Question about AC filtering
on
Slashdot Updates
·
· Score: 0, Troll
Rob, could you take some time to discuss the recent changes with respect to storing IP profiles for every user, banning users, banning IP addresses, and banning entire subnets? Judging from the current updates posted to Sourceforge, it looks like you are working not just on filtering ACs but also on pre-filtering of logged in users, that is, preventing abusive users from posting. MySQL.pm in particular now contains this interesting code fragment:
#logem' so we can banem'
$self->sqlInsert("abusers", {
uid => $uid,
ipid => $ipid,
subnetid => $subnetid,
pagename => $script_name,
querystring => $query_string || '',
reason => $reason,
-ts => 'now()',
and
$submission->{subnetid} = getCurrentUser('subnetid');
Could you discuss who in particular you are logging and banning? Specifically, is it just those darn Windows advocates, or are you broadening the scope? Personally, I would really appreciate it if you could subnet ban those people for life.
Your nonsensical babble is not welcome here. I think I speak for everyone when I say that not one of your comments makes a lick of sense. If you would stop posting, it would be greatly appreciated.
Sir, do you understand that your gibberish is incomprehensible to the other denizens of this web site? In the future, I would advise you to have someone proofread what you post before you post it here. This will save you a great deal of humiliation, and the rest of us a great deal of anguish.
Please, make an effort to restrain yourself. You are generally disliked, and no one understands a word you are babbling.
What they REALLY need to decode is whatever virus it is that prompts record executives to pull together a group of 4-5 teenage boys and turn them into a 'boy band'. Cure THAT virus, and the world will thank you.
You know what else would be great? A cure for malaria, the disease responsible for half of the world's deaths.
Or neither is true. But the same argument has been used against both. The difference is, when Microsoft and the Church of Scientology attacked Slashdot, they used the DMCA. Islam Way was attacked with the threat of new legislation.
The fact is, every weblog is going to have a seamy underside. Hopefully the public will not be so easily swayed by emotion as to outlaw weblogs because of the comments posted by a handful of fools.
In what is quite possibly the worst pun ever, is it possible that Victor has received a pre-emptive patent on pre-empting? That is, he has prevented others from nefariously patenting the process, by patenting it himself. It's not as if he is trying to exploit it financially, and the patent process is quite costly.
... If nothing is serious anymore, then there's nothing to satirize." - Berke Breathed.
Well, Berke, I must say, I know of someone who still takes himself seriously. His name is Jack Valenti, and he says things like this:
"If we have to file a thousand lawsuits a day, we'll do it." -JV.
There you go, if you start cartooning again, you can pick on him. Personally, I need to go pick dinner out of my beard, and build me a wheelchair to go dandeylion stomping in. It's probably just like building a bicycle, you never forget. By the way, Opus is an idiot, right?
At issue is whether it is legal and ethical for officials in Washington to check to see if any of the judiciary's 30,000 employees, among them nearly 900 active judges and hundreds of semiretired ones, use their computers for pornography, streaming video or music.
While this is certainly what the esteemed newspaper reporter has printed, we must ask ourselves: is it true? That is, is the monitoring program they have installed so brilliant, so incredibly artificially intelligent, that it can distinguish these three things: "pornography, video, and music" from everything else the judges might be looking at? Or is it (as I might believe to be the case) that the program is far less intelligent than the reporter claims, that the program simply monitors what web pages are viewed, and reports & tracks this at a central authority. Perhaps the judges don't wish any central authority to know that they are reading www.2600.com? Or perhaps that they are posting to weblogs as "Anonymous Coward", writing tracts such as "IANAL", which we all know means "I am not a lawyer (i'm a judge)" but which might be construed as pornography (I ANAL).
I think we must petition the reporter to check his facts at once.
Slashdot Mirror
Rob, could you take some time to discuss the recent changes with respect to storing IP profiles for every user, banning users, banning IP addresses, and banning entire subnets? Judging from the current updates posted to Sourceforge, it looks like you are working not just on filtering ACs but also on pre-filtering of logged in users, that is, preventing abusive users from posting. MySQL.pm in particular now contains this interesting code fragment:
#logem' so we can banem'
$self->sqlInsert("abusers", {
uid => $uid,
ipid => $ipid,
subnetid => $subnetid,
pagename => $script_name,
querystring => $query_string || '',
reason => $reason,
-ts => 'now()',
and
$submission->{subnetid} = getCurrentUser('subnetid');
Could you discuss who in particular you are logging and banning? Specifically, is it just those darn Windows advocates, or are you broadening the scope? Personally, I would really appreciate it if you could subnet ban those people for life.
Thanks,
-Sheldon.
Shit ... there goes my launch set.
Your nonsensical babble is not welcome here. I think I speak for everyone when I say that not one of your comments makes a lick of sense. If you would stop posting, it would be greatly appreciated.
To sum up, put a cork in it. Thank you.
-Everyone on Slashdot.
"So is fucking car industry" ??
Sir, do you understand that your gibberish is incomprehensible to the other denizens of this web site? In the future, I would advise you to have someone proofread what you post before you post it here. This will save you a great deal of humiliation, and the rest of us a great deal of anguish.
Please, make an effort to restrain yourself. You are generally disliked, and no one understands a word you are babbling.
What they REALLY need to decode is whatever virus it is that prompts record executives to pull together a group of 4-5 teenage boys and turn them into a 'boy band'. Cure THAT virus, and the world will thank you.
You know what else would be great? A cure for malaria, the disease responsible for half of the world's deaths.
No wonder everyone hates Americans.
"zealotry can be a potent force for survival."
Are you talking about this guy???
Not Osama. He's already GOT his.
Oh well. I can dream! By the way, what does this mean: "Your comment violated the postercomment compression filter. Comment aborted"?
...and Islam Way is a terrorist site.
Or neither is true. But the same argument has been used against both. The difference is, when Microsoft and the Church of Scientology attacked Slashdot, they used the DMCA. Islam Way was attacked with the threat of new legislation.
The fact is, every weblog is going to have a seamy underside. Hopefully the public will not be so easily swayed by emotion as to outlaw weblogs because of the comments posted by a handful of fools.
In what is quite possibly the worst pun ever, is it possible that Victor has received a pre-emptive patent on pre-empting? That is, he has prevented others from nefariously patenting the process, by patenting it himself. It's not as if he is trying to exploit it financially, and the patent process is quite costly.
So, basically, if Windows can get down to one reboot per year, they could actually get those 5 9's they're always talking about in their ads.
I'm only crashing once a week on average under Windows 2000, so I'd say they're well on their way to achieving this by 2045. Good luck guys!
... If nothing is serious anymore, then there's nothing to satirize." - Berke Breathed.
Well, Berke, I must say, I know of someone who still takes himself seriously. His name is Jack Valenti, and he says things like this:
"If we have to file a thousand lawsuits a day, we'll do it." -JV.
There you go, if you start cartooning again, you can pick on him. Personally, I need to go pick dinner out of my beard, and build me a wheelchair to go dandeylion stomping in. It's probably just like building a bicycle, you never forget. By the way, Opus is an idiot, right?
Good luck with everything.
Sincerely,
Sheldon.
At issue is whether it is legal and ethical for officials in Washington to check to see if any of the judiciary's 30,000 employees, among them nearly 900 active judges and hundreds of semiretired ones, use their computers for pornography, streaming video or music.
While this is certainly what the esteemed newspaper reporter has printed, we must ask ourselves: is it true? That is, is the monitoring program they have installed so brilliant, so incredibly artificially intelligent, that it can distinguish these three things: "pornography, video, and music" from everything else the judges might be looking at? Or is it (as I might believe to be the case) that the program is far less intelligent than the reporter claims, that the program simply monitors what web pages are viewed, and reports & tracks this at a central authority. Perhaps the judges don't wish any central authority to know that they are reading www.2600.com? Or perhaps that they are posting to weblogs as "Anonymous Coward", writing tracts such as "IANAL", which we all know means "I am not a lawyer (i'm a judge)" but which might be construed as pornography (I ANAL).
I think we must petition the reporter to check his facts at once.