that conduct counter to the values they stand for would be a deciding factor - there are plenty of people who are as qualified to attend but who aren't jerks.
Supporting one politician and opposing another is not the same thing as supporting rape and opposing racial equality. The former will NOT keep you out of Harvard. Only the latter.
Slashdot Mirror
If you're going to insist on that level of apples-to-apples, why not go all the way and look at intentional murder by gun vs intentional murder by vehicle?
I don't give a fuck about democracy, but I do care about human rights a lot.
Good fucking luck getting the latter without some form of the former.
Pot, meet kettle.
... because it sure isn't "Stuff that matters".
Source?
" The content of those discussions probably fall under executive privileged communications and will continue to be so even after Comey left office. " Which would mean that Congress can't compel Trump to provide such documentation. It has no bearing on whether or not Comey can legally disclose what happened in the meeting. Further, it almost certainly doesn't apply because Trump spoke about the conversation in public.
Probably because government is the only entity that can protect internet service. It seems to me that they - rightly - don't trust the current government to do so.
The drawbacks being primarily less money for Comcast and Time Warner to spend on paid trolls.
These parties? The Democratic party supports net neutrality.
My opinion of that is irrelevant to my point, which is that political affiliation doesn't matter when it comes to matriculating at Harvard. But if you must know, I would certainly count such things as a big mark against someone if I were deciding whether or not to bring them into an institution. In this case, Harvard has far more qualified applicants than they have opening. It shouldn't be a surprise that conduct counter to the values they stand for would be a deciding factor - there are plenty of people who are as qualified to attend but who aren't jerks.
Supporting one politician and opposing another is not the same thing as supporting rape and opposing racial equality. The former will NOT keep you out of Harvard. Only the latter.