Slashdot Mirror


Naughty Words in Domains

benny_c writes "I decided to make an online Christmas card for my friends, and the domain name I was after has the 'Fword' in it. While I am articulate enough to speak without dropping that bomb (most of the time), it is an integral part of the running joke behind the site. I was somewhat disturbed when I tried to search on nsi.com which returned the message 'The domain name requested was not accepted because it was inappropriate.'" The story continues, read on. (Caution: you may see four ascii characters in the range 97-122 which, when concatenated, offend you.)

register.com just said the site is unavailable, as is any other domain which happens to have the wrong string of four letters (even when surrounded by giberish ... try searching for something like ewqsdfuckdfd). I am sure that if I keep looking I will find another registrar who does want my business. I was wondering though whether anybody else has had potential domain names censored for something other than the 'Fbomb', and what else might be taboo amongst the registrars.'

The secret is to speak another language, or find a friend who does, and register your domain using a registrar based in a non-English-speaking country. I speak a little German so I tried it, and while I didn't actually spend the money to take the final steps, I was told by three separate registrars that "Die Domain fuck12065237.com ist noch frei!"

If anyone tries this, let us know how it works. If you find any other taboo words, in English or any other language, tell us the details!

Here's the list of accredited registrars, including many in non-English-speaking countries.

307 comments

  1. Re:Can anyone explain the logic behind this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    What are the seven taboo words?
    The seven "classic" words, as popularized by George Carlin, are shit, piss, fuck, cunt, cocksucker, motherfucker, and tits.
  2. domainpeople... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    a friend of mine registered "completelyfucked.com" at domainpeople.com ... i would suggest them. www.domainpeople.com

  3. Re:It seems to have a different meaning in the US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Well, as my nine-year-old has already told me, "F*ck" is clearly a short form of "Fire truck". This before he ran away sniggering.

    Seeing as I am not bound by Constitutional restrictions, however, I saw fit to punish the little f*cker for his misbehavior.

  4. Re:Can anyone explain the logic behind this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    French swearwords are all to do with religion

    MERDE! No,they aren't.

    VACHE is about as rude as it gets...

    No, no religion there.

  5. Hahahaha... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    LMAO!

    Hopefully you punished him for incorrectly applying a short form to the word "Fire Truck" and not for utilising F*ck. I remember my mom used always call me and my brother little sh*ts! when we were growing up.

    That's pretty rich though, I gotta admit. Can't wait till mine thinks it's funny - of course then I'll have to explain to him why it really *is* funny! (as well as explaining why he shouldn't use it that often since most of the people he will come into contact with won't agree with his open-minded fathers opinion...)

  6. NSI = fuck.com domain squatters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Can anyone here demonstrate prior business use of "fuck" -- you could take NSI to arbitration and under the cybersquatting rules.. :)

  7. That's a backronym by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The word Fuck comes from the word "Fukar", which means "to grow" (a man's penis grows before sex.)

    1. Re:That's a backronym by TheGreatAvatar · · Score: 1

      from Merriam-Webster

      Main Entry: 1fuck
      Pronunciation: 'f&k
      Function: verb
      Etymology: akin to Dutch fokken to breed (cattle), Swedish dialect fokka to copulate
      Date: 1503
      intransitive senses
      1 usually obscene : COPULATE -- sometimes used in the present participle as a meaningless intensive
      2 usually vulgar : MESS 3 -- used with with transitive senses
      1 usually obscene : to engage in coitus with -- sometimes used interjectionally with an object (as a personal or reflexive pronoun) to express anger, contempt, or disgust
      2 usually vulgar : to deal with unfairly or harshly : CHEAT, SCREW

      --
      Three things are certain: Death, taxes, and lost data. Guess which has occurred.
    2. Re:That's a backronym by c0sm0 · · Score: 1

      the world fuck comes from the acronym For Unlawfull Carnal Knowledge which was an old legal term.

  8. Use Speednames (www.speednames.com) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Speednames ( http://www.speednames.com/ ) don't have any problem registering domain with the word 'fuck' in them (or any other words for that matter), so I suggest you go to them and register your domain.

  9. www.fuck.it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Try this one on for size www.fuck.it

  10. Censorship is a must in a civilized society. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Folks, we can't allow foulmouthed domains to exist. They are obscene and thus illegal. Maybe if some of you so called geeks would pick up a Bible instead of staring at a screen all day you would realize this. There are inherently bad words and the "f word" is certainly one of them. The first ammendment only protects good speach not foulmouthed speech or pornography. Foulmouthedness is ruining our families and society. We must do everything we can to stop it from spreading to our children and punish them severely when they utter a bad word.

    1. Re:Censorship is a must in a civilized society. by mors · · Score: 1

      If you are going to feed the trolls, at least do so with a litle humour.

    2. Re:Censorship is a must in a civilized society. by Grand+Facade · · Score: 1

      Fuck You!

      --
      Rick B.
    3. Re:Censorship is a must in a civilized society. by mpe · · Score: 2

      Maybe if some of you so called geeks would pick up a Bible instead of staring at a screen all day you would realize this.

      Let' s see, just in Genesis we have no shortage of murder, rape, child abuse and genocide. Maybe some people need to actually read the text rather than just thump the book.

    4. Re:Censorship is a must in a civilized society. by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 2

      Ah, but the mass destruction was performed through God's power, so that's okay.

    5. Re:Censorship is a must in a civilized society. by shrike99 · · Score: 1

      I've never seen 'fuck' in the Bible. I've read a lot about how the Lord forgives all and loves us all though. Even those who espouse the use of the word 'fuck'. A bad work is only a bad word when the speaker has intent behind it. Isn't this obvious?

      --
      "Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life." Terry Pratchet
    6. Re:Censorship is a must in a civilized society. by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      As the guy who just 20 minutes ago registered fuckhumanity.org (no href, 'cuz it won't have content for a couple o' days) I say to thee Fuck You. The first ammendment applies to everyone, whether you like it or not. Besides, I consider fuck to be a perfectly good word to express my strong discourse at something; I usually say it when I need to release some steam, since I hate smiting people.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    7. Re:Censorship is a must in a civilized society. by PyRoNeRd · · Score: 1
      Eventually the USA will have to come to terms with the viewpoint of the Europeans and ban all discriminatory speech on the American part of the internet.

      The USA signed the International Declaration of Humanrights and Freedom From Discrimination is one of the most important rights granted by that document. The USA can't continue to upset the world by allowing discrimination to exist in their part of the (one) world.

      Censorship is the only way to guarantee the freedom of all people, not just the ones with the loud offensive mouths who hurt people and silence them into submission.

    8. Re:Censorship is a must in a civilized society. by autocracy · · Score: 2

      Your ignorance is a paramount example of what is needed to destroy a civilized society. Your opinions and lack of thought are of the most dangerous forms. Outlawing cuss words is just one more step in the direction of the total loss of freedom.

      I'll cut you some slack now and say that ethics should take some effect in areas like this, but come off it. This is a part of a joke, and as was said - nobody's forcing you to look at it.

      See if this sounds familiar - "First they came for the ..., but I didn't speak up because I wasn't a ..., then they came for me, but there was nobody left to speak up for me."

      --
      SIG: HUP
    9. Re:Censorship is a must in a civilized society. by m2t · · Score: 1

      Wow, shit, the bible is starting to sound better and better judging from your (and the poster below you) posts!

    10. Re:Censorship is a must in a civilized society. by code9 · · Score: 1
      Let no unclean communication proceed from your lips.

      I often consider the case of the "organized Church" against abortion - trying to prohibit it by legal means. I am a born again Christian, and I believe it to be wrong, as I believe the use of profanity to be wrong, but I realize that God has given each one of us a free will and the right to choose what we want to do. Do we, mere mortals and as believers in particular, therefore have a right to forbid people from doing certain things? Or to condemn them for doing so?

      Love your neighbor as yourself

      You also show a lack of discenrment of the issues. I like profane domain names no more than you do, but I understand that the issue here is the principle of freedom to register them. Domain name registrars are not to make moral judgements or restrict "permissible" domains, and just as someone said, what stops them from prohibiting the use of even part of a corporations name in your own domain?

      Furthermore, the tone of your comment shows no respect for the society in whose forums you speak, naming us as "so called geeks". Your attitude is derogeratory, and that is wrong as well. Jesus said consider others better than yourselves. Lead by example.

      In conclusion, rather than attempting to proscribe "foulmouthed domains", try to reach out and touch people so that they wouldn't feel the need to use profanity.

    11. Re:Censorship is a must in a civilized society. by hwilker · · Score: 1

      Not to forget, in later parts of the Old Testament, several counts of incest, use of WMD (weapons of mass destruction), more murder, and so on. The N.T. actually starts with an instance of infanticide on a mind-boggling scale, with the guilty party saying "Ah didn inhale... eh, order that!". Which, of course, is a lie.

      --
      -- H. Wilker
    12. Re:Censorship is a must in a civilized society. by teaserX · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing your just trying to stir up some "shizat". Who made you the judge of which free speech is good free speech and which is bad. You must be the guy that registered http://www.kkk.com Were you the same "Anonymous Coward" that voted for Buchanan?

      --
      We really need your help
      http://www.gofundme.com/help-sherry
    13. Re:Censorship is a must in a civilized society. by unanimous+cowered · · Score: 2

      >They are obscene and thus illegal.

      yes, Obscenity == illegal.
      Unfortunately for you, profanity != obscenity.
      IANAL, but last time I checked, the only thing that is considered illegal under the "obscene" thing is child pornography, and that because it depicts an illegal act.

      >The first ammendment only protects good speach

      Er, that's "speech" and "amendment", but in any case, you're full of crap. The first Amendment is designed precisely to protect speech that people don't like. If no one was offended, there would be no need to protect it, now would there?

      --

      Dietcrack.com -- Death to All Baldwins!

  11. secondly... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1
    Just to test my assumption, I just registered "go-fuck-yourself.org" at joker.com. I doubt I'll ever use it, but it's kinda cute, I guess.

    - A.P.

    --
    * CmdrTaco is an idiot.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:secondly... by boy+case · · Score: 1

      Brilliant!! :-) +5 funny definitely. You just gotta love geek humour...

  12. firstly... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 3
    ...why the hell were you registering through NSI? Every single registrar out there is better than NSI, whose customer service is, seriously, the worst in the business.

    You'll have no trouble registering domain names with "dirty" words in them (including "fuck" and "shit") with other registrars, such as register.com and joker.com.

    - A.P.

    --
    * CmdrTaco is an idiot.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  13. Can't they do this? by Alan · · Score: 2

    I'm probably missing some huge point, or not clear on the concept (and I'm sure I'll be reminded of that if it is the case), but why can't they do this? If I run a site and I don't want to see swear words (personally I don't fucking care myself :) don't I have the right to filter out?

    If NSI doesn't want to allow certain words to searched on, or domains to be registered, why can't they? They are a company just like everyone else, and just because everyone wants a *fuck*.com address, does that mean they have to let them? Hallmark doesn't have to use every greeting card idea sent to them, and a car dealership has the right to kick your ass off their lot if you're wandering around with a sign saying "fuck everyone". Ok, streching a bit I know.... :)

    Anyway, just my thoughts... I don't agree with them, but I don't nesissarily think that they (the company) has no say in what they do.

  14. Re:Sounds like a free speech issue to me by J.+J.+Ramsey · · Score: 2

    The ruling was that "indecent" expression is protected while "obscene" is not, and what was considered "obscene" by the Supreme Court was, if I remember right, the kind of stuff that would probably be vile enough to make the author of goatse.cx throw up, that is, pretty raw, hard core stuff. Curse words, like the F-word and such, would be considered "indecent" rather than "obscene," I believe.

  15. Re:I remembered hearing something similar about AO by Stormie · · Score: 1

    The story you remember hearing was about the early days of AOL when they installed a filtering program over all their software. It's primary purpose was to stop people creating "rude" usernames and/or swearing in chat rooms.

    I had an amusing problem using the internet cafe at Debenhams (a department store in London). They had some little patch installed so you couldn't swear in text boxes in IE. So for instance, if I was there right now, and I tried to type the word "fuck" in this comment, it would come out as "****".

    OK, fair enough. But what I didn't realise was that it was also applying this filter to masked input boxes, like for passwords on websites. Of course you didn't notice this, because whatever you typed showed up as *'s anyway. Only problem was, the password for my online banking had, um, a naughty word in it.

    I don't know HOW many times I tried to log on to my online banking from there. I KNEW my password was right, but it kept getting rejected. My account got locked (which sucked, because I had to phone them to get it unlocked, and it was an Australian bank and I was in London), I was ready to kill!

    And then, like a thunderbolt, it struck me what was going wrong.

    I had to laugh. After I'd gone to a different internet cafe, and changed my password, anyway. :-)

  16. Fuck by mors · · Score: 1
    Fuck! The fucking fuckers fucking fucked the fucking dns.

    See, we cant do without the word fuck.

  17. Re:Can anyone explain the logic behind this? by Rob+Parkhill · · Score: 1

    Shit fuck satan death sex drugs rape
    These seven words you try to take.
    Shit fuck satan death sex drugs rape
    Right or wrong it's our choice to make.
    America the beautiful, land of the free
    Don't change the words to land of hypocrisy

    Credit to Anthrax.

    --
    "Tomorrow's forecast: a few sprinkles of genius with a chance of doom!" - Stewie Griffin
  18. Re:The Triumph of the Juvenile by Amphigory · · Score: 2
    Profanity, when used with thoughtfully and with moderation, can be an amazingly powerful thing. It is true that the vast majority of profanity use is heavy-handed and ineffectual, and is spouted for the sake of sensationalism; to suggest, however, that the very utterance of a profane word reduces an individual to idiocy smacks of intellectual eletism. To infer that profanity exists only in the realm "potty and shock humor" is akin to thinking that anybody with a classic New England drawl owns a summer house in the Hamptons.
    Name me a counter-example. Seriously: show me one case where the use of vulgarity (profanity is when you use the Lord's name in vain, not just ordinary cussin') serves to advance a cause that matters where the use of "respectable" language could not work better. There aren't any. All profanity will do, however artfully you use it, is detract from your position among those who still care about it.

    As for your complaints against my elitism... My point was not my "elite" status. My point was that Slashdot has changed. Could it be perhaps that you interpreted it this way because you are insecure about your own status? (If I had wanted to portrary myself as somehow elite, I would have mentioned my 200+ karma.)

    I think the "Your Rights Online" section has served to seriously weaken Slashdot's potential for social change. It has tended to present a host of "causes" which are simply not important. DeCSS -- sure, critical free speech issue. "Geeks Rights" in the aftermath of Columbine -- definitely. I think Slashdot really helped to raise the flag there, and probably saved a lot of kids a lot of suffering.

    Using the "f word" in a domain name for an inside joke because someone is too lame to go to an alternative registrar? Oh spare me.

    Every time you raise a ruckus over an issue, you use some "capital." If you raise a ruckus over an issue that doesn't matter, you may not have this "capital" when the issue does matter. This is why organizations like the NAACP and ACLU have lost much of their ability to affect social change. Slashdot is rapidly becoming a cry-baby website, and when the issue really does matter -- when there is another Columbine -- nobody will listen. And that is a shame.

    Or, to put it terms that brains limited to four letters might understand:

    NEVER CRY WOLF!
    Oops... That's right, 'never' has five letters. Just proves you can't say anything useful in four.

    --

    --
    -- Slashdot sucks.
  19. Re:The Triumph of the Juvenile by Amphigory · · Score: 2
    I disagree. Profanity detracts from your position among those who take an absolutist view similar to your own; I'd argue that for the vast majority of people, however, profanity is a part of their lexicon. As above, context and audience are everything.
    My point is vulnerable to proof by counterexample. I ask again: please name me one way to use offensive language that has redeeming social importance.

    Doubt you can.

    --

    --
    -- Slashdot sucks.
  20. Re:The Triumph of the Juvenile by Amphigory · · Score: 2
    I just can't tell if you're a troll or an idiot (make that a fucking idiot, for consistancy's sake).
    Oh you say the sweetest things. What precisely makes you think I'm an idiot? Is this an appeal to ridicule? Just curious.
    It's not the word, it's the use..and frankly, it's become rather commonplace in the English language at this point, saying that use of profanity indicates ignorance is alot like saying that use of French or Latin indicates ignorance, as you're too "stupid" to know the appropriate English equivalent.
    Okay -- how 'bout "bad taste" then? Some people are still offended by these words (believe it or not, I'm not one of them) even though the Supreme Court has been plastering them on the walls for 50 years. Isn't it a simple lack of courtesy to use them in most cases?

    Don't dare try to tell me that DS is courteous.

    Besides, I submit that, if the drill Sargeant is as talented as you claim, he could insult you just fine without using a single word from the "7 you must not say." Why pick the low hanging fruit? Remember: I specified an example where more "appropriate" language could not serve just as well.

    Likewise, your appeal to cursing as a means to aculturation fails, since there are many other means of aculturation, and it is perfectly feasible to develop a distinctive vocabulary that would acculturate just as readily without having to be intentionally offensive.

    As for the whole "french or latin" thing... Spare me. Those both require time and effort to learn. To simply say "fucking" this and "shit" that takes about ten seconds to learn, and I'm sure my 2-year-old could do it -- and I've heard two year olds cuss like sailors.

    So let's see... You call me an idiot as you respond with irrelevant examples defending a behavior that accomplishes nothing and could be done by a 2-year-old.

    If you don't see the disconnect, then I have to wonder whether you are an idiot or a troll.

    --

    --
    -- Slashdot sucks.
  21. Re:The Triumph of the Juvenile by Amphigory · · Score: 2
    Okay, now we have descended to the only thing more Juvenile than gratuitous obscenities. "He-said/She-said". I'm out of this one.

    --

    --
    -- Slashdot sucks.
  22. The Triumph of the Juvenile by Amphigory · · Score: 3
    This story make sme think of how, in our culture, the juvenile and idiotic has triumphed over intelligence, vocabulary, maturity and good taste.

    Most people get over potty and shock humor by the time they're twenty. Most people know it's a waste of time, and that a compelling urge to say "fuck fuck fuck fuck" is really an indicator of a limited imagination. Similarly, most people realize some time shortly after they first begin to support their own addictions instead of going to mommy and daddy for it that our rights are not nearly so important as our responsibilities.

    So you can't register "I want to fuck your body.com". WHO CARES? If you don't like it, start your own registrar. If anyone cared about enabling this kind of juvenile nonsense, they would add your tld's to their cache.

    Guess what: nobody cares.

    I've been on Slashdot since pretty close to the beginning (take a look at my user number -- 4 digits, not 6). But I rarely bother to read anything but headlines anymore, and almost never bother to post. This article is a perfect example of why. By perpetuating the whines of emotional and intellectual infants for rights that they don't have to do things that don't matter, Slashdot has itself become nothing more than a forum for the tendentiousness of teenagers.

    Kind of sad, ain't it?

    The first person to say that "a little bit of censorship is like a little bit pregnant" (or its moral equivalent) gets a sugar coated pacifier and that stinky diaper changed. I've heard it before, and I'm not whelmed.

    --

    --
    -- Slashdot sucks.
    1. Re:The Triumph of the Juvenile by pheonix · · Score: 1

      My point is vulnerable to proof by counterexample. I ask again: please name me one way to use offensive language that has redeeming social importance.

      Doubt you can.

      I'll bite. I'm judging by you absolutionist view of "swearing" or profanity that you've never served in the military in any capacity, so I'll enlighten you.

      Obscene language plays an important role among the enlisted (most notably junior enlisted) in the military (US-centric here). First, profanity is how you tell "us" from "them". The more genteel officers speak "eloquently", the rest curse. Second, until you've been in Basic training, A-school, or what have you, you just don't understand how thoroughly a DS can make his/her point with the most imaginative (and seemingly endless) string of obsceneties.

      Now, I'm sure you'll complain about a lack of "concrete" examples (showing your utter lack of exposure to the world and imagination) so I'll help you out some there. Obscenity has little impact when used constantly; however, if you take your average, clean-cut, polite individual (my grandmother in this particular example) from whom you don't remember EVER hearing an obscenity, and from that person you hear the phrase "Don't you EVER fucking say that again!", it has a SERIOUS impact.

      It's not the word, it's the use..and frankly, it's become rather commonplace in the English language at this point, saying that use of profanity indicates ignorance is alot like saying that use of French or Latin indicates ignorance, as you're too "stupid" to know the appropriate English equivalent.

      I just can't tell if you're a troll or an idiot (make that a fucking idiot, for consistancy's sake).

    2. Re:The Triumph of the Juvenile by pheonix · · Score: 1

      Okay, thanks for clearing that up for me...you're not a troll...*shrug*

      So, because, as you put it, "Some people are offended by these words", they indicate a lack of innate intelligence? That's the most absurd logic I've heard in quite some time. It's too absurd to even respond to, so I'll move on to the rest of your "winning" post.

      You should look up 'aculturation [sic]'. The word you are bandying about is 'acculturation' and you're using it poorly. Acculturation isn't a verb, it's a noun. Your sentence is devoid of actual content, and I can only assume you were simply interested in getting your new big word in there somewhere.

      French/Latin v. Obscenity: I wasn't referring to the entire French or Latin language in this example, but people who use pseudo French or Latin phrases in English (i.e. Vice Versa, ad nauseam, etc). Saying that cursing indicated a lack of intellect is the same as saying that using any other language within English is unintelligent, and is perversely wrong.

      So let's see...all of my examples are relevant, the behavior accomplishes much, and the fact that it can be done by a 2 year old has little to do with anything. Personally, I find people that swear worthy of no undue attention, but people who misuse $10 words to sound impressive are complete imbeciles; so no, you're not a troll, you're an imbecile. I apologize for the confusion.

      Aren't sweeping generalizations fun?

    3. Re:The Triumph of the Juvenile by pheonix · · Score: 1

      Probably a good idea. When valid arguments run out, bow out as if for some reason aside from being proven wrong.

    4. Re:The Triumph of the Juvenile by Chasuk · · Score: 1

      Language - in this case, arbitrarily selected words from a given vocabulary - cannot offend me. "Fart" is another word for "flatulence," and I can choose to be offended by the latter as easily as the former. I choose to be offended by neither.

      If you call me a "stupid fucker," I am no more offended than I might be if you called me an "ignorant pretender." The words cause no damage: it is intention that causes hurt.

      The words "poop," "booger," shit," "fuck" or "cunt" long ago lost the power to titillate, as should happen when a child matures into an adult. For some, this is obviously not the case. Those adults still delight in the mere enunciation of strings of simple syllables, which seems, to me, just as silly as being offended by those same syllables.

      If a person, with real animosity, called me a "wiffly dribblehead," and this was a person whose esteem I valued, I would be offended. If an anonymous /.'er called me an "arrogant asshole," I would be amused that they thought I cared.

      Just my .02 cents worth.

    5. Re:The Triumph of the Juvenile by pyradigm · · Score: 1

      >please name me one way to use offensive language >that has redeeming social importance sorry, Im just reading this thread for the first time, I know Im late sounding in. "give'em hell" General George S. Patton. I know its only hell, but that was pretty 'dirty' back then. So theres my answer, you fucking idealogue.

      --
      Where are the keys to my whore?
    6. Re:The Triumph of the Juvenile by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 3
      Name me a counter-example. Seriously: show me one case where the use of vulgarity (profanity is when you use the Lord's name in vain, not just ordinary cussin') serves to advance a cause that matters where the use of "respectable" language could not work better.

      Actually, sacrilegious speech is but a subset of profanity; even "ordinary cussin'" falls in the realm of profanity. The phrase "I don't give a damn" is, indeed, a profane statement, as is swearing in the name of Allah; both are uttered as curses, and both are used simply to emphasize the speaker's conviction. Now, the severity of a profane statement varies greatly from word to word and amongst different audiences; at this point, however, one enters the realm of personal tastes and standards. Just as there are those who use "fuck" in every sentence without batting an eyelid, there do exist people (my great aunt included) who are scandalized by Rhett Butler's famous line of "I don't give a damn" in Gone With The Wind. This said, you'll forgive me if I do not consider your own standard to be definitive, or even representative of the community at large.

      There aren't any. All profanity will do, however artfully you use it, is detract from your position among those who still care about it.

      I disagree. Profanity detracts from your position among those who take an absolutist view similar to your own; I'd argue that for the vast majority of people, however, profanity is a part of their lexicon. As above, context and audience are everything.

      As for your complaints against my elitism... My point was not my "elite" status. My point was that Slashdot has changed. Could it be perhaps that you interpreted it this way because you are insecure about your own status? (If I had wanted to portrary myself as somehow elite, I would have mentioned my 200+ karma.)

      ...and are you honestly the least bit surprised that Slashdot has changed as it shifted from 3,000 users to hundreds of thousands? You point to the Downfall Of Slashdot, link it directly to the influx of the "nouveau utilisateur", and proceed to lament the fact that it now caters to the tendentiousness of a whole bunch of other classes of user, too. (Don't think for a second that you're not fully and proudly airing your own tendency.) Spin it how you will, but in the end it boils down to elitism.

      I think the "Your Rights Online" section has served to seriously weaken Slashdot's potential for social change. It has tended to present a host of "causes" which are simply not important. DeCSS -- sure, critical free speech issue. "Geeks Rights" in the aftermath of Columbine -- definitely. I think Slashdot really helped to raise the flag there, and probably saved a lot of kids a lot of suffering.

      Using the "f word" in a domain name for an inside joke because someone is too lame to go to an alternative registrar? Oh spare me.

      Since when has Slashdot been about evoking social change in and of itself? Yes, Slashdot has always played a central role in reporting major issues relating to the geek/nerd/techie community. It is not Slashdot's place, however, to set and push any given agenda (despite the fact that agendas do unfortunately sneak their way into news stories with alarming frequency; see some of my other posts for thoughts on this trend.) As for the issue at hand being unworthy of reporting, I must say that the event in and of itself is, in fact, a very silly thing, and does not merit a great deal of attention. Reading beyond the headline, however, it takes only seconds to grasp the broader picture: should it be the right of the registrar to determine the boundaries of taste (and thus act as the de facto censor) when giving out domain names? No matter how trivial the example, the underlying theme decidedly merits of discussion, and as such, a good many posts address just that. Just because the particular instance isn't the most earth shattering news to break on the front page doesn't mean that the underlying issue is equally trivial.

      Every time you raise a ruckus over an issue, you use some "capital." If you raise a ruckus over an issue that doesn't matter, you may not have this "capital" when the issue does matter. This is why organizations like the NAACP and ACLU have lost much of their ability to affect social change. Slashdot is rapidly becoming a cry-baby website, and when the issue really does matter -- when there is another Columbine -- nobody will listen. And that is a shame.

      Again, Slashdot is not a social activism site. It is a news reporting site. News is a fickle creature, and the world does not generate breaking stories on a daily basis; read through some of the fluff on any other major news site and try to tell me otherwise. To it's credit, Slashdot does an excellent job of keeping interesting, wide-ranging topics flowing through the site, with very little of the "ongoing story" demon that shackles itself to many major news providers (Elian Gonzalez, The Florida vote recounts, etc.) On the other hand, Slashdot has always had a problem with tainting it's source material in an attempt to appease it's readers, which is most evident in the unabashed and ongoing evisceration of All Things M$. Regardless of whether or not social commentary is warranted, it is not the place of Slashdot itself to make such commentary outside of the editorial articles (the community usually does a good enough job of that on their own, as well they should.)

      If anything, it is this that is the bane of Slashdot's credibility. It is not Slashdot's place to dictate what we should or should not think about the news it reports; that is an exercise left to the reader. When I come to read Slashdot and see the editors themselves making snide remarks on poorly-proofread, factually inaccurate front page stories, that hurts it's credibility. I wholeheartedly believe that a move to make Slashdot an even more politically charged forum will only serve to push it back into the niche world, and whatever strength of reporting it has gained as a general technology/nerd news site will evaporate faster than you can say "closed source sucks". That is the issue Slashdot must contend with, not making themselves out to be even greater zealots than they already seem.

      Or, to put it terms that brains limited to four letters might understand:

      NEVER CRY WOLF!

      Oops... That's right, 'never' has five letters. Just proves you can't say anything useful in four.

      ...and after going to such lengths to explain the importance of properly choosing one's speech to evoke respect and intelligence in the mind of the reader, you end with this snide quip. I continue to maintain that you are perfectly content to rest atop your ivory tower, taking the occasional shot at the masses below when the spirit so moves you.

      Strangely enough, though, you found it necessary to respond to my post, even though my post contained the foulest of foul words used in a most shocking fashion. Surely, my banal idiocy doesn't merit this level of attention?

      $ man reality

      --

      Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    7. Re:The Triumph of the Juvenile by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5
      To think that the use of profanity is an automatic mark of idiocy and immaturity is, in my opinion, a rather idiotic and immature thought.

      Profanity, when used with thoughtfully and with moderation, can be an amazingly powerful thing. It is true that the vast majority of profanity use is heavy-handed and ineffectual, and is spouted for the sake of sensationalism; to suggest, however, that the very utterance of a profane word reduces an individual to idiocy smacks of intellectual eletism. To infer that profanity exists only in the realm "potty and shock humor" is akin to thinking that anybody with a classic New England drawl owns a summer house in the Hamptons.

      Language is what the speaker makes of it, and profanity is but another form of expression at the speaker's disposal. It is quite difficult to use properly (and all too often abused,) but can be used to formulate powerful, powerful statements in the proper circumstances. In this individual's case, the profanity is intended neither to offend nor sensationalize; it is merely a matter of coincidence that it is part of an inside joke. Suggesting that this cause is infantile and unworthy of notice simply because he wishes to register a profanity in his domain name is absurd.

      Your making note your low Slashdot number is just about as impressive as people who point out that their ancestors were royalty, or were amongst the original pilgrims in America. What do you prove by lording your holy four-digit status over us six-digit chattle? Do you somehow think that one is incapable of insightful commentary if one's user account is higher than 9,999? Could we silly six-digiters not possibly grasp the breadth of knowledge you four-digiters are endowed with? Do you enjoy smacking of aristocratic eletism?

      So Slashdot isn't the ivory tower it was back when it was just you and your 2,374 best friends. Poor you. May I suggest you take a page from your own book: if you don't like it anymore, start your own Slashdot. If Taco et al. really cared about keeping your mental playground free of us riff-raff, they'd have closed the doors ages ago.

      Well? Go on. Scram, ya fucking dolt. You've got a website to build.

      $ man reality

      --

      Obliteracy: Words with explosions

  23. fuck.com.au case by danny · · Score: 1
    We had something similar in Australia. Someone registered fuck.com.au, which was fully consistent with the guidelines - three weeks later the domain was deregistered, and the guidelines were retrospectively modified. See the Electronic Frontiers Australia press release for details.

    Danny.

    --
    I have written over 900 book reviews
  24. Use Gandi by pridkett · · Score: 2

    After a fit of stupidity on NSI's part this summer I decided to get back at them. Using Gandi.net I registered the domain name fucknsi.org. They kinda got taken aback when I was on the phone with them and said my email was i@want.to.skull.fucknsi.org. Plus Gandi is like 10 bucks for a year. Well, depending on the strength of the Euro I guess.

    --
    My Slashdot account is old enough to drink...
  25. Austria and Argentina by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 2

    Fucking is a real city in Austria. The domain has been taken to sell T-shirts, though.

    And there is the Argentinian film Fuckland.
    __

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  26. and more! :) by Chakotay · · Score: 2

    bullsh.it
    damn.it

    funny, actually :)

    )O(
    Never underestimate the power of stupidity

    --

    Never underestimate the power of stupidity
    To err is human, to moo bovine
  27. four-letter domain by Chakotay · · Score: 5

    This is a nice example that it is definitely allowed elsewhere: fuck.it.

    )O(
    Never underestimate the power of stupidity

    --

    Never underestimate the power of stupidity
    To err is human, to moo bovine
    1. Re:four-letter domain by Demona · · Score: 1

      And also fuckyou.co.uk.

      --
      Fuck Slashdot
    2. Re:four-letter domain by badzilla · · Score: 1

      What's funny about this? I got a blank (black) screen.

      --
      "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace." V.Stone, Microsoft Corporation
    3. Re:four-letter domain by Hotrodder · · Score: 1

      You can get a .com fuckclowns.com

    4. Re:four-letter domain by keesh · · Score: 1

      fucked.co.uk, IIRC they give email addresses (whatever@fucked.co.uk).

  28. I remembered hearing something similar about AOL by jim · · Score: 1
    ... so I put myself in the place of somebody working for a (fictional) radio station in a well known English town.

    [ www.radioscunthorpe.com ]

    The domain name was not accepted because it was inappropriate.

    Stupid bastards.

    --
    -- Arm yourself when the Frog God smiles.
  29. Re:It seems to have a different meaning in the US. by Howie · · Score: 1

    My impression, from references in things like Austin Powers and Midtown Madness 2 (which has some really awful "brit-isms", but also treats you to an 'upper class women' calling your fellow drivers tossers, amongst others) that wank does at least double-duty.

    There's the one I know and love (right-handed), which is a reference to masturbation, and this other more vague 'crap' or something similar, as in the The Wonderful Wank-o-meter or the jargon file entry.

    I would agree with c*nt being probably the most offensive here (UK) too - a sound yelling from my dad when I first discovered the word and called my sister one at age 7 has seen to that with me :)
    It is an ugly word though.

    [oh yeah - I am a britfag, blah blah blah, two world wars, whatever - save you the bother]

    --
    "don't fall into the fallacy of believing that Perl can solve social problems. Maybe Perl 6 can, but that's a ways off"
  30. It seems to have a different meaning in the US... by Howie · · Score: 2

    but I have wankyspanky.com, also as part of a silly private joke (Hi Clairey & Lex!).

    I think wank is a lot ruder in britain than america though.

    --
    "don't fall into the fallacy of believing that Perl can solve social problems. Maybe Perl 6 can, but that's a ways off"
  31. you can register it somewhere. by vendull · · Score: 1

    I am sure that many of the ICANN registrars will allow this. I know for fact that the registrar I work for (GKG.NET, INC) will allow you to register domain names of this type. So you could register your domain HERE.

  32. I registered mine... by boinger · · Score: 1
    ...through nominalia.com which is based in Spain - When I registered, it helped to know a little Spanish (One confirmation message was all Spanish, but a guy in my office helped me out), but they seem to have updated their site considerably. Maybe there's an all-English route, now.

    Good luck.

    --
    Send your friends messages of love at fuck-you.org
  33. Be a little more creative by theFerret · · Score: 1

    The best method I've found to getting around that fucking NSI bullshit is to buy a domain that is available and is strategic toward your end result.

    For example, if you're trying to reserve the following TLD:

    fuckgeorgewbush.com

    ewbush.com

    Then use a DNS service (e.g. http://www.easydns.com) to set up a virtual domain to read this:

    fuckgeorg.ewbush.com

    This isn't the most elegant solution, but hell, there's *always* more than one way to skin a cat! I've not done this yet, but I've sure looked into doing it (as you can tell).

  34. OpenSRS will allow you to register it. by IRNI · · Score: 1

    I registered algoreisapigfucker.com through dynodomain.com which is an opensrs registrar. I went through the same problem with nsi and such that you have. Its ok.. there is someone else always willing to stand up for freedom of speech.

    :)

  35. Re:Historical by Arturus · · Score: 1

    For reference, this is the list of words which NSI will refuse to register:

    Olympic
    Olympiad
    Redcross
    Red-cross
    Nasa
    Genevacross
    Geneva-cross
    Citius-altius-fortius
    Citiusaltius-fortius
    Citius-altiusfortius
    Peacecorps
    Peace-corps
    Fuck
    Piss
    Cunt
    Cocksucker
    Cock-sucker
    Motherfucker
    Mother-fucker
    Tits
    Nigger
    Kike

    This is from the list that comes with the ISP Tools package that ships to companies who resell domain names using NSI.

    Bigger companies like NSI are pretty much always going to do this to appease stuffy old suits with money.

    Smaller and newer registrars normally don't care, mainly because they're too busy working just to maintain a functional operation.

    Bulkregister will take names with 'bad' words because they're just *now* getting their operation into a functional state. Heck, until just this month, there was no way for their resellers to do anything but register a domain with existing NIC handles without having to manually fill out forms. They're just too busy trying to build their infrastructure to give a rat's ass about screening domains for 'bad' words. I'd be willing to wager that once they start looking for major investment and some suit with a problem with swear words starts waving cash that a system for screening out 'inappropriate material' pops up real quick. That's business.

  36. Re:Can anyone explain the logic behind this? by Zagadka · · Score: 1

    Take "garglesnarf" for example.

    Watch your mouth!

  37. Re:Historical by Zagadka · · Score: 2

    On CityTV they bleep out "fuck" and "motherfucker" during the day, but after a certain time (I think around 8:30PM or so) they only bleep out the "mother" part of "motherfucker". I'd always thought it strange that the innocent word "mother" somehow made a swear word even worse somehow.

    ObFuckDomain: fuckedcompany.com

  38. Re:Can anyone explain the logic behind this? by Zagadka · · Score: 2

    There's a difference between getting offended when someone says something, stopping someone from saying it.

    Of course, it isn't the word itself one should be offended by, but the intended meaning. If you use a word like "nigger" or "kike" actually intending to insult the people those derogatory terms refer to, then that would be something I'd get offended about. On the other hand if you used those terms for another reason (like quoting Mark Twain, or this discussion), then I wouldn't be offended at all. Either way, I wouldn't attempt to take away your right to say it.

  39. Re:*sigh* by Zagadka · · Score: 3

    the U.S. is the nation that has become the most powerful nation with the highest standard of living (for its size)

    When you say "for its size", I assume you mean population-wise. If that's the case, then the same could be said about China.

    If you're actually referring to land-area, Canada has a higher standard of living that the US.

  40. Re:Sounds like a free speech issue to me by Seumas · · Score: 1

    Most of them are agents of Satan. Particularly, NSI.
    ---
    seumas.com

  41. Image by jjr · · Score: 1

    I guess that they do not want to be assoicated with those types of domains. And they are worried about thier liability if they register those types of domain.

  42. You are not authorized to view this page by Barbarian · · Score: 2

    This is what I get: (from a shaw @Home ip in the 24.67.119.0/255.255.255.0 netblock)

    You are not authorized to view this page

    You do not have permission to view this directory or page from the Internet address of your Web browser.

    If you believe you should be able to view this directory or page, please contact the Web site administrator by using the e-mail address or phone number listed on the bullsh.it home page.
    HTTP 403.6 - Forbidden: IP address rejected
    Internet Information Services

    Technical Information (for support personnel)

    Background:
    This error is caused when the server has a list of IP addresses that are not allowed to access the site, and the IP address you are using is in this list.

    More information:
    Microsoft Support

    1. Re:You are not authorized to view this page by N473 · · Score: 1

      I believe that the site is setup to reject all (except maybe localhost...) It is an email service, they just have no content on port 80 they wish us to see.
      ---

  43. Bad words = BIG Juju. Bozo sez so. by crovira · · Score: 2

    The list of words, thoughts and concepts that we have had to be protected from spans the range from Carlin's famous Seven Words You Can't Say on Television to dodecahedron, the existence of which was thought by Helenic Greek philosophers to be too complex and powerful for mere mortals.

    Some far-Eastern sects believe that saying the nine billion names of Rama will being about the end of the Universe.

    Just saying the name of Jehova will bring death by lapidation (stoning) from some fundamentalist Jewish sects. ("Oy! Put down that rock!)

    Just having the ability of giving birth to their sons condemns women to solitary confinement amongst the Taliban.

    The litany of forbidden words would fill its own dictionary. Different words for different times and different places. The fun begins when they, those mystical, all-powerful illuminati,) set up mutually exclusive rules. Then you're damned if you do and damned if you don't.

    The issue has always been about control. Thou shalt not is not for your good but for your good not! Its about: Who's in charge here!

    Setting one fundamentalist against the other doesn't work either. They merely get together to oppress you more together.

    The trick is to propose something that is so ridiculous that it is unenforcable:

    disembowelment for cursing, in any of a hundred languages about any of a hundred concepts;
    decapitation for thinking about dental floss;
    genitorture and mutilation for humming off-key;
    immolation for dragging elections through the courts long after anybody cares who robs them blind;
    castration for failing to deliver campaing promises

    You get the idea...

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  44. Don't use NSI by Syberghost · · Score: 2

    So don't use NSI.

    I used DomainZero (when they were still free) to register fucknut.org, they didn't bat an eyelash.

    -

  45. Re:NameZero can't count by TrentC · · Score: 2

    Hmmm, I'm not sure I can trust a domain register if they can't even get their Terms of Service correct. "three (5) times", "twenty (30) page", and "three (5) times" confuses me. What are the trying to say?

    It's obvious to me that NameZero (losers) decided to modify their TOS (retroactively screw over existing customers) to take into account real-world necessities of the usage of their service (we made up some numbers, they didn't work, so we made up some more numbers); in the process they neglected to fact-check the document before posting it (can't afford a proofreader).

    Jay (= (karma whore looking for "Funny" points)

  46. Gandi.net - The best there is by Jack9 · · Score: 1

    As usual, Gandi.net proves _again_ that they are the best registrar. fuck12065237.com is perfectly fine if you register with them. Who in their right mind uses NSI? I know from experience that they review domain name "checks" and register ones that look good, if you do not immediately.

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.

    --

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.
    Everyone knows me.
    1. Re:Gandi.net - The best there is by Delphis · · Score: 1

      I like Gandi too .. works very well and was very simple and quick to register and modify domains with.. plus the 12 euros works out to like $10 (US) now, so it's great value too. I have a few of my domains via them.


      --

      --
      Delphis
  47. Re:Can anyone explain the logic behind this? by Delphis · · Score: 1

    And also the (unfortunate) nickname of a guy I met while at uni .. Hi Dave, if you're reading ;D


    --

    --
    Delphis
  48. Re:It seems to have a different meaning in the US. by Athos · · Score: 1
    But it's my only line!

    --

    --

    --
    The Internet is the Suppository of All Knowledge. You get it in the end.

  49. domain names by opse · · Score: 1

    I was not allowed to get a .org.au of my domain name because the registra thought it was too much overhead to have it in both the .org and the .org.au domain lists. He said i should have au.organisation.org or something similar. So it does not supprise me one bit that its hard to get swear words through. Hopefully one day Robert Elz will no longer be the sole admin for the .org.au domain space and will let people have the right to do what they wish. Why can greenpeace have both .org and .org.au?

  50. Re:Hmm, not good... by um...+Lucas · · Score: 1

    NSI's decision not to register domain names that they deem as being vulgar is just like MAPS and ORBS' decisions to not deliver email to persons who's ISPs have signed up with them whom they deem as being spammers.

  51. Re:Good (cheap) Registrar by um...+Lucas · · Score: 1

    How do you figure that $11USD is cheaper than $10.00, pray tell?

    I might have a cheap bridge to sell to you if you come up with a compelling enough explanation...

  52. Re:For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge by DHartung · · Score: 1

    Very funny. Anyway, it is NOT an acronym. The word has clear relatives in other Germanic languages, which variously mean "to hit", "to push", or even "to have sex".

    The other "backronym" that was invented to explain the word is "Fornication Under Consent of the King". Not true either.

    See alt.usage.english FAQ, or Snopes.
    ----

    --
    lake effect weblog
    {Network engineer in Chicago--looking for work!}
  53. you moron by semis · · Score: 2

    why should idiots like you clog up the internet by buying domain names for christmas cards. I bet you irc with some rediculously long host like i.am.a.complete.fucking.idio.ot or post to alt.losers.i.have.no.life.so.i.like.to.waste.time. buying.domain.names.for.christmas.cards

    I have no sympathy for you. get a life.

  54. shitakemushrooms.com by Robin+Lionheart · · Score: 1

    NSI has screened George Carlin's seven dirty words for years.

    In 1998, Jeff Gold raised a fuss because NSI automatically rejected the domain name shitakemushrooms.com.

    Fortunately, NSI is no longer the only registrar around. However, using another agency is no guarantee that NSI won't censor your domain name. For example, NSI unilaterally cancelled the registration of www.vote-auction.com, registered with a company in Germany.

    1. Re:shitakemushrooms.com by Legion303 · · Score: 1
      In 1998, Jeff Gold raised a fuss because NSI automatically rejected the domain name shitakemushrooms.com.

      Not that I'm agreeing with NSI (in fact, I just switched to another registrar because I was tired of their stupidity), but if he had spelled it correctly (2 i's) it wouldn't have been a problem.

      -Legion

  55. Re:Sounds like a free speech issue to me by grappler · · Score: 1

    That's a George Carlin routine, I think


    -------

    --
    Vidi, Vici, Veni
  56. fuckinmoney.com by David+D · · Score: 1

    We registered fuckinmoney.com just fine with DirectNIC, and it's cheap too. www.directnic.net

    1. Re:fuckinmoney.com by bobsnob · · Score: 1

      I have many great domains based on George Carlin's nasty words when they first became available. I used quicknic.com, but they are a bit expensive. Nsi, register.com and several other registrars do not allow them, but many others do. http://www.registerfree.com/ is another one that also has no restrictions. If I recall, joker.com also has no restrictions (based in Germany). We get tons of hits, but of course we have REALLY good one word nasty names :)

  57. Re:EasySpace by Skapare · · Score: 2

    How the fuck do you know that shitface domain won't fucking get rejected later, such as when it goes through to the motherfucking central registry? (language included for the unoffended)

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  58. Exeptions made... by Felinoid · · Score: 2

    I rember how the word "fuck" was banned yet the domain name fuckedcompany.com was allowed.
    I might add that this is the Internet and keepping the Internet domains clean of english curse words when web sites are known to contain graphic discriptions of thies curse words.

    One often posted website contains a clear example of one curse... something I personally got called a lot when someone didn't get what they wanted. But the domain name is deceptive.. It is quite likely had the domain holder had a choice he would have selected a compleatly discriptive domain name.

    Why should the f word be void from Internet domains when in some cases Usenet posts are composed of almost nothing but....

    Aren't we being a bit prudish?

    On radio and TV I understand the point.. broudcast.. etc. But gezz... Make bind filter the 7 words and then let people reg those domains who don't want kids accessing those web sites....
    hay instead of credit card varification require adult sites use a 4 letter word that can then be cut off at bind...

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  59. My all time favourite by seizer · · Score: 5

    ...is the free redirector service, www.isfuckingbrilliant.com. (I have http://andy.isfuckingbrilliant.com). They also have isfuckingshit.com, hadyourmom.com, etc etc. Check it out (blatant plug, and I don't even own it... terrible).

    --Remove SPAM from my address to mail me

  60. Factoid: Number of .com domains containing fuck... by Der+Wibbler · · Score: 2

    ..in the com tld (as of 20001114):

    $ grep -c 'FUCK.*IN NS' com.zone
    25026

    That's right - there's currently over 25 thousand domains registered in the com tld containing those four letters in sequence...

  61. I registered at networksolutions.com by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 2

    I registered tcpipbitch.net with NSI no problems, and bitch was one of them words they would not register in the past.

    --
    I came, I conquered, I coredumped
  62. Re:Sounds like a free speech issue to me by Surak · · Score: 2

    Yes, it does. It says, "Congress shall make no law...yada yada" which roughly translated means: "Like I give a fuck about your goddamn motherfucking assfuckers who don't like it when I fucking swear."

    BTW--NSI registered "likeigiveafuck.com" along with many others (hit the web site and see) so why are they now giving people a hard time?

  63. You can register dirty words cheap by Riskable · · Score: 1

    Just thought I'd add to the people's resources by pointing this out...

    $10/year, whatever words you want (assuming the name is free) at www.domainsite.com. I tested it with various offensive language and they don't seem to censor anything. They apparently are going to be offering a web-based DNS administration tool soon too, which sounds damn cool!

    -Riskable
    "I have a license to kill -9"
    --------------------------
    -Riskable

    --
    -Riskable
    "Those who choose proprietary software will pay for their decision!"
  64. try OpenSRS by apeman · · Score: 1

    Try An OpenSRS registrar, like www.easyhosting.com

    I could register anyfuckingdomain.com :) and its like 15$ can. Which is like 8$ american... lol
    - apeman

  65. My own success and New Zealand domain names by Internet+Ninja · · Score: 1

    Sometimes mucking about with the phonetics gives a measure of success. I've registered phuqed.com without any trouble.
    Additionally, in New Zealand, any .co.nz domain can be registered including 'the big six' which went very quickly. The reasoning was that since New Zealand is a bi-cultural language country (English and Maori) that there was no system so prevent you registering a rude word in Maori ('cooked head' is an example) so instead of regulating more, they lifted all restrictions.

    Graeme

  66. Re:I remembered hearing something similar about AO by Ratface · · Score: 2

    The story you remember hearing was about the early days of AOL when they installed a filtering program over all their software. It's primary purpose was to stop people creating "rude" usernames and/or swearing in chat rooms.

    It slipped up however when a guy who was trying to register a user account kept getting his application refused by the system. He eventually worked out that it was due to him entering Scunthorpe in his address.

    When he contacted the support desk, they evntually came up with the solution that he should use a misspelled form for the name such as Sconthorpe! They couldn't correct the problem in the filters until the next major revision of their software because it was so deeply ingrained in the code! This led to some great jokes about AOL being the company that took the cunt out of Scunthorpe :-p

    "Give the anarchist a cigarette"

    --

    A little planning goes a long way...
  67. Doesn't matter by gregbaker · · Score: 2
    I really don't see that this matters for most of us. I mean, if domains with "fuck" in them were allowed, don't you think they would all have been snapped up by porn sites?

    Just a thought.

    Greg

    1. Re:Doesn't matter by bogoweenie · · Score: 1

      That's great! Screw the new top level .sex or .pr0n. I want a top level .fuck! Great domain names like I.want.to.fuck and Sheena.Easton.wants.me.to.fuck or George.W.Bush.needs.a.dog.to.fuck. Holy.fuck? you.were.a.great.fuck? what.the.fuck? would.you.like.to.fuck? yes.i.would.like.to.fuck. Great.lets.fuck! fuck.fuck.fucketty.fuck.fuck.fuck! How do I go about requesting a new top level domain?

  68. This has been NSI's policy for a long time... by delmoi · · Score: 1

    A very long time. Its also their policy that you don't actualy own you're domain. And it was their policy to cancle domain names at the drop of an email.

    Why anyone would ever want to use NSI is beyond me...

    --

    ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
  69. Re:Sounds like a free speech issue to me by plunge · · Score: 2

    Yup, And I believe the constitutional test for obscenity is still: "I'll know it when I see it." Sigh...

  70. We have a bunch of dirty ones... by nasalgoat · · Score: 2

    My company does web-hosting for a number of porn sites, many of which have the word "fuck" in the domain name. The secret is to avoid NSI like the plague. We used to use Domain Wizards, but have since moved to being an OpenSRS partner.

  71. Your not the only one trying... by tred · · Score: 2

    A while ago I came across a page describing someones attempts to register the domain fuck.com. The information may be a little dated, since it all took place during InterNICs monopoly over registration, but it is useful (and somewhat entertaining) nonetheless. The url is http://www.links.net/webpub/fuck.com.htm l.

    --
    - tred
  72. Re:Christmas card? by Jimithing+DMB · · Score: 1

    It is my understanding that Christmas is supposed to be about celebrating the birth of Jesus Christ. So what exactly is the issue of using the F-word in a Christmas card to some personal friends. If it was part of an inside joke then apparently these are at least fairly close friends or were at one time.

    I don't know about you, but I generally say the F-word all of the time around my friends but try to avoid its use when around other people. Think about the irony in that.

  73. Re:Sounds like a free speech issue to me by Another+MacHack · · Score: 3

    Our supreme court also decided a while back that "obscenity" isn't protected by the 1st Ammendment for some reason.

    I wonder if George Dubya's "Strict Constructionists" will revisit THAT one. Heh.

  74. Same here by jfunk · · Score: 2

    I'm in the 24.222.88.0/21 netblock (Eastlink) and I get the same error.

    I'm guessing the site blocked 24.0.0.0/8.

    Who would block a class A?

    Ah yes, someone running IIS. I get it now.

    1. Re:Same here by gwyrdd+benyw · · Score: 1

      I cannot reach the site from 216.15.foo.bar, either. Maybe they're blocking everyone?

      --

      I adblock all animated gifs.
      Blessed be the prime numbered slashdotters
  75. German and 4 letter words by Confused · · Score: 1

    Just for the fun of it, search in a german or austrian phonebook for strings containing those 4 letter words, americans are so obsessed about.

    Example taken from www.etb.at, the austrian phonebook:

    String to search for: fuck*

    Samples from the resulting list:
    Fuckar Bruno, ....
    Fuckenrieder Annika, ...
    Fucker Friedrich, ...
    Fuckerieder Johann, ...
    Fuckerrieder Adolf, ...
    Fuckner Frieda, ...

    Those names are not common, but not unheard of either. Wank* and Dick* will get you even more names. For Shit* I suggest taking a japanese phonebook, for Cunt* spanish or frensh will yield better results.

    Damn those silly americans!

  76. Re:Can anyone explain the logic behind this? by gorilla · · Score: 2
    Swear words are offensive because they break taboos. In those who have descended from the American Puritians and the British Victorians traditions, the taboos are about discussing sex & bodily functions. Other language groups have other swearwords, for example French swearwords are all to do with religion.

    I find it particuarly interesting what has happened when broadcasters have tried to avoid swear words. Red Dwarf used 'smeg' as a replacement for 'fuck', and it is begining to enter the language, being used even where there isn't a Red Dwarf connection.

  77. Worked in Israel ok... by david.heyman · · Score: 1

    I tried thereoncewasafucknamedjohn.com in Israel at http://www.domain.co.il and although I also didn't whip out my credit card it said the domain was available.

  78. Re:look what a whois has to say... by HerrNewton · · Score: 1

    >> STATUS QUO ANTE (FUCK17-DOM

    Oooh... kinky stuff. ;)

    ----

    --

    ----
    Am I the only one who thinks Microsoft is a misnomer? Perhaps Macrosoft would be a better fit?
  79. Re:Can anyone explain the logic behind this? by MemRaven · · Score: 2
    Dude, that's from an Anthrax song, and relates to the whole PMRC fiasco as you noted. However, it has nothing to do with federal statutes on obscenity, or even the NSI standards for domain names. For an example, go to www.death.com to see.

    I've heard the same song, and I quite liked it. But the words of Anthrax do not an NSI policy make.

  80. Re:(OT) Re:It seems to have a different meaning... by MadAhab · · Score: 1
    The whole emphasis on it as being so terribly offensive definitely reflects which side of the Atlantic we're talking about... The word has much less impact in the UK.

    Curse words are so culturally bound that the Internet in particular is a bad arena to try to restrict their use. Learn some foreign slang and register that.

    Boss of nothin. Big deal.
    Son, go get daddy's hard plastic eyes.

    --
    Expanding a vast wasteland since 1996.
  81. Piss-poor Javascript by chazR · · Score: 3
    So did I. (Netscape 4 on Linux, Flash plugin present).

    So I read the HTML source. It's mostly Javascript that appears to be written by a non-idiot. Unfortunately, they overlooked some minor details, so the site won't work unless you run Windows or Mac on a 68k. The URL to try is fucking here.



    Fuckwits with Flash can try this fucking url

    I wonder who owns FuckNSI.com? That was rhetorical - I know who does now. - that's a cute weasel.

    Or, less rhetorically, but rambling:
    [chaz@phoebe chaz]$ whois fucknsi.com
    [whois.internic.net]

    Whois Server Version 1.3

    Domain names in the .com, .net, and .org domains can now be registered
    with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net
    for detailed information.

    Domain Name: FUCKNSI.COM
    Registrar: TUCOWS.COM, INC.
    Whois Server: whois.opensrs.net
    Referral URL: www.opensrs.org
    Name Server: FRANK.BAZ.ORG
    Name Server: SOM-NS-1.FSCK.COM
    Updated Date: 20-sep-2000

    >>> Last update of whois database: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 07:31:56 EST

    The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .ORG, .EDU domains and
    Registrars.

    So, now you know.

  82. Re:Sounds like a free speech issue to me by gonzocanuck · · Score: 2
    Follow the link below to see the many ways Fuck can be a useful word

    http://www.gonzo.org/fun/sound/fword.html

    ----

    --

  83. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  84. Never had a problem... by detritus. · · Score: 2

    I have had great luck with 000domains.com. Haven't had a problem yet with registering a domain name with "explicit 4 letter words".


    - Slash

  85. Re:Gandi & Core by endquote · · Score: 1
    I have to agree that Core is a great group. I registered thefucking.net through joker.com shortly after the alternate registrars opened.

    I've had absolutely no problems... no idea why anyone would register with NSI anymore.

  86. Narrow minded, but what about... by RallyDriver · · Score: 1

    The censorship seems to be restricted to US English usage... just tried NSI and it quite cheerfully offered to register (with advance apologies to our French speaking readers) encouler.com, and while poofter.com is taken, it suggested pooftercentral.com which is available.

    Also, what about that famous site parodying Fast Company magazine and cataloguing the demise of silly .com startups? They must have registered somewhere.

  87. Re:Sounds like a free speech issue to me by Buck2 · · Score: 1

    "Can I get a witness?"

    What? Whereabouts can one feel confident that
    they can say anything they want ... ?

    I believe you ... I would just appreciate case
    examples.

    --

    As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
  88. fuckedcompany.com by Johnzilla · · Score: 1

    Tucows' OpenSRS doesn't seem to mind

  89. Re:Sounds like a free speech issue to me by dubl-u · · Score: 2

    The constitution, alas, only tries to keep the government from interfering. Private citizens are, regrettably, allowed to be as dumb as they want.

    If your queen ever lets you have a constitution, you should think about putting something like that in.

  90. Re:Sounds like a free speech issue to me by dubl-u · · Score: 2

    Around these parts, when we talk about the Constit uti on, we generally are referring to both the original and the changes to it. Sort of the same way that when people say "Linux" they're not talking about the 1.0 release.

    Personally, I think the constitution is precious precisely because we can change it, (although I am pleased that it's pretty hard to change). The whole point is that the government is not some static thing handed down from on high; it's something we all do. Allowing the constitution to be ammended is just a recognition that a) circumstances change, and b) nothing is perfect, even if it seems that way at the time.

    But you're right about the 18th amendment; that's why we repealed it.

  91. Re:Historical by Uri · · Score: 1

    Network Solutions initially allowed all words, then banned George Carlin's "seven dirty words," alone or as substrings, with occasional slip-ups and odd exceptions. The seven words were piss, shit, fuck, cunt, motherfucker, cocksucker, and tits.

    Isn't motherfucker a bit redundant here, containing, as it does, the subword fuck? Also, what exactly is so offensive about the word motherfucker in the first place? After all, motherfuckers are a fairly essential part of motherhood.

  92. Gandi & Core by Coward,+Anonymous · · Score: 3

    Gandi and most of the Core registrars will register a domain with fuck in it. Gandi is in Europe so they'll charge you with those silly Euros, but assuming you don't have some real shitty credit card that shouldn't be a problem if you're outside Europe, you should be able to find a Core registrar from your country of origin if that's the kind of thing you're into.

    1. Re:Gandi & Core by dane23 · · Score: 1

      Gandi and Core registrars in general rule!
      As an example:

      Whois results for clusterfuck.com

      Whois Server Version 1.3

      Domain names in the .com, .net, and .org domains can now be registered
      with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net
      for detailed information.

      Domain Name: CLUSTERFUCK.COM
      Registrar: CORE INTERNET COUNCIL OF REGISTRARS
      Whois Server: whois.corenic.net
      Referral URL: www.corenic.net
      Name Server: DNS1.NOMINALIA.COM
      Name Server: DNS2.NOMINALIA.COM
      Updated Date: 14-jul-1999

      >>> Last update of whois database: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 07:31:56 EST

      The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .ORG, .EDU domains and
      Registrars.

      null Tam Freestone-Bayes (template COCO-660)
      tam@webflair.com
      2 Ladysmith Road
      St Albans, HERTFORDSHIRE AL3 5QA UNITED KINGDOM

      Domain Name: clusterfuck.com
      Status: production

      Admin Contact:
      Tam Freestone-Bayes (COCO-661) tam@webflair.com
      +44 7974 769 295

      Technical Contact, Zone Contact:
      Technical Department (COCO-376) tecnico@nominalia.com
      +34 932687707 (FAX) +34 93 3193257

      CORE Registrar: CORE-1

      Record created: 1999-07-14 20:19:57 MET by CORE-1

      Domain servers in listed order:

      dns1.nominalia.com 62.22.18.11
      dns2.nominalia.com 62.22.18.12

      Database last updated on 2000-11-23 21:35:23 MET

      To optimize query speed and answer correctness see the
      --help option. Depending on your whois client use
      whois -h whois.corenic.net HELP
      or
      whois HELP@whois.corenic.net

      --


      Warning! Keep Out of Eyes! Wash Out with Water! Don't Drink Soap! Dilute! Dilute!
    2. Re:Gandi & Core by m2t · · Score: 1

      We use OpenSRS personally, they've been pretty good about letting us get pretty much whatever names we want. Hell, they let someone get:

      Domain Name: FUCKNSI.COM
      Registrar: TUCOWS.COM, INC.
      Whois Server: whois.opensrs.net

      I guess bulkregister let someone get fucknetworksolutions.com too. I personally think it'd be better if they managed to register both using NSI, but whatever :)

  93. Re:Sounds like a free speech issue to me by diverman · · Score: 1

    It is supposed to be perfectly legal to have the "BIG 7" words in a domain name. A law passed a while back, and the registrars started allowing them.

    HOWEVER! Some friends and I decided to check a bunch of domain names the moment these registrars were supposed to have them allowed.... and guess what!? Most of the common domains we thought of that contained a cuss word (fuck, shit, etc.) were already registered... and by who? The US government! I guess they'll pass the laws to allow them, but steal them all first, so they won't be usable.

    Sometimes I really hate the government's methods. And if anyone says "The US government sucks," my response would be "Do you REALLY think they're the only ones?"

    Cheers,
    -Alex

  94. Re:It seems to have a different meaning in the US. by mr100percent · · Score: 1

    Not to mention $70 US for a name

  95. Buck Futter! by centron · · Score: 1

    Mr. Connery. Let's see your answer. Oh, I guess that's your wager, a buck. And your answer? Futter. I...I'm afraid I don't get it.
    Oh. I think that you do, Trebek.

    Buck Futter!

    --

    XeoMage

  96. rot13.net by Googol · · Score: 2

    Solution is simple: someone needs to write a browser with a "ROT13" switch. Then "alternate" encoded domains can be surfed normally. You just throw the ROT13 switch and surf away in the alternative domain. Sites that care can register the alternate name as an alias and exist in both domains.

    Sure, it fractures the internet into a commercial, acceptable domain and an "anything goes" domain.

    =googol=

    1. Re:rot13.net by Deosyne · · Score: 2

      Goddamn, I'm glad I took a second to actually think about that for a second, as I was about to blow it off. That is actually pretty fucking brilliant; if you can convince the developers of lynx, Mozilla and other browsers to implement this functionality, perhaps as a somewhat obscure switch in the preferences with a keyboard shortcut to make it convenient for those who would actually use it, then there would be a completely open list of domain names to choose from that wouldn't be flooded by commercial interests for quite a long while due to its obscure nature. Hopefully, by the time it does happen, we will have found a better method. Gonna have to get IPv6 off its ass to make it work, though. Ah well, a pipe dream perhaps, but so was the Internet at one point, so who knows? ;)

      Deo


      Terradot.org: Growing Awareness

  97. Fuckedcompany by TheGeek · · Score: 1

    Why not find out who http://www.fuckedcompany.com registered their domain through. If that URL didn't trip alarms, then you've pretty much got to be ok.

    TheGeek

    --

    TheGeek
    http://www.geekrights.org
    Kill the monkey
  98. Re:Can anyone explain the logic behind this? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    Of course, it isn't the word itself one should be offended by, but the intended meaning. If you use a word like "nigger" or "kike" actually intending to insult the people those derogatory terms refer to, then that would be something I'd get offended about. On the other hand if you used those terms for another reason (like quoting Mark Twain, or this discussion), then I wouldn't be offended at all. Either way, I wouldn't attempt to take away your right to say it.


    I agree 100%

    I believe everyone has the right to freedom of speech, and everyone has the right to freedom to not listen :)

    You can still insult with "common words" such as stupid, dummy, "what are you? stupid?", etc.

    I think what you said, pretty much sums it up!
    Just because we have to freedom to offend people doesn't mean we should, without thinking about the consequences. And the people that are easily offended, need to lighten up a little.

    Some people are offended at swear words, others are not. The trick is respect the appropiate people (and their beliefs)
  99. Can anyone explain the logic behind this? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 5

    So certain words are taboo. Big !@#$ing Deal! (censored so as not to offend anyone ;-)

    I really don't understand why the BIG 7 taboo words all deal with sex, and other bodily functions.

    I also really don't see the problem. If people are offended at these words, it is NOT like you're FORCING them to visit your site!

    Maybe we need to grow up socially, and understand that words are just that: JUST WORDS! (Yes, they carry a conatation behind them, but if you don't like it, stop listening to them. :-)

    Live, and let live. People wouldn't be so stressed out then.

    1. Re:Can anyone explain the logic behind this? by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      The seven words (shit, piss, fuck, cunt, cocksucker, motherfucker, and tits) for the most part are dirty as far as the FCC goes (piss is marginal nowadays). They are not, however, the only 7. When I was a radio DJ, I couldn't say "cock" unless referring to a rooster, and I couldn't say "pussy" unless referring to a cat (and even that was questionable, since everyone knows what I'd be implying). I also can't say twat, nor can I damn someone to hell on the radio. Those are just the FCC's rules.

      There is the strange case of some songs, that for reasons never shared with this former DJ, are perfectly acceptable. No radio station I've ever heard has ever censored the line "Who the fuck are you" from that Who's "Who are you", or the phrase "good bullshit" from Pink Floyd's "Money". Similarly, anyone can say "shat" (the past tense of shit) on TV or the radio, as most people don't seem to know what it means.

      While I don't agree with the FCC, I can see the point: some people might very well hear the offensive words when they weren't expecting it,or their children might hear them. While I see absolutely wrong (and everything right) with creative uses of words and letters, I understand that some people can be offended. But in a web site address, who cares? You're not going to type it in, and you're not going to see advertising for it, and you're not going to see it in a search engine unless you're looking for it...and even so, the words in a domain name are NOTHING compared the pictures and words ON websites with names as inconspicuous as whitehouse.com.

      If you don't like it, don't look at it...I think that's what all this comes down to. If you don't want your children looking at words and letters in offensive combinations, check to see what they're doing online. But don't stop me from doing what I want to do if it doesn't hurt you.

      The Good Reverend

    2. Re:Can anyone explain the logic behind this? by CodeMunch · · Score: 1
      Exactly! But I can't get this through my ex-gf's head. Then of course she brings up that "love" word and says IS THIS MEANINGLESS TOOO???? And then I get shit. Apparently it's the meaning implied behind the word that is bad. it's all BS anyway. It's just a string of characters. - Any word could be considered offensive: Take "garglesnarf" for example. It is meaningless and it could be used as profanity but "FUCK YOU" sounds a heckuva lot better than "GARGLESNARF OFF"

      This of course begs the Question, Why do I uncontrollably shout the word "FUCK!!" or "SHIT!!" when I screw up while playing UT :)

      --Clay

    3. Re:Can anyone explain the logic behind this? by CodeMunch · · Score: 1
      Mommy, make the bad woman stop!

      --Clay

    4. Re:Can anyone explain the logic behind this? by jalalski · · Score: 1
      I really don't understand why the BIG 7 taboo words all deal with sex, and other bodily functions.

      Because the two big taboos are sex and death. Some people are uncomfortable with either or both.

      Maybe we need to grow up socially, and understand that words are just that: JUST WORDS! (Yes, they carry a conatation behind them, but if you don't like it, stop listening to them. :-)

      Whose is this 'we'? Most of the world doesn't have a problem with fucking, shitting and pissing. Its the US that needs to grow up. I lived there for a while and have never met so many anally retentive people in one place.

      If you don't like it, why not change it?

      the great jalalski spake thusly...

      --
      .sig available on 'Need To Know' basis only!
    5. Re:Can anyone explain the logic behind this? by SimCash · · Score: 1
      "What a fekking idiot"

      Well, not exactly, but the argument that "words is just words" fails to understand why people use the "vulgarities" they do. The entire and only reason to use them is to indicate strong emotion and/or to shock the user. They are the verbal equivalent of baring one's teeth (if you were a dog) or of raising one's tail (if you were a skunk).

      If the commonly accepted "naughty" words no longer perform that function, then other words will be created to perform the functions formerly performed by the now weakened words. I would prefer to keep the well tested words we know rather than worry that my innocent "well, shiver me timbers" had become "fighting words" that could get me killed.

      For an example, note that "you fekker" has been replaced with "you muthafekker" because fekker is too diluted.

      SPFCCMT

    6. Re:Can anyone explain the logic behind this? by Capt.+DrunkenBum · · Score: 1

      Whoops... Wrong answer... Smeg is a real word. No one was more surprised than me..
      However, like the cast, I ain't saying what it means. :)

      --

      Not everyone deserves a 320i

    7. Re:Can anyone explain the logic behind this? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      I think the comic you're looking for is Here, at Hounds Home, a daily comic. He's currently running a storyline that has slowly mutated into a critisim of US society and their censorship on the media. Check it out, it's a pretty funny strip.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    8. Re:Can anyone explain the logic behind this? by tagishsimon · · Score: 3

      What are the seven taboo words? And should they be the subject of a slashdot poll? I think so.

    9. Re:Can anyone explain the logic behind this? by keesh · · Score: 1

      But words define thought (supposedly)... If you can think something, you might as well speak it. Maybe the words are considered bad because sex is supposed to be 'bad'. I mean, it exists, it's necessary, what's the fuss for?

    10. Re:Can anyone explain the logic behind this? by ColdGrits · · Score: 1

      Erm, smeg IS a word anyway, even before Red Dwarf came along.
      Certainly, it was a term we used to use in University back in 1984, for example...

      It is a contraction of "smegma", which refers to that white secretion which builds up under the foreskin.

      It is also, rather amusingly, a Brand Name for a manufacturer of fridges, dishwashers and other kitchen appliances! Seriously :)

      --

      --
      People should not be afraid of their governments - Governments should be afraid of their people.
    11. Re:Can anyone explain the logic behind this? by ColdGrits · · Score: 2

      They are -

      shit
      piss
      balls
      wank
      fuck
      cunt
      tits

      (At least that WAS the case a few years ago - thanksfully the UK had less severe restrictions so one of our radio stations was able to tell us this :) )

      --

      --
      People should not be afraid of their governments - Governments should be afraid of their people.
    12. Re:Can anyone explain the logic behind this? by johnny38 · · Score: 1

      >for example French swearwords are all to do with >religion. I would disagree with you there. Most swear words in Québec revolve around religion (tabarnacle, the worst word in français québecois), however France is right with the US in sexually connotative bad words. Examples: putain ~= damn (lit. whore) l'enculé ~= holy shit (lit. fuck it up the ass) ça me fait chier ~= what's up with this shit (lit. this makes me shit) il est parti en couilles ..and so on Perhaps technical, but important to note for us français! (Of course, correct me if I'm wrong guys, to which I suspect slashdot readers would happily oblige) john

    13. Re:Can anyone explain the logic behind this? by Soruk · · Score: 1
      The seven "classic" words, as popularized by George Carlin, are shit, piss, fuck, cunt, cocksucker, motherfucker, and tits.

      The word piss can be found several times in the Old Testament of the King James Bible.

      --
      -- Soruk
    14. Re:Can anyone explain the logic behind this? by Kurt_Rambone · · Score: 1

      the words are actually as follows:

      shit
      fuck
      satan
      death
      sex
      drugs
      rape

      stupid, i know, but it's a PMRC thing. ah well....

    15. Re:Can anyone explain the logic behind this? by Kurt_Rambone · · Score: 1

      I'm starting up a posse,
      to come and look for you.

      we're gonna put a stop
      to what you're trying to do.

      You fucking whores
      (you fucking whores)

      That all you are

  100. concatenated? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

    Ah, its a Jamie post.

  101. Re:It seems to have a different meaning in the US. by captredballs · · Score: 1

    Thats really interesting. I know several women (in the US) who prefer to use that name for their "apparatus". These women also tend to despise terms like "p...y", "sn..ch", "c**ze", because the have so many implications and extra meanings.

    Would a rose by any other name smell as sweet? ;-)

    --

    I suppose I'm not too threatening, presently, but wait till I start Nautilus
  102. Re:It seems to have a different meaning in the US. by bnitsua · · Score: 1

    You forgot:
    10. Semprini

  103. Re:Blame the Churches... by CConkle · · Score: 1

    Rhyme does not a derivitive make. A direct descent from 'facit' to 'fuck' is highly unlikely, in my opinion. Facit means to make as in to fashion, compose, etc. To my knowledge, it has no sexual connotations- the Romans did not use such crude euphemisms. Fukar looks and sounds much more like the root of 'fuck'. A good dictionary will tell you the first evidence of the word is 'fuccus', encrypted, in some statement about a bunch of monks fucking the women of some city. (dict.org unfortunately does not have this definition, and my dictionary is not handy.) They identify fuccus as a Latinization of a colloquial, which makes a good deal of sense to me.
    You might be right, but to my linguistic eyes and ears, you look quite mistaken. (Many derivitives are formed on the fourth principal part- facio's is 'factus' which results in fact, etc. I have never seen a derivitive based on a third person singular present, like facit.)

  104. Bad words are allowed... by jcampbell · · Score: 1

    At least in the situation I am using it.

    I got a free domain from namezero.com and it happens to be: f?ckingjihad.com, whether I can register this after the period that they ask for you to wait, with a larger domain name registrar is a nother question, but at least for now, f?ckingjihad.com is at my bidding. MUAHAHAHA.

  105. Re:I remembered hearing something similar about AO by kampo · · Score: 1

    Excite games room too - while playing we got to chatting about coffee and I mentioned I liked a particular kind of spiced coffee that a local Arabian coffee shop did.

    Except it wouldn't let me say the word 'spiced' as the first four letters were listed as an offensive word. Duh.

  106. Re:I did this! by Phrogman · · Score: 3

    As part of a study on offensive words for a Linguistics class I circulated a questionaire in the Residences at the University of Victoria. It listed about 20 "offensive" words and asked the user to rate them on a 1 (least offensive) to 7 (most offensive) scale. The results were quite interesting, as was the reception, but I have lost the paper alas.

    --
    "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
  107. The FAQ isFuckingCool.com by Eil · · Score: 2


    A short demonstrative snippet:

    Below are the answers to many Frequenly Asked Fucking Stupid Questions about isfuckingbrilliant services. If you've got any fucking stupid questions that are unanswered, you can mail them to support@isfuckingbrilliant.com

    How do I get rid of that fucking stupid banner?
    Don't be fucking stupid, we offer you a free service, all we ask is for that ONE banner to be displayed when someone enters your site, it's not awhole lot to ask for is it? In the near future we plan to have several banner options, such as delay and frames, this will give you more options if you do not like popup banners.


  108. Re:It seems to have a different meaning in the US. by deefer · · Score: 1
    Why, what does it mean over there?
    Over here (in Great Britain), wank used to be _really_ rude, but due to over use (maybe through TV), it's not really that rude any more. C*nt is about the most offensive swearword in Great Britain right now, I think. But what will happen when that gets overused? I wonder if anybody has plotted a league table of swear words, in order of offensiveness, and compared it over the years...
    Mind you, I can just imagine Great Aunt Hilda being stopped in the street by a MORI pollster, and asked to rank the following swearwords in order...

    Strong data typing is for those with weak minds.

    --

    Strong data typing is for those with weak minds.

  109. Hmm, not good... by deefer · · Score: 3
    A poor precedent to set.
    This is the first step in censoring; the more that "the authorities" take upon themselves to regulate, the more they will assume to be their right to regulate. Mostly to protect themselves, I think; for example I can see the next logical step in this being "Oh, that's too similar to [large corporation]'s domain name".
    The only rule domain registrars should actively enforce, is that the domain itself does not currently exist. That way, they don't have to encase the registration in x different rules and disclaimers to protect themselves from lawsuits.
    Scary precedent.

    Strong data typing is for those with weak minds.

    --

    Strong data typing is for those with weak minds.

    1. Re:Hmm, not good... by forgey · · Score: 1

      NSI has been silently doing this for years. At least 3 years ago (possibly more) someone I know wanted slut.com which NSI refused to register for him based solely on the word. What is odd about them is that they are inconsistent. They later registered slut.com to someone else.

      I am pretty surprised they are still doing it now that they have competition. They are effectively driving business to their competitors. Given the attitude NSI has always displayed (being in it for the money) I am highly surprised that they have clung to this censorship of domain names.

      forge

    2. Re:Hmm, not good... by osgeek · · Score: 1

      - MAPS and ORBS don't deliver email.
      - MAPS and ORBS never had a monopoly like the NSI had until recently.
      - Spamming is an issue of privacy and improperly impossed hardship of spam recipients, not censorship. Yes, most spammers would like to play the victim. I don't think many people are buying it.
      - "deem" should be replaced with "know" for MAPS, and ORBS doesn't worry about whether or not they're spammers, just whethor or not they're irresponsible enough to leave an open mail relay active.

      But yeah, they're just like each other - they both have Internet connections.

  110. Re:look what a whois has to say... by forgey · · Score: 1

    If you hit their website at http://www.networksolutions .co m/c gi- bin/whois/whois you can get contact info for domains that are registered with NSI.

    You can also get the contact info by doing:

    whois fuck.com@whois.networksolutions.com

    at a commandline.

    forge

  111. Re:look what a whois has to say... by forgey · · Score: 2

    Or for the full reg info:

    Registrant:
    STATUS QUO ANTE (FUCK17-DOM)
    United States District Court, District of
    New Hampshire, 55 Pleasant Street
    Concord, NH 03301

    Domain Name: FUCK.COM

    Administrative Contact, Technical Contact:
    Network Solutions, Inc. (NSOL-NOC) noc@NETSOL.COM
    Network Solutions, Inc.
    505 Huntmar Park Drive
    Herndon, VA 20170
    US
    703-742-4777
    Billing Contact:
    Accounts Payable (AP5173-ORG) ap@NETSOL.COM
    Network Solutions, Inc.
    505 Huntmar Park Drive
    Herndon, VA 20170
    US
    703-742-0400

    Record last updated on 04-Oct-2000.
    Record expires on 24-Mar-2002.
    Record created on 24-Mar-2000.
    Database last updated on 23-Nov-2000 10:07:20 EST.

  112. F-cked Company by kimihia · · Score: 1

    F-cked Company managed to register a domain with that naughty word in it.

    I understand that they registered it with Tucows/OpenSRS.

  113. Inappropriate Words Elsewhere ... going too far! by Jens · · Score: 1
    I think all this censorship about "inappropriate words" is going too far. (The problem being, I suspect, that people in the US have successfully sued ISPs/registrars who have offered such domain names to customers, no matter who really was responsible for the name).

    Another example:
    In Germany, at ebay.de, you can criticize/endorse the person you bought something from. I think it's the same as with the US ebay auctioning service. If I write "war schnell" (meaning "was fast"), the system rejects this because it parses

    "wAR SCHnell"

    - where "ARSCH" means "asshole".

    Are there really so many illiterate idiots on the web that the big companies must "protect" us from dirty words like in kindergarten? Or is the problem that it's so easy to sue somebody over anything and the companies want to avoid the paperwork?

    Anyway, I think the above is WAY out of line... how does ebay.com handle this?

  114. George Carlin rules by jyang · · Score: 1

    Here is a verbatim transcript of Filthy Words prepared by the Federal Communications Commission. (From Law suit FCC vs. Pacifica Foundation).

    --
    --- You make things foolproof, and they'll find you a damn fool.
  115. Interesting side note by biglig2 · · Score: 1

    In the UK we're having a cyber-squatting case for a clothing company we have over here called French Connection. They use the initials FCUK as a branding thing "woo-wear our clothes and you'll be sooo cool you'll almost be able to swear" etc.etc. and are trying to get fcuk.co.uk back. However the judge is having doubts about it on the basis that it's a distasteful name. Perhaps actually that's a little unfair to the judge - he does have to bear in mind that the ASA here in the UK (who handle complaints about advertisements) have ruled against them in the past as offensive.

    --
    ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  116. Root servers? by Ryu2 · · Score: 1
    Doesn't NSI run the .com root servers, which are responsible for the entire .com domain, regardless of which registrar registered it?

    They don't let you register a company with a dirty word in it, but yet, they are obligated to provide root name service (ie, pointing queries to the actual ISP's DNS server)

    It's a very interesting paradox.

    --
    There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
  117. Re:whatthefuck.com -seriously by jdwilso2 · · Score: 1

    yep... great site... love it...

    JDW

  118. Registrars... by rakslice · · Score: 1

    One of the domains I own was purchased through Gandi, as they were the cheapest registrar for single domain registrations at the time (at 12 euros = ~ C$16, US$10). I'm not sure if they still are, though. Anyway, they are based in France, and don't seem to have any problem with registering names containing ascii (102,117,99,107) or various other things. =)

  119. Re:It seems to have a different meaning in the US. by laborit · · Score: 3

    I don't get it?

    None of those words are dirty! Or do you expect someone to be "offended" by nonsense like "feck","cknt", or "c%wboy neal"?

    -----
    Go ahead, blame me... I voted for Nader!

    --

    -----
    Go ahead, blame me... I voted for Nader!
  120. Substitute by jacobcaz · · Score: 1

    Couldn't you just use "Belgium" instead?

  121. i found it available by tootired · · Score: 2
    https://www.dotster.com/registration/step_01/check domain.asp?DomainName=fuck12065237.com&x =45&y=23 dotster is my friend

    "This is the way the world ends
    Not with a bang but a whimper."

  122. No ends for Microsoft sillyness by magi · · Score: 1
    I once tried Microsoft's IRC server. It has a politically correct system that prevents certain words in nicknames and channel names, such as the horrible F-word, nig-word, etc.

    The funniest word which the server refused was "evangelisluterilainen". That's Finnish name for "Evangelic Lutheran" (the major Christian sect here), and it seems to be the only Finnish word that contains the letters "*slut*".

    Slut also means "closed" or "end" in Swedish. No sluts for Microsoft, eh?

    Ps. I hope I haven't doomed Slashdot to be eternally blocked by major filtering software by saying the horrible dirty word... EVANGELISLUTERILAINEN!

  123. Re:One that won't get registered by Deosyne · · Score: 1

    Startin Up a Posse by Anthrax, off of Attack of the Killer Bees. Great band, great song, great album, although I would highly recommend checking out the album Spreading the Disease as well. Actually, any old Anthrax is great; their new stuff with the new lead singer is decent, but it sounds a bit forced, while classic Anthrax is just metal thrashin' fun. :)

    Deo


    Terradot.org: Growing Awareness

  124. Re:I can try by peterarm · · Score: 1

    I know you're a troll, but I'll bite...

    Fucking is a wonderful act (without which none of us would be here), yet the only verbs for having sex are taboo... sorry, but what the fuck is up with that?

    Note: In the more "acceptable" phrasings like "have sex" used above, the wonderful verb for having sex--fuck--is replaced by a noun--sex--and coupled with the generic verb "have", which can be used equally well with ice cream as with sex. Fucking, if done right, is definitely a verb--NOT a noun--for both parties involved (hopefully, since it's not much fun if either person just lies there :-), and should be referred to as such. I mean, really people, we've advanced way too far technologically to still be saddled with this pathetic Dark Ages Christian taboo bullshit...

  125. Historical by Argy · · Score: 5

    Network Solutions initially allowed all words, then banned George Carlin's "seven dirty words," alone or as substrings, with occasional slip-ups and odd exceptions. The seven words were piss, shit, fuck, cunt, motherfucker, cocksucker, and tits, preventing names like "scunthorpe.com" and "shitakemushrooms.com."

    In late 1998 NSI started allowing "shit." In July 1999, other registrars were granted authority to register .coms, .nets and .orgs, and many of them took any name you wanted, and most still do. There was a piece in Slashdot about this at the time.

    NSI and Register.com still refuse, perhaps to appease current and potential investors. (Register.com had IPO aspirations a while back) On the other hand, I think bulkregister.com, with no rules, has overtaken register.com as the #2 registrar, which can't be appealing to investors.

    A lawsuit was filed by a person wanting to register obscene names in early 1998, so NSI registered them on behalf of the United States Attorney General to hold in escrow pending a decision. That's why fuck.com, for example, is registered by NSI to a US District Court. It's been a long legal process, and from what I gather, NSI fucked up and forgot to renew registration on at least some of them. As a result, NoNameCorp (who sucks up most good expiring domains) landed motherfucker.com when it expired in March.

    1. Re:Historical by Mr_Tom · · Score: 1

      [Quoted] Network Solutions initially allowed all words, then banned George Carlin's "seven dirty words," alone or as substrings, with occasional slip-ups and odd exceptions. The seven words were piss, shit, fuck, cunt, motherfucker, cocksucker, and tits [/Quoted] What about "semprini.com"? [/Ponty Mython]

    2. Re:Historical by (char+*)dragoness · · Score: 1

      if they check "fuck" in substrings, why do they need to separately check for "motherfucker"?

  126. Registrars Human? Easily Offended? by crucini · · Score: 1
    I think it may be a little ridiculous to expect the registar to not be offended by anything. After all, they are human too.
    No they're not. Legally they're corporations. Factually, they're networks of computers. If you still think registrars are human and capable of being offended, try registering nsieatsfeces.com. No objections there, because you're dealing with a pattern matcher, not a sentient being.
    For a human being, a broad-minded, tolerant outlook is something to strive for; intolerance is normal. For a computer, it's just the opposite. Aloof disinterest in the content of strings is normal - prejudice has to be programmed.
  127. its such a flexable word by ozzmosis · · Score: 1

    Fuck is such a flexable word.
    it can be used for love , anger , pain.
    as in this example from Dr.Demento the Definition Of fuck.

  128. Articulate by cafelatte · · Score: 1

    This guy should look up the word "articulate" in the dictionary.

  129. Improved offence available :) by E-Prime · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately there is no web site, but at least you can ping bad.mother.fucker.dk :)

  130. dopemotherfucker.com by abramsh · · Score: 1

    I had the same problem. I went to names4ever.com, and now me and my dopemotherfucker are very happy.

  131. Re:Sounds like a free speech issue to me by wolfspell · · Score: 1

    Yes. Now that RIP has been passed we have the Human Rights Act, which incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law.

  132. Re:Sounds like a free speech issue to me by belroth · · Score: 1
    The constitution, alas, only tries to keep the government from interfering. Private citizens are, regrettably, allowed to be as dumb as they want.

    Funny, I thought that was the First Amendment that did that....
    Which means that your precious constitution has been changed - how many amendments are there now?
    What was the Eighteenth amendment.
    Now tell me how the constitution protects you?


    ----

    --
    I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
  133. Re:Sounds like a free speech issue to me by belroth · · Score: 1
    The point is, it can be changed.

    I know, it's not easy etc,etc. But it does happen, and prohibition was an illustration that it isn't always that hard to change. I know that was repealled, but that was yet another change.
    What if the first amendment was repealled? Can't happen? Why not?
    What if the Constitution is quietly ignored?
    How exactly did the Fourth Amendment protect Steve Jackson Games from the Secret Service, for example?

    Q. When is a democracy not a democracy?
    A. When the gut who gets the most votes comes second?

    I am NOT anti-US, I just get hacked off when 'merkins bang on about their sacred cow of a constitution without looking how it really works, and when they criticise other countries electoral systems. A lot of people are laughing at you right now guys, it's unfortunate but true.

    Sometimes outsiders have a better view of how things work - I.E. 'merkins can have a more balanced view of problems in the UK than we do - and vice-versa.

    There's lots of good things about the US, but not everything is good - just like anywhere else.
    ----

    --
    I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
  134. Re:*sigh* by belroth · · Score: 1
    I wish that people weren't so ignorant. An amendment to a document is considered PART OF THE DOCUMENT!!!
    amendment == change
    Therefore it can be changed.

    I don't want to mock the U.S. - there are plenty of good things about it, but there's also lots of bad things too, or can only a USian criticise the U.S.?
    The British Empire never ruled the world, just quite a large part of it, if it had ruled the world, well, it probably still would.

    It's not as if the US isn't a colonial power too, or am I mistaken about the status of Puerto Rico? And what's the deal with kidnapping a foreign a Foreign Head of State to try him in the US for crimes against US but not local laws allegedly comitted NOT on US soil?
    What would US reaction be if Clinton had been kidnapped to stand trial for adultery in an Islamic country? Remember in some parts of the world this is a VERY big deal.

    Just look at your own country with the same critical eye you look at others, and don't get upset when people from other countries react to a USians smug criticisms by responding in kind.

    As for comaprable systems, hmm try China - a military superpower too, larger population Arguably works better than the US, not a democracy of course but you didn't specify that.
    For a larger democracy (but admittedly not yet as much military power) have a good look at India, they do rather well with a largely illiterate population. Admittedly they have a rather dynastic approach to democracy, but then with Gore and Bush so does the U.S.........
    ----

    --
    I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
  135. Nothing wrong here, cap. by twitter · · Score: 1
    Time and place. You will learn that real life sex is not like that glamorized stuff you were sold at the movies. In any case, not everyone gets off when you do.

    Q: What will you bring to the oval office?

    GWB: A can of lysol.

    Ewwwwwww! Your roomate brought someone home again. There goes your sleep. Turn on the vent fan, and eat breakfast out. God knows what you will find in the shower (Hint, your roomate and you don't have red hair). Who's going to clean the drain?

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  136. it's just an opinion, ridicule as you see fit by twitter · · Score: 1
    the only person I know with a dirtier mouth than my own is my wife.

    I'm glad you found your soul mate, but I'm not as happy that she teaches junior high. Do you two really think of sex and shit all the time or do you just use the words without thinking?

    A related question is why you would want to talk to a child about sex, or why you would even think of such a thing around children? What on earth are you thinking?

    I have no reason to doubt my wife, sister, mother and other's word on the shock sex was to them. It seemed strange to them, even though they were told it was natural. Take it for what it's worth, there are people in the world that don't think like you and your wife. Not everyone is exposed to that kind of thing, and they prefer it that way.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:it's just an opinion, ridicule as you see fit by flwombat · · Score: 1
      I'm not necessarily ridiculing your opinion, but I hope you understand that 'horrified' is not the only normal reaction to learning about sex. Without going into great detail, I grew up in a very conservative and religious community. A lot of my friends didn't know much of anything about sex (e.g. the actual mechanics of it) until they were nearly 18. My parents, while just as religious as their neighbors, happened to feel that sex is natural (which doesn't make it less sacred, in their view) and therefore information about it should not be withheld from children. My parents explained sex to me at age 5, and they also explained that it was something for adults to do under very specific circumstances, etc.

      Long story short, I grew up to find myself one of only a few of my peers in that community to be free of sexual hangups. The concepts of sex were not mysterious to me; I had a clear understanding of how it works and what it is for. I also did not have an unstated but ingrained impression of sex as dirty and surreptious. A few of my friends, including one or two who did not learn the mechanics of sex until age 16 or 17, were not so lucky. They were, as you said, horrified.

      But all this is off topic. The fact is, refraining from the use of profanity in 'mixed company' is simply politeness; a useful social skill to be sure, but not a prerequisite for the right of free speech. My wife works at the aforementioned junior high school with children who have behavioral disorders (a federally defined disability status, no laughing matter) who pathologically lack such social skills, and believe me, they use impolite words all the time. My wife endeavors to model a better example, because it's important to teach such children social skills that may help define their success later in life. But when she's at home or among friends, she has every right to swear like a sailor.

      And as far as that goes, some people do swear like sailors, and it's not because they think of sex and shit all the time; the words are meaningless particles that add flavor to language, at least in some cultural groups. Not your cultural group, obviously, but that doesn't necessarily mean my (chosen) cultural group is less worthwhile than yours.
      ---------

      --
      ---------
      get your war on
  137. I can try by twitter · · Score: 2
    Fuck is not a nice concept to throw around. My wife tells me that she was very disturbed to learn what the word means, and that most women are. It's a concept that only thoughtless people or rapists would deliver to a child. The more you throw it around, the more likely it is to land in the wrong place. Less importantly, it's just not a nice thing to think about when you sink you teeth into a big tuna po-boy.

    There is a time and a place for everything. George Orwel's description of the Spanish civil war could have used the words shit, turd and crap at least once for variety and sharpness. He chose the words dung, and human excriment instead which worked well enough. After reading him, you will never look at trenches the same way again.

    You would do yourself a favor to try not to think of such common, and usualy unpleasant things. If you can't do that, you might try to remove them from your speech so other people will not associate you with such stuff.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:I can try by twitter · · Score: 2

      I donno, ask a woman. It's just a perspecitve you may not have. Take it for what it's worth.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    2. Re:I can try by fatphil · · Score: 1

      What is unpleasant about fucking?
      You are doing it wrong, obviously.

      FP.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    3. Re:I can try by flwombat · · Score: 1
      I don't know of anyone who is disturbed to find out what the word 'fuck' means. Actually, I can't understand how anyone would not understand what it means from context, without explanation. And your 'most women' thing is a little ridiculous. You obviously don't know the women I know. Besides, the only person I know with a dirtier mouth than my own is my wife.

      Now, obviously, I'm smart enough to change my speech patterns to suit a situation, as is my wife, who works at a junior high school. This is a matter of politeness and common sense.

      I also have to disagree that the definition of 'fuck' is something only a thoughtless person or rapist would deliver to a child. I have certainly known since I was fairly small that 'fuck' means 'have sex with' or in some cases 'to act foolishly' or 'to victimize (not necessarily sexually)' with no adverse affects, and I don't see how the concept of sex is 'common, and usualy(sic) unpleasant.'

      Furthermore, Orwell's writing skills notwithstanding, if you're writing about characters who probably swear like sailors, I think it is unnecessary in today's cultural climate to pretend that they don't.
      ---------

      --
      ---------
      get your war on
  138. EasySpace by FoxIVX · · Score: 1

    I use www.easyspace.com because they are super cheap (And I mean REALLY cheap) and because they dont give a rats ass what domain I want. I went through the steps of registering www.fuckchristmas.com and they didnt have a problem with it, I just stopped short of giving them my credit card number. So, it's still available if anyone wants it. I would also suggest www.fuck-santa.org

    -Josh

  139. If you need a dirty domain... by wizarddc · · Score: 1

    NameSecure.com is your place. At least it was my place. About a year ago I purchased itfuckingsucks.com, as a joke I had going with my coworkers. It was the standard price of $35 a year, and they have decent support, like dns changes withing 36 hours. I'd suggest it to anyone looking for this such thing.

    --
    Th
  140. This is just supid by R!O!N · · Score: 1

    I sure wouldn't want to offend anyone by saying such bad words as f*ck, sh*t, ect. Our culture is just stupid for thinking it can censor the net or anything else from offensive words/acts. Like no one on TV doesn't know what word they were REALLY saying. R!O!N ---------------------------------------------- If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten. ~ George Carlin

    --
    R!O!N
  141. *sigh* by gvonk · · Score: 1

    I wish that people weren't so ignorant. An amendment to a document is considered PART OF THE DOCUMENT!!! Someone hanging out in even a semi-tech forum like this should know that.
    Anyway, this brings up something that has been annoying me for the last few weeks. People from other countries have been looking at our FUBAR election and bitching about how "Uh, yore system doesn't work... huh huh... Divided country...you guys suck...etc etc."


    The reality is, our system DOES work. Of course it isn't perfect. Show me something that would work better with our size, populace, and power that is currently working somewhere else in the world. I find it funny that Brits feel the need to mock our system when the U.S. is the nation that has become the most powerful nation with the highest standard of living (for its size) in the world and good ol' England has been reduced to not much more than a smelly relic. Sure, you guys WERE powerful, you DID rule the world, but here we are, consti-frickin-tution and all, and I suppose you could say we have made do.

    --


    El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
  142. Naughty Canadians by Tinfoil · · Score: 1

    Here's a few that work (and some are taken)
    Whois
    Domain fuckthis.ca
    Organisation TCI
    Registrar Tucows International Corp.
    Date received 2000/11/18
    Date approved 2000/11/18

    Yet,
    Domain fuck.ca is not available.
    01043 Domain name is restricted

    Hrmm? Domain fucker.ca
    Organisation most wanted domains, inc.
    Registrar Echelon Internet Corp.
    Date received 2000/11/09
    Date approved 2000/11/09
    Last changed 2000/11/12

    And yet another:
    Domain shithead.ca
    Organisation Jaiveer Singh
    Registrar Tucows International Corp.
    Date received 2000/11/09
    Date approved 2000/11/09
    Last changed 2000/11/12

    So far, 3 for 4.. Too bad they are all taken.

  143. Re:Sounds like a free speech issue to me by jorbettis · · Score: 1

    The framers of the Constution felt that the document proper should do nothing but describe the workings of Government.

    The first ten amendments, called the 'bill of rights' were planned from the outset, infact, some states only ratified the Constution on the understanding that those ten amendments would be ratified once the Constution was in place.

    As far as the eighteenth amendment goes, something nightmarish like that happens every time there's an unhealthy rash of conservitisim in this country. And it was quickly repealed.

    --

    Jordan Bettis

    ``Wherever you go, there's another stupid sigfile quote.''
  144. Re:A Poem by utunga · · Score: 1

    or .. "Everythings fucked, so i guess its time it got unfucked ?" hmmm.. unfuck.org (12 euros.. fucking eh!)

  145. naughty words in domain names by edibobb · · Score: 1

    Check with fuckedcompany.com, they seem to be alive and well.

  146. Re:It seems to have a different meaning in the US. by Andy_R · · Score: 1

    We don't prohibit those words in domains though, as proved by the (unoffensive unless incorrectly snipped) soccer club site at http://www.scunthorpe-united.co.uk/

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
  147. The Word Fuck by pclinger · · Score: 1

    Do a search on Napster for "The Word Fuck" and listen to the MP3. You will find it hillarious.

    --
    /. editors made it impossible to link to file:///c:/con/con in my sig. Please just type it in
  148. ACLU and NSI by e2d2 · · Score: 1

    I just wanted to say this has happened for quite a long time. Apparently this has been changed with the influx of new registrars. fucksprint.com registered by alt.2600 is one example.

    But anyway, I tried to register a equally foul domain name a few years ago and NSi rejected it for the same reasons. I then got pissed and contacted the ACLU which said they would not help because NSI is a corporation and can basically set their own policies. I tried to explain that they had locked the entire registration process down (at the time they did) and had a monopoly on the registration. Makes sense. They had bigger wars to wage at the time also.

    Oh well, it was a nice try and eventually enough people like myself screaming that "NSI sucks!" changed things. Now that I can do it I really don't want to.

    - just my little tid bit

  149. would-be guardians of virtue by jejones · · Score: 1
    Sigh. Seems to me they'd have the same problems as Web filters, compounded by the international nature of the net. (As Mario Pei pointed out long ago, French speakers get a laugh out of seeing references to "Con Edison," but I bet they don't filter for that...)

    I wonder what they'd do with a domain I ran across once. I was following links from a web page of a fellow I know who does fight orchestration, and one of the links was to a page for something called the Actors' Exchange...but when I saw http://www.actorsexchange.com/, I thought "Actor sex change?! Seems like an awfully limited clientele..." I hasten to add that the site is a fine one, and has nothing at all to do with what I originally feared.

  150. fuckeverything.com also got screwed by forkspoon · · Score: 1

    When I was registering my site fuckeverything.com a few months ago, I ran into the same problem. My solution was to register through one of the many registering services out there. It cost about $35 more than I would have paid if I had been able to register it normally, but it did get registered.

  151. Re:It seems to have a different meaning in the US. by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    forl

    falling on the rug laughing
    .oO0Oo.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  152. Re:It seems to have a different meaning in the US. by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    yes, I much prefer the capacity being used for the relentless pursuit of capital.

    domain names want to be free

    mail me :

    skwid\
    @\
    fuckyou.co.uk
    .oO0Oo.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  153. Registrar that WILL let you register by viper115 · · Score: 1

    www.domainsatcost.ca will let you register any domain that is available with a .com, .net, .org, and .ca tld. I just tried diefuckhead123 and if found .ca, .net, .org, and .com as all being available.

    --
    Anthony Pritchett Mosaic Web Design ICQ:2669369 tony@mosaicweb.ns.ca http://www.mosaicweb.ns.ca
  154. Re:I did this! by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

    What a coincidence. I'm just starting a remarkably similar survey for my statistics class.

    "An investigation into the relative offensive nature of selected cuss words and racial slurs."

    :D

    --

  155. Re:I did this! by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

    It's all about the relative offensive nature, so they'll all be in the same context. The idea is that if "my cunt hurts" is more offensive than "my ass hurts," then "you cunt" should be more offensive than "you ass."

    --

  156. Fuck Censorship by StandardDeviant · · Score: 2

    Cohen vs. California, 403 US 15, 18 (1971) ... Protecting Non-spoken Free Speech since the 1971. :-)

    Admittedly the internet isn't governed by US Supreme Court decisions, but NSI is...


    --

  157. Simple, don't use NSI by ectoraige · · Score: 1

    I've only just seen this article, and I have to run, so I'm sure many people have made the point, just don't use NSI, IMO they are money-grabbing tossers, there's plenty of alternatives, go to Tucows and you'll find many resellers of their OpenSRS system, like this crowd. The only domain that is not allowed, is 'example' for use in textbooks, plus the tlds themselves., (not the cctlds mind) Blah, I'm rushing. There is no banning of vulgar words in tlds, just some regitrars who are afraid of getting hassle

    "A goldfish was his muse, eternally amused"

    --
    Vs lbh pna ernq guvf, ybt bss abj. Tb bhgfvqr. Syl n xvgr.
  158. Re:I did this! by KahunaBurger · · Score: 2
    What a coincidence. I'm just starting a remarkably similar survey for my statistics class.

    "An investigation into the relative offensive nature of selected cuss words and racial slurs."

    Will you be using the words in or out of context? I ask because it seems to me that the offensive/assaultive strenght of many words depend on how they are used. For instance, "my ass hurts" vs "you're an ass" or to be more extreme "I wanted him in my cunt fucking me" vs "Fuck you, you cunt".

    Language is all about context, and while I do find some words pretty damn offensive without any context, most can be moderated or enhanced by the way they are used. After a few turns round westminster, for instance, it might take you a while to remember why the phrase "all my bitches" can be offesive. :)

    -Kahuna Burger

    --
    ...will work for Chick tracts...
  159. Some profane non-English free domains by maxxon · · Score: 1

    No match for "FIKUVIN.COM".
    No match for "PATRINFIKULO.COM".
    No match for "PUTINFILACHO.COM".
    No match for "CXIESULINO.COM".
    No match for "FORFIKIGHI.COM".

    --
    max
  160. Re:Sounds like a free speech issue to me by Fester213 · · Score: 4

    The constitution only protects us from government censorship. Domain registrars are no longer an agent of the government.

    -- Fester

    --

    -- Fester
    "Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows."
  161. Tried it. by Anonymous+Squonk · · Score: 1

    I once tried about 10 different registrars in an attempt to register "---.com" Speednames was the only one which said I could register this domain. It was only a day later when they sent me another email saying the domain name was illegal and couldn't be registered.

  162. A Poem by Enonu · · Score: 5

    The usage of the word fuck

    Perhaps one of the most interesting words in the english language today is the word fuck. Out of all of the English words that begin with letter F, fuck is the only word that is referred to as the F-word. It's the one magical word, just by it's sound can describe pain, pleasure, hate and love. Fuck, as the most words in the English languages, is derived from German, the word fricken which means to strike. In English fuck fall into many grammatical categories.

    As a transital verb for instance : "John fucked Shirley."
    As an intransitive verb. "Shirley fucks."

    It's meaning is not always sexual.

    It can be an adjective such as "John's doing all the fucking work."
    As part of an adverb : "Shirley talks too fucking much!"
    As an adverb enchancing an adjective : "Shirley is fucking beautiful!"
    As a noun : "I don't give a fuck!"
    As part of a word : "Abso-fucking-lutely" or "in-fucking-credible"
    And, as almost every word in a sentence : "Fuck the fucking fuckers!"

    As you must realize there aren't too many words with the versatility of fuck. As in these examples describing situations such as:

    Aggression - Fuck you!
    Agreement - Fucking-ay right!
    Amazement - Fucking shit!
    Annoyance - Don't fuck with me.
    Apathy - Who really gives a fuck, anyhow?
    Benevolence - Don't do me any fucking favors.
    Command - Go fuck yourself!
    Confusion - What the fuck?
    Denial - I didn't fucking do it.
    Despair - Fucked again.
    Difficulty - I don't understand this fucking question.
    Directions - Fuck off.
    Disbelief - Unfuckingbelievable!
    Dismay - Oh, fuck it!
    Displeasure - What the fuck is going on here?
    Encouragement - Keep on fucking.
    Etiquette - Pass the fucking salt!
    Fraud - I got fucked.
    Greetings - How the fuck are ya?
    Hatred of chemistry - Thermofuckingdynamics.
    Identification - Who the fuck are you?
    Ignorance - He's such a fuck head.
    Incompetence - He's a fuck up.
    Insight - You're out of your fucking mind!
    Laziness - He's a fuck off.
    Lost - Where the fuck are we?
    Panic - Let's get the fuck out of here.
    Passive - Fuck me!
    Perplexity - I fucking know all about it.
    Philosophical - Who gives a fuck?
    Pleasure - I couldn't be any fucking happier!
    Question - You ain't fucking me?
    Rebellion - Fuck the world!
    Resignation - Oh, fuck it!
    Retaliation - Up your fucking ass!
    Suspicion - Who the fuck are you?
    Trouble - I guess I'm really fucked now.
    Ugliness - You're a dumb looking fuck.
    Wisdom - Fuck that shit!
    Wonder - How the fuck did you do that?

    It can be used in an anatomical description - "He's a fucking asshole."
    It can be used in business - "How did I wind up with this fucking job?"
    It can be maternal - "Motherfucker."
    It can be political - "Fuck Dan Quayle!"

    It has also been used by many notable people throughout history:

    "What the fuck was that?" - Mayor of Hiroshima
    "Where did all these fucking Indians come from?" - General Custer
    "Where the fuck is all this water coming from?" - Captain of the Titanic
    "Thats not a real fucking gun." - John Lennon
    "Who's gonna fucking find out?" - Richard Nixon
    "Heads are going to fucking roll." - Anne Boleyn
    "Let the fucking woman drive." - Commander of the "Challenger"
    "What fucking map?" - Mark Thatcher
    "Any fucking idiot could understand that." - Albert Einstein
    "It does so fucking look like her!" - Picasso
    "How the fuck did you work that out?" - Pythagoras
    "You want what on the fucking ceiling?" - Michaelangelo
    "Fuck a duck." - Walt Disney
    "Why?- Because its fucking there!" - Edmund Hilary
    "I don't suppose its gonna fucking rain?" - Joan of Arc
    "Scattered fucking showers my ass." - Noah
    "I need this parade like I need a fucking hole in my head." - John F. Kennedy

    I'm sure you can think of many more examples. With all of these multipurpose applications how can anyone be offended when you use the word? So, use this unique flexible word more often in your daily speech. It will identify the quality of your character immediately.
    Say it loudly and proudly : "FUCK YOU !!!"

    1. Re:A Poem by jon_adair · · Score: 1

      You don't have my favorite from the audio version of this: "Why don't you go outside and play hide-and-go-fuck-yourself?"

  163. This goes back a long time! by fmouse · · Score: 1

    Some of this stuff goes back a long time! Back in 1995 Justin Hall tried to register fuck.com and ended up with an extended and very funny series of exchanges with various DNS registrars from Jon Postel on down. Take a look at http://www.justin.org/webpub/fuck.com .ht ml.

    Interesting... The domain is currently registered.

    $whois fuck.com

    Registrant:
    STATUS QUO ANTE (FUCK17-DOM)
    United States District Court, District of
    New Hampshire, 55 Pleasant Street
    Concord, NH 03301

    NSI is the Tech, Admin and Billing contact. Looks like they're scared of someone registering it, and also scared of someone suing them because they've locked it out.

    I note, interestingly enough, that while the domain has a whois registration, it has no name servers. Try to do that for a domain of your choosing! Perhaps if someone wrote the court a nice letter, and since they're obviously not no using the domain, they'd be willing to give it to someone who might make better use of it :)

    --
    "Everything works if you let it" - The Flying Mouse
  164. So I looked and was offended. by luckykaa · · Score: 2

    They actually allowed someone to register Microsoft.com! How could they let anyone use a name so offensive on the Internet?

    But seriously, who did f&%$edcompany.com register with? and f&%$ed.com? (Yes, I do have a problem with my u, c and k $eys. Its f&%$ing annoying)

    1. Re:So I looked and was offended. by Ralph+Nader · · Score: 1


      Domain Name: FUCKEDCOMPANY.COM
      Registrar: TUCOWS.COM, INC.
      Whois Server: whois.opensrs.net

      Domain Name: FUCKED.COM
      Registrar: CORE INTERNET COUNCIL OF REGISTRARS
      Whois Server: whois.corenic.net

      --
      Government Of, By, And For The People... Not Monied Interests.
  165. Re:Sounds like a free speech issue to me by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 1

    Personally, I reckong the RIP bill came from watching a little to much Star Trek:

    "Guilty until proven innocent?!"
    "Of course, brining the innocent to trial wouldn't be fair!"

  166. A friend of mine... by locutus074 · · Score: 1
    ...registered ifucku.com at Domain Bank. I don't know how much help this will be, since the impression that he gave what that it somehow slipped by them, but I hope it helps.

    --

    --

    --
    We have fought the AC's, and they have won.

  167. Re:One that won't get registered by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    lol which song is that by anthrax? must download and listen... i'm guessing they're a heavy metal band?

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  168. Re:Blame the Churches... by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    Fuck, which comes from the word Fukar - "To Grow"

    really now, mr. high and mighty :)

    the first day of freshman latin our highschool latin teacher decided that after we pestered him about latin swear words and would not awnser, he told us to get out a sheet of paper and copy down the vocabulary on the board he was writing down. The first word was "facit, which uses the long A sound, pronounced (basically) "Fuck it". The translation was equally interesiting, having three translations, one being "To make", "To do", and "Do it".

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  169. swear words should be censored by arcus · · Score: 1
    anyone who cares about swear words should be in favour of their censorship. They're the only words in Western Society with a sacred or magical quality (if you don't believe me, swear at your mother and see how a couple of monosyllabic words can entirely change her demeanor).

    Of course, if people ever come to think that these are just words then their magic will be lost. And this is exactly what will happen if they become commonplace in domain names.

    I'm sorry for the people who can't make jokes with domain names, but sacrifices must be made by all to preserve the unique culture of swearing.

    support censorship of swearing today, to protect the might of swearing for tommorrow.

  170. AC, help me out here by digitalmind · · Score: 1

    Dear Anonymous coward,

    Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's law. I have learned a great deal from you, and I try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind him that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination..... End of debate !

    I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some specific laws and how to best follow them as a true believer.

    When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord (Lev. 1:9). The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. How should I deal with this?

    I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as it suggests in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?

    I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness (Lev. 15:19-24). The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.

    Lev. 25:44 states that I may buy slaves from the nations that are around us. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans but not Canadians. Can you clarify?

    I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself?

    A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination (Lev. 10:10), it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this?

    Lev. 20:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear prescription glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?

    I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident that you can help. Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging.



    And I leave you with the note that if I felt that the bible was offensive (which I don't, but easily could), the right that allows you to tell us what should be censored could easily be used against you.



    Kris
    botboy60@hotmail.com
    Nerdnetwork.net

    --



    Kris
    botboy60@hotmail.com
    Nerdnetwork.net
    1. Re:AC, help me out here by Soruk · · Score: 1
      Lev 10:10: You must distinguish between the holy and the common, between the unclean and the clean

      What has that got to do with shellfish?

      Lev 20:20: If a man sleeps with his aunt, he has dishonored his uncle. They will be held responsible; they will die childless.

      What does THAT have to do with vision or approaching altars?

      --
      -- Soruk
  171. Blame the Churches... by Psi-kick+Guy · · Score: 1

    "Taboo" words originally came about because they offend the church...

    In most cultures, this means that taboo words are usually related to religion ("God!" "Jesus H. Christ!", "Damn!" are all examples of this for western people.) IIRC in Hebrew, God has a name, but it's not meant to be spoken aloud (although it's OK to write it in proper context, like religious tome)

    In the west, words dealing with sex are taboo because the church has decided that sex is taboo (it's only use is procreation) - so words dealing with sex (Fuck, which comes from the word Fukar - "To Grow") are not allowed to be spoken. This has become less so, but (especially in the US, for example) sex is still considered something that shouldn't happen unless the goal is making babies (witness the criminalization of prostitution, for example.. or the fact that some states still have laws against oral/anal sex.)

    What's really interesting about this is the fact that (generally) the west (therfore western religions) consider sex to be more important than god (because saying "Fuck" is considered worse than saying "God!")

  172. Re:It seems to have a different meaning in the US. by plover · · Score: 3
    I've heard there are three football club names that can't pass through the "child surf-safe filters":

    Arsenal

    Scunthorpe

    Manchester-fucking-United.

    John

    --
    John
  173. What happened to the capital 'F'? by MrChris2 · · Score: 1

    (Caution: you may see four ascii characters in the range 97-122 which, when concatenated, offend you.) Where's the capital 'F' in this range then eh!? Come on boy's grammar! Chris

  174. Good (cheap) Registrar by cd_Csc · · Score: 2

    Personally, I use Dotster as my registrar (US based). I just checked, and they don't appear to be censoring anything. Their regular price is $15/year, but if you're patient, they often have $10 specials.

    1. Re:Good (cheap) Registrar by Antipop · · Score: 1

      Gandi.net is cheaper than that. The price is 10 Euros, which is about $11USD depending on the current exchange rate. I've had a few friends tell me good things about them.

      -antipop

  175. look what a whois has to say... by adpowers · · Score: 1

    I whois'ed fuck.com and this is what showed up:
    Whois Server Version 1.3

    Domain names in the .com, .net, and .org domains can now be registered
    with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net
    for detailed information.

    Domain Name: FUCK.COM
    Registrar: NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC.
    Whois Server: whois.networksolutions.com
    Referral URL: www.networksolutions.com
    Name Server: No nameserver
    Updated Date: 04-oct-2000

    >>> Last update of whois database: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 07:31:56 EST

    The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .ORG, .EDU domains and
    Registrars.

    Network Solutions registered it. Interesting.

  176. Re:It seems to have a different meaning in the US. by chroma11 · · Score: 1

    Well a friend from the UK thought "bloody" was pretty intense. In California "FUCK" was close to "oh gosh" in technical circles. Or like saying " Man, Steve you did that..." Here in West Virginia it will freak old ladies and get strong reproof from adult males if said in front of women one doesn't know. In similair social situations. I mean nothing one would say in front of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals which is in San Francisco.

  177. Re:It seems to have a different meaning in the US. by chroma11 · · Score: 1

    I use "DEVICE" (with emphasis. Saying: "Well she liked the back seat of a cold car and with cold and throughts of police invasions I was glad my DEVICE worked.

  178. The meaning of the 'F' word by cheekymonkey_68 · · Score: 1

    As no one else seems to have posted it....

    For the 1% who don't know what it means.

    Factually its an abbreviation:

    For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge.

    So when someone say go f**k yourself it doesn't really make sense as an insult.

    1. Re:The meaning of the 'F' word by Dest · · Score: 1

      your an idiot. YAI

  179. On topic at last by cheekymonkey_68 · · Score: 3

    One site I feel should be mentioned is mikehuntsonfire and also check out
    sickfuckers.com

    SickFuckers got registered so you're in with a chance here...

    FYI MikeHunt is a cool underground site that in their own words "puts out the evilest books, videos & comix this side of hell!"

    Oh and their index page is pretty funny because the opening link is "CLICK TO ENTER MIKE HUNT". I know pretty inane stuff...

    I never thought this link would EVER be on topic....time to sit back and watch my kharma burn !!!

  180. Why single out NSI? by Mortimer+Snerd · · Score: 1

    NSI isn't holding back anyone's freedom. No one forces you to use them. They can ban the word "cow" if they feel like it, it's their system. They have competition now, so if there is demand to regester the word fuck, someone else will do it.

  181. exchange rate... by InfiX · · Score: 1

    you're aware that the euro has been under a dollar for months now, right? so actually €10 is more like $8.50

  182. Re:Dump nsi by imagineer_bob · · Score: 2

    I agree! If the doamain is legal to sell, then perhaps they're violating their agreement as a domain agent. Of course, try getting our current crop of "let's clean up Hollywood" politicians excited about allowing FUCK in domain names. A little story: For about a year, I dropped out of my long career as a researcher and worked for a dot-com. They would meet for days on end about what dirty words should be filtered in chat rooms! They'd rather talk about that than actually making the products better. I finally left in disgust, and the CTO of the company who was a main force behind keeping chat clean was arrested for soliciting sex with what he thought was a 13-year-old girl on the Internet. --

  183. whatthefuck.com? by outZider · · Score: 1

    I'm the administrator of whatthefuck.com -- I got in on the first day of ICANN registrations, and got in before the filters went up. There appears to be few registrars left that allow it.. - oZ

    --
    - oZ
    // i am here.
  184. Re:Sounds like a free speech issue to me by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1
    We have an unwritten constitution :) Because it's unwritten, Phony Tony got away with the RIP bill. I doubt an actual constitution would help.

    Didn't I read that the UK was on the verge of codifying citizen rights in some form? And wasn't RIP pushed thru in order to get it done before those rights got enumerated?

  185. Prudes. by broody · · Score: 1

    Gods, how upset can people get over a simple little word?

    I suppose as upset as they get over cloth they call a flag or some damn football team. I don't get this and I don't think I ever will. It's not a bomb or something; where does the offence come from?

    --
    ~~ What's stopping you?
  186. NSI registered burningshithead.com by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    Check it out. No problems registering it, but we had trouble getting search engines to list it, and seem to have offended many people when we linked to their sites from this domain. Whatever. Also, the folks at datapimp.net have a bunch of dirty domains, including the essential fuckthatshit.org. I believe there was a story on slashdot about registering dirty domains a couple years ago but I am too lazy to search for it....

  187. Re:It seems to have a different meaning in the US. by heytal · · Score: 1

    And i regularly use one to do some disk related stuff on my unix machines..

    anyone remember "fsck" ??

    :-)

  188. And what if ... by heytal · · Score: 1
    They start banning names with sex in it ??

    maybe www.sussex.ac.uk will have to get another name for itself :-)

  189. Re:It seems to have a different meaning in the US. by tshak · · Score: 1

    Which is why, based on most regex standards, one should use a ".". Oh well, who the f.ck cares?

    --

    There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
  190. Re:It seems to have a different meaning in the US. by andyh1978 · · Score: 2
    Mind you, I can just imagine Great Aunt Hilda being stopped in the street by a MORI pollster, and asked to rank the following swearwords in order...
    A prime suggestion for a decent Slashdot poll.

    Most offensive swear word:
    1. F*ck
    2. Sh*t
    3. C*nt
    4. W*nk
    5. C*wboy Neal
  191. Re:(OT) Re:It seems to have a different meaning... by andyh1978 · · Score: 2
    The word "c?nt" has something to do with a goddess.
    This link has a dissertation on the etymology and history of 'cunt'.

    Regarding the link to a goddess, it has this to say:
    Barbara Walker cites the Indian 'kundas', "[descendants] of the Goddess Kunda [or 'Cunti']" (ibid.), and Terence Meaden (1992:33) suggests that legal suppression of 'cunt' is related to a desire to suppress the worship of such pagan idols and represents "a series of vicious witch hunts encouraged by an evil establishment wishing to suppress what amounted to apparent signs of Goddess beliefs".
  192. Re:Offense is relative; you go only where you want by truelight · · Score: 1

    You know, the .nu domain (Niue) means "now" in Swedish. now=nu

    "knulla" means "fuck"

    Now imagine how cool it is to own "knulla.nu"

  193. Naughty Words in Domains by aseidas · · Score: 2

    It seems that eatmyass.com is appropriate but unavailable. They have suggested the following: myeatmyass.com e-eatmyass.com abouteatmyass.com eatmyassonline.com eatmyasscentral.com

  194. Sounds like a free speech issue to me by tagishsimon · · Score: 3

    Fuck is such a useful word. Doesn't your constitution provide for dealing with people who are a bit anal about the fuck word?

    1. Re:Sounds like a free speech issue to me by keesh · · Score: 1

      We have an unwritten constitution :) Because it's unwritten, Phony Tony got away with the RIP bill. I doubt an actual constitution would help.

    2. Re:Sounds like a free speech issue to me by Killer+Napkin · · Score: 2

      Not really. Besides the obvious fact that this isn't a government organization, but rather a private organization that is doing the censoring, one has to remember that not all speech is free in this country.

      Basically, the Supreme Court has ruled that certain criteria can be applied to Free Speech. They've ruled that Free Speech and other first amendment rights are limited can be limited by time, place, and manner restrictions. I think the famous example is crying out that there is a fire inside of a crowded movie theatre.

      Slander, libel, obscenities, and anything that creates a "clear and present danger" are not necessarily protected under the Consitution. Of course, it really depends on what the courts say is protected and what isn't. It changes all the time.

  195. Re:It seems to have a different meaning in the US. by dark_panda · · Score: 3

    Since the asterik is usually used for a string of characters in a wildcard situation, it would probably be preferable to use a question mark, no? Otherwise, the poll options could be misconstrued as anything from "Fiddleback" to "Clerihewboy Neal."

    J

  196. Re:One that won't get registered by 72beetle · · Score: 1

    It's from 'Starting Up A Posse' off the Killer B's album. The song is a heartwarming personal message to Tipper Gore from the boys in the band.

    --
    -Those who dance are considered insane by those who can't hear the music.
  197. Re:One that won't get registered by talesout · · Score: 1

    It's called "Startin' Up A Posse" or something like that, and the guy missed one:

    It's actually Shitfucksatandeathsexdrugsrape
    these seven words they are trying to take.

    It was on Attack of the Killer "B"s and most of the stuff on that little album was absolutely hillarious. But you kind of had to follow Antrax history to get some of it.

    --


    Bite my yammer.
  198. Swear words are easy targets by JCCyC · · Score: 2
    Entities interested in stifling criticism will use any excuse to shut down a domain/website/whatever. Swear words are just too easy a target. If anyone is interested in venting his/her rage against one of such entities, I'll be happy to create a host definition under one of the domains I acquired recently:

    isverybad[.com|.org|.net] or areverybad[.com|.org|.net]

    You show me a page with meaningful content criticising entity X and I'll create entityx.isverybad.org or entitiesx.areverybad.net or whatever combination is preferred. For instance, http://softwarepatents.areverybad.org now points to the LPF. Let's see people shut down that.

    Feel free to interpret my geographically-and-trigonometrically-spamproofed e-mail and discuss the subject with me.

  199. Re:It seems to have a different meaning in the US. by fatphil · · Score: 1

    My three current favourite naughty words...

    Kn*ckers
    Kn*ckers
    Kn*ckers

    Semprini?

    FP.

    --
    Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  200. Re:Offense is relative; you go only where you want by Mike1024 · · Score: 1
    Hey,

    There are plenty of innocent words that are offensive in other languages.

    You mean like french company Sodem??

    Michael

    ...another comment from Michael Tandy.

    --
    "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
  201. Re:Offense is relative; you go only where you want by shokk · · Score: 1

    And besides, what are the chances that fuckyomamma.com is going to become the next Yahoo or Amazon. Let them have their little domain and watch it fade away. The registrar gets their $75 and the moron gets their yuks for a little while.

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  202. Use Dotster! by CritterNYC · · Score: 1

    Just use Dotster. Better service, security and admin utilities than Network Solutions. And you can use any words you like, including the seven dirty ones. I checked and this domain:

    piss-shit-fuck-cunt-motherfucker-cocksucker-tits.c om

    ; is open and available for registration via Dotster. Proof you can use as many dirty words as you'd like in your domain name.

    Some day I hope to have a .plan.

  203. Policy change?? by WPL510 · · Score: 1

    If NSI has really decided to play censor, can someone please explain to me how FC came into being? I'm sure you know which site I'm referring to- the one that gleefully tosses about the F word at every possible chance. Granted, it also has a URL for the more delicate souls, but still- if there really is censorship, how could FC be FC?

  204. Fucker.com and Fuckertown.com exist by themushroom · · Score: 1
    Chank Diesel of the greatest font foundry in the world owns Fucker.com (which some of chank.com's items linked to) and Flash cartoon site Fuckertown.com, both of which are working right now ... and we all know about FuckedCompany.com, which has been featured on this site before.

    My wife works at a library where there is a "site of the week" promoted. I'd suggested chank.com and it was almost put on their list... until someone watched the link display in their browser and saw the references to fucker.com as elements loaded. Whoops...

  205. (addendum) And then there's WTF.com! by themushroom · · Score: 1

    And when I posted about fucker.com and fuckertown.com, I completely forgot that I have an email account with WhatTheFuck.com!

  206. Re:It seems to have a different meaning in the US. by Garbagehead · · Score: 1

    I dunno... i live in australia (darwin :), and up here swearing is pretty common. people don't put f*ck after every second word or anything, but its greatly used to show size, or greatness. eg. it was f*ckin' huuuuge!!!

    Cops dont seem to mind the word either... while explaining a seatbelt fine i had a cop tell me "what a load of bullsh*t!"

    Cunt is a veeery regularly used term for the yummiest part of the female anatomy :) but its probably also the most offensive when your called a cunt.

  207. Canada seems to work by Dark+Sorcerer · · Score: 1

    I checked out random .ca addresses with teh f-word in them and several worked, so if you want to try that :)

    --
    -DS
  208. NameZero can't count by el_nino-2000 · · Score: 1
    This is quoted from NameZero's Terms of Service page:
    Each member is required to access any part of the Namezero Service (including but not limited to the domain name, e-mail account or instant messaging service) at least three (5) times during each calendar month, generating an aggregate of at least twenty (30) page views during such visits. ..... The e-mail account offered to you as part of the Namezero Service if any, must be accessed at least three (5) times each calendar month in order to remain active.

    Hmmm, I'm not sure I can trust a domain register if they can't even get their Terms of Service correct. "three (5) times", "twenty (30) page", and "three (5) times" confuses me. What are the trying to say?
  209. www.citizenwatchessuck.com by Deanasc · · Score: 1

    I have the above web address from register.com and have had no trouble from them. In fact the Citizen Watch company is aware of the address and I haven't heard from their lawyers. Provided my new watch doesn't break down 6 months into a 5 year warrantee (like the first one) I'll let the address expire then they can have the address if they want it.

    --
    I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
  210. fuckertown.com? by fishfooddelux · · Score: 1

    One of my favorite sites.

    --
    "In the future, we will all have our 15 minutes of privacy."
  211. I don't see the point by keesh · · Score: 1

    I really don't see the point. Banning a word won't make it go away, especially words that are so common. In the UK that kind of language is fairly common on TV anyway... Forbidding it makes no sense. And what about words which are swearing in other languages? Filter those as well and there's probably not much left... For all I know, 'slashdot' could be a curse in some obscure dialect spoken by three people. Or something.

    1. Re:I don't see the point by keesh · · Score: 1

      Money. It may be necessary but the way it is being used upsets me. Commercialisation of people especially. And charging people to use their own hardware in ways they aren't told (cough WinME cough). Censorship. Mainly, though, waste of ability. There are thousands of people that are being wasted because governments, large companies (not all of which are bad), journalists don't approve. Language is just a way of using concepts in a constructive manner. Get rid of one word, why not get rid of them all?

  212. Re:Offense is relative; you go only where you want by keesh · · Score: 1

    Also, not everyone speaks English. There are plenty of innocent words that are offensive in other languages. Add product names and the list is almost endless -- remember the MR2 (merde) anyone?

  213. It's all in english ... by nickol · · Score: 1

    All those registrars are english-speaking.
    If you want offensive names, you should register english words in non-english speaking countries and vise versa.
    Example - www.zaebali.com - the same word in russian.
    BTW. there are also f-u-c-k.com, oFoUoCoKo.com, fukck.com and variants. There is always a way around.

  214. fuck is a word in webster's dictionary by afxgrin · · Score: 1

    found this entry at www.m-w.com which
    is Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary

    Main Entry: 1fuck
    Pronunciation: 'f&k
    Function: verb
    Etymology: akin to Dutch fokken to breed (cattle), Swedish dialect fokka to copulate
    Date: 1503
    intransitive senses
    1 usually obscene : COPULATE -- sometimes used in the present participle as a meaningless intensive
    2 usually vulgar : MESS 3 -- used with with
    transitive senses
    1 usually obscene : to engage in coitus with -- sometimes used interjectionally with an object (as a personal or reflexive pronoun) to express anger, contempt, or disgust
    2 usually vulgar : to deal with unfairly or harshly : CHEAT, SCREW

    Its not like its completely slang here. I still think censorship is such a waste of time and money. And the excuse "its to protect kids". Whats it really protecting them from? Nothing.
    They'll learn it at school or from the parents before they learn it from radio, television or the internet.

  215. Re:One that won't get registered by Ayon+Rantz · · Score: 1

    Actually it's shitfucksatandeathsexdrugsrape, if I'm not mistaken - definitely seven words, at least.
    --
    Pokéthulhu

    --
    Pokéthulhu
    Gotta catch you all!
  216. Re:Dump nsi by gle · · Score: 1

    What?
    (0, Troll)

    Could the moderators send me some of the stuff the smoke, please.

    Then "imagineer_bob" just replies "I agree" and gets a (2, Interesting). And then "Coward, Anonymous" says roughly the same as me and gets (3, Informative) instead of (-1, Redundant).
    I am not happy at all.

    Do the idiot moderators realize they are just pushing users into becoming Trolls with this kind of behavior?

    ____________________

    --
    Ni!
  217. BTW: f-u-c-k.com is registered by davetoepfer · · Score: 1

    It's a porn site if I recall. dt .

  218. (OT) Re:It seems to have a different meaning... by DrQu+xum · · Score: 1
    There's actually a movement in NA to "unvulgarize" the word c?nt...by feminists, of all people. (Note that I have nothing against feminists.)

    Their reasoning:
    • The word "vagina" is derived from the Greek for "sheath of a sword."
    • The word "c?nt" has something to do with a goddess.

    To get back on topic, it seems to me that NSI uses "George Carlin's Incomplete List of Impolite Words" to determine what's inappropriate in a domain name. But still, how do names like f.uk get through?
    Thus sprach DrQu+xum, SID=218745.
    --
    DrQu+xum: Proof that the lameness filter doesn't work.
  219. I found one that doesn't censor you by rabtech · · Score: 2

    Registerfree.com doesn't censor domain names, and I've used them in the past. They offer cheap, no-frills registration. Go check them out.
    -----

    --
    Natural != (nontoxic || beneficial)
  220. Swear words? by hwilker · · Score: 1
    teenagepregnancy.com
    drugabuse.com
    minimumwage.com
    righttobeararms.com

    No, I didn't test them... I was afraid!

    --
    -- H. Wilker
  221. Censorship is typical by Daath · · Score: 1

    of Americans... No offense.
    I use speednames.com, they're cool and fast, and mostly pretty cheap. It started as a Danish company, so you'll probably not find censorship there.

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
  222. Sad... by thedesertfox · · Score: 1

    I find it sad that domain names can go from being freely registered to being regulated to the point of even restricting certain words in a domain name. What is this? What's next?

    If the Internet was once a place people looked to for freedom of speech, I think that compainies such as Network Solution and "register.com" along with government intervention are slowly, but surely ending that.
    -----

    --
    Los Angeles: 1,000 suburbs in search of a city.
  223. Humorous, but you have a good point... by Gendou · · Score: 1
    Yes, I agree. I think it may be a little ridiculous to expect the registar to not be offended by anything. After all, they are human too.

    But, on the same token, as providing a service to the Internet population - a VERY diversified group of people, you're kind of required to put up with all sorts of different things.

    If you didn't want to run the risk of being offended by viewpoints different from you own, don't become a domain name registrar

  224. Offense is relative; you go only where you want. by Gendou · · Score: 5
    Attention to NSI. Not everyone is offended by what offends you. I know it's hard to accept, but everybody has their own relative point of view.

    What does it say about people like this? Do they ignore the fact that if you decide you want to walk down a sidewalk to a strip club, the sidewalks don't throw a barracade up that says "your direction is inappropriate, please choose another". It's everyone person's right to choose what they want to expose themselves to.

    This form of censorship is utterly redundant and excessive. IF you are offended by something, you are NOT going to go out searching for that thing on purpose. If someone's offended by the word "f*ck", they are not going to type it into a search engine. As for those of us who aren't offended, we don't care either way.

    Besides, this kind of blockage at a search engine does nothing to keep you from all the naughty words, porn banners, and so on that will be thrown at your face once you start clicking links.

    Why do people think they are going to make some sort of positive influence by trying to censor the Net? Arrogant, conceited, and utterly foolish. Stopping the ocean tides would yield better results.

  225. Their Rules by KarmaChameleon · · Score: 1

    When you do a search for such a domain (fuckedcompany.com for example) they give the following rules:

    - Use only letters, numbers, or hyphen ("-")
    - Cannot begin or end with a hyphen
    - .com, .net and .org domain names cannot exceed 67 characters total
    - Other domain names cannot exceed 22 characters, not including the extension
    - Domain names are not case sensitive
    - Domain names cannot include spaces

    There doesn't seem to be anything there about 4 letter words.

    kc.

    --

    kc.

    "You'll have to speak up, I'm wearing a towel." - Homer J. Simpson
  226. Shitteren Gafuck by grovertime · · Score: 1
    This is not just a problem for registering domains, though I have come under heavy fire after attempting (on several occasions) to purchase URLs that contained curse words from what I thought were registrars that I had relationships with. It is also a major problem with ISPs and their content filters. I've heard of Yahoo! terminating service to many of its Site.Yahoo users for using curse words - and they did it with no warning and no impunity. This story and others posted recently on /. illustrate the tremendous censorship issues that are going to arise with greater frequency with our new communication systems.

    Confused about my title? It is a Yiddish term and not a curse word - but you know what? I couldn't register it because of those dirty little words.

    1. P 2 P___H U M O R
  227. ms by H*rus · · Score: 1

    What about microsoft.com?
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

    --

    - if you love something, set it free; if it doesn't come back, hunt it down and kill it
  228. Naughty Words in Domains by Avon_Brandt · · Score: 1

    It seems really bizarre that registrars should start being so hard on people wanting to use the F word in domain names, since they've clearly allowed them in the past - cf www.f**kyou.co.uk. Have they all just recently turned into a bunch of f**kin' net NAZIs?

    --
    "Brevity is the soul of lingerie." - Dorothy Parker
  229. .ca seems unaffected by MikeLRoy · · Score: 1

    at least with the registrar i tried (easyhosting.com). There may, however, be someone to reject it later on.


    -MR

    --
    -Michael Roy Some people are like Slinkies. Not really useful, but you can't help smiling when you see one tumble down
  230. Devil's advocate- Watch out for what you say by Faies · · Score: 1
    I do believe that much of the censorship that goes on today is frivulous. However, I let me be the devil's advocate just a bit.

    Free speech is the major complaint behind all this. Free speech lets use the word "fuck" as we please (although I must say that is a different story in school). Free speech, most importantly, lets orginizations and corporations dictate their feelings. If a group of people are so offended by people who want to use the word "fuck", they have a right to say that is wrong and refuse service. That's all. They can't stop us from using such language. However, as long as there are other companies willing to accept the usage of such domain names, fuckedcompany.com (a most entertaing site at times, I might add) will still exist, for one. There is nothing (legally) wrong when nsi.com denies such service. There may only be a problem is a monopoly dictating such censorship exists, or the government takes a stance and bans the usage of "fuck"

    ------------------------------
    Faies

  231. fuckedcompany.com was registered by hughk · · Score: 1

    There is a wonderful little website putting up info about high-tech companies about to go-under called www.fuckedcompany.com - very appropiate, funny and useful as well. This is a US run site, so someone must have accepted the registration.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  232. 1Coms.com by optize · · Score: 1

    1Coms.com is another great domain service. Only $8.75/year for domains. They dont filter out the bad words either! Woohoo!

  233. Re:Pick up a Bible why don't you. by teaserX · · Score: 1

    Been there...done that. Also looked OUTSIDE of the Book and found much more truth. ...and by the way go fsck yourself

    --
    We really need your help
    http://www.gofundme.com/help-sherry
  234. Relativity is relative. by Kibo · · Score: 2
    It's not that NSI is personally offended. They are mearly selecting the type of customers they don't want, funny paying ones. That's cool they're free to go down that path, they can be the Nordstroms of domain naming. They can even have a little guy playing piano music on their website 24/7. It's stupid, but isn't that THEIR choice?

    It's a big wide beautiful world we live in, and everyone should be allowed to be as silly and ignorant as they want to be. Sure, we who live in cities have to tolerate a little inconvienence, but those bible loving icon worshipers who want to save the interent for the children, they live in the midwest. I think it's pretty clear who got the short end of the stick.

    The argument that any outlet of anything should offer you the full range of choices available is, even on its face, not very realistic. I personally think the world and its infobaun would be a fairly boring place if it were homogeneous. The differences are what make stuff interesting, stupid, worthy of ridicule, and the hottest wetest nastiest teenage porn you've never paid to see.

    --
    --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
  235. Why protect kids? Drink bud dry. by Kibo · · Score: 2
    I'm tired of everyone asking why are we saving the children? What are we protecting them from? How in the hell can we realisticly expect to shelter them from ideas so prevelent?

    You're all missing the point! We need to shelter them from the "bad ideas" so when they read Catcher In the Rye, the impact will be preserved. I know it's a lot of work to shield little Suzzie until sophmore english, but from my own personal experience the effort is well worth it.

    See, I have a learning disorder which makes it immpossible for me to understand new words solely from their spoken context. Consequently, when I was around five or so and began to hear objectionable language regularly in school, I was unable to integrate it. By the time I was in sophmore english I still was ignorant. I would read the internet often, so I knew what it was in a sence, but I'd always seen it as "bowl of fukk." We were reading Salinger in class one day, and I hit the pivitol passage. Well I was stunned, and confused. I remember it like it was directed by John Woo, with doves and unnecessary slow motion. I rasied my hand. The teacher came over; I pointed and asked my question. He bent down and whispered his reply. At this point I reflexivly shouted, "No shit? Well sonuvabitch!" I spent the remainder of the afternoon with the vice principal, but wow what an impact!

    And the answers to the questions follow: We're saving the children from Sally Struthers, and with a creature of her size we need all the help we can get.

    --
    --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
  236. The 'F' Word by anal.retentive · · Score: 1

    I think we all need to remind ourselves of the monty python skit on the word fuck. All those with napster search monty python - fuck and you will find a quite valid and logical explanation. Microsoft..can't live with it, can't kill it

    --
    Windows: frustration through ignorane
  237. A way to get by it by xMKRx · · Score: 1

    Use pig latin, uckFay is one word i've never seen filtered in anything.

  238. domain registration by batray · · Score: 1

    I tried it on my BulkRegister.com accunt and it worked fine. They don't seem to censor.

  239. Registering Naughty dot coms by Mr.+Macintosh · · Score: 1

    http://www.directdomain.com/ will let you register the f-word in domains. I haven't tried any others. Register.com will let you register ass.com (Taken) but not the seven words you can't say on television. No Shit.com, Piss.com, or Tits.com.

  240. Re:Offense is relative; you go only where you want by The+Burger · · Score: 1

    It does mean jack. When is the last time you went somewhere for some service and they stated that your opinions are morally corrupt?

    --
    That's a tasty burger!