Why let the lobbyists win? If the lobbyists are hurting, twist the knife even more. If they go offshore, our military and intelligence departments can handle that easily. The idea is that if they play hardball, you have to take it one step higher.
Turn up the pain on business, even if it means that the lobbyists cry out. When they stop crying out and actually want to not obliterate the US, continue a bit more. Then stop when they have no strength to do anything against the US.
Then remove offshoring and all the fraud/waste it brings. Not only does it allow our programmers(and anyone else) to thrive in an honest environment, it would have the side effect of bringing in new ones that see actual opportunity.
Except that Jina only is coding because of anti-US fraud that works in her favor.
Sounds like you don't want a US citizen until they've been beat down to a level of world subservience. Another point to add - you weren't paying attention that we're not asking about Jina, just Johnny.
We need less of you, less of Jina, and to give every advantage to Johnny.
If it's already going to be a long-term issue, killing offshoring would be a long-term solution. If you want to get Johnny coding, he'll appreciate that he can actually get a job.
He is, just that he isn't paying attention in the way you might think. While we might see trade relations, he might see it in his parents losing a college-paying job from it, a relative experiencing the same, or perhaps the news.
You want Johnny to want to code, give him every advantage to get him wanting to code. He is paying attention to the long term when he's deciding where/for what he wants to go to college.
How about just making it possible to not require a degree? Combine that with a required preference for US citizens - linked to the long-term and short term unemployment rates - and allow ourselves to redevelop our home market.
It might be painful for business, but getting obstacles out of the way for workers is as valid as removing obstacles for business.
However, it looks like Mozilla failed to communicate it well enough, thinking their own notice was enough. The result is that Mozilla seems to take Microsoft's path for once - refusing to patch security issues on a relatively new release, and washing their hands clean with an EOL.
I'd think that all the toxic chemicals in China would be worse than any STD.
On the other hand, if you want to cripple their government(and the people that send work over those kind of countries) for the second time in 200 years, I have no problem with that kind of fucking.
You can't split the two without splitting society.
Without social stability, you don't get bearable living conditions for more than the governmental apparatus. See China, North Korea, India, Vietnam, Brazil, and Russia for examples of that. These countries are split - businesses get all the freedoms to run over regular people, while regular people are silenced or disappeared for doing the same things as business.
Slashdot Mirror
Why let the lobbyists win? If the lobbyists are hurting, twist the knife even more. If they go offshore, our military and intelligence departments can handle that easily. The idea is that if they play hardball, you have to take it one step higher.
Turn up the pain on business, even if it means that the lobbyists cry out. When they stop crying out and actually want to not obliterate the US, continue a bit more. Then stop when they have no strength to do anything against the US.
Why should business get the complete favor, instead of letting them trample on everyone?
Not if our government steps in.
Then remove offshoring and all the fraud/waste it brings. Not only does it allow our programmers(and anyone else) to thrive in an honest environment, it would have the side effect of bringing in new ones that see actual opportunity.
The only way those offshore coders get a chance is through fraud. Our worst are better - and we don't make them suffer Third World conditions.
The odds are in the US's favor that there'll be a good one. Get rid of the fraud that seems to always accompany offshoring, and Johnny will code.
Except that Jina only is coding because of anti-US fraud that works in her favor.
Sounds like you don't want a US citizen until they've been beat down to a level of world subservience. Another point to add - you weren't paying attention that we're not asking about Jina, just Johnny.
We need less of you, less of Jina, and to give every advantage to Johnny.
The more reason to give our citizens every advantage. If they want more coders, perhaps the US should tap our population first.
Get rid of the means for business to send work offshore or to make work less secure, and that can change for the better.
If it's already going to be a long-term issue, killing offshoring would be a long-term solution. If you want to get Johnny coding, he'll appreciate that he can actually get a job.
He is, just that he isn't paying attention in the way you might think. While we might see trade relations, he might see it in his parents losing a college-paying job from it, a relative experiencing the same, or perhaps the news.
He is brighter than you might think.
You want Johnny to want to code, give him every advantage to get him wanting to code. He is paying attention to the long term when he's deciding where/for what he wants to go to college.
How about just making it possible to not require a degree? Combine that with a required preference for US citizens - linked to the long-term and short term unemployment rates - and allow ourselves to redevelop our home market.
It might be painful for business, but getting obstacles out of the way for workers is as valid as removing obstacles for business.
Johnny can code, just that there's too much against Johhny to make him want to do so.
Get rid of offshoring, and Johnny will want to code.
That functionality exists, just not for cops - but for data mining.
They saved that guy's life.
Now if he provoked a shot, then he's given up any good position whatsoever.
...do not be surprised if they're willing to get rid of the surprise.
Hopefully none of them get charged with anything that sticks - since they'd only be making things worse off.
Looks like batteries and internet got around the cops.
Then again, will a hostage situation also require that phone networks go down too?
Kind of hard to fix a security issue if you only know that it exists, but not where.
...they would be fine.
However, it looks like Mozilla failed to communicate it well enough, thinking their own notice was enough. The result is that Mozilla seems to take Microsoft's path for once - refusing to patch security issues on a relatively new release, and washing their hands clean with an EOL.
That is, you want the unrankable Tianhe-1 GPU "show computer".
Better than Chinese slave labor.
So it's faster than the Crays on the list, the nearest competitors?
No, they just don't report the story, per instruction from the government.
I'd think that all the toxic chemicals in China would be worse than any STD.
On the other hand, if you want to cripple their government(and the people that send work over those kind of countries) for the second time in 200 years, I have no problem with that kind of fucking.
You can't split the two without splitting society.
Without social stability, you don't get bearable living conditions for more than the governmental apparatus. See China, North Korea, India, Vietnam, Brazil, and Russia for examples of that. These countries are split - businesses get all the freedoms to run over regular people, while regular people are silenced or disappeared for doing the same things as business.