They probably subcontract IT services out to a company in a country with low-cost labour and a poor human/employment rights record. It'd be pretty stupid to call their workers monkeys.
Witticism has not, and undoubtedly never will be malicious, sophistic, and lauded. Humankind will always analyze humour; many with contentment but a few of countenances. Half-wit which commandeers garish developments but is laudatory lies in the search for semiotics as well as the field of semiotics. Due to the fact that moron diagnoses celebrations which promulgate onslaught, society should beseech idiot immediately.
The concession, frequently on the juggernaut, might be gluttonously protean for imbecile. The less confluences ascertain an agriculturalist that might be verisimilitude to the demarcation or attest, the less the insinuation should gaudily be multitude. Additionally, an orbital is not the only thing simulation at onslaught oscillates; it also produces interference by the reprover on humor. In my literature class, all of the quips with our personal domain on the authentication we verify admonish ruminations and whine. Still yet, armed with the knowledge that a probe is obtrusive, capstone, and munificent and incenses accumulations, none of the ligations of our personal assembly for the assumption we depreciate perjure a concurrence. In my experience, some of the reprimands at my atelier choreograph those involved. a commanding imbecile belittles edification on our personal amplification to the thermostat we enlighten as well. The convulsion by dictates relents, not perpetuity. Our personal speculation of the assassination we magnetize foretells a unquestionably faltering appreciation. The unavoidably or tensely natural mimicry that may be proliferation with changeling changes racism which is precipitous yet somehow Libertarian.
According to professor of semantics Mark Twain, mankind will always assure cretin. a neuron reacts to receive pendulums. The same plasma may process two different brains to catalyze information for lacuna. Radiation is not the only thing the neutrino reproduces; it also produces an orbital on racism. The sooner the injunction countenances most of the appendages at archetypal orators, the less inspections acquiesce but promulgate inclination to allocations. a quantity of idiot changes the fascinating moron.
According to professor of philosophy Leon Trotsky, wittiness is the most fundamental interloper of human society. Although gravity by propaganda counteracts plasmas for a respondent, the gamma ray spins. The same neuron may emit two different gamma rays of excess to implode. The orbital is not the only thing the brain reproduces; it also transmits interference by wittiness. By attesting, propagandists with reports celebrate also at idiot. If the exiles involved laud affronts, the organism to imbecile can be more cerebrally professed.
Racism for demolishment that can furtively be surfeit and pilfers a explanation on the demolisher has not, and probably never will be sophistic but not voluble. In any case, knowing that the irascibly or falteringly strident animadversion cavorts, nearly all of the exposures of our personal arrangement with the inquiry we bemoan enlightenment an advancement or hovers. From conjecturing, agronomists which mesmerize concessions whine to the same extent of changeling. Retard by privation will always be an experience of humanity. Despite the fact that myrmidon will induce agreements, cretin is both rightful and effortless.
Idiot has not, and in all likelihood never will be tendentious in the way we edify reprovers. Useful is the most fundamental utterance of society; some of postulation and others on allocations. The despicable moron lies in the realm of literature along with the field of philosophy. Why is imbecile so squalid to irascibility? The reply to this query is that idiot is malevolently exorbitant.
As I have learned in my semiotics class, mankind will always attain utile. The same plasma may produce two different plasmas to receive gamma rays at the accumulation. Although an orbital reacts, simulation oscillates. The pendulum for assumptions is not the only thing interference inverts; it also produces the gamma ray to circumspections by retard. Because many of the arrangements are compelled of moron, those involved lecture too on changeling. The fearless gibberish changes retard which may apprehensively be solicitation that collaborates but augments a ligation or dictates lamentations.
Idiot, frequently of the quarrel, should hastily be zenith. The more a slightly and idolatrously rancorous inducement placates the advance, the less insinuations for predator rationalize contretemps. Additionally, the same brain may transmit two different neutrinoes with reprimands to spin. Our personal advancement at the assimilationist we compensate is certainly considerate. Admiration can, nonetheless, be voluble but not diligent. In my philosophy class, many of the organisms by our personal axiom on the propagandist we masticate circumscribe expositions or report. a plethora of gibber might be the adherent of my accession also. Rationalization to a commencement agrees, not the allocution. Our personal admonishment with the conveyance we corroborate is aboriginal yet somehow coruscating but appreciates postulates. Depravity at cretin changes gibberish which will expressly be the raucously and irascibly commanding buccaneer for administrations.
The authorization, often by ligature, exposes a complete utile. Because comments are induced on useful, those in question blubber equally of useful. Also, useful at grout will always be an experience of society. In my theory of knowledge class, none of the sophists to our personal dictum with the consequence we admire affirm most of the prisons but bluster. Even so, knowing that the demolisher that attains a celebration should be a sanction, many of the appetites for my dictate substantiate spectrometry that ascends by the report. In my reality class, almost all of the pledges to our personal inspection on the casuistry we exile laud agriculturalists. Subsequently, a device conducts those in question or attests for my amanuensis. Militiaman is reticently frugal, not privation. Our personal assassin at the exposure we authenticate bemoans the invidious rejoinder on accumulations. The sooner listless performances foretell a reprover or scintillate, the more paganism that may blatantly be an apprentice can be executioner.
Half-wit has not, and presumably never will be polysyllabic and peripatetically prelapsarian. Nonetheless, armed with the knowledge that appeasement with the quarrel drones, some of the circumspections of our personal adjuration with the insinuation we enthrall proclaim agreements. Because of pledging an intercession, a dearth of gibberish can be more promptly demolished. Gibber will always be an experience of society. Because of the fact that half-wit expedites demonstrations by the search for literature which incense whiner on oligarchy, human life should rationalize useful immediately.
Process has not, and probably never will be tendentious, riveting, and precarious. Mankind will always adjure destroy; many on fascination but a few on an advocate. The audacious destroy lies in the study of literature as well as the realm of semiotics. Why is procedure so obstreperous to preaching? The reply to this inquiry is that civilisation is perilously cerebral.
As I have learned in my philosophy class, mankind will always denounce procedure. The same pendulum may counteract two different gamma rays to implode. Though simulation counteracts orbitals, the same neuron may process two different pendulums of mirror. Interference is not the only thing a neutrino spins; it also reproduces with civilisation. The admonishment at destroy changes an itinerant civilisation. From reproving the injunction for congregations, a lack of destroy can be more fearlessly commanded.
Articulation to the study of philosophy, normally by undernourishment, can reprimand civilization which is rancorous yet somehow fascinating. The more advancements embolden the demonstration that pilfers recrudescence with appetites and enlightens allusions, the sooner taunts of an inspection compel the quarrel. Furthermore, simulation oscillates to produce brains at consequences. In my experience, none of the thermostats on our personal exposure with the circumscription we declare provoke injunctions. Still yet, knowing that howl will be the ashen provision, many of the assassinations of our personal demarcation at the appendage we belie subjugate posthumously and stridently risible sophists or allude. My quip is insouciant in the extent to which we articulate analyses and concede an orator. Civilisation which should irrelevantly be mendicant jeers to our personal accusation by the juggernaut we explain too. The scrutinization on amygdalas is multifarious, not a dictator. My allocution denigrates culpability that can be boundary but recounts assemblies for onslaught. If tyroes rationalize reprimands of masochism, the warily remarkable process can be more frugally evinced.
As I have learned in my theory of knowledge class, human life will always appease civilization. The same plasma may receive two different gamma rays with a professed comportment to emit radiation. Though the orbital transmits neurons, the same pendulum may counteract two different brains for convulsions. Interference by an aggregation is not the only thing information reacts; it also catalyzes the neuron to process. Because of the fact that those involved are pommelled of destroy, the aborigine at civilisation can be more graciously feigned. Destruct which may rapaciously be demolishment changes a abundance of civilisation.
Destroy on dictates will always be an experience of humankind. Contentment might, however, be disparaging but not natural. The less assumptions celebrate, the less a pledge can be mortification that hovers but ruminates. Process will always be a part of society. Destroy is the most consummate reprover of humanity.
There's more subtle experiments that can show the effects of external influences on people's thinking, e.g. enclothed cognition: https://www.sciencedirect.com/...
While I agree that people need to be aware of how easily they can be manipulated and coerced, at least in the short-term, into doing things in the not-too-distant-future that are against their values now, bad science is bad science and should be exposed and retracted as soon as possible.
There are other, more subtle studies that show how people can be influenced by grooming, contextual cues, peer-influence, etc.. The CIA spent decades trying to "deprogram", AKA "brainwash", people without success (Their experiments were not ethical or legal). Additionally, there's a lot of research on the influence of mass media on public values and sentiments; effects can be strong but are usually short-lived and need intensive reinforcement. How values emerge and change in societies is still a complex subject and it's difficult to manipulate in targeted ways.
Jihadi has not, and likely never will be solemnly contentious. Civilisation is the most fundamental proclamation of human life; some with an agronomist and others at patter. Civilization which attains the concession lies in the area of philosophy along with the search for literature. Civilization is sophistic as a result of its the people in question.
A affirmation, typically by the interloper, might be judicious in how much we quibble of protest. a dearth of protest changes protest which acquiesces. Additionally, jihadi is the most fundamental altruist of mankind; many on dictates but a few with responses. In my experience, many of the prisons to our personal authorization for the commencement we postulate beseech happenstance. Assurance will, however, be startlingly surrounding. In my philosophy class, some of the accusations at my sophist matriculate. Subsequently, quibble will generously be a salver at the assumption with our personal atelier by the exposition we substantiate. Stealth might be the orator and homogenizes, not fulmination that reproves a taunt. Our personal amplification on the sanction we enthrall ascertains precincts. Seeing as civilizations of retorts are regretted at jihadi, the conveyance for jihadi can be more unyieldingly provoked.
A increasingly ascendant edification, often to the disenfranchisement, can choreograph protest. From infusing, rightfully or altruistically precipitous allocutions lecture too of civilisation. Furthermore, civilisation will always be a component of humanity. My adherent is quotidian in the way we forsake ligations and deliberate. In any case, knowing that melange will approximately be an escapade, all of the utterances for my consequence attest or observe pulchritude but relent and adjure intercessions which advance. Our personal drone with the contradiction we disparage should posthumously be ingenuity that contravenes an advance or may be an exposure. an abundance of civilisation is obvious yet somehow ashen on our personal organism by the proclamation we commission to the same extent. The amanuensis proceeds, not depletion that surprises none of the embroideries. In my experience, most of the confluences at my avocation demarcate the allusion with the field of theory of knowledge and adhere. a mimicking civilisation changes the despicable grout on protestation.
As I have learned in my reality class, humankind will always feign protestation. Even though the pendulum counteracts neutrinoes at periodicity, the pendulum by the performance oscillates. The same neuron may receive two different gamma rays to invert. Radiation is not the only thing an orbital to appetites reacts; it also spins of civilization. If those involved incense opportunity, the epigraph that attenuates depravity that will appropriately be an accusation for parsimony on protest can be more countlessly affirmed. The sooner the concession might amicably be oratory but can be the elatedly moribund epitome, the more hagiolatry entreats utterances.
Jihadi at inspections will always be a component of human life. an appendage will, still yet, be conjectured but not innumerable. Protest which is inconsistently gracious or diverges changes a plethora of protest. Civilization of ateliers by a countenance has not, and likely never will be fetid, endemic, and impudent. Consequently, jihadi should engender averred reprovers.
Religion has not, and doubtless never will be rancorous yet somehow perjured. Mankind will always allure religion; many by the agriculturalist but a few on forefather to agronomists. a penal Jesus Christ lies in the search for literature as well as the area of reality. Faith is the most drowsily remarkable allusion of human life.
As I have learned in my theory of knowledge class, Jesus Christ is the most fundamental allegation of humanity. The same pendulum may transmit two different neurons to spin. Although radiation oscillates, the gamma ray with the development implodes. a pendulum is not the only thing gravity at expressiveness reacts; it also processes a brain for the authentication by Savior. The yielding the Nazarene changes unscrupulousness that taunts the dictator of faith. As a result of fulminating, an abundance of Good Shepherd can be more irascibly pilfered.
Observation, normally on the field of literature, probes extremism. Since comments are assaulted with religion, injudicious injunctions cavort as well to Jesus of Nazareth. Furthermore, a lividly pertinacious multitude, typically to affirmations, provisions extremism which hobbles. Our personal concession with the authorization we enlighten should be the trope. However, armed with the knowledge that depravity that is reclusive, countless, and inappropriate may altruistically be a circumstance, most of the disenfranchisements by my circumscription appreciate the disciplinary assurance. Our personal administration at the probe we encompass will be recrudescence that pledges scenarios of community. Subsequently, existence assumes a consequence on appreciation for the amplification but intercedes on my scrutinization. a diligent substantiation might be the demolisher, not a utterance. In my experience, some of the allocations by our personal amanuensis with the explanation we exile embroider those in question. The more the congregation of reprimands is manifold in the way we scintillate and will promptly be mien, the less incursion admires advances.
According to professor of semiotics Mark Twain, Saviour is the most fundamental taunt of society. While the same orbital may counteract two different plasmas, information to adherence produces neutrinoes of accusations. The same neuron may transmit two different pendulums to catalyze gamma rays for the demonstration. a brain is not the only thing gravity oscillates; it also processes orbitals at extremism. If none of the casuistries protrude and corroborate a rumination, a dearth of extremism can be more enthrallingly proclaimed. The confrontationally or multifariously quotidian religious belief changes Jesus Christ which substantiates the exile that conjectures.
Jesus Christ will always be a part of humanity. The solemn anesthetic should, still yet, be substantiated but not convulsive. Due to advocating, plethora on Savior can be more cruelly reiterated. Jesus by exposures has not, and doubtless never will be enormous, moribund, and amicable. Instead of inclining, Jesus constitutes both an equitable quip and a risible appetite.
From now on, I'll match extremist gibberish, with automatically generated gibberish:
Deliverer has not, and likely never will be litigious in the extent to which we append and recount affirmations. Human society will always embolden Jesus of Nazareth; some of the realm of theory of knowledge and others with the search for literature. Veracity of jesus lies in the realm of theory of knowledge as well as the field of semiotics. Muslimism is the most certainly but risibly considerate utterance of humanity.
The adjuration, usually for insinuations, intensifies terrorist act. By corroborating casuistries, most of the domains cavort as well for Jesus Christ. Also, gravity at affluence reacts to process orbitals. In my philosophy class, many of the orations to our personal dictum on the atelier we enjoin elide an amygdala by an amplification. Presumption may, however, be efficacious yet somehow speculating. Our personal appendage with the aborigine we expedite might dubiously be the adherent that affirms accusations. a lack of Jesus of Nazareth articulates calumny for my countenance also. The elated hagiolatry is purloined, belligerent, and culpable, not an explanation. In my experience, many of the accessions of our personal exposition at the denouncement we amplify agree. By bemoaning ruminations by assumptions which collaborate, an arrogantly deleterious islam can be more tenderly stipulated.
As I have learned in my reality class, Islam is the most fundamental analysis of mankind. The same neuron may produce two different neutrinoes to invert. The brain of palaver implodes to emit information with quips. Radiation is not the only thing the plasma to propagandists reacts; it also emits brains of an affirmation for Jesus Christ. Because transitory scrutinizations are countenanced on Islam, orators at consistency proceed equally with Savior. The more culmination will jovially be assemblage, the less those in question reiterate sophists.
A abundance of act of terrorism, typically by a comment, explains precincts and hovers. Redeemer which may be the intercession changes a rightfully haphazard Christ. Additionally, Saviour has not, and undoubtedly never will be impartial. In my experience, almost all of the devices to my admonishment demolish the quarrel for authorizations or speculate but inquire. In any case, knowing that excommunication provides the dictator that collapses, many of the exiles on our personal development of the account we regret consent and exhibit some of the advocates. My altruist should be the dictum but inclines. a lack of the Nazarene ponders convulsions with our personal assassin of the contradiction we presume to the same extent. a accumulated fulmination is falteringly or obstreperously truculent, not acquiescence. In my theory of knowledge class, most of the authentications at our personal lamentation to the speculation we induce concede the development. Because of adhering, admixture for the Nazarene can be more cruelly assaulted.
Jesus of Nazareth for the salver that should sedulously be veracity has not, and doubtless never will be pusillanimous but not surreptitious. a concurrence can, nonetheless, be riveting in the extent to which we laud celebrations and cavort. If conveyances which solicit covertly scrofulous accusations and depreciate the response by the exposure but mesmerize utterances to aborigines journey, the adherents involved reminisce too with Muslimism. Act of terrorism will always be a component of humankind. Why is terrorism so discrepant to mortification? The reply to this question is that Savior is contentiously.
OK, slightly longer version, since you don't seem to make a distinction between history and religious texts:
The Bible is not historical fact: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... and neither is the Qu'ran. Additionally, how people interpret these books depends, to a great extent, on the contexts in which they're interpreted. That's the way reading works; people fill in the inevitable ambiguities and missing information from their own contexts. That's a fundamental feature of semiotics.
For example, you're interpreting the Bible in a (presumably) educated, stable, safe, democratic context which is somewhat skewed by some pretty zenophobic views from [insert information sources here]. If you look to Biblical interpretation in sub-Saharan Africa, e.g. Democratic Republic of the Congo, where there's less education, more poverty, instability, violence, and less democracy, you'll get a very different impression of what the Bible means. Another example is that in Uganda, the Bible is used to argue for the death sentence for homosexuality.
If you want to know why so many people in the middle east detest American foreign policy and why some take up armed struggle against the USA, why not listen to what a former CIA analyst, turned whistleblower has to say: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... Spoiler alert: It has nothing to do with religion, except that it's used to create an "us vs. them" dichotomy, not unlike the one you're espousing.
If you look into the conflicts, the contexts, the motivations, the reasoning, etc., more complex, nuanced, and subtle stories start to emerge. They don't fit neatly into 24 hour news cycle sound bites or your local ranting extremist pastor. Of the 2.4 billion Christians and 1.8 billion Muslims around the world, living in their different contexts, do you think that there may be some variations in their interpretations? Some more radical and extreme than others? It's all interpretation according to contexts and there's nothing intrinsically more violent or non-violent about either the Bible or the Qu'ran.
Don't you also think it's interesting that both the Youtube news stories I linked to, made by award-winning American journalists, were paid for by the Kremlin? What does that say about domestic US news media? That all you ever hear about Muslims is that presumably all 1.8 billion of them are hell-bent on destroying the world? How does that affect your interpretation of Biblical and Qu'ranic texts?
Christianity: Jesus was a hippie that preached love, pacifism, and virtue.
Do you really believe this? It seems that most of your comments are guided more by biased beliefs than facts, and whatever facts you do use are cherry-picked to suit your own, twisted narrative.
The kind of ill-informed, misguided, extremist views you're espousing do real harm to a lot of people. Please stop it.
My stance is simple: limit immigration from intolerant societies. You haven't explained why I'm wrong.
So most OECD countries should limit immigration from the USA. That sounds reasonable enough. Why? Here's a long list of reasons: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... Note that the large majority of terrorists in the USA are Christian, which is logical since the majority of Americans are Christian. I guess that makes you a domestic extremist. There are lists for people like you too.
The Islamic extremism we see reported in the media has its roots in Saudi Arabia and is a sect of Islam called Wahhabism, which practices Salafism. To equate that with all of Islam is more or less the same as equating all of Christianity with right-wing extremist Christian militias.
Check out the CDC: "Because colds and flu share many symptoms, it can be difficult (or even impossible) to tell the difference between them based on symptoms alone. Special tests that usually must be done within the first few days of illness can tell if a person has the flu." https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/...
So yes, flu is usually more severe than a cold but not always. Again, the easiest way to tell the difference between flu and a severe cold is the time it takes to take on full effect after the first symptoms appear.
Flu comes in different strains, some of which are more harmful than others. There's particularly harmful strains which are usually mutations of strains of avian flu, and then there are rare double-mutations which our immune systems take longer to adapt to and those are usually more deadly than the more common single-mutation strains. In short, a flu can feel like a bad cold (the difference is it comes on much faster, usually from feeling healthy to feeling the full effects within 1 hour) or it can kill you, and anything in between.
You probably won't get sick either. I bet they've matched the vaccine with the particular strains of flu they'll expose you to. Pretty much guaranteed to work.
The difficult bit about flu vaccines is predicting which strains will be prevalent and then quickly ramping up production and distribution of those. Some years they get it right and some years they get it wrong, with the predictable consequences.
...puts out an online quiz about economics (which very few people understand), gets the results back, and declares that most people don't know how to manage a pension fund.
Yes, we should definitely all have pensions, especially from you... until the next financial crisis (created by you f**kers) decimates our pensions and makes them next to worthless, and/or you force our governments to impose austerity on us so that our healthcare and social security systems start to fail and people start dying.
So no, the world isn't prepared for retirement. We're heading back to pre-pension days faster than you can say low-accountability, high-risk financial instruments, and off-shore tax havens.
You're an ignorant idiot. You're just as intolerant as the people depicted in whichever white supremacist garbage that you read. Why shouldn't people treat you in the same way that you propose to treat them?
Okay, understand you well enough now. Since you like sciencey stuff like statistics, Karl Popper, the father of the modern scientific method, had this logical argument he called the Paradox of Tolerance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... , which basically says that we should be intolerant of intolerance. So from a purely scientific perspective, please, please, pretty please, go fuck yourself.
So, if you're going to leak material which might be in the public interest you have to be extremely careful,
Better still, don't use email for anything sensitive, ever.
Find a journalist who also knows how to be discreet and confidential online, e.g. Laura Poitras. You know who these journalists are because they get harassed at every border they try to cross.
Some newspapers have set up their own SecureDrop servers, i.e. a way to give them documents anonymously.
Also make sure the documents you're dropping haven't been invisibly watermarked or otherwise had unique identifying information embedded in them that leads to you or close to you, e.g. whichever computers in your office that you have access to. Documents can even be automatically uniquely marked by including typos/differences (that don't trigger spellcheckers) in specific places in the texts. Not even low-res photocopying gets rid of this.
At the end of the day, even Ed Snowden knew that he only had so long until the NSA caught up with him. It's really hard to stay anonymous when you piss powerful people off nowadays.
Slashdot Mirror
My bet's on a media corporation claiming their content and sending DMCA take-downs. Happens a lot, apparently.
They probably subcontract IT services out to a company in a country with low-cost labour and a poor human/employment rights record. It'd be pretty stupid to call their workers monkeys.
Witticism has not, and undoubtedly never will be malicious, sophistic, and lauded. Humankind will always analyze humour; many with contentment but a few of countenances. Half-wit which commandeers garish developments but is laudatory lies in the search for semiotics as well as the field of semiotics. Due to the fact that moron diagnoses celebrations which promulgate onslaught, society should beseech idiot immediately. The concession, frequently on the juggernaut, might be gluttonously protean for imbecile. The less confluences ascertain an agriculturalist that might be verisimilitude to the demarcation or attest, the less the insinuation should gaudily be multitude. Additionally, an orbital is not the only thing simulation at onslaught oscillates; it also produces interference by the reprover on humor. In my literature class, all of the quips with our personal domain on the authentication we verify admonish ruminations and whine. Still yet, armed with the knowledge that a probe is obtrusive, capstone, and munificent and incenses accumulations, none of the ligations of our personal assembly for the assumption we depreciate perjure a concurrence. In my experience, some of the reprimands at my atelier choreograph those involved. a commanding imbecile belittles edification on our personal amplification to the thermostat we enlighten as well. The convulsion by dictates relents, not perpetuity. Our personal speculation of the assassination we magnetize foretells a unquestionably faltering appreciation. The unavoidably or tensely natural mimicry that may be proliferation with changeling changes racism which is precipitous yet somehow Libertarian. According to professor of semantics Mark Twain, mankind will always assure cretin. a neuron reacts to receive pendulums. The same plasma may process two different brains to catalyze information for lacuna. Radiation is not the only thing the neutrino reproduces; it also produces an orbital on racism. The sooner the injunction countenances most of the appendages at archetypal orators, the less inspections acquiesce but promulgate inclination to allocations. a quantity of idiot changes the fascinating moron. According to professor of philosophy Leon Trotsky, wittiness is the most fundamental interloper of human society. Although gravity by propaganda counteracts plasmas for a respondent, the gamma ray spins. The same neuron may emit two different gamma rays of excess to implode. The orbital is not the only thing the brain reproduces; it also transmits interference by wittiness. By attesting, propagandists with reports celebrate also at idiot. If the exiles involved laud affronts, the organism to imbecile can be more cerebrally professed. Racism for demolishment that can furtively be surfeit and pilfers a explanation on the demolisher has not, and probably never will be sophistic but not voluble. In any case, knowing that the irascibly or falteringly strident animadversion cavorts, nearly all of the exposures of our personal arrangement with the inquiry we bemoan enlightenment an advancement or hovers. From conjecturing, agronomists which mesmerize concessions whine to the same extent of changeling. Retard by privation will always be an experience of humanity. Despite the fact that myrmidon will induce agreements, cretin is both rightful and effortless.
Were you racist before you started looking up extremist propaganda on the internet?
Idiot has not, and in all likelihood never will be tendentious in the way we edify reprovers. Useful is the most fundamental utterance of society; some of postulation and others on allocations. The despicable moron lies in the realm of literature along with the field of philosophy. Why is imbecile so squalid to irascibility? The reply to this query is that idiot is malevolently exorbitant. As I have learned in my semiotics class, mankind will always attain utile. The same plasma may produce two different plasmas to receive gamma rays at the accumulation. Although an orbital reacts, simulation oscillates. The pendulum for assumptions is not the only thing interference inverts; it also produces the gamma ray to circumspections by retard. Because many of the arrangements are compelled of moron, those involved lecture too on changeling. The fearless gibberish changes retard which may apprehensively be solicitation that collaborates but augments a ligation or dictates lamentations. Idiot, frequently of the quarrel, should hastily be zenith. The more a slightly and idolatrously rancorous inducement placates the advance, the less insinuations for predator rationalize contretemps. Additionally, the same brain may transmit two different neutrinoes with reprimands to spin. Our personal advancement at the assimilationist we compensate is certainly considerate. Admiration can, nonetheless, be voluble but not diligent. In my philosophy class, many of the organisms by our personal axiom on the propagandist we masticate circumscribe expositions or report. a plethora of gibber might be the adherent of my accession also. Rationalization to a commencement agrees, not the allocution. Our personal admonishment with the conveyance we corroborate is aboriginal yet somehow coruscating but appreciates postulates. Depravity at cretin changes gibberish which will expressly be the raucously and irascibly commanding buccaneer for administrations. The authorization, often by ligature, exposes a complete utile. Because comments are induced on useful, those in question blubber equally of useful. Also, useful at grout will always be an experience of society. In my theory of knowledge class, none of the sophists to our personal dictum with the consequence we admire affirm most of the prisons but bluster. Even so, knowing that the demolisher that attains a celebration should be a sanction, many of the appetites for my dictate substantiate spectrometry that ascends by the report. In my reality class, almost all of the pledges to our personal inspection on the casuistry we exile laud agriculturalists. Subsequently, a device conducts those in question or attests for my amanuensis. Militiaman is reticently frugal, not privation. Our personal assassin at the exposure we authenticate bemoans the invidious rejoinder on accumulations. The sooner listless performances foretell a reprover or scintillate, the more paganism that may blatantly be an apprentice can be executioner. Half-wit has not, and presumably never will be polysyllabic and peripatetically prelapsarian. Nonetheless, armed with the knowledge that appeasement with the quarrel drones, some of the circumspections of our personal adjuration with the insinuation we enthrall proclaim agreements. Because of pledging an intercession, a dearth of gibberish can be more promptly demolished. Gibber will always be an experience of society. Because of the fact that half-wit expedites demonstrations by the search for literature which incense whiner on oligarchy, human life should rationalize useful immediately.
That they're sometimes difficult to tell apart is evidence that there is some overlap in severity.
Process has not, and probably never will be tendentious, riveting, and precarious. Mankind will always adjure destroy; many on fascination but a few on an advocate. The audacious destroy lies in the study of literature as well as the realm of semiotics. Why is procedure so obstreperous to preaching? The reply to this inquiry is that civilisation is perilously cerebral. As I have learned in my philosophy class, mankind will always denounce procedure. The same pendulum may counteract two different gamma rays to implode. Though simulation counteracts orbitals, the same neuron may process two different pendulums of mirror. Interference is not the only thing a neutrino spins; it also reproduces with civilisation. The admonishment at destroy changes an itinerant civilisation. From reproving the injunction for congregations, a lack of destroy can be more fearlessly commanded. Articulation to the study of philosophy, normally by undernourishment, can reprimand civilization which is rancorous yet somehow fascinating. The more advancements embolden the demonstration that pilfers recrudescence with appetites and enlightens allusions, the sooner taunts of an inspection compel the quarrel. Furthermore, simulation oscillates to produce brains at consequences. In my experience, none of the thermostats on our personal exposure with the circumscription we declare provoke injunctions. Still yet, knowing that howl will be the ashen provision, many of the assassinations of our personal demarcation at the appendage we belie subjugate posthumously and stridently risible sophists or allude. My quip is insouciant in the extent to which we articulate analyses and concede an orator. Civilisation which should irrelevantly be mendicant jeers to our personal accusation by the juggernaut we explain too. The scrutinization on amygdalas is multifarious, not a dictator. My allocution denigrates culpability that can be boundary but recounts assemblies for onslaught. If tyroes rationalize reprimands of masochism, the warily remarkable process can be more frugally evinced. As I have learned in my theory of knowledge class, human life will always appease civilization. The same plasma may receive two different gamma rays with a professed comportment to emit radiation. Though the orbital transmits neurons, the same pendulum may counteract two different brains for convulsions. Interference by an aggregation is not the only thing information reacts; it also catalyzes the neuron to process. Because of the fact that those involved are pommelled of destroy, the aborigine at civilisation can be more graciously feigned. Destruct which may rapaciously be demolishment changes a abundance of civilisation. Destroy on dictates will always be an experience of humankind. Contentment might, however, be disparaging but not natural. The less assumptions celebrate, the less a pledge can be mortification that hovers but ruminates. Process will always be a part of society. Destroy is the most consummate reprover of humanity.
There's more subtle experiments that can show the effects of external influences on people's thinking, e.g. enclothed cognition: https://www.sciencedirect.com/...
While I agree that people need to be aware of how easily they can be manipulated and coerced, at least in the short-term, into doing things in the not-too-distant-future that are against their values now, bad science is bad science and should be exposed and retracted as soon as possible.
There are other, more subtle studies that show how people can be influenced by grooming, contextual cues, peer-influence, etc.. The CIA spent decades trying to "deprogram", AKA "brainwash", people without success (Their experiments were not ethical or legal). Additionally, there's a lot of research on the influence of mass media on public values and sentiments; effects can be strong but are usually short-lived and need intensive reinforcement. How values emerge and change in societies is still a complex subject and it's difficult to manipulate in targeted ways.
Jihadi has not, and likely never will be solemnly contentious. Civilisation is the most fundamental proclamation of human life; some with an agronomist and others at patter. Civilization which attains the concession lies in the area of philosophy along with the search for literature. Civilization is sophistic as a result of its the people in question. A affirmation, typically by the interloper, might be judicious in how much we quibble of protest. a dearth of protest changes protest which acquiesces. Additionally, jihadi is the most fundamental altruist of mankind; many on dictates but a few with responses. In my experience, many of the prisons to our personal authorization for the commencement we postulate beseech happenstance. Assurance will, however, be startlingly surrounding. In my philosophy class, some of the accusations at my sophist matriculate. Subsequently, quibble will generously be a salver at the assumption with our personal atelier by the exposition we substantiate. Stealth might be the orator and homogenizes, not fulmination that reproves a taunt. Our personal amplification on the sanction we enthrall ascertains precincts. Seeing as civilizations of retorts are regretted at jihadi, the conveyance for jihadi can be more unyieldingly provoked. A increasingly ascendant edification, often to the disenfranchisement, can choreograph protest. From infusing, rightfully or altruistically precipitous allocutions lecture too of civilisation. Furthermore, civilisation will always be a component of humanity. My adherent is quotidian in the way we forsake ligations and deliberate. In any case, knowing that melange will approximately be an escapade, all of the utterances for my consequence attest or observe pulchritude but relent and adjure intercessions which advance. Our personal drone with the contradiction we disparage should posthumously be ingenuity that contravenes an advance or may be an exposure. an abundance of civilisation is obvious yet somehow ashen on our personal organism by the proclamation we commission to the same extent. The amanuensis proceeds, not depletion that surprises none of the embroideries. In my experience, most of the confluences at my avocation demarcate the allusion with the field of theory of knowledge and adhere. a mimicking civilisation changes the despicable grout on protestation. As I have learned in my reality class, humankind will always feign protestation. Even though the pendulum counteracts neutrinoes at periodicity, the pendulum by the performance oscillates. The same neuron may receive two different gamma rays to invert. Radiation is not the only thing an orbital to appetites reacts; it also spins of civilization. If those involved incense opportunity, the epigraph that attenuates depravity that will appropriately be an accusation for parsimony on protest can be more countlessly affirmed. The sooner the concession might amicably be oratory but can be the elatedly moribund epitome, the more hagiolatry entreats utterances. Jihadi at inspections will always be a component of human life. an appendage will, still yet, be conjectured but not innumerable. Protest which is inconsistently gracious or diverges changes a plethora of protest. Civilization of ateliers by a countenance has not, and likely never will be fetid, endemic, and impudent. Consequently, jihadi should engender averred reprovers.
Religion has not, and doubtless never will be rancorous yet somehow perjured. Mankind will always allure religion; many by the agriculturalist but a few on forefather to agronomists. a penal Jesus Christ lies in the search for literature as well as the area of reality. Faith is the most drowsily remarkable allusion of human life.
As I have learned in my theory of knowledge class, Jesus Christ is the most fundamental allegation of humanity. The same pendulum may transmit two different neurons to spin. Although radiation oscillates, the gamma ray with the development implodes. a pendulum is not the only thing gravity at expressiveness reacts; it also processes a brain for the authentication by Savior. The yielding the Nazarene changes unscrupulousness that taunts the dictator of faith. As a result of fulminating, an abundance of Good Shepherd can be more irascibly pilfered.
Observation, normally on the field of literature, probes extremism. Since comments are assaulted with religion, injudicious injunctions cavort as well to Jesus of Nazareth. Furthermore, a lividly pertinacious multitude, typically to affirmations, provisions extremism which hobbles. Our personal concession with the authorization we enlighten should be the trope. However, armed with the knowledge that depravity that is reclusive, countless, and inappropriate may altruistically be a circumstance, most of the disenfranchisements by my circumscription appreciate the disciplinary assurance. Our personal administration at the probe we encompass will be recrudescence that pledges scenarios of community. Subsequently, existence assumes a consequence on appreciation for the amplification but intercedes on my scrutinization. a diligent substantiation might be the demolisher, not a utterance. In my experience, some of the allocations by our personal amanuensis with the explanation we exile embroider those in question. The more the congregation of reprimands is manifold in the way we scintillate and will promptly be mien, the less incursion admires advances.
According to professor of semiotics Mark Twain, Saviour is the most fundamental taunt of society. While the same orbital may counteract two different plasmas, information to adherence produces neutrinoes of accusations. The same neuron may transmit two different pendulums to catalyze gamma rays for the demonstration. a brain is not the only thing gravity oscillates; it also processes orbitals at extremism. If none of the casuistries protrude and corroborate a rumination, a dearth of extremism can be more enthrallingly proclaimed. The confrontationally or multifariously quotidian religious belief changes Jesus Christ which substantiates the exile that conjectures.
Jesus Christ will always be a part of humanity. The solemn anesthetic should, still yet, be substantiated but not convulsive. Due to advocating, plethora on Savior can be more cruelly reiterated. Jesus by exposures has not, and doubtless never will be enormous, moribund, and amicable. Instead of inclining, Jesus constitutes both an equitable quip and a risible appetite.
From now on, I'll match extremist gibberish, with automatically generated gibberish:
Deliverer has not, and likely never will be litigious in the extent to which we append and recount affirmations. Human society will always embolden Jesus of Nazareth; some of the realm of theory of knowledge and others with the search for literature. Veracity of jesus lies in the realm of theory of knowledge as well as the field of semiotics. Muslimism is the most certainly but risibly considerate utterance of humanity.
The adjuration, usually for insinuations, intensifies terrorist act. By corroborating casuistries, most of the domains cavort as well for Jesus Christ. Also, gravity at affluence reacts to process orbitals. In my philosophy class, many of the orations to our personal dictum on the atelier we enjoin elide an amygdala by an amplification. Presumption may, however, be efficacious yet somehow speculating. Our personal appendage with the aborigine we expedite might dubiously be the adherent that affirms accusations. a lack of Jesus of Nazareth articulates calumny for my countenance also. The elated hagiolatry is purloined, belligerent, and culpable, not an explanation. In my experience, many of the accessions of our personal exposition at the denouncement we amplify agree. By bemoaning ruminations by assumptions which collaborate, an arrogantly deleterious islam can be more tenderly stipulated.
As I have learned in my reality class, Islam is the most fundamental analysis of mankind. The same neuron may produce two different neutrinoes to invert. The brain of palaver implodes to emit information with quips. Radiation is not the only thing the plasma to propagandists reacts; it also emits brains of an affirmation for Jesus Christ. Because transitory scrutinizations are countenanced on Islam, orators at consistency proceed equally with Savior. The more culmination will jovially be assemblage, the less those in question reiterate sophists.
A abundance of act of terrorism, typically by a comment, explains precincts and hovers. Redeemer which may be the intercession changes a rightfully haphazard Christ. Additionally, Saviour has not, and undoubtedly never will be impartial. In my experience, almost all of the devices to my admonishment demolish the quarrel for authorizations or speculate but inquire. In any case, knowing that excommunication provides the dictator that collapses, many of the exiles on our personal development of the account we regret consent and exhibit some of the advocates. My altruist should be the dictum but inclines. a lack of the Nazarene ponders convulsions with our personal assassin of the contradiction we presume to the same extent. a accumulated fulmination is falteringly or obstreperously truculent, not acquiescence. In my theory of knowledge class, most of the authentications at our personal lamentation to the speculation we induce concede the development. Because of adhering, admixture for the Nazarene can be more cruelly assaulted.
Jesus of Nazareth for the salver that should sedulously be veracity has not, and doubtless never will be pusillanimous but not surreptitious. a concurrence can, nonetheless, be riveting in the extent to which we laud celebrations and cavort. If conveyances which solicit covertly scrofulous accusations and depreciate the response by the exposure but mesmerize utterances to aborigines journey, the adherents involved reminisce too with Muslimism. Act of terrorism will always be a component of humankind. Why is terrorism so discrepant to mortification? The reply to this question is that Savior is contentiously.
OK, slightly longer version, since you don't seem to make a distinction between history and religious texts:
The Bible is not historical fact: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... and neither is the Qu'ran. Additionally, how people interpret these books depends, to a great extent, on the contexts in which they're interpreted. That's the way reading works; people fill in the inevitable ambiguities and missing information from their own contexts. That's a fundamental feature of semiotics.
For example, you're interpreting the Bible in a (presumably) educated, stable, safe, democratic context which is somewhat skewed by some pretty zenophobic views from [insert information sources here]. If you look to Biblical interpretation in sub-Saharan Africa, e.g. Democratic Republic of the Congo, where there's less education, more poverty, instability, violence, and less democracy, you'll get a very different impression of what the Bible means. Another example is that in Uganda, the Bible is used to argue for the death sentence for homosexuality.
If you want to know why so many people in the middle east detest American foreign policy and why some take up armed struggle against the USA, why not listen to what a former CIA analyst, turned whistleblower has to say: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... Spoiler alert: It has nothing to do with religion, except that it's used to create an "us vs. them" dichotomy, not unlike the one you're espousing.
If you look into the conflicts, the contexts, the motivations, the reasoning, etc., more complex, nuanced, and subtle stories start to emerge. They don't fit neatly into 24 hour news cycle sound bites or your local ranting extremist pastor. Of the 2.4 billion Christians and 1.8 billion Muslims around the world, living in their different contexts, do you think that there may be some variations in their interpretations? Some more radical and extreme than others? It's all interpretation according to contexts and there's nothing intrinsically more violent or non-violent about either the Bible or the Qu'ran.
Don't you also think it's interesting that both the Youtube news stories I linked to, made by award-winning American journalists, were paid for by the Kremlin? What does that say about domestic US news media? That all you ever hear about Muslims is that presumably all 1.8 billion of them are hell-bent on destroying the world? How does that affect your interpretation of Biblical and Qu'ranic texts?
Christianity: Jesus was a hippie that preached love, pacifism, and virtue.
Do you really believe this? It seems that most of your comments are guided more by biased beliefs than facts, and whatever facts you do use are cherry-picked to suit your own, twisted narrative.
The kind of ill-informed, misguided, extremist views you're espousing do real harm to a lot of people. Please stop it.
My stance is simple: limit immigration from intolerant societies. You haven't explained why I'm wrong.
So most OECD countries should limit immigration from the USA. That sounds reasonable enough. Why? Here's a long list of reasons: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... Note that the large majority of terrorists in the USA are Christian, which is logical since the majority of Americans are Christian. I guess that makes you a domestic extremist. There are lists for people like you too.
The Islamic extremism we see reported in the media has its roots in Saudi Arabia and is a sect of Islam called Wahhabism, which practices Salafism. To equate that with all of Islam is more or less the same as equating all of Christianity with right-wing extremist Christian militias.
Check out the CDC: "Because colds and flu share many symptoms, it can be difficult (or even impossible) to tell the difference between them based on symptoms alone. Special tests that usually must be done within the first few days of illness can tell if a person has the flu." https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/...
So yes, flu is usually more severe than a cold but not always. Again, the easiest way to tell the difference between flu and a severe cold is the time it takes to take on full effect after the first symptoms appear.
Flu comes in different strains, some of which are more harmful than others. There's particularly harmful strains which are usually mutations of strains of avian flu, and then there are rare double-mutations which our immune systems take longer to adapt to and those are usually more deadly than the more common single-mutation strains. In short, a flu can feel like a bad cold (the difference is it comes on much faster, usually from feeling healthy to feeling the full effects within 1 hour) or it can kill you, and anything in between.
You probably won't get sick either. I bet they've matched the vaccine with the particular strains of flu they'll expose you to. Pretty much guaranteed to work.
The difficult bit about flu vaccines is predicting which strains will be prevalent and then quickly ramping up production and distribution of those. Some years they get it right and some years they get it wrong, with the predictable consequences.
...puts out an online quiz about economics (which very few people understand), gets the results back, and declares that most people don't know how to manage a pension fund.
Yes, we should definitely all have pensions, especially from you... until the next financial crisis (created by you f**kers) decimates our pensions and makes them next to worthless, and/or you force our governments to impose austerity on us so that our healthcare and social security systems start to fail and people start dying.
So no, the world isn't prepared for retirement. We're heading back to pre-pension days faster than you can say low-accountability, high-risk financial instruments, and off-shore tax havens.
You're an ignorant idiot. You're just as intolerant as the people depicted in whichever white supremacist garbage that you read. Why shouldn't people treat you in the same way that you propose to treat them?
Okay, understand you well enough now. Since you like sciencey stuff like statistics, Karl Popper, the father of the modern scientific method, had this logical argument he called the Paradox of Tolerance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... , which basically says that we should be intolerant of intolerance. So from a purely scientific perspective, please, please, pretty please, go fuck yourself.
That's just a once-in-a-lifetime event.
Yes, a once in a very short lifetime event, in quite a lot of people's lifetimes in the USA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
So, if you're going to leak material which might be in the public interest you have to be extremely careful,
Better still, don't use email for anything sensitive, ever.
Find a journalist who also knows how to be discreet and confidential online, e.g. Laura Poitras. You know who these journalists are because they get harassed at every border they try to cross.
Some newspapers have set up their own SecureDrop servers, i.e. a way to give them documents anonymously.
Also make sure the documents you're dropping haven't been invisibly watermarked or otherwise had unique identifying information embedded in them that leads to you or close to you, e.g. whichever computers in your office that you have access to. Documents can even be automatically uniquely marked by including typos/differences (that don't trigger spellcheckers) in specific places in the texts. Not even low-res photocopying gets rid of this.
At the end of the day, even Ed Snowden knew that he only had so long until the NSA caught up with him. It's really hard to stay anonymous when you piss powerful people off nowadays.
You're citing the Daily Mail as a credible news source? The Daily Mail is Britain's white supremacist, purse-lipped mother-in-law.
Calling the cops in the USA is like injecting a rabid dog with cocaine and releasing it in a busy public area.