It depends on why they are failing. If they are failing due to a lack of a resource, that's not unreasonable. Ideally you would provide a suitable exit code on a crash and have a suitable monitoring system pick that up, and allow a configuration for that daemon decide on the next action.
The user land tools in "Linux" are generally GNU, and GCC and associated tools hgaved been very successful, so your criticism seems off-base. If you had criticised GNU's terrible and ugly website, along with the failure of HURD, you might have a point.
Whilst you can have access to the components, rule extraction can vary from difficult to impossible. In that sense "the algorithm" may not be available for scrutiny. With machine learning even buggy models or code can result in mostly reasonable classification behaviour.
My wife is helpful, as she reminds me there are whole areas of human endeavour that I am not even in the ballpark of right in. Luckily our skills areas are complementary.
Harder? Maybe not. More frustrating unless you are using the right framework in the right way? Yes. More frustrating even if you are using the right framework in the right way? Yes. A pain to test sufficiently? Yes. A pain to keep up with the latest UI trend? Yes. UI dev pay seems like a case of paying for someone prepared to put up with a certain type of annoyance, but that seems to be true of many jobs, just different types of persistence required!
Given the complexities of some APIs, reinventing the wheel is the lazy option. Except it is probably a slightly wonky wheel that only works downhill, and only if you turn left, and catches fire if you try to turn right.
In my experience, high IQ people don't assume other people are dumb, and I know people with pretty stratospheric IQs. If anything, assuming others are also highly intelligent is more likely the issue, but there are plenty of people with very high IQ aren't guilty of that either. What you seem to be describing is arrogance, which isn't correlated with intelligence in my experience.
I must have missed the memo about Syria being moved to Africa.
If you had ever spoken to someone who has escaped a despotic regime or war zone in sub Saharan Africa (I have), it's not that Africans feel it is Europe's job, but that it is somewhere that they can go, and often other countries in the region will not or cannot accommodate them.
Going back to Syria, Lebanon has accepted over one million refugees into a population of four million, and simply does not have the resources to accept more, and hasn't had sufficient external support. Accepting more would also be destabilising, even with support. The same is true of Jordan. This means that Europe can be the only option left.
Are some refugees really economic migrants? Yes, but most area refugees. Will some stay long term? Probably, as that also happened inEuropeafter WW2, but most French exiles went home, and those that did not go home were from countries that continued to have political issues, or had border changes.
Would more support in countries of origin, etc, be good? Very likely, but the underlying issues can be complex, and deep-seated.
There's no ideal solution here, so simplistic offerings will be sufficient. I certainly wouldn't want to be in charge of trying to create something ethical and effective.
In conversation with someone from a university in Ireland, they said the reverse - the wages on offer from USA-based companies there were such that staff retention was difficult. Wages in the USA are much higher than the equivalent in Ireland, or the UK, although differences in healthcare costs might account for some of the $20k difference you observed.
Why do you consider people whose houses have been destroyed, towns shelled, families killed and mutilated to be freeloaders? When similar things happened in WW2, people were given succour. Many of those forced out of Syria are living in tents in Lebanon and Jordan in tents in freezing conditions. Are they also freeloaders?
Sometimes schedules are set by when it is believed a competitor is going to release a product. Recruitment and bringing staff up to speed takes time.
Ideally, even after release, you would still recruit more staff for next time, but that's not always done, or financially possible.
It's about creating strategies to work well in increasingly complex situations. Solutions can then use this to develop AI more able to navigate the real world. Using a game is easier to control and accelerate training for, and develop required techniques faster.
The GP seems to be not in the USA. Things work differently outside the USA, especially in terms of "union position", something not seen in most of Europe, for example, for 30 years since closed shops were ended.
Just because you do it doesn't mean others do. I worked salary for most of my career and any after hours I had to attend were balanced by a reduction of standard hours. Do your job, do it well, and you can do this.
It's often more about company policies than how well you do your job.
US rates on debt are set by the free market (this is not the same as the central bank rates, which defines the central bank rate as last call lender). If the USA cannot sell it's debt at a particular rate, then it has to set the rate higher, or not sell the debt. As it is, the rates are low, and it can only be sold at such rates as it is a low risk store of value, even below inflation rates.
Slashdot Mirror
Freer in what way?
It depends on why they are failing. If they are failing due to a lack of a resource, that's not unreasonable. Ideally you would provide a suitable exit code on a crash and have a suitable monitoring system pick that up, and allow a configuration for that daemon decide on the next action.
The user land tools in "Linux" are generally GNU, and GCC and associated tools hgaved been very successful, so your criticism seems off-base. If you had criticised GNU's terrible and ugly website, along with the failure of HURD, you might have a point.
The essential core of the userland tools in what people call Linux us from GNU, which is the point the OP was making.
I would have hoped that the French AI would at least want to discuss philosophy.
Whilst you can have access to the components, rule extraction can vary from difficult to impossible. In that sense "the algorithm" may not be available for scrutiny. With machine learning even buggy models or code can result in mostly reasonable classification behaviour.
I doubt it, as these adverts aren't even in the USA.
My wife is helpful, as she reminds me there are whole areas of human endeavour that I am not even in the ballpark of right in. Luckily our skills areas are complementary.
Harder? Maybe not. More frustrating unless you are using the right framework in the right way? Yes. More frustrating even if you are using the right framework in the right way? Yes. A pain to test sufficiently? Yes. A pain to keep up with the latest UI trend? Yes. UI dev pay seems like a case of paying for someone prepared to put up with a certain type of annoyance, but that seems to be true of many jobs, just different types of persistence required!
It's common in job adverts now.
Given the complexities of some APIs, reinventing the wheel is the lazy option. Except it is probably a slightly wonky wheel that only works downhill, and only if you turn left, and catches fire if you try to turn right.
In my experience, high IQ people don't assume other people are dumb, and I know people with pretty stratospheric IQs. If anything, assuming others are also highly intelligent is more likely the issue, but there are plenty of people with very high IQ aren't guilty of that either. What you seem to be describing is arrogance, which isn't correlated with intelligence in my experience.
I must have missed the memo about Syria being moved to Africa.
If you had ever spoken to someone who has escaped a despotic regime or war zone in sub Saharan Africa (I have), it's not that Africans feel it is Europe's job, but that it is somewhere that they can go, and often other countries in the region will not or cannot accommodate them.
Going back to Syria, Lebanon has accepted over one million refugees into a population of four million, and simply does not have the resources to accept more, and hasn't had sufficient external support. Accepting more would also be destabilising, even with support. The same is true of Jordan. This means that Europe can be the only option left.
Are some refugees really economic migrants? Yes, but most area refugees. Will some stay long term? Probably, as that also happened inEuropeafter WW2, but most French exiles went home, and those that did not go home were from countries that continued to have political issues, or had border changes.
Would more support in countries of origin, etc, be good? Very likely, but the underlying issues can be complex, and deep-seated.
There's no ideal solution here, so simplistic offerings will be sufficient. I certainly wouldn't want to be in charge of trying to create something ethical and effective.
In conversation with someone from a university in Ireland, they said the reverse - the wages on offer from USA-based companies there were such that staff retention was difficult. Wages in the USA are much higher than the equivalent in Ireland, or the UK, although differences in healthcare costs might account for some of the $20k difference you observed.
The idea that (effectively) neighbours will help those in need, and the state will wither away is, ironically, what Marx wanted.
Why do you consider people whose houses have been destroyed, towns shelled, families killed and mutilated to be freeloaders? When similar things happened in WW2, people were given succour. Many of those forced out of Syria are living in tents in Lebanon and Jordan in tents in freezing conditions. Are they also freeloaders?
Sometimes schedules are set by when it is believed a competitor is going to release a product. Recruitment and bringing staff up to speed takes time. Ideally, even after release, you would still recruit more staff for next time, but that's not always done, or financially possible.
Doublespeak is not a term used in 1984, and predates its publication.
It's a parliamentary committee, which is not the government, any more than a Congressional commitee is the President.
Disclosure: I worked on this sort of face recognition fifteen years ago, using 3D imaging, with a similar use case.
societal queues
I've met people who could benefit from playing a few rounds of Queue Simulator.
It's about creating strategies to work well in increasingly complex situations. Solutions can then use this to develop AI more able to navigate the real world. Using a game is easier to control and accelerate training for, and develop required techniques faster.
The GP seems to be not in the USA. Things work differently outside the USA, especially in terms of "union position", something not seen in most of Europe, for example, for 30 years since closed shops were ended.
Just because you do it doesn't mean others do. I worked salary for most of my career and any after hours I had to attend were balanced by a reduction of standard hours. Do your job, do it well, and you can do this.
It's often more about company policies than how well you do your job.
US rates on debt are set by the free market (this is not the same as the central bank rates, which defines the central bank rate as last call lender). If the USA cannot sell it's debt at a particular rate, then it has to set the rate higher, or not sell the debt. As it is, the rates are low, and it can only be sold at such rates as it is a low risk store of value, even below inflation rates.