His job smacked his wife around. Now seriously, who's gonna stay in a relationship like that? I mean come on...
His job was also very lazy, never did anything around the house. And it would never listen! If you're going to be in a relationship with a man, women, and a job, everyone needs respect each other and their personal space. But job just didn't know when to back off either... it would keep pressing and pressing... jesus, I'm in the bathroom. Just leave me alone!
If he had to explain it to her many times then I guess it's not "no nosense" now is it?
Even in the article he said,"I went even further and speculated that the child would almost certainly have to have prior contact with a person about where to meet in order to make this possible."
My thinking is that she heard "possible" and ran with it, but I don't know that, and you don't know that. Only she does.
It's possible she just didn't understand how the unit worked (yeah, she shouldn't have went ahead with the story), but I'm not so sure her mistake was intentional. I'd like to hear her side of the story.
My guess would be that she had conflicting information and went ahead with what the parents had told her.
This is a capitalist model, where the owners of something get to decide with whom they share it and under what terms.
ahhh, so who gets to decide on the owners? Your typical socialist U.N. bureaucrat or the dollar? If the bureaucrats want to dish out IP addresses based on population, let them buy the addresses first. Then they can do what ever they want. But don't take away my company's opportunity to pay a higher price for those addresses.
You're placing obstacles in front of people just so you can satisfy your socialist model of IP address distribution.
The point is, people should not be forced to use NAT because you want to be the nice guy and give China 1.3 billion addresses. It should be first come, first serve, pay as you go. If my company wants to spend a few thousand bucks on a Class C (instead of a $20 router), they should be allowed to do so. They shouldn't be forced to use workarounds just because a Marxists Internet administrator says so. Instead, the market should decide.
ohh, but what about the children... it's not fair...
I hardly think that NAT is so damned terrible. In fact, the firm for which I work has several thousand employees and all web surfing goes through a single IP address.
So I should apply your solution to my problem. ohhhh wait..
Oh great, the U.S. just decided to donate 25% of their IP addresses to Sub Saharan Africa. Now I gotta dick around with NAT all day while Mugabi and his fuckwads get to surf pr0n from a Class A. Fuck that!
There are some four billion possible IP numbers. Of these, some 2.4 billion have been allocated. Of those, some 1.3 billion are allocated to organisations in the United States.
The EU has a little less than twice the population of the United States. India and China each have over four times the population of the United States.
You make it sounds like this is a bad thing. This is a good thing.
An alternative history would be something like 30 years ago, before the internet boom, the creators of the internet sitting around a table discussing the distribution of IP addresses.
"You know, we've got 4 billion IP addresses. How about we divide it up based on the population of each country. Each person can have their own IP address, and we can all hold hands together."
uhhh, no thanks. I'd prefer to let the market decide and not some round table of socialists.
It's nice to see that newly created Internet Governance is starting things off on the right foot!
Ahead of the summit, rights watchdogs say, both Tunisian and foreign reporters have been harassed and beaten. Reporters Without Borders says its secretary-general, Robert Menard, has been banned from attending.
Fantastic! I don't know about you, but I can't wait to for my new internet tax, limited connectivity, filtering, monitoring and suppression. w00t!!!
I saw a commercial for a Hulk video game the other day.... it had a rather large red and white 8.9 out of 10 rating stamped on the cover of the box.
What's the point? come on, either create a fake website and post a 10 out of 10 rating, or just leave it off. Who wants an 8.9 game when you can get an "11 out of 10"* game?
*(no joke, I remember more than a few reviews for the original half-life that rated the game as 11. mmmmmmm..... original half-life
But then again, lawyers have got to make a living...
why should Perfect 10 be responsible for monitoring ALL webservices/search engines/etc from ALL companies and look for abuse of their property? And when they find such abuse, Perfect 10 must read this page, got here, do that, type these letters in the boxes, shiggle you winkydink, etc, etc.
I could understand if this was Opt-IN, BUT IT'S OPT-OUT!!
Today's cars use more gas at highway speeds if only one window is down compared to the air conditioning.
Yeap, Mythbusters did prove this theory wrong. 2 SUV's were loaded up with 5 Gallons of gas and driven around the track. One had the AC on and windows rolled up, the other had the AC off and windows rolled down. If I'm not mistaken, The first test was inconclusive. However, the next test I believe proved this theory wrong. They decided to fully gas up the SUV's instead of trying to accurately measure and fill up only 5 Gallons. The test showed (and I'm not sure on these numbers) somewhere around a 5% to 10% loss of MPG on the AC SUV. While the AC SUV had to pull over, the windowed SUV kept on trucking!! So yeah, they busted that myth.
The Future of Firefox is another 5 MB download...
on
The Future of Firefox
·
· Score: 5, Informative
NASA administrator Paul Brown was quoted as saying "We've recently discovered a pervious mission with the name Phoenix, therefor we'll need to change the name to Firebird."
This was quickly followed up by another response "Actually we've found another mission with the name Firebird, so uhhh.... we're gonna settle with FireFox".
And a few moments later, "OK, fuckit, we're just gonna call it WammyJoMammy. Take that ya name hoggin bastards"
Anyone know of a Firefox distribution that can be executed(and consequently updated just once) from a network drive or thumb drive?
I ask because I have alot of extensions on each of my Firefox installations. I have Firefox on my desktop at work, my laptop, my home computer, my wife's computer, etc etc
updating one computer (and then going into safe mode to find the extension that freaked out) is not that bad. But updating 5 or 10 computers can be a pain in the butt. Can I run ONE Firefox from *someplace* on the internet that has all my extesions/addons/updates?
only thing I can think of is using Remote Desktop, but then that's not what I really want to do:(
everything falls to the bottom of the bag. I've got cd cases, 2 power bricks, a portable harddrive, cables, mouse, etc, and everything gravitates toward the bottom of bag (and this is a "laptop bag" mind you). A better design would be to have a lot of little pockets, preferable located somewhere other than the bottom of the bag.
But best of all, it's ugly as hell. It looks like a cheap $10 Walmart bag. Just make sure get extra padding on the inside(for the laptop) AND extra padding on the outside(for your back). If you're unfortunate enough to have one of those heavy ass 10 pounder with a 17" screen, then you'll need the extra padding.
If it's not already waterproof, you can buy that stuff in a spray can at most shoe stores.
Slashdot Mirror
His job smacked his wife around. Now seriously, who's gonna stay in a relationship like that? I mean come on...
His job was also very lazy, never did anything around the house. And it would never listen! If you're going to be in a relationship with a man, women, and a job, everyone needs respect each other and their personal space. But job just didn't know when to back off either... it would keep pressing and pressing... jesus, I'm in the bathroom. Just leave me alone!
RMTTFFL (Read More Than The First Fucking Line) ....never used that one.
Server Monitoring on Windows != "follow this tutorial is to use a command line client/SSH client (like PuTTY for Windows)"
having said that, a good, free, open source server monitoring solution (including Windows Servers) is MRTG.
.... been waiting a while to say that.
If he had to explain it to her many times then I guess it's not "no nosense" now is it?
,"I went even further and speculated that the child would almost certainly have to have prior contact with a person about where to meet in order to make this possible."
Even in the article he said
My thinking is that she heard "possible" and ran with it, but I don't know that, and you don't know that. Only she does.
It's possible she just didn't understand how the unit worked (yeah, she shouldn't have went ahead with the story), but I'm not so sure her mistake was intentional. I'd like to hear her side of the story.
My guess would be that she had conflicting information and went ahead with what the parents had told her.
meanwhile at Wired magazine.....
During an interview with Wired magazine, Kamen was upbeat about a new venture. "It's going to change the way we look at _change_."
When pressed for more information Kamen clamed up. Only providing us with the name of his new endeavor.....
Mary-Ann.
if article_dupe_count > 50 then fade_away();
This is a capitalist model, where the owners of something get to decide with whom they share it and under what terms.
ahhh, so who gets to decide on the owners? Your typical socialist U.N. bureaucrat or the dollar? If the bureaucrats want to dish out IP addresses based on population, let them buy the addresses first. Then they can do what ever they want. But don't take away my company's opportunity to pay a higher price for those addresses.
ahh yes, security through obscurity, the model of the lazy admin. lol
http://www.kame.net/newsletter/19980807/
ohh and btw, you missed my point entirely.
You're placing obstacles in front of people just so you can satisfy your socialist model of IP address distribution.
The point is, people should not be forced to use NAT because you want to be the nice guy and give China 1.3 billion addresses. It should be first come, first serve, pay as you go. If my company wants to spend a few thousand bucks on a Class C (instead of a $20 router), they should be allowed to do so. They shouldn't be forced to use workarounds just because a Marxists Internet administrator says so. Instead, the market should decide.
ohh, but what about the children... it's not fair...
I hardly think that NAT is so damned terrible. In fact, the firm for which I work has several thousand employees and all web surfing goes through a single IP address.
So I should apply your solution to my problem. ohhhh wait..
Oh great, the U.S. just decided to donate 25% of their IP addresses to Sub Saharan Africa. Now I gotta dick around with NAT all day while Mugabi and his fuckwads get to surf pr0n from a Class A. Fuck that!
There are some four billion possible IP numbers. Of these, some 2.4 billion have been allocated. Of those, some 1.3 billion are allocated to organisations in the United States. The EU has a little less than twice the population of the United States. India and China each have over four times the population of the United States.
You make it sounds like this is a bad thing. This is a good thing.
An alternative history would be something like 30 years ago, before the internet boom, the creators of the internet sitting around a table discussing the distribution of IP addresses.
"You know, we've got 4 billion IP addresses. How about we divide it up based on the population of each country. Each person can have their own IP address, and we can all hold hands together."
uhhh, no thanks. I'd prefer to let the market decide and not some round table of socialists.
It's nice to see that newly created Internet Governance is starting things off on the right foot!
Ahead of the summit, rights watchdogs say, both Tunisian and foreign reporters have been harassed and beaten. Reporters Without Borders says its secretary-general, Robert Menard, has been banned from attending.
Fantastic! I don't know about you, but I can't wait to for my new internet tax, limited connectivity, filtering, monitoring and suppression. w00t!!!
more goodness at reporters without borders
http://www.rsf.org/rubrique.php3?id_rubrique=20
Who gives fuck where the score came from? All I see when watching the commercial is a fat 8.9.
The point is, if I'm spending thousands of dollars on an ad campaign, why the hell would I glorify an 8.9?
and btw, go fuck yourself you cock-gobling coward
I saw a commercial for a Hulk video game the other day.... it had a rather large red and white 8.9 out of 10 rating stamped on the cover of the box.
What's the point? come on, either create a fake website and post a 10 out of 10 rating, or just leave it off. Who wants an 8.9 game when you can get an "11 out of 10"* game?
*(no joke, I remember more than a few reviews for the original half-life that rated the game as 11. mmmmmmm..... original half-life
But then again, lawyers have got to make a living...
why should Perfect 10 be responsible for monitoring ALL webservices/search engines/etc from ALL companies and look for abuse of their property? And when they find such abuse, Perfect 10 must read this page, got here, do that, type these letters in the boxes, shiggle you winkydink, etc, etc.
I could understand if this was Opt-IN, BUT IT'S OPT-OUT!!
Today's cars use more gas at highway speeds if only one window is down compared to the air conditioning.
Yeap, Mythbusters did prove this theory wrong. 2 SUV's were loaded up with 5 Gallons of gas and driven around the track. One had the AC on and windows rolled up, the other had the AC off and windows rolled down. If I'm not mistaken, The first test was inconclusive. However, the next test I believe proved this theory wrong. They decided to fully gas up the SUV's instead of trying to accurately measure and fill up only 5 Gallons. The test showed (and I'm not sure on these numbers) somewhere around a 5% to 10% loss of MPG on the AC SUV. While the AC SUV had to pull over, the windowed SUV kept on trucking!! So yeah, they busted that myth.
Coding misstep forces new Firefox release
http://news.com.com/Coding+misstep+forces+new+Fir
well....at least we have extensions.... here's my list:
TextZoom - because I'm blind as a bat
Adblock - use with Filterset.G from http://www.pierceive.com
Session Saver - saves tab sessions _when_ firefox crashes
Web Developer - lot of web dev options
IE View - click to view in IE
Target Alert - let's me know what I'm clicking on
ForecastFox - show forecast
FindBar Switch - makes the find bar toogle hide/un-hide with CTRL+F
Download Statusbar - much better than the download window/popup
SpellBound - because my spelling sux
up, up, down, down, left, right, left, right, B, A, Start.
NASA administrator Paul Brown was quoted as saying "We've recently discovered a pervious mission with the name Phoenix, therefor we'll need to change the name to Firebird."
This was quickly followed up by another response "Actually we've found another mission with the name Firebird, so uhhh.... we're gonna settle with FireFox".
And a few moments later, "OK, fuckit, we're just gonna call it WammyJoMammy. Take that ya name hoggin bastards"
Anyone know of a Firefox distribution that can be executed(and consequently updated just once) from a network drive or thumb drive?
:(
I ask because I have alot of extensions on each of my Firefox installations. I have Firefox on my desktop at work, my laptop, my home computer, my wife's computer, etc etc
updating one computer (and then going into safe mode to find the extension that freaked out) is not that bad. But updating 5 or 10 computers can be a pain in the butt. Can I run ONE Firefox from *someplace* on the internet that has all my extesions/addons/updates?
only thing I can think of is using Remote Desktop, but then that's not what I really want to do
here they are:
Adblock
Session Saver
Web Developer
IE View
Target Alert
everything falls to the bottom of the bag. I've got cd cases, 2 power bricks, a portable harddrive, cables, mouse, etc, and everything gravitates toward the bottom of bag (and this is a "laptop bag" mind you). A better design would be to have a lot of little pockets, preferable located somewhere other than the bottom of the bag.
But best of all, it's ugly as hell. It looks like a cheap $10 Walmart bag. Just make sure get extra padding on the inside(for the laptop) AND extra padding on the outside(for your back). If you're unfortunate enough to have one of those heavy ass 10 pounder with a 17" screen, then you'll need the extra padding.
If it's not already waterproof, you can buy that stuff in a spray can at most shoe stores.
ya, the review sucks. He doesn't even crack the case open. Nice box, but come on.... 2,500 for a multimedia station with no network connection???