PopeRatzo - you often reply cogently and wittily. I look forward to your posts whether I agree with them or not. (Actually, disagree is MORE interesting cuz you put out some some really really good slapdowns.) Can you explain however how you believe that right nationalists appear on college campuses? Not even feminist, black woman and former muslim Ayaan Hirsi can appear on campus without riots threatened and honorary degrees revoked (Brandeis) because of leftist campus control. Maybe you consider Orthodox Jews like Ben Shapiro to be 'white supremacist' because he's caucasian even though the skinheads want him dead. He is also highly protested and even locked out of some campuses. (youtube video of police blocks available). Berkeley rioting shut down Milo and has, for now, halted Anne Coulter. If Milo is a WS that means White Supremacy now contains fantabulous (and often flaming ) gays who prefer black lovers. (shit man, that's almost a white supremacy that I could get into) And he's proud to state he's catching, not pitching, and I don't think one bottoms their way to supremacy. (I could be wrong. I'm heterosexual so maybe I just don't know.) So help me understand how I come over to your side and espouse that college campuses are where white supremacists foment. BTW -- the story you linked is absolutely an example of awful violent detestable white-supremacist cowards who should be put away for decades or more. It underscores they are thankfully a minority. According to 2014 FBI Homicide statistics 8% of black murders were by whites - no doubt often like the skinhead scum in your link. However 15% of killed whites were murdered by blacks. Whites are 77% of America, and blacks are 13%. Seems like one group there is underrepresented as murderers and the other vastly over-represented. I always enjoy your thoughts and I am interested in why I should adopt your points instead of what appears to be factual information to the opposite. I am rational enough to change my opinions based on properly understanding facts. Yeah -- and I'm man enough to handle your quick slapdowns. I'll probably enjoy it (but hey -- I'm not coming on to you, just so you know....unless you're really cute, clever and female and about 22-28 but I suspect you're not precisely in that ven intersection ) P.S. Ever see 'Midnight Cowboy'? Oscar winning 60's film. Dustin Hoffman's character is called 'Ratzo' at times in the movie. Whenever I see your handle the images that hit are Hoffman + Pope Of Greenwich Village. The set of memes it invokes for me is really cool.
Kirby (sic) -- now you STOP IT with your true-facts which happen just not get reported by the press unless they are FORCED TO. Did you not realize some former Obama voter and Occupy dude recently declared himself a white nationalist and killed some chick at a protest. And for that we should impeach Donald Trump and install Maxine Waters as president. And we should take all of Trumps stuff because after DECADES in the public eye with HORDES of enemies (Rosie O'Donnel counts as one or more hordes herself) we now realize he's racist. Black people winning The Apprentice was cover and his employees like Omarosa (she's white house staff!) are really white chicks wearing shoe polish. Viva la revolucion!!!
moronoxyd - I am interested in your point that leftist violence is mainly property damage while rightist violence leads to greater shootings and bombings. Some would debate your point by saying "millions of people were killed by the left (Stalin, Mao)" but that's pointless and doesn't apply to a point you're making about TODAY. The Stalin/Mao point is often an intellectually lazy knee-jerk response. I appreciate you're talking about TODAY. I am interested in your 'left=property damage VS. right=guns+bombings'. As of TODAY the most recent history is that a leftist wing-nut attacked a baseball field of Republican congressmen with a semi-automatic combat rifle. Two FL policemen were assassinated by a 'former marine'. Former Marine sounds rightist until one find out the media covered up he is actually a BLM supporter, Black Power rant-maker, Muslim Convert, Black himself, and Leftist based on his social media data. Okay, I agree those are micro datapoints. Lets go macro - about 13% of the population is responsible for about 50% our murders -- done mainly with guns. That 13% is virtually entirely comprised of a Democratic constituency. Gun violence is highest in Democrat controlled cities like Detroit, Chicago, D.C. These are cities controlled by the left for DECADES. While on the other hand virtually zero NRA members are violent criminals because felons cannot own guns. (Even if every NRA member was a closet felon they aren't killing at 4x-5x their population count). Okay -- in the interest of brevity, I will cease at two TODAY micro points and two TODAY macro points. All easily googled. Of course I could be wrong in seeing more leftist gun violence. I am human (albeit a suave and charming one, still flawed and prone to error). Please tell me why I should change my opinion to yours. I have an open mind. Thank you.
Was seeing a Democratic Socialist being effectively called a Right Wing Zealot. Much more amusing than my being called out for being a White-Nationalist for my defense of freedom of speech in the public square. Seriously - I'd be THE MOST AWESOME White Nationalist EVER because I'm so brown that I should sue UPS for cultural appropriation. Oh shit...that's not actually funny because Yoga is under attack and universities can't have Mexican Food Day. But I REALLY REALLY like white women. So maybe I'm a white nationalist in that respect. Why white women you say? Easy. The flavor and the aroma. However -- back to serious points -- any defense of the tenets of Western Culture (including use of the words Western Culture) trigger the "You are a racist capitalist white supremacist!" against even those of us who are philosophically and biologically incapable of such feats. Then the dialectic fails. Shouting begins. Fighting possible. (That ALWAYS means fewer white women in bikinis, unless it is in amateur female jello wrestling which I am familiar with as I once managed Hillbilly Hussy). What, if any, could be a way to enter this debate without being labelled a KKK Grand Dragon?
Rockoon - Your response is intriguing. I've been trying to figure out the [reason] so many people in USA would think the media is right-wing. I mean, the number is FAR over the few points of fringe in any standard deviation. My placeholder for [reason] was [lives in an alternate universe]....and I think you just described that universe to me. Which will assist with my own active efforts to bring further rationality. Can you elaborate more on this mindset? Even if you were joking -- your explanation is still the MOST logical one I have encountered for any normative human to be able to say "the press right-wing dominated". P.S. Did you notice that Trudeau in the great north is deporting record numbers of immigrants? What happened to his tweet welcoming refugees with open arms in response to American enforcement of border law. Maybe one day our 'right wing' dominated press will report on that. And the collapse of Venezuela.
dfenstrate - That was a lucid, logical and cogent response. Thank you. Valuable for me to paste into my debate points for future reference. Needed a concision in my response to "White Supremacist terror is the greater threat." Okay, maybe 'concision' isn't a word. Yet. Until I repeat it enough. Muhahahaahahahah. P.S. The 'marine' who recently killed the two cops also happened to be Black (by casual observation), a Black Lives Supporter (by Facebook posts), and Muslim by, oh, his new name Muhammad Ali (Facebook again, which also contains his anti-white rants.) http://www.thegatewaypundit.co... Yeah, well, anyway, I just can't find myself to be worried that, in general, it would be former marines that are going to ram a building with aircraft full of passengers or shoot up a gay nightclub.
Strat - I surmise that a good deal of the anti-speech movement on the left comes from, as one philosopher phrases it, "A Desire to Be Heroic." It is, as of yet, unclear to me what the highest quality approaches are to discussing this. Some of us believe the best defense against hate speech is MORE SPEECH. Suggesting this quickly got you labelled a member of the aryan nation by one responder. No doubt I'll get flamed too for responding to a couple of them. I included images of what MORE SPEECH means to me (Anna Kasparian's legs, Mel Brooks impersonating Hitler, Woody Allen as Castro). However the 'YOU ARE A WHITE RACIST' response quickly follows. And it's worthless, in my case for example, to explain that I'm not white. Nor will I pass the 'paper bag test' any time soon.
The best defense against hate speech is more speech. Let these idiots be ridiculed in the public square. NONE of them could handle themselves in a debate on the news. They'd just look like uneducated, uninformed, tribal, socially backwards members of some particularly regressive religions. Seriously -- those guys do NOT get the hot girls. So let them speak. When the ACLU defended the right of actual NAZI's to march it was the right thing to do. (although it was funnier when Mel Brooks dressed as Hitler.)
What I would 'tell the family' is that MORE SPEECH is the best herd-immunity against hate speech. If white-supremacists were allowed to speak freely (without antifa mobs rioting) they would just look like fools. LESS people would be swayed to their side rather than more. Just imagine Anna Kasparian debating a white supremacist. In a bikini. (her not him you schmuck!) In general when speech is suppressed then WORSE societal behaviors often end up fomenting in the fringes. You're outspoken on slashdot. You'll take on a white supremacist idiot in the public forum. I have faith in people like you. And if you find any bikini pics of Anna Kasparian (blonde era), do forward them. P.S. Here's the 'Battle of The Blondes' Coulter vs. Kasparian at Politicon and Toure being sexist by calling it a catfight. Yeah, I'm being sexist too but look at her legs when she gets up! https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
AmiMojo - thanks for this. I always look forward to your informative and useful posts. What suite of apps would you recommend to implement for reasonably high protection? Generalized information like you've already given is best, since many people will be reading the post. This is why I am not burdening you with my config. Whatever you think would be good additions to a PiBadgerBlock solution would be great to hear. Thanks!
Aryl - Thanks for this advice. Would you be kind enough to share any problems or pitfalls I should look to avoid by adopting this strategy? Also would be great if you suggested any hacks, better processes or insights. I'd like to adopt this and learning from someone who's already done it would be helpful. I'd like to avoid problems like account lockouts/deletions from lack of activity, for example. Best, Marcus
lucm, thanks for this advice. Can you provide some more info on the risks associated? e.g. email accounts going stale and not being able to access password reset info later. In other words what, if any, problems you've encountered or process efficiencies or hacks have you found that you could share? I'm very interested in doing this myself. Thanks!
Whoah -- Google "Naval Pregnancy Rates" turns up a wealth of info. Am interested in any articles you'd recommend. (apologies for dupe post. time matters.)
Holmwood -- this is very interesting. Can you provide citations or a data source that provides this info as well as comparison data for males? Best would be if we could look at some historical data too. I'm willing to dig myself as I have a vested interest in such data. Obtaining a startpoint from you, if I can, will provide additional efficiency. Thank you.
Drinky -- What kind of lock and what kind of gate? I mean -- *lots* of us have tools that can cut metal or open locks with degrees of stealth ranging from ninja through angle-grinder. Although a spark-filled flurry in a photo would be the picturesque one. A large part of this group are hackers and SOME will live in the area with a valid reason to be there if they are obtuse enough to attract authorities. Lots of hack whatever is hackable...higher status and robin-hood hacks are the MOST satisfying. Why isn't this gate being hacked on a regular basis? (Not speaking of myself of course. Hacking is ILLEGAL and I would NEVER EVER EVER DO IT I SWEAR. My dog swears too. Hell I don't even know nuthin' of the Linicks operating table or whatever its called. My penguin swears.)
The vast majority of very wealthy capitalists end up being corporatist and ultimately statist. All humans (all lifeforms even, including proto-life like viruses) seek status increases. Once one has a lot of money it is pretty easy to get lured into the fact that America is corporatist because it is actually REALLY FUCKING CHEAP to buy access to some useful political power for anyone who can put as little as 5-10K per year into donations. This is probably what Khosla is counting on to help him steal the land from the people. He is a THEIF and should be labelled as one. Preferably a THEIF who LACKS ENOUGH WEALTH TO SHARE. He'd hate being called poor more than ANYTHING else.
Aristos, this is an interesting debate. Can you provide an example or two of what you mean by someone who takes a short term 'liberty' position that results in long term loss of liberty? When I think about this first thing that comes to mind is 'Patriot Act' which was supposed to give us 'Freedom from Terror' but really has moved the government towards the police state. Next in mind is LBJ's great society. Generations later blacks are now more highly regulated than any other race group (more stop & frisk, greater incarceration, more out-of-wedlock mothers forced to buy gov't approved food via WIC program, lousy black youth employment rates) when pre 1950 both black marriage AND black youth employment rates where HIGHER than White rates. (see Economist Thomas Sowell for research summaries). Corporatism sucks too as well. Corporatism is where the gov't favors & protects corporations. That's what we have in the USA, not really capitalism. A really egregious corporatist example comes from Mexico where VOIP is illegal in to protect Carlos Slim's telecom monopoly. None of the above is freemarkets, classical liberal, or libertarian. Yet as I am human my knowledge base is limited by both scope and bias. So I would like to learn more. Can you give me some examples of how you're thinking about this so that I can better understand your position? Thanks! Rock on.
Vinodh Khosla is just a beachgrubbing douche. At that status/money level if one must still STEAL FROM THE PUBLIC he should be branded as a THIEF and STINGEY. Silicon Valley *hates* any insult that labels them acting less-than-magnanamous, or, god-forbid, so impovrished they cannot share resources. Gary Johnson, former 2 term Governor of New Mexico ran twice for President as a libertarian. He's the kind of libertarian that says the government shouldn't be in your bedroom and should be less invasive in your wallet. Smoke whatever you want, just don't drive. First time he ran as freemarkets Republican. Second time he *WAS* the actual Libertarian presidential candidate 2016. Rand Paul is libertarian as are a few others on the Freedom Caucus -- but they have to operate as Republicans due to our 2 party system, inevitable because of First-Past-The-Post voting. There *ARE* ways to donate to libertarians in politics.
And all of them agree that Caitlin Jenner is a beautiful woman! I'm sure they'd be happy to date her. Or be proud that their son or nephew is dating her!!!
I just have one single question for people who say the DNC has been hacked by Russians. If Russian hacking is the case, then why has the DNC absolutely refused, for over a year, to allow their servers to be examined by ANY law enforcement authority or even ANY authority beyond their own outside consultants? I mean, if Russia hacked our election and installed a manchurian candidate, and we should be removing this guy at 'all costs' -- why can't anyone obtain any evidence at all from the DNC hack? Can ANYONE answer this for me?
Yeah...what do you think about the idea of posting a voice-over of that video in American English? We have access to talent & we operate a studio for our own product demos, so the vocals & mixing would be pro (or at least highly talented intern supervised by a pro). Thoughts? Anyone? This is an EXTREMELY VALUABLE documentary as it is fair, funny, and full of real science. But I need some feedback before I pour company time into this. Anyone have a higher def version? Even if we upload 360 to remain with what is probably Norway TV's copyright parameters for youtube it is better for us to work with a high-def file. Conversion-losses & such. (and there is always conversions at some point). I think this is a hot moment and we could concievably have an english version up by mid next week.
Yo fellow honkey mofos, sorry for the double post -- here's the TL;DR segment from swillden's documentary recommendation. https://youtu.be/tiJVJ5QRRUE?t... which summarizes the gender preferences of ONE DAY OLD CHILDREN before the effect of post-birth culture. Also worth it to watch this segment https://youtu.be/tiJVJ5QRRUE?t... which informs us that gender roles are STATIC across ALL studied cultures, implying a biological basis. (Apologies to those who are not honkeys, mofos, or fellows. Especially the non mofos. Cuz it is GOOOOOD to be a mofo)
Slashdotters - This doc is AWESOME. Subtitled so it demands full attention. No way absorb it while doing pullups or giving your hampster his daily bath. However it is BRUTALLY HONEST in a way one doesn't find in anglosphere media. Plus the host is totally a dude you'd want to have a scotch with. He also comes across as potentially a really grade A wingman, in which case the drinks'd be on me. (Never underestimate the power of an affable European wingman when you're stateside. That, is of course, unless you are the affable European yourself in which case see me about above wingman position)
Holy Reference Library Batman!! -- Thank you for pasting this. Placed into my reference reading list and archive for dialectic usage. Still I suggest not to lead with "women are more neurotic" as the uninformed thronging masses will interpret that as "women are disabled." BETTER to lead with "men totally suck such as being impulsive because they are risk monkeys and women are better in [domain gamma]. Did I mention men suck? Conversely, according to [study1; study2 etc...] representing current science women can be measured to be not impulsive buttloopers like dickweed men (who suck worm ass, btw) but instead described as more 'neurotic' in the scientific sense where neurotic's clinical meaning is [behavior1; behavior2]. This allows women to excel in [domains theta>]. BTW -- did I mention men TOTALLY SUCK and smell of icky toxic masculinity. Maybe that's why they mass in the engineering quad. And it's just too gross for women to get near them. Seriously, like the guy in your dorm who NEVER rinsed his razor. Oh, shit, sorry Ned. Still you suck TOXIC M. WORM ASS."
Slashdot Mirror
PopeRatzo - you often reply cogently and wittily. I look forward to your posts whether I agree with them or not. (Actually, disagree is MORE interesting cuz you put out some some really really good slapdowns.) Can you explain however how you believe that right nationalists appear on college campuses? Not even feminist, black woman and former muslim Ayaan Hirsi can appear on campus without riots threatened and honorary degrees revoked (Brandeis) because of leftist campus control. Maybe you consider Orthodox Jews like Ben Shapiro to be 'white supremacist' because he's caucasian even though the skinheads want him dead. He is also highly protested and even locked out of some campuses. (youtube video of police blocks available). Berkeley rioting shut down Milo and has, for now, halted Anne Coulter. If Milo is a WS that means White Supremacy now contains fantabulous (and often flaming ) gays who prefer black lovers. (shit man, that's almost a white supremacy that I could get into) And he's proud to state he's catching, not pitching, and I don't think one bottoms their way to supremacy. (I could be wrong. I'm heterosexual so maybe I just don't know.) So help me understand how I come over to your side and espouse that college campuses are where white supremacists foment. BTW -- the story you linked is absolutely an example of awful violent detestable white-supremacist cowards who should be put away for decades or more. It underscores they are thankfully a minority. According to 2014 FBI Homicide statistics 8% of black murders were by whites - no doubt often like the skinhead scum in your link. However 15% of killed whites were murdered by blacks. Whites are 77% of America, and blacks are 13%. Seems like one group there is underrepresented as murderers and the other vastly over-represented. I always enjoy your thoughts and I am interested in why I should adopt your points instead of what appears to be factual information to the opposite. I am rational enough to change my opinions based on properly understanding facts. Yeah -- and I'm man enough to handle your quick slapdowns. I'll probably enjoy it (but hey -- I'm not coming on to you, just so you know....unless you're really cute, clever and female and about 22-28 but I suspect you're not precisely in that ven intersection ) P.S. Ever see 'Midnight Cowboy'? Oscar winning 60's film. Dustin Hoffman's character is called 'Ratzo' at times in the movie. Whenever I see your handle the images that hit are Hoffman + Pope Of Greenwich Village. The set of memes it invokes for me is really cool.
Kirby (sic) -- now you STOP IT with your true-facts which happen just not get reported by the press unless they are FORCED TO. Did you not realize some former Obama voter and Occupy dude recently declared himself a white nationalist and killed some chick at a protest. And for that we should impeach Donald Trump and install Maxine Waters as president. And we should take all of Trumps stuff because after DECADES in the public eye with HORDES of enemies (Rosie O'Donnel counts as one or more hordes herself) we now realize he's racist. Black people winning The Apprentice was cover and his employees like Omarosa (she's white house staff!) are really white chicks wearing shoe polish. Viva la revolucion!!!
moronoxyd - I am interested in your point that leftist violence is mainly property damage while rightist violence leads to greater shootings and bombings. Some would debate your point by saying "millions of people were killed by the left (Stalin, Mao)" but that's pointless and doesn't apply to a point you're making about TODAY. The Stalin/Mao point is often an intellectually lazy knee-jerk response. I appreciate you're talking about TODAY. I am interested in your 'left=property damage VS. right=guns+bombings'. As of TODAY the most recent history is that a leftist wing-nut attacked a baseball field of Republican congressmen with a semi-automatic combat rifle. Two FL policemen were assassinated by a 'former marine'. Former Marine sounds rightist until one find out the media covered up he is actually a BLM supporter, Black Power rant-maker, Muslim Convert, Black himself, and Leftist based on his social media data. Okay, I agree those are micro datapoints. Lets go macro - about 13% of the population is responsible for about 50% our murders -- done mainly with guns. That 13% is virtually entirely comprised of a Democratic constituency. Gun violence is highest in Democrat controlled cities like Detroit, Chicago, D.C. These are cities controlled by the left for DECADES. While on the other hand virtually zero NRA members are violent criminals because felons cannot own guns. (Even if every NRA member was a closet felon they aren't killing at 4x-5x their population count). Okay -- in the interest of brevity, I will cease at two TODAY micro points and two TODAY macro points. All easily googled. Of course I could be wrong in seeing more leftist gun violence. I am human (albeit a suave and charming one, still flawed and prone to error). Please tell me why I should change my opinion to yours. I have an open mind. Thank you.
Was seeing a Democratic Socialist being effectively called a Right Wing Zealot. Much more amusing than my being called out for being a White-Nationalist for my defense of freedom of speech in the public square. Seriously - I'd be THE MOST AWESOME White Nationalist EVER because I'm so brown that I should sue UPS for cultural appropriation. Oh shit...that's not actually funny because Yoga is under attack and universities can't have Mexican Food Day. But I REALLY REALLY like white women. So maybe I'm a white nationalist in that respect. Why white women you say? Easy. The flavor and the aroma. However -- back to serious points -- any defense of the tenets of Western Culture (including use of the words Western Culture) trigger the "You are a racist capitalist white supremacist!" against even those of us who are philosophically and biologically incapable of such feats. Then the dialectic fails. Shouting begins. Fighting possible. (That ALWAYS means fewer white women in bikinis, unless it is in amateur female jello wrestling which I am familiar with as I once managed Hillbilly Hussy). What, if any, could be a way to enter this debate without being labelled a KKK Grand Dragon?
Rockoon - Your response is intriguing. I've been trying to figure out the [reason] so many people in USA would think the media is right-wing. I mean, the number is FAR over the few points of fringe in any standard deviation. My placeholder for [reason] was [lives in an alternate universe]....and I think you just described that universe to me. Which will assist with my own active efforts to bring further rationality. Can you elaborate more on this mindset? Even if you were joking -- your explanation is still the MOST logical one I have encountered for any normative human to be able to say "the press right-wing dominated". P.S. Did you notice that Trudeau in the great north is deporting record numbers of immigrants? What happened to his tweet welcoming refugees with open arms in response to American enforcement of border law. Maybe one day our 'right wing' dominated press will report on that. And the collapse of Venezuela.
dfenstrate - That was a lucid, logical and cogent response. Thank you. Valuable for me to paste into my debate points for future reference. Needed a concision in my response to "White Supremacist terror is the greater threat." Okay, maybe 'concision' isn't a word. Yet. Until I repeat it enough. Muhahahaahahahah. P.S. The 'marine' who recently killed the two cops also happened to be Black (by casual observation), a Black Lives Supporter (by Facebook posts), and Muslim by, oh, his new name Muhammad Ali (Facebook again, which also contains his anti-white rants.) http://www.thegatewaypundit.co... Yeah, well, anyway, I just can't find myself to be worried that, in general, it would be former marines that are going to ram a building with aircraft full of passengers or shoot up a gay nightclub.
Strat - I surmise that a good deal of the anti-speech movement on the left comes from, as one philosopher phrases it, "A Desire to Be Heroic." It is, as of yet, unclear to me what the highest quality approaches are to discussing this. Some of us believe the best defense against hate speech is MORE SPEECH. Suggesting this quickly got you labelled a member of the aryan nation by one responder. No doubt I'll get flamed too for responding to a couple of them. I included images of what MORE SPEECH means to me (Anna Kasparian's legs, Mel Brooks impersonating Hitler, Woody Allen as Castro). However the 'YOU ARE A WHITE RACIST' response quickly follows. And it's worthless, in my case for example, to explain that I'm not white. Nor will I pass the 'paper bag test' any time soon.
The best defense against hate speech is more speech. Let these idiots be ridiculed in the public square. NONE of them could handle themselves in a debate on the news. They'd just look like uneducated, uninformed, tribal, socially backwards members of some particularly regressive religions. Seriously -- those guys do NOT get the hot girls. So let them speak. When the ACLU defended the right of actual NAZI's to march it was the right thing to do. (although it was funnier when Mel Brooks dressed as Hitler.)
What I would 'tell the family' is that MORE SPEECH is the best herd-immunity against hate speech. If white-supremacists were allowed to speak freely (without antifa mobs rioting) they would just look like fools. LESS people would be swayed to their side rather than more. Just imagine Anna Kasparian debating a white supremacist. In a bikini. (her not him you schmuck!) In general when speech is suppressed then WORSE societal behaviors often end up fomenting in the fringes. You're outspoken on slashdot. You'll take on a white supremacist idiot in the public forum. I have faith in people like you. And if you find any bikini pics of Anna Kasparian (blonde era), do forward them. P.S. Here's the 'Battle of The Blondes' Coulter vs. Kasparian at Politicon and Toure being sexist by calling it a catfight. Yeah, I'm being sexist too but look at her legs when she gets up! https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
AmiMojo - thanks for this. I always look forward to your informative and useful posts. What suite of apps would you recommend to implement for reasonably high protection? Generalized information like you've already given is best, since many people will be reading the post. This is why I am not burdening you with my config. Whatever you think would be good additions to a PiBadgerBlock solution would be great to hear. Thanks!
Aryl - Thanks for this advice. Would you be kind enough to share any problems or pitfalls I should look to avoid by adopting this strategy? Also would be great if you suggested any hacks, better processes or insights. I'd like to adopt this and learning from someone who's already done it would be helpful. I'd like to avoid problems like account lockouts/deletions from lack of activity, for example. Best, Marcus
lucm, thanks for this advice. Can you provide some more info on the risks associated? e.g. email accounts going stale and not being able to access password reset info later. In other words what, if any, problems you've encountered or process efficiencies or hacks have you found that you could share? I'm very interested in doing this myself. Thanks!
Whoah -- Google "Naval Pregnancy Rates" turns up a wealth of info. Am interested in any articles you'd recommend. (apologies for dupe post. time matters.)
Holmwood -- this is very interesting. Can you provide citations or a data source that provides this info as well as comparison data for males? Best would be if we could look at some historical data too. I'm willing to dig myself as I have a vested interest in such data. Obtaining a startpoint from you, if I can, will provide additional efficiency. Thank you.
Drinky -- What kind of lock and what kind of gate? I mean -- *lots* of us have tools that can cut metal or open locks with degrees of stealth ranging from ninja through angle-grinder. Although a spark-filled flurry in a photo would be the picturesque one. A large part of this group are hackers and SOME will live in the area with a valid reason to be there if they are obtuse enough to attract authorities. Lots of hack whatever is hackable...higher status and robin-hood hacks are the MOST satisfying. Why isn't this gate being hacked on a regular basis? (Not speaking of myself of course. Hacking is ILLEGAL and I would NEVER EVER EVER DO IT I SWEAR. My dog swears too. Hell I don't even know nuthin' of the Linicks operating table or whatever its called. My penguin swears.)
The vast majority of very wealthy capitalists end up being corporatist and ultimately statist. All humans (all lifeforms even, including proto-life like viruses) seek status increases. Once one has a lot of money it is pretty easy to get lured into the fact that America is corporatist because it is actually REALLY FUCKING CHEAP to buy access to some useful political power for anyone who can put as little as 5-10K per year into donations. This is probably what Khosla is counting on to help him steal the land from the people. He is a THEIF and should be labelled as one. Preferably a THEIF who LACKS ENOUGH WEALTH TO SHARE. He'd hate being called poor more than ANYTHING else.
Aristos, this is an interesting debate. Can you provide an example or two of what you mean by someone who takes a short term 'liberty' position that results in long term loss of liberty? When I think about this first thing that comes to mind is 'Patriot Act' which was supposed to give us 'Freedom from Terror' but really has moved the government towards the police state. Next in mind is LBJ's great society. Generations later blacks are now more highly regulated than any other race group (more stop & frisk, greater incarceration, more out-of-wedlock mothers forced to buy gov't approved food via WIC program, lousy black youth employment rates) when pre 1950 both black marriage AND black youth employment rates where HIGHER than White rates. (see Economist Thomas Sowell for research summaries). Corporatism sucks too as well. Corporatism is where the gov't favors & protects corporations. That's what we have in the USA, not really capitalism. A really egregious corporatist example comes from Mexico where VOIP is illegal in to protect Carlos Slim's telecom monopoly. None of the above is freemarkets, classical liberal, or libertarian. Yet as I am human my knowledge base is limited by both scope and bias. So I would like to learn more. Can you give me some examples of how you're thinking about this so that I can better understand your position? Thanks! Rock on.
Vinodh Khosla is just a beachgrubbing douche. At that status/money level if one must still STEAL FROM THE PUBLIC he should be branded as a THIEF and STINGEY. Silicon Valley *hates* any insult that labels them acting less-than-magnanamous, or, god-forbid, so impovrished they cannot share resources. Gary Johnson, former 2 term Governor of New Mexico ran twice for President as a libertarian. He's the kind of libertarian that says the government shouldn't be in your bedroom and should be less invasive in your wallet. Smoke whatever you want, just don't drive. First time he ran as freemarkets Republican. Second time he *WAS* the actual Libertarian presidential candidate 2016. Rand Paul is libertarian as are a few others on the Freedom Caucus -- but they have to operate as Republicans due to our 2 party system, inevitable because of First-Past-The-Post voting. There *ARE* ways to donate to libertarians in politics.
And all of them agree that Caitlin Jenner is a beautiful woman! I'm sure they'd be happy to date her. Or be proud that their son or nephew is dating her!!!
I just have one single question for people who say the DNC has been hacked by Russians. If Russian hacking is the case, then why has the DNC absolutely refused, for over a year, to allow their servers to be examined by ANY law enforcement authority or even ANY authority beyond their own outside consultants? I mean, if Russia hacked our election and installed a manchurian candidate, and we should be removing this guy at 'all costs' -- why can't anyone obtain any evidence at all from the DNC hack? Can ANYONE answer this for me?
Yeah...what do you think about the idea of posting a voice-over of that video in American English? We have access to talent & we operate a studio for our own product demos, so the vocals & mixing would be pro (or at least highly talented intern supervised by a pro). Thoughts? Anyone? This is an EXTREMELY VALUABLE documentary as it is fair, funny, and full of real science. But I need some feedback before I pour company time into this. Anyone have a higher def version? Even if we upload 360 to remain with what is probably Norway TV's copyright parameters for youtube it is better for us to work with a high-def file. Conversion-losses & such. (and there is always conversions at some point). I think this is a hot moment and we could concievably have an english version up by mid next week.
Thanks for the cultural update. Having been a Bearnstein Bear lad myself, I only internalized a bit of the Seussiverse.
Yo fellow honkey mofos, sorry for the double post -- here's the TL;DR segment from swillden's documentary recommendation. https://youtu.be/tiJVJ5QRRUE?t... which summarizes the gender preferences of ONE DAY OLD CHILDREN before the effect of post-birth culture. Also worth it to watch this segment https://youtu.be/tiJVJ5QRRUE?t... which informs us that gender roles are STATIC across ALL studied cultures, implying a biological basis. (Apologies to those who are not honkeys, mofos, or fellows. Especially the non mofos. Cuz it is GOOOOOD to be a mofo)
Slashdotters - This doc is AWESOME. Subtitled so it demands full attention. No way absorb it while doing pullups or giving your hampster his daily bath. However it is BRUTALLY HONEST in a way one doesn't find in anglosphere media. Plus the host is totally a dude you'd want to have a scotch with. He also comes across as potentially a really grade A wingman, in which case the drinks'd be on me. (Never underestimate the power of an affable European wingman when you're stateside. That, is of course, unless you are the affable European yourself in which case see me about above wingman position)
Holy Reference Library Batman!! -- Thank you for pasting this. Placed into my reference reading list and archive for dialectic usage. Still I suggest not to lead with "women are more neurotic" as the uninformed thronging masses will interpret that as "women are disabled." BETTER to lead with "men totally suck such as being impulsive because they are risk monkeys and women are better in [domain gamma]. Did I mention men suck? Conversely, according to [study1; study2 etc...] representing current science women can be measured to be not impulsive buttloopers like dickweed men (who suck worm ass, btw) but instead described as more 'neurotic' in the scientific sense where neurotic's clinical meaning is [behavior1; behavior2]. This allows women to excel in [domains theta>]. BTW -- did I mention men TOTALLY SUCK and smell of icky toxic masculinity. Maybe that's why they mass in the engineering quad. And it's just too gross for women to get near them. Seriously, like the guy in your dorm who NEVER rinsed his razor. Oh, shit, sorry Ned. Still you suck TOXIC M. WORM ASS."