Slashdot Mirror


User: NateTech

NateTech's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
2,032
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 2,032

  1. Thomas Edison on 'Just Sleep On It' Solves Tricky Problems? · · Score: 1

    Weren't there stories of the famous inventor just getting up and leaving his lab and going to the movies whenever a particularly hard problem had him stumped, and coming back later with the answer?

    He accredited it to letting go of the conscious thought required to "think" about the problem and letting the brain continue working on it subconsciously while he focused 100% on the entertainment of the movie.

    I would say this is more of a key to the reason than the sleep itself. When you're asleep, your brain continues doing whatever it does to solve problems, but your conscious self and all your preconceived notions of how to handle the problem are no longer in the way, so to speak.

  2. Re:GUI's don't behave nicely with advanced configs on Review - Mac OS X Server 10.3, Part 1 · · Score: 1

    No, they had backups. It's not the important point -- Apple needs to teach the GUI's to read configuration files better -- especially the GUI in front of Apache.

  3. GUI's don't behave nicely with advanced configs on Review - Mac OS X Server 10.3, Part 1 · · Score: 1

    At least two friends have complained that OSX Server's Apache/Web GUI has trashed their carefully hand-crafted apache configurations without warning.

  4. Re:Get your resume together on Sharing IT Problems with Executives? · · Score: 1

    Doesn't work if the person above you isn't interested in fixing it and would rather use your pain as their gain -- "we put out yet another fire today"... without mentioning the the entire fire was completely avoidable.

  5. What retards. on Sun's new UltraSPARC workstation: the Blade 1500 · · Score: 1

    Sun releases a new platform that won't even run their flagship OS (Solaris 9). Yet another indication that Sun is floundering and doesn't know what they're doing anymore, is the impression this gives me. Wow.

    If anyone were actually driving the technology "somewhere" at Sun, would they really let hardware get out the door that can't even run their main OS? This is "back room lab" quality hardware that made it out of the company labs with a Sun badge on it and a manual, but it's not ready for prime-time yet. No company that has a clear technology vision and proper oversight of what's shipping as product would do this.

    Sun's still in their tailspin. I use and enjoy their older hardware that came from a day when the company had a vision to provide the best Unix platforms on the planet. (I said they had a vision, I didn't say if they hit it perfectly...) But more and more it looks like they're just lost and floundering and riding on their old systems and sales of mid-range boxes that are hideously overpriced.

  6. Re:Odd title. on BSD For Linux Users · · Score: 1

    I just wanted to screw with anyone who thinks it important, since mine just happened to be lower to prove a point -- that someone would respond to my stupid flamebait.

    I guess it worked, I got a rise out of you. ;-)

    Smile and enjoy the humor of how stupid it is to worry about one's Slashdot number. Relax....

  7. Re:Check This Out ! on BSD For Linux Users · · Score: 1

    Amen, brother. Sing it loud.

    Unix is Unix.
    Linux is Linux.
    BSD is BSD.

    They're all ... what they are. Learn 'em all, be a real pro and not a snot-nosed zealout.* I agree with ya.

    * While still bitching loudly to all in the room about stupid things like HP-UX not setting your damn terminal type for you correctly or not having "EDITOR" set in the shell by default to SOMETHING SANE. ;-)

  8. Re:Odd title. on BSD For Linux Users · · Score: 1

    Oh, I thought it was implemented to embarass you about how high your's is. (snicker...)

    Nice example of rationalization though.

  9. Re:In that case you wont be able to run anything.. on The Uncertain Promise of Utility Computing · · Score: 1

    Moles? Are you there Moles?

  10. Re:Can it be? on End of Life for Red Hat 7.x, 8.0 · · Score: 1

    You might have indicated that your response was toungue-in-cheek somehow. Smiley face, something.

    The moderators were confused too. It got moderated as a Troll, and by just reading it verbatim, rightly so.

    Maybe it needed MORE sarcasm for this crowd to "get it". :-)

  11. Re:Bad decision. on End of Life for Red Hat 7.x, 8.0 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, agreed. Some places even turn the "oh my god X blew up, fire fire!" and then the resulting three days of putting Humpy Dumpty back up on the wall into some kind of sick twisted view of "normal" and start to enjoy the "congratulations party" at the end of every fire.

    Ohh, we're so smart we figured out how to do X right!

    Meanwile the seasoned admin is over in the corner thinking... "yeah, but if you'd just planned for that problem and designed it out up-front like we used to..."

    Sad, isn't it? There are more and more workplaces where the truly professional admins aren't even consulted about how to "build things right" because of simply being outnumbered in his/her own department by "peers" who don't know what they're doing these days. Not a good trend.

  12. Re:The problems with the others on End of Life for Red Hat 7.x, 8.0 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, look at Mandrake if yours is a desktop install. 9.2 is pretty solid if you like KDE.

  13. Re:what the hell on End of Life for Red Hat 7.x, 8.0 · · Score: 1

    Uh, I think you may have missed the whole point of the GNU Public License all that software is licensed under, big guy.

    Learn to be your own "support". "Network" with other people who use and need the software you use to work too.

    Hello? Why does everyone think Service Contracts, SLA's and big bills pay for any better support than the people who write the software in the first place? (RedHat and most distros don't write the majority of what they're selling!)

  14. Re:what the hell on End of Life for Red Hat 7.x, 8.0 · · Score: 1

    Welcome to the Bazarre.

    You want orderly pews and rows, head back into the Cathedral. Buh-bye now.

  15. Re:RH 9 on End of Life for Red Hat 7.x, 8.0 · · Score: 1

    The subscriptions auto-renew. Beware.

  16. Re:Bad decision. on End of Life for Red Hat 7.x, 8.0 · · Score: 1

    I hope the so-called "linux professionals" that ONLY know/use RedHat do go back to the evil empire. Or at least far far away.

    Linux is linux. Learn and teach and test on linux. Not packaging tools. Even LPI.org gave in to the packaging tool crap and split their tests up... a good linux guru knows ALL of the packaging tools and their strengths and weaknesses.

  17. Re:Can it be? on End of Life for Red Hat 7.x, 8.0 · · Score: 1

    Linux is linux. Puh-leeze.

    uname -a ... oh lookie, I'm running Linux.

    Slackware = Linux.

  18. Re:Fedora and up2date on End of Life for Red Hat 7.x, 8.0 · · Score: 1

    repositories rhymes with...

    Ah. That explains it.

  19. Re:I moved to Fedora on End of Life for Red Hat 7.x, 8.0 · · Score: 1

    Yup, as I always suspected -- take development away from the company and move it to truly open and you get a product far superior to RedHat's. Gee... go figure.

    p.s. Professionals don't care about uptime when security patches are at stake. Patching is obviously the way to go. l33t kiDDi3z worry about uptime.

  20. Re:Mandrake on End of Life for Red Hat 7.x, 8.0 · · Score: 1

    I think layers 8 and 9 of the OSI networking model have affected the brains of those who claim RedHat is still the "easiest" distro to use.

    (Layer 8, religion .. Layer 9, politics...)

    Mandrake, Knoppix, and a whole bunch of other commercial distros do a much much better job at hardware autodetection and configuration than Kudzu/RedHat ever did nowadays.

    People are just sheep about such things... they remember how "easy" RH 5.2 was over Slackware in the mid-90's and just keep right on believing... Layer 8, baby...

  21. Re:Pity on End of Life for Red Hat 7.x, 8.0 · · Score: 1

    On i386 platforms there are at least four other distros that do a better job than Kudzu for hardware autodetection and installation.

    Homework project: Find them.

  22. Re:What about these options... on End of Life for Red Hat 7.x, 8.0 · · Score: 1

    Because (in order you presented them):
    1. They're too lazy to learn on their own and need other people to do their work for them.
    2. See #1.
    3. Because they drive cars that look good too.

    WTF? Linux is linux. If you can run one, you can run another. Pay for RHEL or download another one and don't pay. That seems the only choice here unless you're running commercial software on linux that requires a specific distro (stupid).

  23. Re:What services you running? on End of Life for Red Hat 7.x, 8.0 · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't go to any University stupid enough to be wasting money on a Linux distro. Which part of free (and Free) does your employer not understand?

  24. Re:vandalism just got a lot more fun for criminals on Wireless Street Lamps for Traffic Monitoring · · Score: 1

    Jeb, quit defending your brother George again...

  25. Re:About elbow height is good on Ideas for a Multipurpose Garage Workshop? · · Score: 1

    My wife's parents and sibling are all about as tall as you guys. If you ever get a chance to purchase/build your own house, look into raising everything. They did this customization to their home to everything from the kitchen counters to the bathroom toilets, and loved it.