Well they have peered with most major isps because it saves Netflix and the ISP the s*** ton of money to keep a local cache black box from Netflix hooked to the local node. So this point Netflix really doesn't have that much of bandwidth costs. not compared to the idea that they're paying for every stream bit by bit. they paid for one out of maybe a thousand streams bandwidth.
Netflix doesn't get to do that. It's the same cost to Netflix whether I setup four autoatreamers just to make sure that Netflix it's not getting free money, or of my friends or someone else talk to make sure that what I paid for is consumed. Just because Netflix wants to provide less than people paid for, in order to pocket. Extra ill-gotten profit,. Doesn't mean that's a realistic plan or supported by physical reality
That's fair enough those who don't accept security is just posturing, role-based countless dollars and time on a fruitless task, when they could have adjusted their life to function from a philosophy of everyone's going to know anyway. There are two ways to solve the problem.
Eliminate it. And this case that one is a lost cause.
The second way to solve a problem is to adjust your underlying system of operation to count on these sort of things happening and plan on not being able to predict when so that you are motivated to prepare and when it happens are not traumatized by it.
Similar to how we learn not to cry and freak out just cuz it's raining on a day we want to play outside we learned to accept that sometimes it's going to rain. And we plan and prepare for it so that we don't have to care when it does.
How many times does it have to happen over and over and over again before people realize, as soon as you monetize a situation, every slick-talking scumbag crawls out of the darkness try and get that money. and any credibility for what someone says goes right out the window because , now it's not about sharing ideas and discussing them. it's about whatever panders to the paycheck.
Wow that's so hard to believe that many Americans don't support American values outside of American borders?
Is it really so crazy to think of some of us might understand the concept of jurisdiction.
Yes they do because in the pressure of the moment, they are told that if they don't then innocent or not it is doubtful they're going to be able to prove their innocence and if they don't want to have any more trouble necessary evil take the plea bargain. To most people being threatened by the most powerful incarceration machine in the free world is extremely intimidating. Especially when your experience in life is that the rules only help the people who make the rules and f*** everybody else due to selective enforcement and glaring exploits actually practiced by those in positions of reputation power and or financial advantage.
Why would I send my kid to public school when most of public school is waiting for the teacher to shut up cuz you finished the homework 15 minutes into class before the teacher even assigned it. Because public School workloads are that lax and easy. People are in bad lessons from public school. Mainly that it doesn't matter how hard you work it doesn't matter how well you do.they'll never reward you with anything you truly value. Your time and freedom do as you choose and go where you want because you finished your work.
If kids were rewarded with free roam time for finishing their curriculum for the week you can about guarantee they will get everything done by Monday or Tuesday, so that can go explore the world and live a while. if you give kids the freedom they burned by completing their daily responsibilities, will only ever be at school long enough to get their next week's curriculum. how would they waste their time with people when there's more interesting things to explore in the world?
Well yeah. when Western Civilization collapses on itself due to over reaching somebody needs to be around to continue things. So it's important not to let any certain culture or one rule become dominant. Similar to farming crops, a social or legal monoculture increases chances of one critical point of failure or exploit affecting all.
Besides the USA has been a dominant world power for quite a while now. They don't need any more help controlling the world.
What They do need help with is learning to take turns and how to step down gracefully. when one entity stays in control too long it's time for turn over to prevent and dissolve perceptions of entitlement.
Because they're human. I'm only one smart enough to create such technologies are too smart to avoid awareness of the ramifications of what they built. People are responsible for their creations, and by extension any fallout effects of their creations. Responsibility is not passed. responsibilities stacks. Everyone who has a chance disrupt or prevent acts of violence and do not, share responsibility for the death toll. But the person who created the potential, retroactively receives responsibility for all effects in addition to the responsibilities held by everyone else involved
Cuz if you develop a technology that has while being aware that there is a clear potential for abuse, and have any sort of moral integrity at all, you're going to feel responsible for everyone killed with the technology you created
there is a greater responsibility that transcends that to country as the developer of a technology to safeguard it from military use.
Remember the right thing to do is often unpopular and illegal.
This is the kind of misappropriation of technology for violent uses that makes developers kill themselves in later years, rise of the death count from their technology rises, so does the personal guilt of those that invented it, until they either embrace harming others as no big deal, or they kill themselves In chagrin.
And the way you talk about it makes it sound like a good thing, that is justified but then again a good Word-Smith can make vacuum sounds sweeter,to try and breathe, than oxygen.
release the military could do is kill the developers of the technology and put them out of their misery. They are never going to have another night sleep without nightmares of those who died because of they selfishly ignored potential for abuse, when they developed the technology to bring joy.
I speak of the USA. Casual and visious atrocities occur commonly and daily in the US throughout country. Here it is s brushed under the rug until someone wants to weaponize the concept for political means. Then a particular type of atrocity it is put in the media spotlight until the agenda it was providing for is achieved and then neatly tucked away back out of public awareness and documentation.
The USA is not better. it's just more sneaky and willing to lie about itself to itself. And the house has no limits to its brutality as long as it fills the coffers
Get in trouble is not about right and wrong. It's about whether someone with the capability and the well perceives you to be in the way of what they want. if so they're identify something about you that they can exploit to create a dialogue where you are an evil.
Every parent Grooms their child. Christian's groom their children for a life of unsubstantiated guilt, and higher propensities for being manipulated, schools groom children to betray their families and self interests 4 whatever society wishes to devour and use them for.
Grooming is a hypocrotical derogatory term for people people raisng children inways you don't like.. but if the children are trained to it than they may not have a problem with it and then there will be no trama for me to use to justify interference with their lives.
Teenagers are sexual creatures. they're supposed to be fucking six ways to Sunday. It's the prime of life. That's why they continue to do so cross culture. Even consider them teenagers until around 1920.
And that there right as a Sovereign Nation to conduct and Define their own legalities and morality. unless you're saying they're merely a colony that which case to whom is the authority they have to answer to? And then who tells that Authority what to do, eventually all forms of legalitiescome down to might makes right . that's what the law enforcement part is the night Whoever has the bigger gun can control other people. So are there people have value intrinsically and therefore oh nothing to laws they didn't create personally themselves, or they're only valuable relative to how they can be sacrificed for society and so therefore the government named body of that Society defines morality, and a person has no value except relative to what Society deems them to be,
You write a written receipt, make a second one have them sign it, then hold on to it to run the transactions through the computer later, and use your basic math skills. Fourth grade level shit
Or maybe I just don't have blind worship for the random Nation I happen to have been spat into the world, disassociated from such blind loyalties am to see things clearer. I hate to say it but people who live in the u. S. Turn to think like a bunch of fanboys when it comes to contrasting different countries and cultures. The bias is glaring I must be accounted for. Just because it's the country you were born into doesn't mean you should automatically granted any Allegiance. Respect must be earned.
Intellectual property is not real it's an artificial construct created as an economic prop. And exist only as a product of law. Outside of law, sharing and duplicating and refining existing information is just pragmatic and useful. I don't need to take what you have because with this information I can make my own and now neither of us either depend on each other and can do our own work.
Slashdot Mirror
Well they have peered with most major isps because it saves Netflix and the ISP the s*** ton of money to keep a local cache black box from Netflix hooked to the local node. So this point Netflix really doesn't have that much of bandwidth costs. not compared to the idea that they're paying for every stream bit by bit. they paid for one out of maybe a thousand streams bandwidth.
Netflix doesn't get to do that. It's the same cost to Netflix whether I setup four autoatreamers just to make sure that Netflix it's not getting free money, or of my friends or someone else talk to make sure that what I paid for is consumed. Just because Netflix wants to provide less than people paid for, in order to pocket. Extra ill-gotten profit,. Doesn't mean that's a realistic plan or supported by physical reality
That's fair enough those who don't accept security is just posturing, role-based countless dollars and time on a fruitless task, when they could have adjusted their life to function from a philosophy of everyone's going to know anyway. There are two ways to solve the problem. Eliminate it. And this case that one is a lost cause. The second way to solve a problem is to adjust your underlying system of operation to count on these sort of things happening and plan on not being able to predict when so that you are motivated to prepare and when it happens are not traumatized by it. Similar to how we learn not to cry and freak out just cuz it's raining on a day we want to play outside we learned to accept that sometimes it's going to rain. And we plan and prepare for it so that we don't have to care when it does.
How many times does it have to happen over and over and over again before people realize, as soon as you monetize a situation, every slick-talking scumbag crawls out of the darkness try and get that money. and any credibility for what someone says goes right out the window because , now it's not about sharing ideas and discussing them. it's about whatever panders to the paycheck.
Wow that's so hard to believe that many Americans don't support American values outside of American borders? Is it really so crazy to think of some of us might understand the concept of jurisdiction.
are you accounting for your national hubris?
Legally definition does not equate to reality, and more often is an attempt to hide reality
Yes they do because in the pressure of the moment, they are told that if they don't then innocent or not it is doubtful they're going to be able to prove their innocence and if they don't want to have any more trouble necessary evil take the plea bargain. To most people being threatened by the most powerful incarceration machine in the free world is extremely intimidating. Especially when your experience in life is that the rules only help the people who make the rules and f*** everybody else due to selective enforcement and glaring exploits actually practiced by those in positions of reputation power and or financial advantage.
Why would I send my kid to public school when most of public school is waiting for the teacher to shut up cuz you finished the homework 15 minutes into class before the teacher even assigned it. Because public School workloads are that lax and easy. People are in bad lessons from public school. Mainly that it doesn't matter how hard you work it doesn't matter how well you do .they'll never reward you with anything you truly value. Your time and freedom do as you choose and go where you want because you finished your work.
If kids were rewarded with free roam time for finishing their curriculum for the week you can about guarantee they will get everything done by Monday or Tuesday, so that can go explore the world and live a while. if you give kids the freedom they burned by completing their daily responsibilities, will only ever be at school long enough to get their next week's curriculum. how would they waste their time with people when there's more interesting things to explore in the world?
Well yeah. when Western Civilization collapses on itself due to over reaching somebody needs to be around to continue things. So it's important not to let any certain culture or one rule become dominant. Similar to farming crops, a social or legal monoculture increases chances of one critical point of failure or exploit affecting all.
I thought they were known as capitalists.
Besides the USA has been a dominant world power for quite a while now. They don't need any more help controlling the world. What They do need help with is learning to take turns and how to step down gracefully. when one entity stays in control too long it's time for turn over to prevent and dissolve perceptions of entitlement.
Because they're human. I'm only one smart enough to create such technologies are too smart to avoid awareness of the ramifications of what they built. People are responsible for their creations, and by extension any fallout effects of their creations. Responsibility is not passed. responsibilities stacks. Everyone who has a chance disrupt or prevent acts of violence and do not, share responsibility for the death toll. But the person who created the potential, retroactively receives responsibility for all effects in addition to the responsibilities held by everyone else involved
Cuz if you develop a technology that has while being aware that there is a clear potential for abuse, and have any sort of moral integrity at all, you're going to feel responsible for everyone killed with the technology you created
there is a greater responsibility that transcends that to country as the developer of a technology to safeguard it from military use. Remember the right thing to do is often unpopular and illegal.
This is the kind of misappropriation of technology for violent uses that makes developers kill themselves in later years, rise of the death count from their technology rises, so does the personal guilt of those that invented it, until they either embrace harming others as no big deal, or they kill themselves In chagrin. And the way you talk about it makes it sound like a good thing, that is justified but then again a good Word-Smith can make vacuum sounds sweeter ,to try and breathe, than oxygen.
release the military could do is kill the developers of the technology and put them out of their misery. They are never going to have another night sleep without nightmares of those who died because of they selfishly ignored potential for abuse, when they developed the technology to bring joy.
I speak of the USA. Casual and visious atrocities occur commonly and daily in the US throughout country. Here it is s brushed under the rug until someone wants to weaponize the concept for political means. Then a particular type of atrocity it is put in the media spotlight until the agenda it was providing for is achieved and then neatly tucked away back out of public awareness and documentation. The USA is not better. it's just more sneaky and willing to lie about itself to itself. And the house has no limits to its brutality as long as it fills the coffers
Holy shit, a true blue, dyed in the wool, blind misguided patriot crusader.. the most destructive of fools..
That's a quicker and less painful death then the slow torture of the poor and huddled masses die of barbaric conditions in our country.
Get in trouble is not about right and wrong. It's about whether someone with the capability and the well perceives you to be in the way of what they want. if so they're identify something about you that they can exploit to create a dialogue where you are an evil.
Every parent Grooms their child. Christian's groom their children for a life of unsubstantiated guilt, and higher propensities for being manipulated, schools groom children to betray their families and self interests 4 whatever society wishes to devour and use them for. Grooming is a hypocrotical derogatory term for people people raisng children inways you don't like.. but if the children are trained to it than they may not have a problem with it and then there will be no trama for me to use to justify interference with their lives. Teenagers are sexual creatures. they're supposed to be fucking six ways to Sunday. It's the prime of life. That's why they continue to do so cross culture. Even consider them teenagers until around 1920.
And that there right as a Sovereign Nation to conduct and Define their own legalities and morality. unless you're saying they're merely a colony that which case to whom is the authority they have to answer to? And then who tells that Authority what to do, eventually all forms of legalitiescome down to might makes right . that's what the law enforcement part is the night Whoever has the bigger gun can control other people. So are there people have value intrinsically and therefore oh nothing to laws they didn't create personally themselves, or they're only valuable relative to how they can be sacrificed for society and so therefore the government named body of that Society defines morality, and a person has no value except relative to what Society deems them to be,
You write a written receipt, make a second one have them sign it, then hold on to it to run the transactions through the computer later, and use your basic math skills. Fourth grade level shit
Or maybe I just don't have blind worship for the random Nation I happen to have been spat into the world, disassociated from such blind loyalties am to see things clearer. I hate to say it but people who live in the u. S. Turn to think like a bunch of fanboys when it comes to contrasting different countries and cultures. The bias is glaring I must be accounted for. Just because it's the country you were born into doesn't mean you should automatically granted any Allegiance. Respect must be earned.
Intellectual property is not real it's an artificial construct created as an economic prop. And exist only as a product of law. Outside of law, sharing and duplicating and refining existing information is just pragmatic and useful. I don't need to take what you have because with this information I can make my own and now neither of us either depend on each other and can do our own work.