Slashdot Mirror


Book Publishers Abandoning DRM

tmalone writes "The New York Times is reporting that book publishers are beginning to phase out DRM-protected audio books. This month the world's largest publisher, Random House, started offering DRM-free mp3s; Penguin has announced that it will follow suit. Their logic? DRM just doesn't work. 'Publishers, like the music labels and movie studios, stuck to DRM out of fear that pirated copies would diminish revenue. Random House tested the justification for this fear when it introduced the DRM-less concept with eMusic last fall. It encoded those audio books with a digital watermark and monitored online file sharing networks, only to find that pirated copies of its audio books had been made from physical CDs or DRM-encoded digital downloads whose anticopying protections were overridden.'"

218 comments

  1. abandon ebooks too by circletimessquare · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ebooks are an example of technophilia overwhelming common sense. they haven't yet succeeded, and they will never succeed. ebooks are NOT, repeat are NOT superior to wood pulp. sure you can use them in low light situations, but they aren't as durable and they require batteries

    every new technology satisfies a need that was not satisfied before. there is no need to improve upon wood pulp when it comes to book. a paperback book beats an ebook in any way, any day. technophilia informs some people that they are an improvement, but they aren't thinking like a consumer does. a consumer looks at a paperback and an ebook and he or she chooses a paperback, every time

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:abandon ebooks too by DKlineburg · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I disagree. I rarely if ever will pick up book anymore. I can't do it while I'm driving, while I'm jogging, or while I do a host of other things. Living in the greater Seattle area, a commute that takes an hour is common place. If you can figure out how to get back a useless hour of your time, I think that it is very profitable.

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    2. Re:abandon ebooks too by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Since the only ebooks I've purchased are Role-Playing Game modules, I'd have to disagree. Going cover to cover: yes, I enjoy physical books much more. But searching for a tidbit of information (for school projects as well, in which Google Books is quite the useful tool), I prefer the ability to search through an entire text for a single word instead of flipping through a book for the page I need.

      --
      Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
    3. Re:abandon ebooks too by bistromath007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, the main problem with ebooks now that paper-like displays are seeing some progress is the cost. $400 for a Kindle is just nasty. When the cost comes down, people will snap those up like crazy, because it's all the benefits of ebooks without the eye strain that kept them away from the concept before. I know I want one, and I've always hated reading stuff on a screen.

    4. Re:abandon ebooks too by Rolgar · · Score: 4, Informative
      Wrong


      1. Searching: An index is nice, but I can think of times that I'd rather be able to search.
      2. Portability: With an ebook reader, you can carry your entire library in a device the size of a piece of paper. Sure you have have to charge it, but you've got to sleep some time, right?
      3. Commenting: The ability to markup the book without damaging it book in some way.
      4. The ability to make as many bookmarks as you want. I don't know if any reader has instituted this yet, but this would be a killer feature that would allow you to mark all your favorite pages/passages so you can jump to any of them in a second.
      5. Portable bookstore: Decide you want to read something but don't have the time to go to the bookstore, download the book to your computer or directly to your reader.
      6. Unlimited selection: Everything ever published will eventually be available to be loaded on my ebook reader, but I have real difficulty with the selection available to me at local bookstores, especially with the lack of older titles available.

      What is stopping me from getting into the ebook game now are the cost and features of the readers available. I never pay the early adopter tax, but within five years, I'll probably get a reader. I'm also not interested in paying the same price as I would at the bookstore for a new hardback, because the bookstore and it's share of the price shouldn't be necessary any longer, but as long as I can wait a year and get the book at half of the paperback cost, I'll be sold.

    5. Re:abandon ebooks too by DrXym · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I disagree. Ebooks are fantastically useful. I can pack 100 books onto a PocketPC and have something to read. It's just that so far book publishers and distributors have released their books in proprietary formats, slathered with DRM and that only play on devices they deign to release readers on. Consequently the whole ebook scene has been transformed into a wasteland of warring factions where no standards prevail and the attraction of the concept has fallen through the floor. Amazon Kindle is just an extension of this, choosing to implement yet another proprietary format and ensuring support for popular (free) file formats is minimal.

      Publishers really need to pull their finger out and adopt a common book file format with no active DRM. The consequence of not doing so is ebooks languish. People who want books in an electronic format will just grab them them anyway through P2P, IRC or wherever and the publishers will get nothing at all. Once an industry standard format appears, the format has a good chance of taking off.

      I also think the experience of ebooks and music should be a lesson for digital video downloads. People would have to be stupid to *buy* digital movies from Amazon, Sony, Microsoft, Apple, Netflix or whoever when the content is locked to a handful of supported devices and you are at the mercy of the provider to manage your collection. I don't want to have to own two or three software players, or only be able to play some movies on some devices. Just like with ebooks most people will just turn to P2P instead.

      Drop the DRM. Piracy happens whether DRM is there or not. Dropping the DRM just means more people will buy their direct download videos rather than get it on P2P or copy it from DVD.

    6. Re:abandon ebooks too by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1

      The article is about audio books, not ebooks.

    7. Re:abandon ebooks too by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, the main problem with ebooks now that paper-like displays are seeing some progress is the cost. $400 for a Kindle is just nasty

      Actually, $400 is basically free, if you are a heavy reader. Kindle books seem to be uniformly, and significantly, cheaper than the non-Kindle editions. A heavy reader will make up that $400 in a year or so, and then start pulling ahead.

    8. Re:abandon ebooks too by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      e-books are kinda valuable to libraries in the third world where care and maintenance of computers is easier than care and maintenance of thousands of books.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    9. Re:abandon ebooks too by Archtech · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One of the big lessons we all need to learn is this: People are different!

      Some get addicted to drugs; others don't.
      Some have their health ruined by alcohol; others drink like fish yet remain fairly healthy.
      Some get sick when they eat certain foods; others thrive on them.
      Some lose weight by exercising; others don't (true; look it up).
      And some will never give up paper books, while others will be happy to do so.

      It makes life more complicated, but also more fun.

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    10. Re:abandon ebooks too by RedWizzard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      a paperback book beats an ebook in any way, any day Really? How much will you bet me that you can do a text search on your paperback faster than I can on my ebook?
    11. Re:abandon ebooks too by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of heavy readers who don't have a big (or any) book budget. See, there's these things called libraries...

    12. Re:abandon ebooks too by Mathinker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your comment ignores the plethora of free content for ebook readers. Never heard of Project Gutenberg? And it's not the only game in town, lots of publishers are trying to raise interest by free giveaways, at least in the science fiction / fantasy genre (Tor, Baen).

      > if you are a heavy reader. -----> if you are a heavy reader of expensive enough ebooks.

      There, fixed that for you.

    13. Re:abandon ebooks too by bhima · · Score: 1

      I own tens of thousands of books. I love books... everything about books. Having said all of that, I also find myself pining for the next version of iRex Iliad (the current version being oh so close to compelling) and I find myself listening to more and more spoken word audio content. I have completely replaced broadcast radio with serialized Podcast presentations from NPR, BBC, APM, and variety of other producers. I have found the internet awash with audio presentations of older books, scholarly lectures, current technical news, and political science, news & opinion.

      I still subscribe to a few paper magazines (Nature, Science & Analog) and I still buy paper books. But I am not so interested in buying new books about computers, technology, or those awfully expensive books from the likes of CRC which are in my scientific discipline.

      Professionally my main product is paper. I write designs of experiment, investigation reports, details of design, summary of design, lists of essential requirements, test results, service & users manuals... all of which wind up both as a digital copy and as a paper copy. My office is dominated by bookshelves and binders. Using my laptop to bring a digital copy of these documents to meetings has proven to be unsatisfactory. Bringing the paper copy is pain in the ass. The idea of having a wirelessly capable eBook which allows me to markup local copies of archival documents is really, really interesting.

      So I'll disagree with your assertions but I'll keep all my books.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    14. Re:abandon ebooks too by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      The ebook fills a few needs for me.

      1) wireless internet on the small and cheap
      2) A good way to read Project Gutenberg (this is the big one, there is probably enough "required" reading I have not read to pay for a Kindle
      3) If I want to read something more than a short paper back it is easier to travel with
      4) If I am traveling long enough that I want 2 books it is easier to travel with

      All that said, I am not ready to drop $400.00 because of the durability issue. But come $200.00 or less, I will be buying one happily.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    15. Re:abandon ebooks too by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

      Agreed, I have no problem reading a book on my PDA. I don't worry about "batteries" or the likes, I just read on it. It doesn't make it any less of an experience - the words are the same, just a different medium. It's kind of amusing seeing people react this way to new mediums on a "news for nerds" website... very very amusing.

    16. Re:abandon ebooks too by Eivind · · Score: 2, Informative
      As you just pointed out, Ebooks -are- infact superior to wood-pulp books in some ways, and inferior in other ways.

      As long as that remains so, they will suceed in some uses and fail in others. Notice how wood-pulp books are unlikely to improve much over the next few decades but Ebooks are certain to do so though, this likely means that ebooks will get more popular over time.

      Advantages:
      • Can be read in darkness
      • Saves space physically.
      • Free when the content is. (there is much free content)
      • Cheaper than paper to buy content.
      • Search, bookmarks, annotations, integration of errata
      • Instant availability of content wherever there is a net-connection.
      • User-selectable font-sizes (good for people with poor eyesight)


      Disadvantages:
      • More expensive reading-device (~$400 versus ~$0)
      • Reading-device requires batteries
      • Less durable


    17. Re:abandon ebooks too by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      you can use them in low light situations, but they aren't as durable and they require batteries


      I thought an ebook was simply a txt or pdf file, and an example for an "ebook reader" is less or Acrobat? What format do the files for these hardware gadgets have, and can they be read on a normal PC without buying expensive electronic toys and supplying them with batteries?
    18. Re:abandon ebooks too by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Here's the problem. ebooks need to be published that can take advantage of that. I dont give a rats ass that I can search the entire unabridged text of necromancer. I want the service manuals for all my cars, all my textbooks, several programming books, and other technical documents on the ebook reader.

      I cant get them. Ebooks and ebook readers are useless toys until the publishers pull their heads out of their asses and publish what the format is designed for and would shine best at. Technical information and textbooks for education.

      Until then they are just toys that are a passing curiosity. Get me my textbooks, my technical manuals, and my research books on a ebook reader. THEN and only then they will be useful and adopted widely.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    19. Re:abandon ebooks too by txoof · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Ebooks are a fantastic invention for the following reasons:

      1. Searching: An index is nice, but I can think of times that I'd rather be able to search.
      3. Commenting: The ability to markup the book without damaging it book in some way.
      4. The ability to make as many bookmarks as you want. I don't know if any reader has instituted this yet, but this would be a killer feature that would allow you to mark all your favorite pages/passages so you can jump to any of them in a second.
      College kids would die for those features in their text books, not to mention the whole portability thing. Lugging 30 pounds of books from class to class is never fun. As somebody who studied literature and science in university, I would have loved having all of Shakespeare at my fingertips in a highly search able format. No more skimming and poking around for the verse I wanted. Also, being able to search a chemistry text for the word "redux" or "hydronium" or whatever would have saved me tons of time when studying. The book marking feature is brilliant as well.

      Unfortunately, for the some of same reasons an ebook is perfect, it also is lacking.
      1. Searching instead of an index - I've stumbled upon countless, worthwhile side tracks while flipping to a particular page. It's sort of like finding a hidden treasure right there in the book you've used hundreds of times. You're digging through your perl book, looking for how to parse a string and you stumble on some database function that is EXACTLY what you need for some other project. That just doesn't happen when you search. It's serendipity at its best.
      2. Commenting - buying a used book with someone else's comments is both entertaining and incredibly helpful. I don't think I would have made it through some political science classes without some of the notes scribbled in the margins of my text books. I had no idea what the hell I was doing and some of the summaries in the margins really helped me along. Today, when I borrow a cook book from someone and find all sorts of notes in the margin, it's like a gift of insight from a much more talented chef.
      3. Bookmarks - On that one, I agree, bookmarks in dead-tree books suck. They fall out, they're not at all transmittable between copies.

      What I'd really love to see is some sort of hybrid Ebook. A book with REAL e-paper pages and perhaps an input pad that you could write on with a stylus. You could write notes on the pad and insert them INTO the "margins" of the document where ever you wanted. I enjoy the act of turning a page; that could be simulated with a 4 page epaper book with some sort of ADVANCE> button that would display another set of pages. It wouldn't satisfy my desire for skimming, but the portability would be phenomenal.

      --
      This one's tricky. You have to use imaginary numbers, like eleventeen... --Hobbes
    20. Re:abandon ebooks too by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Some of you people make WAY too much money! "Basically free" is the Public Library. Those of us who have to work for our money only buy the books that are so amazingly good that we know we'll re-read them. E.G. Asimov or Adams.

      I'm not carrying around a four hundred dollar device that I can easily lose or break.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    21. Re:abandon ebooks too by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      It's just that so far book publishers and distributors have released their books in proprietary formats, slathered with DRM and that only play on devices they deign to release readers on

      That's just abysmally STUPID. They're not going to sell me one! The only format I'll buy any book in is plain ASCII text.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    22. Re:abandon ebooks too by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid you missed the memo.

      A lot of my friends are going to these lately and report being happy with them. They must have passed some critical point of quality.

      I do not have one myself yet. With carpal tunnel, I'll probably stick with wood pulp.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    23. Re:abandon ebooks too by DrXym · · Score: 1
      That's just abysmally STUPID. They're not going to sell me one! The only format I'll buy any book in is plain ASCII text.

      PDF would suit me fine assuming it could reflow content to the screen reader / font settings. Alternatively HTML and / or XML with suitable layout would be perfectly adequate for 99% of books. Text just doesn't convey adequate information for presentation.

      It should be totally possible for the industry to produce a standard around either PDF or HTML. I'm sure they would lose some sales to piracy, but then they save a bundle by not having to manage DRM as well as the resurgence in sales that a common format would bring. If they have to tag content, they can do so via HTML tricks that do not affect the visible layout.

    24. Re:abandon ebooks too by Nemilar · · Score: 1

      I have to say, I love Google for their book search. I never read eBooks in their entirety; if I'm doing research I'll read a few relevant passages (again, Google book search to find them), but other than that I can't stand reading pages of text on my LCD. Dead-tree format is the way to go.

      But you are 100% right - you can't "search" a physical book the way you can when it's digitized. Enter Google book search; if I own a book and want to find a particular passage, I can usually remember a few keywords to search for, and find it within seconds. I honestly don't know how people got along before search!

      --
      Nemilar http://www.techthrob.com - Visit Me!
    25. Re:abandon ebooks too by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Long duration copyright is an issue.

      Assuming copyright the problems are:

      Physical library:
      Minus- hundreds can't read the same book if there's only one copy.
      Plus- hundreds can decide to borrow other books and read them.

      Digital library:
      Minus- _each_ human reader needs to use an expensive device, and due to copyright and DRM you might still only be able to have one copy floating about :).
      Plus- someone gets rich out of selling those devices and DRM ;).

      If it weren't for copyright most stuff would be digitized then the library would just put books onto CDs or paper on demand (or in anticipation of demand).

      If copyright were 7 years, authors would still make money from people who can't wait 7 years to read some book, or queue up for that one copy the library has.

      --
    26. Re:abandon ebooks too by Nathanbp · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd like to point out that at least one book publisher gets it. Baen sells their titles as eBooks in plain, DRM-free HTML as well as a variety of eBook reader formats (with infinite downloads) for a somewhat reasonable price ($4-6 for a book, $15 for selected bundles of 4). In addition, a selection of their books are online for free at the Baen Free Library, in the same formats.

      (I have no association with Baen beyond being a happy customer.)

    27. Re:abandon ebooks too by STrinity · · Score: 1

      ebooks are NOT, repeat are NOT superior to wood pulp. sure you can use them in low light situations, but they aren't as durable and they require batteries
      That's a problem with ebook readers, not the ebooks themselves.
      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    28. Re:abandon ebooks too by notorious+ninja · · Score: 1

      I agree, but one drawback (other than the lack of a good reader) really stops me from converting to eBooks: I can't read an eBook while in the bath, or while floating around a pool. If only they could make a reader that is completely waterproof, I'd be sold.

    29. Re:abandon ebooks too by novakyu · · Score: 1

      Really? How much will you bet me that you can do a text search on your paperback faster than I can on my ebook? Well, I don't know about a "text search", but if you are talking about simply looking up some information, there are these things called "Index". You may have heard of it. It's usually at the end of the book that most people don't bother getting to.
    30. Re:abandon ebooks too by MttJocy · · Score: 1

      Mainly proprietary DRM laden formats is where the added complexity and incompatibilities come in over ebooks, as you pointed out a book is the simplest form of file possible on it's own, it is literally text plain and simple text, maybe PDF if you want to throw in illustrations as well, it is the proprietary DRM schemes that create all the many formats and incompatibilities.

    31. Re:abandon ebooks too by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      All good points: I'd also like to say that some idiots over at Amazon decided early on that everything needed to be DRM'd, even PUBLIC DOMAIN stuff. A number of years ago when e-books were all the rage Amazon had a decent collection of free sample books for download. Dracula, The Wizard of Oz, etc. All in the public domain. I downloaded all of these, only to find that they no longer worked after I reinstalled my OS. What the hell is the purpose in putting DRM on a book that anyone can legally copy anyways?

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    32. Re:abandon ebooks too by MttJocy · · Score: 1

      7 may be a little low, the last thing I saw which put a number on it based on any attempt at producing a rational thought out result without the obviously emotive reactions it stirs up when the matter is discussed legally because too many parties virulently defend their particular interests and don't consider the reasoned cost benefit balance to both themselves and wider society (the latter being what copyright was supposably intended to protect by encouraging creativity.) was a value of 14 years with the implicit statement that the term actually would drop with lowered cost of production of (official) copies, it took into account the costs of production for official and none official copies, the value of the work to society versus time this being the one where the current long copyright terms fail, works are in copyright for decades after much of it has gone out of date, where a term in or around 10-15 years would leave many works out of copyright within time that a derivative work desirable to society could be written. Yes there are some classics that do still stand out decades after they are produced but a small number of what is produced, however if the term was shorter and derivative works of other material could be produced before it became old on arrival perhaps more works would actually be improved or enhanced with derivatives to make them also valuable classics.

    33. Re:abandon ebooks too by Bud+Dickman · · Score: 1

      "Kindle books seem to be uniformly, and significantly, cheaper than the non-Kindle editions."
      You're comparing apples and oranges.

      Since Kindle has DRM, you never truly own any book you buy that way. You've got no guarantee that the book you rent from Amazon is going to be on your Kindle tomorrow. So, it's apples versus oranges because when I buy a book made from real paper, I have complete and total control over it.

      Now, if you'd like to make an apt comparison - apples to apples - there's this place called a library that rents books. It is significantly less expensive to rent your books from the library than to rent your books from Amazon.

    34. Re:abandon ebooks too by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Actually, the main problem with ebooks now that paper-like displays are seeing some progress is the cost. $400 for a Kindle is just nasty

      So forget the Kindle and go with the Sony Reader (PRS-505 is the newer model) for around $280?

      Yeah, I wish they were less expensive. But they were upwards of $500+ about 2 years ago. So the prices on the units are dropping reasonably quickly (I expect to see readers based on e-ink drop below $200 in the next 12-18 months).

      (I'm very happy with my Sony Reader. Been using it daily for a month or two now. Currently working through a list of about 100 Project Gutenberg texts that I've always wanted to read.)

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    35. Re:abandon ebooks too by MttJocy · · Score: 1

      It can be useful with fiction as well, especially such as like was done heavily by the fan community of books written in series (like harry potter for instance) where people discuss theories and other critical analysis of fiction works where it can be very useful to supply direct quotes from the work in question, and most people even the most avid readers of a work can remember it word for word in all it's hundreds of pages.

    36. Re:abandon ebooks too by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      All that said, I am not ready to drop $400.00 because of the durability issue. But come $200.00 or less, I will be buying one happily.

      My price point as $300 (and you can pick up Sony's 2nd gen reader for about $280), so I went with the PRS-505. I expect that you'll see other e-ink paper readers below $200 within the next year or two.

      But then, I'm not interested in the wireless part. I want something that just works, where I load books onto internal memory, or use the Memory Stick or SD card slots. I usually keep 50-60 books on internal memory, and have other books on 256MB or 512MB flash memory cards.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    37. Re:abandon ebooks too by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      there are these things called "Index"... It's usually at the end of the book
      Not in a novel. Don't you ever run into a character late in a book and then go flipping back madly to try to remember who they were?

    38. Re:abandon ebooks too by BlackCreek · · Score: 1

      Disadvantages:
      * Less durable

      I would make the distinction that the device is less durable. The digital files, and specially any annotations made on it will be as durable as your capacity to back them up.

    39. Re:abandon ebooks too by TheLink · · Score: 1

      "Yes there are some classics that do still stand out decades after they are produced "

      I don't see that a concern.

      What would be a valid concern is if turns out there are many people who _keep_ writing classics that are only discovered (big time) AFTER the copyright expires.

      But I think this would only happen to a very very unlucky few - nowadays with the pace of society, better networking etc.

      In my opinion if you can only write one classic, you should be doing a different job ;).

      --
    40. Re:abandon ebooks too by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Just what we need, some asshole reading a book on his PDA while driving.

    41. Re:abandon ebooks too by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      AIUI, though, the PRS doesn't do pdfs very well, right?

    42. Re:abandon ebooks too by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I've never seen a completely waterproof book, either...

      Though I guess dropping a $8 copy of "A Game of Thrones" into the tub isn't nearly as crushing as dropping a $400 ebook reader...

    43. Re:abandon ebooks too by tolan-b · · Score: 1

      I couldn't disagree more. With high resolution passive e-ink displays the argument for e-books has never been more compelling. Ths only reason I've stuck to pulp this long was because there weren't portable screens that were close enough to a normal printed image, but that's no longer true.

      The day that the majority of the books I own, and those I want to read, are available in a non-DRM format I'll say goodbye to my hundreds of kilos of dead tree and I won't shed a tear. Especially next time I move house. I'm really looking forward to freeing up the space.

      Incidentally similar arguments have been made about vinyl for some time that are equally spurious and frankly little more than sentimentality.

    44. Re:abandon ebooks too by Bud+Dickman · · Score: 1

      Sony is not a company I wish to support. After installing rootkits on the computers of their own paying customers, then insulting those who took issue with it, then suing lik-sang.com over the right of resale, they've used up all the good faith I might have offered them.

    45. Re:abandon ebooks too by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      There's some irony in that. DRM seems to make these ebooks obsolete before they even become properly mainstream - after all, the main advantage of switching from paper to digital is the fact that the content is in an easily accessible form for quoting, searching, even editing...

    46. Re:abandon ebooks too by novakyu · · Score: 1

      Not in a novel. Don't you ever run into a character late in a book and then go flipping back madly to try to remember who they were? Nope. That's where total recall comes in useful.

      Just kidding. If that happens, I just Google-search for the character. Using my paperback.

      In more seriousness, it's actually in "flipping madly" that ebooks really lack. If you don't remember the exact phrase or words, but it feels like a few sentences in the context would bring back your memory (I had that reading Herodotus's History), then there's no substitute for flipping through pages, and the refresh rate on ebook readers, or even PDF readers on a PC isn't that great compared to what you can do with a paperback.
    47. Re:abandon ebooks too by Danse · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I wish they were less expensive. But they were upwards of $500+ about 2 years ago. So the prices on the units are dropping reasonably quickly (I expect to see readers based on e-ink drop below $200 in the next 12-18 months). What's the battery life like on the Sony Reader? I'm thinking about getting one, but it's still kinda pricey right now. If they were under $200, I would buy one in an instant. I'm still seeing them for more like $300 right now, and I'm concerned that they don't really have a lot of storage space. I'd be carrying around a lot of reference books which are much larger than their stated average of 1.24MB per book. That could be a problem.
      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    48. Re:abandon ebooks too by pml · · Score: 1

      I sure hope their html books are better designed than their website.

    49. Re:abandon ebooks too by torkus · · Score: 1

      "The idea of having a wirelessly capable eBook which allows me to markup local copies of archival documents is really, really interesting."

      It's called a Tablet PC. They're not all that great (in fact some suck horribly for daily use) except for that one single use you specified. It's that single use that they are quite handy at.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    50. Re:abandon ebooks too by torkus · · Score: 1

      Actually i've seen on both generation sony ebook readers that 'pixels' on the screen eventually get stuck (i'm not talking 100,000+ page flips either) and slowly the screen takes on a grey din because there's always a bunch of tiny black dots. It eventually gets annoying, the crisp clear screen you bought it for is now kind of fuzzy. Personally it hurts my eyes (that's one reason i don't use my sony reader much anymore).

      I buy paper books because I can't get the same book in a non-DRM eBook. If i could, byebye paperback. Oh, and i've never 'stolen' a single ebook. Baen has them non-DRMed so I just buy them. pfft. Simple. Though at 6 bucks each now they're starting to push it...since there's no printing cost, transport cost must at least balance with web cost, and there's no retailer overhead.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    51. Re:abandon ebooks too by Hyperspite · · Score: 1

      It might be because most nerds started with dead trees before they did anything else. Granted, there are some who went right into electronics or something, but at some point, a great many of the people here got into dead tree books.

    52. Re:abandon ebooks too by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I disagree strongly with that. I've got severe ADHD and trying to read a book in print is challenging to say the least. Between finding a comfortable position where I'm not straining my neck and back, holding it steady while I try to read word by word through the page and the likelihood that I'll not be able to stay on the same line long enough to finish the sentence; it's nigh impossible to properly read anything which is printed like a standard book. Some books are better than others, but a standard paperback isn't likely to be readable for me. The rare occasion where I will complete the book, I'm basically speed reading through it missing as many words as I read.

      An ebook OTOH can eliminate most of those problems off the bat with presently available technology, they can be set up so that the text is larger for those that need it, the position of the monitor can be set for comfort, and one can use a screen reader or program to help direct the focus to the words being read.

      Not every ebook is going to provide for those, but it is basically impossible for a printed book to do any of those things without sacrificing readability for other people. But an ebook published using say XML and a good interpreting engine can satisfy the needs of most people without forcing anybody to read in a way that is uncomfortable. It also has the benefit of being much more accessible to people with blindness or Irlen as well without making the same copy unusable for the rest of the populace.

    53. Re:abandon ebooks too by Smauler · · Score: 1

      there's this place called a library that rents books. It is significantly less expensive to rent your books from the library than to rent your books from Amazon.

      You're obviously more organised than me. I can't count the number of times I've paid more in late charges than the books are worth :P. (and yes, you can call me a moron - but most of these books weren't ones I wanted to keep, and I figured paying the charges and giving the books back to the library helps everyone, whereas paying for the books and then having them clutter up my room and no one else being able to read them helps no one).

    54. Re:abandon ebooks too by rkanodia · · Score: 1

      It might start giving the users the impression that they don't have to let publishers and distributors shit all over them in order in exchange for the privilege of buying content.

    55. Re:abandon ebooks too by kesuki · · Score: 1

      ebooks can be viewed on a PC as well, you don't need a fancy portable device to read them. drm containing ebooks have done okay through public libraries (public libraries are the number one consumer of drm containing ebooks and audio books with drm) it is kinda sad, but as the article mentioned, the main source of online audio book piracy were from cd sets, or from 'other drmed sources' eg: public libraries allowing download of DRMed audio books. so, yeah, they're selling drm free stuff on their website now, because the pirates find public libraries a 'cheaper' source for pirating content. makes sense to me, why pay to pirate, when your local library can pay for you.

    56. Re:abandon ebooks too by Eivind · · Score: 1

      True. Should've added "easy and cheap backups" to the list of advantages. Neither list was complete anyway, just an attempt at illustrating that eBooks are superior in some ways, and inferior in other ways.

    57. Re:abandon ebooks too by Archtech · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. My study and all the adjacent rooms are piled high with stacks of books - many of which I have never read. I just love shopping for them, buying them, opening them and browsing through them, and just... well, it sounds crazy, but *having their company*! Kind of like a primitive version of Charlie Stross' "exobrain" (see his novel "Accelerando").

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    58. Re:abandon ebooks too by DrXym · · Score: 1

      That's great but every publisher needs to do it. There needs to be a very well specified single standard that all publishers use and tools exist for. Something as ubiquitous as MP3. Once that happens, ebook sales will shoot up.

    59. Re:abandon ebooks too by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      AIUI, though, the PRS doesn't do pdfs very well, right?

      That's more of an issue of trying to pack a 8.5" x 11" PDF down onto a screen that is only a quarter of that size. Even with a 170dpi display, trying to view the PDF in portrait mode is going to be painful. The display is 3.5" x 4.75".

      PDFs are not well suited for devices that are a different size then what the PDF was originally laid out for. Their primary use is to preserve physical formating and whitespace, not to encapsulate text in a easily reflowable manner (like HTML, BBeB, Mobi, or other ebook formats).

      All that being said, you can press and hold the zoom key on the PRS to switch to landscape viewing mode. Then you can view the top/bottom halves of a PDF page at closer to full size resolution. It's still not perfect, but unless the screen was 600dpi and came with a magnifying glass (or was letter-sized and huge) you'd still have the same issue.

      There are tools that can be used to convert PDFs into a more ebook friendly format (allowing the device to reflow the text correctly). Most of them are discussed over at:

      MobileRead

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    60. Re:abandon ebooks too by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      What's the battery life like on the Sony Reader? I'm thinking about getting one, but it's still kinda pricey right now. If they were under $200, I would buy one in an instant. I'm still seeing them for more like $300 right now, and I'm concerned that they don't really have a lot of storage space. I'd be carrying around a lot of reference books which are much larger than their stated average of 1.24MB per book. That could be a problem.

      Built-in space is 190MB or so on the internal memory. It has slots for both Memory Stick Duo and SD Cards (not SDHC). So you could (in theory) use 8MB MSD cards and 2GB SD cards to hold additional books.

      The caveats are:

      - Having a SD card installed does measurably drain battery life, even when the unit is in standby. The MSD cards are apparently more thrifty with power and don't impact battery life as much.

      - It takes time for the reader to load the directory on the flash memory card, sort it, and ready it for display. So for practical reasons, you may not want to have more then 50-250 books on a single card. This wait only occurs when you insert the card, not when you pull the device in/out of standby. I just bought a collection of 256MB and 512MB memory cards that I'm planning on using.

      Using just internal memory, reading for 2 hours a day or so (figure 60-120 pages per hour), I'm managing to only drain the battery about 25% per week. I generally hook it up to recharge it whenever I get below halfway. Which happens about every 2-3 weeks. If I was using it with a memory stick duo installed, I might have to charge it every 1-2 weeks instead. Some SD cards might make that as frequently as once every 6-9 days.

      See Mobileread.com forums if you want end-user opinions.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    61. Re:abandon ebooks too by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I'll look into it. Thanks

    62. Re:abandon ebooks too by Mauvaisours · · Score: 1

      Oh, you mean that it's a feature for no-life geeks. I forgot we're on slashdot.

    63. Re:abandon ebooks too by Brother+Phil · · Score: 1

      pdf works quite well for me - I use Mobipocket, but all the 200-odd books on it are from places like Project Gutenburg, manybooks.net, and Textbook Revolution.

      I download them as pdfs, and dump them on a chip for my Zire.

      I prefer paper, partcularly for study, but a PDA is good for the bath, in bed at night, and on the tube.

  2. duh. by Dance_Dance_Karnov · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the blindingly obvious usually will win out in time.

    1. Re:duh. by IBBoard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think this is needed as a tag for this article - suddenoutbreakofcommonsense.

      Isn't this all based on something we try to teach children? If you give someone trust then they will do the right thing, but if you're instantly distrustful then they're never going to do the right thing.

      Hurrah for non-DRM! It's good to see they put some effort in to this rather than just going "we must put digital restricting management on the files because of 'teh leet haxxorz' who will cost us trillions of dollars and destroy the world economy by being selfish enough to want to do what they wish with the file they've paid for".

      If only I had the cabling to format-shift my two Discworld audio book tapes.

    2. Re:duh. by StripedCow · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it won't be long until they come up with a business-solution to the drm-problem ... audiobooks with embedded advertising.

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    3. Re:duh. by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Way to not read!

      Isn't this all based on something we try to teach children? If you give someone trust then they will do the right thing, but if you're instantly distrustful then they're never going to do the right thing.
      From the blurb

      It encoded those audio books with a digital watermark and monitored online file sharing networks, only to find that pirated copies of its audio books had been made from physical CDs or DRM-encoded digital downloads whose anticopying protections were overridden.
      People are going to pirate whether their is DRM or not, which is pretty much what their study found.. the DRM did not stop piracy, so why pay extra for a mechanism that doesn't work and inconveniences legitimate purchasers?
      --
      The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
    4. Re:duh. by IBBoard · · Score: 1
      Way not to read! From the blurb:

      It encoded those audio books with a digital watermark and monitored online file sharing networks, only to find that pirated copies of its audio books had been made from physical CDs or DRM-encoded digital downloads whose anticopying protections were overridden.


      People are pirating the DRM/physical versions, where as the watermarked versions (from the use and meaning of the phrase "only to find") weren't pirated (or were to a much lower level as to be insignificant). That reads (to me) as "people who were given DRM-free audio books were happier with them and didn't feel the need to pirate them". The reason they chose not to could, by human nature, be because they're being trusted and not restricted/instantly put under suspicion and locked out like criminals.
    5. Re:duh. by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      "Isn't this all based on something we try to teach children? If you give someone trust then they will do the right thing, but if you're instantly distrustful then they're never going to do the right thing."

      Actually, I'd say it's kind of the obverse - what I've learned as an adult: that people who are basically honest assume others are too. If someone immediately assumes you're a lying, cheating, deceitful SOB, that's usually a key clue that THEY are in fact lying, cheating, or simply a deceitful SOB.

      I believe psychologists call it transference; I'd simply say it's a matter of seeing the world through your own particular glasses. If you are constantly thinking of lying and ways to cheat people, then you're going to naturally assume others are too.

      --
      -Styopa
    6. Re:duh. by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 1

      That reads (to me) as "people who were given DRM-free audio books were happier with them and didn't feel the need to pirate them".
      Or the DRM release was available way before the DRM-free release and pirated first by a piracy group looking to sell it on in China or release it for some 'scene kudos'.
      --
      The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
    7. Re:duh. by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Everyone thinks everyone else is like them. It's just human nature.

      I used to go to Planet Crap years ago, and was struck that the publishers and heads of game companies who commented there who were in favor of DRM all admitted to being copyright infringing pirates when in college.

      Thieves expect everyone else to steal, violent people expect violence and honest men expect honesty. Basically, anyone who insists that DRM is necessary is a thief.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    8. Re:duh. by IBBoard · · Score: 1

      That wasn't quite my point. Yes, you can over generalise and there will always be people who are inherently going to cheat, but if you're given a position of responsibility then people will often be responsible because they have been given something extra and feel they should show it was worth giving it to them.

      The other similar one is respect. A lot of people complain that they don't get respect from youngsters and yet they won't give respect themselves. Once you start giving respect then you start getting respect, as many "these kids are unruly" experiments have shown. Yes, it might take some time, but it can work.

    9. Re:duh. by MttJocy · · Score: 1

      True, this actually reminds me of a survey that was done which was interesting more so in my opinion as it lacked the emotive aspect of talking about terms like piracy which makes something sound inherently bad. The study actually surveyed groups of people one was highly marginalized people the other was socially well connected people about what they would expect an extraterrestrial civilizations attitude to be were we to encounter one those who were highly marginalized generally considered that they would be hostile, the other group answered very strongly towards them being benevolent. Of course this is how psychology works people make assumptions about everyone they meet from the second they encounter them and go very heavily on the actions of themselves, but also the actions of others towards them thus the marginalized people who have generally felt society to be hostile towards them assume an entirely separate society would be also. Of course taking this thought process even further it is quite likely that content producers implicit assumption by using DRM that the buyer is a thief could very well cause the buyer to assume that the content producer has some kind of negative intent as said person sees the entire group of content producers as being hostile towards them (accusing you of theft is hostile) thus are likely to be hostile towards the producers and probably are much less likely to be altruistic in return by doing something like for instance paying for a work because it would be the right thing to do, people are not very inclined to do right by another person who is accusing them of wrongdoing.

    10. Re:duh. by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      "...the DRM did not stop piracy, so why pay extra for a mechanism that doesn't work and inconveniences legitimate purchasers?"

      This is the exact sequence of events that occurred with early computer games and copy-restricted floppy disks. It didn't stop piracy since cracking programs ran rampant, and it irritated all of the paying customers who had to type in those damn words from the manuals. This is exactly what's meant by people failing to learn from history being doomed to repeat it.

    11. Re:duh. by The+Mighty+Buzzard · · Score: 1

      That's all fine and good but then you have examples like politicians and major league baseball players. We keep trusting them and they keep only doing the right thing when they're sure they're being watched.

      --
      Violence is like duct tape. If it doesn't solve the problem, you didn't use enough.
    12. Re:duh. by IBBoard · · Score: 1

      At which point their research methods are terrible and whoever recommended removing DRM on the basis of the "they're not being shared if they're non-DRM" should be shot and given the sack.

    13. Re:duh. by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      HaHa, I so remember having to type in the 13th word on the 7th page of the manual for some old Sierra Games.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    14. Re:duh. by rkanodia · · Score: 1

      How about the TSR 'Gold Box' D&D games?

      Step 1: Align the outer ring with the Dwarven rune shown on the top corner of page 13.
      Step 2: Align the inner ring with the Elven rune shown on the bottom corner of page 27.
      Step 3: Goddamnit, it doesn't work.

  3. Audible.com not allowing non DRM books by DKlineburg · · Score: 4, Informative

    I understand this was originally causing quite a stir with Audible.com. Audible stats that it will not allow any non DRM books to be placed on there site. Even if the author requests that they do so. I know of one author mentioned on TWIT - This Week In Tech. (I believe was John C Dvorak, but can't remember) that we was not going to put his book up on Audible.com just for the reason he wanted it not DRM'd. With all the major book companies shifting to a none DRM format, I wonder if sites like this that are smaller will change there attitude.

    --
    Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Audible.com not allowing non DRM books by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Even pdf ebooks are f*cked up. The one I bought from PACKT Publishing [in the UK] was watermarked with my email and mailing address [fine, didn't interfere with me using it], but the book also has errata. A) They don't have a version with the errata applied [which has been expounded as being a reason for having ebooks, because they are SO EASY TO UPDATE]. B) The permissions on the PDF are set so I can't even manually add annotations to the various pages with the errata

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    2. Re:Audible.com not allowing non DRM books by allcar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Audible insists on DRM, so I won't use audible.
      Whenever the free, pirated version is technically superior to the costly commercial version, the business case is on pretty rocky ground.
      There are an increasing number of examples showing that people will pay real money for products that can easily be obtained for nothing, but it must be worth their while. Well presented, high quality, DRM free recording, perhaps accompanied by supporting extras, such as maps and illustrations will sell. The recent experiment by the Nine Inch Nails is an excellent example of people being prepared to pay for a premium product.

    3. Re:Audible.com not allowing non DRM books by Alon+Tal · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was Cory Doctorow who complained about Audible's mandatory DRM, in TWiT 124, around the 43 minute mark.

    4. Re:Audible.com not allowing non DRM books by PinkyDead · · Score: 1

      I shall watch with interest to see who wins out: the large publishers or Audible.com

      I tried Audible.com last month - I actually tried to get into Audio books full stop, but on Linux it's a miserable disaster. All the methods I tried failed - for obvious reasons. Audible, however, while having the best site, quality and selection, was the worst experience. Their subscription model is hard to get your head around - especially if you are trying from scratch. And by the time you find out you can't use it on Linux you've paid for your first month, downloaded your first book and tried in vain to get it to play. Canceling the subscription proved equally tricky - to the extent that I'm not altogether sure if I have canceled it.

      I think not having support for Linux is a bad idea. Not because of any Linux fanboy nonsense, but because I would imagine that the market share for Linux in the segment of 'People who will download and listen to audio books' is much higher than the normal 'Desktop' market share. Hey, I wanted to do it - and I was willing to pay for it.

      I know that my father (committed to Windows) for instance would never do this - he would always prefer to have a physical copy of a book or CD - as would I think most of his generation, and the younger Win-generation (get off my lawn) wouldn't be into audio books (from an opportunity cost perspective).

      Anyway, I gave up. Yesterday I bought the CD version of 'Slaughter House 5' - I couldn't find anything else I was interested in. I know, I know - it's better in book form.

      --
      Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
    5. Re:Audible.com not allowing non DRM books by Kredal · · Score: 1

      If you have not called them on the phone and waited on hold for 15-30 minutes, your account is probably still active.

      Good luck.

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    6. Re:Audible.com not allowing non DRM books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understand this was originally causing quite a stir with Audible.com. Audible stats(states) that it will not allow any non DRM books to be placed on there(their) site. Even if the author requests that they do so. I know of one author mentioned on TWIT - This Week In Tech. (I believe was John C Dvorak, but can't remember) that we(he) was not going to put his book up on Audible.com just for the reason he wanted it not DRM'd. With all the major book companies shifting to a none(non-) DRM format, I wonder if sites like this that are smaller will change there(their) attitude.

      I'm not even going to get into the punctuation and grammar issues. I'm not usually spelling/grammar Nazi, but your manner of writing is painful.

    7. Re:Audible.com not allowing non DRM books by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      placed on there site... change there attitude...

      Their literacy is over there.

      Once is a typo, twice in the same comment is either a non-English speaker or an illiterate. Ironic that in a thread about literacy you get comments from people who can't spell a five letter word.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    8. Re:Audible.com not allowing non DRM books by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Are there any free PDF readers that ignore the permissions on these documents. It seems like a stupid restriction to no allow one to add annotations.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    9. Re:Audible.com not allowing non DRM books by Isao · · Score: 1
      I know of one author mentioned on TWIT - This Week In Tech. (I believe was John C Dvorak, but can't remember) that we was not going to put his book up on Audible.com just for the reason he wanted it not DRM'd.

      That would have been Cory Doctorow, unsurprisingly. (I like Cory.)

  4. Are they even listening? by Gareshra · · Score: 2, Informative

    I realize almost everyone here knew this back when this whole thing began, but I fear that the music and movie industries will largely ignore this, or, worse, try to improve upon it somehow. The current models are failing, but they don't want to admit it. They'll probably continue investing more into an arms race they can't win. Maybe a mixture of diminishing sales and wasted money will cripple them enough that others can rise up and take their place.

    1. Re:Are they even listening? by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      ``I realize almost everyone here knew this back when this whole thing began,
      but I fear that the music and movie industries will largely ignore this,
      or, worse, try to improve upon it somehow.''

      I don't mind if they improve it. If they can come up with a scheme that
      allows legitimate use (using the software and hardware of _my_ choice,
      thank you very much) while making unauthorized use harder, I will be
      happy. The problem I have with current DRM schemes is that they
      restrict legitimate use (which then isn't even legitimate anymore,
      due to _incredibly_ stupid laws).

      ``The current models are failing, but they don't want to admit it.''

      Sometimes, I think we only _think_ they are failing, because we fail
      to see what they are really after.

      At other times, I think it works like this. The DRM schemes aren't
      developed by the entities whose intellectual property they are used
      to "protect". Rather, they are developed by companies that then
      proceed to market their technology to the rights owners. Sort of
      along the lines of "You are losing millions because of piracy.
      Our proprietary technology (hence, you can only buy it from us)
      will help protect your intellectual property and curb lost sales."
      In other words, it's the old "sow fear, harvest meek sheeple"
      tactic. Any technically inclined person will see that the DRM
      scheme won't help against piracy and will only harm legitimate use,
      but it's not being marketed to technically inclined people, it's
      being marketed to managers. And it sounds like a good idea: for
      a small fee, you can protect against millions in lost sales.
      Clever marketing. The same thing that makes so many other
      lousy products successful.

      Apparently, the people in at least one company got the bright
      idea to actually measure and compare the DRMful situation with the
      DRMless situation. And they apparently came to the conclusion
      that DRM costs them more then it gains them. Hurray! They've
      done their homework, and their new policy is good for them and
      good for their customers. Win-win. It's how business is
      supposed to be.

      ``They'll probably continue investing more into an arms race
      they can't win.''

      Likely some will, some won't. Corporations are already getting off
      the DRM bandwagon. Perhaps more of them will do a cost-benefit
      analysis. Perhaps they will come to the conclusion that DRM
      is a net loss to them. Perhaps they will discontinue buying into
      it. Or perhaps they will continue to fall for clever marketing.

      ``Maybe a mixture of diminishing
      sales and wasted money will cripple them enough that others can rise up
      and take their place.''

      Now this is the real problem. This is what would happen if there
      were healthy competition. But in the world of entertainment, money
      and power are concentrated in a handful of players. Often, this
      is reinforced by laws. Actual competition is difficult and
      sometimes even illegal. Fortunately, the Internet and the examples
      of open source, Wikipedia, file sharing programs, etc. make it
      easy to experiment and provide ideas for directions for
      expirimentation. New and better models will develop and, in time,
      may even prevail.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    2. Re:Are they even listening? by JohnBailey · · Score: 1

      I realize almost everyone here knew this back when this whole thing began, but I fear that the music and movie industries will largely ignore this, or, worse, try to improve upon it somehow. The current models are failing, but they don't want to admit it. They'll probably continue investing more into an arms race they can't win. Maybe a mixture of diminishing sales and wasted money will cripple them enough that others can rise up and take their place. I'm not so sure. There have already been moves to get music DRM free. Now Audio books seem to be following suit, so perhaps the penny is finally dropping. DRM is not a safeguard, its a challenge.
      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
  5. Is the sky falling? by 49152 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From the article: "Our feeling is that D.R.M. is not actually doing anything to prevent piracy," said Ms. McIntosh of Random House Audio.

    Wtf? A business person actually seeing whats been f...king obvious for years now? :-)

    1. Re:Is the sky falling? by mSparks43 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      its better than that, they're saying DRM encourages piracy, which makes a funny kind of sense, since even if you buy DRM'd stuff, you then have to turn to the file sharing networks to get the non DRM stuff.

    2. Re:Is the sky falling? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Too bad they still haven't figured out that "piracy" isn't costing them a dime but can actually increase revinues, but DRM does cost them money.

      DRM costs them qite a bit money they would get from me if I didn't refuse to buy it, and I imagine a lot of other people's money as well.

      OTOH how many people bought a legitimate copy of something they originally got through shady means? Quite a few.

      DRM is brain-dead stupid.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    3. Re:Is the sky falling? by denobug · · Score: 1

      Random House is a book publisher, not RIAA and associates. They had to weather the change in the way customers view and buy books before. Somehow it take some objective reasoning and common business sense and make appropriate changes in the publishing business. I don't think we would be talking about Random House if all they simply whine and not able to coop with the changing marketplace. Heck, the reason audio books exist in the first place is to increase the revenue from publishing a book.

      As far as for myself, I will purchase audio books. But why would I want to release an mp3 file containing watermark of my personal identifiable information in it? Sure I can circumvent that, but why take the trouble? I'm glad there is a company sponsored research that can quantify this and allow their executives to make a good choice in public.

  6. I'm impressed. by v(*_*)vvvv · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How often does a company actually get the queue and do something right? The fact that they tested their assumption and made a move based on evidence is praise worthy. Not that they will give up, but at least they figured out how they aren't going to win.

    Maybe these books that everyone talks about actually do make you smarter.

    1. Re:I'm impressed. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      How often does a company actually get the queue and do something right?

      "get the queue"? Are you sure you're using it right? I've never seen that expression before. Maybe you mean "get a clue"?

    2. Re:I'm impressed. by phaunt · · Score: 1

      "get the queue"? Are you sure you're using it right? I've never seen that expression before. Maybe you mean "get a clue"? Or: get the cue.
    3. Re:I'm impressed. by v(*_*)vvvv · · Score: 1

      Correct, thank you.

      All this speed posting has got me publishing embarrassing errors with no recourse!

    4. Re:I'm impressed. by syphax · · Score: 1


      The scientific method in the media industry. Remarkable.

      As someone who gets eBooks from eMusic, and doesn't share them via P2P (go get your own damn subscription- it's not that expensive), you're welcome.

      --
      Simple Unexpected Concrete Credible Emotional Stories
  7. Baen by Ruie · · Score: 1
    And some did the right thing way back:

    Baen Webscriptions, Baen free library

  8. Is it not ironic... by yurivr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    that so many people listen to audiobooks in their cars? Who would have thought that poor transportation and urban sprawl lead to appreciation for literacy? Then again... automotive accidents are always on the rise, and surely most of them are due to distractions. Yet if we fix this problem, the economy fails! Efficiency is a bitch...

    1. Re:Is it not ironic... by shmlco · · Score: 1

      Well, quite a few people also listen to them on subways, trains, buses, and airplanes. I also listen to them at the gym, and pretty much anyplace where I have to wait in line.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    2. Re:Is it not ironic... by sm62704 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who would have thought that poor transportation and urban sprawl lead to appreciation for literacy?

      Er, what? My idea of "literate" isn't having someone read to you.

      You normal people should pity the poor hyperlex. There is no way that someone like us could enjoy a book while driving a car. When we read a novel by a good author, we become totally immersed. We are there.

      When the literate drive we must unfortunately concentrate on piloting thousands of pounds of steel and avoidiong the fucktards that are paying attention to the machine that's reading to them instead of the task at hand, which SHOULD BE driving the damned car.

      -mcgrew

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    3. Re:Is it not ironic... by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 2, Informative

      Can someone please mod up that post?

      Don't listen to ebooks in the car folks. It's distracting.

      There's just no way to concentrate on the book when you are dodging traffic and other drivers.

      Won't someone think of the publishers?

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    4. Re:Is it not ironic... by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      I can do both. I devour print books, and I throughly enjoy good audiobooks, but only while driving.

      Currently the only good audiobooks I have found are: the unabridged version of "A Short History of Nearly Everything", "A Song of Ice and Fire", and anything by Alan Watts or Feynman.

      Perhaps you should feel envious of the "hyperlex" who isn't incapacitated by someone reading words to them. :-)

    5. Re:Is it not ironic... by Yev000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sorry, but thats a pretty narrow minded view...

      You can quite easily drive a car while having a coversation. Quite a few people do it every day. People listen to the news on the radio in their cars. There are constant trafic announcements and none of this increases the chance to have an accident. So why are you so hostile towards Audio Books? If people should drive in total silence then why don't we have single seated cars with no audio devices?

      It's quite clear that a majority of drivers enjoy having audio of some sort in their cars otherwise *all* cars would not be sold with speakers as standard. In todays world where safety is God, do you really think audio equipment in cars would still be there as standard if it significantly increased the risk of having an accident?

      Now you could argue that it diverts attention significantly enough to cause an accident... But then so do police cars and speed cameras... Maybe we should not have those on the roads too hmm? After all, I could be glacing at that police car instead of putting my breaks on one day...

    6. Re:Is it not ironic... by matria · · Score: 1

      "quite a few people do it every day". Hm. Seems to me that quite a few people have accidents every day too. Maybe a few less distractions and a bit more paying attention to the road would reduce those accidents? Why do you suppose buses instituted the rule about not talking to the driver so many years ago? I am constantly amazed at the general acceptance of the highway carnage in the US as well as a lot of other places.

    7. Re:Is it not ironic... by Yev000 · · Score: 1

      And lets remove advertising billboards while we are at it.

      "I am constantly amazed at the general acceptance of the highway carnage"

      May I suggest that you are easily amazed. "quite a few" is not a quantative measurement, you cant use it to correlate distractions to accidents. While I'd wager that that over 50% of drivers get distracted daily while driving, the accident rate its quite a lot less.

      May I also suggest that driving a vehicle the size of a buss is a little more complicated than your avarage car.

      Different people require different levels of focus to remain safe on the road. Thats why some people can drive F1 cars but most cant. This does not mean we should abandon audio in cars just because some people cant handle it. Perhaps the driving test should be made harder and keep those people off the roads in the first place...

    8. Re:Is it not ironic... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Seems to me that quite a few people have accidents every day too. Maybe a few less distractions and a bit more paying attention to the road would reduce those accidents?

      Has it occurred to you that different people have different levels of skill at driving and multitasking and that there is no one-size-fits-all solution? Some people are quite comfortable at driving and decent at multitasking (cell phone/radio/big mac). Other people probably shouldn't be allowed on the roadways on bright sunny days with no distractions and zero traffic. Personally I'm quite comfortable eating behind the wheel and talking on my cell phone (with headset) on the highway -- I don't do it around town because I drive a stick-shift and need both hands.

      As a random observation I've often thought if more people drive manuals that less people would drive distracted -- it just requires too much of your attention span to try and do other things. It confines distracting activities to the highway -- which has less risk as a general rule of thumb (traffic only going one-way, no stopping, etc, etc). Around town the stick-shift tends to keep you more engaged and alert to your surroundings.

      Why do you suppose buses instituted the rule about not talking to the driver so many years ago?

      Eh, around here you can talk to the drives to your hearts content -- if they are one of the friendly ones (most are).

      I am constantly amazed at the general acceptance of the highway carnage in the US as well as a lot of other places.

      That "carnage" has been around as long as cars have -- it predates cell phones, ebooks, drive-throughs and advanced sound systems. Might it be possible that you are mistaking correlation with causation?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    9. Re:Is it not ironic... by Kimos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm envious of people who can read on the bus. I get motion sick reading more than a couple sentences while in a moving vehicle. Audio books and an MP3 player give me something interesting and entertaining to do while commuting.

    10. Re:Is it not ironic... by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

      The problems with stuff like this is that people are different. Some people can drive, talk on the phone, and drink coffee all at the same time. Others can't focus on anything but one task at a time. Since we aren't all the same, there are a variety of solutions to the problem.

      1) Give everyone all the options and let them decide. Current system in place which leads to incapable people trying to do what their more capable peers can. This isn't the best solution but changing this will be hard.

      2) Give everyone the bear minimum - the single seater cars without radio. Unfortunately, this holds everyone back just because some people can't handle multiple tasks. Same problem as that No Child Left Behind crap.

      3) Some middle ground solution that depends on the driver/conditions. Option 3 is pretty hard to implement. So the only fair solution would be to push for automated driving as people that aren't as high on the totem are going to complain as they were higher before.

      Questions
      Who is responsible when something fails? -> Who do Americans, the legal happy folk we are, get to sue?
      What do you do about the folks that really do enjoy driving?
      If they can still drive, do certain areas become automatic only? - highways and such
      Do we just have the cars react to each other independently like bees in a swarm acting as a whole or hive mind control?
      There are clearly more questions that require answers...

      It's a difficult system to develop and maintain but would eliminate many of the general problems associated with driving. I would rather we find ways to develop more reasonable mass transit systems that people can and would use. Unfortunately, people don't seem keen on giving up their cars. Something has to be done as Atlanta, for example, doesn't look like it can handle much more in terms of capacity. Other major cities have the same problem. Automated driving might solve a lot of those problems. So would mass transit.

    11. Re:Is it not ironic... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      You can quite easily drive a car while having a coversation.

      You think you can; in reality how closely you're paying attention to the conversation probably depends on what is going on around you.

      People listen to the news on the radio in their cars.

      Listening takes less than having a convesation. Again however, how closely you can pay attention depends on the situation. I've tried listening to an audio book; much of the content was lost, because I have to shift my attention at various times when traffic is heavy.

      There are constant trafic announcements and none of this increases the chance to have an accident.

      I wouldn't be suprised if some accidents are caused by minor distractions. But if you know otherwise, post some links to conclusive studies.

      Now you could argue that it diverts attention significantly enough to cause an accident... But then so do police cars and speed cameras... Maybe we should not have those on the roads too hmm? After all, I could be glacing at that police car instead of putting my breaks on one day...

      I actually agree with both of those things. People start paying more attention to the cop than other cars, and it leads to problems. Nevermind the fact tha many slam on their brakes as soon as they see one to drive 15 mph UNDER the limit. Oh, and improperly set speed limits (which are the staggering majority) DO cause an increase in accidents. Stepping up enforcement just creates more revenue for insurance companies and government.

    12. Re:Is it not ironic... by plague3106 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And lets remove advertising billboards while we are at it.

      Excellent idea! Actually Vermont had banned such billboards, it's actually quite nice.

      May I suggest that you are easily amazed. "quite a few" is not a quantative measurement, you cant use it to correlate distractions to accidents. While I'd wager that that over 50% of drivers get distracted daily while driving, the accident rate its quite a lot less.

      I'm willing to be that near 100% of accidents though are directly caused by distracted drivers.

      May I also suggest that driving a vehicle the size of a buss is a little more complicated than your avarage car.

      How so? They handle differently, but so do all cars and trucks. Semis are a bit different, since you have two attached pieces, no one single vehicle.

    13. Re:Is it not ironic... by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Er, what? My idea of "literate" isn't having someone read to you.

      You normal people should pity the poor hyperlex. There is no way that someone like us could enjoy a book while driving a car. When we read a novel by a good author, we become totally immersed. We are there.

      When the literate drive we must unfortunately concentrate on piloting thousands of pounds of steel and avoidiong the fucktards that are paying attention to the machine that's reading to them instead of the task at hand, which SHOULD BE driving the damned car. Some of us have trouble walking and chewing bubble gum at the same time. From those of us who can, you have our sympathies.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    14. Re:Is it not ironic... by Yev000 · · Score: 1

      "Excellent idea!"

      I know! Won't go down too well with the advertisers though.

      "I'm willing to be that near 100% of accidents though are directly caused by distracted drivers."

      My point exactly. Now if we can get a driving test hard enough to weed out drivers that can get distracted, we'd be onto something!

      "How so? They handle differently"

      You answered yourself there.

    15. Re:Is it not ironic... by sm62704 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Re: your sig-XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.

      Mayor Hardin said (in Asimov's Foundation) "XML is the last refuge of the incompetent!"

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    16. Re:Is it not ironic... by sm62704 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Perhaps you should feel envious of the "hyperlex" who isn't incapacitated by someone reading words to them. :-)

      It doesn't matter how well you do or don't read, if you're paying attention to anything but your driving you're a menace. And my writing must be particularly bad or you would have seen that the two paragraphs, one on immersion and one on dangerous driving, are entirely separate.

      Or did someone read it to you while you were driving? ;)

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    17. Re:Is it not ironic... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      I know! Won't go down too well with the advertisers though.

      Well, if one state can do it, so can others.

      My point exactly. Now if we can get a driving test hard enough to weed out drivers that can get distracted, we'd be onto something!

      Not sure that's possible, but I do think in general the tests should be more difficult and take into account reaction time.

      You answered yourself there.

      Well, you can't clip part of my statement. People drive cars that aren't their own which handle differently, yet do so without incident. So what is inheritently more difficult about learning to handle a bus rather than say a big U-Haul?

    18. Re:Is it not ironic... by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      You can quite easily drive a car while having a coversation

      Your passenger can see you're in a dangerous situation and STFU if you are in one. An ebook can't. A passenger can actually help you see a dangerous situation crop up. An ebook can't.

      The "news" for the most part is bite sized, easily digestable, and doesn't need nearly the attention as a narrator telling a story. In some cases it can actually make you safer by keeping you awake.

      I think cops are such abysmal drivers because of all the distractions they face in their squad cars. Have you noticed that they are the most dangerous drivers, followed by bus, cab, and delivery drivers? (discounting the VERY dangerous dimwits who shave, text message, and other things that actually force them to take their eyes off the road).

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    19. Re:Is it not ironic... by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Nevermind the fact tha many slam on their brakes as soon as they see one to drive 15 mph UNDER the limit

      Often when gas prices soar (like today) and I'm forced to travel, I'll do 50-60 rather than the 67 I normally do. But no matter how fast or slow I'm driving, there is always the guy (usually in the new $75,000 vehicle, is there a correlation between wealth and stupidity?) who flys past me, then I pass him on the right (still in the right lane) as he slows down for the cop.

      You can never overestimate stupidity.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    20. Re:Is it not ironic... by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      I have no problem with TALKING on the phone (text messaging is a different matter) or drinking coffee; you choose when you do it. On the phone, if a dangerous situation crops up you can say "call me back, traffic got bad" etc. I do both on the highway, not in the city.

      Of your three options I'd choose the first. I wouldn't outlaw ebooks in the car, but in most circumstances I would discourage their use while driving.

      I may keep the URL of your comment for its questions about what to do when cars drive themselves for a journal. Thx.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    21. Re:Is it not ironic... by Smauler · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      if you're paying attention to anything but your driving you're a menace.

      If you can drive without paying attention to anything else, you're not human. Seriously, listening to the radio is a distraction, daydreaming is a distraction, thinking about where you are ultimately going is a distraction. And anyone who does any of those things is a menace in your view... get a grip. I personally drive around 70,000 miles a year or so and do _so_ many things that are distracting. However, I always know my number one priority when driving - some don't. The closest I've come to accidents in the past few years is when I've been distracted by very little and am lulled into a sense of smug concentration. I try not to let myself get into that state too often - I'd advise you don't too, for your and other's safety.

    22. Re:Is it not ironic... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      I use a lot of music and other stuff when driving because if it's quiet, my mind finds something else to do. I sing a lot in the car because of this.

      If all I'm doing is driving, I'm definitely not paying attention to the road.

    23. Re:Is it not ironic... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Wealth and penis size my friend. The expensive, fast car helps attract girls who need at LEAST four inches in other circumstances.

    24. Re:Is it not ironic... by maglor_83 · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to be that near 100% of accidents though are directly caused by distracted drivers.
      I'm willing to bet that a good chunk of your near 100% are caused by alcohol and speed, not distractions.
    25. Re:Is it not ironic... by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      Having posted the original post to start this, now I have to agree with you. While I do listen to books, I frequently listen to them 5 or 6 times to get the same reading comprehension that I used to get when I read the actual book. That is in the car at least. When you jog (outside or on treadmill) your motions are just repetitive. I can easily get lost in a good book and end up running farther, as I don't pay attention to the stress of actually running. There are always pro's and con's to everything. I agree overall, it is less literate to listen to a book. I did recently pick up a good book though, and realized that I can read just as well as I ever did (500 pages in about 8 hours with comprehension). I don't know if that comes from the large quantity of books that I read as a child though. I used to read a 500 page book a day all the way through High School. Overall, I don't know how audio books have helped or hindered the literate community though.

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    26. Re:Is it not ironic... by Yev000 · · Score: 1

      For me personally it's the other way around (Ironically I spent the first part of my life in Soviet Russia, litiraly). I'm bilingual and I can't read either languages as fast as a local would. So having books read to me yeilds the same level of comprehention as if I had read them myself.

      I usually have to re-read certain parts a few times to understand what the author is trying to get at.

      This doesen't stop me reading myself, but there no additional benefets to doing so either.

    27. Re:Is it not ironic... by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      That actually makes a lot of since. When you say you have to re-read it a few times, I'm assuming you me re-listen if you listen. I think the major advantage if you can read is being able to spell. With computer spell check (I copy and paste all posts from word) I can't spell much at all. I can comprehend the word, or use dictionary.com if I have to. From your post, I don't infer that you can't spell; your thoughts are straight forward and concise. I'm glad to hear that listening to books has widened your horizon.

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    28. Re:Is it not ironic... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Nope. Speeding does not cause accidents. This has been proven. Raising speed limits does not cause an increase in the number of accidents.

      http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4179/is_19990425/ai_n11718981
      http://www.hwysafety.com/hwy_montana_2001.htm
      http://www.junkscience.com/nov98/peters2.html

      As for alcohol, according to this 39% are alcohol are involved. "There were 16,885 alcohol-related fatalities in 2005 - 39 percent of the total traffic fatalities for the year."

      So, I guess I need to revise my statement 61% of all accidents are caused by distracted drivers.

    29. Re:Is it not ironic... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe I was too hasty in revising my statement; 39% of fatalities involve alcohol, but I wasn't only including fatalities.

    30. Re:Is it not ironic... by sm62704 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Every other driver on the road is a menace in my view, and so am I. The question is how much of a menace? I would posit that daydreaming while driving is probably the most dangerous thing you can do because your attention isn't on your driving AT ALL.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    31. Re:Is it not ironic... by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      What's sad is, like I said in one of my journals last year (and I was once chastised for not warning that it was not entirely safe for work, despite the lack of graphics), a big dick won't get you laid. By the time she finds out how large or small it is, you're sliding into home plate.

      There are definite disadvantages to having a larger than average member as well. It's disgusting when you're sitting on a toilet and it dips into the water, for example.

      That said, you do have to pity the poor sap with an extremely small one. Some of my friends sit around laughing about some of their clients' members.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    32. Re:Is it not ironic... by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Ironically I spent the first part of my life in Soviet Russia, litiraly

      In Soviet Russia, commentor responds to YOU!

      =) sorry, couldn't resist! (=

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    33. Re:Is it not ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only on the bus, but while driving ;)

      If it's stop and go traffic it's easy, interstates are usually ok too, bad conditions, I put it down for a minute. Ebooks allow me to hold something small and non-descript to read and I have grown accustomed to reading afew paragraphs at a time.

    34. Re:Is it not ironic... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      It gets you laid when you've gotten laid several times and the gossip goes around. And only if it's not like 9-10 inches and 2 inches thick and hurts girls.

    35. Re:Is it not ironic... by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Well, and if your GF or wife likes to brag.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  9. AUDIO book by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think you and the parent are talking about different things. eBooks SHOULD be digital books, text documents. You are talking about AUDIO books, books being read by someone. Note how he talks about low-light, while you talk about driving.

    Granted, the original article gets pretty confused about it as well.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:AUDIO book by Firehed · · Score: 1

      The summary only mentions audiobooks, though naturally I haven't RTFA. I would love to see DRM on download service audiobooks (Audible, etc) disappear. I really have no interest in eBooks but that's beside the point - I don't want DRM on them either should I get an interest (on the odd occasion I've wanted one, I'll just search that part of the internet for some manually-transcribed copy - I already own the dead tree edition).

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  10. Me too by filabrazila · · Score: 1

    Long time lurker (many years), first time poster. I just created a slashdot login, just so I could comment on this story. My comment beside what I've said so far is thus: HELL YES! VIVA LA REVOLUTION! FOR RANDOM HOUSE IS A JOLLY GOOD FELLOW! ETC! Finally a story worthy of my awesome posting powers.

    1. Re:Me too by that_itch_kid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Long time lurker (many years), first time poster. I just created a slashdot login, just so I could comment on this story.

      Shame on you - you DO realise that you could have had a UID < 1000000, right!?!?

    2. Re:Me too by filabrazila · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yes, but in Soviet Russia, I DON'T realize that you shame on me, but do realize that you are UID > 1000000 right you!?!? WTF! FTW! teh f1rst POST!!!

      Did I do it right?

  11. Avoid Audible.com for your own peace of mind by justsomecomputerguy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As the unwilling DRM expert in the school district I work for, I've told all the Librarians to NOT buy from either the Apple iTunes store or Audible.com, to instead buy the books as CD's or even Cassette Tapes and then make their own DRM-less MP3 files for use on the players the district checks out to students.

    We don't do this to get around copyright law, we buy as many copies as are made available, but it is simply NOT WORTH THE TIME AND TROUBLE to deal with DRM.

    1. Re:Avoid Audible.com for your own peace of mind by douthat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Both Audible and iTunes audio books support CD Burning out of the box. If it is your prerogative, you can then rip the CDs to DRM-free mp3s or oggs, or whatever. The DRM is annoying, but not invasive, but using these services is really about the instant gratification. (You can also authorize your audible account on a seemingly endless number of computers and devices. There are also apparently some tools to strip the DRM in pure software.)

      --
      She loves me: 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0 She loves me not: 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688BF ...
    2. Re:Avoid Audible.com for your own peace of mind by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      So they should buy it, buy blank CDs, use proprietary software to burn it to those CDs, then rip it back to the computer.

      How is this is better than just buying the CDs and ripping them?

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    3. Re:Avoid Audible.com for your own peace of mind by shalla · · Score: 1, Interesting

      As the unwilling DRM expert in the school district I work for, I've told all the Librarians to NOT buy from either the Apple iTunes store or Audible.com, to instead buy the books as CD's or even Cassette Tapes and then make their own DRM-less MP3 files for use on the players the district checks out to students.

      And as a librarian, I'm appalled if they listen to you. Is it easier? Yes. Is it still copyright infringement if you aren't very strict? Yes.

      I think DRM is wrong, and this move is making my day. When this news first ran, I printed out the article, and I will shortly be referring to it to pressure the library e-audiobook suppliers to drop DRM from their books so that my patrons can use any mp3 player they want to listen to them.

      I know DRM is a pain in the ass. Every time I get a call from a patron who can't get the (*^&^% license to download properly for their e-audiobook, I mentally imagine slapping a publisher. I am the queen of multiple versions of screenshot-heavy step-by-step instructions for senior citizens on how to find, download, transfer, and listen to e-audiobooks on various systems with various pieces of software. But sadly, that only gives me a reason to be very pointed in my conversations with reps and to examine any alternatives that pop up. It still doesn't give me the right to break copyright.

      Maybe I misunderstood the way your librarians are using the books on tape/CD, though. I assumed you were using one book on CD to make multiple copies on multiple mp3 players to lend. Maybe that isn't the case. If not, I apologise. :)

    4. Re:Avoid Audible.com for your own peace of mind by jcouvret · · Score: 1

      Can anyone suggest good alternatives to Audible for purchasing digital audiobooks? I do hope that with Amazon's purchase of Audible that they will change their stance on DRM. Amazon was a key player in getting the music industry to drop DRM.

    5. Re:Avoid Audible.com for your own peace of mind by Dlugar · · Score: 1

      And as a librarian, I'm appalled if they listen to you. Is it easier? Yes. Is it still copyright infringement if you aren't very strict? Yes. ...
      Maybe I misunderstood the way your librarians are using the books on tape/CD, though. I assumed you were using one book on CD to make multiple copies on multiple mp3 players to lend. Maybe that isn't the case. If not, I apologise. :)

      "fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies ... for purposes such as ... teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use) ... is not an infringement of copyright."
      (US Code, Title 17, 1:107. Emphasis added.)

      Dlugar
      --
      Computer Go: Writing Software to Play the Ancient Game of Go
    6. Re:Avoid Audible.com for your own peace of mind by justsomecomputerguy · · Score: 1

      "We don't do this to get around copyright law, we buy as many copies as are made available"

      We ARE very strict. If we're are going to have 15 copies to circulate, then by gum we BUY 15 copies. What part of THAT LINE didn't you understand?!

      How can you write an otherwise coherent followup to my comment and miss that?!

      As the technical support to many librarians, whose ethics I find quite admirable, I am appalled that (even when missing that second clear sentence) you could misinterperet the intent of my first (albeit run-on) sentence! PLEASE re-read that first sentence and then realize that even though you think you're doing as much as you can to advocate for your patrons, you are not entirely in the right frame of mind. The thought process should not be "put up with DRM because distributor wants it their for the distributor's purposes/benefit even if it encumbers it to the point of being useless", but "What is the best way, within legal boundaries, to serve my patrons".

    7. Re:Avoid Audible.com for your own peace of mind by justsomecomputerguy · · Score: 1

      Two things: First, Loss of Quality is unacceptable when Converting from MP3s to CD then back to MP3 files. Second, our experience with Audible is that they do NOT like dealing with libaries, they are almost entirely geared towards individual consumers and as every FOUR devices we need to CALL an 800 number and get "reauthorized". Try doing that for 30 to 50 devices and see how much of a time waster that is. MORE than negates any time savings for the librarians. As for tools to strip out the DRM: it is easier to show all the librarians once how to use one tool (Audacity) to rip MP3s than it is to show them separate DRM stripping tools for each format.

    8. Re:Avoid Audible.com for your own peace of mind by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      Both Audible and iTunes audio books support CD Burning out of the box.

      I'm not arguing that you can't strip the DRM. The problem with the DRM is time involved in striping, and quality of said striped file. If you repeatedly burn and encode, I understand the file will downgrade. Now whether you can hear the difference is another thing, I for one have bad hearing so am unlikely to. It is still a hassle.

      Also, I remember hearing on Buzz Out Loud that there is a program just for removing DRM in the software. The name escapes me, but it plays the song to itself through the analog hole and re encodes. Again, time in the process (even encoding at 48x+), and possibility of audio loss. DRM free is more desirable and as stated above in thread, will sell.
      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    9. Re:Avoid Audible.com for your own peace of mind by shalla · · Score: 1

      Um, no. School librarians can't copy an entire audiobook multiple times and lend it out multiple times and claim that's fair use. Sorry. Not going to fly. There's a limit to how much of the whole you can copy and still have it be fair use for educational purposes. Also, the multiple copies for classroom use generally applies to things like photocopies of an essay from a collection or an article from a magazine that is copied for the whole class to read.

      I'll back my words up. If you look through the Copyright Office Circular 21: Reproduction of Copyrighted Works by Educators and Librarians, you'll see that the guidelines for use for both books and music fair use include the phrases "Copying shall not:(a) substitute for the purchase of books, publishers' reprints or periodicals;" (page 8) and "Copying for the purpose of substituting for the purchase of music, except as in A(1) and A(2) above." (page 9, and the exceptions wouldn't count for you.)

      Also, under the GUIDELINES FOR CLASSROOM COPYING IN NOT-FOR-PROFIT EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
      WITH RESPECT TO BOOKS AND PERIODICALS, Multiple Copies for Classroom Use it limits copying of prose: "(ii) Prose: (a) Either a complete article, story or essay of less than 2,500 words, or (b) an excerpt from any prose work of not more than 1,000 words or 10% of the work, whichever is less, but in any event a minimum of 500 words." (page 8, first column)

      The GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATIONAL USES OF MUSIC limits the copying of music to the following: "2. For academic purposes other than performance, single or multiple copies of excerpts of works may be made, provided that the excerpts do not comprise a part of the whole which would constitute a performable unit such as a section*, movement or aria, but in no case more than 10 percent of the whole work. The number of copies shall not exceed one copy per pupil.**" (page 9, second column)

      So as you can see, the precedent is essentially that even for classroom use, you cannot create multiple whole copies of an entire work. At most, you can make multiple copies of about 10% of it. There are other sections that further limit things like how often a teacher can do it (not every year for the same work).

      So buying one audiobook and copying it a bunch of times onto various iPods/mp3 players and lending it out to multiple students is a breach of copyright, even if done for their education. Sorry.

    10. Re:Avoid Audible.com for your own peace of mind by shalla · · Score: 1

      How can you write an otherwise coherent followup to my comment and miss that?!

      You know, I haven't a bloody clue, especially since I read that line several times. What the hell? I've gotta cut WAY back on the crack, I see. (Librarians with reading skillz? Unpossible!) I apologise.

      Way to go and rock on, then. :)

      The thought process should not be "put up with DRM because distributor wants it their for the distributor's purposes/benefit even if it encumbers it to the point of being useless", but "What is the best way, within legal boundaries, to serve my patrons".

      Actually, my thought process is more that SO many of my patrons want it and DO manage to use it even with the godsforsaken DRM on it that it's sort of a deal with the devil. Do I go without it and cut everyone off, or do we go with it, bitch, and pressure them to dump DRM and make it fully useable? I've opted for #2 (not that it's fully my choice, being part of a county-wide library consortium, but even if it were...). So although it wasn't fully expressed so that you understood it, my thought is to best serve my patrons... all of them, by getting what they want and trying by damndest to get it changed so it works for them.

      Of course, the thought of quitting e-audiobooks altogether is always tempting when I'm dealing with a problem over the phone, but when I'm not, sense prevails and I vote for some over none. (Rather like how I'd like to get rid of all our tax forms every time some idiot screams at me because we ran out of a specific form and are waiting for the state to send more and can only print it off the Internet for him/her. But when I'm not being screamed at, I know there are people out there who need a place to go pick up a paper copy, and the public library is now the only place to get it now that the legislators' offices, post offices, and state liquor stores all stopped carrying them.) Just don't let me vote when my eye is still twitching.

  12. They really would be better off with just PDFs by MikeRT · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What the publishers need to do is make an agreement with a few distribution channels to get their books out there in PDF format incredibly cheap. If I could buy a typical $8 paperback book on the iTMS and sync it to my iPod Touch for $3, I'd buy a lot more books. Not only that, but if you got it down to around $3, the publisher would have much fewer worries about piracy because it'd be clearly discounted for internet sales. One of the things that is just asinine is that most ebooks cost as much as the printed copies!

    I've debated a few IP expansionists on a subject that would do much more to hamper piracy: bringing IP under state property laws. You catch someone making a business off of your IP without you releasing it for free? How does grand theft sound instead of "copyright infringement" if it's really property? You want to get rid of serial piracy, especially the for-profit kind? Throw the punks in with the guys who commit real felony property crimes.

    Of course that's assuming IP is real property...

    1. Re:They really would be better off with just PDFs by STrinity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What the publishers need to do is make an agreement with a few distribution channels to get their books out there in PDF format incredibly cheap
      Please, no. PDFs should be reserved for files where the layout is important. With ebooks, I don't care if the pagination matches that of the dead-tree version. I'd much rather have some form of text markup language where the software can rewrap to make optimal use of my screen space.
      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    2. Re:They really would be better off with just PDFs by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I guess it depends on the book. For paperback novels, you are totally right. However, for textbooks and the like, I would have to say that having a specific layout can help in a lot of instances. You could probably develop a PDF reader than would output the book in a more plain text type format (similar to 1 column available on the Wii Opera browser) if you just wanted something without the layout.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:They really would be better off with just PDFs by Steve001 · · Score: 1

      STrinity wrote and included with a post:

      What the publishers need to do is make an agreement with a few distribution channels to get their books out there in PDF format incredibly cheap

      Please, no. PDFs should be reserved for files where the layout is important. With ebooks, I don't care if the pagination matches that of the dead-tree version. I'd much rather have some form of text markup language where the software can rewrap to make optimal use of my screen space.

      I strongly agree with this. One of the greatest advantages of e-books over physical books is that the formatting, font size, and typeface can be adjusted to fit both the user and the display device. With PDF, I've found that the document that looks great when printed on paper, is less satisfactory when viewed on my monitor, and is basically unreadable on my e-book reader. But with a format like HTML the text can automatically adjust to any device.

    4. Re:They really would be better off with just PDFs by amplt1337 · · Score: 1

      The problem with this is that publishers are already operating on very thin margins (I know, I work with them and have friends in the industry). This is because so many books that get published totally flop, and because authors actually get a fair shake with royalties (unlike music artists). That $8 paperback is cheap already, but the physical production costs are going to be around a dollar. Selling online at a $5 discount would probably push the profit-per-sale into the red.

      If you want to start an online-only publishing business that does away with physical copies and a lot of the expense of layout/composition etc, and can actually afford to spend money helping developing authors improve (the way editors did fifty years ago) and publishing lots of stuff that's not crap, you'll have a world-beating business. But meanwhile, all the experienced real-world publishers are consolidating because they already struggle to stay afloat.

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    5. Re:They really would be better off with just PDFs by Firehed · · Score: 1
      Why not HTML? I've put some books on my hacked iPhone, and all I did was copy some PDFs into a text document, wrap things in

      tags appropriately, and add a bit of spacing in some CSS. Seems simple enough to implement on pretty much any platform out there, especially since you can embed the CSS in the device itself that will optimize the output for the device.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  13. DRM only; 404 compatibility soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coming soon, to a website near you.

  14. DRM free by Plasmagrid · · Score: 1

    Quote "It encoded those audio books with a digital watermark and monitored online file sharing networks, only to find that pirated copies of its audio books had been made from physical CDs or DRM-encoded digital downloads whose anticopying protections were overridden."

    Did I miss something, they encoded to trace but wait, they found that the CD's were ripped and the DRM encoded ones were overridden

    well if then how did they trace it, nothing to trace on overridden encryption and nothing to track from a CD ripped.

    1. Re:DRM free by Icarium · · Score: 1

      Who's going to bother to try and remove a watermark that doesn't stop you from sharing the file, especially if you don't know it's there?

      It makes it a reasonable assumption then that if the pirate copies popping up are lacking the watermark, they must have been sourced by ripping cd's or removing/curcumventing the DRM.

      I would quote Sherlock Holmes, but I've never read it.

    2. Re:DRM free by Laughing+Pigeon · · Score: 1

      Quote "It encoded those audio books with a digital watermark and monitored online file sharing networks, only to find that pirated copies of its audio books had been made from physical CDs or DRM-encoded digital downloads whose anticopying protections were overridden."

      Did I miss something, they encoded to trace but wait, they found that the CD's were ripped and the DRM encoded ones were overridden

      well if then how did they trace it, nothing to trace on overridden encryption and nothing to track from a CD ripped.

      I think You did miss someting. When it is said that the books were encoded with a digital watermark that does not main they were encrypted into some illegible group of bits (what does happen when You digitally sign something). A watermarked file will still be the same to the listener but it can be recognized/detected when found on some p2p network or in a binaries group (look for steganography in your favourite search engine). Later DRM was put on them, they were encrypted (and then they were illegible). When being decrypted (i.e. de-drm'ed) the still watermarked file shows up and that was being made available on file sharing media, being open to recognition.

      If You watermark your product when You sell it to someone you can always trace back which customer put it on a file sharing network because You can use a unique watermark for each user (like someone else said, an email address and a name for example). It seems to be very difficult to create a watermarking systems that withstands re-encoding though, so if You would have bought an mp3 and recode it into another bitrate or format, the watermark will get damaged.

    3. Re:DRM free by amplt1337 · · Score: 1

      well if then how did they trace it, nothing to trace on overridden encryption and nothing to track from a CD ripped.

      The watermarks survive.

      Even if they didn't, the existence of copies online that aren't scans would prove that the digital versions were getting into the wild somehow.

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
  15. My take on ebooks and readers by zotz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My take on ebooks and readers:

    http://zotzbro.blogspot.com/2007/11/ereaders-and-ebooks.html

    Summary:

    You need a great reader at a great price.

    eBooks should be way less than regular books people.

    Have every regular book come with an eBook in a sleeve in the back or have a code printed in it that allows for a free download of the book.

    A bit more at the link and a place for more permanent comments.

    all the best,

    drew
    http://zotzbro.blogspot.com/

    --
    FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
    1. Re:My take on ebooks and readers by japhmi · · Score: 1

      Have every regular book come with an eBook in a sleeve in the back or have a code printed in it that allows for a free download of the book.

      Yes, yes, a thousand times YES!

      I love paper books, and I stare at a monitor for far too long as it is. For a first read through, paper is the best. If I decide that the book needs further attention, then an ebook with the ability to write notes and attach them to the pages (with indexing and searching). Having both in one package would be a dream come true.
      --
      "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
  16. 7. Variable type by davide+marney · · Score: 2, Insightful

    7. Variable type: With an ebook reader, you can zoom the font size to suit your needs and/or abilities. Invaluable.

    --
    "We receive as friendly that which agrees with, we resist with dislike that which opposes us" - Faraday
    1. Re:7. Variable type by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      8. No need to hold the screen.

      9. No need to turn pages.

      10. Flexible pagination.

      I've used both a TV and a computer monitor to read PDF ebooks from my couch with the scroll wheel of a wireless mouse, with the font size greatly increased as you mentioned. Adobe Reader with PDFs is really the worst case scenario compared to dedicated ebook readers, but even it has good options for reading ebooks. Set to Reading Mode, Continuous Pages (no page breaks) and Reflow zoom level. Then you can just scroll line-by-line.

      Much more convenient than holding a book, keeping it from closing, and turning pages. Can never get comfortable with books. It's so tiring. I'd rather read practically hands-free from my couch. Did I mention I'm really lazy?

    2. Re:7. Variable type by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      I had forgotten about number 7. For number 10, ebooks might move to passage/paragraph numbers.

      11. Clutter: My wife hates my book collection because it takes up space. I still have the books because I might want to read them some day, but all I'm really interested in is the words, not the paper they're written on. Once we can store them on paper, they are stored on the reader and your computer, but you don't have to use physical space to store them.
      12. Back-up-able: Put all your books on a physical disk the way you back up your pictures, and store in your bank safety deposit box the way you do your pictures, and your library is safe from most disasters that you'd have to worry about.
      13. Organization: Instead of figuring out how to physically store your books, and having to remember where each title is, you can use tags (author, genre, etc.) or search instead.
      14. Magazines and newspapers should become e-zines, and you should be able to have the entire collection of whatever magazine you like, or excerpt the articles you like and ditch the rest in short order. You should be able to pull your newspaper down from anywhere. Popular columnists can go 'independent,' and you would be able to get their newsletter, weekly column, etc. with one or two ads from their own website.
      15. Lower cost of entry for authors: You might see books released directly by an author that can't find a publisher, but one big, good review, and they'd find an audience. The author would get nearly all of the money by setting up an account to bill readers who voluntarily pay like with the Radiohead and NIN recent web releases. Some might write a book, and offer to release it once a certain amount of money has been pre-paid against the release of the book by fans of the author who are waiting for the next release. This might result in the return of the serial, the original episodic content.

      The only advantages to using a paper book are temporary (mostly technical) limitations that can eventually be overcome. The biggest obstacle will be the formatting and DRM issues (mentioned elsewhere, and which I agree with) and publisher reluctance, much like what the music industry is progressing through.

  17. So Just Watermark Them Then by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since the watermarks survive, as the content plays indistinguishably with them in there, but don't prevent copying, why don't they just watermark everything?

    If they charge your credit card when you download the watermarked content, they can just watermark the content with your card ID. Then if they catch a file out there in the wild, they can see who it came from, and investigate the cardholder and the contentholder with violating copyright law.

    If it's even worth the bother. They'll realize that people distributing some of the content for free to their friends the best advert for more content. And even if they give all the content away free, they'll realize that the content is just a way for people to connect to its author, so the content is advertisement for all kinds of other products: presubscription premiere releases, physical copy collector's items, schwag like T-shirts/posters/actionfigures, personal appearances, "author's picks" compilations of other content, recommendations of other authors, branded SUVs with the author's signature...

    The audience has already moved into the 21st Century "free content" economy. These dinosaurs are still selling CDs as if they're still in the business of selling plastic discs, that they emboss with content-encoded patterns as a marketing stunt. Well, they can't custom-watermark CDs so easily, and the costs of trucking them around is more than they "lose" on free downloads. They should get with the program before they're nothing but an obstacle.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:So Just Watermark Them Then by David.R.Benham · · Score: 0
      If your computer was compromised (trojen, stolen laptop, etc) your legitimately purchased and watermarked music collection might end up all over the internet. Sure they'd be traceable back to you, but you didn't do anything wrong.

      Or what about if you decide to sell your watermarked music and destroy all your copies when you do the transfer in order to do everything 'by the book'. Then the guy who bought it puts it on a file sharing network?

    2. Re:So Just Watermark Them Then by amplt1337 · · Score: 1

      This is book publishing, not music. The kind of tie-ins you're talking about are not and have never been a major revenue stream in this industry. Kiss will sell out stadiums' worth of tickets; when was the last time you or anyone you know paid more than a moderate venue cost to go to a book reading?

      Book publishing is seriously in trouble, because the Internet is already great competition for text-based information. Making books is expensive. Making good books is even more expensive. Good books are much easier to justify paying for than mediocre crap that you can hear on the radio anyway.

      Now, what WOULD reduce piracy is if all content industries required credit cards for online downloads or purchase of originally-digital media, and then watermarked the result with the credit card number such that you couldn't reproduce copies without handing out your credit information. That would be a big deterrent to some types of piracy, though it'd hardly fix it.

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    3. Re:So Just Watermark Them Then by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Yes, the criminal who stole your notebook can use your property to do damage without your being liable. Why is that a problem? Catching the physical thief should be even easier than catching a virtual pirate.

      And if you sell your watermarked music, it should be trivial to notify the watermark registry that you've deleted your copies in the transfer, and have them transfer the watermark to the buyer, who would confirm it. If the copies show up, the buyer has to prove that you didn't delete yours, contrary to what they confirmed, and that you illegally copied your old ones, or they're as liable as you would have been.

      Seems to me that the watermark makes the transfer of the content enough like transfer of physical property that finally using these property laws and enforcement techniques can be justified, because they'll work.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:So Just Watermark Them Then by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I dunno, the biggest victims of book piracy, like _Harry Potter_'s publishers, attract the equivalent of "sell-out" crowds the first day the book is released. They could charge for access, especially if the author is actually there. They also have a lot more revenue from cross-licensing the book, including to TV, movies, collectible objects, even just marketing other products. All of which increases in value by an increased market familiarity, which the bootlegged copies all build without any cost at all.

      Smaller circulation books don't really suffer much from piracy. And this is audiobook piracy. The audiobook consumer is certainly a good target market for more products, even if they're just other audiobooks. The more people in that market, which again is grown at no cost to the legitimate publisher by pirated copies, the more other audiobooks can be sold to them, even if less than 100% legitimate copies. Especially popular would be subscriptions, which are harder for pirates to deliver (and each new issue gives a new chance to get caught), but cheaper and easier for legit publishers.

      And I said how watermarking alone can protect. Publishing is a game of statistics. A smaller share than 100% of a bigger pie is worth it.

      Physical book publishing is in trouble. But that's an entirely different problem that has nothing to do with DRM.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:So Just Watermark Them Then by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I said "investigate", not "prosecute". The evidence of your watermark in the wild isn't enough to conclude that you were party to illegal copying. In fact, the recent ruling that just exposing your storage to the public on the Internet doesn't make you liable for copying means that many legitimate downloaders aren't liable even when it's copied. But transaction records can show that the person who downloaded it didn't have the right to do it.

      The watermarks can't be so easily detected or removed. The simple way to hide them is to use the download ID itself as the index into the data, then brute forcing it from the relatively short (secret) list of IDs (GUIDs from a very large, but sparsely and randomly populated namespace). Or a secret number from a very short list that's the key to which bit the watermark starts in. The watermarks then run a pseudorandom walk through a small percentage of the low bits of the entire file, indistinguishable from inherent noise. Watermark contains the download ID, and thereby the identity of the original downloader. That cheap and fairly simple watermarking is not going to get cracked or discarded without reducing the quality of the recording.

      And I said that eventually these publishers would see that overall limiting the copying is a losing game, compared to what I described. But since they're not there yet, they could at least admit we're all well past DRM, even if we're not to completely unencumbered - or eventually, even publisher-assisted - freely copied content.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    6. Re:So Just Watermark Them Then by amplt1337 · · Score: 1

      the biggest victims of book piracy, like _Harry Potter_'s publishers, attract the equivalent of "sell-out" crowds the first day the book is released.
      Harry Potter is a unique phenomenon in the history of publishing. Seriously, if you could see a chart of the Nielsen Bookscan numbers (they track sales of books the same way they track TV popularity) there is this HUGE spike when HP7 came out, which is basically the equivalent of an anthill that's visible from outer space. There is NOTHING like this anywhere else in the publishing world.
      That aside, even perennial bestsellers, like Dave Barry or Terry Goodkind (to pick a few random names), don't really generate much revenue. Their appearances generate buzz (and that's why they go on book tours), but they're not a revenue stream of themselves, and therefore really wouldn't help conventional publishers. Can you seriously imagine someone paying the same price to hear, like, Clive Griffin speak, as they currently do to go to Stones concerts? The live-performance revenue stream just isn't there, and that's the strongest argument for the "recorded-music-should-be-free" folks. And can you really imagine your favorite author being able to write so many good books if he were busy travelling the country doing readings all the time? Musicians do it, but they're making a totally different product.

      You mention cross-marketing in movies etc. also -- actually, given how much creative ownership authors maintain over their books, I'm pretty sure that publishing houses don't see a huge cut from this (but don't quote me on that). Regardless, you're saying that books should be free (pirated or not) because it'll drive up the cost of the movie rights; that doesn't seem like a very good bet to me. If nothing else, the studios are going to say "Look, you have a huge audience that's used to not expecting to pay anything for this; they're just going to pirate our movies!" Although I suppose if movies were also free, we could then fund the movies with ad sales and live performances... there's tons of profitability in live theatre, right?

      The more people in that market, which again is grown at no cost to the legitimate publisher by pirated copies, the more other audiobooks can be sold to them

      "No cost" is more a sunk cost to piracy, which publishers acknowledge is unaffected by DRM. Publishers are being more mature about it probably because they're used to people loaning books to each other and borrowing them from the libraries; but because of those current means of free access, piracy has fewer "unrecognized positive benefits" for the book market than for the music market.
      Piracy may be growing the market, but my instinct says that when somebody pirates a book (audio or no) despite the other free means of getting ahold of it, they're more likely to pirate more books (which isn't so true for music). Besides, publishers already do this by giving out free chapters of books online.

      Physical book publishing is in trouble. But that's an entirely different problem that has nothing to do with DRM.
      It's the fundamental problem: where does the content for those audiobooks come from? I agree that the DRM is stupid and should be removed; but I disagree that the same "there-are-other-revenue-streams" logic that I'll happily apply to music production will work with book (or audiobook) publishing. I just think that these two types of products are substantially different in their purpose and consumption patterns, and I don't think that the arguments from one realm of copyright apply to the other.

      What it comes down to is that for music, recordings are effectively epiphenomena; for books, they're pretty much the whole ballgame.

      Or perhaps it's just that I'm perfectly happy in a world without corporate music, but I rather like good books, and a world without editors sounds a bit too much like wading through google looking for diamonds in slime. All the crap the RIAA feeds us about music is self-interested smoke; but for publishers, it's actually true.

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
  18. Doh!-R-M by DotNetFreak · · Score: 1

    I think that even Homer Simpson would have been able to understand that: Protecting digital content from someone who *already* paid for it makes no sense. It's like taking out insurance for the purpose of protecting you from yourself if you develop multiple personality disorder. Sheesh... (or as we say in our native language, "bliksem!")

    1. Re:Doh!-R-M by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      (or as we say in our native language, "bliksem!")
      No, we don't. And anyone who would say that would receive weird looks. Unless he's called "Jommeke" that is.
  19. Bleah... wake me up when they add eBooks... by argent · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was briefly excited until I realized that this had nothing to do with multi-format eBooks.

    Guess I'll stick with Fictionwise and Baen for a while more.

  20. inaccurate subject by trawg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    would it have been that hard to prefix it with 'audio'? I don't care about audiobooks

  21. mnb Re:abandon ebooks too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consequently the whole ebook scene has been transformed into a wasteland of warring factions...

    I thought you were talking about #bookz on undernet for a moment there.
  22. The issue so far by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    has been the ability to get books on a reader. At this time, I have been unable to load anything interesting on an ebookwise reader. IOW, it was 100 poorly spent. Once the DRM gets dropped, I would load many different books on it. But I also do not want to 400 for a reader. That is ridiculous. Once a real reader is available for ~100 AND they have the ability to easily load books AND the books are available, then we will see a massive take off. And yes, the publishers will back these. Why? Because book printings costs money. So does the equipment, the ppl, etc. In fact, once these take off, we will see paper-backs disappear slowly. Hard and leather covers will make a resurgence. Companies like Easton press will actually do BETTER, not worse. But the all the paper back companies will disappear within 10 years of the above condition.
    BTW, the reason why easton will do better is that paperbacks compete against them, while e-books will actually show what books to print.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  23. Books on MP3 ... by Rick+Richardson · · Score: 1

    I bought serial number #1 from them, "The Pleasure of finding things out", on MP3 CD.

    Then, they went DRM.

    From: Doreen Moore
    Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 12:21:58 -0700

    Dear Mr. Richardson,

            We just created our first MP3-CD recording. It is available for purchase
    only
    for 19.00. The title is "The Pleasure of Finding Things Out" by Richard
    Feynman.

    It will be a slow process initially, but hopefully within the next few
    months we can release an initial batch of about 50 or so titles to start,
    then expand the collection from there.

    Within the next few years I'm sure we will get involved with streaming audio
    formats as that technology becomes more feasible and more widespead.

    Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance. Thank you.
    Sincerely,

    Doreen Moore, Customer Service Representative
    Books on Tape, Inc.
    www.booksontape.com
    Phone: (800) 626-3333
    Fax: (714) 825-0756

  24. STOP GIVING ME 40% OFF! by freedomwrangler · · Score: 0

    I'd buy MORE books if the publishers stopped giving me 40% off hardcover price and include the ebook and MP3. Paying $30-$40 for all three is tolerable, IMHO.

  25. MOD parent up by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    This is actually very important. Like school books, these are a huge costs to societies to maintain books. In addition, libraries suffer in that only one person can access a material at a time. For schools, that has normally meant that children are competing for a resource. Now a resource is infinite and at little cost to preserve.

    Just thinking about it, I wonder if some form of DRM should be developed and made free for readers that will enable a time limited access to a resource. That would enable a library to buy an e-book. The only problem is that companies will take the idea, pervert it and destroy the concept before it has time to take hold.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  26. Re:Good, now I can start pirating them. by sm62704 · · Score: 1

    This is a nerd site, not an RIAA lawyer site, Mr Troll.

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  27. So, so wrong by nightsweat · · Score: 1

    I'm exactly the kind of consumer marketers want to get. I buy things only when they make sense and I usually influence friends and family to buy the same thing because I make smart choices. I'm about 15% away from buying an e-book reader, and if the Kindle looked like the Sony reader or if the Sony had the instant download and instant buy feature of the Kindle, I'd have bought one.

    My wife is a doctor and she lugs huge books around with her - up to 20-25 pounds at a time. If she could put those books into an e-book reader, she'd do it in a minute.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  28. Confirmation of my three-stage theory? by Rhapsody+Scarlet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've made a three-stage theory on DRM:

    1) DRM is introduced, many bold claims are made about it, manufacturers are very excited about it, cracking efforts begin.
    2) The DRM starts to get cracked, new schemes are introduced with equally bold claims, many legal threats are made, but it starts to become clear that this isn't working.
    3) Investigations are done into how beneficial DRM is, and the results aren't favourable to DRM. The DRM is deemed to be costly and useless, and is promptly abandoned.

    e-books seem to be moving towards stage 3 right now. Of course, there is the possible stage 4 to be concerned about.

    4) Stage 3 is somehow forgotten, DRM is re-introduced, many bold claims are made about it...

    1. Re:Confirmation of my three-stage theory? by Technician · · Score: 1

      The DRM is deemed to be costly and useless, and is promptly abandoned.

      Almost right.. DRM kills sales cutting into revenue. There fixed it.

      DRM introduces vendor lock-in. By nature, this is a compatibility problem, a backup problem and a hardware upgrade replacement cycle problem. These problems make it a sales problem. I don't buy media with an expiration date. Music or other content tied to only one of my pieces of hardware which can't be backed up, and the hardware can't be upgraded or replaced is for the birds.

      Apple with the iPods has addressed some of these issues. DRM free MP3's has addressed the rest. e-readers haven't come nearly as far yet.

      The, it will play on my Sony reader but won't play on it's replacement is the problem. The problem is killing sales.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  29. Then, there's the library by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

    "A heavy reader will make up that $400 in a year or so, and then start pulling ahead."

    Use the library. The Kindle falls behind to start and falls further behind with each book you read.

    Plus, librarians are sexy! They're fighting for our 1st amendment rights.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:Then, there's the library by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Librarians are sexy! They're fighting for our 1st amendment rights. That's not true at all. A librarian is a government employee, and she's always shushing me!!!

    2. Re:Then, there's the library by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      and she's always shushing me! ...then you're doing it wrong!
      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  30. If only they'd have asked us... by stinerman · · Score: 1

    Their logic? DRM just doesn't work.

    It's a shame it took them this long to figure that out. They could have asked any one of us and we would have told them that for a $20,000 consulting fee.

    (apologies to Mr. Black for ripping him off)
    1. Re:If only they'd have asked us... by pxuongl · · Score: 1

      But you know... business models are just like a science (to use a science analogy) in that ideas and hypothesis need to be proven beyond a doubt to be true before it's accepted as a viable business model/theory. and even then, those business practices are thoroughly dissected and analyzed before mass adoption. in this case, the issue of using or not using DRM needed to be put thru it's paces at the most conservative level.

      and while you claim to be able to have told them that for a $20k fee, i think you would've been grossly short changing yourself because you would be doing a ton of work to prove what you're saying... something a large industry would happily pay millions for if the data and conclusions are incontrovertible.

      and the complete absence of DRM is just as bad as high levels of DRM. We all lock our doors at night, not because it'll prevent all robbery, but it prevent opportunistic theft. and that's how DRM should be used. Just a sprinkle of it - enough to discourage a person from casually pirating music... but for those who really want to, no level of DRM will be enough. maybe just a digital watermark to identify the person the music was originally sold to at most.

  31. Hallelujah! by phaggood · · Score: 1

    Yay! Yay! Yay!

    Do I sound sufficiently excited? I thought my audible.com subscription; up to 5 books/mo for $20, was a great bargain; unfortunately when I dumped the last Windows box in my house I lost access to their library (and iTunes, but Amazon's DRM-less mp3 store is proving an adequate replacement). I would *love* to be able to subscribe to audible again, especially now with my new Palm Centro which is slowly replacing my old cell, my palm and my iPod. They keep sending me email inviting me back, and I keep responding that I can't until they drop DRM; no response from them on this request however.

  32. Tor books is giving away books for free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found out from this guy that book publisher Tor is giving away free e-books. Not just no DRM.

  33. mas vale tarde que nunca by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Insightful


    The computer software industry generally realized twenty years ago that copy protection schemes cause more problems than they solve. (When was the last time you had to look up a word in a printed manual, or attach a hardware dongle, in order to run a piece of software?) Copy protection is rarely difficult to circumvent, adds to the costs of media distribution, provides no benefit to the legitimate customer, and often drives legitimate customers to become illegitimate for the sake of convenience.

    It's nice to see a sign of hope that other digital content industries may finally be coming to the same conclusions.

    1. Re:mas vale tarde que nunca by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      or attach a hardware dongle, in order to run a piece of software?
      Isn't that what you're doing when you have to insert a game CD when the game is installed to the hard drive?

      I think soon we're likely to start seeing games distributed on modified USB flash drives. That could function as a dongle, would save the time to install the game, would save the user's hard drive space, and would run faster.

  34. Ebook DRM is easily worked around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Since Kindle has DRM

    Ebook DRM has the same analog hole as the others, all you need is a digital camera and OCR software.

    And enough time, of course (which is probably why people tend to illegally trade their non-DRM ebooks with each other, it distributes the work over more people).

  35. What a hasty decision! by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

    Non-DRM books: merely a few centuries of proven success, only adding up to a few trillion dollars of revenue to date.

    DRM books: a few years of lost revenue, customers complaints about interoperability problems, and watching your non-DRM-using competitors eat you alive.

    C'mon, you can't compare a few years of loss to centuries of success. That's apples to oranges! Clearly, the jury is still out of telling customers to go fuck themselves because you don't need their stinking money. What would you do with their filthy stinking useless money anyway, other than spend it on tech support for the DRM-caused problems? It's still an untried business model. How disappointed I am, that they gave up on the grand experiment of turning away customers. I'm sure telling customers to go fuck themselves and give their money to competitors, would have eventually worked out, if only they had persevered.

    Quitters. Cowards! The anti-DRM crowd is just a bunch of lame asses who only care about raking disgusting heaps of profit. Businesses doesn't need that type. The publishing world will soon forget your puny centuries of accrued wealth and prosperity. The poverty revolution is still coming, and soon the publishers will renew the race to see who can lose money the fastest. You anti-DRM hippies will be left out in the cold, shivering in your piles of cold hard cash.

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump