"But this young man did violate school rules and regulations and he understood the severity of the rules he broke...." - Dist. Supt. Fitzsimons
The kid was 13 years old, do you really think he had a grasp on the consequences? Do you think that before he decided to break into his school's computer systems, he honestly thought he might go to jail for what he was doing?
This angers me because it's the parents role to teach kids right and wrong, and as such, I think that unless someone is in serious danger, the parents should be contacted before action is taken against a 13-year-old. I think that Shinjan's parents should have been the ones to first discuss with him, his 'crimes' and their consequences. I mean really, where did the kid get the idea that he was going to go to jail?
and not a single mention during the Superbowl.
on
The Challenger
·
· Score: 1
I have a Sony S360 DVD player, and not only does it play VCD CD-Rs that I've burnt, but it also plays VCD CD-RWs. (along with playing burned audio CDs)
Um, weren't Turing's Bombes used to crack the Enigma? Weren't the Bombes just a set of 12 enigma scarmblers connected in series? No turing machine involved. Atleast that's what I got from Singh's book...
From all the reports I've read, Bill Gates is apparently a very intelligent, and very well-spoken man, despite the alleged evil that lurks in his heart. This letter, while seemingly well written, and with many good examples, contains far too many sentences I've seen in Linux related articles. (Would Bill Gates really use the term FUD?)
I have a very difficult time believing that this message came from Microsoft, but rather from someone in the Linux community with the intention of spurring peace and harmony among open-source developers by trying to show them the error of their ways.
I agree, in fact, Singh makes mention in the Introduction to The Code Book that "The history of codes is so inordinately rich, that I have been forced to leave out many fascinating stories, which in turn means that my account is not definitive." He then provides a list of further reading for those who choose to deepen their experience.
Actually, I was watching CBS's Big Brother lab rats on bigbrother2000.com (because I really have no life) and they were talking about Survivor, and how Rich won, and how when he got back, his kid had gained weight.
Apparently he was very abusive towards his kid because of this, forcing him to run and what not, and that he got done with child abuse. He was still allowed to claim his prize.
What will that prove? Any script kiddie can DoS a box, why not leave the machine alone, if all you're going to do is tie it up for the people who might be making an intelligent effort to penetrate it?
Slashdot Mirror
"But this young man did violate school rules and regulations and he understood the severity of the rules he broke...." - Dist. Supt. Fitzsimons
The kid was 13 years old, do you really think he had a grasp on the consequences? Do you think that before he decided to break into his school's computer systems, he honestly thought he might go to jail for what he was doing?
This angers me because it's the parents role to teach kids right and wrong, and as such, I think that unless someone is in serious danger, the parents should be contacted before action is taken against a 13-year-old. I think that Shinjan's parents should have been the ones to first discuss with him, his 'crimes' and their consequences. I mean really, where did the kid get the idea that he was going to go to jail?
But Stormin' Norman got some praise.
I have a Sony S360 DVD player, and not only does it play VCD CD-Rs that I've burnt, but it also plays VCD CD-RWs. (along with playing burned audio CDs)
I learned Java in First year Comp Sci at U of Toronto, that was back in 1997.
Um, weren't Turing's Bombes used to crack the Enigma? Weren't the Bombes just a set of 12 enigma scarmblers connected in series? No turing machine involved. Atleast that's what I got from Singh's book...
Tucows' OpenSRS doesn't seem to mind
From all the reports I've read, Bill Gates is apparently a very intelligent, and very well-spoken man, despite the alleged evil that lurks in his heart. This letter, while seemingly well written, and with many good examples, contains far too many sentences I've seen in Linux related articles. (Would Bill Gates really use the term FUD?)
I have a very difficult time believing that this message came from Microsoft, but rather from someone in the Linux community with the intention of spurring peace and harmony among open-source developers by trying to show them the error of their ways.
I agree, in fact, Singh makes mention in the Introduction to The Code Book that "The history of codes is so inordinately rich, that I have been forced to leave out many fascinating stories, which in turn means that my account is not definitive." He then provides a list of further reading for those who choose to deepen their experience.
I wonder if the vulnerability came from poking and prodding slashcode, or from a break into the database server?
This is great, I can totally see hard-core BNL fans now digging around Napster trying to 'collect' all the variations of ad mp3's.
Way to go guys!
Finish eggs, grab empty carton, scan barcode into grocery list, hotsync palm, dump grocery list to palm.
vs.
Finish eggs, scribble "eggs" on notepad stuck to fridge.
Seems like an aweful lot of work to make a grocery list, however, I do like the recipe database idea.
True, true.
While I agree with you about Bush, I can't help but feel that there's something wrong with this...
Actually, I was watching CBS's Big Brother lab rats on bigbrother2000.com (because I really have no life) and they were talking about Survivor, and how Rich won, and how when he got back, his kid had gained weight.
Apparently he was very abusive towards his kid because of this, forcing him to run and what not, and that he got done with child abuse. He was still allowed to claim his prize.
Creative doesn't need to come up with their own SBLive Linux, Mandrake's Lothar can get it working no problem!
Some people's kids...