Slashdot Mirror


French School Students To Be Banned From Using Mobile Phones (theguardian.com)

The lower house of parliament in France has passed what it called a "detox" law for a younger generation increasingly addicted to screens. As a result, French school students will be banned from using mobile phones anywhere on school grounds starting in September. The Guardian reports: The new law bans phone-use by children in school playgrounds, at breaktimes and anywhere on school premises. Legislation passed in 2010 already states children should not use phones in class. During a parliamentary debate, lawmakers from Macron's La Republique En Marche party said banning phones in schools meant all children now had a legal "right to disconnect" from digital pressures during their school day. Some in Macron's party had initially sought to go even further, arguing that adults should set an example and the the ban should be extended to all staff in schools, making teachers surrender their phones on arrival each morning. But Macron's education minister, Jean-Michel Blanquer, brushed this aside, saying it wasn't necessary to extend the ban to teachers and staff.

136 comments

  1. Use paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    to pass messages in class.

    1. Re:Use paper by Humbubba · · Score: 2

      Ah, this is just an underhanded way to bring back the Minitel. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minitel#Minitel_and_the_Internet

    2. Re:Use paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Since it was impossible to use the Minitel in class I don't think this ban is trying to revive a dead technology.
      Although funny as it seems, the Minitel never had all the vulnerabilities of the classic internet with its viruses, malwares, spam etc... since it was a closed system and it god damn worked. It was pricey, you had to time your connection but it just worked. And yeah even stupid people could use it so simple it was. France lost something useful when the Internet killed the Minitel.

    3. Re:Use paper by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

      Sure, if you're naive enough to think the NSA doesn't already have backdoors in all the paper.

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  2. Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    At least in some areas, the French have been ahead of the curve. Children have no need for cell phones during lesson time. Or anytime during the school day.

    The French have also banned burqas and other primitive tribal Halloween costumes. The French are starting to get things right, unlike the Germans and Swedes who enjoy being raped and humiliated by foreign invaders.

    Sweden is the very definition of a "Soy Boy" and of course Germany has become a nation of "Sitzpinklers".

    1. Re:Excellent by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      The point should be, this isn't school rules, this is government mandated LAW....

    2. Re:Excellent by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      The point should be, this isn't school rules, this is government mandated LAW....

      Is there much difference these days? Schools in most countries have lost most of their autonomy. Even in the USA where we have local school districts with local tax dollars, everything from which books to use to how many days/hours to be in school to what to feed for lunch is dictated by the government.

      When I was in school, unauthorized items including electronic games, etc... were confiscated by the individual teachers. If you were lucky, you got it back at the end of the current school day. In other cases, your parent had to come retrieve it for you. I also distinctly remember teachers bringing their box of confiscated stuff out on the last day of school and giving kids back stuff that they had confiscated and held on to for the entire school year.

      Even in college, most of my professors had a no cellphone policy. I'm amazed that middle schools allow kids to have phones in class. I know many employers and even a few schools that don't allow employees to have phones. For kids, this seems like a no brainer. Phones should remain in their locker during school hours.

    3. Re: Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol right. Phones cost maybe $100-$1000, do you really think parents would be ok with teachers having an arbitrary confiscation of a $1000 phone that lets the parent talk to their kid? And do you really think teachers want to be responsible for safely storing thousands of dollars of electronics?

      This policy has to be clear policy with well understood rules. I am a teacher and I gotta say bravo for France. Cell phone use in class is basically every teacherâ(TM)s pet peeve, and making it federal policy will help the nations schools.

    4. Re: Excellent by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Lol right. Phones cost maybe $100-$1000, do you really think parents would be ok with teachers having an arbitrary confiscation of a $1000 phone that lets the parent talk to their kid? And do you really think teachers want to be responsible for safely storing thousands of dollars of electronics?

      This policy has to be clear policy with well understood rules. I am a teacher and I gotta say bravo for France. Cell phone use in class is basically every teacherâ(TM)s pet peeve, and making it federal policy will help the nations schools.

      I sent an email just last week giving my kids teachers permission to take away their phone and not be responsible for damages. Our school also implemented a no backpack policy for a while and required them to be left at the office. It's simple enough to require kids to either leave them at home or leave them in their lockers. Lots of schools have lots of policies from no ballcaps, to no guns, to certain dress codes. It would be easy to just say no phones allowed at school. Lots of businesses do that already. My kids school already tells parents not to call or text their kids at school. If they think they need them for the walk home, then requiring them to be in the locker and/or off would work too. Make use of a phone during school hours a one day suspension. How is this so hard? Plenty of places are cellphone free zones. My mom's school won't even allow teachers to have them. If I need to get a hold of her during school day, I have to call the office and use the intercom like they've been doing since the 1970s. And if for some reason you need to keep them on their person, https://www.overyondr.com/ is a low tech solution. I kindof understand why teachers have to put up with the school's policies, but I don't understand why they don't complain to the principal and make a school wide policy. Most schools likely used to have a school wide ban, it's only recently that they have decided for some reason that this is acceptable behavior.

  3. Sad generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I pass about 8 school grounds (covering all age groups) on the way to work every day for over a decade. I remember it was always kids playing sports, on the swings, running around, etc. The last 5 years it's mostly sitting around and staring at phones.

    I'm so thankful I wasn't raised in this generation.

    1. Re:Sad generation by Peter+P+Peters · · Score: 4, Funny

      I pass about 8 school grounds (covering all age groups) on the way to work every day for over a decade. I remember it was always kids playing sports, on the swings, running around, etc. The last 5 years it's mostly sitting around and staring at phones.

      I'm so thankful I wasn't raised in this generation.

      My grandparents said the same thing. They used to ride horses to school and go fishing at lunchtime. We were slackers that bludged along on those new fangled bicycle thingies and simply ran around a field with a ball at lunch instead of having real fun. Nothing good would ever come from that apparently...

    2. Re:Sad generation by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I pass about 8 school grounds (covering all age groups)

      Where I live (San Jose, CA) the elementary schools ban devices. They can be powered off in a backpack, but can't be turned on during school hours.

      Middle schools and high schools are more permissive, banning only in-class use. At my daughter's high school, any student whose phone rings in class has to get up in front of the class and dance The Macarena. This is a surprisingly effective deterrent.

    3. Re:Sad generation by shess · · Score: 2

      I pass about 8 school grounds (covering all age groups) on the way to work every day for over a decade. I remember it was always kids playing sports, on the swings, running around, etc. The last 5 years it's mostly sitting around and staring at phones.

      I'm so thankful I wasn't raised in this generation.

      A year ago, I went with a group of scouts to Seabase in the Florida Keys. We spent a week on an island with no electronics of any kind, even watches. When we got back, the kids all spent their time playing odd physical games, while the various adult leaders were all sitting silently staring at their phones.

      I put my phone away at that point.

      BTW, did _you_ spend any time today outside just running around?

    4. Re:Sad generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well compared to them we were slackers*, so I'm not really seeing your point. The current generation is just continuing the downward trend. Take it forward another 40 years or so and kids will probably spend all day lying on motorised armchairs cyber-bullying each other via brain implant while their parents sit at home on their antique smartphones bemoaning how "kids these days" can't be bothered moving their thumbs to type like they did in the good old days.

      *for example my grandfather used to ride a horse to school at 7am every morning *after* milking the cows and helping with odd-jobs around the farm.

    5. Re:Sad generation by EmeraldBot · · Score: 1

      And as someone who's gay, I am extremely thankful I wasn't raised in yours...

      --
      "Set a man a fire, he'll be warm for the rest of the night. Set a man afire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
    6. Re: Sad generation by houghi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My grat aunt was a teacher in the 1920s and told we had it better, because not starving so much. Also living in houses was a nice thing. Also the twowars where not a nice thing.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    7. Re:Sad generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're keep up to date, to see if there's an active shooter in their district.

    8. Re:Sad generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe schools should consider providing more entertainment instead of installing two swings and throwing a football into the field and calling it a day.

    9. Re: Sad generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll trade legalised poo sex for healthy children any day of the week.

    10. Re: Sad generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phrasing, Krieger!

    11. Re:Sad generation by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      *for example my grandfather used to ride a horse to school at 7am every morning *after* milking the cows and helping with odd-jobs around the farm.

      A horse? You flash git.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    12. Re: Sad generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no. guns protect people, not phones or information. only guns. more guns.

    13. Re: Sad generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey stupid, its france, they dont throw in football, they kick. silly 'murkin. stay inside your precious borders. the world doesnt need you.

    14. Re:Sad generation by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      My grandparents said the same thing. They used to ride horses to school and go fishing at lunchtime. We were slackers that bludged along on those new fangled bicycle thingies and simply ran around a field with a ball at lunch instead of having real fun. Nothing good would ever come from that apparently...

      Good example - nothing good did come from it :)

    15. Re:Sad generation by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Given the mess caused by the few horses we get riding through the village I'm kind of glad every kid isn't on one every day. The country would be ankle deep in shit.

    16. Re:Sad generation by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      My grandparents said the same thing. They used to ride horses to school and go fishing at lunchtime. We were slackers that bludged along on those new fangled bicycle thingies and simply ran around a field with a ball at lunch instead of having real fun.

      Unless your grandparents grew up in the 1850's, bicycles wouldn't be considered "new fangled thingies". ;-)

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    17. Re:Sad generation by antdude · · Score: 1

      Adults do this too these days. :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  4. Good... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They're also a distraction in lectures/classes -- you retain a lot more if you're taking notes on paper and not browsing the Internet. Honestly, this should extend to all electronic devices like laptops and tablets unless there's an accommodation for a disability.

    1. Re:Good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you. I'll shit in your yard if I want, old man.

    2. Re:Good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      same to you, "young" man...

    3. Re:Good... by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      Unless...you educate your children, and provide them with devices - and the knowledge to use them - that enable them to securely share notes, pictures etc.
      It makes them more productive and ready for more advanced environments later.

      If you're here, you're a nerd with your own private server(s) - start with this:
      https://nextcloud.com/

    4. Re:Good... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      You can also take notes on a laptop or tablet ...
      And if you insist on handwriting, just take a tablet that is suited for that (or an eBook reader).

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  5. Ulterior Motives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just so the cops have less to go on (he said she said only) of what the illegals are up too.

    1. Re:Ulterior Motives by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      What does one thing have to do to another? Not that cops having less ability to conduct surveillance is ever a bad thing.

  6. Legal right? by Nahor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    students will be banned from using mobile phones

    ...

    a legal "right to disconnect"

    Being forced to do something isn't a "right", unless you live in Oceania

    1. Re:Legal right? by quenda · · Score: 1

      unless you live in Oceania

      I do live in Oceania, mate. Bloody yanks.

    2. Re:Legal right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... something isn't a "right" ...

      What he means is the freedom of choosing activities that are (digital) gadget-free.

    3. Re:Legal right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank god the yanks still live in the United States, then. You can have as much Big Brother as you want; the rest of us took 1984 as a warning.

    4. Re:Legal right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Gov't is forcing you not to use your phone because it knows what's good for you???

      I though France was liberal, but what part of liberal allows the gov't to control your peaceful actions?

      Its reasonable to prohibit phone use during class, but recess? In the halls during break?

      Phones are legal, and there are many reasons why having phones in class is a good thing: shooters, terrorists, medical emergency, fights.

    5. Re:Legal right? by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      there are many reasons why having phones in class is a good thing: shooters, terrorists, medical emergency

      All those should be covered by the responsible adults running the school. Seriously.

      fights

      I fail to see how the ability to video fights on your phone and post them on YouTube is some sort of fundamental human right.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re:Legal right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      school shooters are not a reason to need a phone in france.

      in the usa perhaps, in the rest of the world, no.

      freedom!

  7. Never happen in America by Peter+P+Peters · · Score: 1

    Because 'Freedom' to be a jerk seems to be written in the Constitution....

    1. Re: Never happen in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just jerks.

  8. Phones Are HELPFUL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    My daughter's school had a water main break & flooding. They canceled school in the middle of the day. Her ability to call me was a godsend!

    Mind you, her phone stays in her locker all day. She can't use it in classes or during lunch. But when we need to coordinate after-school activities, having a phone available for texting or calls is a godsend!

    1. Re:Phones Are HELPFUL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Little known fact: there were no after-school activities before the advent of cell phones. That was indeed the technology that finally enabled them.

    2. Re:Phones Are HELPFUL! by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      Every school around here can contact the parents in case of early dismissal, not to mention that early closures are announced on the radio and television.

      After school activities are just that - after school. Who cares if a child uses a phone after school? That's not what we're talking about.

    3. Re:Phones Are HELPFUL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phones are what allow us to be overbooked on afterschool activities, instead of picking just 1. Also, we used to use pay phones. Try to find one today...

    4. Re:Phones Are HELPFUL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every school around here can contact the parents in case of early dismissal,

      We thought so too. Didn't work out so well in practice. Cell phones saved the day.

      not to mention that early closures are announced on the radio and television.

      Good luck with that. If you're someplace with live rather than canned music or tv, and if you tune in at just the right time, maybe you'll hear about it. Radio & TV cover a wide area. Around here that's hundreds of school systems.

      After school activities are just that - after school. Who cares if a child uses a phone after school? That's not what we're talking about.

      Good point. I can just drive over after school to give each of my kids their cell phones since they're no longer allowed in school.

    5. Re: Phones Are HELPFUL! by houghi · · Score: 5, Funny

      When I was a kid, I had no way of surviving when school was out earlier. And a result I was killed dead. Kids can nor be left unattended for any amount of time. Let me be an example, as I was killed dead because of it.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    6. Re: Phones Are HELPFUL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen to that. I myself was killed so much I never stopped being dead. I'm still dead today, I tried not to be. They told me "have you tried not being dead?" But I have been killed too much. I'll always be dead because I didn't have a phone. It's quite sad, really.

    7. Re:Phones Are HELPFUL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are also quite useful during school shootings. Fortunately, that's extremely unusual, when not just inexistent, in civilized countries.

    8. Re:Phones Are HELPFUL! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      My daughter's school had a water main break & flooding. They canceled school in the middle of the day. Her ability to call me was a godsend!

      Call me old fashioned, but I think I'd want a boring old phone call from an actual adult at the school in that sort of situation.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    9. Re: Phones Are HELPFUL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      datchoo kenny?

    10. Re:Phones Are HELPFUL! by nbuet · · Score: 1

      When kids don't have phone, the school calls or let them call, or they ask a friend, or a neighbour or an office. Or the school takes care of them. Phone is not mandatory, it's just one way for your kids to get to you - among multiples. Make sure your kids understand and use these options.

    11. Re:Phones Are HELPFUL! by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      "Her ability to call me was a godsend!"

      Because it's impossible to make a phone call without using your personal mobile phone,

    12. Re:Phones Are HELPFUL! by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and so want the other 300 parents of those 300 kids.
      So, one minute per kid to inform the parent ... adds up to 5hours of phone calls. Sure, if the teachers have mobiles probably 10 teachers can call 30 parents each, still takes half an hour.

      It makes much more sense each child calls on its own, and only those who have no phone are covered by other kids or teachers.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    13. Re: Phones Are HELPFUL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the UK schools have parents phone numbers and SMS are routinely sent. School closed, child ill, any other issues.. SMS for every occasion. They can be batch sent or individually sent.

    14. Re:Phones Are HELPFUL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a fucking stupid take. Now I'm going to take your fucking kid's phone away myself you dumbfuck

    15. Re:Phones Are HELPFUL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also with direct communications with their child, the parents can coordinate with their child on when and where they can pick them up and/or calm their child down if its a stressful situation.

    16. Re:Phones Are HELPFUL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It makes much more sense for the school to have automated messages set up to inform all of the parents and guardians about that kind of an event at once.

    17. Re:Phones Are HELPFUL! by catprog · · Score: 1

      And how does the guardian get in touch with the kid with the arrangement?

      --
      My Transformation Website
      Kindle Books http://www.catprog.org/rev
      Interactive CYOA http://www.catprog.org/st
  9. Secondary school by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if it applies only to primary school or to secondary school as well. The measure would be mostly relevant in secondary school.

    1. Re:Secondary school by herve_masson · · Score: 2

      From TFA: "... in nursery, primary and middle-schools, until around the age of 15. "

      I'm so glad they passed this law (I'm French), and really surprized to see most people thinking that way. We went really far in kid's addiction to smartphones & social media ; time to control this shit a little. This is an important milestone.

  10. Why legislation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read the article and while it was informative, I still came away wondering why this needed to be law at all. I don't know much about French bureaucracy, but couldn't this be accomplished with a strong recommendation? Some kind of policy change? It seems like using a hammer on an ant.

    1. Re:Why legislation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The French are big on protecting their cultural identity from change - including inter-generational change. This usually involves legislated barriers to change. They are likely seeing this less as a means to correct negative impacts on school scores than as a means to slow growth in the generation gap.

    2. Re:Why legislation? by x0ra · · Score: 1

      No, in France, the State is seen (and sold as, from the earliest childhood) as the carrying mother that shall cater to all your need and dictate how you shall live. (source: I'm French... unfortunately)

    3. Re:Why legislation? by herve_masson · · Score: 1

      I'm french too, and nobody "dictates" me how I should live. Hopefully ! Some may think it's over-regulated. That's a different thing to me.
      Freedom remain central in France, and this is what really matters to me. You're even free to leave France and find a better place elsewhere :P

    4. Re:Why legislation? by nasch · · Score: 1

      Freedom remain central in France

      Well, unless you want to wear something the government deems inappropriate. https://www.theguardian.com/wo...

    5. Re:Why legislation? by PPH · · Score: 1

      nobody "dictates" me how I should live

      May I carry a gun?

      Non!

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    6. Re:Why legislation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      guns are ghey, like really really ghey

    7. Re:Why legislation? by herve_masson · · Score: 1

      No, you can't. People don't have guns here. This is not the kind of freedom I'm looking after, but granted: thats personal opinion.I'm actually glad other's can't have this "freedom"in my country. You also can't do religion proselytizing in public schools; it goes as far as not showing obvious religion signs. People have fought and voted for this in the past. Nothing I would call "lack of freedom".

    8. Re:Why legislation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not the kind of freedom I'm looking after

      In the fight between the strong and the weak, another point goes to the strong.

    9. Re:Why legislation? by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

      French governments believe there need to be laws framing every single aspect of human existence. It's just a Gallic tradition, like blocking roads and making boring TV shows.

      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
  11. In classes in US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Friend teaches in texas. Kids use them in class here.

  12. Surrender phones before class by prunedude · · Score: 1

    At my daughter's school, all students put their phones in a basket as they enter the classroom and collect them as they leave. This is a small private school, so I don't know how well this would go over in a larger public institution....

  13. Appserk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Face it. The human has kinda gone berserk over the smart phone and apps. Simply observe, what is.

    I realize 'tech' is interesting, valuable, a big part of our economy. The apps came from human beings brains though and maybe some of these appety apps are in all brains by default and we don't need to app as much.

  14. Bravo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brravo! Increasingly he French have been ahead of the curve. Children have no need for cell phones during lesson time. Or anytime during the school day.

    The French have also banned burqas and other primitive tribal Halloween costumes. The French are starting to get things right, unlike the Germans and Swedes who enjoy being raped and humiliated by foreign invaders.

    Sweden is the very definition of a "Soy Boy" and of course Germany has become a nation of "Sitzpinklers".

  15. What use is a school by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    If you got a phone...

    --
    [($)]
  16. Which group is going to think this is a bad idea? by shubus · · Score: 1

    I know you're out there! But I'm not one of them.

  17. Not a drill by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Funny

    In the US, we can't ban mobile phones from schools because then how would students be able to tell their parents goodbye when they're hiding in a closet from a member of the well-regulated militia?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Not a drill by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      That's just a once-in-a-lifetime event. Students need phones daily to set up drug buys.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    2. Re:Not a drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > That's funny cause the per student death rate from school shootings in France is 4 times higher than in the U

      LOL. [Citation Needed]. Because, well, I am French, and, well, this utter bullshit:

      Norway 2011 attack was not a school shooting

      There have been around no school shooting FRANCE

        Statistic where you see the US at 11th positon was probabl on Faux News, the_donald, or both.

    3. Re:Not a drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you ackbar your allahus today, froggie frog?

    4. Re:Not a drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure that will comfort French students during islamist terror attacks with weapons that wouldn't even be legal in the US.

    5. Re:Not a drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are supposed to do that every time you get out of the door, at least thats what we do in europe with so many people of the religion of peace around

    6. Re:Not a drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit confirmed!

    7. Re:Not a drill by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      the per student death rate from school shootings in France is 4 times higher than in the US

      Now that's a scientific fact: there's no real evidence for it, but it is scientific fact.

      (Copyright Dr Fox).

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    8. Re: Not a drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. But how is the weather in Russia today?

    9. Re:Not a drill by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Look, I live in England and am thus legally obliged to hate the French and even I think you're a twat.

      It's not just the way you failed miserably in responding to his valid point, the inherent racism, the assumption of his religion. It's the pathetic childish lack of imagination you used in your insult.

      Please, do try harder.

    10. Re:Not a drill by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      And when was the last school shooting in France? 2017 happened 1 with 4 injured, the one before that was 2012 ... 4 dead.

      Interesting list: https://www.infoplease.com/us/...

      Shootings every month, sometimes more than once a month in the US ... and you think more die in France, ha ha ha ha.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    11. Re: Not a drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice attempt trollyMc-trollFace

    12. Re:Not a drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      his tiny impotent peen prohibits him from trying or otherwise being a functional human

    13. Re:Not a drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The U.S. Government has not banned mobile phones from schools, and I see that as a good thing. Where I live, students are not allowed to use phones in class, they must be turned off. If a student's phone rings in class that student gets detention. The students still have their phones with them, and can use them at breaks, during lunch, and after school.

      The problem is not the phones themselves, but that so many (both kids and adults!) have been sucked into social media addiction! They actually get nervous if they are unable to constantly check their social media accounts. And they seem not to realize (or just don't care) that these "social media" sites only exist to collect and sell people's personal private data! Collecting and selling private data is now one of the biggest businesses in the world! Look at the recently revealed business dealing of Fakebook, where data on many of its users was sold to Chinese phone makers!!

    14. Re:Not a drill by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 1

      That's just a once-in-a-lifetime event.

      Yes, a once in a very short lifetime event, in quite a lot of people's lifetimes in the USA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
  18. French students will by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    have to pass their exams and tests on merit.
    Got to study more for your professionnel, technologique, général, scientifique, économique et social curriculum for real in the future.
    Hours of study. Learning equations, facts, how to think within in a set time. Rather than what site to look up that has the needed facts on Napoleons successful campaigns.
    The happy decade of glowing instant networked support is over.
    The only skill an entire generation had was how to use the internet.
    With academic changes like this France will soon be back as an academic super power.
    Think of the future innovations in hydropneumatic car design and bridge building. In the improved quality of Ada code used to fly rockets.
    All due to a better quality of graduates who passed their tests by learning and having the skills to study.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:French students will by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Once again, we will see the French engineering dominance represented by the Citroen 2CV and Renault Dauphine.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    2. Re:French students will by mccalli · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Being more po-faced with that comment than I should be, the 2CV was actually a brilliant design for its intended purpose. It's one of the more famous automotive design briefs - it needed to be capable of carrying a basket of eggs across a farmer's ploughed field without breaking. That's why you end up with the design they got, with very high ground clearance. More here - the 2CV is a very under-appreciated car when taken out of context, but in context it was superb.

    3. Re:French students will by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not sure American can be really proud of their car industry.
      I personally would choose a Citroen DS, thanks for asking.

  19. How is this new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, but how is this new? At what point did schools START to allow you to use devices in class or school?! When I was a student, you werenâ(TM)t allowed to bring a gameboy, Walkman, radio, cell, or anything else to school and definitely not in class. It was a sure way to get it confiscated by the school.

  20. Hmm, correction... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    They're also a distraction in lectures/classes -- you retain a lot more if you're taking notes on paper and not browsing the Internet.

    IDK, in many of the classes I've been in I would probably have learned more if I spent the class Googling the topic instead of taking notes.

    Once again people who actually study are forced to pay for the sins of those who cannot.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Hmm, correction... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      No you wouldn't, you remember more taking notes than reading off a screen.

  21. No it is a right by aepervius · · Score: 1

    As in a lex legis right. That right may not be the *student* right. It seems counter intuitive but some right are imposed on the whole as a restriction to protect people. e.g. the right of school until you are 16 , would probably not being recognized as a right by the kids, rather as an imposition, on their freedom, but it is definitively a right.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:No it is a right by x0ra · · Score: 1

      we have reach new level of new-speech indoctrination... A right is something you can freely choose to exercise... or not, at your own discretion. Carrying a gun is a Right (in the US). Mandatory school is not a right, it's mandatory school.

    2. Re:No it is a right by sabri · · Score: 1

      School is not mandatory in the U.S. Education is, but you can choose to home-school.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    3. Re:No it is a right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the amount of time consuming browser games that are both rather distraction and still popular in my area forcing all children to stay offline might be actually positive.

      Also deals with helicopter parents needing constant updates or using the phones build-in functionallity to supervise their children 24 hours a day.

      Mandatory school is not a right

      Education is a right, mandatory school is a tool to enforce that right.

    4. Re:No it is a right by tepples · · Score: 1

      This is correct of the United States. It is not correct of other countries like Germany, which ban homeschooling.

  22. Dumb by xenobyte · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be a whole lot smarter to teach the kids how to have access to their phones but not to use it? - Because that's how the world is outside the school...

    A straight-out ban teaches nothing and only encourages students to find workarounds and similar.

    --
    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    1. Re:Dumb by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be a whole lot smarter to teach the kids how to have access to their phones but not to use it? - Because that's how the world is outside the school...

      A straight-out ban teaches nothing and only encourages students to find workarounds and similar.

      You can't workaround having a teacher smash your precious phone to pieces with a club hammer.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  23. Children do not need phones in school by sjbe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My daughter's school had a water main break & flooding. They canceled school in the middle of the day. Her ability to call me was a godsend!

    Do you suffer from the delusion that that sort of thing never happened prior to mobile phones being widely available? Here is a hint. The SCHOOL called you instead. I know, right? You might actually have to talk to an adult!

    Schools now can very easily send a blast message out to all parents via text or email. They also maintain call lists and other people have phones too. Your child would have survived just fine and worst case would have been bored for a few hours. Schools are well equipped to deal with this sort of thing.

    But when we need to coordinate after-school activities, having a phone available for texting or calls is a godsend!

    No it has become a crutch. It is not necessary. When I was school age I had no problem coordinating after school activities with my parents and I didn't get a mobile phone until I was 26. Your argument is specious.

    1. Re:Children do not need phones in school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your child would have...been bored for a few hours. Schools are well equipped to deal with this sort of thing.

      Yup.

  24. Because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's so when the French branch of Boca Haram shows up to kidnap girls, they won't be able to call for help.

  25. Phones used to run a graphing calculator app by tepples · · Score: 0

    Phones should remain in their locker during school hours.

    Should graphing calculators also "remain in their locker during school hours"? If not, why should phones used to run a graphing calculator app "remain in their locker during school hours"?

    1. Re:Phones used to run a graphing calculator app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Graphing calculators, no. Sure there are some hacks where you can get them to transmit to each other and what not, but that was always sketchy to get working.
      Phones, YES. That gives kids access to internet, texting, sharing answers, etc.

      You don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.

    2. Re:Phones used to run a graphing calculator app by Kulahan · · Score: 1

      Are you too stupid to realize there's a difference between a tool, primarily used for a single function (helping with math calculations) and a toy which CAN have that kind of functionality, or are you just trolling?

    3. Re:Phones used to run a graphing calculator app by tepples · · Score: 1

      Are you too stupid to realize there's a difference between a tool, primarily used for a single function (helping with math calculations) and a toy which CAN have that kind of functionality, or are you just trolling?

      I'm smart enough to realize that if a high school freshman already carries an entry-level Android phone on a low-end prepaid plan (no cellular data and a handful of minutes and texts per month), a graphing calculator app for that phone can be much cheaper for the parents than a dedicated TI-8x graphing calculator, which includes a hefty surcharge for College Board rent seeking.

    4. Re:Phones used to run a graphing calculator app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and apparently stupid enough not to understand that schools have their own supplies of graphing calculators, so its not on the student to bring one

    5. Re:Phones used to run a graphing calculator app by tepples · · Score: 1

      Whether every classroom carries a full set or just a handful for those who forgot or cannot afford their own calculators depends on the attitude of the taxpayers in the area toward funding public K-12 education. Some states' fiscally conservative electorates have chosen to put a ceiling on property tax.

    6. Re:Phones used to run a graphing calculator app by Local+ID10T · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and...?

      Seriously, who cares if it is cheaper? This is about what is right (for French school children), not about what is cheap.

      --
      "You want to know how to help your kids? Leave them the fuck alone." -George Carlin
    7. Re:Phones used to run a graphing calculator app by tepples · · Score: 1

      In other words, this ban can work provided the people of France are willing to pay for a full set of calculators or other electronic learning aids for every public school classroom that requires students to use them.

    8. Re:Phones used to run a graphing calculator app by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Should graphing calculators also "remain in their locker during school hours"? If not, why should phones used to run a graphing calculator app "remain in their locker during school hours"?

      My kids school allows phones but doesn't allow graphic calculator apps to be used on tests and even if they did, all their instructions are for a single model and brand so kids would be on their own. Same with colleges. Colleges aren't going to allow smartphones to be used on tests anytime soon. Kids are still going to be required to buy dedicated graphing calculators. I've heard plenty of parents say that an app would be cheaper but I doubt many schools are going to budge. So yes, in theory, some kids might save a few bucks by allowing them to bring a phone to school but that's doubtful and still not reason enough to allow phones at school. Also, at most schools, they usually have a school issued tablet anyways.

    9. Re:Phones used to run a graphing calculator app by tepples · · Score: 1

      Does your kid's school keep a full classroom set of graphing calculators on hand for tests? (And to the point of the article, do French schools?) A phone ban could work if that is the case.

    10. Re:Phones used to run a graphing calculator app by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Should graphing calculators also "remain in their locker during school hours"?

      Yes.

      Anyone who has been paying attention during their maths lessons can look at the function, derive the inflexion points and axis crossing points and sketch the curve within a few seconds. If you don't understand the maths, then you have already failed your maths test and that's your education over and finished. I'll have fries with that burger.

      If your school curriculum is so fucked up that your Physics course demands things that your Maths course hasn't already provided, then you've got an issue to take up with the school management. And you did take it up when you read the course description at the start of the year. Because you read the paperwork before signing up. Didn't you?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    11. Re:Phones used to run a graphing calculator app by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Does your kid's school keep a full classroom set of graphing calculators on hand for tests? (And to the point of the article, do French schools?) A phone ban could work if that is the case.

      Some schools do, but most I've seen require kids to buy their own as part of their school supplies at the beginning of the year. I've heard plenty of parents complain over the years especially when they already have calculator A (from another kid/class) but now need calculator B but that's how it's usually done in the USA from what I've seen. Most elementary schools do have some sort of allowance for kids who can't afford to buy their own. In college, you're usually on your own and I saw some kids try to get by with a different model/brand but it usually made the class harder if your calculator didn't match the one the teacher/book used for examples.

  26. Macarena Non Stop by tepples · · Score: 1

    At my daughter's high school, any student whose phone rings in class has to get up in front of the class and dance The Macarena. This is a surprisingly effective deterrent.

    Until you get to the showoff with six different remixes of "Macarena" on his phone, including the one that sounds like it's straight out of Mortal Kombat ("La Mezcla Guerrillera by Fangoria") and the one that sounds like almost a mash-up with "Unbelievable" by EMF ("Bass Bumpers Remix").

    Source: Macarena Non Stop

    1. Re:Macarena Non Stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa. It was released in 1996, but the second track is titled "Pura Carroceria (Meme Dance Short Remix)".

      I didn't realize memes were so old.

  27. Throw-in by tepples · · Score: 1

    throwing a football into the field

    hey stupid, its france, they dont throw in football, they kick.

    Until someone kicks the ball across the sideline. Then it's just as AC said: throwing a football into the field.

  28. Word confusion by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

    During a parliamentary debate, lawmakers from Macron's La Republique En Marche party said banning phones in schools meant all children now had a legal "right to disconnect" from digital pressures during their school day.

    Sort of like my right to not kill people in public? Seriously, 'right to disconnect' is totally the wrong choice of words. How the hell did 'banning phones' morph into 'right to disconnect'? Even for a euphemism, that's a pretty serious stretch.

    1. Re:Word confusion by the_skywise · · Score: 1

      Orwellian newspeak(tm).
      We're not denying you something. We're expanding your rights citizen!

  29. No phones in my kids' primary school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's been a ban on phones ever since some kids showed some other kids some content which was not suitable no matter how liberal of mind you are...
    So, total ban on phones, my kids sometimes needs to carry one for their after school activities that they go to straight after school, and they are semi paranoid about anyone finding out about it,... Even though it's just an old slider.

    Anyway, any phone seen in a child's hands will be confiscated. Not just until class is out, but until one of the parents comes to pick it up.
    Indeed, my children's primary school is entirely phone free.
    In case you wonder, all parents I've spoken with about this are happy about this status. And, this is in Switzerland.

    aRTee

  30. Mind evolving... by Herve5 · · Score: 1

    I clearly remember, although I am not able to track the reference right now, of an ancient roman text that went somehow this way:
    It was during the wars of Cleopatre. The scene depicted a war field, with one of Cleopatre generals receiving orders, reading them, then turning to apply them.
    In any classical movie you can imagine the picture : general receives sealed package, unseals, reads, and now on to the next action scene, nothing special to be seen here.

    Then, the actual roman text: written by the man dedicated to this, a clerk which you'd call today the embedded war reporter, or something like that.
    And that's where it goes wild : our 'reporter' actually turns extraordinarily haggard when seeing this, and his text expands at length.
    Thing is, the general read *silently*. And, that's the first time our 'reporter' sees this. In his life. Despite the fact he himself is a clerc.

    What he is describing is not the prelude of yet another romanic battle. At all.
    It is a change in human mind and thinking. Romans, and then us, were on the verge of *thinking differently* -by the fact one, from then on, could read silently.
    Maybe, without Cleopatre, generations of commuters wouldn't anything to read during hours. The word 'education' would have a different meaning. Would you, yes you here, be reading this very text aloud? Really? Slowly?

    The connected generation is just one such switch. Many have told us about the Gutenberg revolution, etc. Silent reading is another one less known. Connected people is yet another. All come with trashing various things, some *very* regrettable, and, clearly, some *irresistible* and significant too.

    This switch to connected people is now a thing of the past, of the recent history at best.

    My main concern today is rather, what will AI bring, and delete, in our everyday life.
    Not just jobs, I mean : which parts of our minds are going to change again, in my grandchildren.

    --
    Herve S.
    1. Re:Mind evolving... by someoneOtherThanMe · · Score: 1

      An anecdote from my grandfather: when he was in the army (in the 1930's, in southern Europe), lots of folks couldn't read but still received letters from their family, so my grandfather would read them aloud. They wanted him to put his hands over his ears so he wouldn't hear what he was reading.