Slashdot Mirror


The Dirty Jobs of IT

dantwood writes "In an Infoworld article, Dan Tynan writes about the '7 Dirtiest Jobs' in IT. Number three? Enterprise espionage engineer (black ops). 'Seeking slippery individuals comfortable with lying, cheating, stealing, breaking, and entering for penetration testing of enterprise networks. Requirements include familiarity with hacking, malware, and forgery; must be able to plausibly impersonate a pest control specialist or a fire marshal. Please submit rap sheet along with resume.'" Paging Mike Rowe, Mike Rowe to the IT desk.

162 comments

  1. Link covers several pages by TFer_Atvar · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Link covers several pages by waterwingz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry - the OP of this thread is not really that informative. On most websites that insist on stretching their articles out over many pages there is often a "Printer Friendly" link at the top. That usually gives you the whole article on one page with a minimum of ads and dancing baloney.

      --
      . waterwingz
    2. Re:Link covers several pages by Marvin01 · · Score: 1

      Big deal. There is no mod category: "helpful".

  2. A script has tried to read private data by gomiam · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    That link is certainly weird. While loading, a script tried to "read private data from any window". Is Infoworld hacked or something?

    1. Re:A script has tried to read private data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The problem is that you're allowing Javascript to run on your machine. Stop it.

  3. Uhm... by OpenSourced · · Score: 4, Funny

    lying, cheating, stealing, breaking, and entering for penetration testing of enterprise networks

    Sounds like fun.

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
    1. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      lying, cheating, stealing

      Someone call Darl McBride, I hear his gig as SCO has come to an end ...

    2. Re:Uhm... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      He's talking about playing at being criminal instead of actually being one.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lying, cheating, stealing

      Those wrestling fans out there... who remembers Eddie Gurerro?

    4. Re:Uhm... by LuisAnaya · · Score: 1

      I guess that's better than brush up my JCL :).

      --
      Vi havas e-poston.
    5. Re:Uhm... by sapphire+wyvern · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know, running a penetration testing firm sounds like an excellent cover for black-hat hackers.

      Nothing gives you plausible deniability for your data heists like being paid to try stealing it in the first place...

    6. Re:Uhm... by Z00L00K · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I wouldn't consider the Legacy systems archaeologist a really dirty job in IT.

      And I actually think that a really dirty IT job is when management enforces the implementation of a hack that may not only be insecure but also possibly illegal.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  4. On TV? by psychicsword · · Score: 2, Funny

    When will this be on Dirty Jobs

    1. Re:On TV? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      When will this be on Dirty Jobs
      Never, because only one of these jobs actually involved dirt in the sense that Mike Rowe deals with. The rest were just trials and tribulations of a typical IT person, and one or two about IT workers with questionable ethics.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    2. Re:On TV? by psychicsword · · Score: 1

      it was supposed to be a joke

    3. Re:On TV? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      it was supposed to be a joke
      And my post was supposed to be a criticism of the article.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  5. Mike Rowe! by hansamurai · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hey, last time Mike Rowe was on Slashdot he was getting sued by Microsoft!

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/01/19/133233&tid=109

    Now that's a dirty job.

    1. Re:Mike Rowe! by Alexx+K · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, this guy is the TV narrator, and this guy was sued by Microsoft.

      --
      Don't mind the extra X. Alex
    2. Re:Mike Rowe! by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      Wow, I didn't realize that, thanks for the update, Alexx K.

  6. What about the guy by antifoidulus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    who publishes stories on IT web sites and only puts a tiny amount of information on each page but has tons of pages in a desperate attempt to increase ad revenue? I think that should be #1 on the list.

    1. Re:What about the guy by countSudoku() · · Score: 5, Informative

      Welcome to *world. Everytime you see a URL that ends with ...world.com you're in for a shite load of badly designed pages with a minimum of technical content strewn about a myriad of ugly web-widgets in an attempt to outwit adblock+. Good luck with that! No need to RTFA when that's the case, it's safe to assume anything from the summary.

      --
      This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
    2. Re:What about the guy by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or, how about the guy who publishes user-submitted stories with varying amounts of information on geek websites, adds a misleading headline and sensationalizes the summary, including several misspelled words, and then sits back and waits for all the users to write things like "Fr1st Ps0t", "In Soviet Russia...", "I for one welcome..." and goatse.cx links, all in a desparate attempt to increase subscribers and ad revenue?

      I, for one, welcome our new dirty, spelling-challenged, sensationalizing user-submitted story-posting editor overlords!

    3. Re:What about the guy by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, because whoever wrote that isn't in IT, he's a journalist. Writing articles to maximize the number of ads is an important part of his job. If he thought that writing pages like that was a Bad Thing, he'd be in a different industry.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    4. Re:What about the guy by CodyRazor · · Score: 1

      You know to be fair i actually cant remember the last time i saw a goatse link...

      --
      So Skulldilocks threw acid on the schoolchildrens' faces, cause somebody from the bible told her to do it!
    5. Re:What about the guy by qzulla · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just hit the print it link and read it all on one page.

      But yeah, those multiple page things annoy me too.

      qz

    6. Re:What about the guy by duggi · · Score: 1

      No need to RTFA when that's the case, it's safe to assume anything from the summary.
      Actually, we do it all the time.
      You must be new here :)
      --
      http://monkeynesianeconomics.blogspot.com/
    7. Re:What about the guy by Inda · · Score: 2, Insightful

      gamecopyworld.com - that's got to be one of the best sites ever.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    8. Re:What about the guy by Kashgarinn · · Score: 1

      "I, for one, welcome our new dirty, spelling-challenged, sensationalizing user-submitted story-posting editor overlords!"

      - In soviet Russia, our new dirty, spelling-challenged, sensationalizing user-submitted story-posting editor overlords welcomes you!

  7. Depends what you mean by "dirty" by NMajik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If "dirty" implies unpleasant to preform, I think anything that forces you interact with an end user should be higher on the list. If "dirty" implies morally wrong, only the espionage engineer seems to apply. But if "dirty" implies physically dirty, only 1 and 2 apply. This article seems to combine all the different definitions, but I enjoyed reading it anyway. I think intern would fit somewhere on the list event though it isn't a job, exactly. You get to experience whatever other people would like to avoid, so you get a nice spectrum of unpleasantry.

    1. Re:Depends what you mean by "dirty" by mrbluze · · Score: 1

      If "dirty" implies morally wrong, only the espionage engineer seems to apply. What about "kiss-ass golden boy" or "underpaid so has to pimp self out to on-line video chat room using company's servers" or "sewer-control-system-maintainer". I think the black-ops job is far from dirty - sounds like a hell of a lot of fun to me and the people doing it are probably loving it.
      --
      Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
    2. Re:Depends what you mean by "dirty" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What about "kiss-ass golden boy" or "underpaid so has to pimp self out to on-line video chat room using company's servers" or "sewer-control-system-maintainer".

      All redundant, Windows admins are already covered by "onsite reboot specialist".

  8. Left out ecommerce by rossz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For a time I was the primary (er, only) technical person for an eCommerce site. I learned one important lesson. Sales people have zero morals. They would lie to their own mother to make a sale. Hell, they would toss in sex with their baby sister to make a sale. I felt sleazy just keeping their servers running. I hope I never have to take that kind of job again.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
    1. Re:Left out ecommerce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd go so far as to say _comissioned_ sales people would lie to their own mother. Including ones operating under sales metric "incentive" programs. I've had a good time dealing with the current non-comission based travel insurance company sales reps i work with.

      Sounds like you were me. or i was you......one of those.

    2. Re:Left out ecommerce by barzok · · Score: 1

      Don't ever work for an insurance/financial services company then. Which is basically the same as a commissioned sales force anyway. Those assholes would give up their firstborn and their wives for an extra $10K in commissions.

  9. Again with the Wikipedia!! by sczimme · · Score: 4, Insightful


    What is the point of linking to the Dirty Jobs entry on Wikipedia? What's wrong with the actual Discovery Channel site ??

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    1. Re:Again with the Wikipedia!! by junner518 · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'd trust wikipedia with my life.

    2. Re:Again with the Wikipedia!! by B3ryllium · · Score: 4, Funny
    3. Re:Again with the Wikipedia!! by dubl-u · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What is the point of linking to the Dirty Jobs entry on Wikipedia? What's wrong with the actual Discovery Channel site?

      Well, I looked at your link and I see some ads and a big Flash thingy. (I'm using FlashBlock so I have to click to view Flash. Wonderful!) If I load the Flash, I see some fancily designed animated cruft with a bunch of buttons that may or may not lead to actual information. Much of text is at slightly random skewed angles, and there's no obvious place to find basic facts.

      When I look a the Wikipedia article, on the other hand, I see no ads, no Flash, and some nicely formatted text, written to give quick answers, laid out in tidy sections, all using a standard format that I'm familiar with from a bunch of previous visits.

      Other than that, no reason.

    4. Re:Again with the Wikipedia!! by value_added · · Score: 1

      What is the point of linking to the Dirty Jobs entry on Wikipedia? What's wrong with the actual Discovery Channel site ??

      I don't know. Maybe I'm not in the US and don't know WTF the Discovery Channel is all about? Or maybe it's that getting comprehensive information from an independent source is preferable to searching it out from a business trying to promote something?

      I'm a big fan of The Discovery Channel and especially Mike Rowe. But if I really wanted to know something about either, I would need to make my first stop, for better, or worse, at Wikipedia.

    5. Re:Again with the Wikipedia!! by sczimme · · Score: 1


      Well, I looked at your link and I see some ads and a big Flash thingy. (I'm using FlashBlock so I have to click to view Flash. Wonderful!) If I load the Flash, I see some fancily designed animated cruft with a bunch of buttons that may or may not lead to actual information. Much of text is at slightly random skewed angles, and there's no obvious place to find basic facts.

      I am deeply sorry you needed an additional click to see the content; you obviously didn't click any of the links or you would have gotten some hints about the show. Oh, that's right: the text was skewed. Try tilting your monitor and/or your head - that might help. I'm using AdBlock so I don't see ads. *shrug*

      When I look a the Wikipedia article, on the other hand, I see no ads, no Flash, and some nicely formatted text, written to give quick answers, laid out in tidy sections, all using a standard format that I'm familiar with from a bunch of previous visits.

      So your grumbling boils down to a) Flash and b) your comparative lack of familiarity with the Discovery Channel sites. Yes, those are indeed compelling arguments. *rolls eyes*

      The original point stands: it is silly to use Wikipedia when there are better/more direct sources. Basic critical thinking skills will allow you to see that.

      --
      I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    6. Re:Again with the Wikipedia!! by georgeav · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wikipedia is lynx friendly.

    7. Re:Again with the Wikipedia!! by dubl-u · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So your grumbling boils down to a) Flash and b) your comparative lack of familiarity with the Discovery Channel sites.

      No, my point is that Wikipedia is easier to get information out of. That's because they understand that fancy design reduces utility. Further, their only reason for existence is to provide answers, whereas the Discovery Channel has different purposes, like promoting their show, reinforcing the fan base, and selling my attention to advertisers.

      And suggesting that it's somehow more efficient to become familiar with every primary-source site on the web rather than just one? You can't expect to be taken seriously with statements like that, can you?

      it is silly to use Wikipedia when there are better/more direct sources. Basic critical thinking skills will allow you to see that.

      Basic critical thinking skills? Yes, please use them before posting. It will save us all some time.

      More direct sources are very rarely better for a quick overview, which is why I have shelves of dictionaries, almanacs, concordances, indexes, encyclopedias, guides, maps, analyses, abstracts, and literature surveys. I also have plenty of primary sources, and go to them when needed. But the whole point of an encyclopedia, on-line or off-, is to make basic info more conveniently available than primary sources. Which is what 99% of people want as a starting point. If you don't, fine. Post your little link and move along.

    8. Re:Again with the Wikipedia!! by maxume · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the feeling of smug self-satisfaction.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    9. Re:Again with the Wikipedia!! by Brian+Puccio · · Score: 1

      Chances are the Wikipedia link will work a whole lot longer, I'd guess that it is less susceptible to linkrot.

    10. Re:Again with the Wikipedia!! by teh+moges · · Score: 4, Funny

      Weird, that's not what your wikipedia page says...

    11. Re:Again with the Wikipedia!! by landonf · · Score: 1

      The poster's response didn't seem ridiculous to me. He was simply pointing out the undue complexity of the destination site.

      Moreover, he's right. Wikipedia -- as an independent third party dedicated to neutral point-of-view articles -- is likely to provide useful information about the show, as compared to an entity with a vested interest.

      --
      http://plausible.coop
    12. Re:Again with the Wikipedia!! by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the feeling of smug self-satisfaction.

      On Slashdot? No worry that will get forgotten. Here we all worship at the church of Laziness, Impatience, and Hubris.

    13. Re:Again with the Wikipedia!! by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      "Wikipedia is easier to get information out of" is exactly what he did say, and all that flash garbage is the reason why. I agree with him 100%.

    14. Re:Again with the Wikipedia!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, just stop. He called you on your ridiculosity, so just walk away. You're just making yourself look like an ass.
      righteo...

      him: (Score:5, Insightful) (obviously because there is no "+1 looks like an ass" moderation, right?)
      you: (Score:-1, Troll)
      gpp: (Score:1)


      just accept that flash is NEVER the right choice when deciding how you want to present your information and walk awak.
  10. slashdot editor by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

    Slashdot editor. Just think of all the firehose entries you have to post^H^H^H^Hedit.

  11. dirty job? by ILuvRamen · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh really, I think corporate spy would be a simple job. Find out what they want you to do, turn in your company/boss, flip them off as the FBI takes them away, collect the reward and get a new job. Sounds awfully simple to me. If anyone ever asked me to pull some illegal bullshit job like that I'd be like "Hmm, yeah can you repeat that and speak closer to my MP3 recorder?"

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    1. Re:dirty job? by nomadic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh really, I think corporate spy would be a simple job. Find out what they want you to do, turn in your company/boss, flip them off as the FBI takes them away, collect the reward and get a new job.

      And hope your next employer doesn't hear about what you did...

    2. Re:dirty job? by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      Or hope that your new boss has higher morals (Unlikely, but you never know).

    3. Re:dirty job? by blhack · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oh really, I think corporate spy would be a simple job. Find out what they want you to do, turn in your company/boss, flip them off as the FBI takes them away, collect the reward and get a new job. Sounds awfully simple to me. If anyone ever asked me to pull some illegal bullshit job like that I'd be like "Hmm, yeah can you repeat that and speak closer to my MP3 recorder?" They're talking about being a pen-tester.
      The company that you're breaking into hired your firm to test their security.
      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    4. Re:dirty job? by mrbluze · · Score: 1

      And hope your next employer doesn't hear about what you did... Indeed, it would be have been better if they didn't take him away, but took him 'out'.
      --
      Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
  12. Enterprise espionage engineer? by cashman73 · · Score: 1

    How about Consumer Espionage Engineer . That's what that **AA is into these days. They probably pay pretty good money for individuals with low enough morals to spy on their friends,... ;-)

  13. Black Ops IT is another way of saying by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Official arrestee when they break the LAW in the process of doing their "job".

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  14. Finally by redeye01 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Finally some recognition.
    Dirty IT job No. 7: Legacy systems archaeologist WANTED: INDIVIDUALS FAMILIAR WITH 3270

    1. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally some recognition.
      Dirty IT job No. 7: Legacy systems archaeologist WANTED: INDIVIDUALS FAMILIAR WITH MICROSOFT WINDOWS There. Fixed that for you.
  15. #7 seems pretty sweet by sokoban · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hey, that #7 job doesn't sound bad at all. Legacy systems? I'll take that any day over most of those other jobs. It's probably not very outsourceable and is obscure enough that when you actually do a good job you'll be revered as a god by those who depend on your work.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    1. Re:#7 seems pretty sweet by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      In case you missed it, the one ranked 7th is the least worst of the jobs. So, yes, it makes perfect sense that the other 6 are worse.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  16. Servicing equipment neglected for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How about equipment in an 'institutional' environment? Replacing printers, terminals and interface hardware in areas where the dust lays almost an inch thick like dryer lint. One spark in the wrong place and FWOOOM. How about facilites where there are wiring problems? Never touch a metal doorframe and a metal computer case at the same time, cause you'll get a jolt (not cola). How about servicing a line printer with five guys with guns on one side and a score or more of arrestees peering at you behind an expanded steel screen with the place smelling like BO, spit and fingerprint ink?

  17. Mixed Metaphors? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

    "I know of at least one major office supply retailer that powers its site by connecting AS400s to Web front ends," says Andrew Gelina, CEO of Syrinx Consulting, in Waltham, Mass. "The cost of rewriting or migrating these apps is huge and the risk is high, so they look for any way possible to reuse and reconnect to modern technologies. It's like marine archeology. You'll need a spelunker to dive deep into them, figure out how they can be bolted and duct-taped into a more modern integration engine, like a SOAP/XML front end."


    A spelunker explores caves, not underwater wrecks.

    1. Re:Mixed Metaphors? by Faylone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While a spelunker isn't likely to be going to explore underwater wrecks, they very well may be going to explore underwater caves.

    2. Re:Mixed Metaphors? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      they very well may be going to explore underwater caves. An odd choice of words. Cave diving is a dangerous, niche sport. The certification rituals are quite difficult-- whereas getting a recreational diving license is fairly easy, and caving clubs are ubiquitous.

      In any case, software archeology presents no risk of death-- despite what Vernor Vinge's novels might imply.

  18. Risking your life to test security by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I took a security course at Interop many years ago. The guy who taught the course worked on a "Tiger Team" that tested the security of White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico. They only base employee who knew in advance was the base commander.

    My teacher stayed in a nearby motel and hacked in over the telephone, but a military officer with expertise in security parachuted into the base at night - it's a big base, with lots of wide open space.

    He started breaking into computer rooms. Interestingly, he was detected but not caught. My teacher intercepted emails from the base staff warning that an intruder had been seen in the area.

    Eventually they went public, and submitted a report to the staff as to how they could improve security.

    They emphasized that this sort of thing is meant to help, and not to cost anyone their jobs.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
    1. Re:Risking your life to test security by QuantumG · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Parachute eh? Why not just wait until there's an airshow at Holloman airforce base, which is right next door, and drive over to White Sands.. it's not like they have any real border security between the two. I know because I nearly accidentally drove the wrong way into White Sands last time I was at Holloman.. thankfully they do put up a nice big sign saying "WARNING: rockets being tested".

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
  19. Mike Rowe? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Funny

    Would this then, be a description of Mike Rowe Soft?

    Jus' wonderin'...

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:Mike Rowe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is too busy hosting 'Dirty Jobs' on the discovery channel!

  20. Number 8 BSA guy by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Number 8 BSA guy

  21. #0 dirtiest IT job by freelunch · · Score: 4, Funny

    Slashdot Dupe Checker.

    1. Re:#0 dirtiest IT job by halcyon1234 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just a note for job-seekers: the above position is yet to be filled. Please drop off resumes at /dev/null.

    2. Re:#0 dirtiest IT job by bondjamesbond · · Score: 0

      Actually, I've hacked into your system and put my resume in /home/cowboyneal/Desktop/resumes.

  22. Why does the link go to the end page of the story? by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 1

    Is there a compelling reason to make us start at the end of the article? Other than possibly heading off a hundred "WHY ISN'T THIS ARTICLE ALL ON ONE PAGE?!" posts, I mean?

  23. A.K.A by ndnspongebob · · Score: 0, Troll

    Also known as s.h.I.T. a recent innovation in CS

  24. Penetration Testing? by Itninja · · Score: 1

    From TFA: "For tips on penetration testing, see "How to think like an online con artist"
    Like any /.'ers know anything about penetration. hehe

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  25. Help Desk Zombie by catmistake · · Score: 1

    Must disagree with the crack about low self-esteem. Having never worked help desk, I say these troopers are surprisingly patient and well-balanced individuals. These troopers must be commended not only for their ability to abstract problems and processes, but also for their increasingly rare phone skills. They are good guys. Now... desktop support itself can get pretty dirty... as in when the PEBKAC is the sticky grime on the keyboard itself.

    1. Re:Help Desk Zombie by Brewskibrew · · Score: 1

      I have infinite respect for help desk phone agents who can walk a customer through describing a problem over the phone and managing to interpret what they're saying compared to what's being displayed on the screen. And on top of that, so many of them have language challenges seeing as how they're in Manila or Bangalore or East Bug Burp or wherever these jobs are being outsourced these days. But the desk side people? No way! You actually have to *see* the customer. And they can see you. And ask a billion questions, like "well, since you're here, how do I fix the 12:00 that's blinking on my VCR?". And YOU CANT ACCIDENTALLY ON PURPOSE HANG UP ON THEM! That's the worst job in the IT world!

      --
      For sale: Signature. One owner. Low miles. Always garaged. New punctuation, just installed!
    2. Re:Help Desk Zombie by JosKarith · · Score: 1

      I am and "onsite reboot specialist", but have done 1st line as well. I have to say I prefer to be face-to-face with the user - but then again I am 6'5" and 210 lbs... It's wonderful how much more polite people are when physically faced with someone who looks capable of throwing their "flickery monitor" out the window. With the VGA cable wrapped round a serial whinger's leg...

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
  26. Number one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Steve Jobs?

  27. The real list by halcyon1234 · · Score: 5, Funny

    1) Dreamweaver webmaster
    2) Keyboard cleaner (cheetos and pepsi and genetic splatter, oh my!)
    3) Floating point wrangler
    4) Monochrome wire detangler
    5) Witnessing <body bgcolor="#FFFF00">
    6) rpm dependency arbitrator
    7) "Cowboy Neal option" writer

    1. Re:The real list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      8) Perl developer

    2. Re:The real list by Pointy+McButterpants · · Score: 1

      > 7) "Cowboy Neal option" writer

      Self reference FTW

    3. Re:The real list by thechao · · Score: 1

      2) Keyboard cleaner (cheetos and pepsi and genetic splatter, oh my!)

      The cleaning staff at a major educational institution I once worked at nearly went on strike over whether or not they had to clean keyboards/mice. It was finally decided that each employee was responsible for maintaining a "clean computing environment" and the cleaning staff was off the hook. The entire thing was sparked by an upper-management's son who had ... predilections.

  28. I don't think so... by painandgreed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...help desk zombie, but even lower on the totem pole, is the on-site reboot specialist...

    Having done both, I completely disagree. In fact, I have yet to meet a help desk zombie who hasn't dreamed of becoming an on-site reboot specialist. It doesn't take long for a help desk zombie to wish they could simply get the person on the other end of the phone to do what they tell them and nothing else, or even just understand what they have told them. Getting to be an on-site reboot specialist allows one to work directly on a machine without the person who has no idea playing a literal game of telephone with your instructions to mess things up. In addition, on-site rebooters usually get paid more for doing less and can get rid of angry customers at least for a time by telling them to go get coffee. The only real exception I've seen to this would be the Graveyard Support Vampire who have other priorities than more money or getting the job done ASAP to meet quota.

    1. Re:I don't think so... by Tteddo · · Score: 1

      Real call this morning, I am not kidding:

      I get a call from one of my customers with a spooler problem. So I say:
      "Did you reboot?"
      "Yes, several times."
      "Well, that's odd because usually with a spooler problem if you reboot
      it clears the spooler and your printers come back."
      "Oh, well then, I'll try it again and call you back."

      So, she started off by friggin' lying. Nice.

    2. Re:I don't think so... by painandgreed · · Score: 4, Interesting

      One of the first thing that any IT support person needs to know is that "USERS LIE". With people on the other end of the phone, they are certain there is some secret "fixed" button and if they stall and are a pain long enough, you'll tell them where it is so they make stuff up in an effort to speed things along. Sometimes, you even do tell them where the "fixed" button is (for their problem anyway) and they'll keep on lying because they don't recognise it as being the instructions for pushing the "fixed" button. They may not even know they are lying, but they still lie. Many times, they'll try and describe what is happening, and do so in a way that either offers no information or wrong information who actually knows what the terms they are using actually mean. Then there are the people who simply call the help desk but are still trying to solve the problem on their own. The number of times I've told people to click one button or open a window and not to do anything else, and could hear frantic typing over the phone drives is non-trivial. When I repeat "do not do anything" they'll tell me they aren't. Then when I ask them to do something like read the error message that appears or follow a set of steps that has to be done in order without doing anything else, they tell me to hold on and reboot the machine to return to the state I told them to get in. This in one of the main reasons help desk zombies want to get their hands on the machine, users lie and when the person who is actually trying to fix the machine can't see the machine and must rely upon a lier to tell them what is going in, it makes things really hard.

      On the other side of things, the on-site reboot specialists have to deal with the users who give them no information and still expect results.

    3. Re:I don't think so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because 99 percent of the time she is asked to reboot the computer, it is a problem that is never fixed by rebooting, and the tech support doesn't want to wake up his other brain cell and start thinking about the problem yet, and is just buying time.

    4. Re:I don't think so... by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiousity, what "other priorities" do you refer to when you talk of the Graveyard Support Vampire? :-)

    5. Re:I don't think so... by DeathElk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wrong, verging on flamebait. Chances are they're supporting software running on a Windows OS, and the first point of call when troubleshooting is to start from a fresh reboot.

    6. Re:I don't think so... by jackbird · · Score: 1

      I couldn't count the number of times I've been told to reboot the computer as a first resort by DSL/Cable modem support when reporting a modem without sync. Not to mention that one is more or less obligated to lie if one is using a router or VOIP box of any kind, and give feedback as if the computer were directly connected to the internet (shudder).

    7. Re:I don't think so... by Brewskibrew · · Score: 1

      Proly something along the lines of bollock juggling, ala http://www.joe-ks.com/British_Complaint.htm

      --
      For sale: Signature. One owner. Low miles. Always garaged. New punctuation, just installed!
    8. Re:I don't think so... by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      One of the first thing that any IT support person needs to know is that "USERS LIE".

      Is that you, Dr. House?

    9. Re:I don't think so... by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      You know, it could very well be that the poor tech support monkey on the other end of the line has a list of things to check before submitting a ticket and if that list says "#23 - Has the computer been rebooted? [Y/N]" then they know they have to get the user to reboot the computer or the ticket will be sent back to them and they'll have to call the user and ask the user to reboot even though they know the problem couldn't possibly be solved by a reboot. And one of the things you learn in tech support is that you don't lie to or argue with 3rd line techs who make modem sync checklists with questions like that, they have more power than you and they don't like being proven wrong by someone in 1st line support.

      /mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    10. Re:I don't think so... by jackbird · · Score: 1

      OK, they have a stupid reason for asking the question, and I have an excellent reason for pretending I did what they asked.

    11. Re:I don't think so... by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Yeah, of course when it comes to the router/VoIP box issue there's a very good reason to disconnect it whenever the problem isn't sync-related, and yet 90% or so of the customers will immediatly go into "But it worked yesterday waaaaaah!!"-mode the moment you ask them to disconnect their five year-old DLink DSL router. And amazingly that's also pretty close to the percentage of non sync-related connection issues that are resolved by disconnecting the router (and if the user doesn't have a NAT router or VoIP box you can count on disabling the software firewall will solve almost all problems (if the computer is otherwise properly configured and there are no obvious configuration errors on the ISP side)).

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    12. Re:I don't think so... by jackbird · · Score: 1
      you can count on disabling the software firewall will solve almost all problems (if the computer is otherwise properly configured and there are no obvious configuration errors on the ISP side)

      Yes, because within seconds, there will be a host of entirely new problems that prevent the network stack from working at all.

    13. Re:I don't think so... by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Wrong, verging on flamebait. Chances are they're supporting software running on a Windows OS, and the first point of call when troubleshooting is to start from a fresh reboot.

      Your first point of call in supporting anything is to start from a fresh reboot. The first task in doing any troubleshooting is to show that the problem is reproducible. If you can't recreate the problem, then there's no real way to troubleshoot it because you can't tell if anything you've done has fixed it or not. If rebooting the problem does fix the issue, then nothing you would have done would have fixed it. If you don't reboot, and the problem is not caused by a single application but by a combination of applications and workflow, you'll never be able to troubleshoot it successfully. Any attempt at troubleshooting that doesn't start with a fresh reboot, usually isn't troubleshooting, but rather just "pick and pray".

    14. Re:I don't think so... by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Of course there will be but that's not tech support's problem, that's for customer services when the customer gets shut down for running a spam zombie...

      This is how things would play out:

      1. User has set Norton/Panda/RandomCrapSWFirewall to auto-update because it told them it was a good idea.
      2. Firewall updates itself and decides that no network connections should be allowed.
      3. User decides after absolutely no attempt to research the problem that it must be be an ISP problem and calls tech support.
      4. Two minutes later the user gets through to tech support and proceeds to bitch about the horribly long queue for about three to four minutes.
      5. Next the tech support agent spends anywhere from two to thirty minutes figuring out that the connection is working fine and that the problem is in the user's computer. (time depends on how cooperative the user is and how fucked up the user's computer is)
      6. The user will now refute this for another few minutes because "it was working an hour ago".
      7. Eventually the user admits he/she does have a firewall and tech support asks the user to disable this firewall and call back if there is still a problem after doing so (since the user will no doubt be unable to figure out how to disable the firewall and will have to call the tech support line for the firewall software to accomplish this).
      8. In the likely event that the problem occured several days before the user bothered calling in then the user will most likely then call customer services to demand the ISP credit the time that the customer's faulty software made the connection inaccesible (because someone else has to be responsible).

      Seriously, this is how these cases usually play out and if you'd ever spent any time working first line support then you would understand that all solutions that involve fixing things on the user's computer have to be either hack'n'slash or someone else's problem (since anything beyond the standard config tools in Windows 9x/xp/vista, OS X and Linux is impossible for an ISP tech support agent to have to deal with, and if you're using the OEM's own network configuration tool then you'll either have to get their help disabling it or you'll get no support from your ISP).

      Basically, don't backtalk the tech support "monkeys" until you've had to do their job. It pays crap, the customers treat you like shit and refuse to even consider that the problem might be on their end (and this is true regardless of how good you are at persuading them otherwise, that skill simply helps keep call times down since you are able to convince them that they may possibly be wrong a bit faster).

      /Mikael (Yeah, I've spent way too much time doing tech support but it's hard to get out of when most potential employers seem to regard "first line tech support" on your resumé to be worse than "sold drugs and watched cartoons")

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    15. Re:I don't think so... by Coraon · · Score: 1

      Speaking as someone who has been a Graveyard Support Vampire King. (graveyard shift supervisor) You work those shifts for a few reasons: 1. genetics- some people are just better able to work at night 2. Club Kiddies - most IT places say you have to work one day of the weekend, but if you work the Saturday 12:30 to 8:30am shift your up at night to go clubbing all weekend. 3. the money, theres a shift premium at most places, they pay you a few dollars more an hour to take less calls. With that in mind you get a very interesting crew.

      --
      -Ours is the wisdom of Solomon, the magic of Merlyn, the fall of Icaris.
  29. #2 isn't dirty in the least by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It may be undesirable by most of the kids around here, but there is nothing bad about coding COBOL for a living:

    You are always in demand, unlike several other IT fields
    Pays well
    Stable work
    Stable code.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:#2 isn't dirty in the least by Adambomb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Stable code. trust me, all COBOL is not created equal.
      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
    2. Re:#2 isn't dirty in the least by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      While that is true, i was speaking more of the overall concept. There are always bad coders...

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    3. Re:#2 isn't dirty in the least by Quince+alPillan · · Score: 1

      The problem with that is you have to work with COBOL, a language where the number of spaces or the length of the line matter and can cause your code not to run, everything is a global variable unless you're calling another program, and the many ways of writing even simple commands that can lead to a confusing mess of different coding styles.

    4. Re:#2 isn't dirty in the least by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      What sort of systems is the COBOL code you're writing for? Is it mainly maintenance work or is there new development? Everything still on mainframes? Is anything new happening with the language?

      It's been awhile since I wrote any COBOL (and I never wrote that much), but I still have a fondness for it. :)

  30. Not as good as it could have been. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    It would have been an even better article had they chosen one definition of 'dirty' and stuck with it consistently.

    As far as Dirty IT job No. 2: Datacenter migration specialistgoes... *yawn*. Move a bunch of boxes, cable 'em up and hit the on button. Big Deal. Come talk to me when you've moved an entire printing plant three blocks across three weeks - without interrupting production or missing a deadline.

  31. Saldy I currently do two of those jobs by falcon5768 · · Score: 1

    Because I work in education I have to be both a legacy specialist AND help desk. But I honestly dont consider them that dirty personally. Maybe partly because I have a education background, so Im used to working with users, and maybe because I find a elegance in legacy code, but both are fun to me, and both make me almost 50 grand after only 2 years of full time work.

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    1. Re:Saldy I currently do two of those jobs by spikedvodka · · Score: 1

      Damn... I'm only making 27k after 3 full years... but I have to agree with you 100%... legacy specialist, help desk, on-site reboot tech... etc. it's all part of the job

      --
      I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
    2. Re:Saldy I currently do two of those jobs by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      You still got //e's running Oregon Trail?

      A few years back there was a picture in the local paper of a first grader at a computer. It was a II+ !

  32. Hey You! by Sillygates · · Score: 1

    Scrub down that database!

    --
    I fear the Y2038 bug
  33. Real Dirt by Whiteox · · Score: 2

    More and more I'm finding that simple upgrade jobs are taking longer to do due to masses of dust and crap.
    Upgrading a 256mb to 1 gb takes maybe 5 mins. The last one took over an hour, It was so bad I took photos.
    The dust was so thick that I had to dismantle everything, vacuum, use artist brushes and compressed air, reassemble after oiling the fans! I even replaced the power supply as it was too stuffed with dust to be safe.
    By the time I finished, my workspace was filled with dust, crap everywhere.
    Next time I'll blow it out with compressed air outside in the sunlight.

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    1. Re:Real Dirt by KudyardRipling · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ah, yes, 'tis the old eighty gallon tank compressor that blows 120 psi. That's a must have in any computer shop. I had pulled apart a number of Telex controllers that had not been serviced since the mid 1990's. Blowing one of these clean outside may invite either attention from the fire department (the dust cloud looks like smoke) or the green police (DEP) asking questions.

      Any mentions of carousel type color laser printers? Any printer that moves toner cartridges on purpose will always be a mess inside. Metal can wet/dry vac anyone?

      --
      Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
  34. I really didn't think I was special... by rickb928 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...but I've had 5 of these jobs in my career.

    No, I haven't had #1, but the wet end of a paper making machine is very close. It's amazing what will grow in warm pulp, if you leave it there a while. And how your shoes literally fall apart when you walk through the stuff they use to clean it off. Literally. In minutes. Leather is no match for DuStrip.

    Cat Herder is the worst of them. Being a rebootnik isn't quite as much fun as a third-party field tech, driving back and forto from the airport 3 miles away in a driving snowstorm to get *another* part to make that ^&*) Alpha server run again, so people can rent porn. Yeah. /.'s will get the incredible irony of that.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  35. Shenanigans by Fryth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's a dirty job to be a penetration tester? Looks pretty cool to me. Awful to stand in a server room sandwiched between (horror!) a server rack and a wall? That's called working in a server room. And since when are support techs all patronizing idiots, and night-shifters all zombies. For the most part, at our company people treat our techs with respect. This is sensationalist BS... a lot of people would kill for any of these jobs.

  36. Forensics Responder by Rurik · · Score: 3, Funny

    The lab tech at the police officer that gets to deal with computer crimes. Yeah, once the police knock down the door to the house of someone collecting child porn, he's the guy that has to touch the keyboard...

    1. Re:Forensics Responder by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Funny

      rubber gloves. Get the thick ones, too.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    2. Re:Forensics Responder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry about the keyboard. Once the police knock down somebody's door for porn using the "intelegence" who gave them street adress which they "computed" from an IP adress ,and there is no evidence exept what he have at internet explorer cache - you can be very sure they got the wrong guy.

  37. Left out Multi-Level Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pretty early on in my career, I worked at a Multi Level Marketing [read: Pyramid Scheme] company.
    The company makes multi-millions, and I was personally in charge of the systems that calculates, tallies, and print out "reward" cheques every month. I had to be intimately familiar with all the details and clauses and sub-clauses and secret definitions of obvious words like "one week" or heck even what "50" means. I knew first hand that what our marketing people said was very different from what our sales people said, which is different from when people call our customer service, and which in turn is many miles away from how the system actually works.

    They never lie, because you get sued when you lie.

    But ever since, I have been convinced that it is dirtier to speak in half-truths and equivocations than out-right lies.

    [confession]
    I was young and dismissed my disgust at the company as my being too "picky" about jobs. I convined myself to tough it out. Eventually I found out the company was stealing from ME, and only then did I quit. So I already got what I deserved. [/confession]

    sorry about posting as AC, but I have a rather unique handle I've been using for quite a few years.

    1. Re:Left out Multi-Level Marketing by CmdrGravy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I once worked for a company which used to carry out "free security survey" where we'd go round to peoples houses and attempt to scare them into buying an overpriced alarm system from one of our sales men who were without exception sleazy dishonest assholes.

      Their method of paying everyone was to pay large amounts to one person and expect them to take the money from their own bank accounts to pay the other staff as some kind of tax dodge presumably. They paid me like that and I left that very evening and spent the next two weeks laughing at their pathetic phone calls threatening me with their 'top' lawyers and the police etc.

    2. Re:Left out Multi-Level Marketing by bondjamesbond · · Score: 0

      It wasn't Mona Vie, was it?

  38. "Help Desk" is customer service by Lijemo · · Score: 1

    Regarding the Undead of #6...

    Help Desk is a Customer Service position requiring a basic level of technical competence & teachability, NOT a tech position requiring only a basic level of people skills. This is especially true when the Help Desk person is dealing primarily with people with minimal to no technical skills.

    The job should go to someone who likes people-- and who may not want an IT career per se, but does enjoy tinkering around with the stuff a little and learning a little bit about it. It should not go to a tech wizard who just wants to drudge through it so that he can get promoted to a position where he hopes he won't have to deal with another human being ever again.

    People skills are more fundamental to the job than technical skills. (and no, I'm not a help-desk person. I like people, but not enough to be able to deal with being interrupted by them every ten minutes all day long.)

    1. Re:"Help Desk" is customer service by Darth_brooks · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I was just chatting with someone about this the other day.

      You're right, Help Desk is a horrible place to expect qualified techies to hang out. It's more of a litmus test than anything else. If you've got some level of skill, you advance out of the help desk and into something useful. If you suck...well...at least you're unlikely to be fired.

      Every place I've worked that had a decent sized IT department had two types of people; Help Desk / Operators that had been there 10+ years, and help desk staff that got promoted or moved on within six months.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    2. Re:"Help Desk" is customer service by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Every place I've worked that had a decent sized IT department had two types of people; Help Desk / Operators that had been there 10+ years, and help desk staff that got promoted or moved on within six months. at the ISP (Sasktel) help desk job i had last summer, the average lifespan of a consumer-side help desk tech was 12 months. from there they'd be sorted by their skills. some to level 2, some to testing, some to business support, some to 611, some become "hat racks" (someone with the skillsets for all of the above), some to field techs, some become central office techs, etc.
      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    3. Re:"Help Desk" is customer service by hughk · · Score: 1

      I knew a lady who got shifted out of being a secretary to 'manning' the help desk. She was hopeless and knew little but she was drop-dead gorgeous and had a voice like a porn-star (without the moaning and the heavy breathing). None of the customers objected to her lack of knowledge and she was always a welcome guest at the user events. Actually she always was always able to pass on the call to someone on the second level who could help.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  39. Hey don't forget... by larpon · · Score: 1

    online porn distribution!

    Now that's dirty

  40. Due Diligence Blows by gelfling · · Score: 1

    The guy sent in to probe for the intel of the people who may very well lose their jobs in an oursourcing deal has a crappy job. Those people have zero motivation to help, are often scared and angry.

  41. Dr. House said it best by nhtshot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Even though medicine and IT aren't obviously related, I've garnered a lot of wonderful problem solving theory from Dr. House.

    Rule #1: Patients lie

  42. Chemical Plant by enigmastrat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My best experience with a dirty IT job was at a Chemical Plant turned Furniture Factory. I never before hoped the burning sensation in my hands was just fiberglass.

    --
    Logic is flawed
  43. I was expecting dirty by Chewbacon · · Score: 2, Funny

    I should've read into the "of IT" more. Really, I was thinking someone had a dirtier job than I did repairing cables crawling through the mud under a building, working 40 hours a week in an office that flooded with every rain storm (the water carried beach sand, I was working at a resort), the cables the guys I replaced ran through a cesspool yard... if you're thinking nothing is worse than that, you're right. Sadly, this article raised my hopes that I didn't have it so bad... then crushed them.

    --
    Chewbacon
    The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
  44. All of the above by TApril · · Score: 1

    What if your job description is a list of all of the jobs listed on that list?

  45. Who are they talking about? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Dirty Jobs of IT

    Is that you, Steve?

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:Who are they talking about? by JosKarith · · Score: 1

      Finally - I was beginning to despair of people here. It looked like I was actually going to get to the end of a discussion about dirty jobs without a Steve jobs reference. Thank you sir.

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
  46. Sounds like written by a 15 year old by Casandro · · Score: 1

    It sounds like written by a 15 year old.

    Of course COBOL is still around. There currently is virtually no other language beeing able to replace it because they lack BCD arithmetics for easy to predict precision.

    Also there is another one missing. "Developer for organically grown commercial computing enviroments". If you ever had to programm something serious under Windows, and then later tried another OS you will know what I mean. You have Interfaces which are borderline bizarre, partly undocumented, and only plausible if you take decades of company policy into account. It is even more frustrating when you find an error in the interfaces you are using. It is virtually impossible to reach anybody who even remotely cares for your problem, even if the code which shows the problem only has 5 lines and is an exact copy of one of the examples giving out by the people writing the interface.

  47. Is a user lying? - Use the 2 Second Rule! by Gumbercules!! · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Personal experience has taught me the magic formula for telling when a user (over the phone) is lying. (And no, I don't mean that their lips are moving). In all seriousness, I've found an almost 100% correlation with this simple "is the user lying" test. I call it the 2 Second Rule.

    Ask the user your question. E.g. "Did you do {insert something the user may have done}". If the user takes longer than 2 seconds to reply to a simple yes/no question, they are lying. No one takes 3 seconds to say yes or no.

    People only take this length of time to reply if a more complex thought process has kicked off in the background. Something along the lines of "oh no, I did do that... should I have? Should I tell support? Will they still help me or think less of me if I say yes?" ... at which time a few seconds have passed and you'll hear back down the telephone line ".....no". BINGO! User is lying.

    1. Re:Is a user lying? - Use the 2 Second Rule! by jimicus · · Score: 1

      What are you going to do about it if the user is lying? Very few helpdesk jobs allow you to say "Please stop bullshitting and do as I damn well asked".

    2. Re:Is a user lying? - Use the 2 Second Rule! by Gumbercules!! · · Score: 1

      There's a lot you can do about it.

      Often, simply saying "are you sure about that? It's ok if you did {stupid thing}..." works and they tell you what really happened.

      Even if there's nothing you can do about it, you still got the answer to your question, which was the real point of asking it, wasn't it? You just know the answer is the opposite of what they said, so work your diagnosis from that angle.

    3. Re:Is a user lying? - Use the 2 Second Rule! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That "rule" is extrimly effective. You might as well ask the spirits, or watch the cristall ball. Some people will lie , and it will take them less 2 seconds to do it. Somebody who have an intention to give you full answer probably will need more than 2 seconds just to understand your question. And next he need to recall all his recent moves, to be sure he give you the right answer. I guess by now there are a lot of liers on your place of work who took you to a ride, and a lot of honest people whom you call liers, and now they think you are an a-hole, and they are correct.

    4. Re:Is a user lying? - Use the 2 Second Rule! by bondjamesbond · · Score: 0

      This applies to the wife, too, by the way.

      Q) Hunny, are you sleeping around?

      Tic, tock, tick, tock.. BZZZZT

      A) No, baby, I'm not. Why?

      Lying beyotch! (don't ask me how I know)

    5. Re:Is a user lying? - Use the 2 Second Rule! by Robert+The+Coward · · Score: 1

      Generally one of 3 things. 1) you repeat the same process until the user finally does what you tell them to. 2) You repeat the same process until the user hangs up and becomes someone else headache. 3) You get local tech to go to system and fix it usually in 10 seconds. You have to be careful with 3 because then person will become the local persona worst nightmare because when they get on the help desk from that point on all they want if for someone to come to his desk and do is work.

  48. Rap sheet??? by advocate_one · · Score: 2, Insightful

    anyone who was really good at this wouldn't have a rap sheet... as they wouldn't have been caught

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  49. Something wrong with that by octogen · · Score: 4, Informative

    Dirty IT job No. 7: Legacy systems archaeologist
    WANTED: INDIVIDUALS FAMILIAR WITH 3270, VAX/VMS, COBOL, AS/400, AND OTHER LEGACY SYSTEMS

    I have to disagree: It may not be the very best idea to try to connect AS/400 applications to webbrowsers, but an AS/400 is certainly NOT a legacy system. The system architecture of the AS/400 is actually much more modern than that of most other systems. Do you know any other system with a persistent single-level-storage, that continues working exactly where it stopped before the power was lost, after you boot it up again - I mean, it does not RESTART processes, it CONTINUES them. Or do you know another system, where you can plug in a completely different main processor, just recompile the OS kernel, and every application on the system will be AUTOMATICALLY ported to the new processor architecture upon first start - as if they were Java programs? Ever heard of the "technology independent machine interface" (TIMI)?
    Reimplementing your old applications on an AS/400 is much LESS of a risk than trying to migrate those applications to so-called modern systems like PC-servers, because an AS/400 is orders of magnitudes more secure (you DO know it has hardware-supported pointer protection, don't you?) and more realiable than a PC-server.

  50. Bad sign by DavesError · · Score: 1

    I think theres something wrong with me. My job qualifies for 2, help desk zombie/reboot specialist, of the 7 and I rather like it.

  51. Re:What? by ideonode · · Score: 1

    Score:-1, Insightful

    Win! Wait, no, the other thing - Fail! No, hold on...... (Head kerplodes)

  52. No IP lawyer? No marketing type? by hughk · · Score: 1

    The IP lawyer seizes what is obvious and then grabs copyright on it. The marketing type will promise the world to the clients whilst forgetting to confer with developers as to whether it is at all possible. Also the marketing guys for overriding ship dates so that POS like Vista can get delivered to manufacturing months before it is ready for a real customer.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
    1. Re:No IP lawyer? No marketing type? by genner · · Score: 1

      Wow I've done everything on this list except for being a white hat/social engineering penetration expert.
      Hmm..something to work towards I guess.

  53. oh crap.... by bodland · · Score: 1

    My resume has 5 of 7....no wonder I am miserable.

  54. But.... by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

    But it says it requires familiarity with hacking and forgery.....not corporate fraud.

    --
    "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  55. Dirty IT job No. 7: Legacy systems archaeologist by idontgno · · Score: 1

    Vinge thought that "Programmer-archaeologist" might be a growth career area.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.