Hassabis believes that sensory learning in the cortex is supervised and based on backpropagation. Not even wrong. Is this the man who is going to solve AGI?
A different class of local learning rule has been shown to allow hierarchical supervised networks to generate high-level invariances characteristic of biological systems, including mirror-symmetric tuning to physically symmetric stimuli, such as faces (Leibo et al., 2017). Taken together, recent AI research offers the promise of discovering mechanisms by which the brain may implement algorithms with the functionality of backpropagation. Moreover, these developments illustrate the potential for synergistic interactions between AI and neuroscience: research aimed to develop biologically plausible forms of backpropagation have also been motivated by the search for alternative learning algorithms.
Your criticisms of the film industry do not justify theft, no matter how much you pretend otherwise.
This is BS. Hollywood and the rest of the movie industry abuse unfair and unjust copyright laws to destroy the free market and make a hell of lot more money than they deserve. Any time one imposes restrictions on the freedom of others, one destroys the free market. No actor should be worth close to a billion dollars for spewing hot air. I will not shed any tears for the movie industry if people use KODI to watch their shit (mostly libtard propaganda) for free.
In my opinion, hurricanes are part of the earth climate control mechanism that gets rid of excess heat in the atmosphere. This is why there are fewer Atlantic hurricanes during an El Nino period.
One day, in the not too distant future, physicists will wake up from their self-imposed stupor and realize that distance is an illusion of the mind. It does not exist. We will develop technologies that will allow us to travel instantly from anywhere to anywhere. Of course, the aliens, if they exist, have figured this out eons ago and regularly visit us without our knowledge.:-)
Remember this. The best way to determine whether or not something exists physically is to ask the question that Immanuel Kant asked. If it exists, where is it? And what is it made of?
Relativists cannot falsify a major claim (gravity propagates at c) and you complain about minor errors in Newtonian physics? Those errors exist only because Newton could not have known about the Michelson-Morley experiments on the speed of light that were conducted centuries later.
In an essay titled "Objective Knowledge", Karl Popper wrote "... this is a field from which the observer was exorcised, slowly but steadily, by Einstein himself."
The main relativist claim that LIGO depends on is the claim that gravity propagates at the speed of light. There can be no gravitational waves if this claim is falsified. The problem is that GR makes it impossible to falsify the claim because it is essentially saying that gravity acts as if it is instantaneous (like Newtonian gravity) even though it isn't. This is pure pseudoscience because no experiment can be conducted to falsify it. LIGO cannot falsify it, only corroborate it with dubious results.
I am convinced that most of Einstein's physics is a scam for this reason and many others. The public is being deceived on a massive scale. I am not the only one. Unfortunately, science is more politics than science.
You are apparently not familiar with the science. Laplace proved a long time ago that the speed of gravity would have to be thousands of times faster than the speed of light in order for the solar system to remain stable. Look it up.
Moreover, the precession of Mercury argument is irrelevant to a discussion about the speed of gravity. In fact, relativists were forced to add complex terms to the equations of GR in order to make it act like Newtonian gravity which assumes that gravity is instantaneous. In other words, relativists are claiming that gravity acts as if it is instantaneous even though it isn't. This is pseudoscience because it cannot be falsified by experiment.
LIGO is precisely the experiment which could have falsified GR, but didn't.
This is so not true. LIGO was not designed to falsify GR but to corroborate it. A null result would not have falsified GR. It would have been attributed to noise, inadequate technology, etc. In fact, a team of Danish physicists have already written a paper to show that those LIGO wave detections are indistinguishable from noise.
Slashdot Mirror
We don't believe you.
Mainstream media is the true voice of the not-so-hidden government regardless of who is in the WH.
When the hammer comes down, there shall be much weeping in the land. Wait for it.
With good regenerative braking, adding passengers would not shorten the range too much.
Hassabis believes that sensory learning in the cortex is supervised and based on backpropagation. Not even wrong. Is this the man who is going to solve AGI?
From his recent Cell paper, Neuroscience-Inspired Artificial Intelligence:
A different class of local learning rule has been shown to allow hierarchical supervised networks to generate high-level invariances characteristic of biological systems, including mirror-symmetric tuning to physically symmetric stimuli, such as faces (Leibo et al., 2017). Taken together, recent AI research offers the promise of discovering mechanisms by which the brain may implement algorithms with the functionality of backpropagation. Moreover, these developments illustrate the potential for synergistic interactions between AI and neuroscience: research aimed to develop biologically plausible forms of backpropagation have also been motivated by the search for alternative learning algorithms.
What?
Thanks to Demis Hassabis.
Why Google's DeepMind Is Clueless About How Best to Achieve AGI
Your criticisms of the film industry do not justify theft, no matter how much you pretend otherwise.
This is BS. Hollywood and the rest of the movie industry abuse unfair and unjust copyright laws to destroy the free market and make a hell of lot more money than they deserve. Any time one imposes restrictions on the freedom of others, one destroys the free market. No actor should be worth close to a billion dollars for spewing hot air. I will not shed any tears for the movie industry if people use KODI to watch their shit (mostly libtard propaganda) for free.
In my opinion, hurricanes are part of the earth climate control mechanism that gets rid of excess heat in the atmosphere. This is why there are fewer Atlantic hurricanes during an El Nino period.
One day, in the not too distant future, physicists will wake up from their self-imposed stupor and realize that distance is an illusion of the mind. It does not exist. We will develop technologies that will allow us to travel instantly from anywhere to anywhere. Of course, the aliens, if they exist, have figured this out eons ago and regularly visit us without our knowledge. :-)
Remember this. The best way to determine whether or not something exists physically is to ask the question that Immanuel Kant asked. If it exists, where is it? And what is it made of?
Now you know why distance does not exist.
Such a proof would not necessarily be worth a million dollars. It could be applicable only to the Queens Puzzle and to nothing else.
I mean, what is the significance of this proof to the world? Will it lead to some scientific or technological breakthrough?
Pearls do not look good on swines. See you around.
Relativists cannot falsify a major claim (gravity propagates at c) and you complain about minor errors in Newtonian physics? Those errors exist only because Newton could not have known about the Michelson-Morley experiments on the speed of light that were conducted centuries later.
Thanks for the exchange.
I have to disagree. The noise to signal ratio makes it impossible to ascertain the results regardless of the sensitivity of the instruments.
In an essay titled "Objective Knowledge", Karl Popper wrote "... this is a field from which the observer was exorcised, slowly but steadily, by Einstein himself."
The main relativist claim that LIGO depends on is the claim that gravity propagates at the speed of light. There can be no gravitational waves if this claim is falsified. The problem is that GR makes it impossible to falsify the claim because it is essentially saying that gravity acts as if it is instantaneous (like Newtonian gravity) even though it isn't. This is pure pseudoscience because no experiment can be conducted to falsify it. LIGO cannot falsify it, only corroborate it with dubious results.
I am convinced that most of Einstein's physics is a scam for this reason and many others. The public is being deceived on a massive scale. I am not the only one. Unfortunately, science is more politics than science.
You are apparently not familiar with the science. Laplace proved a long time ago that the speed of gravity would have to be thousands of times faster than the speed of light in order for the solar system to remain stable. Look it up.
Moreover, the precession of Mercury argument is irrelevant to a discussion about the speed of gravity. In fact, relativists were forced to add complex terms to the equations of GR in order to make it act like Newtonian gravity which assumes that gravity is instantaneous. In other words, relativists are claiming that gravity acts as if it is instantaneous even though it isn't. This is pseudoscience because it cannot be falsified by experiment.
LIGO is precisely the experiment which could have falsified GR, but didn't. This is so not true. LIGO was not designed to falsify GR but to corroborate it. A null result would not have falsified GR. It would have been attributed to noise, inadequate technology, etc. In fact, a team of Danish physicists have already written a paper to show that those LIGO wave detections are indistinguishable from noise.