There's no excuse for what China does. You're using their excuses, their terminology, and their justifications. It reads like it was a scripted excuse instead of a sound justification.
All China did in 1980 was to find a way to cleanse their despotism. Seeing people like you, makes me think that it worked. Yes, that's a problem.
Unlike China, we like to still give the regular individual the chance instead of disappearing them, harvesting their organs for some Party member, and putting the family under house arrest for objecting to working conditions at the company town.
So this is what businesses want our country to be like - where businesses can roam freely, and ask the government to cut coverage to (and search of) protests?
This is what we encourage when we send work offshore to these kind of countries. No thanks.
This is the same country that copies everyone else and has tons of junk science. I'd rather see these results performed by non CPC controlled/influenced scientists, run on non CPC controlled equipment(which is faster than these show boxes).
If there's enough of the phone to recover images, then the cops have made their situation worse. It looks like that's the case, but it's from an SD card, not a SIM card - given how Sprint's phones work.
Another point - how about apps that instantly stream to an offsite location? The cops would still be thwarted, and still have to pay.
Hopefully the cops end up paying tons of cash to replace the phones, along with whatever criminal penalties come from their actions.
* Various political interests that China wants to kill off are targeted. * The US military is targeted. * The US government (outside of the military) is targeted. * A company that left China out of concerns for it being used as an attack platform was targeted. * The rest of the evidence points to China's red hands being all over this.
The only answer worth giving to the Chinese government: ä½æ''èZï¼
How many of those people took that test in each of those countries? What is their admissions criteria for access to education? What determined the sets of people who were able to access the test? How voluntary was participation in taking the test of individuals?
With that, PISA can easily be fooled by presenting only the set of people who are good at taking that kind of test. Second, the admissions criteria for PISA-level education is less rigid in the US than many other countries. It favors places with rigid admissions policies that deny education to most of a nation's population.
In short, you can goose the PISA numbers by providing a known-good set of people, without regards to actual academic performance of the nation as a whole.
Otherwise, the IRS needs to start talking with the various military/intelligence agencies and doing everything to get these companies to do the above. Pay the higher ones first.
Slashdot Mirror
There's no excuse for what China does. You're using their excuses, their terminology, and their justifications. It reads like it was a scripted excuse instead of a sound justification.
All China did in 1980 was to find a way to cleanse their despotism. Seeing people like you, makes me think that it worked. Yes, that's a problem.
Unlike China, we like to still give the regular individual the chance instead of disappearing them, harvesting their organs for some Party member, and putting the family under house arrest for objecting to working conditions at the company town.
Publishing and searching for that information is not a crime against the US, unlike China.
...is what these people are protesting against. Bad jobs are still bad even if it is the only practical option.
The only thing it really does is gives maximum freedoms to business, while giving a few trinkets to distract from the non-freedom to regular people.
Still doesn't excuse sending work there, but to do everything to undermine that government.
Nothing better to kill a peasant revolt than a company town.
So this is what businesses want our country to be like - where businesses can roam freely, and ask the government to cut coverage to (and search of) protests?
This is what we encourage when we send work offshore to these kind of countries. No thanks.
In China, I'd think that you'd be getting off very lightly if you were charged with tampering those.
This is the same country that copies everyone else and has tons of junk science. I'd rather see these results performed by non CPC controlled/influenced scientists, run on non CPC controlled equipment(which is faster than these show boxes).
No amount of modbombing will change the facts.
And if you happen to have access to a wi-fi link, it won't matter.
If there's enough of the phone to recover images, then the cops have made their situation worse. It looks like that's the case, but it's from an SD card, not a SIM card - given how Sprint's phones work.
Another point - how about apps that instantly stream to an offsite location? The cops would still be thwarted, and still have to pay.
Hopefully the cops end up paying tons of cash to replace the phones, along with whatever criminal penalties come from their actions.
The only message worth giving in reply to the Chinese government: NÇ zhÃge piÃnzi!
(yes, it's translated output of "You liar!", in phonetic)
Ok.
* Various political interests that China wants to kill off are targeted.
* The US military is targeted.
* The US government (outside of the military) is targeted.
* A company that left China out of concerns for it being used as an attack platform was targeted.
* The rest of the evidence points to China's red hands being all over this.
The only answer worth giving to the Chinese government: ä½æ''èZï¼
You can't just create a nearly identical APK, and make it so that Android asks if you really want to install that?
So you want to keep people un-educated, so that they're only worth factory slave-work?
Black is white, down is up, right is left, and an App Store is not an App Store.
Riiiight.
Which gives an opening for the company to "suicide" someone, and claim that against next of kin.
A few questions:
How many of those people took that test in each of those countries?
What is their admissions criteria for access to education?
What determined the sets of people who were able to access the test?
How voluntary was participation in taking the test of individuals?
With that, PISA can easily be fooled by presenting only the set of people who are good at taking that kind of test. Second, the admissions criteria for PISA-level education is less rigid in the US than many other countries. It favors places with rigid admissions policies that deny education to most of a nation's population.
In short, you can goose the PISA numbers by providing a known-good set of people, without regards to actual academic performance of the nation as a whole.
Given the amount of imitation and bad research there, those are near-worthless credentials outside of China.
Then again, unlike China, education is not reserved for the few who manage to luck out on the tests. It's more or less open to all in comparison.
That's because they actually have the luxury of choice.
The flexibility of the few doesn't justify making everyone disposable.
Charlie Sheen sure plays a good Gov Walker.
State open records act, and FOIA where relevant.
It's OK if you use FOIA to threaten academics, but it's not OK if the GOP gets caught with their pants down?
If it were that case, they'd try a few ineffective things and seize proof that their measures were ineffective.
Why would they want to lose it after paying large sums of cash?
What other events are going on with BP that would make this a distraction?
What do they gain about making this front-and-center public?
When they've paid the higher ones first.
Otherwise, the IRS needs to start talking with the various military/intelligence agencies and doing everything to get these companies to do the above. Pay the higher ones first.