Slashdot Mirror


'Prism, Prism on the Wall, Who is the Most Trustworthy of Them All?' Huawei Hits Back at US Over 5G Security Claims (zdnet.com)

The tension between Huawei and the U.S. government took a new turn Tuesday after the Chinese networking giant's rotating chairman Guo Ping poked fun at the massive surveillance programs maintained by the United States. "Prism, prism on the wall, who's the most trustworthy of them all?" Ping said onstage at Mobile World Congress tradeshow. From a report: Ping first appeared to attempt to make light of the ongoing row -- "There has never been more interest in Huawei, we must be doing something right," he said -- but later took a more direct aim at the US and some of its own issues with cybersecurity and surveillance. "Prism, Prism on the wall, who is the most trustworthy of them all?" he said, referencing the previously secret National Security Agency surveillance project, telling the audience to ask Edward Snowden -- the whistleblower who revealed the activity -- if they didn't understand what he meant. Ping also took aim at the US Cloud Act, arguing that the legislation allows the US government to demand access data held by US companies, even if it is stored in different countries. "The Cloud Act allows them to access data cross-borders. So for best technology and for greater security, please choose Huawei," he said.

170 comments

  1. PSA for Americans and others by nimbius · · Score: 1, Informative

    PRISM has several techniques you can use to escape. most are FLOSS. https://prism-break.org/

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The implication is that because NSA does data collection that somehow Huawei isn't an IP thief, fraud, espionage tentacle wholly owned by the Chinese Communist Party, an adversary that seeks military conflict with the US.

      As much as I was dismayed by PRISM (12 years ago when I first found out about it right?) I don't see how this addresses Huawei's frauds or thefts or espionage for China ongoing.

      https://www.businessinsider.com/second-huawei-employee-arrested-in-poland-on-suspicion-of-china-spying-2019-1

      It's also not just the USA that noticed.

    2. Re:PSA for Americans and others by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am always assuming that I am being spied upon. However in America the first Amendment prevents me from being put in jail from my viewpoints, just as long as I am not using my speech intentionally hurt people. Also if content was released about me, that has only happened via my own government spying on me, then I have recourse against it. China doesn't have such advantages to its citizens.

      I am not saying what America is doing is good, or the right thing to do. But at least I have some power and rights from it.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re: PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yet more people are incarcerated in the US than in China. Maybe you guys are just more criminally inclined.

    4. Re:PSA for Americans and others by hackingbear · · Score: 0, Troll

      Majority of accusations against Huawei or China are falsified, exaggerated, outdated, or hypocritical.

      Whether China has done that or not, they has not launched a major PR campaign over the issue against US in the many years PRISM, which revealed direct attacks against Chinese network, has been exposed. The US government and policticians, on the other hand, keep using the same things from IP theft to industry espionage that the US had committed to attack China and never mention its own dirty history (so that they can use the issues to rally the support of populism and nationalism.) That's called hypocrisy.

    5. Re: PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's false. China does not release figures on their prisoners. There are well over 1 million ethnic Uighurs being detained for no actual crime in China. It is a lawless cabal. You are an equivocating apologist faggot.

    6. Re:PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Exactly, these points are overlooked. As much as we are shocked by the scope or scale of the collection, WHAT IT IS USED FOR is the key. In China such data is used to disappear dissidents, undesirable ethnicities, journalists, etc.

      ONE MILLION UIGHURS IN CHINESE PRISONS. The Chief of INTERPOL for chrissake was arrested and secretly detained for MONTHS without being charged. These are common daily occurrences in China.

      Now of course there can be a "whattabout the baby cages" argument related to US (Trump admin) policies against non-citizens at the US border, and the US D.O.C. is by no means an example of a well-oiled bureaucracy.

      But the distinction is clear - there are protections in our laws and in our systems that respect and evaluate the rights of individuals, even those accused of crimes, in our system they are sacrosanct until evidence proves otherwise.

      There is no comparison between our system and the lawless ethno-state criminal cabal Kangaroo courts that comprise the Chinese "legal" system, or government generally. None.

      China is a criminal cabal without even the ATTEMPT AT PRETENSE of being a good faith legally obligated nation that protects ANYONE'S rights, except maybe Han-bloodline Uber-drones exclusively by birthright.

      China has no laws, it's autocracy. The sooner apologist morons realize this fact in plain sight staring them in the face, the fewer morons need to see the inside of a Chinese "court" or prison to understand the difference.

    7. Re: PSA for Americans and others by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are well over 1 million ethnic Uighurs being detained for no actual crime in China.

      Most estimates are that there are less than a million detained in the Xinjiang camps.

      America incarcerates over 2 million people, roughly four times as many as China per capita. Many are in pre-trial confinement, having been convicted of nothing. Many others are in prison based on plea bargains rather than evidence. America has one of the world's highest false conviction rates.

      There is plenty to criticize about China's prison system. There is much more to criticize about America's.

    8. Re: PSA for Americans and others by skam240 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There's more to criticize about the US' prison system!?

      China is a country that regularly disappears people and is currently trying to break a minority population through mass incarceration for reasons no civilized country would prosecute some one for.

      On top of that, China's system lacks so much transparency we have to go with international estimates on what's going on with their prison system.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    9. Re: PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Comparing one province's reeducation camps to the total prison population in another country which has no reeducation camps.

      Good job ShanghaiBill, you certainly are earning your pay on the forums today.

    10. Re: PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There is plenty to criticize about China's prison system. There is much more to criticize about America's." LIAR. China's system is an unknown figure and unknown conditions, secret courts, the whole gamut.

      You're making false equivalences again. 1+ Million UIGHURS ALONE are being held WITHOUT ACTUAL WRONGDOING OR CRIMINAL CONVICTION. It's unknown how many OTHER groups also are similarly incarcerated.

      Given that's a SINGLE GROUP at over a million estimated, one we have credible reports of despite a totalitarian police-state government that censors EVERY DAMN THING COMPLETELY, and given your figure of the US (which actually supplies figures!) is around 2 million KNOWN, VERIFIED COURT PROCESSES that result in criminal incarceration, complete with lawyers, evidence, an attempt at unbiased juries and whatnot...

      For you Blathering Bullshit Bill to compare the two as if EQUAL, or as if China's secret courts and prison systems WITHOUT RIGHTS FOR THE ACCUSED are somehow LESS ONEROUS?

      You simply are a lying traitor in defense of autocratic cabalism, you fucking moron. That you lied about "blood plasma is sterile!" dozens of times underscores that you are willing to say anything even if 100% wrong.

    11. Re: PSA for Americans and others by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's more to criticize about the US' prison system!?

      The bottom line is that an American is four times more likely to be incarcerated than a Chinese citizen.

      If you are rotting in prison, the fact that America's system is transparently unjust, so everyone knows about the high false conviction rate, and the defects of our plea bargain based courts, doesn't really mean much, so long as people don't care about the injustice.

      So who doesn't care? Apparently you, since you would prefer to point to the other side of the world than address bigger problems here at home that we have the collective power to fix.

    12. Re:PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless it's suspected that you are a terrorist, or live within 100 miles of the border. In that case you can be held indefinitely without charge. It's pretty convenient that over 90% of the population fits this criteria considering that the ocean is considered a border.

    13. Re:PSA for Americans and others by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

      Just because they may or may not have stolen technology, doesn't mean their products will spy on you.

    14. Re: PSA for Americans and others by ranton · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not only is that false, as someone else pointed out, but even the nugget of truth there is misleading. The US doesn't incarcerate more people per capita because of government corruption or the silencing of dissidents. It is mostly because of dumb drug laws, harsh sentencing of actual criminals (arguably also dumb), lack of effort around rehabilitation, and income inequality / segregation.

      Total number of people in prison, or per capita figures, don't paint an accurate picture when comparing the US and Chinese governments. It is like comparing a poor starving person with someone on a diet. They may both be hungry but for very different reasons.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    15. Re:PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      China, as big as it is, doesn't throw nearly as much at their military ($200 billion a year vs $700 billion). You don't hear them going all over the world starting fights to make their weapon CEOs stupid rich.

      The US is the only one that wants to start shit. and if you don't think that other companies are poaching people for the whole purpose of seeing what they're doing in the other company? lol

    16. Re:PSA for Americans and others by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      However in America the first Amendment prevents me from being put in jail from my viewpoints

      But in China being in America prevents you from jail as well as so much more. If you're afraid of a foreign government more than your own because of a several centuries old piece of paper then you're doing something very wrong.

      Remember Huawei isn't being banned in China.

    17. Re:PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually disagree slightly (but not too much). China's what happens when you let capitalism run out of control.

      I regularly hear stories about bribing officials to get things approved. State run companies that have the funding of 2 billion tax payers are guaranteed to rival those that clawed their way up to the global stage. Those that decry such things are jailed, deplatformed, or ridiculed (just like in the states)

      Sure, the States (and to be fair, most countries) give semblence of rights. Sure, you can say what you want... but nobody really gives a shit. Even as polarizing as Trump is, I'll bet that no more than 40% of the US population is going to show at the next election.

    18. Re: PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's more to criticize about the US' prison system!?

      The bottom line is that an American is four times more likely to be incarcerated than a Chinese citizen.

      The bottom line is you have to break the fucking law in order to become a victim of any prison system.

      You can drop that whole "four times more likely" bullshit argument because the math is black and white. You're either inclined to break the law, or you're not. Don't want to get arrested? Don't break the law. It's that simple.

    19. Re: PSA for Americans and others by larryjoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are well over 1 million ethnic Uighurs being detained for no actual crime in China.

      Most estimates are that there are less than a million detained in the Xinjiang camps.

      This is not correct. There are some estimates that are less than one million. Most are at least one million. Several are several million. But, of course, these estimates don't really matter. Would attitudes or policy change if the real number were 950,000 instead of 2 million?

      America incarcerates over 2 million people, roughly four times as many as China per capita. Many are in pre-trial confinement, having been convicted of nothing. Many others are in prison based on plea bargains rather than evidence. America has one of the world's highest false conviction rates.

      There is plenty to criticize about China's prison system. There is much more to criticize about America's.

      Comparing the American justice system to the Chinese system is really hard, mainly due to the extreme opacity of the Chinese system. Yes, some of the per capita numbers for China are somewhat lower due to the big denominator. However, there are several significant factors that would favor facing the US system instead of the Chinese system:

      (1) Many laws in China would be considered to be unacceptable by most Americans. For example, texting or posting offensive words like Tibet, Taiwan, or Winne the Pooh. Criticizing the president, his party, and existing laws. Possessing a beard or a Koran at home. Arguing certain viewpoints on Slashdot. The concept of "law" in China is very different in China, and most Americans would find it unacceptable.

      (2) The judicial system in China does not protect the rights of the accused. Extra-judicial punishments, no effective right of appeal or even representation, no due process, no limits on cruel and unusual punishments.

      On paper, China is the world's largest democracy and an exemplary protector of the rights of the people. In reality, the application of law in China is far inferior to the US system. This is not to say that the US system is great, good, or even satisfactory. It's only to show how truly bad the China system is.

      Americans can banter about the philosophical differences between US and Chinese surveillance and law because they have the first-world problem of stating whatever they want within the insulating cocoon of American rights. Where are the corresponding Chinese discussions of Chinese surveillance and law? I'll give you a hint. It's not because the Chinese system is so perfect that there's nothing to criticize.

    20. Re:PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cabalism is a subset of unrestrained capitalism w/o strong laws to protect the "free" market, this is true. That they're "Communist" in party name references the autocracy and totalitarianism rather than economics, though they have retained the "state ownership" planned economics platform of Communism under a veneer of capitalist market systems.

      So I think we do agree but the "communist" moniker still applies even though they do it for personal profit. There is still "The Party" that approves of all, or not.

    21. Re:PSA for Americans and others by hackingbear · · Score: 4, Interesting

      WHAT IT IS USED FOR is the key

      Yeah, like these usages are entirely acceptable, since they are done by the GREATEST NATION on earth.

      ONE MILLION UIGHURS IN CHINESE PRISONS.

      Wow, what a change of heart for Americans! We are suddenly having real empathy about Muslims, as long as they are not being locked up in Guantanamo.

      The Chief of INTERPOL for chrissake was arrested and secretly detained for MONTHS without being charged.

      Wow, another change of heart for a top Chinese security official who supposedly have done, well because he was the top police chief, all the political crimes such as "disappear dissidents, undesirable ethnicities, journalists, etc."

    22. Re: PSA for Americans and others by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Just who is "You guys". Remember, the USA is a nation of immigrants; both legal and illegal. Due to that, the US will always have more issues than other countries with mostly homogeneous populations.

    23. Re: PSA for Americans and others by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Innocent people don't regularly accept Plea Bargains.

    24. Re: PSA for Americans and others by edris90 · · Score: 2

      Yes they do because in the pressure of the moment, they are told that if they don't then innocent or not it is doubtful they're going to be able to prove their innocence and if they don't want to have any more trouble necessary evil take the plea bargain. To most people being threatened by the most powerful incarceration machine in the free world is extremely intimidating. Especially when your experience in life is that the rules only help the people who make the rules and f*** everybody else due to selective enforcement and glaring exploits actually practiced by those in positions of reputation power and or financial advantage.

    25. Re:PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also if content was released about me, that has only happened via my own government spying on me, then I have recourse against it.

      That's priceless. Let's see: government spying on you may be shared with other governments or corporations. This is part of the way the NSA can get around rules about spying on Americans--just trade with other countries for information you spied on their citizens if they have similar rules. Meanwhile, corporations are absolutely horrible when it comes to security. So, governments other than yours can (at some urging) dox or out you. Corporations can, through malice or incompetence, leak whole databases of private information. The best you can do? Sue them for some money and hope the courts agree you have standing or were injured.

      Is all of this "better" than China? Sure, but that's aiming low when they can lock you up on the whim of a politician and harvest your organs. But does the above translate to actual recourse for abuse? No. At best that private information, if it includes actual crimes, can't be used against you in a criminal case. That's something, but it's more about giving the US government no direct recourse when it abuses its people. Now, if you believe in parallel reconstruction...

    26. Re: PSA for Americans and others by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Only because there is no point to imprisoning dead people.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    27. Re: PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have some reasonable points. But you've got to put what happens to prisoners in China in context too... there's good reason to think that there's organ harvesting going on. Check out this movie...

      https://www.swoopfilms.com/hard-to-believe-movie/

    28. Re:PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hold on, you weren't supposed to say that. You should have said that this shows that the US is just as bad as China. And mention Cisco of course. We cannot leave out Cisco.

    29. Re: PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US numbers on incarceration are trustworthy. The Chinese numbers are absolutely not.

    30. Re: PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have more black people.

    31. Re: PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have lived and worked in China for more than 20 years.
      This is a false equivalence. The number of Chinese prisoners and those in "administrative detention" is unknown. As is the number subject to extra-judicial killing.

      The US may have its problems, but don't conflate them into those of a totalitarian state.

    32. Re:PSA for Americans and others by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      If there were one million chinese being held in prisons it would be visible from space.

      Oh.

      Wait.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    33. Re:PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However in America the first Amendment prevents me from being put in jail from my viewpoints

      Why are the Kikes so un-American?

    34. Re:PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means they are willing to do whatever, and continue doing it at least another 6-250 times after being caught. You're being very stupid as far as security is concerned.

    35. Re: PSA for Americans and others by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Most estimates are that there are less than a million detained in the Xinjiang camps.

      Well then, all is well, and China wins the humanitarian award for this year! Only a million detained for no actual crime. That's just the noise floor.

      You are an intelligent guy - But this is the dumbest thing you've ever written. What's your spin on the 1959 Cultural revolution famine?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    36. Re: PSA for Americans and others by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

      "Most estimates are that there are less than a million detained in the Xinjiang camps."

      So, 999,990?

      That the OP's numbers are off a bit doesn't change the fact that there is a large number of people imprisoned for no other reason than their ethnicity.

      I notice that many of the comments made in response to yours are talking about the US prison system instead of the imprisoned Uighurs.

      Nice redirect. Well played, indeed well played.

    37. Re:PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody who wants to play the China card, needs to look at everything they buy. China isn't the only one that seeks conflict. We don't have to seek conflict, If we don't find one, we'll create it, and then accuse the Russians, or Chinese, or the "terrorists" of the day.

      In the Battle of Empires, I'm on the American side all the way, the others are a bunch of savages, but let's not forget what it is.

    38. Re: PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is a country that regularly disappears people and is currently trying to break a minority population through mass incarceration for reasons no civilized country would prosecute some one for.

      So what? The American government props up many dictators that do the same, but it's for profit, to "grow the economy", so it's ok, right?

      Stop believing the lies! Just build and maintain a competent military. That and make an America that people want to defend

    39. Re:PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would still be put to jail, not for your viewpoints but for child porns found in your computer, failing to pay taxes, sexual assault, that kind of things. Then you would be pardoned and become that on the opposite sex.

    40. Re:PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They stole 5G tech from who? Are they ahead of anyone else in that space?

    41. Re:PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scores of people imprisoned after being arrested in a warzone is a far cry from over a million ethnic minorities imprisoned for being ethnic minorities in "reeducation camps."

      Stop apologizing for a modern-day version of mid 1930's Germany with the massive numerical scale of China.

    42. Re: PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's pretty obvious that the number isn't SEVERAL million. There's only 10M Uighurs in China. You are saying that half are in camps?

      Perhaps some of those laws would not be favored in the US, but the US population in general distrusts any form of government due to its history. China is more akin with continental Europe, who likely doesn't distrust the government as much.

      And you got to be joking that just posting Tibet or Taiwan, or Winnie the Pooh would get you jail time in China. You think literally no one can say the word Taiwan? They say it everyday on the news.

      For normal crimes there are legal procedures that are generally followed. For political crimes, procedures are less mandatory.

      In China you can banter also the philosophical difference. I read tons of academic papers from professors in China regarding governance, and how one should govern. Many talk about the rule of law, and the necessity to create legal institutions in China, etc. So there IS academic discourse. The problem is when you try to post what they consider inflammatory on their equivalent twitter... China doesn't like potential rioting, or what happened during the Cult. Rev.

    43. Re:PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As much as I was dismayed by PRISM (12 years ago when I first found out about it right?) I don't see how this addresses NSA's frauds or thefts or espionage for United States ongoing.

      IOW you are as stupid as you are gay Windbourne?
      BTW is Elon circumcised?

    44. Re: PSA for Americans and others by burtosis · · Score: 2
      Don't forget the for profit prisons, where under the 13th amendment you can force people to work for free. More often than not these are minorities.

      Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

    45. Re: PSA for Americans and others by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      While China's legal system is not independent, it does not mean ordinary people are not protected most of the time. See the various positive and negative answers to this Quora question. In particular. the biggest problem was that local government, which typically has conflict of interests or even corruption, controlled the local court; since Xi got in power, the legal system has been reorganized to be managed by the upper judicial layers instead of the government at the same locality.

      It is like that one can in principle have a much higher chance become a victim of gun violence in the US but in practice you are not about to be gunned randomly next week.

      And finally, it is unclear why this discussion of foreign country spy or surveillance (by China) accusations have much to do with the human rights or democracy situations in China. But the US, which is supposedly/on paper a democracy respecting human rights, is still spying around the world. So whether China respects human rights or is a democracy has nothing to do with whether China will spy or not. Apparently, the actual accusations don't hold any water and American nationalists have to divert the focus.

    46. Re: PSA for Americans and others by larryjoe · · Score: 1

      While China's legal system is not independent, it does not mean ordinary people are not protected most of the time

      This is actually true most of the time for most of the people. However, a large part of the reason it's true is that most of the people have enough sense to self-censor to avoid problems with the government. This type of self-censorship doesn't exist in the US and most western countries.

      And finally, it is unclear why this discussion of foreign country spy or surveillance (by China) accusations have much to do with the human rights or democracy situations in China. But the US, which is supposedly/on paper a democracy respecting human rights, is still spying around the world. So whether China respects human rights or is a democracy has nothing to do with whether China will spy or not. Apparently, the actual accusations don't hold any water and American nationalists have to divert the focus.

      The reason why surveillance and human rights is pertinent to this discussion is that surveillance by the US government on its own citizens is not used to control political speech and such surveillance never results in punishment by the government for political speech. In contrast, in China surveillance by the Chinese government on its own citizens for political speech can result in severe punishment and constitutes major human rights violations, at least by western standards. The vast majority of Chinese value their freedom and economic prosperity enough to self-censor, and those that are careless or cannot muzzle themselves are punished. I believe that the NSA/FBI/etc. monitor a great deal of communication on the internet and other communications media, but I don't censor myself at all because I have no fear of retribution based on that surveillance. This would not be true in China. The surveillance apparatus in China exists to protect the party and the supreme leader and is used to punish and squash communication that are viewed as threatening to the party or the supreme leader. One example of the difference between US and Chinese surveillance is that an explicit, credible threat to the safety of the US president is needed to trigger police action, while in China comparing the supreme leader to Winnie the Pooh is enough to get in trouble.

    47. Re: PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Msmash, good article, I am thankfull for your steady high article quality in contrast to many other slashdot editors

    48. Re: PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's more to criticize about the US' prison system!?

      The bottom line is that an American is four times more likely to be incarcerated than a Chinese citizen.

      If you are rotting in prison, the fact that America's system is transparently unjust [...]

      Recognizing this, and talking about it, allows for the possibility for it to be remedied. Try saying that the Chinese government and legal system is unjust, in China, and see what that gets you.

      For all its faults, the American system at least (theoretically) allows for self-correction.

      (I am a Canadian BTW.)

    49. Re: PSA for Americans and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Criticizing the president, his party, and existing laws.

      Don't give Trump any ideas. :)

    50. Re:PSA for Americans and others by Cederic · · Score: 1

      an adversary that seeks military conflict with the US

      Does it fuck. Where's the slightest shred of evidence for that?

      They don't shy away from risking military conflict with the US but refusing to be bullied isn't seeking conflict.

    51. Re: PSA for Americans and others by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      If you actually paid attention to the world, you'd find that lots of people get arrested who haven't done anything.

      An arrest does not require a conviction. At best, it's a matter of probable cause; at worst, it's a matter of who a police officer takes a dislike to. Once in jail, how soon you get out depends largely on how much money you have. If the bail is set at $1000, say, you can hand over $1K of your money to the system and get it back when you show up in court, or you can pay $100 to a bail bonds agency and not get it back ever, or stay in jail. (Bail has to be set by a judge, which usually means that if you're arrested Friday night you're spending the entire weekend in jail.)

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    52. Re: PSA for Americans and others by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      China is a country that regularly disappears people

      This. So much this. A friend of mine who has been living in China (note the tense; they're leaving) was telling me a few weeks back about how a German national they know suddenly disappeared.

      As my friend eventually came to find out, without having ever been approached or questioned before, this German was kidnapped off the street, taken to an interrogation room, told to unlock his phone, and required to hand over all of his contacts' information. When he did all of that they started demanding information that he didn't have (they seemed to incorrectly think he was a missionary?), so they locked him in a windowless cell with no bed, blanket, or change of clothes; provided him with only a bucket for relieving himself; deprived him of sleep for 96 hours by keeping the temperature bone-chillingly cold while blaring music day and night; and, at one point, closed the vents to his cell as they pumped smoke under the door, all while demanding more info from him. After four days they must have realized he didn't have anything more to give them, so they unceremoniously dumped him on a random street in his city and told him not to talk about what had happened, as well as that he had 72 hours to leave the country or he would be forcibly deported. Mind you, this is a man who was there legally, with a valid work visa, who was never charged with a crime, and who certainly wasn't convicted of one, yet he received a sort of mistreatment that I would have hoped was only common in fiction, then was given three days' notice to abandon his life of the past several years by uprooting and leaving behind his work, friends, family, and home.

      As you suggested, stuff like this has been common among ethnic minorities in certain parts of the country (Uighurs in the northwest especially), but up until recently foreigners were largely exempt from such treatment, presumably out of concern for the PR damage locking up foreigners without cause could do. It sounds like the last few months have seen a rapid expansion of disappearances and mistreatment, since it's now including foreigners and it's not just in the northwest, but across much of the rest of the country. The German guy wasn't anywhere close to where that sort of stuff has traditionally been happening, and while he's the only one my friend knows personally who went through something like that, my friend rattled off a half-dozen other instances they had heard second-hand and said that incidents nearly identical to his are increasingly common among their extended circles of expat friends and colleagues.

    53. Re: PSA for Americans and others by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      The censorship issue in China is also exaggerated. For one, political topic is the one being censored. ordinary people have little interests in politics and need to talk about politics much. Most other discussions are allowed and quite open. Follow the actual news from real Chinese news site, you can read a lot of criticism on the various levels of government on variety of topics. Also read Quora on many of the answers on Chinese censorships and other Chinese issues; those give you a lot of in-depth analysis than most of the western outlet shows you.

    54. Re: PSA for Americans and others by larryjoe · · Score: 1

      The censorship issue in China is also exaggerated. For one, political topic is the one being censored. ordinary people have little interests in politics and need to talk about politics much. Most other discussions are allowed and quite open. Follow the actual news from real Chinese news site, you can read a lot of criticism on the various levels of government on variety of topics. Also read Quora on many of the answers on Chinese censorships and other Chinese issues; those give you a lot of in-depth analysis than most of the western outlet shows you.

      While it's somewhat true that Chinese are culturally more prone to focus on economics and food than politics, it is not true that cultural Chinese do not discuss politics or do not passionately want to push for political change. Take a look at the difference between Hong Kong and Taiwan versus China. In Hong Kong and Taiwan, there is a very significant vocal portion of the population that openly criticizes and calls for changes in the current government. This does not exist in China except for those political prisoners who are willing to accept punishment. The difference is that in China, Chinese surveillance combined with the known extreme punishments result in extreme self-censorship. The self-censorship doesn't reflect a lack of intrinsic apathy about political change but rather an induced apathy trained by the state surveillance/punishment apparatus.

      Regarding info about Chinese censorship, surveillance, and punishment available on the internet, I believe what Abraham Lincoln said about trusting information on the internet. The western press has reported on Chinese security attacks across the internet. However, there is much less reporting about the push for Chinese propaganda intended to influence western countries. For example, in Time magazine, there are occasionally multi-page sections that are labeled as guest excepts from a Chinese publication. However, it's obvious that these sections are advertisements that tout the economic, cultural, and political prosperity of China. Other countries also advertise in Time, albeit mostly from a tourism and commercial investment angle. However, in contrast to other national advertisements, the Chinese sections are not labeled as paid advertisements. Instead, the Chinese pages are presented to appear as news similar to the other sections in Time. This is just one example of the Chinese propaganda machine for western audiences.

    55. Re: PSA for Americans and others by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "China is a country that regularly disappears people"

      THE USA FUCKING BOMBS ITS OWN PEOPLE ON ITS OWN NATIVE SOIL.

      Fuck your caps filter, SLASHSHIT. All caps was how code and text was originally displayed.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  2. Know the facts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    https://www.networkworld.com/article/2223272/60-minutes-torpedoes-huawei-in-less-than-15-minutes.html

    1. Re:Know the facts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.networkworld.com/article/2223272/60-minutes-torpedoes-huawei-in-less-than-15-minutes.html

      Less than 15 minutes? Those cheats! I want a refund for the other 45 minutes - I was promised a full 60.

    2. Re:Know the facts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facts? WTF.. The very same article you linked says.

      "Cisco did file suit and it was settled out of court, so we will never know what really happened."

    3. Re:Know the facts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no facts in the article you link. It is full of accusations and innuendos, but there are no facts. Here, a few examples:

      Many people in the technology industry knew - that is hearsay, not a "fact".
      Many say that Huawei stole everything - again, hearsay, no facts.
      Folklore within the routing and switching community was that Huawei stole router product - folklore are tales, rumors and legends, not facts.
      Many have said it for years - repeat of the above, no facts
      Cisco did file suit and it was settled out of court, so we will never know what really happened - so, no facts
      Motorola made the same claim...They also took Huawei to court and that was also settled out of court - again, no facts, but we know very well that in the US suing the competition is a legitimate business tactic to weaken it. We also know that such anti-competition cases are very often settled, and not fought out.

      The rest of the article is FUD and threats by one US senator, who is hardly a disinterested party, and by the author, a nobody with no credentials. Who after making all those accusations laments that Nortel and Cisco should not have settled, which, had it happened, he thinks, would have "proved" his accusations that Huawei stole intellectual property.

      Well, there is a reason why companies settle the cases they bring against potential competitors, and it is only one - that they're better off that way, without going to court, where "the truf" may turn out to be inconvenient for them.

  3. Kind of proving the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This kind of proves the point considering we can all see from the outside that if China asks any Chinese company to hand over their data, they must and will comply.

    1. Re:Kind of proving the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's not new so what else has changed? Oh...that's right...we replaced the neo-cons managing our foreign policy with Steve Bannon and his idiots.

  4. If only politicians could read by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

    I sure hope the (US) politicians can potentially learn from this. On so many levels, this is what they created in their ignorance and arrogance. DiFi, you are the worst on this... it is your own constituents you have hurt.

    1. Re:If only politicians could read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I sure hope the (US) politicians can potentially learn from this" -- Learn what, that some Americans are dumb enough to think Chinese Communist Party owned companies that steal and defraud and spy are "on the level" with the NSA?

      Go fuck a book. Data collection happened since the 1950's, blaming DiFi is hilarious scapegoating (even as mildly culpable as she personally is) for a massive, massive national defense apparatus that predates her holding office.

      If you want to be taken seriously about your feigned outrage at least direct it at the right place. And then try to remember, this is about a Chinese Communist-owned fraud shell corpo making defensive FUD maneuvers.

      Stop being so patently stupid. They planned for it.

    2. Re:If only politicians could read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course the NSA is spying, it's their fucking job. We'd be negligent not to. Of course Huweii is spying; they're part of the Chinese government, and the Chinese would be negligent not to.

      The difference, of course, is that the Chinese government is Orwellian, has demonstrated hostility to Western governments, has committed protracted economic warfare against western industries and has already places APTs into our infrastructure. The US is still a democratic republic, as are most western nations, and is not hostile to other western nations.

      To trust any complex hardware produced in China for infrastructure is negligent at best.

    3. Re:If only politicians could read by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      My comment regarding DiFi is because she is the only sitting congressperson that I have personally written a letter to on the topic and received a response that completely ignored the issue. (I did get a well reasoned response from Barbara Boxer, and Nancy Pelosi said something that was mildly on-topic and relevant.)

      Now, magnitude of potential compromise... not sure it really matters any more. A hole is a hole. We don't know if it is mischief or accidental.

    4. Re:If only politicians could read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "My comment regarding DiFi is because she is the only sitting congressperson that I have personally written a letter to on the topic and received a response that completely ignored the issue." - I'm sorry your 1 letter failed to change US longstanding national security policy. Really, that's awful, you must feel completely unrepresented by your 2-party system. Join the club. That's a different issue than whether DiFi is actually responsible for it, which I agree rhetorically in a small way she has given it cover and her signature on legislation has supported it continuing. The alternative? What is it. What is your plan to stop the NSA data collection mandate - and replace it with what exactly that does a better job of determining threats from idiots? Once you start ACTUALLY ASKING YOURSELF THESE TOUGH QUESTIONS and are forced to try to reconcile the difficulty and balance required for such a necessary security endeavor, you may start to realize that your entire chain of trust is built on corporate promises backed by US laws. There's nothing else defending you from the tyranny you're crying about. China surely isn't helping you either, nor would they. We are, for better or worse, beholden and dependent on our government for protection from these threats. Now you can be self-righteous about the indignation and be blue in the face, that's your right under our system - Not China's - but ultimately if you want to change these policies you're going to have to advocate a helluva lot stronger than a few letters, and you're going to need an alternative plan that makes as much defensive national security sense as what's in place. So far I tend to doubt you've given it that much thought, as evinced by blind blamehanding and unrealistic expectations of it all stopping on a dime, or even representative members discussing it casually with you. It's not a casual program. It's a valid gripe perhaps but not in the way you're making it.

    5. Re: If only politicians could read by edris90 · · Score: 1

      are you accounting for your national hubris?

    6. Re:If only politicians could read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US is still a democratic republic, as are most western nations, and is not hostile to other western nations.

      See what you did here! Read it again, carefully...

  5. Re:Kind of proving the point - exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And they won't admit it, talk about it, discuss it in any way - and deny it externally! And when pressed? They make a 5-point attack on the NSA and "the decadent west" like the obvious Chi-Com shills their board is.

    Just look at the statement Ren made the other day and tell me that's "a normal CEO looking out for shareholders and working to expand to developing markets." It's fucking Chi-Com propaganda to the T.

    I'm surprised Huawei didn't put out a NK-style video of missiles hitting Guam.

  6. You no talk smack on China. Irregal! by Seven+Spirals · · Score: 1

    You nexus, huh? I design you eyes!

  7. The truth by shentino · · Score: 1

    The US government AND Huawei AND china have one thing in common:

    THEY ALL SUCK!

    1. Re:The truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing they don't have in common. Production capacity and supply. When you put all your production capacity eggs in a basket far away, it should not come as a surprise when that far away place has PRODUCED something. Maybe it isn't the thing you want produced, but security concerns ring a little hallow when all the underlying hardware comes from the same place of said security concern.

    2. Re:The truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all hardware comes from China, that's horseshit, and not all Chinese manufacturers are solely owned by the Communist Party and are secretive and lie about that fact, or whose CEO's blather Chi-Com propaganda from hiding.

  8. Corporations should have the same power as Govt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because in China, they are the same thing.

    To the civilized parts of the world that is a terrifying idea.

    But try explaining freedom to a colony of termites.. Not a fruitful discussion.

    1. Re:Corporations should have the same power as Govt by Mr.+Dollar+Ton · · Score: 2

      It is not much different in the US. . The owners of the large corporations set the government agenda and policies, and the public at large has no influence over it.

  9. Re: What does Trump have to say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is not bad parody but you could have worked in some classic insults and name calling. I give it a C-

  10. BOTH of you are acting dishonorable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BOTH of you are acting dishonorable.

  11. Whataboutism at its finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares?

  12. 'Prism, Prism on the Wall' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting brouhaha,5G Network is here to stay,ignore it and stay behind,US must accept competition.

  13. How does Guk Ping know about Snow White? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't that banned by the state for being 'fantasy' or 'superstition' ?

    Will this accelerate his rotation

    1. Re:How does Guk Ping know about Snow White? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's from the Chinese remake Snow Yellow and the Szechuan Dogs: A Culinary Tale

  14. Everyone has access by plague911 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ive said this before and will likely have to say it again. If you use American tech, the Americans have access to your data. If you use Russian tech, the Americans and the Russians have access to your data. If you use Chinese tech the Americans, Russians, Chinese and everyones pet gerbil has access to your data. Its comical to live in a fantasy world where there is privacy. The only choice you have is who has access to your data.

    1. Re:Everyone has access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Russians and Chinese don't care about me. On the other hand, the Americans can use even innocent information as a reason to drag me and others into a legal or extra-legal hell.

    2. Re:Everyone has access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the Americans can use even innocent information as a reason to drag me and others into a legal or extra-legal hell." - Liar. If it had actually happened to you, you wouldn't be here to lie about it, fuckwit.

    3. Re:Everyone has access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that the US government is trying hard to get consumers to not buy "chinese" electronics I'm going to say you're incorrect. As the Chinese government can't make me disappear in the US I'd rather they have the secret backdoor than the domestic alphabet agencies.

    4. Re:Everyone has access by plague911 · · Score: 1

      That's simply not true. The Russians and Chinese are constantly monitoring communications to identify persons of interest for both corporate and national security espionage related reasons. For example the Equifax hack has been linked back to the Russians for precisely this reason. There is more than enough reason to debate the morality of US privacy invasions, what is not reasonable is either the willful child like naiveté or purposeful subterfuge based denial that the Russians and Chinese are hyper aggressive in this front.

    5. Re:Everyone has access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >hyper aggressive
      It's prudent. It's the cheapest way to attack your enemy, and you can do it from the comfort of your own country.

    6. Re:Everyone has access by plague911 · · Score: 1

      It is a tactic that has its strengths and weaknesses like any other. I am speaking of our collective responsibility as citizens of humanity to not live in a fantasy world and accept the reality and discuss from there.

    7. Re:Everyone has access by plague911 · · Score: 1

      You think that China and Russia have never black bagged a person on US territory? Like I said above, childlike like naiveté or purposeful subterfuge based denial on your part.

    8. Re:Everyone has access by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I actually prefer everyone having access. Then they can squabble about who is right.

    9. Re:Everyone has access by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Judging by the rate at which the US loses control of cyberweapons, leaks exploits and has its backdoors discovered and exploited in the wild, I'd say buying US hardware means everyone has access too.

      The bottom line is you are doing it wrong anyway, if you need to absolutely trust all your hardware.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:Everyone has access by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Russia and China are smart, their interesting data is not kept as plain text online.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    11. Re:Everyone has access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I might have exaggerated the difference. Do you really think there's a similar risk?

    12. Re:Everyone has access by plague911 · · Score: 1

      In the US, the US is more likely to use privacy violations (philosophical or legal) for run of the mill criminal prosecutions of varying moral worth. In the US, China and Russia are more likely to entrap in you in a espionage plot that threatens your life and livelihood. Separate and different depending on your personal proclivities one is more threating than the other.

    13. Re:Everyone has access by plague911 · · Score: 1

      There was a story a few years back about some rather secretive Russian organizations that had to go back to typewriters because the U.S. had completely owned any kind of multimedia based communications systems. From the language used in the reports I read this implied Russian made PCs, private phone lines, to low tech like projector screens were all compromised.

    14. Re:Everyone has access by jezwel · · Score: 1

      Right now the most logical reason to me is that 5 Eyes do not have (enough) backdoor access to Huawei gear, hence the aggressive campaign against the company by these countries.

    15. Re:Everyone has access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either this or even simpler reason: shaming Huawei to gain more market share for own companies. All I've heard have been FUD, but nothing concrete. Something along the lines of "They are chinese company and by chinese law they are required to do X if government asks". Well, what about other companies operating in china? Such as Apple, Google, Ericcson, etc? Aren't they bound by Chinese law?
      What about USA? Isn't there laws where companies have to provide information to government if a search warrant is provided and sometimes even without search warrant (NSL, prism...) ?
      There's been backdoor(S) in cisco's products, still the dust has settled quite quickly.
      There was big smear campaign against kapersky for sending NSA data to russia. Only later it was disclosed that the data sending was the AV software detecting questionable code (by NSA) and sent it home for analysis just like any other malware. But boy there was smearing.
      Now similar with huawei.

      For me it all smells like trade wars, trying to undermine non-US competition.

    16. Re:Everyone has access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would go out on a limb to say US has black bagged more people in foreign countries than China did. Not so sure about the Russians though. Non Chinese people talk and it's hard not to notice a group of up-to-no-good Chinese hanging out unless all these targets live in China town.

    17. Re:Everyone has access by plague911 · · Score: 1

      There was an article the other day mocking your conspiracy theory as the competitors to Huawei are also non-american. Although I can actually give it a grain of salt. Even if we are not benefiting, it is hurting China, which is worth something in a trade war.

    18. Re:Everyone has access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If you use Chinese tech the Americans, Russians, Chinese and everyones pet gerbil has access to your data.

      A hint of truth does not make psychological terrorism less so. Foreign tech produced and used in foreign countries is much less susceptible to US espionage.
      Also while all countries are interested in national security, US was proven to use state intelligence for commercial espionage (e.g. Brazil Petrobras).

  15. Nortel unavailable for comment. by edgedmurasame · · Score: 0

    But if you scratch a Huawei product, you might find a Nortel logo underneath.

    --
    "Forget the engineers." -Carly Fiorina, briber of MIT Technology Review.
    1. Re: Nortel unavailable for comment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huawei stole the code for IOS from Cisco nearly 20 years ago.

  16. IT'S HACKINGBEAR THE CHI-COM APOLOGIST AGAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hackingbear only comments to lie, obfuscate, and whattabout anything other than HUAWEI'S KNOWN RECORD. https://www.networkworld.com/article/2223272/60-minutes-torpedoes-huawei-in-less-than-15-minutes.html

  17. What's the difference? You said it thrice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are you saying the same thing (Russian government) thrice? Saying Goldman Sachs once is enough. No need to say German government AND British government AND the weapons industry, like you did.

  18. Fuck china by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And all of its apologists

  19. That is not re-course. by Pitawg · · Score: 1

    You have no re-course against the spying. Re-course is not inter-course. Being screwed does not help, aid, or fight anything.

  20. The UN says 1 million is credible. You are not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Given that you lied about such things as blood plasma, I'll go with the UN. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-rights-un/u-n-says-it-has-credible-reports-that-china-holds-million-uighurs-in-secret-camps-idUSKBN1KV1SU

    U.N. has credible reports that China holds million Uighurs in secret camps

  21. You're a lying punkass apologist Bill bottom line. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    The bottom line is that you lied and claimed that the Chinese prison system is knowable to outsiders and the legal system is comparable to the US, where innocence until proven guilt w/ lawyers, evidence is the norm.

    The bottom line is you lied about blood plasma being sterile more than anyone could count, so convinced your lying ass was right, even though it's 100% false.

    The bottom line is the UN says there are credible reports of well over 1 million Uighurs (no mention of other groups, that's just 1) in SECRET PRISONS in China without crimes or convictions of them.

    The bottom line, Bill, is you're a blathering liar in defense of an autocratic ethno-state criminal cabal credibly accused of crimes against humanity, and you're dishonestly trying to use whattaboutism to deflect.

      https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-rights-un/u-n-says-it-has-credible-reports-that-china-holds-million-uighurs-in-secret-camps-idUSKBN1KV1SU

    U.N. has credible reports that China holds million Uighurs in secret camps

    The bottom line : The people in US prisons actually face trials. You're an apologist coward, Bill. You belong in a Chinese prison, bottom line.

  22. The implication being the USA is projecting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The USA stole IP. They spy on everyone and, unlike China, worldwide. And there's no difference between claiming China owns a company and the USA where the government does what the government wants. The USA government and USA corporations are identical creatures, just as with your claim about china.

  23. You're wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Abu Hamsa is of the view that the USA is the great satan. He's in jail for that. He's not done anything other than speech.
    If you are of the opinion that the USA's illegal activities are wrong, you will be jailed.
    And with trump, if you don't say nice things about him, he'll try to change the law so he can jail you.
    And, unlike China, the USA wants to do that the world over, not just the USA.

    1. Re:You're wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Hamza_al-Masri - don't lie casually - you will be caught and convicted of it.

      Ab amzah al-Mar – literally, the Egyptian father of Hamza), the Hook Hand or simply Abu Hamza, is an Egyptian cleric who was the imam of Finsbury Park Mosque in London, England, *** --- where he preached Islamic fundamentalism and militant Islamism. --- ***

      In 2004, Hamza was arrested by British police after the United States requested he be extradited to face charges. He was later charged by British authorities with sixteen offences for inciting violence and racial hatred.[3] In 2006, a British court found him guilty of inciting violence, and sentenced him to seven years' imprisonment. On 5 October 2012, after an eight-year legal battle, he was extradited from the UK to the United States to face terrorism charges[4][5] and on 14 April 2014 his trial began in New York.[6] On 19 May 2014, Hamza was found guilty of eleven terrorism charges by a federal jury in Manhattan. On 9 January 2015, he was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.[7]

      So he was charged, accused with evidence, faced a jury ostensibly of American citizens, and convicted. Saying he's guilty of "free speech" is not factual.

    2. Re:You're wrong by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      One of the very few restrictions on speech is to restrict direct threats or inciting of violence against people. All your other claims are also absurd.

    3. Re: You're wrong by edris90 · · Score: 1

      Legally definition does not equate to reality, and more often is an attempt to hide reality

  24. And it's the Mafia's job to extort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does breaking the law because it is your job making it any better?

    And isn't it just as valid to claim that it is Huwai's job to "steal IP" from the USA and use it, therefore it is fine and dandy too?

    1. Re:And it's the Mafia's job to extort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Under Chinese law, why yes it is appropriate and their job. But we'd be grossly negligent to allow them the ability to destroy the western world's cell phone networks with a single order. Unless, of course, you're a communist sympathizer.

  25. Putting words in my mouth? Classy. by skam240 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "The bottom line is that an American is four times more likely to be incarcerated than a Chinese citizen."

    I don't really feel that's the bottom line. I feel like the bottom line is that in this country we have guaranteed rights. They might not function as well as they should but they're a hell of a lot better than what a Chinese person has. When Americans are regularly made to disappear by the government for minor infractions or simply because of things they say, get back to me.

    "If you are rotting in prison, the fact that America's system is transparently unjust, so everyone knows about the high false conviction rate, and the defects of our plea bargain based courts, doesn't really mean much, so long as people don't care about the injustice."

    So a fucked system that is transparent is worse than a fucked one that isn't? You're not making sense here.

    "So who doesn't care? Apparently you, since you would prefer to point to the other side of the world than address bigger problems here at home that we have the collective power to fix."

    If you can't make a sound argument based on what some one has said then put words in their mouth! Good work!

    How does me thinking the Chinese prison system is more fucked than ours mean that I don't think we should be working on our own? You're full of it.

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    1. Re:Putting words in my mouth? Classy. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I feel like the bottom line is that in this country we have guaranteed rights.

      Rights that are guaranteed in theory but ignored in practice don't mean much.

      Americans have a "right" to a speedy jury trial, and a fair hearing of the evidence. In practice, they are presented with a choice between copping a plea, or facing trumped up charges and a ruinously expensive prosecution that will bankrupt them even if innocent.

      they're a hell of a lot better than what a Chinese person has.

      Yet the American is four times more likely to end up in prison.

    2. Re:Putting words in my mouth? Classy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Rights that are guaranteed in theory but ignored in practice don't mean much." - Said the apologist faggot who lied about 1 million Uighurs in secret Chinese prisons, accused of no actual crimes.

      You're a spineless, nutless coward making false equivocations and false assertions as if you're free to do so, Bill. I guess that's your right, in this country.

      Your dishonest little punkass. Oh yeah. That lie you told a few days back ADAMANTLY that "blood plasma is sterile"? Is a complete lie, you were corrected and continued to lie about it.

      You're a putz.

    3. Re:Putting words in my mouth? Classy. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Believe it or not you have guaranteed rights in China too. It's just that like the US, in practice they are abused anyway.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Putting words in my mouth? Classy. by skam240 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      " In practice, they are presented with a choice between copping a plea, or facing trumped up charges and a ruinously expensive prosecution that will bankrupt them even if innocent."

      And yet they are still allowed a trial and legal council provided by the state. Meanwhile in China, if a Chinese person is lucky enough to even get a proper trial it is far less likely to be what anyone would call "fair". It's widely known that the verdict in high profile court cases in China is typically determined prior to trial. The trial is just for show. Likewise, I find it highly unlikely a person made to "disappear", like all of those Uighers, get anything close to the rights an American gets prior to sentencing.

      You keep going on about the flaws in our system but how are any of them worse than being made to disappear by your government? Your family and friends have no idea where you are or if you're even alive. And good luck getting any kind of proper legal council as they've already decided you're guilty, that's why you've been made to disappear.

      In the US, we have dysfunctional rights. In China, they are at the continued mercy of the state

      "Yet the American is four times more likely to end up in prison."

      Yet we have rights. Yet everyone is entitled to a trial no matter how dysfunctional that system is. Yet we legally can't be detained in this country with out proper cause and we actually have a proper means of combating illegal imprisonment.

      I mean, where's the Chinese ACLU to help all those people who get disappeared? Probably all in prison...

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    5. Re:Putting words in my mouth? Classy. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2, Informative

      Believe it or not you have guaranteed rights in China too.

      True, but the rights are different. China's judiciary is not independent. A judge can be ordered by party leaders to find someone guilty. A prosecution like that of Bo Xilai would not happen in America.

      It's just that like the US, in practice they are abused anyway.

      Indeed.

      America's system is better for rich people, powerful people, and guilty people.

      China's system is better for innocent people.

      In America, expensive lawyers can get you off, and you can exclude evidence on technicalities.

      For innocent people, America is one of the worst countries. We have one of the world's highest false conviction rates, largely because of the plea bargain system and the high cost of an effective defense. The Innocence Project estimates that 20% of American prison inmates didn't commit the crimes.

      Since America has 4 times China's per capital prison population, China would need an 80% false conviction rate for a Chinese citizen to be as likely as an American to be wrongly imprisoned.

      The whole point of rights is to protect the innocent from oppression. By that measure, America's system is worse than China's.

    6. Re:Putting words in my mouth? Classy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You don't know what you're talking about. In Chinese courts the defense lawyer serves the court, not the client. That's IF they actually FACE ACTUAL CHARGES, rather than just being summarily executed / tortured / labor camp'ed.

      None of that is reported. Comparisons between that and the US system IS FOR DISHONEST FAGGOTS CAUGHT MANY TIMES MAKING SIMILAR LIES AND EXCUSES FOR CHINA.

      YOU have, AmiJoJo

      Your comment history proves you are willing to lie REGULARLY on this topic. This is your come to Jesus moment, stop lying in defense of an autocratic 1-party ethnostate - or be labelled as its agent.
      Correctly so.

    7. Re:Putting words in my mouth? Classy. by skam240 · · Score: 2

      Sure they have "rights". The thing is that they are so routinely violated that they might as well not exist. Meanwhile in the US, you actually have a chance at recourse if your rights are violated. Your lawyer won't even get arrested for taking your case.

      You can talk to me about how much worse America's justice system is than China's when Americans are routinely made to disapear by our government. Until then, you don't have a leg to stand on.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    8. Re:Putting words in my mouth? Classy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just like "blood plasma is sterile" and thus has no health risks associated, Bill swears that's a fact 6 ways to Sunday. Turns out, no, he lied. A lot of times. No admission, no acknowledgement of it. He runs from it.

      Fucking pieces of shit like Bill stick to cheap Chinese shoes all day long and nobody bothers to wipe it off, well it's a new day, Bill. No more lying you punkass.

      You are being corrected on the merits.

      Fact : you don't know how many people are in Chinese prisons, they do not report that.

      Stop lying, you willful bitch.

    9. Re:Putting words in my mouth? Classy. by skam240 · · Score: 2

      "China's system is better for innocent people."

      China's system is better from innocent people!? You've had multiple people point out the Uigher situation in China to you and yet you're claiming China's legal system is better for innocent people!?

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    10. Re:Putting words in my mouth? Classy. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Informative

      The judiciary in the US isn't independent either. At the top you have the politically appointed Supreme Court, and further down judges and prosecutors are elected and thus subject to the influence of both voters and money.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:Putting words in my mouth? Classy. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      And yet they are still allowed a trial and legal council provided by the state.

      Most defendants are coerced out of going to trial. An American defendant who can afford a private attorney is twice as likely to avoid incarceration as a defendant relying on a public defender. "Rights for the Rich" is hardly a fair system. China's courts have many defects, but being poor is much less of a disadvantage there.

    12. Re:Putting words in my mouth? Classy. by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      The root cause of the lack of a speedy trial is because guilty people plead innocent when they know they are guilty which wastes time, taxpayer dollars, and causes innocent people to wait a long time for a trial. A fix for this would be a punishment if you are convicted but lied about being innocent.

    13. Re:Putting words in my mouth? Classy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "China's courts have many defects, but being poor is much less of a disadvantage there." = HORSESHIT FROM A KNOWN LIAR.

    14. Re:Putting words in my mouth? Classy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since America has 4 times China's per capital prison population, China would need an 80% false conviction rate for a Chinese citizen to be as likely as an American to be wrongly imprisoned.

      The whole point of rights is to protect the innocent from oppression. By that measure, America's system is worse than China's.

      Well when you start with a false premise, it does not matter what you conclude.

      You are an apologist for a horrible government.

    15. Re:Putting words in my mouth? Classy. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      You've had multiple people point out the Uigher situation in China to you and yet you're claiming China's legal system is better for innocent people!?

      You are making the fallacious argument that "China is bad, therefore China is worse". That is not a logical conclusion.

      Americans, and especially innocent Americans, are more likely to be unjustly imprisoned even when accounting for the Xinjiang camps.

      China's justice system is bad. No question about it.

      America's justice system is worse.

    16. Re:Putting words in my mouth? Classy. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      At the top you have the politically appointed Supreme Court

      The Supremes are appointed, but once on the court, they are completely independent, and nobody can order them to do anything.

      and further down judges and prosecutors are elected and thus subject to the influence of both voters and money.

      Elected judges are a bad idea. No argument from me about that.

    17. Re:Putting words in my mouth? Classy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When Americans are regularly made to disappear by the government for minor infractions or simply because of things they say, get back to me.

      McCarthism?

      people were blacklisted, etc for what they said, or what someone accused them of.

    18. Re:Putting words in my mouth? Classy. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      A fix for this would be a punishment if you are convicted but lied about being innocent.

      America already punishes people for exercising their constitutional right to a fair trial.

      That is exactly what plea deals are. Plead guilty, get a lighter sentence. Demand the right to challenge the evidence against you, get a harsher sentence.

      Ergo, the "right" to a fair trial no longer exists in practice.

    19. Re:Putting words in my mouth? Classy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the same time, it's clear that you are less likely to be pick up by cops. Just don't join cults. Don't make political statements against the government. Easy as that.

    20. Re:Putting words in my mouth? Classy. by sjames · · Score: 1

      We already have that. People found guilty at trial typically do more time than people who plead guilty.

      However, everyone, even guilty people have the right to a fair trial. Are you saying that the problem is that people exercise their rights?

      The problem is that we think every damned little thing calls for putting people in a cage. And to make sure people plead guilty, we insist on putting them in a cage before they even get their trial (so much for innocent until proven guilty) even though we have technology that would let them go on with their lives and still assure they would show up for their court date (and it would even cost less than maintaining the jail).

    21. Re:Putting words in my mouth? Classy. by skam240 · · Score: 1

      "You are making the fallacious argument that "China is bad, therefore China is worse". That is not a logical conclusion."

      No I'm not, I've literally pointed out what is worse about the Chinese justice system multiple times to you in multiple posts. In fact, this is a perfect case of the pot calling the kettle black as what you are doing is in fact what you are claiming I am doing.

      This is the second time in this thread that you have falsely miss-characterized what I have been saying.

      "Americans, and especially innocent Americans, are more likely to be unjustly imprisoned even when accounting for the Xinjiang camps."

      Well for starters you're attempting to shape this debate into the context of a single metric which wouldn't be accurate at all but let's play your game for a moment. Show me some comparative statistics to support what you've just said. Oh wait, you can't because China doesn't release that info. Well then let's reason some things out here...

      For starters, the Innocence Project (a group that is certainly sympathetic to our country's problems in this area) lists an estimate that 1 percent of the US prison population is unjustly imprisoned, or about 20k people ( https://www.innocenceproject.o... ). That is certainly bad.

      Now let's try our best to compare that to China. So we don't have any proper data on their regular prison system which makes compairson in that context impossible (one of many reasons our system isn't as bad as theirs) but we do have a pretty good idea that there are, at a minimum, several hundred thousand Uighur that have suddenly ended up in specially built prisons almost over night. I feel safe in the assumption that the majority of these people have done little to nothing wrong by any reasonable set of standards

      Which is worse, hundreds of thousands falsely imprisoned or tens of thousands? By your own single metric China's system is much worse than ours.

      Even before the Uigher's mass imprisonment our system was better though. It has always been possible in China for this type of unjust, mass incarceration to happen with virtually no challenge.

      After that, please revisit my other posts where I bring up things like the fact that American's have actual, functional legal recourse to being unjustly imprisoned (and the people who represent them in this context never end up in prison as a result of representing them), are never made to disappear (which functionally eliminates all rights), never have their verdict decided prior to going to court, and never have their verdict decided outside the courts by politicians.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    22. Re:Putting words in my mouth? Classy. by skam240 · · Score: 1

      "The judiciary in the US isn't independent either."

      It is. It's one of our three branches of government.

      At the top you have the politically appointed Supreme Court

      Supreme Court judges can rule how ever they want and answer to no one. That is independence.

      "and further down judges and prosecutors are elected and thus subject to the influence of both voters and money."

      Did you really think I meant independent of everything? Nothing is in this world. Obviously I meant independent of the rest of government.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    23. Re:Putting words in my mouth? Classy. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      " When Americans are regularly made to disappear by the government for minor infractions or simply because of things they say, get back to me."

      Martin Luther King, Jr.

      Malcolm X. Oh they tried to blame that one on Islam, too.

      Edward Snowden had to go into hiding on foreign soil.

      People die in prisons while waiting for a trial, all for something like a joint or a DUI.

      Directly or indirectly, the USA has killed a lot of its own citizens for relatively minor shit, so you need to open your eyes and get your head out of the sand, oh ye with zero historical education.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  26. Wrong again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plea bargains mean no trials. GITMO has people awaiting no trial. And, again, poor people will be in prison for longer than the sentence they will serve, waiting for a trial they never get...

  27. Seeks military conflict with the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As Steve Bannon said, "we've always been at war with Eastasia."

  28. STOP LYING ANY TIME CHI-COM FAGGOTS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "GITMO has people awaiting no trial" False, and those are not citizens with 1 notable exception, total, at any time we know about. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yaser_Esam_Hamdi

    And he was raised jihadi in Saudi Arabia, though he was born in the US, and subsequently renounced his citizenship.

    Stop lying in defense of China's secret prisons as if this is equal. 100 people in GITMO is a legally unprecedented situation in America that is being dealt with relatively in the open.

    Over a MILLION people in China are in SECRET PRISONS without any protections of law, any lawyers, any trials, or any crime credibly accused. That's not really comparable to GITMO, no matter what you might mention.

    Get honest before you die, Chi-Coms.

  29. The domestic spying is doing more harm than good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Americans generally don't harden up on the idea that Russia might be hacking them personally (with certain criminal exceptions; meaning you would need to commit a crime or crimes to put yourself in a situation where this is a concern).

    Americans generally do harden up on the idea that their local employer, police, government, family, 'friends', etc might be looking at their Facebook.

    So generally Americans that aren't completely ignorant to the problem either will be careful about what they post, or they won't have a Facebook.

    It wouldn't be fair at this point to not also mention that domestic surveillance has not stopped terrorism, and it wasn't called on as a means to stop terrorism by any general Americans.

    The only thing I can see that it has done so far is stifle free speech (and make me feel the need to post this anonymously).

  30. Ping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be fair, where would network admins around the world be without Ping ?

  31. Re: More? by edris90 · · Score: 1

    Wow that's so hard to believe that many Americans don't support American values outside of American borders? Is it really so crazy to think of some of us might understand the concept of jurisdiction.

  32. Nothing is trustworthy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing is trustworthy, which is why encryption should be used within all communication channels/apps/whatever. So, txt messages, for example, should be encrypted before leaving the station. There should be a no-trust policy for everything. There is plenty of brilliance to make this a reality.

    No-trust policy....

  33. Nortell Nortell on the Wall by DatbeDank · · Score: 1

    Which Chicom insider stole it all?

    1. Re:Nortell Nortell on the Wall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What Canadians says about the Canadian company. Notice a lack of reference to China.

      https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/a-tale-of-toxicity-the-real-culprit-in-nortels-collapse/article7379114/

  34. Re:You're a lying punkass apologist Bill bottom li by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

    You're an apologist coward, Bill. You belong in a Chinese prison, bottom line.

    Actually, he might be an employee just doing his job as directed. The logic that it is okay to jail only a million people without trial because 'Murrica bad! is just ludicrous.

    Yeah, America jails too many people. This was the result of three major things. Thig one was the "get tough on crime" movement, the victim's right's movement, and the for profit prison system. All were intertwined.

    The biggest problem of making the prison system a profit center is that like all corporate entities, you have to make more profit the next quarter. And there are limits to how cheaply you can maintain prisoners, so the answer is to make sure you have more prisoners in prison for a longer time.

    For that, the magic elixir of the outrageous mandatory penalties for non-crime crimes like weed possession, the three strikes rules that could put a person in prison for life for silly things like shoplifting food, and the ability of the victims to keep a person in prison based on how they feel.

    I can be sympathetic to the victims, but the rest of those assholes should be the ones behind bars.

    But here's the thing - it isn't a crime for me to express that opinion. Bill should try some pointed criticism at the Chinese government - calling them assholes that belong in prison.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  35. Re:You're a lying punkass apologist Bill bottom li by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3

    The logic that it is okay to jail only a million people without trial because 'Murrica bad! is just ludicrous.

    I never said any such thing.

    The fact that innocent people in China are unjustly imprisoned is wrong.

    The fact that innocent people in America are unjustly imprisoned is also wrong.

    By pointing out that America is proportionally worse, I am not in any way justifying China's behavior.

  36. Huawei Chairman Has A Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Chairman Ping (Guo?) has a point though. That's why his statement stings.

    The US used to be a beacon of human rights and freedoms. Now it's tarnished. Yes the US isn't China, but who do you think the average Chinese is going to believe? How about the average Malaysian, or Indonesian?

    Thanks, Three Letter Agencies. Thanks, federal government. Thanks, Mr. President. Thanks, bin Laden.

  37. Re:You're a lying punkass apologist Bill bottom li by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

    The logic that it is okay to jail only a million people without trial because 'Murrica bad! is just ludicrous.

    I never said any such thing.

    The fact that innocent people in China are unjustly imprisoned is wrong.

    The fact that innocent people in America are unjustly imprisoned is also wrong.

    By pointing out that America is proportionally worse, I am not in any way justifying China's behavior.

    Tell us why it is porportionally worse. What is the execution rate in China? Are their prisoners treated well? Are they given trials? Are they imprisoned for opinions?Tell me how you arrived at the conclusion that you would rather be jailed in China than in the USA. You made your claim twice, support it.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  38. Re:You're a lying punkass apologist Bill bottom li by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But here's the thing - it isn't a crime for me to express that opinion... calling them(American) assholes that belong in prison.

    Just make sure the assholes you want in jail aren't Kikes.

  39. Re: More? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Direct Chinese propaganda - no, but I've seen the same wharharble mccarthian post about china-communist-syealing-spying hundreds of times in every thread.

    Obviously not a Russian troll.

  40. HACKINGBEAR, CALLING ALL HACKINGBEAR AGENTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU ARE A PROPAGANDIST

  41. Simple test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great post. The American system is very far from great, but I'm amazed that anyone not from the 50c Party would argue that the Chinese system is not much worse.

    There is a very simple test when comparing the two systems. Most top officials and their families in Hong Kong and China hold passports of western countries (US, British). They cast their votes with their own feet, so to speak. On the other hand, would an American citizen want to become a Chinese citizen and live in a truly dystopian state that is the PRC, where there is absolutely no freedom of speech, freedom of association, freedom of the press and freedom of religion? Oh, so you want to establish a church there to worship $deity? That's fine - as long as you also hang portraits of Xi on the walls too, amongst other things, to remind everyone that there is someone else *above* $deity that one should worship.

  42. Quote Ping "we must be doing something right" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hardcode favorites sites in hosts - Who did it 1st: China or me? I did - dates are my proof https://theregister.co.uk/2017...

    Copycat thieves - proof, along w/ the FACT China rampantly STEALS U.S. Intellectual properties & military secrets!

    * IMITATION truly IS the SINCEREST FORM of FLATTERY!

    (... & proves hosts work vs. DNS faults in tracking you via dns request logs (since you avoid it & resolve FASTER locally using hosts) + DNS being downed OR Kaminsky REDIRECT security flaw misdirected poisoned (or vs. DNSChanger))

    US DHS issues DNS redirect is HUGE danger (not w/ hosts vs.) https://threatpost.com/gov-war... & ICANN ISSUES SAME WARNING https://tech.slashdot.org/stor...

    APK

    P.S.=> Folks, It's NOT EASY being "World-Class" like me (lol - 200,000++ users prove it for me) - enjoy the fruits of my labors for FREE + going FASTER/SAFER/MORE RELIABLY online (w/ more anonymity too via my program) ... apk

  43. And the USA doesn't?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, most people that the USA "disappears", are just openly murdered by drones (or "OMGHEROES") on the street, including any bystanders, even if it's a kindergarten, marriage ceremony or just some random people. The USA has been casually doing this, *uninterruptedly* while "not" being at war, since WWII.

    And let's not even mention the open offensive warfare, "regime chance" actions and backings of evil dictators on literally nearly every country on the planet. Including even Russia! (Look up how Yeltsin got into power. Fun fact: He put Putin in power. So on Putin putting Trump into power... either way: LOL!)

    But it's not like the US isn't somebody who enjoys a nice disappearing when necessary. Which you would know, if you weren't deliberately ignoring every single news about the "black sites" (US term for US a concentration camps, on foreign soil).

  44. Point Of Order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Nortel, not Nortell. The old name was Northern Telecom and that got shortened down to Nortel.

    You sound like a dweeb calling it Nortell, like it was the No-Tell Hotel!