Post a google maps link to it.
Not sure where you went in NYC, but it definitely wasn't a Walmart. Maybe you confused it with Walgreens. There are 0 Walmart's in NYC, including all five boroughs.
Huh??? No republican wanted Clinton.... You mean she was loved by corporate democrats, and that's about it. Left wanted Bernie, and Right wanted Trump. Maybe you could say "centrist" neoliberal corporate democrats wanted Clinton, but no one on the Right wanted anything to do with Clinton and despised her intensely, probably just as much as Democrats are despising Trump now.
It would only be illegal if Trump paid for it. Obtaining it for free isn't illegal and doesn't in-debt him to anything. Keep in mind that Russia didn't like Hillary, so I see no reason why they wouldn't provide this info for free.
If Trump gets impeached, we will not be getting Hillary... We will get Mike Pence, who is probably 100x worse than Trump.... So be careful what you wish for....
You should look up presidential line of succession. It would be Mike Pence -> Paul Ryan -> Orrin Hatch. All nice gems in themselves.
Also it's highly unlikely there was any collaboration. What probably happened was some hackers obviously did hack the DNC, then gave that info to someone, then that someone who possibly was Russian, approached Trump team and said hey I have juicy emails showing DNC corruption, would you like it? And Trump said, hell yeah, let me see.
Collaboration would have to show that they were working together on the plan and execution. Which clearly was not the case.
But but what will republicans now use as a reason to prevent minimum wage increases? Since companies are replacing employees with kiosks/robots/ai without any wage increases? Boggle
Yes because American sources are all propaganda free.
Haven't you noticed a pattern of absolutely zero investigative journalism? All we ever get are news anchors (talking heads) talking to so called "experts" who either work for the US Government or work for an organization that receives funding or is owned by the US Government. By that definition alone, you are being fed American government propaganda, and you happily accept it.
Ask your self this, where are American investigative journalists in Syria? We had them in Iraq and Afghanistan, but all we get are "experts" in Syria. How come there are UK, Canadian and French and many other journalists in Syria, but US media never talks with them???
Same with the Russian nonsense.
We're 10 months into the 'Russia collusion' investigation and their bombshell proof is that some Russians bought ads on Facebook & Google.
That‘s not surprising. "Russiagate" is the 2017 version of the great Iraqi WMDs hoax. The reports in neocon propaganda sheets follow exactly the same pattern as they did fifteen years ago — sensationalist headlines with unnamed "sources" telling us some pretty shocking things — but without any actual hard evidence ever being produced.
Then, as now, it's a case of "we've got the proof, loads of it, but we can't show it to you, and you must believe us that it's there." The image of Colin Powell holding up that vial at the UN springs readily to mind.
Used to?
It still does... I got a HTC U11 dual sim 6GB ram 128GB storage latest qualcomm processor day it came out, and it's a beautiful awesome phone... with one of the best cameras...
Uh I'm in Taiwan and I can download AND upload from/to NY at over 45MB/sec... and that's over SSH using my home connection in Taiwan which is twice the distance of east coast to Europe... If you know what you're doing, it is totally doable...
Slashdot Mirror
Post a google maps link to it. Not sure where you went in NYC, but it definitely wasn't a Walmart. Maybe you confused it with Walgreens. There are 0 Walmart's in NYC, including all five boroughs.
Hate to break it to you, but there are no Walmart's in NYC.
Is there any actual proof of this? Or even any evidence at all to suggest it? Or is this just another tinfoil hat type of thing?
Except that duckduckgo doesn't collect your IP, nor your search terms, so there is nothing to hand over.
Huh??? No republican wanted Clinton.... You mean she was loved by corporate democrats, and that's about it. Left wanted Bernie, and Right wanted Trump. Maybe you could say "centrist" neoliberal corporate democrats wanted Clinton, but no one on the Right wanted anything to do with Clinton and despised her intensely, probably just as much as Democrats are despising Trump now.
So how do you delete this data without deleting your account? What is the link to the "tool accessible via Web browser?"
We have 0 proof it was Russian government that hacked the DNC. Or at least 0 proof that has been shown so far.
It would only be illegal if Trump paid for it. Obtaining it for free isn't illegal and doesn't in-debt him to anything. Keep in mind that Russia didn't like Hillary, so I see no reason why they wouldn't provide this info for free.
No it wouldn't be... How much monetary value would you put on DNC emails? And it's not illegal to read it.
What would be illegal is if Trump paid for it.
If Trump gets impeached, we will not be getting Hillary... We will get Mike Pence, who is probably 100x worse than Trump.... So be careful what you wish for.... You should look up presidential line of succession. It would be Mike Pence -> Paul Ryan -> Orrin Hatch. All nice gems in themselves. Also it's highly unlikely there was any collaboration. What probably happened was some hackers obviously did hack the DNC, then gave that info to someone, then that someone who possibly was Russian, approached Trump team and said hey I have juicy emails showing DNC corruption, would you like it? And Trump said, hell yeah, let me see. Collaboration would have to show that they were working together on the plan and execution. Which clearly was not the case.
But but what will republicans now use as a reason to prevent minimum wage increases? Since companies are replacing employees with kiosks/robots/ai without any wage increases? Boggle
Yes because American sources are all propaganda free. Haven't you noticed a pattern of absolutely zero investigative journalism? All we ever get are news anchors (talking heads) talking to so called "experts" who either work for the US Government or work for an organization that receives funding or is owned by the US Government. By that definition alone, you are being fed American government propaganda, and you happily accept it. Ask your self this, where are American investigative journalists in Syria? We had them in Iraq and Afghanistan, but all we get are "experts" in Syria. How come there are UK, Canadian and French and many other journalists in Syria, but US media never talks with them??? Same with the Russian nonsense. We're 10 months into the 'Russia collusion' investigation and their bombshell proof is that some Russians bought ads on Facebook & Google. That‘s not surprising. "Russiagate" is the 2017 version of the great Iraqi WMDs hoax. The reports in neocon propaganda sheets follow exactly the same pattern as they did fifteen years ago — sensationalist headlines with unnamed "sources" telling us some pretty shocking things — but without any actual hard evidence ever being produced. Then, as now, it's a case of "we've got the proof, loads of it, but we can't show it to you, and you must believe us that it's there." The image of Colin Powell holding up that vial at the UN springs readily to mind.
Used to? It still does... I got a HTC U11 dual sim 6GB ram 128GB storage latest qualcomm processor day it came out, and it's a beautiful awesome phone... with one of the best cameras...
Uh I'm in Taiwan and I can download AND upload from/to NY at over 45MB/sec... and that's over SSH using my home connection in Taiwan which is twice the distance of east coast to Europe... If you know what you're doing, it is totally doable...
Just a slight pocket loss there kek...