Slashdot Mirror


User: Bradmont

Bradmont's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
263
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 263

  1. Re:AMD 64bit CPU's and linux on Slashback: Hilbert's, Transgenic, Silicon · · Score: 0

    There's always Debian!

    ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/woody/main/dis ks -ia64/

  2. "Entertainment Available on the internet" on MPAA Opens Anti-filesharing Website · · Score: 4, Insightful

    (from the "music, games & more" page)
    Browse the links below to discover a whole world of entertainment available to you - legally - right at home.

    Gotta love how they don't link to project Gutenberg on the books page. :D

  3. Re:Respect copyrights! Make fair use available! on MPAA Opens Anti-filesharing Website · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't that be 2pi (or 2n(pi), whatever)? Pi is only a semi-circle.

  4. Quick! While there's still time! on FreeCraft Cease and Desisted by Blizzard · · Score: 1

    apt-get install freecraft :)

  5. Re:A weak point... on Paul Graham on Fighting Spam · · Score: 1

    I don't think this is true: Only the 15 most interesting (eg, spam probabilities farthest from 50%) are used -- .2 isn't likely to be in the top 15, so putting these words in wouldn't likely affect the spam probability at all.

  6. Re:The client should own the code on How to "Open Source" Custom, Contract Software? · · Score: 1

    They only have to release the source for thier changes if they release the binaries for thier changes, and only to the people to whom they give/sell those binaries. If they keep the binaries for their own, in-house use, they don't have to give out the source at all.

  7. whoops on How to "Open Source" Custom, Contract Software? · · Score: 1

    er, I meant to say I have no right to the source for that copy of windows... :o

  8. Re:The client should own the code on How to "Open Source" Custom, Contract Software? · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I disagree with this. It depends entirely on the contract he makes with the client at the project's inception. If the agreement is that he supplies neither source code nor support, that's the ethical result. After all, I have no right to that copy of windows that came with my computer -- the license says so, even though I (indrectly) paid for microsoft to make it. Yes, contract work is a somewhat different situation, but the same principal applies. If he can convince the client to let him put it under some Free license, there's nothing unethical about that, and more power to him.

    As a side note, putting it under a Free license (GPL, BSDL, whatever) doesn't necessarily mean he's going to release the source to the general public, or even at all. With the GPL, he only has to give the source to anyone to whom he supplies the binaries.

  9. Undocumented Feature! on Who Is Liable For Software With Security Holes? · · Score: 1

    Who's to say that those security holes aren't supposed to be there? No license covers every possible function of a software product, and no user manual every possible use. So that's a feature, not a bug. ;)

  10. Re:Canada is actually a nice place to live on CDN Supreme Court Upholds 'Net Free Speech · · Score: 1

    Or you can live in coastal BC where it never drops under 10 below (Centegrade, for those of you who are thinking "10 below?!?! that's nuts!" ;))

  11. BogoMIPS! on AMD To Hide MHz Rating From Consumers · · Score: 1

    We still have the ever useless BogoMIPS! Once someone finds out the mhz/bogomips multiplier for the new generation athlon, clock speeds'll be easy to find.

  12. Re:I know nothing of such high end hardware, but.. on Cray SV1 Named Best Supercomputer for 2001 · · Score: 1

    Hey, thanks for the info! That's really cool! :)

  13. I know nothing of such high end hardware, but.... on Cray SV1 Named Best Supercomputer for 2001 · · Score: 1

    300 MHz? That seems somewhat unimpressive... would someone mind educating me? :o