Slashdot Mirror


IT and Divorce?

frank_tudor asks: "I am graduate student and work as a web developer. I am also getting a divorce and I have a son caught in the middle. I believe my profession had a part in it. For my graduate thesis I am writing a paper about Dads who work in the computer industry, divorce and custody. I think our industry causes a high rate of divorce but I need some help from the Slashdot community. My questions are: How many of you computer Dads have also gone through divorce and have retained either half or full custody of your children? Do you think your job had something to do with it? What were some of your hardest challenges and are your kids happy?"

943 comments

  1. Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    IT didn't cause your divorce. Stop trying to look for external causes when they were internal. My Dad worked in IT and my parents are still married, nearly 40 years now.

    1. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I know! My one anecdotal case is more than enough to completely invalidate yours!

    2. Re:Oh please by Ucklak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly. The writing is there: good student, good employee, horrible spouse. You can't do it all. You have to choose what is important to you and don't you ever put your children second.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    3. Re:Oh please by Veamon · · Score: 0

      It could be that you were a lousy lay, and she would rather get pounded in the ass by Joe the Plumber. Seriously, IT won't cause a divorce. Your devoting more of your life to your job than your family will. Stop being a pussy and man up.

      --

      Slashdot News: As serious as a busted rubber
    4. Re:Oh please by smilindog2000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "don't you ever put your children second."

      Actually, I think many marriage councilors recommend never putting your spouse second. Second is exactly where the kids belong. It's kind of like when the oxygen masks on an airplane pop-out. You put on your own mask before helping others. You can't help anyone if you pass out. The same is true with family. It's hard to help the kids if you're getting divorced.

      I started a company in NC in 2000 with my wife. We already had a 6-month old baby, and a couple years later we had another. I worked like heck, ignoring the family, until one day my wife declared, "This isn't a marriage. You've got to either choose work or our family." I chose the family, and yes, things at work do suffer somewhat as a result. However, I'd be no good to anyone if my family broke up.

      My personal goal is now to work no more than 45 hours/week on average. I'm getting there, but it's hard.

      --
      Beer is proof that God loves us, and wants us to be happy.
    5. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Yes, well, marriage counselors are in the business of marriages. That doesn't make them right about putting children second. Sex, marriage, etc, the whole point of it all is reproduction of the species, aka children. They are the most important aspect, because if you raise them right, you'll benefit society.

    6. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess, you are female.

    7. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot. No, wait - fucking moron. You presume to know what caused his divorce? Arrogant bastard. Just because your parents' marriage didn't suffer due to your father's doesn't mean the submitter's didn't.

    8. Re:Oh please by futuresheep · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Posting to remove my inadvertant redundant to this poster when it should have been insightful.

    9. Re:Oh please by bcat24 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, but raising kids right involves a stable home life. Kids of divorced parent may turn out OK, but who knows what kind of fear and hate they'll carry with them. Happy parents == happy kids. Angry parents == angry kids. (YMMV, of course. And no, I don't know this from experience, thank God.)

    10. Re:Oh please by Peter+Trepan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sex, marriage, etc, the whole point of it all is reproduction of the species, aka children.

      I'm sure your wife's genes would agree. But as for your wife, well, you were probably right to post this anonymously.

      --

      Step into a huge movement. Don't Tread In Me.

    11. Re:Oh please by Canthros · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, dammit. Who are you going to believe? Your licensed and accredited marriage counselor, who sees lots of people with problems like yours, or some anonymous jerk on the Internet, whose advice can be had freely in any forum on the Web. Clearly, your marriage counselor is just bilking you into saving your marriage.

      --
      Canthros
    12. Re:Oh please by The+Mighty+Bill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Careers do not cause marriages to fail. An individual's failure to recognize that the career is impacting the relationship, may be a contributing factor. Both husband and wife (regardless of who's in IT) have to take responsibility. If one feels they are being neglected because the job is consuming the other, then the neglected must communicate that to the consumed, and together they must solve the problem.

      I don't object to the OP's thought's, but IT is not much different than being a Doctor or a lawyer (or any other job that may have to deal with after hours commitements). If both parties want the relationship to work, then it will (with perhaps a few extraordinary exceptions). Just an opinion.

      --
      The Mighty Bill
    13. Re:Oh please by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Good student? Not if he's seriously considering using this shit for his thesis. He obviously wasn't paying attention to his research methods class OR his wife.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    14. Re:Oh please by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Everyone else in most 1st world countries work 40 hours a week. Infact its illegal to go over 45 or 50 in France. America as a result is leading in divorce. You may love what you do but when you age and you are in the death bed will you think of work or your wife?

      I want to hack all day and play too but its not a reality. Work less and see if you can work on a Saturday morning if you can cut down the hours for the rest of the week. If your workplace doesn't allow this then its time to move on and let them hire a college grad who does not have such obligations. There is increasing evidence that addiction to work is becoming common as people become more isolated due to the internet and TV in our lives. Hanging out with others is not as fun. You need to break that and show your wife she is important. If she works as well she wont be impressed about your hours.

    15. Re:Oh please by A.+Bosch · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > Actually, I think many marriage councilors recommend never putting your spouse second.

      I couldn't agree more. Your parents will pass away. Your kids will grow up and move away. You're with your spouse for life, or at least that's the plan.

      --
      Where there is the necessary technical skill to move mountains, there is no need for the faith that moves mountains.
    16. Re:Oh please by Shoeler · · Score: 2, Funny

      You sir are an idiot. First off, stop trying to answer for those of us who ARE married with kid(s) - you can't relate. Don't try. Second, one good marriage doesn't mean a damn thing. If he's been in IT for 40 years, he got in and may have the kush job at IBM with the awesome retirement, etc. I've been in IT for 12 years, married for almost 6. It almost ruined my marriage because of the IT bomb post-20001 / post-9/11. I took a job where I hated the job and the boss hated me because I knew more then him.

      And whoever said it otherwise - the wife always comes first. Kids are perfect 2nd - and they will want to be lower then the dog by the time they're teenagers.

    17. Re:Oh please by ksheff · · Score: 3, Interesting

      IT certainly doesn't help. Having to stay late to wrap up code for a release deadline, fix a production problem or getting calls from the computer room in the middle of the night didn't mesh too well with a wife who thinks that a developer job is a strictly 9-5 occupation. Arguments with my ex over my job were way too common. Not getting a calls at 5:30pm from an irate spouse wondering why you're still at work at least makes the job a little less stressful. Now, at least I can do what I need to get done at work and relax some when I get home instead of getting into a fight.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    18. Re:Oh please by mtrupe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I totally agree. Too often I see people put the kids 1st and the spouse second. That's a really big problem. It's sad because it may seem like the right thing to do, but it just isn't.

      My wife and I try to make our children know that our relationship is the primary one of the family. It's important for us as well as for them... I think children feel safer knowing that their parents have a strong relationship. Just a hunch, and I say this as a son of divorced parents.

    19. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a short-sighted idiot, aren't you? The guy said he thinks it had a part in it. In fact, external things make up our internal selves. There are many pieces of our lives that make up the whole and about 1/3 (or more in the typical IT job these days) come from our jobs. The fact that most IT jobs force us to work 60-70 hours a week take away from the time we have to spend with our families, children and friends. Many IT professionals suffer from having sufficient time to spend with their other parts. This in turn, causes a certain loneliness to take place in spouses and a feeling of neglect in their children. This is NOT a good thing. Yet it is something that the IT world seems to have taken for granted. Guess what? We are all human and we all need a certain amount of time to spend outside of work with our significant others. So, does it have a part in it? It's highly probable. Did your dad happen to get a decent job somewhere within the IT field which allowed him to spend an appropriate amount of time with his family? It's likely, since you don't see the other side of things. There are more experiences in life than just your own. Environment, situations and a certain amount of conditioning in our lives make up who we are and who we become. For you to be so narrow minded and obscenely rude in your comment disgusts me and I'm sure many others. Realize that your life is not the life others and as such you really have no freaking idea about what situation(s) led this guys divorce. I'm sick of seeing people like you with their single-minded obtuse way of viewing everything. Grow up! Go learn something before you make commentary like you did.

    20. Re:Oh please by BlueHog · · Score: 1

      Did you actually explain to your wife repeatedly in language that she understood what you did do pay your side of the bills? If you did and she didn't understand then you should NOT have married her in the first place. Sorry to be so harsh but if you get hitched or stay in long term relationship with someone, and they don't let you bitch and moan about your job then you shouldn't be with them.

    21. Re:Oh please by keyne9 · · Score: 1

      Working 80-100 hours a week couldn't possibly be a cause. Not that that sort of thing is, you know, relatively common in the industry, or anything.

    22. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, there's no pseudo-science involved in marriage counseling. Ask the experts, whose advice is resting upon copious amounts of research that you can verify and validate yourself. Truly a fool-proof plan.

      Most marriages end because you don't put the other person first! That's the ticket. Or you could always realize that "first" and "second" are stupid ways to look at your life, and realize that even if your spouse leaves you that you still love your children and want the best for them, and that there very well may be absolutely nothing you can do to preserve your marriage. It's not as if people just get tired of each other, and now there isn't any social stigma with opting out of divorce to force them to continue to be unhappy for the sake of others. Yeah, don't work 16 hours a day and be completely distant from your family, but don't delude yourself into thinking that your wife or husband will stay with you forever if you placate them at the expense of everything else.

    23. Re:Oh please by bkr1_2k · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seriously, who can we blame but ourselves? What is with our society and the need to point the finger somewhere else? Please bring back the days of personal responsibility.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    24. Re:Oh please by icebrain · · Score: 1

      "Everyone else in most 1st world countries work 40 hours a week. Infact its illegal to go over 45 or 50 in France. America as a result is leading in divorce. You may love what you do but when you age and you are in the death bed will you think of work or your wife?"

      I don't think the solution is to follow the French example and make working overtime _illegal_. However, I do agree that people are driving themselves too hard at work.

      I particularly enjoy my free time. Over my four rotations as a co-op (like a recurring internship, for those wondering), I and the other co-ops were offered overtime pretty much every week. I think I was the only one who didn't work an average of 50+ hours/week. I probably did maybe 20, total. Even in the future, I intend to only work overtime when necessary--sudden bills coming up, or need-it-yesterday type projects.

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    25. Re:Oh please by linguizic · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      You know, the people who live on welfare and have lots of kids have the exact opposite problem you do. What's kind of scary is that they will end up contributing more to the gene pool than you.

      --
      Does this sig remind you of Agatha Christie?
    26. Re:Oh please by zxnos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      did you ever call her and let her know you would be late? my wife is understanding when i communicate with her. then the next day leave early by the same amount of time. if your employer cant give you that, leave.

      --
      always mosh clockwise
    27. Re:Oh please by Coriander · · Score: 1

      The problem was your wife, not your job. I would never marry a guy who would call me at work at 5:30 and demand that I come home. If someone is going to try to make you change your life for them, the answer is 'run' not 'marriage'.

    28. Re:Oh please by Marty200 · · Score: 1

      Even in the future, I intend to only work overtime when necessary--sudden bills coming up, or need-it-yesterday type projects.

      In my experience all projects are "need-it-yesterdau" projects.

      MG

      --

      Randomly distributing Karma whenever possible.

    29. Re:Oh please by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      "It's hard to help the kids if you're getting divorced."

      I call bullshit. Putting your children first is never the cause of a divorce. If you don't put your children first during the divorce you're going to pay for it a whole lot more down the line. The problem is that people put themselves first in a divorce most of the time, and allow their personal feelings toward their spouse (or ex-spouse, if you will) to show in front of their kids. Therapy costs a lot more than spending some time with your child when it matters does.

      If you put your children first, they will never question why you got divorced (assuming they're old enough to understand it to begin with) and will also never question themselves as a result of your divorce.

      Your personal example shows precisely that putting your children (or in your case, family) first is never wrong. You didn't make a choice between your spouse and children, you made a choice between family and work. The money might be tight, or business might not grow as you hope, but really, business and money just aren't that important.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    30. Re:Oh please by wmshub · · Score: 1

      Agree 100%. Any occupation that involves stress and a temptation to work long hours can lead to you not giving your spouse and/or kids as much of your time and attention as they deserve. But that's not your job's fault, it's yours. You just need to put your family first. Will it lead you to be not as effective in the job? It might. But if you think that you can work 80 hour weeks, rise quickly to the top of your profession, and give your family the dedication that it deserves, all at the same time...then you have rocks in your head. Sacrifices have to be made somewhere. Once you have chosen to have a family, hopefully the brunt of the sacrifices will be elsewhere, because it's not fair to them to do otherwise.

    31. Re:Oh please by Amouth · · Score: 1

      funny 5:30.. my wife waits till about 8.. then calls agian at 10...

      she works early mornings and i work from 8am till well 6-7-8-9-10-11-12 hell i never get a normal day.. but we make sure that the weekends we both have off and the phones are off so that no one can get up with us..

      would i like to spend more time with her, yea no doubt about it.. but we do what pays the bills..

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    32. Re:Oh please by dave562 · · Score: 1
      I agree whole heartedly here. I have been in IT for over ten years and with my current girl friend for two of them. We just moved in with each other six months ago and are going through the relationship strains that you deal with when you first move in with someone after having been single for a long time. My g/f has begun to understand the dynamics of the job. Sometimes I'm away from home until 3am, but other days I'm sitting around the house in the middle of the week because I can work from home.

      I'm glad that I decided to live with her long before we thought about getting married. No matter what your profession is, you should move in with your potential spouse and live with them for AT LEAST a year before you get engaged and/or married. There are so many dynamics that you take for granted as common place that will really create problems when someone else has to "deal with" them.

    33. Re:Oh please by brettdavis4 · · Score: 1

      During the time you dated and your marriage, she couldn't figure out that IT isn't a 9-5 job? I'll defend you dude. It sounds like your ex was an annoying needy bitch. She couldn't pick up that things don't always go 100% right and that you might have to put in some late hours? How were you able to study up on stuff on your own with this chic around? Did she complain that you were reading a tech book and not doing some bullshit activity with her?

    34. Re:Oh please by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      I was wondering how we might correct such a thing since if you accidentally released the mouse button before you had the correct item selected you would give someone the wrong mod(as opposed to the previous way of having to select it and then press a button to confirm it). Anyone know if there's a good way around this?

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    35. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What is with our society and the need to point the finger somewhere else?

      So, it's Society's fault that we point the finger at someone else?

    36. Re:Oh please by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Amen. Too many people sacrafice their lives on the altar of their children's "wellbeing". It's like this, barring some catostrophic screw ups on your part, your kids will turn out fine, They will turn out even better if you don't in fact live your life for them, and instead show them how to lead a good life by example. OK, obviously a newborn will require a substantial amount of your time, but as soon as they enter school, the pressure is off, and you can being to wean them off dependance on you.

      Wean them off you, rather than smother them against your chest.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    37. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Generally speaking, I plan to love my wife, but the only significant things that people do are the things that affect the future. For most people, that's raising children and building things.

      Do you think that, on his deathbed, Einstein was thinking "Oh, I wish I had paid more attention to my wife" No, he was thinking "I wish I had gotten to finish my unified theory of relativity"

    38. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm almost certain you're under 30. Marriage should be illegal until the guy is at least 30 and the woman is at least 25. Most people below that age think with their genitals, or worse, with their amygdala rather than with the cerebrum.

    39. Re:Oh please by gluteus · · Score: 1

      For an AC, you sure know a lot about this guy's circumstances. Why else would you respond like such a pompous ass?

    40. Re:Oh please by jschleifer · · Score: 1

      Actually that's the point.. you put the relationship first while there IS a relationship.. then you put the KIDS first in the divorce.

    41. Re:Oh please by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >Working 80-100 hours a week couldn't possibly be a cause. Not that that sort of thing is, you know, relatively
      >common in the industry, or anything.

      So, a financial manager in an insurance adjusting firm that works 80 hours a week and travels 25% of the time is somehow superior to a software developer who gets up at 6:30, drives to an office building across town, returns at 5:00 PM, where he begins to work on the side project that he hopes will lead to independence from the company job and into his own business?

      The real problem is that these guys end up marrying some woman who has no serious career bundled with some passion for gaining an independent self-driven new career.

      It has little to do with the career being "IT."

      I have seen the same phenomenon among musicians and cabinet makers.

      Marry a scientist. Someone who is genuinely driven by a legitimate research need. Then, instead of the scenario where one spouse is maybe working at some mindless job, unable to understand the other person with a job that drives a genuine passion, you have an equitable situation. One partner is trying to develop something seriously important in the IT world and gain economic freedom, and the other partner is trying to make a breakthrough in understanding the myolin sheath in order to end spinal paralysis. Just an example.

      Marry someone who works part time in a bookstore, and you've got a very desperately bored spouse, with no schema by which to possibly understand how someone could have a career that one could actually be sincerely passionate about.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    42. Re:Oh please by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I'm only in my fifth year of marriage, but I understand that my job is one of the LAST things that will get in the way of my marriage. Now, *I* could place my job above my marriage, but that can happen with any job.

      IT can be demanding, I'm not arguing that. I've pulled a lot of late nights and been called in at 3 am more times than I care to count. But my wife understood that all of those things factored into my salary; if that wasn't expected of me, I wouldn't be paid as much. It was always understood with us that if my job got in the way of our marriage that I wanted to know so that I could find another one.

      I left my first adminstration job because they gave me a day off when my son was born. One day. Labor started at 11 am, he was born at 1 am the following day, and I was back at work at 8 the same day. It was then and there that my wife and I agreed I needed to look for another job.

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    43. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If your workplace doesn't allow this then its time to move on and let them hire a college grad who does not have such obligations.

      that's exactly what they're doing, therefore we older coders are lucky to get jobs at all. where do you suggest he "move on" to? he'll still be competing with more of those same college grads. seriously, what worklplace doesn't want someone who'll work more hours for same or cheaper pay? which leaves us where we are now: age discrimination and offshoring.

    44. Re:Oh please by FLEB · · Score: 1

      You post. It clears all mods from that story.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    45. Re:Oh please by Don853 · · Score: 1

      100 hours a week is insane. I can't imagine why anyone would want to do that to him/herself.

    46. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, well, marriage counselors are in the business of marriages. That doesn't make them right about putting children second. Sex, marriage, etc, the whole point of it all is reproduction of the species, aka children. They are the most important aspect, because if you raise them right, you'll benefit society.

      Isn't that the whole point? Sure you should see to the real needs of the children, but they should be balanced with the needs of your family, which isn't just the kids. And you must tend to your own needs as well. People that don't take care of themselves first are the most useless people and no child raised with that kind of role model is going to "benefit society". And anyways, society exists and is created to benefit people, not the other way around, what we add to society comes from the excess of our individual strengths.

    47. Re:Oh please by nine-times · · Score: 1
      IT didn't cause your divorce

      Maybe both are just effects of being a semi-autistic geek?

    48. Re:Oh please by xpun8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's true. My choices at work nearly cost me my family. Wife 1st, kids 2nd, family 3rd, career 4th... Communication with and between all 4 is tops. Communicating with the boss that family is more important than job, showing family that it's true. Most IT isn't a 9-5 job, my wife accepts this, she also accepts that wacky hours and weird phone calls at all hours is what really pays the bills and allows us the freedom to have the toys we share with our family. Sacrifice..

    49. Re:Oh please by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      45 hours.

      I hope that includes lunch.

      Personally, I think 38 hours should be the norm. 4 7.5 hour days with an 8 hour day in the middle somewhere.
      I see too many people glazed over at their desks for more than that waste time anyway.

      I used to like being a contractor since i could just leave when the work was done. On salary I have to do make-work or just sit there for 45 minutes sometimes.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    50. Re:Oh please by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think many marriage councilors recommend never putting your spouse second. Second is exactly where the kids belong. It's kind of like when the oxygen masks on an airplane pop-out. You put on your own mask before helping others. You can't help anyone if you pass out. The same is true with family.

      I think you're slightly right, but mostly wrong. Your analogy is correct, if you fail you can't help anyone. That is why you have to take care of yourself first. After that, however, making a rule about putting your kids or your spouse first seems insane. They are people. Treat them as such. Sometimes one will need you more than the other and sometimes it will be the other way around.

      It's hard to help the kids if you're getting divorced.

      Sometimes getting a divorce is the best thing you can do for your children.

      I know in this day and age of self-help books and weekend mental health seminars everyone wants a simple slogan or rule that will solve all their problems. There isn't one. Marriage, divorce, children, and many other factors can all be the right or wrong thing for you at a given time. Personally, I think marriage itself is dangerous. Everyone has preconceptions about what it entails and no two people have the same preconceptions. It often leads to people assuming their relationship does not need any work on their part anymore because they made a permanent commitment, which in turn leads to a divorce. Just as often it leads to people who grow apart and simply are no longer compatible staying together out of a feeling of religious or social obligation, despite making one another unhappy and it preventing them from forming other, happy relationships. And when they do meet someone that makes them happy it is marred by guilt and often deceit as extramarital affairs are frowned upon by society.

      For those of you without wacky religious ideas, consider having a long term relationship without getting married or making a long term commitment. Every day you can know in your heart that you're staying with someone because they do make you happy and know that the same is true for the other person. Just make sure to deal with the legal issues in a society that assumes people will get married and bases a lot of laws on that presumption.

    51. Re:Oh please by Richy_T · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Absolutely. You have to have enough confidence to say "Just because you have failed to adequately butget time and/or resources for project X does not make it my emergency". Working extra when it really is called for is one thing but if it becomes a way of life, that's where the problems lie.

      Rich

    52. Re:Oh please by 808140 · · Score: 1

      Marriage involves changing your life for the other person, and for your children if you have them. If you're under the impression that you can make your life with someone without changing a single thing, you're dreadfully mistaken. In fact, it's not just marriage that's this way: any successful reasonably long term relationship is founded on compromise.

      Of course, it's a two-way street: each of you needs to re-evaluate priorities and meet the other half-way. In this particular instance, it seems the GP's wife was doing what you seem to be advocating: expecting her needs to be met without re-evaluating her position. Of course, we only have the GP's side of the story in this.

      Marriage is more than just cohabitation. If you're not ready for that, I'd encourage you not to get married. But don't lie to yourself and think that marriage doesn't involve changing your life. It does.

    53. Re:Oh please by Security_Consultant · · Score: 1

      I agree that an I/T job didn't directly cause your divorce, but it probably contributed indirectly. Any profession with high stress and long hours away from the family help fuel discord. I had a high tech job that kept me flying all over the world. After ten years of that, I went through a divorce. But I then and there made the decision that my children were more important than that particular job. So I left that job, and got another one with no travel, and ultimately won custody of my kids. I'm a lot poorer in financial terms, but very wealthy with my family. I put God first, my new wife second, my kids third, my job fourth, and then me. Because I put myself last I have found other people put me first which propels me farther than if I was thinking only of me. Good luck and best wishes on your future.

    54. Re:Oh please by CRMeatball · · Score: 1

      One just needs to remember why we work. We work to support our families. This means our families should be a higher priority. If we don't need to work to support our families, then it is only for our own fullfillment. Either way, if our goal is to maintain the integrity of our families, they need to come first. In stead of asking slashdot, and getting all sorts of stupid, childish remarks, go read Stephen R. Covey's books "7 Habits for Highly Successful People" and "The 8th Habit." Slashdot is not going to tell you why your marriage failed. Some introspection will.

    55. Re:Oh please by shmlco · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Precisely.

      There are LOTS of demanding jobs out there, and plenty where you're "on call". Doctor, lawyer, cop, IT, executive, manager, in fact, practically anything above "Would you like fries with that?"

      IT isn't a special case.

      In fact, I'd say he needs to be careful in his thesis, because there's a chicken-and-egg issue at play: Does IT cause people to have more problems... or are the types who're attracted to IT less likely to have good social/interpersonal skills, and as such be more prone to issues outside the workplace?

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    56. Re:Oh please by paxslash · · Score: 1

      That is incredibly myopic statement. Einstein was not a happy man throughout his life despite all his achievements. Success in work is almost directly related to dissatisfaction. And most people don't want to be around dissatisfied people - so their personal lives are a disaster. First order thinking will only get you so far...

    57. Re:Oh please by GNious · · Score: 1

      I decided to only work more than 40/h weeks when I am away - the weeks I am home (most), it is never more than 40. Its a choice, and mine just works. /G

    58. Re:Oh please by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      Yes, well, marriage counselors are in the business of marriages. That doesn't make them right about putting children second. Sex, marriage, etc, the whole point of it all is reproduction of the species, aka children. They are the most important aspect, because if you raise them right, you'll benefit society.

      Screw that. I don't exist to benefit society, nor does my marriage, nor do my children. Benefitting society is not my highest goal. Society may benefit as a side benefit of my existence (or my wife, or my children), and I happen to think they do, but society would not exist without individuals. "Benefitting society" (which is a nebulous and subjective goal that could never be quantified) doesn't trump individual needs and wants.

    59. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No way.
      I know plenty of really happy parents that have horrible children. Plenty of families that have gone through loads of trouble (deaths, divorces, sometimes multiple of each) and the children turned out great. I know from experience (personal and otherwise)

    60. Re:Oh please by Coriander · · Score: 1

      To a degree, yes, but not to the point of sacrificing career! I've never given up part of myself for a relationship... and I never would. If you need to, you're not a very good match with your significant other and the solution is to change who your SO is, not change yourself.

    61. Re:Oh please by theundergroundman · · Score: 1

      Pure conjecture. It is not inconceivable that despite Einstein's vast contributions to science that he worried about interpersonal issues as the end of his life was emminent. However I think the most important questions are: what are our individual priorities in life (we do all vary in ambition levels)? Will we actually look back on our lives with regret? And perhaps most importantly if we enjoy our lives at the moment will it matter that in our last moments we may somehow forget that joy and "accidently" regret?

    62. Re:Oh please by StormyWeather · · Score: 1

      My wife comes first. We can always make more children.

      My children will know this when they get older, and it will help to keep them in line ;).

    63. Re:Oh please by brettdavis4 · · Score: 1
      So, a financial manager in an insurance adjusting firm that works 80 hours a week and travels 25% of the time is somehow superior to a software developer who gets up at 6:30, drives to an office building across town, returns at 5:00 PM, where he begins to work on the side project that he hopes will lead to independence from the company job and into his own business? The real problem is that these guys end up marrying some woman who has no serious career bundled with some passion for gaining an independent self-driven new career. It has little to do with the career being "IT." I have seen the same phenomenon among musicians and cabinet makers. Marry a scientist. Someone who is genuinely driven by a legitimate research need. Then, instead of the scenario where one spouse is maybe working at some mindless job, unable to understand the other person with a job that drives a genuine passion, you have an equitable situation. One partner is trying to develop something seriously important in the IT world and gain economic freedom, and the other partner is trying to make a breakthrough in understanding the myolin sheath in order to end spinal paralysis. Just an example. Marry someone who works part time in a bookstore, and you've got a very desperately bored spouse, with no schema by which to possibly understand how someone could have a career that one could actually be sincerely passionate about.

      Could you come explain this to my friends? My friends will try to set me up with someone who is a cashier at Star Bucks, or is a sweet girl and works in the daycare, or someother low-level job. I've started to factor in what a person does when I am considering whether to date them or not. I don't factor in what they make. A school teacher is going to make less than a doctor.

    64. Re:Oh please by RedOregon · · Score: 1

      I got years and years of "are you married to me or that computer?!?"

      It stopped when I retired from the Air Force and got a job paying triple what I made before, with no degree or formal training. Only the knowledge and experience I gained from all those hours on the computer, and from IT type jobs I pushed my way into with that knowledge. Most of those jobs were *way* outside my career field, too.

      Was rough at times but worth it in the end! Happily married for 16 years now.

      --
      Skivvy Niner? Email me!
      HEY! Look left just ONE MORE TIME!
    65. Re:Oh please by Ponga · · Score: 1

      You sir are an idiot.

      Perhaps so. But please keep in mind that it IS possible for a person NOT "in your shoes" to reach a rational conclusion on the subject. If you believe that for a person to have *SOME* insight on what it takes to have a good marriage, they must be married; then you are the idiot. Granted, many things are learned from experience, but some things can be reasoned through by just being... a REASONABLE PERSON. At the same time, simply because a person has experience with marriege, does not make them an authority. Would you say that a person that has been married 5 times, to be experienced and therefore be able to relate to you and your experiences more than myself(not married)?
      Btw, I agree 100% - spouse first, kids second. But I guess my opinion does not matter to you, since I have neither, does it?

    66. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Fuck you.

      Sincerely,
      your son

    67. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are absolutely correct and you made the right decision. I've been in IT my entire marriage and we're going on 18 years now. It's a matter of setting priorities plain and simple. If work is most important to you, no matter what the industry, your life will suffer in other areas. Life is all about BALANCE!

    68. Re:Oh please by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Everyone else in most 1st world countries work 40 hours a week. Infact its illegal to go over 45 or 50 in France. America as a result is leading in divorce.

      France is also leading the list of 'first world' countries in unemployment, dropping steadily in the GDP per-capita rankings, dealing with occational labor riots, and generally regressing into a 'second world' country. Hardly a model anybody should be holding up as a goal.

      People should be free to screw up their family life if they so desire. It isn't the job of the government to provide you with a happy marriage.

    69. Re:Oh please by 808140 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not that old chestnut again. Have you actually ever bothered to read any of the statistics on welfare recipients? Of people on welfare who have children, only 10% have more than 4 kids. A google search for "welfare recipients statistics" turned up these two links as the first hits:

      While it is true that there are a number of single mothers on welfare, this is largely because of the following scenario (all too common):

      1. Woman has job.
      2. Woman gets pregnant.
      3. Father leaves.
      4. Woman takes maternity leave.
      5. Despite laws intended to protect her job while she is off, realities force employers to find someone to fill her position. She's assured that this is only temporary.
      6. Woman has a baby. By now, living without a wage and on her own has put her heavily in debt.
      7. As soon as she can, she goes back to her old job. She finds her position filled by someone new. Typically, she is let go soon after, obstensibly due to "restructuring." The fact that someone has filled her old position and that she must balance child-rearing duties with work, of course, are not the reason (this is sarcasm.)
      8. Her child demands a great deal of her time. With no one to help her and no money for a babysitter, her responsibilities make working difficult.
      9. The period of unemployment while she was pregnant makes employers regard her as someone "reentering the workforce." Compared to single men with no dependants applying for the same positions, she is regarded as a high risk candidate. Employers are extremely risk averse. Social stigma associated with single motherhood further reduces her attractiveness as a candidate.
      10. Reduced to this, she gets on welfare to help her get by. She works a job with low pay but relatively flexible hours, and tries to keep from getting further into debt.
      11. On average, within two years, she is able to transition off of welfare: her child becomes eligible for public pre-K programs around age 2.
      12. Once school frees up a substantial block of time, she can concentrate on getting a real job.

      The old 'welfare queen who has 20 kids and keeps having more to increase her welfare check' is a fantasy invented by men who have no concept of just how difficult bearing children can be. It also completely neglects that the marginal increase in aid for each new child is far less than the increase in costs of raising that child.

      Have you ever met anyone on welfare?

      They deserve your compassion. I make a lot more money than they'll likely ever make, but let me tell you, I don't know if I would have the strength or fortitude to make it with the odds they're up against. Working a job, taking care of their child, living in poverty, many of them going to school part-time... you should think twice before you judge them.

    70. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      start your own company if you want to take off for what ever reason.

      I know of very very companies that will give their male workings time off for a new child. You wanted a month off so you could bond with your child? You were there for the birth of your child, fine. I know of a lot of people that had to beg/plead to take time off for the same reason. You get vacation/sick leave/or some kind of time that you can take. Use it, that is what it is there for.

      Oh wait you took all your sick days to go on vacation or something. Plan things out not everything is supposed to be an accident. Unless that is what you are calling your child, an accident.

      just because you caqnnot plan things out doesn't mean you look for a new job. Ever try letting your boss(es) know that your wife is expecting? Try letting them know that very soon you'll have to run out to you can be there? Informing people of what the hell is going on may help you get the time you want.

    71. Re:Oh please by StormyWeather · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Having to stay late to wrap up code for a release deadline.
      Why? Did your boss set an unrealistic deadline? Sounds like his problem and he should stay late to make the deadline. Oddly enough I've never seen a project manager work an 80 hour week with no comp time or bonus, but developers line up for that kind of idiocy.

      getting calls from the computer room in the middle of the night
      Turn off the phone. If the company requires you to answer the phone get another job, or write documentation so they can fix problems without you. I personally count every call after hours as 2 hours on the job that I take off during the week. The wife enjoys me coming home at 2pm on a Friday and spending time with her.

      getting a calls at 5:30pm from an irate spouse.
      She wanted to spend time with you, you wanted to spend time at work.

      And don't spout off about HAVING to work late, you don't have to do anything. I used to work 12 hours a day, and I never got promoted until I stopped being a slave to the job. Why is it us programmers can't do simple division and figure out that a big paycheck divided by 80 hours a week is no better than a manager a burger king.

      You loved your job more than her, hope you can surf porn in privacy at work so it makes a better substitute.

    72. Re:Oh please by Otter · · Score: 1
      Everyone else in most 1st world countries work 40 hours a week. Infact its illegal to go over 45 or 50 in France. America as a result is leading in divorce.

      I was curious about the accuracy of this statement --here are the data. My summary:

      • The US marriage rate is about double that of Western European countries, which is probably the main reason the divorce rate is also roughly double. (See, the "Marriage causes divorce!" guy was correct!)
      • If you rank by divorce rate/marriage rate, most Protestant countries are in the 45-55% range, with the US lower than Germany or the UK.
      • Catholic countries have much lower divorce rates, which is probably the main reason why nominally Catholic France is down at 46%.
    73. Re:Oh please by k12linux · · Score: 1
      Do you think that, on his deathbed, Einstein was thinking "Oh, I wish I had paid more attention to my wife" No, he was thinking "I wish I had gotten to finish my unified theory of relativity"

      That's leaping to conclusions if you ask me. In his later years he was very much a socialist and interested in the well being of other people. It seems that he became a people first type of guy and may very well have lamented not having closer relationships with his wife (take your pick) and children.

      In fact if the unified theory was *that* important to him it seems he would have spent more time on it than on socialist and union-creating activities.

    74. Re:Oh please by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Aye.

      Welcome to corporate America where every project is priority "1A".

      Emergencies: Flood, fire, earthquake, riot.

      Not Emergencies: The boss really wants it by Friday. (doubly irritating when the boss is OUT on friday and until the following tuesday).

      Managers have no way to know how productive you can be. Their only way is to work you to the point of failure.
      So you need to fail mildly and early when you hit your real limits instead of killing yourself and working til you really fail (and they fire you for bad health, bad attitude, etc.).

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    75. Re:Oh please by wckdjugallo · · Score: 1

      But what if I really want to mod someone up and don't want to just post and remove the points and move along. Shouldn't there be a way to confirm the mod point went to the correct place before it tallies it in to the total?

      --
      wahooka - The #1 provider of the real Internet.
    76. Re:Oh please by arth1 · · Score: 1
      You have to have enough confidence to say "Just because you have failed to adequately butget time and/or resources for project X does not make it my emergency".

      The problem is that many companies have budgetted in that everyone who's on salary should put in 20+ hours extra free work a week. For the IT staff, that's most of the staff except help desks.

      Regards,
      --
      *Art
    77. Re:Oh please by infolib · · Score: 1

      I wish I had gotten to finish my unified theory of relativity

      Yeah, that's a pretty common deathbed thought.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    78. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doctor, lawyer, cop, ... executive, manager

      You might want to take a second look at the divorce rates in these professions. Here's a hint: they're high.

    79. Re:Oh please by aunticrist · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah, and Dahmer had a great home life growing up. He turned out wonderfully... :/

    80. Re:Oh please by Sleepy · · Score: 1

      I'll add my vote, kids second. Too many people are "kids first", which is why television is a big crap pile of commercials for kids stuff. They even have CAR and SUV commercials with the kids "approving" or selecting their parents next vehicle.

      As a child, most of my expensive presents lasted me more than 1 year. Why? Because to get them I had to save an allowance, birthday and xmas money. The year after I bought my Atari 2600 I was 11. The next year I wanted a ColecoVision because of Donkey Kong. I COULD have emptied my bank account, but since it was MY money I realized that would be a waste, and I passed.

      be true to yourself first to some degree, your spouse second to a fairness degree.

      People don't stay in crappy jobs if they're not in debt. Employed people generally don't get into debt if they budget. People living in a fantasy world just spend to put the kids first. I'm using money as an example, but time with the spouse matters.

      Not always, but often times when people start living through their kids, it's because it's a reality show and somehow they can "start over" with someone else's life. Some parents take kids on EVERY vacation, because you're just sick of the "other half". Some people take the kids into the master bed every night, as a barrier against sexual relations with the person they married.

      Kids need to grow up into adults, not be pampered. Otherwise they'll be spoiled brats who outgrow their Playstation2 the moment the X-Box 360 comes out (not like they PAID for it out of their allowance now...). Then kinds grow into a whiny, soft, ignororant population up to their eyeballs in debt and dependent on prescriptions to function. Oh wait, that happened. No wonder the population of the middle class US is being targeted for extinction -- they're too distracted, neutered, undisciplined, irresponsible, too comfy and too buried in their kids to think.

    81. Re:Oh please by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I hate to ask but why did she call you at 5:30PM? I mean you knew you where going to be late so you called her and let her know. Did she not get the message on the machine?
      I work in IT and I have a wife. This did come up early in the marriage when I wasn't used to sharing my life with someone.
      Now it really isn't much of a problem.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    82. Re:Oh please by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Well, I'm not sure which parts of the parent post are supposed to be sarcasm and which are heartfelt, but I'll add my bit :)

      People believe the lie that marriage is self-perpetuating. In reality, it's just as much work as any job -- if you think differently, then your spouse is probably the one doing all the work. People do "just get tired of each other" in that one day, they wake up, and realize "hey, there's no love here! Why am I married to this person I don't love?"

      The trick is that just like any software, a marriage needs maintenance as well as the original source code. You need to have a bug tracking system in place, be open to feature requests, and be willing not to give up. Love is just as much a discipline as it is a feeling you get from being around someone. If you work on it, it can get stronger. This is why arranged marriages, despite Western ideologies, actually work for some people. The couple goes into the marriage knowing it's not going to be an easy ride, and they'll have to work to improve their relationship.

      Being unhappy isn't something someone else does to you; you have to set boundaries, live with them, and if someone oversteps them, choose to a) move/redefine your boundaries, b) forgive them and make sure they understand where your boundaries are, or c) let them face the consequences of overstepping those boundaries. This way, if a spouse leaves you, it's not because you weren't working at your relationship, not putting it above your job, your stuff, your children, etc., but because your spouse was unwilling to work at your relationship.

      One thing about IT marriages: I bet you'll find it's generally the spouse of the IT worker who leaves, because the IT worker is too busy to notice that their marriage has stopped growing. By the time they do, their spouse has lost respect for them, and it's MUCH harder to redeem the relationship.

      Also, I think you'll find that this holds true for MBA jobs and travelling salespeople just as much as IT workers. GIGO, and all that (either yours, or theirs, or both).

    83. Re:Oh please by nontrad · · Score: 1

      You know, if I were your professor and you used that as your thesis for your degree, I would probably have the same opinion of you that your soon-to-be-ex does. Just imagine what potential employers will think of this also.

    84. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One way to solve it would make over time over 50 hours in a week be double or triple pay instead of time and a half. Corporations will do whatever makes them the most money, regardless of how it affects their workers. They only care about workers if caring improves the bottom line.

    85. Re:Oh please by Pentavirate · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If we can just figure out how to elliminate step 3 none of the other steps would even occur. Men need to learn to step up and take responsibility for themselves and women need to make the men commit to the relationship before kids are even a possibility. If the woman "gives it away" (ie not require any kind of committment from the man) than she has no power to keep him when she needs him. This is very likely where the the marriage traditions come from. It's to ensure the security of a woman who bears children.

      So how can we elliminate step 3 for the benefit of society?

    86. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She'd call at 5:30? Was she timing you like it was a track meet? I hope you never hit traffic on the way home and were delayed another 30 minutes, she'd have a stroke. I think she needs to learn some patience and understanding.

    87. Re:Oh please by melandy · · Score: 1
      You might want to take a second look at the divorce rates in these professions. Here's a hint: they're high.

      That's exactly what he's saying. The high divorce rate is not confined to the IT field.

      -m
    88. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever think of cutting back on your spending? And thus not need to work quite as hard?

      Not saying that you personally overspend but too many people do spend beyond what they should. Then they spend inordinate amounts of time working to cover it. Instead of stepping back and deciding to live more modestly.

    89. Re:Oh please by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 0

      I couldn't agree more. Your parents will pass away. Your kids will grow up and move away. You're with your spouse for life, or at least that's the plan.

      Plus you probably shouldn't tell her "Shuttup and go to your room!", unless its some sort of game I guess.

      Besides, it sounds like this guy is puting his career first, and then blaming his career. I have said it once I have said it a thousand times; web developers should not have childeren.

      --
      I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
    90. Re:Oh please by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      "My personal goal is now to work no more than 45 hours/week on average."

      Since it is your company consider hiring people (or more of them). You obviously have more work than you can handle. Delegating responsibility is one of the most important things a manager can do.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    91. Re:Oh please by DShard · · Score: 1

      Einstein was a really common man.

    92. Re:Oh please by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Norway also has normal work weeks and they are evaluted as being happier than people in the US. Most people in Europe (i.e. UK, Norway) have far more vacation weeks than us (and use them) and they live quite well on average.

      As far as France goes they have other issues that have very little to do with the 40 hr law. In fact it is due to the unemployment situation that the law was made, not visa-versa. Most analysts agree that France's problems stem from the extremely restrictive hiring/firing laws. I don't see them regressing into a "second world" country any time soon though, Francophobe biases notwithstanding.

      "It isn't the job of the government to provide you with a happy marriage."
      No, but the government sets the labor laws and enforces them.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    93. Re:Oh please by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      The wacky hours it was does it sometimes, but one thing I do is INSIST on:

      A Company Provided Laptop
      Remote access VIA VPN, SSH or whatever.
      If possible, some sort of corporate paid or compensated High Speed Access.
      Net Accessible KVM

      Once you have those, and any software you may need, insist on doing as much as possible from home for the scheduled outages. Not everything can be done that way. but alot of it can. AT least then you can spend all day with the family and not have to go anywhere once the outage starts.

      Insist on backups....cross train others in the critical things. When your on vacation, your on vacation....the backup should be the ONLY person to call you if something hits the fan.

      Jobs don't cause divorces.....stupid decisions do. If your Boss is a prick, remind him there is such as thing in the US as labor laws. You are only obligated to put in 40 a week. If you don't get overtime, don't work overtime. Anything over 50 hours a week is going overboard.

      --

      Gorkman

    94. Re:Oh please by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      It's not because you want to.</clue> I pulled a couple of these at the worst job I ever had. Problem was, it was during the post-bubble meltdown, and the unemployment rate for software developers in my region was somewhere around 30%. So when you get laid off and your first baby's on the way, you take whatever you can get. The company worked us that hard because they could. They knew that as soon as the economy recovered, we'd be gone in a heartbeat (especially at the wages they were paying), so they got as much work out of us as they could. I finally left when they threatened to fire me if I took the vacation I had told them about two months before.

      I guess I got off a little more lightly than some of my cow-orkers, though. They kept getting more and more stock options "in recognition of their hard work and dedication". Then the company was sold to (Earthlink?) and all their options became worthless. Kind of sums it up.

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    95. Re:Oh please by jimicus · · Score: 1

      If you happen to be a Nobel-prize winning physicist who is driven by that kind of thing, fine.

      But for 99.9% of us that's not the case - and I challenge you to find anyone who said on their deathbed "I wish I'd spent more time at work".

    96. Re:Oh please by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't always adequately budgeting time and/or resources, its that employers and employees often have a different opinion on what resources are the company's to budget.

      For instance, salaried full-time employees often think that 40 hours of their time a week are dedicated company resources to be budgeted, and that the rest of their time really belongs to them, but may go to the company to meet a real unusual need.

      Many employers seem to think that full 24 hours a day of the time of each salaried employee belongs to the company and can be budgeted by the company, but its usually best to given employees some of that, but no more than about 128 hours a week without special controls, for personal tasks as a grudging concession to morale and health of the workforce.

    97. Re:Oh please by kniLnamiJ-neB · · Score: 1

      I would argue however that their decisions most likely *put* them in this situation.

      1. Woman shouldn't be making babies with a Man who isn't committed to taking care of aforementioned babies. Here in the South we jokingly call that "Getting the milk without buying the cow".
      2. You mentioned "many of them going to school part-time"... seems like they might have done that before making a baby with just a little planning? I mean, getting pregnant isn't like winning a lottery or something...
      3. Your statistic: only 10% have more than 4 kids. Yeah, well... 4 kids? That's already a handful. When you're living below the poverty line, why did you have more than 1 kid to start with?

      I'm sure this sounds like flamebait, but I speak as someone who has a single mother of 4 in my extended family. And even though I love those kids to death, the fact remains that if their mother had an ounce of sense, she wouldn't be in the predicament she's in. She won't be getting off welfare in "1-2" years... I'm sure of that. She was on welfare when she had the first one, and kept on having kids.

      There are most likely some women out there who are genuinely down on their luck. And I'm happy there's a welfare system to take care of them. My problem is there are those out there consider poor judgment equivalent to bad luck. And I'm tired of watching so much of my paycheck go to the government to help pay for someone else's lack of sense.

      --
      Windows isn't the answer... it's the question. NO is the answer!
    98. Re:Oh please by DShard · · Score: 1
      Of people on welfare who have children, only 10% have more than 4 kids.
      Of people not on welfare, how many have more than 4 kids? 10% is a lot in a country where the average family has less than 2 kids.
    99. Re:Oh please by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Please stop knocking my favorite US o' A myths. Soon you'll be telling me that the French actually put up a good fight in WWII but their army got cut off in Belgium along with the Brits, or that they didn't lose more than 1 million people in WWI.

      Now all I have left are "those lazy Mexicans" and "Republicans care about the middle class".

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    100. Re:Oh please by NotSwo · · Score: 1

      Now if he had said something like 'WoW and Divorce', it'd be a lot more understandable.

    101. Re:Oh please by FreemanPatrickHenry · · Score: 1

      Dear Mrs. Chown, Ignore your son's attempts to teach you physics. Physics isn't the most important thing. Love is. Best wishes, Richard Feynman

      FPH-A physics major

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous .sig which, unfortunately, this space is too small to contain.
    102. Re:Oh please by yaphadam097 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wife: honey, did you remember to take the trash out?

      Husband: what is the Bugzilla number? Did you assign it to me?

    103. Re:Oh please by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      Actually, many of the booksellers I know are very passionate about their profession.

      --
      -mkb
    104. Re:Oh please by mackyrae · · Score: 1

      That's the point. IT aren't the only people who have on-call jobs and get divorces; all those other ones do too, so you can't blame just IT.

      --
      look! it's a bird, it's a plane, it's....a girl? yes, a girl browsing Slashdot on Linux
    105. Re:Oh please by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      This is BS, most good sized companies give paternityleave.

    106. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You're with your spouse for life, or at least that's the plan.

      That is, at least until you wake up one day and realize you can't stand her. Then you find yourself thinking about ways to kill her.

      Just kidding actually. I agree with the parent post.
    107. Re:Oh please by smilindog2000 · · Score: 1

      I have an unusual theory about how the gene pool works. I've done a fair amount of simulating evolution, and one insight I've gained is that evolution is far subtler than most people realize.

      In particular, it is by no means difficult for evolution to arrange for the less skilled people to have most of the babies, and for their children to be at least of average intelligence.

      A population with this quality allows the less skilled individuals to do more of the work that requires less skill, and allows the leaders more free time to lead.

      --
      Beer is proof that God loves us, and wants us to be happy.
    108. Re:Oh please by Knara · · Score: 1

      Highly reliable birth control for men and women, and education as to why one should use it. Duh. Pretty simple in an technologically advanced society. "Not giving it away" smacks of an outdated paradigm that hasn't worked for decades, if not longer.

    109. Re:Oh please by gunnk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Okay, the grandparent's case is one anecdotal case, but I think you'll find it's one of many. Given enough cases in both directions you end up building statistics... we have 9 people in our IT unit and only one divorce (and I think it was HER career that caused the problem there, not his).

      Life is one big quest for balance. You choose your priorities. In this case we're looking at someone working in IT AND going to grad school. Full-time employment plus grad school means SOMETHING else is likely to give. Grad school + work + kids is a combination that really stresses a marriage to the max. Yes, it can be done, but you have to actively MAKE IT WORK. You have to make sure that almost every day you devote time to your spouse and kids. If you can't devote enough time to work + school + your family, be prepared to fail in one of those. It doesn't matter if the work is IT or sales or accounting or anything else.

      Unfortunately, we tend to manage our time by prioritizing whatever has the next pending deadline. Family seldom comes with deadlines attached, so it often gets pushed to "low priority" -- meaning family never gets the attention it deserves. It therefore gets neglected and that's where the failure occurs. The person involved ends up blaming their other activities rather than their failure to make their family a priority.

      I'm working quite a bit lately because I'm in the process of starting a company while working full-time. When I make up a priority list for the day and find it's packed I add a section for "personal life" which says I must do something to let my wife feel special, something to make my daughter feel special, and something to take care of my own mental health. In a pinch, I may neglect me, but my family is important, so I consider those "family priorities" to be drop-dead items. Sometimes the most I can do is give my wife a backrub for 15 minutes or walk the dog around the block with my daughter, but they each DO get my undivided attention.

      Most "job-related" or "school-related" marriage failures are really "time-management" failures. You can't "turn off" your family while you pursue other priorities. If you can't devote a little time every day to each important part of your life you will see the neglected portion fail whether that's school, work, personal health, or family. Something WILL give!

      --
      Life is short: void the warranty.
    110. Re:Oh please by futuresheep · · Score: 1

      Agreed, I would have like to have been to change my selection. I should be able to moderate, verify my choices, then submit my moderations.

    111. Re:Oh please by BalkanBoy · · Score: 1

      Wrong, dumbass. You never put the SPOUSE second. Think about what you are saying. If you victimize the spouse on the account of your children, you will, albeit in a very prolonged, procrastinated way, negatively stimulate your spouse to the point where she can't even be sexually exicted around you. That kind of spouse NEVER makes for a good parent. I remember even a SLIGHT, REMOTE disrespect or anything that disturbed my mother was severely reprimanded by my father to the point where he'd threaten to use force (e.g. like slap us around to scare us a bit, he never ever hurt us when he did anything like that - so I wasn't abused in any shitty, catholic-priest sort of way). Both me and my brother are fine, had happy childhoods, and normal adulthoods (well, as normal as can be :). My mom and dad always came first, we came second. We were never disregarded, but we weren't being put on pedestals or were ever allowed to be the cause of disagreements between my folks. They _naturally_ came before us, and _naturally_ we are a product of their love - in that order, they came first, then we did. I know this kind of sounds "stupid", but it is how it is, and my parents are still married for 31 years so far. My dad wasn't as perfect as my mom, but he is happy to have found a woman as angelic as my mother to have accepted him with all his flaws, sins, etc.

      Don't EVER put your SPOUSE second. Children are always second to the spouse.

      --
      'A lie if repeated often enough, becomes the truth.' - Goebbels
    112. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Careers do not cause marriages to fail. An individual's failure to recognize that the career is impacting the relationship, may be a contributing factor. Both husband and wife (regardless of who's in IT) have to take responsibility. If one feels they are being neglected because the job is consuming the other, then the neglected must communicate that to the consumed, and together they must solve the problem.

      I agree with this wholeheartedly.

      I work in IT. I'm a systems administrator. For the most part, my job is 9-5 unless something dies. My marriage is on the brink of disaster right now. My wife was a teacher for many years before we adopted our son. For most of our marriage, she gave her life unceasingly to the kids. While all the kids loved her, I was put on the backburner. She'd work until 8pm before coming home (later changing that to 6 when I finally had enough), but would then put many hours into lesson plans, grading tests, etc. So often times, we'd be in the same room on our PC's but in different worlds. There was a lot of neglect, and a lot of hurt feelings. Sure I tried to bring it up many times, but I'd often get promises like "I'll make it up to you in the summer when I'm off" and stuff like that. And it never happened. When my wife quit teaching to stay home with our son, that was supposed to fix everything too. But it just shifted the problems elsewhere. I honestly don't know what's going to happen right now. My marriage is a disaster, but it certainly isn't because of IT. I think some IT jobs can contribute and the same can happen in other career fields too. However, it comes down to priorities and what's more important. If something else supercedes the spouse, there will be problems.

    113. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wiÑh I had spent less time masturbating.

      (From the UCB spy cameras at Einstein's residence.)

    114. Re:Oh please by smilindog2000 · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely right. Over the coming year I hope to hire more. I'm in a bit of a tough spot though, since others will follow my lead on hours. My extra effort gets multiplied by several, just because my example will motivate the others. Investors would have me put in 60 hours/week, and have me set that as the standard. I coming off of many years in Silicon Valley where I worked 60 hours year after year. For me, 45 seems like a nice compromise, and my wife has accepted that level.

      --
      Beer is proof that God loves us, and wants us to be happy.
    115. Re:Oh please by pnutjam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't 1/2 of all marriages end in divorce? I think any profession has a relatively high divorce rate. Marriage takes work.

    116. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yay, some feminazi propaganda. Statistics mean dick, try living in a poverty stricken area and you will quickly find that the majority (but not all, mind you) or people on welfare ARE trashy, slutty, drug addicted women. Most probably aren't smart enough to pop out another little Hell spawn or two in order to increase their monthly check, they just do it because they're too loose to use any sort of contraceptive.

    117. Re:Oh please by rk · · Score: 1

      Stock options... the glass beads and trinkets of the 21st century.[1]

      If I ever get offered stock options again, I'll ask for glass beads and trinkets instead. My wife can actually make something with those.

      [1] - Yes, I know many people have made a fortune with them. Many, many more are like me, however, who got options for companies that eventually ceased to exist.

    118. Re:Oh please by Shoeler · · Score: 1

      >Perhaps so. But please keep in mind that it IS possible for a person NOT "in your shoes" to reach a rational conclusion on the subject. If you believe that for a person to have *SOME* insight on what it takes to have a good marriage, they must be married; then you are the idiot. Granted, many things are learned from experience, but some things can be reasoned through by just being... a REASONABLE PERSON. At the same time, simply because a person has experience with marriege, does not make them an authority. Would you say that a person that has been married 5 times, to be experienced and therefore be able to relate to you and your experiences more than myself(not married)?

      You got it all wrong bub. Many (myself included) believes they know what it means to be married before they're married. I wondered why people said it was so hard - I mean, hell, I lived with my GF for 5-6 years. I sure as hell FELT married!

      It's just different. Add in a kid or kids, and wow - hello alternate reality, now I understand what all those people said about how damned hard it is to raise a kid. It's just - well, it sounds crappy, but you just can't relate to it until you do it. Take the hardest job you've ever had, but no days off, randomly long hours in the middle of the night, and you always, always have to be your best because it's someone's future you're shaping. You don't get to have bad days and just shrug it off. Do that for 18 years or more. Straight. When you do have a bad day, sometimes you go home and they look at you and you forget all about what's wrong with the world. It's just the hardest to explain thing.

      Marriage is much like that - except harder because they are already an adult and you should hopefully have to live with them for decades, and they come with their own life experience - you don't get to "shape" them - much. So I guess what I'm saying is I disagree with you - you can come to a rational conclusion, but it won't be a realistic conclusion because those life experiences have to be part of it. It isn't scientific - it's psychological. Can you tell me what I feel when I feel love? Of course not. It's the same thing, really.

      The issue I had really was the tone of what you said. It had authority - "My dad did this so therefore it can be done". He can be an outlier, remember?

      But at least we agree on one thing. :)

    119. Re:Oh please by pnutjam · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I too make it clear that while my wife is "Mommy" to my dauAny mghters she is first and foremost "My Wife". It cracks me up when my daughter refers to her as "Your wife". I think children are usually first for mothers (men deal with this better), but a man should take care of his wife.

    120. Re:Oh please by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      paradigm??

      There are two species of humans, one thinks sex is a special thing to share with a special person.
      The other thinks sex is fun.

      Guess which one ruins it for everybody.

    121. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The order is:

      1. Spouse
      2. Children
      3. Family
      4. Friends

      1,993,394,300. Job

    122. Re:Oh please by gunnk · · Score: 3, Informative

      40% ( http://www.divorcereform.org/nyt05.html )

      Still, the number IS very high. I still think the number one cause of failure is the fact that looking after your family is something that most people would rate "very important", but would not say needs to be one of TODAY's priorities. It gets put off, and put off again, until it fails from neglect.

      It's a big issue in all time management -- items you need to do "sometime" but which don't have deadlines. Working out is another great example. Fitness is critical to a long, happy life, but when you have a big to-do list it tends to get postponed until that most mystical of days: "tomorrow".

      --
      Life is short: void the warranty.
    123. Re:Oh please by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      In a world where people routinely die of old age (and other things), I see children as our most important asset. I have no problem with my taxes going to support a mother who stays home to take care of her children (assuming she is a good parent).

    124. Re:Oh please by crabpeople · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "So how can we elliminate step 3 for the benefit of society?"

      In western countries, its the womens choice whether to have the baby. Don't believe anyone if they tell you the man has any say what so ever. The argument then becomes, well if youre willing enough to sleep with someone then you should be willing enough to raise a family with them. I disagree with this, as I am sure most other people of both sexes would. So your question is how to elliminate relationships from going bad. Buddy, if you ever find a solution to that, please don't keep it to yourself. It's a similar question to "why do bad things happen?". Its unanswerable, they just do. For more reasons than there are stars in the sky.

      Some creative flamebait answers
      - Force all pregnancies to be supervised and agreed to by all parties, else aborted by the state.
      - Perfect contraception.
      - Give financial benefits/tax breaks to people who stay with their families.
      - Reinstitute christian or muslim moral values into the fabric of society.
      - Give fathers a legal say in whether a child can be born, disempowering women.
      - Give away all control of upbrining children to the state and leave the slaves^H^H^H^H^H people free to do work.

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    125. Re:Oh please by Veamon · · Score: 0

      Pecker slap her.

      --

      Slashdot News: As serious as a busted rubber
    126. Re:Oh please by Achra · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mod parent Doubleplusgood Truthspeak!

      Anyone that is in a healthy marriage knows that this guy is dead on the money. It took me until my second marriage to figure this out, btw.. I have no idea why there is this perception that if you meet the right girl, everything will just be peaches and chocolate and rose petals on the bed forever, no matter what you do.. All relationships are work. Period.

      --
      Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
    127. Re:Oh please by anagama · · Score: 1
      Norway also has normal work weeks and they are evaluted as being happier than people in the US. Most people in Europe (i.e. UK, Norway) have far more vacation weeks than us (and use them) and they live quite well on average.

      Norway has a quite a lot of oil/gas, a commodies which surely boost the country's prosperity level, ability to provide services, and the consequent contentment of its populace.

      Check this out:
      ... Norway exports 90 per cent of its entire oil production. Today Norway sits on approximately half of the remaining reserves of oil and gas in Europe. It covers 10 per cent of Europe's gas consumption and within a few years will increase gas exports dramatically and account for 30 per cent of European gas imports.
      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    128. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia... never mind.

    129. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      types who're attracted to IT less likely to have good social/interpersonal skills... more pr0n...

      I knew that was the problem.

    130. Re:Oh please by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      but a man should take care of his wife.


      I raise a glass to you in honor of the Old School.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    131. Re:Oh please by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      In particular, it is by no means difficult for evolution to arrange for the less skilled people to have most of the babies, and for their children to be at least of average intelligence.


      One thing academically intelligent people think is that academic intelligence is somehow an evolutionary advantage. It's obviously not, but rather it looks like a disadvantage.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    132. Re:Oh please by TheRecklessWanderer · · Score: 1

      My sister is one of those people who thinks of welfare as a career. She got that attitude from hanging out with other people who have that attitude. She got it in high school, going to a "trade" high school for less gifted students (AKA dumping grounds). She took classes like hair dressing, english and reading (this is high school folks). In any case, she dropped out with a baby and went on welfare (loser boyfriend = no choice). She never did get of welfare until she got married 15 years later. Now her husband is on workman's comp for a back injury, and he will never work again. So the long and short of this story, one night I was sitting around with one of her friends, and we were having an argument about working. I told her she should get a job and get of welfare. She told me she has a job, she has kids and raises them. It's not a job. It's a life choice, but since your other halves don't want to support you, it's not a good choice, and being on welfare is never a job. she never spoke to me again, my loss, she was a hottie.

      --
      Mean what you say...say what you mean.
    133. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you are having a hard time finding/keeping an IT job then ask yourself:
      • Is it time to learn new languages or are you still looking for COBOL and RPG jobs?
      • Are you still learning and keeping current or are you writing programs with the same tools and libraries you were 20 years ago?
      • Are you actually good or do you just get by?
      • How are your social skills? Do people like you or do you alienate them? (As much as we may dream of acting like the BOFH there's a reason most of us don't.)
      • How are your communication skills? If you can't explain things in a way that gets your point accross that CEO who is 12 years younger it's not going to help you win him over.
      • Are you doing the type of job you should be? Are you advancing to build complex systems instead of still doing basic coding to other people's specs? If not.. why not??

      My experience has been that skilled programmers who are keeping up with technology, adapting as the industry changes, have people skills and can communicate are pretty valued regardless of age. If you're a veteran and still doing basic tasks then what do you expect? Of course a business is going to go after the money.

    134. Re:Oh please by blew_fantom · · Score: 1

      you do realize that by using IT analogies, you have shown just how geeky you are, right? ;) j/k man. good post. good points. if the other geeks can't understand what a relationship is after reading your post, they are doomed...

    135. Re:Oh please by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If oil and gas deposits produce a happy population then how come Nigeria isn't, or Alaska for that matter?

      Actually, contrary to Norway's Foreign Ministry's sunny report oil production in Norway has peaked. Though, as you pointed out, they have better gas reserves. Russia still supplies a major part of Europe's gas needs (#1 at 1,680 trillion cubic feet in reserves).

      Production from Norway, OECD Europe's largest producer, is expected to peak at about 3.6 million barrels per day in 2006 and then decline gradually to about 2.5 million barrels per day in 2030 with the maturing of some of its larger and older fields.

      Estimated Reserves (BB):
      Kazakhstan 9.0
      Norway 7.7
      Azerbaijan 7.0

      Maybe the US will live high on the hog from coal.

      Total recoverable reserves of coal around the world are estimated at 1,001 billion tons--enough to last approximately 180 years at current consumption levels ...67 percent of the world's recoverable reserves are located in four countries: the United States (27 percent), Russia (17 percent), China (13 percent), and India (10 percent).

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    136. Re:Oh please by ocbwilg · · Score: 1

      I think you're slightly right, but mostly wrong. Your analogy is correct, if you fail you can't help anyone. That is why you have to take care of yourself first. After that, however, making a rule about putting your kids or your spouse first seems insane. They are people. Treat them as such. Sometimes one will need you more than the other and sometimes it will be the other way around.

      Well, I'll not mince words by saying that "I think that most marriage counselors." Let me just say that when my wife and I were in counseling, we were explicitly told that when you are working on relationships, the relationship with your spouse comes first, then children second. At first it is counterintuitive to put your kids second, but the best way that you can provide a safe, stable, and reassuring environment for your children to grow up in is to ensure that the primary relationship in the family/household is stable and healthy. If the parents are in sync, then they will be able to work together to provide for the kids, and the kids will have a strong example to emulate. If the parents are not in sync and their relationship is out of whack, it can create stress and uncertainty for the spouses which will be translated to the children.

      Like the previous poster said, it's hard to be an effective parenting team when you're divorced. At that point your family has already disintegrated.

    137. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. I have been in IT for over 15 years and married 9 years.

      I choose to work where I can put my family first. Sure, I do not get a 6 figure salary but I work within 10 minutes of our house, get home around 4pm, make it to the kids ball practices, have most weekends for familiy things and I still make around 70k a year. Sure I could make 100,000 plus if I wanted to drive 30 minutes to an hour and work from 6am to 7-8pm all day and sometimes on the weekends.

      Now there are times at work where crap hits the fan and I am here for days (last years hurricane season comes to mind) but for the most part it's all good.

      I CHOOSE my family over a high paying carreer. The poster IMO, could have made the same choice.

    138. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT causing divorce! Thats like saying working in the coal mine causes lung cancer.

      Oh, wait...never mind.

    139. Re:Oh please by E++99 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Don't 1/2 of all marriages end in divorce?

      Yeah, and the other half end in death. Pretty grim institution. ;-)
    140. Re:Oh please by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      Have you ever met anyone on welfare?

      Yes. Half my extended family.

      Of people on welfare who have children, only 10% have more than 4 kids.

      MORE than 4 kids? How many of them have 4 kids? If you're that financially strapped, why are you having that many kids?

      Yes, I know that being poor also means you can't afford birth control and doctors and other things without medical assistance, and there are a whole slew of societal reasons why the poor have more kids (including more free itme on their hands to have sex, unsupervised children because parent is busy working, etc..).

      Frankly, I would have a lot less of a problem with many of the welfare queens if they actually did their job and took care of their kids like they're being paid by the state to do. Unfortunately, in my experience, they don't. So, despite having a full time stay at home mother, the kids still end up on the streets committing crimes, having more kids, and generally making their situations worse.

      I'm fully aware that Welfare is a great program for many, and that many people use it wisely for a short period of time to get them back on their feet, and for those people the system works well. But come on, 10% with MORE than 4 kids? They probably have as many, if not more kids than those with fewer than 4 kids combined.

      Should we turn a blind eye to those that abuse the system just because it works well for those that don't? I don't think so. Should we abandon the system because there are some that abuse the system? Not at all.

      Just please, don't pretend the abuse isn't rampant. It is. I know, half my extended family abuses the system (with some having been on welfare for more than 20 years). Not just welfare, but SSI, Food Shelves, and a large number of other programs as well. They work very hard at gaming the system, and they have a network of people they are in regular contact with that discuss ways to find loopholes and exploit things. Not illegally, mind you, but it should be. And I don't even live in a poverty stricken area.

      There have been a lot of changes to Welfare over the years in attempts to "fix" the problems, and in my experience they tend to just make it harder on the legitimate recipients. The career recipients just figure out new loopholes.

    141. Re:Oh please by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      At first it is counterintuitive to put your kids second, but the best way that you can provide a safe, stable, and reassuring environment for your children to grow up in is to ensure that the primary relationship in the family/household is stable and healthy.

      There is no such thing as a "primary relationship." You have a relationship with your spouse, parents, coworkers, and each of your children. Those relationships will affect one another. It is possible that solving problems with your spouse will benefit your children, even more so than spending more time with them. It is also possible that focusing on your spouse too much and not enough on your children will lead them to resent you and cause new problems. You can't just focus on one relationship and expect it to fix others.

      If the parents are in sync, then they will be able to work together to provide for the kids, and the kids will have a strong example to emulate.

      Maybe, in some cases. That does not make it so in all cases.

      If the parents are not in sync and their relationship is out of whack, it can create stress and uncertainty for the spouses which will be translated to the children.

      This is possible. It is also possible to be "in synch" with your spouse you will have two parents neglecting or emotionally damaging the children instead of one.

      Like the previous poster said, it's hard to be an effective parenting team when you're divorced. At that point your family has already disintegrated.

      If your goal is to maintain a family no matter what, then this is great. If, however, your goal is to maximize the happiness and fulfill the potential of all the people involved, sometimes a divorce is best for the children. I know people that I will not say were 100% the good half of their marriage, but pretty damned close to it. Their divorces were very much in the best interests of the children. Physical abuse is an extreme example, but their is a whole range of situations and you have to remember that avoiding divorce and having a certain set of people living together is not an admirable goal, by itself.

    142. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm 47, been in IT all my working life, doing techie things and working too hard and enjoying it sometimes too much. Some autism spectrum traits, some obsessive compulsive behaviours - a lot of displacement activities...

      I divorced when my kids were 7 and 9 - and I got custody. My ex and ex-best friend never made their dream together and two families were shipwrecked. He was in IT as well - same university as me - same subject - so go figure that?

      Actually I was lucky - I have a great relationship with my kids (now 15, 17) - probably better than it would have been if i hadn't been sole carer for a while. I have a wonderful new wife, two new kids and I still work the occasional overnight and get calls at 3:00 am from the test team...

    143. Re:Oh please by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      "Careers do not cause marriages to fail."

      I disagree. In modern economic circumstances, the environment, familial attachments, where you are located usually dictate what kinds of compromises you can make and can't make. So yes CAREERS CAN cause marriages to fail. It's always a cost vs. benefit analysis.

      If you want a reason why marriages fail a big part of the reason is simply economic pressure. Especially by businesses on the working class, people are scared of financial insecurity, losing their jobs, etc.

      I bet there is a fairly good correlation between economic pressure and divorce rates.

    144. Re:Oh please by E++99 · · Score: 1
      Highly reliable birth control for men and women, and education as to why one should use it. Duh. Pretty simple in an technologically advanced society. "Not giving it away" smacks of an outdated paradigm that hasn't worked for decades, if not longer.

      Actually it works great and has for millennia. The only places it doesn't work is where it isn't done. Controlling people's behavior by "educating them" is an outdated paradigm that has never worked for sustained periods, but always regresses into controlling people by violence. Especially today, information is too easily spread to think you can limit behavior by limiting ideas.
    145. Re:Oh please by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      People believe the lie that marriage is self-perpetuating. In reality, it's just as much work as any job -- if you think differently, then your spouse is probably the one doing all the work. People do "just get tired of each other" in that one day, they wake up, and realize "hey, there's no love here! Why am I married to this person I don't love?"

      I think that a worthwhile marriage is self-perpetuating. That means, though, that each person gets out more than they put in. This sounds funny, but the whole is more than the sum of its parts in several ways. Some of them are very simple; for instance, it's quicker for one person to wash all the dishes for two people than it is for two people to each wach their own dishes, simply because there's set up and take down for the process which is repeated if two people wash dishes separately. This is a simple, silly example, and it's not a big savings, but my point is that this sort of thing can happen all over your relationship if you let it.

      Also, perpetuating is taken to mean, like, perpetual. But nothing is. NOTHING IS FOREVER - except perhaps some things that we as three dimensional beings may not even be able to apprehend. Sure, marriages end. People fall out of love, although I would argue that means they weren't really in-love in the first place, just in-fatuated. My most recent ex-girlfriend claimed to love me, but my working theory (not that it matters so much because she's my ex and the current one is so much better - er, but I digress) is that she was in love with being treated like a valuable person, an experience that her prior relationships didn't really prepare her for.

      But who knows, it's all academic because she may never know what happened inside her head, and that gives me pretty damned poor chances of it. And, again, it's not really important. I don't have to understand everything even though to me the desire to do so is just part of geekdom.

      The important thing really is to form a relationship with someone who shares your priorities. I know a guy whose wife left him because he was always working to try to provide for his family. Well, his daughter has no self-esteem (and no, that's not my ex - it's my ex's cousin) and his son is in prison, and now he's got a girlfriend he doesn't have much time for, and a nice house house next to a golf course. He's got a hottub, but it's been a soup of algae for years because he feels like he has no time to maintain and/or use it. Is he happy? Not from what I can tell. But if he had hooked up with a woman who wanted to do her own thing, then perhaps he'd be happily married still. And, hopefully, they wouldn't have had any kids whose lives they could fuck up.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    146. Re:Oh please by monkeydo · · Score: 1

      Most people in Europe (i.e. UK, Norway) have far more vacation weeks than us (and use them) and they live quite well on average.

      Main Entry: i.e.
      Function: abbreviation
      Etymology: Latin id est
      that is

      "I.e." can only proceed an inclusive list. I'm not sure if you are asserting that Europe is comprised of only the UK and Norway, or that the populations of the UK and Norway (65,000,000 combined) comprise the majority of Europeans. It doesn't matter though. Both assertions are false.

      Futher, while europeans may live "quite well" on average (which is itself debateable) they also pay much more in taxes.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
    147. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he's looking for data points, here's mine:
      Working in IT for 20 years, happily married for 12, work about 45 hours a week, make it home for dinner most nights.

      If he's looking for opinions, here's mine:
      It's not what you do that affects a marriage, it's how much time you spend at it. Corporate culture and your salary demands are probably better indicators of how much time you're required to spend at work than what you're actually doing. Maybe working for a smaller company and for less money will let you take the time you need to make a marriage work. It's all about the choices you make.

    148. Re:Oh please by E++99 · · Score: 1

      "10% have more than 4 kids"
      Wow! That statistic totally reenforces the stereotype. I'm a father of 4, and people go bug-eyed when I tell them how many I have. I know of no one with 5. That 10% of welfare mothers have 5 or more is amazing and disturbing.

    149. Re:Oh please by EtherMonkey · · Score: 1

      No employer can fire you for refusing to work significantly more than 40 hours/week on a regular basis. The only exception would be if 80-100 hours/week was clearly explained to you in writing before you accepted the job. If 80-100 hours/week is common for you its because you're not confident that you are qualified for a better job.

      I suggest that you either grow some balls, engage a good headhunter to act on your behalf, or find a new field of employment where you don't f*ck things up for the rest of us.

      I'm not saying I haven't been through it myself. I was in the same situation many years ago: working for a public university under oppressive and/or unqualified management, forced to work 80+ hours/week to meet capricious deadlines, baby at home and another on the way. But I grew some balls and stood up to management. In the end I got compensation for some of the unpaid overtime I worked, payment in full for my backlog of unused vacation, and agreement that either schedules or responsibilities would be adjusted so that nobody would be forced to work more than 35 hours/wk by design. At the same time I posted my resume on-line and had a new job offer at almost twice the salary in a matter of days.

      And that period of time did stress my marriage. The same would have happened if I was a salesman trying to reach unrealistic quotas, a doctor in an understaffed hospital, wherever. But in a strong relationship, spouses will communicate and support each other. One spouse will show the other how crazy the job is and encourage, even help that person find another job. They build each other's confidence and act as a safety net and pressure valve. They make accomodations in lifestyle and finances so a job change, even to a lower-paying job, can be accomplished.

      What I'm saying that life is a series of ups-and-downs, and the same goes whether you're married or not. If you have the right partner and a good relationship, events like these are easier to handle and strengthen the bonds.

      Unsatisfactory jobs do not cause marriages to fail; failed marriages cause people to stay in unsatisfactory jobs.
      (And in Soviet Russia, unsatisfactory jobs fail YOU!)
      --
      --- A man with a briefcase can steal more money, than any man with a gun. [Don Henley]
    150. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hear hear!

    151. Re:Oh please by E++99 · · Score: 1, Interesting
      but as soon as they enter school, the pressure is off, and you can being to wean them off dependance on you.

      At what, age 6? or is it 4 now? Therein lies the disintegration of America. If you have kids, you are responsible for their upbringing. And yes, we homeschool.
    152. Re:Oh please by drpentode · · Score: 1

      Your theory intrigues me. I've wondered why wealthy, intelligent people have fewer children. One would think that they would want to spread their good genes around more.

    153. Re:Oh please by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1
      Do you think that, on his deathbed, Einstein was thinking "Oh, I wish I had paid more attention to my wife" No, he was thinking "I wish I had gotten to finish my unified theory of relativity"
      I assume that I'm not going to be happy when I'm on my deathbed in any case. So, might as well be as happy as possible the rest of the time.
    154. Re:Oh please by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      I have no idea why I haven't added you to my friends list before this! :)

    155. Re:Oh please by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      And to think... I'm the one with the mod points today ;D

    156. Re:Oh please by vinn01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dynamics change.

      Your g/f will lose her understanding of your job when you get married and have a baby. At that point you'd better be around to help (unless she has a lot of family for support) because she will not enjoy being a de facto single mother with an absentee father.

      Deal with it.

    157. Re:Oh please by E++99 · · Score: 1
      Yes, well, marriage counselors are in the business of marriages. That doesn't make them right about putting children second. Sex, marriage, etc, the whole point of it all is reproduction of the species, aka children. They are the most important aspect, because if you raise them right, you'll benefit society.

      That's silly. When was the last time a person had sex because they were worried about the species continuing? Oh, yeah, you're talking about Evolution's Grand Plan for the human race, according to which He gave us our sex drive and inclination towards marriage and children. B.S. We have children for the benefit of those children. That they can enjoy all the wonders of life, and also contribute to society themselves. What is the greatest benefit to those children is a question of philosophy and religion. Based upon my religion, philosophy, and experience, I agree that what is best for them is to see the example of a marriage being put first, and made to work.
    158. Re:Oh please by Xybot · · Score: 1

      Putting your oxygen mask on first, is putting your childrens wellbeing first. Working hard to keep a relationship intact is, in many cases also putting your children first.

      --
      God was my co-pilot, but then we crashed and I was forced to eat him.
    159. Re:Oh please by 808140 · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, do you know how much of your paycheck goes to pay for welfare? My guess is no, because if you had any idea how small the percentage is compared to all the other stuff you pay for, you wouldn't be bringing it up.

      Go ahead, look it up. Compare it to the military, medicare/medicaid, and everything else. Hell, I'll even look it up for you, that's what a nice guy I am: Myth: Welfare is to blame for runaway government spending.

      Those numbers are from 1992. I'm rather sure our defense budget has drastically increased since then.

    160. Re:Oh please by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

      Age for truth!

      --
      [o]_O
    161. Re:Oh please by jeffgtr · · Score: 1

      Most marriages end in divorce and it's normally the woman who files, normally around 40 this happens. It probably wasn't your job (unless you were a total workaholic). It's just the way it is, u the normal course of things anymore. You should stop looking for something to blame, accept it and get on with your life, it was probably going to happen no matter what you did.

    162. Re:Oh please by legLess · · Score: 1
      In western countries, its the womens choice whether to have the baby. Don't believe anyone if they tell you the man has any say what so ever.
      What the fuck? The man has all the choice in the world about whether to have sex with a woman in the first place. If you don't want to pay for the consequences of your actions, perhaps you should act more carefully.
      --
      This isn't as much "normalization" as it is "don't take so many drugs when you're designing tables."
    163. Re:Oh please by dave562 · · Score: 1

      Luckily I won't be a slave to the IT machine for the rest of my life. As a counter point, my boss has a wife and kid and things are good there. Obviously one exception doesn't disprove the rule, but it's not impossible to make it work.

    164. Re:Oh please by OSXCPA2 · · Score: 1

      1. If you have children 'to benefit society' you are either really, really twisted or just plain out of your nut.
      2. Having children is imperative for some, not for others. In the long run, we're ALL dead, so it really doesn't matter, and just because there is a long evolutionary history supporting having kids (cause if your parents had none, chances are you won't... ;) ) does not mean there is some sort of goal to it. Evolution is not about outcomes, it's about survival from moment to moment.
      3. More on point, I've seen many people with good marriages go bad because they spoiled the crap out of their kids and neglected each other. I've seen parents so self-centered that they hire nannies as soon as the kids are born so they can resume their careers. Balance, balance, balance. There is no need to rank 'spouse or kids' - just keep both of them somewhere above everything else, and you're golden. Unless that idea doesn't appeal to you - then don't have kids or get married. Either way, you contribute more net happiness to the world than spoilers or nanny-ers.

      My bosses' bosses' boss just had her first kid at 37. She was back at work in 6 weeks, because she and her husband are career oriented - they have a ton of money and one of them could easily quit to raise the rugrat. She told us at a group meeting that her toddler runs to the nanny and has bonded with her instead of mom - she and her husband are happy their precious daughter loves the nanny, because that means they 'got a good one'. I almost vomited. She then replied to a question from one of my peers about stock we were issued as part of compensation, "I really don't know about that - those shares are so cheap, and I get so many other forms of incentive compensation, well, that's just shoe money. Ask Human Resources - they'll know."

      FYI, the share payout was about $900, which is a lot to us - we don't get 'incentive compensation', wages have been frozen and bonuses were cancelled last year, for the foreseeable future. For us, anyway, not for COOs.

      The point of the above - bad parents suck. Don't be one. Have vacations, cars and houses in the wine country instead - your taxes will pay for my kids education, for which I will be grateful.

    165. Re:Oh please by pinkfalcon · · Score: 1


      My mom was raised on a farm as the first of 5 kids. She was driving her siblings to school by the time she was 10. All the kids helped out doing all the chores, etc... My Uncle who still runs that farm has seven kids (currently aged 15 - 34). No one ever went on welfare

      My dad was the last of 11 (yes he was an uncle before he was born). There might have been more but his dad died of a heart attack. My Grandmother raised the kids by herself without going on welfare. (With some help from the older kids).

      --
      Real SUV's don't have cupholders
      It's 5:42 A.M., do you know where your stack pointer is?
    166. Re:Oh please by 808140 · · Score: 1

      As another poster pointed out, the 10% is actually for 4 or more, not for more than 4. My mistake. The same poster supplied the following data from the 2000 census: 2.57 is the average number of people per household, across the entire population of the United States. Taking a weighted average from the data on the site I linked, we can determine the average number of kids for recipients of welfare: 43.2% have one child, 30.7% have 2, 15.8% have 3, and 10.3% have four or more. Assuming that four or more means 4 for a lower bound, we have a mean of 1.932 children per household for welfare recipients.

      In order to bring that up to the national average, the number of children required in the "4 or more" column would have to be 10. Yes, 10. To meet the average for the United States. Assuming 10.3% of the population have 10 children, we get the following weighted average: 2.55. Less than 2.57, even!

      Still think 10.3% is a lot of people?

    167. Re:Oh please by Stardo · · Score: 0

      Hate to say this, but the man is no more responsible than the woman in creating a child, unless either party was forced to have sex.

      A woman does have a lot more birth control options than a man, however.

    168. Re:Oh please by pinkfalcon · · Score: 1


      In my case - the kids were the only thing that kept me sane during my divorce.

      My wife left me with a 2 year old son and a 9 year old step-daughter (that I treated like my own daughter) 5 days before I was laid off. The double rejection actually put thoughts of suicide in my mind (I'm useless at everything, blah blah). But the fact I had to be there for the kids is one of the main things that kept me going. I'm not saying it was the only thing, but it was touch and go for a while.

      --
      Real SUV's don't have cupholders
      It's 5:42 A.M., do you know where your stack pointer is?
    169. Re:Oh please by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's probably because when I'm not being wise and insightful I'm being an incredible asshole.

      Of course, I'm firing for effect, but most people don't think the ends justify my means.

      I'm glad you believe my heart is in the right place though :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    170. Re:Oh please by elucidnation · · Score: 1

      i am reminded of a story I read about Lee Iacocca while he was in charge of chrysler. An upper level manager made a point of telling Iacocca he hadn't taken a vacation in years, hoping t impress the boss with his devotion to the job---Iacocca cut him down to size by asking him why he thought he deserved to manage a large corporate project if he ccouldn't manage his time well enough to spend a couple of weeks with his family

    171. Re:Oh please by Yakko · · Score: 1
      In western countries, its the womens choice whether to have the baby. Don't believe anyone if they tell you the man has any say what so ever.

      If that's the case, may I never marry.

      - Reinstitute christian or muslim moral values into the fabric of society.

      I probably have been trolled(tm), but if this ever happens, I'd rather die. I'll keep my poor opinion of religion to myself.

      --

      --
      Me spell chucker work grate. Need grandma chicken.
    172. Re:Oh please by 808140 · · Score: 1

      I adressed this issue here. I sort of regret bringing that 10% statistic up, because it does sound much larger than it actually is. The thing to recognise is that nearly half of all welfare mothers have only one child, which brings the average way down (to less than the national average, in fact, which I'll admit surprised me.)

    173. Re:Oh please by 808140 · · Score: 1

      Another thought... lots of kids aren't planned. Not saying this is right, but it's a fact. I wasn't (planned, I mean.)

    174. Re:Oh please by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      And don't spout off about HAVING to work late, you don't have to do anything. I used to work 12 hours a day, and I never got promoted until I stopped being a slave to the job. Why is it us programmers can't do simple division and figure out that a big paycheck divided by 80 hours a week is no better than a manager a burger king.


      I worked with someone who got a higher performance grade for all his extra work. Then he found out how much extra it was (0.75%). He reckoned that he'd have been better off doing a an evening in a couple of evenings a month in his local bar.


      I'm staggered that people work huge amounts of extra hours for free.

    175. Re:Oh please by ksheff · · Score: 1

      that's when the "what are still doing at work?" calls would start

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    176. Re:Oh please by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      If oil and gas deposits produce a happy population then how come Nigeria isn't, or Alaska for that matter?


      The former because of a corrupt governemnt that does not use the proceeds to the benefit of the population... The latter... Well, the citizens all get a big fat check with their cut of the revenues every year. The standard of living is very high, and I don't see any evidence that the population as a whole isn't happy.

    177. Re:Oh please by genner · · Score: 1

      The trick is that just like any software, a marriage needs maintenance as well as the original source code. You need to have a bug tracking system in place, be open to feature requests, and be willing not to give up

      This really needs to be on a poster or a desk calender and sold on thinkgeek.com

    178. Re:Oh please by jafac · · Score: 1

      Too true.

      Passive-aggressive tendencies in one or the other partner yield the situation of: "I shouldn't have to tell him/her I'm mad at him/her, he/she should be sensitive enough to my needs to KNOW it without me saying anything." . . . and of course, that causes resentment to build, possibly on both sides. There's got to be communication, even if it's bad news. And it's a two way street - one partner has to be willing to tell the bad news, and the other partner has to be accessible to listen to it, and accept it, or whatever.

      The biggest problem I have in my marriage is that my wife thinks I work too much, and my boss thinks I work too little (~45 hrs/wk). The problem is, in my situation, I don't have a lot of choice employment-wise, if I were to lose this job. No matter what a person's employment situation is, the answer can't always be: go look for another job. The choice is: work the job you have, or be homeless. When a spouse can't accept that, and gets selfish, or needy, or takes overtime as a personal affront, then that's a difficult problem.

      Yes, you can't put your job ahead of your spouse - on the other hand, neglecting your job altogether is not an option either. There has to be some middle ground. This is the hardest task for me. After 14 years, it hasn't gotten any easier. A man HAS to work to support his family.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    179. Re:Oh please by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      IT is not much different than being a Doctor or a lawyer

      I think you're underestimating the alpha/beta personalities involved.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    180. Re:Oh please by ksheff · · Score: 1

      She wanted to spend time with you, you wanted to spend time at work.

      No, she wanted someone else to watch the kids and I don't like leaving something in an unfinished state. I was always taught that if you have a job to do, do it right and do not leave a mess for someone else to waste their time on. A clock watcher would be better for her social life, but that's not who I am or ever will be. I knew an engineer at RedHat that had the exact same gripe with his spouse.
      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    181. Re:Oh please by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      - Reinstitute christian or muslim moral values into the fabric of society.

      I probably have been trolled(tm), but if this ever happens, I'd rather die. I'll keep my poor opinion of religion to myself.


      Actually I think this is the best option. "Religious moral values" != "religion". If there's a social stigma against deadbeat dads (even unmarried, which traditional religion tends to ignore), and no social stigma against a mother saying "that guy fathered my baby and ran away", I think it would do a lot to make parents stay together.
    182. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who moderates this garbage? "Score 5, Insightful" Go and cry somewhere else. Nobody wants to see this spectacal.

    183. Re:Oh please by ksheff · · Score: 1

      they value their time & money more than having a bunch of kids? Good question.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    184. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think many marriage councilors recommend never putting your spouse second.

      okay, this is how it typically works...

      woman uses sex appeal to attract guy. woman can't wait to marry guy so she can stop with all the sex appeal hassle crap. sure, she'll try and look nice - but that's for her to feel good in front of her friends, not her husband. if she was too attractive for her hubby, he might actual want sex, and that isn't gonna happen often.

      the guy can't wait to get married to get into more sex.

      wthe oman neglects to tell guy that she's getting married to avoid the hassle of being sexy and having sex... it never crosses her mind that this might be important to "her new accessory."

      seriously, i think it is a genetic thing - women just think differently. it isn't personal, but you are there to benefit her and she isn't really thinking about what *you* want. she'll give you what she wants to give you. you are the mule, shut up and keep pulling her dream cart.

      so, guy lives life like deer in headlights... and wonders how he never knew his wife's middle name was "chastity."

      the wife plays all prim and proper like it is all good, while the guy starves sexually... a slow, painful fate that feels worse than death... but he still has to be lovey dovey - but not too much. the head hurts. she isn't into "honeymoon sex (3 times a week is honeymoon sex to a typical wife, guys).

      and so goes marriage life for 90% of guys.

      speaking in generalizations...

      1. women are very emotional, but not very intimate.
      2. men are very intimate, but not very emotional.

      you think i kid? you aren't nmarried yet.

      you are a deer who hasn't seen the headlights yet.

      so, how does one succeed in a marriage?

      i know many folks won't like the answer... but each spouse needs to take the time and make the effort to understand the other's needs and work as hard to satisfy their spouse's as they do their own.

      "do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

      sound familiar?

      some folks will notice this *is* the major guiding principal of the bible. the bible also discusses sexuality.

      pre-marital sex - don't do it (have more respect for another human being - maybe two i she gets pregnant - more than your lust).
      maritial sex - do it all the time unless BOTH spouses AGREE not to have sex for a short period of time (I Corinthians 7).
      extra-marital sex - don't do it (lying and cheating shouldn't be done on anyone and you should respect someone else and the potential offspring more than just using them to selfishly get off).

      yes, i know quite well that humans butcher the biblical teachings for selfish ends... that's not the book's fault, is the butherer's fault.

      so, we as humans have screwed up what is right.

      men want sex left, right and center and aren't too choosy. or, aren't choosy at all (if she's hot, anyway).

      women use sex to get their man "hooked" and then don't have time anymore for it after they got what they wanted and freeze out their man - making him miserable. and wondering why... but not enough to actually try and be what she was to get him hooked in the first place. oh, and playing dumb for decades, if you let her.

      what does this mean? don't get married and think your woman will stay the same - statistics say she won't. once she gets "security" she will gladly stop "working" to get security - and that means you, as the husband, are S.O.L.

      have her read dr laura's book, "the proper care and feeding of men" and ask her if she's willing to make that commitment. ask her if she is committed to having an active sex life unless BOTH spouses agree to abstain for short periods of time. this should have special meaning to a true christian woman since it is a clear biblical teaching.

      you may not know it yet, but a woman can go six months without sex and not bat an eye... especially after she uses the kids to avoid

    185. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Putting your children first is never the cause of a divorce.


      That's totally not true. The divorce may be more likely to happen at about the time the kids are leaving the home (college and adulthood), but it's pretty easy for the love in a marriage to die while everyone's worrying about the kids.
    186. Re:Oh please by Phi+Guy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and speaking of people I've known from personal experence, that unforunatly has a hard time distunguishing which is which. :-/ (total reality buzzkill)

    187. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm the AC you're criticizing and you totally missed my point. It isn't about different skills at all, it's about how far we sheep will go, to keep a job and/or to prove ourselves. I don't know any of those older languages. Most of my experience is in relatively newer stuff. I haven't been at it that long. I'm 35 - just old enough to have internalized what the 26 year old across the office hasn't yet - that before you know it, your youth is gone and you'll never get it back. I love programming and tech, but I already somewhat regret all the massive overtime I have put in just to get a foot-hold in this career. When I was in my 20s and a bit more naive, I was afraid of being fired for not meeting every arbitrary deadline, so I didn't spend as much time w/ my family as I should have. What do I have to show for it? Nada, just made some CEO richer. Now I am doing what I should have all along - insist on enjoying what my husband and I have left of our lives and health, and only work in places like that as a last resort. It doesn't matter how good you are, if you are willing to suck it up you're still a chump who will get screwed, unfortunately there are entirely too many of us like that, due to the combination of naivete and competitiveness of the typical newly graduated programmer. In fact the better their skills, the more of an idiot I'd say they are for allowing themselves to be exploited, but hey I'm not the one gladly bending over.

    188. Re:Oh please by Azure+Khan · · Score: 1

      I hate it when people say things like "Money isn't everything" and "move on to another job" or whatever such nonsense.

      It's NOT easy to get a new job. And the cost of daycare is high. Not only does your job have to cover the cost of living, but these costs as well. And unless you're making a significant amount, you likely have two working parents (which is most common these days), and if you ARE making a significant amount, chances are that your work requires your attention proportionally, in the form of additional hours and responsibilities. And it's even worse when you're a single parent, because two incomes isn't even an option, unless you're working two jobs yourself.

      I'm not saying that you should put your job first, because I don't believe that. But let's stop pretending like it's SOOO easy to just flush the job when it interferes. Relationships are complex entities. They can require understanding and sacrifice, and it's one that people are too often not willing to make. Financial uncertainty can and often does cause far more stress than too many late hours in the office, a fact that is often lost on people until AFTER they are confronted with that reality.

      --

      --- I'm going sane in a crazy world.
    189. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ouch!

      When my kids were younger, maybe 5 and 3 yrs old, I would get home around 5pm, and they would be all over me. We would play games together. Build houses out of blocks together. Push the trains around the track together. Play Trouble together. Play chess together. And on and on. Being on your hands and knees with the little ones is a bit tiring, but it felt good to spend the time with them. We were connected.

      Now my kids are 10 and 8. I get home around 7pm. Sometimes I miss dinner. They don't expect me to play with them after work anymore. Part of that might be because they're older now. But really it's because we aren't as connected anymore.

      And what lesson are my kids getting on a daily basis? The fact that I'm not getting myself out of work at a reasonable time is plain proof that I don't see them as a priority. If I did see my kids as a priority, I would be home by 5pm (I'm at work by 7AM), so that I could spend some time with them before dinner, every day.

      The poster nailed it - no deadlines for family, means no priority for family, which means no connection with family, which leads to a neglected family. Every day that goes by by is gone and there's no "do over".

      Shame on me...

    190. Re:Oh please by brandonfpu · · Score: 1

      I am a new teacher at a school in california (fresno) where more than 85% of the kids come from low-income homes. 14 of the 16 kids on my water polo team don't have biological if any fathers living with them. It sucks. They know it. My goal is to get them to see there is a way out through encouragement, tough love (usually much "tougher" than what's on movies... I have no problem with telling a kid to his face he's making dumb decisions and needs to get his head out of his butt. Coupled of course with helping him ask the right questions and think the right directions until he realizes that failing PE because a girl doesn't want him to "dress out" probably isn't the best long-term idea), and consistency. I've only been here for a bit over a year but you couldn't pay me to leave. $35,000 a year gross pay.

    191. Re:Oh please by radtea · · Score: 1

      Happy parents == happy kids

      Yup. That's why I got divorced.

      I'm happy. My ex is happy. My kids are happy.

      Couldn't say any of that when we were married.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    192. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, my best friend's mom.

      Note: This happened around 15 years ago now.

      She would literally feed her kids ramen because she used all her food stamps.

      Boy, don't ever have an emergency her check wouldn't cover the ambulance ride. I know, my mother had to drive 25 miles to take me to the hospital because she couldn't waste her welfare money on gas and she didn't want the ambulance bill to come to her house.

      I was literally dying of food poisoning, spent almost 24 hours in the hospital because it took so long to get there.

      When the law changed, instead of getting a job she married and threw her kids out.

      Yeah, and she's white.

      trash..

    193. Re:Oh please by damiena · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why won't you put the toilet seat down after you're done using it?

      NOTABUG WONTFIX
      CLOSED

    194. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't 1/2 of all marriages end in divorce?

      Yeah, and the other half end in death. Pretty grim institution. ;-)

      And to top it all off, 100% of all those began with getting married. That makes marriage the #1 cause of both divorce and death!
    195. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, maybe in death bed I will think of the mistress..... ;)

    196. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you've never been married to the typical American woman have you? You have a job to keep up with her spending habits. Budget? It's not in their vocabulary, so they have no idea what it means to stick to one. A checking account means that you can shop until the checks run out, unless you have a debit card. Then you can keep going until it doesn't work anymore. The same is true for credit cards whether they are Visa, MasterCard or American Express. Confronting them about it is considered abuse. Try to take all of that away and the reaction will vary from "you don't trust or respect me any more. don't you wuv me?" *pout* to "I'M GOING TO CALL THE COPS AND GET YOU ARRESTED FOR BEATING ME!" - WTF, I haven't touched you! "SO FUCKING WHAT! THEY WON'T BELIEVE YOU!"

    197. Re:Oh please by ksheff · · Score: 1

      I could read when the kids were asleep and she was doing her SCA bullshit. I guess it was easier to con me into marriage than it was for her to get an apartment in public housing. I should have listened to my dad, but I figured it was my only chance of getting married & having a family. and it sort of turned out to be true. I've wasted my youth and my purpose in life now is to make mortgage and child support payments.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    198. Re:Oh please by ksheff · · Score: 1

      for the woman. At a previous job (govt contractor) I had to use vacation and was chewed out about it because it was short notice (like we planned on the kid having to be in the ICU for a few days).

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    199. Re:Oh please by Miow · · Score: 1

      If you want to know the answer have a look at my website www.parentalalienation.co.uk the chances of getting divorced are now well over 50%. The chances of having children without getting married are over 50%. The chances of seeing your children grow up once you are separated are less than 50% It has nothing whatsoever to do with your job.

    200. Re:Oh please by lloyd_powell · · Score: 1, Funny

      100% of deaths begin with getting married? Guess I'll choose singledom and immortality.

    201. Re:Oh please by russellh · · Score: 1

      Stop blaming the women, for one.

      --
      must... stay... awake...
    202. Re:Oh please by dangitman · · Score: 1
      There are two species of humans, one thinks sex is a special thing to share with a special person. The other thinks sex is fun.

      Why can't it be both?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    203. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everybody wants to get married. I just turned 30 and live alone. My number priority right now is my professional career, I couldn't care less about having a girlfriend. There's a big difference between loneliness and solitude. As it's been said above a working marriage requires both partners to spend time to make it work. Some of us don't think it's worth it.

    204. Re:Oh please by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      I ran into that: I was hired expecting a 70 hour work week for 3 months during a big project, then easing back to 60 with 20 of them at home, but a really nice salary to go with it. Over time, it became clear that even then, not enough time was allocated to do projects, and all of them suffered and wound up having to be repaired and recovered, which is often more costly in time and shipping and physical resources than doing it right in the first place.

      It was deadly. Every engineer left the company in the same week.

    205. Re:Oh please by Amouth · · Score: 1

      "Ever think of cutting back on your spending? And thus not need to work quite as hard?"

      Ever try to put your wife through grad school ?

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    206. Re:Oh please by rizole · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's worse than that. All divorce is caused by marriage.

    207. Re:Oh please by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      The man has all the choice in the world about whether to have sex with a woman in the first place. If you don't want to pay for the consequences of your actions, perhaps you should act more carefully.

      Except that the exact same thing could be said to the woman: you made the choice to have sex, now deal with the consequences. But she doesn't. She has rights. She has choices. Men only have no rights, no choices, only responsibilities.

    208. Re:Oh please by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Men need to learn to step up and take responsibility for themselves and women need to make the men commit to the relationship before kids are even a possibility.

      No responsibility for women, eh? You know, the ones who initiate 80% of divorces, the ones who get child custody the majority of the time when it's disputed, and the ones who can choose to keep a fetus or not?

    209. Re:Oh please by xero314 · · Score: 1
      I know plenty of really happy parents that have horrible children.
      First off all you must know a lot of damn good liars. Happy loving relationships (not pathological ones) bread and raise happy well adjusted children, do a little bit of reading this is well document. If the children in a family are misbehaving it is because either than were taught to act that way (directly or indirectly) or they are having trouble coping with certain situations (such as abuse or neglect).

      And second, you obviously haven't a clue since you are using phrases like "Horrible Children," unless of course "Damion" lives in your neighborhood.
    210. Re:Oh please by xero314 · · Score: 1

      As much as I agree that marriage takes continual work I have to disagree on the idea that people wake up one day and no longer love each other. I guess my idea of love is not a conditional situation that can come and go. Your software analogy is not only twisted, but also shows a big reason there is such a high divorce right. There has been written software that has never need a single bug fix and has worked as designed from day one. Marriages can be the same if the right amount of planing is done up front and an good understanding of the scope of the marriage is understood by all involved. All too often people enter marriages for conflicting reasons which causes a marriage to have it's own form of scope creep. And all this coming from someone that has been married to the same person for 10 years, and will tell you it hasn't been easy, but then again I didn't follow my own advice, since I didn't understand it then.

    211. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My wife comes first.

      And I can vouch for that.

      Sincerely,

      Your gardener.
    212. Re:Oh please by CountBrass · · Score: 1

      /. are trying to keep up with Digg I guess but lacked the UI design skills to do it properly .

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    213. Re:Oh please by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      I think this is an issue of terminology. I will always put my children first (well, I don't have any yet, but I plan to once I do). And I would expect nothing less of my wife (okay, this is all hypothetical, as I'm still single).

      That doesn't mean you're supposed to not live your life or enjoy life in order to coddle your children excessively. Because all that coddling isn't putting your children first, it's screwing up their lives. Kids need to learn a certain degree of independence appropriate to their age, as you never know when you won't be there any more to take care of them.

      I agree with the concept of showing them how to lead a good life by example, maintaining work-life balance, taking care of yourself physically and emotionally, being a good husband and father (or wife and mother), etc.

      But in some absurd hypothetical "burning building" scenario, came down to my life or my kids' life, I'd expect my wife to save our kids. As humans, we're all mortal, and the only form of immortality we have is our children. They aren't us, certainly, but they carry our genes, the knowledge we share with them, and the values we impart to them, and they will hopefully have their own children someday to pass on the same to.

      I'll be gone in 80 or 90 years one way or the other (barring medical technology that substantially extends the human lifespan).

      A related digression -
      My mom became ill when I was 21 and passed away right after my 26th birthday (and I effectively had zero relationship with my father at the time, not having spoken with him in about 8 years). The sad thing is I know many people that age who would never be able to deal with the real world as an adult with a parent's illness and passing, getting them back and forth to the hospital, moving back home to take care of her, pay the bills, etc. It was extremely stressful, not to mention disruptive to my relationships and to my career. But my mother was an amazing woman and a great parent to me my whole life, how the hell could I do anything less for her than she would have done for me as a child? And luckily, she did a pretty good job at teaching me to be an independent person, or I probably wouldn't have held up through the whole ordeal.

      I guess the point of all that was that someday you might be sick and alone, and you'll be damned glad if you were a good, loving parent to your children and they're there to help you out when you need them. Your husband or wife can run off to Timbuktu, but your children will always be your flesh and blood. But if you turn them into spoiled little monsters with no sense of familial responsibility, who's going to visit you in your old age or care for you in illness?

    214. Re:Oh please by sholden · · Score: 1

      Possibly the higher divorce rate leads to the higher marriage rate (rather than vice versa) after all once divorced they can get add to the marriage rate again.

    215. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My parents got divorced before I was a teenager, and I'm currently a year away from earning a BS and (hopefully) heading to graduate school. No hatred or feelings of evil toward the world here- at least none above a level that's considered normal. I'm not sure where the whole "kids whose parents get divorced end up being screwed up as adults" sentiment comes from. I think the likeliness of becoming "screwed up" is mostly independent of whether or not your parents stay married.

      Statistics show that fatherless homes account for a high percentage of children who are imprisoned, who commit suicide, and who drop out of high school. However, is social class the lurking variable here? If we examined fatherless homes of only those households who earn more than $60k/year, would these incidences drop? Are the kids who are imprisoned from households that earn less than $30k/year?

    216. Re:Oh please by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Happy loving relationships (not pathological ones) bread and raise happy well adjusted children...If the children in a family are misbehaving it is because either than were taught to act that way (directly or indirectly) or they are having trouble coping with certain situations (such as abuse or neglect). Utter bollocks. Children in their natural state are uncivilized, self-centered animals. It takes diligent application of rules, boundaries, and discipline to make them behave properly. There are plenty of very nice people out there with good marriages who are completely puzzled as to why their screaming, obnoxious brats act that way, when the answer is simply that they never told their children "no". You see them all the time. They try to reason with their 6 year old in the grocery store. They make deals with them to get them to be quiet ("if you stop screaming, I'll buy you [whatever]"). They plug their shrieking pie-holes with food. This sort of slack, evasive child rearing behavior has fuck-all to do with whether their spousal relationship is happy and loving.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    217. Re:Oh please by xero314 · · Score: 1
      Children in their natural state are uncivilized, self-centered animals. It takes diligent application of rules, boundaries, and discipline to make them behave properly.
      Natural healthy narcissism (self love), as is found in infants, is important to healthy mental growth. It is only after natural healthy narcissism is broken down by parental, or other, actions, which in turn causes the child to have to create artificial constructs to cope with new or unknown situations. At least this is the view of the object relations school of psychology, and there is certainly more than a grain of truth to it. It is also been show that children need not "learn" to behave "properly" but would need to be taught to behave in a fashion contradictory to there own survival. Sadly many of the "appropriate" actions we take as adults are contrary to our actual needs. Explaining this in detail would take far more than a simple slashdot post.
      This sort of slack, evasive child rearing behavior has fuck-all to do with whether their spousal relationship is happy and loving.
      Again, I have to disagree. Allowing your child to cause discomfort or embarrassment to your spouse is not a very loving thing, and that a loving spouse would not allow these things to happen. Love involves caring for ones best interested in all ways.
      They try to reason with their 6 year old in the grocery store.
      Lastly I hope you do not yet have children, because acting without reason causes far more harm to the human psyche than acting with. All children, no mater what the age, are capable of reason and always act more appropriately when give alternatives and reasoning rather than the simple game saying of "no." Children are neither two nor pet, they are human beings and deserve the same respect we would want for ourselves. And no I am not a psychologist, I just happen to have grown up with "diligent application of rules, boundaries, and discipline" and know from personal experience that this can leave as major of scares as neglect (since it is a form of neglect).

      Anyway, gotta run, gotta keep my son from sticking his finger in a wall socket...
    218. Re:Oh please by DigitalHammer · · Score: 1

      You thought your *sister* was hot? That just doesn't sound right. :/

    219. Re:Oh please by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      Paternity leave is for men normally. :-D I have seen a fair number of companies that offer at least 1 month paternity leave, some offer 2+

    220. Re:Oh please by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 1
      You thought your *sister* was hot? That just doesn't sound right. :/

      It isn't. He was referring to his sister's friend.
      --
      Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
    221. Re:Oh please by ksheff · · Score: 1

      what companies?

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    222. Re:Oh please by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      Boeing, Safeco, MS.

      (Safeco I am not sure about the exact length of, but I remember it was somethign decent)

      US Government jobs are kind of weird. From here. Fathers are allowed to use their paid sick leave for paternity leave, but it a bit less than a month apparnetly. Someone tried to amend the law to give fathers ~6 weeks paid leave and another 6 unpaid, but of course that did not go over well.

      According to BLS though, yah, it does seem rare. Only 7% of companies in 2000 offered it at all.... dicks.

      Hmm, guess I am just spoiled by big name companies who come to my college and have flashy presentations showing off how good their benefits are! ^_^ Of course they then throw all our resumes in the trash, making one wonder why they bothered with the trip in the first place....

    223. Re:Oh please by hackus · · Score: 1

      "The argument then becomes, well if youre willing enough to sleep with someone then you should be willing enough to raise a family with them."

      Man, are you on the left side of the spectrum or what?

      If you have sex with someone, you have to accept the consequences of your actions.

      Anything else is B.S.

      There is a risk involved, (i.e. pregnancy).

      If you can't handle the risk, put the thing back in your pants.

      The biggest reason why we have these sorts of problems is this attitude I can do whatever the hell I want, and let society pick up the tab sorta mentality is crapola.

      I for one would like to see laws that use the technology of genetics to make dead beat women/men pay child support to the single mom/dad if they find out the 5 minutes they spent in the sack isn't worth helping raise the kid. Including garnishing wages, or forced labor.

      It is perfectly fine to care little or nothing for another human being you have sex with, if that is what you want. So be it.

      But don't come off like its is my responsibility to pay for your poor, destructive and disgusting lack of compassion to the children of this world.

      -Hack

      --
      Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    224. Re:Oh please by ultranova · · Score: 1

      "Not giving it away" smacks of an outdated paradigm that hasn't worked for decades, if not longer.

      Apparently it isn't as outdated as you seem to think, since giving it up has caused the very problem the paradigm was supposedly created to prevent - single mothers without the ability to raise children and make a living simultaneously.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    225. Re:Oh please by ultranova · · Score: 1

      What the fuck? The man has all the choice in the world about whether to have sex with a woman in the first place.

      And the woman has the choice about whether or not to have sex with the man. Don't try to push the decision to have sex to the mans shoulders alone.

      If you don't want to pay for the consequences of your actions, perhaps you should act more carefully.

      I couldn't agree more. If you don't want to risk becoming a single mother, don't sleep around. And if you do, and get pregnant, don't try to blame the man for it - it was your own decision to risk it.

      Alternatively, we could simply consider women to not be legal adults, and therefore not fully responsible for their actions, but for some reason they didn't seem to be happy with this arrangement when it was in place.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    226. Re:Oh please by TheRecklessWanderer · · Score: 1

      Heheh, my sister was hot, my buddies told me. I just didn't see it myself. Of course, they weren't in the bathtub with her one time (OK we were 3 and 2 years old) and she dropped a log. Definitely not hot. :)

      --
      Mean what you say...say what you mean.
    227. Re:Oh please by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I know, half my extended family abuses the system (with some having been on welfare for more than 20 years). Not just welfare, but SSI, Food Shelves, and a large number of other programs as well. They work very hard at gaming the system, and they have a network of people they are in regular contact with that discuss ways to find loopholes and exploit things. Not illegally, mind you, but it should be.

      Ah, American enterpreneur spirit at its finest :). Seriously, isn't this what various business leaders do - only they do it through a corporation, instead of just getting food for themselves ?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    228. Re:Oh please by ultranova · · Score: 1

      - Reinstitute christian or muslim moral values into the fabric of society.

      I probably have been trolled(tm), but if this ever happens, I'd rather die. I'll keep my poor opinion of religion to myself.

      Yeah, since stating that you'd rather die than see religion a significant part of society sure won't give any hints of that opinion ;).

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    229. Re:Oh please by patio11 · · Score: 1

      "Toilet seat up: not a bug."
      "Poker night: won't fix."
      "Nagging: duplicate of EVERY OTHER FREAKING DAY."

    230. Re:Oh please by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1
      The trick is that just like any software, a marriage needs maintenance as well as the original source code. You need to have a bug tracking system in place, be open to feature requests, and be willing not to give up
      This really needs to be on a poster or a desk calender and sold on thinkgeek.com

      Put it on a mousemat, make it a Fathers Day gift, PROFIT! Too true to be good.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
    231. Re:Oh please by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Your theory intrigues me. I've wondered why wealthy, intelligent people have fewer children. One would think that they would want to spread their good genes around more.

      Why would they ? They get no benefit from it, quite on contrary: they need to devote time and effort into rising children. And they tend to be wealthy because they have the habit of taking the course of action that benefits them.

      Oh, and a good social position does not imply that one has good genes. See Just-world phenomenon.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    232. Re:Oh please by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >Actually, many of the booksellers I know are very passionate about their profession.

      It was a bad example of a job that tends to be a high turnover, low paying, zero respect job where you find people with college degrees, I don't actually know how they manage to live indoors, eat regular meals, etc.

      Not every bookstore job sucks, I realize. It was a poorly chosen example, of the type of job that a person typically wants to stop thinking about the moment they punch the clock. I should have said, convenience store clerk.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    233. Re:Oh please by ksheff · · Score: 1

      My experience with Federal installations is that most of the people working at them are actually contractor employees, with a handful of actual Federal employees.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    234. Re:Oh please by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

      Pity you'll never see this reply. AC is an appropriate title for you.

      1) My boss knew we were expecting two days after our families knew.

      2) I had sufficient sick leave/vacation time, my boss refused to give me time off.

      3) They may have violated the Family Medical Leave Act, but I couldn't very well risk being fired by asserting my rights at the time.

      I quit as soon as I was able, and left them without a network administrator in the midst of a major deployment (quite deliberately). It took them six months to recover, and they've been through three more admins since I left. I don't take kindly to being pushed around, and will push back however I can.

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    235. Re:Oh please by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      People in the UK are happy because the average person can afford to do little other than drink.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    236. Re:Oh please by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      Those statistics can be very misleading. Don't take them at face value.

      TANF (ie what was AFDC) is notorious in many states for being nearly impossible to stay on for any length of time. The entire process is governed by a set of complex & arcane rules that few people really understand.

      If a recipient is 15 minutes late for an appointment, their benefits may be cut off. Losing an ID card, paystub, utility bill or other documentation may result in benefit suspension or sitting around for 5-8 hours to straighten things out. The entire system is humiliating and arbritary.

      The "transition" off of welfare that you talk about is similar to how unemployed people whose benefits expire are no longed considered "unemployed". They often give up on the system and many end up in prison for drugs or stealing and lose the kids.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    237. Re:Oh please by Jobe_br · · Score: 1

      I can't say much more than ... amen.

    238. Re:Oh please by fusion9290991 · · Score: 1

      in fact marriage is the chief cause of divorce! :)

      --
      remember to loot and pillage before you burn!
    239. Re:Oh please by Pentavirate · · Score: 1

      I believe I was placing blame on both parties pretty equally because that's where I think the blame belongs.

    240. Re:Oh please by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1
      As much as I agree that marriage takes continual work I have to disagree on the idea that people wake up one day and no longer love each other.
      I think you must have misread my rant. I was disagreeing with the parent who said that people could wake up one day and no longer love each other, and go their seperate ways. I don't see how you think my software analogy is twisted, as you're arguing the exact same thing using it as I am... that marriage takes work, and problems need to be fixed, not ignored.

      Again, I'm wondering why you are saying you disagree with my argument, but then go on to say the exact same things I did, using my analogies.

      Anyway, congrats on 10 years of marriage, and on learning from mistakes!

    241. Re:Oh please by tedgyz · · Score: 1

      Birth is the leading cause of death.

      --
      "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
    242. Re:Oh please by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1

      So what the hell? If boss is out until Tuesday and wants it Friday, why in the world would you deliver on Friday?!?! Boss won't even see it until Tues. so there's *theoretically* absolutely no harm in delivering on Tues. Now, if other people are relying on it to be done Fri. and it's your fault it's not done on time - your bad. If, however, the boss never told you about it, then you'd better explain to him/her periodically how much of your ass they need to be kissing to get it done AS A FAVOR to them for their own forgetfulness.

      I still do not understand why so many people complain about too much work, how work intrudes on their private lives, etc. etc. If it intrudes so much so that it hurts, either push back on your boss, or go find a new job. Can't get a new job because the current one pays the bills and any other job wouldn't? Guess who's fault that is? Not mine, and not the government's, and not your company's, and not your boss' fault. It's your paycheck, budget the use of it!

      Now, all that being said, I KNOW there are situations that we all run into where it's not that easy, and you gotta provide for your family, etc. But for the whiners who ALWAYS complain about this year in and year out - hello! you've had a few years now to correct the situation through creative alternatives to your predicament... it should be the awfully special case that such a situation has no other resolution after a few years.

    243. Re:Oh please by kniLnamiJ-neB · · Score: 1

      I don't care if welfare only takes a single penny out of my *entire check*... if it's a penny that's being spent on someone who's not *trying* to make it on their own, I don't want to spend it. Just because there are dumber ways to spend tax money doesn't mean that this way isn't dumb.

      --
      Windows isn't the answer... it's the question. NO is the answer!
    244. Re:Oh please by kniLnamiJ-neB · · Score: 1

      Exactly. That's why we have a welfare system, to help people who are down on their luck. Maybe they didn't plan that first kid... that's what welfare's for, to help them get back on track. But giving them extra money because they kept screwing around when they already couldn't afford it, and now they've got 4 kids? THAT'S JUST STUPID. Birth Control aids are available for FREE if you go to a Health Department office. And yes, I know they fail once in a while, but they'll definitely be better than nothing.

      --
      Windows isn't the answer... it's the question. NO is the answer!
    245. Re:Oh please by 808140 · · Score: 1

      The number of people who have more kids while already on welfare is vanishingly small. I'm certain they exist, and I agree that they're stupid. But this is where the old saying is so apt: don't throw the baby out with the bath water. Just because there are some people that abuse the system doesn't mean the system isn't good, and shouldn't be maintained. The fact is, most people do not want to live on welfare, because it's extremely hard (the government doesn't provide nearly enough money to survive on welfare alone) and there's substantial shame involved in being on welfare, because of the stigma associated with it. Maybe 1 in a thousand people is happy being on welfare, and isn't planning to get off, but let's face it, with any system there are going to be those that abuse the system.

      Getting rid of welfare because some people are lazy fucks is like getting rid of universities because some people cheat on exams. Try your best to catch the ones that game the system, but recognize that some of them are going to get away with it and just write them off. Like I said in my other post, we spend so little on welfare as it is that you probably aren't giving up much more than a few cents to provide for the people that really do need help. Are you really such a penny-pincher that that's not worth it to you?

      I will admit that welfare has problems: I don't think people who shouldn't be on welfare getting welfare is one of those problems (or at least, it's not a material problem, financially), but I think there are lots of people that probably do need welfare that aren't getting it, and I think that the government does a spectacularly bad job of administering welfare (which surprises exactly no one, there's not much the government does efficiently or well). What's bothers me more than "how many cents am I paying per year to support AFDC and Food Stamps" is "what percentage of the money I do pay gets eaten up in the bureaucracy." Because if I'm going to give, I want as much of what I give as possible to go to those that need it, and as little as possible to entrenched bureaucrats. It seems reasonable that you and I can agree on that, at least.

      There was a study done a while ago (and I don't have the numbers in front of me) that showed that some huge percentage of the money we pay in taxes goes to simply, well, collecting taxes. I recognize that the IRS is a huge monster of a department and that running it takes money, but I would hope that it's not a huge, stupid percentage, which is what this study implied. Things like that really upset me.

      I guess the point I'm trying to drive home is that I'm not a big-government liberal, in fact, I'm a pretty fiscally conservative guy. But the United States is the wealthiest nation on earth, and the fact that helping single mothers raise their children is even an issue really saddens me. We do so little as it is, and it's not like I'm even necessarily advocating doing more. I'd just like it if smart people (and Slashdot is filled with them) would take a step back and recognize that we do very little, and that it costs us next to nothing. In short, of all the things you pay taxes for, it's one of the ones least worth complaining about.

    246. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thankfully a faggot like you won't be contributing to the gene pool. Go suck another dick.

  2. Bias by Odin_Tiger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Aren't you worried that, in light of your personal life issues, this thesis might come across a little...I dunno...biased? Just a tad?

    --
    Unpleasantries.
    1. Re:Bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And?

      Isn't bias the very definition of being human. At least for anyone with half a brain and more than a few years life experience is biased one way or another. The people claiming not to be biased are probably the biggest hippocrites of all and can keep their biases hidden. At least, with this guy, we know where he is coming from.

    2. Re:Bias by venicebeach · · Score: 1

      In the same way asking a community to volunteer stories of divorce will give no unbiased information as to the rate of divorce.

      This is shaping up to be a great thesis...

    3. Re:Bias by 0rbit4l · · Score: 2, Informative
      Aren't you worried that, in light of your complete lack of understanding of what a Thesis defense is, that your question might come across as a little...I dunno...ignorant? Just a tad?

      It's his committee's job to present alternative views, put him on the spot, be impartial, and even by sincerely proposing the "devil's advocate" position. It's his job to be prepared for that and be able to answer tough questions. This is part of the whole "peer review" thing - look it up. Just because a person's experiences coincide with their research does not mean they are "biased." A scientist is not "biased" if their child gets run over by a drunk driver & that scientist then does a study on the phenomenon of drunk driving. If every one of the members of this person's committee has some conflict of interest, then yes, your concerns of bias are perhaps valid. But tossing out his research as biased without impartially examining it is premature and irresponsible - and contrary to whoever is moderating today, definitely not "insightful". We'd never get anywhere if all scientific conclusions by interested/opinionated parties were automatically rejected because the researcher himself/herself wasn't sufficiently "unbiased".

    4. Re:Bias by Otter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would also suggest that, in my ignorant layman's opinion, turning your trauma into your new career is likely to impede your rebuilding your life.

    5. Re:Bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, he's saying that this guy has a conflict of interest on this topic, given his current situation. It's not like being biased on vi vs. emacs or whatever.

    6. Re:Bias by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      I suppose, but the point of a thesis is to avoid bias.

      Dude's gonna fail to grageeeate.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    7. Re:Bias by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      When you're looking at issues that do not have an obvious, objective, experimentally or mathematically provable answer, it's hardly unusual for ad hominems to be tossed based on a researcher's background. See the 'who funds them' response here to any study that questions, say, Linux TCO, or the allegations that Lott's work can be discredited due to industry support for the endowment that helps fund his academic position. Conversely, even "peer review" can give shoddy work a pass based on the author's reputation; see Alan Sokal's successful publication of a deliberately impenetrable, incomprehensible, nonsensical hoax paper in "Social Text", for instance.

      I notice, for instance, that you seem to lob an ad hominem based on a completely unsupported assumption that the author referred to is ignorant of the thesis committee process.

      The bias issue is particularly true for studies involving surveys, interviews and other techniques which may be prone to biases in subject sampling bias, choice and phrasing of questions, et al.

      Oh, and by the way -- thesis committee members other than the student's advisor do not necessarily have a very in-depth awareness of the topic. Committee members, after all, tend to have their own students to worry about first; they may not have even seen the manuscript until a month or so beforehand.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    8. Re:Bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least for anyone with half a brain

      Meh.. depends on which half.

    9. Re:Bias by Bobby+Orr · · Score: 1
      I notice, for instance, that you seem to lob an ad hominem based on a completely unsupported assumption that the author referred to is ignorant of the thesis committee process.


      To quote Princess Bride: I don't think that word means what you think it means...

    10. Re:Bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure that argument will fly with his thesis committee.

    11. Re:Bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you write about something you are not passionate about? Passion = bias.

      The answer is you don't or your thesis will suck.

    12. Re:Bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of people here also seem to have leapt to the improbable assumption that this will be his only source of material. He's asking for opinions that will be incorporated into a greater body of work. Anyone who has ever written a thesis should know how many (hundreds? possibly thousands?) sources are consulted before the final paper is published.

    13. Re:Bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an impartial observer, I would like to point out that the accusation of "ad hominem" was completely deserved in this case. I can repeat lines from "The Princess Bride" as well as the next man. But the mere existence of a glib phrase from that movie does not allow you to make such remarks as you have.
      Read the thread again. See where you have made a mistake. Try not to do it again.
      I would not normally be so blunt but your rhetoric was so incredibly bad...

    14. Re:Bias by catmistake · · Score: 1

      What really annoys me is that women seem to marry ANY man that knocks them up. Don't blame your job... it really is your wife's fault for marrying you. And don't try to be those Dad's that put the child first. This is a thin veil hiding the fact that you just want to keep bugging the child's mother. Of course you love your child, but, I think, what young men are fucking up is that the MOTHER comes first. The way it works well is that the Father stays cold, unemotional, and distant to the child, pressing discipline when necessary, and showing true feelings once in a blue moon towards the child, but always always catering to the mother... because if you have a wife, you can always have more children, but with just a child, you can't neither make a mother nor more children. Let her put the child first... you put her first, even in divorce. The right thing isn't always the easy thing.

    15. Re:Bias by nasch · · Score: 1
      A scientist is not "biased" if their child gets run over by a drunk driver & that scientist then does a study on the phenomenon of drunk driving.
      If his research consisted of asking questions on a MADD discussion board it might be considered biased. If the OP started with existing numbers and correlated them with careers, that would certainly be unbiased. The way he phrased his question makes it sound like he wants support for the conclusion he's already reached before gathering evidence. Considering his personal situation, I think it would be foolish not to question his objectivity.
  3. should read: i am bitter about my divorce and.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    want to blame everything except the parties involved...

  4. I'm about to start the road to divorce by also-rr · · Score: 5, Funny

    The first step? My wedding next year.

    1. Re:I'm about to start the road to divorce by Gnight · · Score: 5, Funny

      Marriage is the leading cause of divorce.

    2. Re:I'm about to start the road to divorce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marriage is the only cause of divorce.

    3. Re:I'm about to start the road to divorce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      50% of marriages end in divorce.

      The other 50% end in death.

      I GOT OUT ALIVE!!!!!

    4. Re:I'm about to start the road to divorce by kalirion · · Score: 1

      And life is the leading cause of marriage. And lets not even talk about the fact that life is a 100% terminal condition.... We really need to find a cure.

    5. Re:I'm about to start the road to divorce by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, and condolences!

    6. Re:I'm about to start the road to divorce by Professional+Heckler · · Score: 0

      Ok, let me get started. Divorce as we know it, stems from a variety of things. 1)Simply picking the wrong person/premarital sex 2)Something happening with that person that causes emotional trauma 3)Finding out you are gay 4)Parents are divorced/Childhood familial insecurity 5)Divorce "Culture" Contrary to popular belief, number 4 is the most important factor in the cause of divorces. The family that eats together stays together doesnt just apply to your family(brother mother father sister) but also to your future family. If your parents divorced you are 50% more likely to get a divorce! Number 1: This usually stems from knowing your girlfriend for all of a year or maybe a year and a half. Also DO NOT LIVE with your girlfriend, this does not: help you to know your girlfriend better. Premarital sex is highly instrumental to divorces. Sex creates an artificial "physical" bond between to peoples that is very,very similiar to love. It does not, however, last. Thus for a lasting relationship some sort of emotional bond is also necessary. Try to just "have fun" and dont go any further. I know it sucks but think of your children. Also a study was done and apparently waiting till marriage not only increases stability but also increases sexual pleasure... Number 2: This also stems from negligence. If you are good to your wife and always the man she wont have a reason to go looking somewhere else. Negligence is perhaps where your marriage went south. IT tends to be engrossing and its easy to forget the family. 3) Nuff said 5) The "lack of sanctity" in marriage nowadays is a real problem. Marriage is not just a "thing you do" this would be true if it were just you and your wife. But once you add children into the equation you are responsible for them. Try and see a counselor, and really just work it out. Remember its not just about your happiness anymore. You took the plunge now you have to hold your breath. Good luck in life, Prof

    7. Re:I'm about to start the road to divorce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marriage is the leading cause of divorce.

      Huh. Pat Robertson told me it was the gays...

    8. Re:I'm about to start the road to divorce by RY · · Score: 1

      Next year?
      Your still posting on slashdot.

    9. Re:I'm about to start the road to divorce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people say the first year of marriage is the most difficult. Not true -- the last year is the most difficult.

    10. Re:I'm about to start the road to divorce by brettdavis4 · · Score: 1
      This usually stems from knowing your girlfriend for all of a year or maybe a year and a half.

      How long should you know someone till you get married? I think a year or a year and a half is plenty of time.

    11. Re:I'm about to start the road to divorce by delepster · · Score: 1

      If you've been with wife-to-be for a few years and you think it goes well enough to get married, then changing your *official* status should not change a thing. Just keep the balanche: 1/3 work, 1/3 family, 1/3 sleep et al.

    12. Re:I'm about to start the road to divorce by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

      I thought it was lawyers?

    13. Re:I'm about to start the road to divorce by freeweed · · Score: 1

      And all marriages end badly - in either death or divorce.

      Cheerful stuff on a Friday the 13th.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    14. Re:I'm about to start the road to divorce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1/3 family ? WTF ?

      In your planning, you don't have any time for the most important person. Yourself !
      And you think the family deserve the same as your work. I don't think at work they'd like to hear that, perhaps you don't deserve to get as much money.
      1/3 work, 1/3 family, 1/3 sleep. That doesn't work like this.
      I'd say 2/4 work, 0,5/4 family, 0,5/4 time for yourself, 1/4 sleep.

    15. Re:I'm about to start the road to divorce by Heir+Of+The+Mess · · Score: 1
      Marriage is the leading cause of divorce.

      I think marrying a crazy, lying, nagging bitch would rate pretty highly as a cause too god dammit.

      --
      Australian running a company that does C# / C++ / Java / SQL / Python / Mathematica
    16. Re:I'm about to start the road to divorce by chochos · · Score: 1
      DO NOT LIVE with your girlfriend ... Premarital sex is highly instrumental to divorces ... a study was done and apparently waiting till marriage not only increases stability but also increases sexual pleasure

      Got anything to back these claims? sounds like religious propaganda to me... Some things ring true, but this stuff about premarital sex just doesn't make sense to me. Seems like oversimplifying things and at the same time giving sex too much importance. Of course it IS important; important enough to be a reason why you don't want to be with someone anymore, as I see it. Marrying someone without having sex with them first is very risky in my opinion; she may turn out to like weird stuff you don't like, or the other way around, etc; in short, you don't know the person completely if you skip that aspect of the relationship, which is just that, one more aspect. People who wait until they're married to have sex are giving sex more importance than it deserves, IMHO.

      Also, that stuff about "being good to your wife and always the man"... I wish it were that simple. This can maybe shorten the list of reasons why your wife would cheat on you but it's definitely not the only reason. Sometimes they just want something different, or someone who won't be as "good" to them, or just get away from the routine, or try something new, or in the case of women who've never had sex with someone else but their husband, the temptation to be with another guy can be too much... or some other stupid reason. You can try to be a good lover, a good husband, a good man, etc but that is no guarantee that she'll be faithful to you.

    17. Re:I'm about to start the road to divorce by Professional+Heckler · · Score: 1

      Yes, youve brought up some important points. One thing to keep in mind is that what I posted above will not always work. Its just a "most likely to work". Sometimes random things happen but the way I suggest will give the best results more often than others.

      Sex. Sex is a VERY important part of marriage. You are definitely on track there. However, and it is not impossible, sex does limit the emotional developement/analysis between the two partners. This does not mean that if you have sex before marriage you are bound to fail, just that you may not have a chance to fully learn your SO. Its sort of a balancing act. Sex is important but premarital sex can jepordize a marriage more than help ground it.

  5. I Can Relate to You by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was a couple patches ago when my wife filed for divorce. I'll never forget the day because that night, my epic tier two helm piece dropped and I won it for only 150 DKP. I don't think I'll ever understand why she did it. I was by her side the entire time she was being charged with child abuse. I know she never abused our son because I was in the other room on TeamSpeak when the alleged beating occurred and I didn't hear any screams except those of my guildmates dying from Nefarion. I know I should have attended the custody hearings for our son but the only night of the week I don't raid on is Tuesdays and the judge refused to move the dates. Call me crazy, but I never saw it coming.

    Yep, the only reason she left me is because I'm in the IT field. I make a lot more cash on average & my job as software developer is one of the most highly sought after in the nation. Computers are becoming more and more prolific in everyday life so I maintain a solid job. But from what I've told you, it's pretty obvious that being in the IT field is what separated me and my wife. Looking back, I miss the times she brought me a beer as I was stacking sunders.

    Sorry to make light of your situation, Frank, but honestly I think that a lot of IT people know how easy it is to find pr0n online. I've heard this is a growing concern. Honestly, the perks of an IT job would probably be desirable for the wife, I think it's just the fact that the person is more clued in to how to use computers for pleasure and addiction. IT filed offers more money and doesn't ravage your body (at least not like construction or farm work does). Whether it be Warcraft or pr0n, these addictions pay a toll on a happy marriage. If you find a correlation, it's probably in those topics, not just IT.

    About the questions with kids, I don't have any but I would think that it would be very simple to get them involved with a computer project and spend plenty of weekend time with them. Then again, that's just what I would dream of happening ... it would probably fail miserably with "I don't want to be a nerd like you, dad!"

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:I Can Relate to You by oneiros27 · · Score: 1
      ... doesn't ravage your body

      Yep, there's nothing women like better than the fine physique that comes from a diet consisting mainly of junk food and soda, combined with lack of sunlight and stress from unrealistic deadlines. (and for some -- lots of alcohol to deal with the stress)

      (at least not like construction or farm work does)

      You've never seen someone in the shape I've already described, decide that they're going to help re-rack a Sun E4500. I'd say Tom blew his back out at least every other week, if not more often.

      --
      Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    2. Re:I Can Relate to You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "a lot of IT people know how easy it is to find pr0n online"

      Non-IT people have a lot of difficulty with this. Online pr0n is SO hard to locate.

      Hey, finding online pr0n is as easy as ... as easy as ... um, NOTHING is as easy as finding online pr0n.

    3. Re:I Can Relate to You by mjm1231 · · Score: 1
      easy it is to find pr0n online. I've heard this is a growing concern. That's an interesting choice for a link to stats regarding online pr0n. I especially like the second from the last:
      • 43% of American women suffer from Female Sexual Dysfunction - 57% are ready to party at the drop of a hat
      Huh?!?
      --
      Ideology: A tool used primarily to avoid the bother of thinking.
    4. Re:I Can Relate to You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then again, that's just what I would dream of happening ... it would probably fail miserably with "I don't want to be a nerd like you, dad!"

      Trust me, that's exactly what happens.

    5. Re:I Can Relate to You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... um, NOTHING is as easy as finding online pr0n.

      Except your mom.

  6. Yeah.... Riiiight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [Insert obvious joke here]

  7. But what about the children... by mordors9 · · Score: 1

    Frank,babe. Hate to break to you. The woman was just out for your fantastic genes. She has the kids now and is ready to move on to the area bad boy :-)

    1. Re:But what about the children... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. Just ask Hans Reiser...

    2. Re:But what about the children... by Eccles · · Score: 1

      That's kinda funny, because sociobiology tells us she'd want the area bad boy's genes and your income. Though perhaps she actually did get the former, and now will get the latter in the divorce settlement.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  8. IT causes divorce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Like spoons made Rosie fat.

    1. Re:IT causes divorce by dubbreak · · Score: 1

      Oprah gave up spoons and look at her now!

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
  9. Poor social skills by AEton · · Score: 1, Insightful

    People who self-select a career in information technology tend to have poor social skills.

    Think about it.

    --
    We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
    1. Re:Poor social skills by triffid_98 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      In 1944, an Austrian pediatrician named Hans Asperger observed four children in his practice who had difficulty integrating socially. Although their intelligence appeared normal, the children lacked nonverbal communication skills, failed to demonstrate empathy with their peers, and were physically clumsy. Their way of speaking was either disjointed or overly formal, and their all-absorbing interest in a single topic dominated their conversations. Dr. Asperger called the condition "autistic psychopathy" and described it as a condition primarily marked by social isolation.[33] He also stated that "exceptional human beings must be given exceptional educational treatment, treatment which takes into account their special difficulties. Further, we can show that despite abnormality, human beings can fulfill their social role within the community, especially if they find understanding, love and guidance"

    2. Re:Poor social skills by spacenut20 · · Score: 1

      I've got to say I disagree that. I spent 10 years in the Retail industry mostly is sales, and I would like to think I have pretty good people skills. Now that I am in the IT field I find that my people skills are almost as valuable as my technical skills. If you lock yourself in front of a screen all day and code or whatever, sure your people skills wills never develop. But, this could happen in just about any profession: musician, artist, athlete etc... I have many friends in the IT field and their pretty normal (well, for the most part) I think it's just if you don't make an effort to socialize, you will never become socialized.

    3. Re:Poor social skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who was it that said, "The only normal people are those you don't know very well"?

    4. Re:Poor social skills by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      True to a point. Except people are more willing to listen about your day and your interests if you are a musician, artist athlete, etc... For IT Work while it is interesting to you it is dry for non IT people. Which is kinda sad because I may have an interesting day a work and most people think I have a booring day, with nothing interesting happening.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:Poor social skills by maddskillz · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I was thinking.
      Correlation does not imply causation

    6. Re:Poor social skills by arivanov · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not necessarily. At least in EU.

      Lack of social skills in IT (and most heavily intellectual industries for that matter) is an American specific thing. That is not the case in the EU.

      Based on personal observations from 2 years in a US Uni and 5 years in a EU Uni the stratification between sporty steroidheads and geeks is much more pronounced in the US. In EU sports are played for fun and there are quite a few sporty geeks or very geeky sportsmen. And quite a few womenisers and party animals (and vice versa) amidst them.

      Till recently most EU companies did not consider it to be a "bad tone" for people to be rational and interested in the material side of the job (shares, salary, etc). That is not the case in the US which is much more like this. You are expected to be a sociopath, work long hours, be passionate about the job and sacrifice your family and kids in favour of it and if you do not fit this mould you do not get hired. While some EU companies have tried to adopt this model (I had that tried on me in an interview), it has not been particularly successfull (at least till recently). As a result in the US there is job based selection towards sociopathic intellectuals (this is not just IT, in fact biotech is much worse).

      For example in the company where I work less then 5% are overweight, 90%+ play some form of sport, 95% are married and the divorce rate has been 0 per 100 employees (for 5 years span). That is way better than the national average for the UK and many times better than the US.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    7. Re:Poor social skills by Slightly+Askew · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      I mean, just today, I was going over some old code that the client was wanting some new functionality for, and I realized that it was storing database data using a re-dimensioning array, and I thought to myself, "Holy crap! If I put this in a datatable or a nice hashtable it would..."

      Hey, come back here.

      --
      Public use of any portable music system is a virtually guaranteed indicator of sociopathic tendencies. -- Zoso
    8. Re:Poor social skills by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      Why does every nerd with poor social skills now claim Aspergers? Seriously, accept that you're nerds and get over it! Very few people actually have Aspergers and it takes a lot more than self-diagnosis for validity. God I'm getting sick of this.

      Here's an idea. Get up from your computer desk, unplug from your laptop/pda/blackberry/whatever the hell else you carry, and talk to people. hell, don't talk to people, just go outside and enjoy everything. But seriously, please stop telling anyone without social skills that you (or they) have Aspergers. It's embarassing and annoying, not to mention belittling to people who actually have valid issues.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    9. Re:Poor social skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed.. most IT guys that I know (including myself at one point) are complete wussies with women. You know the type: very affectionate, clingy, always complimenting her, basically not being a man, not taking the lead, not making her feel lucky that she has you, etc.

      That shit scares women off like you wouldn't believe. Oh sure they "love" you but they don't feel "attraction" that keeps them around. Women are only attracted to MEN, not "men".

      Of course I don't know this dude's situation but I'd bet my new M-class that it's not his career. His wife might've BLAMED the career because she didn't want to hurt his feelings. There are women in my life that I see once every couple of months or even YEARS and they are always passionate and attentive. Because I act like a man around them, I lead them, confidently.

      This is a good opportunity for him to say "I'm never gonna let this happen to me again" and then start learning how to be confident and powerful and masculine. Toss that new-age feminist bullshit out the window.

    10. Re:Poor social skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just a quick comment:

      For example in the company where I work less then 5% are overweight

      This is a huge myth and has been disproven many times by studies. Geeks/etc. are more likely to be underweight or average rather than overweight.
    11. Re:Poor social skills by svnt · · Score: 1
      womenisers and party animals (and vice versa)

      Animal parties?

      Animalisers?
    12. Re:Poor social skills by triffid_98 · · Score: 1
      I don't recall claiming that I had it, however I'm quite likely to be a genetic carrier, as are most of the folks reading this thread....

      Why does every nerd with poor social skills now claim Aspergers? Seriously, accept that you're nerds and get over it! Very few people actually have Aspergers and it takes a lot more than self-diagnosis for validity. God I'm getting sick of this.
    13. Re:Poor social skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't bathing a social skill?

    14. Re:Poor social skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Lack of social skills in IT (and most heavily intellectual industries for that matter) is an American specific thing. That is not the case in the EU.
      No kidding. It's lack of IT skills in IT that's the far bigger problem in the EU.
  10. Married and divorced ... by douggmc · · Score: 1

    Most Slashdotters can barely manage to get away from their computers and speak to a women ... how on earth do you expect them to have actually been married and then divorced :)

  11. IT, No T, any job is the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My ex-wife's job had more to do with it then mine, she was screwing her service manager.

    1. Re:IT, No T, any job is the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oh, I don't know... maybe some of us are capable of satisfying our wives ourselves and would prefer not to be married to sluts?

      Just a wild guess.

    2. Re:IT, No T, any job is the same by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Insightful
      any job is the same

      There is some truth to this. Nearly any coporate job demands long hours and tough working conditions, all so you can make a few extra bucks. Having both spouses working only exasperates the difficulties in spending time together. In a good relationship, both of you should naturally have a clear idea of what each other is up to. There's no need to give each other the first degree, or hang off each other. Just spending time together, talking a lot, and doing the things that couples do can go a long way toward saving the marriage. Unfortunately, this takes a LOT of effort, isn't very easy, and requires the commitment from both sides.

      Having kids only puts more demands on your time. They need just as much of your time as your spouse does. That time, however, does NOT replace the alone time you need with your spouse! Just because you both spend time with your kid doesn't mean that you don't still need intimate time (physical, emotional, and otherwise) with each other. Just something to keep in mind.

      BTW, check out my current sig for a geeky way to give your kids "daddy time". ;)
    3. Re:IT, No T, any job is the same by Canthros · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, you're a babysitter and maid.

      --
      Canthros
    4. Re:IT, No T, any job is the same by Billosaur · · Score: 1

      I agree wholeheartedly. My job is killing my life right now, what with a commute of two hours each way to get into NYC. It cuts down on the time I have and when I get home, I leave work behind only to find more work. I get precious little sleep (4 hours is a pretty good night for me) and as a result of all of this, things are rocky at home.

      But this would occur in any kind of job that demanded the same kind of hours. It is not the culprit. As for me, of course I'm trying to find a job closer to home, but the market is competitive right now with the number of people outsourced rising and employers demanding wider skill sets. I can only hope I luck into something soon.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    5. Re:IT, No T, any job is the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God the mods must be nuts. There is NO greater pleasure than being married to a woman who is so hot that other men want (and DO) to bang her! And even better still when you know that your wife is completely capable of getting so turned on for them. Haven't you ever fantasized about being married to a female porno character? (I specify character because porno actresses are typically not really that horny in real life) For those of us who have tasted the sweetness of living in the hotwife lifestyle I can say with total authority on the subject that you don't know what you're missing. ALl of this stupid macho bullshit about wanting to own your wife, or not being man enough to satisfy my own wife's needs should go right into the rubbish bin. She's an individual and she can do what she likes. I'd much rather be married to a woman with a strong mindset and personality than some dishrag who stays home. And I am perfectly capable of satisfying her. But face it, monogomous sex lives are dull.

    6. Re:IT, No T, any job is the same by syntap · · Score: 1

      Just spending time together, talking a lot, and doing the things that couples do can go a long way toward saving the marriage.

      Wait... I got married so I WOULDN'T have to talk to her anymore. What that bad?

  12. Are you serious? by nasor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are you seriously planning to use responses here as "data" for a graduate-level academic thesis?

    1. Re:Are you serious? by bbernard · · Score: 1

      That's my question too. I hope you've got some sort of scientific data collection planned, because anything you get here on Slashdot is going to be anecdotal at best.

      Other than that, I can't help you: my wife and I don't have any kids yet, and no signs of divorce just yet.

      Perhaps you might want to look at this another way: People who get into may have certain personality traits that make them really good at IT, and very bad at mariage. Or not.

      --
      ----- Connection reset by beer
    2. Re:Are you serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The expectations of today's academics have been lowered greatly. A B.S. (B.A. = Junior High?) is relative to a high school diploma years ago. Most master's degree programs are targeted toward the inept. The single place where the expectations are at a reasonable level is in the Ph.D. programs. Even that has gone downhill. This sort of biased research has no place in the academic world and should not sufficient to warrant any sort of graduate degree. There are always exceptions, as I've seen a B.S. Honors thesis of higher quality than any M.S. thesis and it was better than some Ph.D. thesis work. If you want to judge a school's/department's graduate program, look at the quality of the thesis papers they have approved.

    3. Re:Are you serious? by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 1

      That totally depends on whether he's doing in-depth interviews or statistical analysis.

      --

      Stop the brainwash

    4. Re:Are you serious? by Peldor · · Score: 1
      Don't dismiss the collected works of /.ers.

      Measuring the noise is as important as measuring the signal.

    5. Re:Are you serious? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      If this is the way this guy plans to gather his statistics, he will be laughed out of school. This wouldn't even cut it for undergrad!

      If his thesis is "people in career X are statistically more likely to experience divorce than the cross-vocational average," then he needs to start gathering public records on divorce and start doing the math.

      It sounds like the submitter is looking for hugs, not data.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    6. Re:Are you serious? by El+Torico · · Score: 1

      You were tricked! He was actually hoping that someone would provide him guidance on research methods.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
    7. Re:Are you serious? by catfood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Checking with the college's Institutional Review Board would be a really good idea at this point.

    8. Re:Are you serious? by nasor · · Score: 1

      You're not quite correct. What you should have said is "This wouldn't even cut it in undergrad in a hard science." If he is writing a thesis about divorce and IT, it's probably for some sort of "soft" social science. Based on what I've seen of high-level academic research in areas like sociology or anthropology, it's unfortunately common for people to collect a lot of anecdotal evidence with a series of interviews or a few poorly-thought-out surveys, then successfully pass it off as "data" for their "research" without worrying about things like statistical analysis, selection bias, etc.

      I'm sure some social science fan who is bad at critical thinking will come along and point out that I am committing exactly such an error myself by judging the entire field based on my own biased anecdotal experiences, so I'll preemptively reply by pointing out that I'm making a post to slashdot rather than writing an academic journal article or thesis.

    9. Re:Are you serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even the subject of his "thesis" is ludicrous. Where is his supervisor to tell him what is and isn't an appropriate thesis topic?

      He'll never get past his defence, and after he fails to get his degree he'll probably blame that on his profession too.

    10. Re:Are you serious? by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      Interviews of self-selected respondents on an online forum, many of whom are largely anonymous in the absence of the site administrator's willingness to disclose identities (if they even -have- anything more than a possible throw-away e-mail address), would seem to be an invitation to malicious jokers.

      While there's going to be some likelihood of deception in an in-person interview, at least one might obtain an identify for confirming such basics as the respondents actually having been married and divorced, as those should be matters of public record. In addition, one can restrict it to cases where one can also interview the spouse. Identifying the spouse of a pseudonymous respondent is... tricky.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    11. Re:Are you serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IF you are using /. responses then sorry to tell you but I've been married 19 years, have 4 kids and am nowhere near divorce. I was in a job where stress and hours were affecting my family life. I found a new job where I could put my family first and quit. IT vs non-IT isn't the issue. The issue is whether you put your job (or FPS games, MMoRPG, girlfriend) first or your family. (Ok.. "girlfriend" probably shouldn't be in the list if you're married and hoping to stay married.)

    12. Re:Are you serious? by humphrm · · Score: 1

      > Are you seriously planning to use responses here as "data" for a graduate-level academic thesis?

      A splendid idea.

      Divorce isn't caused by the IT industry.

      It's because you've run afoul of the Flying Spagetti Monster.

      Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire comment are permitted worldwide, without royalty, in any medium, provided this notice, and the copyright notice, are preserved.

      --
      -- "In order to have power, I must be taken seriously." -Mojo Jojo
    13. Re:Are you serious? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      As a software engineer with a particular passion for physics, I can understand your sentiments. But, at least for psychology, it is my understanding that respectable institutes are now (in the past decade or two) demanding proper statistical treatement of their research.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  13. I wonder... by mattgoldey · · Score: 0

    if your divorce has anything to do with the fact that you're an idiot.

  14. Shocking by Tweekster · · Score: 1

    people that have trouble communication about non technical things may have trouble with relationships.

    I wish this was fark, obvious tag...

    --
    The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
  15. Divorced geeks unite by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    I too am a divorced geek. Fortunately I had no children with the ex, and I don't know if it's the job so much that contributed to it as much as my geekness.

    Even when we're not at work, we're still geeks and concerned with all manner of geekery.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:Divorced geeks unite by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, you've failed at being a man.

      And yet you must hide behind the sheild of anonymity. That speaks volumes about you.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  16. Huh? by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Funny

    Married? Kids? I'm still running girlfriend 5.0 since I'd heard the upgrades to wife 1.0 came with so many problems I'd stick with what already works for me. :-P

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, I wish I had mod points right now. This is the best post I've read so far!

    2. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bugs are worked out by the time you get to Wife 3.0 though, at least that is what I found out.

      wife 1.0 can be stable, wife 2.0 if installed too close to the time that wife 1.0 crashed usually is hell for you. also never ever install a wife upgrade when the age of the build is drastically lower than you. Girlfriend upgrades that have build dates that are very low are fun but not good for upgrades to wife.

      I upgraded to wife 2.0 way too soon after wife 1.0 and had a really really young build date. It drove me insane to the point that it took 6 years to try wife 3.0....

    3. Re:Huh? by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sure, but the problem is eventually Girlfriend 5.0's constant nagging to be upgraded gets on your nerves and you end up having to buy the upgrade or uninstall the software.

    4. Re:Huh? by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      Sure, but the problem is eventually Girlfriend 5.0's constant nagging to be upgraded gets on your nerves and you end up having to buy the upgrade or uninstall the software.

      Girlfriend 5.0 is adamant there is no upgrade path from Girlfriend 5.0 to Wife 1.0, and any such attempts would void the warranty and be unsupported by the vendor. The restrictive license of Wife 1.0 comes with too much vendor lock in for both parties.

      Also, all versions of Child are known to be incompatible with Girlfriend 5.0 as that was in the release notes; but I didn't need that feature set anyway, so it's working well for my needs.

      It also includes Sex Life 10.0, which (so far) is the best version of the software I've encountered.

      All in all, a very good product. I'll have to see how it fills my needs long-term, but for now I have no plans to upgrade. It's definitely way less flaky than some of the previous versions. =)

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is, at some point girlfriend 5.0 will refuse to continue running without an upgrade to wife 1.0. Unfortunately you usually don't get a warning before the upgrade demand.

    6. Re:Huh? by fandog · · Score: 1

      Oh no, you're doomed! Unless girlfriend 5.0 has previously been installed as wife 1.0 for someone else, the 'no upgrade path' messages are luring you into a false sense of security with plugin feature Sex Life 10.0. Any spawned Child versions may only be generated within a short time of girlfriend 5.0's inception date, and every instance of girlfriend is aware of it. You're still in the pre-wife 1.0 demand deception phase. Enjoy the phase but be vigilant, and hold onto your wallet.

    7. Re:Huh? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that Girlfriend 5.0 is just as capable of spawning a child process as Wife 1.0.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    8. Re:Huh? by paranode · · Score: 2, Funny
      Sure, but the problem is eventually Girlfriend 5.0's constant nagging to be upgraded gets on your nerves and you end up having to buy the upgrade or uninstall the software.
      Exactly, and the ultimate problem is that eventually your hardware is incompatible or too old to run the latest version of Girlfriend. Then the prospects of upgrading to Wife obviously become bleak. Now you should be warned that if your system is not running any version of Girlfriend then you may get infected by Hookers and Blow, Alcoholism, or gratuitous overlapping installs of Porn Library.
    9. Re:Huh? by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      Oh no, you're doomed! Unless girlfriend 5.0 has previously been installed as wife 1.0 for someone else, the 'no upgrade path' messages are luring you into a false sense of security with plugin feature Sex Life 10.0.

      Well, not all women are conniving wenches who are trying to lull you into a false sense of security so they can get the meat-hooks in. Not all of them have grown up dreaming of their wedding day, what to name their children, and picking out china patterns.

      The friends of Girlfriend 5.0 assure me the no upgrade-path sentiment has been present for a very long time now. I'm not worried about bait-and-switch marketing. ;-)

      Enjoy the phase but be vigilant, and hold onto your wallet.

      *laugh* No worries; there is not much likelihood of me changing my 20+ year stance on getting married no matter how good Sex Life 10.0 is.

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    10. Re:Huh? by mnmn · · Score: 1

      And you'll have to keep upgrading the MS Girlfriend hoping the new version is more stable.

      Back in our days Wife 1.0 on DEC PDP-11 would run forever if the hardware could keep her running. It generated a lot of heat and was expensive, but it did the job and there was never a reason to upgrade. Trust me, MS Girlfriend is all bling bling while the ugly OS on the PDP-11 will always run on weaker hardware.

      --
      "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    11. Re:Huh? by tonyr1988 · · Score: 1

      But does she run Linux?

    12. Re:Huh? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      based on your sig, I would suggest getting off of MS.. Then you can worry about getting a GF or wife that is relatively problem free. It may take a bit of up front admin to set up correctly and keep going; just make certain that you do not miss those continual updates, or GF/Wife will be hacked by others.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    13. Re:Huh? by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      based on your sig, I would suggest getting off of MS

      Eh? What about my sig makes you think I'm on MS? My sig is actually quite blatantly anti Microsoft. Read it again, if you don't get it, maybe someone can explain it to you.

      And, really, running Linux (or FreeBSD in my case) won't actually make your relationships any stronger. One can only really carry the Wife 1.0 joke so far. ;-)

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    14. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      girlfriend 5.0 is free and open source.

      wife 1.0 is proprietaty and closed source.

      'nuff said.

    15. Re:Huh? by Dacmot · · Score: 1

      Is the nagging process going to hog as much resources as the wedding and life_after_marriage processes? I think not. Until girlfriend 6.0 comes along it might be a good idea to stick with girlfriend 5.0, if only for the weekly fsck and other cron jobs.

    16. Re:Huh? by BillX · · Score: 1

      Crap. They told me Wife 1.0 was a security update.

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
    17. Re:Huh? by BillX · · Score: 1

      I used to date one like that. No Wife 1.0 nags, adamant about an entire lifecycle with no child processes; seemed to be exactly what I was looking for at first. However, frequent, unexplained freak-outs and branches into la-la land, unstable and perpetually overclocked. Also, Sex Life 10.0 turned out to be an enterprise-edition site license.

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  17. Hate to break it to you.... by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

    But I seriously doubt this type of data collection is going to fly for a PhD thesis. I hope you're a Master's student, your advisor is ridiculously lenient and he/she has somehow never heard of confirmation bias.

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  18. Primary Cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    My ex cited long working hours and "workaholism" as the primary reasons. They were not the only reasons, but she thought they were primary.
    After remarrying, I've made very sure to spend less time at work and more with my family.
    At least nerds can learn from experience.
    Sorry about the AC reply, my wife reads Slashdot.

    1. Re:Primary Cause by Durrok · · Score: 3, Funny

      You had a wife that reads /. and you let her get away? FOOL!

      --
      I keep telling myself I'm not the desperate type.
    2. Re:Primary Cause by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      He said his wife reads /. not his ex.

    3. Re:Primary Cause by apt142 · · Score: 1

      I couldn't help it, she chewed through the restraints.

  19. A few points by ellem · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1) Ask /. is now officially worthless
    2) Your thesis is horribly flawed
    3) Your wife is leaving you because you whine too much

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
    1. Re:A few points by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      *standing ovation*

      Thank you, sir, for properly eviscerating the submitter. Nothing like burying your pain in a thesis entitled "don't blame me, blame my job."

      In what industry isn't there a high rate of divorce?

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    2. Re:A few points by arth1 · · Score: 5, Funny
      In what industry isn't there a high rate of divorce?

      Priests. Probably prostitutes too. But I repeat myself.
    3. Re:A few points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4) ???
      5) Profit!

    4. Re:A few points by elcid73 · · Score: 1

      *golf clap* Good day sir!

    5. Re:A few points by RumorControl · · Score: 1

      I don't think he's whining, I think this is an attempt to find evidence for a thesis. You see, he's not complaining about it, he's flat, void of emotion, and focused on "facts". Which is precisely the problem, as he's unable to understand why someone would feel the need to end a relationship because it is unfulfilling or unrewarding. The inabliity to understand how someone else could feel could be boiolgical (1 in 50 score high on psychopathy) or just a social awareness he never developed.

      as such, the subject is clearly out of touch with the shared reality . which I must say...my god, a buch of geeks read this and nuked him...that is encouraging for alll those ITSO's out there!

        I'd revise 3 to read "... because you rationalize everything." Seriously, get some therapy, it'll help you understand.

      --

    6. Re:A few points by Mark_Uplanguage · · Score: 1

      THAT made me laugh. Thanks!

      --
      "The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." -- Albert Einstein
    7. Re:A few points by kent_eh · · Score: 1
      In what industry isn't there a high rate of divorce?

      One with excellent pay, stable shifts (with no overtime ever), good benifits, lots of vacation time and no stress.
      If you figure out what industry that is, let me know. I've been searching for years.
      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    8. Re:A few points by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      I think it's called Slashdot Editor...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    9. Re:A few points by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 1
      In what industry isn't there a high rate of divorce?

      Weird logic. Sure, there's no perfect job. Sure, people get divorced in all industries. But I'm not sure how that rebuts the notion that some industries (IT) may be worse than others. Some companies have nearly inhuman expectations and the spouses are affected.

      There are jobs that cater to more family-minded people. Maybe it's the industry. Maybe it's the location. I know that when I worked in Sonoma County (wine country), everyone left work right at 5 PM, maybe had a nice drink together, and that was it. Work was dropped, regardless. If deadlines passed, they passed. When I moved to San Jose (Silicon Valley), the garage startup mentality was HUGE. The idea that you might slave away for 4 or 5 years in order to make a killing in stock options or to leverage a buyout was prevalent just about everywhere. And still is, thanks to YouTube and others like them. One of my bosses was very proud of working 16 hour days for 2 years straight. You might imagine that working for such a person involves similar workaholism.

      Some industries do have bad trends. Maybe they come & go in waves. I don't know. But I know that work environments do differ, and some are very marriage-hostile. If a married person gets stuck in such a job and is living paycheck to paycheck, it may not be so easy to get out. If the OP does his study on a scientific basis -- control groups, the works -- and comes to the conclusion that IT has a 60% divorce rate while the paper industry has a 45% divorce rate, there might be something to it.
  20. I wonder... by On+Lawn · · Score: 1


    I wonder what the author, or others might attribute to the IT industry that is a strain on a marriage.

    I've had times that I need to choose between work and home, and I may not have as much lattitude in that decision in some ways as another profession. But I'm not sure what might be an issue more or less than another career.

    As for myself, I feel pretty lucky that while things in the server room are working well I'm given quite a bit of lattitude to deal with family issues. Which is good considering the critical nature of many of these issues.

  21. Correlation = Causation? by Illserve · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Surely you can't discount the fact that IT workers are drawn from a different portion of the population which makes it difficult if not impossible to prove that there is a causative factor?

    It sounds like an interesting topic, but be careful with overstating the implications of your correlational results.

    1. Re:Correlation = Causation? by SerpentMage · · Score: 1

      Bingo give the man a cigar! Those were my thoughts to a T

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    2. Re:Correlation = Causation? by elakazal · · Score: 1

      I thought of this too. I know lots and lots of people in IT (most of my friends from high school and their friends, plus I flirted with a career in it myself and made a lot of contacts). I also know lots and lots of people in biological research fields (this is where I work now). The hours are at least as long and unpredictable in my field as they are for my friends in IT, but I have to say that the relationships are much healthier by comparison. Why? Hard to say for sure, but one big difference I've noticed is that by comparison the IT people have, on average, worse interpersonal skills. And as far as I can tell, always did, even before they entered that field. It's hardly universal, of course, and I know exceptions on either side, but in general the pattern's pretty clear.

  22. A more likely reason for divorce by aaronwormus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Getting your advice from slashdot.

  23. yes, but.. by Steve_Jobs_HNIC · · Score: 5, Funny

    His job smacked his wife around. Now seriously, who's gonna stay in a relationship like that? I mean come on...

    His job was also very lazy, never did anything around the house. And it would never listen! If you're going to be in a relationship with a man, women, and a job, everyone needs respect each other and their personal space. But job just didn't know when to back off either... it would keep pressing and pressing... jesus, I'm in the bathroom. Just leave me alone!

    1. Re:yes, but.. by operagost · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hate when Job leaves the toilet seat up!!!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:yes, but.. by ptireland · · Score: 1

      Wow, his job sounds a lot like my wife. I'm also in the IT business, and I've been divorced. I'm on marriage version 2.0 and will have a professional hitman take me out if I get married again.

    3. Re:yes, but.. by CelticWhisper · · Score: 1

      Sarah, is that you?

      --
      Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
      http://www.tsanewsblog.com
  24. Maybe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Due to the sometimes-long hours, on-call rotation, nightly work, and general stress, some IT people can experience this situation. I'm in IT and recently got a divorce. But I don't believe the cause was my job nor the hours worked. I'm sure that my have factored into it a small percentage, due to the time spent away from home and away from my wife causing some distancing, but definitely not a deciding factor. People sometimes grow apart or want to persue other interests that subconsiously drive these things. One may not see the exact causes.

  25. That depends... by GmAz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do you bring your work home with you? Is your hobby computers and does it take most up of your free time? Do you commute to work and end up getting home late every night? I work in an IT possition as well and though my marriage is a good one...I could probably play computer games less. Well, mainly one...World of Warcraft. I have taken it easy lately on it since I do have a 6 month old baby girl...but if computers have taken over your life, trust me...its not the IT Industry ruining your marriage...its you. People with the same fascination with cars or fishing or hunting. If those hobbies take over their lives, their personal life is affected. Doctors have the same problem. They work long hours and end up with bad personal lives.

    --
    Click Click Bloody Click PANCAKES!
  26. FWIW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife and I were quite happy together when we worked full time (same company, different departments). It wasn't until we retired and started actually spending time together that we got divorced.

  27. Since other aspects are sufficiently covered ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... I just want you to know that I'm sorry that you and your family are in this situation. It's painful for everybody, and I feel for you.

  28. Grad Level Thesis: Facts Not Hunches by nick_davison · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For my graduate thesis I am writing a paper about Dads who work in the computer industry, divorce and custody. I think our industry causes a high rate of divorce but I need some help from the Slashdot community.

    I realize this may come across as a cheap shot but...

    If you're writing a graduate level paper, shouldn't you actually do some, you know, statistical analysis to support your core hypothesis rather than go with, "I have a feeling and asked some other nerds."?

    You're far more likely to get results with, "Statistics show that while divorce is at n%, n+y% of male IT workers experience divorce. This thesis looks at prime causes for that y% and performs a statistical breakdown of their effects." than "I got divorced, I work in IT, it sucked. This paper's about how I'm pretty sure IT made it happen. I asked some other nerds what they think."

  29. Numbers. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Before blaiming work you should look at all the numbers.
    Devorce Rate in your country. Percentages of Dads who win custity. Then break it out by Professional Sector and Labor Sectors in buisness.

    Now if the devorce rate for Web Developers is 85% and Chances to get custity is 5% and the average for the Professional Sector is 45% Then you may have a point. But if it 50% IT Professionals and 50% Professional Sector and 50% national. Then it is just your fault not work.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Numbers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one who finds "custity" to be a deliciously naughty looking word?

  30. In my situation by otacon · · Score: 1

    I am a network engineer at a large steel manufacturer. I am also currently engaged and have a 3 month old son. Now I love both of them, but I've frequently wondered if we ever did split would I be able to share custody. Work is very demanding and often more time outside of the office for research and studying. Of course I would want to see my child, and could provide finacially, but what about emotionally, honestly I don't think I could, maybe on the weekends if that. It's sad to say but some jobs make it almost impossible to be a single parent without a lot of assistence, as a male, I am not very motherly and would probably need a nanny or something, and I just wouldn't want to do that to him, he would be better off with his mother, as hard as that is to say. My advice would be to really evaluate your career and how much time you really have in a day to care for your child. Good luck.

    --
    In a world of acronyms, the words are the real victims.
    1. Re:In my situation by winkydink · · Score: 2, Insightful

      These are all issues you should have thought about before having unprotected sex. What will happen to your son if something tragic happens to his mom?

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    2. Re:In my situation by otacon · · Score: 1

      First off, my son was planned, thank you. Secondly, If something tragic did happen, then I would have to find a way to manage. I'm not incapable of being a single parent, I'm simply saying it would be hard. My point was under current conditions things simply "work", but if there was a break-up then it would take a lot of careful planning to see what would be the best situation for the child.

      --
      In a world of acronyms, the words are the real victims.
    3. Re:In my situation by winkydink · · Score: 1

      You planned on having a child when you knew going into it that you could not be emotionally available. Nice.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    4. Re:In my situation by toleraen · · Score: 1

      First off, my son was planned, thank you. Secondly, If something tragic did happen, then I would have to find a way to manage.

      If I may reiterate what the GP said, you should have thought of this /prior/. Not trying to flame, but seriously, if you didn't think of something as basic as "what would we do if one of us died/left/etc" before, then what planning was involved? Between my parents and schooling (US public schooling even), I can't even count the number of times that question has come up! Have you thought of how you'd provide if you got fired? What if you had to move, how would your kid take it? Do you argue in front of your kid? Are you open enough to let them know about marital/life problems as they come around?

      With something as life changing as having a kid, especially since it affects other people as well as you, you should be asking each other question after question until you're blue in the face. Then after you pass out, and wake up, ask more questions until you pass out again. If your kid comes to school and shoots my kid because his daddy doesn't love him enough, are you prepared to face the consequences? Obviously not.

    5. Re:In my situation by Zardus · · Score: 1

      That's not what he said, though. He said that he wouldn't be emotionally available enough to raise the child himself. He didn't say that he wasn't emotionally available enough to raise the child with help from his wife. When I was young, my dad travelled over europe as a guest lecturer because there was no money to make in Russia. He'd be gone for months at a time. No way in hell he could have raised us alone, but my mom was there too, and it really worked out. When he'd come home he'd spend time with us and we had (and still have) a closer bond to him than, I'd say, 60% of American kids have toward their fathers nowadays. Conversely, after we moved to the US and my parents got divorced, my mom now too busy to be emotionally available 100% of the time. It wasn't THAT bad, but it was noticeably worse than with two parents.

      So, the GP or GGP or whatever did his planning to the best of his ability. While plans should include a plan B in case of divorce, I've been in his situation and I know what the absolute conviction of "divorces only happen to other people" feels like.

      --
      You can mod your friends, you can mod your nose, but you can't mod your friend's nose.
  31. after two divorces by FudRucker · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    after two marriages ending in divorce i no longer take love & romance serously, i refuse to let my emotions control me like that anymore, i dont care how pretty or nice or available a women makes her self she wont get more than sex and a place to spend the night from me...

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:after two divorces by Stardo · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised you give her a place eto spend the night. =P

    2. Re:after two divorces by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      How else do you get breakfast?

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    3. Re:after two divorces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you sound like a real prize alright. Ever think that they may have left you because you're a fucking loser? I doubt most women would want "sex and a place to stay the night" from a woman-hating faggot.

    4. Re:after two divorces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Straight from the cocks you losers are sucking between Slashdot posts, that's where. Most of you little shits wouldn't know an attractive woman if you tripped on one, and even if you would, you'd be too busy beating off to ever build up the courage to talk to her.

      Funny how Slashdot is full of advice about women, all of a sudden, and it's all coming from hopeless nerds. Blind leading the blind.

  32. Oh grow up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your income is so important that you sacrifice your relationship, you don't deserve neither.

    I work in IT, I have been doing it for 10 years now. TEN FUCKING YEARS.

    Has this destroyed my relationships? No. It has added stress.

    So I'm quitting next year. I hate what this field has done to my life. So *I* am making a change.

    Grow a pair and quit blaming your problems on your job. It's you that is at fault.

    1. Re:Oh grow up. by Morphine007 · · Score: 5, Funny

      If your income is so important that you sacrifice your relationship, you don't deserve neither.
      I work in IT, I have been doing it for 10 years now. TEN FUCKING YEARS.


      Christ almighty I hope you're not a coder...

    2. Re:Oh grow up. by aardwolf64 · · Score: 1

      If (1!=1) Then
      echo("This works!");

      Why isn't it working???

    3. Re:Oh grow up. by FuckTheModerators · · Score: 1

      If (1!=1) Then
      echo("This works!");


      You've got it all wrong. Based on the grandparent's grammar, it ought to be:

      If (1!<>1) Then
      echo("This works!");

  33. Besides the obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The obvious being that many geeks make poor (perhaps "premature" is a more fair word) choices in their personal lives. Before you mod me down, consider how many geek friends you know that go for girls that are TERRIBLE matches for them. Many geeks make very good choices too, of course, but it seems there's no middle ground; geeks either know themselves, or they don't, and it seems to reflect in their personal lives as well.

    1. Re:Besides the obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before you mod me down, consider how many geek friends you know that go for girls that are TERRIBLE matches for them.

      Read: Desperate.

  34. dad or tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work on the TAC of the second-largest vendor of IP-routing equipment (guess which one). While I am not married, most of my collegues are. The divorce-rate is fairly low. I think this is due to the "normal" working hours we have. Unlike previous jobs (at ISP's, being -the- tech), in my current role there is plenty of opportunity to hand of a case if it needs out-of-hours attention. This combined with the fact that most of my collegues (yes, that includes me) have lost the 24/7-drive to tech-stuff, it helps to have a normal family life.

    Now I'm waiting for the flames here. Yes I know we all feel we have a decent life. Yes I know we all feel it is possible to combine being a "hardcore-techie" with being a "family man". But deep down inside we all know that this is pretty much impossible. You can't tech 24/7 and dad 24/7. At work you tech, at home you dad. Itsasimple.

  35. Your career doesn't define your divorce. by Agent+Green · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not sure if any of the data you have here is going to be significant ... and since this _is_ slashdot, I doubt highly that you could use it as a reference on a graduate thesis. Personally, I've been married for 3 years and have a son, which I'm sure outcasts me in the group. But, I digress.

    I have a couple friends that have been divorced, though they are from different professions. In those cases, the job wasn't the crowning gem in the divorce itself ... far from it. Here are some traits I observed which one side, the other, or both had in those cases: personality conflicts, lack of communication skills, unwillingness to communicate, unwillingness to listen, self-absorption leading to the exclusion of the other, disjoint financial strategies, unfair domestic workload balance, ho-hum disregard for the children. I never saw a particular job or anything actually interfere.

    Where I'm at now in my mid-30s, most of the guys I work with are married and have been for quite some time. There are very few divorcees and the people I know are very loyal to their partners and their families. I'd have to say that here in IT, those of us who are married are a pretty fun, stable bunch.

    I think you need to stop blaming your career for your divorce and do a little more soul searching.

    --
    // Agent Green (Ian / IU7 / KB1JQO)
    // IEEE 802.3: All 10base Are Belong To Us
    1. Re:Your career doesn't define your divorce. by dsanfte · · Score: 1

      I'm starting to wonder if there aren't also genetic bases for divorce. This would figure into personality conflicts, counterproductive tendencies, and soforth. Some families seem very, very predisposed to alcoholism, for example, and that's a marriage-wrecker if I've ever known one.

      In my experience, selfishness in its many forms is the root cause of relationship breakdown.

      Good analysis all-around.

      --
      occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    2. Re:Your career doesn't define your divorce. by EtherMonkey · · Score: 2, Funny
      Here are some traits I observed which one side, the other, or both had in those cases: personality conflicts, lack of communication skills, unwillingness to communicate, unwillingness to listen, self-absorption leading to the exclusion of the other, disjoint financial strategies, unfair domestic workload balance, ho-hum disregard for the children.

      I think it summarizes down to this: incompatibility between system components, which sort of makes marriage a lot like a PC running Windows: unstable, prone to crashes and violations, demanding of frequent repair and outright reloads.

      The obvious solution, that I'm surprised that no other ./'er has suggested, is to replace your Microsoft marriage with either OS/X or Linux. As a divorced IT professional with full custody of the kids, I fully plan to switch to Linux-based relationship OS before considering any future long-term relationship. :P

      --
      --- A man with a briefcase can steal more money, than any man with a gun. [Don Henley]
    3. Re:Your career doesn't define your divorce. by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1
      I'm starting to wonder if there aren't also genetic bases for divorce.

      Why look it so far?

      Divorces are more common as people are lead to be more individual and pursuit their own individual needs more (constant unsatisfaction). Expectations are as well much higher on both sides, and either side are more easily replaced as they fill a personal need rather then perform a function.

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    4. Re:Your career doesn't define your divorce. by booch · · Score: 2, Funny

      As a divorced IT professional with full custody of the kids, I fully plan to switch to Linux-based relationship OS before considering any future long-term relationship. :P

      I agree. An Open Marriage would be great. Granted, it's a lot different than a Closed Marriage, and many people will have some difficulty adapting.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    5. Re:Your career doesn't define your divorce. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my opinion, the number one cause of divorce is a man's unwillingness to continue to be nice to the same old vagina month after month after long, tedious year. If a man has the ability and opportunity to get new vag after he gets a divorce, he's more likely to cheat or stop appeasing his wife, leading to divorce.

      The number one reason that men stay married is because they don't want to lose half their money just for new vag. However, I believe in the quote "Do you know why divorce is so expensive? Because it's worth it."

      Or, the Rod Stewart quote: "Instead of getting married, I'm just going to find a woman I hate and buy her a house."

    6. Re:Your career doesn't define your divorce. by blindd0t · · Score: 1
      I think you need to stop blaming your career for your divorce and do a little more soul searching.

      I agree to an extent - the career alone certainly isn't to blame. The key is setting the right level of expectations with your loved ones, being there when it really counts, and also making sure your significant other is understanding of your career *before* you get married. I am happily married, and I tend to work long hours and work even more in the evenings right after I've gotten home and eaten dinner. Thankfully, my wife is very understanding and supportive of my career and my work ethic. Fact is, I'm in this career because I'm doing what I love to do every day - she was always understanding of that as our relationship grew. Likewise, I respect her career choice and work ethic, and our understanding has always been and should always be mutual.

    7. Re:Your career doesn't define your divorce. by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      The obvious solution, that I'm surprised that no other ./'er has suggested, is to replace your Microsoft marriage with either OS/X or Linux. As a divorced IT professional with full custody of the kids, I fully plan to switch to Linux-based relationship OS before considering any future long-term relationship. :P

      Are you saying you'd prefer your relationships to be, shall we say, open-source?

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    8. Re:Your career doesn't define your divorce. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Here are some traits I observed which one side, the other, or both had in those cases:lack of communication skills, unwillingness to communicate, unwillingness to listen, self-absorption leading to the exclusion of the other, disjoint financial strategies, unfair domestic workload balance, ho-hum disregard for the children. I never saw a particular job or anything actually interfere.

      I'm a father of a 4 and 2 year old and have been married to my wife for 4 years now(with her for 8 years before that) with no sign of a divorce in site and I have to second this.

      These are some of the things I've seen friends who have gotten divorced pull to give an idea of how these things play out in real life situations:
      Guy has a wife and kids at home and still stays late to play network games with the single guys. Regularly. No excuse, grow the fuck up.

      Guy has a kids birthday/wifes birthday/anniversary/etc... coming up and blows most of his spending money on some gadget/technical project(read: adult toy). You can generally get away with this once or twice depending whether it was something you regretted doing afterwards, or if you are able to con her into thinking you regretted it. When the third time comes, you're in deep shit because the message you are sending loud and clear is: "Everything comes second to my petty desires." If you really don't regret it at this point, then you should view divorce as a good thing.

      Guy has some kind of anger/insecurity/depression/etc... issues that he does not tell his wife about! Guys, that's your WIFE, not your mommy you hide secrets from. If there is one person in the world you should be able to open up to as a man, it's your wife. That's what she's there for, that's what you're there for(not counting the hot sex, baby talk, and all the other fun shit). You have to share each others burdens, as well as happiness. This nearly destroyed my relationship with my wife, until I just got it out. So much shit practically fixed itself after I opened up to her that it was amazing. My friend didn't though, he's a real man who doesn't have any issues. He'll never open up and talk and feel weak because he's still pissed that he got beat as a child, so he'll carry that weight by himself. Not really by himself, he's getting a married a second time so I'm sure this time will be forever and the kids from his previous marriage will just understand what a man he is. :P

      I just wanted to give some examples because sometimes I think people read those words and really don't put two and two together that they are doing things that qualify as what those words are saying. My friend who keeps his anger and the reasons for it bottled up inside is completely oblivious to his inability and unwillingness to communicate what needs to be communicated. He thinks he's open. My other two divorcee friends, the game addict and the gadget addict, think their ex's were "bitches" because they didn't "understand". All three of them tell me I don't know how lucky I am to have the woman I do, and that's total shit. First off, in case she reads this, I do know how lucky I am. And second, If I did what they did consistantly, my wife would drop me like a bad habit.

    9. Re:Your career doesn't define your divorce. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope she as as understanding when you are trying to convince her you should have equal custody after she files for divorce. Just how many years do you think she will be satisfied getting attention from you 1/12th of the day while the computer and pillow get the other 22 hours?

    10. Re:Your career doesn't define your divorce. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why Linux? You just risk coming into contact with someone else's open sores...

    11. Re:Your career doesn't define your divorce. by DrCode · · Score: 1

      And then, a lot of it is due to the fact that we live much longer than before. If you're in an unhappy marriage, and you know that you're likely to live another 30 or 40 or 50 years, you're a lot more likely to look for a change.

    12. Re:Your career doesn't define your divorce. by DrCode · · Score: 1

      I agree that it's not the career. But it can be the type of people that go into that career.

      A lot of us male technical types have fairly nerdy personalities, meaning that, growing up, we weren't as socially adept as others. The result is that some (but certainly not all, or even most) techies end up with women that more experienced fellows knew to stay away from. And I think there are certain hard-to-get-along-with women who target men like this (in the same way that abusive men go after women they think will be easy to push around).

  36. How is this different from any other job? by the_humeister · · Score: 1

    Doctors work long hours, especially surgeons, and have high divorce rates. Same with lawyers. Basically, any job in which you're working long hours and not spending time with your wife is a contributing factor for divorce. We've known this for at least several decades.

  37. my divorce- by jmahler · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I work as an IT person (net admin, specifically) and I went through a divorce with 2 kids.

    I came out with a shared parenting plan and am considered the custodial or residential parent (the 2 kids live with me, and have structured times w/ their mother). My divorce, however, was not due directly to my workload. It was due to the fact that my ex is an alcoholic with violent tendencies... my long hours irritated her, sure - but that's about it. :)

    Long hours suck the life out of everyone - but they are an unfortunate side-effect of what we have chosen to do for a living. This is beginning to change a bit, I've noticed - I can do my work from home when I need to be home with the kids due to a great implementation of citrix and vpns (not to toot my own horn), and my cell phone keeps me in constant contact when needed.

    1. Re:my divorce- by pikine · · Score: 0, Troll

      You probably married your wife for a wrong reason. At least, when compared to the option that you could help her rehabilitate from alcoholic problems and violent tendencies, it does not weigh enough. Isn't unconditional help and love what a family is for?

      --
      I once had a signature.
    2. Re:my divorce- by Chirs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Long hours suck the life out of everyone - but they are an unfortunate side-effect of what we have chosen to do for a living."

      I have to disagree with that.

      Everyone has a choice as to what hours to work. Granted, there may be consequences if you put your family before your job, but the choice is there.

    3. Re:my divorce- by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      I work in IT. I don't work long hours. If you do, you should find another job, then quit your current job and TELL YOUR BOSS IT WAS BECAUSE HE OVERWORKED YOU. If everyone did likewise, companies with bad management (like yours) would be punished until they shape up.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    4. Re:my divorce- by jmahler · · Score: 1

      I never put my job before my family, but sometimes my job requires hours that are inconvenient for my family. We do all have a choice- I'm not bitching about the fact that I am in IT - I LOVE what I do for a living. The long hours, I'm saying, just aren't that great for a relationship. That's all.

      It's NOT an unsurmountable obstacle, either - I have a very happy and fulfilling home life with my kids and relationship with a girlfriend as well as musical expression and other great things.

      THAT said - some people don't know how to deal with the time pressures and constraints. That will be an issue whether he/she is in IT, a lawyer, or whatever.

    5. Re:my divorce- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      I work as an IT person (net admin, specifically) and I went through a divorce with 2 kids.

      You shouldn't have been married to kids in the first place.
    6. Re:my divorce- by jmahler · · Score: 1

      Wow....

      1: You can't rehabilitate abuse. She was physically abusive. She wasn't when we got married 9 years previously, but became such eventually. Is that my fault? Could I have "fixed" that, really?
      2: You can't rehabilitate alcoholics. Only they can do it. I couldn't fix her anymore than I could, say, change the transmission in my car. (and trust me, it's not a good idea to let me near a car with any kind of tools)
      3: Families can be about unconditional love, sure - and no matter how much I showed, it was never reciprocated. So... do I stick around anyway, like an abused little puppy, hoping for a handout instead of a violent outburst?
      4: I married her out of love. Is that the wrong reason?

      See, after having had to restrain her entirely too many times and watching my possessions destroyed systematically and having my kids finally witness the violence she was capable of, I gave up on her. And you know what? My kids and I have never been happier than we have been since that time. I regret nothing, other than letting her get away with her violence for so long based on the idea of "holding the family together no matter what, for the kids". F--- that noise.

    7. Re:my divorce- by (A)*(B)!0_- · · Score: 1
      "2: You can't rehabilitate alcoholics. Only they can do it. I couldn't fix her anymore than I could, say, change the transmission in my car. (and trust me, it's not a good idea to let me near a car with any kind of tools)"
      Bad analogy guy? Is that you?

      You mention the transmission in your car in the same context of saying that only your wife could fix herself. Are you saying that only the transmission in your car can fix the transmission in your car?

      Or..your wife could have been fixed by someone, just not you. I mean, transmissions in cars can be fixed by people. That's counter to your statement that others can't help the alcoholic, only the alcoholic can. Take care.

    8. Re:my divorce- by jmahler · · Score: 1

      okay, true- it was a bad analogy. I was in a hurry.

      The point is, no one can "fix" an alcoholic. You can't. I can't.
      Here is the exception:
      The alcoholic decides to stop drinking.

      Until that happens, you can have ANYONE you want giving it their best shot- that person's not going to help any more than (insert bad analogy here). Does that make more sense?

    9. Re:my divorce- by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 1

      Long hours for IT is red herring. I have worked in many situations, particularily corporations and goverment, where everyone goes home at 5pm. If your job has sucky life ruining hours, get a new job.

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    10. Re:my divorce- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once you're divorced, you have to toot your own horn.

      Sorry, it IS slashdot.

    11. Re:my divorce- by Electric+Cartographe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's pretty amazing that the situation of how your marriage ended parallels mine exactly.

      At the time it all ended, I was doing most of the parenting, going to grad school, and holding down two jobs. Then she would get pissed at me because I had homework to do after I put our son to bed. I always tried to explain to her that it wasn't going to be like this forever, but right now that's the way it has to be.

      Her selfish drunken abusiveness was too much to handle anymore. Trust me, I wanted it to work. I stuck it out and held our family together with band aids and string for two years. I begged her to get help but as a typical alcoholic she would just externalize all the problems and blame them on me. It just got to the point where enough was enough. I didn't want our son to be caught in the middle of her anger anymore. Making the decision to pull the trigger and call the cops on her the night it all ended was the hardest decision I ever had to make. Ironically, it all happened about two months before I completed my Grad school and things would have been potentially better. I don't think she wanted us to succeed, I think she wanted it all to fail.

      I ended up with full legal and physical custody of our son. I let her have the house. I'm now a full time single parent with a very good IT job. Between work and my son, I'm am extremely busy all the time but it sure seems alot easier than trying to figure out how to handle or deflect the abusiveness in the household on a nightly basis.

      And regardless of what the other fools in this thread say, you are right, you can't fix an alcoholic if they don't want to be fixed. It took the loss of custody for her to straighten out to any large degree. I certainly didn't want that to happen to her or our family, in fact I offered her a much more amicable proposition, but she decided to be bullheaded and continue on fighting me in court. In the end the courts said she should have zero custody. And she is still extremely bullheaded about most things. Some people you just can't fix and they will fight with you and act contrary to what is best for themselves and the family simply for the sake of being a pain in the ass and a waste of time for everyone.

      And did my job and school have anything to do with it? Maybe, from her point of view it did. But the courts obviously recognized that there were much bigger problems with her than my extreme schedule as it was at the time. And any effort I made to try an fix my external responsibilities to give her and myself more time were usually completely disregarded. She just wanted to be angry and that's the way it was gonna be.

      I'm glad you shared your story. Us single full time dads are an exception to the stereotype. It's sad really. Usually I have to repeat myself when I tell people about the custody situation and they still don't get it. And like I said, it should have never had to happen, but it did. The best we can do now is try and make life for the kids as positive as possible.

    12. Re:my divorce- by jmahler · · Score: 1

      i know this thread is long-dead, but I'm dropping back in anyway to (first of all) say thanks.

      You're dead-on about how closely we mirror each other - it's strange. :)

      Stay strong, and keep your kid stronger.

    13. Re:my divorce- by pikine · · Score: 1

      You could have just said, "I tried my best, sorry." But instead you over-reacted and became defensive. Maybe you're much more pain in the ass than you think you are. Of course I have my fair share of pain-in-the-ass-ness to ever bother with someone like you. But believe me, I meant to do you good, not harm.

      I met a number of ex-alcoholics at my church. They've been successfully rehabilitated and now function as able members. I have no doubt an alcoholic can be rehabilitated. I think most alcoholics recognize alcoholism as a problem and want to improve their condition. What is crucial is if you allow them to build their self-esteem.

      Since your wife wasn't alcoholic when you first married her 9 years ago, that means from that point on, her life must have declined to the point she is now. You've been part of her life after marriage, so don't be so quick denying your responsibility. I don't blame you for having failed your relationship, but I need you to agree with me on what could have been better.

      Do you think your wife just needed an exercise when she systematically destroyed your stuff? She wanted to find your most precious possession and hurt you by destroying it. What makes she hate you with such bitterness, especially you said you loved her to marry her in the first place? There is a lot of details that only you will know. I can't think of a reason other than that you've been constantly eroding her self-esteem.

      How easy it is to erode someone's self-esteem? Tons of tiny criticisms. You posted your marriage problems on slashdot, and I expressed my concerns, and you think it's criticism. It's that easy. "Honey, why don't you put the eggs inside this compartment instead of that." "Honey, where did you put my newspaper?" When these things happen daily, it accumulates. It appears to her that you've never appreciated her presence.

      Learn to appreciate someone's presence. It is very important. It is a lot of work. Love is a lot of work.

      I can't expect you to love her or anyone at this moment. Bitterness reinforces itself like mic feedback. It precipitates through your comment and almost made me feel bitter about you. But I want to correct you with one point: true love never reciprocates.

      To be fair, I would never post my personal details online. You've done that, and that takes great courage. I hope you'll take some time to think about what I just wrote.

      --
      I once had a signature.
  38. Lets start a club by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 1

    We won't even need the 'No Girls Allowed' sign.

    -recently divorced geek
    --1 year old son
    ---half custody!

    1. Re:Lets start a club by pinkfalcon · · Score: 1


      Count me in!!

      (o.k. he was 2 when we split, and he's now 8)

      --
      Real SUV's don't have cupholders
      It's 5:42 A.M., do you know where your stack pointer is?
  39. Asshole alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know I am going to sound like a total asshole, but you really need to work on your methodology. Gathering data for a thesis on Slashdot is not going to get you anywhere.

    Grab hold of an assistant professor or someone similar and make him give you the 101 on basic research.

    And good luck on your thesis.

  40. Counseling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know this won't be a popular post, but I have to ask you what steps you have taken toward changing the course of your marriage? When choosing to marry someone (assuming you used somewhat standard vows), you claim that you will put that person ahead of all other things - including your career, if necessary.

    Obviously, I'm not saying you should stop working if your wife and son don't feel you spend enough time at home, but asking the question "I wonder if my job led to my divorce?" makes me wonder if you've had an objective conversation with your family about all of this. Perhaps you could see a counselor to at least help you understand what got you to this point and what steps could be taken to change course.

  41. You need to work it out... by javabandit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Marriage is hard. Its a lot of work. If you aren't willing to give up on your child, then why give up on your marriage? I wish people valued marriage half as much as they valued their relationship to their children.

    I've seen divorcees willing to move to other states, pay lots of money, adjust their schedules, adjust their lifestyles... all just to be with their kids. Spouses should do the same thing. Its all a matter of priority. Marriage just doesn't mean as much anymore.

    These days, people divorce because they argue too much. Or because "the spice" is gone. Or because they don't like arguing about money. Or because the in-laws hate each other. Or because wife gained some weight and doesn't look good enough anymore. Get over it. Man up and deal with it and treat the marriage with the importance it deserves.

    I've been married for eight years now and I have a child. Some of that married time has been REALLY hard. But I treat my marriage like my child. It would take a LOT for me to give up on my child. Same for my marriage.

    Its all about priorities.

    1. Re:You need to work it out... by s31523 · · Score: 1

      I wish people valued marriage half as much as they valued their relationship to their children.
      Or their jobs!

      These days, people divorce because they argue too much.
      Or not enough. Communication is one of the most fundamental things that can keep a marriage going, and arguing is a part of that. Arguing/Fights are a natural occurence; its how they end up being resolved which is usually the problem (i.e. passive agressive behavior like storming out of the house never to discuss the topic again and stuffing it waaaay down deep adding to the already overwhelming resentment).

    2. Re:You need to work it out... by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Its all about priorities.

      You're right. It Is all about priorities. One of your major priorities is marriage. Good for you. I've been there and done that (twice), and I've since realized that at least for me and other people, marriage is 100% pure, unadulterated horse shit. My priorities now revolve around having as much fun as I possibly can before I die. Marriage isn't some kind of undebateable "good", like having food and clean water. It's a lifestyle choice.

    3. Re:You need to work it out... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      The way you describe marriage I have to ask.....what are the benefits? What do you get in return for all the misery that you can't get from an unmarried relationship?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    4. Re:You need to work it out... by Percent+Man · · Score: 5, Funny

      These days, people divorce because they argue too much. Or because "the spice" is gone.

      But "the spice" must flow! The entire galactic economy could collapse, nevermind a single marriage!

    5. Re:You need to work it out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or because "the spice" is gone

      I got divorced because we ran out of cinnamon. Looking back on it now, that was probably a mistake.

    6. Re:You need to work it out... by maxume · · Score: 1

      Plenty of people also get married because it seems like the thing to do. If people go into marriage not thinking of it as important, they aren't going to be real reluctant to walk out of it.

      Another way of saying it, you aren't committing yourself to the relationship because you bought your wife a nice ring, you bought your wife a nice ring because you are commited to the relationship. Thats a *good* thing, but I'm not sure how often it applies to marriages that end in divorce.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    7. Re:You need to work it out... by pete.com · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are numerous studies, that show married people are generally happier and live longer.

      I screwed up the URL's sorry.....here they are corrected

      http://www.family.org/cforum/briefs/a0041644.cfm
      http://abcnews.go.com/Health/Depression/story?id=2 298049
      http://www.apa.org/releases/married_happy.html
      http://pewresearch.org/social/pack.php?PackID=1

    8. Re:You need to work it out... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      This is assuming your marriage survies though isn't it?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    9. Re:You need to work it out... by gosand · · Score: 1
      I've been married for eight years now and I have a child. Some of that married time has been REALLY hard. But I treat my marriage like my child. It would take a LOT for me to give up on my child. Same for my marriage.

      Just curious if you think the children are the deciding factor here. I mean, do you give marriage the same regard if there aren't children involved?

      I was married, right out of college. And got divorced a few years later. Thank goodness that there were no kids involved. But that divorce was the right thing to do. I am remarried now, with one child and one on the way. My two marriages were like night and day, and I was involved in IT during both of them. You have to marry the right person, and have good communication with them. It isn't IT that causes the problems - but it sure as hell doesn't help much either. I went through a rough year and a half at my last job, where I was always working. My wife wasn't happy, mainly because I wasn't happy. When I was home, she said I wasn't really there, and I wasn't myself. Lucily, we are past that now, and I don't want to let that happen again. I take my career seriously, but I take my family more seriously.

      I respect the people who are able to keep a life outside of work much more than those who let their jobs run their lives.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    10. Re:You need to work it out... by tj2 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      These days, people divorce because they argue too much. Or because "the spice" is gone. Or because they don't like arguing about money. Or because the in-laws hate each other. Or because wife gained some weight and doesn't look good enough anymore. Get over it. Man up and deal with it and treat the marriage with the importance it deserves.


      Okay, but what if you're the only one working on it? I'm going through some tough times right now with my wife, and I seriously doubt the marriage will survive. We've tried counseling, and I've learned some shit that makes me want to go out and piss on her dad's grave, and I didn't much care for him before I knew what I now know. But here's the deal: *now*, she can continue forever wallowing in her repressed anger (and taking it out on me and our daughter) and never take responsiblity for her actions when angry, because she has a perfect excuse for being angry. And if I stand up for myself/my daughter/my beliefs/etc, I'm just an insensitive prick.

      I can't even begin to tell you the times I've swallowed my pride so as to "man up" and keep the marriage going. I always figured, in time, she'd get over some of it. Nope. I'm still taking the heat for shit that happened *years* before I met her. We've been married for 23 years, and it's just getting worse.

      The sad thing is, she's great when she's not mad, but there's no telling what will make her mad. She doesn't have a state such as "upset", or "miffed", or "put out". Nope, if she's mad at all, it's instantaneous and unequivocal rage, and it lasts a long, long time. It can be something I say, or don't say, or a commercial on TV, or something she reads. Doesn't matter, I'll have to pay the piper for it.

      Now, after this many years, am I a quitter?

    11. Re:You need to work it out... by mochan_s · · Score: 1

      I disagree. What you're saying is that people aren't trying hard enough. Yeah, I'm not a millionaire because I didn't try hard enough and so on. I haven't won the Nobel prize or the fields medal because I didn't try hard enough.

    12. Re:You need to work it out... by KlomDark · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Holy shit, that sounds pretty much exactly like my story! I think I'm the only one working on it. She cannot see anything good, only the bad. She cannot let go of the past. I think she has somehow moved my image in her mind to the place occupied by her dead, abusive father. Very nice when not mad, but goes off with no apparent trigger. Got mad and moved out last week when I asked her what her problem was after she gave my daughter (her step daughter) enough shit that she started crying.

      Oh well, trying counseling for the first time next week. But if she doesn't want to try, not much that can happen. Very heartbreaking to have a 3 year old boy in the mix who does not understand what's going on.

      Shoulda listened to my grandma. When I was about 12, I mentioned something about wanting to have a girlfriend, and grandma said "You just stay away from girls. They'll just break your heart and make your life miserable." Best advice I ever got. :)

    13. Re:You need to work it out... by javabandit · · Score: 1

      23 Years. Congrats.

      And your wife literally sounds like she has problems with depression or some other mental condition. LOTS of people do. It is not normal for someone to encounter instantaneous, unequivocal rage triggered by the drop of a hat. She sounds like she has a medical problem that needs attention. And if so, then help her come to grips with it. You'd be surprised what a bottle of Zoloft will do. People are literally different people after they take it. Happy. Content. Balanced. I know this from very close personal experience.

      You don't need a divorce. Your wife needs a regular psychiatric appointment and a constant flow of Zoloft.

    14. Re:You need to work it out... by javabandit · · Score: 1
      My priorities now revolve around having as much fun as I possibly can before I die.


      Which is fine. I'm glad you discovered that about yourself and sad that you had to go through two marriages to figure it out. I don't deny the selfish their happiness... whatever makes you happy.

      But let your life be a lesson to others... if your priority is all about you and your own happiness, then don't get married. Because marriage isn't as much about *you* as it is about the *other* person. Marriage is about putting others before you. Opening the door rather than having it opened for you. Giving up your seat rather than taking it.

      Same thing when it comes to raising kids. If its all about you, then don't have kids.

    15. Re:You need to work it out... by dbcad7 · · Score: 1

      Sorry to interject here.. But I have to point out something I learned a long time ago, but have occasionaly forgotten. Happiness is a state of mind. You choose to be happy or not. Another person can not make you happy. It is not selfish to put your happiness first. This does not mean you should be irresponsible. However, to stay in a bad relationship just because it is "expected" does neither any good. Your comment of putting others before yourself is nobel, but it only works if the other person does the same for you.. and the rub is, that one or the other will always feel that the scale is tipped toward their doing more, even if not true... If it can be done "truely" without mental scorekeeping that would be great.. just never seen it.. It's a lot like the old phrase "forgive and forget",.. nice in theory...

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
    16. Re:You need to work it out... by dramaley · · Score: 1

      That Dune reference should probably be modded "funny", not "insightful".

      --
      ----- "I'm still sane on three planets and two moons."
    17. Re:You need to work it out... by javabandit · · Score: 1

      It isn't selfish to put your own happiness first? I disagree. That is in itself a selfish act. And I'm not saying everyone isn't selfish to some extent. We all are. But the extent of selfishness is really the issue. For the one poster, he said his entire life centered around making himself happy until he dies. Well, that's fine, but its also selfish.

      Nobody should stay in a bad relationship because it is expected. That's the wrong reason. Stay in a relationship if you are committed to making the relationship work. If you aren't, then get out of it.

      Putting others before yourself works regardless of the response. I'm not saying that people should do this all the time. But people should make a habit of putting others that they care about before themselves. To me, that's what love is all about. Putting someone else's needs above your own.

      I do agree about the "Forgive and forget..." I never really subscribed to that either. For me, I really just say, "Look, what you did pissed me off, but give me time and I'll get over it. This situation isn't enough to make me want to blast our relationship apart. Pass me a beer."

    18. Re:You need to work it out... by dbcad7 · · Score: 1

      To sacriface your own happiness to make someone else happy may seem like the right thing to do... But think about it in reverse... Do you want others to sacrifice their happiness to make you happy ? ... So I say it is not selfish to put your happiness first and you should not think others are selfish if they do the same... However, I will also say that if sacrificing "something" to make another person happy, makes you happy, there is nothing wrong with that (in fact I do that alot)

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
    19. Re:You need to work it out... by lorcha · · Score: 1
      When she is not in one of her psychotic fits of rage, does she understand and acknowledge the pain that she is causing the rest of her family? Is she at least trying to work on treating those she loves better? Or is she just using her abusive father as an excuse to be selfish?

      She should be working with professionals on her issues. I doubt she enjoys her fits of rage when she sees the pain she's inflicting on others.

      --
      "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  42. Life's Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your writing a paper about Divorce and Dad's and your surprised your getting a divorce too? If I was you, I'd write a new thesis - How to get laid like a rockstar. Then you can post to slashdot a few months later and go "Do you think the IT industry has a problem with getting real work done when the b-----ches won't back the f--- off a brother? Damn girl, I'm trying to write a paper here."

    Clearly your focused on the wrong type of research.

    1. Re:Life's Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the first post I've read on Slashdot in months that's literally made me laugh out loud. Good show.

  43. You mean my right hand can get pregnant?! by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

    Oh shit, I better start practicing safer porn viewing!

  44. most of the time by mattboston · · Score: 1

    it has nothing to do with our careers, it has to do with woman are crazy. if you want more info read http://nomarriage.com/

  45. Scapegoat? by JLavezzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm married with two happy children. I know several people who have gotten divorced and have shared custody of children. None are IT professionals.

    The high instance of divorce in the US is much more related to materialism, disconnectedness (also called "independence") and ideas of "self", attitudes towards relationships and the myth of satisfaction than any scapegoat, popular (homosexuality) or unpopular (IT professionals).

    I always tell my single friends that finding a spouse and marriage is more about being the right person than finding the right person.

    Good luck on your thesis. I hope it's well researched and well received. Obviously there's more to it than you could put in an "Ask Slashdot."

    1. Re:Scapegoat? by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      I always tell my single friends that finding a spouse and marriage is more about being the right person than finding the right person.

      Well, it's not entirely about 'being' the right person IMO. You are who you are, and that probably isn't going to change much, despite the old joke/observation to the contrary (*)

      I have never been married, but I have watched a *lot* of people I know get divorced. In my opinion, far too many people get married very quickly and only then find out they don't have anything in common. Or that there were little niggling things they thought they could work out. Or they had unrealistic expectations about how things would work. Or that they didn't know as much about the other person as they should have.

      I think if they had spent a little more time finding the right person, they wouldn't have to worry about being the right person. That doesn't mean that after you get married you don't need to change some things, or focus on being a good spouse, or all of those things which go along with making a relationship work. But I've seen far too many people who were so fundamentally incompatible from the beginning that all of their friends bit their tongues rather than be the one to say "your marriage is doomed", which is often apparent to everyone but the ones saying I do. Then afterwards, people might say "yeah, we could see it coming", but it doesn't help the people getting the divorce.

      Only the 'right' person can be the right person, and part of that means finding the right person. I've seen enough evidence in watching people go through this, they often gloss over some of the blatant reasons why that person isn't the right person, or don't even think about the bigger issues. As long as they're getting laid and not fighting, it mujst be perfect, which it often isn't.

      Cheers

      (*) The joke is "A man marries a woman hoping she'll never change. A woman marries a man planning all of the ways she will change him."

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Scapegoat? by ljw1004 · · Score: 1

      "The high instance of divorce in the US is much more related to materialism, disconnectedness (also called 'independence') and ideas of 'self', attitudes towards relationships and the myth of satisfaction than any scapegoat."

      Quoting for truth. That's pretty darn insightful.

    3. Re:Scapegoat? by booch · · Score: 1

      I think you missed his meaning. He meant that you need to be happy with yourself before you can be happy in a relationship. Not necessarily that you need to change to be the person that your spouse wants. Being happy with yourself allows you to spend the time to find the right person, instead of getting into a relationship for the wrong reasons, in order to fulfill something that's missing in yourself.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    4. Re:Scapegoat? by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      I think you missed his meaning. He meant that you need to be happy with yourself before you can be happy in a relationship.

      No, I did't miss it. I disagreed with it in it's generalities.

      Given the number of people who are actually happy, well-adjusted people, most people shouldn't get married. Too often people seem to get married thinking it's going to solve their other problems, and then it doesn't. Or they get married because they simply want to be married.

      I still assert you have to find the right person. In general, most people don't seem to know how to be happy and content with themselves. Heck, I've seen successful marriages of two cranky people who aren't happy with anything. And, I've seen unsuccessful marriages between people who (seem) happy with themselves, but become miserable with the other person -- often because it was the wrong person to begin with.

      And, when people start dating, they usually offer a slightly edited person to the other. They gloss over their own issues, turn a blind eye to the differences of other people, etc. Then it all goes boom when someone figures out you leave the cap off the toothpaste.

      Being happy with yourself allows you to spend the time to find the right person, instead of getting into a relationship for the wrong reasons, in order to fulfill something that's missing in yourself.

      I agree with you completely. But I bet 90%+ of all marriages would be stopped up front if people did what you say. Most people (me included ;-) are just way too screwed up to be considered 'happy with themselves'.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:Scapegoat? by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1
      I always tell my single friends that finding a spouse and marriage is more about being the right person than finding the right person.

      Well, it's not entirely about 'being' the right person IMO. You are who you are, and that probably isn't going to change much, despite the old joke/observation to the contrary (*)

      Being cynical, I don't disagree that people are unlikely to change, but I am still convinced that the secret to marital bliss is for each party to "be the right person" to the other. If you force yourself to change your nature and put your spouse first, and they do the same and put you first, I think you'll have a successful marriage. Hardly anybody's naturally selfless; it takes effort. The easiest way to have your needs met is to not withhold meeting your partner's needs until your needs are met.

      I think if they had spent a little more time finding the right person, they wouldn't have to worry about being the right person.

      It's true that some people are fundamentally incompatible, but every person has major flaws of one sort or another that living together will inevitably reveal. I've never heard of a perfect couple; even people who don't fight still have times when they disagree or don't get along. Every marriage of sufficient length encounters difficulty.

    6. Re:Scapegoat? by booch · · Score: 1

      I still assert you have to find the right person.

      I don't think the original post in this thread was arguing against that. Just that being ready to find the right person is also important, and more often overlooked.

      Given the number of people who are actually happy, well-adjusted people, most people shouldn't get married.

      That's probably true. And probably accounts for a large percentage of the current divorce rate. Is there some reason that people feel compelled to get married? Even in the face of evidence that they should not? I think that's where the blame should be placed, if you want to place blame external to the actual people involved. (Not that I'm generally a fan of that.)

      It occurs to me that pre-marriage counseling is a good idea -- but probably too late, since the couple have already pretty much made up their minds. Pre-engagement counseling would probably be a better idea, and help people to determine whether to decide to get married. If I ever find myself in that situation [and yes, I've had several serious girlfriends], I may actually try that.

      Good discussion.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    7. Re:Scapegoat? by Seanasy · · Score: 1
      "I hope it's well researched and well received. Obviously there's more to it than you could put in an 'Ask Slashdot.'"

      Here, children, we have an excellent example of what is known as 'damning with faint praise.' Study it.

  46. Avoid blame by _prime · · Score: 1

    YOU are the one in control of the industry in which you work and how much time you put in. Saying your career was a great factor in your divorce sounds to me like you loved your job more than your partner.

    Writing a paper on divorce in an industry where many have sustaining healthy relationships seems to me like a collosal attempt to avoid looking at the truth and to justify what has happened.

    I'm not saying a short marriage can't be a successful one -- it just sounds like you aren't happy with what is going on and I think you have some larger questions to ask yourself. Any of us can make something else a higher priority that our marriage. Is this what you have done?

  47. Asperger's Syndrome by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 2, Informative

    I wonder if there may be a relation with Asperger's Syndrome. According to an article in Wired, Apserger's is disproportionally common among IT people.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    1. Re:Asperger's Syndrome by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I have Aspergers and I am very happy in my long term relationship. Yes autism is common and more pervasively in IT related fields but that doesn't mean divorce. Infact she likes the fact I am different because I have to work harder on communication skills and it brings a certain amount of sensitivity that most men do not possess. Women who dig geeky guys who are competant in what they do are attracted to us.

      I suppose its priority and setting time that women really want and they need to feel valued. Having an IT job does not mean ones marriage is set for failure but spending more hours there then at home is. What point is working hard if you do not spend your money and time with the family? She works too( well most women these days). I do know being selfish and playing wow is a no no with my current fiancee but she does not mind if I do so in moderation or play on the gamecube with her and the kids and include everyone. My 2 cents

    2. Re:Asperger's Syndrome by DaMattster · · Score: 0

      Wow, dude! Keep up the hard work. I also have a dissability diagnosed NLD and I **know** how difficult it can be. Hell, I work in IT and I have yet to even keep a relationship for more than 4 mos. Initially, she is enamored with me than grows bored and I get the shit end of the stick. Keep it up!

    3. Re:Asperger's Syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not really. As people mature, they stop judging the little things. I'm a freshman in college, with Aspergers. No one knows, or if they do they don't care. I go to parties, drink, have sex, all while getting good grades. I'm basically what everyone apires to be, and I don't think I'd be this way if I DIDN'T have Aspergers. I went to a nationally acclaimed school district in an affluent suburb of Pensylvania. By all means I shouldn't complain, right? The problem is that they taught to the tests... proficcency tests, SATs, PSATs, ACTs, and all other kinds of Alphabet. Anything not on a standardized test was simply not learned, and it killed a lot of my peers when they got to college. I on the other hand educated myself in history, art, literature, and of course, technology. I was rebelious and bored in high school, and squeaked out with a less than stellar GPA. By all standards, I was a fuck up who'd never succeed in life. But I'm not. I obtained a consulting gig over the summer through the woman who ran an Asperger's study I was in, and at the camp I consulted for I got an offer work for a local psychiatrist helping more seriously autistic kids prepare for college during the school year. (The consulting gig was a summer job). I'm active in several campus organizations, and assuming something unforseen doesn't happen I'll have a 4.0 my first semester of college. So please, kindly don't imply that everyone with Aspergers is going to be a rich, lonely, fat nerd. It's offensive.

    4. Re:Asperger's Syndrome by LeonardsLiver · · Score: 1

      I, too, have Asperger's Syndrome. I was diagnosed as an adult after my son's diagnosis (at 4). He is much more affected than I am, but thanks to a good school, he's doing well.

      I've been married for 14 years. My wife isn't an IT professional (rather, medical). I'm a software engineer. Work wise, we have very little in common, but that's ok. I don't want to listen to someone talk about computers when I get home. I want to escape, and oftentimes just listening to her describe her work world is captivating. Now I occasionally get in trouble for not picking up on a subtle signal, such as a facial expression or voice tone, perhaps a bit more than your average NT male would, but all in all I've managed to decode conversation protocol well enough to manage.

      Some of the main problem areas for married people with AS are lack of empathy, facial expression interpretation, and area's of interest. In the case of the latter, having to NOT talk about programming to her ALL the time (that being one of my few "narrow interests") has helped me in my daily life. Good practice for the office, you might say.

      Anyway, I think I have a good marriage, and so does she (I just asked). It takes a special NT to be married to someone with AS.

  48. Exited IT long time ago by zitintheass · · Score: 0

    I've graduated as an IT software engineer. Later I realized that there is only a few places where you can feel secure in this industry today. Most of the jobs are "dead-end job" type engagements... I build a small hotel in the hills to profit from winter sky seasons here and so far so good. Even bank manager was ok to lend me money, because he had clear understanding of the business I was about to conduct, something very rare in the IT business these days.

  49. God /. is getting lame by mkswap-notwar · · Score: 1

    Honestly. Is this advice really to be used?

    --
    "I reject your reality, and substitute my own!"
  50. On second marriage now... by revlayle · · Score: 1

    ...maybe might be done with second marriage in a few years. However, this time, it is no fault of my S.O. She is a fine and great person in her own right. I'm just not marriage material and increasingly finding my self with a "trapped" feeling, like I'm in some sort of obligation without understanding what I really got into (both marriages)

    In my case, I enjoy my work, career (software development), and hobbies more than I care about family and traditions. Also, I am a bastard and find it increasingly difficult to live with other people; however, I don't know if that is exactly an IT-only thing. ;)
    I know if this second marriage does dissolve sometime down the road (not 100% guaranteed it will, just looking that way, and mostly my fault), I'm not doing it again. As it is I have a dim view of relationships and marriage and raising families, etc.
    Maybe it has to do with my work and my personality pre-disposition to such work. I do software development during the day, *sometimes* contract work in the evenings, I geek out for my hobbies, and I'd rather go out and have a few drinks more often than be trapped at home when I have time to go out. I'm not very family-oriented, and getting less as they days go by, while my wife is fairly family-oriented, and getting more as the days pass by. When will be the point of difference between us that is so far we don't care anymore? Oddly, we never really fight, we get along great most of the time.

  51. IT and Divorce by doomicon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been in IT for some years now. I went through a divorce. Was my profession responsible, no. I have a wonderful son and share custody 50/50.

    I worked at a startup for 1 year, during that year I rarely if ever saw my family. Did that job contribute to my divorce? No, because I decided to quit that job, and find another (That year surely didn't help my relationship, however it wasn't the catalyst to the failure of the marriage).

    Divorce can be a horribly emotional experience, we often soul search to find out "what went wrong, what could've I done differently". Sometimes, you just got to sit back.. take a deep breath, and just realize it didn't work out. Regardless of whether she cheated, you cheated, you were away working all the time, she wasn't a good wife, and the myriad of other reasons, nothing can change the present situation... so...

    Best advice, Keep your cool and move forward. If you feel the job's a problem start looking for a new one.

    --

    Awesome!
    1. Re:IT and Divorce by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      Divorce can be a horribly emotional experience, we often soul search to find out "what went wrong, what could've I done differently". Sometimes, you just got to sit back.. take a deep breath, and just realize it didn't work out. Regardless of whether she cheated, you cheated, you were away working all the time, she wasn't a good wife, and the myriad of other reasons, nothing can change the present situation... so...

      I don't presume to know you or your circumstances, but that part of your post struck a chord with me.

      While I agree with you that beating yourself up and playing the what-if game to the point of madness does no good, it's still worthwhile to take a breather and figure things out. Discern what was and wasn't beyond your control and extract a lesson. Shrugging your shoulders and moving on with your life will not fix the underlying problem that may have brought about the situation in the first place.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    2. Re:IT and Divorce by camt · · Score: 1
      ...nothing can change the present situation... so...


      Nothing...except for choices that can be made by the two people who control the present situation, which is to say that anything can change the present situation. "It didn't work out" and "nothing can change the present situation" is way too fatalistic for me. I refuse to be a victim of circumstance. I certainly can change my present situation. If my attempts are foiled by the other party who shares a controlling interest, well that could certainly mess things up - but that is not quite the same as nothing having the power to change the situation.

      Maybe I am being pedantic, but I think the distinction is important to make.
    3. Re:IT and Divorce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Divorce can be a horribly emotional experience, we often soul search to find out "what went wrong, what could've I done differently". Sometimes, you just got to sit back.. take a deep breath, and just realize it didn't work out. Regardless of whether she cheated, you cheated, you were away working all the time, she wasn't a good wife, and the myriad of other reasons, nothing can change the present situation... so...

      Hans Reiser? Is that you?

  52. fuck equality by not+already+in+use · · Score: 1, Informative

    It's issues like these that really give me a bad taste in my mouth with it comes to women's rights and equality and such. Not that I want to bring the discussion off-topic, but in order for there to be true equality, women would infact have to give up certain rights. One of these being the fact that women are almost always given custody of children in a divorce. I went through this, not as the parent, but as the child. The issue itself is really independant of your job. By default, my mom was awarded full custody. My dad threatened to take the issue to court to fight for custody. I don't know your overall financial situation, but the thought of hiring a lawyer and going through more legal process than already required by a divorce was enough for my mom give up half custody. As far as any advise I could offer, if it is possible to live close to your ex, try and do so. I constantly moved every other week, across town. It was hard to maintain friends. It was hard to get to school on time living way outside my district, and it was held against me when I would be late so often. To be honest, it was tough not have one place to call home. But at the same time I feel like having the influence of both parents in my life was a positive thing. Hope things work out for you.

    --
    Similes are like metaphors
    1. Re:fuck equality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn straight dude. My present situation is that we're separated with a divorce likely. Among millions of other reasons she is spouting, she says that I didn't share the family workload 50/50 (laundry, cleaning, etc - pointless stupid stuff to argue over). But do you think in this state I have a 50/50 chance of gaining full custody or even half custody? Not a chance in hell. I have the better job (re: ability to support child), I have the house (she's living with her mommy now), etc, but she will get 100% custody with occasional visition for me. She wants it both ways.

      My reason for not "equally" sharing the "workload"? I travel 25% or more of the time, she's a teacher so gets the summer off! What parent wouldn't die for 3 months straight of being with her child while I am on the road? She's complaining that I didn't do enough laundry while I was out on the road working and she sat on her ass all summer? What a crock.

      Of course, there's more to it than that but it's mostly the petty stuff that's pulling us apart.

    2. Re:fuck equality by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Why can't the men stay home and the women work? If you want to fuck equality, then mother fuck you!

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    3. Re:fuck equality by not+already+in+use · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Men can stay at home, and women can work. Is that generally the case? No... but thats not my fault. It's not my fault that, by nature, men have higher levels of testerone that, when taken artificially, is considered a performance enhancing drug. It's also not my fault that women are, by nature, the ones who give birth to children, and go through a week period every month in which they become emotionally instable due to an increase in estrogen. And queue the accusation of sexism. But guess what... I don't give a fuck. It is only natural that men and women fall into different roles in society. Does this mean that women can't break the mold, and say, become CEO of a big company like say.. Ebay? Oprah Winfrey, Martha Stewart... both self-made billionaires. So really... don't give me this shit about equality. There is inequality going both ways. That's nature. Deal with it.

      --
      Similes are like metaphors
  53. never, EVER put family second for a long time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    give me a break "It's all my career choice's fault"

    If you had a job that forced you to put your family second for long periods of time, you should have considered a change of career.

    How much of that money went to things you NEEDED? how much went to things you WANTED?

    you should have wanted a family more.

  54. You're kidding, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My God, man. You get divorced because one of you married a loser... or someone that turned into one. This isn't a function of your job type, it's a function of YOU (or her).

    If you work 60+ hour weeks and this has a negative effect on your marriage that's not because of your job, it's because you continued to work 60+ hour weeks, duh.

    Yes, we all know there are places that expect 60 hour weeks, and guess what, if your home life is important to you then you'll find someplace else.

    I work in a shop that stresses a 40 hour week and pays OT when they need to. I check with the wife to see if she minds me putting in a few more hours later in the week because it's important to her, and me, that the kids actually know who I am.

    Don't blame your computer for your jacked up family life...

  55. Probably OT but thought I'd share. by Enzo1977 · · Score: 1

    This is just my biased opinion as a divorcee with no children to speak of. Although I do not work in information technology I have noticed in myself and other men, that there's this strange change that happens in the relationship. Keep in mind that my analysis fails to make any attempt at acknowledging the paradigm shift associated with modern feminist ideals.

    As a bread winner in the family, husbands tend to get caught up in their career; they take a great sense of pride in accomplishment with their work, time spent, and advancements in their career. This sense of pride helps in legitimizing their efforts as the bread winner. But in the process, the husband loses sight of those goals and dreams that were once shared with their spouse to raise a child. They find a new dream to be head of the IT department, to be CFO, CEO, or whatever snazzy title, becomes a very singular narrow minded path, that tends to exclude their spouse and children. In my opinion, relationships are built on shared dreams and goals, and when those dreams and aspirations diverge, two different lives are forcibly born from a once shared sense of unity. I fail at reaching any sort of viable resolve, other than there needs to a level of acceptance by both parties that, these are the dreams we aspire to raise a happy health child, but this is the path we must take to attain those dreams. Along that path is hardship; and time spent apart, but there must be constant reinforcement that the work and time spent is for the greater good of the relationship. And what is that goal or dream that you both hold in the relationship? Sometimes it is to have a happy family with 2.5 children, other times it is a lot more simple like wanting to grow old together. So it is not just about the child, but the shared hopes and dreams. Blah, I wish I had a better conclusion.

    --
    I hate all sigs, even this one.
    1. Re:Probably OT but thought I'd share. by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 1
      This is just my biased opinion as a divorcee with no children to speak of.
      No children to speak of? You do realize what this phrase means, right?
    2. Re:Probably OT but thought I'd share. by AaronDunlap · · Score: 1

      You Win

      --
      Relax... You're soaking in it." -Madge
    3. Re:Probably OT but thought I'd share. by Enzo1977 · · Score: 1

      Please, enlighten me to the hole in my logic.

      --
      I hate all sigs, even this one.
    4. Re:Probably OT but thought I'd share. by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 1
      The phrase "no children to speak of" implies that you do have children, but, for whatever reason, they are not worth speaking of. Also connotations of unspeakable; perhaps guilt of some crime not permitted to speak of in polite conversation.

      Surely this was written by mistake; either you don't have children, or it is about the worst insult you could give them.

  56. Perhaps you should ask Hans Reiser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ironically, the CAPTCHA word is "acquit"

  57. Priorities by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 1

    I'm not convinced there's a big difference between IT divorces and other divorces caused by people who are often away on business or have on-duty responsibilities, or true workaholics. Depending on the situation this might be a factor in custody decisions. If you're doing well and have a nanny and are every bit the nice guy as some fathers in the open source world are, then don't worry. On the other hand, if you're up to $200K in debt, have had a restraining order and know your company is in financial trouble.. then you might consider other priorities than custody because you should darn well know you're in no position to take care of children at the moment. Just to mention something recent.

    Point being, be honest with yourself and judge whether you are capable of taking care of children in combination with your job. Don't make a principle point out of it based on your best intentions but admit you can't bear unlimited responsibility and might have to set priorities sometimes. I bet it also really depends on your current relationship with your children. If you're just the guy who cuts the meat Sundays, you'd be stupid to think you will all of a sudden be. Visitation rights would be more than enough and could always be extended if indeed you would start to find it easy to shift the balance between from home to work step by step.

  58. might have more to do with the fact by bunions · · Score: 1

    that you're married, have a kid and somehow thought that you'd have plenty of time for grad school -and- work.

    disclaimer: I don't know you.

    --
    there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
  59. Poor choice of thesis topic by lsm2006 · · Score: 1

    Reconsider. You are much too personally involved with the topic to write a fair, balanced and scholarly work.

  60. IT? Try every job... by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Anyone that works long hours is going to have a hard time maintaining their relationship. It really has nothing to do with the industry itself, but instead is a result of people neglecting their relationship to spend more time at work or on their computer. I've gone through that myself, with my wife and I going through a separation before I realized that I needed to spend more time with her and less time on the computer. Same goes for mechanics, engineers, managerial staff, etc. Leave your work at work and spend some time with your wife.

    --
    You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
  61. There is a moral to this tale... by jamesbulman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was in a relationship for eight and half years with my ex. We'd bought a house together nine months earlier and I thought things were okay. Yes, I'd been working *a lot*, like nearly every weekend for the last three months. She'd got a promotion which took her out of town a few nights a week, I didn't mind, she'd been really supportive of my career in the early days and I figured it was me returning the favour.

    I came home one Sunday evening and she announced she'd met someone else and she was leaving me. She'd known him for a month and was in love with him, she still loved me but she wasn't *in love* with me. WTF?! No it's not up for discussion, I'm moving out. So I got fifteen minutes notice that my relationship was over.

    I knew that we'd been distant but I'd resolved that I was going to put the effort into our relationship as soon as this project was delivered.

    Have you figured out the moral yet?

    1. Re:There is a moral to this tale... by Morphine007 · · Score: 1

      Have you figured out the moral yet?

      Women are assholes? :-)

    2. Re:There is a moral to this tale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That women are evil?

    3. Re:There is a moral to this tale... by finkployd · · Score: 1

      Have you figured out the moral yet?

      I....should....spy on my wife and make sure she does not meet any guys?

      Hon, if you are reading /. I am only kidding (and wondering what on earth you are doing reading /.)

      Finkployd

    4. Re:There is a moral to this tale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you figured out the moral yet?

      Figure out which type of person your partner is before you marry:

      A) The type who respects their partner and formally ends the relationship before looking elsewhere

      B) The type who doesn't.

      You should be saying "good riddence".

    5. Re:There is a moral to this tale... by AtomicJoshua · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yep. Don't act like you are married (or expect your significant other to) when you aren't. If 8 and 1/2 years have gone by without making a serious commitment like marriage, you aren't the one, just the one for now (or the one until a better one comes along).

      The fact the she was open to meeting someone new tells you everything.

      I'm married and I'm committed to my marriage. That means that I don't go looking for new people to get into a relationship with and I am not open to that possibility with people I meet.

      --
      -AJ
    6. Re:There is a moral to this tale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shit happens?

      similar thing occurred to me. almost 8 years dating, ready to propose in less than a month, she leaves for some guy she's known for 3 months. Same phrase, "I love you, but I'm not in love with you". *shrug* life goes on. She's missing out and I'm enjoying the single life for the first time in years. Life is too short to worry about the past.

    7. Re:There is a moral to this tale... by Sonar · · Score: 1

      That is basically exactly what happened to me and my marriage.

    8. Re:There is a moral to this tale... by R2.0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The proper response her is to ask when she is moving out. If the answer isn't "within the next 5 minutes", tell her she only HAS 5 minutes. No, she doesn't get to pack, or make arrangements, or any of that crap. Get the checkbook, cancel the credit cards, and show her the door. Immediately change the locks, and arrange for a time for her to come get her stuff, supervised. Close all joint accounts, maintaining scrupulous records of funds, etc.

      If someone is going to bail on a relationship with that little notice, they deserve the same consideration. This worked quite well for a friend of mine - he told her not to let the door hit her on the ass on her way out, charged head with the divorce, and is happy. She is miserable, because it turns out it was all a ploy on her part.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    9. Re:There is a moral to this tale... by dch24 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, mod me famebait or troll, but I've got some really great friends who are women. I'm not married, but I know lots of couples that are very much in love. Not saying women are perfect, but they're a lot better than your average guy, even just as friends.

      Not currently dating any of them, either. Maybe I'm just an aberration.

    10. Re:There is a moral to this tale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That women are selfish and evil and have no respect for sacrifice and what it takes to make it in the real world?

    11. Re:There is a moral to this tale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      8 years? Yeah, sure you were ready to propose in less than a month. She figured out what was going on, don't think that we won't.

    12. Re:There is a moral to this tale... by ZeroConcept · · Score: 1

      True love is action, not the emotion of falling in love.

    13. Re:There is a moral to this tale... by freeze128 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Have you figured out the moral yet?
      Yeah. The moral is that you can pick up chicks who are in town on business, even if they are in a relationship, if their SO is in the IT field.
    14. Re:There is a moral to this tale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And men are stupid, yes.

    15. Re:There is a moral to this tale... by augustz · · Score: 1

      That there is always another project... and she knew that after living with you for 8 years!

    16. Re:There is a moral to this tale... by crabpeople · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Have you figured out the moral yet?"

      Bitches ain't shit but hoes and tricks?

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    17. Re:There is a moral to this tale... by Morphine007 · · Score: 1

      lol... I love as many women as I can get away with... women rock. Hell.. I've had ex girlfriends act as "wing-men" at bars telling the girl that I was hitting on that "he's a lot of fun... he lives far away so dating him probably won't happen... but if you're just looking for a good time, take him home"

      All that to say, my "women are assholes?" post was supposed to be a joke... this is just the "whoosh" explaining why you're hearing it ;-)

    18. Re:There is a moral to this tale... by DrCode · · Score: 1

      I think the moral is that you're going to come out of this fairly well because you did not get married. You ought to be able to get your share of the house and other common assets, and you won't owe your ex-girl-friend anything else.

      Imagine this: Your wife leaves you for another man, legally kicks you ought of the house, and you get to pay her "spousal support" for several years.

    19. Re:There is a moral to this tale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Have you figured out the moral yet?
      Your wife was a whore?
    20. Re:There is a moral to this tale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Have you figured out the moral yet?

      Yep. Read the lyrics to "Cat's in the Cradle" for a fuller explanation.

    21. Re:There is a moral to this tale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was born, raised, and went through school with feminism. I believed all of the propaganda about the idyllic new world we were creating, a world in which no one would suffer discrimination; a world in which anyone could take on any role that they wanted in life. I really believed that stuff. As well, looking around me and looking back, I must say that for Canadian and American women this dream has pretty-much been realized, at least as best it can be in an imperfect world.

      The rub is that for men the quality of life has gone in the opposite direction. Now, I'm not talking about men's fortunes going downhill in the feminist sense. You know: men having been at the pinnacle of power, controlling everything, running the home, running the political world, the financial world, and pretty much every other world there was to run, and now having to share that power with women. I don't believe that bunkum any more.

      After all, Fred Everyman who dragged his butt to the factory every morning and back home every evening thirty years ago is still dragging his butt around the same way thirty years later, if he's lucky enough to have a factory to which to drag it. It is true that the high-rolling, über-boss men of yore now have to share the corner office with high-rolling über-boss women, and this may upset them (I wouldn't know), but life options for the average working Joe haven't changed much in three decades.

      One thing that has changed a lot for Fred Everyman is married life. There once was a time when Fred would wake up in the morning, sit down to a nutritious breakfast made for him by his wife, head off to work carrying a lunch made for him by his wife, work all day, then return home to a dinner cooked for him by his wife, in a house that he didn't have to clean, perhaps with kids that he helped raise but didn't have to tend.

      What we refer to as "modern women" see this scenario as a kind of slavery. Jane Everyman was stuck at home, cooking, cleaning, and wiping runny noses. Many of today's women have sworn that they would never cook, clean, and raise children for any man, and many of them have managed to avoid these things, principally by convincing men that men ought to help out with the household chores while at the same time she goes out to earn a bit more money. This still seems like a fair trade to me, and this was why I supported feminism: not to free women from slavery, but to allow men to become more involved in their homes and their childrens' lives.

      Then two things went terribly wrong. First, rather than signing up for boring but profitable work like computer programming, or dangerous but profitable work like underwater welding or garbage collection, women signed up en masse for people-contact professions that had always paid--and continue to pay--lousy wages. Second, in addition to insisting that men learn to cook, clean, and look after kids, many women decided that the best way not to be caught in the housewife / mother trap was not to learn any of this stuff, and ultimately not to do it.

      What we've ended up with is something that boggles my mind: thousands of women who made career choices that stressed "easy" over "profitable," who as well know next to nothing about keeping house, complaining that they can't seem to meet the man of their dreams.

      This does not surprise me. Who the hell would want them?

      Don't get me wrong: love is a wonderful thing, and it's one of the biggest rushes in life to meet someone who turns you on sexually, enjoys spending time with you, and likes many of the same things that you like. However, the harsh reality is that eventually some meals must be cooked, some dishes washed, some babies changed, leaves mucked out of gutters, toilets repaired, and oil changed. This is the stuff of everyday life, and someone has to do it. Love and friendship are wonderful things, but one must also address the practical matters of living. The garbage won't take itself out.

      I know far too many "modern" women who make lousy money, are hopele

    22. Re:There is a moral to this tale... by lorcha · · Score: 1

      Lick on deez nutz and suck the dick

      --
      "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  62. even if you telecommute, remember these 4 words by fl!ptop · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and in this order of importance:

    1) family - you need me to work during my kid's/wife's birthday party? too bad.

    2) faith - you need me to work on saturday night/sunday morning/holy day of obligation? sorry.

    3) home - my pipes burst and my basement is full of water. i'm not coming in today.....(or i'll be in late)

    4) work - i'm ready, lay it on me.

    the key is to manage your time - you can meet a deadline *and* keep your private life if you're organized and diligent.

    --
    When you recognize love in another and realize how precious it is, everything else seems so insignificant.
    1. Re:even if you telecommute, remember these 4 words by vjmurphy · · Score: 1

      Dammit, I'm an unemployed, homeless, childless atheist, you insensitive clod.

      Really, though, faith second? Really?

      --
      Vincent J. Murphy
      Spandex Justice
    2. Re:even if you telecommute, remember these 4 words by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

      in a post further down on the thread, I comented that most religions put it more like 1. god, 2. spouse, 3.

      --
      How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
    3. Re:even if you telecommute, remember these 4 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the key is to manage your time - you can meet a deadline *and* keep your private life if you're organized and diligent.

      I agree and share your priorities. Unfortunately, I have found out the hard way that it isn't enough for *you* to be organized and diligent. In my current job, the only way to work at my potential is to work and live by some DISorganized asshat's whim. If I can't do it by their random deadline that requires dumping on the 1st 3 priorities, then I don't do it. It's given to someone else with opposite priorities, who'll work overtime with no notice, I'm seen as incompetent and slow, and I get even shittier tasks. That is how we geeks and our egos typically work, and my situation is an example of how it is exploited to get free labor from us. So, now I'm posting on /. at work and job-hunting to work either for more reasonable people, or as the only/lead IT person. :)

    4. Re:even if you telecommute, remember these 4 words by fl!ptop · · Score: 1
      Really, though, faith second? Really?

      yes, i put it after family because mass/church/worship services will get postponed for a trip for the kids to see their grandparents.

      actually, now that i think about it, faith should be 3rd, after home, because i don't think i'm going to mass if my basement is flooded either.

      to me, faith is important. everyone should take at least one hour per week for spiritual reflection. it can make the family whole, while preventing situations that lead to divorce, imho.

      --
      When you recognize love in another and realize how precious it is, everything else seems so insignificant.
  63. Couple of thoughts. by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why are you so concerned about your job? If you've put so much work into your job that you've neglected your family do you really think you should get full custody of the children?

    I know it's difficult but think of yourself second to your kids. Your wife is not "the enemy" she is an ally you're struggling with at the moment. If you're working so hard you can't spend time with your kids don't have them for more than weekends you won't be working.

    Some times it's hard to think when you have a knife in your heart, but it's these times you need to.

    --
    I like muppets.
  64. Sorry for you misfortune by MISplice · · Score: 1

    But as many people have said what is the primary reason your wife has filed for divorce.. if it is because you are never home and work to much expect to be hard pressed to get full custody of your child. If it is for other reason outside of work then you may have a better chance. This is really has nothing to do with the IT sector it has to do with any field of work.. if you spend more time there then with your family the majority of the time then expect to be divorced. Balance is the key and yes some IT jobs are more demanding than others but they are also the ones that are more flexible. Most web developers I know work 8 to 5 unless they are pressed by a deadline or just starting out.

    --
    "Imagination is more important than knowledge" -- Albert Einstein
  65. Disagree by Zerbey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In my experience, people in the IT industry have a lower incidence of divorce in general. It is more likely that divorce happens because you do not prioritise what's really important (work vs. relationship). Blaming it on your job is just silly.

    1. Re:Disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with Zerbey. You have to chose your priorities, just like any other area of life. Divorces do not happen because you work 80 hours a week (evidence being that there are couples where one spouse works 80 hours a week - not many, but they do exist). The thing with making work a high priority is that it has an impact upon the marriage relationship. More work on the job does not equal less marriage, it means a harder marriage. In some ways, I would consider home life "work" as well, as it does not just happen, and it is rife with responsibilities.

    2. Re:Disagree by aztektum · · Score: 1

      Sounds like this fellow wasn't quite ready to really be married in the first place. Focusing on work, grad studies... wife and kid on the side.

      My thought on this is simple. You need to decide for yourself first if you're going to college or just going to "work", get those goals underway/out of the way, then decide if you want a family. Once you have a stable thing going for yourself, only then can you offer stability to anyone you may want to get involved with (and kids too if it goes that far.)

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    3. Re:Disagree by EtherMonkey · · Score: 1
      In my experience, people in the IT industry have a lower incidence of divorce in general. It is more likely that divorce happens because you do not prioritise what's really important (work vs. relationship).

      In my experience, people in IT have lower incidence of divorce because it's so difficult for geeks, particularly those active on /., to meet and form romantic relationships with real living persons.

      Joking aside, there is a large component of the IT marketplace that dedicate themselves into getting ahead/rich as fast as possible, which generally means very little time spent on social interaction and development. Essentially, these people become socially retarded as they put career and cash above all else. After spending the first 10 years after college intensely focused on career/cash, at age 32, they finally decide its time to "settle down." Unfortunately, with the social development of a person 22 years old -- just barely out of their teens -- they are not well prepared to select a partner for or participate in a long-term relationship.

      Add to this the fact that there is no social or moral stigma against divorce anymore. You don't have to catch your husband in bed with his co-worker, show documentary evidence of drug or alcohol abuse, in any way disparage your spouse in public to be granted a divorce. "Irreconcilable Differences" is sufficient cause for divorce, which is a no-fault decision. So, if after two or three years of marriage to your boring java-programming coworker-turned-spouse or too-flirty Hiro-shot-girl-turned-spouse it becomes unbearable, a few thousand in lawyer fees frees you from all discomfort with no downside other than some minor (if you were smart) resource allocation.

      In fact, what I see as a divorced professional, (and yes, I do have full custody of my children), is that divorce is more than just tolerable. A successful divorce, i.e., one that is significantly lopsided in your favor, is considered an accomplishment almost on-par with a successful product launch, while a bad divorce often is good for at a pass if work performance slips, without the negative connotations associated with general burn-out from stress.

      But none of this is limited to or even more likely for the IT industry. I see the same things going on in legal, medical, real estate, financial and most other industries I've encountered throughout my consulting career. Maybe this would be a good topic for a Time Magazine or even Cosmo/GQ type of study, but I don't think IT is unique in this area.
      --
      --- A man with a briefcase can steal more money, than any man with a gun. [Don Henley]
  66. Simple question by lawpoop · · Score: 1
    Why do you think that employment in the IT industry causes divorce? Long hours?

    Personally, I feel that people who are attracted to IT, and those who succeed in IT, are people on the Autism spectrum. People diagnosed as having Aspergers syndrome or Aspergers usually have:
    • Lack of observed desire for friendship
    • Poor ability to make friends
    • Indifferent to the feelings of others
    • Social awkwardness
    • Indiscriminate social interaction
    • Lack of eye contact
    • Brief response to questions
    • Gullibility
    Sounds like an average woman's dream guy.

    Couple that with easy divorce and people not willing to make sacrifices for a marriage, you have divorce.

    Personally, I think the ideal of marriage of a man and a woman who are best friends and meet each other's fantasy of the perfect make is unrealistic. It creates a disillusioned, jaded populace. I spent a summer in a field study school with an Indigenous family in Ecuador. The living pattern was basically the oldest mom and dad, their children, grandchildren, and various extended family members and in-laws. Life was centered around the cooking fire, and to me, it felt like there was a big party that never ended.

    Now, I'm not saying the system was perfect or a utopia, but it seems that the young couples had less stress raising young children because they had a greater support network. Children basically ran around freely and could entertain each other. Other women and grandmothers would handle children who needed more care.

    In the US and Europe, people live basically isolated, lonely, stressed out lives.
    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:Simple question by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      "Sounds like an average woman's dream guy."

      You may have made that remark with sarcasm but alot of aspies have great relationships. Alot of women like sensitive men who are competent in what they do and smart. THey like nurturing as well as long as we make an effort to include them in our lives.

    2. Re:Simple question by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      I wasn't being sarcastic. I don't think 'sensitiveness', in the sense of caring and considerate, is a hallmark trait of Aspies. Often it's reported that Aspies are *insensitive*, cold, callous, uncaring, emotionless, etc. Now, that's not the reality inside the Aspie's head; but that's what normal people percieve. Also, Aspies are reported as overly-sensitive, in the sense of having inapropriate emotional reactions to what others percieve as minor things.

      I was diagnosed with Asperger's, so I am not just talking out of nowhere.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    3. Re:Simple question by SerpentMage · · Score: 1

      Funny that you mention Ecuador... My sister just happens to live in Ecuador and lives in this BIG HAPPY family... It drives my sister bonkers. The reason is because the mother-in-law and grand-mother keep looking over my sister's shoulder to make sure the children are "reared" properly. My sister found it extremely stressful because she was constantly being monitored. Of course one could say that it was because she was from Europe and North America. The reality is that these "big and happy" families have many other stresses that I think you did not experience.

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    4. Re:Simple question by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      That's true. I did give the caveat that this wasn't a Utopia. Also, let me add that the family we stayed with was an Indigenous Quichua family, not a Hispanic Ecuadorian family. So there are some differences. One of the problems is that there is absolutely no privacy. Everyone knows (and watches) everything you do. People have to sneak about on moonless nights to have sex. If you really get fed up with someone and don't want to interact with them, you have to leave and go live with some other relatives for a while. You don't have your own room, or a door you can shut, to get away from people -- they lived in open-air, plywood-floored, thatched roof huts.

      Personally, I was only there for 10 weeks -- not long enough to get fed up with anyone -- but when I came back, I felt a profound loneliness -- sleeping alone, quietness, not seeing people's faces and hearing their voices.

      Again, it's not a Utopia, but at least in my mind, too many people are preferable to not enough. I grew up as the oldest of four children in a small house, so my upbringing may be a bit different than an average American's. My place was always noisey, with too many annoying younger siblings running around. I have a hard time sleeping without noise.

      However, as far as raising children, I think it's a better experience for a child to have several people competing to faun over them than two overworked parents saying "Not now, I'm busy", or taking out there stress by discplining and micromanaging their children. And there is a difference between actually helping take care of a child versus just telling someone else how to do it.

      I dated a Chinese girl who was raised for several years when she was a teenager by her grandmother. Her parents lived and worked in different cities. While it might seem like some kind of child neglect to American sensibilities, to her and her grandmother it was a great time. Her grandmother was retired and had time to teach her piano, singing, dancing, and calligraphy. It was fortunate she spent this time with her because her grandmother died shortly after she went back to live with her parents.

      I am in my late 20s, and several people I know have babies. While they are happy with the children, they realize is is basically a lot of frustrating work rearing children. Children will play power games with their parents that they wouldn't dare with their grandparents. It would help tremendously, at least as far as my friends are concerned, to have other people helping out with the kids. And we do sort of have this in our society, with day care and school. But the impersonal nature of these instituions can't do better than having loving relatives who have a personal interest in the kids future.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
  67. My replies by killmenow · · Score: 4, Insightful
    My questions are: How many of you computer Dads have also gone through divorce and have retained either half or full custody of your children?
    /me raises hand (full custody).

    Do you think your job had something to do with it?
    No.

    What were some of your hardest challenges and are your kids happy?
    1. Hardest challenges: being a single father with an eighteen month old son, learning to actually be a parent, growing up, staying focused on the job because...TADA! divorce sucks...regardless of what profession you claim on your 1040.

    2. Happy Kids? You don't have a teenager do you? Happy is a relative term. And, yes, my children are relatively happy.

    I also must say I think your thesis premise sucks. But good luck anyway.
  68. Just keep think it's because of "your job" by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

    Probaly cheating on you with someone who is a better man, like someone who knows Death Yoga and not afraid of a little BDSM.

    --
    US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
  69. Hmmm.... by mtrupe · · Score: 0

    Blaming your career for divorce? I guess I can see blaming workaholism for divorce, or maybe if your career was pornography or rock star, but IT? Really?

    My personal experience is that IT geeks have lower divorce rates, but I could be wrong. I think the divorce problem touches on a number of issues, so making a correlation here would be difficult.

  70. Half of marriages end in divorce.... by bachroxx · · Score: 1

    but then again, just think how the other 50% of marriages end!!

    hint - pine box...

  71. The whole industry? How about ANY industry? by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1


    ALL professions carry this risk depending on the personal circumstances. If you are a person who lets your job consume your life, it doesn't matter if you're a short order cook, a Wall Street banker, a Head of State or anything in between.

  72. Check your premises by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I fixed a few errors and omissions in your summary of your current plight:

    I am graduate student and work as a web developer. I am also getting a divorce and I have a son caught in the middle. I believe my choices, including allowing myself to devote too much of my passion to my profession instead of my family had a part in it. For my graduate thesis I am writing a paper about Dads who work in the computer industry, divorce and custody. Since I cannot fathom how my own personal actions could have had any relation to this outcome, I came up with this thesis to cast the blame to somewhere else, making me look like the victim: I think our industry causes a high rate of divorce but I need some help from the Slashdot community. My questions are: How many of you computer Dads have also gone through divorce and have retained either half or full custody of your children? Do you think your poor choices had something to do with it? What were some of your hardest challenges and do your kids share your selfish lack of committment?"

    Note: I have no idea of any of the circumstances surrounding the submitter's real life, but his summary made it sound like he didn't really want advice, but just wanted help vindicating his newly formed self-victimizing attitudes about the whole situation.

  73. Numbers by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

    So, from the people I know in the field, I'm going to have to guess the divorce rate is lower among IT people than the general population. It is what 55% in the US now? Sure people neglect their spouses because their career interferes, but that isn't limited to the IT profession.

  74. IT Types have the wrong approach by thewils · · Score: 4, Funny

    They tell the woman that they love 'em, and figure that the woman should understand that the value of love for that woman should be 'true' from now until they tell her that it is now 'false'.

    Unfortunately, the woman needs to have the value of love set every time she boots in the morning, and occasionally during the day also.

    Playing Call of Duty 8 hours a night for a month straight doesn't help either.

    --
    Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
    1. Re:IT Types have the wrong approach by Dr.+Hok · · Score: 1
      Don't mod parent funny! Give him insightful. This is exactly the point.

      I find it hard to tell my wife every day that I love her. And this is simpy because I am a nerd. And most nerds are, well, nerds. Unformtunately, women seem to need this kind of emotional conversation.

      We have gone through divorce-like situations every year or so. Finally, we would have some weeks of real ugly argument in a row.

      Luckily this counts as emotional conversation, and all was fine again (for a while).

      --
      Say out loud: I'm an Aspie and I'm somewhat proud, I guess. Uh. Can I write an email in all caps instead? Hm...
  75. May not be IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just my two cents... but being married with children while working and going to school might have something to do with it.

  76. Nerds and Divorce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Male nerds, desperate for female companionship, marry the first attractive female they can get their hands on... ignoring the things that they should well know will cause a bad marrage. Also, in many cases adult nerds have money, which makes them attractive to the wrong kind of women. In the end, it is a disaster.

    Please nerds, be picky... do not fall in love with a girl just because she is hot, and you don't think you can get better, when you know she has personality problems that are going to be a big mess in the future!

  77. Informative by p0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Only on Slashdot will a comment as the parent gets modded +Informative...

    --
    This is my sig. There are thousands more, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Informative by Amouth · · Score: 1

      have no fear.. currently it is "(Score:5, Insightful)"

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  78. Tech consulting and travel by spudchucker · · Score: 1

    You should check out The Vault. Much info about work caused family problems are discussed in the forums archives.

  79. I don't think it's our industry. by DeltaSigma · · Score: 1

    See how plausible these edits sound to you:

    "I am graduate student and work as an accountant . I am also getting a divorce and I have a son caught in the middle. I believe my profession had a part in it. [...] I think our industry causes a high rate of divorce..."
    "I am graduate student and work as a construction worker . I am also getting a divorce and I have a son caught in the middle. I believe my profession had a part in it. [...] I think our industry causes a high rate of divorce..."
    "I am graduate student and work as a project manager . I am also getting a divorce and I have a son caught in the middle. I believe my profession had a part in it. [...] I think our industry causes a high rate of divorce..."
    "I am graduate student and work as an engineer . I am also getting a divorce and I have a son caught in the middle. I believe my profession had a part in it. [...] I think our industry causes a high rate of divorce..."
    "I am graduate student and work as a cop . I am also getting a divorce and I have a son caught in the middle. I believe my profession had a part in it. [...] I think our industry causes a high rate of divorce..."
    "I am graduate student and work as a web developer . I am also getting a divorce and I have a son caught in the middle. I believe my profession had a part in it. [...] I think our industry causes a high rate of divorce..."

    I'd personally find it more likely that divorce rates are a product of our society. Our workplaces are certainly a factor, perhaps even the dominant factor, but I don't think divorce rates vary significantly corresponding to industry.

    It's my impression, though. If your study yields compelling evidence to the contrary please let us know, I'm sure such an article would make it on Slashdot.

  80. Mod parent insightful! by bcat24 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously, if you've come to the point of getting a divorce, it's a problem with you and your spouse. Don't blame your job, your health, your astrological sign, or whatever. They might contribute to the problem, but the problem was there long before then. If, e.g., you work too much and don't spend quality time with your husband/wife/kids, that's a family problem. Either you or your spouse (probably both of you) need to recognize that everything starts with you.

    Damn, I'm starting to sound like Dr. Phil. :)

    1. Re:Mod parent insightful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Damn, I'm starting to sound like Dr. Phil. :)

      Could be worse! I'm starting to Look like Dr. Phil!

    2. Re:Mod parent insightful! by maxume · · Score: 1
      Damn, I'm starting to sound like Dr. Phil. :)

      Please report to the nearest suicide booth post haste.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Mod parent insightful! by kthejoker · · Score: 1

      It's hard to believe this is getting modded insightful. How exactly is "contributing to a problem" not the same as "being part of the problem"? How can a problem only be defined as the quantitative success or lack there of of a single interpersonal relationship? When the relationship *itself* is defined by external factors?

      Are you kidding me?

      Your relationship doesn't exist in some sort of ahistorical vacuum. Your job affects your relationship, your relationship affects your job. The same for your health, your mood, your ego, your kids, and your sanity. These are not one way streets.

      "Everything starts with you." What the hell kind of pop psychology is that? You cannot separate the "you" from the aspects of your life like your job and your health. In fact, it is the totality of "you" that can be divided into the components that "contribute to problems." IE, your problems are the sum of the problems in the different aspects of your life. And they are so intertwined as to be impossible to sort out.

  81. Actually, no... by rueger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... IT does not "cause divorce."

    Neither do trees. Or the weather. Or hockey.

    What may cause divorce are your choices in how to deal with each of these things.

    If you let technology, or the job, or your boss, take priority over your loved ones and family, that is your decision.

    Sadly North American society places the almighty buck ahead of everything, and that translates to a belief that The Job is more important than any other thing in life.

    There are people and places who have rejected these attitudes to varying degrees. In Europe, where work weeks are often quite less than the 40 hour minimum common here, and vacations begin at multiple weeks each year. In intentional communities, where a balance between work and life and family is central to the overall design of the environment. Or even with a small number of employers who have realized that happy and healthy employees lead to greater long term productivity and profits.

    So don't place the blame on "IT", place it on yourself and take long hard look.

    1. Re:Actually, no... by SerpentMage · · Score: 1

      I hate these America = bad, and Europe = good arguments. The reality is that Europe and North America have divorces. http://www.divorcereform.org/gul.html. At the link you will find the real trends. But before you say, "But wait in Europe there are less divorces", you have to remember in Europe less people get married http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MaggieGallagher /2006/02/28/europes_marriage_crisis. Thus when they split they don't need a divorce.

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    2. Re:Actually, no... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      In Europe, where work weeks are often quite less than the 40 hour minimum common here, and vacations begin at multiple weeks each year. In intentional communities, where a balance between work and life and family is central to the overall design of the environment.

      And how's unemployment doing in say, France and Germany?

      The main reason that there's such a "work-life balance" in France is because of the state imposition of a 35 hour week. Someone got taken to caught for working more. He wanted to work it, his boss wanted him to work it, but the state didn't.

      The problem with all of this is that anyone starting a business is going to avoid those countries that give less flexibility. So, the UK (who has less restrictive labour laws) gets a whole lot more inward investment than say, France.

  82. five stages of grief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Denial - This is the stage you are in now. You are denying that your wife slept with me. You are looking to other places to set the blame.

    Anger - When you finally realize that I am much better and smarter than you, you are going to be angry at me. You will probably try to start a flame war on a message board, or attempt to h@x0r my machine.

    Bargaining - When your attempts at h@x0ring me fail you will try to work out some sort of bargain. No I will not perform felatio on you.

    Depression - You will start listening to EMO and more than likely end up shaping your calluses by playing some random MMORPG. "Time after Time" by Cyndi Lauper will be your favorite tune.

    Acceptance - she is gone and you now realize I am much better of a man than you. and now you can finally play warcraft all day, not worrying about hygiene, sleep or food.

  83. I am the product of such a marriage. by ezkl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I grew up in a household that was abundant in two things; computers and marital tension. My father is an IT entrepreneur. My mother is a teacher. I have a feeling that my father was a lot cooler in college when they met. Of course, when the ex-hippie turned pseudo-philosopher graduates from college and runs into the brick wall of real life, certain decisions have to be made. He runs into computing in the late 70's and it's a match made in heaven, far stronger than anything my parents ever had. As the divorce was happening, I blamed it on tension created by certain members of the extended family, but I was 12 when they separated, so my analysis at the time holds no weight. In retrospect, almost 13 years later, I now see that the computer, or at least the number of hours logged in front of it had much more to do with it. Admittedly, the divorce messed me up for quite a while, as I think they mess up most children (especially at that age) but things are much better now than they were before. Both my parents remarried and are extremely successful now in both their careers and personal lives. My sister and I both lead productive, well-balanced lives and have great relationships with both sets of parents.

    I'd venture a guess that you could make a correlation between ANY job that elicits long, dedicated hours and divorce. It's the way social evolution seems to work. Community -> Family -> Individual -> Online Groups -> Large Online Communities. That may be a little contrived, but hopefully you all get the point.

  84. Sorry 'bout the divorce, however by Rumagent · · Score: 1

    First of all. Get whoever is counsil(I don't know the american term) on thesis and kick him in the nuts.

    Secondly, make him explain to you why collecting data on slashdot is a waste of time.

    Thirdly, the premise of your thesis is uncertain at best. Proposing "our industry causes a high rate of divorce", is like saying "putting your head under water kills you" - it may not be wrong, but it does not explain anything. Could the reason for a (possible) higher rate of divorce be long hours? Or how about social disorders among computer scientists? Or any number other reasons.

    You have had a pretty nasty experience. You need to get over it - Not glorify it in a thesis.

  85. Easy by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

    I am graduate student ... getting a divorce and I have a son ....

    If you're a grad student and you've spent enough time in the marriage to raise a son and get around to wanting a divorce....maybe you married too early?

    1. Re:Easy by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I'm a grad student, and the age range of people in the lab where I work is 21-75. Just because someone is a grad student, doesn't mean they are young.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  86. Come on by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Frankly, your "profession" probably had very little to do with your divorce. I'd bet good money that your personality (and hers) had an order of magnitude more to do with it.

    My wife and I are both in a position where we work long, hard hours. The thing is, we're both willing (and often do) drop whatever we're doing in an instant to help the other out--even if "help out" is nothing more than "just sit here with me for a while."

    Marriage, done well, is hard work. Marriage, done well, is telling your wife to put her feet up and relax while you do the laundry or cook dinner--never mind that you're both exhausted from a long day's work and you'd really rather just play video games if you had the choice. Marriage, done well, is moving to a new city so that your spouse can pursue a promising new job. Marriage, done well, is near-constant attention, care, and dedication. That said, it's easily the most satisfying, fulfilling, entertaining and educational thing I've ever done, and I don't regret a second of it.

    My grandfather-in-law had some sound advice on how to make a marriage work. He told me that marriage is a 90/10 proposition: each partner should expect to do 90% of the work themselves and only expect 10% from the other.

    How much did you give your wife and family? How often did you ask your wife to wait until you were done doing whatever it was you were doing? How many times did you tell your wife not to bother cleaning the kitchen or bathroom and instead do it yourself? How many hours a day did you spend "free time" in front of the computer?

    Do you genuinely believe that the fact that you write web pages played a significant role in the collapse of your own household?

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:Come on by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Marriage is hard work. I'm happily married. I was lucky however to find someone with whom I find attractive, has many of the same ideas I have, who is supportive and caring. Its hard to do. As for blame; don't go there. Blame is worthless. Just deal with the situation and get on with your life and your son, as much as the law will allow. Family law is heavily skewed toward the mother. I probably don't have to tell you that.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  87. IT is not the cause by LittleStone · · Score: 1

    I know some guys are going to mod me down. But here it goes.

    Don't blame your industry. Don't blame your life. If you two don't want to get divorced, nothing can make you two divorced. It's completely you two's choice. The life in IT hard on marriage? It's just because you don't have the ability to make it work. There are so many others working in IT and have a happy marriage. You choose your work over your marriage. It can happen in any job and any industry. It's just your priority.

    You may say the IT industry attracts more people who got your priority. Any industry that is well paid with long working hours attracts people who choose work over family. If you don't want your marriage fails, choose another industry that is suitable to you.

    --
    A sig is redundant.
  88. Statistically Most marriages will end in divorce by bryz · · Score: 1

    It's sad, but we've reached a point where many statistics indicate that more than half of marriages will end in divorce.

    Even sadder is blaming your job or the entire industry for being the cause of your failed marriage. With that kind of attitude towards your marriage, it was doomed from the start.

    If you really cared about your marriage and your son and if you really thought your divorce was happening because of your industry, why did you make the choice to chose computers over a family?

  89. Correlation, not causation by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

    It's not the job, it's the people that are attracted to it that are predisposed to divorce.

    IT attracts loner types. Long IT hours and parental responsibilities leave married people with limited free time.

    Loner types don't do well living with others, because it requires a sharing of space and marital responsibilities limit one's amount of alone time.

    Why get married then? Because of social pressure.

    1. Re:Correlation, not causation by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      It's not the job, it's the people that are attracted to it that are predisposed to divorce. IT attracts loner types.

      I suggest, perhaps, it is the exact opposite. IT attracts people with few social skills, who have had fewer relationships, but who have spent more time living alone and most of whom are more flexible and less likely to divorce. How many people do you know in IT who have divorced? From the people I know, I'm looking at something like 10%, much, much lower than the 55% or so that is the average in the U.S.

  90. work alone does not cause divorce by WickedLogic · · Score: 1

    >>I think our industry causes a high rate of divorce but I need some help from the Slashdot community.

    And you are writing a thesis?

  91. Marriage? kids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    A true geek knows not these things. Er, institutions. Semi-seriously...

    I've made a conscious decision to stay childless, partly because I haven't the time or money (or any prospect of them) to be able to bring them up properly. Having grown up in severe financial stress, with both parents working longer than full-time hours, I don't want the responsibility of bringing other people into the world to go through the same crap I did. I think it would be selfish of me to do that just to cover up my dissatisfaction with my own life...

  92. Doesn't have anything to do with IT by flitty · · Score: 1

    I believe that this has nothing to do with IT, it has to do with addiction and time. This country works too much for it's own good, and that seems to be emphisised in IT jobs. My brother-in-law is a web developer and every other weekend he spends all 3 days at work because he has to update the site. This is hard on my sister (his wife), but she understands it's what he has to do. If he worked late every night and came home and sat on the computer (which most IT people do) it really begins to eat at the marriage. Addiction is addiction, whether it is work (IT), games, or anything else. Open a conversation with the people you interact with. Talk to your wife about what she needs for the marriage to work, and don't blame your job. If you want to work less hours, you can, find a way, move into a smaller house if you can't afford it. This country is in trouble though, since most familys have both parents working, and they still can't afford their bills. If we keep this up, this is going to get real bad. Why do you think there has been almost 10 kids at school with guns in the past 2 months? Both parents work. Don't blame IT for this. Anyone who works to much will have the same problem

    --
    Whether or not there is some sort of god, I'm not supposed to say/god is a word and the argument ends there-Smog
  93. Still ok by steve802 · · Score: 1

    I entered the IT world professionally 1989. I married in 1990. Today, I'm still in IT and still married.

    Fortunately for me, I work at a company that values family as much as profit, and so there was never any pressure to work long hours or weekends, so I was able to devote attention to my marriage - and because I was happy with my family, I think I was a better worker.

    Of course, in that time, I've had coworkers who have divorced, but two of my closest coworkers have both been married at least as long as I. Can working in IT contribute to a divorce? Sure - if you let it; if your company forces you to let it. But I don't think that's unique to IT.

  94. Work Hours by frosty_tsm · · Score: 1

    Grad school aside, one thing that seems to come up in the tech industry is long or unusual working hours. Grad school will only make this worse.

    We all hear about start-ups and how insane some of the work hours can be there. It's do or die there; if you aren't willing to put the hours in you really shouldn't be there. Even in larger companies, a crunch period can take you away from your loved ones. Some will expect that you work ridiculous hours on a regular basis (I sometimes don't see my roommate for a few weeks).

    Yes, we're in a field were there is a lot of money to be made. But we need to know that that money isn't worth it unless we can still have a life and pay attention to the more important things in life.

    Other than that, how is a thesis on divorce related to IT? This sounds more like a psychology or some other non-tech study.

  95. Poor work habits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The company I used to work at had the following problems :

    - Poor management
    - Poor decision making
    - Poor decision structures
    - All this leading to overtime to correct errors
    - Agressive IT restructuring while having power struggles between the IT managers

    This kind of stuff leads to being unhappy, not having enought time for your family, friends and health. The bottom line is, what ever your job is, what ever the field is, you are responsible of your happiness and the happiness of the people around you : if the environment gets shitty, get out or risk loosing everything.

  96. You have to LET the industry take over by businessnerd · · Score: 1

    I will start off by saying that I am not married, have never been married and do not have any kids. With that in mind, I have recently began my career in IT consulting. On my first project with the company, I was working with a fairly large team, majority of which were married. I also noticed a lot of them from time to time were having trouble with their spouses that seemed to be related directly to the current project. This project was on it's tail end with deadlines looming, then passing with an extension, lather, rinse, repeat (I think we've all been there). Many a day, many, if not all of us were on the client site long after 5pm (my personal record is 2am) and even coming in on weekends. Many shared that their spouses were unhappy with their hours. The thing is though, that most of them did it to themselves. When the project manager said "we need this done by monday," most of them said, "OK, i'll just go cancel my flight home and work straight through the weekend." It wasn't very often that they said, "I understand the time constraints, but I need to spend the weekend with the family, is their any way this can be pushed." The funny thing is, when a bunch of us did try to push back on the boss, we were able to at least reach a compromise that gave us more personal time.

    If you don't make an effort to keep your personal life, or make the time for family, you won't have the time for the family and the family will resent this. If you push back on your supervisors, most of the time they will try to work with you to come up with a solution that works for everyone (This is what makes good managers).

    --
    "It's not whether you win or lose, it's how drunk you get." -- H. J. Simpson
  97. What kind of bullshit major by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lets you have this topic as a thesis? What are you majoring in, sociology?

    Your wife left you because you're an inconsiderate asshole and she thinks that she can do better. Looking at your "thesis" topic I'll go out on a limb and say that you're a self-absorbed dick with an inability to take responsibility for your own actions.

  98. Been there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Read Judith Wallerstein's book, "Second Chances". ( http://www.divorceinfo.com/bestbooks.htm#SecondCha nces). Have your wife read it too.

    As a child that went through my parents divorce over 30 years ago, I can tell you that there is a long term impact on children, which you need to know about if you want to help your kid.

  99. It's not your job by booch · · Score: 1

    It's how you deal with your job.

    --
    Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
  100. It's just a job! by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

    I simply can't understand workaholic types. I mean, come on people, it's JUST A JOB. Don't get me wrong, my job is important to me. I make good money. I like the work (most of the time). But I DO NOT work overtime unless "the barns buring down". Overtime is for emergencies, not because some jackass made promises his ass can't keep.

    People who let EVERTHING go to hell because of their job are just sad.

  101. Don't blame IT by Daemon_az · · Score: 0

    I've been working IT since before we got married (loooong time ago) and we had to experience all the "good" stuff that comes with it (relocations, even across countries and continents), long hours (not too often though), weekend support calls, working from home, weeklong business trips, you name it. Fortunately she has been very understanding and never made a big deal out of it. And I was making up to her for it. We are divorced now (totally my fault, but job had nothing to do with it). We have a shared custody of our two kids and I probably spent as much time with them as she does (fortunately they are grown up and can take care of themselves if both parents are busy). It's not your job that ruins your marriage, it's you neglecting basic communications and not realizing that certain sacrifices by your partner need to be rewarded. Of course it does help to have a spouse who does understand that sometimes you have to take this support call or spend weekend fixing bugs.

  102. Could you get your wife to read /.? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    That way you both would be on the same page. You can post your thoughts. Friendly mods will give mod points. And may be you will resolve differences amicably like other /.ters. You just look at our history. AAPL vs MSFT solved. IE vs FF solved. You are right in asking for advice here.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  103. Web Developer? Try Sales by zapster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh Geez, you think IT is problem job? Try being a salesman on the road 50 weeks a year, or a field engineer rolling out a multi-year project in China, or even field technicians for Fortune 500's that do multi-year rollouts, construction (from engineers to dump truck drivers) the list is very long and IT is not even close to being the worst. Get over it, get your life in order, pick which is more important to you, your work or your kids.

  104. Balance is essential by TheDrewbert · · Score: 0

    Refusing to allow your job, in any field, to completely dominate your life is key. Too often people get so wrapped up in their job they make it the most important part of their life. The people close to them suffer as a result. A place I used to work at would treat fairly minor issues with the crisis level of an ER during the LA riots. I was stressed constantly, my partner didn't like being around me and was urging me to quit the job, my mental and physical health suffered. It was only after I said to myself "Hey, we make low end white sheets, why am I getting all worked up over this?" that everything suddenly got better. Moral of the story, unless you work in an ER, don't allow your employer to work you like you're an ER doctor.

    --
    http://www.CelloFourteGroupie.net
  105. Love, and marraige. by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

    Is there nothing you can do to salvage your marraige?

    Divorce is so common, in part because it is so easy, in part because people don't want to take responsibility for their actions, and also because marraige is work and our society has become a little bit lazy. Interestingly enough, Women file 2x as much as men do.
        That doesn't mean it's their fault though. That could be because men cause most of the problems I don't know the basis of this statistic.

    Still though, the reality is you can't blame it on anything other than you and her.

    I found when I went through mine, that it was an introspective experience. I was heartbroken, but I was also awakened. I saw that I was basically sabotaging my marraige because I wasn't happy with it. I escaped into WoW, I spent any moment I could with anyone other than my exwife (I didn't cheat on her though). My real problem was that I didn't want to confront her on what she did to piss me off. I just let it build. When she left it was a great eye opener, and I tried valiantly to get her to give me one more shot but she wouldn't have it.

    A few months later, After I was reborn in a psychological sort of way, I realized I never would have been happy with it anyway. Just as I realized that, she knocked on the door, but I wasn't there anymore. Since then, my wages have doubled, my vehicles are paid for, and I am debt free. I was fortunate in that I haven't had any children yet. I started to date again, and low and behold I found someone with visions that alligned with mine.

    Simply put, divorce isn't about what you do 9-5, it's about what you do when you are off. Ask yourself "did you put her at the top of your list?" (most religions order it 1. God, 2. spouse, etc...)
    Were you doing a fair share of the work? Marraige is work, no matter what the fairytale says.
    (this is where I was very unhappy)

    I wish you the best of luck, I know it was the hardest thing that I have ever gone through.
    Spend time with family as often as you can, and just try and be a better person in general.

    "The way your heart beats makes all the difference in learning to live" -Dream Theater

    --
    How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
  106. Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'm a custodial dad, posting as AC for privacy (prejudice avoidence). The numbers are depressing: 75% of all divorce petitions involving kids are filed by mom, and she gets custody 85% of the time (UScensus). No amount of virtue will win custody for dad, severe defects in mom have to be proven to overcome court/jury bias towards mom (especially below 12yo). And not always even then. There are lots of horror stories out there.

    At some level, men understand this and it makes us less willing to commit, marry, have kids or be involved in childcare. Why put all the effort in if it can be snatched away? And that becomes a self-fulfilling prophesy.

    IT is probably a worse industry than others except high-travel. The bursty nature of projects makes for long hours, and it's hard for anyone to maintain a relationship under these conditions. It's actually worse on women. I don't think the technical nature matters much. What matters is "Being There".

    As for my kids, I've found raising them very enjoyable and fulfilling. It was worth a horrible fight. When they were young s6/d4 it was hard being a single father. I knew they needed nurturing, and I had to work hard to provide it even though that isn't my natural inclination. Now that they are teeners s17/d15 I find it easier: Of course they rebel. They're expected and required to rebel. But I can deal with them on a "natural consequences" basis.

    Ultimately, I agree with Hillary: It Takes a Village to Raise a Child." But half that village is male! I think many of our serious social ills are the result of insufficient fathering. Moynihan said it best: "If we encourage a father-absent society, how can it be other than "Lord of the Flies", writ large?"

  107. Depends on the IT Field DBA's tend to stay married by woodsrunner · · Score: 1

    I have the impression that web professionals have a difficult go of any relationship because the web culture is based on chaos: it's all about 80 hour weeks and IPO's out of nothing and is very high in the dramatics and stress.

    This is why I prefer the Database world. All of the author's of my University DB texts seemed to be married 40+ years. This also seems to be the case in most departments I have worked. It's a different culture, based on order, structure, sane hours, professional respect and decent hours.

  108. Let me speak from the kid's POV by Khyber · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm the son of a man who's worked IT/EE/DOD for pretty much his entire life. He divorced my mother when I was six months old, and obtained full custody.

    I'll guarantee being in the profession had NOTHING to do with it. When I turned 18 I went thru every document concerning the divorce (and a few old cassette tapes with my mother's adoptive father telling my dad to ditch my mother and take me somewhere else,) and I can easily conclude it wasn't due to him being in the profession, it was a matter of morality and family economics (what should've gone to diapers, food, etc. to me instead went to my mother partying every night and getting FUBAR'd.)

    Now I will say that *YES* it's possible that working in the IT field, which is very demanding (sometimes requiring 30-hour shifts, from what my father's told me from his days at Texas Instruments,) will strain or destroy your relationship, mainly because your job keeps you away from your wife, or the job puts so much stress on you, that while you wish you could vent it at the job, you end up relieving it in unconstructive ways at home.

    But it's a little unfair to place the blame squarely upon your job. Tell me, what did you try to keep the relationship working? She should've known that you would have long hours. Somehow, knowing how many relationships I've been in for the past ten years, not all of it is squarely the fault of the job, or even your girl (well, minus my three lying and stealing ex-fiancees,) but usually upon you. There are always exceptions, but most filed cases I've seen are the woman leaving the man, for infidelity, spousal abuse, drug usage, conflicting interests, etc.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:Let me speak from the kid's POV by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      "three lying and stealing ex-fiancees"

      I offer question in the spirit of inquiry and kinship: Have you considered that you may be following in your father's footsteps re. women? At least in terms of being attracted to those who will take advantage of you?

      Having gone through marriage and individual counseling, I've been amazed at how our parents affect our relationships, via who we are attracted to and how we conduct ourselves in a relationship. If you have gone to counseling, good for you. If not, I reccommend it from personal experience.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    2. Re:Let me speak from the kid's POV by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Good question! Let me give you an answer to this. Fiancee #1 - Canadian girl, met over internet, started seeing each other very regularly over the couple years afterwards. She proposed to me, then a week later I find out she cheats. Fiancee #2 - just wanted me because I had good computer/gaming equipment. Half of that was stolen, she got caught, put in jail, my stuff was never found. Fiancee #3 - Psychotic Catholic Bitch. Great in bed, horrible everywhere else.

      After that, I said fuck it, and I got a male partner. Went through ONE (and that relationship lasted longer than all three engagements combined,) male partner, he threw me down a flight of stairs, almost killed me. Round two, I found the perfect match. Counseling isn't what's always needed, it's finding the person that matches your tastes, behaviors, and interests. Now I'm going to definitely marry a nice guy who's unbelievably bright, speaks Chinese (still learning) and is quite a joy to be around.

      From my own personal experience, it's the failures that lead you to a better person - counseling has almost always been a social band-aid, starting with my psychiatrist who decided that at my tender age of 6 that I was "depressed" and needed medication (though I acted NO DIFFERENTLY than other children my age.)

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:Let me speak from the kid's POV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To AC: Wow, congratulations, you're an asshole!

  109. I can see it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a "Computer Dad" but *knock on wood* I haven't had to go through a divorce. But, I can certainly see how it could happen. The long hours on projects, the high stress levels on the job, short deadlines with big bucks on the line, the competative landscape, high employee turnover rates, and the need to constantly keep researching to stay up with the curve in order to keep your career going certainly don't help in keeping a personal relationship going on the side.

    As I write I now find myself away from my family 70% of the time on business trips for my company simply because I have managed to stay in there through all the rough times in my career.

    Yeah... I can see how being in IT could certainly provide a number of the conditions that would help to break up relationships.

    My sympathies on the fact that you are going through a divorce, and (I assume) custody hearings.

  110. My interest in IT helped! by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 1

    I couldn't stand my wife...when I got home from work I went right down into the basement and taught myself HTML, Perl and Linux. Thanks to my desire to avoid my now ex-wife, I got pretty good at coding. Thanks I.T.!!!

  111. Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A few lessons:

    a. Your job, profession, work hours have nothing to do with it. It is the attitude that counts. If you or your spouse have a rotten attitude towards your relationship, you will find no excuses fit the bill.

    b. Custody is a joke: if you pursue this you will go down a painful path; being a male suffer more in a climate that affords the female lots of benefit of the doubt and sticks males with unfair stereotypes; you will also lose tons of money for the aggravation;

    c. If you drop your weapons before the legal masters and don't even pick up the Custody fight, you will dissapoint your legals and a lot of sympathetic onlookers, but you will save yourself a lot of aggravation; and in the end it won't matter either way;

    d. Your care of the child is not affected by whether or not you have custody. In the long term, it matters zilch who had the custody. Suffering is a part of the game, you can suffer and take care of things or increase suffering for others (and yourself). Take care of yourself and do the best you can.

    e. The sooner you accept your follies and the fait accompli without seeking scapegoats, the earlier you will recover; and that is the best thing you can do to your child(ren).

  112. from the other side by learithe · · Score: 1

    As a girl who has had a few long-term relationships with IT guys... it's not the job, it's the lack of attention, communication, and activity that has killed my relationships. Relationships require a great deal of maintenance to flourish, and if one (or both) partners spend all their time on the computer ignoring the other person, the relationship will fall apart. Look, if you never leave your computer to be with me... if I can strip in front of you and you still won't get off of the computer... sorry, it's just not going to work. Does that mean I'm leaving you because you code? Hell no... I like geeky guys. It's because you're ignoring me.

    It's an addiction thing... if you are addicted to something, your relationships will fall apart. If there is a correlation between IT jobs and divorce, it wouldn't be because of the IT job. As eldavojon said above, it would be because of a confounding factor: being familiar with computers increases your chances of developing a computer related (internet/gaming/porn) addiction. Being with an addict is just plain miserable. Don't blame the job. Blame your actions -- did you spend time with her? Or were you on the computer all the time?

  113. The Real Question is this... by dahwang · · Score: 1

    If you were to quit your job and go into another field, do you think that she'd stay with you? If not, look elsewhere. The problem lies deeper than your occupation.

  114. In light of all of this... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

    Would it be safe to say that your former wife's next husband probably won't have a slashdot account?

  115. The big M by HyperVerbal · · Score: 1
    1.a son caught in the middle.

    See him as much as you can and be their for him no matter what.. you lost the marriage don't lose the son because of work.

    2.I believe my profession had a part in it.

    It was your choice to walk down that path so yeah your right but your still walking aren't you!!!

    3.For my graduate thesis I am writing a paper about Dads who work in the computer industry, divorce and custody.

    Post it here so we can comment on our thoughts on it first!!!

    4.I think our industry causes a high rate of divorce but I need some help from the Slashdot community.

    I think being a pimp is up their too.

    My questions are: How many of you computer Dads have also gone through divorce yep thats me!!!

    and have retained either half or full custody of your children? just legal not half (i got F*****)

    Do you think your job had something to do with it? NO it was all her wanting to party!!!

    What were some of your hardest challenges and are your kids happy? Having to see her every time when i pick up my son. My son is not happy because he has to DEAL with two parents apart... we as a society is fuc*** and aren't educated to have a family environment by default. I'm not into the bible etc its more than a book can give i feel.

    --
    Stan M. ~~~Verbal~~~
  116. The best gift you can give your child by with_him · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The best gift you can give your child is a stable family. Many people try to buy the happiness for/of their children. Others try to be their best friend. If you really want to help your kid out. Give them security in an insecure world. Model for your kids that life and relationships can be hard, but at the end of the day Dad and Mom are commited to each other and them "the kid(s)". Most of us will, like it or not, end up similar to our parents. How you treat your spouse becomes the norm and comfortable for them. Notice I am not saying the right way or even healthy, only what they are used to and most likely to reproduce. Later in life, despite all of our best efforts, we tend towards the relationships we see modeled around us. Words of wisdom that others have shared. 1+1=1 or 100%+100%=100% When you are fully devoted to building up your spouse and they are fully committed to building you up will both of your needs be met. The struggle should not be on "how do I get my needs met". If we could do that than there would be no reason to get married! From the personal experience, grace can carry you a long way and only when you are both working together do you achieve real happiness. If you want to help your Child, give them security and good model for their future relationships. Never fail to tell them you love them. While you may not like some of the things they do, you should always love them. Final thought before I step down from my soap box: Love is choice, lust or desire are feelings!

    1. Re:The best gift you can give your child by with_him · · Score: 0
      And seperately, I have found that a personal relationship with Jesus is the surest way to happiness. It is not an easy path or one for the meek. But there is nothing like it in this world. Some here may not agree, and that is their decision and I respect that.

      If you want to talk about this or hear more, let me know.

      The flaming of me and my person may now commence.

    2. Re:The best gift you can give your child by Marcos+Eliziario · · Score: 1

      I am not exactly a religous type, and I often get irritated with people trying to "convert" me. But at the same time, I feel that people should be free to express their beliefs. If someone strongly believes in God, I think that's reasonable for him/her to express his/her belief that having strong religious bonds are a good thing to improve familiar relationships.
      Why was Parent modded offtopic? Just because moderator doesn't agree with his/her instance? Looks like censorship to me.

      --
      Your ad could be here!
    3. Re:The best gift you can give your child by with_him · · Score: 0

      Thank you for your support. I would say that I didn't and still don't expect much beyond the moderation the comment recieved. That is part of why I posted it seperately. As your post suggests, I do believe that it is related. A better me make me a better daddy. I do believe that my faith and relationship with God help me and spur me on to do and be better.

      Once again thank you for your support.

    4. Re:The best gift you can give your child by rbowles · · Score: 1

      [funny] For simplicity, I've prepended statements with recommended mods in [brackets]

      Like the previous (religious) reply to the "parent post", I'm far from the most religious person in the world, but I've gotta make the [redundant] point that "offtopic" down-modding seems more like censorship than anything else.

      [offtopic] The reason is likely that modern day intellectuals (and the unrelated slashdotters) have a tendencty towards anti-religious fervor. Ironically, this "anti-fervor" more closely resembles a dopamine-laden religious opiate than many church goers. ([troll] huzzah for the anti-dogma-dogma!)

      [insightful] The "pro-god" parent post is likely more "on-topic" than most of the posts I've skimmed here (which covered offtopic issues ranging from welfare to race). It speaks of a correlation between religious beliefs and marital and/or life stability, which many studies support (google it yourself dammit). Its quite likely that had I not been so much of a heathen (or a lunatic), my personal contribution to the divorce rate would've been lower.

      --
      /* MAGIC THEATRE
      ENTRANCE NOT FOR EVERYBODY
      MADMEN ONLY */
  117. psych trap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would wager his thesis is not on this post at all, but using the topic to measure our responses to said post.

  118. Hans ? by jalet · · Score: 1

    Is that you ?

    --
    Votez ecolo : Chiez dans l'urne !
  119. Its because of Women psychology by unity100 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yes indeed.

    MOST women, almost ALL of them, in every nation of the world, have a tendency to see the universe around them as "part of their life".

    Its mostly about their dreams, their needs, their wants, the things that they deem important, things they think should be done or should not.

    It can be said to a degree that women live in "their-self" world, in which, the things in existence around are always seen as "part of" their inner world, self.

    In short, its "me", not in an overly selfish way, in fact a rather childish perception, but "me" again.

    Whereas men, because of the way our current civilization treats them, tends to understand the fact that there is a "me" and "the others" in the world, always. They are more aware that there are "other entitites" in the world, and they are apart from his self, and those other entities have their own agendas, feelings, plans, perceptions, and views.

    A short example - a man would think thrice before getting outta the car and yelling at some other car's driver, even he is extremely pissed of - the other guy can be a karate-expert, can be a psycho, can be district attorney, and even indeed, might be right to a degree - world is never black & white.

    Women on the other side, tend to behave like there are noone other than themselves while on traffic, even the traffic is an extension of their own selves' lives. Not somewhere filled with many other thinking and conscious entities, but a place they go to and back from work.

    This perception varies with income, the social situation in different countries, with education, and (though there are VERY few women in this situation) with a more developed soul, but overall in all over the world, the same generalization applies.

    This IT & computer thing is something that is closely tied to that matter.

    You might be going to work, doing hell lot of things there that your wife does not want you to do, but, overall, its ok - because you are doing this labor for betterment of the life you are a part of - her life - the baby, the family, the social position, income, amenities and so on. You, are a part of her life. And when you come home, you HAVE to continue being a part of her life, you will deal with stuff, you will watch tv, you will attend kids, eat dinner, listen to this or that and be told that you need to do this or that - all ok. In general, in house, your attentions and your concentration is always on something that is directly related to your wife, or something that she wants you to concentrate on.

    BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTtt

    There is a VERY big difference if you are in IT, or you are into games.

    Both computer games, and IT, are things that can totally get the concentration, creativity, and attention busy on them, your mind and social mind are totally busied and, what is more, satisfied, as their energy overage and desire to act on something is fulfilled.

    But, as in the very big but, this process generally totally engulfs your concentration - you are at that point totally taken off of the "self" life of your wife, or the parts that take place in it, and carried away to abstract or "virtual" concepts and environments. At that moment, you are no longer part of her life, because you are not interacting with any part of her life, or doing any benefit or enjoyment to any part of it.

    Just like cats get very annoyed with extreme attention you are paying the monitor and keyboard, and come and lay on the keyboard or mouse and try to take attention.

    If this trent continues, your wife, will increasingly see you negligent, as you are not concentrating on things that she deems important. Increasingly will she distance herself from you, if the attempts to forcibly get your attention back to what she sees as important via fights, emotional blackmail, social conscience blackmail, fails. Then, the divorce.

    Wo

    1. Re:Its because of Women psychology by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      If i had mod points, i would mod you double insightful.
      All you have said is absolutely true.
      I have the same issue at home.
      As a young father and married for 3 years, i see fights erupt often between us. She expects me to take her out often, i prefer the solitude and quiet of saturday and sunday after dealing with mind-numbing work. I also prefer to watch SG-Atlantis and BSG on weekends instead of American Idol she prefers.
      She expects me to be closer to her, i feel it is unnecessary since we end up fighting if we talk too much.
      Even movie-wise we are different. I prefer Superman Returns, Spiderman 2, or old TCM classics, she likes Am Idol, Sleepless in Seattle...

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    2. Re:Its because of Women psychology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God help the woman that gets saddled with your sorry ass.

    3. Re:Its because of Women psychology by BlueHog · · Score: 1

      Lots of geeks, normally male, suffer autistic like symptoms. The most commonly complained about skills with geeks is their lack of social and communication skills. Your examples in the above post illustrate your lack some of these important social skills. By the way they are not actually hard to learn if they don't come naturally. ALL women complain about how they get treated by their husbands but I've never heard a women whose husband looks after the children i.e. gets up in the night without complaining & tends to them if they are crying, complain about their husband in a nasty way. The most common complaint I've heard from women and one reason they want a divorce is when they have a baby or young children the husband doesn't understand that the kids take over your entire life, and continues to try and act in the way he did before. Yes you have work commitments but now you have a kid or two, so that means neither of you are getting much leisure time and sleep so grow up and deal with it.

    4. Re:Its because of Women psychology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like the spewage of some religion that genuinely sees women as lesser beings. Garbage in, garbage out, and we've still got a lot of sexist garbage going on in our culture, even when it isn't religion-driven. If people are consistently treated as if they're less capable, should be expected less of, and treated somewhat child-like, then that's how they'll turn out.

      Interstingly I see your point, about the self and me-world thing, but with opposite genders. Maybe because I am a female in IT, who interacts with many non-IT family and friends (including males, obviously.) :) Then I have been described as a spiritual and relatively non-materialistic person, so maybe you would say I am one of the exceptions that proves your rule. However, usually when I see others behave self-centered (both men and women! wow!) I tend to think that US society encourages that - to sell more crap that people don't need. Perhaps typical women get caught up in it more, though. But around here, its just as often to be me, the female, that wants to get some linux install working or get to a stopping point in a game, while a bored male interupts, reminding me that its time to go socialize (with him & his friends.)

    5. Re:Its because of Women psychology by learithe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "You, by now definitely thinking that this is a macho post ... and im laying all the blame on women."

      Why, yes I am. I can't believe a post saying, and I quote, "women are faulty" got an "insightful" score. Of course, I personally have witnessed plenty of male chauvinist attitudes on slashdot, so I suppose I shouldn't be surprised. But I'm still really damn offended.

      Sure, women have a biological drive to find a secure, loving home to raise children. Even if we choose not to raise a family, we still are wired to be in and part of a loving, caring environment. It's not a fault, it's a virtue that ensures the future of the human race. There is a plethora of evidence that children raised without affection, attention, and love develop all sorts of horrible emotional problems. If everyone had your attitude, 21st century or no, we'd be a race of miserable, disfunctional people. Yes, there are plenty of ways to connect and interact with people through technology -- but that doesn't change thousands of years of evolutionary pressure to want to be with someone in a physical sense.

      Besides, if you never "get out and do something", you'll quickly become obese, lethargic, and die of a heart attack at the age of 40. Who wants to be married to that?

    6. Re:Its because of Women psychology by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      That was very well put. I do like to get out and do things, but not for the sake of going out and doing things.

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    7. Re:Its because of Women psychology by unity100 · · Score: 1

      yes, you are an exception that not only included in my point, but proves it still.

      Your spouse is more "me-worldly" than yourself, apparently. which is generally the opposite in female population, they being more "me-worldly".

    8. Re:Its because of Women psychology by solanum · · Score: 1

      I'm late on this discussion, but I have to say. That is one of the worst posts I have read on Slashdot. I am staggered that a presumably educated person could come up with such sexist rubbish. "Women are faulty" says it all. I feel sorry for any female partner you may have.

      --
      Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.
  120. You got it backwards by deadline · · Score: 1

    I think you have it backwards. You are the Dad, be the Father. Relationships and parenting take work (playing house lasts a few months at best). You can be a victim and blame something/anything for your misery OR you could be hero and do the right things for you and child (and I don't mean going back with your wife). You kid does not care if you are in IT, he/she cares for you as a person.

    I would invite you to write something else than a victims thesis on "Dads who work in the computer industry, divorce and custody". How about "Why I can not be me in IT?" (here is a hint: it is not about the IT industry)

    If you want to wake up, be man, a father, a spouse, get initiated, then write your thesis, I bet it will take on a whole new meaning.

    And yes, I did have walked the walk.

    --
    HPC for Primates. Read Cluster Monkey
  121. Maybe it's not too late by big+dumb+dog · · Score: 1

    Try telling her that you only look at "those" websites because they have the best javascript.


    ...I'm only joking. Divorce is hard. Good luck.

    --
    "Seven years of college down the drain. Might as well join the f-ing Peace Corps." - John 'Bluto' Blutarsky
  122. You are what you eat, including at your wedding by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

    From yesterday's irish Times:

    A dietician addressed a large audience, saying the following: "The material we put into our stomachs should have killed most of us sitting here, years ago. Red meat is awful. Soft drinks erode your stomach lining. Chinese food is loaded with monosodium glutamate. Vegetables can be disastrous, and none of us realises the long-term harm caused by the germs in our drinking water.

    "But there is one thing that is the most dangerous of all and we all have, or will, eat it. Can anyone here tell me what food it is that causes the most grief and suffering for years after eating it?" An old man stood up and said: "Wedding cake."

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  123. Your question isn't good enough: by musther · · Score: 1
    'Do you think your job had something to do with it?' Is not specific enough to get you any meaningful data.

    Also, I suspect that a job in IT has nothing really to do with your chances at getting a divorce, at least not directly.

    As somebody said above, people who select a career in IT usually have low social skills, this is a well documented issue (and because it's not always true, the stereotype is also an issue).

    Of course it's possible that somebody working huge hours could neglect their family, and that could set them on the road to divorce, so maybe you should look for a correlation between hours worked and divorce rate. Also of course, people with IT jobs, for which they can easily work long hours, and often do so from home, may have a tendency to absorb themselves in their work to hide from the fact that their relationship is crashing down around them. Some people console and absorb themselves in alcohol, some with their PC.

  124. Graduate Thesis ??!!?? by Nick05 · · Score: 1

    This topic my friend is not a Computer Science Graduate thesis topic . This should be a thesis done by a student in FAMILY AND CONSUMER SCIENCES or FAMILY STUDIES. Anyways, all the best in finding a job !!!!!!!!!!!!!.

  125. Blizzard's IT by devv_null · · Score: 1

    I'm blaming Blizzard Entertainment's IT for my divorce. Damn that StarCraft! But seriously, I also work in the IT industry, am divorced and have shared custody of my son with my ex-wife. But as much as I might be tempted to blame my on-call rotation for diverting my attention from what should have been the most important things in life -- the failure in my marriage had nothing whatsoever to working in IT. Now if I had been working as a web developer for an adult web site, there might have been a stronger relationship between the divorce and my profession. I probably would have worked more from home too...at night...behind closed doors.

  126. Re:Since other aspects are sufficiently covered .. by chroot_james · · Score: 1

    once they've split you can feel his wife for him too!

    --
    Reality is nothing but a collective hunch.
  127. You are analyzing symptoms... by i3iz · · Score: 0

    I have been married for a long time and I do IT. You have to make decisions in life. Do you want to put your family before work or your work before your family? The computer/internet easily allows for workaholism. Computers that require 24-7 on-call duty allow for workaholism. This is like saying, drinking alcohol causes divorce, because i drink alcohol in excess and I am getting a divorce. If you put alcohol before your family, then this will lead to division, alcohol itself is not necessarily the cause of division. In fact, in many cases it promotes comradery and relationships. It is the addictive/compulsive personality that takes this tool and uses it in a foul manner. Workaholism is also usually rationalized by "care" for the family. with statements like, "I am just trying to provide a 'Good' home for them" or "I really need to 'meet' their 'needs'." These workaholics usually have a driven personality. They want the accolades of the friends, neighbors and co-workers more than they want to spend time loving and nurturing their family. If i was doing a survey i would ask about income in relation to living expenses. If i make 80K/year i can support a 2 child family in South Orange County. I live in South Orange County CA. You may not have a 3 bedroom home that you own, but you can support the needs of your family. However, if you have a mortgage, 2 new luxury cars, eat out a lot, and are constantly spending, maxing out your CC's with wants and not needs, then you will need more like 200k/yr. What is more important? A BMW or time with your kids? If you didnt have time to spend relating to your family when you were married, what makes you think it will change when you get a divorce. Your priorities are Bass Ackwards and now you want custody of the kids so you can train them to be like you? If i was the court, i wouldnt give it to you. You dont even see the error of your ways. Reconcile your marriage, change your job. make some life changing decisions instead of looking for something to blame. It doesnt take a graduate thesis to see that.

  128. Can we hear from her? by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you're going to blame this on your career and you're asking slashdot. Why don't you lay out exactly why the relationship failed and then get her to post her side of it. It would be good input for your thesis. In the meantime, I'm going to make some popcorn.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  129. "Life is a 100% terminal STD" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is generally the funnier way to put it.

  130. IT and Divorce? It is my experience. by PhreeStyle · · Score: 1

    I feel that my line of work highly exacerbated issues in my marriage that would not have otherwise ended in divorce. I don't "blame" my job - I like what I do; however, the 'dot bomb' and 'outsourcing' effected my ability to provide for my family for a certain period of time. My x-wife was highly traumatized by this; to this day she says that I never provided for her and my step son and that I did not work - when in fact I was unemployed a total of 18 months in a 12 year period, and during many of those months I made money consulting. Clearly the amount of 'change' that goes on in the technology field did not allow my x-wife to feel secure with my ability to provide and I am certain that this was the instantiation of the failure of an otherwise good relationship. I have to be honest, I am getting to the point that I am no longer willing to trade my "happiness" for the financial rewards that this field of work has provided for me. I lost a somebody very important to me. and while I believe everything happens for a reason and I have since fallen in love with somebody new, somebody who brings me happiness I did ever expect to find in my life - somebody I am not willing to sacrifice on the altar of my job. I know many other consultants that are on their 3rd relationship/wife as well. I have to tell you that the travel is really difficult on a relationship as well. I swore I would never be one of 'those' guys - and now I am one. Go figure.

    1. Re:IT and Divorce? It is my experience. by MrJerryNormandinSir · · Score: 1

      It takes two to make a relationship work. I've been lucky. I married a "Saint" I guess.
      If your wife had patience and understanding you would have made it ok.
      I've been heading off the Indians at the pass too. I was a Sr. Systems Engineer at Welchs, I really liked that job. But when they asked me to train the remote India team regarding the code I wrote.. hell thats where I draw the line. I put it off for 6 months, I made more excuses than that excuse scene in the original "Blue Brothers".. you know when the former girlfriend had an M16 to John Belushi's head. Anyay, you know how it works. I volunteer for "some" after hours stuff, but not everything. You've got to balance time.
      As far as "hard times" go. Sure I've been through that as well. Heck, wasn't something about that mentioned in the wedding voes, in sickness and in health, during the good times and the bad ...
      Well it sounds like your girl couldn't commit twice. So don't beat yourself up for it.

    2. Re:IT and Divorce? It is my experience. by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      If your wife had patience and understanding you would have made it ok.

      That's really the problem. People get into relationships without really understanding the life or needs of the other. I'm not necessarily blaming the wife here. It's possible the guy misrepresented what he was willing to offer the wife, and she rightfully felt betrayed when he couldn't provide it. However, I think women need to understand that "good provider" often means "works a lot and may not always be there for your every whim".

      It really amazes me how some women want their cake and to eat it too. They want a man who's always around, attentive, family man who spends all his time with the family, but they also want a nice home, money to go shopping with, lots of expensive food to go around, etc...

      Now, I'm not saying that men aren't equally hypocritical. They want a wife who looks perfect (despite having born several children), young, keeps a nice house, puts dinner on the table when he gets home, attentive to their needs (when they want them to be), but puts their children first, and maybe even works a full time job.

      Both are unreasonable, and I think marriages would last a lot longer if people could understand their partner more.

    3. Re:IT and Divorce? It is my experience. by Javaman59 · · Score: 1
      It really amazes me how some women want their cake and to eat it too. They want a man who's always around, attentive, family man who spends all his time with the family, but they also want a nice home, money to go shopping with, lots of expensive food to go around, etc...
      You are so right! I've seen so many marriages, including my own, suffer from the wife who wants it all. When she's looking for a spouse, she wants someone who's "straight", as in: dependable, hard working, has a promising career. A guy with a low income, in a low stress job, and lots of free time isn't going to do well with most women. But once she's got her spuse, and provider for the family, the woman wants him to available, practically and emotionally, for her, most of the time. ie. she wants the guy with the low stress job, and lots of free time. But she stil wants the high income.

      When I was being torn apart by the conflicting demands of earning the big $, and spending time with my (ex) wife and kids, I sometimes discussed with her the option of cutting back on spending, so that I could take a lower paid job. No nada! forget that! but, oh btw, you are still required to be a more attentive husband and father. (and, I want that holiday in Europe)
      --
      I'm a software visionary. I don't code.
  131. NICE POST! by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

    NICE POST!

    Obligatory "If I had mod points..."
    Two very good points.

    My old CS program made us take a few comunications classes so that we could be successful when dealing with people as well as computers. (it was more of a relationship course though... 8')

    Secondly Corelation is != to cause.

    person 1 plays ut

    person 2 plays quake

    Person 2 shot up a highschool

    Therefore that means that person who plays quake shoots highschools.

    I think not.

    --
    How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
  132. Crawlin outta the woodworks by AaronDunlap · · Score: 1
    I love this thread... members falling over themselves offering up their relationship wisdom. Happily married, 2 kids... divorced from a great gal... bla bla bla.

    You just don't want to admit that your neighbor Jerry the auto-mechanic is banging your wife, & they are running around your house, wearing your underwear on their heads & laughing about your shortcomings.

    Now... back to CounterStrike...

    --
    Relax... You're soaking in it." -Madge
  133. a titanic issue by mschuyler · · Score: 1

    Asking slashdot readers this question is like hiring the captain of the Titanic to head up your water safety program.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  134. Unwarranted Advice by Jugo · · Score: 1

    Here are the wonderful gems of advice from the wonderful posters who don't know anything about you or your marriage but decided that they know enough to advise you on your current situation. do some soul searching don't put your children second don't put your spouse second work no more than 45 hrs/week don't watch pr0n or play Warcraft you're just plain SOL because you have poor social skills you whine too much As for me, I have no advice, but in regards to your post I'd say that working a lot of extra hours can make your spouse feel unloved and unwanted. Letting them know that they are loved and finding time to prove it of the utmost importance.

    1. Re:Unwarranted Advice by AaronDunlap · · Score: 1

      "As for me, I have no advice..." ummm "...put your children second don't put your spouse second..." What's that?

      --
      Relax... You're soaking in it." -Madge
  135. Are you sure it's not the booze and caffeine? by ev1lg · · Score: 1

    Ever since I wrote my first line of code, I seem to find less days sober or proper sleeping nights.

    All jest aside, I comiserate. Multiple attempts at starting my own firm, working with other firms or consulting all took tons of time. I think this to be true in any profession though. Any time you strive for higher income, higher requirements are set of you (although, somehow the highest paid people I know or know of don't seem to work - I'll keep on researching that and will let /. know if anything else is conclusive).

    BUT (here it is... along the lines of "I can implemenent that, but you'll need to fulfill this hardware specification"), here is the catch: any relationship is also work. The rewards are different.

    Maybe you need to revisit this once you are able to juggle an IT job and retain a successful relationship, where both you and your partner (and potential offspring) are content.

    Again, it's work.

  136. Not a dad, but married 23 years, in IT for 20 by bearl · · Score: 1

    I'm not a dad, but I've been happily married for 23 years, while in the IT industry for 20.

    I personally feel the fact I'm NOT a dad contributed to the happy marriage, but that's just me. YMMV.

  137. What about computer moms? by jfruhlinger · · Score: 1

    Their input is considered irrelevant, apparently.

  138. Workaholism and Social Skills by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

    (I'm married, happily, with no kids yet.)

    The #1 reason for divorce has to be overwork. Anyone who's been in the IT world long enough, unless they're very lucky, has worked in one or more jobs that have lousy working hours. Either you're on call 24/7, or projects you're working on are in constant crunch mode. Plus, they never seem to hire enough people to get the volume of work done at the speed they want. If I were a spouse, especially if I had never worked in a job like this, I would probably be pissed after a while. If the other partner isn't available to help with the house stuff, raise the kids, etc. then I don't blame them for divorce.

    It's not just IT, but IT jobs tend to require long hours. I've promised myself that I'm going to keep a sane home life, even if I have to accept a lower rate of pay. Here's a wierd example: the company I work at tends to pay on the average side for IT work. Especially on the lowest rung, people could do a lot better somewhere else. This is especially true for our area...banks, brokerages, entertainment companies and law firms routinely pay very high IT salaries. The only problem is that you usually also sign up for the long work hours and lousy work conditions. However, their higher pay means that we have a harder time attracting talent. The flip side is that most of us work a very reasonable schedule.

    If you want a non-IT example, just fly on a US airline on a Monday or Friday. You'll see young, unattached consultants who don't mind doing long hours because they've got nothing to come home to. You'll also see overworked executive types who look miserable and haven't seen their families all week. I can't imagine their spouses are all too happy. Just look around at the guy/girl with the discheveled look, loosened tie, and pissed-off expression.

    The #2 reason for divorces, I think, tends to be social. I really think a lot of people just fall into marriage, even if they can't stand each other on the inside. Also, it sounds like stereotyping, but the truly great IT people tend to have social problems. It may sound unfair, but our profession is attractive to introverts the same way sales is attractive to extroverts. Some problems are mild (inappropriate humor, difficulty in social situations) and some severe (total withdrawal into work or hobbies, addiction to stuff like Warcraft.) When you pair a geek with a non-geek, you're going to have problems. IT people like to talk about their work too much; I've had to consciously avoid this at home. Even though the wife is smart (works in a different field of geekery,) she could care less about the minutae of my work.

    Think of this example. I worked with a guy a few years ago who wound up getting divorced. He was a computer geek, and she obviously wasn't super-bright. I'd overhear phone conversations where she'd ask him questions, and he'd yell at her for not knowing how to handle whatever it was. Whenever he'd get off the phone, I'd hear, "She's so f**king stupid!" Talk about the exact not-right thing to say to someone.

  139. Well, you know... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    IT professionals are special.

    Just like everybody else.

    -rick

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  140. Any Evidence IT People Work More Hours? by carpeweb · · Score: 1

    Has anyone seen credible research that shows IT people work longer hours than non-IT people? I would readily believe that people who work for systems integrators, etc., work longer hours, but I think that's true of all consulting, whether it's IT or something else. I've worked in consulting for business strategy, for financial services and for IT services, and the hours seemed pretty similar to me. I've also worked in corporate IT as well as other corporate departments, and the corporate hours (IT or otherwise) also seemed pretty similar to me -- and a lot lower than the hours in consulting. In-house lawyers don't bill the same kinds of hours as attorneys at corporate law firms, as another example.

    Admittedly, this is without much real evidence (which doesn't seem to have bothered the hundreds of prior posters), but maybe the organizational environment is a much bigger factor than IT.

    Oh. And a lot of that other, non-work stuff.

  141. you're in IT, and... by eosp · · Score: 1

    you were married at any point in your life?

  142. One angle hasn't been mentioned yet by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

    frank_tudor says:
    I am graduate student
    I work as a web developer
    I am married
    I have a child

    That's his problem right there.
    Choose three.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:One angle hasn't been mentioned yet by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Choose 3?

      More like choose 2 ... or 1.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    2. Re:One angle hasn't been mentioned yet by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      Choose three.

      Not without a Cowboy Neal option.

  143. As with any research by joeflies · · Score: 1

    make sure you don't equate a symptom with causality. For instance, even if you do discover there is a higher rate of divorce in IT, it doesn't mean the job did it. It could be that the right applicant for the job leads to a skewed population, of which certain traits leave them prone towards divorce.

  144. Silly Question by SiO2 · · Score: 1

    What were some of your hardest challenges and are your kids happy?

    Is my kid happy? He's a teenager. Of course he's not happy. ; )

    My ex and I divorced when our son was three. He's very happy and well-adjusted. Of course, his mother and I have tried to maintain an amicable relationship since our divorce. That probably helped quite a bit.

    I'm reasonably certain your job in IT isn't the sole reason for your divorce, sorry to say. It might have played a minor role, though. Regardless, at least in my situtaion I don't have to worry about that. When I remarried, I married a geek girl! While they are a rare breed, geek girls can be found in the wild.

    Actually. That raises a poll within a poll in my mind. Are other IT geek slahdotters married to IT geeks as well? If so, what's been your experience? A lot of women would get upset with all the geekiness I get into (My last GF sure did. Yikes!), by my wife understands and takes an interest. I think it's also been very good that we can talk about our jobs and totally understand each other. We even help each other out with tech support. I feel sorry, though, for the people at the tables next to us in restaurants. If they catch any of our conversations, they have to be scared. ; )

    SiO2

  145. IT doesn't cause divorce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    being an introverted control freak does, however.

  146. My I.T. career path paid a part... by Dreben · · Score: 1

    ...but was certainly not the only factor in my divorce. That probably goes without saying, but it might be helpful to those mocking to understand and take note of other's experiences. If one doesn't know how to leave the stressors at the keyboard, (and anyone that's been working in I.T. long enough for at least a few different employers), knows that stressors are many, unique, often beyond your control. Come to think of it, probably one of the most critical professional development classes someone in I.T. should be required to take is stress and/or anger management. Exercise helps, or if that's is not for you, learn to drink responsibly and buy a bus pass.

    I can't count the unrealistic projects I've been assigned to and had employment tied to their delivery. Often times that implies its necessary to bring work home, pounding keys into the wee hours of morning, heading back to the cubicle at the crack of dawn. How many projects have the wrong developers (wrong skillset), incompetent managers lacking foresite or essential knowledge, lack of hardware for development (including versioning), testing and deployment, unrealistic delivery schedules? How many projects are underfunded? How many contract system integrators are stuck between two or more vendors unwilling to disclose integration aspects of their application interfaces?

    Ever worked on a project where the employer just bought every RUP product ever made, no clue how to use any of them, demanding every document/diagram in the RUP arsenal goes through three revisions before coding a line? Maybe the manager (i.e., recently demoted executive, marketing 'genius' brought in from some other industry) sold management that HIS whip would be the most effective at motivating skeleton crew of Serenity-type misfits to pound out some pie-in-the-sky?

    Finally, the economy of late, in particular for software developers, (at least in the western hemisphere), hasn't really been ideal to allow us each to shop for the perfect fit/employer. The notion that a Perl scripter can somehow transform themselves overnight into the a .NET guru because their resume says "software engineer," runs rampant at the executive level. Or perhaps your project got reassigned overnight by the Business Development group after they cut a new marketing relationship with M$ yesterday to "save a ton of money" (swampland in S. Florida anyone?)

    There are so many stressors. You HAVE to learn to leave the problems at the keyboard IN YOUR CUBE. If you chose to sit at a keyboard when not at work, that's your time to kill some monsters, cast a spell, download some pr0n, yada. I don't give a shit whether they just bought you a new Dell XPS laptop or not (wise to not download the pr0n there)! They're gonna make you give it back.

    Ultimately, my unavailability to my family lead to the stressors in my relationship and ultimately to my marriages' demise. Anyone choosing to mock this reality, call me when you need a good divorce attorney. Plan on it costing you at least a years salary just to pay them, but don't plan on walking away with your house, since the courts will see your "earning potential" overshadows that of your partner's.

  147. Sysadmin and Teacher together forever... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
    I'm a Sysadmin/Programmer and she was an English teacher. We were together for 20 years (married for 16 years and 3 weeks) until she died in January 2006. Our careers are/were important, but never as important as the other or our relationship.

    There was 19 years difference in our ages (I'm younger), and we were always at different places in our careers; we met in 1985 when I was 22 and still in college. Making a deliberate choice to always put the relationship first and deciding then and there to stick by that choice, made things a lot clearer down the road.

    As for work, we always supported each other and I helped her with school work as much as I could -- creating forms, flyers, databases... I understood when she had to sometimes grade papers all weekend and she understood when I got paged at 10pm and had to work all night.

    You can always find another job, but the love of your life comes around only once. Though we didn't have children, I would include them in this sentiment if we had.

    Unless there's something wrong with or abusive about one or both, I believe that people stay together because they want to. People come up with various excuses like "we drifted apart", "I wanted something different", etc... but I believe it comes back to not wanting and/or caring enough to work things out and stay together.

    Remember Sue...

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  148. I'm not convinced.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You always have control over your life. If you wanted to work less hours, you could've told the boss to sit on it or go to another job. I don't think you prioritized things correctly. When it comes to morals, I strongly believe to each his own, so I'm not going to tell you should put your marriage frist or shouldn't. but if you're wondering if your job is related to you getting a divorce, I'd have to say that if you really wanted to save your marriage, you would've put the time into it.

    Maybe she left you because you wouldn't stand up and say "no, I'm not working 5-9 instead of 9-5". I'm not some dumbass macho-type, but at the same time, you gotta stick up for your own. Some things are more important than ass-kissing and making a boatload of money.

  149. divorce rates by recharged95 · · Score: 1
    "I think our industry causes a high rate of divorce"

    You're mistaken. Just look at the law industry, rates are 10x higher...

  150. You can't argue with Logic by Evets · · Score: 1

    I can certainly blame my career for problems I've had with my wife, but that makes it a little too easy doesn't it? In the end, every aspect of my career that has affected my home life is the result of a decision I've made. Most of those decisions could be changed on a day in and day out basis. I would think that most IT guys have enough of a logical mindset to understand that jobs don't hurt marriages, people do.

    As far as kids and custody goes, I don't really have any info to comment with. The people in my social circle that are divorced don't have kids.

    But as far as kids and happiness through divorce goes - rare is the situation where a child is happy once their parents are divorced. The child can move on and grow up to live a normal life, but there will be permanent mental scarring and more than likely some personality quirks to go with it.

    Before getting divorced you really have to ask yourself - Is this so important that I should permanently scar my children? Is this so important that I should risk losing my children? There are scenarios that exist where the right answer is yes. There are many more where the right answer is no.

  151. Yes, of course IT is a factor by wumingzi · · Score: 1

    I work as the alpha IT geek in a female-heavy office. The women are always appreciative and thankful when I fix their systems and software problems.

    Then trouble sets in.

    Because of female nurturing tendencies, they feel guilty that I'm always helping them, and they're not doing anything for me. Everyone knows I'm commuting and don't get a lot of home cooking when I'm on site.

    "Would you like to join my friends and I for dinner?"

    "Yes, of course."

    One thing leads to another. One day my wife does a surprise visit to my commuter pad in Vancouver and finds the entire bedroom filled with shaving cream, riding crops, toys with knobs and bumps in improbable places, an administrative assistant and a data analyst.

    I'm not sure which made her more upset. My infidelity, or the fact that the place is a disaster and she KNOWS it won't get cleaned up unless she does it.

    I am now divorced and lost a beautifully restored turn-of-the-century house in Seattle and the chance to see my two children growing up. I manage to barely function at my job while I go to my dark and dirty commuter pad and huff lighter fluid every night. Worse, I get daggers from the AA and the DA every time I walk the halls.

    OK. That was pretty silly. The reality is more succinct.

    Keeping a relationship together requires time with your spouse. It is very easy to get sucked into work, come home late, and let home stuff slide.

    One part of that cock-and-bull story is true: I do commute. However little time you spent with your spouse, I spend less. I promise. The secret is to structure your time. When I'm home, that time is spent with family doing family-related stuff. Not that we don't go shopping or do projects or whatnot, but you keep everyone involved and make sure you're spending time together. If you go to the back room, blob out, and play WoW by yourself, you are doomed.

    Another important thing is if you are really going nuts at work, set a time limit on how long that's going to happen. Say "All right. The product ships 1st December. 1st of January, we're going to close it down and spend two weeks in Italy," (You don't have to go to Italy if you don't want to. Go to Vegas. It's all good). This way, if your spouse is feeling alone or neglected, he/she can say "This too will pass. Five more months, and we'll have a normal life." Having an endpoint his helpful and gets you through points where you might otherwise despair.

    Finally, if you find you'd rather be at work than with your spouse, there are some other issues going on. At that point, I'd advise either some really serious soul-searching or professional help.

  152. IT did not cause your problems by Tod+DeBie · · Score: 1

    I don't see that IT works people harder than other groups in general. If your specific department worked you very hard or if you are a workaholic and either way did not spend the time that you needed too with your family and that led to your divorce, that is your problem. I am sure the warning signs were there long ago, you should have stopped working so much, found another job or whatever. In any case, IT did not cause your problems.

  153. The problem is the women by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 0, Troll
    The problem really is the women.

    They want their prince charming to bring them money so they can spend, but in order to earn, you have to work.

    Ladies, you can't have your cake and eat it at the same time, so if what you want is a warm body, get yourself a gigolo. But just make sure he's out of the way when hubby comes home and wants to pork you or wants a blowjob, and, by all means, give him the blowjob. After all, he's the one who pays the bills.

  154. You need to set priorities! married 21 years! by MrJerryNormandinSir · · Score: 1

    I'm in IT. So far my wife and I have been married for 21 years and I've been with the same girl for 23 years. The trick is you've got to set your priorities. Remember 1:family 2:health 3:job. Do the laundry every now and then, load and unload the dishwasher every now and then, fire up the grill and cook supper every now and then. It has it's paybacks! BTW, I was 22 years old when I got married.

    1. Re:You need to set priorities! married 21 years! by Lxy · · Score: 1

      So far my wife and I have been married for 21 years and I've been with the same girl for 23 years

      That's odd, does your wife know about her?

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
  155. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I understand better now than before:
    * Be honest
    * Be present
    * Be connected
    * Get out early, if that's what needs to happen.

  156. I'm one by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    I'm just going through a divorce and have an 18th month old son.
    Although originally from England, I now live in the US. Unlike Europe where they're used to the idea of 50/50, at least here in Arizona if you're male the system is against you.

    According to my attorney, You have no chance of getting 50/50 actual time with your kids if they're younger than about 5 no matter how good a father you've been.

    The other big difference between Europe and US that is also a factor in divorces, is that most US companies treat developers like they own your life. Companies here in the US seem to think its fair to expect/demand developers to work ongoing 60 hours+ weeks but not pay for that time, just by saying you're salaried. If you only want to do the hours a week that your terms of employment state then the majority of comapnies here think you're a bad employee. That really screws up your family life too.

  157. You might be right... by hamman359 · · Score: 1

    My wife's ex-husband is in IT and after reading your thesis idea, I now think that the fact that he works in IT was the real reason they got divorced. She claims that it was because he's an alcoholic, a drug addict, had become abusive, had at least 10 affairs that she now knows about, sexually assaulted a teenage girl and was in general a huge SOB. But your probably right that the fact that he works in IT was a big part of their marriage falling apart.

  158. Things can be tough, but you have to deal... by smithbp · · Score: 1

    I currently work as a SysAdmin. The job is a good distance from my home, like upwards of two hours. When I applied for the job, the main goal was to be able to move closer to family and friends and the job. I have been working for this company for about a month and during that time I have been staying at my parents house with my 3 month old son Tuesday through Thursday nights and going home on weekends and Monday nights. After reading all of this, my outlook has completely changed. My wife and I had an argument last night about a subject that is directly related to the situation that we are in. She states that I am unable to finish projects that I start around the house because of my previous schedule and our current living situation. I know that it is because I am a bum when I get home and just want to relax, but I also know that if I don't take action I could lose my wife. Children change the equation significantly in a marriage and life in general. My son is my life, second only to my wife. It is for him that I took this job, to be able to provide better for both he and his mother. It is tough to balance the time away and time together in the current situation, but it is an extremely important part of life. Just because you can't balance things out and get along on your wife, you can't blame that on your profession, no matter how much you want to.

  159. From my perspective... by DamienMcKenna · · Score: 1

    .. blaming your job for your marriage falling apart is like saying you leg fell off because your pants were blue.

    I married rather young (22), have been addicted to all things geekly since a kid and have ruined many friendships from this. I have a tendency to get attached to all the blinking lights, the hum, etc, to get obsessed over the latest thing to pass my way (gadgets, TV shows, music, etc), and there have been various points in my life when my addicted & sociopathic tendencies almost ruined my life. I'm just lucky to be married to a wonderful woman who knows there's good in there somewhere and has been willing to fight through it for eight years.

    Three years ago we had our first child and in march we're expecting our second, and right now I'm working 9-6 and have a side job to pay off our quite massive quantity of debt (a good deal of which is there because of said addiction). Needless to say this has been difficult few months but we're trying to work through it, to as much time together as we can around the work.

    Working so much means that you miss out on the only thing in life that means a damn: the person who at one point in time believed that you were a good enough friend, confidant, play mate, lover, etc, to want to spend the rest of their life with. My wife has put up with a lot over the years and at times I wonder why she sticks with me, but if it were to fall apart I'd have no misunderstanding that it was *me* who caused the problems.

    As for putting the children first: horsecrap. Children first and foremost need a stable family to grow up in, if the parents/couple are always arguing, or if one is never there, etc, then there's no stability for them to feel safe with. So put the children second, they need to see you and your spouse enjoying each other's company, being loving with each other.

    You see, it takes two to tango, and if one is "too busy" then ... you know the rest.

  160. Raises hand by weiserfireman · · Score: 1
    I have been in IT in one shape or another for 16 years. I have been divorced for 7 years, was married for 3 years. I have 50/50 custody of my 9yo son. My ex- blaims IT. To this day she still says "you spent too much time on computers". To be honest, the last year of our marriage, I spent way too much time on the computer. By then I wasn't happy and was tired of dealing with her weirdness. I used computers to avoid fighting with her. If she hadn't filed for divorce, we would still be married and miserable.

    To this day she still whines that 50/50 gives me too much contact with my son and how she doesn't get to spend enough time with him. She's taken me to court 4 times in 6 years. All she has to show for it is a conviction for criminal contempt of court. She blaims me for that too.

    No it wasn't IT's fault. Divorce is a people problem.

  161. Look at it from the kids point of view by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

    I've worked in IT since 1993. I got married in 1999, and it has been a real tough job keeping the marriage going good. We have no children, and aren't sure if we ever will. As others have said, you must work at it constantly. Communication is the key.

    Both my wife and I are children of divorce, as I'm sure many on /. are. Do any of you remember what it was like to see your parents go through it and all of the other "fun stuff" that children of divorce must deal with. The affects of divorce on children cause many of our society's current social ills.

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  162. You need the |D I4 [] |\| Browser ^tm by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

    Basically it is imune to ISTD's, clears cache upon exit/alt-tab or custom hotkey, erases history upon exit/alt-tab or custom hotkey, clears completed forms exit/alt-tab or custom hotkey ...

    it's sweet, want a copy? only 25k!

    --
    How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
  163. I doubt it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really doubt your profession had anything to do with it. It may not be time to give up yet, though, Frank. If you are interested, there is lots of scientific research about how to make a happy marriage or long term relationship. If you want to geek out on the topic of divorce, geek out by looking into how to avoid them -- possibly this one, definitely any future ones. If you have a kid with this woman, you can't really divorce her anyway. You can divorce her legally, but your kid will always force you to have interaction with her, consider her when making major life decisions, and so on. You can begin the geeking out by listening to the 3/26/04 episode of This American Life. http://www.thisamericanlife.org/ You might also check out the book Divorce Busters by Michelle Weiner Davis, which is based on many of the ideas that reasearcher talked about, and actually saved the marriage of a couple I know -- the gentleman had already moved out in this case. They've been back together for a couple of years now. (That book is actually good for anyone -- even if you're not on the brink of divorce, and even if you're not actually allowed by the stupid government to get legally married. I wish it had a less scary title so I could give copies to people as a wedding/commitment ceremony gift.) Good luck, Frank.

  164. Case Study by Khammurabi · · Score: 1
    People who self-select a career in information technology tend to have poor social skills.
    Hell, I think all the responses we just gave to the OP just proved that fact. The OP should just switch his thesis topic and make the content I see here the core of his new argument, "Inept Social Skills: The Slashdot Effect".

    While the OP should really be seeking a professional to talk to, I can't imagine tactless responses like "You dumb f#$!, it's your own d!@# fault," are too helpful to him at all. The man asked for constructive criticism and thoughtful responses, and the majority of what he got was outright bashing.

    I usually respect what people have to say here on Slashdot. But DAMN, people. I'm ashamed to even post among you people today. If you can't say something nice to a person who's world is being torn apart, shut the hell up. The man needs helpful advice, not criticism.
  165. Stats about divorce rates of Blackberry users? by poopie · · Score: 1

    I used to work too much, then my wife (non-techie) was forced to get a blackberry. Before, she worked 7-8 hours a day. Now she works 24 hours a day. So, she got a few raises, but she works at least twice as much. I call that a massive pay cut.

    Seriously, my wife's behavior with the blackberry has made me change so I don't work at all at home anymore, and I bitch at her all the time about not being able to separate her work from our personal lives.

    I've actually suggested marriage counseling to help us deal with her blackberry.

    Someday, I'm going to smash that F'ing blackberry with a sledgehammer.

    NOTE TO GEEKS: Turn off your f'ing blackberry and pay attention to your family!

  166. My take by value_added · · Score: 1

    How many of you computer Dads have also gone through divorce and have retained either half or full custody of your children?

    Not me. The woman "typically" and "traditionally" (euphemisms for reverse sexism) gets custody. If she doesn't agree to share, you get to litigate the arrangement. On your dime, of course. I've known a dozen or so fathers who spent years doing just that, and ended up with an acrimonious state of affairs and token visitation rights the nature and timing of which were repeatedly subject to the varying whims of the mother), and incurred debt in the low to mid six figures.

    I opted to pass on the custody fight as I had lost the child support battle and already owed an amount in the low six figures that I couldn't afford. I wasn't about to put the kids through a custody fight.

    Do you think your job had something to do with it?

    It usually does, but the nature of the job is irrelevant. I'm a guy. Most any guy (unless he's a florist) is susceptible to the notion that his job (obligation) is to work hard and provide for the wifey and kids. That single minded devotion applies to someone trying to write the next best seller, a business man trying to make money or gain power, or a lowly programmer. I was brought up that way, but the instinct goes deeper than one's culture or upbringing.

    The female of the species, on the other hand, may be impressed by ambition, money or success during the courtship ritual, but soon dismisses such attributes in her mate. She expects and demands his time and his attention. If he's killing himself to make lots of money to buy the big house, build for the future, yada yada, he shouldn't expect thanks, gratitude or even recognition, but should instead expect a growing resentment over time and effort spent elsewhere.

    You can't have it both ways. That's one fact of life that applies equally to both sexes. Once upon a time it was possible, perhaps, but today people divorce readily.

    What were some of your hardest challenges and are your kids happy?

    The hardest challenge for me was regaining my faith in humankind. Women have an amazing talent for evil behaviour. And the kids? They resent me. I wasn't there for them, was I?

  167. Maybe by hilltx · · Score: 1

    I work in the I.T. business also and so did my now ex wife. We have a 8 yrs old daughter and she a 13 yrs old son. When we first got together she wasn't in the industry and when she approached me on the opportunity to do so as a consultant I warned her that this was not a family oriented business. I worked an enormous amount of hours and when she started her new job she was traveling some but the time away began to grow and eventually took a toll on our marriage. My opinion is that it might not be the industry that led to your breakup but the management principles in place at your job. High stress and long hours certainly exist at a number of I.T. shops but I believe that they are found in other industries also. I hope I'm wrong in saying this but it would be more correct to say that the culture of the I.T. business seems to thrive on the long hours and stress as a kind of 'badge of courage'. I wonder what the overall divorce rate is in our industry and how it correlates to other industries that are also high stress. Maybe like an air traffic controller or police man, or now days a soldier.

    --
    The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving,
  168. Family First by Canis+Lupus · · Score: 1

    "Whatever you are doing, it is not more important than your family," that is what my reminder to go home says. Sometimes, we all need a reminder. If your employer does not agree, fuck 'em!

    --
    The real silver bullet to good programs is caffeine; lots and lots of caffeine! *twitch, twitch*
  169. Help yourself... by rs25com · · Score: 1

    I've been in IT for 20 something years now, and have one divorce to my credit. After that divorce, however, I found out that it was pretty much all my fault. A friend suggested I get some advice from www.DocLove.com and www.askmen.com/dating/doclove. I actually paid $99 for his book (when you can easily buy it used on eBay for half that price, or less) and it made a huge difference in my life.

    Before reading his book, I was pretty much a man with no standards, no self respect, no self control, and was, in a word, boring. I thought the mark of a good relationship was avoiding fights, when in fact the mark is being able to effectively deal with the underlying problems that cause fights.

    Now nearly 8 years later I am engaged to the most wonderful, honest, loyal, flexible, and plain *fun* woman I have ever met. I've even started giving advice to friends, who keep trying to convince me to start a business around giving guys advice.

    My view is quite simply most men have the relationship skills of a 12 year old. They treat their wives/women like their mothers, and expect her to take care of them. Fact of the matter is that you have to be somewhat of a leader, a decision maker, and you have to provide your wife and family with quality time. "Quality" being the keyword there, not so much "time" as so many men would like to think. I am always amazed to hear of guys who spend 8 hours working, then 4-6 hours playing computer games or surfing the 'net when they get home, and then they wonder why their woman left them.

    Likely, in my opinion, if your woman cheats or leaves, it was because of something you lacked. The *trick* is to LEARN FROM YOUR MISTAKES, something so few men do. :(

    I do give out advice on a forum nowadays, but I'll be hard pressed to get slashdotted!

  170. Obligatory by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

    If I had mod points.... + insightful

    --
    How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
  171. You Sir by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 1

    Are a coward!

    Divorce when only the man and woman are involved is OK...No harm no foul. You involve a child in that marriage -- and then choose divorce on the grounds that "you work to much at your job" is a stupid excuse. (How will things be better for your child when you are divorced and spend time with him even less?)

    You are not only divorcing your wife -- you are divorcing your child to. Don't try to spin it and blame it on your job. Money is king -- if you were working 30 hrs. a week for minimum wage turning burgers would your marriage be better? I don't think so....

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
    1. Re:You Sir by MKalus · · Score: 1

      To stay together for the kids is the most stupidest thing you can do. Also who says HE initiated the divorce? It isn't clear who "wanted out".

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
  172. My story.. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "True" love in high school. We were both going to do college and then have kids.

    She took one semester- said "THIS SUCKS" and went to work full time.

    When I was three years into college she decided, "We need kids now. You need to quit college and work two or three jobs like my brother-inlaw does for my sister." Then she unilaterally decided to have kid (Found that out years later in a tearful confession).

    Was she a bad person- really probably no worse than average.

    Were we both STUPID for getting married so young? YES.

    College takes a LOT of work and is completely unforgiving. If you miss a test- that's it, change schools or just quit because otherwise that is going to be on your GPA 11 years later. If you truly understand that, you can see the conflict when you are studying and she throws a hissy fit because you are not paying attention to her. You get fired from a job- who cares, you can get another one. You fail a course- you are screwed. Maybe so badly that there is no point in getting the degree any more.

    We finally broke up after 10 years together (8 married). She waited about 30 days into the separation period before she started cutting a path through our male friends (which pissed me off back then- but hell these days I figure why lose a good friend over a woman).

    Now-- how about those "working 60 hours a week" guys?

    Okay- 10% of them do get ahead. The rest get NADA, BUPKIS, ZERO.

    It took me about 8 years longer, but I had 20 hours a week more life during those 8 years.

    Having a wife tho? Under today's legal setup (welcome to divorce land- you are screwed guys- enjoy paying the mortgage for her and the new boyfriend who thinks it's okay to spank your kids) I personally won't be going that route. I have my own house, no debt, new car, nice clothes. I have several girlfriends (one for concerts, one for gaming, one for dancing, etc.). It works out great for me; they are happy (I'm open about being a bachelor up front which helps) and I don't have to turn the stereo down or clean house when I don't want to. Plus when I lose one or two (as happened in 2002) then I'm not devastated and I just load up a couple more. I personally do not think people were meant to stay together forever any more. I'm not sure people were meant to invest *EVERYTHING* into one single other person. You always have to give *something* up (this one goes to bed at 9pm- that one doesn't drink- this one doesn't like gaming- that one doesn't like going out dancing, etc.)

    Plus- in my opinion, when you give so much incentive to women to divorce- they are a lot less likely to stay married until the kids are 18. Basically, if you have a good income and kids: they win, you lose. The courts even go so far as to make men pay for kids that do not exist for years and unless you have a super lawyer you get to see the kids six days a month and every other christmas.

    ---

    Basic advice- if you want kids and to be married- at least wait until you are 25 to 27. And yea- don't work 60 hours a week. It's really stupid. Most women won't disconnect emotionally if you pay them any attention at all. Even 3-4 hours a week they can count on will fulfil their needs. But randomly coming home late, skipping important holidays, only touching or kissing them when you want sex, you are asking for the street.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:My story.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quote: "College takes a LOT of work and is completely unforgiving. If you miss a test- that's it, change schools or just quit because otherwise that is going to be on your GPA 11 years later. If you truly understand that, you can see the conflict when you are studying and she throws a hissy fit because you are not paying attention to her. You get fired from a job- who cares, you can get another one. You fail a course- you are screwed. Maybe so badly that there is no point in getting the degree any more."

      What are you smoking?? Granted, good grades help, but I know many, many people that failed a class or two, ended up with so-and-so GPAs, and were still able to land great jobs. Grades matter that much only for academia, and not even there.

      This is not on-topic, I know, but I was pretty shocked when I read those lines.

      What do people think?

    2. Re:My story.. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Posting as an AC isn't going to get you many replies. :)

      1) for many degrees, a bachelor's degree with good grades isn't enough- you have to have a masters.
      2) if you are much below 2.5, you are probably not going to get a job in your field unless you network hard.
      3) You can recover (mostly) from bad grades after 5 to 10 years but you never recover the lost income.
      4) for the coolest jobs- you need a 4.000+ (in most cases even if you are a genius)

      Screwing up your GPA is best recovered by changing schools and blowing off the courses entirely or by doing "okay" after that and interning well so you graduate with experience.

      College only determines your *first* job mostly. But your *first* job determines most of the rest of your jobs.

      In IT you either get on the cool project with the cool technology or you are screwed (and possibly selling movie tickets or burgers even WITH a good GPA- I've known several of those guys who 'missed the turn'.)

      I'm working my way out of IT while playing on my IT background. It pays better, it hires at more places than pure IT, and the working hours are less.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    3. Re:My story.. by PCM2 · · Score: 1
      College only determines your *first* job mostly. But your *first* job determines most of the rest of your jobs.

      Meh. I think you're being a little rigid in your thinking there, guy. I'm 33 and I have no college degree, and yet I've had several "real" jobs, some good, others bad. I've made OK money. The job that paid me the most, as it turned out, was one of the ones I liked the least, so I quit that job. Then I took almost a year off to think things through. When I took a full-time job again it was to change careers, doing something I'd never done before. I'm still in that line of work today. My current employers like, value, and respect me, and short of making me rich, what more can I ask for? I'm still looking for the "perfect" work setup, but I feel like I have lots of options and that, to me, is the definition of success. As far as I can see, there's nobody telling me that I "can't" do anything I want.

      So while I'm sure your hard work in school is never going to hurt you, the way you describe it, it sounds like an awful tough burden to bear for something that maybe isn't quite as crucial as you make it out to be.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    4. Re:My story.. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      your GPA is meaningless beyond your first job.

      it does NOT RULE YOU.

      (in fact, I never even finished college and have NO degree. I make a good six figures, I'm a leader in my field and I do very well, thank you).

      college is to get you started. after you get a job or two, the hell with the degree. seriously.

      its as funny as 'your permanent record' is, in terms of FUD factor. pure scare tactics. don't sweat it, dude.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    5. Re:My story.. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand about all the jobs that are not even open to the general public.

      let's see...

      Can you go to work for JPL? NSA? Google? SUN? IBM?

      Will you be fast tracked into management? Heck-- will you *start* your first job in management?

      Will you be IT-Director and choose if your shop is going to be Java or .net?

      Will you get that gig leading a 100 million dollar project in Japan with all your living expenses paid?

      Do you have a shot at ever sitting down to lunch with a senator to talk shop?

      Will you get into medical school?

      Will you get to be a full Professor at a university? (so you feel important even if you don't make big bucks or have a lot of power)

      Will you get to be the leading researcher at a big company?

      Will you get hired to work on problems so hard they only give them to people with 4.0 averages?

      Heck, are you *even* ever going to live in one of those 400,000 grand micro mansions and tour the carribean on a private sailing ship with 8 other couples?

      Will you be able to look back and say, "I made big decisions and made a difference" or "I wrote a lot of code that is now in boxes and no one knows that I existed except a few close friends"

      Sure... .001% of random people get into those environments. But the other .999 get the right school, the right social circles, the right grades, the right random choices about technology and investing, etc.

      At the lower end of the GPA and school pool you have:

      Will you even get a job in your field?

      Will you be 10 years behind everyone else your entire life- always aware the "Bob" is going skiing while you have to work overtime for your TV?

      I made my choice- I got married. Stupid stupid stupid. I was ahead of the curve (even in college during high school and had a senator lined up to arrange for officer training in one of the military branchs if I wanted) and blew it for "true" love that lasted about 10 years. It was good in many ways-- but how much better it would have been to bloody well WAIT until I had the degree (with a much better GPA- and more time to focus on school while I was there without working 50 hours a week in IT to support a family).

      The worst was when I worked 8 weeks at 72 hours a week and they said 'Wow- take this friday *afternoon* off!"

      4 hours off- and a $50 "employee of the month" award. I woke up and have never done that crap again. The last time I worked 83 hours, I got paid close to 4 grand for one week's work (and that was back in the 90's). I was single then- so the trade was worth it.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    6. Re:My story.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your school sounds scary.

      At my school, you could re-take a class up to two times and have the new grade erase your old grade. I "took advantage" of this when I got stupid my first year and stopped going to a couple of classes, completely failing them.

      Fast forward five years (five because I took a year off in the middle, not because of the above-mentioned shenanigans), and I not only graduate from the same school, but graduate with honors.

      In my experience, college is entirely flexible. If you miss a test for good reason, you can usually make it up. If you don't have a good reason, it often won't sink your grade for the class. And even if it does, one class does not appreciably affect your GPA. If you go from an A to a C in a three-credit class as part of a 120-credit degree, that's a change of less than 2 in the second digit after the decimal.

      If failing a single course can make the degree no longer be worthwhile, then I think it's time to change schools now, before you fail that course.

    7. Re:My story.. by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Heh. Living in the San Francisco Bay Area as I do, I found your comment about $400,000 "mansions" to be totally charming. (FYI in my neck of the woods 400 grand won't get you a one room condo.) And, yes, believe it or not some of those options you mention are open to me. Others are non sequiturs. You sound bitter. I hope things work out for you.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  173. Been there, done that... by dougthug · · Score: 1

    I got divorced to my first wife after a 4 year marriage with 2 kids. I got full custody of both. The custody part has to do with my ex-wife being such a looser. I got married to her when I was 19 and my oldest child, who will be 10 this month, was 7 months old. I got my start in IT right about the time she was born. The first 4 years of my career weren't bad due to my work, but directly as a result of who I married. She more or less kept me from growing in my field. The interesting time was really between marriages, when I was commuting 75 miles away and raising 2 kids on my own. If it wasn't for my parents helping out so much, I have no idea how I could have made it really. I couldn't read all the comments that were posted, but most that I did sound like people who don't know cause they've never been there. IT is demanding as hell, especially if you're like me and never finished college and worked your way up the latter. Spent the first 3 or 4 years doing system support stuff and worked up to doing system administration and finally have spent the last 5+ years doing development, which is the best part in my opinion. The point is, you got to take care of your family first, whether that's your wife and kids or just your kids. Part of taking care of them is working and providing, so you have to work, and sometimes that means working your butt off. You have to find balance and the best thing I think I ever did was surround myself with people who understand. I had a couple of bosses that were never married and never had kids and those experiences were bad for me, cause they didn't understand not being able to work until midnight and having to leave to get your kids from the after-school program. I hope everything works out for you. It did for me. I've remarried, and to a remarkable woman and we have a child together now. She's been giving enough that my career has been able to blossom as well as provided the kind of mother all my children deserve. Good luck and keep praying (or start if you need to :)).

  174. Sure, here's your moral by Bozdune · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Your wife is an asshole. That's the moral.

    The way I look at it is this. Either you are flying signals ("I'm single! I'm looking! I'm available! Look at me!") or you are not. I'm going to bet that your wife was flying signals. If you look back at her behavior totally objectively, you'll probably see it. If you do, internalize this fact -- she was looking to get out.

    The best advice I can offer you is from my own experience.

    1) Don't hang around. She says she still loves you? Bullshit. She doesn't. She's not even THINKING about you. Move on.
    2) Don't believe her if she comes back. She says she wants to try again? She says she wants to "Renew your vows" (that's a rich one)? Move on.
    3) Don't let her set your agenda. Guilt trip about "staying with the kids while she goes away?" Sure, if you want to. If you don't, tell her to drop them off at your place, you'll deal with them.

    And don't -- absolutely don't -- let yourself be angry, bitter, unhappy. This is not your fault. It's not about your job or how many hours you put in. It's not that you didn't "work hard enough" at the relationship. Baloney. I know plenty of people who have ridiculous schedules and see each other rarely, but they're doing just fine.

    Remember: it's about her wanting to leave. It's not about you "failing" in some respect. Dry your eyes, forget your guilt, and find someone who wants to be with you. And if you notice her "flying signals," put her on the "temporary fling" list and start flying your own signals, fast.

    1. Re:Sure, here's your moral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I guess personal responsibility really is dead, huh?

  175. I was a single dad... by iceperson · · Score: 1

    but my wife and I splitting up had nothing to do with either of our careers. I raised my son alone for 6 years until I remarried. I honestly can't imagine working in IT has any affect on parenting or being a good spouse.

  176. Be Honourable by SpentFuel · · Score: 1
    I'm about a year into the process. A wise person warned me that the process takes many years to get over. The hardest times were not at the beginning of the process.

    My best advice is to conduct yourself in an honourable manner. It is best for your kids, and you will salvage some self respect. This is very difficult to achieve once lawyers are involved. My second advice is to watch and conserve every dime you spend until everything is settled. Divorce is the #1 cause of bankruptcy for men.

    I have shared custody and shared parenting - meaning I have my two kids half the time. Despite being in IT, I have pretty reasonable work hours. Working more than 40 hours a week is a waste of time anyway. Work smarter, not longer.

    You will have to be both Mom and Dad to your kids when they are with you. My kids don't know what the word divorce means or that mom and dad living in different houses is not normal. My kids have a rich life at both houses, with their favourite stuff in both places. They are happy, so I am happy.

    Unfortunately, family law is systemically biased against the person who has the better job (typically the man). You can expect this to cost you a lot of cash. Depending on your jurisdiction, your pension valuation may be a nightmare. Not much you can do about it - if divorce was not your choice you are a victim. Make the most of it.

  177. leading to a conclusion by gorup · · Score: 1

    Your thesis is flawed from the onset. Maybe you can poll the readers and see what you get. Ask generic questions, record the available answers and then try to draw conclusions. You're leading us towards your own conclusion. A good neutral set of questions would start with:
    Age:
    Occupation:
    Level of education:
    Married (Y/N) If Y, years married:
    Divorced?:
    # Children:

    Then compare your results from an established, well documented, rock solid source (census? Support group for divorced people?) and see if you can make any conclusions.
    Otherwise, your sample set is flawed from the start. As is, it'll either:
    1. Greatly extended your graduate time, as you now have some more pre-req work to do, or:
    2. Greatly shorten it, as the staff may not choose to waste any more time on you.

  178. She got the 1's by thorkyl · · Score: 1

    I got the 0's

    I'm not divorced but that was the agreement we had when we got married.
    We are both IT and it has always been an IM or a system message to let the other
    know its dinner time. The best part about both in IT is the sex both cyber and regular

    We have our "time". Its on Sundays, that's when we load the horses up and go riding
    in the woods or on the beach.

    --
    Old Glory, Love it, leave it, you burn it you die.

    --
    -- I am the NRA, enough said...
  179. The kids by jaweekes · · Score: 1

    I'm almost finished with my divorce and have Joint Custody of my kids. My Ex did try to get Full, but I had been a bit anal in keeping a log of all the time I spent with the children since the seperation, so I won that part of it.

    The one part I would say about the IT field is that the after hours work / on-call does impact the time I spend with the kids, and can cause problems. I had to go on training to Chicago this year, and some emergancy visits to Atlanta when I had to tell my kids that I would not see them. She could argue that because of this she needs full, but it is unlikely she would get it.

    My $0.02 worth.

    IANAL!!!

  180. My ex tried to use my profession against me. by pecosdave · · Score: 1

    My ex took up prostitution to pay for her drug habbit after we split (and as I think back on it probably before as well). She was advertising online. I of course took the advertising photo's to court for use as evidence. She attempted to claim I doctored the photo's. An eye glazing explanation of JPEG compression methods and the dead giveaways that come with photo editing cleared me of that one.

    Another thing she did was attempt to get me labeled as a cyber stalker. I think she succeeded in that. I no longer have custody of our daughter, but neither does she my parents do.

    One thing to keep in mind. Lawyers and judges are not typicaly techs. Most lawyers and judges are actually less adept technically than other professionals earning simular wages. They view technology with an eye of suspicion, because as legal people they usually see the criminal end of things not the positive end of technology. Your typical legal person will use Office 97 on an out of date computer with an out of date version of Windows. The only thing they'll use the average Linux geek will use as well is PDF documents. They love PDF's, they're like faxes, only not nasty looking.

    In the end I was labeled as a criminal by a divorce court with absolutely no proof whatsoever that can be tied back to me. The only thing they had was the word of a proven liar, that was a convicted felon, convicted of drug posession and theft. My criminal record to this day is spotless. She attempted to have me arrested, but when I proved to the detective she was a liar the detective dropped the case. I'm surprised she didn't turn around and go after her instead. The civil end of things are another matter entirely. I honestly think my profession had a lot to do with the courts distrust of me, and my Ex's lawyer played that up with every oppertunity. The fact I had webpage printouts of her advertising and CD's burned of her bragging about the crimes she comitted actually worked against me in that respect.

    Here's an out of date account of my case. I need to make an updated version.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  181. What? by pupstah · · Score: 1

    If this isn't proof that "ask slashdot" needs to die a horrible death, I don't know what is. Its too bad common sense isn't sold at think geek, perhaps some of you might have some.

    --

    -- pupkick

  182. Kids ruin most relationships IMHO by Indy1 · · Score: 1

    The amount of time, effort, and money to properly raise a child in the US in this time and age is astronomical. Face it, most couples do NOT have enough of the above to do it, which leads to strained relationships and eventually divorce. Most of the happy couples I know have avoided kids, and they have far more time and money for themselves, which results in a much happier relationship.

    --
    Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
    1. Re:Kids ruin most relationships IMHO by redelm · · Score: 1
      Probably true. Eventually there must be dilemmae between spouse and children. The necessary compromises hurt both.

    2. Re:Kids ruin most relationships IMHO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes - more people should remember that childfree is always an option! I am happily married for 9 yrs and no plans for kids. We both work in IT, enjoy spending time with each other, enjoy our geeky hobbies, and both have health issues (the original reason for not having kids) We live fairly comfortably now, but we never could see ourselves affording both our own medical expenses and kid expenses, especially college. I mean, we get decent pay, but our employers are always getting bought-out or offshored and we go months between jobs sometimes. Now that we've seen what others go through, we're sure that even without the health issues, we would not have been happy w/ kids.

  183. The IT doesn't cause divorce by tojamismis · · Score: 1

    The person causes divorce... If you are getting divorced due to spending too much time on IT, then PEBKAC! The person chooses to spend more time on these machines, losing part of themselves in the process. They become so immeresed in IT that they forget what is actually going on in the world around them. For money, glory, hobby or out of an earnest desire to give to the world. Try getting up from the keyboard and giving to the world that way... It will vastly benefit your life and might even bolster some of those "non-tech" skills that can get you farther in the world.

  184. My experiences by suparjerk · · Score: 1

    While I have never been married (and don't really intend to be), I do have personal relationships and find that they suffer from my various computer-related jobs. A good portion of my paid work is work I do from home. I, like a lot of people (I imagine) do not have separate computers / areas of the house specifically for work and leisure. I play my video games and chat online and watch videos and code and code and code all from the same computers in the same room. A lot of times this consequently blurs my "work" and "play" together in the eyes of other people in the house. Sometimes I'm in my room playing video games, upgrading my computer, compiling something for fun, but sometimes I'm in there developing a company website, or repairing someone's computer, or something else I'm getting paid for. Unfortunately for my girlfriend and family, a lot of times they can't tell the difference. They just come to visit me in my room, wanting my attention for something, and I have to tell them sorry, I can't be bothered, I'm working and can't spend my paid-hourly time doing personal things. Sometimes it doesn't come out with as much finesse as written in that last sentence, and sometimes having to say/hear that creates a lot of interpersonal tension, which I suppose could ultimately lead to the divorce of a married couple if there's not a lot of understanding about the situation.

    --
    I caught the Mountain Wumpus! He gave me his treasure chest ($100) to let him go free again.
  185. Telecom/IT by BloodSpite · · Score: 0

    I don't know about IT as much as I know about Telecom, and as many people lump the two together I can say that in Telecom (specifically my area, Cellular) the divorce rate is extremely high. Mostly because we are on the road 10 months out of the year, and occasionally even out of the country. Cellular Installers, Commissoners, and Optimizers can be on a Project anywhere from 3 weeks to a year anywhere from Ireland to California, making it not unlike the Military with long deployments, long hours and last minute deployments. Having been working IT Rollouts for the last year, I can say that division of IT isn't much different than the above and can also cause a severe strain. But it being the root cause of divorce? I disagree with that particular segment, as it takes 2 to tango, and as mature and responsible adult you have to take in to account your own reaction to change, job demands, and family responsibilities.

    --
    The truth does not change by our ability to stomach it -Flannery O'Conner
  186. No, they're as bad as men by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just in different ways.

  187. Exists there In-Depth-Books Related to This ? by pg--az · · Score: 0

    Way back in 1974, I was an intern at the JHU/APL, helping format the solar-wind-data visually - Fortran, keypunch, card-decks. One of the regular employees, Ph. D etc, was having troubles, his papers were not up to snuff. He chose the auto-in-garage CO exit, we all attended the open-casket funeral - this is vastly different than cremation. I still retain the image of Jim's face, lying in the casket. Without that image, my visual brain would be forced to remember him using other available memories. Anyway I think there OUGHT to be a book on the pressures of hi-tech jobs, is there one, I don't know of any ? At least, not any spiced up with personal case histories like yours etc. I would appreciate it if folks might cite a few such books, if they are out there. Of COURSE there are statistical issues - there is doubtless some truth in comments like the one above, that >> "People who self-select a career in information technology tend to have poor social skills" But also, statistically, you may be investing most of your early life into education, with graduate school you might start your first real job as late as early twenties. How many developers are still developing past say age 40 or 45 ? So statistically I suspect one could make a case for tech careers being similar to those of other ATHLETES in performance-based careers where it's difficult to stay employed till say Social-Security-Retirement-Age. So you will statistically tend to have problems if you become unemployed, a different set of problems if you are successful in spending oodles of time keeping up with the next batch of twentysomethings. SO I think it's a book that needs to be written, more power to you. A catchy title might be say "The Techie Life-Cycle", by analogy to some convoluted life-cycle in nature such as tadpoles-to-frogs, or dragonflies.

  188. Free Time by FJ · · Score: 1

    I also work in IT, but a while back I was also a part time fire fighter. I fellow I worked with got me involved with it. He made one comment that I've always remembered.

    "A lot of people in this job (fire fighter) get divorced and they all blame the long shifts and the strange hours. That isn't the cause. The cause is that when they have a day off they spend it with the same guys they work with playing softball or watching T.V. instead of spending time with their spouse. Eventually their spouse realies that divorce won't be much different than their current life. They are already alone so why stay married."

    I always thought that was an interesting insight and I've tried to remember it. When I have free time I make sure to spend the majority of it with my family. I've been married 11 years now and I'm probably closer to my wife than I was when I married her. Very few people can say that and I believe that advice got me there.

  189. A Couple Of Things for You To Understand by Doug+Dante · · Score: 1

    I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advise.

    1) The Child Support Agency will probably not be neutral - they will probably want to give custody to your wife - Title IV-D of the Social Security Act provides for incentive payments to states based on the amount the collect in child support. If you make more than your wife, the state has a strong incentive to give her custody or to avoid joint custody.

    2) The judge may not be neutral - He or she works with the people above.

    3) Your Lawyer May Not Represent You - Judges in many states have vast discretion to make decisions regarding child custody and divorces based on the "Best Interest Of the Child" standards (Which means whatever the judge thinks it means). Lawyers who regularly practice divorce law representing men sometimes learn that it's best to go with the flow and let the process take place than fight and cause more harm. They ignore procedural violations of the law, just usher their clients through the system, and bill them when they're done. Some dad have had better luck with criminal attorneys rather than divorce lawyers.

    4) You may pay for everything - Just to be clear, there's a fair chance that you're going to pay for your wife's lawyer, court fees, any counselors that will be called, etc.

    5) You may loose the love of your child - CS collection agencies are legendarily reluctant to enforce visitation rights. Many fathers loose touch with their children after a divorce, especially when mom gets a new husband and wants that man to act as the effective father in their child's life.

    6) You are not alone. One organization is here: http://www.krightsradio.com/

    OK, this is advise, but not legal advise:

    7) NOW IS THE TIME TO RECONCILE! Learn what's coming. Get in front of this and try to fix things with your wife NOW!

    --
    The world will not get better through technology. We must seek to be better people.
  190. is this science at work? by hswerdfe · · Score: 1

    Asking slashdot will provide nothing but anecdotal evidence. The plural of anecdote is NOT data.
    please if you ever plan to complete your "graduate thesis", and validate you theory that "our industry causes a high rate of divorce". Please do a proper scientific study.

    Try to get the information (statistics/Data) from an existing database somewhere (census data)
    or do your own random sample survey.

    but for the love of science, do not ask /. and then expect to write a thesis on it.

    --
    --meh--
  191. It's called reality by parvenu74 · · Score: 1

    There are some managers who fail to adequately budget time and/or resources and will blame you for not getting the project done on time and then fire you for it.

    There are also some managers who will work their development teams to death so they can deliver their projects either ahead of schedule or in less time than other managers said it would take in order to pile up the brownie points toward bonuses and promotions. Their developers are not their concern.

    There are more types of a-hole managers for this list, I am sure, and they are a fact of life. Their shortcomings are not yours, per se, but you have to make them yours as long as you wish to work for said employer and boss. The alternative is to find a new job.

    1. Re:It's called reality by drpentode · · Score: 1

      And there are managers that correctly allocate 40 hours per week per developer and ask their developers to put family first. And these managers actually mean it. However, sadly, I have found that to be more of the exception than the rule. I look for these types of managers when I go job hunting, and it's been totally worth the trouble.

  192. Hypothesis: people get married far too young. by Tim · · Score: 1

    "These days, people divorce because they argue too much. Or because "the spice" is gone. Or because they don't like arguing about money. Or because the in-laws hate each other. Or because wife gained some weight and doesn't look good enough anymore. Get over it. Man up and deal with it and treat the marriage with the importance it deserves."

    In my experience, most people get married at far too young an age -- right out of college, typically. But when you're 22-ish, fresh out of the sheltered womb of academia, and you've never had a full-time job, a home of your own, or even more than one or two serious relationships in your life, you know virtually nothing about who you are, or you're going to become. Nevertheless, people think that they can commit themselves to another person "for eternity" at this ridiculously early stage of the game.

    I believe that this is why a lot of couples split up in their early 30s for reasons that seem trivial or fundamental (i.e. "the wife gained weight," or "the spice is gone"). Couples marry young, grow apart as they grow up (you do a lot of growing in your 20s!), and discover that what seemed like True Love at 23 was really only an intoxicating mixture of youthful horniness and the fear of being alone. I'm an unmarried guy in my late 20s, and I've heard this same, sad story on many, many dates.

    That said, it's a typical, puritannical American response to suggest that people should "man up," hunker down and stay in a failing relationship because the "institution" of marriage is somehow sacred or important. If two people want a divorce because they're no longer attracted to one another, or because they have disagreements about money, or family, or any number of other very fundamental things, it's incredibly stupid to suggest that they should stay together "for the marriage." People should stay together because they want to stay together -- not because some cultural police officer told them that their marriage was inviolable.

    --
    Let's try not to let fact interfere with our speculation here, OK?
  193. hmmm....could be by BubblePuppy · · Score: 1

    My first wife and i divorced and I retained custody, not legal custody though. They just ended up living with me which was what I wanted out of the deal. I have worked in IT for 20 years and I think there could be a problem with a spouse not 'speaking your language'. Most IT folks are passionate about their jobs and need someone to talk to about it. A spouse who may not have the background and education could feel alienated. My problem was I was attending school at night and working full time, I'm sure this was part of the problem.... I was not there a lot for three years.

  194. I'm sorry to say this by Plutonite · · Score: 1

    but you are very unlucky, and very wrong. People in SW and HW engineering who decide to give up porn and settle down seriously are almost never on the brink of divorce. When you compare them to business people or, in contrast, very low-earning families that just had children, the divorce potential we have is far less.

    People involved with comp.science are mathematicians, by extension philosophers. We value love, and often are more emotional than those who have drained themselves of it with endless nights drinking and partying and going after simple innate desire. The only danger we have is being isolated in cyberspace, but that is never a threat if you are truly intelligent.

    If you've already lost your wife, don't lose your son. Don't let the monitor devour you. And try to change your thesis for the love of God.

  195. Frank - Yes. by knomevol · · Score: 1

    Hi Frank,

    Yup, I feel for you.

    Three years after our divorce, my ex-wife said we probably would have stayed together if it hadn't been for my job.

    I was at XXXXX, responsible for several hundred servers from which a million+ customers were being served. There was the occasional night of getting a full sleep, but more often than not I was paged, sometimes multiple times, each page-out meaning I'd have to call the NOC to get a status, turn on the laptop, VPN in, get a few shells going, investigate the problem. Ranged from 15 minutes to many many hours per page.

    It killed me, new wife, screaming. New baby, screaming. Pager, screaming.

    So, we got a divorce, and I have no doubt in my mind the hell I went through at work was the primary cause of it. I even missed my own birthday party - on a four hour page-out. Came back and most people had left.

    Anyway, I got custody, but it was because I had evidence that I was a better father to the child than she was a mother to the child. Write things down, keep dated notes. Yes, it could turn into a "he said, she said", but I'm telling you from experience, dated notes of events that you think will make a difference in court will make a difference in court.

    The child would obviously be better off having both a mother and a father around all the time, no question. But, hey, this is life, and we get dealt our hand, and we have to deal with it. No matter what, as I'm sure you will, always make time for your child. Nothing says "I love you" like spending copious amounts of time with your child. It can make all the difference in how they turn out.

    Hope this helps somehow. Good luck.

    1. Re:Frank - Yes. by learithe · · Score: 1

      This isn't because you had an IT job. It's because you were working too many hours and on call all the time. This could be equally true of many non-IT professions: for example, a doctor. You couldn't spend time with your family because you were busy working. Not because of *what* you were working on.

    2. Re:Frank - Yes. by knomevol · · Score: 1

      this is true. but i was working in IT, not in a hospital.

  196. IT vs Divorce? by hAckz0r · · Score: 1
    The study seems flawed to me for several reasons.


    The relationship affects the job sometimes. In general, to be good at IT one needs to be immersed in technology and keeping current on a constantly changing and complex field of study. This balance is sometimes skewed by the individual them self who uses 'the job' as an escape from the relationship and so its not the job that kills the relationship, as the relationship was already over. In IT its just easier to bury your head and let the relationship die of natural causes (neglect).I have seen this many times before.

    IT is a VERY broad field to ask about, and you should be much more specific. IT customer support personnel get yelled at day in and day out which makes for 'a bad day' almost everyday. Other positions (like mine) allow the person to be very creative and thus they have a more positive outlook on life and their relationships. Which type are we talking about here?

    There may be some predisposition for the reason a type of person gets into a type of IT in the first place, therefor the person affects IT not the other way around. My own divorce had nothing to do with my job, but it had everything to do with her job. More specifically it was her personality that made her incapable of keeping any one IT job (aka 'her boss') for more than six months, and it was her personality that went through four cars in just under two years (had to find one she liked enough to keep), and it was her personality that made her start a consulting business and hire accountants and lawyers (but still called me for technical advise). Once she rolling in the money and was hanging out with business men and lawyers you can guess what happened next. All that was her choice in life, and I just tried to be supportive because you can't change who a person is inside no matter how you might want to try. All you can do is try to satisfy, nurture, and care for them (e.g. like 13 years of 'trying to'). At this point I'm glad she 'did it' because today I am a lot happier than she is. I've been remarried for many years now and still loving life. In contrast she will never be happy, even though we both still work in what you might call 'IT'. Our worlds are very different now, but she still calls for technical advise.

  197. Just asked the ex and she said it wasn't my job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was married for 2 years and just finalized my divorce. I asked the ex if my job had anything to do with the divorce and it came up in our marriage counseling sessions as well. She said both to me and to the therapist that my job had nothing to do with it. We just had different interests in life. We simply wanted different things. That was the main issue. She had no issues with what I did for a living as long as I was happy. Everything that we did with each other was for each other, not because we actually enjoyed doing the same things. That type of relationship just won't last. My advise, actually ask your ex why you guys got divorced and really listen to her response.

  198. Using IT as a scapegoat for failings in life by pl1ght · · Score: 1

    IT has little to do with Divorce. Both partys involved are to blame regardless of their jobs. I am a network admin and im on call 24/7, sometimes im away from home for days at a time. My wife is a cardiologist and works 10-12 hr days. This often leaves little time for each other. But you know what? We love each other very much, and when we have time together, we are sure to spend a lot of it together. Fortunately we are both low maintenance people and can enjoy our alone time as well, this probably helps tremendously. We both understand the scopes of each others jobs and work the best we can with it. And I feel we have a very happy and successful relationship. Its a cop out to hope that your job had something to do with it. If it did you should have quit. Family is > any job.

  199. IT was cake for my marriage by EQ · · Score: 1

    After a combat tour of duty in the Army in Iraq during the first sandbox war and one in ashcanistan as a reservist, me being a bit late or busy at the office as a civilian wasn't that bad a deal for my wife nor me. That perspective in some ways makes for a far different view of what's important.

    Some things simply are not worth the money. Some things are. To me, my country is, so if you're wonderin why i was in the Army - that's why I took the oath and put up with some stupidity, lots of risk and the definite possiblilty of dying in a job you _can't_ quit. The rewards certainly weren't monetary, but there are rewards that you can't measre that way, especially as you get older. Its not all roses and glory (very little of it is actually). Having done my duty I hung up the uniform for good because it was hurting my marriage.

    In my experience, your wife has to know she's at the top of your list (other than God if you are religious and even then you must use some sense), certainly ahead of the kids and definitely ahead of the job. But dont forget you BOTH have to work hard at it or it will fail. A long marriage isnt easy.

    If push comes to shove, you have to have the courage to shove the job. Better to be squeezing by working retail with 40 hour weeks and happy with your marriage than doing IT pulling 60-70 hour weeks and miserable wrecking your marriage.

    In my opinion, an IT job is not worth it compared to a marriage.

    --
    Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo! http://goo.gl/J9bkO
  200. just plain wrong by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

    >America as a result is leading in divorce.

    don't forget their are other options besides divorce.

  201. dito by swanriversean · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm from the same situation (devorced parents).

    Our young son is happiest whenever he sees mommy and daddy kissing or hugging. He usually wants to join in too. The rest of the time, you've got to ask really nice for a hug, especially if he's in the middle of driving his tractors or "reading". But when he sees us hugging, he can't drop whatever he was doing fast enough to join in.

    I think it is important for children to know that they are loved, but it at least as important that they know that the people who love them love each other. It kind of ties their whole universe together. And parents are the two most important (and most visible) people to a child, so they really need to see a strong relationship there. Before they're too old they'll know that mommy and daddy are *supposed* to love each other, and have probably heard them say it to each other too. If they see that relationship breaking down and missing love (or like I was as a child, told that mommy and daddy don't love each other any more), they'll feel a lot less secure about the love they're supposed to get from each parent, or from anyone else for that matter.

    Of course I don't think it is *easy* to do this. Marriage takes work like any relationship, like any job. And often, that work doesn't seem as fun or as rewarding as your professional work (I can speak for myself here). Still there can only be two people to blame when any relationship breaks up (and usually they both deserve blame too).

    What's the thought here anyway?
    Is IT really that much more demanding than other professions (doctor, lawyer, army personel, etc., etc.)?
    Anyways, its not the job's fault, its the person who chose the job over his or her spouse's fault.

    --
    Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. - Dr. Seus
  202. First rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You seem to be forgetting the first rule about divorce:

    Don't.

  203. Count me in (or out...) by natural1 · · Score: 1
    When I was working IT for a digital imaging company (a startup - I think you know where this is going) I was logging 60-80 hrs a week without fail. I missed dinners regularly - and my daughter's school plays, etc. When my wife filed for separation, it was a wakeup call to me about the balance between work and family. I had lost the balance. So, I quit IT and started work in biotech - 40hrs flex-time with 40 paid days off per year. The divorce is final, I have joint custody of my daughter and I've never been happier.

    The funny thing is, I was working so many hours in my job because I was miserable in my marriage and didn't want to be home. It took a while for me to figure that out, but once I realized that being a work-aholic is often a cover for other problems (depression, etc) I found a new, useful perspective on my relationship to work.

    Being there for your family mean being physically present for them. Showing up (at home)is 90% of making a marriage work. IT is built on the paradigm of work-weary geeks with no social live and no families. Seems like they don't mix well. Exceptions are noted - your milage may vary.

  204. You asked if my kids are happy if I work in IT by MrJerryNormandinSir · · Score: 1

    You bet! my oldest son is 20, he's going to college and decided to live at home instead of the dorm. My middle son just got his driver's license and he still hangs at home. My youngest one as well. Thier friends come to our house. My basement has foosball, airhockey and video games, plus a wood/metal work area.
    I got married early too, so I guess I'm beating the odds. I was 22 when I got married. Right when I graduated from college and got my first job.

  205. IT work environment does contribute by Walking+Dude · · Score: 1

    A lot of IT environments do make to hard to stay married and be the doting father and husband. The culture of IT is basically be on-call, work a lot of nights for changes, and be available during the day. I learned awhile back that you can push back on a lot of this, but only after you have established yourself within the industry a little.

    Don't forget the constant self-study if you want to stay up to date. In a lot ways, IT Professionals have a lot of the same gripes that doctor's have and I bet the divorce rates are similar. Whether that's higher than the average or not I have no idea, but anecdotally I'd say IT folks to stay married more versus the general population, as do I would suspect doctor's do as well.

    Face it, IT professionals are still paid well above the national average, and that helps balance out the negatives quite a bit.

  206. Raises hand, next!!! by guruevi · · Score: 1

    IT is one of the most horrible jobs for relationships.

    1) You work not by the clock, most are salaried and thus they 'expect' at least some overtime. I work '40' hours a week, but some of my collegues clock out long before I even have a view of the end
    2) You work nights, weekends. Especially in smaller companies because you're the only point of advanced/superuser support but in bigger companies you have to because you're replaceable. You're on call 24/7 or at least once a month.
    3) Stressed situations. Your manager sits on your ass for having as much work done, while end-users need your support because they are making the business. Usually you're not part of the core business, so you're merely an expense and you have a direct impact on business & performance
    4) You come home and still have to keep up to date with the latest news and technologies so you're not outsmarted by some accounting dude that took the cheapest route

    I have been there, I was married for over a year but the spouse couldn't keep up with the early leave, late arrival and nightly nagios alerts. It's horrible for every type of relationship because everytime you plan on something, the power goes out in the datacenter or the server crashes and there goes the planned romantic night.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  207. Tech: Social Handicap? by schemashift · · Score: 1

    I, too, am a student and developer/designer with a son amidst a divorce. Granted, our marriage was doomed from the start for various reasons, but I can admit that being tied to a computer for prolonged periods of time has its social handicaps. So, it's a natural consequence that the social endeavor of marriage take a hit. I often heard "Stop playing on the computer!" as working was often misinterpreted by her as playing (although, I will also admit that I enjoy my work). Our industry does not necessarily equate to divorce inevitability, but it's safe to say that it plays a part.

  208. What I said to Frank... by DaedalusLogic · · Score: 1

    I wrote him an e-mail, but in the end I did want to post it here too.

    Frank,

    My situation was a little different than yours, but similar enough to compel me to seriously comment on your questions rather than fire off something on Slashdot.

    I was dating a girl at the end of college and ended up in a situation in which the girl I was dating got pregnant and moved back home. There were details that were not entirely explainable and it later turned out, there was another man involved in her life. It did turn out that she had a boy, my son, and continues to live in her home state with him to this day.
    Over a year it looked like things might be worked out to provide at least a happy arrangement in which we would travel back and forth and I would get to see him regularly. Then over Christmas holidays in 2004 his mother expressed that she "never loved me" and her attitude went from warm to cold very quickly. Since then we have had one visit together which occurred later that spring. Since then it has been a string of hurtful episodes and a lot of unanswered questions. I tried to visit in the fall of 2005 and spring of 2006 when I had time off from work, and when I had a business trip that took me to the midwest. Both times his mother either "had no time", or reduced the window of time that she had available to make seeing him impossible. Yet I know that not a month after I traveled up to that area she took a vacation and went to a concert within 5 miles of my house. She didn't say she was coming, she didn't offer to bring my son... I only found out through an errant message on MySpace a month after she had been here.
    I don't think my job played into our separating, but I have encountered a couple of relationships, including one that lasted a year and ended this week... some people demand lots of your time. They can be the person that you spend the most time with in the world, and treasure more than anyone, and still not see that you love them. While it is your choice to spend that time with them or not, it is also up to them to love you for who you are and let you grow as a person. Both my ex-girlfriends had a similar statement that they once made, "A serious relationship is spending all the time you possibly can with that other person." and, "People in a serious relationship see each other more than two nights a week."
    I always thought a "serious relationship" was about how you felt about someone and not punching a clock to be with them when they expect you to. Especially when I see the extremes in my clients. Married entertainment business couples spend weeks apart or fly home on weekends only. There are also the couples that work together and spend ALL there time together. No one can say which is better or worse, but one thing is for certain... Time is not the most important factor in a world where both types of these relationships can exist.
    My hardest challenge is everyday knowing all the things that I am missing in his life. My greatest comfort is knowing that every time I have seen him in person or in photographs... he is happy and he is healthy. I worry when I hear that he has another ear infection, or that he has been sick.
    Being an IT dad, I set him up an e-mail account... He's two, he can't even read... but one day he will read the notes and the letters... and hopefully watch the video if I find a good app the use with this crazy MacBook... Hopefully he will get to know his dad, and what he was/is really about.
    I can hope that the situation gets better, and I do every day. The most important thing that I would say if the relationship between your ex is not amicable... get someone in the middle to act as a buffer. My son's mother wants to meet everything head on with a great deal of conflict in every encounter. If I press to see him, she questions why a

  209. Cheer up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > How many of you computer Dads have also gone through divorce and have retained either half or full custody of your children?

    I'm no computer dad (yet), working on it this year though with the wife. Unless your wife was/is a crack-whore, porn star, stripper or some other type of totally immoral person, or she's just a lazy, incapable bum who couldn't earn a penny to buy toilet paper so she can wipe her ass, she will most likely retain custody of your children and half your property unless you were smart enough to get her to sign a prenup or otherwise mitigated the mutual ownership of your large assets by involving your parents on property titles, and such. I don't think even half custody (I could be wrong here, but this is just anecdotal evidence I remember from others I know are divorced) is awarded that often. She'll keep the children, and you get visitation. That's it.

    > Do you think your job had something to do with it?

    You want to blame something for the divorce, so it must be the job, eh? Wrong. 10 out of 10 it is you who is to blame. Not the job. Hell, not even the bitch that's leaving you right now. She probably had set a clear expectation for herself what she wanted out of the marriage. You failed to realize that before you dipped it in her honeycomb and produced an offspring that you now have a duty before society, yourself and God to rear until adulthood (18+ years). Your expectations were, obviously, different than hers. Somewhere along the way, she decided to pull out because her expectations weren't met. The good thing for her is, she now thinks she's "free" and "happy" for having left you. The bad thing for her, and she doesn't know this yet, is statistically, you are no more likely to experience a second love high from a repeat marriage or relationship than you were in the first one. She too had her demons that were telling her to leave you. It could be that she thought you were selfish with your time for her - in which case, you are the stupid one for allowing yourself to work more than 8-9 hour workdays (probably for a long time too) instead of spending time with her and your children. If you got married so that you can never be around her or the child but once in a while when you feel like it because of whatever work pressure you allowed on yourself, then why get married at all? For sex? That's what girlfriends are for - get one who doesn't want to be married, just wants to fuck, go out partying but not really share any time together. Granted, most women aren't like this, they're needy creatures, starved for attention, but I'm sure you could find a few who have as brassy "balls" as a male.

    She definitely felt remiss in some department, whether it was time with you, or time with your children, or time in the sack, or maybe even money concerns (if she was a money grubbing bitch and didn't know a lick of personal/family economics and living below your means), and I'm sure she gave you warning signs all along before she decides to abandon the institution of marriage, which is a rather harsh decision. You need to reflect on how you were acting/being around her to see your perceived faults from her perspective. If you are unable to find fault in yourself, there are qualified and experienced people in these matters that can help you point out flaws in your personality, behavior, etc that may have contributed to your divorce.

    There's other reasons why she may have left you... she may not perceive you manly enough, exciting enough, challenging enough, secure enough - all of which are personal emotions/views of hers, in which case, you were never a match for one another.

    Now, this one may be hard to grasp - but I'll tell you something about myself - I _always_ knew which women I could marry and would stay with me, and can fully accept me, and which ones could not. I was able to pull that out of them within the first month or two of dating. After having been through numerous relationships, I got hitched at age 25, probably earlier than what I expected, but I

  210. Sorry, wrong crowd! by sunking2 · · Score: 1

    The fact that you are asking about something that has to do with kids pretty much excludes just about everyone here. Unless they've become lax and have started letting people living in their parents basement adopt kids.

  211. Too many variables... by zguru · · Score: 1

    The job can be a factor, but how much of one depends on the kind of woman you married. If she's an high-maintenance attention whore, it doesn't matter what kind of job you have, just count your blessings and move on.

    --
    Companies want programmers who think "out of the box" only to put them in tightly controlled boxes after hiring. WHY?
  212. Mmmm hmmmmm by eko33 · · Score: 1

    Unbalanced commitments to your job and interpersonal relationships caused your divorce. It's probably two steps beyond that, but hey, I'm not a counseler.

  213. haven't had a laugh like that in a while by nuggz · · Score: 1

    Many marriages involve compromise.
    You picked nice steroetypical womens wants and IMO skipped over the basic issues.

    Women (and men) tend to want some attention and time with their spouse.
    Guys might get more attached to career and video games, women might get spend more time on the kids or their career or friends.

    In these cases the one spouse is pursuing their own interests without the other. This may cause some resentment which at least contributes to some relationship issues.
    It happens both ways for a variety of reasons.

    The going out thing is simple, some people don't want to just sit around their house ALL the time. My last vacation I just went somewhere else to be away from the house and break out of the routine.

  214. IT And Divorce by mardukvmbc · · Score: 1

    Definitely.
    My first wife walked out on me 1 1/2 years out of university. The reasons (as far as I understand):
    1.It was during the .com boom and my wife expected me to be making $100K my first year out. The paltry $50K wasn't enough. Talk about unrealistic expectations.
    2.IT is stressful, especially for those that seem to be good at it -- if there's a bug that you can't fix, even a minor one, can you go home at night and not think about it? When I was young, I couldn't. They don't teach you that one in "algorithm optimization 305".
    3.I couldn't talk to my wife about my work problems. Try explaining that I haven't come home for 48 hours because I forgot to malloc an array before using it and the damn thing randomly starts spewing out weird data after 20 hours of continuous use.
    4.Guys that like IT like to play with computers. You generally have one at home. Do the math. Ever spent 3 hours optimizing your 2 minute boot up time down to 1 minute 45 seconds? Me too. Run multiple web servers/database engines/operating systems at home "just for fun?" Me too. Do you think that's fun for the wife?
    5. Unrealistic project deadlines. It always seems that IT gets the shaft on projects. You estimate 8 weeks to deliver something without working overtime, and the business delays until 2 weeks before you need it. Of course the home life suffers.

    --
    "You disturb me to the point of insanity. There. I am insane now." - The Sprockets
  215. Its not just IT by aprenot · · Score: 1

    I have been a working developer for 8 years - 5 years ago and meet my ex-wife and 4 years ago we go married. 1 year ago, we got divorced. I will admit that the long hours that I would work didn't help. A few months before our seperation, I had just finished a project that had me working 80 hours a week for 3 months straight!! That really put a strain on things. But in the end I can't blame my job or the career. Point blank - I didn't respect her. She hadn't graduated high school, and I couldn't convince her to go to college, not too mention she didn't help out around the house. However, all my peers are educated, have good paying salary jobs, or at least do something productive. When I would see the hot girl in marketing, or even the normal decent looking girl programming on my team, I would be jealous and wish my wife could be like them. In the end, that destroyed my marriage. However, it was for the better ;) As for our son (who is now 4), he is taking it ok. It is happening early enough in life that he doesn't really know any better. At first he was confused and when he was with either of us, he missed the other. But ultimately, my wife and I being apart is better for him because he doesn't see me being a jerk to her, nor does he see us arguing. I want him to grow up respecting women, and be seeing me not respecting my wife would have taught him wrong. Aa

    1. Re:Its not just IT by ksheff · · Score: 1

      I could see if she didn't do anything around the house, but being there to raise the kid does have some value.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  216. I know what you mean by StarBar · · Score: 1

    Love the kid, respect his needs and put yourself second, as simple as that. But wounded egos makes the simple task complicated. Try to be honest to your kid and yourself about the reasons you feel the way you are and never go for the sympathy from your son, he is mad at both of you naturally because you are acting very strange to him.

    In my opinion computer jobs are the perfect escapes where you can have total control for a while in a time when things are totally screwed up and you have become a passanger in your life. You rather crush that bug than fix the needs of your family. In that sense you are right but the cause is not our jobs I think.

    On the bright side, you will now have the chance to get to know your son better. Nothing is more important.

    And when you think about it, if you hadn't been so tired from overtime you might not have created the bugs you have been working overtime to fix, and so forth. I am constantly trying to work less hours a day for that reason, the creative peak is 2-4 hours long + 2 hours of meetings and coffee drinking makes a total of six hours. Then go home avoiding the bugs you are about to create...

    Making careers in the US is probably based on loads of working hours and making quarterly reports. Hmmm..., poor you, no wonder that you need that christian fundamentalism over there to keep the families together...

    Let go! / Starbar

  217. Hey, what did you expect? by blang · · Score: 1

    We're nerds. Deal with it. Consider yourself lucky that you got laid, and move on.

    Nerds will never be more than husband 1.0, or maybe husband 0.99.

    Any woman who marries a nerd is eventually looking to upgrade to Jock 1.2, after having secured enough funds from nerd 1.0 to pay for Jock 1.2's beer habit.

    As to kids, etc. You might be better off without the hassle.
    And pencilnecked nerds in the company of children looks suspsicious anyways.
    Just send them the best possible christmas and birthday present, and hope the mother isn't anything like the wicked queen in Snowhite.

    --
    -- Another senseless waste of fine bytes.
  218. IT = Purpose driven life? by Erisian+Pope · · Score: 1

    I think there are a lot of people in IT that sought out this field because of a need to dedicate themselves to something greater than themselves. When a database crashes in the middle of the night and you know you're the one that can fix it and that hundreds, thousands or more people rely on your skills, well, it may not be curing cancer, but it feels good to be that important. This can be difficult to explain to your family and it can be hard when you know that your spouse doesn't understand what it is you do. As a programmer I spend countless hours absorbed in my code. Sometimes I can't stop thinking about it, obsessed with how object layers and databases and network communication and security aspects all fit together. When my wife asks what's on my mind I can say "work" or "code" or just "nothing" but I can't hope to explain my deep fascination with these projects. If I try she feels bored or confused or feel belittled because I'm talking over her head. So, yeah, I'd agree that IT can be tough on a marriage. It's been tough on mine, but we're still together. I imagine many other professions suffer from similar issues. Law comes to mind as probably much worse.

  219. Exactly by Jason+Mark · · Score: 1

    He's right dude (please mod this parent up).

    Now it may be true that there are work-a-holics, and anti-social people in IT (both traits which can lead to bad marrages), but trying to carry on a job, an education, kids, and be a good spouse, something's gotta give. I think you're stretching it man.

  220. Ignorance... by paxslash · · Score: 1

    Before anybody reading this thread even considers giving advice. please read: 1. The Evolution of Desire - by David Buss 2. The Selfish Gene - by Richard Dawkins. Enough said.

  221. ANd another question by plopez · · Score: 1

    Does IT attract preople who are poor at personal relationships to begin with?

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  222. How About a Computer Mom? by beadfulthings · · Score: 1

    I worked for over 20 years in information technologies, starting briefly as a programmer and moving into networking. For the last ten years of that time (or when our two kids were in middle grammar school through high school and college) I traveled between 60% and 80% of my time. One of my sons followed me into the business and jokes that in order to get his first gig, he showed them my resume and said, "This is my mother, and she taught me everything she knows. You gotta hire me." (Of course he did no such thing.) He has now far surpassed me in knowledge, capabilities, and skills. The other son went off in a completely different direction. One is married, both are in stable, loving relationships. I am more proud of them than I can ever express, and I believe both have actually become friends. I am still with the husband I married in my twenties, before I knew what a computer was. He, too, is a friend as well as a husband. He enabled me to accomplish all that I did.

    The all-important key is that you have to set limits. Employers will want to wring as much work out of you as they can get. That's what employers do. What you have to do is to develop an ironclad determination that you are working to live, not living to work. You are a spouse first, a parent second, and a [insert job title here] third.

    There are always trade-offs. A screaming, teething baby with an earache demands more time than a sunny, stable three-year-old. That extra time gets shaved out of the marriage, and it has to be put back later. A frenetic project on the other side of the country demands more time than a week of filing reports or doing proposal work. That extra time, too, gets shaved out of the marriage (and the parenting). It has to be put back later.

    Think of it as a bank account. You can't keep making withdrawals without ever making a deposit, or you'll be broke. Since 2001 I have set off in an entirely new direction. My husband is still my main supporter. We don't have as much money, but we get to spend a lot more time together. Fortunately there is enough in the spiritual/marital "bank account" that we can actually enjoy this.

    I think if more people would stand their ground on this subject with overbearing employers, more employers would get the message that employees with actual lives really have more of a stake in the game.

    --
    "Here's what's happening. You're starting to drive like your Dad..." - Red Green
    1. Re:How About a Computer Mom? by akohler · · Score: 1

      Thanks very succinctly put, and I wholeheartedly agree on all points. My spouse is a coder/sys admin and all around computer geek, and I am a technical writer. We have two young children that we are home schooling, and last year we started a business together. Just like all those long hours at corporate jobs, but for a lot less cash. ;)
      We've been married for six years, and the only thing that's wrong with our relationship is that we're broke and tired all the time, but I think that taking charge of our own economic future now will (hopefully) mean that in the future we'll have time and money, and if not, it's certainly an adventure.

      --
      "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." - Mohandas Gandhi
    2. Re:How About a Computer Mom? by beadfulthings · · Score: 1

      You may find that the "broke and tired" gives way to "plenty of money and too tired to spend it." I've come full circle back to "broke and tired," but I like owning my own business and would have a tough time rejoining the corporate world. I feel as though I could undertake our economic future if I had to. Work hard, and enjoy your spouse and kids.

      --
      "Here's what's happening. You're starting to drive like your Dad..." - Red Green
  223. Stupid by ffejie · · Score: 1

    No offense, as it's a touchy subject, but this is the lamest way to pull information for a paper. At best you're going to pull anecdotal evidence from pissed off divorcees and their counterparts who are happily married.

    Why don't you use your time looking for surveys based on occupation vs. divorce rates?

    --
    Disagreeing with me does not mean you get to mod me troll.
  224. divorced IT guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a divorced IT guy. To everyone who is spraying the original poster with shit mist, I have this to ask:
     
    Have you ever been in love? Have you ever bet the farm? Have you ever given everything, and failed?
     
    The answer is "no", because you are too emotionally immature and selfish. You are wasting your life and if you live long enough, you will be very sorry.
     
    And they will shit on your chest. Selah.

  225. Divorced CCIE agrees with you. by routerdevilccie · · Score: 1

    I agree with you 100%, and it's all about personality type. I just finished high school, and jumped right into working for an ISP in Ontario, Canada. I met a girl, had a child, and was married, all before I was 21. For the next 3 years I would study Cisco certifications and eventually was awarded CCIE #11021 in Janurary 2003. Since I had finished studying, I decided to start my own business in addition to my dayjob. I spent a year coding and wiring the business, and it was a success. The Business was fully automated and ran itself. Great. I had a CCIE, was a network engineer for a great company, I had my own thriving business. All the while, I was on call for both companies 24/7. I was a success - or was I? Well just newly successful, I was ready to enjoy some free time with my wife and two children, but it seemed that we had drifted apart. She had her own new social life, of which I didn't seem to fit in, and I went a bit crazy. She eventually asked me to leave, and so I did. I've been separated for almost 2 years now. I've sold my Business, and am just directing my energy to my day job, and trying hard to keep my spirits up. I pay a fortune in spousal & child support, and can barely afford my own car and appartement. Maybe it has something to do with the sort of people that are successful in IT. We're incredibly smart - mathematically, and technically, but we seem to have no common sense. I guess I would have been better off paying more attention to selecting a the right wife, rather than the right career. I've caused large networks to crash spectacularily, and I've learned a lot by putting them back together more efficient and robust than they were before. However, when all is said and done, computer programmers learn by making mistakes. We're high energy risk takers and problem solvers. We shouldn't expect our family life be an excpetion to this. Just learn from the mistakes, and build it better the next time.

  226. Random Sampling by UniAce · · Score: 0, Redundant

    If this is the kind of thesis that involves doing actual research, wouldn't you want to collect data using RANDOM SAMPLING?

  227. Re:I'm NOT sorry to disagree by redelm · · Score: 1
    Whether it is true that techies are more romantic (in the true, classical sense of the term), the arguement is false: it assumes that the techie can control a relationship and "stop" divorce. Naive: there's another person involved. As a simple example, women have a primal driver towards infidelity: Who wants to put all her eggs in one basket? More effective than man spreading his seed.

    As for intelligence, it always isolates because it reduces the number of potentially mutually satisfying (whatever the tolerable IQ delta) interactions. Communications technology helps (especially as flat as the Internet) but it helps averages precisely the same amount.

  228. step back, take an inventory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could see potential, but stop & take inventory of all the information you offered in your ask slashdot post:

    1) Web developer (btw, I hate when people lump programming/design work into the IT bucket...)
    2) Grad student
    3) Married
    4) Child

    Ever consider that maybe you're a bit overextended? That's your own fault, not the fault of the IT industry.

  229. Re:Hypothesis: people get married far too young. by gknoy · · Score: 1
    That said, it's a typical, puritannical American response to suggest that people should "man up," hunker down and stay in a failing relationship because the "institution" of marriage is somehow sacred or important. If two people want a divorce because they're no longer attracted to one another, or because they have disagreements about money, or family, or any number of other very fundamental things, it's incredibly stupid to suggest that they should stay together "for the marriage."


    I agree with much of what you said, especially about people not being ready for a long term relationship, or of having a lot of growing still to do. However, the latter portion (quoted) led to some objections.

    I agree, that if two people realize that they aren't meant to be together, and that they aren't happy, or have other unresolvable differences (number of viable partners, etc ;)), it's certainly proper for a divorce to happen.

    That said, it seems like the general tendency of many Americans (I can't broaden this to the rest of the world, since I don't live there) to throw up their hands in defeat at the first sign of resistance. I believe the "man up and do something about it" part was accurate, in that a healthy marriage takes work (just like most any good relationship). If you get in a fight, you have to be willing to make up. You have to be willing to think about compromise, and likely will need to meet in the middle on many topics. (Or, decide which ones are important to you enough to object to, versus which ones Don't Matter in the long run -- color of towels, house painting, etc, anything that Makes the Wife Happy.)

    I didn't take the "Man up!" imperative as a direction to stay with any marriage, and keep it alive no matter the cost, but more of a reminder that we have to actually put in effort to keep our marriage healthy.

    I think this ties in with your theory: I suspect many people marry before they are emotionally mature enough to be willing to think of TWO needs, instead of just ONE. =)

  230. Re:yep... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess she should have thought about that before deciding to 'keep' the baby... Many women are being made aware of these realities, but feel they know better.

    I have little sympathy for those situations.

  231. appropriate subject by icepick72 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Ask Hans Reiser.

  232. Not the job, it's the type of person by JasonEngel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I fall into the category - tech worker, dad, divorced. I don't have any kind of custody of my son, basically because my ex is from a rich family and I was dead broke at the time from paying her credit card bills. I do have standard visitation, though, and I'm always pushing for more.

    Anyway, the point is, I don't think it's so much a question of the tech industry creating situations (lots of time in the office, high stress, bringing work home, etc etc) that lead it's people into divorce. I think, rather, that the tech industry is filled with people who lack the social skills required to make a marriage work.

    First off, techies probably got into the field because they grew up spending more time with computers than humans because they were the geeky social outcasts. Second, because techies were likely geeky social outcasts, they probably glom'd onto the first person willing to marry them (but not necessarily the right person) because of a fear they would never find anyone else (low self-esteem is rampant in the geeky social outcast crowd). Third, not many geeky social outcasts with low self esteem are able to handle confrontation, which is inevitable even in a strong healthy marriage, so they probably avoided the problems (long hours at work) or behaved to aggressively in response (the ol' "yell louder to win" routine). Neither solves problems, both just make problems worse. Eventually, someone calls it quits. Either the techie grows a spine and realizes what a mess he or she is in and jumps ship, or the non-techie spouse gets fed up with the loser and leaves.

    Raise your hand if this sounds familiar to you? It's basically the exact situation almost all of my divorced techie coworkers found themselves. It's pretty much where I found myself. At least I was fortunate to be the kind of techie who learned some self esteem and grew a backbone. While I may not have custody of my son due to my financial circumstances at the time, I do have a strong relationship with him, my experience has taught me invaluable lessons in how to make my second marriage a brilliant success, and . . . I guess i don't really have a third. But anyway.

    To sum up, stop trying to blame someone else for what really is a failure between you and your spouse. The fault lies solely between the two of you and not with your employer. Grow a spine, learn some self esteem, and work harder at your marriage than at your job.

    1. Re:Not the job, it's the type of person by entrigant · · Score: 1

      "I don't have any kind of custody of my son, basically because my ex is from a rich family and I was dead broke at the time from paying her credit card bills. I do have standard visitation, though, and I'm always pushing for more."

      Sounds to me like you were used. Women these days will not hesitate to take advantage of men. They will convince you they love you, and even worse, they'll use pregnancy to prove it or lock you in if they have to. Then they will drain you dry. She got you to pay off her debt, then took your son and hauled ass. Is she demanding child support and/or alimony as well? I've seen women pop out a kid for less. Women are not to be trusted. They are simply too good at playing men, and the modern women has learned this.

  233. mod parent up by suparjerk · · Score: 1

    =p

    --
    I caught the Mountain Wumpus! He gave me his treasure chest ($100) to let him go free again.
  234. I think the hypothesis is backward by erroneus · · Score: 1

    The idea is to show that IT careers cause divorce. I don't think that's the case. What I think is more the case is the personality of "IT people" leads to a high frequency of divorce.

    Some people in IT have very long-term relationships as one poster had indicated. (By the way, you're a moron if you think your one example disproves a generality. Exceptions do not disprove generalities. Generally speaking, "Men like naked women." But there are lots of exceptions to that assertion, but it's GENERALLY true.) But generally, my casual observation seems to agree with the submitter's experience, which is that IT people have a pretty high incident of divorce. And there could be a lot of reasons contributing to divorces where one party is in an IT career.

    But to presume it's the career, I think, is a bit off. For one, "IT" is too general to begin with. "IT" is everything from telephone support to DBAs to Applications developers. Some "IT pros" work from home and some 9-to-5 it. (Still others 7-to-7 it like I do sometimes.) But to really get to the root of the issue, you need to determine the cited causes of divorce where one party is "IT." From there you could divide causes into catagories like "IT root cause" and "personality root cause."

    My first marriage ended because she was a lunatic. (A generality that many people could also claim for themselves, but in my case it was especially true since it could be said she attempted to kill or critically injure me with a katana.) It had little to do with my IT career or personality traits. That said, there was considerable friction associated with my habits associated with the use of computers and games.

    If I were to put forth a hypothesis, I would suggest that the "IT personality" is a cause for the high incident rate of divorce among IT professionals.

  235. Film Industry by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

    At least in IT you have the choice. You can advance slower, take on less responsibility and work a 10 hour day to make less money. In film production you either work 16 hour days or you don't work. The End. One of the few other jobs with similar demands would be the medical profession. I agree I don't think the OP can complain about his hours, he had the choice to work less hours, and he didn't. Boo Fucking hoo.

    There's also always the option to *not* work in said demanding industry.

  236. Children come first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until the kids are independent, the kids must come first. When two people agree to have kids, they are morally obligated to give the kids their best. That means they should give of themselves and get along with each other for the sake of the kids. Forget about "I". If you have kids, everthing else is second. But it follows that if the kids come first and the best thing for the kids is to have a stable, heathy family environment, then the parents will get along, respect each other, etc. for the sake of the kids. When you have kids, you are no longer number one. Neither parent is number one.

    If you don't have kids, who cares if you get divorced. If you have kids and get divorced, you are harming your kids. It may be the lesser of two evils, but it still does harm. Of course when one parent is abusing the kids or being unfaithful or so on, then the best thing for the kids IS to get divorced. It's all about what's best for the kids. Sometimes a divorce IS what's best for the kids.

  237. Re: 02cents by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    You didn't mention what your degree was in. But, if it's in IT, I don't think you should be writing this paper at all. You don't have the experience to proceed. The mere fact you're asking a group like /. is proof that you don't know how to gather the data.

    I was in IT for 35+ years. Married some, single custodial dad for some. IT didn't exert any undue influences, the people in the marriage did.

    Go over to a mirror and stand there looking into it until you find the source of the divorce. Oh yeah, have your soon-to-be ex stand alongside you. The children should be playing in the yard, away from the causes of the problem.

  238. On the thesis some introspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IT work is not the cause for divorce, several factors can contribute.

    One -- setting the proirities of your life to work centric.
    a good selfless /family centered value system puts the family at the top, followed by work then spiritual and personal development time, then personal time, then time with friends/ play

    two -- allowing work even when it is not needed to interfere with personal time with the children and your wife. working late when you could have been home with the wife and kids, then work for a hour or two before bed. working on the train instead of at home, etc. working at home too much, try to set at least two weekend and two weeks of the month with no work at home and no late nights.

    three -- finding yourself running faster than you can bear, too much work, too little time for others, even with deadline, finding the time to relax, fully without thoughts ( stop and smeel the roses, even if it takes a little while to catch up

    Four -- not working at you marriage, marriage is hard work at time, not just chores, but attending to the needs, emotionally or your spouse is a key to a happy home.

    best saying for a family centered life,

    In 100 years it will not matter how much money was in my bank account, what car i drove, or the job I had, but the world can be a better place because of my influence of me in the life of my child.

    just my thoughts, as A IT professional for 10 years three children and 9 years of marriage.

    e-mail me if you want dleighner@gmail.com

  239. You CAN blame IT because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be in this industry, you're basically required to work longer/harder than 'average'. To those who say it's just a matter of priorities, that's fine, but if your top priority is something other than work you'll probably end up finding yourself another job that's less demanding, meaning not an IT job. IT jobs are demanding, so if you're in IT it is basically understood that you do prioritize your job pretty highly (some exceptions).

    Now, nobody defines 'average', except your significant other. Long story short though, if your wife doesn't like how long/hard you have to work it makes your relationship more difficult. More difficult relationships have a higher rate of failure. On average, I think it can probably be proven that the divorce rate is higher than average for IT workers.

  240. I think what everyone is trying to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is that you're a tool.

  241. My thoughts.... by NVP_Radical_Dreamer · · Score: 1

    I've been married for 3 years now and previous to that dated her for 6 years. We were together since high school and she knew that I was going into IT but I dont think she really knew what was in store for her as the wife of an IT guy. The 3am calls, the random "I have to work 5 hours over", along with the leaving the movie theater/dinner because I got a message on my blackberry saying a server is down takes its toll on her. She understands the fact that the industry I work in is like this, but at the same time she gets angry because to her this means I love my job more than I love her.

    This could not be further from the truth, I dont enjoy these kinds of events but that doesnt stop her feelings that she should be more important. We've had the discussion about it many times and while she is understanding of the issue she doesnt like it. I can see how the OP feels like IT is the reason for his divorce, it is stressful on a relationship but I dont think it was the only reason. More than likely it was just something extra putting stress on a relationship that wasnt stable in the first place

    --
    The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.

    - Winston Churchill
  242. Missing the point by leet.box · · Score: 1

    It seems many people are missing the point of this Thesis possibility.

    The idea is to check if there is a correlation between working in a stressful job, like a developer or project manager whose commitments don't end when he or she leaves the office.

    The question is not whether this man's divorce can be blamed on working IT or not. The question is whether a stressful/analytical job which often requires overtime might be related to the relationship troubles characterized by a divorce.

    On that point, this thesis sounds more like anthropology than computer science or IT.

  243. Idiots. by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

    Idiots.

    Everywhere I go, I see idiots.

    You are one of them.

    If you have to work more than 40 hours a week, then you are either incompetent or poorly managed. If the only way to meet deadlines is to work insane amounts of overtime, then you have to hire more people or do less work. (i.e. have fewer customers or looser deadlines). You only have so many productive hours in a day. Thinking that you can work more than that is a fallacy. Your code will be junk. Your designs will be shitty. You will have no life. And frankly, you fucking incompetent meatbags who have to take twice as long give managers absurd expectations about human performance. Further, if you're spending 6 of your so-called 10 hour days read /., fark, and going to meetings, then you're really just working for 4 hours and the rest of your time could be replaced by a mannequin.

    I am an Engineer. (A real one.) I am married with two kids. I am salaried. I meet all my goals (I've actually been told to stop working so fast!) and I go home on time.

    My day starts when I get home. So should yours. If your boss won't accept that you are not a machine, then tell him to fuck off. He is a sociopathic homewrecker. Use those words. Be unkind.

    And for fuck's sake, stop being a fucking idiot.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    1. Re:Idiots. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Idiots. by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Testify, brother! Deadly post...

  244. Statistics, not philosophy. by Honest+Olaf · · Score: 1

    Many people have said that blaming IT for divorce is foolish; it is the person who causes the divorce, not their chosen career. That is true. What would be interesting to me are divorce rates among IT professionals. If those rates are high, it wouldn't suggest that IT, as an industry, causes divorces. It may suggest that people who tend to go into IT aren't capable spouses. Or it may suggest that people who tend to go into IT aren't don't marry capable spouses. Nevertheless, I don't think anyone (even TFQ) has said that that IT, as a career, has a greater sway in divorce than any other time-intensive career.

  245. Decisions and Balance by Java+Ape · · Score: 3, Insightful
    First, IT is not unique in being a demanding career. I'm getting to be a bit of a gray-hair, and have worked in several career fields. IT tends to attract people with obsessive/compulsive tendencies, which we politely describe as drive/curiosity/commitment. And yes, companies encourage our little work-a-holic souls to do their bidding 70 hours a week, if possible.

    In my opinion, a boss saying "you're indespensible" or "there's a dealine friday" is just an ego-stroke, designed to keep you working unpaid overtime for the company. I should know, I've taken that bait more than once. No one is indespensible, and if the company were serious about the production schedule, they'd hire enough staff to come in on time. We're being played. Worse, we offer up our families on the alter to our egos. Grad school is a huge time commitment - having done it, I'm not sure it was worth the price.

    Ultimately, companies rise and fall, whole fields of endeavor wax and wane, and the career that looks like gold today will likely be dross in time. Take time NOW for your wife, and kids if you have them. I know too many nerds that have a shelf filled with company awards, and go home to an empty house at night. No pretty little bauble on your brag-shelf will compensate for failure within the family. If your current job isn't family friendly, start printing resume's today.

    I left a "big" job a few months ago. I kept it because after the dot-bomb I was afraid of being unemployed. They gradually demanded more and more of my time, and were fairly generous with the compensation. Eventually, I found myself arguing my wife of 20 years (a rare occurance), and it became apparent I didn't know the name of the school my daughters went to, or the names of their best friends. The next day, I talked with my boss, and when she wasn't receptive to my needs, started looking for new work. I am poorer financially, but FAR, FAR happier than I would have been had I stayed. I hope my wife will be at my side long after I've bid a final farewell to my career, it would be stupid to ruin something eternal for that which of little worth.

  246. Talk about Divorce!!!! by flajann · · Score: 1
    I am a dad with 3 kids, and am currently going through a divorce. My story is rather complicated, but the divorce is related to my IT occupation, in a more or less roundabout way.

    Alas, I don't feel like telling the whole story here. If any are interested, shoot email to fred_thestory@sillylife.com and I will send you the URL once I have it set up.

  247. Effect & Cause | Cause & Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my experience, working too many hours in an IT position has been quite disasterous as far as maintain a relationship goes. There's something about sitting in front of a glowing screen for 9-10 hrs a day sorting through a million different details that "matter" to someone else but that you don't give a flying fuck about in the long term that quite simply sucks away the desire to do anything other than slowly self destruct. Is this really the best I (we?) can do?...

  248. Re:Are you freaking kidding me??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Holy crap. I've got to grab my hip waders, the bullshit is getting deep in here.

    It's because of WOMEN PSYCHOLOGY????? THe woman sees the world around her as part of HER life? Everything's a ME thing to the woman, where the MAN sees everything is about others, never himself??? The Woman needs to adjust to the 21st century???

    Holy crap.

    Mr. Women Psychology Sir - it sounds like you had a few too many BAD experiences with women. That crude blathering you spout here is not "women psychology" - that is YOUR take on women. And it's malarky, no matter how well it fits the psychology of the women you've known. And I feel badly for you in that case.

    To the thesis boy ... may I just simply echo a long chorus of /.ers that have said - don't blame the work - it's either you or her. The fact that you are trying to place blame on your profession? That quite strongly pronounces that it was you.

    You are getting a divorce - and - to PROVE that it was not YOUR fault your marriage failed, you are going to write a thesis, get the support of your fellow geeks here (at least that was the *plan*) - and get a soaring A++++++ grade that would affirm what you've always known - it's NOT YOUR FAULT!!!

    Take responsibility. Stop blaming your profession, or "women psychology" - or whatever else convenient crap excuse you can come up with which sounds convincing enough to assuage your guilty conscience.

    Dammit - be a man! Where the hell has honor and accountability gone?

  249. "Skill" by TerranFury · · Score: 1

    I always flinch when people talk about intimate relationships in terms of 'skills.' It changes the framing of the coversation: She's no loger a person who I love; there's a "relationship" that I... 'do?' 'Skill' reduces 'having relationships' to an activity to be mastered, like riding a bike or using a machine tool. The word implies exploitation -- that you make a relationship 'work' by having mastered the art of operating people. We acquire skills by practice: Do we wake up in the morning and choose for another day to stay with someone simply because we've "fallen off enough bicycles" to be "good at it?" What might it mean to have "mastered" 'relationship-ing' anyway? To continue to sustain 'a relationship?' What's the inherent good in that?

    The word 'skill' connotes 'manipulation.' What it does not connote are genuineness or honesty -- yet those are what are worth seeking. Where is the spark, the humanity, the connection, in 'skill?'

    I will leave 'skill' on my resume. Next to words like 'achieve' and 'implement.' And away, I hope, from 'love.'

  250. Doctors/Lawyers Wives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think women (most with exception of shegeeks) respect Doctors and Lawyers more...they will carry the load for "Doctor's/Lawyer's wife".

  251. Your job isn't the problem by Rudeboy52 · · Score: 1

    I have been working in IT for almost 9 years now. I started back when I was 18 and worked all the way through college. I am married with a 2.5 yr old son and while I do believe the job adds stress, it is not to blame. Late nights and off hours emergencies are part of the job, but as long as the communication is there it isn't an issue. You also have to be conscious about the level of time and effort you put into your marriage and family and make sure it's at or above the committment you have with your job and company.

    --
    ~Cone
  252. Funny you should mention that... by Valdrax · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Funny you should mention that when he's essentially soliciting anecdotal evidence in favor of his thesis by asking for people to tell their own stories.

    He's not taking a representative sample group and testing whether or not his thesis is true but is instead trying to find data points that agree with his thesis and ignoring the context of how many others disagree with it. It's not exactly scientifically rigorous work so much as an attempt to find other people to reassure him that he's normal, and that's it's less his fault than if there was no correlation.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Funny you should mention that... by noz · · Score: 1

      Good point, but moot. He's writing a paper that smacks of, "last weekend we went to the beach." Troll, I know, but droll: not academia.

    2. Re:Funny you should mention that... by phritz · · Score: 1

      This isn't a scientific study. Who said it was? It's a discussion. This is a discussion board. We have discussions here. Here, we're discussing how careers in IT affect one's marraige. You're attacking him for starting this discussion. Do you believe this discussion isn't worth having?

    3. Re:Funny you should mention that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      forgive me if i'm wrong, but isn't slashdot for 'stuff that matters'?

    4. Re:Funny you should mention that... by bezgin · · Score: 0

      Yeah.. but family MATTERS!

      --
      exit();
  253. you're kidding, right? by geekoid · · Score: 1

    It's not the job.
    Out of all my computer industry friends, I am the only one who had a previouse wife.
    Small data point, but there you are.

    It's the relationship.

    If you really think it's your chosen profession, why don't you change fields?
    If it is your field, and you don't want to switch, then it's YOU.

    we're in an industry where most people can be home most weekends, work a regular schedule, and seldom are in harms way.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  254. Nostalgia by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    Married? Kids? I'm still running girlfriend 5.0 since I'd heard the upgrades to wife 1.0 came with so many problems I'd stick with what already works for me. :-P

    Yeah... I miss the 90s too. They had the best jokes then, didn't they?

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  255. From a childs point of view by CrazyP · · Score: 1

    Well, this is from my point of view. My mom was a school teacher (no she isn't dead, yet, but retired) and my father worked in IT (till about 2 years ago when his division was out sourced) and I also have a brother who is a year older. Okay, so you have the back round information. My parents got divorced in 1986. I am not sure why, but do I think it was from the job my father held at the time? No. Has it affected me and my brother? Yes, I mean my parents divorced when i was 7 years old and I saw my father every other weekend (so about 5 days a month). Does it still affect me? Why yes, I am not close to either parent. I have not talked to my father is several months, I talk to my mom often but don't feel close. As for my brother, we talk and have started to become close, but me living 6000 miles away doesn't help this at all... Because of this, I don't see my father as a father, I see him more like a friend, growing up that is how it was too. I mean only seeing him 5 days a month it was like lets go have fun, he never had to punish us or do any of that normal parenting stuff.

    Basically, divorce sucks, more for the kids then the parents! I could go into more personal stuff too, but I dont have the time and you don't want to hear it... divorce screws with kids heads, has done it to me!

    --
    How do you take a picture of the best moment of your life?
    1. Re:From a childs point of view by Javaman59 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for contributing. I'm sure that many children of divorced parents have sad stories, and continuing damage. I hope things get better for you, and that if and when you marry, that your own marriage is successful.

      --
      I'm a software visionary. I don't code.
    2. Re:From a childs point of view by CrazyP · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I know I am not the only one out there has has experianced these troubles, but it would be nice to see my gneration take marriage more seriously and actually try to work through some of the problems, nothing is easy so why should getting married be an easy thing?

      Also, things have gotten better for me, I mean I moved to Hawaii... how can I not be happy here? :)

      Aloha and thanks again.

      --
      How do you take a picture of the best moment of your life?
  256. I can only tell you a bit about my own situation. by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I've been divorced for a couple years now, and I have primary custody of my 4 year old daughter. I've worked in I.T. for roughly 15 years now. (I'm 35.)

    While I agree that it's foolish to blame "I.T." itself as "the reason" for a divorce, it's also true that it can be a contributing factor. If you look at the statistics out there, they show that a surprisingly large number of marriages end in divorce primarily over financial stress/issues. I know my own divorce happened right in the middle of the whole "dot com bust" era, when everyone started getting worried about the I.T. job market, and I in fact did lose my job.

    Without going into too much detail, my ex-wife wasn't completely mentally stable. Her pregnancy seemed to be the "trigger" for her latent issues (never conclusively diagnosed but suspected by at least one therapist in the past of being bi-polar, and suffered from bouts of depression). That's, ultimately, what made it impossible to live with her anymore ... although if I wasn't under the financial stresses of losing a decent-paying job and having no prospects on the horizon of a replacement with anywhere near similar pay, we might have had a better shot of working through it.

    I will tell you this much. If you're in I.T. like I am and you're trying to raise a child by yourself, make SURE you work for someone who is understanding and flexible with the hours!! My kid just started preschool during the day, and they won't even allow dropping her off until about 7:50AM each day. I'm supposed to be at work by 8:00, which just doesn't quite work. After a few rounds battling this out with the owners, H.R., etc. - they finally seem to have agreed to let it slide, as long as I make myself very reachable by cellphone and make up the time with shorter lunches, working a little bit late, etc. Since school usually lets out by 3PM, that also poses problems. I'm currently faced with selling my house and moving much closer to my parents, so they can more easily lend a hand.

  257. Mismatched expectations lead to divorce by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't blame the IT field for your divorce. Blame yourself (and your wife) for not ensuring that your ideas of marriage aligned before you got married.

    It sounds like your idea of marriage was that you would prioritize your job over your wife under certain circumstances. It sounds like your wife's idea of marriage was that you would prioritize her over your job under those same circumstances. It doesn't mean you always deprioritized your wife or didn't care for her. It doesn't mean she was too demanding or needy. It doesn't mean that either one of you was "wrong" for expecting what you expected. It just means your expectations were fundamentally mismatched.

    You need to find yourself a woman who has the same idea of marriage that you do. You both need to check continuously that you are on the same page as each other -- this is what those relationship advice articles mean when they are always talking about "communication". Find a woman who agrees with your expectations and tactics and who wants the same things out of marriage and life that you do. And the same advice would help your ex-wife: she needs to find herself a husband whose idea of marriage aligns with her own.

    As for the kid caught in the middle of this divorce, be honest with yourself: who is going to give that kid more time and attention and proper parenting? If it's not you, then do the kid a favor and let your ex play that role. Don't use the poor kid as a tool of vengeance (by fighting for custody just to deny your ex something she wants). Be the better human being and do the best thing for the kid instead of being immature and selfish.

    --
    Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
  258. Does getting a divorce while changing to IT count? by sirgoran · · Score: 1

    I was learning how to code and learning my craft when I filed for divorce back in 1997 after nine years of marrige. But then I was also married to a golddigging, lying, cheating bitch at the time so I don't know if that had anything to do with it either. Wife number two is a gazillion times better and my partner in the graphics and webdesign company we now run out of our home. She does the pretty artwork, and I make it into a working website. It's the best of both worlds. I get to work at a job I love, with my wife and I don't have to put up with the usual office politics and bullsh**. Frankly, my stress level is nearly zero and I have time for my son (with #2, none with #1 thank the gods!). Just my two bits on the subject Goran

    --
    Carpe Scrotum - The only way to deal with your competition.
  259. Re:I'm NOT sorry to disagree by Plutonite · · Score: 1

    As a simple example, women have a primal driver towards infidelity

    That is not true, and offtopic. Men are historically known to have a greater tendency for polygamy, to the degree that it is socially accepted and sometimes part of religious doctrine. Infidelity on part of the wife is very rare if she is satisfied, and communities the world over tend to think a lot lower of the unfaithful wife, due to the pscychological nature of the female-male relationship and the role of dominance..etc.

    AS for the more relevant part of your answer - the romance, the deep reflection and the intelligence of the computer scientist can be either tools for his destruction or stairways to marital heaven. If you're smart enough to make your spouse laugh and to know what she wants and to respect it, rather than being drawn into the sometimes more important areas of thought, then you will do fine. If you can't enjoy time with your wife then you have made an obvious error in choice, which is not exclusive to intelligent people alone.

  260. A generation of pampered kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "and don't you ever put your children second."

    Only to a point. We have pampered and spoiled kids everywhere now. We've turned them into these little fragile angels who you can never say no to or even raise your voice at. They need to learn that sometimes the best thing for you is ultimately good for them. You need to take care of yourself too.

  261. A must read for parents/childern of divorce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whether you're a parent going through a divorce, a child whose parents were divorced, or are married to a person whose parents are divorced, you absolutely should read "The Unexpected Legacy of Divorce" by Julia Lewis.

    The book is a 25 year longitudinal study of children whose parents were divorced and it covers many, many issues, some of which I am still working to resolve some 20 years after my parents divorced.

    FYI, I am married, no kids.

  262. Kept the Marriage, Lost the Job by sofla · · Score: 1

    I hear where you're coming from. In my case, it turned out differently. I saved the marriage and lost the job. It wasn't easy - I basically had to walk out of the job, with nothing lined up, and we lived off savings and odd jobs for a few months. But I did eventually find an family-friendly employer. I say we let the young, single people work the 80+ hour weeks, and wonder why the old timers don't. Call us lazy if you want, then you'll hit burnout and realize what we've been on about the whole time. Your lack of planning is not my crisis!

  263. As a child of a divorced computer dad... by grgyle · · Score: 1

    I'll give the perspective from the flip side. My dad was a computer professional back in the punch card and reel-to-reel days. He and my mother divorced in 1979, and had shared custody of my brother and I until 1989, when I turned 18 and my brother sued for emancipation.

    Growing up in a tug-of-war shared custody environment is something that I would never wish on anyone. I fully believe that I would have been better off growing up being 100% with one parent or the other after their divorce. Picture a band-aid slowly being peeled off over ten years. My brother and I eventually made the adult choice to side with my mother (realizing our dad really did have fundamental problems) and have cut off relations with our father, having not spoken with him for almost 10 years.

    My point being, do what's best for your kid. If you or your kid's mom are unable to leave your emotional baggage behind, and not fight over your kid's time or make your kid feel like he's a commodity in an emotional tug-of-war, then just man up and leave his life now (or convince his mom to leave) while he's young enough to not hate you for it.

    On the upside, I have fond memories of playing "Hunt the Wumpus" on a terminal in a vast cavern of humming mainframes during "Take your kid to work day", and learned to program little things in Assembly while still learning my multiplication tables. So I guess that relates to Slashdot.

    --
    ----- And all that the Lorax left here in this mess was a small pile of rocks, with one word...UNLESS.
  264. Intriguing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What exactly are these "marriage" and "divorce" concepts you speak of?

  265. IT is not the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work in IT and am still married with one son to my wife of 6 years, partner for 11. We are about to buy our second house together.

    IT can be demanding. The threat of cheap offshore labor has a lot of us putting in 60, 70, 80 hour weeks so we won't get 'outsourced'.

    At the end of the day, your life and family are the most important thing in your life. Work 40 hours a week and be happy. Don't come home and work. Don't stay at the office til 10 PM. Don't think you can come home after an 8 hour day and stretch out. You need to change diapers, help clean, and watch the kid while your wife cooks dinner (or you need to cook while your wife handles the baby). Then you need to sit down and eat as a family.

    Put the kid to bed, then hang out with your wife and watch TV, or a movie. Take a break together. That "you take him, I had a bad day at work" crap won't fly. Go out once a month.

    If your boss has a problem with it, find a new job.

    You are a father and need to be there for your wife and child. There is no other option. I suggest you take what you've just learned here and go save your marriage.

    Working more than Joe in the corner cube so you get the biggest bonus in the group is _stupid_ and it's a fools game. Working 80 hrs a week so you can get the project done that your manager overpromised on, won't help. That project will still be late and if you rush it, you'll have way too many bugs. Studies show that your efficiency actually drops when you work 80 hrs a week, and in fact, sometimes get less done than if you were well rested and working 8 hour days.

    That is what the root of the issue is, not your career choice. Work-life balance is the thing that most people never get right and causes a large percentage of divorces.

    I work 40 hours a week, sometimes, during a big implementation, 60. That happens 4 times a year at the most.

    I was in your position 3 years ago, my wife was fed up and ready to leave. In fact, she was so distraught she went to a walmart and stole stuff because she knew she would get caught. It took her getting arrested to wake me up.

    I had a talk with a therapist who pointed out to me that my wife thinks I think my boss is more important than they were. I had a radical 180, stopped worrying about stuff that was out of my control and could do nothing about, started working 40 hours a week and leaving my pc at home turned off, and my wife and I are now happier than we've ever been.

    I have news for you, if your boss tells his boss that you can do a 3 month project in 4 weeks, it's not your problem, it's his.

    If this creates a problem between you and your boss, you need to fire _him_.

    I did it, you can do it. I am more productive doing a 40 hour week here than I ever was doing 80 hour weeks at my last job.

    -AC

  266. Been there but please dont take this personal by gone.fishing · · Score: 1

    First: Do you really think that this is a subject that you should be writing a thesis on? While you are experiencing it, that in this case, does not make you an expert. It makes you a person with an opinion, a person with a stake in it, a person suffering through it. It is like a typical cancer paitent writing a medical thesis on their particular malignancy. To me, a thesis like this should be written by someone with a background in social work.

    I've been married three times and divorced twice, with kids involved in both divorces. Sure work had something to do with it. But then again so did every single aspect of our lives. If you are blaming your job, I'd ask you to look inward and see what the job has done to you. Divorce happens because two people can no longer get along. This may happen because of communications, it may happen because the two of you become "different people" or because you have changed in some other fundamental way. Or maybe it was a difference you were able to overlook back when the sex was so damned good.

    Look no further than yourself, you will find the answers there when you are ready to be honest with yourself.

    Divorce is no fun and it is seldom just one person's fault. It does not need to ruin you though. Get over it and get on with your life. If you want to write the thesis as an act of self-discovery, do it but don't burden your prof with it because he will see it for what it is and that is most assuridly not a thesis but rather an auto-biography of one persons rather difficult and probably bitter experience.

  267. Women want to have it both ways by MCTFB · · Score: 2

    You are simply damned if you do and damned if you don't when it comes to being a husband these days. With most women, you just simply can't win anymore.

    Either you put 110% into your career and as a consequence of your long working hours you neglect the inflated emotional needs of your wife, or else you work a regular 9-5 job where you can make enough money to support yourself, but certainly not enough to support a family with a middle class lifestyle.

    Most women don't consider men who don't make well beyond the national income average (around 40K a year) as marriage material, especially if they don't already own property. Try buying a home on 40K a year in a state like California. Good Luck!

    Plus most women these days come into a marriage with massive debt in the form of student loans and other expenses they racked up in their early 20's, so they NEED a guy who makes a lot of money just to rescue them from their financial nightmare which usually is the direct result of student loans for a degree in liberal arts or some other area of study which won't get you the kind of job you need to pay off massive student loans.

    Now, to make the kind of income you need just to be considered "Marriage Material", in America you usually need to work your butt off unless of course you were born with a silver spoon in your mouth (which is a very small minority of men out there). Of course, if you work your butt off then you are probably not going to be coming home at 6:00 PM for dinner every night because your job/career demands that you get the job done because the reality is that if you don't get the job done, then you are going to have to find a job that does not pay enough to be considered "Marriage Material" by most women.

    There was once a time in America's history when it was socially acceptable for men to work their butt off all day long and women would not complain, so long as their man brought home the bacon and he was not off spending his limited free time and resources on hookers or some subordinate such as a secretary. But now, men are expected to make enough money to support a middle-class lifestyle, while at the same time be home at a predictable time as if that is how the professional world (and especially the IT world) actually works. If a man doesn't seem to be earning enough money, or else he is working too much, then those are immediate grounds for divorce. In fact, in any state with no-fault divorce, a woman can divorce you at a whim, take most of the marital assets and then have you paying child support out the wazoo for kids you will be lucky to see for even more than a few times a month. And yes many women work these days , but shortly after they get married and pop out a few kids, few wives want to ever return to work full-time again and the statistics bear that out.

    Hey, but look on the bright side, at least your are not in the military. Divorce among military families since the Afghanistan and Iraq war has been spiraling out of control as brave men and fathers are routinely rewarded for their hard service with Dear John letters from their soon to be ex-wives because they have been "neglecting their family". Even worse than that, their wives get uncontested permanent full custody of the children as well so when a father returns from his tour of duty, he finds he no longer can live in his own home, and that everything he truly fought for, deserted him while he was away defending the country.

    Whatever you do, don't blame yourself and your own hard work for your wife leaving you. There may be other mitigating circumstances in why she filed for divorce, but if your only crime is working hard to support your family, well then she is the one with the problem and not you.

    1. Re:Women want to have it both ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to review your gender-based stereotypes. Out of the engineers in my department, 5 are women, 10 are men. (This is obviously a much healthier ratio than the gender ratio in my graduating class, which was 7 women : 62 men.)
      Out of the 5 women, 3 are married; 2 of us are on our second marriages. Out of the 10 men, 6 are married, 3 are on second (or third) marriages.

      We all work long hours. Some of us have kids, some have very avid outside-work activities or commitments. Interestingly enough, it is those of us on second(or later) marriages that insist on getting the hell out of the office at a reasonable hour, for the health of our families and our own sanity.

      None of what you have stated is exclusive to one gender; it is not even stereotypically correct anymore.

      regards,
      Karinne W.
      (posting as anonymous coward; my logon's not working at the moment)

    2. Re:Women want to have it both ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You are simply damned if you do and damned if you don't when it comes to being a husband these days. With most women, you just simply can't win anymore."

      And YOU are an ignorant whiny fuckwit. If women are telling you that you're not working/loving hard enough, it's because they're trying to spare your feelings.

      Fuckwit.
      Whiner.
      Loser.

    3. Re:Women want to have it both ways by evie+goddard · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that nugget of unadulterated brilliance. What a relief that nobody expects women to be busy little yogurt-eating child-safety-obsessing supermoms who effortlessly balance their sex life, kids, and career. Why does society always hand men such a raw deal? Sorry, but "I bring home more money" doesn't justify inadequate attention to the family. You've noted the (decreasing) phenomena that more women discontinue full-time work after kids. Perhaps this isn't due to laziness, or the inherent desire to sit back and watch men suffer through the workplace. Perhaps it's because many women realize that maintaining a house, raising kids, and fulfilling any other commitments actually constitute a full-time job unto themselves, albeit unpaid. And if you think it's societally rough being a father accused of neglecting his kids, try facing that accusation as mother. I'm all in favour of sociopolitical griping, but at least give a nod to both sides, as well as the varying causes for your observed phenomena.

    4. Re:Women want to have it both ways by utah-ldl · · Score: 1

      What you say is so true. Look at how abortion is perceived by our society. Many people say it's a matter of a woman's choice and that the government should just stay out of such a personal decision and that choices are good. Sure choices are good but that attitude doesn't think for a moment about the father's choice let alone the baby's choice. It's just all about the woman herself these days. And further generally speaking it just keeps getting harder and harder to find women that respect service and dedication to others and family anymore expect perhaps among the most conservative religious women. Where is a notion like chilvalry for women??? Society doesn't have one; and that's sad! What's good for the goose is no longer good for the gander.

  268. "The Plan" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Step 1: Obtain assistance of professional peers by means of anecdotal evidence that the IT profession ruins marriage

    Step 2: Write brilliant thesis detailing how marriages (but not families, no, you are still a good dad!! See anecdotal evidence!) are ruined by the evil profession that is IT - ESPECIALLY web design. Naturally, you get an A+, pass the course based on your unique understanding of the complexities of marriage in the IT world.

    Step 3: Gain sympathy and understanding from those around you due to your brilliant thesis - which is well on its way to be published, of course.

    Step 4: Use (now published with accolades) thesis to garner support in the courts as you fight for custody of your child. Just because you didn't have time for your marriage, doesn't mean you don't have time for your kid. IT professions are bad for *marriages* - not parenting! (see published thesis)

    Yeah, good plan. Good luck with that.

  269. damn statistics by hurfy · · Score: 1

    "Of people on welfare who have children, only 10% have more than 4 kids."

    only? ((and it is 4 or more actually in link, your statement makes sound even worse than they are!!))

    What percent of all people with children have more than 4?

    only thing i found from census bureau:
    "In 2005, 10 percent of the nation's households contained five or more people, down from 21 percent in 1970. During the same time period, average household size declined from 3.14 to 2.57 people."

    Since not all of that 10% of households with 5 or more will be single parents , you ARE saying that welfare moms have MORE kids than average !

    That fails to dispute the previous poster. Nice try 10% did sound small...

    1. Re:damn statistics by 808140 · · Score: 1

      I think most everyone agrees that poverty and family size are positively correlated; it's hard to argue with this. It's not surprising, either, as from an economic perspective children are a money sink that offer little or no return on investment. In some settings (for example, in China) children are seen as an investment in the parent's future, and a parent typically spends everything they have on making sure their child is in an economically stable earnings bracket and saves little or nothing for themselves. The hope (and cultural expectation) is that the child will care for the parent in their later years. Not so in the West.

      Here, most children expect an inheritance from their parents, and people start planning for retirement by putting money aside relatively early -- many of us as early as our 20s. We won't need kids (from an economic standpoint, mind you) to take care of us when we're old.

      Children are a time-sink, a lot of work, and they offer no financial reward in most cases. Young people today, having not experienced the joy that a child can bring, will often come to the conclusion that their career is more important than starting a family.

      So it shouldn't surprise anyone that many of the nation's high-earners are also childless, or if they have children, they only have one or two. This brings the national average down.

      A higher percentage of poor people are also on welfare (which surprises exactly no one.) You would therefore expect people on welfare to have higher numbers of children than the national average.

      However, there are a few key assumptions that are implicitly made when people talk about welfare mothers with tons of children. One particularly erroneous one is that they have those children on welfare, not that they had three kids, lost their jobs, and were forced on to welfare to make ends meet. Obviously that's a rather different situation, wouldn't you say? And yet, just looking at the numbers, it all looks the same.

      Your argument is sort of silly, too, from a purely mathematical standpoint. The mean of a sample (average household size, in your case) is not at all indicative of the "shape" of the distribution (skew, kurtosis, etc) and makes drawing conclusions difficult without further analysis. This is why the median and the mode are usually included when trying to draw meaningful conclusions.

    2. Re:damn statistics by 808140 · · Score: 1

      As an addendum, you'll be glad that I used your numbers in another post in this thread to further illustrate how silly your line of reasoning is.

      Thanks for that.

    3. Re:damn statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not commenting about wheather welfare people have above/below/same number of kids on average than folks not on welfare, but I will say your understanding of those statistics is mightily screwed up.

      I'm single. Been that way a looooong time. My household size is 1. My retired parents have a household of 2 (kids are long gone from living with them). We drag down that average to 2.57 from what would be a much larger number if you were only including households with children to try to determine the number of children per household. There isn't enough data presented from those statistics you cite to say if welfare mothers do or do not have an above average number of children.

  270. The point of ask slashdot by crabpeople · · Score: 1
    "1) Ask /. is now officially worthless"

    now ?

    But more honestly, as someone once famously posted, the only point of ask slashdot is to make fun of the people asking slashdot.

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
  271. sure didn't help my wife out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my job as an IT consultant keeps me on the road 4-5 days a week, 48-50 weeks a year. I work in this position so that my wife can stay home and homeschool our son. I can say that when we nearly divorced last year that the pressure of being on the road all the time was a major contributing factor to our problems. But this was because I'm a road warrior moreso than that i'm in IT.

  272. Is this really your thesis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're doing your thesis on this? Are you studying computers or counseling?

  273. A better question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A better question is why would you put up with that crap?

    I made a decision years ago to leave a job BECAUSE it impacted my family life. 80 - 120 hours per week, holidays included. I took a 30% pay cut to go elsewhere, but was up to my old salary before the year was out and only working 40 hours a week.

    Now I'm still in IT, I take 2 week vacations to Hawaii, most weekends off and work no more than 46 hours a week on average. The key is (A) not putting up with that crap and if they won't budge, leave and (B) surrounding yourself with competent people who don't need you to hold their hands 24/7.

    Do I carry a cellphone with paging? Yes, and it's used only during emergencies. Do I get paged at 2 AM sometimes? Yes, but I have 2 other people who can fill in when it gets bad.

    You must prioritize your life and not blame your carreer because you didn't have the backbone and/or financial planning skills to not be in that situation. But mostly, find another job rather than destroy your life. I'd be happier working IT for a small privately owned company making 20% less than everyone else if it meant I had a happy home life. Money isn't everything. Family is.

    I guess it all just boils down to what your priorities are. The first thing I told my new employer (where I'm now a partner/owner) was "I don't work on Sundays, just so you know."

  274. It doesn't matter _what_ the job is... by jonadab · · Score: 1

    Any job, in any field, can cause marital problems that can lead to divorce, but the problem is independent of any particular profession. The problem comes from a difference of understanding between you, your spouse, and your boss about how much priority your job takes over other stuff. In some cases the differences between your spouse and your boss may be irreconcilable, in which case you have no choice but to pick sides. If you do what your boss wants in such an instance, your family life will suffer, make no mistake.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  275. Programmer, Married, Divorced, No kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was married to a beautiful girl, active, outdoorsy, and hot. I didn't devote too much time to my job, but I did devote too much energy to it. I was always drained after work; I didn't want to do anything, even on weekends. We used to do so much together, hiking, camping, shooting, even working on cars together. She had no interest in computers, but programming was my hobby *and* my job. I think she got lonely.
    At any rate, she left me and I was too caught up in work and too tired to do anything about it. In case it wasn't obvious, I still miss her (been 7 years). I should never have devoted so much energy to a job that ultimately didn't give a damn about me. STUPID!

  276. Not the job's fault? Uh, maybe? by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, this topic is about to fall off the Slashdot homepage, so I guess my comment is destined to languish in obscurity. However, let's do this for posterity.

    There are many posts here making the point that it's ridiculous to blame your job for your divorce. They make the distinction that human beings make these choices, and the blame should fall there. It's a good point, although maybe some could have said it more kindly. But it doesn't change the fact that some work environments are extremely hostile to marriages.

    I worked at software reporting tools company for a couple of years. At one point, there was a Web site redesign scheduled. As the sole Web person at the time, I worked 2 90+ hour weeks back to back. It was something like 16 days on, each day up at dawn, home at nearly midnight. I was a (relatively) new father. I didn't once speak to my daughter during that time -- I only saw her sleeping at night. I was OK with this because it was a very short-term crunch. But I was a little sad. I launched the redesign Sunday night, got a few hours of sleep, and arrived at work Monday morning at 7:30 AM. I wasn't expecting much, but some acknowledgement of my hard work would have been nice. My boss was there, livid. I don't even recall what the problem was, but it was minor. She ripped into me. I defended myself with the truth -- "I've worked 16 days in a row, I haven't seen my family, there aren't any more hours in the day!"

    Her response? "You'll just have to find a way to do more!"

    You can say that the people in the marriage are always the problem. You can say that it's a cop-out to blame external pressures. And I agree to a certain point. I was at a crossroads, and I could have chosen my job over my family at that moment. It would have been my choice, my consequences. But I also know that certain types of people can and will take advantage. Certain people do NOT care about anything other than their own goals, and if they can manipulate a young, inexperienced worker bee into slaving away, so be it. If the worker bee crashes & burns, "maybe that worker bee wasn't cut out for the job." It is a fairly heartless way to interact with people, and to some degree, I think such people are not blameless for the pain that follows.

    Oh, and I'm still married. I work freelance, my own schedule. We have income that is nowhere near what I used to make, but I'm way the hell happier.

  277. Wait a minute! by WrongDecision · · Score: 1

    Wait a minute! Who said marriages were supposed to last?

  278. Re:yep... by 808140 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The time that elapses between steps 2 and 3 is variable. Late-term abortions are generally held to be dangerous, not to mention the moral quandries associated with them. Sometimes the father is a dead-beat who doesn't leave (or leaves after the child is born), but provides no financial support, or worse, spends money.

    Personally, being pro-choice, I support a woman's right to choose. Were I woman, and were I in a similar situation, I might choose to have an abortion. But I think it's important to recognize the psychological strife that comes with ending the life growing inside of you. Don't fall into the trap of thinking that it's not an agonizing decision for most women, even those that are pro-choice. For me, respecting a woman's right to choose means also respecting her choice to keep the child. If she can't pay for it herself, I don't think giving her a measily 7000 dollars a year is too much of a burden on the American taxpayer, given the other things we pay for (like billion dollar stealth bombers the military doesn't even want.) But I'm making a value judgement there, based on my own politics. You might disagree, which is your perogative.

    Everything else aside though, the "just have an abortion" response is pretty callous, and if you think about it, it's easy for you to say because, and this is important, you will never have to decide whether or not having an abortion is the right decision or the wrong one. It's like non-smokers who tell a lifelong addict to "just quit smoking." It might be the right response, but it's much easier said than done. A person who has successfully quit smoking generally has a great deal more empathy for people who have trouble kicking the habit than people who have no frame of reference. I hate to sound sexist, but as men, we are biologically incapable of having a frame of reference when it comes to abortion.

    We will never have more than anecdotal evidence to bring to bear when it comes to subjects like pregnancy, period cramps, and abortion. A little bit of humility goes a long way here.

  279. the job is wrong seen it to often. by PermanentMarker · · Score: 2

    I see this happen to often the job is wrong. Engineers doing a job work to much hours a week. And spend to less attentions to their family life. Not because they dont want but often they cannt because of how much they work A lot of them are burned out early also it's much the same You wouldnt have that if you would have been a painter for example. A painter would say it's 17:30 i'm going home i'll be back the next day. While your boss tells you custommer xx database is down help, and he will keep telling you that because after customer X we got Y and then Z, and then we start all overagain with A, B... (it never ends) As people in IT are to afraid to loose their job they do just to much. This is not in balance with their sallery. Not only that it's not in balance with a promice of mariage to be there when your girl needs you, and thats so wrong, so damn wrong!! so it this must be told for once

    --
    I know you're out there. I can feel you now. I know that you're afraid. You're afraid of us. You're afraid of change.
  280. Quit your job for "Bob" by scalpod · · Score: 0

    Any yetinsyny woman worth her weight in yak hair will fully support you leaving your go-nowhere soul-sucking slackless Con job. A faithful and true Connietite will understand your duty in promoting patriopsychoanarchomaterialism being first-and-foremost the 'king of your castle'. If you're not subgenius, please keep toiling away as a miserable mediocretin. Pathetic pinkboys with the spines of jellyfish deserve every lingering lash of their demonic taskmaster's whip. If you want to know what you really think and to learn how to pull the wool over your own eyes - send $30 to "Bob" and "get right" with the only Man that matters, you schmuck. Sure you'll still get whipped mercilessly but it'll be a whip of your choosing, wielded by a smiling beacon of slack and not some middle-management goon. www.subgenius.com Eternal Salvation or Triple Your Money Back!

    --
    If "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" and "it was beauty that killed the beast" then "please stop staring at me".
  281. tough sh_t by ralph1 · · Score: 1

    If you are stupid enough to get married what happens in divorice is your tough sh_t. No one can ever make a bitch happy.

  282. The KKK took my baby away by grapeape · · Score: 1

    Everyone has an excuse, but usually we need to look internally to find out what causes relationships to split up. IT is convenient because of the time consuming tasks involved but when you look deeper usually its due to ignoring the spouse after work because your spending all your fee time on the computer as well. Gaming, Email, IRC and even posting on Slashdot can make a spouse feel a bit neglected. At one point early in my married life I was spending more time at the computer after work than at work...it lead to my wife having an affair. At first I just wanted to end it, but reluctantly agreed to counseling. I came to realize that the problems that led to the affair were more my fault than anything. My wife said she did it to get my attention, it worked. I changed my habits, my wife and I now have time that the computer is off limits and we have been happy for 15 years now. The bottom line is your job doesnt have to define your life, dont neglect those around you and keep the office and home life separate as much as possible.

    1. Re:The KKK took my baby away by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      The Cramps referenced on Slashdot?!?! [stunned]

  283. MOD PARENT UP by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    Really.

    People who get divorced always say 'he/she changed!' Bull. They were always that way you just ignored it because they were good in bed/had money/you had low self esteem.

  284. It may not be the only cause... by pinkfalcon · · Score: 1

    I don't think my IT job was the cause of my divorce (In fact I was only working half time for a dot-bomb at the time, got laid off 5 days after my wife moved in with her boyfriend).

    But at my new job, we do have a standing joke to rate the complexity/stress of a just-completed project by the number of divorces that occured among everybody concerned.
    The worst I've worked on was a 3 divorce project, but that's probably low in bigger organizations.

    (We had one one guy who got married and divorced during the same project)

    --
    Real SUV's don't have cupholders
    It's 5:42 A.M., do you know where your stack pointer is?
  285. Child Support thread starts too by vinn01 · · Score: 1

    If Girlfriend 5.0 spawns a child process, a Child Support thread also starts. And it cannot be terminated until many run time conditions are met.

  286. Are you kidding? by countach · · Score: 1

    Are you kidding? Computers is a high paying, generally short hours, low stress job. If this gives you a divorce, anything would.

    1. Re:Are you kidding? by mrobinso · · Score: 1

      countach (534280) writes:

      > Are you kidding? Computers is a high paying, generally short hours, low stress job.
      > If this gives you a divorce, anything would.

      Well, the term "computer industry" is a pretty broad spectrum of skills
      and job descriptions.

      How does managing the network infrastructure for a 15000 employee Fortune 500
      location compare to blowing the dust out of used PCs with canned air at a
      Best Buy for stress and hours?

      Advancedment in the industry requires unbridled dedication and commitment.

      So does a marriage.

      There's a train wreck waiting to happen.

      mike

      --
      -- Karma whore? You betcha. --
  287. A URL to look at... by javabandit · · Score: 1

    BTW... I feel for your situation personally. There's a good chance that your wife may have a very tough time accepting her own illness. Here's a good site talking about depression and its symptoms:

    http://www.dbsalliance.org/info/depression.html/

  288. Apparent from your post by 22_9_3_11_25 · · Score: 1

    That you totally disregard a woman's point of view since your OP only invited 'computer dads' to respond. You might want to look right there for the source of your problem.

  289. Just goes to show by snuf23 · · Score: 3, Funny

    we have 9 people in our IT unit and only one divorce (and I think it was HER career that caused the problem there, not his)

    Never marry a stripper.

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
    1. Re:Just goes to show by ksheff · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know a guy that did. He regrets it and passes along the same advice.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    2. Re:Just goes to show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work with an ex-stripper (if there is such a thing) in IT (not that she really has any IT skills), and I can sympathize.

    3. Re:Just goes to show by MoeDrippins · · Score: 1

      Considering we're talking about IT folks, I'm guessing the "marry a stripper" possibility is slim indeed.

      --
      Before you design for reuse, make sure to design it for use.
  290. I beg to differ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1) for many degrees, a bachelor's degree with good grades isn't enough- you have to have a masters.
    2) if you are much below 2.5, you are probably not going to get a job in your field unless you network hard.
    3) You can recover (mostly) from bad grades after 5 to 10 years but you never recover the lost income.
    4) for the coolest jobs- you need a 4.000+ (in most cases even if you are a genius)

    I did not graduate from college. Mind you, I appreciate the importance of a degree, and plan to get one, but the timing hasn't been right. I am working in IT, and pretty much at the top of my game right now. Right now, my income is around 250K ($US). That's a far cry from selling movie tickets or burgers. It's not Donald Trump or Bill Gates money, but it's enough for a comfortable living.

    This is posted as AC because I don't feel a need to brag about my income, just stating it to prove my point. Yes, college is useful in many ways, but it isn't necessarily the be-all-end-all or employment. If you're truly good at what you do (and have experience and references to back it up), you can substitute for a lot of education.

  291. Like I said, marriage itself has no value anymore. by javabandit · · Score: 1
    If two people want a divorce because they're no longer attracted to one another, or because they have disagreements about money, or family, or any number of other very fundamental things, it's incredibly stupid to suggest that they should stay together "for the marriage."


    Incredibly stupid? Why even get married then... if you aren't going to stick it out? The way you talk, its stupid for people to realize that a disagreement is not the end of the world... and stay in their marriage.

    And "American" has nothing to do with it. If anything, "Americans" these days don't "man up" and own ANY responsibility or decisions. Its always someone else's fault, its always someone else's burden to carry, its always all about *me*. Being married means that you are going to stick with a person, love them, through the good and the bad. If you don't want the bad, then don't get married -- because it comes with the territory.
  292. This will yield only a series of random anecdotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    He will not be able to derive any conclusions from this quest, because he will get nothing but a series of random anecdotes.

    I find his quest to be an exceedingly odd one. It would have never occurred to me in a million years to associate my career in software with my marriage.

    The probability of me getting a divorce is about as close to zero as imaginable. That's because of the priorities I have, and the kind of person I am, and the extreme care that I took in selecting my partner.

    None of that has anything whatsoever to do with the fact that I happen to have a knack for software development.

  293. Re:Since other aspects are sufficiently covered .. by oldbaldandfat · · Score: 1

    I agree with a few others here that your job is not the necessarily the reason your Wife has decided to leave you.

    Ask yourself this:

    Did you concisely show her AFFECTION? i.e. go out of your way to hold her hand in public and in front of her family and friends?

    Did you have 'DATE NIGHTS'?
    Did you show 'family commitment' by spending time with your family?

    Did you focus much of your time working about just the "providing" part of your roll as a husband?

    If any of these things get a YES for an answer, YOU have left your wife in need.
    I will grant you, you may not have known any better and tried your best to make her happy, but I think you are suffering from a lack of skill in the marriage department.

    Please take a look at two websites to get help if you want a chance to save your marriage.

    1. www.marriagebuilders.com
    2. www.survivingbetrayal.com (it's a site about affairs, but also to get help about why your wife is leaving you)

    Here are some books to take a look at as well:

    His Needs and Her Needs by Dr. Harley.

    Here is a link: http://www.marriagebuilders.com/graphic/mbi6020_ne eds.html

    Best value for $20 you will ever get!

  294. Re:Hypothesis: people get married far too young. by jamesmrankinjr · · Score: 1

    If two people want a divorce because they're no longer attracted to one another, or because they have disagreements about money, or family, or any number of other very fundamental things, it's incredibly stupid to suggest that they should stay together "for the marriage."

    In The Great Divorce, C.S. Lewis describes Hell (or maybe Purgatory; it's never fully explained) as a place where people can build whatever they want just by thinking about it.

    The natural result is that soon, people are living literally thousands or millions of miles away from each other, because every time there is a disagreement or one person is irritated by another, they construct something bigger and far away so they don't need to deal with that person.

    I think the U.S. is striving to create this kind of society. We live in bigger and bigger houses, farther and farther away from each other, watch television and play video games instead of talking to each other, masturbate to porn instead of making love to other people who may not be liposuctioned or enhanced just the way we like or might not feel like it when we do or even might possibly reject us.

    If you leave someone every time you don't happen to feel attracted to them, or have a disagreement about money, or family, or something else fundamental, how can you ever be intimate with someone, love someone, know someone beyond a superficial level?

    Maybe sometimes, a relationship, love, is worth sacrificing for?

    Peace be with you,
    -jimbo

  295. Women speak out, that's the big diff these days... by javabandit · · Score: 1

    Totally agree. Communication is fundamental. And avoiding the conflict will just make it grow (this is Conflict Management 101 straight out of management classes).

    I've fought a TON with my wife. But she has security because she knows now that I won't leave her over a bad fight. Whereas we've had friends (married couples) who had a bad fight and it ends with: "Fuck you, bitch. I'm calling a lawyer." Fighting used to scare the hell out of her. And some of our fights have been months in length -- on and off. But it works out, eventually.

    I think the big difference these days is that women can actually speak out these days. 50 years ago, they used to just stifle and not say a word. These days, a wife will walk up to a husband and say, "I don't care if you bring home the money, you're a fucking idiot for doing ."

    I don't think a lot of men can deal with that kind of confrontation. I think most men just think, "Look, I'm bringing home 100k a year, I'm feeding you, I'm clothing you, you just need to shut up." Those days are over.

  296. Scientific by bkruiser · · Score: 1

    I hope you don't expect to use any of this as valid information.

  297. Marriage is flawed by design by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    The human is poligam by nature. Living and sleeping with the same woman all your life is an almost impossible thing to do.

    Once I has been told that an old arab proverb stated something like:
    "The age of the perfect woman for you equals your age divided by two plus seven"

    So if her_age = your_age / 2 +7 then:
    At 13 you deserve a 13.5 year old girl
    At 16 you get a 15 year old girl
    At 20, her's goes to 17. Not bad uh? but wait..
    At 30, she should be 22!!!
    At 40, she should be 27!!!!
    At 80, 47
    And so on.

    See the pattern? In order to get the perfect woman for you, every year, you have to change her for a new one each year.

  298. Re:yep... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it may be agonizing for some random person who got knocked up without planning to but how the fuck is that my (wallets) problem? Make responsible choices or crash and burn.

  299. Hmm by DaveJay · · Score: 1

    My parents have been married -- and still are -- since the 60s. My father's been working in IT since the 70s. I've been working in IT since the mid 90s, and my marriage is strong/kids are happy.

    Er, I don't have a point here, except to say that working in IT is not a guarantee of marital strife.

  300. I'm not surprised by ChronoFish · · Score: 1

    I'm not at all surprised. The IT world is full of driven people. Smart, motiviated people who love to solve problems get addicted to the constant positive feedback their brain craves with each small increment in software development (or other problem-solving profession). There is a preception that "I'm on a role" - I just need 15 more mintues (and then 15 more and 15 more and 15 more... before you know your wife was expecting you home hours ago).

    The delimia is that IT jobs are typically taken by people who love IT jobs. Their work is their pleasure. And there is always work to be done. Add in pressure from a boss, or upper level managment, or customers, who can blame an IT guy for living at work?

    However the perception that you can't leave work is just that. It's a perception. You actually can leave. You may not want to. You may feel obligated to stay and finish "one more line of code" - but your feeling guilty for leaving is something that you have to come to terms with on your own.

    We all make choices - and leaving a wife and kids at home for the bennefit of work is the sacrifice we all make. What time should you be home? What time should you leave for work in the morning? How many hours should you stay at work? Those are all choices. You will do what you feel makes you happiest. Those choices may be at conflict with what your family wants.

    That is not the jobs fault. That is not the industries fault. It is simply the choice you have made. An easy choice? Maybe not. An active choice? maybe not. But a choice non-the-less.

    BTW:
    I find it humerous that there are huge number of Triathletes that come form the IT World (my self included). Triathletes also have a high divorce rate (not including me). There are only so many hours in the day to do all the things one wants to do. Personally I have shoved my workout schedule to the side and try to limit my hours at work - I have a new son and I am not willing to let him become the secondary part of my world.

    -CF

  301. Amen - small, frequent amounts of time can suffice by Rikardon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I agree that if your family is or wants to be supportive, they don't usually require a lot of time each day. What my wife and kids DO require is some amount of time, however limited, that is theirs and theirs alone (nearly) every day. Also, they need to know that whatever else is taking my time is in pursuit of some concrete, beneficial goal.

    I have bedtime traditions with my kids. Not the same one every night, but a handful we can use on different nights depending on everyone's energy level. Sometimes I wrestle with them before bedtime. Sometimes I read to them out of a slim blue volume of Robert Louis Stevenson's poems for children. With my daughter I'm teaching her a song in French; sometimes we dance around the livingroom and sing together. With my oldest son I'm now listening to him learn to read before bedtime.

    None of those take more than fifteen minutes each, but they happen (nearly) EVERY night, at or about the same time, and my children and I have come to count on them.

    With my wife it's similar. Some nights we're lucky, and all three kids are asleep early enough that we can talk (and do other things) for some time. Other nights we're really tired but we make time to exchange a simple kiss or two when passing in the hallway, or to rub each others' shoulders, or something.

    I guess if I have anything to add to the parent post it's that you need to sell your family on the benefits of whatever else is consuming your time. If your family truly believes that what you're doing is in pursuit of some shared goal, there's less resentment at your being busy. Couple that with consistent time together, even if it's short, and it sends the message "I value you" rather than "I don't have time for you." I myself am very task-focused and tend to deal brusquely with interruptions when I'm focused on something, so when I'm with my family I try to be WITH them, and I apologize when I'm too harsh.

    I'm rambling a bit, and I'm deeply sorry if this post is hard to read for the original poster since he's past the stage where these ideas have any value for his current situation. But I wanted to chime in with my two cents in support of the immediate parent post to this one, which contains a lot of useful wisdom.

  302. Re:Decisions and Balance by ksheff · · Score: 1

    so how did she deal with the pay cut?

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  303. Getting married caused your divorce! by SimHacker · · Score: 1

    IT didn't cause your divorce. Getting married caused your divorce. And who do you have to blame but yourself and your wife, for that?

    -Don

    --
    Take a look and feel free: http://www.PieMenu.com
  304. Re:Hypothesis: people get married far too young. by Tim · · Score: 1

    "If you leave someone every time you don't happen to feel attracted to them, or have a disagreement about money, or family, or something else fundamental, how can you ever be intimate with someone, love someone, know someone beyond a superficial level? Maybe sometimes, a relationship, love, is worth sacrificing for?"

    Nice straw man.

    I didn't say that couples should split up "every time" they had problems. I argued that it's incredibly stupid for two people to stay together for the sake of an institution. That said, consider the universe of relationships outside of the institution of marriage -- people are regularly intimate, loving and caring with one another without the need for a sacrament or legal framework to bind them.

    Only the pious seem to have the (perverse) need to force couples to stay together in the face of obvious evidence to the contrary. We would all be much happier if we allowed our relationships to form, develop and -- if necessary -- dissolve without penalty or social stigma, in order to meet our intellectual, sexual, and social needs.

    May you be touched by His noodly appendage,
    -tim

    --
    Let's try not to let fact interfere with our speculation here, OK?
  305. Re:Like I said, marriage itself has no value anymo by Tim · · Score: 1

    Incredibly stupid? Why even get married then... if you aren't going to stick it out? The way you talk, its stupid for people to realize that a disagreement is not the end of the world... and stay in their marriage. If anything, "Americans" these days don't "man up" and own ANY responsibility or decisions. Its always someone else's fault, its always someone else's burden to carry, its always all about *me*. Being married means that you are going to stick with a person, love them, through the good and the bad. If you don't want the bad, then don't get married -- because it comes with the territory.

    What a very feisty rant. Two points:

    1) You meant to respond to the grandparent post, not the parent.

    2) "Being married" means that you have certain legal rights and obligations. Everything else is a strictly personal interpretation and/or value judgment, and as such, is relevant only to you. Hence, my argument: it is incredibly stupid to stay in a non-functional relationship (or to argue thereof) for the "sake" of a marriage. A marriage is a thing, not a value.

    My argument does not preclude responsibility, love, decision-making or morality. It does, however, preclude the unnecessary psychological damage that unhappy couples inflict on one another in the name of religious and social dogma.

    --
    Let's try not to let fact interfere with our speculation here, OK?
  306. Divorcing Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm currently in the process of getting a divorce, but it had nothing to do with my work. In fact, before my wife took off, my boss tried to minimize extra hours to I could concentrate on saving my marriage. The problem was, however, my wife's 15 year old daughter (my stepdaughter) who was completely out of control because my wife didn't have the backbone to put limits on the kid. It wasn't something as simple as occasionally staying out a bit late. The kid was getting drunk on a daily basis, refused to go to school, would run away for days at a time, often with no clue as to who she was with or what she did. The topper was when my wife refused to intervene when her daughter started dating a 21 year old guy who was supplying her with cocaine and alcohol and having a sexual relationship. Even when I handed my wife the evidence, the full AIM chat logs where she brags to her friends, my wife refused to believe it. For me, this was the final straw and I contacted the police.

    So now I'm getting a divorce and my wife continues to live a life of delusion about her daughter. I expect CPS to step in and do something in the near future.

    1. Re:Divorcing Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, we must have the same exact teen age daughter and almost the same wife. My situation is a little different in that our daughter is both of ours and my wife is not as delusional, but more "sympathetic" and "understanding" toward our daughter then I am. I have just about given up because it is very hard in many ways when the parents do not have a united front. It is now to the point that my daughter blames ME for her own problems instead of accepting the blame for her own actions. On another note.. I often wonder how a 21 year old becomes such a loser that he can only find a comfort level with teen age girls at least 5 years younger then himself. My dauther can not understand that if he can not maintain friends or relationships with people at or around his own age then there must be a problem.

  307. IT Nothing, ry being "The Cable Guy" by BroadbandBradley · · Score: 1

    you work as a contractor (no health benefits or vacation time) from leaving the house at 6AM and getting home around 8 or 9 (sometimes later) at night. do this 6 days a week , dig trenches to lay cable lug a heavy ladder around and crawl in attics at 120+ degrees, then spend most of Sunday cleaning out your cable rig and getting ready for another run. it's $1200 a week the hard way, it either keeps you young or ages you before your time I'm not sure which yet.

    Me thinks you Likely just spend too much time reading slashdot instead of "Tickling the Wife" as we in the Cable business call it.

  308. Re:Since other aspects are sufficiently covered .. by NoseSocks · · Score: 1

    brilliant!

  309. It=D I V O R V E . . . by certain+death · · Score: 1

    Funny story here.... I was a Nurse/Respiratory Therapist for about 12 years before I went into IT...During that time, I went through 2, count them, 2 wifes...Now that I have been in IT for about 12 years, I have only had ONE wife, and she accepts that sometimes the job comes before the marriage, but I make it up to her when I can, and she knows I will. I think ANY job can cause a divorce if you let it. Either a Dr., Lawyer, IT guy, Wedding videographer, or wetf you decide to do, just make sure if you get married, you know the person, and that they understand you have a demanding job. SHIT!!! I sound like SUCH A SISSY!!!! :o)

    --
    "My immediate reaction is "WTF? What kind of moron doesn't make things 64-bit safe to begin with?" Linus
  310. easier to move by DriveDog · · Score: 1

    In my case (which did not end in divorce), I was pretty confident I could find work in most other geographic areas because of my field, which made it easier for me to consider leaving. It absolutely did enter into the equation. Other than that, I can't see any particular evidence or basis for believing that being in IT would make divorce more likely.

  311. VERY common misperception here by unity100 · · Score: 1

    "geek" has no social skills.

    And apparently, whatnot, you have seen sufficient "evidence" from my post indicative of that matter.

    Totally irrelevant.

    I have been involved in 4 different clubs in university, did the vice presidency of one of them, which was not a club but even more of a technical department anyways, and also in the meantime i have become involved and worked in a respectable position in a big political party that was the main opposition then.

    all these without counting the social organization and stuff i did over the internet.

    A very common misconception that is very easily and mistakenly slapped to so-called 'geek's forehead or to the people who do not very much prefer to PHYSICALLY get out of the location and pre-historically come face to face with MANY other people.

    If we had internet back then, i would very much prefer to do many stuff over the net, social wise, because it saves you HUGE amounts of time, and prevents unneccessary energy&time wastage for doing trivial social contact.

    Internet provides me with much more social contact, on MY initiative. Rather than trying to chance the schedules with some other 4 guys once every month and "see" them by spending a considerable amount of time and effort to meet, i can get into contact with over 80+ people in icq, 40+ people in msn. And a great many of them overseas people.

    There are times that one needs to close down instant messengers to feel alone. If used in correct manner, internet amenities can provide THAT much social interaction.

    The same thing that was valid in physical contact is still valid on the internet too - less quantity, more quality. Choose who you get around yourself, even in an instant messenger, and you may get phenomenonal amount of pleasure from a simple text chat too.

    So please spare me the stereotypical understanding of "people who sit in front of computer dont do any social" crap that is only befitting of a grandmother who has no idea what the hell this internet thing is.

  312. My story among the many by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Married at 18. In the military for 10 years, 3 years of that doing rigous training (about 12-18/hr day) and 5 years on a submarine away from home a minimum of 50% of the time in cycles of ~100 days at a time with ZERO outgoing communications to the outside world. I did luck out and both of my kids were born while I was in port. It takes a strong willed spouse to handle that stuff alone and far away from the rest of their own family. I am out of the military now and for the last 8 years I have been climbing up the IT ladder and average about 8 to 12 hours a day. We have been married for 17 years and still going. Kids are 15 and 16.

    Don't blame a divorce on your work, it is a combination of you and/or your spouse not getting what each wants. It may not be your direct fault the other feels let down but everyone is different and has different needs and more often then not, the other one feels those needs are not justified. Neither person is right or wrong.

  313. Misreading and misperceptions here ... by unity100 · · Score: 1

    "You, by now definitely thinking that this is a macho post ... and im laying all the blame on women."

    Why, yes I am. I can't believe a post saying, and I quote, "women are faulty" got an "insightful" score.


    That is of course without reading the latter part of the sentence & post that clearly states "women are faulty IN THIS". in this = case at hand. so no surprise you cant believe why this got an insightful score.

    Sure, women have a biological drive to find a secure, loving home to raise children. Even if we choose not to raise a family, we still are wired to be in and part of a loving, caring environment. It's not a fault, it's a virtue that ensures the future of the human race.

    When this biological drive to create or be in a loving, secure home starts being in expense of another (male here) soul's expense, there is a problem in that. We, the mankind is not striving to exist just for the existance's sake. We strive to live more fulfilled lives. So, if women tend to turn males to puppets that only feed the herd, by using their emotional superiority, this is exploitation without intention.

    Besides, if you never "get out and do something", you'll quickly become obese, lethargic, and die of a heart attack at the age of 40. Who wants to be married to that?

    another misperception here, despite i spend VERY much time in front of the computer, and eat everytime i feel like it, im 1.83 cm in height and 75-80 kg in weight. Which proportions are just appropriate for enlisting in the air force academy that has the tightest health requirements in my country.

    We live in a world of misperceptions, as you can easily see.

  314. Re:Are you freaking kidding me??? by unity100 · · Score: 1

    And curiously, you are an anonymous coward here, in your post. Which makes me wonder.

    I, a supposed geek, am deliberately expressing opinions about what i have EXPERIENCED in around my life and the people's lives around, a spectrum of people in many ways and alleys of life, yet, your response is just like reprimanding a way out of control husband, albeit in a more fierce manner.

    What i see in your post is emotional belittlement and supression of opposite idea, which is EXACTLY the thing i wrote that lenghty post for.

    Bad experiences with women - and where did the hell you come with that from ? - Well, one can definitely go into many types of unfounded assumptions when s/he tries to supress an opposite idea cant s/he ?

    I, myself suggest you take a look on your post and see that your post alone proves my point.

  315. you are WRONG by unity100 · · Score: 1

    being 40 years married for now, makes them at least 60 years old.

    Those generations were different from today's generations. Then the values of sincerity, fidelity, sacrifice etc were more emphasized and seen important.

    Today's generations have generally grown up in leisure conditions, at least acceptable environments. They have been urged to go to be the best, to get the best, to enjoy life etc.

    As a result most of the female members are little princesses, and males are princes.

    They marry, and they think that marriage is going to be a place where the attention and effort is still focused on them, like in the parents' house or the college.

    Both, after a while sees it is not so. Then problems arise.

    1. Re:you are WRONG by ksheff · · Score: 1

      we're talking about the Baby Boom generation, not their parents.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    2. Re:you are WRONG by unity100 · · Score: 1

      Baby boom generation still had virtuous principles. Heck, the hippie generation was of baby boomers.

    3. Re:you are WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stop contradicting yourself. Hippies were and still are pond scum. Nothing virtuous about them at all.

    4. Re:you are WRONG by unity100 · · Score: 1

      Let us see :

      Before hippies, it was "do duty by your country, appear conformist at all costs, supress your and others feelings, wealth is good, wealthy is respectable, politicians always right" morally.

      And "exploit whatever you can in the name of production, consumption, technological progress, political power, poison the air, sea, water, people, let the government cover it up" socially.

      After hippies the ideas that constitute many of the socially bettering principles that we now see as normal have come.

      If this is pond scum, i request that whole world should be a pond, and scum be filled in it.

      My mother was an agricultural engineer in government service.

      She died because of intestine cancer, caused by usage of DDT for agricultural purposes.

      If hippies came 10-20 years earlier, she wouldnt have died.

      So sire, go drown yourself in a pond.

  316. Support Calls by Magic+Fingers · · Score: 1

    In IT the only reason I see of failed marriage is when your wife start picking up support calls..

  317. Sports - WHY obligatory ? by unity100 · · Score: 1

    I dont get why people pose doing sports as an "obligatory" thing.

    People fail to realize that every body has its unique psyhology, with its own biorhytm and such.

    I dont do sports. i sit in front of computer. i dont go out much. i eat whenever i want.

    Yet im still 1.83 cm and 75-80 kg, and healthy.

    The main thing is to listen to your body and tend to ITS needs, not what society thinks it needs.

    1. Re:Sports - WHY obligatory ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet im still 1.83 cm and 75-80 kg, and healthy.

      With respect, you have a body mass index of 409836.066-437158.47 -- this puts you well above the "morbidly obese" 25.

    2. Re:Sports - WHY obligatory ? by Qem · · Score: 1

      Generally because doing sports, indicates social interation and having a hobby outside of work, which are generally considered good things for making a well-rounded person.

      --
      bah.
    3. Re:Sports - WHY obligatory ? by unity100 · · Score: 1

      Air force does not think so.

      It is an absurd scale if it puts me in "morbidly" or any other sort of "obese".

      Should be an american scale apparently, in which healthy people are taken to be skeleton-like supermodels.

    4. Re:Sports - WHY obligatory ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a joke, you originally claimed you were 1.83 CENTIMETERS tall, which makes your BMI quite outstanding!

    5. Re:Sports - WHY obligatory ? by unity100 · · Score: 1

      doh - all these differences between measurement units and the opportunities they create

  318. And i hate this - by unity100 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If we find the toilet seat down, we put it up and do our thing. We dont yell or bitch about it being up or down.

    WHY dont women do the same ?

    1. Re:And i hate this - by russellh · · Score: 1
      If we find the toilet seat down, we put it up and do our thing. We dont yell or bitch about it being up or down. WHY dont women do the same ?
      good lord, man. everyone should close the thing. it's not complicated.
      --
      must... stay... awake...
    2. Re:And i hate this - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps because we don't fall ass-first into its cold, slimy embrace when we find it left accidentally in the down position. Why don't you get some sense, take a load off, join with women and piss while sitting down? Not at public bathrooms, of course -- that's just gross -- but certainly at home, and perhaps at work, for the benefit of your legs and your loved women folk.

      The only time this is at all more difficult is in the mornings while experiencing an erection. It can be difficult to fit the thing inside the bowl while maintaining a position which allows you the flexibility to pee without the chilly porcelain nipping at you. But it's hardly more difficult than pointing it upwards and arcing your stream in an attempt to keep your urethra open.

    3. Re:And i hate this - by ComaVN · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. Men have to sit down sometimes too. If nothing else, conditioning learned me to always check the position of the seat before sitting down. Why shouldn't women learn the same?

      --
      Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
    4. Re:And i hate this - by Cederic · · Score: 1


      I change the rules. I always put the seat down, and close the lid.

      That way she can't complain, and she has to go to the same effort to open it that I do.

      If I was really nasty I'd complain about her leaving the lid open, but that would be overtly aggressive, rather than my current passive stance.

    5. Re:And i hate this - by Cyphertube · · Score: 1

      I grew up in a house with dogs and small children. We NEVER had the lid up. I would get chewed out by my mom for leaving the lid up. So, now, married, I always close the lid and try to get everyone else to.

      There are few things I find more disgusting than the dog licking me after drinking out of the toilet bowl. (One of those would be after she ate cat shit.)

      --
      Linux - because it doesn't leave that Steve Ballmer aftertaste.
    6. Re:And i hate this - by sweede · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why don't you get some sense, take a load off, join with women and piss while sitting down?

      What would that do? it's not like men are stupid enough to sit on the john without looking to see that the seat is down..

      I mean, really, do you walk backwards, ass first into the bathroom and try to find the toliet blindfolded or something?

      Is it really that difficult to LOOK where you are going to sit, before sitting down?

      I don't think you should be complaining to your man about "omg you left the seat up", but be looking in the mirror every day and say to yourself "I am not a retard, God gave me eyes and I am not blind"

      btw,
      But it's hardly more difficult than pointing it upwards and arcing your stream in an attempt to keep your urethra open.

      Funniest thing ever written, if your guy does this, kick him in the balls.

      Real men lean over the toliet and point it down.

      --
      I follow the SDK and GDN principles.. Spelling Dont Kount, Grammer Dont Neither
    7. Re:And i hate this - by DudeTheMath · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, my wife never turns on the bathroom light when she goes to the toilet at night (basically, yes, finding the toilet blindfolded). It wakes you up too much and messes with your night vision for the walk back to the bedroom. Since I realized that, I've started doing the same thing (and sitting down to pee at night).

      But then I've always been a lid-down guy anyway, having grown up with dogs. I think a previous poster mentioned this habit, as well.

      --
      You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
    8. Re:And i hate this - by sweede · · Score: 1

      Use a small night light with like a red filter / bulb and leave it on all the time. it'll be bright enough to see and won't disrupt the effect darkness has on your vision.

      --
      I follow the SDK and GDN principles.. Spelling Dont Kount, Grammer Dont Neither
    9. Re:And i hate this - by netsharc · · Score: 1

      I wonder if someone's invented an automatic toilet seat raiser/lowerer. Maybe combine it with an RFID sensor that can identify if it's a woman or a man who just walked in to the bathroom. Of course then it wouldn't work if the man has to do some sitting-down-business... hmm how about a sensor that notices approaching butts... RFID butt implants!

      All kidding aside, a button to activate the gadget would be enough.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    10. Re:And i hate this - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to always close the lid, but now that I live with my girlfriend, I find that I have to leave it open for her cat who refuses to drink anything but toilet water. Really is pretty gross.

  319. Divorce or Unable to Face Reality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me thinks your lack of social skillz and interaction has everything to do with divorce, not your profession. I've worked for Big Blue, MSFT, and others in my 15+ years in IT and have never gotten divorced. Look into the mirror and not the monitor :)

  320. huh? wha? pussy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nerds dont get married, silly geek.

  321. You're Asking The Wrong Crowd by CarnivorousCoder · · Score: 1

    This is Slashdot. We don't have sex.

    --
    What are you doing now, you lazy drunken obscene unsayable son of an unnameable gipsy obscenity?
  322. Re:Like I said, marriage itself has no value anymo by javabandit · · Score: 1
    2) "Being married" means that you have certain legal rights and obligations. Everything else is a strictly personal interpretation and/or value judgment, and as such, is relevant only to you. Hence, my argument: it is incredibly stupid to stay in a non-functional relationship (or to argue thereof) for the "sake" of a marriage. A marriage is a thing, not a value.

    Ah. Here is where you and I differ. To me, all marriages become "non-functional" at some point. They go in and out. It is a long-term commitment that has its cycles -- some great, some good, some bad, some really bad. But the love and the commitment to the partner is what keeps the union together. The "institution" (the only word I can think of) is really only symbolic. A "marriage" is *supposed* to a stronger institution. Stronger than your usual, six-month, fuck-buddy stint. I'm not religious at all, but the word "marriage" is the only term I can use to describe a relationship that is meant to be stronger/longer than the usual "boyfriend/girlfriend" relationship.

    I'm starting to think that the only difference between you and I is where we consider it "stupid" to stick around. You probably have a much shorter fuse than I do. For you, you'd consider me stupid to stick around in certain situations. For me, I'd probably consider you stupid for not sticking around in a particular situation.

    Not sure we can resolve that difference.
  323. If we find the toilet seat down, we put it up and do our thing. We dont yell or bitch about it being up or down.

    WHY dont women do the same ?

    Way offtopic, but it's a struggle for dominance thing. You are being tested to see how you will react to an irrational and illogical request. It sets the tone for the rest of the interactions between you and that person.

    Ah, the great Slashdot, bastion of toilet politics. ;)

    1. Re:Flip by MPHellwig · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dominance, hah! Today I showed my dominance clearly, I said to her:"Now you sit down and listen! I'm the man in my house! If I want to do my dishes in my own house I'm going to do them and I'm going to do them right now! And you're not going to stop me! Heck, perhaps I'll clean the windows too!" Now that showed her! The only thing she could do is put on her lovely smile and said: "Yes dear". It clearly felt as a victory, although somehow I mistrusted her willingness to comply on my demands...

    2. Re:Flip by ksheff · · Score: 1

      for some reason they think it's sexy when the guy does the dishes. Sorry, I do it so I can have at least one clean plate to eat off of in the fucking house.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    3. Re:Flip by OverflowingBitBucket · · Score: 1

      for some reason they think it's sexy when the guy does the dishes.

      I understand this completely. I have a dishwasher and damn if it isn't the sexiest thing in the house to me when the kitchen is full of dishes.

    4. Re:Flip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If we find the toilet seat down, we put it up and do our thing. We dont yell or bitch about it being up or down.

      WHY dont women do the same ?

      Way offtopic, but it's a struggle for dominance thing. You are being tested to see how you will react to an irrational and illogical request. It sets the tone for the rest of the interactions between you and that person."

      I put the seat down and piddle all over it. At least I did while I was married.

    5. Re:Flip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We leave the toilet seat up, women leave the car seat all the way forward.

    6. Re:Flip by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      I was in the same situation. I was flying in a plane when the pilot said over the intercom: "I'm sorry people, but in ten minutes, we're going to crash. Thanks for flying KLM."

      So this blonde stands up and screams: "Is there a man here who can make me feel a woman??"

      I say "that'll be ME", unbutton my shirt, throw it in her face and say: "Iron my shirt, bitch".

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  324. IBM - Read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was in a similar situation. I work for IBM, rather I just put in my two weeks notice. I was working 84+ hour weeks, 12-hour days 7 days a week for 15 to 20 days at a time. This did not include commute time. This added some stress to my marriage. I chose to quit rather than destroy my family.

    The norm in IT is long overtime hours, oncall hours (The number of people woken up for an emergency conference call are always insane. The pay is nice, but it's a trade off.

    There comes a time when you have to ask yourself if the job is worth your life, or if your life is worth more than money. I chose the latter, I hope you find something that will make you happy.

  325. Re:Hypothesis: people get married far too young. by jamesmrankinjr · · Score: 1

    I didn't say that couples should split up "every time" they had problems.

    Every other time? Every third time? You said couples should split up if they had "fundamental" problems. So if you're not saying every time, then how many? Give me a number.

    We would all be much happier if we allowed our relationships to form, develop and -- if necessary -- dissolve without penalty or social stigma, in order to meet our intellectual, sexual, and social needs.

    What a weaselly construction. "Relationships" are not animate beings. They don't just "form, develop,...,dissolve" like a chemical solution. To be worth anything, people must actively invest in them, sacrifice for them, work at them. No social need for commitment? No social need for unconditional love? No social need to learn compromise instead of giving up after your encounter a "fundamental" problem? Oh, sorry, forgot, we still need to attach a number to qualify that. Get back to me with that number when you get a minute.

    -jimbo

  326. Re:Not the job's fault? Uh, maybe? by swordgeek · · Score: 1

    Very well thought out post, and also fairly compassionate.

    I'm facing a similar situation right now--My "official, billable" hours are gradually creeping above the 55/week mark, with 1-2hr/day extra. It's hurting my social life, hurting my hobbies, and could be hurting my marriage.

    I've got enough confidence in my skills and abilities that I've said, 'enough is enough. Either we fix this together, or I walk.' My superiors want to keep me and have seen enough people burn out that they're working on fixing this with me--according to a relatively definite timeline.

    But ten years ago when I first jumped into IT, or fifteen years ago when I was fresh out of University, I'm not sure I would have been sure enough of myself and my future to stand up to horrid conditions. If I'd started dating my wife before the Y2K crunch came along, would our relationship have worked? Hard to say.

    Basically, it's easy to look back at such situations and know that you need to walk away. It's also easy to be young and believe that you'll recognise such a situation and walk away. It's really not all that easy when you're the guy in the middle of it, and you're facing down either a career or a marriage, knowing you can't take both of them home without serious changes. Financial security is a really strong incentive, and can drive a wedge between people far too easily.

    However, the OP clearly recognises his problem. I suspect that a lot of the hostility here is that on a subconscious level, people are willing to allow mistakes like this when the subject is unaware, but once they KNOW what the problem is, failure to fix it seems a sign of weakness.

    Whether it is, I can't say. All I know is that I'm now at the point where I'll take less money to spend more time with my wife.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  327. Some Real Research by Chagatai · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm writing a book right now and one of the topics upon which I touch is how the divorce rate is higher amongst executive managers. In the research I did, I looked at the executive biographies for the CEOs of the top 50 of the Fortune 500. Out of these 50 bosses, only 6 of them mentioned their families in any way, shape, or form. They are more proud of their MBAs than they are about having a loving wife or children. Steve Ballmer's mentions that he is a really funny guy, but leaves out any traces of personal relationships.

    Think about wanting to be a manager with that in mind.

    --
    --Chag
  328. The core reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the fact that you are posting a message here asking if IT caused your divorce gives a pretty good explanation of what really caused your divorce.

    Work can be hard, but not just IT work. And jobs can affect your life, but ultimately you determine how you let things affect you and how it affects your relationships with other people.

    Sorry about your divorce, but its not that uncommon. People grow apart. There doesn't necessarily have to be a cause you can put your finger on, and you may never have an explanation. You have to let it go.

  329. Re:I'm NOT sorry to disagree by redelm · · Score: 1
    Neovictorian? I hope you find the guilt comforting.

    Cuckoldry (~10% from a UK blood bank) is a stark reminder of women's independence. Sure, female infidelity is less frequent and better hidden than male. Because of more severe consequences. But ~40% isn't zero.

    And that is precisely my point: everyone, including women have free will. "If you treat her right, she will stay" is mechanistic and maybe even mercenary. Some women will never leave, even if mistreated. Some will always leave even if not. If you have difficulty with this concept, tryin inverting the genders. Hint: not every man would cheat if he could. Some of us are smart enough to know better.

  330. Yes IT does play a part in divorces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi, I have seen this many times in Japan, even among foreigners. Many IT people do not have a "sense of time" and "priorities" and their jobs require extreme concentration. When you develop a family, this can cause destruction. Also, IT people do not "normally" have Job Stability as compared to other jobs. IT people move from job to job and from place to place putting stress on the family in the long run, which tends to build up over time and then blowup like a bomb. As I said, I have seen many good and honest people get crushed by this. But as IT is young mans domain, this especially tends to happen to those who stay in the field after middle age. Then either you are in management or working at McDonalds pushing burgers. Most companies don't want middle age IT people because as one ages they become "out of sink" with developments and engraved into the old ways to do things. Young people bring in new knowledge base and the enthusiasm to work hard for 20 hours a day at a cheap cost. Older people tend to have families, need to leave at 5pm and don't want to work on the weekends and demand 20 times the cost of the younger workers. So out with the old, except in niche areas where the younger ones need to pick up your knowledge so they can get rid of you ASAP. So then you are on the short end of the stick, they call that "consultancy" to give people a sense of importance before they can you. So the only ones that survive are those that go into management and then work like a dog at half their previous salary as a programmer. Yes, IT probably has the "highest" divorce rate of all industries combined. ...

  331. Good luck finding dads with decent custody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think my profession caused my divorce.

    Am I happy? Five years out the answer is still no. Are my kids happy? Yes.

    It takes a monumental amount of work to make it so, IMNSHO. Society places little emphasis on keeping dads in their kids' lives. The general consensus of the divorce machinery is dad is better used as an ATM than a care giver.

    Sad that all serious studies show the presence of a father to have a tremendously positive effect on children.

    The best advice I can give is to understand the system is against you, you _will_ lose a lot of money and a lot of sleep, and receive a lot of heartache. Do everything in your power to stay connected with your kids at all costs. It'll suck for you but maybe, just maybe, it will suck less for them.

  332. Man, that's rough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did your wife finally find out that you're a dick smoking linux fag? I say good for her, you fucking filthy faggot. If she needs a real man send her my way, I'll add her to my collection of bitches.

  333. Answering your questions by Javaman59 · · Score: 1
    How many of you computer Dads have also gone through divorce and have retained either half or full custody of your children?
    I was divorced after 10 years of marriage, when my wife left me for another man. I got custody of our children, without a court battle.

    Do you think your job had something to do with it?
    Tough question. When she left, my ex blamed everything about me. For most of the 10 years I had worked hard, with several periods when I worked late nights, and weekends. She didn't seem to particularly resent me for the actual hours, but she did seem to not accept that I was often tired, and stressed when at home. She put quite a extra load on me, in helping out with the house work and kids. I agree with the poster who said that there are some women who are like cats, which sit on the keyboard, just because they resent the attention you are giving it. I mainly remember feeling drained the whole time. My biggest regret is that I didn't do more to protect myself from the extra demands.

    I think that it is reasonable for a man with a promising career to put in extra hours, especially in hi 20's and 30's. It's a bit tough that this is the time when the children are small, but a good wife will support her husband in his career, and help him to make the most of the time that he has with her and the children, rather than making this time just another stress for him. I've seen several very happy marriages work like that.

    What were some of your hardest challenges and are your kids happy?
    The hardest challenge as a divorced, custodial father were certainly the practical ones - holding my job, while running a house, and trying to give the kids some personal attention. If the housework is getting behind, then everything else will fall apart quickly. I put my personal life on hold for about 3 years, while I got on top of things. The next biggest challenge is being happy in oneself. Keeping busy, and avoiding alcohol, is a good start. Then you have to start finding one or two pleasant recreations which take only a small amount of time, but give something back for you. Having work you enjoy is a big plus. And, you've got to keep your job! It can be very tough at times, but make sure that your personal traumas don't interfere too much with your work.

    The kids have been reasonably happy, and turned out OK. I am sure they would have been happier without the divorce, but I think that I did the best I could in the circumstances. And I think that's show's how much you care, that you included that question. :)

    Don't pay any attention to all the people here who are telling you that the divorce is your fault. It may, or may not be. They don't know. No amount of "working" at a relationship will work if one of the parties wants out. Sure, you've got faults, perhaps you put too much into work. Well, here's some news - a lot of people have faults, and your wife might have had some too. You don't leave someone because they've got faults.

    Good luck with it all, and I especially hope that it turns out well for your child.

    - Javaman
    --
    I'm a software visionary. I don't code.
  334. your career, eh? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Could it be that it wasn't your career, but your obsession with computing and lack of life balance that did it?

    I mean, it's not like a career in IT AND working on a post-graduate degree at the same time, while trying to maintain a marriage and raise a kid is what one would term a "low key schedule". In such a situation, if your career is doing well/better than average and your schooling is going well, you ARE neglecting family members. Two years of multiple day/evening classes, plus course work and papers, on top of 40+ hours a week makes it difficult to get out and get drunk once a week with buddies if you're single or uncommitted. A kid and a wife? Just asking for trouble.

    If you're going to school and working full time, and your wife isn't, then I suspect you mis-paired yourselves anyway - she should've been doing something to help alieviate your work burden so you could better pay attention to her and your schooling, and in general be an emotionally healthier person.

    FWIW, married, 2 kids (well, 1, but the 2nd is due this week), just finishing up my bachelors in IT, and here-and-there work to make ends meet. I could not maintain a "career" in IT at this point without going insane from lack of "me time" (or "sleep time"); if I were single and childless, it would be another story. Relationships and raising children take effort, but MOST IMPORTANTLY time, to not end up with a broken product.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  335. misleading "1/2 divorce" stat by r00t · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Some people fail at 2, 3, or more marriages. They drive up the numbers.

    The chance of any 1 person being divorce-free is much better than 50%.

    Tip: divorce runs in families. Be wary of this when you choose.

    1. Re:misleading "1/2 divorce" stat by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      That is interesting. I never thought of that, but it does make sense and makes the numbers work better.

      I hate when people who have been divorced several times act like they are just waiting for your marriage to fall apart and think it has to be awful. I know that is their reality, but most people understand that different people have different experiences. Why do they think all marriages are doomed?

  336. Re:Hypothesis: people get married far too young. by Tim · · Score: 1

    "Every other time? Every third time? You said couples should split up if they had "fundamental" problems. So if you're not saying every time, then how many? Give me a number."

    Do you know what a straw man argument is? Your insistence that I "give you a number" either totally misses, or totally ignores the statement that I made: it is stupid to stay in a relationship "for the sake of" an institution. On the other hand, you have consistently ignored the last sentence in my post: people should stay together because they want to stay together.

    In other words, Jimbo, people should stick togther through difficult times because they still see value in their relationship. Not because a preacher said "no divorces," not because divorces give the pope indigestion, and certainly not because some nutball believes that divorce "violates" the text of an internally-inconsistent, poorly-written book written before the dawn of modern civilization.

    "What a weaselly construction. "Relationships" are not animate beings. They don't just "form, develop,...,dissolve" like a chemical solution. To be worth anything, people must actively invest in them, sacrifice for them, work at them."

    Hey Jimbo....are you really trying to make an argument based on my use of the passive voice? (...you do know that I can say the same thing in the active voice, and it would mean the same thing, right?)

    "No social need for commitment? No social need for unconditional love? No social need to learn compromise instead of giving up after your encounter a "fundamental" problem?"

    Your words, not mine. Marriage is not a prerequisite for commitment, love or compromise. Therefore, divorce does not invalidate their existence.

    (Also....I suppose you think you're being sneaky by slipping that "unconditional" in there...but really, you're just being absurd. As most of us know, a dog will love you unconditionally. A spouse has boundaries.)

    Noodle on, Jimbo....

    --
    Let's try not to let fact interfere with our speculation here, OK?
  337. My Job by Mantrid42 · · Score: 1

    It is indeed the fault of Jobs. Damn him and his sleek white machines and charm!

  338. one right way to live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no one right way to live.

    There are lots of different ways to live, and there are lots of different people who find different ways to live in ways that work for them. Not all of them involve marriage.

    Unfortunately, this is a lesson that is not taught enough to people growing up. Kids are taught whatever tradition their family has - and typically this means one man, one woman, in a monogomous realtionship disconnected from all the other families and extended relations. Human tribes never evolved that way; people live now in separate family domiciles, and frankly it makes rearing children almost an impossible task.

    Basically, the reason that 50% of marriges end in divorce comes from several factors: the extreme unhealth in sexual relations, leading to desparation and need for connection. Thinking that marriage will "solve" the need for connection with others, people rush into it, only to find that the process of bonding and determining the power relations between 2 people takes about 3 years to figure out. People need to DROP the idea that 1 on 1 marriage works for all people - it simply doesn't. People also need to WAIT more than 3 years while living with a person before they tie the knot.

  339. quite right by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    you are actually quite right, it is about female psychology. it is a fact that women are on average lot more egocentric. the reason for it is very simple - biologically males are expendable, females are not.

    but times has changed, human society now is very different to human society hunderds of thousands years ago. behaviour patterns which worked back then are serious dated now. males have adapted to the 21st century, females not, and this causes lots of problems.

    there is a great german word for those who have modded you down: "berufsbetroffene". this word describes people who see it as their job being conserned and offended. they read your opinion and are offended about you being misogynic in their eyes. they are the same people who try to be overly political correct.

    well, i've got news for all those bleeding hearts: males and females are NOT equal. equal rights, yes. but that's it. women are on average lot more egocentric and they listen more to their instincts and to their emotions than to their consciousness.

    anyway, read more here

    --
    Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
  340. Yes, there is a moral to this tale... by Kuroji · · Score: 1

    ...and it is that relationships take effort on the part of both the people involved. The lesson is clear: ignore your mate or try to control them and you'll lose them. Everyone has a breaking point.

    If you don't know what that point is, then you should reconsider a relationship with that person. If you don't think it exists, you should reconsider a relationship in the first place.

  341. Let's see if anyone's still reading this... by natebrau · · Score: 1
    Yes- my ex-wife left me while I held onto my 18-month-old son, and disappeared for 6 months, choosing to see him perhaps one day a week. I went through marriage counseling, changed jobs to be a "Technology Manager" (had to increase my income 25% to keep a house & pay for day-care).

    IT didn't cause my divorce- my ex-wife choosing to become "Chief Resident" in her residency did that. Or more specifically, my ex-wife choosing to leave did that.

    People are people, and you'll always have problems. Arranged marriages won't solve them- they're specific to the people involved, and not amenable to any imposed solution.

    Any attempt to place blame for a divorce square on a career/money/house/you-name-it ultimately misses the point that there's a wide variety of people out there, and there really are some with whom one cannot be compatible with (horrors!), and others who are. This may change with time or circumstance. Compatible one year and not the next.

    What's the solution? There really isn't one. You can only do the best that you can, and hope that it's enough.

  342. Reiser by dario_moreno · · Score: 1

    Don't forget to quote Hans Reiser in your dissertation, he obviously met the same issues than you and found some kind of definitive solution.... Joke apart it means that you need either infinite love for a relationship to work, or (and this is probably the same) very like-minded people who understand each other.

    --
    Google passes Turing test : see my journal
  343. Forever gay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    100% of deaths begin with getting married? Guess I'll choose singledom and immortality.

    Yeah, groovy!

  344. Other related factors by Grismar · · Score: 1

    Somehow I doubt that the actual career of IT dads is the problem here. In my experience, IT professionals spend a lot of time with computers in their spare time as well. Computer games, hobby programming and all sorts of "digital hobbies" like photography, music or movie making, etc. are very popular with IT personnel, but also very time consuming.

    Not just that, all if these hobbies usually come with large, active online communities. As a result, most of my friends who are in IT, like myself, have wives or girlfriends complaining of a lack of attention, personal contact hours or common interests. Now, you might say these women just aren't the right match for these men. But it's not like it would be any better if they had similar hobbies, in fact I'd say it would aggravate the situation.

    Any career, if taken seriously, is demanding. And people in all fields bring their work and its problems home with them. But I think IT may be special in that it flows into personal life almost seamlessly and this is the true root of any structural marital problems in the field.

  345. your PHB and divorce .. by rs232 · · Score: 1

    I don't think the computer industry is any more cause of marital strife than any other industry. Generally it's the non-techie managers who are the cause of the problem. Hiding information and buying the wrong/cheep equipment over the advise of their own IT dept. The thing is that in IT you're trying to fix something while putting up with this corporate BS. You usually find out what new direction your company is going by reading about it in the tech press. Usually announced at an awards seremony where some PHB awards himself an award for 'Internet visionary', what ever the heck that is. You're best bet to a happy marrage is to get a qualification in systems analysis, that way you don't actually have to do real work and get paid a lot more.

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  346. Not here... by PenguinBoyDave · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Been in IT for 15 years and travel globally for my company. Three kids and twelve happy years of marriage later (to the same woman) the key for us was my finding balance between work and life. I know a lot of IT guys who can't put their computers down "computersexuals" as that is their only life. When 5:00 PM hits, I step out of my desk and into the Dad / Husband role. From 8:00 PM to 9:00 PM I work a little more once the kids are asleep (while my wife does her thing) and then we do our thing. It's all about balance.

    --
    I'm not a troll, but I play one on Slashdot.
  347. Re:Hypothesis: people get married far too young. by jamesmrankinjr · · Score: 1

    Not because a preacher said "no divorces," not because divorces give the pope indigestion, and certainly not because some nutball believes that divorce "violates" the text of an internally-inconsistent, poorly-written book written before the dawn of modern civilization.

    And you accuse me of straw man arguments?

    Marriage is not a prerequisite for commitment, love or compromise. Therefore, divorce does not invalidate their existence.

    Divorce does not signify an end to commitment, a lack of love, or a decision that an issue is beyond compromise? There may be very good reasons for those things, but surely you can't deny that divorce is precisely a declaration that commitment, and likely love and compromise, have gone out of existence in that particular relationship?

    I'm sure you're going to tell me I've misunderstood you again. Which is not surprising, because up to this point you've been steadily qualifying what you initially said further and further. Which is a good sign, because it indicates you now realize what you originally said doesn't make much sense.

    Also, allow me go back to an earlier comment of yours.

    That said, consider the universe of relationships outside of the institution of marriage -- people are regularly intimate, loving and caring with one another without the need for a sacrament or legal framework to bind them.

    Are you against gay marriage? Have you paused to ask yourself why many gay people are so upset that this sacrament and legal framework are being denied to them? Maybe they're just nuts?

    Or maybe, like other people, they see the value to themselves and to society of a public commitment with public rights and responsibilities tied to it. That's pretty much what marriage is.

    You seem to have a bug up your butt about the fact that many people also want a sacrament associated with their commitment, also, but what business is that of yours? If two people feel strongly about expressing their commitment with a spiritual sacrament, why are you obligated to care one way or another?

    -jimbo

  348. divorce: mens' rights commonly denied by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What people need to know about divorce...

    The industry that has evolved from people wanting divorces is a huge cash cow machine for states' social services and often shabby lawyers who really care more about having a job and lining their pockets than the welfare of our citizens or our children. The biggest lie in divorces involving custody is that the court tries to make decisions "in the child's best interest". This is of course an entirely subjective definition which while in theory sounds like what we all want, in practice it runs completely afoul of the United States Constitution in violating multiple constitutional rights, particularly: the right to protection from unreasonable seizure, the right to due process, the right to equal protection under the law. Remember that our laws are not meant to be - nor should they be - the highest of moral standards but rather minimal standards in order to best protect everyone while still keeping people as free as possible.

    No doubt many people will just simply not believe me when I tell you that men are routinely and commonly and unjustly denied their constitutional rights in divorce proceedings. Ignorance is bliss after all but then complacency is no virtue either. Meanwhile others will cry about how abused women are while others will say but women are just naturally better parents. If you don't believe me read what the other people say:

    In a 66 page legal article in Volume 25, No. 4 (Summer 1998) Florida State University Law Review at http://www.law.fsu.edu/Journals/lawreview/download s/254/mcneely.pdf, Cynthia A. McNeely very clearly lays out the unconstitutionality of current divorce practices from its historical basis to its societal impact.

    In a 32 page article published in Volume 1, Number 2 (1999) pp 123-150 University of Utah School of Law, Journal of Law & Family Studies at http://people.cohums.ohio-state.edu/hubin1/Researc h/PRDP.PDF, Donald Hubin rights about Parental Rights and Due Process that specifically describes the failure of the courts to recognize that the standard of "child's best interest" fails to meet our right to due process that should require the courts to recognize that sole custody to one parent means taking away the other parent's custodial rights and that this should not be allowed to be done without proof beyond reasonable doubt that the parent is unfit to share in that right. Imagine if the same standard of "child's best interest" were applied to your family where no divorce was going on and your children were taken from you because in the judge's opinion your faith (or anything else) wasn't in your child's best interest. That's an aweful lot of latitude for subjectively taking your kids away unless we demand nothing less than our due process right. In the context of divorce and custody that means nothing less than a presumption of continued shared custody unless a parent can be shown unfit to the same standards as is done in showing guilt in criminal cases.

    In an ongoing battle to protect the virtues of justice and equality are folks like Glenn Sacks who runs a great website on many of the abuses suffered at the hands of the courts in regards to divorce which folks should also check out at http://www.glennsacks.com/. And the list of references can easily go on.

    If you get through at least these three references, you'll hopefully be at least dispelled of any blissful ignorances you too may have once had.

    1. Re:divorce: mens' rights commonly denied by utah-ldl · · Score: 1

      great points and great references!! Thanks for pointing these out!

  349. sudo make me a sammich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  350. flawed conclusion by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

    As others have pointed out, this thesis topic is flawed. You're using only your experiences and drawing a conclusion about everyone in the IT field. With over a 50% divorce rate in this country, it's going to be hard to prove your theory. What kind of divorce rate are you looking for in IT? 75%? You're probably not going to find it.

    --
    Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
  351. My environment by slidersv · · Score: 1

    My IT department:
    13/20 currently married. 1 divorced (she is a secretary though).

    --
    there is no issue with my network
  352. Re:yep... by quintesse · · Score: 1

    "A person who has successfully quit smoking generally has a great deal more empathy for people who have trouble kicking the habit than people who have no frame of reference."

    Strange, my personal experience is almost exactly the opposite. Although I know non-smokers who look down on smokers who _say_ the would like to stop but in the end never even (really) try I know many more ex-smokers who really have no patience with smokers telling how many times they tried to stop but just weren't able to get rid of the habit.

    For them it's "I was able to do it so don't give me that "oh it's too difficult crap"!"

    But like I said, this is my personal experience, it might very well be that you are (statistically) right.

  353. Re:Hypothesis: people get married far too young. by Tim · · Score: 1

    "I'm sure you're going to tell me I've misunderstood you again. Which is not surprising, because up to this point you've been steadily qualifying what you initially said further and further. Which is a good sign, because it indicates you now realize what you originally said doesn't make much sense."

    No. I've quoted the same sentence from my original post, over and over again:

    It is stupid for a couple to stay together for the "sake" of an institution.

    My position has not changed.

    "Are you against gay marriage? Have you paused to ask yourself why many gay people are so upset that this sacrament and legal framework are being denied to them? Maybe they're just nuts....Or maybe, like other people, they see the value to themselves and to society of a public commitment with public rights and responsibilities tied to it. That's pretty much what marriage is."

    1) No, I'm not.

    2) They're upset because they're being denied rights that straight people take for granted. They're upset because in many/most places in America, they can be prohibited from adopting, seeing their partner in the hospital, acting as a legal or financial guardian for their partner, or even making arrangements for their partner's funeral. They're upset because at this moment in America, marriage is a bigoted institution, and if nothing else, represents a way that religious and cultural forces are attempting to marginalize gay and lesbian citizens.

    3) Gay and lesbian couples have been in loving, committed relationships for years, without the "incentive" of marriage. Giving them the right to marry will not change this fact. And, incidentally, gay and lesbian couples have been holding public commitment ceremonies for years -- it's assinine and arrogant to suggest that gay people want the legal right to marry because they're otherwise unable to express love and commitment for their partners.

    "You seem to have a bug up your butt about the fact that many people also want a sacrament associated with their commitment, also, but what business is that of yours? If two people feel strongly about expressing their commitment with a spiritual sacrament, why are you obligated to care one way or another?"

    But I don't care, jimbo. You're twisting my argument again. In case you missed it:

    It is stupid for a couple to stay together for the "sake" of an institution.

    Perhaps one of these times, you'll actually read it.

    May frese be with you....

    --
    Let's try not to let fact interfere with our speculation here, OK?
  354. IT and Divorce by richardlvance · · Score: 1

    Need statistical evaluation to see the relation between IT and divorce. There are always multiple factors and cause and effect are not what they seem. You may want to look at your commmunity situation. Some areas of the country have very high divorce rates and you will find concentrations of some type of work or profession there that may provide a casual link. For example, here in Huntsville, AL we are chock full of engineers and scientists, mostly male. The ratio of men to women is high. The women have their pick and they don't mind the divorce to move up that ladder. American women in general are spoiled; so many Americn men are going overseas to find brides. Look for that phenomena to continue.

    --
    cursethedarkness
  355. Re:Hypothesis: people get married far too young. by jamesmrankinjr · · Score: 1

    gay and lesbian couples have been holding public commitment ceremonies for years

    The hairs you are splitting are getting infinitisemally smaller.

    Public commitment ceremonies good, marriage bad? Marriage is pretty much just public commitment ceremony plus legal rights and obligations, with an optional sacred element attached if the couple so chooses.

    And you seem to be for the legal rights and obligations part (unless you only support that part for gay people, I don't want to put words in your mouth).

    It is stupid for a couple to stay together for the "sake" of an institution.

    I'm ignoring it because it's banal. What about staying together for each other? Because of a promise they made to each other? Because what price can you place on being on your death bed with a person you've loved for most of a lifetime beside you (or however much time you are given together)? Because what price can you put on being on your beloved's death bed, knowing you made it through a lot of hard times together and loved each other through it all, knowing you really, truly loved someone to the best of your ability?

    If you remember back to the post you originally responded to, the argument made there is that many people value marriage lightly today compared to many other things, like jobs and children. Instead of addressing that basic point, you're rattling on about the Pope. If everyone is being told what to do by the Pope, why is it that about half of all marriages end with a divorce (in my country, the U.S.A., at least)? If you really, truly think there's still a significant stigma associated with divorce today, the world has certainly passed by you and your antiquated ideas.

    -jimbo

  356. Finally, an Honest Reply! One URL is all you need! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go here... www.honestwealth.umbizsite.com

    You are EXACTLY The type of person I'm looking for!

    I am in the exact same position about family that _I_ am!

  357. I believe by comp974 · · Score: 1

    I believe that it isn't absolutely being in IT that takes the situation and bombards it to and beyond the brink of divorce. Primarily, you do have control of your job, if you believe that your job is causing problems with your marriage, then first (yes, this is the biggest and toughest position for any man) talk to your wife/husband, and decide what can be done to make it better. if that means that you must find a different area to work in, then yes, time to move away from the ALL POWERFUL IT position to something less demanding. I have heard of different IT managers complain that their wives have no understanding of them when they come home after a long and hard day. I usually tell them, "Well, do you have understanding for them when you come home from a long and hard day?" What I mean is, if your coming home from one of those DISASTER FROM ABOVE BELOW AND BESIDE days, then realize your going to be cranky... your not going to be a nice person to be around. Go to the gym before you go home, do something that will take your mind off of the problems at work. Also realize that if you have kids, she has had to deal with them while you dealt with your end-users primates. While us IT's can sometimes escape into the corners of the computer closets to "check the cabling" your spouse doesn't have that option.

    If the problems are because of time constraints (for instance I am a 24/7 hour on call tech) then yes, this is a major problem and you need to (again) talk to your spouse about the situation, and make sure that you are both on the same website/page (had to throw something techy in). If s/he doesn't think that your paying enough attention to them, well guess what... "it ain't gettin' any betta." this would be the time to actually look into another career. Perhaps a career as a IT sales guy (I don't know for certain, but I have been told that they make as much as most IT Managers).

    I think the hardest part of the whole thing is to make sure that your paying attention to your spouses needs, make sure that s/he is aware that you're willing to do what it takes to keep things happy between each other. That s/he understands that if there is something that is upsetting him/her that you're willing to actually listen (and not bite their heads off and not try and make excuses or pass the blame) and you're willing to attempt what needs to be done to make your spouse un-upset and allow Happiness to Abound!

    This is my statement...

    "You have the ultimate control over your relationships, it is YOUR responsibility to manage your time, your emotions, your attitude, your mood and your family. This responsibility of your family requires a direct link between you and your wife/husband. Without agreement, in any field you work in be it IT or anything else, it WILL end in divorce!"
    --- Thats my statement, and I am sticking to it.

    Seeing as how this is WAAAAYYYYY down on the list, I doubt anybody will actually read this, so oh well, wisdom to the ether of the internet.

  358. Why just Dads? by PaigePB · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm an avid Slashdot reader but have never been incited to post until now.

    My story is the complete reverse of what is being solicited.

    I was a 'stay-at-home' mom of a 2-year-old and a -3-month-year-old (6 months pregnant) when my husband developed a severe mental illness. My divorce was sudden and my prospects were bleak since I had a master's degree in a field that was non-lucrative, I had no prospects for child support (my ex was rendered unemployable) and little or no social security since he had been a freelancer.

    I moved my small family to CA just after the peak of the dot-com boom to be near extended relatives, too a good, hard, look at the world to see what industry would pay enough to support a family on a single income, would have the flexibility to allow for working at home or if extra hours are needed could be done in the evening while children slept, and which would reward self-starters rather than (or along with) those with formal degrees.

    IT was the answer. Specifically programmming.

    I found an employer who would hire a determined, untrained woman (job interview question: 'Can you write an ASP site', answer: 'Never heard of it, but give me a month and I'll have one written'.

    And that started my career as a working mom. I am now an R&D programmer - I would call myself an architect-in-training - for a good sized program. I train and review code written by others but always seem to find something new to explore that would benefit the company I work for. My employers understand that I require a flexible schedule but they apparently seem to find that this relationship is worthwhile for them.

    I entered the field for Machiavelian reasons. What I didn't expect was how much I would enjoy this career path - how much quality-of-life I would have when each day I wake up to learn something new or have the opportunity to teach someone else how to use what I've learned, all to benefit other people - users of our software, the company, our customers.

    My family is growing well. My at-the-time not-born-yet daughter is now 7 years old. I have remarried to someone in the industry - a CTO with a background in network administration.

    The IT lifestyle give me the flexibility to be a mom and help support my family. While this is not a 'magical' quality of the IT industry, intrinsic to it in some mysterious way and no other industry, it is the reason why I chose this career path and it worked out for me (with up-front negotiation with my employers) extremely well.

  359. Alternative Masters Study? by planetaryg · · Score: 1

    Sure it has been said that police and neurosurgeons have a higher rate of divorce, perhaps those women fear lobotomy or a bullet! But I dont think IT must cause any more or less than other divorce by profession. If you need a topic for your thesis why dont you do something related to the 'child support' industry and the new welfare queens, state attorney generals(AG) , across this land. 1. How many fathers are turned into noncustodials just because mommy goes to the AG? 2. How many of those fathers are later driven away rom teh house of thier children because of the precedent established? 3. How many fathers are committing suicide because of custody and divorce? 4. How many children are being alienated by thier mothers? 5. How many fathers are having to work two jobs just to make a living because of exorbitant child support levels and arrearages? 6. How many fathers ar going to jail in this country because of child support issues? 7. How many fathers cannot afford to pay? 8. How many fathers have left the country because of? 9. How long does it take an alienated child to reconnect with thier demonized father? 10. Why dont the state release certain pertinent information to the public about these things? 11. Why does the government continue to attribute domestic violence to the man when the women do it more against men and especially the child? 8.

  360. I'm reading everything, even the personal messages by frank_tudor · · Score: 1

    I want to thank everyone for their contributions to my post...I am reading everything. So if you think this is too far down the replies...think again because everything is relevant! Keep the good posts coming! Frank

  361. Re:Decisions and Balance by Java+Ape · · Score: 1

    Amazingly well, actually. We live in a smaller house, and have had to cut back in a few areas, but overall we're much happier. Surprisingly, a large portion of the old budget went to restaurant dinners, and other means of coping with a hectic schedule. So, yes, even on less money, I'm much happier, and my wife seems to be as well. Weird, huh?

  362. IT had nothing to do with it by MacAllen · · Score: 1

    I've been in computers all my life, and been divorced for 3 years out of a marriage of 20 years. I filed divorce because my ex was a nutbag, and have 75% custody of my kids...while paying an arm and a leg in spousal support, which is the price I pay for focusing on custody and not money.

  363. Simple solution: by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    The entire problem can stop with #2 and/or #3.

    #2 - Don' get pregnant.

    and #3 - Get married before getting pregnant. That doesn't specifically stop the male from flying the coop, but it does reduce the chances that he will not stick around. Marriage is a contract, and if the man isn't willing to enter into that contract, he probably isn't a good choice for seeding your womb.

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
  364. The original quote: by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    "Guns cause crime like spoons cause Rosie to be fat and stupid"

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
  365. I like your rant. by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

    I hope you don't mind me posting it to my blog. :)

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    1. Re:I like your rant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I could offer one piece of sage advice to a young man in this profession, it would be this: DON'T GET MARRIED. Don't do it. Come the divorce, as come it probably will, the courts will systematically shear you of your children, your house, and huge amounts of your income for twenty years. Don't do it. It isn't worth it. Nothing is.

      My saying this usually brings, from women, cries that I'm an extremist or woman-hater. No. The problem is not women, but the courts. Men can behave every bit as reprehensibly as women, though they go about it differently. But the judicial system, which is politicized to the gills, utterly favors women over men in divorce cases, without remorse, decency, or concern for children.

      Be honest with yourself and see if you don't think like Joe Everyman. If you're like most young men, you hope and expect to marry some day. You think you deserve to live happily ever after, but if things don't work out that way, you'll get a civilized divorce and move on. You'll stay pals with your ex, and you'll see your kids as often as you want. You have no idea what you're getting into.

      And you don't. Not the faintest freaking clue. A few facts:
      - The odds are 50% that your marriage will end in divorce.
      - The odds are 70% that your divorce will be filed by your wife.
      - The odds are 80% that your wife will get:
      ~~~ custody of your children
      ~~~ child support amounting to 15 to 35% of your after-tax earnings
      ~~~ alimony,
      ~~~ a hefty chunk of your property, assets, retirement accounts and pensions
      That is how it is.

      Yes, I know: You don't think this applies to you. Cup Cake loves you. She would never behave in such a way.

      Think again. You have no conception of the hatred that divorce engenders. Men are callous; women are mean. When a family breaks up, when a life dreamed of disappears in flames and emotions go limbic, women are not the kinder sex, and certainly not the more rational. And Cup Cake will have the absolute upper hand, with the full power of the state to help her express her dissatisfaction with you.

      Clock in for a reality check, fellas. If your wages are not withheld and you fail to pay your child support, the State will garnish your pay, slap liens on your property, intercept your tax refunds, report you to credit agencies, discontinue your driver's license, suspend your professional and business permits, hold you in contempt of court, put your face on a wanted poster, throw you in jail, and deny you food stamps. But if your ex doesn't spend that very same support on the children, the State will do. . . nothing.

      It gets worse. There is, for example, "imputed income." This means that your child support will be based not on what your children need, not on what you earn, but on what the court decides you could earn. You know that pleasant time that you used to have between contracts; the time when you used to go out hang gliding or scuba diving or for those interesting trips to Bangkok. You don't get that anymore. Because you earned $80 an hour on one contract, you now have to keep paying support as though you were earning $80 an hour - even if you're between contracts (or worse, right-sized out of your job).

      Don't do it. If you love Cup Cake, live with her. Be kind to her. Be loyal to her. She may be as nice as you think she is: Many women are. Buy her roses. Just don't marry her, or have children with her. If the laws were even-handed, marriage would be an admirable institution. The laws aren't equal. But it's the kids she'll use, should things get nasty, to tear your guts out. If you're sure that Cup Cake won't do this, you're crazy. True, she may not. Not all women do, or not to the same degree. But you won't know until it's too late. And the courts will do anything she wants.

      Believe me, your ex will warm to calling all the shots.

      She may cancel your visitation now and then. If she's truly mean-spirited, she'll go much further. Under the cover of her court-appointed role as sole custodian, she'll systematicall

    2. Re:I like your rant. by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
      I like the "extended remix version" of your rant, and I did indeed repost the original rant to my blog, but fortunately the rant itself it doesn't apply to me.


      I've been with my high school sweetheart Carolyn for almost 15 yrs now. We lived together 3 yrs in college, and bought a house, and did not get married until after that, on our 8-year anniversary. So we didn't jump into things. And she is a geek too (but a hot one). So, I would say better advice is to wait and make sure you are both sure of things before jumping into it. 100% of all other couples jumped into it, in comparison to us.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  366. A Suggestion... by Niet3sche · · Score: 1

    Ditch IT and go instead with something like, "Institutionally-Supported Antecedents of Divorce" (if you use that title, please drop me a line in the Acknowledgements). The idea here is to look around in at least 2 bodies of literature: that surrounding Organizational Behavior (OB) and Industrial/Organizational Psychology (I/O Psych), and the literature describing small group relationships (specifically, obviously, intimate groups such as marriage).

    What you'll want to do, after asking your major professor about your roadmap (to digress a bit: if your major professor is worth ANYTHING, s/he can give you some high-level guidance and appear remotely interested/invested in the topic. If this is not the case, DUMP THEM. Do this now. You'll be happier. Trust me.), is to try to marry (pardon the pun) the two bodies of literature and look for overlap in measures, context, or behaviors/attitudes that form natural analogues or antecedents to the other body of literature.

    Aside from this - and I know this point is redundant - USE your local experts and your University library access to look at journals. Look, now that I'm on the topic, at a LOT of literature. Add rigor to your research, even if it "only" gives you personal satisfaction of honestly earning an advanced degree. Specifically, it seems to me that - if you want to continue along this vein of research - you MUST have an OB/IO Psychologist as well as someone from counseling or social psychology. Additionally, an OB person from the business college would also be quite useful.

    And then, of course, it is YOUR job to herd your cats and steer them to agreement regarding your research.

    G'luck and stop reading slashdot, you. ;)

  367. For Carolyn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Carolyn's Guide to Geek Guys

    So, your crush on the bass player from Green Day has finally died a whimpering death and you're wondering where to go from here. All the sinister dudes are either dating a series of interchangeable high-school riot girls in baby doll dresses and an overdose of manic panic, or permanently shacked up with some bitter old lady who pays all the bills. Which will it be, a wifely prison or a humiliating one night stand? Into this void of potential mates comes a man you may not have considered before, a man of substance, quietude and stability, a cerebral creature with a culture all his own. In short, a geek.

    Why Geek Dudes Rule
    - They are generally available.
    - Other women will tend not to steal them.
    - They can fix things.
    - Your parents will love them.
    - They're smart.

    Where The Geek Dude Lurks
    While they are often into alternative music, geek dudes tend not to go to shows too often. Instead you'll find them hanging out with their friends, discussing the latest hardware revolution or perfecting their Bill Gates impressions. You know how some people wear t-shirts with their favorite bands on them, thus showing that they went to certain shows? Well, geek dudes wear t-shirts with the logos of different software companies on them, thus showing that they are up on the latest, um, releases. A small, though convivial, rivalry may be detected here amongst the geek dudes. Try wearing one yourself and see if he strikes up a conversation. Of course the best way to meet a geek dude is through the Internet. All geeks harbor a secret fantasy about meeting some girl in cyberspace, carrying on an e-mail romance in which he has the chance to combine an activity he is comfortable with, computing, with one he is very uncomfortable with, socializing. To many geek dudes, cyberdating is just an advanced form of some kind of video game, but they are frustrated by a lack of players. Their lack is your strength.

    Imprinting
    You might notice that these men harbor some strange ideas about how the world works and some particularly strange ideas about women. There is a reason for this. Because they've had limited interpersonal experience, geek dudes must look elsewhere for behavior models. Lacking a real world social milieu, geeks often go through a transference stage with such narratives, and try to model their interactions on them. Thus, certain media images and themes come to have an overly cathected, metaphorized reality to them, while the rest of us view such programming as mere entertainment. Case in point, our next topic...

    The Trek factor
    If you're not up on your Star Trek, you can forget about getting or keeping a geek dude. And I'm not just talking vintage-era Captain Kirk and Spock either. You've got to be up on your The Next Generation, your Deep Space Nine, your Babylon 5. Armed with your own knowledge of Federation policies, you can better gauge when and how to act. The sexual politics of Star Trek are pretty blunt: the men run the technology and the ship, and the women are caretakers (a doctor and a counselor). Note the sexual tensions on the bridge of the Enterprise: the women, in skin tight uniforms, and with luxuriant, flowing hair. The men, often balding, and sporting some sort of permanently attached computer auxiliary. This world metaphorizes the fantasies of the geek dude, who sees himself in the geeky - but - heroic male officers and who secretly desires a sexy, smart, Deanna or Bev to come along and deferentially accept him for who he is. If you are willing to accept that this is his starting point for reality, you are ready for a geek relationship.

    Once You've Nabbed Him
    Of course, catching that geek guy is only half the battle. Keeping him by your side is another story altogether. I was privileged to speak with Miss Victoria Maat, who not only got herself a geek guy but was also clever

  368. Technology Induced Divorce? Nope,... by SuiteLifeSooner · · Score: 1

    Like most other things that are worthwhile, Marriage is a choice that is made daily by the two people who are in it. It should be a lifelong commitment although things can go awry. A little thinking ahead can save a lot of time and anguish later. For example: Talking through the fact that an IT job is demanding on the husband or wife's time before being married is time well spent. Map out who will take what responsibilities at home when he/she is not out in the field can help minimize stress. There is no magic to pre-marital counseling but the greatest value of it can be that individuals decide beforehand whether they can deal with a spouse who is not home on a regular basis or called out at random times. Sitting down and discussing issues like this can help a Marriage last longer or be stronger. Divorces can be caused by lack of communication about hot topics such as household/childcare responsibilities, money or sex. Currently, we have many men and women of the Armed Forces overseas and their Marriages last so just being out of the house over an IT job, in and of itself doesn't cause divorces. The difference is our military families have communicated before deployment what the expectations will be on each person's part, then COMPROMISED with each other for the common good of the family. Finally, anything you put before God and your family can wreck your household. It may take time but if your wife and kids see that your job is more important to you than they are (IT, Brain Surgery, Ice Cream Vending or any other career), you're on thin ice. Focus on the priorities of the entire family unit. They may change with time, wife, then kids, then you, not in any scripted order. Treat your kids good and they'll grow to love and respect you. Treat your spouse good and they'll send you to work with a big smile on your face. Give your Marriage everything you've got and it will pay great dividends for years to come. Of course you'll miss out on having at least one ex to blame all your troubles from here to eternity on but somehow, you'll survive (see Gloria Gaynor). : )