managing those cases in the traditional manner (probably a letter to the residence of the owner)
And what happens to all those vehicles that don't have insurance or valid registration, and also the new owner hasn't updated the vehicles owners details with the state? Its more prevelent than you think.
Your contract doesn't contain the totality of what you need to know about a product. Your purchase contract does not tell you about the deficiencies or limitations of the iPhone or Macintosh.
In the context we are talking about here, the contract contained everything relevent to the current discussion - tethering is not allowed.
As for your other irrelevent mumblings, I never buy on the day of release and I always test drive.
I'm don't have to cry to anybody: I did look at the iPhone in detail, I did read the restrictions and limitations, and I concluded that it's an overpriced piece of shit. And to save other people the trouble of wasting as much time as I did with doing so, I'm sharing my conclusions.
So we should all just bow to your superior knowledge that the iPhone is 'an overpriced piece of shit'? There are many people that would disagree with you.
Once again, you can take your stereotypes and stick them up your arse. You made an assumption, one that is totally false.
Wow, do you live on sterotypes or are you just an asshole? I read everything I sign, electronically or not, EULAs included. I make informed choices, which is why I am pissed off that no one else seemingly can take responsibility for their own actions - a contract is something you read before you sign it, so stop crying to your mother when you find out it covers something you don't like.
You don't like their terms, don't use their product.
Exactly. And in order to ensure that as many people as possible know about Apple's restrictions and the consequences of those restrictions before they get locked into a contract, we keep talking about it.
You know, if people just fucking read the shit they sign, you wouldn't have to waste your breath talking about it.
But oh no, its the big bad corporations fault for the crap people lock themselves into...
You seem to be talking about Open Source as one single entity - it isn't, and it never will be. What Apache are doing is nothing more than ensuring they can increase their own market share by having their products run well on all platforms. Whats wrong with that?
And laws banning smoking are also something I am against - especially as you say people ignored the voluntary bans, showing that the people were against them...
Seriously, this is not something that should ever be legislated about - its a decision to be taken by the individual airlines based on feedback from their customers, not something they should be bound to enforce. What next, body odour legislation?
The problem (if it is a problem?) is is that Copyright law does not state that you are entitled to a free and unrestricted copy of the item when copyright expires on it, it only states that the rights holder loses the entitlement to decide distribution of said item.
Put simply, the creator is under no obligation to ensure that you have access to anything after the copyright expires - as it should be. Copyright expiration does not prevent a copyright holder from continuing to distribute restricted copies - again, as it should be.
The onus in all cases is on you, yourself, to provide yourself with an unrestricted copy.
No it doesn't, all that setting does is remove from the results your bookmarks and links you have clicked on (I think) - it still searches the titles of pages you have entered the URL for.
I currently have HyperV running on a Dell Vostro 200 (Core 2 Duo E8300, 4GB ram), with 3 Windows 2008 and one Windows 2003 VM running full time (and under load).
I will agree that the RCs were pigs, and Windows 2008 RTM did not include the final version of HyperV - if you grabbed the right update, it worked peachly however.
HyperV RTM was released a few weeks back, and was a simple update through Windows Update - it works a *lot* better than the RCs, and has sped things up as well.
Uhm, HyperV is not VirtualPC - its completely different (although it can use VirtualPC and VirtualServer images if you really want it to).
HyperV does have multiple LAN segments (with the ability to setup routing between as required) and unlimited snapshots are available as standard, to respond to both your issues.
Slashdot Mirror
I read the link the first time, and again I will ask - why mono and not wine?
http://www.gnome.org/~seth/blog/mono As this blog post explains, while the current software patent situation exists, Mono is an unacceptable risk.
What makes Mono an 'unacceptable risk' but allows Wine to become one of the most often praised open source projects on Slashdot?
managing those cases in the traditional manner (probably a letter to the residence of the owner)
And what happens to all those vehicles that don't have insurance or valid registration, and also the new owner hasn't updated the vehicles owners details with the state? Its more prevelent than you think.
Your contract doesn't contain the totality of what you need to know about a product. Your purchase contract does not tell you about the deficiencies or limitations of the iPhone or Macintosh.
In the context we are talking about here, the contract contained everything relevent to the current discussion - tethering is not allowed.
As for your other irrelevent mumblings, I never buy on the day of release and I always test drive.
I'm don't have to cry to anybody: I did look at the iPhone in detail, I did read the restrictions and limitations, and I concluded that it's an overpriced piece of shit. And to save other people the trouble of wasting as much time as I did with doing so, I'm sharing my conclusions.
So we should all just bow to your superior knowledge that the iPhone is 'an overpriced piece of shit'? There are many people that would disagree with you.
Once again, you can take your stereotypes and stick them up your arse. You made an assumption, one that is totally false.
Wow, do you live on sterotypes or are you just an asshole? I read everything I sign, electronically or not, EULAs included. I make informed choices, which is why I am pissed off that no one else seemingly can take responsibility for their own actions - a contract is something you read before you sign it, so stop crying to your mother when you find out it covers something you don't like.
This isn't something you want women to read :)
Nothing, except Slashdotters seem to forget that most people and corporations are not malicious.
It would be theft of service, if your service contract forbids tethering.
You don't like their terms, don't use their product.
Exactly. And in order to ensure that as many people as possible know about Apple's restrictions and the consequences of those restrictions before they get locked into a contract, we keep talking about it.
You know, if people just fucking read the shit they sign, you wouldn't have to waste your breath talking about it.
But oh no, its the big bad corporations fault for the crap people lock themselves into...
Then they will be getting a letter from my lawyer regarding the £5.99 I paid for the app.
Microsoft playing with strict rules would mean something. Microsoft playing with no rules means nothing.
And by 'strict rules', you mean your rules and no one elses.
You seem to be talking about Open Source as one single entity - it isn't, and it never will be. What Apache are doing is nothing more than ensuring they can increase their own market share by having their products run well on all platforms. Whats wrong with that?
Should Apache 'take one for the "team"'? No.
Infact, such an act would probably end up with them being held in contempt of court of the original ruling, let alone this case.
And laws banning smoking are also something I am against - especially as you say people ignored the voluntary bans, showing that the people were against them...
Seriously, this is not something that should ever be legislated about - its a decision to be taken by the individual airlines based on feedback from their customers, not something they should be bound to enforce. What next, body odour legislation?
The problem (if it is a problem?) is is that Copyright law does not state that you are entitled to a free and unrestricted copy of the item when copyright expires on it, it only states that the rights holder loses the entitlement to decide distribution of said item.
Put simply, the creator is under no obligation to ensure that you have access to anything after the copyright expires - as it should be. Copyright expiration does not prevent a copyright holder from continuing to distribute restricted copies - again, as it should be.
The onus in all cases is on you, yourself, to provide yourself with an unrestricted copy.
No it doesn't, all that setting does is remove from the results your bookmarks and links you have clicked on (I think) - it still searches the titles of pages you have entered the URL for.
*sigh* someone always posts this - all that addon does is make it *look* like the old bar, it doesn't change the behaviour.
Does it contain the ability to disable the 'Awesome Bar' completely?
I currently have HyperV running on a Dell Vostro 200 (Core 2 Duo E8300, 4GB ram), with 3 Windows 2008 and one Windows 2003 VM running full time (and under load).
I will agree that the RCs were pigs, and Windows 2008 RTM did not include the final version of HyperV - if you grabbed the right update, it worked peachly however.
HyperV RTM was released a few weeks back, and was a simple update through Windows Update - it works a *lot* better than the RCs, and has sped things up as well.
Uhm, HyperV is not VirtualPC - its completely different (although it can use VirtualPC and VirtualServer images if you really want it to).
HyperV does have multiple LAN segments (with the ability to setup routing between as required) and unlimited snapshots are available as standard, to respond to both your issues.
Problem is, if 'cheaper' is your first goal, then your second goal which costs money for no operational benefit simply won't get started on.
The HTV (aside from being seriously behind schedule, as it was originally supposed to fly in 2001), can move 7,600kg to the ISS.
The ATV can also carry 7,600KG, accessible through the 'severely limited' APAS hatch...
Constellations cargo variant was deleted from the contract with Lockheed in April 2007.
Now, the CBM hatch is good for bulky payloads, but its advantages are not head and shoulders above the currently available cargo vehicles.
That doesn't mean anyone is going to take the service - so again, this is the only guaranteed period.
The only guaranteed period is the games - theres no guarantee the campus will be reused, even if that is the plan.