Slashdot Mirror


Why Johnny Can't Code and How That Can Change

snydeq writes "Fatal Exception's Neil McAllister discusses why schools are having a hard time engaging young minds in computer science — and what the Scalable Game Design program in Colorado is doing to try to change that. 'Repenning's program avoids this disheartening cycle in three important ways. First, it deemphasizes programming while still encouraging students to develop the logical thinking skills they'll need for more advanced studies. Second, it engages students by encouraging them to be creative and solve their own problems, rather than just repeating exercises dictated by their instructor. Third, and perhaps most important, students are rewarded for their efforts with an actual, concrete result they can relate to: a game.'"

527 comments

  1. Offshoring. by sethstorm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Johnny can code, just that there's too much against Johhny to make him want to do so.

    Get rid of offshoring, and Johnny will want to code.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:Offshoring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      lol that doesn't make ANY sense. I mean offshoring is a real issue with Johnny finding a job later...but it won't make him want to code. Even WITH offshoring Software Engineering is one of the ONLY segments of the US economy that is still hiring and has a serious shortage of qualified people.

    2. Re:Offshoring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Middle school and high school students haven't had to fret about offshoring, I doubt that's a factor...

      I think the big difference is, people in the industry (even young people, shortly out of college) grew up with (at minimum, if not earlier systems) DOS based systems, Windows 3.1, IRC chat client's etc. "Back in the day" anyone interested in using their computer for something useful had to learn to do it themselves, and tinker, and become interested in expanding their ability to make their computer do what they want.

      Now, before they can walk, they have 3D games, music players, Facebook and all other forms of social media. I'm not saying it's all bad, but, where is the drive to get someone young interested in computing? To them, using a computer is playing a game, or reading Facebook. Not writing a script for mIRC to scrape text for keywords and have your bot auto respond to people, because that's what used to be fun.. 10+ years ago..

    3. Re:Offshoring. by Daetrin · · Score: 2

      Get rid of offshoring, and Johnny will want to code.

      I'm pretty sure "Johnny" isn't considering international trade relations and the resulting corporate offshoring when deciding what to do with his free time and/or study time. I certainly didn't give any kind of thought to that thing when i was a kid, and i expect the usual answers of "what do you want to be when you grow up" are based far more on what that individual finds cool than on a coldhearted analysis of future earning potential. By the time they reach middle school i expect most people are barely starting to get out of that mindset.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    4. Re:Offshoring. by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying it's all bad, but, where is the drive to get someone young interested in computing? To them, using a computer is playing a game, or reading Facebook. Not writing a script for mIRC to scrape text for keywords and have your bot auto respond to people, because that's what used to be fun.. 10+ years ago..

      We need something like a cross between Logo and the cool, but relatively simple Lightbot flash game to get kids when they're young. Teach them the basics while still being fun.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    5. Re:Offshoring. by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      I don't know what things are like in your market, but around here there's a lot more programmer jobs than qualified people to fill them.

      Offshoring isn't exactly on my top 10 list of worries. 5-6 years ago there was (locally) a big rush to do a lot of it with development work, but a few projects later most of the companies have figured out that getting offshoring to work is a lot harder and more expensive than it first appears, and so that work is coming back.

    6. Re:Offshoring. by Kagetsuki · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bullshit. Jina can code just as well as Johnny if not better, and he doesn't have the elitist "I'm always right because I studied design theory for four years" attitude. That's the problem.

      I had played around with coding myself, but really learned first at Stanford. The thing is after returning to Japan I went to a specialty school that didn't even have an entrance exam - anyone can attend, and had to re-learn everything during the first year. I thought this would be worthless, but I quickly found out I had been taught how to code very poorly. You could easily draw parallels from programming education to math education in America vs math education in Japan or India.

      I'm sure I'll get marked flamebait for all of this, but from my personal experiences both learning to code and working with other coders from America, Japan, and India I can tell you I'd probably never choose to partner with an American coder over an Indian or Japanese. Drop the attitudes and learn from those who in reality are doing it better than you.

    7. Re:Offshoring. by sethstorm · · Score: 2

      He is, just that he isn't paying attention in the way you might think. While we might see trade relations, he might see it in his parents losing a college-paying job from it, a relative experiencing the same, or perhaps the news.

      He is brighter than you might think.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    8. Re:Offshoring. by RazzleFrog · · Score: 2

      Protectionism never works. It's a global market and you can't go back now. If you want Johnny to not lose his job to Jhoni than he better learn some value added skills.

    9. Re:Offshoring. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      If it's already going to be a long-term issue, killing offshoring would be a long-term solution. If you want to get Johnny coding, he'll appreciate that he can actually get a job.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    10. Re:Offshoring. by tthomas48 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, that's why software developers are some of the highest paid workers in the US. If you're having trouble finding a programming job you are probably piss poor at it and should look for another line of work. There are hundreds of open jobs right now in my city.

    11. Re:Offshoring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF is Johnny going to code? Angry Birds II - The Extended Remix Edition? Given the amount of craptastic content available in any app store, we probably have enough coders. Now, teach Johnny to think, and we might have something.

    12. Re:Offshoring. by MBCook · · Score: 2

      ...but I quickly found out I had been taught how to code very poorly.

      Can you explain what you were taught incorrectly (or just weren't taught)? I'm curious what the issues were.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    13. Re:Offshoring. by RazzleFrog · · Score: 2

      So tell me how you "kill" offshoring? I'm curious what you magic antidote is to prevent companies from operating in a cost-efficient manner.

    14. Re:Offshoring. by DurendalMac · · Score: 0

      Baloney. There are TONS of US jobs out there for entry level programmers. Crap software tends to be what gets outsourced. Most companies want to keep their stuff domestic and under their own roof if they want good stuff.

    15. Re:Offshoring. by Americano · · Score: 1

      So...

      - 3d games, music players, facebook, social media != fun.
      - Writing a script for mIRC to scrape text for keywords and have your bot auto respond to people == fun.

      You have a strange definition of fun, friend.

    16. Re:Offshoring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You end up with that attitude no matter where the programmer is from. In my experience, the Indian programmers are a lot like American programmers during the late 90's. They went into the field because people are looking for programmers. However, they have neither the skills or the aptitude to learn proper programming techniques. At Chrysler there was the 5:00 meeting everyday with all the Indian developers crowding around the cube of one person, programming in a group. This does not look good for the group. Right now I would say it is about a 60-40 split of all programmers with the 40% not having any business creating code.

    17. Re:Offshoring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Johnny can code, just that there's too much against Johhny to make him want to do so.

      Get rid of offshoring, and Johnny will want to code.

      Yes, and then Johnny will code just as crappy as offshore "Johnnies" do.

    18. Re:Offshoring. by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

      Why should everyone in the US be a computer programmer? It makes no sense. Who cares? I want automechanics and skilled artisans, not programmers; we have enough programmers, and the steady spiral downward might be because they're rolling out of college and taking up beggary due to the lack of programming jobs.

      Stupid single-minded one-dimensional gits trying to "fix" education...

    19. Re:Offshoring. by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      It depends on his parents. If his dad's a software engineer, he probably told little Johnny to find something else to do for work because his job was sent to India.

    20. Re:Offshoring. by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 3

      Get rid of offshoring, and Johnny will want to code.

      You make programming sound like some kind of a chore, a typical day job that someone is only going to do because they are paid to do it. I am sure that such programmers exist, but the best programmers out there are the ones for whom programming is as natural as breathing, who would be hacking even if they were unemployed, and who are enjoy the work that they do. This is not terribly different than the situation with mathematicians -- the best mathematicians are the ones who love math.

      America has a lot of trouble teaching math to middle school and high school students, at least by comparison with other countries. It should come as no surprise that we have trouble teaching computer programming, which is very close to mathematics. It also doesn't help that we have a mass media that portrays computer programmers as these nerdy anti-social types (yes they sometimes become rich, but we glamorize people who were born into wealth).

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    21. Re:Offshoring. by Octorian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And the current trend in computing devices is one from where the normal consumer device could be tinkered with, to where the normal consumer device is forbidden from being tinkered with. Its only a matter of time before you'll need a special "development system" to do any tinkering at all. Of course there are many in our age group who may not see this as a problem, because *they* would get such a system, and *normal* people don't need one anyways.

      And you know how likely it is for a middle-schooler to actually have access to such a system? Especially when the parents aren't tinkerers themselves? Practically zip!

      Think about it.

    22. Re:Offshoring. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      The more reason to give our citizens every advantage. If they want more coders, perhaps the US should tap our population first.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    23. Re:Offshoring. by jesseck · · Score: 2

      Middle school and high school students haven't had to fret about offshoring, I doubt that's a factor...

      It's still a factor, high school students are going to be concerned about what college to attend and their future employment. Middle school students, not so much, but at that point in their lives the children's parents will influence what happens. And parents will see offshoring as a threat.

      Personally, I encourage my 3rd grader to learn programming- things like logic and operators are fun. Especially when we can sit down and work through a problem, all skills that easily translate into a scripting language in the future.

    24. Re:Offshoring. by Huckabees · · Score: 1

      Get off my lawn!

      I should think the accessibility of technology today has encouraged students to become interested in software and computer science in general. And it's easier now than ever to write your own applications for various gadgets you own - especially something that's android or ios based. The hobby development hasn't gone away - it just moved to a different platform.

      I mean I can't tell you how impressed with myself I was when I made some random junk in flash back in the day having not grown up with DOS based systems and IRC chat and I went on to a career in software dev. And it was playing other people's games that got me into doing that

    25. Re:Offshoring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm... it's hard to get kids interested in building sanitation too. Since when do kids get excited about a seemingly boring, now wholly unimpressive chore of a job that gets done for $3/hr in Bangalore?

      Kids know they're not going to make the next Facebook. They're better off going into business or accounting. That's where all the money, power and glory is. Hell, you're can't even fail in those jobs.

    26. Re:Offshoring. by scottbomb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or maybe you're just getting started and NO ONE will even look at you unless you've got 3-5 years of professional experience.

    27. Re:Offshoring. by TheLink · · Score: 1

      but the best programmers out there are the ones for whom programming is as natural as breathing, who would be hacking even if they were unemployed, and who are enjoy the work that they do

      And by your definition they aren't the "Johnny who can't code" which is what the article is about.

      I bet plenty of those "natural programmers" taught themselves how to program, many before they were teenagers. Nowadays that's even easier with all the online resources available.

      If you aren't a natural talent at it, and you're in the USA it'll be stupid to take up programming because there would be hundreds of thousands of programmers as crap as you but cheaper. Go take up plumbing or something.

      It's all different if you were a poor person in India.

      --
    28. Re:Offshoring. by arth1 · · Score: 1

      If it's already going to be a long-term issue, killing offshoring would be a long-term solution. If you want to get Johnny coding, he'll appreciate that he can actually get a job.

      Dynamic tariffs that adjust according to trade imbalance.

      It would have a secondary benefit in making the economy more global and not settle into a duopoly - it would become more advantageous to buy goods and labour from countries we currently only export to, and spread the imports around more.

    29. Re:Offshoring. by tthomas48 · · Score: 1

      I'm seeing tons of junior jobs, as well. And this is one field where experience is trivial to get. Work on some projects. Build up a resume. It's trivial to show a potential employer you've got what it takes.

    30. Re:Offshoring. by mbkennel · · Score: 2

      You mean like the large across-the-board tariff that China has employed via currency manipulation for the last 25 years?

      Yes, it has clearly destroyed their industrial base and damaged their standard of living.

    31. Re:Offshoring. by stinkyj · · Score: 2

      I tend to agree. It's all about economics. Last year I went to Romania and India for work. From what I can see, the only difference between them and the USA coders are costs. They have good, bad, and lazy coders just like we do. I saw an Indian girl playing bejeweled all afternoon, and a Bucharest girl instant messaging constantly(no it wasn't part of the job). So I tell my kids don't be try computers, it's too difficult to try and compete against a business case of money. Offshoring is alive and well, it has slowed due to economics, but the sheer number of big corporation buildings going up in India is incredible.

    32. Re:Offshoring. by CapnStank · · Score: 1
      "Now, before they can walk, they have 3D games, music players, Facebook and all other forms of social media. I'm not saying it's all bad, but, where is the drive to get someone young interested in computing?"

      Then the solution would be to engage them in those things:
      • Write a simple mod on the Source engine
      • Write a phone app for their iPhone/Android/Blackberry
      • Write a plugin for mediamonkey or the like to categorize music
      • Write a facebook app

      Force the students to get involved with the community and let them choose if they want to dive in deeper or not. In my personal experiences as a student I hated Java because of the community but found home with C users who were more friendly (I was young and ignorant to the fact that one forum can be friendlier than another). Let them dive into an academic forum for phone development or what have you and you'll find students doing work on their own time to bring to school and tinker with.

    33. Re:Offshoring. by anyGould · · Score: 4, Informative

      So tell me how you "kill" offshoring? I'm curious what you magic antidote is to prevent companies from operating in a cost-efficient manner.

      Easy - remove the loopholes that make it cost-efficient for companies to offshore.

      This doesn't mean protectionism - just closing the rules that allow companies to shift their revenues and losses between tax districts will do wonders to encourage companies to work in house.

    34. Re:Offshoring. by BigDaveyL · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Quoting from your post:
      "Even WITH offshoring Software Engineering is one of the ONLY segments of the US economy that is still hiring and has a serious shortage of qualified people."

      I think you need some additional quantifiers here - employers set the bar high and don't want to pay for a rockstar. There will always be a shortage of the super highly skilled/niche programmers, and these people will easily find jobs because of their highly skilled/niche status.

      Also, employers are unwilling to recognize transferrable skills and adverse to having promotions/employee development. For example, I know people that are stuck programming VB 6 because their employer doesn't want to upgrade to the new fangled .Net stuff. When employees want to look for a new job, they are told "Sorry, you don't have .Net exp." so they are stuck supporting crappy apps, even though they could be an above average programmer.

      I also thought I read somewhere that colleges and universities are graduating enough people in computing related fields to fill computing related jobs. If this is true, then the shortage is less of an issue.

      So in conclusion, there is only a shortage of people that are highly skilled and have real world exp. in what you're specifically looking for, and willing to accept your pay. All others need not apply.

    35. Re:Offshoring. by anyGould · · Score: 1

      Middle school and high school students haven't had to fret about offshoring, I doubt that's a factor...

      It's still a factor, high school students are going to be concerned about what college to attend and their future employment. Middle school students, not so much, but at that point in their lives the children's parents will influence what happens. And parents will see offshoring as a threat.

      Not to mention that even as early as the mid-late 90s, the Common Wisdom was that if you weren't working in The Tech, you were going to be relegated to second-class status. (Of course, the opposite happened, since it turns out knowledge of HTML doesn't get your toilet unplugged, but I digress). Schools get pressure (yes, even as early as middle school/junior high) from parents, industry, and politicians to teach The Skills That Tomorrow's Workers Will Need. Which is bull, since not only no-one can guess what today's 13-year-old will be working at in 5-10 years, but if you push *everyone* into the hot new job, you're guaranteeing a glut and crash at the other end.

    36. Re:Offshoring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is pretty much pride talking here. While what you say will be generally true I guarantee there's "just a day job" programmers that are so phenomanally gifted that no matter how much you may love programming you just won't be able to keep up. You're simply assuming everyone who does programming as "just a job" can't pull their own weight (and these people certainly do exist), but when I put it that way, as an absolute statement, it sounds as stupid as the idea actually is.

      Programming can still be as natural as breathing for someone and they'll never go home and code, they'll do whatever it is that they want to do, because programming comes with basically zero effort to them.

    37. Re:Offshoring. by scruffy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And the current trend in computing devices is one from where the normal consumer device could be tinkered with, to where the normal consumer device is forbidden from being tinkered with.

      There are a couple other trends that make it more difficult for learning computer programming.

      Even if it's not forbidden, it's very difficult to tinker with any number of devices. When I was a kid, it was useful to spend some effort to take a device apart, figure out what was wrong, replace or juryrig some part, and put it back together again (sounds like programming, doesn't it). Nowadays, you need special tools and even if you get it apart, there's not much that you can tinker with.

      Another trend is that math in schools depends more and more on using calculators rather than manually applying an algorithm to add, multiply, whatever. This might be ok for math, but students lose out on problem solving skills.

      Overall, there are a number of factors that result in kids not having to learn problem solving skills that come in handy for computer programming. You could include following recipes in a cookbook, making up games and arguing about the rules, sewing, fishing, wandering around by yourself and finding your way back. Kids hardly do any stuff that involves real-world planning, execution, and debugging. No, a video game does not suffice for this (at least not so far).

      The result is that college instructors (such as yours truly at an average college) end up with students that are essentially clueless about putting one step after another. Because the students have not been exposed to this, they are crippled when it comes to doing programming for the first time, and only a lucky few make it through the first few courses.

    38. Re:Offshoring. by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      If nothing else, join a FOSS project and start contributing code. Then you'll have something to show on your resume, even if it's not "professional" (i.e., paid) work.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    39. Re:Offshoring. by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Heh, my Dad was a computer operator in the Navy (Naval Tactical Data Systems officer) and told me way back in the 70's to not get involved in computers as you'd only become a maintenance guy dusting the cabinets.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    40. Re:Offshoring. by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      +1

      IMHO, most of the problem is cultural, not a lack of potential. I knew a man who went to Poland several years ago, and took a bunch of footballs to give to the kids there. None of them had any idea what a football was. However, he noticed that many of the kids there were playing chess every chance they had. Here in the States, we worship our athletes and sports stars. In Poland, their heroes were the chess grandmasters. What do you see in our media? "Beavis and Butthead", "Dumb and Dumber", etc. As long as we continue to glamorize intellectual mediocrity, we'll have trouble raising up new generations of programmers, engineers, scientists, mathematicians, and such.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    41. Re:Offshoring. by Eggbloke · · Score: 0

      I think the big difference is, people in the industry (even young people, shortly out of college) grew up with (at minimum, if not earlier systems) DOS based systems, Windows 3.1, IRC chat client's etc. "Back in the day" anyone interested in using their computer for something useful had to learn to do it themselves, and tinker, and become interested in expanding their ability to make their computer do what they want.

      I think even with all the things we have these days people will teach themselves about computing. The first OS I used was Windows 95 and my computer education has been awful but I know more about computers than most people my age because I tinker with them. I wanted my own website so I taught myself how to use Linux and ran a webserver on an old laptop. I think it may have even become easier for people who are actually interested to teach themselves because of the massive wealth of information available on the internet.
      I think the real problem is that people have been taught that computing is too difficult for them and that knowing about computers is only for 'geeks'. Schools need to stop teaching just Microsoft Office and teach people that computers aren't just Facebook and games.

      --
      I care not for your karma and your mod points.
    42. Re:Offshoring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where? From someone with a Java and Swing background (1.5 yrs of co-ops/internship + BS in Software Engineering), all I can find are web development positions and I don't believe in web apps. I have 9 months of full-time C++ and C work too. I've been unemployed for 4 months; fired from my last job due to DSPS (delayed-sleep phase syndrome).

      I wish someone at college would have told me all the Java jobs are for J2EE developers. I would have focused on another language.

    43. Re:Offshoring. by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      I'm sure I'll get marked flamebait for all of this, but from my personal experiences both learning to code and working with other coders from America, Japan, and India I can tell you I'd probably never choose to partner with an American coder over an Indian or Japanese. Drop the attitudes and learn from those who in reality are doing it better than you.

      Of the 3 Indian programmers I've worked with in the US, 1 was spectacular, 1 was above average, and 1 was quite possibly the worst programmer I've ever seen and still get paid for it.
      yeah, small sample size, but it's not all wine and roses.

    44. Re:Offshoring. by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      Has Japanese code no quality issues at all? The recent Sony hack might indicate differently, assuming they used Japanese coders for their hardware.

    45. Re:Offshoring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Its only a matter of time before you'll need a special "development system" to do any tinkering at all."

      It's sort of already here in the name of Apple.

      And people line up by the millions to support it.

    46. Re:Offshoring. by AJH16 · · Score: 1

      I believe that was his point. In it's day, getting a computer to do something was fun. Now since stuff just works, it is now more fun to just use established services without ever having to learn the technology. If facebook could only be accessed by telnet, we'd have no problem getting young people to know technology.

      --
      AJ Henderson
    47. Re:Offshoring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my experiences are exactly the opposite of yours. My experience with H1B's has been brutal. Japanese software is a joke

    48. Re:Offshoring. by SlowMovingTarget · · Score: 1

      My guess would be that the classes Kagetsuki took at Stanford were Computer Science classes, not programming classes. Those classes, I'd venture, were intended to teach you what computers can do. Computer Science and Programming are not the same thing.

      By the same token, I suspect the classes in Japan that Kagetsuki mentions were classes on the craft of programming, and not computer science. They would teach how to tell a computer what to do, as opposed to teaching the range of opportunities. So vocational training rather than science.

    49. Re:Offshoring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is crap, I have worked with foreign students and for the most part, they do nothing and expect the American student to do it all he was Chinese. I recently went to two seminars that were requirements and two Indian students stood up in front of everyone and admitted they could not do the topic of their chosen paper. Now I could be a racist like you and say does this mean all Indians and Chinese suck, but NO, it means every race has its idiots like you.

    50. Re:Offshoring. by Americano · · Score: 1

      And who's creating those games, music players, social media, and other things using computers? Are they just materializing out of thin air?

      Are Mark Zuckerberg and all the other 20-somethings building Facebook, writing games, and building music sites secretly 60-year old veterans of FORTRAN and COBOL programming?

      Your argument suggests that everybody in the world should be a trained mechanic in order to be able to use cars to drive themselves to work, or that everybody should be an HVAC technician if they want to have a cool house during the summer months. The simple fact is that computers are becoming appliances, where you don't need to have a 4 year university degree just to operate one. The appliance-ization of technology doesn't kill off the need for experts, they just require less expertise and training on the user end for the users to accomplish the things they want to do with them.

    51. Re:Offshoring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In all honesty, ever since elementary school we have been fed "Dont do anything professional involving computer programing or IT, its all going over shore and people are losing their jobs left and right". To suddenly say "We need people " is not going to change the years of having that battered in our heads. I for one too every AP computer science course in my high school. When it came time for college, IT and Programming looked very unappealing. Years later and an Accounting degree, I only program for fun.

    52. Re:Offshoring. by Eil · · Score: 1

      Get rid of offshoring, and Johnny will want to code.

      Judging from your sig, I'm sure you find offshore contracting and industry a convenient scapegoat for just about everything. But back here in the real world, the U.S. has a thriving software development industry and it's one of the few white-collar jobs that hasn't been trounced by the recession. The last three companies that I've worked for (to include my current employer) simply can't find enough programmers. The last one in particular had a $10,000 referral bounty for Java developers. And you didn't even have to be affiliated with the company to be awarded the bounty.

      Developers in the U.S. still make decent salaries these days and likely will in the foreseeable future. And TFA itself is about how there are lots more job openings than there are programmers to fill them. Employers literally have no choice but to go overseas if they ever want their products to ship and be maintained.

    53. Re:Offshoring. by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      The recent Sony hacks were on unpatched Apache and PHP vulnerabilities. And no Japanese code isn't perfect, but the general coding methodology is much more efficient and realistic in my opinion.

    54. Re:Offshoring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My job has evolved to writing specs for Indian coders to code from, and reviewing their results. Sometimes they get it right, but just as often they can't follow specific instructions. In general they seem to lack initiative (not all, but the majority) and you can't always trust what they claim are their test results. More than once I've been given results that were impossible from the program they had coded and the input data they claimed to have used, and even when shown that their results could not have been produced the way they claimed, they did not come clean. My company works with 2 different offshore companies and it's happened with both of them. Maybe you should drop your attitude - there are good and bad coders everywhere there are coders.

    55. Re:Offshoring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weeaboos? In my slashdot?

      It's more likely than you think.

    56. Re:Offshoring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While your world sounds pretty nice, most of us have bills to pay and so we have day jobs that are a chore. We usually code something fun after work if we're not too tired and have time after running kids to football practice, grocery shopping, taking out the trash. Stop paying us and we will stop programming for the 8-10 hours a day that we whore ourselves out so that we and or our families can eat.

    57. Re:Offshoring. by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

      Quite so. To be more accurate, make coding look like an activity that makes as much as lawyering or doctoring or any other profession where Johny isn't competing with a $5/hr labor pool in a $50/hr price environment, and Johny will start taking coding seriously as a career.

      In the meantime all the corporate and political blather about education and training is just posturing and feel-good sound bites. Makes a decent marketing tool.

      Currently, the USA has a tax and legal structure that does not make outsourcing at all difficult. If we weren't forced into a frothing ideological debates over socialism vs. capitalism every time the conversation starts, we could probably find a way to make it more attractive to in-source than outsource.

      --
      Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    58. Re:Offshoring. by rezalas · · Score: 2

      The "serious shortage of qualified people" is mostly the fault of the companies themselves. Businesses want to pay pennies and earn dollars when it comes to developers, and they only want to hire the absolute "creme of the crop". Also it is not that there are only a handful of rockstar programmers, but simply a lack of opportunity for programmers to become highly skilled. It is difficult to work a job, go to school, and then find time to become some sort of master coder in the small amount of time you have left to sleep / eat / avoid divorce. Businesses want pre-packaged master programmers with a decade of experience and two degrees, and they want to pay $50,000 a year with meager benefits to match. If they set the bar lower and actually hired college graduates with little experience for a decent wage they might find that the average person can learn to become what you need them to (in this example, an amazing programmer). But when you go looking for a job all you find are "Sr. .NET Developer, minimum 10+ years experience" and you rarely (maybe 1 a month) find "Entry level .NET programmer, Bachelors or 2-4 years experience". Everyone has to start somewhere, but they never become masters when you fail to give them a chance.

    59. Re:Offshoring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get rid of offshoring, and Johnny will want to code.

      America has a lot of trouble teaching math to middle school and high school students, at least by comparison with other countries. It should come as no surprise that we have trouble teaching computer programming, which is very close to mathematics.

      No, America has a lot of trouble paying people who have learned math and know how to program what they're worth. That's why we go to business school.

    60. Re:Offshoring. by rezalas · · Score: 1

      I think kids see all of the solutions in the world and then think "why bother?" I have to admit that when it comes to programming something yourself in-house and spending a few months getting exactly what you want, or spending 5 minutes buying a package from someone else and the next two weeks tailoring it to provide the results you require, it makes sense to take the existing solution. Programmers face a different problem today than they once did. Before it was an issue of "this code doesn't exist yet", while today its "almost everything you can imagine needing, someone has already written." The incentive to write effective and innovative code in a sea of "effective and innovative code" is a moving target that previous generations of programmers never faced.

    61. Re:Offshoring. by steelfood · · Score: 1

      I find that difficult to believe. More likely, the institution at where you learned how to code did not teach you well rather than the state of programming education in the U.S. in general. Or you mistook Information Technology vs. Computer Science vs. Software Engineering, which are 3 very different fields despite all three involving "computer programming" in its curriculum.

      I've found that software engineered by SE-major professionals in the U.S. are better in terms of design. They are more easily maintained, better compartmentalized, and conform to a design pattern that is appropriate for the situation. I find that software written by those with only some kind of certification or by IT majors in general to be poor, with little in the way of design patterns, lots of code duplication, and in general no thought to the design or what fits the problem. CS majors aren't trained to be designing large applications at all, but I find those who do are are fairly competent, especially if their CS program includes some amount of SE.

      I find software written in China and India to be of an even lower quality, though I should qualify that there certainly are good software engineers coming from both countries. Additionally, I think a large amount of people out there working (all over the world) as "programmers" are actually hacking their way through their projects. And I don't mean hacking in the sense of cracking, but hacking as in trying to fit the square peg into the round hole by chipping the corners of the square peg away.

      This is largely because the barriers to entry are so low, demand is sufficiently high, and none of the managers know (or possibly care) what good code is, or what a good developer is worth in the long term, and will hire anyone who can write "Hello World!" in VB.

      But back to the point, I think the best-trained software engineer trained in the States or Europe would beat the best-trained software engineer in any other part of the world. This is largely because of the culture of freedom of expression. Software engineering is as much an art form in that it requires creative thinking as it is a mathematical science in that it requires logical thinking, and art flourishes when there is a strong culture of freedom of expression.

      Now, other parts of the world may produce better code monkeys that are good at mindlessly churning out code, and that may also be a cultural by-product. But from my experience, they certainly don't produce very good software designers and architects.

      And the designer, the architect, the engineer is what companies need, what people here need to study, and what the best institutions in the States and Europe teach.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    62. Re:Offshoring. by Kagetsuki · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, I took programming classes at Stanford, and then I studied at HAL in Japan. The difference was very much the same as the difference between education in mathematics between American and Japan, both I have experienced. Americans just seem to jumble concepts together in some sort of linear path where to get from point A to C you absolutely must learn point B before C and after A.

      For example, in mathematics in America you learn different equations for a line in different mathematical styles - algebra, geometry, etc. In Japan we learn all the equations for lines together at the same time. For programming in America you'll learn some method and then learn several algorithms that employ that method (learn loops and conditionals, then learn different types of sorts). In Japan we learned computing architecture including how things were stored in memory and collected and processed by the CPU, stored in the registers etc. while also learning assembler, doing algorithms with flow charts, and learning C. By learning all that in parallel I understood how the code I wrote in C would look in ASM, and how the ASM would translate to a list of binary instructions stored in memory, and how those instructions in memory were composed and how they would be sent through the machine. I came out of the first year at Stanford roughly able to code, I came out of the first year of HAL with a complete understanding of how to implement complex algorithms in C and how the compiled binary output of that C code would be processed by the machine.

      Certainly different schools will teach differently, but it seems to me the general methodologies of teaching have different underlying paradigms. As for India, good schools in India are insanely difficult to get into because of limited space. To get into a good university in India the hurdles are significantly higher than those of say MIT. On top of that India has a very unique system of mathematics that can prove to be extremely impressive. Calculation code I would have to write down and spend time converting, breaking down and checking I have seen my Indian counterparts glance at and find errors in seconds. Certainly the Indian coders I have worked with would be the higher-level ones; the ones that have made it to Japan. By the same token I've yet to see an American that worked well in a group and didn't continually press their random ideas like they were be-all end-all solutions. Just personal experiences for sure, but if I were putting my own money down on foreign developers my past experiences would have an effect on my decisions.

    63. Re:Offshoring. by milimetric · · Score: 2

      I'm going to call you out for racism. Generalizing something like the coding ability of the millions of coders in either Japan, India, or the US is ludicrous. Some people code well, some people don't. It has a little bit to do with education but mostly with passion and dedication. That can't really be taught and can develop in people at different times in their life. So I think as long as the education is somewhat adequate, the blame and glory of the results rests solely with the individual.

    64. Re:Offshoring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I was rather thinking the same thing about some of the Indian programmers I have worked with. For a country that's supposed to produce some of the smartest and best programmers in the world, I am not impressed.

    65. Re:Offshoring. by smelch · · Score: 1

      Right, then they'll just move the company offshore, or we'll be swallowed alive by other countries services that are much much cheaper. That's a really nice way of fixing the problem.

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
    66. Re:Offshoring. by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      My discrimination is by nationality, not race. And yes I was making a generalization based on personal experiences - I accept that there are many many exceptions to this.

    67. Re:Offshoring. by smelch · · Score: 1

      Side projects, they're everywhere. I didn't have .Net experience either until I started doing my own dev. No .Net experience doesn't mean shit when you show them your prowess with some demos or some articles or even giving your stack overflow name on your resume. Sorry jobs aren't just falling in your lap, but come on, do a little work. And odds are if you don't have any of those things to show off, you aren't as good as you think you are anyway. Development is a career, put in more than 9 - 5 and you'll get more than a crappy job out of it.

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
    68. Re:Offshoring. by Radres · · Score: 2

      I call B.S. If anything, a computer science degree from a US university focuses on the general concepts behind computing to a fault. Perhaps more of what you're describing falls under computer engineering. At any rate, you could have learned those things from Stanford just as well as you did from Japan, or perhaps better. The remedial intro to programming course you took was probably intended to cover the kids who chose to major in CS without any real coding experience from high school.

    69. Re:Offshoring. by Kagetsuki · · Score: 0

      Just to clarify I studied Software Engineering at both institutions. And you do realize Japan is a country that has a very high level of freedom of expression and an emphasis on creativity is a big part of the culture, don't you? Perhaps you should compare the selection and quality of video games - those are both software and art.

    70. Re:Offshoring. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Saying that Johnny can't code is like saying that Johnny can't do accounting or brain surgery or practice law. Coding is a profession not a basic skill. Nothing to worry about here. Face it the majority of professional adults can't code either, and that includes many programmers I know.

    71. Re:Offshoring. by anyGould · · Score: 1

      Right, then they'll just move the company offshore, or we'll be swallowed alive by other countries services that are much much cheaper. That's a really nice way of fixing the problem.

      Kind of doubt that - otherwise it would have happened already. If a company is going to have a presence in-country, there's a certain amount of infrastructure that has to be "on the ground".

    72. Re:Offshoring. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Students do know about offshoring.

      I was a substitute teacher last year and it is taught starting from 7th grade that they need to start thinking about careers and taking classes in Jr high and highschool that will help them later on. Guest speakers from different industries come and tell students whats hot and what careers can coincide their strengths. Yes, they are told that many computer scinece jobs have gone to India as well as manufacturing going to China. This is more of a scare tactic to make them want to go to college.

      Many students are into technology where they equate a cool IPAD/Phone/Computer as web apps. Word is boring, most games outside of World of Warcraft are boring, and the cool stuff is flash or HTML 5 based. It is popular with them.

      Clouds and internet sites replacing IT workers is the new norm in the next decade and the students are prepared for that. Coding itself is changing as no one needs to write assembly routines or tiker high end C code to make a cool game work now. Infact, operating systems have evolved where you no longer need autoexec.bat or memmaker to learn why your game uses extended and not expended ram for the 1024k wall, where the DOS drivers fight for ... shudder.

      HTML 5 and phone applets are exciting and much easier to code for. Let the engineers worry about assembly code and C, as they are an ever decreasing demand but all but specialized cases now.

    73. Re:Offshoring. by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      You're way off base and ranting about a completely different subject from what everybody else was talking about. The AC wasn't making any value judgements, he was describing motivations.

      As the barriers to having fun with a computer are lowered, the motivation to learn how to overcome barriers in computer use is likewise lowered. That doesn't mean that computers used to be more fun when you had to edit config scripts or whatever, or that there's anything wrong with lowering the barriers to entry, and it CERTAINLY doesn't you need to be an HVAC technician to have a cool house (WTF?).

    74. Re:Offshoring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi,

      I also have worked in a lot of attitude problems, and is now a major issue in a decision to leave a job.

      But I too would like to read more about the differences in teachings you experianced (good/bad) and also details on "draw parallels from programming education to math education in America vs math education in Japan or India". Math is too poor in US and so computer programming too? Was it a purely algorithm or does that also includes architecture, design, how to write good specification, how to deal with clients, how to evaluate a product (likethe best language for a project)?

      Thanks,

      GG

    75. Re:Offshoring. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      "Back in the day" anyone interested in using their computer for something useful had to learn to do it themselves, and tinker, and become interested in expanding their ability to make their computer do what they want.

      Horseshit. If I wanted a word processor, I bought one (retail or shareware or freeware). If I wanted a chat program, ditto. If I wanted a game, ditto. In fact, I could have gone my entire life having the computer doing everything I bought it to do without ever touching a line of code.

    76. Re:Offshoring. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      The "loopholes" you refer to are bits of freedom in a less-free general environment.. So, it looks like you you want to remove the bits of freedom.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    77. Re:Offshoring. by ericpraline · · Score: 1

      Some people code well, some people don't.

      I would go so far as to assume this might, on a statistically relevant scale, have to do not only with people's abilities, but also the teaching they got, which brings us to

      So I think as long as the education is somewhat adequate [...]

      That's quite an assumption there, isn't it? And comparing people's characteristics by nationality(!) (or even only country of residence) is hardly racism (unless the reader really refuses to see any other motivation, for there are many that are more plausible, having to do nothing with race).

    78. Re:Offshoring. by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      I can search the Seattle area for entry-level/junior developer positions and get hundreds of results, and for far more than just web developers. Are you only searching in your immediate geographical area?

    79. Re:Offshoring. by Kittenman · · Score: 1

      Horseshit. If I wanted a word processor, I bought one (retail or shareware or freeware). If I wanted a chat program, ditto. If I wanted a game, ditto. In fact, I could have gone my entire life having the computer doing everything I bought it to do without ever touching a line of code.

      Damn right. I've met a number of people who say (or their mothers say) are quite good at computers. This means that they can find MS Word in the start menu, can change their desktop wallpaper and maybe degauss their old CRT. That's it.

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    80. Re:Offshoring. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It is difficult to work a job, go to school, and then find time to become some sort of master coder in the small amount of time you have left to sleep / eat / avoid divorce.

      The problem is that lazy employees think they have some sort of right to marriage and a social life. They need to dedicate themselves entirely to their job, stay single, don't have kids or sex, and don't have any friends except their coworkers. They need to spend all their time in their cubicle, so that their employer can be more successful, and they need to be thankful for their $50k salary.

    81. Re:Offshoring. by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      In Japan we learned computing architecture including how things were stored in memory and collected and processed by the CPU, stored in the registers etc. while also learning assembler, doing algorithms with flow charts, and learning C. By learning all that in parallel I understood how the code I wrote in C would look in ASM, and how the ASM would translate to a list of binary instructions stored in memory, and how those instructions in memory were composed and how they would be sent through the machine.

      That sounds exactly like my university education here in the USA, at Virginia Tech. The thing is, I never took any Computer Science classes; my major was in Electrical Engineering.

      If you want to learn low-level stuff like that, you have to go into EE or Computer Engineering, not CS.

    82. Re:Offshoring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Get rid of offshoring, and Johnny will want to code.
      You are absolutely on the right track, great idea. Get rid of the competition, and even a 7 year old can code !

    83. Re:Offshoring. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Horseshit. If I wanted a word processor, I bought one (retail or shareware or freeware). If I wanted a chat program, ditto. If I wanted a game, ditto. In fact, I could have gone my entire life having the computer doing everything I bought it to do without ever touching a line of code.

      Damn right. I've met a number of people who say (or their mothers say) are quite good at computers. This means that they can find MS Word in the start menu, can change their desktop wallpaper and maybe degauss their old CRT. That's it.

      And though there's many here on Slashdot who'll try desperately to claim otherwise (because their fragile ego's, self image, and virtual penises depend on it), that's 99.99% percent of being "good with computers" is. Crap like scraping IRC chatlogs (the original commenter's example of "being useful") is like smoking your tires - impressive as hell to your adolescent buddies.. but it doesn't get you to work the next morning. It's nothing but sound and fury signifying - nothing.

    84. Re:Offshoring. by definate · · Score: 1

      Yes, and one of those "loopholes" is ... They are willing to work for less.

      So, how do we close that loop hole?

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    85. Re:Offshoring. by drsquare · · Score: 1

      How do you get rid of off-shoring in a global market?

    86. Re:Offshoring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bigger problem is not off-shoring, as the kids there want to code. In the USA and two other countries in the world, patents are the stumbling blocks.

    87. Re:Offshoring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with Anonymous. In those days we had to do it ourselves. but think of the automobile industry. Who does it themselves today. Need an oilchange,go the the garage, tires rotated, ditto, and any regular maintenance, bring it to the dealers.

      So, how many programmers does it take to write a program? One to code, and 10000 to use.

    88. Re:Offshoring. by SomeStupidNickName12 · · Score: 1

      Disagree, for your average middle-schooler the type of access to the system has simply changed. Before you would play around configuring the OS and writing simple scripts to do things for you. Now its write an app and tinker with the available API.

      Different process, but has the same affect in getting people interested and building that mindset of taking things a part to see how they work.

    89. Re:Offshoring. by SomeStupidNickName12 · · Score: 1

      You spot on! There are million ways to get kids interesting technology. Hell writing a facebook or iPhone/Android app should be a project for every school kid.

    90. Re:Offshoring. by SomeStupidNickName12 · · Score: 1

      Big difference between the maintenance guy and the guy designing the new system. Same differentiation between an electrician and an electrical engineer

      Designers/Architects still have work coming out of their ears, grunt level programmers not so much

    91. Re:Offshoring. by sjames · · Score: 1

      Most of the attitude towards Indian programmers is based directly from offshoring experience. It's not that there are no good programmers in India, it's just that like everywhere else, they're not working for the lowest bidder.

      It's a fairly common scenario. Company considers offshoring. Offshore service provider introduces them to the "A" team. They talk at length and all goes well. Clearly they are highly skilled and professional.

      Now, the problem starts. The "A" team is re-assigned to the next new prospect and the "B" team is brought in. The "B" team is filled with anyone off the street who was able to turn the computer on in 5 tries or less.

    92. Re:Offshoring. by sjames · · Score: 1

      It's not that there are no good programmers in India, it's that you won't meet them by outsourcing to the lowest bidder. That is true of the good programmers in any country.

    93. Re:Offshoring. by dwpro · · Score: 1

      I think your overarching point is that two educations better than one. Good point. I would suggest having the one education prepared you to learn even more from the other. I'm certain now that with some industry experience I could go back to school and truly appreciate what I was learning, even if it were the same material.

      As for learning all the equations for a line at one time, how does that even work? Wouldn't you need the foundations of each mathematical style before you can make sense of the equations for it? It seems logical to try and not overload students with all of the different mathematical variations on a subject when trying to teach.

      In regard to programming, I went to a much less prestigious school than Stanford and I was taught programming the same way as you describe; starting with memory management, registers, and assembly. Some of my other friends went to more prestigious schools than me and many focused more on the architectural aspects of programming rather than the nuts and bolts. Both styles have their merits.

      --
      Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. -- Susan Ertz
    94. Re:Offshoring. by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      You have it exactly.

      The TOTAL cost of hiring Johnny over Jhina needs to be one in which Johnny comes out ahead or why bother?

      Programmers need to have excellent communication skills and by excellent I mean being able to speak fluent non-programmerese. Programmers need to really understand the industries they are working in, not just how to program basic tools for it. Programmers need to really understand the organizations they are working for. A programmer who has those three things adds a LOT of value - now they need to sell their clients on that.

      I work currently developing tech for various kinds of psychological and social research teams. Not only am I quite adept at communicating tech to non-techies in a way that makes them feel comfortable (I used to teach career changers how to program) but I have my undergraduate and advanced degrees in fields other than CS that are more closely related to the research field. I also work very, very hard to understand the teams, departments and universities I consult with. Consequently, I get a lot of business and can charge a premium rate for my services.

      If I just wanted a code monkey who could take a design document and turn it into something without deviating from it or questioning it, I'd go with the lowest bidder who was competent to handle that work. But if I wanted a team member (even a temporary one) who is capable of seeing ways to use tech to give me what I really NEED, then I want someone else, someone who just happens to be able to program but is so much more also.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    95. Re:Offshoring. by orthancstone · · Score: 1

      that's 99.99% percent of being "good with computers" is

      Sure, up until the point that something goes wrong. Now said person that's "good with computers" is twiddling their thumbs until someone else comes along to fix it.

      How much productivity is lost daily due to some low level peon "breaking" their computer because they have little understanding of how it works outside of "open Word/Browser/Productivity software," "use said program," and "lock/shutdown/walk away at the end of the day?"

      The notion that understanding web browsing or knowing how to use a spreadsheet/document creator/presentation creator is 99.99% of computing is as antiquated as the notion that understanding bash is necessary for all serious programmers (although it warms my heart when you find those who do). As long as people continue to believe that computing is as easy as "tap app, use app, close/hide app," there will always be those who are at a loss of what to do when something goes wrong. Without that knowledge, I would judge said individual as being familiar with computers, but not good with them.

    96. Re:Offshoring. by anyGould · · Score: 1

      The "loopholes" you refer to are bits of freedom in a less-free general environment.. So, it looks like you you want to remove the bits of freedom.

      I wouldn't call the ability to make billions while claiming to lose money (and taking the tax credits from that) "freedom". Accounting tricks are not freedom.

    97. Re:Offshoring. by anyGould · · Score: 1

      For starters, by removing the accounting tricks that let a company say "I'm here in America, but all those folks over there are the same company so I don't have to pay taxes to bring their product over here. But if you're talking about income, no, we don't make that money here. Hollywood accounting, to put it simply.

    98. Re:Offshoring. by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      Why are you even bothering to reply to these people? You called out a deficiency in their education system that definitely exists(it's well documented) and they wont hear about it. They are obviously from the US and suffering from the USA USA USA disease. You cannot talk to them, reason with them, and/or influence their preconceptions in any way. It is not worth trying. Like you I have had similar exposure to different teaching methodologies in different countries and agree completely. Calling you out on racism is just a low attempt to use PC BS to undermine you. What millimetric doesn't understand is that if you put a white guy, brown guy, green guy into one of these far superior 'asian'(quick call the PC police) classes is that they will excel over their US peers(very loosely used word). Using accusations of racism to attack superior education systems in other countries is a complete joke and the tactic of someone unable to see past the flag pulled over their eyes. Here I was thinking prayer was the last refuge of a scoundrel.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    99. Re:Offshoring. by definate · · Score: 1

      Oh sorry, you must have missed my post, read someone else's and responded to that.

      They are still willing to work for less (a worker in Romania will work for less money than one in America), so how do you close that loop hole?

      Additionally, you're saying that the company should pay double taxes. They should pay the other countries taxes, and your taxes. Does this apply to two separate companies with the same shareholders? If company A outside America sells something to company B inside America, how do you know how much tax they should pay when they sell that item? What if the company inside American only bought it for a price slightly under what it's worth? What if they aren't the same company?

      Just so you know, there's absolutely no reasonable way around this, that wouldn't hurt the country, more than it helps them.

      I am an accountant.

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    100. Re:Offshoring. by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      I lived in America for a while as a kid, my father is a white American, so the whole racist thing makes even less sense. Due to my fathers work we also lived in Europe for a bit and I went to school there as well. I also have an Indian uncle. In the end I live in Japan and chose Japanese citizenship because I honestly think it is a better country than the US. I'm raising my children here because I feel that without a doubt the education is superior, and that's not just because of the layout it is because of the fundamental cultural concept of education and how that is implemented. It's not like there isn't proof Japan, and Asian countries as a whole do better - there is. Just look at international test scores and education rankings. And it's not like everyone in class is ethnically Asian either - I had schoolmates from Canada, Russia, Brazil, Australia and Israel throughout my school career in Japan and it's not like I was attending an international school either. Do people think we didn't benefit from the education here because we were a different color?

    101. Re:Offshoring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Johnny can't code because he is taught to avoid self-thinking creative non-motor challenge. He is a proficient user of the non-reading applications, as long as such apps are entertaining, mind dumbing and discussable at social gatherings. He does zong zong music, sports, social blogs. He numbs his feelings to "the value of life" by developing proficiencies in "life is worthless" virtual reality.

        I don't blame him because virtually every job he or she can hold as an adult will be done better and cheaper by a robot.

    102. Re:Offshoring. by hitmark · · Score: 1

      I would say that is already the case, as unlike the microcomputers of old, these days a computer do not come with a programming language preinstalled.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    103. Re:Offshoring. by rbrausse · · Score: 1

      If facebook could only be accessed by telnet, we'd have no problem getting young people to know technology.

      if only I could believe in this dream - but no, if Facebook would only be reachable by non-convenient tools it would be a (sometimes social) network of nerds and geeks like you and me. Even with technologies like HTTP and CSS it would be perfectly possible to destroy the point&click-for-dummies environment of the current big webtwozero-thingies: Just take a look at the _horrible_ usability of the /. commenting system - do you think a Farmville player and Like user would spend hours on one site if it would similar to this one?

  2. if you're not interested in computers.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    no amount of coddling will make you a good programmer.

    1. Re:if you're not interested in computers.... by ciderbrew · · Score: 1

      Ahh; but what makes a good programmer and a programmer good?

    2. Re:if you're not interested in computers.... by Anrego · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A disturbing interest in the kind of things that put off the kids described in this article

      There are exceptions, but most of the programmers I know (and myself), when first exposed to computers, immediately started wondering how they worked and how we could "make programs". If that curiosity and interest isn't automatic and you have to be "tricked" into it... in my opinion you'll probably be a bad programmer.

    3. Re:if you're not interested in computers.... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      You can say that about anything and it would be just as true. If you are not interested in doing it, you will not do it very well. These kids should find skills they won't mind doing for a third of their adult lives, not something they have to be tricked into.

    4. Re:if you're not interested in computers.... by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

      There has to be a combination of some skill and interest. I would really like to be a major league ball player but I stunk in Little League.

      --
      Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    5. Re:if you're not interested in computers.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes you have to know about something, and then try it, before you'll find that you like it.
      For instance, my wife doesn't like trying new things all that often. I don't understand it myself.
      So I'll occasionally make her try something new, and occasionally she'll find that she really likes it, and it becomes a new habit.

      Settlers of Catan was like that. She thought it looked confusing and so wasn't interested. I got her to play, and now she likes it and we play a few nights a week.

      Give these kids a taste of it, let them see what can be done, then teach them how to do it.

    6. Re:if you're not interested in computers.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you don't need to be tricked in to anything. Bad teachers make subjects boring. Good teachers can make a subject you had no care in the world for in to something you'd give an ear for.

      Fact: most teachers are taught to teach the bad way. (good way for society as a whole)
      Those who don't pick up the subjects they are taught end up in the slower class.
      These people then end up with a lesser education and end up in the lesser jobs.
      A small subset of those sometimes go on to tertiary education to better their lives since they screwed up when they were kids, some are just content with education finishing in secondary.
      All those "no child left behind" things are bullshit. They just give those children some more practical skills, basic literacy and numeracy skills, bham. It's not like it is a bad thing, it really gives them a chance at life, but it is designed to give more workforce to the lesser jobs almost all the time.

      If we taught everyone to be super geniuses, they'd have this high and mighty attitude and not want to do lesser jobs. (I know from personal experience with some "friends" moaning and bitching that they have no jobs and don't want to do waitering, food prep. or similar jobs because it is pointless. IT GETS THEM MONEY, THAT ISN'T POINTLESS)
      Of course, it is worse when people end up getting manager jobs because they have some pathetic certificate when the only people who should be getting manager jobs are people WITH EXPERIENCE OF THE LESSER JOBS THEY ARE MANAGING.

      Long story short, education system is designed to screw people over, including tertiary education. (of money)
      But just like shotguns, it took down more than it meant to.
      It is slowly killing off a number of courses, maths, sciences, technology, all suffering greatly.

      If people don't like an intro course to X, they just drop it when they get to decide courses later on.
      No trickery should be needed.
      This is no trickery, this is good education. Problem solving is a huge skill requirement for these kinds of jobs. Telling people how to do things is the old style that is meant to turn you in to yet another society drone that takes instructions.
      Same with maths and sciences. You can't just force mindsets on people, it destroys the field as a whole and makes people hate the subject or get bored senseless. Getting people to naturally fall in to those mindsets is the best way to go about things.

    7. Re:if you're not interested in computers.... by darronb · · Score: 1

      I don't think this is true. It's also about presentation.

      When I was 7, my uncle convinced my parents to get me a TI 99/4A. He supposedly stayed up until 2am programming it to play "we wish you a merry christmas" in a loop. When I saw that and realized "You can make it do stuff?!?" I instantly started to try to program it.

      I had an Atari 2600 at the time and I loved playing games on that. If my parents had just stuck a game cartridge in the TI, I would have just played games on it for who knows how long. I'm not sure I would have (a) figured out you could make it do stuff (program it) AND (b) thought it was something a pre-teen could accomplish totally on their own... it could have been 5-7 years longer before I started programming with that simple change in presentation.

    8. Re:if you're not interested in computers.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have yet to see any evidence that certain minds are better at tasks than others. Ability comes from experience, experience is gained through thoughtful exposure, and thoughtful exposure is sustained through an interest in the field. So it doesn't matter if they are tricked into interest initially, what matters is whether or not they sustain that interest after the class is over. If they don't they probably won't go into computer science anyway.

    9. Re:if you're not interested in computers.... by SparkleMotion88 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that people entering college now are too young to remember when they were first exposed to computers because computers are everywhere and they've had them all their life. I remember being excited about my family's first computer (and IBM PC XT) and wondering how it works, but that was because I was 9 at the time. Computers are so commonplace today, and many are not even recognizable as computers, that we shouldn't expect kids to have an immediate sense of wonder about them.

      Another issue is that young people probably see computers and software as these mystical things that are handed down to us from large, powerful companies like Apple and EA. So they may need to be informed that it is within their means to tinker with software and build things on their own.

    10. Re:if you're not interested in computers.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i know physics profs would could code programs better than most here but couldn't use their computer for spit.

    11. Re:if you're not interested in computers.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true at all. I didn't like computers, but took a programming course in college at the recommendation of a friend and fell in love with it. I still don't like computers or gadgets, but still love programming.

      That's like saying you can't be a good a good sculptor unless you are interested in geology. Computers have nothing to do with programming except as a practical medium.

    12. Re:if you're not interested in computers.... by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      Meh, I can't remember when I first saw a computer (I'm 21 right now)....some of my earliest memories are of sitting in front of an old, straight DOS machine. But by third grade I, when asked what I wanted to be when I grew up, I was saying 'computer programmer'. I've changed slightly, as I'm not really that interested in being a code monkey forever, but the point is that even though I don't remember my first experience with a computer, I still wanted to know how it worked.

      Of course, at that point I had already done a bit of BASIC programming I think...I mean nothing more than hello world, basic math, 10 print something, 20 goto 10, that kind of stuff...but still, I'd had some exposure. Add in modding games, more BASIC and Logo in elementary school, and programming Lego Mindstorms....at least in my childhood, I had PLENTY of ways to get interested in this stuff.

    13. Re:if you're not interested in computers.... by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. When I first got into computers I was 3. By the age of 11 I was writing code and liking it. Yet it wasn't until I was programming in university (while getting a maths degree) and a friend showed me gdb that I really really fell head over heels for it. Oddly enough, my favourite part of programming is debugging, and it's hard to explain to someone else the joy of examining a large call stack, looking at every parameter, and tracing the root problem all the way back to its origin.

      Actually, the exact same thing got me into that maths degree in the first place. Maths teaching at the high school level does nothing to show you how beautiful maths can be, all it shows you is the loathsome drudgery. It would've turned me off maths if I hadn't had several people in my life that showed me the other side of it, from the surprising richness of Pascal's triangle to the elegance of group theory.

    14. Re:if you're not interested in computers.... by Anrego · · Score: 1

      my favourite part of programming is debugging, and it's hard to explain to someone else the joy of examining a large call stack, looking at every parameter, and tracing the root problem all the way back to its origin.

      Takes all kinds to make a world, but that's just weird ;p

    15. Re:if you're not interested in computers.... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      What I think is sad is that we have many professional engineers and programmers who do not have this curiosity. To them programming is just a distasteful chore that's a part of their work day.

      The reason is that for a long time the one word "computers" was the equivalent of the word "plastics" from the movie "The Graduate". People going into college were strongly encouraged to become programmers and engineers. Never mind if they had no aptitude, the attitude was that this was a big up and coming field and would make the kids a lot of money and guarantee them employment. But the department was glutted with hopeful future programmers because of this. I saw a ton of people around my age with zero aptitude for the subject who stuck with it because that's what was expected of them. I even saw this when I was in graduate school in Computer Science! It was sad when these were foreign students who would admit that they could not quit even if they wanted to because then they'd be deported.

    16. Re:if you're not interested in computers.... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I grew up with a television set all my life. It was a mystical thing handed down to us from large powerful companies like RCA and Zenith. We did NOT need to be informed that it was within our means to tinker with them or build them, it was taken as granted that it could be a useful profession if you were interested in it. Computers aren't any different.

    17. Re:if you're not interested in computers.... by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Heh, i like creating mental models of large computer networks. The number of boxes actually involved to let two people across the street, let alone the planet, can be crazy to think about.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  3. Learn the logic, first. by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    Johnny needs a solid foundation in Programming Logic and avoiding pitfalls of "drop-through logic" before Johnny writes code for production.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Learn the logic, first. by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Johnny probably needs motivation and opportunity to learn how to code before he worries about attaining production-quality habits. Trying to ingrain correctness from day one is why no one studies Latin and Ancient Greek any more. (And can we, as a society, really afford FORTRAN programs becoming mysterious cultural artefacts?)

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    2. Re:Learn the logic, first. by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Johnny probably needs motivation and opportunity to learn how to code before he worries about attaining production-quality habits. Trying to ingrain correctness from day one is why no one studies Latin and Ancient Greek any more. (And can we, as a society, really afford FORTRAN programs becoming mysterious cultural artefacts?)

      My first motivation was in seeing what I could get this box to do. After that it was smartening up, learning how to be a tidy coder. Microsoft's legions of bugs and security holes tells you how emphasis is placed upon meeting delivery deadlines over quality.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Learn the logic, first. by wed128 · · Score: 1

      FORTRAN programs will never become artifacts as long as two conditions are met:

      1. FORTRAN manuals still exist
      2. The state of computer science education is such that picking up a new language is a trivial task.

      I have never used FORTRAN in my life; I am absolutely confident i could learn it quickly if i had to.

    4. Re:Learn the logic, first. by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Completely agree. But we must emphasise that learning how to do something wisely follows learning how to do it; one model might be learning how to program willy-nilly in high school and then properly in college/university. Demanding rigour in the interests of a child will either kill the interests or kill the child.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    5. Re:Learn the logic, first. by kmdrtako · · Score: 1

      When you say study, do you mean devote a lifetime, or just take four or five years in middle school and high school? Schools around here teach Latin at least and lots of kids take it.

      My own children wanted to write their own computer/video games, but weren't the least bit interested in learning anything resembling programming in order to do it. ("Can't you just do it for us dad?" Yeah, sure, in my copious spare time I can.) My son took CS101 (Intro to Algorithms) and did okay until they got to recursion. I helped him and he got more tutoring at school, but he just couldn't get his head around it. He got demoralized and it was all down hill after that.

      That aside, there was no force fed correctness. Despite my best efforts they just never got into creating things like I did as a child. Their creative efforts never, IMO, reached the same level as my own as a child, spanning the spectrum from legos to chemistry sets to building bikes, and forts and tree houses. It's sad really.

    6. Re:Learn the logic, first. by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Well... literary epics from two millennia ago are considered artefactual. Just because the manuals still exist doesn't mean the idioms and style of the language won't become so archaic that reading it is a challenge. If the programmers in twenty years are raised on a diet of Haskell, Python and Javascript, this isn't so infeasible. Even the new C++ includes lambda functions—that's going to make reading traditional imperative code very alien. Assembly is already perceived as magic by many, and yet once it was standard fare. (Maybe we're working off two different definitions of 'artefact', here, but I'm going with some degree of veneration and mystery as required.)

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    7. Re:Learn the logic, first. by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      I mean study it at the university level. The Classics programmes at American universities have extremely high attrition rates and some of the oldest average faculties. This is in part due to how thoroughly the field has been analysed, meaning that the only work left to be done outside of archaeology is literary critique, but a major factor in this is heavy reliance on textbooks that have barely changed since the professors learned from them—Wheelock's, for example—and a disconnect from how things are done in other linguistics departments. In fifty years, it is unlikely that there will be more than a few Classics departments in the United States. There won't be any PhDs to run them.

      Some people just aren't destined to code, and unfortunately we can't argue people into being creative. It's very difficult to create someone highly imaginative, period, although starving children of creative inputs seems to be the way to go. Recursion is something that I struggled with, in varying degrees, throughout all of high school; I only got it down for certain in second year, and that was with many thousands of hours of prior experience. Without a doubt, it's one of the trickiest leaps of logic in CS to absorb, and my university actually didn't expect us to really be comfortable with it until after first year. (It sure made mathematical induction make more sense when I finally was comfortable with it, though!)

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    8. Re:Learn the logic, first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C++ adding lambdas does not magically turn it from an imperative to a functional language, nor it is going to make it "alien" or hard to read. Picking up a new (or old) language is quick easy, and will always be so. Fortran will not become "magically" hard to understand in 100yrs.

    9. Re:Learn the logic, first. by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      I am absolutely confident i could learn it quickly if i had to.

      If you have any ability to program at all, you could. It was one of the easiest-to-learn languages I ever used.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    10. Re:Learn the logic, first. by nharmon · · Score: 1

      Early adolescence is marked by poor abstract thinking abilities. As a result their curriculum is designed to be more concrete-based. This is what the title of the article, "Why Johnny can't program", aludes to. The title is borrowed from a book titled Why Johnny Can't Add: The Failure of the New Math, which identified a similar problem in the revised American math education of the 1960s & 70s. This new curriculum was designed by mathematicians without a great deal of consideration of their target audience, or how their target audience learned.

      A computer programming curriculum that is heavily logic based has no hope in being taught to students who lack well-developed abstract thinking skills. This is why things like AgentSheets sees much success.

    11. Re:Learn the logic, first. by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Really? Recursion was that difficult for you? That was one of the more intuitive concepts for me in my college CS courses. Pointers took a while to wrap my head around, and to this day, I still find pointers cumbersome to use, even though I get the concept now. It's one of the two main reasons I went into system administration rather than programming -- I just couldn't get the knack of C, since pointers are so integral to the language. I found that I was more suited to scripting in Perl, Python, Bash, etc. than writing large programs in C/C++, etc.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    12. Re:Learn the logic, first. by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      I had a clear understanding of recursion when I needed to put it to the task of doing something, but as I'd never read a programming textbook until university, I had a bad habit of adding extra cases for handling the second-last step, with the mistaken belief that avoiding the base case's function call was preferable. It wasn't really a disaster as much as a confusion of concepts. Seeing a large number of examples of recursive implementations for greedy algorithms and dynamic programming helped a great deal, as did exposure to functional programming. This was something of a handicap in the regional programming competitions I entered in high school; universally it seemed that every other school's students were better-prepared, though I still managed to hold my own with enough work.

      Pointers were actually not that hard for me once I'd absorbed a proper explanation of them. It's a lot easier to get used to them once you've spent a long stretch programming in a language that heavily uses implicit references—try implementing some fancy trees in Java or some other childproofed object-oriented language, and you'll build up the understanding in a hurry. After that, pointers just feel like syntactic salt, and less like quicksand. It's remarkable how such small subtle details can be such a tripping point... and a great example of how the head-first approach is a bad idea in programming.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    13. Re:Learn the logic, first. by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      I am absolutely confident i could learn it quickly if i had to.

      Of course. Any decent programmer could pick up another programming language easily. FORTRAN is easier than most as its quirks are relatively few. In FORTRAN 77 and older, the main ones are no dynamic allocation, and no complex structures. Just arrays. You have to statically declare up front all the space the program could ever need. Want to use a stack? Then figure out the maximum possible number of items that could ever be in that stack so you know how big to make the arrays for it.

      But employers have grown accustomed to dismissing that basic fact of programming languages. HR will immediately throw your resume in the trash if it doesn't have all the magic words. They make it difficult for you to work around their shortsightedness, and will insist that only experience counts. Taking a class or learning and using it on your own free time doesn't count. Giving yourself a crash course on a particular language may not be good enough to pass the kind of trivia test they are apt to give. Depends how obscure they get. I can think of several obscure C/C++ trivia, such as "pascal". Think of the Obfuscated C Code Contests. Such tests completely fail to sort good programmers from bad ones. Then, after they've thrown the babies out with the bathwater, they complain they can't find any good programmers.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
  4. In other words .... by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... it's designed to attract the types of students who are disinterested in, or don't have the mind-set for, "real programming".

    That worked out real well for all those colleges that churn out useless web monkeys - but not so well for the unemployable students going around with their "Certificate as a Webmaster's Assistant".

    What next - "Programming by Powerpoint"? Oh wait ...

    1. Re:In other words .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What next - "Programming by Powerpoint"? Oh wait ...

      That's called an "M.B.A."

    2. Re:In other words .... by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not necessarily. Johnny could be a diamond in the rough, but thinks that programming is hard and pointless. By giving him a rewarding goal that shows results quickly, he might discover that he actually has a talent and a passion. It worked for me - I only learned to program so that I could hack Netrek, and now I do some fairly deep fu.

      Remember, we're competing for Johnny's heart and mind. Would we rather that he became a lawyer, or an accountant?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    3. Re:In other words .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What next - "Programming by Powerpoint"? Oh wait ...

      That's called an "M.B.A."

      The funny thing is, the (top 20) MBA program I'm currently working through is trying to reduce dependence on powerpoint. Meanwhile, the major technically dominated corporation (20B market cap with less MBA representation than most of that size) that is paying for said program has miles of processes, created by "software engineers" that are basically driven by mandatory, verbose to the point of uselessness, powerpoint presentations for customer reviews.

      So while your mileage may vary, you might want to check those stereotypes at the door if your intent is progress.

      Johnny can't code because his Java education hid what's going on under the hood, such that when he goes to write something more complex than "Hello World", he doesn't really understand why his Java app is (effectively) leaking memory, his pointers... sorry, references get all bungled, etc.... That and when he hits corporate land, he's graded on his reports, not his code, so he never gets the correct mentoring.

    4. Re:In other words .... by anyGould · · Score: 1

      Johnny can't code because his Java education hid what's going on under the hood, such that when he goes to write something more complex than "Hello World", he doesn't really understand why his Java app is (effectively) leaking memory, his pointers... sorry, references get all bungled, etc.... That and when he hits corporate land, he's graded on his reports, not his code, so he never gets the correct mentoring.

      Well, let's be fair - for the vast majority of Business Logic software there isn't a big push for performance "under the hood". If it provides correct input in a reasonable amount of time (which can be defined as simply as "it's faster than it would be to do by hand"), that's pretty much a "win" to them. (Obviously the benchmarks are a bit more severe when you start talking back-end.)

      As an example: my day job is largely building tools for management types to retrieve, display, and manipulate data. It's almost entirely VBA in Excel, because what my end-users want is a "smart spreadsheet". They open Excel, fill in some cells, push the button, and Automagically Stuff Happens.

      Is my code all that and a bag of chips? No. But most days, something Good Enough Now trumps Something Perfect Later.

    5. Re:In other words .... by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      There is a significant argument to be made that basic programming abilities are the next form of literacy. As 150 years ago, much of the population was unable to read and write to any degree, much is the condition right now of programming. The average persons STILL can not be a professional writer, but there is a general understanding that we all need to be able to read/write in small amounts on a daily basis. Will it be true that in 50 years, you will be expected to be able to do basic level programming, but that won't necessary mean everyone is a professional.

      On another part of that same token, while programmers currently make decent money, the people who are making the real killing are those with totally different trades, say doctors, who can also program, and use it to advance their specific job, you will see more of this pattern in the future.

    6. Re:In other words .... by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      If Johnny is young enough, I think it works. For instance, I didn't realize it until many, many years later, but the first programming I learned wasn't Java or C++ in high school, and it certainly wasn't one of the dozens of others I saw in college, but was rather Logo in elementary school. I recognize now that Logo actually was a big part of what got me interested in computers in the first place. I used to rush through the keyboarding exercises and other work we had in computer labs in 4th and 5th grade so that I could go back to "playing" with "that fun little turtle drawing program".

      It wasn't until sometime in college that I remembered having played with Logo as a child, and realized that it had covered loops, functions, and other concepts in a way that seemed simple and natural at the time. It also explained why I jumped at the chance to learn programming when it was offered in high school.

    7. Re:In other words .... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Programming has become a commodity, much like operating systems and software.

      As such, I expect demand, on a per-capita basis, to slide, as the low end (for example, the web monkey) is completely supplanted by tools anyone can use to make a web site, and the middle sees increasing pressure due to the excess capacity after all those "monkey jobs", whether web or whatever, go bye-bye.

      Just as you don't need any programming skills to set up and run a web site now, in the future you won't need any programming skills to make all sorts of other content, such as animated videos and games (see http://www.xtranormal.com/ as an example for video animations)

    8. Re:In other words .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To me this looks like a 1.4 million grant to develop and promote "AgentSheets" as a new computer visual/menu programming language and not an attempt to teach kids to program in existing languages.

    9. Re:In other words .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Barbara (tom) Hudson, cyberstalker? Decide here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36572732 because it's been going on since May last year if you look at the post dates.

    10. Re:In other words .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Barbara (tom) Hudson, cyberstalker? Decide here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36572732 because it's been going on since May last year if you look at the post dates.

    11. Re:In other words .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Barbara (tom) Hudson, cyberstalker? Decide here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36572732 because it's been going on since May last year if you look at the post dates.

    12. Re:In other words .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have a computer science degree? No.

    13. Re:In other words .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering. We ate you Computer Science weenies for breakfast. On toast.

  5. Re:Programmer vs Computer Scientist by specialguy92 · · Score: 1

    Future Borders employees in that they will be coding the database software that Borders uses in it's thousands of stores worldwide.

    --
    I can never spell "recursion" correctly on Google
  6. Motivation by jimmerz28 · · Score: 1

    That was the one frustrating thing about CS classes it seemed like a whole lot of useless exercises. I wanted something that felt like it would matter later; exercises that show me how to draw a circle on the screen are great, but students need applicable exercises to show them why this stuff matters.

    When we'd talk after class as juniors in college we wondered if we really knew anything at all, because it felt like we didn't.

    Motivation is everything and if you feel like what you're learning has no applicability it's damn depressing.

    1. Re:Motivation by geoffrobinson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I understand your feelings. At the same time it sounds like someone learning chord progressions on the guitar and wondering how it was applicable to playing Led Zeppelin songs.

      --
      Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    2. Re:Motivation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You weren't supposed to be only learning how to draw circles. You were also supposed to be learning how circles are drawn.

      Most of the kids in CS programs think the courses don't apply because, for one reason or another, the students don't understand WHY they're important. I see this a lot in algorithm analysis and theoretical CS courses, as well as discrete math courses. I wouldn't go near hiring someone who did poorly in those courses, unless all I wanted was someone to churn out shitty code they found on google that solves unrelated problems.

      They think the classes are just rote training exercises and they simply copypasta their code from google searches and end up not knowing how to do shit.

    3. Re:Motivation by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      I agree. When I took CS in college, I was taught all sorts of things that I can understand why they might be useful, especially for actual computer scientists, but have had no application on my career. Like the processor design class I had to take. Knowing digital design makes a lot of sense, and it was certainly interesting, but I can't think of one time I have ever used it. Except maybe as a story told to co-workers about how I designed a pipelined processor in software and had to use assembly language to operate it and get a result.

      The worst thing about it is that there do exist some places where optimization from CS would come into play, but you can't use them because they insist that you work with frameworks, libraries and templates that speed up coding, but completely take any customization out of your hands. Not that I want to code my own garbage collection, for instance, but you learn in CS how to do those things and then never use them again.

      I think there are more people out there that would be interested in programming (as opposed to CS) if you didn't have to learn to be a computer scientist to get a programming job. Most programmers are not computer scientists. They learn languages, and use frameworks and other tools to make thinks work. A programmer is a craftsman, not a scientist. Given the materials and tools, the best programmers can create masterpieces, but they don't need to know the details behind every tool they use.

    4. Re:Motivation by wed128 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This.

      A lot of people taking computer science in college and wondering why they're not learning how to do ASP.NET projects in Visual Studio belong in a Tech School. The world needs bottom level implementers just like it needs ditch diggers.

      University level computer science is about Design, not Implementation.

    5. Re:Motivation by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Not This.

      The person doing the programming is not, and can probably never be doing the equivalent of "digging a ditch". Programming is probably the equivalent of drawing up the plans for a bridge. Sure someone else may tell the programmer the basic requirements, but that still leaves a lot of implementation details for the coder to figure out. You can come up with the best design in the world, but if you task a "ditch digger" level coder at the project, it will still end up a mess.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    6. Re:Motivation by Nursie · · Score: 1

      But there are times when it all comes in useful.

      I was certainly in that bracket when I was at university, not paying too much attention to all the abstract or 'deep' stuff. But as I've gone on through my career I've found it more and more useful to understand what's going on at deeper and deeper levels.

    7. Re:Motivation by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      There's a balance to be struck.

      On the one hand, there's the problem that you've had where the task doesn't seem to do anything useful. I think your teachers have failed you if you take an entire course, learn all the concepts, but still can't write an end-to-end program that would be half-way useful in the real world.

      At the other end of the spectrum, if you want to teach a concept, you don't want your examples to be filled with so much code that is irrelevant to what you are trying to teach, that it gets in the way. My high school computing classes used Java as a teaching language, and the examples were 90% event handling code for the GUI that was showing our results, and 10% code for the actual concept I was trying to learn.

      When we'd talk after class as juniors in college we wondered if we really knew anything at all, because it felt like we didn't.

      When I was learning to program, everything seemed difficult at first, and I wasn't good at looking at a problem and identifying the solution. Then, sometime in my first year of university, everything just clicked, and I started learning at a much faster pace than previously. Different people hit that point at different times, and some never hit it at all.

      Still, I look back on those years and think, hell, I knew nothing. I even look back on the time when I'd left uni with a degree and started my job, and think that I knew very little then. And I'm sure that in five years' time I'll think the same thing about now. I don't think you should feel too bad about not knowing much at the start of college, as you've got a lot of time to learn. Just wait for everything to click.

    8. Re:Motivation by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      "University level computer science is about Design, not Implementation."

      No, that's Software Engineering. No let the flamewar begin.

    9. Re:Motivation by jimmerz28 · · Score: 1

      Definitely.

      I'm not saying that these things aren't useful, but students aren't being given the foresight as to why they are useful to learn now.

    10. Re:Motivation by anyGould · · Score: 1

      I understand your feelings. At the same time it sounds like someone learning chord progressions on the guitar and wondering how it was applicable to playing Led Zeppelin songs.

      That's a decent comparison, except that the gulf between "school coding" and "what my console game does" gets wider every year. It's a lot harder to teach basic principles *and* generate something actually useful early on. (Most of the modern solutions seem to involve black-boxing implementation into easy function calls.) Definitely not my old Vic-20 days where a text game *was* state of the art. :)

      If anything, I'd be tempted to teach critical thinking and logic, and break out the old Logo robot. (Hell, those things should be cheap enough now that every student can have one - Roborally in class!)

    11. Re:Motivation by CapnStank · · Score: 1

      "students need applicable exercises to show them why this stuff matters."

      The students destined to be coders find this out on their own. As for the others I find a lesson plan that works backwards is best. Show them a functional product then show them the components that someone had to make in order for it to function. So show the kids where that circle they learned to draw the week before is in a massive UI environment.

      "When we'd talk after class as juniors in college we wondered if we really knew anything at all, because it felt like we didn't."
      You didn't know anything, and never should pretend that you do. Staying humble is one of the only ways I keep myself sane sometimes.

    12. Re:Motivation by jimmerz28 · · Score: 1

      "You didn't know anything, and never should pretend that you do."

      I agree with the humble and sanity check, but I had to laugh because that sounds like what managers tell their employees so they can keep thinking that pittance of a salary is worth it.

    13. Re:Motivation by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      Well alright, I'll chuck the first counter-volley.

      I don't know how it is elsewhere, but at ISU they have those in the esteemed engineering department and the poor slobs with a liberal arts major in ComSci. Guess which one I was? In theory, the bottom rung was those with an MSI degree (or something along those lines) , who were destined for IT work, which is really a parrellel field, but we still looked down on them. Then there were those with in ComSci. Just enough to be dangerous with a compiler, but little clue what was really happening behind the scneses. Then we had Computer engineers, who actually knew how to do things, and in theory had an idea what the hardware was doing. Then came the Electrical Engineers, who walked like gods around campus. Mostly because there were two hard-ass professors that cackled as they got students to drop out, and they didn't leave too many around. Then came the engineering grad students, and at the very top were the ComSci phd students who couldn't code worth a damn but were somehow revered for their mysical in their trancendence of it all.

      Usually you could tell the potential phd students from the doomed code-monkeys.

    14. Re:Motivation by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      The problem is HR requires computer science degrees and then whines that they can't do ASP.NET or know help desk methods for customers! In India, they teach these things and businesses have noticed. It makes the US look bad as they do not give a shit about the science of algorithms. They need an ASP.NET grunt and assume that is what computer science is. Meanwhile people who know it are turned down because they do not have computer science degrees.

    15. Re:Motivation by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      "At the other end of the spectrum, if you want to teach a concept, you don't want your examples to be filled with so much code that is irrelevant to what you are trying to teach, that it gets in the way. My high school computing classes used Java as a teaching language, and the examples were 90% event handling code for the GUI that was showing our results, and 10% code for the actual concept I was trying to learn.

      "

      Java is a poor choice to learn a new language or simple concepts. I struggled and hated Java until I took C++ first with functional and then later object oriented concepts. Then retook Java and it was easy and now powerful. It is too object oriented and if you do not know object oriented concepts, it can be a hair raising experience to do anything useful.

      Javascript is much better and can be done in a browser. Java is great for complex very large apps because of the extra layers and cement, but still for 80% of uses. Hence, why php is the most popular language for websites.

    16. Re:Motivation by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      indeed there is a bridge in the middle east that only works because I pointed out the Engineer had used the wrong formula when defining the shape - I had to develop a program to draw the section of the complex curved supports (so that the draftsman could put in the rebar supports)

  7. Problem is by Anrego · · Score: 1

    It's hard for young students to see the purpose of these kinds of exercises, particularly when there is already plenty of software available to accomplish the same tasks, with no programming required.

    The big problem with doing large "real" projects while still learning is that eventually you hit a point where you realize your initial design was bad. On a small "make work" project you can start over .. on a large project you just kind of have to go with it. Obviously this happens in real life to seasoned pros as well... but while you are still learning the fundementals it's apt to happen way more often and would seem to hold less educational value.

    Somewhat offtopic, something that isn't done enough when people are learning to do design and coding, is to analyze failures. If you come up with a bad design, don't just bin it and start fresh.. really look at the process you went through to end up with that bad design. Sometimes it is a lack of understanding of some concept (especially true when initially learning OO fundementals) ... but sometimes it is a way that you looked at a problem. I think a lot can be learnt not just from looking at a bad design and analysing why it is bad, but also looking at we arrived at that design.

    1. Re:Problem is by cklosowski · · Score: 1

      Somewhat offtopic, something that isn't done enough when people are learning to do design and coding, is to analyze failures

      I think that's totally on topic. It's part of the learning process. The other thing that isn't taught is how to take that 'bad design' and refactor it to become a good design. Scrapping an entire codebase isn't feasible 100% of the time, but a refactor can breathe new life into a codebase. In order to improve, you must know where it went bad. Plain and simple.

    2. Re:Problem is by Anrego · · Score: 1

      The other thing that isn't taught is how to take that 'bad design' and refactor it to become a good design.

      Totally agree. Ongoing maintenance in general (which is at least a huge chunk of the jobs out there) isn't taught well.

      What I actually think would be a good way to do this, is have some software application that is maintained for _years_ by the various classes. As a project, each class has to add new functionality to it... upgrade it to the latest technology, etc. The grading would cover not only that the new functionality worked, but that all the existing functionality continued to work and that the code base was still in a maintainable-ish state. I'm sure one could come up with some pretty clever "new functionality requirements" that would require extensive re-work and refactoring to make functional.

  8. I'll tell you why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You programmers rest on the achievements of the physical sciences which allowed the production of billion transistor CPUs, gigahertz clock rates and gigabytes of RAM , etc. There is no consequence to writing academically "bad" software. Just keep waiting and hoping for a faster computer and blame the hardware for being "slow", even though you wouldn't even understand how a 25 year old computer actually worked inside.

    Software is now a personal thing, everyone with a glimmer of an idea invents a new language or "framework" for one specific task, creating a tidal wave of buzzwords, incompatible ways of doing things and general confusion. Software is a world where you learn something one day, flush it down the sink at the end of the day and start again from scratch the next day.

    Software is a world in which people can say with a straight face they are "craftsmen" when in reality a craft is all about learning a set of tools that DOESN'T CHANGE, so you CAN learn the tool! Do you know any craftsmen who learn let's say about the circular saw, then forget all about and find some other way to cut wood the next day? You'd have them committed for mental evaluation.

    Software shouldn't be all that different. At the end of the day, your job is to take a byte from here and put it there. That's it.

    1. Re:I'll tell you why by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      You're the same kind of person that railed against the circular saw in the first place, I bet. Normal saws were plenty good enough and inventing new things was pointless, eh?

      Tools change all the time for ALL professions and crafts. It just so happens that programming is new and as such hasn't been solidified yet.

      Feel free not to use anything we make. It won't hurt our feelings.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:I'll tell you why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're completely misunderstanding what makes a craftsman a craftsman. A master woodworker doesn't "learn the circular saw". Yes, that may be one of his tools, but his craftsmanship is not dependent on it. And yes, I would expect a master woodworker to be interested in new tools. Laser guided saws, sliding miter saws, etc. Hell, the miter saw itself is a fairly recent development.

      There is no difference between a woodworker learning to use a new type of plane, chisel, or saw and a developer learning to use a new IDE, language, or pattern.

    3. Re:I'll tell you why by fred911 · · Score: 1

      Outstanding comment! Eloquent and right on point. Thanks!

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    4. Re:I'll tell you why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Methinks fred911 is GP.

    5. Re:I'll tell you why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical. You think all software and all programmers are the same, cookie-cutter. I write real-time systems. I have neither gigahertz, nor gigabytes. My software has to work, every time. It has to be fault tolerant, and meet it dead-lines, ALL THE TIME. Not all of us write crappy web tools, or buggy Windows utilities.

    6. Re:I'll tell you why by russotto · · Score: 1

      You programmers rest on the achievements of the physical sciences which allowed the production of billion transistor CPUs, gigahertz clock rates and gigabytes of RAM , etc. There is no consequence to writing academically "bad" software. Just keep waiting and hoping for a faster computer and blame the hardware for being "slow", even though you wouldn't even understand how a 25 year old computer actually worked inside.

      Of course there's consequence for writing bad software. Because the problems scaled up along with the computers. Not all of them, but a lot of them; by definition, most of the interesting ones. And of course faster computers bring some problems from the range of "obviously infeasible" to "expensive but feasible". Has nothing to do with understanding how a computer works inside; knowing the details of the quantum physics happening inside transistors really won't help you write programs...

      Software is now a personal thing, everyone with a glimmer of an idea invents a new language or "framework" for one specific task, creating a tidal wave of buzzwords, incompatible ways of doing things and general confusion. Software is a world where you learn something one day, flush it down the sink at the end of the day and start again from scratch the next day.

      Bad experience with Enterprise Java?

      Software is a world in which people can say with a straight face they are "craftsmen" when in reality a craft is all about learning a set of tools that DOESN'T CHANGE, so you CAN learn the tool!

      Nonsense. Never been true even in woodworking. Craftsmen build tools to help them make things all the time; a lot of them one-off jigs of some sort, others eventually become standards of the craft.

    7. Re:I'll tell you why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep pushing those bytes on your magical black box! Don't forget to disparage drag and drop programmers when you do exactly the same every time you include or import!

    8. Re:I'll tell you why by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

      "Software is a world where you learn something one day, flush it down the sink at the end of the day and start again from scratch the next day."

      Of course. That's why it's "soft". That's a feature.

      And, yes, I rest on the achievement of the physical sciences. And compiler writers. And OS writers etc. I have other problems to solve and I stand on their shoulders. I don't particularly feel like doing what has already been taken care of by others.

      Should I feel bad about this?

      --
      Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    9. Re:I'll tell you why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, as long as you don't disparage others for being "drag and drop programmers" when you're the same. Besides, your kind of self-awareness is rare with the software crowd.

  9. Develop a home market for IT & CS by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    How about just making it possible to not require a degree? Combine that with a required preference for US citizens - linked to the long-term and short term unemployment rates - and allow ourselves to redevelop our home market.

    It might be painful for business, but getting obstacles out of the way for workers is as valid as removing obstacles for business.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  10. Re:Programmer vs Computer Scientist by SirGeek · · Score: 1

    Yeah. Good luck with that. Companies need people who aren't "blind" programming. The will always need good "computer scientists" who can look at a design and see the defects before any coding is done to save the company $$$ and time getting to market.

    They'll also need people who can LOOK at the code from the kids and make sure that whet they're writing is actually, I don't know... FUNCTIONAL ?

    Too many companies are short sighted in their hiring/retention practices and forget that people with experience have just that, EXPERIENCE. They're used to looking at a problem and seeing solutions (or at least seeing the problems and working around them).

  11. In my experience by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1
    In my experience, it's nothing like that. I think you will have a relatively constant percentage of the population with the ability to think in the way that allows programming to come as a natural skill. All the enticements in the world, all the attempts to make it exciting... they may find a few more of these minds and make them aware of what they can do. They'll probably also entice a lot of minds that aren't really capable of showing the same level of skill - the same types that show up en masse for offshore development contracts, or like those in the 90s who hopped on the programming bandwagon to make money. (Same thing, by the way - just different environments.) People who can get by - but don't expect them to come up with a decent algorithm or even to implement an existing one without step by step instructions.

    You either have it or you don't. I think in this case of nature/nurture, nature plays a much bigger factor. Nurturing can find these minds, but I've not seen any evidence that it can create them.

  12. How much by Inda · · Score: 1

    How much game programming can you do in an hour's lesson? Even Scratch, used at our local school, takes an age to get the loop timings and event handling right. My little'un soon got bored of that.

    How long would it take one of you guys to program Tic-Tac-Toe in a low level scripting language? What about with an AI?

    The kids spend 38 weeks a year at school, maybe doing an hour ICT a week. Knock Tic-Tac-Toe out in 38 hours? I think not.

    The article also spoke about getting Johnny interested... My little'un camp back from school yesterday with a robot. It consisted of a batery pack, two motors, two microswitches with cable-ties attached, which doubled the speed of the motor when pressed, all held together with electical tape, with two googly-eyes on top. You want interesting? That's what you do with young children.

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    1. Re:How much by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      The kids spend 38 weeks a year at school, maybe doing an hour ICT a week. Knock Tic-Tac-Toe out in 38 hours? I think not.

      Depends on at what age we're talking about, when I was in HS we did Tic-Tac-Toe with a primitive "AI" that essentially tried to play a perfect game with a "fudge factor" that determined the probability of it making a mistake. This was the first project we had for the first programming course and took nowhere near 38 hours.

      Of course, for most younger kids (say, grades 1 through 7 or so) who aren't interested in programming in the first place it's going to be hard to get anything done in 38 hours, they won't even care, to them it's just a matter of getting a passing grade and moving along to more fun things.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    2. Re:How much by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Those games are too hard for them to make. Punch the monkey with pygame is a better example. If that takes 38 hours little Timmy needs to be steered towards jobs more suited to his skillset, like ditch digging or collecting welfare checks.

    3. Re:How much by the+agent+man · · Score: 1

      How much game programming can you do in an hour's lesson? Even Scratch, used at our local school, takes an age to get the loop timings and event handling right. My little'un soon got bored of that..

      Well, perhaps you should try AgentSheets instead. Its programming approach is quite different. You can look at the research but with AgentSheets kids with no programming background make their first complete PLAYABLE game in a couple of hours. From that, they move on to more sophisticated games and simulations including advanced AI with collaboration and competition models. How to make programming work in schools: http://www.cs.colorado.edu/~ralex/papers/PDF/SIGCSE10-repenning.pdf

  13. We got in at a good time by jaymz2k4 · · Score: 2

    I can't help but feel lucky to have met computers back in the 80's and to have spent my time using something "simple" like the C64 with BASIC and then moving up to PC's learning various languages and growing my interest more and more to then eventually be sat a linux workstation coding in Python for a living. Many of the ids I know through family no longer look at computers with the same sparkly or excitement of those early days.

    I feel incredibly lucky to have got in at a point where I could experience relatively low spec & power computing and see it progress to the state it is today. I get the feeling that a lot of people getting into computers these days as kids don't get that sort of exposure and so don't get so bonded to learning about them. There was a good chance you could understand the schematic of a C64. Look at a die of a modern i7 and it's more modern art than anything that's going to make sense to a kid.

    I definitely feel that in some way we lucked out in getting to experience computing the past 30 years.

    --
    jaymz
    1. Re:We got in at a good time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LoseThos, my operating system, addresses this. http://www.losethos.com

    2. Re:We got in at a good time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's where Arduino comes in...

    3. Re:We got in at a good time by jesseck · · Score: 1

      I definitely feel that in some way we lucked out in getting to experience computing the past 30 years.

      I agree... growing up we had to learn BASIC and the command prompt to accomplish anything. It became second nature to write batch files to accomplish tasks, and to imagine the directory structure. Today, when I'm using a command prompt on SSH, my co-workers wonder how i keep track of where I'm at- without the GUI, they would be lost.

    4. Re:We got in at a good time by turtle+graphics · · Score: 1

      Those good times are coming back. For the '90s and most of 00's, home computers got harder to program and universities used C/C++ to introduce programming, which meant novices were faced with a steep learning curve and got to write code that produced, say, and ASCII histogram of some random numbers. Now, there's a trend towards Python, Java, and other languages with simple, powerful library sets built in so that students can write easy programs that do interesting things - in particular graphics and/or games. I think it's kind of a waste of time to "de-emphasize" programming, though - the more coding you do the better you get. But that doesn't mean you're wasting your time if you code in some very high level game description language. As long as you're being required to handle abstract concepts and explicitly describe what you mean, you're learning how to program.

    5. Re:We got in at a good time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... I think you have a point. There isn't a common, relatively open, relatively straight forward "low end" platform available. The Apple II and Vic-20/C-64 were common platforms, and most of the pieces were documented enough (e.g., 6502/65C10 assembly op codes, as well as memory addresses and behaviors of the various ASICs), that one *could* make them do some cool things.

      While much of that has been abstracted away in new computers, BillG did try to democratize Windows development with VB. The professionals, of course, hated this. Looks like we've "won". But now the problem is that there is no low-brow lingua franca for programming, either. Java, C#/VB.Net, C++ are all pretty high-brow programming arenas. The languages these days are relatively complex, but the environments they run in are even more so (but this is just inherent to GUI environments. Geos app development for the C-64 probably wasn't much fun compared to just mashing out a BASIC app, with all its PEEKs and POKEs to do interesting things).

      Of course, we've "won" in the computer world in almost eliminating the character-based interface for making the computer do things, too...

      writing a program that you invoke by typing in "do_this" is still much simpler (even in Java, C#, VB.Net, etc) than writing a typical GUI app that does what do_this does, and then also building an installer app that puts an icon on the desktop, etc. so one can do the GUI-equivalent, double-clicking on the do_this icon.

    6. Re:We got in at a good time by jank1887 · · Score: 2

      my first program was when someone showed me you could type
      10 print"butt"
      20 goto 10

      Type run and the teacher flips out because she doesn't know about the Break key. yes, she eventually just pulled the plug on the computer. next we learned the PLAY command, and the room was filled with ambulance wails. Some of us may have been temporarily banned from the computer lab.

      But I learned how a program works. I made the computer do something using a total of 24 characters.

      Low bar to entry, intuitive method for an absolute newbie. what's the modern day equivalent? "hold on Johnny, first you forgot to include all the right io headers..."

    7. Re:We got in at a good time by dylan_- · · Score: 1

      my first program was when someone showed me you could type

      10 print"butt"
      20 goto 10

      I suspect mine was similar...

      Low bar to entry, intuitive method for an absolute newbie. what's the modern day equivalent?

      Python?

      while (1):
       print "butt"

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    8. Re:We got in at a good time by dylan_- · · Score: 1

      ...except with an actual space rather than the entity...

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    9. Re:We got in at a good time by HeadSoft · · Score: 1

      I agree wholeheartedly. Having the unique experience of learning to code in the 70s and 80s with simpler platforms, languages, and even expectations gave our generation of coders an enormous advantage. I daresay that we will probably be the most knowledgeable computer programmers in the history of mankind, because there will never be another Commodore PET/Vic-20/C64/etc. nor will BASIC and assembly language ever rise again... nor will any of us *have* to write software just to have software. There were many times I wrote my own applications or games out of necessity because the obscure platform I was using didn't have *any* software available to speak of... Timex Sinclair 1000, TRS-80 MC-10 and similar come to mind. We're living in much better times for computers, but much much worse times for programmers.

      Still, it's kind of nice knowing we understand computers better than anyone else in the future of mankind ever will.

  14. FYI: Something worth be paid for is hard to learn by mattaw · · Score: 1
    Good grief - how far have we come?

    "The middle school years are critical for students in reaching conclusions regarding their own skills and aptitudes,"

    Yes educators should make things understandable, yes we should make learning fun but there is a whole big nasty world of hungry people who would kill for the chance to "reach conclusions about their own skills...".

    Where are the parents or schools telling students that engineering, maths and science can make the difference between having a job and not? Because at the end of the day those students need to get the cold hard fact: Do something useful and get paid, or hope somebody else will just give you a living. Presumably they don't expect to be hungry no matter what happens.

    N.B. please reread the "Yes educators should make things understandable, yes we should make learning fun" line before replying.

  15. Bring Back BASIC by nevermore94 · · Score: 1

    I started programming BASIC when I was 10 (1985) and that is where I developed my love of programming. Sure, as a Java developer now, I know BASIC does little more than teach bad programming habits, but it was FUN and it helped me develop The Knack. There is plenty of time to learn proper OOPs methods later once you develop the interest to learn more about programming.

    --
    Nevermore.
    1. Re:Bring Back BASIC by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Pascal or Modula 2 is probably better since it does not learn you things you must unlearn later.

    2. Re:Bring Back BASIC by anyGould · · Score: 1

      Pascal or Modula 2 is probably better since it does not learn you things you must unlearn later.

      Please not Modula 2. That's what I took, and while it's OK for teaching, it's completely dead weight in the marketplace.

    3. Re:Bring Back BASIC by BeforeCoffee · · Score: 1

      I was the same way, brother. Type-in games in BASIC on the C64 were the draw because my family was too poor to buy Atari games, and that experience got me hooked. Of my own volition, I went straight to TurboPascal when I outgrew Basic and 6502 Assembly, then Quick C then C++ in college, and for career I was all set for systems-level C++ and later Java/Java EE. Got an enjoyable and profitable career out of the deal.

      Tell me what the equivalent path is for kids today? Is drag and drop coding the way to get them hooked? I'm not yet sold on that... It's too flashy and too shallow. Hm, well, maybe not too shallow - that experience teaches good handling of media files, and there is a lot of value there these days. But as a programming tool, I find those systems de-emphasize the use of logic and the building of abstractions and the construction of data structures and of encouraging the development of problem solving, which is the whole point of learning to program. I feel like we're going to lose our edge and have less qualified replacements coming up - worldwide, not just here in the states.

      So how about ClubCompy? It's got a BASIC-like language, nostalgic for us 8-bit veterans. The character generator is my favorite part to dink around with. Sprites are my second favorite now that the collision detection is working properly, and it's got 256 sprites instead of just 8!

      https://clubcompy.com

      Check out the demos on the homepage and the benchmark page.

      Disclaimer: I need to mention that ClubCompy's my site. ;)

    4. Re:Bring Back BASIC by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

      Ditto -- 1975.

    5. Re:Bring Back BASIC by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Are you saying OOP but meaning structured programming, by any chance? My biggest concern about BASIC -- and it was my first programming language too, at roughly the same time frame -- is that it all but actively encourages writing spaghetti code. IMHO, while OOP can certainly wait until later, writing structured code ought to be taught from the very beginning.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    6. Re:Bring Back BASIC by srobert · · Score: 1

      Who learned you to speak English?

    7. Re:Bring Back BASIC by BeforeCoffee · · Score: 1

      I'm more optimistic about kid's chances for learning with BASIC-like languages. BASIC programs tend to be small and spaghettified. Trying to build a large BASIC program usually yields something that will collapse under the weight of its own complexity. BASIC is something to chafe against and grow out of.

      I can't tell you how often the alarmist/purist message of "GOTO is evil!!!!!!!!!1!!!!" reached my ears when I was a little guy. I got that message and processed it, and ultimately understood the wisdom of it. I trust the same thing would happen today if kids were in a similar situation. I just think we coddle our next generation that is SO primed for great things. If only we'd just challenge them.

  16. Modbomber didn't think of the long term. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    You want Johnny to want to code, give him every advantage to get him wanting to code. He is paying attention to the long term when he's deciding where/for what he wants to go to college.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  17. Why johnny can't code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because all the johnnies who are smart enough to code... Also are smart enough to figure out THERES NO MONEY IN BEING A CODER!

  18. What? by ZirconCode · · Score: 1

    Why teach people which don't want to learn?
    Those which want to learn definitely can, it is not about the reward but about the activity itself which should create joy.
    That is the problem with schools.

  19. Don't cater by clinko · · Score: 2

    I Think the problem is that "Johnny" doesn't like programming. Why fix that?

    The worst employee is a specialist that hates his specialty. He's only going to fight his way out of his job and defer to others. Why do you think there's usually more IT managers than Developers? :)

    1. Re:Don't cater by brainzach · · Score: 1

      I Think the problem is that "Johnny" doesn't like programming. Why fix that?

      Not everyone who has an aptitude for software development enjoys programming.

      I am a programmer who doesn't care for programming. I am more passionate about designing programs that people enjoy using. Programming is just a means to an end.

      I started studying computer science in college but stopped after getting into assembly and digital logic because I don't care to do all this tedious work when I can use C++. I ended up studying business and the only reason I ended up becoming a programmer was because it was the only decent paying job I could find in this economy.

    2. Re:Don't cater by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      I Think the problem is that "Johnny" doesn't like programming. Why fix that?

      I've programmed for a long time, and I know that programming really isn't a fun thing to do. Sometimes I have to call functions that have strange side effects or don't actually do everything that is advertised in documentation.

      A program in the simplistic von Neumann machine is a sequence of steps. Easy enough to teach. A program in the modern computer is an unpredictable beast talking to third party systems and involves flaky workarounds. That sounds like a real video game, but why make it a career choice? If Johnny wants win the game, he might take a hint from a chess player, steeped in the art of patience: "wait for the software industry to make life easier for programmers and in the meantime find something better to do."

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    3. Re:Don't cater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Appreciation for a subject can be developed. You aren't born into this world as a passionate programmer.

  20. Re:Programmer vs Computer Scientist by siride · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The poster made a mistake because of a homophone. Before you assume that he doesn't know the difference, consider that it may just be an honest mistake. I know the difference, for example, between "no" and "know", but when typing quickly, I might accidentally type the wrong one, and if I'm not careful, I won't go back and fix it. It doesn't mean I'm an idiot who doesn't know basic English. It just means I'm being careless. And for the commentary section on a second-rate news aggregator site, I don't think that's a big deal.

  21. bad career choice by theCat · · Score: 1

    Been writing web applications for 15 years. Through 5 startups. Been outsourced twice, one time with the entire US team the week after closing an important B-round that we all worked really hard to land.

    I have two kids. I've never suggested work in a technology field as a career choice for my own children. I'm glad they don't teach coding in schools, it's not good work. Coders are paid sh*t and used like toilet paper. All of our daily creativity and occasional brilliance ends up making the MBA pukes rich and rolling in blow.

    --
    =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
    1. Re:bad career choice by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 1

      Coders are paid sh*t and used like toilet paper.

      Maybe where you live. Here in the Netherlands, that's simply not true. Good coders are appreciated, well-paid and treated as humans. But the latter part might not be related to the profession and more with a difference in work ethic between the US and Europe.

    2. Re:bad career choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should stop writing web apps and start writing real apps (either desktop or mobile). ;)

      Are you too lazy to learn/expand your skill set?

    3. Re:bad career choice by theCat · · Score: 1

      The web app I am working now sells for $5000 per CPU, and runs in Fortune 100 network environments providing cloud network security services.

      I have worked on it for 3 years and once it's running with the full feature set my job as lead UI coder could be outsourced to a team in Hungary who would then do the bug fixes. And I absolutely expect that is what will happen.

      You are not in my industry, or else you are not in my league.

      --
      =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
    4. Re:bad career choice by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      No, "web application" coders are paid sh*t and used like toilet paper.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    5. Re:bad career choice by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      "Maybe where you live. Here in the Netherlands, that's simply not true. Good coders are appreciated, well-paid and treated as humans. But the latter part might not be related to the profession and more with a difference in work ethic between the US and Europe"

      The US gets HUGE tax breaks by laying off its workers and more breaks with health care costs (40% of salary). After laying off millions and going overseas, these same employers that hired a few back can treat them like slaves because 50 applicants are begging for the job and sending hundreds of resumes a week. It is hard to tell your boss to fuck himself, when he knows he can replace you so easily.

      I am getting into coding, but plan to make it a startup and be an MBA type, just because I want job security and respect that lower level employees do not get. Accountants in the US also label programmers as cost centers and managers and salesmen as profit centers. This means that they are despised and looked down as a liability to the company that takes away money, while everyone else makes it.

      That is the attitude difference and I think it is disgusting. Accounting standards really defined anyone not selling as a dreaded cost.

  22. It is simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since we are apparently in the business of making people do what we want them to do....

    just make hot women want to mate with computer programmers.

    That is all it will take. You will be up to your ears in computer programmers in no time.

    1. Re:It is simple by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      make hot women

      Error: No target for hot women

  23. Teaching by Aladrin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It has been my experience that walking a student through making something simple will widen their eyes considerably. This usually means something like an easy game where they can visually see the results of their work. Games that can be modified easily are even better, because they -will- play with the code and try to improve it for their own tastes.

    On the other hand, teaching them to write a linked list is mind-numbingly boring for someone who can't imagine why they'd want such a thing.

    Getting people interested in programmer is mostly about giving them the right exposure at the start.

    This course sounds like it at least is headed the right direction.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    1. Re:Teaching by w_dragon · · Score: 1

      EA once made a game called 'tank wars', where the idea was that you would program an AI for a tank given a fairly simple API they provided, and then you would put different AIs up against each other and see who wins. Something like that could be great for initial programming - there is a competitive aspect and the overhead to get something simple going is pretty low. The copy I had was buggy and didn't really work, but I think the idea is a sound one for introducing programming.

    2. Re:Teaching by Swanktastic · · Score: 1

      I agree with you to a point, and then no further. Teachers have to be careful not to distill everything down to the level of a Science & Industry Museum exhibit, where there's a bunch of fun knobs to twist and the student comes away understanding nothing but the bare essentials. It is critical to get kids hooked on science and math so that they are willing to put in the long hours learning abstract concepts. At some point, they're going to have to learn to write the linked list.

      I actually feel like the world might be a better place if we focused on the 5 kids who innately love programming and put a curriculum for them together, rather than the 500 who love video games and want a video-game based curriculum.

    3. Re:Teaching by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Teaching is being insourced by cheaper teachers in Latin America in Lousiana and Florida. Over 50,000 teachers got pink slipped due to the lack of funds from the recession. My exwife was a teacher and the jobs are not secure anymore. More people are graduating teaching school than open positions thanks to outsourcing from other industries.

    4. Re:Teaching by naroom · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about Robocode, perhaps?

      I played with it back in the early days of Java when I was trying to learn to code, but Java was very bad and frustrating to work with then. Nowadays it might be an effective teaching tool for some.

    5. Re:Teaching by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Made me think of Core War: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Core_War

      Tho i guess that is much closer to learning assembly.

      Another option could be Lego Mindstorm: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Lego_Mindstorms

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  24. Wow CopyWrong R US?!? by sgt+scrub · · Score: 0

    AgentSheets with Ristretto® - Define agent behaviors with Visual AgenTalk® - Amazing new Conversational Programming technology (patent-pending)...

    It is amazing what government funding can do for the bottom line. I love this page Why Us It

    Free tools are not always free solutions
    Yes, there are free tools. But just how well do they really work and how sustainable are they? Do they include a curriculum that you can use? Can you really make sophisticated games with them? Can the tool be used for more than just games. For instance, can it be used to make powerful scientific simulations including visualizations? Do you want to be just a graduate research experiment? AgentSheets technology is studied and proven. It comes with a comprehensive curriculum that is ready to be put in place and will grow with your needs.

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  25. Programming games for kids by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    Always looking for things to motivate my young aspiring computer-game-designer offspring. When I was their age (8) I wasn't really exposed to computers all that much, but did already have exposure to Logo. Any good sites online that might provide some experience similar to that? The only one I know of is Lightbot.

    The wife and kids are heavily into Minecraft at the moment, and I'm hoping to get them into building more redstone circuits. (unfortunately, minecrafwiki's realstone circuits seem to be down at the moment). I'm pretty tickled by the whole concept of constructing complex circuits the size of buildings out of basic NOT-gate building blocks, which has kinda been a running joke in IC logic design classes forever.

    What are other good programming games / intros to expose them to?

    1. Re:Programming games for kids by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Pygame is nice and easy to use. If you want it to be a game not programming Little Big Planet is something you might want to look into.

    2. Re:Programming games for kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a kid I loved Chipwits (http://www.chipwits.com/), which has recently been modernized by the original authors. Also Robot Odyssey which can still be found online and run in an Apple II emulator (if you can get past the primitive graphics).

    3. Re:Programming games for kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First Lego League (FLL) or for the under-9 crowd JrFLL. Programming + mechanical design + strategy + research on topics that affect peoples' lives.

      People who learn programming for a *reason* rather than for the sake of programming are more likely to use programming to solve problems. That's not to say there aren't good programming drones -- but non-traditionals are the ones who solve problems.

    4. Re:Programming games for kids by bartle · · Score: 1

      Agentsheets (the subject of the article) is actually pretty good. The coding is almost completely drag n' drop and each of the agents processes its code in parallel. The result is I think more intuitive for a mind that is not trained in computer logic. Unfortunately the product is being produced by grad students which (at least in this case) means that it's overpriced and not terribly well coded. I kinda wish they had just sold the idea to Hasbro or something - it would be running on the iPad by now.

    5. Re:Programming games for kids by fractic · · Score: 1

      Check out http://www.zachtronicsindustries.com/. Those games take the essence of what makes programming fun and turn it into a game. Spacechem is not free but the other games are. They do get fiendishly difficult though.

  26. Re:Its not the icky? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll be disappointed to hear that there are a lot of "average" or "normal" people writing code in the industry. You're not an exceptional snowflake because you can write code. People don't use Linux because there's no incentive to move - Windows is a pain in the ass for anybody who wants customizability and programmability, but well supported and relatively easy to use for the average consumer. Linux is a pain in the ass with uneven support and uneven ease of use. That's a step backwards for people who aren't predisposed to spending hours dicking around with their computers and learning how to program.

  27. Re:Programmer vs Computer Scientist by kmdrtako · · Score: 1

    +1 and I'd mod you up if I had modpoints. (hmm, it's taking a much longer time to get modpoints with this account than it did with my previous account)

    I've been touch typing since I took typing in high school. And I know the diff between write/right, to/too/two, your/you're, its/it's, etc.

    With muscle memory and/or the lizard brain running things when I'm typing quickly, I've had plenty of instances when I thought one word but the other came out of my fingertips. This is often compounded by physiological issues with the speed at which the messages travel from brain to the different fingers and it's very common for me to type, e.g., suod instead of sudo.

    Since I know this happens I make a point to check, and even so I still miss some. I wonder how many are in this message.

  28. Re:Its not the icky? by Moryath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    just like normal people aren't clever enough to use Linux (hence it's low market share)

    Uhm... try that one again.
    Most people don't use Linux because:
    - The support for it is limited to forums where you never get actual help, but instead a bunch of ass-hats who shout back "RTFM LAMZOR" and similar insults at you. If you write in to a bug report forum or a feature request to some bit of software, someone screaming "the beauty of it is its linux so you can fix it yourself so go fix it yourself and post the fix noob" is not comforting or likely to make you stick around.

    - Most of the programs they are looking to run, don't run on Linux (games industry, sadly, used to be a lot better but has backslid over the years considerably).

    - The "open source alternatives" to many of the programs they run, have problems with shifting crap around on them for poorly documented reasons.

    - You don't just "switch to linux." You have to pick one of a gazillion discordant distros, or else fuck around trying out every goddamn one for six months to settle on the one you like and HOPE that it remains updated and supported thereafter. And that they don't fuck with you in the next release, like Ubuntu just did forcing this crap "Unity" interface. And that the architecture for your particular distro isn't rewritten in some bizarre-ass fucking arcane way that causes your particular hardware to break on the "standard linux driver"... presuming one even exists.

    I won't say that there aren't very intelligent people using Linux - there obviously are. But it has become very obvious to me over the past 15 years that the people programming Linux, the people designing interfaces for Linux, and the people evangelizing Linux, have absolutely no goddamn fucking clue what a normal desktop user wants, needs, or what will appeal to same. I refer you to this insightful post from someone who also has spent plenty of time with Linux as well.

  29. Johnny can suck on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm happy Johnny can't code, means I can keep my job and the market doesn't get flooded with yet *more* crappy code.

    We don't need more programmers, we need to treat the ones we already have better.

  30. Make It Fun by jarich · · Score: 1
    Whether you love or hate Ruby, you should look at how the Ruby community has sold itself. It's a language that's designed (according to evangelists) to be fun. Frameworks like Rails are about making the work fun. Again, I'm quoting pitches... but.... But it's interesting what kind of a community that sales pitch draws in.

    .

    In other words, start off students with easy wins and clear syntax (like Ruby). Don't make them spend hours debugging pointer bugs (C/C++). There's plenty of time for that later. First get them hooked on creating. That's where the fun in programming is... making something new that actually works. I suspect most of us remember the first time we wrote a program that actually did something. That's the high, the rush, that we want potential programmers to feel. How easy can we make it get their first hit?

    How can we do this instead of depending on their internal motivation? I'm sure we'll rope in a few that don't have the chops for it, but I bet we'll find a lot more who do but never considered the field because the barriers to entry were too high.

  31. This is a BAD idea by gman003 · · Score: 1

    Game programming is not like most "real" programming - it's designed differently, implemented differently, and fundamentally just differs. Game programming is full of coding in the exceptional cases - run doMainBattleLoop(), unless you're in a boss battle and in a round less than 4, when you should run doBossBanterBattleLoop(), unless you're in a battle with Boss X and it isn't the final one, when you should add a branch to the end to call doBossRunawayScene() instead of doBattleEndScene(), but if it's the actual last battle, jump to doBattleEndSceneFinal(), then call doCreditsMinigameLoop() after expanding backgroundMusicBuffer from 10 minutes to 20 so it doesn't crash while loading that big long ending song the music guy wrote...

    Not to mention the language issues. I'm willing to bet the school's using UE3. That engine does a lot of game stuff (weapons code, broad AI coding, etc.) in a proprietary "UnrealScript" - similar in syntax to JavaScript, but with a completely different DOM model, and with a lot of added functions.

    All this is going to do is teach students bad coding and bad game design.

    1. Re:This is a BAD idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's a bad idea because it's abstracting the hardware. I already work with too many programmers who don't understand the hardware they're writing for, and it almost invariably results in bad code.

    2. Re:This is a BAD idea by darronb · · Score: 1

      These are kids.

      The MAIN PROBLEM is simply to get kids interested and teach the very basics of logic.

      Programmers tend to take for granted the simple process of how to take what you want to do and deconstruct that into logical steps that you apply through some sort of program.

      This is absolutely fundamental, and I believe it's where most kids get lost and quit.

    3. Re:This is a BAD idea by darronb · · Score: 1

      The most promising ways IMHO to getting kids interested in math and science are through educational robotics competitions like FIRST and electronics projects tinkering with stuff like Arduinos. There's enough hardware there to get people started.... it's almost a mini renaissance in that stuff right now.

  32. Re:Programmer vs Computer Scientist by Moryath · · Score: 1

    Didn't you hear? Borders and B&N won't exist in 10 years once EBooks and E-Readers take over.

  33. Re:Its not the icky? by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

    While I hate to jump to the defense of the masses, this is ridiculous. Normal people are certainly "clever enough" to use Linux. Lots of people on here, I'm sure, have wives or parents who use Linux; my wife does. It's no harder than using Windows, and in a lot of ways is quite a bit easier. Of course, as with the others with Linux-using relatives, I have to be the IT support person, but that's no different from Windows for most people: they outsource their IT support to either their kid, their nephew, or Geek Squad (I see them driving to peoples' homes in subdivisions here all the time) or some other "computer repair" business. Luckily, Linux doesn't have problems nearly as much as Windows, but things happen sometimes, or they need help finding a certain application to do something.

    Now granted, these Linux users aren't working at the command line, writing bash or Perl scripts, and certainly not full-blown C++ applications, nor are they compiling their own kernel. But they're still using Linux, even if all they do is use Firefox and OpenOffice/LibreOffice.

    As for kids doing programming, you're half right. It's not that they aren't clever enough: most programming really isn't that hard, and anyone with half a brain who applies themselves can write simple programs in Java or Perl or Python or whatever if they really want to. But just like doing automotive repair work or woodworking, you have to want to do it, and take time to learn it. Most people aren't interested, and would rather take their car to a mechanic, buy their furniture pre-made (even if it is shitty particle board with fake-looking veneer), or buy a pre-made application or hire someone to do something custom (or just do without).

    Just like other professions, programming takes a lot of time to learn and master, and even more time to keep up with because it's constantly changing (e.g., 5 years ago Perl was still pretty popular, but these days everyone seems to be using Python for that stuff now, and only the diehard Perl fans still use it; C++ just released a totally new revision with all kinds of changes). The big question is: why is there SO much of a push by educators to get kids to take up programming? Why not push them to take up auto mechanics, so they can fix their own cars and save money? Why not push them to learn woodworking, which they used to do decades ago in schools? Why not push them to learn about law, since we can never have enough lawyers (sarc.)? It's probably because there's a bunch of tech companies in this country that want a larger pool of workers so they can pay less. The worst part is that they're trying to get these poor kids interested in programming games. Everyone here should know by know how bad the working conditions are at EA and the other game makers, because they rely on a constant stream of bright-eyed college grads who are all excited by being a "games programmer" that they can take advantage of and overwork until they're totally burned out; it's absolutely the worst part of the software field. I'm sure they never tell these schoolkids about this.

  34. A Gen-X'ers view... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two factors:

    1. Johnny, via the internet, has FAR too many distractions these days. In my day (get off of my lawn) getting the latest game involved sneaker net (which, where I was living had a pretty low bandwidth) and often cracking it (or applying a known crack) yourself, so some intimacy with the machine was involved. Johnny doesn't HAVE to know anything about the computer to get the latest and greatest game up and running on it. There's also Johnny's PS3, his Xbox 360, his DS, the 250 channels of cable, etc. that make it hard to devote a lot of time to a single device. We had 4 channels (the new-fangled Fox network!) and a NES with three carts.

    2. Johnny's world involves computers that are FAR more complex than the computers of my era. A C64 or an Apple II (or 8088) is much more accessible and easier to learn than a modern i7 system. Even if Johnny wanted to learn how to program, the fundamentals are much more difficult to grasp on a modern system than on an 8-bit system.

    I'm forty, by the way. I remember asking my dad to buy me a game when I was about 12 or 13. He didn't, but two weeks later a package arrived from some store undoubtedly found in the back of Computer Shopper. He opened it up, pulled out a copy of Turbo Pascal, handed it to me and said, "Here...you can write your own games with this." ...and I did. It was probably the most brilliant parenting move he made in his entire career. )

    1. Re:A Gen-X'ers view... by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      >He opened it up, pulled out a copy of Turbo Pascal, handed it to me and said, "Here...you can write your own games with this." ...and I did. It was probably the most brilliant parenting move he made in his entire career. )

      Excellent! Reminds me of the phrase, "Give someone a fish and you fed them for a day. Teach them to fish [ in your case your dad gave you a fishing pole ] and you have fed them for life."

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    2. Re:A Gen-X'ers view... by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      Like you, I'm 40, and like you, I cut my programming teeth on the C-64 (among others). I started writing code because because I didn't have *ANY* software for my first computer (a ZX-81). I pursued programming through junior high and high school because I wanted to fly...but at thirteen and with no income, that dream was a long way off (four years is an eternity when you're a teenager). So, I tried to write a helicopter flight simulator. I didn't have a snowball's chance with what I knew at the time, but I learned a lot about programming, which eventually lead to a job that paid enough for me to get a pilot's license.

      As I said elsewhere in the comments, provide kids with the right motivation, and you'll be surprised at what they can do.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  35. Re:Programmer vs Computer Scientist by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    The will always need good "computer scientists" who can look at a design and see the defects before any coding is done to save the company $$$ and time getting to market.

    No they don't. Have you seen the quality of commercial software these days? Especially "enterprise" software? It costs a fortune and is total crap. Yet the companies that make it make money hand over fist from their business customers. What do they need good computer scientists for? If they're making this much money from clueless customers with crap code, then I doubt they'll get much return on their investment by hiring better (and more expensive) people to do it better.

  36. More results taken from the people who paid for it by dwheeler · · Score: 1

    Sigh. Yet another project that took the money from the people, and took away the results from the people. That's rediculous. If "we the people" paid for research, then "we the people" should get the result. It should be a rule that all government-funded research software must be released as open source software (unless it's classified or for some other reason can't be released to the public in any form)... at least by default. If someone wants to develop proprietary software, then they should be investing their own money, not taking mine. Why am I not getting what I paid for?

    --
    - David A. Wheeler (see my Secure Programming HOWTO)
  37. yay for education reform by swan5566 · · Score: 0

    This is just one of many examples of how many educational methods in general have fallen behind the times, so I applaud them for trying to fix it. This problem actually shows up in college, and even grad school (I'll attest to first-hand), though obviously in different ways than in grade school. I long for the day when educational systems take a more proactive attitude toward addressing this problem, and take more responsibility towards preparing their students for the "here and now".

    --
    In debates about Christianity, there are two groups: those looking for answers, and those looking to just ask questions.
  38. Why not? by chemicaldave · · Score: 1

    You're right about Johnny not liking programming. That's what TFA is pointing out. Why fix it? Because you're never going to fill the gap between the low number of able programmers and the need for them if you don't entice kids into the field. How can you expect to engage middle and high-schoolers in programming if you stick to theory. Let them figure out they hate it in college, that's what it's there for.

    Young kids probably picture Milton and his stapler when they think of computer science. How can we possibly expect to attract anybody with that image, even the ones who can program but don't know it yet?

    1. Re:Why not? by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      And how many programmers do we need? At what salary?

  39. A case for intervention by government. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Get rid of the means for business to send work offshore or to make work less secure, and that can change for the better.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:A case for intervention by government. by theCat · · Score: 1

      Oracle, Google, Apple, Yahoo, HP and all the rest have an army of lobbyists in Washington DC specifically to prevent anything of the kind ever happening until the heat death of the universe.

      Nope. My kids will do something else. Farmer or teacher or architect or chef or just about anything else, with my blessing. Of course that means Oracle, Google, Apple, Yahoo, HP and all the rest will become dependent on an external labor pool, with all the political and socioeconomic issues so implied, and when the cheese really gets binding and they are hemorrhaging trade secrets to off-shore competitors they'll fall on their swords claiming "it wasn't our fault!" and the US technology industry can start over from basic principles.

      So yeah, maybe my grandchildren will be coders. That's cool, I could totally help them with their apps.

      --
      =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
  40. Re:tomhudson do U get paid by adverts U have by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    Care to point out any time in history when trolltalk.com ran even one paid advertisement?

    Hint - you can pick from these three: never, null, and zero.

    You still haven't explained how people giving away their GPL'd code is greedy (which is the accusation you made elsewhere, that by doing so on trolltalk I'm a greedy advertiser - webmistress Rachel completely trolled you on that, and you took the bait :-).

    YHBT. Again! Sucker! Why don't you just stick slashdot in your precious hosts file and make the Interwebs safer for yourself?

  41. Game programming. by mustPushCart · · Score: 1

    When I learnt how to program I couldn't see any other use for it except to make games. And soon as I had the opportunity I went for it. Now of course I am a little more knowledgeable. I have a few friends who are working for some huge banks doing java code and earning buckets of monies, another few in web development and a few others scattered here and there but im pretty happy to be a Game programmer. Its not the best way to learn but it might be the best way to get one interested in programming.

    On topic, I would like to see if people who arent good at math also cant code.

  42. Instant Gratification by JoeTalbott · · Score: 1
    I see the problem as one of people needing instant gratification. The mindset seems to be:

    Why bother with the fundamentals when someone else has already done them? I can just use a library I found on the Internet.

    What I've encountered is that one ends up with 'software' that's a bunch of not-well-understood third-party pieces cobbled together that works under ideal circumstances. In my estimation developers must have:
    • 1. The drive and passion to want to understand how things work, even the boring already been done things.
    • 2. The vision to foresee user misuse and misunderstanding of the product.
    • 3. The notion that software is more than its interface, the inside is important too.
    1. Re:Instant Gratification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why bother with the fundamentals when someone else has already done them? I can just use a library I found on the Internet.

      Before being allowed in front of a keyboard, everyone should be making their electricity and, for the fundamentals to really stick, invent the wheel and how to use fire.

  43. Teaching Computers are for Games by unil_1005 · · Score: 1

    Once upon a time computers were invented to solve serious, difficult problems.

    Today they are toys to fill up our empty hours.

    Or sales platforms.

    How do you spell iPad?

  44. It's a carreer with high stress and long hours by mrflash818 · · Score: 1

    It is my opinion that the dot com bubble bursting, offshoring, and the equation of salary vs hours worked + stress is why people do not pursue programming as a profession.

    So it seems it is not that people can't code, it is that there is no motivation to do it as a career.

    Hobbyist programmers, or those that do it 'on the side' to their regular career (I am assuming many that participate in open source or linux-based software) will be able to code, but that they will not be counted as a full-time coder.

    --
    Uh, Linux geek since 1999.
  45. Resources are there, just not well-established by kakyoin01 · · Score: 1

    I think that a combination of a lack of available resources and late introduction to all things coding are responsible. We have the technology, we just don't have it in the classrooms everywhere. Perhaps due to lack of budget or adherence to "if it ain't broke, don't fix it", the curriculum hasn't quite arrived yet. It can be tough finding the right instructors, teaching style and materials (including facilities and hardware) for the job of educating those interested. Yes it's true that there can be those students who get 'suckered in' to liking programming but then discovering that's not what they want to do, but I think that a late introduction to tech fields such as programming in grade school is at least partially to blame for that. But hey, there's a new CS Principles course in pilot thanks to CollegeBoard. Perhaps not all hope is lost. :)

    --
    The more you know, the more you have to say and the more you should listen.
  46. Story misses it again by Slugster · · Score: 0

    Kids don't want to program mostly due to the huge amount of offshoring/layings-off that occurred about oh ten years ago.

    It's only colleges that want to sell this shit to students--and the students know that it is largely rotten fish. For every US student who graduates with any kind of CIS degree, there's a half-dozen B1B visas who will work for less.


    If the people who run universities were half as smart as they think they are, they'd have come out against B1B visa hiring and offshoring a long time ago.

  47. Re:Its not the icky? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Normal people aren't patient enough to program, just like normal people aren't masochistic enough to use Linux.

    There, FTFY.

  48. Re:tomhudson: R U paid by adverts @ trolltalk.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, I don't know tomhudson, but I sure would like to sign up for his newsletter if it enrages Alexander Peter Kowalski (an infamous malware author and internet troll) this much.

    Bravo, Tom. BRAVO.

    The check is in the mail.

  49. I can code! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, I consider myself quite a good coder.

    - Johnny

  50. Kids are smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kids are smart, it's just that like most people in general, most of them are selfish and lazy. Why waste your time being a nerd learning productive skills and a good work ethic in a STEM field while not getting laid and receiving little pay and praise.

    No, what Johnny has realized is that society better rewards people who spend their youth partying and having lots of sex, then getting an MBA and getting a highly paid job listening to powerpoint presentations, making bad decisions then blaming them on the engineers beneath you.

    The company employs 100 desk jockeys for every engineer, 9 out of 10 engineers are on work visas, and all the support staff is in India. The part of the company that's IN America produces 95% lip service, 5% product and no one can figure out why our economy is tanking.

    Did you think this circus was going to sustain itself forever?

  51. tomhudson: Do you earn money from trolltalk.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Answer it yes, or no. We know you do adbanners already, and you aren't answering if that pays you or rather is supposed to. Hence why you stalked & trolled apk by ac replies and told others to do so regarding HOSTS files, and Your own words show that much, no denying that.

  52. Re:tomhudson: R U paid by adverts @ trolltalk.com? by tomhudson · · Score: 1
    Already answered - there has never been any paid adverts on trolltalk.com.

    Webmistress Rachel trolled you, and you, being the idiot you are, fell for it rather than check out the site.

    Why not make life easy for yourself, and put slashdot in your stupid APK HOSTS FILE, and make the internet safe from idiots like yourself, who couldn't buy a clue if they were free?

    Or you can explain how giving away my own GPL'd code makes me "greedy", like you accused me of being elsewhere.

    How does it feel setting yourself up as the fool yet again? YHBT. Suck it up, fat boy (yes, APK is obese. He claims to have grown several inches in his 30's so that he's not overweight any more, but unless he spent a couple of years on the space station, that's just another fat lie).

  53. It Doesn't Matter Why Johnny Can't Code by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

    It just doesn't matter why Johnny can't code: by the time Johnny grows up, our corporate masters will have off-shored every programming job in the U.S.

    --
    Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
    1. Re:It Doesn't Matter Why Johnny Can't Code by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      Not if our government steps in.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  54. Re:tomhudson: R U paid by adverts @ trolltalk.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bravo? For tomhudson ac reply stalking n trolling apk?

    ---

    "Wait until he starts on another kick, then reply to him as an AC. It's the new meme". - by tomhudson (43916) on Sunday May 09 2010, @08:29PM (#32150544) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1646272&cid=32150544 [slashdot.org]

    ---

    #2

    HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step

    "The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off). He'll accuse you of being me" - by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @01:38PM (#35841122) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35841122 [slashdot.org]

    ---

    #3

    "if you're going to tell this guy to stop spamming his hosts file crap, make sure you do it anonymously" - by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @12:45PM (#35840680) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086920&cid=35840680 [slashdot.org]

    ---

    Bravo (not).

  55. Wow, your contempt for the US shows quite well. by sethstorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Except that Jina only is coding because of anti-US fraud that works in her favor.

    Sounds like you don't want a US citizen until they've been beat down to a level of world subservience. Another point to add - you weren't paying attention that we're not asking about Jina, just Johnny.

    We need less of you, less of Jina, and to give every advantage to Johnny.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:Wow, your contempt for the US shows quite well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      quite the opposite, your moronic nationalism is showing.

      what humanity and the market needs is more effective coders. if the US wants to continue being part of that
      maybe they can try to do something about it, for example the work in the article

    2. Re:Wow, your contempt for the US shows quite well. by Nesa2 · · Score: 1

      What is wrong with giving every advantage to Johnny? And why would we concern ourselves with Jina?

      Maybe for the arguments on Slashdot - fine, it's multinational site.

      But, Johnny sinks in tens of thousands of dollars into economy just by paying for his education in US. For rest of his life he will have have paid millions of dollars in taxes (with any success), and contributed in one way or other to his community, and his country. So will did his parents, and so will his kids. What is wrong with protecting your country and your people and your community? If anything, I'd like to see more of that.

      Who is going to look after US citizens if not US? China? Russia? India?

      Sure globalization is here, and is fact of life, but anything we can do to hold on to our $$ and enrich OUR people, I'm for it. I'm not sure where this anti-patriotic Obama type mentality is coming from...

    3. Re:Wow, your contempt for the US shows quite well. by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      You may like to note I'm not a US citizen.

    4. Re:Wow, your contempt for the US shows quite well. by Kagetsuki · · Score: 0

      Jina is a male name. And the arrogance you present in your post is just one of the reasons it can be excessively hard to work with American developers in any sort of team setting.

    5. Re:Wow, your contempt for the US shows quite well. by donscarletti · · Score: 1

      Americans are quite happy to buy every foreign company and push into every foreign market they can, but the minute their companies start buying something like foreign labor they cry foul. Oh well, it would be a lovely day when American companies are forced to staff their entire international supply chain with unionized American workers and see how they compete.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
  56. Time for apprenticeships and better class content by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    College needs to change for the times start by cutting down on the filler classes.

    Cut back on the math some CS programs have to much of it.

    Some of the classes are to much theory based others are all about the test (some you can just cram for the test and pass with people who are good with working with if but are bad at tests failing) others are very hands on.

    We need mixed tech school / apprenticeships for CS and IT.

  57. Re-hash of old ideas? by CodingHero · · Score: 1
    From TFA:

    AgentSheets combines a graphical, drag-and-drop user interface with a rule-based programming language to allow students to develop games and interactive applications of surprising sophistication. Projects built with AgentSheets incorporate not just code but images, sounds, and other multimedia.

    Haven't we seen software like this many times before? Examples include (but are not limited to): Alice, the old GUI used to program Lego Mindstorms, and Labview. If those didn't "take off" in terms of generating interest in programming and computer science, why should we expect this one to be any different?

    1. Re:Re-hash of old ideas? by the+agent+man · · Score: 1

      Haven't we seen software like this many times before? Examples include (but are not limited to): Alice, the old GUI used to program Lego Mindstorms, and Labview. If those didn't "take off" in terms of generating interest in programming and computer science, why should we expect this one to be any different?

      Actually NO:

      With the exception of Labview (which as far as I can tell would be tricky to use to make a game) AgentSheets preceded all these packages.

      What is really different now is to have finally found some solid leads on how to make computing education work on schools.

  58. Do you earn any money from trolltalk.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes or no. Answer that. We know you ac stalk & troll already:

    ---

    "Wait until he starts on another kick, then reply to him as an AC. It's the new meme". - by tomhudson (43916) on Sunday May 09 2010, @08:29PM (#32150544) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1646272&cid=32150544

    ---

    #2

    HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step

    "The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off). He'll accuse you of being me" - by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @01:38PM (#35841122) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35841122

    ---

    #3

    "if you're going to tell this guy to stop spamming his hosts file crap, make sure you do it anonymously" - by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @12:45PM (#35840680) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086920&cid=35840680

    ---

  59. I love linux, but I don't recommend it. by p4nther2004 · · Score: 2
    (BTW: Unity sucks and you can go backward, I did.)

    Anyway, ...back to your argument:

    "absolutely no goddamn fucking clue what a normal desktop user wants, needs, or what will appeal to same.'

    I love linux, but I never^H^H^H^H^Hrarely recommend it.

    If you like Windows...USE it. Why would you go to Linux? I tell people Linux is harder to use, flat out.

    And then people either shutup about it...or they ask me WHY I use it. Oh, then it gets interesting. I explain, that, for a programmer, Linux represents probably the best choice as a platform. Endless programming language, databases, web servers, browsers, etc. More tools I can shake a stick at. All free!

    But most people aren't interested in that. Like you pointed out, they want to run Microsoft Office, play games, etc. That's fine, run Windows.

    So, we'll never have a Linux desktop? Cough. Most people have USED linux at one point or another. How many appliances use linux? How many tablets, smart phones, routers, etc are using it? People use it all the time....but it's not a Linux "Desktop"

    The reason for that is simple. A Desktop for people is "Running Microsoft Office, playing games, etc."

    Linux is bigger than that.

  60. Wizard not the wand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its not the tool, but how its taught. I had a lot of math from HS through college. A bad teacher could make me bored with a subject I was already interested in and a good teacher could motivate me in something I had thought to be boring.

    Be a better teacher. Don't fret over the tools (the wand so to speak).

  61. Why Johnny (or *I*) can't code .... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    When I was back in grade-school and high-school, I was interested in coding. (Heck, back then, you pretty much HAD to be, since that came as part of the deal when you bought a new computer. You learned BASIC and started keying in programs from listings published in books of "50 great computer programs for your Timex Sinclair 1000" or whatever you were using, and kind of went from there. The owners' manual packaged with whatever computer you bought included a complete programming reference for it. It was just assumed that you were going to be inputting some code to make the computer do things, or else you wouldn't have bought it in the first place!)

    As time passed and things progressed, though, I got sidetracked by the ever-increasing complexity of software people were making and distributing. It became a career path of its own just to learn to USE the stuff other people made, vs. writing your own code. Half the time, I couldn't even think of anything possible to write that hadn't already been done by somebody else -- and I didn't have much motivation to re-invent the wheel.

    By the time I took another serious look at writing some code, so much had changed, I realized I had NO useful talents in that area anymore. Nobody coded in BASIC anymore .... years of knowledge and experience right out the proverbial window there. (In fact, I was repeatedly told that knowing BASIC was a DETRIMENT to being a good programmer, since it encouraged lots of "bad programming techniques" that were best avoided.) I took a stab at learning "C" in college, until I became completely disenchanted and befuddled by it. (No clean English-like syntax to be seen? All this mental gymnastics required to master recursion and keeping track of pointers to variables and such? Ick! Bleah!)

    Since then, I've watched numerous languages come into vogue and vanish back into obscurity ... and all in all, I think I'm pretty happy I stayed away from it. I'm pretty good at the hardware side of things and at doing support and network administration. It's more my "calling" than the software development side of things. I can put together a batch file when I need to, and decipher command line parameters -- and that gets me by just fine.

    Part of me hopes my kid will take an interest in learning to code, because she didn't have to grow up with all this useless "legacy knowledge" that I had, and maybe she'll be fine using the latest and greatest languages and compilers. But so far, she loves the computer while not seeming to care a bit about creating her own new content for it. (She likes limited things like changing the clothing on an avatar in a game or decorating up her igloo in "Club Penguin" -- but doesn't even go so far as to like games like "Little Big Planet" that center on world building.)

    At the end of the day, I'm just not sure too many kids today can get TOO excited about things like "coding their own game", when everything they've been exposed to is such a big production. People don't generally sit down and write their own game title from start to finish by themselves anymore. It's more like a movie, with art directors and musicians and code QA testers, script-writers, etc. etc. I wonder how many folks working at a company like EA even have much of an idea what a title will turn out like as they're paid to code their little component of it every day?

  62. Re:Its not the icky? by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

    This....

    I'm not a technophobe. I've used computers since I was 12 (I'm 39 now). I prefer a command line over a GUI for a lot of activities. I can build a computer from the ground up. I can write complex programs in multiple languages.

    And I don't use Linux because.....my apps all work in Windows (even the foss versions cater to Windows to gain an audience) and no one has yet to build a list of "this distro is best for you because of feature X" list.

  63. Re:tomhudson: Do you earn money from trolltalk.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see any adbanners at that site. Care to provide screenshots or links to your evidence?

    Or should we assume you're just a dissociative psychotic who bumps up your own importance by simulating a "crowd" who rabble-rabble-rabbles alongside you but curiously shares the same apparent brain damage when it comes to typing out comments, Mr. Kowalski?

  64. OMSI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The local Oregon Museum of Science and Industry (OMSI) in July will be having a new gaming exhibit that covers games from Donkey Kong to Gran Turismo, and will be having actual game developers on site for discussions. It seems to me that someone is pulling strings in the right direction to get a younger audience motivated towards the learning aspect of what they already devote so much of their time to. I for one will be taking my young kids (3 and 6) to OMSI to experience this exhibit. I feel it is a little less archaic than the seasonal "Dinosaur" exhibits of the past.

  65. Broken Analogy by istartedi · · Score: 1

    I think you've taken the analogy and extended it improperly. What if woodworking were like programming?

    We'd have a circular saw that never broke down, that was designed over 50 years ago, but that takes a journeyman carpenter a year to learn how to use (Lisp). We'd have another design that takes about the same ammount of time to learn, cuts through lumber 10 times as fast, but occassionally blows up and takes off the arms of novices (C). Then we'd have a whole bunch of slow saws imported from China that have to be serviced every other week, and tend to break down every other day. Wait, I haven't told you the best part. When you go out on one jobsite, you have to use a particular saw. Houses in the Web Districts have banned C-saws because they assume they're unsafe despite the fact that somebody invented a safety shield for them. Other job sites have arbitrarily committed you to a particular saw because once their carpenters are trained on it it's hard to switch. Also, the saws make cuts such that wood can't be joined properly if it was cut with a different saw. The only way to fix that problem is to bring in a nail and glue consultant who charges 3 times what a regular carpenter does.

    Now, how's that for a coding analogy?

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Broken Analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's too close to the truth, the software turds are all sweating and crying and wetting themselves and inventing a new language to deal with the situation.

  66. Gave coding up. by DougInKY · · Score: 1

    I coded for years as a hobby. Quit because I became worried that I would somehow step on someones software patent by accident. Just not worth the trouble for a hobby.

    --
    Nothing remains as constant as change.
  67. Re:Programmer vs Computer Scientist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how many are in this message.

    None. The punctuation's iffy, but no typos.

  68. I'm interested too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not good engough to say X is bad and then don't bother to explain what is wrong. How are things going to get better otherwise?

  69. Arduino by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arduino

    Arduino is an open-source single-board microcontroller, descendant of the open-source Wiring platform,[1][2] designed to make the process of using electronics in multidisciplinary projects more accessible. The hardware consists of a simple open hardware design for the Arduino board with an Atmel AVR processor and on-board I/O support. The software consists of a standard programming language compiler and the boot loader that runs on the board.

  70. Pro Bono Publico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We don't need more programmers. It's for the good of the public that we nurture the programmers we already have.

  71. Re:Its not the icky? by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

    Normal people aren't clever enough to program, just like normal people aren't clever enough to use Linux (hence it's low market share). If kids aren't interested in programming, its because they aren't clever enough and don't have the spark - in which case we can just let them join the rest of the hurd and do mundane 9-5 job for the masses, its all they can imagine doing anyway.

    I'm a Computer Scientist (official name of my position) in an engineering shop, and there are a bunch of *very* smart Engineers who can't code (otherwise why would they need me?). Coding is a skill, not an attribute.

  72. Re:tomhudson: R U paid by adverts @ trolltalk.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey Fatbody Kowalski, why don't you shut up? Or at least take your fucking meds? Jesus you're fucking boring.

    Oh, and "4chan is talking about tom, countertrolling, et al.?" (from one of your linked rants) - Not in the least. I don't think I've ever seen a mention of slashdot there, much less specific users.

    Though I bet you'd shit brix if you got doxed, wouldn't you?

  73. Re:Programmer vs Computer Scientist by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1, Insightful

    We need a lot of programmers (2 year tech degree) and a few computer scientists (4 year degree and beyond).

    A "good" programmer just needs to be able to hit the write keys to implement someone else's design. That's why we hire the young kids willing to do the job for the least amount of money. Old programmers are future Borders employees.

    Wrong. Absolutely Wrong.

    For starters, Computer Science is only good if you want to stay in the theoretical - e.g. doctoral work. For anything else (e.g. a real job) it's a joke and useless as it does not have the balance between theory and pragmatics that is really necessary to succeed in the field. I never recommend CS to anyone that wants to actually do something outside of Academics - I only recommend Computer Engineering and Software Engineering degrees for people that want real jobs.

    Second, as otherwise noted, "blind" programmers are useless. They need to be able to understand what they are working on to do it right - and that means they really need a Computer Engineering/Software Engineering degree.

    However, to get kids interested in going for Computer Science/Computer Engineering/Software Engineering then the high school programming classes need to inspire the kids - create something that "scratches their itch" and helps them solve the problem - create a competitive environment between the students - so the class is not so much strict adherence to solving the problem, but also how one does it - the presentation, the user interface, etc; with strict adherence being the minimum required (e.g. a C+/B- grade).

    --
    Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
  74. maybe Johnny doesn't know where to start by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    I admit I haven't coded in years, and never done java or scripting or whatever. So it's either I spend some years in computer classes or years muddling through whatever scraps of stuff out there. There are books but they immediately jump into all kinds of options and various things. What I hate are examples of "hello world" and how easy it is to write the source but there is nothing about compiling (kind of like teaching someone to skydive but you don't provide a jump plane).

    This reminds me about learning networks, there are no books except those written in the 1990s (with lots of pages discussing thinnet vs. thicknet), virtually all webpages are basically aggregates of some shallow discussion but you are blasted with ads.

    What I think is needed is something basic that can get people started, and they can then decide if that is what they want to do or not. I use an example of a ballroom dance studio has beginner specials. You are taught basic (very basic) waltz,foxtrot, tango,rumba,cha-cha,swing skills enough to get you on the dance floor so you can experience the activity. Now if you want to master then that will take considerable more training. You don't start beginners with intent to train them to compete as open pros.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  75. Society doesn't need very many programmers by mrflash818 · · Score: 1

    A little off topic, but my mind is stuck with this thought:

    How many people use an Office software product? Billions+
    How many people use an Operating System? Everyone with a PC, Billions+
    How many people use a web browser? Billions+

    Now

    How many actual programmers (not including support staff, mgmt and such) does it take to write and maintain an office program suite, or single program, or web site? Perhaps 100 developers? Maybe even less, say 25? 10?

    So, why would Johnny want to code?

    --
    Uh, Linux geek since 1999.
    1. Re:Society doesn't need very many programmers by Animats · · Score: 1

      Until salaries start going up, there's no programmer shortage.

      The business whining about a programmer shortage comes from companies who want a pool of people who know exactly the stuff they're using, require no training, are immediately available, will relocate, and can be fired at the end of the project.

  76. Defending fraud? by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    The only way those offshore coders get a chance is through fraud. Our worst are better - and we don't make them suffer Third World conditions.

    The odds are in the US's favor that there'll be a good one. Get rid of the fraud that seems to always accompany offshoring, and Johnny will code.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  77. Help our own, help solve the greater problem. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Then remove offshoring and all the fraud/waste it brings. Not only does it allow our programmers(and anyone else) to thrive in an honest environment, it would have the side effect of bringing in new ones that see actual opportunity.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  78. Re:tomhudson: R U paid by adverts @ trolltalk.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do adbanners then tom? Doesn't make sense. Do you earn any money at all from trolltalk.com or is it just a useless waste of your time?? I don't think you're telling the truth. It would make no sense to have adbanners.

  79. Re:Programmer vs Computer Scientist by NatasRevol · · Score: 1
    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  80. Why Educational Technology Has Failed Schools by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    http://patapata.sourceforge.net/WhyEducationalTechnologyHasFailedSchools.html
    "Ultimately, educational technology's greatest value is in supporting "learning on demand" based on interest or need which is at the opposite end of the spectrum compared to "learning just in case" based on someone else's demand. Compulsory schools don't usually traffic in "learning on demand", for the most part leaving that kind of activity to libraries or museums or the home or business or the "real world". In order for compulsory schools to make use of the best of educational technology and what is has to
    offer, schools themselves must change. ... So, there is more to the story of technology than it failing in schools. Modern information and manufacturing technology itself is giving compulsory schools a failing grade. Compulsory schools do not pass in the information age. They are no longer needed. What remains is just to watch this all play out, and hopefully guide the collapse of compulsory schooling so that the fewest people get hurt in the process."

    I wrote that essay after working towards some FOSS tools to make it easier for kids to get into programming.

    Also related:
    http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/chapters/16a.htm
    "I'll bring this down to earth. Try to see that an intricately subordinated industrial/commercial system has only limited use for hundreds of millions of self-reliant, resourceful readers and critical thinkers. In an egalitarian, entrepreneurially based economy of confederated families like the one the Amish have or the Mondragon folk in the Basque region of Spain, any number of self-reliant people can be accommodated usefully, but not in a concentrated command-type economy like our own. Where on earth would they fit? In a great fanfare of moral fervor some years back, the Ford Motor Company opened the world's most productive auto engine plant in Chihuahua, Mexico. It insisted on hiring employees with 50 percent more school training than the Mexican norm of six years, but as time passed Ford removed its requirements and began to hire school dropouts, training them quite well in four to twelve weeks. The hype that education is essential to robot-like work was quietly abandoned. Our economy has no adequate outlet of expression for its artists, dancers, poets, painters, farmers, filmmakers, wildcat business people, handcraft workers, whiskey makers, intellectuals, or a thousand other useful human enterprises -- no outlet except corporate work or fringe slots on the periphery of things. Unless you do "creative" work the company way, you run afoul of a host of laws and regulations put on the books to control the dangerous products of imagination which can never be safely tolerated by a centralized command system."

    And, speaking as someone who has been using computers for thirty years, and while thinking everyone should ideally have a baisc computer literacy to be an informed citizen, how many programmers does the world really need? Kids are smart. They know there are fewer and fewer "good" jobs in technology for all sorts of reasons.
    http://philip.greenspun.com/careers/women-in-science
    http://www.its.caltech.edu/~dg/crunch_art.html
    http://community.dice.com/t5/Tech-Market-Conditions/Alice-Dice-s-claim-of-4-Unemployment/td-p/235866

    From:
    http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4209831/Engineering--The-next-generation
    "We often hear from readers who are engineers that they try to dissuade sons and daught

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
    1. Re:Why Educational Technology Has Failed Schools by the+agent+man · · Score: 1

      How can you make unqualified claims that Educational Technology has failed where there is evidence that it works?

    2. Re:Why Educational Technology Has Failed Schools by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

      If you read the essay, the title has a double meaning, as in "Education Technology has given schools a failing grade in the information age".

      --
      A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  81. Everyone has an agenda by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    I want to jump through my TV and strangle every CEO that says our country (USA) is falling behind in engineering and science, and that colleges must produce more engineers and scientists.

    What CEOs want is an oversupply of engineers and scientists, that way you can work them to death 80 hours a week for $40,000 a year, and throw them away when you are done with them.

    Mike Rowe says that we are also lacking skilled tradesman in this country. I have a hard time believing that with 9% unemployment, housing market in the toilet and new construction levels also in the toilet that none of those 9% would learn a trade in one of these short-handed fields.

    The reality is that we have a shortage of people with skills that are willing to work FOR SLAVE WAGES. Employers can not expect to get highly skilled workers in exchange for near minimum wages.

    There is one RELIABLE way to get more of something - pay for it. Start raising wages in short-handed fields, and in less than 10 years, you will have a glut of people in that field. You don't even need to go back in history that far for proof - just look a the dot com boom in the early 90s. This programmer "shortage" is a result of that employment bubble.

    -ted

    1. Re:Everyone has an agenda by russotto · · Score: 1

      Mike Rowe says that we are also lacking skilled tradesman in this country. I have a hard time believing that with 9% unemployment, housing market in the toilet and new construction levels also in the toilet that none of those 9% would learn a trade in one of these short-handed fields.

      You can't; the barriers of entry to the licensed trades are high, and no working tradesman wants a 40-year-old ex-IT guy as a go-fer.

    2. Re:Everyone has an agenda by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      We are way past 9% unemployment.

      If everyone who didn't have a job, gave up looking for one, we'd be at 0% unemployment.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  82. Only if we don't stop business. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Why should business get the complete favor, instead of letting them trample on everyone?

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  83. Programming is a talent like portrait painting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Programming is a talent like portrait painting some people have it some people don't

  84. Wrong! by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    They see the value in it, and decided it is not worth it.

    They sell crap software, then charge maintenance fees or require upgrades to get software that fixes the bugs.

    Sometimes maintenance or upgrade fees are valid where is includes support, or the platform changes (ie. new versions of OS, or tax code changes, etc.).

    I object to having to pay support to report a vendor's bugs to them.

    1. Re:Wrong! by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      I object to having to pay support to report a vendor's bugs to them.

      You might, but apparently there's plenty of genius MBAs running companies out there who don't mind paying giant maintenance fees for the privilege of reporting a vendor's bugs to them and hoping they get fixed.

  85. Re:tomhudson: R U paid by adverts @ trolltalk.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do adbanners if not paid 4 em? Makes no sense. I don't think tomhudson tells the truth. Does tomhudson earn any money at all from trolltalk.com or is it just a useless waste of tomhudson's time?? tomhudson's reactions alone with stalking and trolling telling others to do so is lame, but the adhominem attacks in his replies only show the rest.

  86. Then find a way to remove the lobbyists. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Why let the lobbyists win? If the lobbyists are hurting, twist the knife even more. If they go offshore, our military and intelligence departments can handle that easily. The idea is that if they play hardball, you have to take it one step higher.

    Turn up the pain on business, even if it means that the lobbyists cry out. When they stop crying out and actually want to not obliterate the US, continue a bit more. Then stop when they have no strength to do anything against the US.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:Then find a way to remove the lobbyists. by theCat · · Score: 1

      Spoken like a true engineer. Including a full stack trace.

      If only governance worked like software, or machines. Unfortunately there is this thing called "money" that's gumming up the gears. Money now owns everything including the tools use to clean up the machine. The battle was lost a long time ago and we must await the day when all this falls apart from it's own excessive greed and compulsive malice.

      I give it another 15 years. Of course, things will have gotten very ugly by then and it's unlikely we'll be talking about software much for another 15 years past that.

      --
      =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
  87. You make it sound too easy. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Why should business get to demand more when workers can't?

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:You make it sound too easy. by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Because they're the ones handing out the checks.

      It isn't all bad, though. You are free to start your own business anytime you feel like it. Then you can set your own demands.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    2. Re:You make it sound too easy. by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Because they're the ones handing out the checks.

      It isn't all bad, though. You are free to start your own business anytime you feel like it. Then you can set your own demands.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  88. Better game frameworks by Salamander · · Score: 1

    I recently went through a related exercise with my daughter. I showed her ponycorns because it's exactly the kind of game she already likes. She got the idea that we could create a game too, since I'm also a programmer and she's a whole two years older than Sissy. At that age I'm not about to teach her actual programming, but I thought it might be a good way for her to see the creative process at a higher level - plus we'd end up with something that she could enjoy and show off to her friends. We had a lot of fun with her drawing the characters which I then turned into sprites, and recording audio, and brainstorming about what puzzles would be in the game. Now the effort has stalled, mostly for lack of a decent framework. I mean, all we need is basic point-and-click stuff, maybe even an inventory and stuff like that, but it would sure be nice to have the characters actually *move* smoothly from one place to another instead of just disappearing from one place and appearing in another. Oh, it would be extra nice to have something open source, or at least runnable on Linux. I looked at dozens of frameworks that I found on http://www.ambrosine.com/resource.html and elsewhere, and very few could meet those simple requirements without getting into full-out 2D suitable for side-scrollers and platformers - meaning that they're way more complicated than I need and generally don't "scale down" to the simpler stuff very well. I tried Adventure Maker but quickly ran into its limitations even with a project as simple as this. I might try GameMaker next, even though it's also Windows-centric (I can use my wife's machine if I have to), because the other offerings out there seem so incredibly thin.

    The point is not that I personally need help finding a tool with which to make this particular game - though suggestions would certainly be welcome. The problem is that the "state of play" is just so incredibly piss-poor overall. Forget about finding something that even an older child could use *themselves* to create a game that doesn't totally suck. It's hard enough to find something that a *professional programmer* (albeit not a game programmer like Sissy's dad) can stand to work with long enough to get such a result. Something just good enough to let parents and kids put together a simple adventure/puzzle game on par with ponycorns, to give them something that's fun and that just barely hints at what you can do if you can program, would go a long way toward making them want to learn more. As far as I can tell, such a thing doesn't exist.

    --
    Slashdot - News for Herds. Stuff that Splatters.
    1. Re:Better game frameworks by the+agent+man · · Score: 1

      Do try AgentSheets as it does cover the range from simple to use to make your first simple game all the way to advanced games include sophisticated AI. Have a look here at some of the more advanced game: http://scalablegamedesign.cs.colorado.edu/sgda/event/universityofcoloradoboulder/2011csci7000/finalprojectdesign/ All just produced in about a week (don't look at the graphics).

  89. tomhudson runs trolltalk.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adbanners can be removed, even temporarily, quickly to try fool others. tomhudson was asked if he made money on trolltalk.com at all. I read where webmistressrachel.com said tomhudson does adbanners here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2250914&cid=36531394 on trolltalk.com so something's not making sense. If tomhudson codes it he could reload it without adbanners easily in seconds. That's a way he could be fooling you, think about it.

    1. Re:tomhudson runs trolltalk.com by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Rachel trolled you, you idiot. Anyone can access the wayback machine at archive.org and see that there has never been a single banner on trolltalk in all the time I've administered it (since May, 2007).

      I fund trolltalk out of my pocket. I have never asked for, or received, even a penny for it. Right now, one subdomain (http://starmedia.trolltalk.com) is being used to expose the frauds and confidence games of Alex Cholella and his starmedia.ca and 770star.com businesses. Again, not a penny of revenue will ever be generated from that, even though whistleblowing can result in a lot of legal expenses - but I think it's worth the risk to expose a fraud, and to show others that we really need to stand up against this sort of crap,or we become part of the problem through our silence.

      It's because I don't accept revenue in any shape or form for the domain that I was able to hold firm when the hosting company yanked the site for two days while we debated whether http://starmedia.trolltalk.com/ was citizen journalism or not. It's to their credit that they agreed that it is, and access to the site was restored. Score one for all the people on slashdot who offered to mirror it, and my restraint in not making a big deal out of it by exploiting the Streisand Effect. If I were generating revenue from it, you can be darned sure that I would have submitted the suspension as a story about censorship of citizen reporting, rather than saying "Great, we've resolved that, no harm, no foul, let's move on".

      In the future, part of trolltalk will be used for promoting "l'Art de la troll" - "The art of trolling", as webmistressrachel wants, and as a discussion forum for how white-hat trolling is a skill that is needed today to counter misogynist asshats like you (and how this has always been the case, we just didn't call it that in times past).

      White-hat trolling is educational, informative, insightful, and gets past all the bafflegab that people have erected to ignore reality, making them respond on a gut level, and exposing their prejudices and illogic. When someone like gmhowell says he occasionally trolls, it's not necessarily a bad thing - especially when the target is either you or me (he admits he does it to me anonymously on occasion to keep me honest, and I have no problems with that :-)

      You, on the other hand, are a fool, and so SO easily played that you're like the Titanic - you serve as an example of what NOT to do. And you keep giving others, including me, opportunities to prove it when we have a few spare moments. The simple fact is that if you had been using modern ad-blockers instead of a hosts file, you would have been able to see immediately that there are no ads on ANY of my personal domains. The only ads I have ever run were banners for open-source projects - for example, firefox when they were doing their big push, or openoffice before the Oracle debacle.

      Oh, right - giving free advertising for free open-source projects licensed under the GPL makes me greedy ... I think it would be a good thing if everyone were at least as "greedy" as me.

      Moron! Rachel's going to get a real kick out of how she completely p0wned you, even after warning you many times that she was trolling you.

    2. Re:tomhudson runs trolltalk.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think anyone believes you tomhudson. Not after the stalking and libel you've demonstrated especially. Doesn't look good for you. I'd post under my normal account but some of what seems to be going on here looks like you're going to have some trouble possibly. Not too smart of you tom.

    3. Re:tomhudson runs trolltalk.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, since we're to believe everything we read in a comment post on Slashdot, does that mean we should also conclude that you, APK, are:

      1) Troll
      2) Idiot
      3) Moron
      4) Malware author
      5) Psychotic
      6) Fat

      Because if the standard of evidence is "somebody once wrote something that said that," then you've got way more to worry about than tomhudson's lack of banner ads.

      Of course, with each post you make here, you also demonstrate firsthand that you are a psychotic trolling moron, so I guess the claims about you are at least PARTLY true based on clearly visible evidence.

    4. Re:tomhudson runs trolltalk.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tom, using adhominem attacks, stalking by ac reply, libel and lies to prove your point isn't 'white hat trolling' (it's a joke in fact that you are trying to apply some b.s. term you made up to harassing others). It's harassment, and libel tom. Don't you wonder why you have no children, no man, and are alone? That's why. You're a disgusting idiot online that thinks "trolling is ok to do" to others. Get your head examined. I've seen enough here to know you are mentally disturbed and if what you do is done back to you, you go ballistic. Grow up, go see a shrink, and don't think you can fool others reading here.

    5. Re:tomhudson runs trolltalk.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those star media guys fired you because you suck and stole others GPL code Barbara Hudson and tried to pass it off as your own. That's why you ended up doing GPL code, because you use others GPL licensed code to make things which is not really coding, it's using others' work. I understand you got fired too lol. Good job (or rather not so good of a job tomhudson, your a jobless bum now) and calling your trolling citizen journalling? You were trolling others from there and you were caught and fired.

  90. Re:Its not the icky? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    . But it has become very obvious to me over the past 15 years that the people programming Linux, the people designing interfaces for Linux, and the people evangelizing Linux, have absolutely no goddamn fucking clue what a normal desktop user wants, needs, or what will appeal to same.

    And thank the FSM for that. I was forced to use an OSX laptop not to long ago and it was a nightmare. The mouse and keyboard default speeds were set at retard slow, it did not support my Model M very well at all. It did not seem to support my extra mouse buttons, find anything was a pain in the ass, its terminal does not support tabs, and I did not bother trying to find out how to enable focus follows mouse which is a must have. Even worse the terminal does not close when you exit it, you have to use the mouse to click the window close button like an ape.

  91. Re:tomhudson: R U paid by adverts @ trolltalk.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Care to provide a link to a screenshot showing these adbanners, Fatboy (aka Alexander Peter Kowalski, aka APK)?

    As far as I can see, they don't exist.

  92. What's the matter, APK? U ran when called out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As posted before: Show us the screenshots proving it used to have adbanners. But you ran and hid instead of providing evidence to back up your claims - because you can't.

  93. Re:tomhudson: Do you earn money from trolltalk.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tomhudson won't answer if he makes money @ trolltalk? That was the question he was asked. It's odd that webmistressrachel says tomhudson has adbanners on trolltalk here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36542610 so what's the point of having adbanners if you're not making money? What's the point of making a CMS software if you're not being paid for the site you made it for?? No, tomhudson's b.s.'ing again and since he runs it, he could pull adbanners temporarily to fool you.

  94. tomhudson codes & runs trolltalk.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He can pull adbanners in seconds to fool anyone. Why run a website with adbanners if you're not being paid? Why run a CMS Software site at all if you're not making monies on it and at least PR'ing it using adbanners to again, be paid. webmistressrachel said there are adverts there for tomhudson here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36542610 No it looks like tomhudson's trapped in lies again.

    1. Re:tomhudson codes & runs trolltalk.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      APK, your hearsay is inadmissible. You have no evidence, your claims are unfounded, and you are running a serious risk of stepping over the line into libel - publishing lies about someone in order to smear them or harm their financial interests.

      I'd suggest you check yourself into a treatment center, you psychotic fatboy.

    2. Re:tomhudson codes & runs trolltalk.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Barbara (tom) Hudson, cyberstalker? Decide here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36572732 because it appears from the post dates she's been stalking apk since May last year, maybe earlier.

  95. I might run too if I was stalked and trolled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tomhudson could have pulled those in seconds to fool you. Use your brain. tomhudson runs trolltalk.com. I do see that tomhudson likes to stalk and troll others by ac replies though from his own words. He should call it trollStalk.com, hahaha. See below:

    ---

    "Wait until he starts on another kick, then reply to him as an AC. It's the new meme". - by tomhudson (43916) on Sunday May 09 2010, @08:29PM (#32150544) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1646272&cid=32150544

    ---

    #2

    HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step

    "The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off). He'll accuse you of being me" - by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @01:38PM (#35841122) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35841122

    ---

    #3

    "if you're going to tell this guy to stop spamming his hosts file crap, make sure you do it anonymously" - by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @12:45PM (#35840680) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086920&cid=35840680

    ---

  96. Johnny (Ivan) can't code because of C(++) by A+Friendly+Troll · · Score: 2

    Well, at least it's like that where I live.

    See, ages ago, we had kids being taught LOGO and BASIC. That worked splendidly. Write some stuff, see a turtle draw, or make an infinite '10 print "hello": 20 goto 10' loop.

    Then came along Pascal, usually in high school, although it wasn't unheard of to see it in the final levels of elementary school. It was a bit more of a nuisance, with all the begins and ends, and the semicolons too, but it was still somewhat manageable for the kids.

    But then someone had a serious brainfart and decided that kids be "taught" C and even C++. Suddenly there were all these strange symbols ("teacher, why is 'and' called '&&' here and why and how is '&&' different than '&'?") and stdio.h includes and god damn pointers, which extremely few children managed to grasp because they had no idea how memory and processors work. No, they were supposed to learn what a keyboard is, then how to translate a number into binary/hexadecimal and back, and then they were immediately thrown into curly braces and pointer hell.

    I have no idea what it's like in the USA, but over here it fucked up everything. If you make it hard for the kids and drown them in hardcore idiocy to the point of them being sickened by IT classes, then you can't expect that they learn how to code.

    Me? I started with BASIC on the ZX Spectrum in the early eighties. Had the Speccy had something more difficult, I'd have been a librarian right now.

    1. Re:Johnny (Ivan) can't code because of C(++) by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      You can wait until university to learn to code. How come hardware people aren't panicking that kids can't solder in middle school, or that they don't know their transforms in high school? You throw coding at kids, not matter how easy you make it, and you'll turn them off. Or worse you turn a potential engineer or programmer or mathematician or scientist into a mere grunt coder instead working for the IT department.

    2. Re:Johnny (Ivan) can't code because of C(++) by A+Friendly+Troll · · Score: 1

      Actually, in my times, we learned BASIC in elementary school (too late for LOGO) and kids loved it. Even a lot of girls did. BASIC was easy and fun. Give those kids C, as it happens now, and you scar them for life. Even at college the mandatory C class was way too much to grasp for grown-ups...

      (I soldered and did Laplace transforms in high school, by the way, but it was a technical high school.)

    3. Re:Johnny (Ivan) can't code because of C(++) by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 1

      Wow. Thanks for the insightful post. I too learned in BASIC. C and C++ are horrible languages. They have their uses but teaching programming isn't one of them. Even pros hate C and C++ because those languages are so very wrong from a design standpoint. For instance, what kind of twisted mind thought assignment should be allowed in a logical evaluation?

    4. Re:Johnny (Ivan) can't code because of C(++) by A+Friendly+Troll · · Score: 1

      It gets worse. Over here, you do your C exams *ON PAPER*. That's right - you write your code with a pencil. And god forbid that you miss a semi-colon or get the program logic wrong - things that you could easily spot if you used, you know, a computer to do your programming exam.

    5. Re:Johnny (Ivan) can't code because of C(++) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, they're teaching school kids C++ and university students Java?
      (I had to learn Java at uni for 2 years...)

    6. Re:Johnny (Ivan) can't code because of C(++) by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Where do you live? Elbonia?

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  97. Re:Its not the icky? by element-o.p. · · Score: 2

    Bovine Scatology (that's B.S. for short).

    I have a part-time job working with kids between 6th grade and 8th grade, and I'm continually amazed at how clever and intelligent every single one of them can be...if you can find a way to motivate them to make the effort. I also used to work as a flight instructor, so I have first-hand experience teaching, too. I've had students that I was certain were either deliberately trying to kill me in the airplane or else were so uncoordinated that they would never be able to fly. One of those students ended up becoming one of my best students, once I figured out how to communicate flying concepts to him in a way he could understand.

    Saying "normal people aren't clever enough to program" is a cop out. If a teacher can't motivate the student to make the effort to learn to program or can't communicate in a variety of styles so that people of all learning types can get that "Aha!" moment when it finally begins to make sense, it's a failure of the teacher. Here's a tip for you, though: if you're so insecure that the thought of "the masses" learning to code scares you, then you probably aren't one of the top 10%, either.

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  98. Observation... by BigDaveyL · · Score: 1

    What TFA is stating is nice and all, but until you can get hiring managers, recruiters and other HR types to stop recruiting solely on the latest buzzwords you'll have this problem.

    Even though you may not have programmed Java or C# in a professional environment, doesn't mean that you are not qualified. You may have plenty of exp. in other languages and the mental capacity to solve problems. The syntax is the easy part. May non-techie/manager types fail to understand this.

  99. Who's running? This says otherwise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2250914&cid=36531394 from webmistressrachel, tomhudson's fellow trolltalk.com friend.

    You're also overlooking the fact that tomhudson codes and runs trolltalk.com.

    Others here say they see no adbanners there now "suddenly" (lol, not):

    Despite webmistressrachel's statements in the URL above stating the domain's used for adbanner serving for tomhudson's CMS site. Makes no sense to have adbanners if you're not being paid, or at least to pr a website you get paid for, even if indirectly.

    * There you go.

    I'm not running anywhere - I'm right here standing my ground, because tomhudson stalked & trolled me with his trolltalk.com pals here for a yearby ac trolling/stalking replies.

    Don't believe it? Ok see this - Tomhudson said it himself, quoted:

    ---

    "Wait until he starts on another kick, then reply to him as an AC. It's the new meme". - by tomhudson (43916) on Sunday May 09 2010, @08:29PM (#32150544) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1646272&cid=32150544

    ---

    #2

    HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step

    "The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off). He'll accuse you of being me" - by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @01:38PM (#35841122) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35841122

    ---

    #3

    "if you're going to tell this guy to stop spamming his hosts file crap, make sure you do it anonymously" - by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @12:45PM (#35840680) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086920&cid=35840680

    ---

    Let tomhudson speak for himself on THAT account...

    APK

    P.S.=> I'd like to know WHY tomhudson even has a website with CMS software if he's not making any $ from it, and why float adbanners if you don't? No, like was said here already? Tomhudson's up to his old tricks again... lol! apk

  100. Re:Its not the icky? by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

    Normal people aren't clever enough to program, just like normal people aren't clever enough to use Linux (hence it's low market share). If kids aren't interested in programming, its because they aren't clever enough and don't have the spark - in which case we can just let them join the rest of the hurd and do mundane 9-5 job for the masses, its all they can imagine doing anyway.

    You could not be more out of touch. The reason for the low marketshare is the the lack of applications and games. Fragmentation of the linux platform is what causes this lack of software. If everyone could agree on a linux base set of libraries including audio subsystems and one common default GUI toolkit then you would see higher adoption by developers outside of the "open source' community. The lack of programs like Adobe photoshop keeps end users from even considering it as a platform for everyday use.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  101. The truth is the other way around by AmyLynn · · Score: 1

    Schools won't bother to teach coding until someone puts it on the state assessment test. Until then, coding will be the same independent extracurricular activity it has been since the days of BASIC. Reporting from the real world (Maryland).

  102. Re:Its not the icky? by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

    ROFL.

    Although, I switched to Linux because I wasn't masochistic enough to use Windows =)

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  103. Repost of $99 per kid license sales brochure by leftie · · Score: 1

    This is not a story. This is the 2nd time in week this 99$ per kid sales promotion has been posted here.

    http://developers.slashdot.org/story/11/06/14/2156236/Programming-Is-Heading-Back-To-School

  104. Second language? by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    English might not be the person's first language.

    BTW. My righting is always purfect.

  105. Re:Its not the icky? by radtea · · Score: 1

    The big question is: why is there SO much of a push by educators to get kids to take up programming?

    My g/f is doing her PhD in adult education, and spending much time looking at documents from the OEDC, the World Bank, etc, on the so-called "Knowledge-Based Economy", which is a catch-all term for "high-tech stuff people who write policy documents for places like the OEDC and the World Bank don't understand".

    These people have the idea that there is something really important about information technology, and in particular seem to believe that using more complex machines somehow makes work MORE knowledge-intensive instead of less, whereas the entire thrust of work since the Industrial Revolution has been to make work less knowledge-intensive.

    To make pottery before Wedgewood invented the modern factory required everyone involved in the process have a huge amount of very specialized knowledge, from raw materials to finishing, and in fact the only people who could be involved were master potters and their apprentices. After Wedgewood, anyone who could follow a simple set of operational instructions for a single step in the process of making one particular type of pottery could participate in the process, and benefit from the increased productivity involved.

    Even fifty years ago creating a finished document was the work of a specialized secretary because a typewriter was a very simple machine. Today we use a vastly more complex machine--Libre Office--to let anyone who is capable of pointing and clicking do all that work in complete ignorance of tab stops and standard formats.

    The same is true of engineering drawing: today high-school kids can create drawings that are better than highly-trained draughtsmen could turn out fifty years ago.

    In every field we are deskilling, but educators are being told their students need more and more skills, and because they are mostly not very experienced with the world outside schools they take the policy documents at face value and try to teach what they are told to teach.

    --
    Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
  106. Re:tomhudson: Do you earn money from trolltalk.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "trolltalk isn't a forum anymore. It's an advert for TomHudson's admittedly useful and niche-filling (it's intended for programmers who own websites) CMS software." - by webmistressrachel (903577) on Wednesday June 22, @01:28PM (#36531394) Journal

    There you go, right from tomhudson's fellow trolltalk.com pal! You can read that right there if you like http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2250914&cid=36531394

    Why float adverts from a domain if you're not making monies from them, or at least PR from them for making monies?

    Does tomhudson make any monies from that?? Doesn't look i.

    His CMS software must be a hunk of junk then. If so why bother do it? No, tomhudson yanked the adbanners because he runs the site trolltalk.com if anything temporarily to fool others here who said they see no adbanners http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36542772

    Either way tomhudson fails.

    The trolling and stalking stuff tomhudson does by ac replies doesn't help tomhudson's case here either http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36542646

  107. Re:Its not the icky? by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

    The mouse and keyboard default speeds were set at retard slow

    This is true, it's why there have been programs like USB overdrive (and the excellent MagicPrefs for the Magicmouse) and the like on mac for years. The default tracking is painfully slow.

    it did not support my Model M very well at all. It did not seem to support my extra mouse buttons

    Don't know about the keyboard, but the mouse buttons are basically a driver problem. Again, something like USB Overdrive is needed to support them.

    find anything was a pain in the ass, its terminal does not support tabs,

    Was this pre-Tiger ? Because Terminal most certainly has tabs, and Spotlight (OSX' desktop search system) has been part of OSX since Tiger.

    and I did not bother trying to find out how to enable focus follows mouse which is a must have

    Does not play well with the single menu bar. Think about it.

    Even worse the terminal does not close when you exit it, you have to use the mouse to click the window close button like an ape.

    Cmd+Q.

    --
    If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
  108. tomhudson runs trolltalk.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he can pull adbanners in seconds time flat. Use your head. This is better than that though, from a trolltalk.com pal of tomhudson's:

    "trolltalk isn't a forum anymore. It's an advert for TomHudson's admittedly useful and niche-filling (it's intended for programmers who own websites) CMS software." - by webmistressrachel (903577) on Wednesday June 22, @01:28PM (#36531394) Journal

    There you go, right from tomhudson's fellow trolltalk.com pal! You can read that right there if you like http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2250914&cid=36531394

    Why float adverts from a domain if you're not making monies from them, or at least PR from them for making monies?

    Does tomhudson make any monies from that?? Doesn't look it, lol! His CMS software must be a hunk of junk then. If so why bother do it?

    No, tomhudson yanked the adbanners because he runs the site trolltalk.com if anything temporarily to fool others here who said they see no adbanners http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36542772

    Either way tomhudson fails.

    The trolling and stalking stuff tomhudson does by ac replies doesn't help tomhudson's case here either http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36542646

  109. Re:Its not the icky? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    It was the last PPC OSX, I am not sure what cat that is. Installing drivers for stuff is too windowsy for me.

    If single menu bar and mouse focus conflict then single menu bar is a broken concept. Since it was ppc I could not get firefox, which meant no vimperator. A browser without vimperator is not a world I want to live in.

    I can understand the attraction of OSX for those who are not good with computers, but it seems like a huge usability step backward for me from my linux machines. I do not hold any notions that what I want is what typical people want, I just don't want my options to go away.

  110. Teach programming early along with reading by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1
    I learned to program in the early 80's on Apple ]['s as part of my school district's gifted program when I was in first grade. We started with Logo and those plastic CRT overlays and then moved on to Apple Basic using some programming manuals developed by our school district (IL #66). Kids are capable of learning to program while they are learning to read and when they start that early there's no need for typing classes later since they've already developed the skill.

    My mother was a school teacher which certainly helped and she brought a computer home each summer, at about the same time my Dad bought a TRS-80 which I setup and programmed and I was into video games since I got an Atari in, I think, '82. Video games definitely encouraged my experimentation with computers as did my interest in those choose your own adventure books and the Infocom text adventure games. My public library had an Apple lab and I was there several times a week using the computers and playing games with the high school students; this was as an elementary school student.

    You need to cultivate the interest by creating a supportive environment at an early age. Public schools tend to fail students by focusing on boring things like tests and facts that turn kids off to school instead of just making learning fun. Kids learn a lot more when they're having fun at play; there is plenty of time to focus on course material at the high school and collegiate level.

    1. Re:Teach programming early along with reading by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I don't agree completely. I'm not saying to cut out all the fun, but temporal efficiency is important. Because, in case you forgot, you don't have time for anything during high school, because you're too busy wrestling with hormones and normal human psychology, i.e. garnering respect (not gold stars, just some old fashioned respect for being a human being and not a pot plant, of the sort all the "adults" demand), and seeking an intimate partner. At that age, you still haven't digested all the idiocy that surrounds you, so you have to take it in stride. That doesn't leave much time or energy for studying - and then they wonder why so many teenagers turn into homicidal drug addicts and outcasts. They're the normal, thinking ones, the rest are sheep. So please, balance the curriculum along the whole age range.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  111. Because it is hard by AutoReg · · Score: 1

    Johnny can't code because coding is hard. Johnny only wants to do things that are easy.

    1. Re:Because it is hard by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      I want to do things that are easy. Is it...just me and Johnny? I thought it was was of those "Being alive" things.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    2. Re:Because it is hard by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Kids will put effort into things that they see producing a result that they value. Being able to produce something fun, and having some but not too much difficulty in getting there, gives the student a feeling that his efforts are effective in controlling the world around him. That's a tremendous incentive.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  112. Programming will never be for everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One problem with education today is trying to stamp out our children as each one with the same passions, skills, and competencies. Truth: Most people can learn all forms of curriculum but not all will take to it well, enjoy it and become competent at it. One of my boys is more creative, artistic while the other's bent in another way -- toward reading and such. Now they both read, and are both (IMO) pretty intelligent, but one is totally uninterested in anything I show them about programming and how to make their own games and levels and such and the other one is more interested. Making the curriculum interesting to all students is going to be pretty impossible.

    I think the key is finding those kids that are logic-minded and getting them in the courseware meant for them. Just as I think that art should be taught to artistically-minded children.

    I do think they are on the right track trying to make the program fit the age by making it about games. But that's only a start.

    1. Re:Programming will never be for everyone by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 1

      Yeah, make the class game centric. Some will like the art aspects, some will like the programming, others will like being the "idea/problem solver" guy or girl. Teams work together to make a product just like real life.

  113. Re:tomhudson: Do you earn money from trolltalk.com by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    Answer it yes, or no. We know you do adbanners already,

    You're such a liar, APK. I have NEVER done a single ad banner on trolltalk, as anyone can verify with the wayback machine. The answer is no, I have never accepted a single paid add on ANY of my domains - the ONLY ads I have ever run on any of my personal domains were for other open-source projects. Then again, you've already said that you think that giving away source code under the GPL somehow makes me greedy ... how does that work?

    Rachel completely trolled you - you thought you didn't see ads because of your stupid hosts file, when in fact there were none to begin with.

    She p0wned you, dickhead. The worst part was she TOLD you, over and over, that she was trolling you, and you still fell for it. No wonder everyone thinks APK is an idiot - it's because you keep giving us so much proof that you're nothing but a fat stupid dope.

    She trolled you, using your own stupid dependency on your stupid hosts file. If you had been using adblock plus (or any other MODERN solution) , you could have temporarily disabled ad-blocking on the site, and you would have seen that there were no ads.

    As bugs bunny would say, "Alexander Peter Kowalski, the hosts file guy? What a maroon!" Oops, make that "What an obese maroon!"

  114. Re:More results taken from the people who paid for by darronb · · Score: 1

    It's not ridiculous at all.

    Grants are institutions giving money to companies to develop ideas that otherwise would very likely not be developed. If you limit grants to basically academics, non-profits, and volunteers you're not going to get nearly as much done. Many non-profits work for a bit and shut down when the key people get tired of it and want to pursue something else. Academics are going for a paper and drop the project immediately after reaching a diminishing returns point on it's ability to produce more papers.

    Grants are also highly unpredictable and in my experience they're usually for short incremental tasks on something that requires massive ongoing development.

    If you want to do something long term, you need long term money. Grants are not long term. It's the difference between "I could quit my job and do this 3 year grant, then hope I can find another job" and "I could quit my job for this 3 year grant, and then it should be able to sustain itself and my salary". Can you see why the latter would attract a lot more people?

    Open source is really awesome when there's enough real interest to create a sustainable project. "That's cool... somebody should do that" isn't enough, you have to do it.

  115. Re:Its not the icky? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Sorry, but there are coders and there are programmers.

    You can teach a person to write code. It's not rocket science. Especially with today's RAD tools, intimate knowledge of anything isn't really a requirement anymore. And since pretty much every problem you might usually have in everyday programming has been solved already, copy/paste programming has become a staple of the industry.

    That doesn't mean that these people really know what they're really doing.

    I don't know if you ever had to take over legacy code from someone. Often you find out that he has been fired with good reason. There's a lot of voodoo programming going on, with people filling their programs with a lot of code that makes no sense whatsoever, but it was in the snippet they copied (where the code might even have done something meaningful).

    So please, don't think that just 'cause a lot of people are "writing code" today that they actually know what they're doing. There's a lot of cookbook coders out there.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  116. Why can't Johnny code? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    Because Johnny doesn't care about coding. He doesn't care about computers work. Johnny cares about getting high, fucking Tiffany, vandalism, watching Jersey Shore, listening to shitty "music" and rap, being "gangsta", playing *ball so he will get fat stacks in the majors, and generally being a douchebag.

    Johnny doesn't care about coding because he has YouTube, Google, a phone capable of (t|s)exting, Garage Band, and software that can do what ever he wants to do.

    Johnny doesn't care about coding because it takes too long, requires an ability to think clearly, intelligence, and doesn't provide instant positive feed back. Johnny like coding because it takes effort.

    Johnny doesn't care about coding because it isn't cool and you rarely see a rich coder. The rich and happy people he sees are movie stars, bankers, executives, and athletes who generally get slaps on the wrist for doing things that would put a coder in prison.

    Johnny can't code because Johnny has no need to, desire to, or interest in coding and you really can't blame him.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  117. Your friend says otherwise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "trolltalk isn't a forum anymore. It's an advert for TomHudson's ... CMS software." - by webmistressrachel (903577) on Wednesday June 22, @01:28PM (#36531394) Journal

    FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2250914&cid=36531394

    Who's the liar now tomhudson?

    You, or webmistressrachel?? Going to call her a liar now too to try to "save yourself"???

    (No, you're not weaseling out of this one tomhudson... lol!)

    Read on slashdotters, it only gets BETTER:

    "Suddenly" (lol, yea - right, NOT)

    Others in that thread are saying "I can't see adbanners" as ac replies too?

    PUH-LEESE, LMAO - see here:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36542772

    LMAO, and an ac reply too... like tomhudson uses to troll yself here (see below)

    Hey -

    (Tomhudson up to his dirty tricks yet again, lol... like these below):

    ---

    "Wait until he starts on another kick, then reply to him as an AC. It's the new meme". - by tomhudson (43916) on Sunday May 09 2010, @08:29PM (#32150544) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1646272&cid=32150544

    ---

    #2

    HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step

    "The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off). He'll accuse you of being me" - by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @01:38PM (#35841122) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35841122

    ---

    #3

    "if you're going to tell this guy to stop spamming his hosts file crap, make sure you do it anonymously" - by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @12:45PM (#35840680) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086920&cid=35840680

    ---

    tomhudson, not good, not good @ all. Trolling & stalking me's one thing, but trying to lie your way out now too?

    "BAD, BAD, BAD tomhudson"

    APK

    P.S.=> So, tomhudson: Do you make ANY MONEY AT ALL FROM "TrollStalk.com", oops, I meant trolltalk.com? LMAO... answer the question!

    ... apk

  118. Here's something for that too, lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "trolltalk isn't a forum anymore. It's an advert for TomHudson's ... CMS software." - by webmistressrachel (903577) on Wednesday June 22, @01:28PM (#36531394) Journal

    FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2250914&cid=36531394

    Who's the liar now tomhudson?

    You, or webmistressrachel your friend?? Going to call her a liar now too to try to "save yourself"???

    (No, you're not weaseling out of this one tomhudson... lol!)

    Read on slashdotters, it only gets BETTER:

    "Suddenly" (lol, yea - right, NOT)

    Others in that thread are saying "I can't see adbanners" as ac replies too?

    PUH-LEESE, LMAO - see here:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36542772

    LMAO, and an ac reply too... like tomhudson uses to troll yself here (see below)

    Hey -

    (Tomhudson up to his dirty tricks yet again, lol... like these below):

    ---

    "Wait until he starts on another kick, then reply to him as an AC. It's the new meme". - by tomhudson (43916) on Sunday May 09 2010, @08:29PM (#32150544) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1646272&cid=32150544

    ---

    #2

    HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step

    "The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off). He'll accuse you of being me" - by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @01:38PM (#35841122) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35841122

    ---

    #3

    "if you're going to tell this guy to stop spamming his hosts file crap, make sure you do it anonymously" - by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @12:45PM (#35840680) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086920&cid=35840680

    ---

    tomhudson, not good, not good @ all. Trolling & stalking me's one thing, but trying to lie your way out now too?

    "BAD, BAD, BAD tomhudson" :

    ---

    "APK, your hearsay is inadmissible. You have no evidence, your claims are unfounded, and you are running a serious risk of stepping over the line into libel - publishing lies about someone in order to smear them or harm their financial interests." - by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 23, @01:40PM (#36544018)

    OH, really - see above, not hearsay, IT"S QUOTESAY!

    OH, by the way?

    Not only has tomhudson been stalking me, but HE HAS LIBELED MYSELF and may have AFFECTED MY PROFESSIONAL REP WITH IT:

    "APK is a know-nothing troll who has never worked in the industry." - by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday February 12, @11:19AM (#35186644) Homepage Journal

    I have many others like that too... want them also?

    Pot calling the kettle black again, tomhudson, and via your "patented" ac stalker/troller replies again??

    APK

    P.S.=> Do you make ANY MONEY AT ALL FROM "TrollStalk.com", oops, I meant trolltalk.com? LMAO... answer the question!

    ... apk

    1. Re:Here's something for that too, lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two points, you fucking enema crust:

      1) Hearsay is defined as, "Information received from other people that cannot be adequately substantiated; rumor," or alternately, "The report of another person's words by a witness, usually disallowed as evidence in a court." (Source: Google 'define hearsay')

      Your use of WebmistressRachel's statement about the presence (or lack) of ad banners on trolltalk.com is hearsay. You have no proof that there are banner ads on that site, you are simply reciting what somebody else told you, and assuming it is true. That'd get you tossed out of court, it sure as shit isn't going to fly here on Slashdot. Screen shots of ad banners to substantiate your case, or shut up about the ad banners.

      2) If you feel that the user tomhudson has "libeled" you somehow, then the proper place to resolve that is in a court of law, not with your obnoxious, endlessly repetitive, copypasta screeds all over Slashdot. Either file charges, or shut the fuck up about it.

    2. Re:Here's something for that too, lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow tomhudson's losin it. Trolling apk as ac posts and libeling him. Dumb.

  119. the bullshit runs strong in you by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    Bullshit. Jina can code just as well as Johnny if not better, and he doesn't have the elitist "I'm always right because I studied design theory for four years" attitude. That's the problem.

    I had played around with coding myself, but really learned first at Stanford. The thing is after returning to Japan I went to a specialty school that didn't even have an entrance exam - anyone can attend, and had to re-learn everything during the first year. I thought this would be worthless, but I quickly found out I had been taught how to code very poorly. You could easily draw parallels from programming education to math education in America vs math education in Japan or India.

    I'm sure I'll get marked flamebait for all of this, but from my personal experiences both learning to code and working with other coders from America, Japan, and India I can tell you I'd probably never choose to partner with an American coder over an Indian or Japanese. Drop the attitudes and learn from those who in reality are doing it better than you.

    Bullshit. I've been to Japan, and there are good developers and bad developers there. Same with the Johnnies here in America. Same with the Jinas in India... oh, I've so have had to deal with the bad offshore coders from India, it's not even funny. The good ones aren't get paid peanuts, and many of them actually come to study or work here.

    Again, there are good and bad developers in any random country of your pick. You know that, so don't give me this shit you are trying to feed us. You have a point on the deficiencies in math education at pre-collegiate levels, but are you going to tell me that there are marked college-level mathematics deficiencies here? Marked to the point that they are substantially detrimental?

    Your experience in Stanford is pretty much that, a personal experience. What courses you took? Under what conditions? What specifically did you learn badly at Standford? And assuming that all of that is true, how do you take that personal experience at a specific university (and elite one mind you) into a accurate generalization of software development and CS education in the US? And for that matter, how do you take your own personal experience at that particular specialty school in Japan and turn it into an accurate generalization of software/CS education in that country? Here is a xkcd cartoon to you. Maybe it will give you some insight into the flaws of your argument.

  120. to LIBEL? tomhudson libels ME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "APK, your hearsay is inadmissible. You have no evidence, your claims are unfounded, and you are running a serious risk of stepping over the line into libel - publishing lies about someone in order to smear them or harm their financial interests." - by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 23, @01:40PM (#36544018)

    See below... and check the date on it too, this has been going on in libeling myself from tomhudson for a LONG time!

    ---

    "APK is a know-nothing troll who has never worked in the industry." - by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday February 12, @11:19AM (#35186644) Homepage Journal

    FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1992296&cid=35192078

    ---

    Not only has tomhudson been stalking me, but HE HAS LIBELED MYSELF and may have AFFECTED MY PROFESSIONAL REP WITH IT:

    I have many others like that too... want them also?

    Pot calling the kettle black again, tomhudson, and via your "patented" ac stalker/troller replies again??

    (I've worked in the Fortune 100-500, & even told tomhudson 1 example in Goulds Pumps, as far back as 1995 professionally as a programmer!)

    APK

    P.S.=> Do you make ANY MONEY AT ALL FROM "TrollStalk.com", oops, I meant trolltalk.com? LMAO... answer the question!

    ... apk

    1. Re:to LIBEL? tomhudson libels ME by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      You have no professional reputation; you ruined it yourself with your constantly spamming forums for your crappy hosts file "solution" years ago.

      If you want to blame someone, look in the mirror - but make it a BIG mirror, you fat loser.

      Also, maybe Johnnhy can't code, but you can't read english. The quote from webmistressrachel does not say that I ever ran ads on the site - it says the site itself is an "advertisement" for my giving away GPL'd code that I wrote.

      Also, when you write crap like "Why run a website with adbanners if you're not being paid? Why run a CMS Software site at all if you're not making monies on it and at least PR'ing it using adbanners to again, be paid." you smear everyone who has ever donated bandwidth to run a free banner for getfirefox or any other open-source software (yes, I've done that), as well as the hundreds of thousands of devs who also make their code available for free, including many who are paying to host the code themselves, because they believe in giving back and paying it forward.

      Again, Johnny can't code, but APK (the "hosts file" guy) can't understand what he reads, which is worse, but at least good for some lulz on a rainy day.

      Jackass!

    2. Re:to LIBEL? tomhudson libels ME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the site itself is an "advertisement"

      Yup. You'd think APK would be able to wrap his mind around the concept, since he himself is, himself, an "advertisement" for abortion. Or maybe suicide. Please, God, let it be.

    3. Re:to LIBEL? tomhudson libels ME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read the replies here and another here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36563144 and tomhudson it appears you have orchestrated a concerted effort of libel and stalking of this guy apk. The links he puts up here show you are clearly a victim of geek anger for being defeated by apk many times where you tried to challenge he. The link above shows that you and your troll friends are a pack of liars also that even turn on one another and lie again. Nobody believes you tomhudson. Your motives and harassing by ac replies tells me you are an obsessed psychotic sociopath that cannot handle when he has been gotten the better of after you start things with others. Go seek professional help or take your meds, please. You need to hear this tomhudson. I have seen for many years here how you and your trolltalk.com people operate in packs dishonestly. This upset me in fact on how your friend countertrolling downmods others dishonestly http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2245866&cid=36491652 and that is breaking rules here also just so you and your friends can maintain an appearance of doing well. I have also seen you lure others into your journals with harassment so you can try to pump the view counts. You are pitiful and to be blunt about it, mentally disturbed. I would post with my normal account, but I do not want your mental ass stalking and harassing me either. Last I say, good day.

    4. Re:to LIBEL? tomhudson libels ME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Barbara (tom) Hudson, cyberstalker? Decide here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36572732 after tomhudson posted

      but APK (the "hosts file" guy) by tomhudson (43916) on Friday June 24, @12:08PM (#36557306) Homepage

      in the post I replied to. tomhudson's been "cyberstalking" the hosts file guy apk for more than a year now by anonymous coward replies and literally said to do it with her trolltalk.com friends.

  121. Re:Its not the icky? by couchslug · · Score: 1

    I never had a problem with forums since I started using Linux in 1999. They've been a superb source of support for BOTH Linux and Windows.

    Forums where noobs are roasted aren't worth visiting, so don't go there.
    Problem fucking solved.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  122. You're so 1990s... by mangu · · Score: 2

    - The support for it is limited to forums where you never get actual help, but instead a bunch of ass-hats who shout back "RTFM LAMZOR" and similar insults at you

    As opposed to forums about windows where you are always sure to get helpful professional advice?

    If you write in to a bug report forum or a feature request to some bit of software, someone screaming "the beauty of it is its linux so you can fix it yourself so go fix it yourself and post the fix noob" is not comforting or likely to make you stick around.

    Have you ever tried sending a bug report to Microsoft? I have and, believe me, I'd rather be called "noob" than get the response I did:

    -"We are aware of that situation and it will be fixed in the next version"
    -"Oh, great! And when will you send me the next version?
    -"It will be available next spring for $"599.95"

    - You don't just "switch to linux." You have to pick one of a gazillion discordant distros

    Yeah, like Linux Starter, Linux Home, Linux Professional, or Linux Ultimate, right?

    And that the architecture for your particular distro isn't rewritten in some bizarre-ass fucking arcane way that causes your particular hardware to break on the "standard linux driver"... presuming one even exists.

    That reminds me of the last time someone asked me for help installing his new printer in his dual-boot computer. He had already installed the drivers for Windows that came in the CD. I asked "have you tried printing something in Linux?" He hadn't. When he did the printer just worked in Linux, differently from Windows, there was no need to run any install programs.

    But it has become very obvious to me over the past 15 years

    Admit it, you haven't actually tried to run Linux in the last 15 years, have you? Because your comments are exactly the way I felt in 1995 when I first installed Yggdrasil Linux in my computer.

    I refer you to this insightful post from someone who also has spent plenty of time with Linux as well.M

    I found this "insightful" pearl in that link: "I want to use Notepad++; it lacks a Linux port.". That's like saying "I want to eat pig shit and can't find it in this fancy restaurant's menu".

    1. Re:You're so 1990s... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - The support for it is limited to forums where you never get actual help, but instead a bunch of ass-hats who shout back "RTFM LAMZOR" and similar insults at you

      [...]

      I found this "insightful" pearl in that link: "I want to use Notepad++; it lacks a Linux port.". That's like saying "I want to eat pig shit and can't find it in this fancy restaurant's menu".

      So you hang around on linux forums a lot, right?

    2. Re:You're so 1990s... by mangu · · Score: 1

      You don't need to hang around Linux forums to know that Notepad++ is pig shit, anyone in a Windows forum will tell you the same thing

    3. Re:You're so 1990s... by mpeskett · · Score: 1

      Plus, if you do want to eat pig shit, you can wash it down quite happily with a mouthful of WINE.

    4. Re:You're so 1990s... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whooosh!

  123. Just go play by deblau · · Score: 1

    Robo Rally. Try the demo.

    --
    This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
  124. Talent and Proficiency Do Not Work That Way. by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    Not necessarily. Johnny could be a diamond in the rough, but thinks that programming is hard and pointless. By giving him a rewarding goal that shows results quickly, he might discover that he actually has a talent and a passion. It worked for me - I only learned to program so that I could hack Netrek, and now I do some fairly deep fu.

    Remember, we're competing for Johnny's heart and mind. Would we rather that he became a lawyer, or an accountant?

    Point me to one great programmer, or physicist or mathematician or musician or whatever-specialist that was good, if not great despite the fact that he found his subject of interest hard and pointless? Great practitioners seek that which is hard and they never need to be coerced into seeing that which they seek as not being pointless. This is not empty rhetoric (while your proposition is.) This is how mastery of something works.

    It is a natural talent. It can be guided, assisted or supported. But it cannot be created out of the vacuum for someone who is not talented and that. And the great American Failure is to think that everyone can be talented at everything if just they get polished a little into the right direction. It flies in the face of human experience, and it is a complete denial that talent for something is scarce, not general, and that there are people who will not be talented, or even efficient at anything.

    Instead of wasting time trying convince kids into going into programming by what is nothing more than shinny gimmicks, we should be 1) improving the overall quality of general education and 2) providing kids with vocational education opportunities (as in the German/Japanese models of education) early on.

    1. Re:Talent and Proficiency Do Not Work That Way. by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Also, there is nothing wrong with having lawyers and accountants. Or what, do you think the legal system runs on its own? That there is no need for accounting? Seriously, where the hell do you people get your impressions about life?

  125. Re:Its not the icky? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If single menu bar and mouse focus conflict then single menu bar is a broken concept.

    Focus-follows-mouse is a broken concept. It allows an application that is in the background to have focus. I hate it. I always hated it. People who like it are nuts.

  126. Speak 4 URself tomhudson: MORE OF YOUR LIBEL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this isn't libel, I don't know what is, because I own my own home (and rental property), even a nice sportscar & more:

    FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35840802

    "APK is 44 years old and really does live still with one or both of his parents (or another relative);
    APK can't write software for shit;
    APK stopped hosting it with download.com because he could use the $80 fee for buying better hardware instead (no wonder he posts on a 400hz computer),
    His "programs" generally consist of nothing more than easy-to-code front-ends to edit ini files (his "graphic accelerators", for example) in Delphi, or "code that will remove duplicate entries from a hosts file" (never heard of cat /etc/hosts | sort | uniq > hosts.uniq)? Oops, my bad - Windows only - so grab a copy of cygwin [cygwin.com] instead" by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @12:59PM (#35840802) Homepage Journal

    ---

    (Go to the URL & read: It's amazing the amount of b.s. & time tomhudson spent trying to libel me here in fact!)

    AHEM: "Pot CALLING THE KETTLE BLACK AGAIN", tomhudson?

    APK

    P.S.=> Need I say more? I think not... between this & the other example of libel tomhudson's directed MY way here, repeatedly thereof here:

    "APK is a know-nothing troll who has never worked in the industry." - by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday February 12, @11:19AM (#35186644) Homepage Journal

    FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1992296&cid=35192078

    Don't make me LAUGH: On LIBEL? I could sue or countersue you & most likely WIN, in a heartbeat!, just based on the above & more I have of the same libel tomhudson's been doing to me since last year even

    ... apk

    1. Re:Speak 4 URself tomhudson: MORE OF YOUR LIBEL by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      So for once in your life get off your big fat ass and do it! You've threatened so many people, and you NEVER follow through, you bloviating gasbag. Discovery against you will be interesting.

      BTW - you're the one who wrote that you stopped paying to host your crap because you wanted to spend the $80 on a new graphics card. How is repeating that "libel"?

      Just like pointing out that anyone can duplicate your "life's work" with a couple of lines in a shell script under any *nix certainly isn't libel.

      And I only yank your chain when your lies come to my attention, which you go out of your way to attract, with your crap-floods after my posts. The only stalker here is you.

    2. Re:Speak 4 URself tomhudson: MORE OF YOUR LIBEL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Barbara (tom) Hudson, cyberstalker? Decide here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36572732 because it's been going on since May last year if you look at the post dates and those are Barbara (tom) Hudson's own words quoted with links to them.

    3. Re:Speak 4 URself tomhudson: MORE OF YOUR LIBEL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apk didn't threaten to sue anyone he only said he could from what I've seen, but never bothered. You lost here tom, face it, and have egg on your face which is why you hide in your journal most of the time here. Your rants and rage and further ac trolling replies to try to support yourself afterward only give you away as another stupid broad trying to play computer guru and pass herself off as a man too when you yourself don't even have a college degree in computing.

  127. tomhudson, do you code & run trolltalk.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tomhudson, do you code & run trolltalk.com? It appears you have a problem:

    "trolltalk isn't a forum anymore. It's an advert for TomHudson's ... CMS software." - by webmistressrachel (903577) on Wednesday June 22, @01:28PM (#36531394) Journal

    Seems that you pulled the adbanners advert code from that site because others can't see it here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36542772

    You may be losing money.

    QUESTION:

    Do you make money from your website in any way tomhudson? Look into that then.

  128. Re:Its not the icky? by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

    It was the last PPC OSX, I am not sure what cat that is.

    Sounds like Panther, which shipped with the last generation of PPC macs (PPC itself was supported until as recently as Leopard in 2007.)

    Installing drivers for stuff is too windowsy for me.

    Well , they're not strictly drivers more like what we called "commodities" on the Amiga (run in the background modifying system behavior.) Don't know what you would call that on Windows or Linux.

    If single menu bar and mouse focus conflict then single menu bar is a broken concept.

    It's a question of preference. Personally I could never stand "focus follows mouse." You could make "single menu bar" and "focus follows mouse" work together by "locking" the menu bar to a program by using a modifier key of some sort eg. by holding the right mouse button à la Amiga. That's pretty un-maclike though.

    Since it was ppc I could not get firefox, which meant no vimperator. A browser without vimperator is not a world I want to live in.

    There were very definitely PPC builds of Firefox 2 for mac available around that time.

    I can understand the attraction of OSX for those who are not good with computers, but it seems like a huge usability step backward for me from my linux machines. I do not hold any notions that what I want is what typical people want, I just don't want my options to go away.

    Yeah like I say a question of preference, in the end that's why we have different OS's at all. Good thing they're not all the same. It has little to do with the technical proficiency of the user though since OSX is just a (very nice) layer above a unix OS.

    --
    If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
  129. Basically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Basically if you don't like programming, programming will suck for you and so will your work. The number of people that actually like to program is rather limited which is why there are not many good developers. Most are in it because it's a good way to make a buck now. Others are in it because it's what they love to do and any other way of making a living would be hell. Those are the ones that end up being good.

    I've been doing it since I got a Commodore 64 the first year they were out. I tried to go to college for something else (this was 1990 and computer programming jobs were scarce in my area) and failed miserably. However in the area where my college was there were a lot of software engineering shops, so I dropped out and became a professional programmer because I knew someone and showed them what I could do. To quote KRS-1 "I make about a G a week, fuck school".

    I've never looked back. I still don't have a degree or any type of certification, and I'm just fine. When you can demonstrably code assembler and C you don't need a degree. You don't need to summon the power of certification either. I've worked for 2 fortune 500's and a little software startup. I'm in the startup now still, been there for 6 years now and we are now a mid sized company.

  130. tomhudson, there's laws against libel & stalki by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tomhudson, stalking and trolling others is against the law isn't it? See here:

    (Is someone impersonating you tomhudson? It doesn't look it but let's hear what you have to say about it)

    ---

    "Wait until he starts on another kick, then reply to him as an AC. It's the new meme". - by tomhudson (43916) on Sunday May 09 2010, @08:29PM (#32150544) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1646272&cid=32150544

    ---

    #2

    HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step

    "The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off). He'll accuse you of being me" - by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @01:38PM (#35841122) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35841122

    ---

    #3

    "if you're going to tell this guy to stop spamming his hosts file crap, make sure you do it anonymously" - by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @12:45PM (#35840680) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086920&cid=35840680

    ---

    Why do you do that tomhudson? There are laws against it!

    There are also laws against libel tomhudson:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36544762

    So, it seems you like to libel others you stalk and troll others on this website also, per the link directly above as well tomhudson!

    What's up with that tomhudson?

  131. Aren't there laws against libel and stalking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tomhudson, stalking and trolling others is against the law isn't it? See here:

    ---

    "Wait until he starts on another kick, then reply to him as an AC. It's the new meme". - by tomhudson (43916) on Sunday May 09 2010, @08:29PM (#32150544) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1646272&cid=32150544

    ---

    #2

    HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step

    "The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off). He'll accuse you of being me" - by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @01:38PM (#35841122) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35841122

    ---

    #3

    "if you're going to tell this guy to stop spamming his hosts file crap, make sure you do it anonymously" - by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @12:45PM (#35840680) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086920&cid=35840680

    ---

    Why do you do that tomhudson? There are laws against it!

    ---

    There are also laws against libel tomhudson:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36544762

    So, it seems you like to libel others you stalk and troll others on this website also, per the link directly above as well tomhudson!

    What's up with that tomhudson?

    1. Re:Aren't there laws against libel and stalking? by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      I have never libeled you, APK. Everything I have written about him is the truth. I have never, for example, said that you were a monkey-f*cking, goat-dick-sucking serial pedophile. I *have* said that you're an overweight, immature, stupid, paranoid misogynist with delusions of self-importance who is obviously so obsessed with me that you have to stalk me on slashdot and crap-flood whenever some AC posts that you're an ill-informed jerk with the personality of a wet turd.

      And those are probably your good points.

      Your obsessive crap-floods are why I advise others to post AC when replying to you - it makes you go nuts (which is a bonus), but the real reason is preventing you from stalking them the way you do me, since I don't post as an AC, and am easy to follow.

      Those of us who have followed your personal obsession with me for some time know the real reason you're so obsessed with me, and it has nothing to do with your stupid hosts file. And we're laughing at you, because you can't come out in the open and admit the real reason, because you haven't got the guts. Think of it - of the almost 600 people who have friended me on slashdot (and the thousands more who just happen to take a peek once in a while because I'm sometimes interesting, sometimes funny), I think about half of them know the real reason, and we're all laughing at you.

      BTW, are you a monkey-f*cking, goat-dick-sucking serial pedophile? Just asking, because that's got to be at least as likely as my being "greedy" because I run some sites that don't take any paid advertising whatsoever, and promote giving away GPL code (including my own), expose fraud such as I'm doing at http://starmedia.trolltalk.com/ and ran a few banner ads years ago on one of them (not trolltalk.com) telling people to OMG HOW EVIL OF ME get firefox because your beloved IE sucked.

      Poor APK. Do yourself and the world a favor: Go HOSTS FILE yourself. And lose some weight.

    2. Re:Aren't there laws against libel and stalking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Attention APK! damn_registrars is at it again! http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263796&cid=36546024

    3. Re:Aren't there laws against libel and stalking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tom you've ac trolled and libeled him. Are you insane? Seek help.

    4. Re:Aren't there laws against libel and stalking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My god. tomhudson's losing it.

    5. Re:Aren't there laws against libel and stalking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      spaz out much tomhudson?

    6. Re:Aren't there laws against libel and stalking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like libel to me tom http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1992296&cid=35192078 in your statement quoted there at the top. It's designed to affect his career. That is libelous. Have you lost your mind?

    7. Re:Aren't there laws against libel and stalking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tomhudson we can read your own words you know

      Wait until he starts on another kick, then reply to him as an AC. It's the new meme by tomhudson (43916) on Sunday May 09 2010, @08:29PM (#32150544) Homepage Journal

      QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1646272&cid=32150544

      HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step

      The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off). He'll accuse you of being me" - by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @01:38PM (#35841122) Homepage Journal

      QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35841122

      #3

      if you're going to tell this guy to stop spamming his hosts file crap, make sure you do it anonymously" - by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @12:45PM (#35840680) Homepage Journal

      QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086920&cid=35840680

      tomhudson you are losing it. We can read. That looks like stalking and trolling being planned and done to me. Cut and pasted it here for your reference. Did you forget saying those things?

    8. Re:Aren't there laws against libel and stalking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1992296&cid=35186644 he has worked in computing and never said a hosts file could secure a computer completely because when you were asked to show where he said it, you did not produce it. Telling lies of the nature you did that could adversely affect someone's livelyhood is libel tom. You seem to think trolling is cool to do. It's a form of stalking from what I have seen out of you because you told others to harass the man 3 times by anonymous coward replies which is a coordinated defamation with your trolltalk.com friends involved. Not a very intelligent thing to be engaging in online tom. It can cause you great trouble.

    9. Re:Aren't there laws against libel and stalking? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm so scared of yet another APK anonymous post. Not.

      Everyone should post AC when replying to you, because this way you can't stalk them like you do me. Don't like it? Then don't do it yourself, you lying hypocrite.

      That's not the definition of libel, ass-wipe. Besides, when I say you're obese, stupid, disturbed and obsessed, and that people should post AC when replying to you because otherwise you'll crap-flood them, the proof is there. It's not libel if it's the truth, fatso.

      If it has any consequences for your livelyhood, here's a clue - the first thing to do when you're in a hole is to stop digging. Stop trying to pimp your crappy useless hosts file all over the net. Stop trying to claim that Windows is somehow more secure or better performing than the various *nixes out there. Stop telling lies about others who point out what a phoney you are when you threaten to sue, but never do (there's a law against that, btw).

      In other words, go hosts file yourself. The world will be a better place for it. Or you could grow up, but we both know that will never happen.

    10. Re:Aren't there laws against libel and stalking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Barbara (tom) Hudson, cyberstalker? Decide here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36572732 because it's been going on since May last year if you look at the post dates and those are Barbara (tom) Hudson's own words quoted with links to them. tomhudson even mentions the hosts guy apk in the post I replied to here. You decide.

    11. Re:Aren't there laws against libel and stalking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Barbara (tom) Hudson, cyberstalker? Decide here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36572732 because it's been going on since May last year if you look at the post dates. tomhudson even mentions HOSTS files in the post I am replying to now. You decide.

    12. Re:Aren't there laws against libel and stalking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adhominem attacks tom? apk dusted you on HOSTS and has made you look like an illogical fool there many times.

      You stalked apk calling him host file guy and host file troll yet you yourself here say you are a troll (and one that said to troll apk as anonymous replies posted many times here).

      You blew it on hosts vs. apk and here is the list again for your reference and so you can face it and get over your geek angst:

      ---

      tomhudson bullshit on HOSTS is outnumbered 30:1 vs. apk evidences:

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2087330&cid=35847946

      ---

      tomhudson BURNED on DNS vs. HOSTS and CPU cycles/memory & more used on HIS "ideas" vs. HOSTS vs. apk's ideas:

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2087330&cid=35879374

      ---

      tomhudson BURNED & RAN on HOSTS vs. VIRUSES vs. myself yet again:

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2088808&cid=35877448

      ---

      tomhudson says "hosts are so 90's" & apk's fellow RESPECTED security person wrote a noted article on them in 2009: (based on his readings of MY posts in forums no less)

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2088808&cid=35876806

      ---

      3 times tomhudson, and for over a year now? You're a cyberstalker tomhudson.

  132. Re:Its not the icky? by smelch · · Score: 1

    Right, because we need tons of people churning out more shovelware bullshit, instead of people with the skills and the knowledge to actually innovate. You're advocating for shitty products made by sheeple instead of quality products and inventions made by those with skills. Further, if you can't imagine how programming skills directly tie in with all engineering and innovation you're a moron. You know what, even if you do see those things you're still a moron. We need people who can design the machines that unskilled labor operates, and we don't have enough of them. If you lack the skills you will be left behind in the global, national and local economies.

    --
    If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
  133. Appears to be coordinated libel (record material) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Refer to CASE # SYRPDD6202011-44

  134. Re:Its not the icky? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    There were very definitely PPC builds of Firefox 2 for mac available around that time.
    This was last week, not years ago.

    It has a lot to say about the technical proficiency of the user, that unix OS has no real useful tools installed. Even locate was missing. Worse yet, there is no official way to get them, maybe the app store fixes that.

  135. Re:Its not the icky? by Flyerman · · Score: 1

    If your gf hasn't read "In The Age of the Smart Machine" by Shoshanna Zuboff, I recommend she give it a look. It has a lot of insight on exactly what you've described in your post.

  136. Facts? by sakonofie · · Score: 1

    "There are more and more [computer science] jobs," says Alexander Repenning, a computer science professor at the University of Colorado Boulder, "but the interest is actually going down, and the interest of women in these kinds of jobs is going down even faster."

    That is as far as I got. Every alarm bell in my head was ringing. Quite unpleasant. So I went and found something of possible value: http://www.cra.org/resources/crn-online-view/undergraduate_cs_degree_production_rises_doctoral_production_steady/ . Long read, but take a look at those charts. I think I am willing to step out on a limb and say, "Man people like the idea of getting rich for not much work, and during the dot-com boom CS was the place to pan for gold." I need to find longer term data though. Oh and the claim about women in the above quote is not born out by this data.

  137. Most People Don't Care... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Say it slowly, "most people don't care about science/engineering". Really, it's true. Esoteric concepts like "building things", figuring out "how something really works" are not important to most people. And if someone doesn't care about that kind of stuff, then they probably never will. Maybe you can convince a few people it's fun but your success rate will be low most likely.

    And say you do convince some people do go down that road. What do you think they are going to do when they find out about the truly *massive* amount of work it takes to actually build something that works? Because as most of us know, all the fun stuff like concept, design, initial work is great fun... too bad that's really only 50% of the work. Then you get to testing, design rework etc (not fun). Factor in the workload of a decent Engineering BS degree, and there better be a big fat reward at the end or else most people will just quit and go do something else.

    If you really want more programmers then the industry needs to pony up the dollars IMO. Then you will get a bunch of people who may have no passion, but will work their arses off to chase the almighty dollar.

  138. there's an app for that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the real reason Johnny can't code.. just about anything you want to do on a computer these days you can buy off the shelf.
    back in the day if you wanted something as simple as a clock, a timer, or a way to secure your PC. you had to write it.

  139. Yeah, way to rewrite history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are forgetting one thing. Now computers are cheap. Nearly everyone can afford on. And a development system? Peanutes. A 2nd hand PC will do, development tools are freely accesible. Hell, server grade software is not only free, all its source code can be obtained fully.

    Us oldies had to seriously save to get our own hardware. Software cost a fortune. Even older ones could only get time shared access once they went to the RIGHT university. And still, they learned.

    It has become easier and easier to become a developer. Compare having to buy or borrow books with endless programming tutorials available on the web. My own first computer? A C16 and I couldn't afford a tape drive.If I turned it off, my code was gone.

    Now you can code with near endless storage with a 2nd hand PC for a 100 bucks and have server software, an IDE, the entire internet as a resource as a small child easily.

    Yes, the click and pray kids don't stand a chance, but then they would never have saved up all their savings to get a commodore either.

    Yes, some devices are closed. So? Plenty are not and they are cheaper then they ever were.

    Take the lego mindstorm. I would have KILLED for such a device, years ago I finally bought the commodore robot, just because I finally could afford it after it having tempted me throughout my childhood years. It doesn't even hold a candle to mindstorm which is CHEAPER then a console!

    Oh and those closed devices? Which one of them so far has not been hacked wide open? Where was the guy hacking the mainframe open so I could get a time share on it as a small child?

  140. Script kiddies by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

    Just turn it into a script kiddie competition. Put them in a classroom with old XP (or maybe even Windows 95) machines hooked together on a private network, show them how to get started writing email trojan scripts for Outlook Express, and let them fight it out. That's more likely to get kids interested faster (because good games take longer to write).

  141. Re:Its not the icky? by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

    There were very definitely PPC builds of Firefox 2 for mac available around that time.
    This was last week, not years ago.

    Ahem, Firefox 0.8 for OSX (Jun 2004), Firebird 0.6 for OSX (Jun 2003), ...

    It has a lot to say about the technical proficiency of the user, that unix OS has no real useful tools installed. Even locate was missing. Worse yet, there is no official way to get them, maybe the app store fixes that.

    No locate ? OSX manpages online says you're wrong. And Macports (formerly Darwinports) has been around since at least 2003 delivering all other goodies you can think of.

    No offense but I think time and frustration may have warped your memory.

    --
    If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
  142. Deemphasizes programming? by LUH+3418 · · Score: 1

    Ah, yes, deemphasizes programming... Because existing CS degrees don't do enough of that already. I've done a B.Sc., a masters and am now doing a Ph.D. in CS... And the whole time, everybody's been pretending that programming is just not that important. That computer science should be something pure and somehow entirely detached from the practical realities of computing. The result? Lots of students can't code. Lots of students don't really understand how computers work, both in the concrete and in the theoretical sense.

    I think if you hate coding, you should pick another field. Like it or not, unless you're doing purely theoretical CS, you're going to need to implement something on a computer at some point... And this is done with a programming language.

    I think coding could be made more *fun* and less tedious, but I don't think we should try to hide it under a rug and pretend it's not there. If anything, learning to program is a great way to develop your logical/critical thinking.

  143. but can johnny get laid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he can who cares if he can code !

    Coding today is a hobby. most work has left the country. Think of it as chess or reading sci-fi.

  144. Re:Its not the icky? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    I did not go looking at archive.org I looked at firefox.com and was told no modern firefox existed.

    Niether of those is official.

    I agree though frustration probably did warp my memory. It was a huge PITA and a more modern version of OSX would have helped a ton.

  145. Re:Its not the icky? by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

    I linked to archive.org to show the webpage as it existed at the time, builds for OSX were offered right alongside windows versions at the time on the official webpage for firefox. Firefox finally abandoned PPC builds with version 4 I believe.

    --
    If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
  146. Re:Its not the icky? by node+3 · · Score: 1

    Most people don't use Linux because:

    You're overthinking it. Most people don't run Linux because, quite simply, there's no reason to. They don't give a shit about fsf-style "freedom" or the Unix way of doing things, which are quite simply the two biggest reasons, generally speaking, to run Linux. Actually, that really should be "the two biggest rationalizations" to run Linux, because I suspect the biggest *reason* has more to do with simply wanting to geek out (which, again, is a reason that is important to almost no one).

    Very few people ever get to a point in their decision-making process where you list comes into the picture.

    For most people, buying a computer means buying a Windows PC (although they don't even realize that's a way to refer to it). For a lot of people, it means choosing between a PC and a Mac. For a reasonably large minority, it means buying a Mac.

    But for almost no one does it even include the option of running Linux, let alone some sort of pro/con assessment. Those that do can find it on the internet easily enough, and have plenty of options and communities which to join, if they so wish. It's a fairly nice arrangement, except the part where the nerds get in a fuss about market share. You (the general 'you', not you specifically) can't expect people to want to use something that doesn't serve their needs, regardless of how well it serves yours.

  147. "pull adbanners in seconds" from SCREENSHOTS? HOW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject, & please tell us how someone can pull adbanners from your screenshots that you have saved on your own personal computer. The only way that he could do that is by hacking into your computer and deleting/modifying files on it. It sounds to me like you are accusing him of hacking into your computer. Is that correct? If so it just goes to prove yet again that your HOSTS file is complete crap and doesn't prevent you from getting hacked or infected by viruses/trojans which you claim it does.

  148. I like it by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    Although I've never been happy with the drag-and-drop method of producing programs (because it hides too much of the internal mechanics), being able to get something running quickly and then altering it to do something better has a big appeal. Providing that enough of the workings are explained, this looks like a good approach.

    What I don't understand from the article is why the program disappears because funding stops. The software is there, why can't teachers continue using it?

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    1. Re:I like it by the+agent+man · · Score: 1

      The funding only comes to an end for this one particular research. Teachers will continue to use it and more teacher development will happen.

  149. Re:Its not the icky? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    I used this last week, meaning in 2011 not years ago when it was brand new.

    I honestly considered putting a ppc linux on the machine. If the battery was not dead I would have. Too much work to fix it though, stupid Apple sealed laptop design.

  150. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many kids code and there will always be a geek chic about it.
    While it helps allot, they should divorce mathematics from coding.
    Many feel that logic (not necessarily mathematical logic) and creativity is more important than getting bogged down in advanced mathematics.

    The main problem though is the job market for coders.
    Young folks coming up today have a more sophisticated and realistic view of the job market.
    Why would they want to subject themselves to the work life of a coder?
    Working for dead brain clueless bosses while competing with equally clueless but cheap VISA and offshore workers who misrepresent their credentials.

  151. the simple answer: Python by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Python has all the features of other languages,
    it's free, its syntax is very simple,
    in it you can easily do functional and procedural
    programming.
    I taught Python my students in the college,
    my brother in law, and a guy from the jail
    who wanted to learn programming.
    It has Mathematics package (Numeric)
    which is very efficient and easy to use.

    Good luck!

    1. Re:the simple answer: Python by the+agent+man · · Score: 1

      Python is a great language but here is a prediction. Teaching Python in a required class, not the Friday afternoon computer club, at the middle school level: not going to work.

  152. Appears to be coordinated libel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Refer to CASE # SYRPDD6202011-44

  153. Re:Its not the icky? by the_hellspawn · · Score: 0

    Your butt hurt much? "hey don't fuck with you in the next release", "have absolutely no goddamn fucking clue what a normal desktop user wants", "instead a bunch of ass-hats who shout back "RTFM LAMZOR", and "And that the architecture for your particular distro isn't rewritten in some bizarre-ass fucking arcane way" seriously clam the fuck down. It is just an operating system.

    --
    "The laws of science be a harsh mistress." --Bender
  154. tomhudson are you sane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tomhudson you're making a fool of yourself by libeling and trolling somebody by saying things that could affect their income and professional standing. I'd cool it because you appear to be spazzing out.

  155. Re:Its not the icky? by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

    I used this last week, meaning in 2011 not years ago when it was brand new.

    In that case : Tenfourfox (community ppc build of Firefox 4) and of course Firefox 3.6 is still available as a universal (x86 & ppc) binary.

    I honestly considered putting a ppc linux on the machine. If the battery was not dead I would have. Too much work to fix it though, stupid Apple sealed laptop design.

    What laptop is it, the "non user-upgradable" batteries only came in about 2008 IIRC, with the unibody macs ?

    --
    If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
  156. didn't you hear? by Eponymous+Hero · · Score: 0

    didn't you hear? ebooks and ereaders are not venues where people can go to get free wi-fi, read books and magazines without paying for them, hang out in a bookish atmosphere and feel trendy while they get trendy coffee as their favorite author signs their ereader screens during a beatnik poetry performance.

    --
    insensitive clod overlords obligatory xkcd car analogy russian reversals whoosh pedant fanbois ftfy in 3...2...1..PROFIT
  157. Become a rocket scientist! by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

    It'll increase your problem solving abilities.

    --
    Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  158. tomhudson why no children & no man? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you ever wondered why you are childless, and no man wants you? Let's see:;

    1.) You are a 1 eyed cyclops

    2.) You are a miserable troll online that stalks & harasses others, and thinks it's "the right thing to do"

    3.) You live alone with dogs and no man wants you.

    (That tell anyone anything here?? It certainly does me!)

    APK

  159. tomhudson = 1 eyed cyclops childless monstrosity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't that right tomhudson? No man wants you.

  160. Does tomhudson have a college degree in CSC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. You're childless cyclops 1 eyed monstrosity no man wants which is why you profile says you live with dogs and alone. Some accomplishment. Just like you think being a troll is. That is no accomplishment. It shows the rest of us how miserable you are.

  161. tomhudson, you stalk & troll others by ac repl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're the one that trolls and stalks others, your own words prove it, so who's the hypocrite now? Proof's below:

    ---

    #1

    "Wait until he starts on another kick, then reply to him as an AC. It's the new meme". - by tomhudson (43916) on Sunday May 09 2010, @08:29PM (#32150544) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1646272&cid=32150544

    ---

    #2

    HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step

    "The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off). He'll accuse you of being me" - by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @01:38PM (#35841122) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35841122

    ---

    #3

    "if you're going to tell this guy to stop spamming his hosts file crap, make sure you do it anonymously" - by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @12:45PM (#35840680) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086920&cid=35840680

    ---

    You're also a childless 1 eyed monstrosity, hence why your profile shows you live alone with dogs instead of having a partner of the opposite sex.

    It's obvious You troll others (big accomplishment that (not)). You do so, because you're a miserable hideous beast, that nobody wants. I feel sorry for your dogs actually.

  162. Re:Programmer vs Computer Scientist by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

    and that means they really need a Computer Engineering/Software Engineering degree.

    Not necessarily. Some people (though not all or many) can teach it to themselves through the use of various methods. And, despite this, they actually know what they're doing.

    --
    Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  163. Re:Its not the icky? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

    And just like art, it requires a certain "gift" if you hope to do any better than stick figures and finger painting.

  164. Re:Its not the icky? by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 2

    Well, when I was a teacher, (and even now in my professional life), I used to ask everyone a simple question.

    "What is the difference between a Programmer, a Software Engineer, and a Hacker?"

    To which i give the answer:
    "When presented with a square hole and a round peg and told to integrate: The programmer will say, it cannot be done. The Engineer will re-engineer the hole and/or the peg in order to fit properly, the Hacker does the same, but with a Hammer."

    However, in any real project (especially agile) you need people with all three mentalities. You need the developers to code the menial stuff, allowing the engineers to focus on the more chalenging aspects, and sometimes you need the hacker mentality to meet a particular deadline, as long as you have a long term plan to refactor that code later.

    --
    Have a nice day!
  165. Another Question by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

    Y can't Tori read?

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  166. Re:Its not the icky? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    The last mac book ppc, huge screen, maybe the battery is user replaceable I did not look. When I see an Apple product I immediately think "Sealed useless when breaks". Not that I have never fixed an iPod, but Apple is outright hostile to folks like me so rather than fix them I prefer to tell people to buy something with a replaceable battery.

  167. tom, show proof apk went to trolltalk.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tomhudson, show proof apk went to your trolltalk.com troll's website: Can you show us a link where he states he did? How about a log with his IP address??

    No, you can't produce that.

    All you have is lies, libel, adhominem attacks, and trolling/harassments (trying to pass them off as invalid anecdotal evidence)

    1. Re:tom, show proof apk went to trolltalk.com by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      APK, grow up. If you're now claiming that you're too stupid to even check something yourself, you've just proven that stupid is as stupid does. You make Forrest Gump look like the second coming of Einstein.

      But really, since you claim that I ran ad banners on trolltalk.com (not that it would be a big deal if I did, who gives a f***), prove it.

      You can't because it never happened. You said I was "greedy", based on your misinterpretation of what someone else (webmistressrachel) wrote, and I have yet to see any convincing argument that people who give away their code under the GPL and host it on a web server paid for entirely out of their own pocket, with nary and ad in sight, are "greedy".

      Then again it's what I expect from a Windows fan-boi whose life is spent either spamming discussion boards about his craptastic "hosts file" when everyone else has moved on to better solutions, or stalking people who pointed out your bs.

      So again, APK, if you didn't check it out yourself, you're stupider than even I thought possible. In fact, I doubt we'll find a dumber poster on slashdot. Rachel gave you lots of notice that she was trolling you, and even then, you either didn't bother to check, or you did, but assumed that your "hosts file" blocked any ads - because you wanted SO badly to believe that I was a greedy slimeball. A pshrink would say that it's revealing how you project your internal self-image onto others' actions.

    2. Re:tom, show proof apk went to trolltalk.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grow up? Your words quoted show you stalk and troll Apk tom, and he posted the quotes of it here . You have been quoted 3 times doing it and telling others to do that with you from long ago. That's a pot calling a kettle black tom and very dumb. tom, don't you respect the law? That's asking for possible trouble in harassment and your other libelous statements here shown that you tried to libel him saying he didn't even work in computing ever when he clearly has. Dumb, mostly if you do that to others around the web also and from the name of your domain, trolltalk.com, that's a dead giveaway you probably do. Take your own advice, grow up.

  168. AC sockpuppets, alternate reg'd acc't. here (easy) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AND, being owner of trolltalk.com domain as tomhudson is.

    And using a sockpuppet ac reply as tomhudson's been shown to do via his own words:

    Wait until he starts on another kick, then reply to him as an AC. It's the new meme. - by tomhudson (43916) on Sunday May 09 2010, @08:29PM (#32150544) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1646272&cid=32150544

    HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step

    The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off). He'll accuse you of being me by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @01:38PM (#35841122) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35841122

    if you're going to tell this guy to stop spamming his hosts file crap, make sure you do it anonymously by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @12:45PM (#35840680) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086920&cid=35840680

    Or even by having an alternate registered luser sockpuppet account registered on slashdot.com (no big trick via gmail or other public email systems and another computer even).

    So, you can stop replying via ac replies to try to save face here tomhudson - we know what you're about.

  169. tomhudson ac replies fail again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36556110 and it's not like tomhudson doesn't have a few trolling tricks up his sleeve he and his friends use. Here is another one from his pal countertrolling on how the upmod each other, and downmod others http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2245866&cid=36491652 as evidence thereof/proof.

  170. tomhudson pulls same transparent trick, again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and others know he does Tomhudson did you do this? here http://slashdot.org/journal/266852/Did-You-Do-This-TomHudson where tomhudson did the same trick to he as well and others!

    (Tomhudsons' trolling/harassing playbook is very limited and easily seen thru, because he does the same things over and over including ac stalking trolling replies so yes, we know it's you again tom).

    tomhudson, your ac replies and stalking/trolling are catching up to you it seems, and in your +5 moderated thread!

    Everyone KNOWS you and your friends mod up yourselves just like how you mod down others via tricks shown by your 'friend' (sockpuppet) countertrolling http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2245866&cid=36491652 here ).

    You're (and your trolling friends and sockpuppet accounts as well as your ac replies) doing yourself in tomhudson. Nobody else did this to you.

  171. Thought U said trolltalk.com not 4 trollin yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No proof as usual, eh, tomhudson -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36555984 and your "trollStalk.com" puny site?

    (And, I doubt APK blocks it in his HOSTS file (nobody but your troll crew goes there)).

    Proof? Ok:

    ---

    Join us all on Troll Talk, this Tues. ;-) I'll be in London or Prague - I hope you have the "same Tuesday". by Jeremiah Cornelius (137) on Thursday June 16, @08:26PM (#36469928) Homepage Journal

    from -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2245062&cid=36469928

    ---

    (Just last week no less, and tomhudson says that his domain's NOT used for trolling yet? B.S.!)

    Either you're all liars (jeremiah cornelius & webmistressrachel) OR, you are... take your pick, either way?? You show you're a liar that hangs out with other trolling liars... end game/period.

    Yet you have stated here publicly that it's only going to be used for "the art of trolling" (or something along those lines) in the future only?

    Who are you trying to fool?? Yourself???

    You only do this to yourself, tomhudson (watch him now say the same b.s. he did that Webmistressrachel "pwnd" me - you always pwn yourselves, see above, lol)

    Tomhudson will bury himself in yet another lie: Just as he did of webmistressrachel, his fellow troll (who lied or tom's lying about his site serving ads)

    Worst part is?

    You're willing to show that you will take down your entire crew of pals or sockpuppets, like a SOCIOPATH would, just to save your sorry childless cyclops trolling/stalking ass!

    1. Re:Thought U said trolltalk.com not 4 trollin yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tomhudson busted lying again (4 spinmaster lies). Hahahahaha.

  172. Run FORREST (tomhudson) - Run (again) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now UR caught in more lies 2 lie UR way out of more http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36557992 [slashdot.org] ROTFLMAO! You're so insignificant apk couldn't be bothered (and to give away his IP address at as well, do you think he's as stupid as you are?)

    Seems nobody goes to your domain, but other trolls you hang around with like Jeremiah Cornelius!

  173. "Vi veri universum vivus vici" - V 4 Vendetta/APK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject-line, & translate (By the power of truth, while living, I have conquered the UNIVERSE, and the trolltalk.com crew, & mainly the "ringleader" tomhudson here, lol... too easy! Truth makes it thus...)

    Thank-you for your time if you're reading, & I hope you've enjoyed it as much as I - they've been trolling, stalking, libeling me, making blackmail threats, & more...

    I am glad the trolltalk.com trolls (tomhudson & crew) actually were foolish enough to attack me here yet again via AC replies as seen above:

    Mainly - Because it explains EXACTLY how to take out trolls, by using the simple power of truth & facts (and their own words + misdoings online @ this website).

    ---

    tomhudson (The ringleader & bigtime trolling liar)

    gmhowell (agreed to truce)

    webmistressrachel (liar & pawn or, sockpuppet of the main fool, in tomhudson I suspect)

    jeremiah cornelius (pretty much leaves me be, we got along before this)

    damn_registrars (I think he was just a pawn of tomhudson),

    clone (both guises 52431/52431 LONG gone)

    erroneus (just another troll I blew away recently for the same crap, blackmail attempt on me too - I could NOT believe it in fact, & trolling mechanics the idiots from trolltalk.com, above, utilize bogusly)

    ---

    AND, of course, since tomhudson always trolls me on HOSTS files posts I do, & fails hugely!

    (See here -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2230966&cid=36418796 )

    Plus, in other technical matters in networking + programming & yes, HOSTS files - see below!

    Yes - a "rib/jab" @ trolls around here... not blaspheming, but the point's there!

    The latter url's internals, which is why I suspect is WHY tomhudson trolls me via AC replies, "Geek Angst" of his, blown away, by yours truly - TOO many times, & just "too, Too, TOO EASILY - '2EZ-ily'"

    (AND, everytime he starts with myself, & "tries me" as he has here... only to expose he & his and how they work online (dishonorably), lol!)

    ---

    "Heavenly hosts refers to an army (Luk.2:13; Rev.19:19) of good angels mentioned in the Bible. It is led either by the Archangel Michael, Jesus, or by God himself. ... The heavenly host participate in the War in Heaven and, according to some interpretations, will battle Satan (lol, tomhudson) and Satan's own army (trolltalk.com) at the End of Days and be victorious" - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavenly_host

    ---

    * So - with that "all said & aside"?

    Thanks for your time, and again - Do ENJOY (and use) THE TIP ON NORTON DNS (good stuff)...

    APK

    P.S.=> So, per my FAVORITE FILM of all time (LAYER CAKE), do see it, great film - Specifically @ it's termination?

    AND

    Because I especially like doing analogies via film (better than scripture quotes or those from classical literature, since more folks have a backdrop in film by far lately)??

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ffz2MHYEaAE&feature=related

    "Adios Amigos" - XXX

    ---

    LAYER CAKE ENDING:

    ---

    Clarkie the Chemist - "The King is Dead, Long Live the King..."

    XXX - "Well I'm honored, but for me? This is all over, I'm getting out... what was true THEN, is true now: Have a Plan, & Stick to it. So I'm sure you gentlemen have LOTS to discuss, but I have no business being here... Adios Amigos (Paul the Boatman (clone), Kinky (Jeremiah Cornelius), The Duke (tomhudson), Slasher (webmistressrachel), Mr. Lucky (damn_registrars) , Troop () ...Jimmy (Pseudonym Authority) - I don't want to add my name to THAT list. My name? If you knew that, you'd be as clever as me..." - XXX

    ... apk

  174. Whoa, did you hear that, folks? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    I'm "LONG gone".

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    1. Re:Whoa, did you hear that, folks? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      We're looking for the stupidest poster on slashdot, and so far APK (the "hosts file guy", Alexander Peter Kowlalski) is it. Nobody else even comes close when it comes to self-immolation.

      He must really like the taste of shoe leather and dirty socks, the way he keeps stuffing both his feet into his mouth.

      He keeps accusing me of attacking him as an AC, when it's obvious to everyone that, unlike him, I don't hide. His latest post sounds like the "Vietnam strategy" - declare victory and get the f*** out. Of course, being the perennial loser, he'll be back. Sort of like herpes, the "gift that keeps on giving". He just can't help himself.

    2. Re:Whoa, did you hear that, folks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UR adhominem forum illogic logic attacks ain't cutting it here tomtroll http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36557992 U FAIL tomtroll! Illogical adhominem attack always fail. An, Whu said I was anyone related to anyone or anything here in the 1ST place noob troll? Hahaha, 4chan here 4 teh lulz ( we have a thread on you being caught trolling like the stoolie noob U R @ trollin' ) we have been watchin apk kick a$$e$ on /. 4 dayz now.

  175. Re:Its not the icky? by radtea · · Score: 1

    Pretty sure she hasn't... thanks for the tip. It looks like an interesting read!

    --
    Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
  176. 1st troll w/ gmhowell & tomhudson (proof insid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You prove I'm right that UR connected to trolltalk.com - by showing here, lol, I am sort of glad you did:

    THANK YOU!

    In fact?

    You have put the "icing on the cake" of my last post you reply to now!

    The proof's in the URL link below & the exchange there below next, lol... Man:

    BUS-TED clone, 2x in a row here... you've got DOUBLE-EGG on your face (once more, see below!)

    LMAO... been "stinging that long" in "Geek Angst" have you? I must ask:

    tomhudson - has clone always been a sockpuppet of yours??

    (LOL, probably! "Special sock-puppet troll in reserve")

    For you??

    I'll make 1 more appearance!

    Man - I am laughing SO HARD right now, it's not funny! You dolts are ridiculously easy to get the best of, everytime:

    ---

    PERTINENT URL QUOTE EXCERPT EXCHANGE:

    "Wait until he starts on another kick, then reply to him as an AC. It's the new meme". by tomhudson (43916) on Sunday May 09 2010, @08:29PM (#32150544) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1646272&cid=32150544

    ---

    And, guess who's there with gmhowell too! YOU ARE:

    EVIDENCE THEREOF:

    "Iâ(TM)m actually a little bit disappointed. His attention is getting pretty divided... I think he spread himself too thinly and now heâ(TM)s took a break from it." - by clone53421 (1310749) on Monday May 10 2010, @11:37AM (#32156274) Journal

    FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1646272&cid=32156274

    (Same exchange as tomhudson formulating with others no less to troll & stalk me as ac replies in fact!)

    ---

    LMAO - The only thing that took a 'break' was trolltalk.com as I broke you ALL in 1/2... easily!

    In fact, you just KNOW I just gotta say it, as is my usual inimitable style:

    This? This was just "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2EZ'"

    ---

    (gmhowell? Hey - He conceded to a truce w/ me!)

    Well - "backed down" really!

    Albeit, ONLY after I practically had to put a gun to his head in fact!

    Much as with tomhudson here and many times in the past shown in the reply of mine you are responding to, like a puppet dancing on a string (you're probably another tomhudson sockpuppet, lol).

    QUOTE:

    Meh, I'm bored anyway. Whatever. Fine. by gmhowell (26755) on Tuesday June 21, @06:04PM (#36520598) Homepage Journal

    He stuck to it so far... as will I.

    gmhowell, laid off... (I think ONLY because I exposed him for trolling too - showing people here just how you all operate - bogusly!)

    ---

    Just like tomhudson's +5 rating is bogus here (see PS below for how trolltalk.com games the rating system here falsely for down mods & sockpuppet or "fellow troll" rate one another up in 'teams')

    This all, which to his dismay, EXPOSES HIM TO A LOT OF FOLKS, lol for what tomhudson is: SCUM! Online trash & lying sociopath (that will even take his pals down, who screwup & give me information to "NOOK" them with, lol!)

    (tomhudson?)

    Man - Please... a +5? No way!

    After all, on computer science and degrees? tomhudson's nobody to talk on degrees in CSC (as he doesn't HAVE one)

    In fact on THAT subject?

    I've asked tomhudson IF he even had a CSC degree here as he trolled me during most of this year, & as per usual? Well - no answer:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1952834&cid=34915292

    LMAO! See for yourselves...

    YES, more tomhudson's "Run, Forrest RUN" evasions which do him in, for credibility every time!

    (Especially when he tries to play smart, as he did on monetary mechanics, economics,

  177. "The LORD of HOSTS", rules... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The LORD OF HOSTS", absolutely RULES (dominates trolltalk.com, easily):

    ---

    "Heavenly hosts refers to an army (Luk.2:13; Rev.19:19) of good angels mentioned in the Bible. It is led either by the Archangel Michael, Jesus, or by God himself. ... The heavenly host participate in the War in Heaven and, according to some interpretations, will battle Satan (lol, tomhudson) and Satan's own army (trolltalk.com sockpuppets & troll members) at the End of Days and be victorious" - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavenly_host

    ---

    And?

    As "Good Will Hunting" (Matt Damon in title role) said:

    "You like APPLES? How do ya like THEM apples?"

    LOL!

    Ah, you KNOW I just gotta say it, in my usual "inimitable style":

    This? This was just "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2EZ'" as per my usual vs. the trolltalk.com trolls (whom Jeremiah Cornelius said I would NEVER defeat, but oddly with HIS HELP, I have!)

    * So, in a way? I have told JC this before - I have class, so Thanks Jeremiah Cornelius... indirectly!

    APK

    P.S.=> That, & these REPEATED fails listed, of yours vs. myself, SPECIFICALLY on HOSTS files below:

    (Now that you've been caught lying that trolltalk.com's NOT used for trolling tactic strategy & JC gave you away above, see date of his post, last week, lol!)

    So "Satan GET THE BEHIND ME", because not only per this thread, & other tech topics? You note hosts in your feeble ranting reply... On HOSTS you are MILES behind me see below for proof thereof:

    ---

    tomhudson bullshit on HOSTS is outnumbered 30:1 vs. apk evidences:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2087330&cid=35847946

    ---

    tomhudson BURNED on DNS vs. HOSTS and CPU cycles/memory & more used on HIS "ideas" vs. HOSTS vs. apk's ideas:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2087330&cid=35879374

    ---

    tomhudson BURNED & RAN on HOSTS vs. VIRUSES vs. APK:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2088808&cid=35877448

    ---

    tomhudson says "hosts are so 90's" & apk's fellow RESPECTED security person wrote a noted article on them in 2009:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2088808&cid=35876806

    ---

    tomhudson has to "eat his words" after TRYING TO PUT WORDS IN APK's MOUTH HE NEVER ONCE STATED on HOSTS, & tomhudson ran:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2092742&cid=35956312

    ---

    "Thanks be to God" &

    "The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides, by the inequities of the selfish & the tyranny of evil men. (from trolltalk.com)

    What do I have to say about that much above? I can't say it any better, than this was stated already (from the greatest book of all time, the "tech manual for life" imo):

    "But by the grace of God I am what I am: and his grace which was bestowed upon me was not in vain; but I labored more abundantly than they all: yet not I, but the grace of God which was with me." - Corinthians Chapter 10, Verse 10

    ... apk

  178. Vietnam 'strategy'? Lord of HOSTS strategy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is or does the Lord of Host means?

    ---

    PERTINENT QUOTE/EXCERPT:

    "The image of this title brings to mind a mighty military commander, the hosts being his troops. The Lord is one who can at a mere word summon rank upon rank of protective power"

    * Just like HOSTS files do, for added "layered security"...

    APK

    P.S.=> Rank after RANK of protective "power", & to the tune here currently as of 15 minutes ago?

    1,445,426++ 'rank' entries in it, vs. known bad sites/servers/hosts-domains...

    Of said power...

    AND?

    Clearly - Enough POWER, to blow the doors off trolltalk.com & tomhudson especially (lol, too easy)!

    Now - JC (jeremiah cornelius) once said I couldn't but... guess what?

    Proof's in the pudding, lol, from this entire exchange albeit MUCH to your dismay! You have been as YOU put it??

    "PWN'D" & LARGE (as I put it)

    Yes - In a +5 thread, bogusly modded up by trolltalk.com no less (proof next of their cheater mechanics for it in gaming the moderation system here no less also)

    AND

    tomhudson having no degree & their bogus up/down team moderation gaming tactics notwithstanding!

    All, per countertrolling apparently saying he does so here & he's DEFINITELY one of you -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2245866&cid=36491652 ) proves it!

    From the film Layer Cake to you, tomhudson (as I told you before for your trolling, stalking, & libeling of myself on these forums as YOU have shown via quotes many times that I put up in all regards now mentioned/noted by me):

    DRAGAN -> This is the end Mr. Duke... as I told you!"

    ... apk

    1. Re:Vietnam 'strategy'? Lord of HOSTS strategy! by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Ok, you've convinced pretty much everyone that you're a total psychotic nutjob with those last two posts.

      If you call that "winning", even Charlie Sheen carries it off better than you.

      But no, you haven't "exposed" anything, or "won" anything, except the Internet Fool of the Year Prize. We're all still here, there was never any "coordinated attack" against you except in your own paranoid-addled pea of a brain, and everyone is laughing at you, not with you.

    2. Re:Vietnam 'strategy'? Lord of HOSTS strategy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got 2 U did it, tomhudsontroll? As bad as U FAIL here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36557992 ? Hehehe, U FAIL tomhudsontroll, U FAIL. Your lies made U FAIL alongside UR weak lame trolltalk trolls spillin teh beanzor on U, an UR lies. Hahahaha (4chan luvz ya 2day 4 bein' TeH TroLLiN'Noob U R) Gettin' bustd trolin's 4 lamerz an U Knowz it. See tomhudsontroll "ReAcTiN'"? AHahahah ROTFLMAO! Adhominem attack forums' "illogic-logic" by tomhudsontroll an his GIANT FAIL vs. APK who ain in 4chan's level o' teh powerz of trollin' eitherz!@??!!!.

    3. Re:Vietnam 'strategy'? Lord of HOSTS strategy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UR+5 post came by cheatin teh modsystem tomhudson http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2245866&cid=36491652 R U happy phool? 4chan be pwnzoring tomhudsontroll! countertrollin is sockpuppet troll 4 tomhudsontroll. Bustd tomhudsontroll noob @ trollin.

    4. Re:Vietnam 'strategy'? Lord of HOSTS strategy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UR+5 post & no CSC degree tomhudson? Ya rite LOL, no way http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2245866&cid=36491652 R U happy phool? 4chan be pwnzoring tomhudsontroll! countertrollin is sockpuppet troll 4 tomhudsontroll. Bustd tomhudsontroll noob @ trollin an caught lyin. Hahahaha, U NOOB, *U FAIL*!!!!! U cant code an trolltalk.com is da suxorz nobody visits cuz its lamez!!! *U FAIL* AGAIN NOOB TROLL tomhudson.

    5. Re:Vietnam 'strategy'? Lord of HOSTS strategy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tomhudson - listen: If you're not in Charlie Sheen's Korner, then you're out there with the trolls (like you & your trolltalk.com friends)... & about WINNING? It's better than losing (your eye, your job, and vs. me, lol), check it:

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36562132

      * Nuff said... & I've got DOUBLE THAT bookmarked, easily!

      APK

      P.S.=> So, tomhudson - See that URL above, & keep on losing, it's just what you do (quoting someone who posted as Charlie Sheen in fact, funnier than hell, in another "exchange" of ours) lol...

      ... apk

  179. one word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Robots.

    Once your programming interacts with the world instead of a screen, it gets real interesting.

  180. Wait - what - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm confused... then again, I'm usually confused after trying to make heads or tails from one of your rants.

  181. tomhudson/webmistrerachel busted (JC date) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pay attention to the dates and who posted them (Hilarious) because it gets them trolltalk.com & tomhudson bunch BUSTED large:

    "In the future, part of trolltalk will be used for promoting "l'Art de la troll" - "The art of trolling", " - by tomhudson (43916) on Thursday June 23, @02:36PM (#36544996) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36544996

    ---

    Read on, this gets better, & funny as hell (keep reading the post dates too, especially that, because the last one from another member of trolltalk.com SMOKES them!)

    ---

    "BTW, yes, eventually part of trolltalk will be about the art of trolling :-)" " - by tomhudson (43916) on Thursday June 23, @03:16PM (#36545572) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> hhttp://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2250914&cid=36545572

    ---

    NOW HERE IS THE KICKER:

    PAY ATTENTION TO THE DATE IN JEREMIAH CORNELIUS' POST NEXT, REQUOTED (lmao, from LAST WEEK - 8 days earlier than tomhudson's LIES above quoted saying trolltalk.com isn't used for troll gatherings!)

    ---

    "Join us all on Troll Talk, this Tues.". by Jeremiah Cornelius (137) on Thursday June 16, @08:26PM (#36469928) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2245062&cid=36469928

    ---

    Again - 8 days earlier than tomhudson's LIES above quoted saying trolltalk.com isn't used for troll gatherings!

    ROTFLMAO!

    Man, that's funny, it looks like trolltalk.com is used for a gathering of trolls...& longer than a week ago too despite tomhudson's quoted LIES above!

    (Unbelievable!)

    The "spinmaster attempt" by webmistressrachel, when I showed her that, shows she's a damned liar too, because she's now trying to say same shit tomhudson said of her!

    E.G.-> We were trolling you (no, you got caught in a LIE)

    Doesn't look too good for trolltalk.com trolls, lol!

    Check it:

    ---

    "Please don't attack me for lying when I might simply be mistaken. If there is some kind of forum on there" - by webmistressrachel (903577) on Wednesday June 22, @05:31PM (#36535156) Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2250914&cid=36535156

    ---

    LMAO - webmistressrachel knows EXACTLY what's going on there... she's "thick as thieves" with tomhudson is why & I actually think she's tomhudson's sockpuppet!

    ---

    * LMAO - MASSIVE FAIL BY TOMHUDSON! Caught lying yet again... lol, by the calendar & Jeremiah Cornelius, another forums troll!

    Note to tomhudson - Either:

    ---

    1.) Adjust your calendar OR timemachine (lmao)

    2.) Quit the damn lies (you too webmistressrachel)

    3.) OR admit defeat (lol, YOU LOSE!)

    4.) Quit trying to blame your friends/sockpuppets!

    ---

    (Your sockpuppets/troll friends? They only make it worse for you, as you tried to say rachel lied about banners on your website, and how you lied now that she only trolled me above... not!)

    I shouldn't say they are your friends, there is NO LOVE AMONG DEMONS or lying trolling online scum. I should say your fellow trolls.

    Jeremiah Cornelius' words did you in!

    Rachel ONLY NOW, lol, suddenly as tomhudson said of her no less, lol, earlier on adbanners on trolltalk.com changed her apology tune quoted here (even though it was quoted on adverts too)!

    Now, rachel suddently "changes here tune" from being busted on JC's words quoted above, says:

  182. tomhudson ac reply to "defend himself"? LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please tomhudson - we KNOW you do those for "support":

    Your own words quoted below next, on ac replies to stalk & troll me no less, show how you operate, your "std. modus operandi" via ac reply usage & yes, registered users can do those too so don't even think I don't know taht much even though I don't have a reg'd LUSER acc't. here:

    ---

    Wait until he starts on another kick, then reply to him as an AC. It's the new meme. - by tomhudson (43916) on Sunday May 09 2010, @08:29PM (#32150544) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1646272&cid=32150544

    ---

    HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step

    The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off). He'll accuse you of being me by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @01:38PM (#35841122) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35841122

    ---

    if you're going to tell this guy to stop spamming his hosts file crap, make sure you do it anonymously by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @12:45PM (#35840680) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086920&cid=35840680

    ---

    U can't fool us with those tomhudson - we all know your games here in ac stalker/troller replies per your own words above, now you use them to try to "defend yourself"!

    We also know HOW you and countertrolling your sockpuppet downmod others and your trolling team mods each of you up as favors to one another!

    As shown by countertrolling on downmod technique to game the mod system here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2245866&cid=36491652

    APK

    P.S.=> Tomhudson - you are BUSTED on every front!

    NOTE - I wish the 4chan freaks would post more clearly though. I had a fairly hard time reading their busted english too!

    ... apk

  183. tomhudson RAN when asked for proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of a "professional rep, yourself... lmao -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2106048&cid=35951822

    * YOU RAN WHEN YOU SAID YOU HAD CODE, I SAID SHOW ME IT, and you couldn't... lol, YOU RAN!

    Proofs in quotes below in fact!

    (TOO EASY tomhudson... again, your dumb words DO YOU IN hugely as usual!)

    APK

    P.S.=> See tom's bullshit evasion here on "professional rep" or things he'd done in CSC related work (he has none, he's a lying bullshit artist who @ best is a webpage maker):

    I asked tomhudson to backup his bluster from this link:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2087330&cid=35938262

    This was his response (his typical bullshit lies "spins", as usual):

    "Maybe one of these years I'll install a 3.5 floppy back in the old box and dig out the source. There's actually some code (a vga palette register utility that gives dos screens a choice from a palette of 262,144 colours) that I want to port to linux (plus is should still work under current versions of windows). But keep in mind I have nothing to prove to you, so it's not exactly a priority in my life. And consider yourself blessed that I actually read your post - I really can't make any more time to read much of your crap". - by tomhudson (43916) on Tuesday April 26, @11:40PM (#35949582) Homepage

    ROTFLMAO!

    * So thank you again for proving to us all that you are nothing more than a lot of talk, lies, and that you are a lying bullshit artist that can't backup his own bullshit tomhudson and with your OWN WORDS no less!

    ... apk

  184. I have more than YOU ever will, tomhudson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "My Name is Ozymandias: King of Kings - Look upon my works, ye mighty, & DESPAIR..."

    ----

    Windows NT Magazine (now Windows IT Pro) April 1997 "BACK OFFICE PERFORMANCE" issue, page 61

    (&, for work done for EEC Systems/SuperSpeed.com on PAID CONTRACT (writing portions of their SuperCache program increasing its performance by up to 40% via my work) albeit, for their SuperDisk & HOW TO APPLY IT, took them to a finalist position @ MS Tech Ed, two years in a row 2000-2002, in its HARDEST CATEGORY: SQLServer Performance Enhancement).

    WINDOWS MAGAZINE, 1997, "Top Freeware & Shareware of the Year" issue page 210, #1/first entry in fact (my work is there)

    PC-WELT FEB 1998 - page 84, again, my work is featured there

    WINDOWS MAGAZINE, WINTER 1998 - page 92, insert section, MUST HAVE WARES, my work is again, there

    PC-WELT FEB 1999 - page 83, again, my work is featured there

    CHIP Magazine 7/99 - page 100, my work is there

    GERMAN PC BOOK, Data Becker publisher "PC Aufrusten und Repairen" 2000, where my work is contained in it

    HOT SHAREWARE Numero 46 issue, pg. 54 (PC ware mag from Spain), 2001 my work is there, first one featured, yet again!

    Also, a British PC Mag in 2002 for many utilities I wrote, saw it @ BORDERS BOOKS but didn't buy it... by that point, I had moved onto other areas in this field besides coding only...

    Being paid for an article that made me money over @ PCPitstop in 2008 for writing up a guide that has people showing NO VIRUSES/SPYWARES & other screwups, via following its point, such as THRONKA sees here -> http://www.xtremepccentral.com/forums/showthread.php?s=ee926d913b81bf6d63c3c7372fd2a24c&t=28430&page=3

    It's also been myself helping out the folks at the UltraDefrag64 project (a 64-bit defragger for Windows), in showing them code for how to do Process Priority Control @ the GUI usermode/ring 3/rpl 3 level in their program (good one too), & being credited for it by their lead dev & his team... see here -> http://ultradefrag.sourceforge.net/handbook/Credits.html or here http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2993462&group_id=199532&atid=969873

    AND lastly: http://g-off.net/software/a-python-repeatable-threadingtimer-class [g-off.net] where I got other programmer's work WORKING RIGHT (in PyThon no less, which I just started learning only 2 week ago no less) by showing them how to use a "Dummy Proxy Function" as I call it, to make a RepeatTimer class (Thread sub-class really) to take PARAMETERIZED FUNCTIONS, ala:

    def apkthreadlaunch():
    getnortonsafeweb(sAPKFileName = "APK_1_NortonSafeWeb360Extracted.txt".rstrip())

    a = RepeatTimer(900, apkthreadlaunch) # 900 is 15 minutes... apk

    Where it was NOT working for many folks there, before (submitted to the maker of the RepeatTimer class no less, & yes, it WORKS!)

    ----

    What do I have to say about that much above? I can't say it any better, than this was stated already (from the greatest book of all time, the "tech manual for life" imo):

    "But by the grace of God I am what I am: and his grace which was bestowed upon me was not in vain; but I labored more abundantly than they all: yet not I, but the grace of God which was with me." - Corinthians Chapter 10, Verse 10

    (And, because I got LUCKY to have been exposed to some really GREAT classmates, professors, & colleagues on the job

    1. Re:I have more than YOU ever will, tomhudson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ozymandias (apk) vs. Comedian (tom). We know who wins there from the start of the film the Watchmen. Same thing here. tom the comedian took a beating there and got killed. Same here imo. I see tom running away from times apk can show it in links or quotes of proof he has. tom has his anecdotal crap that seems to be constant lies. I see apk has a list and digging into the link where apk says tomhudson ran, he said he had an alleged list, it was tiny compared to apk's partial one only. I mean changing pallettes is cake. I did that as a freshman x86 assembly class. Why I call tom comedian is because it was funny seeing him pull a fail with some b.s. he couldn't find his code. Now that is comedy, that makes tom look like a liar to be honest. Still funny.

  185. U have NO "pro rep" period & stalkin/trollin m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll let YOUR OWN WORDS prove that, for me, on that account - as usual!

    See subject-line above, & these 'choice quotes' of YOURS tomhudson (and my p.s. proves you don't HAVE a professioal rep @ all via your words & lies again also):

    ---

    Wait until he starts on another kick, then reply to him as an AC. It's the new meme. - by tomhudson (43916) on Sunday May 09 2010, @08:29PM (#32150544) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1646272&cid=32150544

    ---

    HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step

    The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off). He'll accuse you of being me by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @01:38PM (#35841122) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35841122

    ---

    if you're going to tell this guy to stop spamming his hosts file crap, make sure you do it anonymously by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @12:45PM (#35840680) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086920&cid=35840680

    ---

    * 3 strikes YOU'RE OUT tomhudson... outtie!

    APK

    P.S.=> Not only do you have NOTHING you can show professionally & prove it when asked?

    LOL, you RAN WHEN I ASKED YOU TO BACKUP A LOT OF BULLSHIT YOU SAID YOU ACTUALLY COULD PROVE, lol!

    See here -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36563326

    All that, proven there, & again: IN YOUR OWN WORDS, lol... hilarious!

    ... apk

  186. PHUK U APK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    4chan = l33t not suxorz noob like U n' tomhudsontroll. U cant read 4chan speek. U suxorz!!!

  187. tomhudson = stalker troll that's EZ to shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thus, I don't have to: YOU do that, to yourself, as usual!

    Plus, making you look the fool easily vs. your own stupidity documented here so many times, especially this one on computing technicals where I utterly FLOORED you & so many times it's not funny:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2230966&cid=36418796

    So, Please:

    Dont' flatter yourself that you're worth my time or monies (attorneys and their time CO$T large) for a stalker troll like you...

    I mean, why should I?

    You make it easy to make a FOOL out of you & with your OWN WORDS, everytime! See link above as an "example thereof"... lol!

    tomhudson = HIGHLY "pwn'able", see below - because this gets even funnier! I am having FUN now doing it... about time.

    Worst part is? I warned you & I told you I would if you kept up the ac stalker troller replies, & I even tried to make peace even with you twice, but no... you had to be stupid.

    Well - So be it then...

    That's ALL (the above) In addition to showing others here how YOU operate trolling and stalking me via ac replies designed to harass me:

    ---

    Wait until he starts on another kick, then reply to him as an AC. It's the new meme. - by tomhudson (43916) on Sunday May 09 2010, @08:29PM (#32150544) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1646272&cid=32150544

    ---

    HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step

    The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off). He'll accuse you of being me by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @01:38PM (#35841122) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35841122

    ---

    if you're going to tell this guy to stop spamming his hosts file crap, make sure you do it anonymously by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @12:45PM (#35840680) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086920&cid=35840680

    ---

    3 times tomhudson? You're a cyberstalker no questions asked, & to expose you in it, cost free? Hehe, I will and have with your own words.

    Yes, you're clearly by your OWN WORDS proven a cyberstalker, albeit one I can that I can show how VERY easily (per the 1st url above no less) that I have "pwn'd" so many times on this forums, it's not even funny anymore to me.

    It was at first, because you "talk a good game" - I figured "I may have a worthy adversary here"... LOL, not!

    SO, when push came to shove and I asked you show you have some work that was published it was so good (as I have many I can show, I only put out a TINY list of my favs, some recent even)?

    LMAO - you had ZERO, & you ran... lol, with some bullshit excuse (Heck, I'll even QUOTE you in it too):

    ---

    E.G.-> I asked tomhudson to backup his bluster from this link:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2087330&cid=35938262

    This was his response (his typical bullshit lies "spins", as usual):

    "Maybe one of these years I'll install a 3.5 floppy back in the old box and dig out the source. There's actually some code (a vga palette register utility that gives dos screens a choice from a palette of 262,144 colours) that I want to port to linux (plus is should still work under current versions of windows). But keep in mind I ha

  188. Charlie Sheen here troll (I hate trolls) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wining is better than losing like you are tomhudson. About time someone kicked your ass around here you creep. I see you got burned on a job and didn't get paid. Why? You're a chump that loses. That's just what you do. You know it. It's why you troll people. So go take your miserable 1 eyed self and go back to troll talk or whatever you call that unknown hole, and stay there. Leave us alone here. Please. Thank you. Good bye, and keep losing troll. You're good at that at least.

    Sincerely,

    Charlie Sheen

    1. Re:Charlie Sheen here troll (I hate trolls) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, the charlie sheen himself didn't post that.I agree with his views on winning. Tomhudson has 1 bad eye and that is truth from her journals to correct on that note.

  189. Your contradicted yourself tomhudson on adbanners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tomhudson contradicts himself on if his site had adbnners or not:

    "Anyone can access the wayback machine at archive.org and see that there has never been a single banner on trolltalk in all the time I've administered it (since May, 2007)." - http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36544996

    vs. this change in tune, later the same day:

    "advertising on any of my sites - the only banners I ever ran were for things like" - by tomhudson (43916) on Thursday June 23, @05:18PM (#36547180) Homepage Journal

    Well tomhudson, which one is it - Did you run adbanners on your site, or not?

    APK

    P.S.=> You're burying yourself yet again: First his site didn't have banners, and now suddenly they did? Come on... apk

  190. tomhudson contradicts himself again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tomhudson contradicts himself on if his site had adbanners or not:

    "there has never been a single banner on trolltalk in all the time I've administered it (since May, 2007)." - http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36544996

    vs. this later:

    "advertising on any of my sites - the only banners I ever ran were for things like" - by tomhudson (43916) on Thursday June 23, @05:18PM (#36547180) Homepage Journal

    Well tomhudson, which one is it - Did you run adbanners on your site, or not?

    APK

    P.S.=> You're burying yourself yet again tom, but that's not the important part here, this is (quoted straight from you once more):

    ---

    Wait until he starts on another kick, then reply to him as an AC. It's the new meme. - by tomhudson (43916) on Sunday May 09 2010, @08:29PM (#32150544) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1646272&cid=32150544

    ---

    HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step

    The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off). He'll accuse you of being me by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @01:38PM (#35841122) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35841122

    ---

    if you're going to tell this guy to stop spamming his hosts file crap, make sure you do it anonymously by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @12:45PM (#35840680) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086920&cid=35840680

    ---

    Along with your libeling of myself trying to adversely affect my professional reputation also:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1992296&cid=35186644... apk

  191. tomhudson contradicts himself on adbanners here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tomhudson contradicts himself on if his site had adbanners or not:

    "there has never been a single banner on trolltalk in all the time I've administered it (since May, 2007)." - http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36544996

    vs. this later:

    "... advertising on any of my sites - the only banners I ever ran were for things like..." - by tomhudson (43916) on Thursday June 23, @05:18PM (#36547180) Homepage Journal

    Well tomhudson, which one is it - Did you run adbanners on your site, or not?

    APK

    P.S.=> You're burying yourself yet again tom, but that's not the important part here, this is (quoted straight from tomhudson once more and most importantly, the link @ the bottom):

    ---

    Wait until he starts on another kick, then reply to him as an AC. It's the new meme. - by tomhudson (43916) on Sunday May 09 2010, @08:29PM (#32150544) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1646272&cid=32150544

    ---

    HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step

    The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off). He'll accuse you of being me by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @01:38PM (#35841122) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35841122

    ---

    if you're going to tell this guy to stop spamming his hosts file crap, make sure you do it anonymously by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @12:45PM (#35840680) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086920&cid=35840680

    ---

    Along with your libeling of myself trying to adversely affect my professional reputation also:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1992296&cid=35186644

    ... apk

  192. tomhudson contradicts himself on adbanners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tomhudson contradicts himself if his site had adbanners or not:

    "there has never been a single banner on trolltalk in all the time I've administered it (since May, 2007)." - by tomhudson (43916) on Thursday June 23, @02:36PM (#36544996) Homepage Journal

    vs. this later:

    "...advertising on any of my sites - the only banners I ever ran were for things like..." - by tomhudson (43916) on Thursday June 23, @05:18PM (#36547180) Homepage Journal

    Well tomhudson, which one is it - Did you run adbanners on your site, or not?

    (First you state explicitly you don't and then you did, see above...)

    APK

    P.S.=> You're burying yourself yet again tom, but that's not the important part here, this is (quoted straight from you once more):

    ---

    Wait until he starts on another kick, then reply to him as an AC. It's the new meme. - by tomhudson (43916) on Sunday May 09 2010, @08:29PM (#32150544) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1646272&cid=32150544

    ---

    HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step

    The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off). He'll accuse you of being me by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @01:38PM (#35841122) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35841122

    ---

    if you're going to tell this guy to stop spamming his hosts file crap, make sure you do it anonymously by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @12:45PM (#35840680) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086920&cid=35840680

    ---

    Along with your libeling of myself trying to adversely affect my professional reputation also:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1992296&cid=35186644

    And that one's just a TINY sampling of it!

    ... apk

  193. tomhudson contradicts himself again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tomhudson contradicts himself if his site had adbanners or not:

    "there has never been a single banner on trolltalk in all the time I've administered it (since May, 2007)." - by tomhudson (43916) on Thursday June 23, @02:36PM (#36544996) Homepage Journal

    vs. this later:

    "...advertising on any of my sites - the only banners I ever ran were for things like..." - by tomhudson (43916) on Thursday June 23, @05:18PM (#36547180) Homepage Journal

    Well tomhudson, which one is it - Did you run adbanners on your site, or not?

    ---

    (First you state explicitly you don't and then you did, see above... how about what your fellow trolltalk.com troll said here next below also?)

    "trolltalk isn't a forum anymore. It's an advert for TomHudson's" - by webmistressrachel (903577) on Wednesday June 22, @01:28PM (#36531394) Journal

    Funniest part is, tomhudson said she was "trolling me" (is that a polite way to say you trolltalk.com scum lie to other people to "play games" with them?)

    * You're trash tomhudson, online TROLLING harassing trash. See below for more on THAT note!

    APK

    P.S.=> You're burying yourself yet again tom, but that's not the important part here, this is (quoted straight from you once more):

    ---

    Wait until he starts on another kick, then reply to him as an AC. It's the new meme. - by tomhudson (43916) on Sunday May 09 2010, @08:29PM (#32150544) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1646272&cid=32150544

    ---

    HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step

    The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off). He'll accuse you of being me by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @01:38PM (#35841122) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35841122

    ---

    if you're going to tell this guy to stop spamming his hosts file crap, make sure you do it anonymously by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @12:45PM (#35840680) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086920&cid=35840680

    ---

    Along with your libeling of myself trying to adversely affect my professional reputation also:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1992296&cid=35186644

    And that one's just a TINY sampling of it!

    ... apk

  194. Hell yea... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm definitely in Charlie Sheen's Korner - cuz if you're not? You're out there with the "TomHudson's" of the world, TROLLS!!!

    Mr. Sheen (if this really is you), and you're awesome imo, because you're just being honest (unlike trolls like tomhudson and his pals here) unlike the "plastic worms" people out there living lives of quiet desperation, having to be cowed into submission being fakes all their lives, until it becomes their bogus reality. I feel sorry for people like that, and I don't - we all determine our world. Free your mind, the ass follows.

    You're also (going to be blunt here) funny as fucking hell too, lol!

    (Dude, people WISH they were you!)

    * Loved your work in PLATOON, & I love your "If you're not in Charlie's Korner, then your out there with the TROLLS" & your "trolls need not apply" about winning.com!

    APK

    P.S.=> Tomhudson the troll from trolltalk.com?

    tomhudson has "sheenis envy" as you so eloquently put it, lol... I love it!

    Want to see WHY? Man... you KNOW why:

    This is me, WINNING (& this is tomhudson the troll, losing (& only a tiny sample thereof no less, I could easily put out double this from my bookmarks)):

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2230966&cid=36418796

    Get a load of that - it's ALL about WINNING, especially vs. a KNOWN troll around here...

    ... apk

  195. Come on (admit it: Your writing's weird) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I get complaints on my style here & there too, but you're leet-speak? It's outta control. Yes, I can decipher it, but... WoW!

    * Besides: The LAST thing I need is 4chan on my case, because "been there, done that"... thanks.

    APK

    P.S.=> Don't get on my back about it, it was just a suggestion... that's all (tell Harm Sorensen I said "hi" - he's 1/2-way ok, & he goes to your place online).

    ... apk

    1. Re:Come on (admit it: Your writing's weird) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but you're leet-speak?

      YOUR. Not you're. Now go kill yourself.

  196. Correct, but I had it right in my subject line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See my subject line here, and in the post you are being a 'grammar/spelling nazi' about also.

    * Quite odd that I spelled it correctly in my subject there, & not in the body of my reply - oh well!

    "Fair enough: I stand corrected!"

    Man, lol... I am glad you pointed that out! If you didn't? The world would have been on "DEFCON 1", you know??

    Happens to us all @ times: To quote my fav. person of all time on that note?

    "Let him without sin cast the first stone..."

    APK

    P.S.=> Time to go do the rest of my gardening, in the rain (muddy, but worth it - linining the beds with stones, which is an excellent "weeds shield" that even functions for decent aesthetics purposes too).

    ... apk

  197. It does NOT "happen to us all @ times" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I said, kill yourself.

    1. Re:It does NOT "happen to us all @ times" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Barbara (tom) Hudson, cyberstalker? Decide here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36572732

    2. Re:It does NOT "happen to us all @ times" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take your own advice tom. Wait, you killed yourself here lol, with lies and libel as well as stalking and trolling being shown as your modus operandi of anonymous reply trolling others out of weak retaliation as well with your trolltalk.com scum friends. No small wonder you hide in your journal most of the time here nowadays out of shame. apk and others have burned you to a crisp for your libeling him on this forums and stalking him. You burned yourself too trying to take him on, I saw your fail list posted as a link here and it made me laugh how many times you trolled him and tried to take him on in networking, and programming topics only to fail every single time. What was it, like 50 times? Then as you're doing now, reacting the only way you know how you do ac replies in retaliation or to try to support yourself. Big fail, because it's been posted here many times how you have ac reply harassed apk along with you telling your trolltalk.com friends to do so also. Big fail tom, big fail. Being caught by posting dates here too in lies? You ended up trolling yourself tom. YHBT by your own stupidity.

  198. tomhudson = cyberstalker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait until he starts on another kick, then reply to him as an AC. It's the new meme. - by tomhudson (43916) on Sunday May 09 2010, @08:29PM (#32150544) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1646272&cid=32150544

    HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step

    The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off). He'll accuse you of being me by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @01:38PM (#35841122) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35841122

    if you're going to tell this guy to stop spamming his hosts file crap, make sure you do it anonymously by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @12:45PM (#35840680) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086920&cid=35840680

    3 times tomhudson? It appears you're a cyberstalker.

    1. Re:tomhudson = cyberstalker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does tomhudson stalk and harass hosts file guy apk for by anonymous coward replies though?

    2. Re:tomhudson = cyberstalker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not tomhudson.

    3. Re:tomhudson = cyberstalker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geek angst because hosts file guy apk burned tomhudson on HOSTS when tom attacked him using his normal tomhudson account. See results of that here

      ---

      tomhudson bullshit on HOSTS is outnumbered 30:1 vs. apk evidences:

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2087330&cid=35847946

      ---

      tomhudson BURNED on DNS vs. HOSTS and CPU cycles/memory & more used on HIS "ideas" vs. HOSTS vs. apk's ideas:

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2087330&cid=35879374

      ---

      tomhudson BURNED & RAN on HOSTS vs. VIRUSES vs. apk yet again:

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2088808&cid=35877448

      ---

      tomhudson says "hosts are so 90's" & apk's fellow RESPECTED security person wrote a noted article on them in 2009: (based on his readings of MY posts in forums no less)

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2088808&cid=35876806

      ---

      tomhudson gave up trying to do it using his normal account and when apk posts anything that mentions the word hosts file tomhudson tries it with anonymous coward replies instead as he stated in the post you replied to, only to fail 3 times in the past few week. Talk about big fails! See tomhudson's ac reply stalking trolling results on HOSTS files here

      ---

      E.G. #1 - ON tomhudson posting as AC trolling apk yet again failing on LARGE HOSTS FILES BEING CACHED BY THE LOCAL KERNEL-MODE DISKCACHING SUBSYSTEM:

      http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2220314&cid=36379004

      ---

      E.G. #2 - ON tomhudson posting as AC trolling apk yet again failing on HOSTS ON ANDROID PHONES (yes, they work there):

      http://apple.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2204000&cid=36318508

      ---

      E.G. #3 - ON tomhudson posting as AC trolling apk yet again failing on DNS Client Cache needing to be turned off in Windows (which tomhudson knows next to nothing about clearly after the first one above) today, no less:

      http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2268432&threshold=-1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=36567794

      ---

      E.G. #4 - ON tomhudson posting as AC trolling apk yet again failing on APK exposing tomhudson's doing ac replies to stalk & troll him, which tomhudson logged out and logged back in, down modded him, logged out and trolled as ac yet again:

      http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2268432&threshold=-1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=36567794

      ---

      Yes, tomhudson and his trolltalk.com pals like countertrolling cheat the moderation system that way!

      See here on how they do it http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2245866&cid=36491652

      To try to upset others and frustrate them (& that's how its down in that link of countertrolling's another trolltalk.com freak tomhudson has (probably tom's sockpuppet alternate registered user account is my guess)

      ---

      As Charlie Sheen said, there's no doubt tomhudson has a case of "SHEENIS ENVY", lol, vs. apk

      Hence tomhudson stalking and trolling apk for over a year now here as shown in the post you replied to asking your question about!

      No offense to Mr. Sheen, but tomhudson (actually Barbara Huds

    4. Re:tomhudson = cyberstalker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure your not tomhudson (yea, right) doing an ac reply http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36572732 and, neither am I, but from my observations and tomhudsons misdoings in that link I tend to think you are.

      I read both of the links here in response to the person asking why tomhudson would do this.

      That one above I just posted shows tomhudson saying to do so and telling his trolltalk.com friends to join tomhudson in it also.

      This second one I read shows apk dusting *some ac* (tomhudson) trying to troll him on hosts files and failing even more here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2270208&cid=36574390

      tomhudson's got a clear case of "SHEENIS ENVY", but calling himself tom when her name is Barbara Hudson is clearly more of a case of PENIS ENVY imo, lol!

    5. Re:tomhudson = cyberstalker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All that means is that you're wrong.

    6. Re:tomhudson = cyberstalker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think not tomhudson based on UR cyberstalking here

      Wait until he starts on another kick, then reply to him as an AC. It's the new meme. - by tomhudson (43916) on Sunday May 09 2010, @08:29PM (#32150544) Homepage Journal

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1646272&cid=32150544

      HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step

      The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off). He'll accuse you of being me by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16 2011, @01:38PM (#35841122) Homepage Journal

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35841122

      if you're going to tell this guy to stop spamming his hosts file crap, make sure you do it anonymously by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16 2011, @12:45PM (#35840680) Homepage Journal

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086920&cid=35840680

      Along with your trolltalk.com friends as well who are you seen telling to do so with you.

      3 times tomhudson, for more than a year straight you've been harassing apk hosts file guy?

      tomhudson = /. psycho-cyberstalker.

      As well as libeler of the same apk hosts file guy trying to ruin his career and rep here

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1992296&cid=35186644

  199. Re:tomhudson do U get paid by adverts U have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tomhudson posts dates of quotes show differently here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36563144 tomhudson

  200. That's funny, you could have fooled me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cause it seems to me like you are the one doing the cyber-stalking (and at the very least you don't seem to have anything better to do than constantly spam slashdot).

  201. Re:tomhudson do U get paid by adverts U have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You only GPL code because you use other people's GPL code and you have to. That's not coding. That's using others' work tom. You lose as usual.

  202. Re:tomhudson do U get paid by adverts U have by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    None of the code I've GPL'd is a derived work, moron.

  203. Re:tomhudson do U get paid by adverts U have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YHBT!!!! ROTFLMAO, look at that reaction. So easy to get out of you, foaming at the mouth in effete rage! Nobody believes a word you say anymore tomhudson you cyberstalker http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36572732 where you been shown as a cyberstalker online psycho here and you got caught doing it in your own words quoted, for more than a year now, telling others to join you in it (we're all not nutso like you tomhudson) and despite your accusations/wild claims during your numerous rants here, you could produce proof of your accusations toward others http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36555984 . That person you libeled handed you your ass so many times in technical computing topics http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2230966&cid=36418796 that you are still stinging from it and have stalked and trolled him by ac replies for a year now with your trolltalk.com fellow trolls. Too bad you were all caught lying by posts dates here about trolltalk.com being used as a place you meet in Jeremiah Cornelius' quote here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36557992 vs. webmistressrachel's lies and your own. tomhudson = The boy who cried wolf, tomhudson, busted. You also first said you didn't have adbanners, then that you did on trolltalk.com (the name alone shows anyone you're a troll for Pete's sake, lol) here also http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36567208 no one believes a thing you say. Especially since you and your trolltalk.com friends cheat on the moderation system here in your sockpuppet/fellow troll, countertrolling who shows how you do that here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2245866&cid=36491652 and you've been seen with him many times in your journals, and webmistressrachel who was caught in a lie is in his journal here where she was caught in said lie which the post dates burned you and she for here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2250914&cid=36533088 So go away cyberstalking troll. Your own misdeeds and quotes do you in everytime. YHBT too easily and all the links above show you have actually, lmao, trolled yourself through stupidity of your own.

  204. Re:tomhudson do U get paid by adverts U have by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    Silly goose, learn to read (and to format your posts properly). I never said I ever had any banners on trolltalk.com.

  205. Re:tomhudson do U get paid by adverts U have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody believes U get over it tomhudson. No defending yourself from this where you stalk apk hosts file guy here for more than a year which makes tomhudson = cyberstalking psycho as well

    HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step

    The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off). He'll accuse you of being me by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @01:38PM (#35841122) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35841122

    if you're going to tell this guy to stop spamming his hosts file crap, make sure you do it anonymously by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @12:45PM (#35840680) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086920&cid=35840680

    Wait until he starts on another kick, then reply to him as an AC. It's the new meme. - by tomhudson (43916) on Sunday May 09 2010, @08:29PM (#32150544) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1646272&cid=32150544

    3x tomhudson, and for over more than a year now? That's been going on from you constantly too (we all see apk's hosts file posts get modded down for no good tech reason too)?

    tomhudson = the /. psycho-cyberstalker.

    There's also no question you ran after accusing apk of going to trolltalk.com and you could not produce a log, nothing here

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36555984 too.

    (Though he was not here, your guilt of cyberstalking him's getting to you, paranoid that every ac reply is *apk*, take you meds already)

    The best part was seeing you get caught in this post on dates of the posts made where you deny that trolltalk.com is some place you trolls go (not that anyone cares because it's so unknown and insignificant online) to discuss your stupidity

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36563144

    "...advertising on any of my sites - the only banners I ever ran were for things like..." - by tomhudson (43916) on Thursday June 23, @05:18PM (#36547180) Homepage Journal

    Well tomhudson, which one is it - Did you run adbanners on your sites, or not? Seems you did.

    Just like the last poster I am telling you we are all sick of you trolls from trolltalk.com. Don't wonder why we are moderating you down in most of your posts this week either. We have registered user accounts here, but are afraid to use them while we chastize you. Do us a favor, go back and stay there alone (like you do in the real world alone with no man because no man wants you troll).

  206. Re:tomhudson do U get paid by adverts U have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    U said U stalk hostsfileguy apk for over a year http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36576988 though and what disgusted me most was that you and your trolltalk.com friends cheat the moderation system here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2245866&cid=36491652 to mod others down with that method and then you mod one another up even if your post sux. I often wondered why good posts got moderated down when people who got the best of you http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2230966&cid=36418796 posted correct useful material.

  207. Tomhudson, do you have anything that allows you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To legally or professionally assess anyone's personality or sanity (mental state) as you have? Answer that. I do not believe you do, nor have you administered a formal examination of anyone in order to make that determination either, and nor do you have a license to practice in psychiatry (or related fields) unless you say differently. Otherwise, afaik, you are performing more libel here by doing so. I hope you have the sense to call a halt to all of this as was offered you and yours by apk. Your journals with your friends also shows coordination, and your libel of apk about him never working in the industry (computing as he has stated about himself) link below, is libel because it is false and can harm his career, as well as your stating he said hosts files are all you need for security on a computer http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1992296&cid=35192078 which he asked you to prove by a quote he actually said that. You never produced such a quote. Tomhudson, big mistakes.

  208. Re:Programmer vs Computer Scientist by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

    and that means they really need a Computer Engineering/Software Engineering degree.

    Not necessarily. Some people (though not all or many) can teach it to themselves through the use of various methods. And, despite this, they actually know what they're doing.

    In context - "blind programmers" rarely do more than type out code, etc as specified by some other individual - code monkeys really. Yes, they may be able to do self study to better themselves and get out of that "blind programmer" job; but they would be far more beneficial to the world if they were not a "blind programmer" to start with in that case - in which case, a CE/SE degree would do them best.

    --
    Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
  209. Re:Programmer vs Computer Scientist by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

    I was just saying that a degree isn't necessarily needed for someone to learn how to do the job properly and efficiently. Some people can learn without that.

    --
    Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  210. It appears I'm correct about why you troll me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on HOSTS files then, because they can block adbanners:

    "such as I'm doing at http://starmedia.trolltalk.com/ [trolltalk.com] and ran a few banner ads years ago on one of them - by tomhudson (43916) on Thursday June 23, @03:56PM (#36546134) Homepage

    That says it all really tomhudson along with the fact you tried to stalk & troll me by ac replies and stated you were trying to start a cooridinated effort with others to do so, harassing myself:

    Wait until he starts on another kick, then reply to him as an AC. It's the new meme. - by tomhudson (43916) on Sunday May 09 2010, @08:29PM (#32150544) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1646272&cid=32150544

    HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step

    The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off). He'll accuse you of being me by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @01:38PM (#35841122) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35841122

    if you're going to tell this guy to stop spamming his hosts file crap, make sure you do it anonymously by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @12:45PM (#35840680) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086920&cid=35840680

    3 times tomhudson? For over a year now also??

    (Appears you've degnerated into a cyberstalker tomhudson, and even trying to get others to do it with you in your own words as shown above)

    See professional help of somekind... because you didn't do very well @ it as your tomhudson account as shown below:

    TOM HUDSON'S "FAIL LIST" ON DISPROVING MY POINTS ON HOSTS FILES NUMEROUS TIMES:

    (Since HOSTS can block adverts online/adbanners so you get more speed, &, so you are protected vs. malicious content in online adbanners also)

    ---

    tomhudson bullshit on HOSTS is outnumbered 30:1 vs. apk evidences:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2087330&cid=35847946

    ---

    tomhudson BURNED on DNS vs. HOSTS and CPU cycles/memory & more used on HIS "ideas" vs. HOSTS vs. apk's ideas:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2087330&cid=35879374

    ---

    tomhudson BURNED & RAN on HOSTS vs. VIRUSES vs. myself yet again:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2088808&cid=35877448

    ---

    tomhudson says "hosts are so 90's" & apk's fellow RESPECTED security person wrote a noted article on them in 2009: (based on his readings of MY posts in forums no less)

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2088808&cid=35876806

    ---

    You're also libeling myself yet again & lying:

    "I have never libeled you, APK. Everything I have written about him is the truth." - by tomhudson (43916) on Thursday June 23, @03:56PM (#36546134) Homepage

    FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36546134

    No it is not tomhudson, & that's more lies + libel of myself.

    ---

    You have stated here on this forum publicly I have ne

  211. This explains why you troll me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on HOSTS files then, because they can block adbanners, obviously & better than other tools do like adblock (email is covered too in programs like outlook by HOSTS for example):

    "such as I'm doing at http://starmedia.trolltalk.com/ and ran a few banner ads years ago on one of them - by tomhudson (43916) on Thursday June 23, @03:56PM (#36546134) Homepage

    FROM http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36546134

    That says it all really tomhudson along with the fact you tried to stalk & troll me by ac replies and stated you were trying to start a cooridinated effort with others to do so, harassing myself:

    ---

    tomhudson libelling myself in regards to my professional career:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1992296&cid=35186644

    ---

    You're also libeling myself yet again & lying:

    "I have never libeled you, APK. Everything I have written about him is the truth." - by tomhudson (43916) on Thursday June 23, @03:56PM (#36546134) Homepage

    FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36546134

    No it is not tomhudson, & that's more lies + libel of myself.

    ---

    You have stated here on this forum publicly I have never worked in this industry:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1992296&cid=35192078

    ---

    And that my programs are only front ends to various things:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35840802

    Yet another utter lie (and libel designed to harm my career obviously).

    Some are of course, & so what? Many, in fact MOST, are not.

    ---

    You have said I live with my parents & other things designed to harm my reputation here:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35840802

    Another lie. I own my own home paid in full. You are a person with severe issues of somekind I am certain of this by this point.

    APK

    P.S.=> The list goes on, but as anyone can see reading you have issues, and that you have done so by using anonymous coward replies to harass myself as well:

    ---

    Wait until he starts on another kick, then reply to him as an AC. It's the new meme. - by tomhudson (43916) on Sunday May 09 2010, @08:29PM (#32150544) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1646272&cid=32150544

    ---

    HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step

    The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off). He'll accuse you of being me by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @01:38PM (#35841122) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35841122

    ---

    if you're going to tell this guy to stop spamming his hosts file crap, make sure you do it anonymously by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @12:45PM (#35840680) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086920&cid=35840680

    3 times tomhudson? F

  212. Coming from tomhudson the moron with no CSC degree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject-line, says it all.

  213. This is WHY tomhudson trolls me on HOSTS files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because they can block adbanners & he's a webmaster, obviously & better than other tools do like adblock (email is covered too in programs like outlook by HOSTS for example):

    "such as I'm doing at http://starmedia.trolltalk.com/ and ran a few banner ads years ago on one of them - by tomhudson (43916) on Thursday June 23, @03:56PM (#36546134) Homepage

    FROM http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36546134

    That says it all really tomhudson along with the fact you tried to stalk & troll me by ac replies and stated you were trying to start a cooridinated effort with others to do so, harassing myself:

    ---

    tomhudson libelling myself in regards to my professional career:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1992296&cid=35186644

    ---

    You're also libeling myself yet again & lying:

    "I have never libeled you, APK. Everything I have written about him is the truth." - by tomhudson (43916) on Thursday June 23, @03:56PM (#36546134) Homepage

    FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2263468&cid=36546134

    No it is not tomhudson, & that's more lies + libel of myself.

    ---

    You have stated here on this forum publicly I have never worked in this industry:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1992296&cid=35192078

    ---

    And that my programs are only front ends to various things:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35840802

    Yet another utter lie (and libel designed to harm my career obviously).

    Some are of course, & so what? Many, in fact MOST, are not.

    ---

    You have said I live with my parents & other things designed to harm my reputation here:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35840802

    Another lie. I own my own home paid in full. You are a person with severe issues of somekind I am certain of this by this point.

    APK

    P.S.=> The list goes on, but as anyone can see reading you have issues, and that you have done so by using anonymous coward replies to harass myself as well:

    ---

    Wait until he starts on another kick, then reply to him as an AC. It's the new meme. - by tomhudson (43916) on Sunday May 09 2010, @08:29PM (#32150544) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1646272&cid=32150544

    ---

    HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step

    The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off). He'll accuse you of being me by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @01:38PM (#35841122) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086424&cid=35841122

    ---

    if you're going to tell this guy to stop spamming his hosts file crap, make sure you do it anonymously by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16, @12:45PM (#35840680) Homepage Journal

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086920&cid=35840680

    3 times tomhudson?

  214. Re:Programmer vs Computer Scientist by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

    Agreed.

    --
    Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
  215. Alexander Petey Kowalski do you have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    anything that allows you to live? Answer that. I do not believe you do. Please to be killing yourself now. Thanks.