Slashdot Mirror


User: QuantumG

QuantumG's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
11,687
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 11,687

  1. Re:hmmmm on A Robotic Taxi Named robuCAB · · Score: 1

    Dude, he's already admitted he didn't RTFA.. please RTETBP.

  2. Re:Offline web apps on MIT Picks Top 10 Emerging Technologies · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes, all the undocumented apis and annoying workarounds of the web, now in your desktop app!

    Was talking to a guy the other day who said he was once going to write an xml/css/javascript rendering engine for wxWidgets. So the same app could run on your desktop or through a web browser and you never have to deal with web 2.0 crap.

  3. Re:hmmmm on A Robotic Taxi Named robuCAB · · Score: 0, Troll

    Clearly you didn't RTFA as you would have seen they are not "cars". They are more like golf buggies.

    So your entire comment is stupid.

    RTFA.
    RTFA.

  4. Re:He also tried to buy Linux, didn't he? on "DonorGate" Is Latest Scandal To Hit Wikipedia · · Score: 1

    cost != value.

  5. Re:He also tried to buy Linux, didn't he? on "DonorGate" Is Latest Scandal To Hit Wikipedia · · Score: 1

    Hehe, $50k eh. That's about 2000 man hours. Ohloh estimates the cost of the Linux project at $172,788,619.

  6. Re:abandon ebooks too on Book Publishers Abandoning DRM · · Score: 1

    e-books are kinda valuable to libraries in the third world where care and maintenance of computers is easier than care and maintenance of thousands of books.

  7. Re:Normal on Linux PCs Discontinued at Wal-Mart Stores · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I suppose EEPC's are not flying off the shelf and are being returned in record numbers too.

    It's pretty simple, if you have no evidence, STFU.

  8. Re:Normal on Linux PCs Discontinued at Wal-Mart Stores · · Score: 5, Insightful

    you can't find a reference because it is FUD and you know it.

  9. Re:Normal on Linux PCs Discontinued at Wal-Mart Stores · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Umm, dude, you're still not getting it. They sold out both online and in stores. The most likely reason that Wal-Mart is pulling these from the store is that they are getting too much interest and tying up staff. Customer service is suffering as a result. If Wal-Mart hires more staff that will increase the cost of the product and may decrease the demand, resulting in an elastic effect on sales.. so it is easier to pull the product from stores and require customers to buy it online where they won't be tying up customer service agents.

  10. Re:mmm yes on Linux PCs Discontinued at Wal-Mart Stores · · Score: 1

    As in, customers are not pestering the staff to explain to them why this computer is so cheap.. they have to do their own research.

  11. Re:No surprise really... on MacBook Air Confuses Airport Security · · Score: 1

    Ok, Mr smart guy, please explain how you find people who want this job and have an extensive knowledge of consumer electronics.. how do you retain them? What makes you think they are not going to just leave the moment they gain this extensive knowledge and get a better job?

    Seriously.. it's really easy to say "the guy who screens electronic devices should know something about electronic devices" but how exactly do you make that a reality rather than a random wish?

  12. Re:No surprise really... on MacBook Air Confuses Airport Security · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Umm.. they're given a bunch of rules that they have to follow. It's not like they are bomb experts. If they were they would be working a higher paid job. This doesn't mean they are idiots. It doesn't even mean they are ignorant, unless you want to compare them to said bomb experts, in which case every one of us who isn't a bomb expert is ignorant.

    One of the rules happens to be: separate laptops from other electronic devices. So what makes it a laptop and what makes it a "dvd player"? The keyboard? You can't see the keyboard until you open it.

    Another rule happens to be: don't open electronic devices unless a secondary inspection is warranted.

    And there's a bunch of other rules to decided if a secondary inspection is warranted.

    They're just trying to do their job. It's a joke what the experts tell them but they are the experts so if you want to blame anyone, blame them.

  13. slashvertisement on MacBook Air Confuses Airport Security · · Score: 2, Funny

    Besides that, it seems they were confused as to which set of procedures they had to apply to it. Is it a laptop or is it an "electronic device".. Seems the definition of a laptop included a hard drive.

  14. Re:not responsible for the actions of its customer on Tenth Anniversary of First Commercial MP3 Player · · Score: 1

    1. there are no criminal copyright laws in Australia.. only the pathetic "especially egregious acts" wording in the Copyright Act which claims criminal prosecution may be possible.
    2. way to set up the seppos and the limeys for a "wasn't it started as a prison colony" joke.

  15. Re:400 Million? on Beatles and iTunes At Last? · · Score: 1

    Let's say one person in ten buys music legally, and only half of those like the Beatles - one in twenty overall. Huh? one person in ten, what, in the whole world? are you honestly trying to suggest that 660,222,417 people "buy music legally". Do you mean online? Or do you just mean they buy CDs? Cause I honestly think you would have trouble finding 10% of the population of the USA who have bought a CD this year, let alone bought music online, let alone all the people in the rest of the world.

    The vast majority of people on this planet are not customers of the music industry.

  16. 5 more years on Beatles and iTunes At Last? · · Score: 1

    In 2013 the sound recording copyrights expire..

    Then there will be a total legal snafu.

    The copyright on the score, etc, will not expire for another 100 years.. Assuming McCartney dies soon.

    Of course, if you believe McCartney died in 1966 and was replaced with a look-alike, then I guess the clock started in 1980.

  17. Re:Risking your life to test security on The Dirty Jobs of IT · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Parachute eh? Why not just wait until there's an airshow at Holloman airforce base, which is right next door, and drive over to White Sands.. it's not like they have any real border security between the two. I know because I nearly accidentally drove the wrong way into White Sands last time I was at Holloman.. thankfully they do put up a nice big sign saying "WARNING: rockets being tested".

  18. Re:Uhm... on The Dirty Jobs of IT · · Score: 1

    He's talking about playing at being criminal instead of actually being one.

  19. Re:Uhm... on The Dirty Jobs of IT · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Yeah, like rich people who get their 'people' to pay shop keepers to look the other way while the lady does some shoplifting for the giddy thrill of it.

  20. Replace yourself then on European Space Agency Launches New Orbital Supply Ship · · Score: 1

    Robots are capable of posting on Slashdot 24 hours a day.. they don't need sleep, and most of what they say is more insightful than the average Slashdot user.

  21. Re:It is NOT fair use, or even close to it. on Olympic Web Site Features Pirated Content · · Score: -1, Troll

    Sorry, infringing the copyright on a work that is given away for free precludes 4. The nature of the copyrighted work is that it is trivial and has about a $20 value.. and that's if you were to hire an american to create it.. in china it has about a $1 value. So 1 is the only thing that works in the author's favor.. and in a Chinese court the case would be thrown out.

  22. Re:Copyright doesn't work like that on Olympic Web Site Features Pirated Content · · Score: -1

    Like what? What are you talking about? If you want to have a conversation, state your freakin' opinion already.

  23. Re:Bullshit. on Olympic Web Site Features Pirated Content · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    They're standard flash fonts.. and maybe you should read the entire thread before posting.

  24. Fair use on Olympic Web Site Features Pirated Content · · Score: 0, Troll

    Seeing as I'm replying to myself here, let's make it 3 for 3.

    The original work is 353,472 bytes. The copied material is:

    icecube 758 bytes
    cloud 3464 bytes
    splash sound 5423 bytes
    bell sound 1783 bytes
    poof sound 1783 bytes
    bling sound 1783 bytes
    song 42967 bytes
    total 57961 bytes

    Which is 16% of the original work, and the majority of that is the song which was used in neither the original work, nor the derivative..

    In any case, this is small enough to be considered fair use.

  25. Re:Bullshit. on Olympic Web Site Features Pirated Content · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Wow. Ya know, is it too much to ask that people read the entire thread before posting?

    This is like "posting on the Internet 101" stuff here.